Category: Friday

  • An orphan’s legacy

    “Who shares his life’s pure pleasure and walks the honest road; who trades with heaping measure and lifts his brother’s load; who turns the wrong down bluntly and lends the right a hand; he dwells in God’s own country and tills the holy land.”
    Louis F. Benson.

    This is Rabi‘ulAwwal, the third month of the Islamic calendar. It is on the 12th day of this month that Prophet Muhammad {SAW}, the son of Abdullah and Aminah was born into the world. In Islamic history, this month is as important as any other Hijrah month but not more. It is therefore a form of innovation to to it any myth which the Prophet himself who was born in it did not attach to it.

     

    Preamble

    Contrary to what may be the thought in certain Muslim circles, in Nigeria today, this article is not meant to celebrate the birth of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) for which the 12thof this month is often erroneously declared as a public holiday. As far as ‘The Message’ is concerned, what is to be celebrated about this great Prophet is by far much more than his birthday. It is only those whose achievements in life are short of adequate benefits to mankind that need celebration of birth to augment theiracclaimed achievements.   Thus, there is no need wasting time on the birthday of a great Prophet whose achievements are immeasurable.

     

    Who was this man?

    Prophet Muhammad {SAW} was a man whose life is a school in which every knowledge-seeker learns.  In fact, no man’s biography has been so much written and read as that of Prophet Muhammad (SAW)This man’s biography has been written from all perspectives, positive and negative, by various men and women of diverse races, tribes, ideologies and religions since he became a Prophet of Allah in 610 CE. And the biography is still being written and re-written authoritatively and un-authoritatively, today, in uncountable languages across the world.

     

     Effects of his Biography

    Through the writings of Prophet Muhammad’s biography, some people have zoomed into un-dreamt fame. Others have sunk into the abyss of a permanent oblivion. In a nutshell, no other Prophet’s biography has attracted as many writers from among the believers and non-believers, as well as from friends and foes alike as that of Prophet Muhammad (SAW).

    Every aspect of this Prophet’s life including the dresses he wore, the food he ate, the way he spoke, the wives he married, the children he bore, and even the jokes he cast, has formed the basis of his biography. In short, next to the Qur’an, no book is as much read daily in the world today as the biography of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) in one form or another. And so it will continue to eternity.

     

     A Vital Question

    Butwhy is there aglobal focus so much on this unlettered Prophet from Arabia?

    The answer to that question is not far-fetched. The world has not produced any human being like him. And it will not. He is the seal of all Prophets and the epitome of human exemplariness. In him alone are found all the traits of what a perfect gentleman should be in all ramifications.

     

     The Ifs of His Life

    If Prophet Muhammad had not been an orphan, he would not have been able to guide humanity on how orphans should be treated especially with regards to inheritance. If he had not been a husband, his marital life would not have been an excellent example for others to emulate and women’s rights would have been permanently ignored. If he had not been a widower the world not have realized the plight of widows and learnt how to provide for them. If he had not been a father, the proper care for children by parents would have been relegated to the background in Islamic doctrine. If he had not been trustworthy, the value of trust would have been totally lost on mankind.

    It was his migration from Makkah to Madinahthat paved way for the culture of hospitality universally imbibed today and it was the wars he was forced to fight that engendered the law of war, armistice and peace. Without his conquests in some wars, the word magnanimity would not have found a place in the dictionary of man and without the defeat he suffered in some other wars, the vanquished elements in the contemporary world would not have learnt the act of gallantry.

     

     Further Ifs of His Life

    If Prophet Muhammad {SAW} had not been a judge, the virtue of justice would have been globally thrown to the winds and survival in all societies would have been for the fittest.

    If he had not been a democratic ruler, the relationship between the ruled and their rulers, all over the world, today, would not have been dissimilar from that of slaves and their masters and dictatorship in governance would have known no bounds. If the Prophet had not been poor despite being a Head of State, the policy of social welfare adopted in civilized societies today in favour of the poor, would not have been possible. If he had not been an illiterate, the world would not have known the difference between literacy and education. And, if, despite all these qualities in him, he had not been humble and affable, arrogance would have been the main character of all privileged people in the world today.

