Category: Friday

  • Wonders of the Qur’an

    “Do you not see how Allah has set forth a parable of a wonderful ‘WORD’   like a fruitful tree with formidable roots that are firmly planted in the belly of the earth while its branches sprout magnificently into the firmament of the orbits, yielding edible fruits every season by Allah’s grace? Allah gives wonderful parables to men (of reason) that they may ponder over their existence and be mindful (of the wonders of the world)…” (Q. 14: 24).

     

    The world is full of wonders. But those wonders cannot be fully enumerated by mortal beings because their enumerations will be limited to their times. Whatever might have been termed as wonder in the primordial or contemporary time could only be limited to certain generations. For instance, the wonders of the ancient times are quite different from those of the modern times. Yet they bear no names other than wonders.

    Thus, when men of philosophical sciences or religious charlatans who claim to be ‘men of God’ talk of wonders or miracles, it can only be according to their myopic view of life in their immediate environments. The only globally permanent WONDER in human life, which is not limited to a particular time or place, is the Message of Allah called the Qur’an.

     

    Irony of life

    It is rather ironic that even in this age of internet, some ignorant people still perceive Islam as a mere dogma like many other religions in which fabricated stories, abominable rituals and satanic superstitions thrive. This is quite far from the spiritual reality of Allah’s divine religion.

    But it takes only people with functional eyes to perceive the light. Ignorance is a disease which only knowledge can heal. It is some of those ignorant people that are currently wondering on why Muslims should engage ceremoniously in a competition on the recitation of the Qur’an as it is now happening in Lagos, Nigeria. Such people can never understand until the cloaks on their faces are lifted to enable them see the genuine light of life.

     

    The meaning of Qur’an

    The word Qur’an means continuous recitation. It is so defined because of its inimitable origin which makes it a compelling daily recitation throughout the world, across nations, continents   and centuries. For those who do not know, only the Qur’an, among all revealed Books, contains the unsurpassable words of Allah not only in the grandeur of its diction and splendour of its rendition but also in the depth of its meaning, substance and profundity.

     

    Qur’anic revelation

    The revelation of this sacred ‘Book’ to mankind through an unlettered desert Arab, named Muhammad (SAW), the son of Abdullah and Aminah, began in 610 CE and lasted for 22 years and three months (12 years in Makkah and 10 years plus three months in Madinah).

    This sacred  Book contains 114 chapters and 6236 verses (not 6666 verses often erroneously quoted by most Nigerian Muslim clerics).

    Of these 114 chapters, 86 were revealed in Makkah and 28 in Madinah. But the 28 chapters revealed in Madinah constitute over two thirds of the Book. And this is because the Makkah chapters are short and rhythmic while those of Madinah are long and prose-like.

     

    The preservation of the Qur’an

    Although the Qur’an was revealed orally, its writing began as soon as its revelations commenced. The writing was however done initially on primitive materials such as wood, animal hide, back of trees, tablets of rock and others of the like which were then readily available.

    However, it was not until one year (633 CE) after the demise of Prophet Muhammad  that those writings were compiled into a book form not in a foreign language as in the case of the Bible but in Arabic which was its original language of revelation.

    And one of the wonders in documenting the Qur’anic revelations is the classification of those revelations into chapters and verses by Prophet Muhammad himself despite his unlettered status.

     

    Memorisation

    Meanwhile, it must be noted here that one of the vital ways of preserving the contents of the Qur’an was memorisation which made the confirmation of the written chapters and verses possible. No other religious Book has been so memorisable in human history. And that alone is a clear evidence of the divine origin of the Qur’an.

     

    Manner of presentation

    The manner of presenting the Qur’anic revelations is simple and direct. It employs neither artifice nor conventional poses. Its main appeal is to man’s intellect, feelings and imagination. It does not only touch the anecdotes of previous Prophets and nations in different ages, it also catalogues the accounts of earlier revelations and covers the entire period of human existence from the beginning of creation to the very last Day of Judgment.

     

    Authenticity of the Qur’an

    It is an indisputable fact that the Qur’an remains the only revealed ‘BOOK’ in the world today that has consistently retained the originality of both its contents and the language of its revelation for over 1440 years.

    And that alone is enough a testimony to the proof of its divine origin. It also confirms not only the genuineness of the prophet-hood of Muhammad as the arch-Messenger of Allah to mankind but also the lucidity of Arabic as  the oldest sustained language of divine revelation in the world till today.

    Thus, just as there can be no proof of the identity of a messenger without the authenticity of the message he is ordained to deliver so can there be no proof of the   genuineness of the prophetic mission of Muhammad outside the proof of the originality of the Message contained in   the Qur’an.

     

    Features of the Qur’an

    The features of sacred Book called the Qur’an  have no comparison among all other revealed books. For instance, it is only the Qur’an that leaves no aspect of life untouched just as it leaves no secret unrevealed.

    Problems and solutions; history and lessons; crimes and penalties; truth and justice; governance and equity; morality and righteousness; discipline and courage; friendship and trust; leadership and guidance; education and methodology; marriage and divorce; widowhood and orphanage; childhood and inheritance; poverty and wealth; opinion and logic; facts and figures; darkness and light; war and peace; power and magnanimity; angels, jinn and man; life and death; heavens and earth; all these and many other  matters relating to man and his environment form the subjects of discussion and guidance in the ‘Divine Diary of Life called the Qur’an’.

     

    Qur’anic referential insights

    Unlike other revealed Books that preceded it, the Qur’an gives insight into some natural phenomena like sphericity of the orbit and revolution of the earth (Q. 39:5) the formation of the rain (Q. 30:48); the fertilisation of the wind (Q. 15:22); the migration of the sun, the moon and the planets in their fixed orbits (Q. 36:29-38); the aquatic origin of all creatures (Q. 21:30); the duality of the sex of all living organisms including the plants and other creatures (Q. 36:35); the collective life of animals (Q.6:38); the  living mode of the bees (Q. 16:69) and the successive phases of the child in its mother’s womb (Q. 22:5 & 23:14). Yet, the purpose of this Book is not to teach history, astronomy, philosophy or sciences but to pave man’s way towards understanding those phenomenal aspects of human life.

     

    Proof of the Qur’anic revelations

    Some religious charlatans who perceive Islam through the conducts of certain malfeasant Muslims and see that   sacred path of Allah as a dogma continue to ask for the proof of the genuineness of Qur’anic revelation as if other revelations before the Qur’an do not require proof. In reason and logic, asking for the proof of the Qur’an is like asking the sun to prove the vividness of its rays.

    Can anybody reasonably ask for the proof of the hair growing on his head? It is the nature and character of unbelievers to deny the truth and refute the manifest. But does it ever bother the sun in any way that some blind men or women deny its rays? Or can a brook be affected in any way if some herds boycott its water?

     

    Doubting ‘Thomases’

    During the revelation of the Qur’an, Allah had foretold the reaction of certain pathological doubting ‘Thomases’ across generations of races whose hymns of denial would come from the abyss of falsehood even as they would cling remorselessly to the chord of ignorance. To such ‘Thomases’, the Qur’an owes neither explanation nor apology. They are free to live, die and be buried with their ignorance.

     

    The similitude of the Qur’an

    The Qur’an is like gold which most fashionable people seek to possess directly or indirectly because of its material value but which only a few can recognize in its raw form. It takes geologists to identify the soil in which gold is incubated.

    It takes miners to mine it out just as it takes smelters to smelt it before the goldsmith can transform it into a beautiful ornament. In the same manner, it takes categories of pious intellectuals to pursue the memorisation, the recitation, the comprehension and the interpretation of the Qur’an to a loftily appreciable level.

     

    Testimony

    To Muslims who understand the teachings of Islam through the Qur’an, all the genuine Messengers including Prophets Ibrahim (Abraham), Musa (Moses) and Isa (Jesus) are from Allah and all the divinely revealed ‘BOOKS’ written in the languages of the Messengers that brought them are series of the same Allah’s ‘MESSAGE’ to mankind.

    Those Messages are like envoys of a nation to another nation. Changing those envoys from time to time does not change the constitution of the nation they represent or the foreign policy of that nation. This fact has been firmly established in the Qur’an itself thus: “The Messenger of Allah (Muhammad) believes in what has been revealed to him from his Lord; and every true believer also believes in Allah, His Angels, His revealed Books and His Messengers.

    We do not discriminate against anyone of them (those Messengers) as they say we hear and obey (the contents of the revelation). Oh God! We seek your forgiveness. To You is our return.” Q. 3:285-286.

     

    Discipline

    It is evident that true Muslims are not known for maligning any Prophet or genuinely revealed ‘BOOKS’ that are devoid of traces of human tampering. Right from its very first day of revelation, the Qur’an has come with undeniable proof.

    But it takes only a divinely cleansed heart to comprehend such proof and acknowledge its authenticity. If anything, it is the Qur’an itself that should be called the master proof of all other celestial messages that preceded it.

    The Qur’an is the final divine revelation which has no human interference or tampering in any form. And that is why this sacred Book does not harbour any contradiction like most other books.

    Neither Prophet Muhammad, who brought this Sacred Book to mankind, nor any of his companions (or disciples), had a say in its contents.

    The Book contains no chapters or verses according to anybody. And unlike some other books, no one speaks in the Qur’an on behalf of Allah in the name of revelation. Even the personal expressions of Prophet Muhammad which are meant to explain the contents of the Qur’an and called  Hadith cannot to be mingled with the verses of the Qur’an despite his endowed divine inspirations.

    And where such expressions seem to contradict any part of the Qur’an they automatically become superseded by the contents of the Qur’an.

     

    The mirror of life

    Qur’an is the extraordinary compendium in which the activities of man from the very beginning of human existence to the end of human life are chronicled. It is the eternally concrete ‘MIRROR’ through which the descendants of Adam and Hawau can see life in its past, its present and its near and far future. This ‘MIRROR’ is the spectacle that heals the blind, the natural manure that fertilizes the human brain and the greatest treasure in the possession of mankind.

    For the rightly guided mind, the Qur’an is the eye with which to see; the ear with which to hear and the sense with which to reason.

    It is the bridge across the valleys of life; the insurance against any satanic damnation; the passport with which to obtain permanent divine visa for salvation and the only reliable redeemer of mankind from the evil machinations of this ephemeral world.

    For any divinely tamed mind therefore, life begins and ends with the Qur’an, Allah’s own tradition and the only authentic fountain from which man can draw and sip the living spring of wisdom. The sense that reasons with the Qur’an makes no mistake.

    Any mind that thinks with the Qur’an can never be devilled. Any eye that sees with the Qur’an can never be blind. Any tongue that talks with the Qur’an can never stammer. Any power that genuinely rules with the Qur’an can never fall.

    Meanwhile, the Almighty Allah warns in this glorious Book (the Qur’an) thus: “But whosoever deviates from My guidance, verily for him is life of subjugation and We shall raise him up a blind person on the Day of resurrection” (Q. 20: 124).

     

    Controversy

    There is a raging controversy among Muslim scholars over the first and last revelations in the Qur’an. Much as this controversy is unwarranted, it may be necessary to clear the coast here (without claiming authority) if only for the purpose of authenticating history in its normal perspective.

