Category: Maritime

  • Groups partner on maritime ecosystem

    Groups partner on maritime ecosystem

    In an effort to strengthen Nigeria’s international trading ecosystem, Welcome2Africa International and Zenith Carex International Limited have announced their partnership to host the upcoming Nigeria Seaports Investment Forum 2022 (NSIF2022).

    The maiden conference scheduled on September 28 and 29 in Lagos provides an opportunity to address seaport issues and improve import and export in Nigeria, according to a statement by the organisers.

    With the theme “Repositioning Nigeria’s seaports for investment and trade attractiveness,” the event will address major bottlenecks such as congestion, technological advancement, infrastructural deficiency, dredging, port equipment, security, logistics, and training that represent opportunities for investors at the seaports.

    According to the organisers, the programme will cover various issues such as security, infrastructure, technology, policy, international trade with Europe, and the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA), through sessions including: Technology and Trade Potential – The Future of Seaports in Nigeria, EU-Nigeria Agro-Commodities trade and expansion mechanism, and Increasing Trade through Improving Port Safety and Security in Nigeria.

    Read Also: NIMASA inaugurates maritime security strategy team

    “The event will also generate investment interest in all of Nigeria’s seaports, including the Lagos Apapa Port, Tin Can Island Port in Lagos, Calabar Port, Delta Warri Port, Lekki Port, Rivers Port, and Onne Port in Rivers State.

    “NSIF2022 partners include the Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission (NIPC), the Nigerian Export Promotions Commission (NEPC), the Ministry of Trade and Investment, AFEX, and Oneport365.

    “This conference will feature speakers such as Saratu A. Umar, executive secretary/chief executive officer of the Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission (NIPC), Ezra Yakusak, executive director/CEO of the Nigerian Export Promotions Commission (NEPC), Adelana Olamilekan, MD/CEO of Zenith Carex International Limited, and Adesoji Adesugba, managing director of the Nigeria Export Processing Zones Authority (NEPZA).

    “The forum will provide an excellent opportunity for stakeholders to connect with agro-producers, agribusiness, exporters, and importers from Nigeria and Europe.”

  • Much ado about $350m Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund

    Much ado about $350m Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund

    The Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF) is to assist indigenous ship owners in the acquisition of assets, although they are expected to pay back. However, 19 years after the idea was floated and approved, the $350 million CVFF remains inaccessible, thereby defeating its objective of boosting international trade and creating jobs. OLUWAKEMI DAUDA writes.

    IT was a laudable idea aimed at boosting the fortunes of the maritime sector. The Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF) is to assist indigenous ship owners in acquiring assets, although they are expected to pay back the loan. However, 19 years after the idea was approved by the Federal Government, the $350 million CVFF remains inaccessible, no thanks to civil service red tapism, which has defeated its objective of boosting international trade and creating jobs.

    The Director-General, Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), Dr. Bashir Jamoh,  is, however, passionate about the actualisation of the Fund. A few days ago, speaking on Inspiration 92.3 Fm Lagos Shipping on Radio, he said nine primary lending institutions (banks) had been listed for the disbursement of the CVFF by the agency’s Governing Board and that their names had been forwarded to the Minister of Transportation for approval.

    Explaining the cause of the delay, Jamoh, who assumed duties as DG in 2020, said NIMASA was only trying to avoid the previous pitfalls experienced under the Ship Building and Acquisition Fund when beneficiaries diverted the funds to other areas.

    He said NIMASA, with the support of the Federal Ministry of Transportation (FMoT), was exploring other options to ensure that the CVFF is properly disbursed.

    His words: “If you can recollect, last year, we advertised for expression of interest as provided by the guidelines of the Cabotage Vessel Financing Funds and after the advert, about 12 banks indicated their interest and we shortlisted nine. As the law provides, we forwarded it to the Minister of Transportation.

    “The delay is to avoid the mistakes made with the disbursement of the Shipbuilding and Acquisition Fund where beneficiaries collected the funds and refused to pay. Every Minister is scared and afraid to be part of that failure.

    “What every Minister of Transportation wants to do is to make sure that before disbursing these funds, let it not turn out to be another national cake, just like the case of the moribund Ship Acquisition Fund. New ideas are now on the table as to how best to avoid this pitfall.’’

    In 2020

    In late 2020, Jamoh raised the hope of players in the sector when he announced at a virtual meeting with the Shipowners Association of Nigeria (SOAN) that the immediate past Minister of Transportation, Chibuike Amaechi, had approved the disbursement of the fund.

    He said: “Only the details are being discussed with a view to avoiding former mistakes and ensuring effective and efficient utilisation of the fund. We have also submitted proposals to the minister to seek fiscal and monetary incentives for our ship owners.  Since then, the fund is yet to be disbursed by NIMASA.’’

     

    The CVFF

    Observers say that CVFF is not government, or free, money. It was created by the Coastal and Inland Shipping Act, 2003, popularly known as Cabotage Act, which states: “There shall be paid into the Fund, a surcharge of two per cent of the contract sum performed by any vessel engaged in the coastal trade; money generated under this Act, including the tariffs, fines and fees for licences and waivers; such further sums accruable to the fund by way of interests paid on and repayment of the principal sums of any loan granted from the Fund.”

    Also, there are primary lending institutions (PLIS), that is, commercial banks, accredited to handled the CVFF. They are expected to contribute 50 per cent of the CVFF. They are Fidelity Bank, Skye Bank (now Polaris Bank), Sterling Bank, and Diamond Bank (now Access Bank).

    Manager of the fund

    The fund is not managed by NIMASA as many seem to erroneously believe. The PLIS does, while NIMASA provides fund administration and corporate governance. The Federal Ministry of Transportation is the third party to the CVFF, while the obligor (i.e. an applicant that has accessed the fund) the fourth. Schedule 44 of Part VIII of the Act states: “The fund shall be collected by the National Maritime Authority (NIMASA) and deposited in commercial banks and administered under guideline that shall be proposed by the Minister and approved by the National Assembly.”

    Beneficiaries

    According to Schedule 45 of the Cabotage Act, “the beneficiaries of the fund shall be Nigerians and shipping companies owned by Nigerians … for “the development of shipyard/maritime infrastructure to facilitate vessel construction, repairs and maintenance,” as well as “other shipping auxiliary projects relating to the development of local tonnage capacity and shipyards”.

     How much can a ship owner get from the CVFF?

    A ship owner can get about $25 million and shall have a maximum of seven years’ payback. The CVFF is to be disbursed on a single-digit interest rate of 5.6 per cent, 0.25 per cent processing fee, according to NIMASA.

     

    Qualifications for accessing CVFF

    Not all indigenous shipping service providers that are trading on Nigeria’s cabotage area will get the loan. The law, which establishes the fund, also states recommendations for accessing it. Firms wanting to access the CVFF loan must have been paying cabotage dues of two per cent surcharge, licence and waiver fees. The company will have contracts with international oil firms.

    Also, the firm must have positive cash flow and bankable feasibility reports, which shall be verified by NIMASA and the PLIS, among others.

    Indigenous shipping firms seeking to borrow from the CVFF are also expected to comply with the Cabotage Act and the CVFF guidelines, including domiciliation of company’s account with PLI of their choice. They shall provide full condition survey report on vessel to be procured, (for vessels) and legal mortgage on vessel to be procured.

    A maritime lawyer, Dr Dipo Alaka, said the CVFF scheme was created in 2004. “Since then, indigenous ship owners have been longing to benefit from the fund after several unfulfilled promises by the successive administrations,’’ he said.

    Alaka said the CVFF fund needed to be disbursed and urged NIMASA to do so before the end of the second quarter of this year.

    “The fund, an off-shoot of Cabotage regime, was set up to empower indigenous ship owners, increase their tonnage, enhance their capacity to compete in coastal trade and generate employment. More important is that the fund is the two per cent contributions of ship owners deducted from the value of their contracts under the Cabotage regime. “But it is sad that almost 18 years after, no single dollar has been disbursed from the fund and the endless promises keep coming as if some people somewhere are benefiting from the nondisbursement of the fund,” Alaka said.

    An analyst, Mr Kehinde Adeleke, urged NIMASA to disburse the fund and create enabling environment for the private sector to invest in the industry to achieve the objective of developing the nation’s blue economy and boost the revenue of the Federal Government. “But it is sad that almost 18 years after, no single dollar has been disbursed from the fund and the endless promises keep coming as if some people are benefiting from the non-disbursement of the fund.

     

    Senator queries fund’s non-disbursement

    The presidential candidate of the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), Senator Musa Kwankwaso, during the week, queried the non-disbursement of the fund to ship owners.

    Kwankwaso, who spoke in Lagos at a town-hall meeting for Maritime Agenda, organised by the Prime Maritime Project, ahead of next year’s general elections, also expressed shock over failure to refloat the Nigerian National Shipping Line (NNSL), many years after it collapsed.

    He said: “So many things have gone wrong with the industry. I can still remember the days of the Nigerian National Shipping Line (NNSL) with its beautiful ships flying Nigeria’s flag across the globe! Why did it die? Why do we not have a replacement as the giant of Africa? What has become of the Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund (CVFF)? Why has it not been disbursed to the beneficiaries? From my little knowledge of the sector, a lot of questions are begging for answers.

    “In summation, the desired assistance to importers of goods, manufacturers, including exporters and other ancillary stakeholders associated with port operations and management, will be guaranteed under our party’s regime, by the special grace of God.”

    Kwankwaso also bemoaned the underutilisation and overutilisation of the Eastern and Apapa Ports. He said: “Lagos port system originally designed for a population of less than 50 million in the 1950s with less than 20 million cargo throughput has remained almost the same for over 200 million population in 2022. Our government will look into constructing a rail line from both Apapa and Tin Can Island ports to a dry port area outside Lagos, where arrived goods should be domiciled for clearance in order to stop heavy trucks from causing gridlock in Lagos.

    “We should also look into the possibility of opening other ports such as Warri, Port Harcourt and Calabar, among others, to decongest the Lagos port. He requested the stakeholders’ forum to form the nucleus of the group that will design “a workable and actionable maritime sector reform template, which should include clearance of goods arriving our ports within 72 hours, as done in other countries.”

    Kwankwaso also vowed to place the control of the nation’s maritime sector in the hands of stakeholders, saying: “Under our watch, maritime professionals will take charge of the maritime sector.”

     ‘Too many changes in govt’s agencies affecting sector’

    Earlier, chairman of the occasion, Mr Kunle Folarin, had enumerated the rot in the sector, regretting the incessant changes in the leadership of maritime regulatory agencies and the supervising ministry, which are often headed by appointees that have no knowledge of the industry, which adversely affects its growth.

    This was also listed by the Prime Maritime Project, which said the series, which would be availed presidential candidates, was meant to extract a social contract from them on their plans and commitment to placing the maritime sector in the front burner as a major economy driver.

     

    New road map

    Nigerian ship owners may soon heave a sigh of relief as the Federal Government may have unveiled a new road map that will see Nigeria actualising the dreams of becoming ship owners under the CVFF very soon.

    According to Jamoh, “we have approached the Bank of Industry and commenced discussions on using the CVFF as seed money, getting additional funding, and by this getting as many beneficiaries as possible on board the scheme.

    “We are also into some research as to what types of vessels or boats we need for inland waterways so we could maximise our waterways. The issue of these small crafts having constant accidents is also giving us worries.”