     

     Further Questions

    Who else can be compared to this man in history? And, in which any other single person have all the aforementioned qualities ever been found in history? There can be little wonder then why so much attention was and is still being focused on the personality of this extra-ordinary human being. That is Prophet Muhammad (SAW) for you, the like of whom the world has never seen and will never see again. If this man is celebrated anywhere in the world, anytime in this month or after the month, therefore, it is definitely not because he was born. His achievements evidently transcend his birth.

     

    Attestation

    There are many attestations to the above assertion. For instance, after many years of scientific experimentations, a German-born American physicist and Nobel Laureate, Albert Einstein who was the inventor of atomic bomb and is generally known as the 20th century creator of special and general theory of relativity, compared his works with the contents of the Qur’an and concluded as follows: “Science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind”.

    He then called on fellow scientists to endeavour to read the Qur’an without bias in order to know the true origin of science in human life.

     

    Professor Keith Moore

    Yet another Embryologist, Professor Keith Moore of the Department of Anatomy, University of Toronto, Canada, after carefully examining the translation of the Qur’anic verses presented to him admitted thus: “most of the information concerning embryology mentioned in the Qur’an is in perfect conformity with modern discoveries in the field of embryology and does not conflict with them in any way”.

    Professor Moore had no prior knowledge of anything leechlike about embryo until he read chapter 96 of the Qur’an where Allah says “Read! In the name of your Lord Who created. He created man out of a leechlike clot…” He then went to verify this fact in an embryo under a powerful microscope and compared his observation with a diagram of a leech. He was astonished at the resemblance of the two. That prompted him to go fully into the study of the Qur’an and Hadith to acquire more knowledge until he was able to answer about 80 hitherto unanswered questions in that field.

    It was that discovery hat prompted him to correct the contents of his book ‘The Developing Human’ which he published earlier and he had to re-publish it in 1982. It was with that revised edition that he became the recipient of an award for the best medical book written by a single author in the 20th century. That book has been translated into many major languages of the world and is mostly used as textbook of embryology today in the first year of medical studies in various Universities in the world.

     

     Book of Signs and not of Science

    Despite talking about all sciences, the Qur’an is not a book of Sciences but that of ‘Signs’. Those ‘Signs’ invite man to realize the purpose of his existence on earth and live in harmony with nature.Judging the above verses of the Qur’an revealed over 1400 years ago with the wonderful reality of scientific civilization of today what further proof does anybody need of the genuineness of the Qur’an? And who else can give any similar guidance as that of the Supreme Creator Himself? And who else can be better called the ‘PATH FINDER’ other than Prophet Muhammad (SAW) who showed humanity the way to that all time guidance?

     

     Comments by Other Non-Muslims

    If all the descriptions given above about Prophet Muhammad (SAW) sound exaggerated because they are quoted by Femi Abbas, a Muslim and an ardent follower of that Prophet, and if Michael Hart is seen as crazy in his scientific judgment, let us read the views and impressions of some other non-Muslims about this great Prophet. One of them (Alphonse de Lamartine of France) had the following to say in his book ‘Histoire de la Torque’:

    “Never has a man set for himself, voluntarily or involuntarily, a more sublime aim since this aim was superhuman; to subvert superstitions which had been interposed between man and his Creator; to render God unto man and man unto God; to restore rational and sacred idea of divinity amidst the chaos of the material and disfigured gods of idolatry, then existing.

    Never has a man undertaken a work so far beyond human power with so feeble means, for he (Muhammad) had in the conception as well as in the execution of such a great design no other instrument than himself, and no other, except a handful of men living in a corner of a desert…. If greatness of purpose, smallness of means, and astounding results are the three criteria of human genius, who could dare to compare any great man in modern history with Muhammad? The most famous men created arms, laws and empires only. They founded, if anything at all, no more than material powers which often crumbled before their very eyes. This man moved not only armies, legislations, empires, peoples and dynasties, but millions of men in one-third of the then inhabited world; and more than that, he moved the altars, the gods, the religions, the ideas, the beliefs and the souls. On the basis of a book, every letter of which has become law, he created a spiritual nationality which blended together peoples of every tongue and of every race…..As regards all standards by which human greatness may be measured we may well ask, is there any man in human history greater than Muhammad?”