    It is an incontrovertible consensus that the first revealed chapter in the Qur’an is Suratul ‘Alaq (Chapter of the Clot). But the very first revelation reaching Prophet Muhammad (SAW) through Angel Jubril in 610 CE when he was 40 years old, was ‘BASMALAH’ (In the name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful) which precedes every chapter in the Qur’an except one (Suratut-Tawbah). Basmalah is not just a whole verse in Suratul Fatihah, it is the very first verse in that chapter of the Qur’an that was revealed twice in the duration of the Qur’anic revelations. That chapter which is tagged ‘MOTHER of the BOOK’ was first revealed in Makkah and again in Madinah.

     

    The last revelation

    As for the last revelation in the Qur’an, majority of Nigerian Muslim scholars believe that it is chapter 5, verse 3 of the Qur’an which says: ”Today, I have perfected your religion for you and completed my favour on you. And, I am pleased with Islam for you as religion”.

    That verse of the Qur’an that was revealed to Prophet Muhammad at ‘Arafah while he was performing his farewell Hajj in 632 CE couldn’t have been the last revelation because it came about 81 days before the demise of the Prophet (SAW).

    Rather, authentic research confirms that another revelation came about nine days before the Prophet’s sickness and eventual demise. This can be found in Qur’an 2: 281 which says: “And fear the day when you shall all return to Allah; the day when every soul shall be requited according to its desert and none shall be wronged”.

    That is the Qur’an for you, the Diary of life for those seeking divine guidance and the Mirror of life for those expecting Allah’s equanimity on earth and His eternal pleasure in the Hereafter. Whatever is in human possession beyond the Qur’an is mere ephemerality that will end up with its possessor in vanity.

     

    Conclusion

    With the closing session of the 34th edition of National Competition of Qur’an Recitation in Lagos tomorrow (Saturday, January 4), ‘The Message’ column hereby joins millions of Muslims around the world, who have been watching the glorious event, in congratulating the cerebral contestants, the dedicated organisers, the committed stakeholders and the faithful guests who participated in making that historic occasion a success.

    We pray Allah to further shower His interminable blessings upon you all with His eternal guidance and protection against diabolism of Satan and his evil archers among humans and Jinn. AMIN!

  • From cradle to crown

    By Segun Gbadegeshin

    Despite the uncertainty of our world, certain outcomes are predictable. The first born of the Queen of England will succeed her as king while his son is next in line. North Korea’s dictator Kim Jong Un succeeded his father, just as Bashir Assad did in Syria. And children of wealthy parents are more likely to have a head start in life, though how they turn out is not predictable.

    How about the prospects of a baby born to parents who cannot afford the luxuries of life; a baby whose cradle is a manger; whose father almost rejected him as illegitimate? What is the chance of such a baby becoming a crown-wearing king?

    That was the implausible story of Jesus Christ! With the manger as his cradle at birth, depending on others for sustenance, and even resting finally in another man’s tomb, our Lord rose to become the king of the universe. How did this happen? Surely, he had David, the anointed king of Israel, as ancestor. But he was at least 28 generations removed from David. The thought of Joseph, his earthly father, becoming a successor of Herod was a remote one. How did it happen? We could try a few approaches to answering this question.

    God’s original plan for humankind in the Garden of Eden was for them to become the controller of the universe. Our model was Christ’s stilling of the storm on the sea. But while God made us like Himself, we deviated from His original plan and lost the lordship of the earth. We became subject to the forces of nature, which we were created to control.  Humans lost the garden and became subject to supernatural forces.

    But God is merciful and he would not let his anger linger forever. Therefore, he looked to His creation through Abraham, His faithful servant, whom He promised to bless, a promise fulfilled with the birth of Isaac when Abraham was 100 years old. Then, God tested Abraham’s faith by calling on him to sacrifice his only son through whom he had been promised many blessings. And when Abraham obeyed, we had the inkling of the blessings to humankind in his confident assertion that “God will provide.”

    God provided a lamb in place of Isaac. But it was also a declaration of God’s intention to provide a sacrificial lamb in person of Jesus Christ. This declaration was further confirmed to David, descendant of Abraham through Judah in 1 Chronicle 17: 11-14: “I will raise up after you your descendant, who is one of your own sons, and I will establish his kingdom. He will build a house for me and I will establish his throne forever. I will be a father to him and he will be a son to me…I will appoint him over my house and my kingdom forever, and his throne will be established forever.” While Solomon was the immediate subject of this promise, we also know that the reign of Jesus was the ultimate promise. And just as Isaac did not struggle with Abraham, Christ did not struggle with God. Abraham’s blessing was through Isaac. Jesus’s blessing is everlasting.

    Again, even after he volunteered to run this end for his father, Jesus could have developed cold feet and reneged on his promise. He didn’t, marking the beginning of a journey from heavenly glory to earthly humiliation. He was tempted in the wilderness when Satan “took Him up and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world in what must have been a difficult situation. The devil said to Him: “I will give you their splendor and all this authority, because it has been given over to me, I can give it to anyone I want; if you, then, will worship me, all will be yours” (Luke 4: 5-7).

    How tempting! How attractive! Many of us will fall into that kind of temptation. What does it take? Attraction to the satisfaction of our material desires! But what did Jesus say to Satan? ‘It is written: “Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only” (Luke 4: 8). If Jesus had succumbed to the temptation to deny his father and accept Satan’s offer of worldly glory, that would have been the end of his mission and ministry, and the end of his glorious reign. What about the humiliation he suffered in the hands of those he had come to save, and the persecution, including hanging on a tree, as a cursed man?

    It is the combination of all these that earned Jesus the crown and the kingdom. It is the meaning of Christ’s journey from cradle to crown. The all-merciful God, desiring our good, took on the form of a human being, was born as baby Jesus by a virgin of humble background, and grew up materially unimpressive but contented. As a model of divine excellence, he went about doing good yet suffered persecution in the hands of those whom he desired to redeem, and was crucified like a common criminal. But he died and resurrected and was taken into glory in his eternal kingdom. With his victory, he earned the crown of glory and a mandate to judge the world. This is the message of Christmas. It is to this Christ’s kingdom that we have the grace of being called.

    Yet, there is no doubt that, anyway we look at it, our contemporary world appears more like the kingdom of Satan than the kingdom of Christ. Look around and see the triumph of the devil in many areas of our society: cultism, gangsterism, kidnapping, money rituals, terrorism, parental rape, corruption, etc. Even the Church has an inglorious share in the reign of Satan as we hear stories of pastors engaging in rituals and sexual perversion. We must not fall into the temptation of the kingdom of the world. We must claim our membership of the kingdom of Christ.

    What is this kingdom like? What can we expect as members, subjects, and participants?

    Left to our wits, we are not qualified to enter the kingdom of God because it is not by works; it is only by God’s grace. And when chosen by grace, we are not to expect fun-fare on the way. Like Christ himself, we must expect to encounter many hardships. Jesus achieved kingship because he was victorious over Satan’s antics. He was master over worldly desires, as he subjected himself to the instructions of His Father.

    On the narrow path that leads to the kingdom, we must expect a bumpy ride. Therefore, we need His companionship, which He assures us if we faithfully brace ourselves with His words at all times, as David habitually did. (Psalm 119:11) Nonetheless, kingdom members need the mutual support of one another.

    How do we as members of Christ’s kingdom relate to one another? With love or with malice in our hearts? But He commanded us in John 15: 12 to “love one another as I have loved you.” And in John 17: 21-22, He prayed to his Father that He may keep His followers as one: “May they all be one, as you, Father, are in me and I am in you. May they also be one in us…I have given them the glory that you gave me. May they be one as we are one.”

    How do we present ourselves to those who are outside the grace of membership of the Kingdom so that they see Christ in us and through us and decide that they want to be part of the Kingdom? Do we have time for those who need our succour and help? Or do we simply see ourselves as spiritual beings who don’t need to be bogged down by things of the world, including those who need our help?

    I pray that God may help His redeemed ones, who are destined by His grace to ascend from the cradle of sin to the throne of grace, to do His will as members of the Kingdom of the God of Justice.

    • Text of an address to Alafia Baptist Church, Mt. Rainier, Maryland, USA, on December 22, 2019. Merry Christmas!
  • Welcoming Sultan to Southwest

    By Femi Abass

    Today, all national and international roads lead to Lagos, the main hub of Nigeria’s economy. In that State of Excellence, a grandiose event of historic remembrance that will be watched live on different cable network electronic media globally takes place. The event is being graced by the President General of Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) and Sultan of Sokoto, His Eminence, Dr. Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar as Special Royal Guest.

    The President and Commander-in-Chief of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, His Excellency,  Muhammadu Buhari is expected to be the Special Guest of Honour at the occasion while the 4th Republic’s pioneer Governor of Lagos State, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the Jagaban Borgu, will be the Chairman.

    Other high caliber guests expected at the event include some serving State Governors, foreign delegates and Ambassadors as well as a galaxy of distinguished personalities across the continent of Africa.

    The occasion is for the 34th National Qur’an Recitation Competition, the formal opening of which will be declared today. Participants in the event will consist of the representatives of all states of the Federation.

     

    Sultan’s Attendance

    The attendance of this occasion by Sultan Abubakar is a confirmation of the fact that this millennial Sultan is rather of Nigeria as a country and not just of Sokoto as often cited in the media. Looking at the random itinerary of His Eminence very carefully and the intention behind that itinerary, no sensible person will dispute the fact that he is truly of the nation and not of a particular region. Ever since he assumed office in 2006, this Sultan has had cause to touch virtually every part of Nigeria repeatedly not only to ascertain the unity of the Muslim Ummah but also to ensure peaceful coexistence of all citizens irrespective of their tribes and religions. Even in the past three months, he has visited the Southwest alone about five times. He was in Ondo, Ekiti, Oyo, Ogun and Lagos states for various events. And he visited some of those states twice or more within the period. Just yesterday, December 26, he was in Ibadan, Oyo State, where he attended the grand finale of Islamic Vacation Course (IVC) of the Muslim Students’ Society of Nigeria (MSSN). It was from there he moved to Lagos to attend today’s great event. In the history of Sultanate in Nigeria, no Sultan has ever been so dynamically committed to unity, peace and harmony.

     

    Who is this Sultan?

    Time flies. It has been 13 years since Sultan Abubakar, CFR, mni, ascended the Sultanate royal throne as the 20th Sultan. The specific historic date of his ascension was November 6, 2006. Until then, the lofty man’s name did not ring any bell in Nigeria. And he was probably not conscious of the royal blood in him. If he was ever conscious of that at all, his humble nature did not reflect it. But the thinking of man is quite different from the will of Allah. And when the thinking of man clashes with the will of Allah, the latter automatically prevails.

     

    His ascension to the throne

    For Sultan  Abubakar, ascending the throne of the great Sokoto Caliphate was like the rise of the sun ‘anon meridian’. Whenever it beams its rejuvenating rays over the world, all the stars in the galaxy take their bow with reverence. History and man are like Siamese twins. The one cannot do without the other. History makes man just as man makes history. And the reciprocal baton continues to change hands between them as long as they mutually remain in existence.