    Jamoh also said the Minister of Transportation Ma’uzu Sambo has agreed that some of the ministry’s officials would travel to Kenya this month because the biggest ship building industry domain is building a shipyard in Kenya that will address the kind of issues we are facing.

    “So, they want us to go and see the kind of shipyard they are building for the Kenyan Government. If we see it and it is in line with our thoughts, then we would now come and replicate same here,” Jamoh said.

    He said indigenous ship owners would be part of the trip and decisions taken would be consensual. “ But what I am telling you is just a proposal. The stakeholders will be carried along and they will be able to see what we are doing and everything,” he said.

  • Making Badagry seaport a reality

    Making Badagry seaport a reality

    Few days ago, the Federal Executive Council (FEC) okayed the development of the $2.59 billion Badagry Deep Seaport. In this report, OLUWAKEMI DAUDA examines the prospects and proffers solution to the obstacles to the multibillion-dollar project.

    The Federal Executive Council’s (FEC) approval of the $2.59 billion Badagry Deep Seaport, Lagos was a relief in many ways. Besides that it would create employment for about 250,000 Nigerians and attract more foreign Direct Investment (FDI), more importantly, it would decongest the Apapa Ports, which access roads are hampering their huge contributions to the economy. But there are more problems.

    The Badagry road is not only an eyesore, but also clog in the wheel of progress. For years, the government has neglected the once-busy expressway, known mainly for its trans-regional role in West Africa. And even when its contract was awarded, the construction has been slow, very slow.

     

    What Sambo said

    Speaking with the State House Correspondents after the FEC meeting, the Minister of Transportation, Muazu Jaji Sambo, said the project would be funded by private partners.

    Sambo said:  “The project cost as contained and approved in Council, based on the final business case, as approved by the Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC), in line with the laws stood at $2.59 billion. It has to be developed in four phases with milestones and a concessional period of 45 years. Reversion is, as I said, to the Federal Government.

    “This is to further the government’s goal of making Nigeria the maritime hub of the West and Central African sub-regions. This project, it may interest you to know, will also generate total revenue of over $53.6 billion over the concession period. It will create about one quarter million jobs and also attract foreign direct investments to the country and help in improving Nigeria’s economy in general and the well-being of Nigerians.’’

     

    Africa’s biggest port

    According to its promoters, the port is aimed to be Africa’s biggest deep seaport.

    The state government, it was gathered, has plans to construct the deep seaport on a piece of land measuring over 1,000 hectares in Badagry.

    The port is expected to create thousands of job opportunities for the citizens and has positioned the country to be the first country in Africa to host the largest cargo container port.

     

    Port’s Master plan

    The Badagry Port and Free Zone is a new deep-sea facility in Nigeria, expected to be the largest deep sea port in Africa. It will include a container terminal, oil and gas services and a liquid bulk terminal, with cargo and Ro-Ro facilities.

    Following APM Terminals’ appointment, Royal HaskoningDHV’s work on this project has involved the development of the port layout and master plan, as well as the procurement and supervision of onshore and offshore soil investigations, hydrographic surveys and met-ocean studies.

    The promoters said the state-of-the-art Badagry Port and Free Zone will support strong, sustainable growth. It will provide the deepest water in West Africa, allowing larger vessels to visit West Africa. This will allow Nigeria’s port system to remain competitive in the global marketplace

     

    What Sanwo-Olu said

    In February, the Lagos State Governor, Mr Babajide Sanwo-Olu, assured that the construction of Badagry Deep Seaport would not be delayed once it is ratified by the Federal Government.

    Sanwo-Olu gave the assurance during a stakeholders’ meeting and community engagement on Badagry Deep Seaport Project  at the Administrative Staff College of Nigeria (ASCON) Auditorium in Topo, Badagry, amid outcry of the host communities over alleged neglect and delay of the project, an idea that was birthed 10 years ago.

    The governor also assured the people of Badagry that his administration was determined to push development to the axis of Lagos, reiterating his government’s readiness to compensate residents for economic losses on buildings, ancestral lands, farms and sites displaced.

     

    Apapa seaports are overstretched

    Also in May, the Lagos State governor said plans had reached an advanced stage to begin the construction of Badagry Seaport.

    He made this known at the All Markets Conference 2022 (AMC’22), Lagos organised by the Ndigboamaka Progressive (Markets) Association, with the theme “Development and Sustainability of the Nation’s Economy.”

    He explained that the facilities at the Apapa Seaport were overstretched, adding that efforts to reduce the challenges had produced little results.

     

    Benefits

    According to the governor, the Badagry Deep-Sea Port represents a multi-level potential for growth for the people.

    He stated that once the Badagry deep seaport project was fully operational, it would improve the lives not only in Badagry, but also in the state, and the West African region. He emphasised prioritising employment and capacity building for the youth and women.

    Sanwo-Olu urged stakeholders to collaborate to make the seaport a reality.

     

    Concerns of the people

    An importer and resident of the area, Mr Segun Agbato, urged the promoters of the port to be fair to host-communities.

    He called for consideration of indigenes in job placement and award of contracts, and consideration of indigenes when there is a vacancy.

    “It is important for the promoters of the port to ensure that they are fair and just in their dealings with host-communities to ensure a peaceful environment for oil production.

    “As elders, we are irrevocably committed to ensuring a better deal for our host-communities and as such, we encourage all those behind the project to do everything humanly possible to make peace with their host communities.

    “To foster better relations with the community, the promoters should ensure they consider qualified indigenes of host-communities in their recruitment process and contract awards in the spirit of the Local Content Act,’’ Agbato said.

     

    Challenge

    Findings have shown that the development of a large-scale greenfield port to accommodate a container terminal, oil and gas services, a liquids terminal as well as general cargo and Ro-Ro traffic is vital.

     

    Solution

    We developed the port layout, master planning, preliminary designs and cost estimates of the quay structures, breakwaters, dredging and land based infrastructure as well as the soil investigations and hydrographic surveys and ESIA scoping works.

     

     

    Buhari promoting private sector

    The Buhari Media Organisation (BMO) said the approval of $2.5billion for the development of Badagry Deep Seaport in Lagos State has reaffirmed the commitment of President Muhammadu Buhari’s philosophy of private sector leadership in its economic development agenda.

    The group said the gesture also shows a strong determination by the Buhari administration to diversify the nation’s economy.

    In a statement by the group’s  Chairman, Niyi Akinsiju and Secretary Cassidy Madueke,”We believe that this project will be of great value to Nigeria, in terms of employment generation, increase in port capacity, and as well improve shipping business. Besides, it will ease congestion in Nigerian premier port in Apapa, Lagos and become one of the most modern ports in West Africa and support the growth of commercial operations in the region.’’

    The group urged stakeholders in the project to play their roles in line with the rules and regulations, adding that “the Buhari administration will continue to provide an enabling environment for local and foreign investors to thrive”.

     

    Hurdles against the port

    A maritime lawyer and university don, Dr Dipo Alaka and other stakeholders, commended the Federal and state governments for the siting of the port, but warned of hurdles that might come with it. They, therefore, urged the government to address the challenges.

    They maintained that this was necessary to forestall a repeat of the debacle at Apapa and Tin Can Island ports. The first hurdle, according to them, is infrastructure. Alaka said if cargo would be evacuated from the seaport to other parts of the country, there would be a lot of problems as the Badagry road in its current state might not accommodate traffic from the deep seaport to the rest of the country unless, attention is paid to it.

    “Unless the port is going to serve as a trans-shipment port where vessels will berth and discharge goods to vessels going into other seaports, if not, the project needs to be properly examined.

    “The main impact of the project on the social and economic life of the people also has to be assessed,” they said.

    He said the ultimate aim of the port was to take cargo from Lome, Tema and other neighbouring ports that had Nigeria as their final destination, but argued that without proper planning, a seaport in Badagry would not be a sound business decision.

    For the port to be economically viable, he urged the state government to ensure that there are many factories in Badagry axis for the seaport to serve as an export or import base.

  • Assessing Nigerian Shippers’ Council

    Assessing Nigerian Shippers’ Council

    In 2014, the Nigerian Shippers’ Council (NSC) was appointed the economic regulator of the ports. There were some agitations against the government. In this report, Maritime Correspondent OLUWAKEMI DAUDA takes a look at the performance of the council in its eighth year.

    NE of the lapses in the concession agreement that handed over the ports to private investors in 2006 was Federal Government’s failure to appoint an economic regulator. This lacuna, according to operators and stakeholders in the industry, left port users, especially importers, holding the short end of the stick.

    However, the need to close the gap was not lost on the government. This was why in February 2014, it appointed the Nigerian Shippers’ Council (NSC) the economic regulator in the industry.

    Eight years after, the NSC is in the centre of public scrutiny. How has it fared in its role at the ports? Has the council delivered benefits to stakeholders in the industry? What have been its major challenges?  And how has it positioned itself to continue playing its role of not only barking but also biting those violating the rules of engagement at the ports? These are some of the questions agitating stakeholders’ minds today.

    What Jime said

    Speaking on the sidelines of the sensitisation held for stakeholders on the regulatory mandate of the Council, its Executive Secretary, Mr. Emmanuel Jime, said the council carried out its mandate effectively, having been backed by the ministerial nod.

    “This sensitisation programme under the supervision of the Federal Ministry of Transportation and anchored by our Permanent Secretary where there is a clear declaration of the legal backing of the mandate of the Nigerian Shippers’ Council as the port Economic Regulator, the stakeholders will go with a certain clarity that, finally, there is a proper definition of the mandate of Shippers’ Council,” he said.

    Jime added that such era of ineffectiveness is no more as the agency is ready to firm up its role as the official economic regulator of the industry with adequate venom to assert its authority to enforce compliance.

    He said no service provider has the power to  hike charges without the approval of the council.

    “We will redouble our efforts to re-em-phasise on the areas where we have already been providing services.

    “It is clear that no agency, no stakeholder can wake up on their whims and go into the marketplace and decide for themselves what charges to impose on our maritime services.”

     

    What terminal operators must do

    Jime added: “You have to negotiate with the Shippers’ Council whether there should be an increase or a decrease and this is going to impact the economy because we are talking of competitiveness and to be competitive, the cost of business must be related to the quality of services that are delivered.”

    The council chief added that, henceforth, an increase in charges in the industry should be related to quality service by operators.

    He said the council is emboldened by the reaffirmation of the agency as the economic regulator by the Minister of Transportation, Mu’azu Sambo, who was represented by the Permanent Secretary, Dr. Magdalene Ajani, at the programme.

    According to him, the pronouncement would bring about confidence in port service users  because they know that every charge would be attached toquality.

    He also said the ministerial endorsement of the council would end the inter-agency rivalry that  has hobbled the performance of the council.

    He said the agencies should work together to attain common goals.

    “On the role of the regulatory  of the Shippers’ Council, we have not been able to do that as clearly as we should because of some questions that have come from industry stakeholders as to whether the legal backing for Shippers’ Council is as clear as it should,” he said.

     

    What NSC should do?

    “First, it will have clarity in the regulatory framework and that is good for business. No business person wants to invest in an environment where there is uncertainty.

    “The stakeholders are clear that there is a body for the economic regulation.

    “In the past, there were a lot of inter-agency rivalries, but we are beginning to come together to work on the same page” he said.

     

    What others said

    Also, an official of the council said: “Effective regulation requires much more than just competent economic and financial analysis, but must also manage often complex interaction with the regulated firms, consumers, politicians, courts, the media, and a range of other interests.”