     

     Napoleon Bonaparte’s Comment

    On his own, Napoleon Bonaparte, the great 18th century French conqueror of Europe was so much amazed by the traits of Islam which he saw in Egypt during his military expeditions that he made the following historic statement about that divine religion and its great Prophet:

    “Muhammad, in reality, was a great leader of mankind. He preached UNITY among Arabs who were, till then, torn asunder due to internecine quarrels, sometimes resulting in bloody war fares. He brought them out of the obscure world in a short time and the discipline which they maintained under his leadership was simply marvelous, and so was their bravery, courage and devotion to the cause which they loved and cherished. This, coupled with the contempt for death, as taught by their leader, made them great soldiers and fighters like of whom history rarely produces. I simply marvel at the achievements of this great ‘Son of the Desert’ within a mere period of less than 15 years; a thing which Moses and Christ could not do in 15 centuries. I salute this great man; I salute his qualities of Head and Heart….”

     

     George Bernard Shaw

    And, in corroboration of the above statements, variously made by renowned men of letters and intellect, another foremost Orientalist, playwright and dramatist, George Bernard Shaw, had the following to say about Islam and Prophet Muhammad (SAW) in his book ‘The genuine Islam’ (vol. 1 No 8 of 1936):

    “The Christians and their missionaries have presented a horriblepicture of Islam. Not only that, they also carried out an organized and planned propaganda against the personality of Prophet Mohammad and the religion he preached. I have carefully studied Islam and the life of its Prophet. I have done so both as a student of history and as a critic. And I have come to the conclusion that Mohammad was indeed a great man and a deliverer and benefactor of mankind which was till then writhing under a most agonizing pain. I have always held Islam in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing face of existence which can make it appealing to every age. I have studied him, the wonderful man, and in my opinion, far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the saviour of humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness.

    I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today”.

     

    Conclusion

    The above quoted comments are just some of the facts that make an orphan and unlettered Prophet, the greatest human being that ever lived on earth. None of the attestations above made any reference to his birth or birthday because they knew that his birth had nothing to do with his achievements.He was not born a Prophet and his greatness was not by accident but by divine will of Allah. If non-Muslims could go as far as expressing the above quoted comments as evidence ofhuman benefit from the greatness of Prophet Muhammad’s mission on earth, what is expected of Muslims for whom that mission is permanently meant?

  • Chief Imam to clerics: shun inciting sermons

    The Chief of Imam of Lagos State, Sheikh Sulaiman Oluwatoyin Abou-Nolla, has advised Imams and Ulamas to avoid incitement sermons.

    He also urged them to brace up for a patriotic role in the forthcoming general elections.

    Abou-Nolla gave the advice at the seminar for Chief Imams and Ulamas in Lagos Central Senatorial District at the Central Mosque, Idumota on Sunday.

    The seminar was part of programmes designed to build capacity of the clerics.

    The revered cleric urged the scholars to ensure politicians are re-orientated through their sermon.

    “We need to encourage them, advise them and also pray for them so that the can deliver the mandate given to them by the people by making our economy grow because if there is no peace in the country, no religion will prosper,” he said.

    According to Abou-Nolla, Muslim clerics’ engagement with political leaders seems to be poor, urging them to uphold, wholeheartedly, the duty of inviting people (political leaders inclusive) to goodness by enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong.

    He also urged them to forge a common front in order to tackle the challenges facing the Ummah.

    The Chairman, Council of Imams and Alfas in Eti-Osa, Imam Yoosuf Abdul-Barri Afini, said the seminar was organised to sensitise Imams and Alfas on their duties in maintaining peace within the community.

    He said the forum would also serve as a reminder for those who are seeking for elective posts that they should not make promises that they would not be able to fulfil.

    The Guest Speaker, Sheikh AbdurRahman Adangba, advised Muslim clerics to increase their knowledge of the Qur’an and the Sunnah in order to sustain positive image of Islam.

    Adangba said the active involvement of Muslim scholars in government is an effective tool when it comes to sustaining positive image of Islam.

    He therefore suggested that that all mosques should be equipped with a library.

    “The mosque must have bank account where all donations that come to the mosque are kept. It must have an investment which is going to be a source of income,” he said.

  • Designed for good, thrives on evil

    Let us start this piece in Jeopardy style:

    Category: Riddles

    Clue: It is an institution designed for human good, but it thrives on evil machinations.

    Answer: What is politics?

    Still amazed by, and unable to wrap my head around the paradox of an institution which is designed for good but continues to thrive on evil, today, I set my gaze one more time on how politics deliberately dispenses with moral values and what this means for our humanity.