    Thus, the sudden emergence of a 50-year-old Brigadier General called Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar as the successor to the exalted throne of the great Sokoto Empire without controversy in 2006 came as a surprise to many Nigerians. His own father, Sultan Saddiq Abubakar ascended the same throne at the age of 37. Surely, the name ‘Muhammad Sa’ad’ played a significant role in the emergence of its bearer as Sultan.

     

    The mystery in name

    There is something mysterious about name which humanity is yet to comprehend fully. A puzzling secret seems to exist in the vocabulary of life which sticks to every man like a second skin. That secret, pearled in the yoke of name, is an effective evidence of destiny in man. Our names are the light that glows at night to lighten up our ways towards the glare of the days through the threshold of life. And when the dawn comes to render the glowing light ineffective, the bearer bows out into the recluse of death leaving behind an indemnified signature on the sands of time. This was the case with Prophet Muhammad (SAW), the greatest man that ever lived on the surface of the earth. Even as an unlettered son of Arabia who was born in an era of blatant ignorance, Prophet Muhammad (SAW) introduced into the world, an unprecedented civilisation that opened the eyes of humanity to everlasting guidance.

     

    Qur’anic backing

    In recognition of Prophet Muhammad’s human exemplariness, the Almighty Allah said of him in Q 33: 21 thus: “You (Muslims) have a good example in Allah’s Apostle for anyone who looks to Allah and the Last Day and remembers Him always”.

    That verse of the Qur’an is a divine template for all rightly guided Muslims in the conduct of their common lives as groups and communities just as it is in their personal mannerisms as individuals.

     

    Peculiarities in names

    Sultan’s first name is Muhammad which he bears in emulation of the Prophet of Islam. His second name is Sa’ad meaning ‘Good ‘Luck’ which makes him a name-sake of one of Prophet Muhammad’s companions (Sa’d Bn Abu Waqqas) who was a great Army General of Islam. And his (Sultan’s) surname is Abubakar which means ‘father of youths’, an inherited name which he shares with the first Caliph in Islam (Abubakr Siddiq). In every one of these names is a profound meaning with profound influence on the personality and conduct of the current Sultan.

    As an Army General, like Sa’d Bn Abi Waqqas, Sultan is demonstrating the courage of a brave leader. As the father of the youths, like Abu Bakr, he is bridging the gap between leadership and follower-ship by breathing a breeze of hope into Nigerian Muslim youths from time to time.

     

    Identity of a leader

    A leader is known, neither by the aura of the office he occupies, nor by the enormity of the power wielded in that office. Rather, a leader is known by the magnanimity with which he exercises the power entrusted to him and the humility he demonstrates in his interaction with the people. This is the lesson that Prophet Muhammad’s leadership taught Muslim rulers in one of his Hadith when he said: “A powerful person is not the one who can suppress others (with the enormity of power or instrumentality of office) but the one who can resist the temptation to use such power by whim”.

    Sultan Abubakar seems to have exemplified this prophetic teaching as a Muslim leader and a faithful one for that matter. And through his humble interaction with all Muslims irrespective of tribal or geographical boundaries, he has become the first Sultan to create a strong feeling of a united Muslim Ummah in Nigeria under a competent leadership.

     

    Philosophers’ assertion

    Philosophers who assert that every new century has a way of producing a great leader may be right after all. The example of Sultan Abubakar, is a manifestation of that assertion. Ever since he assumed the exalted royal office in 2006, this great man has convincingly exhibited all the qualities of genuine leadership by all standards. Every statement he has made socially, religiously or politically and every action he has taken privately or publicly has proved to be a school from which all well-meaning people of Nigeria have learnt one positive lesson or another.

     

    History and man

    History and man are like Siamese twins. The one cannot do without the other. History makes man just as man makes history. The symbiotic relationship of history and man, which is not in doubt, was reconfirmed in Sokoto 13 years ago (November, 2016) when a galaxy of well-meaning men and women from all walks of life assembled to say ‘we are here to bear witness’.

    That was on the occasion of His Eminence’s ascension to the royal throne of the Sultanate when he was unanimously chosen by the Sokoto king makers and crowned as the Sultan following the demise of his immediate predecessor, the former Sultan Muhammad Macido.

    It should be recalled that His Eminence shares birth day and month with a great son of Ogun State, the late Bashorun MKO Abiola (May the Almighty Allah repose his soul in eternal bliss). That date is August 24. The only difference in the dates of birth of these two great men is the year in which they were born. While MKO’s birth year was 1937, that of his Eminence was 1956.

     

    His pedigree

    Before the official emergence of Nigeria as a country through an amalgamation of certain tribes and regions, Sokoto Empire was beyond today’s Nigeria. It consisted of a vast area of today’s Niger Republic, Mali, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Benin Republic and some parts of today’s Togo.

    However, with the partition of Africa into various colonial entities in 1884, the Sultanate of Sokoto became drastically reduced with a large chunk of its territory falling under various colonial authorities.

     

    His intellectual origin

    In the days of Uthman Dan Fodio and his brother, Abdullah Bn Fodio, the main glory of Sokoto Empire was knowledge. And that became its legacy for the descendants on the Sultanate line. It is on record that Clapperton, a British colonial agent, once had an interesting intellectual encounter with the first Sultan, Sheikh Muhammad Bello, the son of Usman Dan Fodio in 1824. After that encounter which came in form of debate, Clapperton had to admit thus: “He (Muhammad Bello) continued to ask me several other theological questions, until I was obliged to confess myself not sufficiently versed in religious subtleties to resolve those knotty points”.

    And, when Clapperton returned to Sokoto two years later (1826) and presented Sultan Bello with a copy of Arabic Euclid, he was shocked to learn that his host already possessed one. Both Muhammad Bello and his father, Usman Dan Fodio, engaged in such complex linguistic, theological and legal studies that the one had 97 books to his credit while the other had 93.

     

    Education and literacy

    When some Europeans first came to our own part of Africa in the 16th century, they found that the most literate part of what is called Nigeria, today, was the north. And that was because Islam had reached that part of the country with its Arabic literacy since the 11th century. The British colonialists confirmed this when they arrived in the 19th century.

    The only reason why those colonialists did not retain Arabic literacy in the north was that they did not understand it. If they had not ignored Arabic literacy, the north would not have been perceived as a backward region educationally today. At least by 1919, when the southern part of Nigeria was just beginning to embrace literacy with some seriousness in less than a score of schools that were then in existence, the north already had about 25,000 schools where various subjects were taught and learned in Arabic language.

     

    Royal awareness

    Immediately after ascending the throne, Sultan Abubakar became very much aware that as Sultan of Sokoto he was wearing two crowns. One is that of an Emperor which the royal office symbolises. The other is that of Amirul Muminin (Commander of Nigerian Muslim faithful). And as Amirul Muminin, he knew that interacting with and consulting the various Muslim communities in Nigeria, in order to carry them along in decision making at the apex Islamic body called Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA), was a sine qua non.

    Like any other thing modern, this millennial Sultan is modern by all standards. He knows that the link between the Sultanate of Sokoto and the Nigerian Muslim Ummah is Islam. He knows that without Islam even the Sultanate of Sokoto could not have come into existence. He knows that he needs the genuine recognition and cooperation of all Nigerian Muslims to function effectively as Amirul Muminin.

     

    Functions

    By his activities and functions so far, Dr. Muhammad Abubakar has indicated to Nigerian Muslims that reformation of the NSCIA is a necessity to suit the modern day requirements for the growth and development of Islam. He knows that for that apex body to be effective, such reformation should take the form of Renaissance. Therefore, as soon as he assumed office, he put both the NSCIA and the Sultanate on the internet to enable all educated Muslims have access to their leader. And as an exemplary leader, he demonstrates his leadership prowess by personally possessing mastering fingers on the computer.

     

    Triple heritage

    Today’s Muslim generation is passing through a paved way without taking note of it. This 20th Sultan of is of triple heritage. As the President-General of NSCIA, he is a religious leader. By virtue of his national royal status as the Chairman of all Nigerian traditional rulers, he is a political leader. And, as a retired Brigadier-General from the Nigerian Army, he is a military leader. Thus, his triple heritage is complete.

     

    His royal agenda

    In what looked like his royal agenda in respect of the NSCIA, when he emerged as Sultan, His Eminence rolled out, certain fundamental programmes to the utter delight of all Nigerian Muslims.

     

    The programmes

    When presenting those programmes at an interfaith conference, he said: “….we initiated, as we had done for the Jama’atu Nasril-Islam (JNI), a thorough review of the activities of the  NSCIA and an extensive reform of its structures”.

    “It is our firm belief that these reforms are not only desirable but necessary to reposition the Council to play its strategic role as the apex Islamic body in the country and to respond, effectively and meaningfully, to the challenges facing the Muslim Ummah in a multi-cultural and multi-religious society. We have had extensive consultations over a couple of years and have received very useful inputs on the reform agenda from all the constituent bodies of the Council. Our strategic objectives in this exercise had been and shall remain the following:

    *The promotion of Muslim Unity and Solidarity to accord the Ummah the ability to speak with one voice and to act and work together for the advancement of Islam.

    *The development of Education and Economic Enterprise, to enable the Muslim Ummah play an active role in the socio-economic life of Nigeria.

    *Promotion of peace and religious harmony both within the Muslim Communities and between the adherents of Islam and Christianity.

    *Establishment of effective linkage with Government, at local, state and federal levels, to safeguard the interest of the Ummah and to build consensus on those vital issues that bind us together as a nation….”

     

    Hope and wish

    “It is therefore our hope that as we bring this reform process to its logical conclusion, we will receive the support and patronage of the entire Muslim Ummah as well as the co-operation of all stakeholders, including state governments and indeed the Government of the Federation”.

    “Finally we must all work hard to limit the influence of wealth in our society and to support those values that promote social responsibility, excellence and hard work”.

     

    Epilogue

    That is Sultan Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar, a leader who knows the problems of his followers and associates with them in solving those problems. Probably without a leader like him, the Nigerian Muslim Ummah would have gone irredeemably asunder.

    “…..Fa amma bi ni’mati Rabbika fa haddith”.

    Long live the Sultan! Long live the NSCIA! Long live the Nigerian Muslim Ummah! Long live Nigeria!

     

  • On this day

    By Segun Gbadegesin

    Seventy-four years ago today, I landed in the open arms of my parents, grandparents and the extended family. Like any parent, they prayed and hoped for the best for their new son. They were not wealthy; but they were hardworking and determined to invest all they could in the future of their baby.

    Of course, wishes are not horses. As subjects of an imperial power many nautical miles away, my parents were limited in their dreams, which had to be tailored to the desires and policies of the metropolis. In 1945, those colonial desires and policies were hardly in favor of the development or progress of the colonial enclave, which they had named Nigeria, or of its subjects. Indeed, colonial desires and policies were directed more towards the development of the masters’ homeland and the fighting of their wars. Therefore, turning parental wishes into desired realities was always going to be a hard nut to crack, unless something gave.