    The road to a sub-regional hub

    “The council needs to work with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Customs and other relevant stakeholders so that every payment made in the maritime domain is reflected on the platform. In doing this, it must design a template and standard tariff system that will ensure 30 to 40 per cent reduction in cost to achieve harmony in tariff and this involves all service providers, a source said.

    Harmonisation of transactions

    There is the need for a system that will harmonise every transaction suc that transfer of containers to off-dock terminal does not attract extra charge in terms of payment of royalty to the terminal operator. Stakeholders said transfer of containers to off-dock facilities should not attract extra charge, as it amounts to double charges to the shippers.

    Streamlining freight forwarding

    The NSC must streamline freight forwarding to strengthen its position.

    Operators, stakeholders react

    Former President, Association of Nigerian Licensed Customs Agents (ANLCA), Prince Olayiwola Shittu, said his group agreed that the seaports have lost their comparative advantage in terms of costs, especially in cargo clearance and that the council should make the seaports attractive.

    Jime, the ANLCA chief said, should ensure that the country recouped its losses and also restored stakeholders’ confidence in the seaports. He, however, said the problem of the ports came about before the Federal Government appointed the NSC as an economic regulator.

    Shittu said this was responsible for the legal tussle the council is fighting and the inability of Nigerians to reap the benefits of the port reforms.

    Shittu, however, said the involvement of stakeholders is an important source of legitimacy and acceptability for regulators and their decision-making procedures. As a start-off, the NSC, he said, met with stakeholders, including clearing agents, shipping agents, importers and private terminal operators to understand the challenges facing them individually and how to resolve the problems and unite the stakeholders.

    The Nation recalled that at the beginning, the council received the support of the Nigeria Ports Authority (NPA), whose former managing director, Mallam Habib Abdullahi, affirmed that ”it would amount to failure on the part of NPA if the NSC fails”. At the meeting, Abdullahi had said he was ready to support the council in its role as the economic regulator.

    The council also had similar consultations with the NCS and the CBN. At these meetings, the chief executive officers of the agencies gave assurances of their support.

    A senior official of the Federal Ministry of Transport confirmed that during the implementation of the port reforms, stakeholders noted  a vacuum.

    “The inefficiency in the procedures and operations of agencies and port users is adversely affecting and undermining Nigeria’s competitive advantage in international trade, which Jime is set out to correct,” the official said, adding that the effective regulation put in place by the immediate past Executive Secretary of the Council, Mr Hassan Bello, was paying off.

    NSC  to provide a level-playing field

    Other stakeholders, however, said the regulator needs to provide a level-playing field, for among competitors.

    “Apart from the private terminal operators, the government will also enjoy improved revenue generation, improved infrastructural development, creation of efficient market; reduction of cost of doing business; improvement of the nation’s Global Competitive Index and consequent attraction of FDI.

    “The NPA will also enjoy the effect of the presence of an economic regulator because it will lead to enthronement of clearer Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) derived from International Laws (Conventions) and Practices. The NPA will also enjoy transparency, efficiency and effectiveness and consequently, improvement in image, improved revenue generation, improvement of competitive advantage in the sub-region, and strengthening of complaint and arbitration mechanisms among others,” said a maritime lawyer, Dr Dipo Alaka.

    The NCS’ work, Alaka said, would boost revenue collection, enthronement of clearer Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) derived from international conventions and practices, improved level of compliance by importers, exporters and freight forwarders and others.

    Those against NSC

    It would be recalled that the council encountered one of its challenges  in October 2014. The council had directed shipping firms and terminal operators to reduce certain charges, increase free storage time, and announced interventions in other pricies.

    The move did not go down well with the firms and terminal operators. They, thereafter, sued the council.

    Not done, 12 shipping line agents under the  Association of Shipping Line Agents, sued the council, saying it does not have the power to impose charges.

    But Justice Ibrahim Buba of the Federal High Court ruled that the NSC was properly appointed.

    NSC Executive Secretary Bello said then: “We’ve resisted attempts to increase charges and we said no to impunity, economic brigandage, fleecing of Nigerians.”

    It was not the only hurdle before the council. The council also had to take on other responsibilities to its mandate, which included the conceptualisation of Inland Container Depots (ICDs) and Container Freight Stations (CFS).  It was championed the Council for the Regulation of Freight Forwarding in Nigeria (CRFFN).

    Beyond that, the Council to protect the interest of shippers, has, for a long time, been perceived as a toothless bulldog because of the divergent interests operating at the nation’s seaports and the lackadaisical attitude of those in power. For instance, for many years, the Council fought to check the arbitrary imposition of charges by the multinational shipping lines.

     

    Expectations

    Some importers, clearing agents and stakeholders, who spoke with The Nation, said prominent among them are competitive pricing, alleged arbitrary charges by shipping firms and other government agencies. They argued that these issues must be resolved so that importers, who patronise the seaports do not suffer in terms of delay and cost.

    The Shippers’ Council, stakeholders said, needs the support of the Minister to regulate the commercial activities of all operators, which include terminal operators, shipping companies, the importers, exporters and clearing agents, among others.

  • Driving non-oil exports through ports

    Driving non-oil exports through ports

    The Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) has created 10 export processing terminals to facilitate cargo exports. In this report, OLUWAKEMI DAUDA looks at some of the steps that should be taken by the organisation and other agencies to make the terminals thrive.

    The new 10 export processing terminals created by the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) to facilitate cargo export is a fulfilment of a dream of sorts.  The objective to boost the Federal Government’s revenue generation policy  and, ultimately, grow the economy.

    The NPA  Managing Director,  Mohammed Bello-Koko, who broke the news at the Zenith Bank International Trade Seminar on non-oil export, noted that three out of the terminals would come on stream soon.

     

     What are non-oil exports?

    Non-oil exports include manufactured  and agricultural products, services, solid minerals like tin, coal and columbite.

    In Nigeria, growing exports, stakeholders said, especially non-oil products, such as cocoa beans, cashew nuts, rough wood, nitrogenous fertiliser, rubber, and cotton, has been a central part of the Federal Government’s policy for decades, but with little or no significant impact on job creation and the economy

     

    Efforts of the banks on non-report

    A bank has played a key role in financing various sectors, including the shipping.

    The bank, maritime stakeholders admitted, is leveraging its vast experience in supporting trade businesses, especially in the Small andMedium Scale Enterprises (SMEs) and corporate business space to lend its expertise to drive discussions that will enable exporters to expand their export businesses and encourage new entrants into non-oil export industry.

    For instance, the FirstBank, the former President, Association of Nigerian Licensed Customs Agents (ANCLA), Prince Olayiwola Shittu said, has an Export Desk to support exporters.

    Also, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), through some banks, has created awareness for the endowment in each region; open exports’ opportunities in these areas, in collaboration with experts; drive grassroots’ conversations with exporters to convert them to opportunities; help overcome export challenges inherent in these regions; kindle an awareness of the export potential for AfCFTA prevalent in the regions; and serve as a workshop to address concerns, challenges and solutions in the export business of the country.

     

    What maritime stakeholders said

    Stakeholders in the non-oil export sector agreed that it holds a lot of promise as a cash cow to boost the economy and provide jobs for the people.

    But regrettably, Shittu and others said, the sector, has suffered setbacks based on inconsistency in government policies.

     

    Impact of govt policy

    “The Federal Government in its determination to drive growth in the non-oil sector has put in place certain policy frameworks such as the Export Expansion Grant (EEG) scheme, which operates under the legal context provided under the Export (Incentives and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1986.

    “The policy which is a fiscal policy instrument is implemented under the guidelines issued by the Federal Ministry of Finance and enforced by the Nigerian Export Promotion Council (NEPC), the apex agency responsible for the administration of the policy, in conjunction with other key implementation agencies such as the CBN and Nigeria Customs.

    “The grant is given to exporters to cushion the impact of infrastructural disadvantages faced by Nexporters and make our exports competitive in the international market.

    “But the fund is only available to exporters who have repatriated the proceeds from their exports, which must be certified by the CBN,” Shittu said.

    The expert, however, faults the policy because it doesn’t take care of the port operators and investors, farmers, miners and other critical stakeholders in the non-noil export project.

     

        What the NPA is ready to do:

    According to Bello-Koko, NPA is addressing bottlenecks affecting export through  proper synergy between vessels that came into the country as well as records of the ones that left the ports.

    “We are working with the government to ensure diversification of the economy and  encouraging non-oil exports. Also, not just about deploying the e-call-up system, we have licensed 10 export processing terminals.

    “The terminals are supposed to be at locations whereby one stock, process, package, certify, seal and send it to the port. But for it to succeed, we need other government agencies. We need to understand that the port is a maritime ecosystem not just for the NPA but other government agencies.”

    The NPA chief said further: “For the export processing terminals that were created, we expect the Nigeria Customs Service and Standards Organisation of Nigeria to have an export desk there for certification”.

    NPA, he said, had deployed a truck electronic call-up system to ease the movement of export cargoes into the port.

    Bello-Koko added that the NPA had created pregates where trucks would park before entering the port and barges were also introduced at a cost borne by the exporters, thereby, making export more expensive.

    He explained that the terminal would reduce the burden in future. He called for the introduction of a National Single Window to ease the movement of cargoes.

    “Automation is key to reducing congestion and will ensure quick processing of export and import documentations.  In the documentation, whether import or export, all starts with the consignee and the form is Form M and this has to do with port destination, loading and discharging.

    “So, there is a need to have one form that serves everybody and that is the National Single Window where all transactions will be done, even payment.

    “One bulk payment can be made and everybody is paid separately at the same time. This is obtainable in other neighbouring African countries and I believe we can do so here,” he said.

    In addition, the NPA boss said the authority has also created a dedicated lane going into the port to fasttrack the movement of export boxes and give them a movement time belt.

    “We understand the essence of export that is why we are working with the Nigerian Export Processing Council to integrate the dues with the new export processing terminals. We will also work with the exporters to see how this works in order to save a lot of time and reduce delays associated with export in Nigeria,” he added.

     

      Bad roads affecting export

    The Managing Director, APM Terminals/WACT, Naved Zafar, blamed poor access roads to the port for the gridlock in the area.

    According to him, the port cannot be efficient if there is no proper inland connectivity to the port.

    Pointing out the role of infrastructural deficit at the Apapa Port, Bello-Koko said the traffic had become heavier until recently when the government expanded the Apapa Port road.

    “At one point, we were having between 40,000 and 45,000 trucks into Apapa and Tin-Can Ports in a month, out of which about 15,000 trucks are for export. There must be a synergy between when the vessel comes within Nigeria’s shore, berths, offload the cargo and when it is inspected by Customs and other government agencies, and when it leaves the port. Any break-in that will create traffic,” he said.

     

     Port of export

    The terminals will help exporters file the Electronic Export Information (EEI) in the Automated Export System (AES).

     

        Various initiatives by the CBN

    Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Godwin Emefiele, said they had introduced various initiatives and interventions that would harness the opportunities in the non-oil sector to create wealth for the country.

    Emefiele added that the apex bank introduced rebate facilities to encourage exporters, and bridge gaps by providing funding for capital expenditure.

    “We have the N500 billion non-oil stimulation facilitation, Commercial Agricultural Scheme Act for agricultural commodities and many others,” he said.

    He advised Nigeria to look inwards for economic growth and development.