    One of the unproven narratives woven around the legendary political juggernaut of Oyo State, the late Chief Lamidi Adedibu was the question that he allegedly once posed to an aspiring politician who sought his blessing for an elective position. “So, you are interested in politics?” the Chief allegedly asked his guest. On an affirmative response from the man, the chief followed with series of neck-breaking quizzes: “Are you strong? Can you tell lies? Can you slander? Can you kill?” The message conveyed by these rhetorical questions apparently was that politics is not for the moral purist, neither is it for the weak-kneed. It is for the strong and ruthless. It is for liars and ego-driven maniacs. Is this right?

    Assume it is right, an obvious question is why would such an institution even be needed in the first place? What would recommend it as an alternative to the anarchy that might prevail without it? Why leave a state of anarchy in which you could creatively outsmart others for a supposedly civilized polity where you hand over your rights to ruthless hustlers bent on making you subservient forever?

    But there is a short answer to the question whether politics is for the strong and ruthless, liars and ego-driven maniacs. No, not in its original intent. As nearly every political philosopher conceptualizes it, the political community is borne out of a desire to escape a state of insecurity where the exercise of freedom is fraught with severe risk and danger. At which point, rational nature kicks in and individuals decide to go into a contract of association with others so willing. The union so formed cannot at the risk of irrationality include ceding our rights to liars and ruthless hustlers.

    Chief Obafemi Awolowo, ever so thoughtful, is characteristically lucid in his account of the historical trajectory of the state especially in our own corner of the world. After an exhaustive discussion of the evolution of the state with the transition from one family to a collection of families, and the establishment of a full complement of state functionaries, the sage concludes that “it is the passionate desire for peace amongst them, and for mutual defence or protection against those outside their union, as well as for the procurement of economic benefits, which led to the emergence of, first, the village states, then the city-states, followed by the nation-state or multi-nation states.” (The People’s Republic, 81).

    The significance of the foregoing summary of Awolowo’s observation should not escape us. People come together to form a state or political community in order to maximize their common interests in security and socio-economic benefits. If this was their intent, we cannot expect them to accede to the conduct of their affairs by liars and ruthless hustlers—if it is up to them.

    Modern democratic republic is the outcome of the people’s struggle against the old idea of the divine right of kings, a conception that was thoroughly refuted by John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in the 18th century. But even the idea of the divine right of kings is often combined with a moralistic view of politics. Kings are generally counseled to dispense judgment with moral considerations and to use their power from a foundation of moral virtue. Those that fail to do so are rebuked.

    The beginning of our modern obsession with power without morality is traceable to the Italian political theorist, Niccolo Machiavelli who made a bold distinction between political power and morality. Moral philosophers have drawn a distinction between power and authority, understood as the rightful use of power. Machiavelli dispensed with this distinction, arguing that there is no moral basis for the distinction and the only point of interest to the ruler is power, however it is achieved or used.

    Machiavellians populate our modern political world, and especially our own corner of that world. This is an explanation for the many aberrations that we experience. The concern of many in politics is to secure power for its sake. For some others, power is the means of personal enrichment at the expense of the common interests of all. For yet others, seeking and securing power is to inflict the most harm to perceived enemies.

    You may already be thinking that these various purposes of power-seeking could be counter-productive and you may be right. If a politician seeks power to inflict harm on perceived opponents, does he or she not think of an end to his or her power? And what if his enemies then take over power? Of course, a rational being would take this prospect into consideration. But it is precisely why we have the phenomenon of perpetual power-seekers. Think of Mugabe and Biya, the latter, just sworn in to another seven-year term at age 85.

    Those who seek power for personal enrichment have “good” personal reason to hustle and give it whatever it takes. Unconcerned with any enduring legacy, they will lie and kill to get what they want. For them, it is important to secure a future for their family, many generations into the future. They forget that no ill-gotten wealth lasts long, and the would-be beneficiaries may not have the skill set to make the most of such wealth. Of course, the certain curse of a bitter public is bound to impact negatively. Consider the plight of the Mobutus of the world.

    What if you just love power and seek it for its sake? Are you likely to be bothered by moral concerns? First, as odd as it may sound, it is not unusual and not out of the question for people to just want to have power without any further purpose or reason other than occupying a position of prestige. If Hobbes is right, and there is a natural propensity for glory-seeking, this is understandable. And since it is not for any moral purpose, it cannot also be constrained by moral concerns.