    Fortunately, our ancestors were not compliant subjects. They were not mumus. While my immediate ancestors were not literate in the master’s language, they summoned their heritage of commonsense. They knew that what you would not accept as a wealthy person, you should reject when you are poor. In 1916, Okeho rebelled against the unacceptable policies of government. Predictably, they were quickly overrun, but they had effectively initiated a movement that was unstoppable.

    Pan-Nigerian nationalism, predicated on the core values of the West, including freedom, justice and equality, challenged the practice of colonialism and demanded constitutional reforms towards independence. Pursuant to a robust debate over what structure an independent Nigeria should have, they settled on federalism as the best form for a multinational state that it was and still is. It was prophetic. The adoption of a federal system six years after my birth turned the fortune of the country around in just a period of nine years before independence in 1960.

    I was one of the beneficiaries of the nationalist struggles and their adoption of the federal system, which opened many doors of opportunity in education and employment that offered my children a head start in life. But the struggle has become generational, and, mine has had to pick up the baton. For while, my generation took for granted those opportunities, my children’s generation had to navigate a different and hostile terrain due to disruptions in the system.

    Fanon succinctly observed that “each generation must, out of relative obscurity, discover its mission, fulfill it, or betray it”. But our destinies are inseparable. What affects our children impacts us. As our parents saw their joy in our achievement, we do not just share in the trials and tribulation of our children in a system that appears rigged against them, we engage in active struggle toward the realization of our dreams for them. Who can blame us? It is natural.

    The naturalness of desiring and acting towards the realization of good outcomes for our offspring, especially when we are convinced that their condition is due to an unjust system, cannot be faulted. But even here, the push for active involvement has to be more than a self-regarding one. There are, after all, many in my generation who simply find alternative routes for the success of their wards without lifting a finger in the general struggle for change.

    In All the Way: Serving with Conscience, I appealed to the pang of conscience, in discussing my own choice to be involved in this continuing struggle. It couldn’t have been pure self-interest because I was at a place where my children had the best opportunities to explore their future, and they did. Indeed, at the height of the struggle, I used to tell cynical folks that I was not interested in politics or positions, and many couldn’t understand why others and I would be so involved.

    But as I explained in All the Way: Serving with Conscience, “I had a childhood that oriented me in the direction of positive action. I had an education that prepared me for activism in support of just causes. I was morally wired and politically activated. Therefore, it was not difficult for me to commit my professional life to the struggle for the upliftment of motherland. Surely, I was free to live my life in peace without getting involved in any form of activism. I could focus on my professional life and shun the urge to confront evil and social injustice. And I could justify such a course by reference to the futility of any such engagement or confrontation. I did not choose that course because I felt palpably the pang of conscience with its incessant taunting and challenge to action.

    “I have always been in bondage of conscience. It is no wonder that I chose the study of philosophy. I was most assuredly attracted to the field because of its synchronization with my pre-career convictions. In Philosophical Consciencism, Kwame Nkrumah, the hero of Ghana’s independence and for much his life, the unrelenting crusader for the freedom of Africa on the continent and in the Diaspora, aptly observed that for an African student of philosophy the subject could not have the same meaning that it has for an average Western student.  In the West, while the struggle for freedom and genuine democracy may still be said to be an ongoing process, in Africa at the turn of the 21st century, it has hardly begun. Therefore, for its African student, philosophy must live up to its Socratic meaning as the gadfly, the conscience of humanity. If philosophy truly responds to experience, my career orientation has not been an exception.”

    Why have we not, as a nation, had a common awareness and determination on this matter? Does conscience work differently in different human beings? Is it then not a good guide to conduct? Is it more productive then to rely on God, Allah, or Orisa, etc. as the source of our duty on justice and fairness? Since we can trace the origin of conscience to the creator who presumably instills it in his creatures, might it be an effective alternative to listen directly to God rather than conscience whose dictates might be misunderstood or misinterpreted?

    The only problem here is that as real as we take God, Allah, Orisa, etc. to be in our lives, and as much as we proclaim our dependence on this reality, we have, through our conduct, shown ourselves to be nothing more than deceivers and hypocrites, disobedient children and rebellious servants. We do not act justly. We hate faithfulness. And we are haughty and arrogant beings, always looking out for self.

    I believe strongly that our common humanity imposes on us the responsibility to take a stand in defence of freedom and promotion of justice without counting the cost. I am convinced that those who do are truly free, and those among them who have paid the supreme sacrifice are immortalized in our memories as their spirits challenge us “to act justly, to love faithfulness, and to walk humbly with (our) God” (Michal 6: 8).

    On this seventy-fourth anniversary of my birth, I pay tribute to those who have become ancestors promoting the cause of justice. I remember, in particular, Chief Ajibola Ige, a true hero who was gunned down eighteen years ago this Monday. That a human being suffered the deprivation of life in such a manner in his own home was a terrible stain on humanity. That as Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the nation, his murder has remained unsolved since 2001 is a sad reflection on the place of this nation in the comity of nations. It simply shows that we do not value human life. That is why many more lives have been lost since his, and we do not appear to care!

    Chief Ige lost his life in the battle for the triumph of progressive over retrogressive ideals in the governance of the nation. A progressive government has been in power since 2015. I am sure it is working actively to reopen the case of the former Attorney General and Minister of Justice. We are waiting for result.

    • For comments, send SMS to 08111813080
  • MUSWEN’S Joint Conference with NUTREND

    Preamble

    IT was another historic occasion at the University of Ibadan (UI) where an International Conference was jointly held on the ‘Biography of Prophet Muhammad’ (SAW) by the Muslim Ummah of Southwest Nigeria (MUSWEN) and Nusret Educational and Cultural Co. Ltd. of Turkey last Wednesday.

    The theme of the Conference was: “Impact of the Exemplary Leadership Style of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) on Inter-Ethnic and Inter-Religious Harmony”.

    Attendance

    The well attended occasion chaired by the pioneer Executive Secretary of MUSWEN, Professor D. O. S. Noibi, was specially graced by the Governor of the State of Osun, His Excellency, Alhaji Gboyega Oyetola who was accompanied by a retinue of Commissioners and his Chief of Staff, Alhaji Abdullah Binuyo.

    Although the President-General of Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) and Sultan of Sokoto, His Eminence, Dr. Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar, CFR, mni, who was to be the Special Guest of Honour at the occasion could not attend, he was, nevertheless, eminently represented with an aura of royalty.

    The Turkish team at the conference was led by the General Manager of Nusret Educational and Cultural Ltd Huseyin Baydar; President of UFUK DIALOGUE FOUNDATION, Dr. Kamil Kemanci and Mr. Nevzat Savas, Editor-in-Chief Hera Magazine (who was unavoidably absent)\ Alhaji Yakub Aliagan and a host of others.

     

    Presentation of Papers

    Several academic papers were presented at the Conference mostly by academic scholars from different parts of the world, including Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Africa. The Keynote Address of the conference was succinctly delivered by MUSWEN’s new Executive Secretary, Professor Muslih Tayo Yahya while the occasion was ably coordinated by UI’s Head of Department of Arabic and Islamic Studies, Professor Lateef Wole Abbas, who chaired the Local Organizing Committee (LOC) of the Conference.

     

    Reminder

    The theme of that   Conference was a cute reminder of an article entitled “Islam’s Charter with Christianity” published in this column some time ago.  The article was about a covenant of peaceful co-existence which Prophet Muhammad (SAW) signed on behalf of Islam with Christian monks in protection of Christianity.

     

    Excerpt

    An excerpt from the referred article is as follows:

    “For many Nigerian charlatans who claim to be clerics and preach to their congregations with instigation of hate speeches and unbridled religious hostility, there are many sources from which to learn a lesson. One of such sources is history which is globally recognized as a great teacher of teachers. Without history, there can neither be any experience for man nor any template for his future plans. It is on the fertile soil of history that the growth of man and the development of his society are firmly planted.

     

    Symbiotic Relationship

    Just as history makes man so does man makes history. But the impact of the latter outweighs that of the former by far in the trend of human civilization. However, the symbiotic relationship of both history and man is what keeps the world going.

     

    Makers of History

    In its characteristic nature as a teacher, history has made many people who continue to depend generationally on its platform for memorable footprint on the sands of time. On the other hand, there are also people who have made history to the benefit of other people even long after their demise.

    However, the greatest maker of human history, as universally acknowledged, is the greatest human being that ever lived. That human being was an unlettered Arab Prophet called Muhammad the son of Abdullah and Aminah, who clearly distinguished between literacy and education with his own exemplariness and thereby opened the eyes of the whole world to the fact that literacy is just an instrument for documenting and preserving knowledge for posterity.  And that is one of the factors that make Prophet Muhammad (SAW) the greatest man that ever lived.

     

    Michael Hart’s Book

    Through a famous book entitled ‘The 100: A Ranking of the Most influential Persons in History’ published in 1977, by a Jewish American astrophysicist and scholar, Michael Hart,  the consciousness of the contemporary world was drawn to the uniqueness of an unlettered man who turned out to be the most educated human being ever in history. It was in that book that its author, Michael Hart, named Prophet Muhammad (SAW) as the greatest man that ever lived.  And since the publication of the historic book, no other author or scholar of note has ever come up with any acknowledged research work that can counter Michael Hart’s sense of judgment by providing a convincing alternative to the latter’s axiomatic judgment.

    Thus, contrary to cynics’ baseless propaganda against Islam and Prophet Muhammad (SAW), out of sheer envy, it was this great Prophet of Islam that taught mankind the act of religious tolerance and accommodation.

     

    The Historic Charter

    In a formal recognition of Jesus Christ as his predecessor and fellow Apostle, Prophet Muhammad (SAW) signed a charter with some Christian pontiffs in  628 CE and the charter remains valid till today. The signing of that charter by the great Prophet was also clear evidence that Islam recognizes authentic Christianity as a divine religion.

    It was in that year (628 CE which was the 6th year of Hijrah), that a Christian delegation from St. Catherine’s Monastery travelled to the city of Madinah to meet Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and seek from him protection of the Islamic government for Christianity under his command. The real objective was to elicit the support of the Islamic government in ensuring protection for the then Christians against the aggression of the Persian Empire. St. Catherine’s Monastery is the world’s oldest Monastery located at the foot of Mount Sinai which has a huge collection of Christian manuscripts second only to those of the Vatican City and known as a world heritage site).

     

    The Contents of the Charter

    In response to the request of the Christian representatives cited above, Prophet Muhammad (SAW) granted them a written charter of rights as follows: “This is a message from Muhammad the son of Abdullah serving as a covenant to those who adopt Christianity, near and far that we (Muslims) are with them. Verily, I and all the servants of Allah, as well as the helpers of Islam, hereby make promise to defend Christians because they are my citizens and by God, I stand out against anything that displeases them.

    No compulsion is to be on them (concerning their way of worship). Neither are their judges to be removed from their jobs nor their monks from their monasteries.