     

      Potential of non-oil sector

    The non-oil export sector has deep agro-allied linkages made up of semi-processed and processed agricultural products such as cocoa, cashew, sesame seed, ginger, gum Arabic, shrimps, cotton and rubber. The country is also a major exporter of finished leather, which has direct linkage to the livestock growers.

    Expectedly, the export sector had helped to boost the incomes of over 10 million farmers in rural areas.

    A case is that during the global financial crisis, Nigeria’s non-oil sector not only soared high but also helped absorb the shock caused by sharp fall in oil revenues.

    Giving an insight into the benefit of the non-oil sector, Dr. Gbadebo Odudaru, in his book, titled: “Nigeria-U.S. Trade Relations in the Non-Oil Sector”, says the country has received good earnings from the non-oil sector, a fact, made manifest in the rising Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth.

    “The Central Bank of Nigeria Economic report for the third quarter of 2007, was estimated at 6.05 per cent compared with 5.73 per cent in the second quarter. The growth was driven by major agriculture activities in the non-oil sector such as yam, Irish and sweet potatoes, groundnuts and maize, which was estimated at 9.47 per cent.”

     

     Investment profile of non-oil export

    According to export market analysts, the growth in non-oil exports rose from $1 billion in 2006 to $2.3 billion in 2010, a development, they attributed to the favourable policy matrix of government made possible during Okonjo-Iweala’s first term as finance minister.

    Other experts said the Bank of Industry’s (BoI) intervention in the sector might have also impacted positively.

     

     Market diversification

    It’s interesting to observe how persistent efforts of exporting companies have led to the acceptance of their products in some of the highly quality conscious customers and markets.

     

    Consider a few examples.

     

        Export goods

    Nigerian products such as cocoa beans and butter, dried-split ginger, leather, woven sacks and technically specified rubber (TSR) are being exported to the US. Hibiscus flowers are also being exported to the United States.

    The NEPC indicates that the EU accounts for 56 per cent market share of Nigeria’s non-oil exports, followed by the regional ECOWAS with 11 per cent share.

     

        Employment generation

    There are over 200 exporting firms in Nigeria. CBN publishes the list of top 100 export companies. According to experts, the direct employment in the non-oil export companies is estimated at about 200,000 while indirect employment in the agriculture sector which gains from the market linkages provided by the exporting companies is estimated at over 1o million. A large cashew processing plant set up in Kwara State employs 1500 people, mostly rural women. The cashew kernels are processed and packed, direct for shipment to developed countries such as the U.S. and Europe.

     

        Cluster development

    A very positive fall out of the non-oil export expansion has been the emergence of export processing clusters.Challawa industrial estate in Kano has emerged as a major export cluster with modern tanneries situated in this zone.

     

        Boosting foreign exchange earnings

    Boosting export earnings becomes even more pertinent today in view of weakening exchange rate of Naira and shrinking foreign exchange reserves. According to a senior official of the Federal Ministry of Transportation, who does not want his name in print but familiar with the past export trends, “a positive feature of the CBN policy has been the tendency on the part of exporters to operate through official channels which compliments CBN efforts to discourage the unofficial forex market in the country.”

     

        Conclusion

    The economy has had to navigate a major crisis that started with the collapse of oil prices in 2014 and was worsened by the high level of insecurity in the country.

    The crisis of the past four years reaffirms the vulnerability of the Nigerian economy to oil related shocks. It underscores the need for Nigeria to look outward, diversifying its export base away from the volatile commodity if the country is to win its battles against poverty and insecurity.

    Oil accounts for 90 per cent or more of Nigeria’s merchandise exports.This heavy dependence of the economy on oil as the dominant source of foreign exchange is widely acknowledged. But the mechanisms through which oil price changes affect the economy and the measures (or lack of them) available to the  authorities to counter oil price declines are less commonly understood.

    We traced the impact of the recent price declines and considered what policy options were available to the Nigerian authorities to come up with counter measures.

    The vulnerability of the economy to oil price shocks has been known for years, and the case for diversification has been made many times. Therefore, the development of a robust non-oil export base is, in all likelihood, no longer a policy choice, it is a growth imperative. To grow and develop over the long term, the country needs very rapid growth in non-oil exports through the nation’s sea ports.

  • Sailing out of troubled waters

    Sailing out of troubled waters

    Despite the constraints, there was an increase in sea safety and trade facilitation in the maritime sector in the first quarter of the year, writes WAOLUKEMI DAUDA in this review.

    THERE is a ray of hope in the maritime sector. Despite the inconsistency of government policy on trade, decaying port infrastructure, inadequate finance, inefficiencies and harsh practices, there was an improvement in policing the nation’s territorial waters, trade facilitation, especially non-oil exports, in the first half of the year.

    Also, there was smooth navigation of vessels as the country recorded zero piracy attack in the period under review, leading to more cargo inflows and revenue generation.

    Regardless of the poor dock infrastructure, sluggish turnaround time of vessels, strike by Customs agents over Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) and long cargo dwell time, experts said the seaports performed well.

    For instance, at the Lagos Port Complex, Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) facilitated the exportation of non-oil commodities with about 2.5 million metric tonnes above the 540 metric tonnes recorded in the corresponding period of last year.

    The service said the Free on Board (FoB) value of the exports, which included steel bars, agricultural and mineral products, also rose from $1.6 million last year to $138 million this year, because of the Federal Government’s policy and export incentive schemes to boost export trade.

    At the Onne Port Command, the service processed 876,775.60 metric tonnes with $495,384,221.99 FoB value translating to N203.97 billion and Nigeria Export Supervision Scheme (NESS) value of N1. 07 billion were processed. The exports were over 150 per cent increase in value to what was recorded in the first half of last year.

    The agencies took some steps to improve their activities during the period, following the support from the global community to create a conducive environment in the Gulf of Guinea (GoG).

     

     NIMASA

    Also, to boost safe ships’ navigation, the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) Director-General, Dr. Bashir Jamoh, pledged to deploy a sonar imagery system in establishing any obstacles on the seabeds.

    He said Nigeria signed an Exchange of Note (E/N) and the Japanese Government for an Economic and Social Development Programme are to acquire a $2.78 million high-speed boat for security.

    NIMASA and Nigerian Navy (NN) also reiterated their commitment to the fight against piracy and oil theft in the maritime domains and the GoG.

    The fight, the two agencies of the Federal Government said, became necessary to keep the gains recorded in the last two years and solidify the security status.

    Addressing stakeholders from various countries in Abuja, during the fifth plenary of the GoG Maritime Collaboration Forum (MCF), Jamoh called for more action on the legal framework to make the Shared Awareness and Deconfliction (SHADE) Initiative successful.

    SHADE was established by Nigeria and 22 countries of the ICC last July, to implement more effective counter-piracy cooperation between Navies, regional and international, as well as the shipping industry and reporting centres of the Yaounde Code of Conduct.

    SHADE, it was learnt, would ensure an efficient collaboration on maritime security improvement within the GoG and offer a platform for member nations and other partners to address piracy.

    Jamoh said their achievements were based on the partnership among NIMASA, the Nigerian Navy and other regional bodies. Addressing reporters at Transcorp Hilton venue of the event, Jamoh said: “No one can easily forget the frequent reports of attacks on ships and the kidnapping of seafarers in the Gulf of Guinea in 2019 and 2020 when they reached their peak and the attendant negative economic effect on the seaborne trade in the region.

     

    NPA

    The Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) has resolved to provide tariff reliefs to vessels that may patronise Calabar Port.

    According to its Managing Director, Mohammed Bello-Koko, importers patronising neighbouring ports due to the challenges faced by the Calabar Port must be brought back, noting that Calabar Port has been revitalised as a vessel berthed at the Ecomarine Terminal where it discharged over 200 trucks and equipment.

    He stated that tug boats and other marine equipment that were absent in the port would soon arrive.

    The Federal Government is also considering the construction of the Tin Can Island Port in Lagos, which has become weak due to its age, the former Minister of State for Transportation, Senator Gbemisola Saraki, said in Lagos.

    She spoke during her tour of the Lagos Port complexes in Lagos, stressing that there was the need for the government to modernise the two ports to berth modern vessels.

    NPA had budgeted over N300 billion for the reconstruction.The minister reaffirmed the position of the management of the NPA for the reconstruction of Quay walls.

    She said: “We cannot build on a weak foundation. It is vital that we get these two very important ports modernised and ready to berth modern vessels.The state of the ports shows decades of neglect but it’s better late than never.”

    The minister’s position is in harmony with that of the Managing Director of NPA, Mr Mohammed Bello-Koko, who had raised concern over the poor state of the port complex and allayed the fears of stakeholders as the Authority is already at completion stages of funding options to save the port from imminent collapse.

    The options, according to Koko, include talks with multilateral funding institutions and the possibility of the Authority using a percentage of the revenue or transfers to CRF to fund the reconstruction.

    He said: “Although the NPA had over the years been undertaking remedial works on the quays, the time has come for a holistic reconstruction and the Authority is working with the Federal Ministry of Transportation on the most prudent funding option.

    “We are on the verge of concluding discussions with multilateral funding agencies to fund the reconstruction. The other option is to go to the government to request that the NPA be allowed to use a certain percentage of its revenue which is transferred to the consolidated revenue fund (CRF) on yearly basis to fund the reconstruction. We transfer about N60 billion a year and we can use about 50 per cent of that to repair Tin Can. Another option is to do hybrid funding where NPA funds part and multilateral agencies fund the rest.”

    Lekki Port receives biggest vessel

    NPA berthed the first and biggest vessel at the Lekki Deep Sea Port in Lagos, as part of its efforts to place Nigeria on the global list of countries with Deep Seaports and attain the regional maritime hub status.This was in preparation of the port for operation before year end.

    NPA Managing Director Mohammed Bello-Koko, who was at the reception of the vessel with other senior officials, expressed happiness for the safe arrival of the vessel laden with three Super Post-Panamax state-of-the-art Ship to Shore (STS) Cranes and 10 Rubber Tyred Gantries (RTG).

    The vessel named ZHEN HUA 28 owned by Shanghai Zhenhua Port Machinery in Hong Kong is expected to complement the expected commencement of port operations at the Lekki Deep seaport to boost the economy and generate employment.

    Bello-Koko said the arrival of the vessel with modern port equipment was a milestone for the country to become the regional maritime hub.

    He expressed appreciation to President Muhammadu Buhari, the Federal and Lagos State Government, the Tolaram Group, the China Harbour, and other promoters of the port for supporting the Lekki Deep Sea Port in making the arrival of the vessel possible.

     

    NIWA

    Onitsha River Port was concessioned by the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) to generate over N23 billion to the Federal Government in 30 years.

    Saraki, who inaugurated the port, said during the signing of an agreement between the Federal Government and Universal Elysium Consortium Limited on the concession, that the river port would ensure that the 60 per cent of cargoes, which go through Onne Port in Rivers State, would be ferried to Onitsha.

    NIWA pledged to make 10,000km-waterways navigable yearly.

    Buhari also moved Mu’azu Jaji-Sambo from the Ministry of Power to the Ministry of Transportation as Minister.

     

    Shipper Council

    At the Nigerian Shippers Council (NSC), its Executive Secretary, Emmanuel Jime, explained why they could not sanction erring firms over non-refund of container deposits to importers.

    He noted:  “I cannot remember in the time that I have been the ES of NSC that anyone has lodged a complaint about a container deposit claim that we have found to be in breach of the current container deposit regime and we have not attended to that complaint.