    No one should destroy a house of their religion or damage it or loot it. Whoever violates this has breached Allah’s covenant with mankind and disobeyed His Apostle. Verily, Christians are my allies and have my secure charter against all they hate.

    No one should force them to fight for a course in which they have no belief or compel them to migrate against their wish. Neither is the sacredness of their covenant to be violated nor their Monasteries to be disrespected.

    And if any damage should happen to their Monasteries by chance, they must not be prevented from repairing them. No Muslim should disobey this charter till the Last Day (i.e. end of the world)”.

     

     Before the Charter

    Long before the Prophet’s migration from Makkah to Madinah, a Prophetic revelation came to him in 616 CE to confirm the brotherhood of Islam and Christianity.

    That revelation which formed a whole chapter entitled ‘The Chapter of Rome’ in the Qur’an partly reads thus: “Rome, (the nation of the Christian Greeks) has been defeated in a neighbouring land.

    But after their defeat, they shall (themselves) gain victory within a few years. Allah is the Supreme Commander before and after.

    On that day (when they become victorious), the believers (Muslims and Christians) will rejoice in Allah’s help. Allah gives victory to whoever He wills. He is Mighty and Merciful. That is Allah’s promise; He never reneges on His promise” (Q. 30: 1-5).

    And true to that divine revelation, the Roman Empire surprisingly defeated the Persian Empire to the ecstasy of the Muslims just nine years after the Qur’anic chapter was revealed. Besides, it will be recalled that the name of Jesus Christ is mentioned more than 37 times in the Glorious Qur’an giving more details of his birth and disappearance more vividly than can be found in the Bible.

    Also a whole chapter of the Qur’an is dedicated to Mary the mother of Jesus confirming her chastity and the miraculous birth of Jesus.

    It is only in the Qur’an that the report of how Jesus spoke as an infant was revealed. That chapter is called ‘The Chapter of Maryam (Mary). How else can the unity of religious mission from the unity of God be confirmed?

     

    Implications of the Charter

    By implication, the inalienability of the   privileges contained in the above charter remains irreversible from the primordial time to the contemporary time.

    Besides, one remarkable aspect of the charter is that it did not stipulate any condition for Christians to enjoy those privileges.

    It is because of that unprecedented charter that Muslims, all over the world, do not blame Christianity for any misdemeanor of a Christian or attack Christianity as a religion in their propagation of Islam as some Christians do against Islam particularly in Nigeria.

     

    Upholding the Charter

    In upholding that charter, the second Caliph in Islam, Umar Bn Khattab, refused to observe Muslim prayer (Salat) inside the Church of Jerusalem when he visited the area following the liberation of that region by the Islamic State from the Persian Empire in which Zoroastrianism (worshiping of fire) was the religion.

    On that historic occasion, the Church of Jerusalem had been cleared by some Muslim soldiers for the observance of Salat which Caliph Umar, as Head of State, was to lead.

    But when he was invited to lead the Salat, he simply declined and rather ordered the soldiers to find another place for Salat and keep the Church intact for the Christians to worship therein in their own way.

    He said he would not do what Prophet Muhammad (SAW) had prohibited before his demise. He then warned the Muslims who accompanied him never to convert Churches to Mosques for that would amount to religious aggression which was capable of breaching the Prophet’s charter with Christians.

     

    Read Also: Tinubu consoles NSCIA, MUSWEN on Islamic leader Babalola’s death

     

        Reciprocation

    Believing that being followers of Jesus Christ was enough a condition to enjoy the privileges contained in the above charter, Prophet Muhammad (SAW) assumed that the Christians, would be civilized enough to reciprocate that unprecedented gesture whenever and wherever they coexist with Muslims not only by tolerating the latter’s mode of worship and way of life but also by refraining from any naked or avowed act of provocation or disdain against them, which could precipitate a religious rancour.

    Another noticeable aspect of the charter is the Prophet’s silence on any payment by the protectorate Christians which was the general norm among nations in those days.

    Thus, that ‘Charter of Rights’ was a free gift. And from it the reason becomes clear why the Islamic State under the command of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) or any of his rightly guided companions or disciples who became Caliphs after his demise never crossed swords with any Christian group or nation throughout their regimes.

    If any wars like those of the crusades ever broke out centuries later between Christians and Muslims such could only be attributed either to a breach of the charter by ignorant adherents of one or both religions. And that does not have anything to do with the tenets of the two religions.

     

    Summary

    Judging by the contents of the papers presented at last Wednesday’s Conference at UI, it is evident that the aim of that conference was to emulate Prophet Muhammad (SAW) in using religion as an instrument of ventilating peace and harmony in Nigeria irrespective of the differences in faiths.

     

    Conclusion

    Religion is like an examination. Those who sit down to write it with blue ink must not turn themselves into examiners using red ink to mark it. Paradise is Allah’s own domain. He admits whoever He wishes into it. And this is done not by sheer mortal charlatans’ recommendation. Only the Almighty Allah who chose our parents for us without our knowledge before we came into this world and who knows where each of us would finally be buried has the final say on everybody’s destination.

     

  • A national nightmare

    Segun Gbadegesin

    State Security Service (SSS), aka Department of State Services (DSS), is a dreadful national nightmare. It earns this ignoble distinction alongside other security agencies. Two pertinent questions follow: What have we done to deserve this? What can we do about it?

    You could probably make sense of the strong-willed obsession of SSS with high handedness in a military regime. After all, the agency received its domestic intelligence-gathering mandate in the dark days of the military and could count on its absolute support against the interest of “bloody civilians”. But how does it fit in a democracy in which civilians are supposedly the indispensable stakeholders with the power of the ballot?

    It turns out that civilians have always had an overrated assessment of their power. At least, since 1999, DSS has not changed a bit as it has consistently proved itself a lover of AGIP, aka Any Government in Power. For at least two reasons, this should normally be a concern to political power holders.

    First is the obvious fact that what goes around comes around.  It always has. As I will remind us shortly, the present deriders, mockers and chief complainants against DSS excesses were once the chief supporters of the agency. By the same token, those who would now see no evil or hear no evil were once the most vocal objectors against the high-handedness of DSS. At best, then, many members of the political class have simply resigned themselves to the operational consistency of DSS in favoring any government in power, or at worst, they are simply hypocrites.

    Second, however, we are facing a crisis which is far greater than what individual political actors decide to think or belief. Equally, it is far more serious than what strength of character politicians decide to exhibit. It goes to the root of what we are as a constitutional republic founded on the rule of law which must determine our national security priorities and legitimize policy choices for their actualization.

    As we may recall, National Security Organization (NSO), the predecessor of SSS, was dissolved by the Babangida regime in 1986 when it had become a liability on government credibility, especially on the crucial issue of human rights. As one of the three emerging agencies, SSS was mandated to protect and defend the Federal Republic of Nigeria against domestic threats to security and to enforce the criminal laws. SSS is also responsible for protecting the President, his Vice, the leadership of the National Assembly, and governors, etc.

    Now, from the preceding paragraph, we may infer two closely related mandates: protecting and defending the Federal Republic of Nigeria and protecting the President and other elected officials. Presumably, some might choose to see the two functions as not just closely related but as identical. The president is the constitutionally recognized leader of government and, therefore, the face of the republic in and outside the country. Therefore, an agency with the mandate of the DSS might consider the President as identical with the republic.

    But he is not; because the president is not a king, but an elected leader who can be rejected at the polls. Since 1999, DSS, like other security agencies, including the Police, has unfortunately identified any incumbent with the State, and has done whatever it could to demonstrate its fealty to him, as if to the republic itself, and to see every opposing candidate as a pest to be extricated or a threat to be stopped.

    If we focus our sight to just the emergence of a strong two-party system since 2014, we have witnessed the frightening partisanship of the main internal security agency. In 2014, DSS in Osogbo arrested APC spokesman and two others in “Gestapo Style”. In 2014, after his suspension as CBN Governor, Mallam (now Emir) Lamido Sanusi was arrested by the SSS and his international passport seized because he was alleged to be aiding terrorists. He filed a suit against the agency and the court dismissed the charges and his passport was returned.

    Accusing the party of planning to clone INEC voting cards, more than 40 armed DSS officers raided APC Data Center in Lagos in November 2014 and arrested some staff of the center. It repeated the raid on December 2. Through its then spokesman, APC cried foul, complaining that “the lack of respect for a court order by an institution of state like the DSS has plumbed the depth of anomie, and shows that our democracy is in clear and present danger from anarchists.”  It further accused the DSS of acting “like an enforcement arm of the ruling party by constantly harassing the opposition.” That was five years ago this month. Instructively, the detained APC staff won victory at the court which ordered their release on the ground that no citizen can be detained for more than 48 hours without being charged to court.

    Now, has DSS changed since APC became the ruling party? Of course not. One of the first acts of impunity by the agency was the raid on the homes and arrest of some judicial officers in 2016. This was on the allegation that these judges, some of whom the National Judicial Council (NJC) had suspended from office and recommended to the President for dismissal, were guilty of corrupt practices.

    The NJC is the constitutional authority for the appointment and disciplining of judicial officers. DSS is expected to go through the Council with any concerns it receives from the public or from its own findings. and NJC is to investigate. In this case, however, DSS decided to act on its own, raiding and arresting the judicial officers.

    In a release, NJC viewed the action as a threat to the independence of the judiciary, while it explained the actions it took on reports that it received prior to the invasions, including suspension and recommendations of affected judges for dismissal. It insisted that NJC had never shielded any judicial officer who committed a misconduct and protested the action of DSS as “a denigration of the entire Judiciary, as an institution.”

    Perhaps the most blatant display of brutal force by the agency was its August 2018 invasion of the National Assembly when it barricaded the entrance gates and shut out members of NASS. The action was against the backdrop of power struggle between APC and PDP lawmakers and the fear of impeachment of the leadership who had just decamped to PDP. Though APC denied any prior knowledge of the incident, PDP wasn’t convinced.

    Acting President Yemi Osinbajo sacked the Director of SSS, Mallam Daura, and promised to deal with other security personnel involved with the “unauthorized takeover of the NASS” which he described as “a gross violation of constitutional order, rule of law and all accepted notions of law and order.” As I observed in a column at the time, it was a different time. By acting to distance the Presidency from the excesses of the DSS, Prof Osinbajo sought to renew the confidence of citizens in the institutional order of democratic governance.

    But subsequent developments have given us pause, and the constitution-driven gesture has not lasted long enough as the Sowore case has apparently demonstrated. The facts of the case are not obscure. A former presidential candidate ran his mouth, calling for revolution now. And there is pictorial evidence that he met with IPOB leader Kanu. And yes, he bragged that he wasn’t going to be silenced even after he was released on bail. Do all these justify indefinite detention? Can’t our judicial system be trusted to handle this? Why lionize a harmless gnat? And is APC, the progressive party of our dream now in cahoots with DSS? It is a sickening thought! Somebody please let my friends in the trenches fighting Abacha DSS understand my distress!