    “We have a complaint unit. When you present facts to the complaint unit and we do our investigations and find out that there is a breach of the due process, of course, we will actually apply sanctions where necessary. You can’t apply sanctions holistically; it has to arise out of a complaint that somebody has laid before the Shippers Council’s Complaint Unit.”

     

     NCS

    Based on complaints, strikes and anger, the House of Representatives Committee on Customs and Excise called on the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) to streamline VIN, which is causing friction between customs and stakeholders.

    The Chairman of the committee, Leke Abejide, has during the oversight visit to the various commands under Zone A, Lagos, observed that there was an impasse over the VIN.

    Also in the period, the Federal Executive Council  ratified Mr. President’s approval for the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) for a 20-year period to Messers E. Customs HC Project Limited as a concessionaire for the delivery of customs modernisation project.

    Importers of low-cost vehicles may have also been pushed out of business by the new regime of duty being paid at the ports to Customs.

    The duty has gone up by a minimum of 120 per cent on vehicles manufactured before 2013.

    For instance, a pre-2013 vehicle on which about N500,000 was paid as duty, now attracts between N1 million and N1.3 million.

    Officials said the government was protecting Nigeria from becoming a dumping ground for “over-aged” vehicles by implementing the Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) for the valuation of imported vehicles.

    Common among such vehicles are the “old” models of  Golf, Toyota Corolla and Toyota Matrix.

    Some of the ‘used’ vehicles, if not cleared within a stipulated period, may also be declared as illegal imports and seized by the Customs.

    An importer, Mr. Fola Balogun, said the introduction of VIN for vehicle clearance was an indirect way by the government to phase out older vehicles as the age limit of recognised vehicles is now 2013.

    Balogun said owners of vehicles below the 2013 model were being forced by the government to pay 2013 duties before they could move their vehicles out of the port.

    Chairman, National Association of Government Approved Freight Forwarders (NAGAFF), Ports & Terminal Chapter, George Okafor, said: “The challenges are that cars from the 2012 model and downwards are still paying the duty of the 2013 model. The ones that are cheaper are even the duty we pay on the 2013 model. If you bring in a car whose year is lower than 2013, you will be asked to pay for 2013. “Cars lower than 2013 will pay the duty for a 2013 model, which makes the payment higher on vehicles that are below the 2013 model that are supposed to be seized by the service.

    The NCS spokesman said: “The system is even trying to assist them. What the law says is that such a vehicle should be seized. That is the law. The law is very clear on that.

    “The system is only trying to be good to them if it asks them to pay the duty of the 2013 model on the 2006 model.  If they are complaining, they are just implicating themselves.”

     

    He added that some of the non-standard vehicles – vehicles without 17-digit chassis number, like Mercedes Benz, some ML, and some X-Class that were not captured on the VIN platform which had made payment of duty on them cumbersome for some of the importers and clearing agents have been addressed by the management of the service.

    The Nation checks outlined a seven-step process on how to use VIN by importers and clearing agents. These include:

    * The importer or clearing agent is expected to input the VIN of the vehicles to be cleared using 000. The VIN Valuation Service will then decode the VIN to get the information of the vehicle the importer of his agent intends to clear from the port;

    * If the VIN of the vehicle is not found because of the year of the vehicle or country of origin, the system will automatically display an error message;

    * At that stage, the importer of the clearing agent is required to print the error message and apply to the Customs Area Controller (CAC) at the port terminal for approval of the use of the Non-Standard VIN procedure code.

     

    Experts react

    Experts said there is an urgent need on the side of the Federal Government and the regulatory agencies to sustain  the attention in the sector and seek the support of the international communities in the remaining half year to boost activities.

     

  • ‘How NPA, NIMASA can achieve deep decarbonisation’

    ‘How NPA, NIMASA can achieve deep decarbonisation’

    In this report, OLUWAKEMI DAUDA looks at some of the problems that should be tackled by the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) and Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) to achieve deep decarbonisation of the industry.

    For the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) and Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), collaboration is key to achieving deep decarbonisation, stakeholders have said.

    Shipping companies, the stakeholders said, need to reduce emissions, while driving growth and profitability. “Nigeria can’t wait to act. We must utilise solutions in the market that can make an immediate environmental and financial impact if we are to, as a maritime nation, to afford the transition to clean fuels,” the former President, Association of Nigerian Licensed Customs Agents (ANLCA) Prince Olayiwola Shittu, said.

    Decarbonisation, Shittu said, could be achieved through alternative fuels such as nuclear, hydrogen, ammonia, methanol and renewable energy sources (biofuels, wind, solar), the maturity of technologies (fuel cells, internal combustion engines) as well as technical and operational strategies to reduce fuel consumption for new ships (slow steaming, cleaning and coating, waste heat recovery, hull and propeller design.

    Goals set by IMO on carbon intensity reduction

    With the IMO adopted energy efficiency strategy on the reduction of Greenhouse Gas emissions from international shipping, the following goals have been set: Energy efficiency requirements or existing vessels from 2023; carbon intensity targets for vessels from 2026; reduction of carbon intensity by 40 per cent by 2030; and reduction of carbon intensity by 70 per cent by 2050 (50 per cent)

    NPA and NIMASA, a lawyer Mr Oluwaseyi Muhammed, said, must come up with a strategy with the aim of providing support and assisting ship owners and operators “to achieve compliance with the new Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI) Legislation, calculation of Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) by investigating decarbonisation/efficiency technologies and operation changes for their vessels, ultimately, providing the best solution in terms reduction of EEXI & CII and return on investment (ROI)”.

    Lessons from other countries

    Few days ago, the French shipping giant CMA CGM Group and Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) to collaborate on the development of capabilities and solutions across decarbonisation, digitalisation and innovation.

    The MoU, findings have shown, seeks to explore the use of low carbon fuels and develop green technologies to accelerate maritime decarbonisation.

    The partners are expected to work on the use of zero and low-carbon marine fuels such as e-methanol, e-methane and biofuels for commercial shipping. Research on technologies such as carbon capture solutions is another objective of the MOU.

    As CMA CGM advances to be a net-zero carbon firm by 2050 diversifying its energy mix, the company ordered 10 dual-fuel liquefied natural gas-(LNG) powered vessels and six dual-fuel methanol-powered vessels. The methanol-powered newbuilds are planned to join the CMA CGM fleet in three years (2025).

    Three of these LNG vessels, which will also be e-methane-ready, will be registered under the Singapore flag. The firm’s e-methane-ready fleet counts 29 vessels in service and will have 77 by 2026.

    Moreover, the parties pledged to promote digitalisation and innovation in the maritime ecosystem for more efficient solutions.

    Some of the areas on which the signatories will focus include cybersecurity and shipping, achieved through data exchanges for port and cargo documentation and reporting. The MoU would also see the two parties work together on innovations such as shipboard automation for more safety, efficiency and smarter solutions onboard vessels.

    Furthermore, CMA CGM and MPA will explore establishing and investing in Singapore-based incubators and accelerators to grow Singapore-based marine tech startups.

    Investigation has also shown that in line with its digitalisation agenda, CMA CGM has recently teamed up with PSA Corporation (PSA) to create and implement digital solutions relating to the company’s port and terminal handling activities in Singapore.

    Under the MoU, will cooperate on new industry-wide initiatives to attract and empower the Singapore-based maritime workforce, tapping on the MPA Maritime Cluster Fund.

    “Decarbonisation, digitalisation, and innovation are strategic priorities for CMA CGM and the entire shipping industry. Given Singapore’s key position in our global network, I am very pleased to sign this partnership with the Maritime and Port Authority. It will allow us to address the challenges ahead and strengthen our existing strong ties with Singapore,” Chairman/Chief Executive Officer, the CMA CGM Group, Rodolphe Saadé, reportedly said.

    “We are happy to work with a like-minded partner like CMA CGM who shares our ambitions to make international shipping more sustainable and resilient,” Chief Executive, Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore, Quah Ley Hoon said.

    The sector is crucial for international trade. About 90 per cent of the global trade occurs through shipping and that makes it vital to the world economy which Nigeria is a member.

    Due to the scale of the sector, shipping represents three per cent of the total global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, therefore strict environmental regulations are set to cause major technological changes in the maritime industry.

    For example, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) can improve the performance, and on the other hand, with methane slip, the benefits are reduced. Other fuels and/or other technologies such as biofuels, hydrogen, nuclear and carbon capture and storage (CCS) could all decarbonise the industry, but each have significant barriers regarding cost, resources and social acceptability.

    In addition, fuel consumption can be improved by various efficiency improvements (such as hull design and cleaning, and propeller design, to name a few). It is obvious that numerous problems/issues must be tackled to achieve deep decarbonisation of the shipping industry.

    Demand for shipping to grow

    Moreover, demand for shipping is likely to grow over the next three decades. Investigation by The Nation has shown that to understand the market trends in the industry, NPA and NIMASA must consider decarbonisation as part of their business strategy in line with the International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO) ambition to reduce CO2 emissions by at least 50 per cent by 2050 compared with a 2008 baseline.

    Financial incentives

    Deep decarbonisation will require financial incentives and policies at the international regional and local level given the maritime sector’s three per cent contribution to GHG emissions.

    Categories of maritime emission

    Maritime emission and reduction measures are divided into two: technical (ship size, ship-port interface, etc.) and operational (lower-speeds, waste heat recovery, etc.)

    The International Transport Forum recognises more routes to achieve decarbonisation, which is the use of alternative fuels (sustainable biofuels, hydrogen, ammonia), electrification of ships and wind assistance, albeit these could be argued to fall under the technical measures’ category.

    Challenges

    There has been increased interest from the sector’s important stakeholders on deep decarbonisation. However, this will require financial incentives and policies at an international and regional level given the maritime sector’s three per cent contribution to GHG emissions.

    Shell and Deloitte, it was gathered, conducted a survey on the market trends and it was realised that the majority of the stakeholders considered decarbonisation an important or top priority for their organisations. This, therefore, shows that the market and the industry are considering decarbonisation as part of their business strategy.

    What Maersk intends to do

    Maersk, the world’s largest shipping container company, had announced its intentions to be net-zero carbon by 2050, with carbon-neutral vessels commercially viable by 2030.

    The IMO has also introduced measures for new and existing ships (SEEMP, EEDI and the fairly recent EEXI), which combine operational and technical measures to help ship operators achieve reductions in emissions.

    Advantages and disadvantages

    The advantages and disadvantages of alternative fuels, in terms of cost, technical difficulties and maturity, were presented. Shell’s view on future pathways involves a “poly-fuel scenario”, in other words, the use of different fuels.

    Also, Japan’s report on “Roadmap to Zero Emission from International Shipping” mentions that pilot concepts are based on two possible emission reduction pathways: LNG, provided that LNG transitions to carbon-recycled methane, and  adoption of hydrogen/ammonia as fuel.

    Although stakeholders who spoke with The Nation agreed that hydrogen/ammonia fuels are solutions to a deep decarbonisation, “There are still issues to be resolved for them to be a commercially viable solution. Issues of storage, transportation, safety, toxicity and cost are the prime inhibitors for these alternative fuels. LNG is a very promising solution to achieve short-term decarbonisation, with ships deploying LNG (mostly as a drop-in-fuel, blended with existing fuels in marine sector).