    Reflecting on DSS invasion of APC’s Data Center in 2015, a former governor and party leader had an idea. He reportedly recommended restructuring security agencies, including DSS. Upon victory, APC would place the agencies on First Line charge, and make their directorship positions term-bound so that only an agreement between the President and Senate can remove them from office. It’s about time!

  • Regulating hate speech

    TWO years ago, on this page, I addressed the question of “how the liberal state ought to deal with speech it considers inimical to its interest, including its unity and progress.” The impetus for that discussion was the first attempt by the government to enact a hate speech law. Apparently, that attempt was suspended. It has now been revived by a member of the leadership of the National Assembly.

    In the column titled, “Hate speech and the liberal state”, my focus was on the foundation of liberalism in the ideal of individual freedom which it prizes above anything else. It is the liberal creed defended by its foremost apostle, John Stuart Mill.

    For Mill, individuality is to be appreciated, valued, and respected because human beings are endowed with great potentials for outstanding moral choices. When society enables those potentials to be freely realized, the consequence is a community of great human beings who care for one another and for the community. On the other hand, when those potentials are wrecked by an overbearing social control, whether in the form of public opinion or legal imposition, the consequence for society is social dysfunction, including alienation and anomie.

    Thus, beside his view that individual freedom is an end-in-itself, Mill offered its promotion as instrumental to the end of social cohesion and social progress. This was why he decried the “likings and dislikings of society” as the determinants of the rules that individuals are supposed to follow. For, such likings and dislikings could be idiosyncratic at best, or at worst, inimical to social progress. Case in point: social dress codes. Mill offers a “very simple principle”:

    “The sole principle for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection…the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.”

    Mill specifically ruled out the personal good of individuals as a legitimate reason for subjecting them to social control.

    We may rightly respond that this is not the point of the regulation of speech, which may well conform with Mill’s principle because unregulated speech can harm other individuals as well as an entire society. Therefore, regulation of speech is not anti-liberal. A clear example is the case of declaring a false fire alarm in a crowded movie theater. Certainly, that kind of speech is subject to control because of its potential for disaster.

    This reality of varieties of speech-acts and the shades of gray between them is the conundrum that different societies have had to grapple with in their attempts to regulate speech. To be sure, only the extremists and anarchists would countenance not regulating a speech that would declare a false fire in a crowded theater. Even Mill acknowledges this as a disaster in the making. But, then, how far is too far? How narrow is too narrow?  How broad is too broad? Societies differ in this matter from the most liberal to the least.

    The liberal contention, as stipulated by Mill, is that the example we just cited is an isolated one, and not all opinions that have been subjected to social control belong to that category. What is decried is the coercion of opinion based on “the likings and dislikings” of society. Silencing the opinion expressed by individuals, no matter how noxious it is, is an illiberal device:

    “If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”

    Based on the belief that the clash of opinions in the marketplace of ideas promotes the truth, liberals oppose regulation of speech which could negate the benefits of such exchange. Still, doesn’t it depend on the content of the opinions? If you insist that the world is round and I insist that it is flat, we have a clash of opinions. With an open public debate, backed up with evidence on both sides, the truth will come out. No harm is done to society by the free exchange.

    To many, however, this insistence on the predominance of freedom is easily defended, in the abstract, as a philosophical position, provided one is not in a position of political responsibility. To these critics, there can be no absolute freedom and we must find a balance between considerations of social harmony and individual freedom. Hence the political responsibility of drawing the line, which falls on representatives of the people.

    But what about hate speech, which is defined as “threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice against a particular group, especially on the basis of race, religion, or sexual orientation.” Due to our demographics and political history, our society has been an open theater of hatred and bigotry since the beginning of the Nigerian experiment. Just as there are many nationalities in Nigeria, there are many more across Africa. The truth, however, is that while we would fraternize with the Twi and Akan of Ghana, Sudanese Nubians, and Malawian Chewas, our immediate neighbors within the Nigerian boundaries are mere objects of hate. We have picked up the trash that Rwanda dropped off on her way to political development.

    George Lakoff, a retired Distinguished Professor of Cognitive Science and Linguistics at the University of California-Berkeley has argued that language can change brains for the better and the worse: “Hate speech changes the brains of those hated for the worse, creating toxic stress, fear and distrust—all physical.” He also observed that this internal harm can even be more “severe than an attack with a fist.” In other words, speech acts that spew pure hate are fighting words, which directly harm their targets.

    Hate speech is divisive. Hate speech is harmful to its targets. Hate speech could lead to violence and national disaster. But should it be regulated? Opinions differ and countries have adopted different attitudes to this question.

    The United States is the most liberal of modern states in the matter of protecting free speech, including hate speech. Writing for four Justices in the Matal versus Tam case in June 2017, Justice Alito of the U. S. Supreme Court observed that ‘the idea that the government may restrict speech expressing ideas that offend…strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful, but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.”’

    For many, the opinion is too liberal. However, a state that gives no credence to freedom of expression but chooses the weapon of the law to regulate all speech is by no means an exemplar of liberalism. That is the road to totalitarianism, which is now generally discredited as a legitimate political practice even by those who exemplify it. On the extreme right of the United States, there is Singapore, which appears to be the model of our most recent efforts. Indeed, many have observed that the Hate Speech Bill before NASS is a replica of the Singaporean law.

    Across the Atlantic from the United States, on the other hand, our colonial masters appear to toe a middle line between an absolute liberal and a frightening totalitarian approach to hate speech. In the United Kingdom, there are hate speech laws which criminalize expressions of racial hatred against persons on account of their race, ethnicity or nationality. However, the laws insist that such expressions must be intended to stir up racial hatred or to likely result in stirring up racial hatred. These are presumably high bars for a prosecutor to clear.

    Let us agree then that because of their tendency to incite ethnic and religious violence, public regulation of hate speech is morally justifiable. However, we must be careful to limit the powers we place in the hands of the administrative state in the determination of what counts or doesn’t as hate speech.

     

    • For comments, send SMS to 08111813080
  • The Almond Tree

    “Do you not see how the Almighty Allah has sets forth the parable of a Pleasant Word like that of a splendid tree with formidable roots firmly entrenched in the belly of the earth and gorgeous branches gloriously sprouting into the firmament of the sky yielding edible fruits every season by Allah’s grace? Allah talks to men in parables that they may be mindfully alert about the outcome of that parable”. Q.14:24

     

    Human life is like a proverbial coin which may turn up the head or the tail any time it is tossed. Perhaps that is why an Arab poet once enacted an axiomatic rune that has come to be a school from which sensible people are still learning a lesson. An excerpt from the poem goes thus:

    “…Those are the occurrences of life as you are witnessing them; whoever is gladdened by an occurrence today should not be over joyous as many other occurrences may come with unbearable sadness”

    Some occurrences of this era are quite capable of serving as a marvellous reminder of the memorable month of April in relation to the establishment of the Muslim Students Society of Nigeria (MSSN) in 1954. That was 65 years ago.

    In Retrospect

    Looking back at the wonderful cultivation of a proverbial fertile land, and the planting of an adamant seed on it which eventually grew up into a gargantuan tree, one cannot but reflect deeply on the above quoted verse of the Qur’an with faithful appreciation.

    MSSN and NSCIA

    Narrating the story of Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) today, no matter how ardently, may not be complete without cogent reference to the Muslim Students Society of   Nigeria (MSSN). The two bodies are like Siamese trees of a gargantuan nature with gorgeous foliages and a formidable stem. Just as it is almost impossible to pluck the fruits of any tree without recourse to its stem so it is difficult to play a significant role in NSCIA today without haven passed through the MSSN. The one is like a wonderful edifice built on the solid foundation of the other. Though, most of the founders of MSSN were not initial members of the MSSN, the role played by each of them in nurturing the tree of that Muslim apex body to fruition cannot be quantified.

    The Almond Tree

    The similitude of MSSN is like that of the Almond tree. For those who do not know, the Almond tree has no equal among domestic plants in grandiose and splendour. Its magnificent   appearance alone simply personifies its environmental grandiose by all ramifications. But much more than that, the tree called Almond is highly curative in medicinal substance and almost indispensable in essence. No soil, whether in the forest, savannah or desert, is ever repugnant to this great tree for dwelling. Wherever it is found, Almond tree creates an incomparably serene environment just as it  serves as a protective umbrella for other living organisms around. It is one unique tree that wears the crown of a king among trees and bears the sceptre of a generalissimo among tropical plants.

    Parable

    The summarised analysis here is not much of the Almond tree per se but that of a Society which it seeks to exemplify. In a nutshell, that parable is of the Muslim Students Society of Nigeria (MSSN) which is like the Almond tree. The seed of that Society was planted like a Mustard seed on April 18, 1954 and the seed gradually germinated into an enlivening tree with no irrelevant part.

    Most Nigerian Muslims of the current generation may not easily recall how MSSN came into existence 65 years ago either because they were not part of the struggle that brought it to bear or because the struggle has now taken a different form which they are unable to relate to the past.

    A Memorable Revolution

    MSSN is both a spiritual and a social revolution which quietly crept into the Nigerian society at the very right time that a revolution was direly in need for Muslim youths. If Islam enjoys a hitherto denied official recognition in Nigeria today, it is mostly due to that miraculous revolution.

    Genesis

    It all started like a dream in April 1954 when a student of Methodist Boys High School (MBHS) Lagos, Tajudeen Aromasodu, now of blessed memory, clairvoyantly mooted a unique idea by proposing an association of all Muslim students in Nigeria starting with Lagos secondary schools. His intention was to create a forum of unity through a common identity for Nigerian Muslim youths of secondary school age. Such a forum was to enable them to agitate for their rights and defend those rights for their common interest.

    Aromasodu’s idea had emanated from a journal of the Muslim Students Association of Burma (Myanmar) which he accidentally came across. He read the constitution of that Association in the journal and became fascinated by it. That was at a time when Muslim school pupils could hardly pass through secondary schools in Southern Nigeria without getting forcefully converted into Christians. Muslim children seeking Western education in those days were seen as trespassers or usurpers despite paying the demanded fees. Besides denying them their rights to worship according to their belief, the Christian Missionaries who owned most schools in those days used the schools as an instrument of forceful conversion. Thus, most of the Muslim boys and girls who attended Christian missionary schools either ended up becoming Christians or were forced to drop out of schools if they rejected conversion.

    The Nucleus Team

    Aromasodu’s focus at that time was probably not beyond Lagos which was then Nigeria’s federal capital and the seat of the colonial rulers. He quickly contacted a few other Muslim students of like minds in Lagos and, together, they decided to invite two delegates from each of the then seven most prominent schools in Lagos. Thus, fourteen of such students (boys and girls) formed the pioneer membership of what was destined to become a proverbial Almond tree of a formidable nature. The seven schools were Kings College, Lagos; Queens College; Yaba, Methodist Boys High School, Lagos; CMS Grammar School, Bariga; Ahmadiyya College (now Anwarul Islam Model College), Agege; Methodist Girls High School, Yaba and Baptist Academy, Obanikoro.

    That nucleus body held its inaugural meeting at Ansar-ud-Deen Primary School, Alakoro, Lagos, on April 18, 1954. It was at that meeting that a proposal which had earlier been sent out to the mentioned schools was formally adopted. And, a resolution was taken to draft the constitution of the Society which was ratified thereafter.

    First Executive Body

    With the constitution in place, some members of the first executive body were elected into office. Dr. Abdul Lateef Adegbite of King’s College was unanimously elected as President while one Shuaib Oloritu also of Kings College and Saidat Anibaba (now Professor (Mrs.) Mabadaje (rtd) of Queens College became first and second Vice Presidents respectively. Dr. Adegbite’s election was quite timely and coincidental because he was not just the Chairman of the Library and Debating Society of Lagos secondary schools, at that time, which made him a first among equals, he too had been planning a common forum for all Muslim students in Nigeria.

    Some other officers were also elected and given responsibilities. Duties were delegated with trust and virtually everybody lived up to the trust.

    What would have been a major hindrance to the realization of that dream was lack of funds. But nothing fails at the dream level if it has the hands of Allah in it. With strong determination and commitment, the young boys and girls levied themselves one shilling each monthly which they dedicatedly contributed from their monthly stipends. Besides, each of them bore the cost of transportation when assigned to a duty outside their immediate environments.

    Conferences

    If the first national conference of the Society, held in Lagos in 1954, drew the attention of many people to MSSN and attracted many new members, that of 1956 held in Ijebu-Ode was a watershed. It was at that conference that the Society can be said to have become a real national body. It was at that conference that some members especially of northern extraction who later became prominent in that Association joined in 1956. Some of those members included the late Shehu Musa of Niger State who later became Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Adamu Ciroma who became the Governor of   the Central Bank of  Nigeria, Jubril Aminu who rose to become the Secretary of Nigerian Universities Commission (NUC) after serving as Vice Chancellor of the University of Maiduguri and later became Nigeria’s Minister of Education and that of Petroleum. There were also people like Yerima Abdullah and a host of others.  It was about the same year that some other Lagos students like Lateefat Oyekan (later) Alhaja Lateefah Okunnu (a former Deputy Governor of Lagos State) joined the Society and boosted its growth with special indefatigability. At that time, Islam was not yet known to have significantly reached what is now called South East or South-South of Nigeria.

    Read Also: MSSN challenges Muslim women on hijab

     

    The third conference was held in Ilesha in 1957. It was hosted by one Alhaji M.A. Smith, a prominent businessman with substantial financial wherewithal. The fourth and fifth conferences were held in Ibadan and Abeokuta in 1958 and 1959 respectively. In all those places, the conscious attention of local Muslims was drawn to Islam and some of them gladly encouraged their children to join the newly formed society of Muslim students in the secondary schools.

    The Turn of Events

    By 1957, Abdul-Lateef Adegbite, the first President of the Society had completed his secondary school education at Kings College and he wanted to vacate the office for someone else but other brothers would not hear of it. They persuaded him to continue with the leadership in appreciation of his cool-headedness and leadership ability. However, providence set in to play a role in the life of Abdul-Lateef and that of MSSN simultaneously. He got a job as a researcher at the Historical Research Scheme in Ibadan in which he was engaged while awaiting admission into The University College, Ibadan (UCI) to read English Language.

    At that time, Adegbite experienced a repeat of fortuitous providence working for him against his wish. He did not succeed in gaining admission into the University College but that was a blessing in disguise for MSSN. If he had been admitted as he wished, he would have had less time for the Society in its infancy and he would not have become a lawyer that he gladly became later. He also would have studied English at the University College, Ibadan (UCI) without any scholarship. Eventually, his patience and faith paid off as he later got admitted into the University of Southampton, England, where he obtained his Bachelor’s Degree in Law before proceeding to the University of London for his Master’s and Ph.D degrees on scholarship.

    Gender Dichotomy

    Realizing the implications of toasting any of the sisters into marriage within the Society, Adegbite, the President himself, avoided any act that could set a bad precedent for others. When it was time for him to choose a marital partner, he made sure that his wife to be, one Miss Taibat Yetunde Carew (now of blessed memory) was not a member of the Society. Although he met her at an MSSN forum, the latter merely escorted her friend to that forum.

    When he returned into the country in 1965 with a Ph. D degree, Dr. Adegbite was surprised at the growth rate of MSSN across the country. Virtually all the Muslim secondary school pupils had fully become members and most of the foundation members had either graduated from Higher Institutions or about to graduate.

    He therefore thought of a higher pedestal for the Society’s alumni to operate spiritually. Fortunately, he was appointed Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice in the Western State in 1967 a position that put him in very good stead. He was therefore, able to strengthen the MSSN and encourage fellow alumni to join hands in floating another Muslim Society that would be meant for only adults as members. That Society was named Western Jama’h otherwise called Westjomo which later graduated into National Jama’ah otherwise called Najomo. Today, most of the pioneer members of MSSN are great men and women in various public and private sectors. The current Sultan and President-General of Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA), His Eminence, Alhaji Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar, CFR, mni, some Emirs, Ministers, Governors, Vice Chancellors, Professors, a JAMB Registrar and, even the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua were prominent members of that great Society called MSSN. And now, the newly appointed Chairman of National Hajj Commission, Alhaji Dhikrullah Olakunle Hassan was once the National President of MSSN.

    Office Accommodation Problem

    It, however, became disturbing that despite the greatness of this Society and its alumni, there was no permanent office that could be called its national   headquarters even by the time its 50th anniversary was celebrated in 2004. An attempt was once made to sight such office in Ilorin being the midway between the north and the south, but that attempt was unsuccessful. It was only when the elders decided to pay attention to the issue of headquarters, recently, that a plot of land was secured for office in Abuja on which work is yet to fully commence even 65 years after the establishment of that great Association.

    National Brotherhood

    Dr. Abdul-Lateef Adegbite’s appointment as Commissioner in the Western State in the 1960s also helped tremendously in bridging the religious gap between the north and the south especially in respect of the formation of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) in which he was to play a major role as Secretary-General later in life. As far as Islam is concerned, Dr. Adegbite’s role was a footprint on the sands of life. Let those who are yearning for a similar footprint be as dedicated to Islam as he was.

    A Leadership Training Ground

    Apart from serving as a unifier of Muslim youths in Nigeria, MSSN also started as a potent leadership training ground for Muslim men and women of the future. That many brothers and sisters who passed through the Society are occupying various prominent positions including Gubernatorial, Ministerial, top managerial and core professional posts in Nigeria today is an attestation to that assertion. At least not less than five Heads of State or Presidents of Nigeria have been produced by the Association. However, the tempo of leadership agility of the past seems to have waned tremendously partly due to change of focus and unwarranted desire for acquisition of wealth and position.

    Thus, due to the fact that most students of nowadays are immature, some experienced hands at the helm of affairs in the Society continue to hold sway as principal officers of the Society thereby hindering the upcoming ones from gaining the necessary leadership training and experience that should normally prepare them for the future. The implication of this is that leadership is no longer by training or experience but by mere incidental assumption. This in itself is a great disadvantage to the growth and development of MSSN as well as a cause of various divisions leading to the emergence of splinter groups. If this Society must progress as expected, a return to the original system that gave it a prominent vibrancy in the past should be a sine qua non.

    Clarion Call

    This is a clarion call on all Nigerian Muslim men and women of substance,   who had passed through the MSSN, and are now blessed in one way or the other, to pull their loins together and rebuild the once great Society that has now become ramshackle for posterity sake. Let those who were once made by history turn round to make history tor the benefit of the future generations. Our footprint must not be obliterated in our lifetimes. The one time great, guiding  crescent of MSSN must not be allowed to eclipse.

  • Thankfulness

    B’eru ba mo nu ro, a dupe

    B’eru ba mo nu ro, a dupe

    Baba o se e,

    B’eru ba mo nu ro, a dupe

     

    A thoughtful slave is a thankful one

    A thoughtful slave is a thankful one

    Thank you, Father

    A thoughtful slave is a thankful one

    That was Opalaba, in his signature baritone, thundering into my eardrum with an early morning call to wish me a Happy Thanksgiving. It was a pleasant surprise, after a long spell of suspense. And I was pleased.

    The song, popularized by talented gospel singer, Yinka Ayefele, is a timeless reminder of the importance of thankfulness even when we feel despised, forgotten or downright unworthy. We are reminded that even a thoughtful servant or slave, has good reasons to be thankful. And so, on a day that the United States set aside for giving thanks, my good friend remembered me. How nice!

    But, of course, it would be out of character if we didn’t give room for a bit of silliness on both ends. We must bicker over frivolities if only to remind ourselves of the good old days of adolescent tantrums. I confess that, on this day, I was the aggressor.

    “Well, thank you, my friend. But you didn’t have to be so loud! You almost punctured my eardrum!”

    My friend didn’t disappoint. “Why am I not surprised!” he exploded. “You are just confirming that you are a new man with a new culture. Your new friends shout “thank you” at every opportunity even when they are killing you softy. They mouth gratitude even when they repay kindness and loyalty with evil. The Kurds bear me witness. Just see how you combined “thank you” with a despicable complaint in the same sentence! How dare you?”

    I thought my friend overreacted. I was just being silly, and I told him so. Since he felt hurt, I apologized, so we can move to a more fundamental issue that I had with Opalaba’s underlying message.

    I have always been ambivalent and skeptical about the message conveyed by my friend’s favorite thanksgiving song. I thought that, probably inadvertently, it legitimizes a social structure that condemns some human beings to conditions of servitude by offering them reasons to be thankful for their condition, however pathetic and unfair it might be. After all, for all we know, it could be worse. My car dealership once had a service agent, a funny guy with a good spirit. To the common greeting “How are you?” his unfailing response was “It could be worse.” It’s the same message conveyed to the slave by the message of the song, “it could be worse; therefore, you must be thankful.”

    To be sure, politics and religion have a meeting of minds on the usefulness and meaningfulness of this message, with the latter providing a spiritual buffer for the former, even though each has a different motivation.

    From a religious perspective, the author of our being is all-knowing and all-benevolent; therefore, incapable of evil or mischief. Therefore, whatever our situation, it is designed for our good. We are not as knowledgeable as God, and we may not fully understand God’s design for our lives. But behind every apparent disappointment, there are blessings. When we appreciate these, and count those blessings, we will see the need for thankfulness. Therefore, we must always be thankful to God. The Psalmist is an exemplar of willing obedience to this injunction.

    But the Most Valuable Apostle (MVA) award for the transition from the religious foundation to the political use of the message must go to Apostle Paul in his various writings, especially his letters to Timothy and Titus. Presumably, being thankful for one’s condition does not preclude struggling for an improvement toward a better condition. But when Paul enjoined all “who are under the yoke as slaves” to “regard their own masters to be worthy of all respect, so that God’s name and His teaching will not be blasphemed”, it suggests that slaves must accept their condition as ordained by God. Slaves “should serve (their believing masters) better.” And to Titus, the instruction was for “slaves to be submissive to their masters in everything and to be well-pleasing….”

    Not surprisingly, enslavers and their political agents, authoritarians and dictators of all shades, hide behind those kinds of passages to impose their wills on innocent people with religious sensibilities and the motivation for obedience to their God. The outcome is political stability for as long as the motivation persists and is widespread.