    “Biofuels look marginally more competitive than fuels derived from renewable electricity or from natural gas with carbon capture and storage. However, biofuels have challenges in terms of sustainability and availability. Thus, in the mid -long-term, they may be uncompetitive due to sustainability restrictions and price volatility. Because fuel price is the dominant factor that determines the total cost of operation, a fuel derived from natural gas or from a renewable energy source “may offer longer term benefits” compared to biofuels if the future growth in energy global demand and the aforementioned sustainability and availability issues of biofuels are taken into account,” said, an analyst, Mr Kayode Balogun, said.

    Other stakeholder agreed that IMO’s targets will be achieved through a radical shift with the aid of social pressure, financial incentives and regulatory and legislative reforms at the local, regional and international levels.

  • Why Customs needs to retain more than 7%

    Why Customs needs to retain more than 7%

    The Nigerian Customs Service (NCS) last year commenced the verification of private jets’ data. In this interview with JOHN OFIKHENUA, its National Public Relations Officer (PRO), Timi Bomodi, promises that the service will sustain the exercise.

    With the retention of seven per cent cost of collection, the service seems to be challenge-free. Or do you still have any challenge?

    There is no system that is without challenges. Of course, there will be challenges. Yes, the seven per cent collection even though it has added to the internal revenue of the service, it is still not enough because there are so many things that are required to have a system that will work at a very high capacity.

    I will tell you that the management has engaged in serious acquisition and building of infrastructure for officers. You know, if you look across the country’s most military establishments, you will find that they consider the residential accommodation of their personnel  a priority. We are seriously handicapped in that area and that is why this management has made the effort to improve the living conditions of officers.

    We are talking also of about the health needs of our officers and men, provision of hospitals and clinics, supplies for those hospitals and clinics, even the working equipment, and the working tools.

    The service recently acquired certain specialised vehicles that could be used in very rugged terrain and the reinforcement for those vehicles are not just like the normal reinforcements because in most border locations, it is almost like a war environment and if your personnel are not well equipped, then they will be coming out mainly as casualties of war.

    So, if you have to arm them properly, protect them adequately and then ensure that when they are in those kinds of combat situations they don’t end up as victims, they end up as victors because it is a fight that we believe we can win and we should win in a short and long term.

    Will the Customs want that seven per cent increased?

    There is nobody that would say no. Even though the government has ceded a lot in giving seven per cent cost of collection to the service, we know it can increase if we increase our capacity to work. Because that is a component of what we will collect. So, that is why you see that we are intensifying to always putting more effort and see that what we did last year, we do better this year.

    We know once it gets better for the country, it will also get better for us. We are very optimistic as to how we can do that, especially with the introduction of this concession agreement.  We anticipate an increase in revenue that could be if not geometric but arithmetic. And in that case, we also know that the seven per cent cost of collection will also go up so long as that is achieved.

    About two weeks ago, the concession of the modernisation project agreement was signed. What results have it yielded?

    The modernisation agreement as you are aware of was recently signed between the Nigerian Customs Service and an indigenous company, Trade Modernisation Project Limited. The purpose of the agreement is to expand the ICT infrastructure of the NSC and automate fully its processes and procedures. As you may be aware, our processes are tied to not just imports and exports excise, and border control management.

    Our responsibilities are very broad and the capacity to effectively perform these activities is greatly enhanced. We believe it will be greatly enhanced by technology. And that is why this concession agreement was signed. We know that as a Customs Service, we can’t do it alone. We have to bring in partners who could midwife the process, and that is where Trade Modernisation Project Limited came in. And they also came in with technical partners.The main one being Huawei, one of the leading providers of hardware and software in the ICT industry.

    We know that they have the technical capabilities to help drive this system. And of course the project is financed by another consortium, which is African Finance Corporation, who are ready to provide the huge amount needed to bring this project to reality.

    So, that is what’s happening, and we expect that at the end of the day Nigerians will be happier for it because we are talking about enhanced systems, making our operations more competitive.

    You know, we are not just competing,we are not competing with anyone within the country, and with other countries.

    The more efficient your system, the lower the cost of doing business in our environment and once the cost doing business goes down, we will be able to attract more foreign direct investments. And once you are able to attract more foreign direct investments, it means that your economy will grow and as the economy grows, the potential for any revenue for the government will also grow and that is what this whole thing is about. That is what we expect to see, which primarily informed the CGC’s comments on the day that the agreement was signed. That we expect that the revenue will go up once we begin to implement the agreement in the phases that they were designed to be implemented.

     Has the implementation of the agreement commenced?

    It has not commenced, but we are phasing it. We will start with the phase of migration, from a platform that we are using, which is the Nigerian Integrated Custom Information System and we will be moving gradually to seeing how our partners can form in with an infrastructure that can accommodate our infrastructure and begin to build, expand the scope to other areas of customs.

    The day that event was held, the CGC said the Nigerian Customs is short staffed; it lacks half of the manpower it needs. It needs about 30,000 while it has about 15,000.

    What is the service doing about it?

    Of course, you know the service does periodic evaluation, a periodic performance evaluation and part of what that entails is that it has to look within and assess the kind of assets that are available to it to carry out its duties. And you know a critical component of the assets available to any organisation is the manpower.

    So, the service has done its forecast in terms of manpower placements and with those forecasts it is able to know that yes, we are at a certain number. But for us to operate effectively and efficiently, we have to operate at a certain capacity, and that is what informed the CGC’s comments. We do know, you know, initially there were two fears expressed; one was that this agreement was going to take over the jobs of the Nigerian Customs Service. Or we are outsourcing the activities of the Nigerian Customs to others? But it is not true; we are not doing that.

    The next fear was that it will lead to job loss, and the CGC also allayed those fears. It will actually require more people because once you have a technology, what the technology does is it simply makes the system more efficient but you need certain level of interrogation which requires the manpower aspect. At the borders, we actually need more persons than we have in our employment. At the ports once we introduce these technological instruments that this concession agreement will require, we need people that will be there to monitor them.

    I mean, we anticipate a future where people will be conducting examinations in the ports in Lagos and there are people at the headquarters level who can see these examinations and draw their conclusions, write their reports. It is just to create levels of checks that will make the system work efficiently, reduce leakages in the system and ensure transparency across board. So, of course more persons will be needed and we expect that as we begin to introduce the other phases of this concession agreement more persons will be brought onto the service and take care of this assignment.

    As you also know, we have just concluded a computer-based test for new employees. It is a continuation of what was started in 2019, and this is the second batch of persons that are going to be recruited under that particular assignment. And we expect that as this new employees come into the system, they will be assigned responsibilities that are best fit for what the service intends to implement in the short and long term.

     It is obvious that for your officers to key into this automation, they must be IT compliant. What is the service doing about IT training?

    The service has a very robust modernisation and ICT unit. If you go to the department, not just here but across the country, we have young, highly trained, very articulate officers who have proved their mettle in that department. As a matter of fact, many of them have won international and local awards in their contributions to enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of the system. And we are not resting on our oars. We are actually expanding the unit even more by introducing newer elements, which requires even larger engagements of individuals with those kinds of trainings and capacity. Of course, in this ongoing recruitment there has been a lot of emphasis on having an enlarged ICT modernisation department and bringing in persons with those kinds of skills that are highly useful in using the kind of technology we will be deploying in the very near future.

    Last year, the Nigerian Customs Service conducted a verification for private jets in the country. We did not hear the outcome of the verification. I want to know if it is a one off exercise.

    Of course, it is not a one off exercise. We started that verification and you know most things we do take time. If not for anything, but for record purposes, it is a very vital exercise because we want to know just the way when you bring in a vehicle into the country you have the vehicle registered and all the data concerning that vehicle is captured somewhere. Periodically, if there are certain payments of taxes that are necessary for the owners of these vehicles to do for the government.

    Of course, the system, which is an automated system is alerting the owner to do that. So, the same thing is with high networth individuals in types of jets, helicopters wherever there is a requirement as to their rules and procedures the importation and use of types of assets within the country. And that is what we are trying to do, which is first document those who have these high vehicles, airplanes and then see also if they have been up and doing in terms of their obligations to government. Those that have not, we have put the notices across to them. A good number of them have made payments to the government. It is an exercise that is ongoing. It is the one that the service will sustain in the long term for the purpose of data gathering and for collecting revenue that are accruable to the government.

    Last year, the NCS launched some boats for marine operations. How have these equipment improved the operations of the service?

    As I said, the thinking of Nigeria Customs management is to deploy its assets in such a way we can get maximum returns on them and the areas of revenue collections, trade facilitation or enforcement. And the deployment of boat as asset in the marine environment has actually yielded a lot of benefits. If you look at the reports from all our marine units in recent times, you see the high volume of seizures than had been made in all our marine units. This is not to say there cannot be improvement but when you introduce anything new you also have to incorporate the training aspect into it. It is the same thing like when you introduce a new asset like a phone. You do not only need to train the person that will run it but you need to have a better understanding of the terrain under which those boats will operate. It is very important we use equipment that can operate efficiently on shallow waters. If you are used to that and, suddenly, you are given heavier equipment that would not operate heavily in certain kinds of water, then you have to be sure that the navigational skills of the people you are handing these equipment over to are top notch.

    Otherwise instead of deploying for effectiveness you may be with certain challenges that will actually affect the productivity of the equipment.

    So training is ongoing. You have different aspects of the training that have to do with equipment handling and navigation, maintenance and so many other things. And the service is Keen on approaching this whole process holistically. That is why you see beyond the seizures that are made by our marine commands, the issue of deployment, which we are taking our time to see, especially for high end and for high value assets of the service.

    Have there been any seizures of petroleum products using the boats?

    Virtually, daily where there are hoard of petroleum products. In short, one of the major challenges is having enough space to warehouse items that are seized in the cause of enforcing duties. For petroleum products, the issue is the volatility of the product itself. So, when seizures are made the service cannot warehouse. You normally warehouse rice and other commodities we have to dispose of them as quickly as possible. Yes, of course, there has been remarkable success in checkmating the activities of those whose intentions is to smuggle this product out of the country.

    What was the revenue collection for May, this year?

    I cannot readily give you that number now but what I can say is that we have the annual projections, which if you check the historical trajectory of revenue collections in the service you will see there is a steady increase in the volume of revenue that the service collects. Last year, we collected over N2 trillion, which was remarkable giving the circumstances under which we operated within that period. For this year, the expectations are also very higher and we are working towards achieving that in a year that is considered to be low traffic. We are gradually picking up our pace and we know, hopefully, before the end of the year are likely going to meet the target set for us by the government if not exceed it.

    Has the Nigerian Customs Service jettisoned its automated auction scheme? If it has not, what is the update because one has not heard anything about it?

    As you said, it is automated. If you go on the Customs website, there is a link e-service. It is the link that handles our aspects of those activities. Auctions are ongoing activities and because they are ongoing they have to be set up in such away, so that in a certain period that the items put up for auction are accessible to the public. So, if you go to the website and click the link, you will see the various things that the individuals users of that website are required to do. They are required to have a tax ID number. They are required to register on the site, create a wallet and fund it. There are so many requirements and they are clearly spelt out there. Once items are populated on that portal that will be auctioned then persons will go in there and look at the items that they may want to bid.

    So, it is a very transparent system that is designed to eliminate the subjective consideration of an individual so that whoever is fortunate enough to win a bid for an item can have it.

    What is the payable Customs vehicle duty?

    As you know, the duty paid on vehicles either used or not, the duty payable is 20 per cent. And we have a component that is referred to as import adjustment tax of 15 per cent. So, the duty itself is 20 per cent that goes for used and new vehicles.