    An unusually attentive Opalaba was also strangely gracious in his response. But if the method of response was unusual, I should be quick to point out that the substance was typical Opalaba, whose progressive credentials are unassailable. Therefore, I was thrilled that we were in accord.

    “Of course, you know that I have no objection to your analysis” my friend responded. “My only concern is that you have conflated the words of the meaningful song with the message of Apostle Paul to Timothy and Titus. I reject a literal translation of “eru” as you appeared to offer. But if you will insist on that translation as slave, then I would suggest that it should be compared to Paul’s reference to himself as “slave of God” in his opening paragraph to Titus. A slave of God must be thankful to God for his or her condition, trusting that as the author of our being, unlike a human master, God can make our condition better over time. At least, that is my understanding and belief.”

    I agreed, and my friend continued: “While I do not for a moment deny that we owe gratitude to those who benefit us, I am more concerned about being thankful to God for all His benefits over us as the Psalmist enjoins. But as you also know, there are different categories of thankfulness: obligatory thankfulness because it is required. This is what our people refer to as ope tulasi, and as you know, they also pray for its avoidance; cheerful thankfulness for blessings received; and anticipatory thankfulness in hope of future blessings.” And not unexpectedly, my friend went directly to what I believe motivated his call. He pivoted the discourse to Nigeria, suggesting that for the country and her people, thankfulness is appropriate in all categories.

    “Let us start with obligatory thankfulness or ope tulasi. It is true that our people’s desire and prayer is to avoid being in a situation in which they must thank God for adversities which they would rather not have to face. But that is exactly what we are supposed to do when we count our blessings and name them one by one. In the case of dear country, there is complaint everywhere by almost everyone. Even the super wealthy complain because the sources of free money have been sealed and their greed effectively contained. But they should be thankful that the poor have docilely accepted the injunction of Paul and the authorities have succeeded in stopping the Revolution Now movement. Who knows what would have befallen the greedy rich!

    “Nigeria also has reason to offer cheerful thankfulness for the blessings received. Despite every prediction of superpowers concerning its breakup for more than ten years, she is still standing. That is not because of generalized satisfaction, nor because ethnic warlords have ceased beating war drums. But while every ethnic nationality has various degrees of complaints, a consensus on a breakup has not been formed among the political, business, and military elite who appear to have collectively ignored the drumbeats. Sans consensus, the alternative is war, which no one wants. We must be thankful.

    Finally, Nigeria must be thankful for anticipatory blessings. The current bleakness will give way to a bright future of full employment, fair distribution of the benefit and burden of social life, equitable distribution of resources among groups and individuals, equality before the law, end of corruption, equal educational opportunities, and an end to discrimination based on gender, sectarian or ethnic differences. Most importantly, Nigeria can look forward to democratic maturity where voters truly exercise their rights to choose their representatives freely and fairly.

    Happy Thanksgiving!

  • Fervour in his burner

    In what became another golden feather of honour to the glorious cap a hardworking, honest Nigerian citizen popularly known as ‘Model of Change’, President Muhammadu Buhari displayed a show of Presidential appreciation to whom honour was due yesterday, November 28, 2019, by giving National Merit Award to the JAMB Registrar, Professor Ishaq Olanrewaju Oloyede, OFN, FNAL for hard work and excellence.

    Long before now, Oloyede had been a household name not only in Nigeria or Africa but also in the entire world just like the University he was privileged to head as Vice-Chancellor over a decade ago. What qualified a onetime madrasah boy for such a vertical position is an interesting question for which most inquisitive minds may earnestly seek an answer. And the answer is not far-fetched.

     

    Binocular Focus

    Unlike most Nigerian men of letters in the Ivory Tower, Professor Oloyede wears a binocular with which he sees life from two opposing worldly sides of the West and the East. And this became evident not just in his management of the University of Ilorin within just one tenure of five years but also in the humility, selflessness and patriotism with which he demonstrated civility and exhibited  knowledge par excellence in that office. Through him, Nigerians came to know that the difference between a man of letters and that of knowledge is indisputably clear. While the one sees life through the common eye, the other sees it with an uncommon vision.

    In the days of Socrates, Aristotle and Herodotus, when education was an adorned virtue used as a yardstick for measuring civility and value, no one cared about the material gains accruing from it. However, bastardization of education set in when certificate became a means of valuing its material worth. Thus, with acquisition of certificates by all means, mere literacy began to be misconceived as education. And today, Nigerian Universities have been reduced to mere centers of advanced literacy rather than citadel of knowledge that they used to be.

     

    Literacy and Education

    Whereas literacy is just an added value to education the modern day man has ignorantly but arrogantly interpolated the one for the other. This is what Professor Oloyede resented in his academic odyssey when he chose to combine Eastern education with that of the West with a determination to take advantage of both in fertilizing the academic soil of Nigeria’s future. For those who didn’t know, that was why he specialized in Islamic Studies even at the professorial level.

    Professor Oloyede’s philosophy of life seems to tally ascetically with that of Daniel Webster an American Statesman and intellectual who in a memorable poem stated as follows:

    ”If we work marble it will perish; if we work upon brass time will efface it; if we rear temples they will crumble into dust; but if we work upon immortal minds and instil in them just principles; we are then engraving that upon tablets which no time can efface but will brighten to all eternity”.

     

    Philosophy of Life

    The above poem symbolizes the philosophy that propelled Professor Oloyede to adopt contentment as a principle right from his adolescent years. Why relating his reason for contesting for the office of the Vice-Chancellor, he once told some medical students of his University who went to congratulate him on assumption of office as Vice-Chancellor that he never intended to contest for that office. But when an academic charlatan with an ulterior motive in the same University threatened to expose him if he dared contest for the post, he (Oloyede) saw it as a challenge to put his privacy on a public table. His intention was actually not to contest but to see what would be exposed in his privacy. And, contrary to the expectations of sceptics, he emerged as the Vice-Chancellor without an iota of blemish.

    Before contesting for that post he had served as Deputy Vice-Chancellor twice. First, he was the Deputy Vice-Chancellor Academic and later Deputy Vice Chancellor Administration in the same University of Ilorin where he had spent his entire academic life as a student, as an alumnus, as a lecturer, as a Director in several areas and as a Professor. Thus, he had seen that University inside-out and that was enough to propel an ambition in him to target the highest office in the Citadel for which he was eminently qualified but there was no such level of ambition in him.

    Professor Oloyede relayed to his students the above story of his unintended contest for the highest office not as mere bravado but as an encouragement towards service to humanity with humility and patriotism.

     

    Evidence of Contentment

    As the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Ilorin, Professor Oloyede was nominated and elected as the President of the African Vice-Chancellors.

    But when he noticed that the position of the Executive Secretary of the Association of African Universities was more meaningful and more beneficial to Nigeria than that of the President which he then held, Professor Oloyede encouraged some of his Nigerian colleagues to apply for that post promising to resign his Presidential position in that Association to enable a fellow Nigerian occupy the office. Incidentally, most of his colleagues did not believe him. But when the time came and one of them indicated interest, Oloyede surprisingly resigned as President of African Vice-Chancellors just after two years in an office where he had opportunity to spend two terms of renewable five years.

    However, the Professor who benefited from Oloyede’s large-heartedness by assuming the office of the Executive Secretary of African Universities eventually ventured into Nigerian local politics and relinquished the covetous post in favour of that of the Secretary to a State Government (SSG) thereby depriving Nigeria the benefit for which Oloyede had resigned as President. The comparison of personalities in this circumstance is better left to the readers of this article.

     

    Academic Administration

    Only a few Nigerians in the academic arena can surpass Oloyede’s record when it comes to the ‘nitty gritty’ of academic administration. Yet, you can hardly notice it in his demeanour. This ascetic Professor is not only the first alumnus of the Faculty of Arts in the University of Ilorin to graduate with a ‘FIRST CLASS’ he is also the first alumnus of that University to obtain a PhD from the same University. Not only that, Professor Oloyede scored many other ‘FIRSTS’ in that University to the admiration of the upcoming students as encouragement for those with same aspiration among those students. He was the ‘FIRST’ Director of Academic Planning and first alumni President to be a member of the Governing Council of the University of Ilorin. Professor Oloyede is also the first Unilorin alumnus to become a Deputy Vice-Chancellor and subsequently the first alumnus to become the Vice-Chancellor of the University.

    And at the national level, he was the first Vice-Chancellor in Nigeria to introduce Computer-Based Testing (CBT) method of screening applicants in the country just as he was the first Vice-Chancellor to lead a second generation University to the number one position in Nigeria based on external ranking. He also became the first Nigerian Vice-Chancellor to emerge as President of the Association of African Universities (AAU) and at the same time the Chairman of Association of Nigerian Universities (AVCNU). Still not done, he is the first Nigerian Vice-Chancellor to combine the Board membership of International Association of Universities (IAU) with those of the Association of Commonwealth Universities (ACU) and Association of African Universities (AAU) at the same time.

     

    Read Also: Elemelu Foundation gives $15.2m to young African entrepreneurs

     

    University Calendar

    With the above listed ‘FIRSTS’ he was (as Vice-Chancellor) able to make Unilorin the first Federal University in Nigeria to run a decade of uninterrupted academic calendar and prompted that University to be internationally ranked as one of the very best 20 Universities in Africa. Also, through his astute academic administration, the University of Ilorin was able to maintain the first position in national ranking for three consecutive years (2009, 2010 and 2011). Another major plus in this man’s life but which most people hardly notice is arbitrating factor.

     

    Conflict Resolution

    Professor Oloyede does not only resent conflicts in whatever form he also regards arbitration as a duty. Thus, whenever he notices any sign of conflict in his vicinity, be it interpersonal, intertribal or interreligious, he immediately initiates arbitration and reconciliation process to ensure resolution without minding the cost. And his impartiality in doing this is generally acknowledged and revered across all borders. Now with his post as the Registrar of the Joint Matriculation and Admission Board (JAMB), he has added a rare feather to his exemplary cap in a way that fetches him a tacit title of ‘A Model of Change’.

     

    A Guiding Life

    In Professor Oloyede is a great example for those who aspire to be great in a world where greatness is a slippery land. His life has become a guide for the younger professionals and artisans who need guidance “either as a warning on the vanity of human wishes or as encouragement or both”.

    With His Eminence, Dr. Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar CFR, mni, at the helm of affairs of the NSCIA and Professor Oloyede as the Secretary-General of that apex body of the Muslim Ummah in Nigeria, who does not see that a right step is now on course on the right path?

     

    Epilogue

    With vertical men of this stature on Islamic stage in Nigeria at this point in time who says Muslims are non-existent in the scheme of modern life? Today, there is no aspect of human endeavour where Muslim men and women do not stand out as signposts of life like summer crescents quietly moving towards zooming into full moon. And now with this latest unique award confirming Oloyede as a unique historic signpost for African men and women of today who may be aspiring to be great in life tomorrow what else is left for sceptics to say about this man vis a vis greatness?