    How compliant are the dealers?

    We had a lot of challenges, especially in the areas of importation of vehicles. We know that our borders giving their very nature have been largely exploited by smugglers, who insist on following those borders just to evade the payments of duty. That is one of the reasons we introduce our automation system – valuation protocol. What it does is to make the system for people to use with ease to get their goods out of the ports. So far, we have been getting positive results from stakeholders: clearing agents and motor dealers and other members of the public because it is a fair, efficient and fast way of clearing goods out of the ports.

    Does smuggling still thrive?

    Of course, smuggling thrives and it is not unique to Nigeria, there is no country in the world that has been able to eliminate smuggling. I mean the biggest countries in the world with their technology and everything has not been able to eliminate smuggling.

    The intention of every customs administration will be to reduce it to the barest minimum. And that is what I told you earlier about the concession agreement which allows for an expansion of infrastructure that will assist Customs officers with their jobs. Like in this case, we know that an area where we are having serious challenges in manning our borders, we do that physically using intelligence, using the kind of assets that we have but there are serious limitations. By the time you introduce technology, and you are able to get information either from aerial surveillance equipment like drones, satellite imaging, geo- spartial and those things, you will have more detailed information, it becomes a lot more easier to combat smuggling.

    So, we anticipate that when this technology is introduced into the system, we, like other advanced customs administration, would have been able to bring smuggling to its barest minimum. And we eagerly look forward to that time when this will be achieved.

    What fuels smuggling in Nigeria?

    You can’t really put your finger on what fuels it. There are people that feel they smuggle just because they feel that there are benefits to be derived from it. Every time there seems to be some form of economic advantage that can be gained across the border, people tend to want to exploit the loopholes in the system to make those benefits. And you find that in virtually all industries once there are differentials in pricing that exist between one area and another there will always be people that would want to exploit it for economic gains, and so we have that.

    So, we also have situations in a lot of our border communities, which, unfortunately, most of them are lacking in certain basic infrastructure, and when they lack in these infrastructure and there seem not to be some kind of recourse to economic empowerment, most of them tend to engage in self-help and the easiest thing that they do is use the borders in such a way that they can achieve some form of economic power by using their unique positions for criminal activities.

    It is very enticing as I must say, because where the infrastructure does not exist people tend to be like, they tend to feel entitled and to say this is where we are, and we should benefit from where we are, simply by being dwellers of border towns, villages. That is what we have experienced. And that is why the service has taken it upon itself to engage border communities, different sensitisation, and social responsibility programmes as well as youth engagements and empowerment. So,  just to tell them that the implications of smuggling will be to the economy of the nation, not just the economy but the security of the people themselves. Our experience in the Northeast especially, you might think there is something to gain economically but if you lose the control of movement of individuals or certain kinds of items through our communities, then we may also have to live with the consequences.

    In this case, it means having terrorists among us which will compromise the safety and well-being of individuals that live in those communities. So, we try to educate them about the implications of allowing their communities to be used as transit points by smugglers, and other potential invaders, and some of them have been quite helpful. It is a process that has to be continued for us to sustain the kind of progress we have made. And hopefully, we believe that we would get them to buy into the fiscal policies of the government and the reason things need to be done properly because, ultimately, they too will benefit from that.

  • X-raying waterways wrecks’ removal

    X-raying waterways wrecks’ removal

    Following the decision of the management of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) to validate its wreck removal exercise, The Nation has toured Lagos waterways – from Marina to Apapa, Ijegun Egba in Ajeromi Ifelodu Local Government Area and Badagry – to examine the state of the navigational route and how secure the two ports responsible for over 80 per cent of cargoes coming into the country are based on the danger and benefits of ship wrecks on the waterways. OLUWAKEMI DAUDA reports.

    Despite the enormous responsibilities on its shoulders, the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) has embarked on a major task: To remove wrecks from our seaways.

    This is not unexpected. The body is charged with ensuring the safety of navigation in line with the Wreck Removal Convention adopted at the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) conference in Nairobi, Kenya in 2007, which came force on April 14, 2015.

    Nigeria was the eighth country to ratify the convention.

    Investigation has shown that no fewer than 35 ship wrecks and vessels have been abandoned on Lagos waters by some shipping firms and individuals.

    The wrecks, derelicts and abandoned vessels’ litter the waterways and are being removed by NIMASA to stem criminalities on the territorial waters and around the port.

    During a tour of Lagos by The Nation, it was discovered that the back of Tin Can Island port in Lagos has become a dumping ground for shipwrecks and abandoned vessels. The people of Ogogoro Village at back of the port and along the coastline said these were making their lives miserable.

    The two Lagos ports are responsible for the highest concentration of shipping traffic to country.

    Findings show that before the efforts by NIMASA, the abandoned vessels serve as storage  for stolen oil as well as shelter for criminal activities.

    Safety and security of shipping business

    NIMASA said it had warned owners of abandoned ships/vessels to remove them or face sanctions, which range from forfeiture or removal by the agency at the owner’s expense.

    Deploying magnetometer

    NIMASA said it had started preparatory works to deploy high-resolution magnetometer to validate the removal of the wrecks along the Badagry Creeks in Lagos.

    Its Director-General, Dr Bashir Jamoh, who stated this during a review session on the wreck removal, also said the impact of the exercise on the marine environment was being assessed by the agency.

    “We shall also conduct a full bottom sweeping operation by deploying sonar imagery system to establish any natural or artificial obstacles lying on the seabed within the area of survey for this phase of the wreck removal exercise. NIMASA is also taking into consideration, the impact of the entire operations on the marine environment to ensure safety of marine lives. We are monitoring the entire exercise to guarantee total removal of all identified wrecks,” he said.

    Submerged barges removed

    Among those removed are a submerged barge, which was lying over 10 meters deep along the Badagry channel on coordinates 711006.1 Easting and 535294.9 Northing.

    NIMASA said it has also removed two others beneath the water at 530924.9 Northing and 710608.3 Easting.

    Another submerged barge, which has been lying along the channels on 711617.5 Easting and 533601.6 Northing has been removed and taken to the dumpsite in Kirikiri, Lagos.

    Collaboration with Navy

    NIMASA had worked with the Hydrography Department of the Nigerian Navy to identify these wrecks.

    “We worked with the Hydrography Unit of the Nigerian Navy in charting the waters and establishing these wrecks as critical for immediate removal. Some are completely submerged while others are partially submerged. This Badagry creek is a commercial route with passenger vessels plying and we place a premium on safety of lives and properties. We are confident that on completion, operations of the Navy in patrolling our waters will also be enhanced as the routes will be free of wrecks,” the DG also said.

    Jamoh told The Nation that it was instructive to ensure that our waters remained safe for navigation.

    He, therefore, warned that abandoned ships on the territorial waters would be declared as wrecks and the agency would ensure that nothing impeded safe navigation in the country’s waters by removing them.

    “In line with our mandate on the protection of the marine environment and safety of navigation within waters and our powers as the receiver of wrecks; owners of all abandoned ships, vessels and derelicts are sternly warned to seek removal plan permits from the agency and ensure the removal of these wrecks and derelicts from our waters and failure of which would attract appropriate sanction,” he said.

    He reeled out the sanctions to include removal of such wrecks at the owners’ expense as well as forfeiture of the vessels.

    He stated that the agency is empowered to do so in line with the powers vested in it by the Merchant Shipping Act 2007 and other enabling Acts and International Maritime Organisation (IMO) instruments.

    The Nairobi International Convention on the Removal of Wrecks (Nairobi Convention 2007) gives states the authority to remove wrecks. In the case of Nigeria, NIMASA is the receiver of wrecks.

    A resident of Ogogoro village, Mr. John Edward, said the areas most affected are Tin Can Island, Kirikiri, Navy Town and Badagry creek areas of the channel.

    According to him, the community has identified over 80 of such abandoned ships and wrecks, which were submerged along the busy Lagos channel,thereby constituting grave danger to ships and crew.

    “The hazards associated with the wrecks are that, most often, especially during high water, they are submerged and hardly visible to boat operators; therefore, they pose the greatest threats during rainy season that is fast approaching.

    “Apart from endangering shipping, most of the abandoned vessels also constitute environmental pollution and hazards,” he said.

    Another resident of Imore, Mr Gbenga Owolabi, said the government has the responsibility to remove the wrecks.

    “It does not portray our port well. It also does not show that as a country within the global shipping community, there is respect for law and order.

    “In addition to these injury, there are navigational aids such as the boyle, markings, light that are not functional, missing or have shifted from their original positions based on the abandoned ships that needed to be fixed by the relevant government agencies.

    “The absence of navigational aids also constitutes risk to shipping, especially at night or during restricted visibilities.

    ‘’We are hoping that actions would be taken to clear our channel of those abandoned vessels so that patrol ships can easily move in and out of harbour to respond to emergencies,” he said.

    Edward and Owolabi are not alone. A senior official of the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), who craved anonymity, also admitted that the Lagos coastline is littered with abandoned vessels and shipwrecks.The official said some of the abandoned vessels had been there for over three years, adding that they were being blamed for erosion that threaten homes and livelihoods of the people living in the riverine community.

    “They said the waves have eaten into their land at a rate of up to 20 miles a month. Because the ship is such a solid object being where it shouldn’t be, they said it causes an impediment to the natural flow of the current and stops sedimentation.

    “Worse still is that it causes these eddy currents that immediately start to chew up the entire shoreline.

    “It is terrifying when you listen to people living in those communities. In fact, at night, they complain that they don’t sleep because they are always thinking that the water could come in at any moment during the rainy season. The problem has been there for more than two years and it is caused by the abandoned ships,” he said.

    He said dismantling ships had become more complicated the longer they stay on the beach and blamed NIMASA for the number of wrecks and abandoned vessels on Lagos water.

    “NIMASA is is responsible for the quality of ship that operates in Nigeria’s waters.The agency should take action to remove the abandoned vessels,” he said.

    He said though NIMASA could not be blamed because most of these abandoned ships are owned by foreigners.“Foreigners are deliberately violating our laws and NIMASA needs to follow due process in removing these wrecks and abandoned ships because of litigation,” he added.

    Ship owners’ responsibility

    Under maritime law, it is the responsibility of the ship owner to remove their faulty vessel from the coast.

    But with many of the vessels having been bought cheap and barely seaworthy to work in the oil industry, when trouble strikes, they are often abandoned mostly when the owner gets to know that they are no longer serviceable.

    Experts said the abandoned ships act as groynes, halting the flow of sand down the shoreline and accelerating erosion.

    Lack of regulation?

    An expert, Mr. Roland Samuel, said lack of regulation on the waters has also helped illicit activity thrive, turning the abandoned ships into hideouts for sea criminals.

    “Copper and bronze and the brass from the ship’s propeller could be sold for as much as N20 million. People steal valuables that are still there because they are abandoned.

    “Section 381(1) of the Merchant Shipping Act 2007 empowers NIMASA on what to do.

    The Act has made it the duty of the receiver of wreck to remove or destroy the whole or any part of the vessel when abandoned.

    The implication of abandoned wreck is dangerous for the water and the environment considering that they are on the navigational routes.

    Floods and erosion are imminent in Lagos communities if they are not removed before the rainy season sets in, an expert warned.

    Parts of the duties as a member of IMO are to ensure the protection of the maritime environment and its security, among others.

    Therefore, it is important for NIMASA to clear the navigational channels of abandoned vessels that are hazardous to safe navigation.

    Challenges

    According to Jamoh, “one of the challenges the maritime industry has always faced is the issue of wrecks and relics in waterways – creeks, tributaries, rivers, canals, the high seas, or any route through which vessels of any size must pass to carry out day-to-day seaborne trade.

    “Some of the maritime accidents that occur in different parts of the world are traceable to wrecks that litter the waters. If such accidents do not involve human casualties, they come with huge costs to businesses or both.

    “There are basically three major consequences of wrecks on maritime transportation. Wrecks

  • Reviving Calabar port

    Reviving Calabar port

    Last week, the Presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) Asiwaju Bola  Ahmed Tinubu, at the APC’s Presidential primary convention, unfolded his plan to dredge the 84-nautical mile Calabar Port access channel to make the port attractive for business and boost the economy of the Eastern region, if elected President. OLUWAKEMI DAUDA writes.

    There was jubilation in the tent of the delegates from the Cross River State when the All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential candidate  Asiwaju Bola Tinubu in his acceptance speech after he won the ticket at the Eagle Square promised to dredge the channel leading to the Calabar Port to enable large vessels berth and do business there.

    The joy was expected. Dredging the port, stakeholders who spoke with The Nation on the sidelines of the convention, said, would boost the economy of Cross River State, provide efficient port service system that will guarantee quick turnaround time of vessels, faster cargo clearance and save cost.  Besides, it would also make the port function maximally so that the youth and business people in the area can also go there and keep themselves busy as alternative to crime.

    Other stakeholders said the delay in the dredging of the channel to acceptable standard had impacted negatively on the economic activities of the state and the country. “The Tinapa Resort, Calabar has been a little bit dormant because of the non-functionality of the channel,” said an importer, Mr Sunday Felix.

    History of the port

    The history of Calabar Port can be traced to the merchants of the 15th century. It served as an important focus of trade with the outside world and port for the north. The old port was privately administered and operated by various shipping companies among which were M/S Palmline Agencies Limited and Elder Dempster Agencies until December 1969 when the Federal Government took over the inadequate Calabar Port facilities from the erstwhile operators and vested it on the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA).

    The development, modernisation and expansion of the Calabar Port was embarked upon under the Third National Development Plan (1975 –1980)  to make the port facilities cope with the ever-increasing demand of the economy. The port complex, which was inaugurated in June1979, consists of the following major areas: 38 hectares, four quays each measuring about 215metres long and 40metres wide. The quays were also divided into six berths.

    The port also has two warehouses measuring 150 metres by 40 metre and 175 metres by 40 metres Its operational area was divided into two terminals. Terminal A consisting of two berths was concessioned to Messrs Intels Nigeria Limited, while Terminal B consisting of four berths was concessioned to Messrs ECM Terminal Limited.

    House of Representatives’ call for dredging

    In March, this year, the House of Representatives urged the Federal Government to re-award the contract for the dredging of the Calabar Seaport to a reputable company, with a mandate to complete the project within a timeframe.

    Also, the House urged the NPA to supervise the project and ensure that standard depth is established to enable larger vessels to berth at the port, in line with international best practices.

    The House further mandated its Committee on Ports and Harbours to “investigate the contracts awarded in 2006 and 2014 to ensure that factors militating against complete dredging of the Calabar Seaport are resolved.”

    These resolutions were sequel to the adoption of the motion moved by a member of the House, Dr. Alex Egbona, entitled: ‘Call to complete the dredging of the Calabar Seaport.’

    According to Egbona, the Calabar Seaport is the oldest seaport in Nigeria, from where palm oil and other goods were shipped to Europe and other parts of the world in the 16th century

    Egbona, who represents the Abi/Yakurr Federal Constituency, said: “My mind is always on the Calabar Port and the waste of a public facility that would have given a boost to commerce and tourism in my state. Each time I think of the Calabar Port, my heart bleeds. Each time I remember that we have a seaport that is lying idle, wasting away, when the Lagos port is busy and making the economy of that state to boom, I develop stomach ache. It makes me want to sometimes think that the Federal Government hates us. I may be wrong, but that appears to be the best way to describe the abandonment of the Calabar Port.

    “See, we are talking about the oldest seaport in this country. In the 16th century, goods like palm oil were being shipped to Europe and other parts of the world from this seaport in question.

    “Before now, it was privately operated by various shipping companies, including John Holts, until December 1969 when the Federal Government took over the port’s facilities and gave its management and ownership control to the NPA. As I said on the day I presented the motion, the development, modernisation and expansion of the port complex was embarked upon under the third National Development Plan of 1975-1980 and then on June 9, 1979, it was inaugurated by the then military administration of General Olusegun Obasanjo. Some of us have at various times expressed the concern that the port is not serving the purpose for which it was established, largely because of its shallow nature and notable sons and daughters of Cross River State, past and present governments at the state level, have cried out to the Federal Government for the port to be dredged, to allow large vessels to come in.

    “There have been diverse government proclamations on the dredging of the port dating back to the administrations of General Ibrahim Babangida and General Sani Abacha but no tangible thing has been done to rehabilitate it. In 2006, Obasanjo, as president of Nigeria, awarded a contract for the dredging of the port to Messrs. Jan De Nul and Van Oord at a cost of $56million but it was abandoned. In 2014, former President Goodluck Jonathan initiated the Calabar Channel Management (CCM), a joint venture company between the NPA and a consortium of companies led by Niger Global Engineering and Technical Company Limited to dredge the port.

    “Although the Calabar Channel Management was reported to have commenced work, the port is yet to be dredged. So, you can see why I said at the beginning, that my heart bleeds whenever I remember what the Calabar port has been through.

    “And in the midst of this neglect, the Lagos port is booming. If you need to clear your goods, you must do so in Lagos and then find a way to bring your containers to the Southsouth and Southeast, with the attendant bad roads and all that. Can you see what I am talking about?

    “Look at the amount of money that exchanges hands in Lagos and compare that with what is happening in Calabar. So, would you say that this country is fair to Calabar, or to the Southsouth? We keep talking about youth unemployment. We are talking of trade and commerce in the Southeast. Go to Onitsha and Aba and see the number of containers that enter those commercial cities daily. Those goods are being cleared in Lagos. Meanwhile, we have a port in Calabar.

    Why can’t the port in Calabar be dredged and made to function maximally so that our boys can also go there and keep themselves busy? There was a time that cars were imported and were cleared at the Calabar Port. That time, if you can remember, people were always going to Calabar either to buy those cars or do other things. That way, hotels were busy, the local economy got some serious boost and life was pleasant. Today, those who believe they are the owners of Nigeria appear to have crippled or killed the Calabar Port. And in the midst of this, the same people will be crying that the Lagos Port is congested. Is that not hypocrisy?

    “So, my plea is that the Federal Government must, immediately, take steps to ensure that the Calabar Port is given a life of its own. A quick completion of the Calabar Seaport will help decongest the Lagos Port and reduce the hardship of waiting for hours to clear goods.

    “The Federal Government cannot pretend not to know of or hear about our hue and cry about the Calabar Seaport. I believe it is a sin for them to continue to keep silent about this. If they do not feel okay with handing it over to private concerns, let them re-award the contract for the dredging of the port and then  supervise it very closely, just to be sure that the depth would be good enough to allow very big ships to berth at the port. This is my prayer,” he said.

     Previous dredging efforts

    The Calabar channel dredging is the most controversial of NPA’s contracts. It has been awarded and re-awarded several times. Sometimes, there were claims that the channel had been dredged, yet the channel remains non-navigable and shallow and unable to attract sizeable vessels to boost business at the port.

    For instance, in 2005, contracts for the management of the four channels in Nigeria were advertised. They included Lagos, Bonny, Calabar and Warri channels. The bid was conducted internationally by Mobotek, a Holland consulting firm where about 49 international firms applied.

    At the end of the pre-qualification involving the technical and financial bids verification with bid clarification meetings between NPA and Federal Ministry of Transport, some companies emerged.

    These include DEPASSA, leading a consortium of companies for Lagos Channel, Dredging International Services, leading a consortium of companies for Bonny Channel, Niger Global Engineering, leading a consortium of companies for Calabar Channel and Forby Engineering, leading a consortium of companies for Warri Channel.

    Though the management of Lagos and Bonny Channels were executed, the ones in Calabar and Warri were not. The Calabar dredging contract may have been won by Calabar Channel Management Limited sources put equity participation in the joint venture at 60 per cent for NPA and 40 per cent for the company, in the ratio of 160 million shares belonging to NPA and 140 million to the firm.

    But the contract ran into a hitch following a strong petition by the former NPA Chairman, the late Chief Tony Anenih.

    In a five-page petition to the Minister of Transport, Senator Idris Umar,  Anenih  appealed to the minister to cancel the agreement, which was made on January 25, 2013 between NPA and the consortium and the directors of NPA, Ministries of Transport and Justice to appraise the agreement and produce an acceptable deal.

    The petition also directed the then managing director of NPA, Mallam Habib Abdullahi, to suspend the 60 per cent subscription fee payment to the joint venture.

    Steps taken by Jonathan

    Former President Goodluck Jonathan’s approval of the capital dredging of the 84-nautical mile Calabar Port access channel in 2014 gave many in the maritime industry the goose pimples because billions of naira had been sunk in the project with nothing to show for it. Up till today,  many are still wondering whether the project had not become a conduit for siphoning public funds, a reason they want the in-coming administration to study the project and see where there were mistakes to make the port work.

    While some applauded the promise by Tinubu, apparently because of the project’s capacity to boost the economy of Cross River and the nation, others were apprehensive because it had been abandoned by contractors for years despite the billions of naira sunk into it.

    Bringing those who handled the failed project to book

    Also, the then Managing Director, Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), Habib Abdulahi, confirmed that the Federal Government has awarded the contract for the dredging of the port.

    During a visit to the then Acting Governor of the Cross River, Mr Efiok Cobham, Abdulahi said: “I am very happy to inform you that Mr. President has approved the capital and maintenance dredging of the Calabar Port.”

    company can discharge its responsibility. He said LCM has 14 dredgers and vessels for removing wrecks, including special dredgers that can do the Key Walls.

    Investors groan

    Despite the huge amount spent on the port, its channel remains shallow, and investors have continued to count their losses.

    Before govt awards fresh contract

    Stakeholders advised that a fresh contract must not be awarded until an explanation was given on the previous ones.

    They said there was the need to probe those that took several billion of naira from the government without much to show for it. The feeling of operators is that if the N96 billion was judiciously invested in dredging the Calabar Port, the channel will not be difficult for big vessels to berth.

    Former President, Association of Nigeria Licensed Customs Agents (ANLCA), Prince Olayiwola Shittu said: “There is nothing bad if Asiwaju promised that he will dredge the channel by re-awarding the contract. But the previous contractors must be made to tell Nigerians what happened and how the money was spent and on what so that people will not start to see it as avenue to siphoning public funds. Was the contract executed to specifications and if no, those who awarded the contract then must tell us what they have done to sanction the companies and if yes, the same people must tell us how come the channel is not navigable? Were there some shady dealings? Who are those involved apart from the contractors? Officials of the NPA and the Transport Ministry who awarded the contracts then must also tell Nigerians what happened and why the huge sum could not improve the depth of the channel and boost the economy of the state and the country.”