    Unfortunately, there are lots of folks in this category, at every level of our governing institutions from local government to the highest offices in the land. They want power because it is glorious to have it, without a clue what they want to do with it. And they will get there by hook or crook, shuffling aside moral compunctions.

    Let us give Machiavelli the benefit of the doubt. Let us imagine him simply analyzing the reality of power politics as opposed to offering injunctions about how rulers should conduct themselves. In other words, the Prince, the Prime Minister, or the President is just a human agent with power using that power for ends that he/she designs as he/she deems fit and without appeal to moral norms. If this is so, Machiavelli cannot be blamed for exposing the reality of political power as a political scientist might.

    We must now decide whether in our political community we want to embrace Machiavelli’s analysis of power-usage. It is important to note that even the ruler whose use of power Machiavelli theorized about (or endorsed) is not expected to be honest about his motives. For, if he does, the people are not likely to be pleased. Therefore, the ruler is deliberately deceptive.

    We have a clue, then, to what our attitude ought to be toward deliberate deception and lying on the part of politicians and political leaders. Deception takes citizens as fools. Lying is a moral flaw and a rejection of the humanity of its object. And there is no greater way of objectifying citizens than putting a price on them. This is what happens when they are incentivized to sell their votes. It is a flagrant disrespect for the humanity of fellow citizens.

     

  • Trump’s Tango with Iran

    “No sensible human being ever restricts his itinerary to a particular habitat; to keep moving and migrating from place to place is the secret of human progress”. By an Arab poet

    Today, ‘The Message’ column chooses to migrate, if only psychologically, from the insanity of Nigeria’s economic and religious rigmarole to the global political tempest for a change. After all, elasticity has its own limit. And by so migrating, even if temporarily, some relief may come to the readers of this column over the current political suffocation in the country. That is a way of ventilating a momentarily peaceful atmosphere for peace-loving Nigerians.

     

    Trump’s planned predation against Iran

    At the instance of the United State’s President Donald Trump, an unexpected global war may soon break out, the consequences of which are unpredictable. As a matter of fact, this assertion has started gathering momentum with the swinging of a dangerous pendulum from the the premise of the US. When and how such a war will break out seems to be the only question that may agitate the mind of any enquirer.

     

    Genesis of Global Tempest

    A few years ago, Al-Jazeera Television throbbed with   breaking news, reporting that a United States military aircraft strayed into the airspace of Iran and the latter promptly responded by shooting it down. The incident occurred when Dr. Barak Obama was the President of the US. And it was the climax of an allegation of stockpiling weapons of mass destruction, especially, nuclear armament by Iran. The allegation was made by the US.

    That disturbing development which dragged Iran to the United Nation’s Security Council for explanation further heightened the already existing tension between the US and Iran. The tension between both countries had started in 1979 with the revolution that uprooted Iran’s imperial despotism that had caged the Iranian people for decades under that country’s last monarch, Muhammad Pahlavi.

     

    U.S.’ reaction

    In reaction to the fortuitous incident of the US intrusion that led to Iran’s prompt military reaction, the US authorities said that the destination of the aircraft shot down by Iran was Afghanistan and not Iran. They explained that its pilot accidentally lost control and strayed into Iranian territory.

     

    Siege on British Embassy

    Shortly before the above narrated incident, Some Iranian students had laid siege on the British Embassy, in Tehran, in protest against what they called an intolerable meddling by the then British Prime Minister, David Cameron’s government, in the internal affairs of Iran. And in retaliation to that siege, Britain quickly evacuated her diplomats in Tehran and sent the Iranian diplomats in London packing despite Iran’s regret and apology over those students’ unauthorized action.

     

    Complication

    To further complicate the tension over that incident, the French government issued a 48 hour ultimatum to Iranian diplomats to quit France. That was done in solidarity with the British government in the spirit of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as well as European Union (EU). From thence, things started to move so fast that it became difficult to predict what would happen next. Most diplomatic observers saw a similarity between those developments and the unexpected occurrences of the early 20th century that precipitated both World War I and World War II.

     

    Genesis of faceoff

    The genesis of the faceoff between the West and Iran actually took roots in the latter’s unexpected revolution of 1979 which caused a diplomatic row between the two geographical blocks. That triangular row actually started in February 1979, when Iran jumped democratically onto the world stage with a fortuitous revolution that held the Arab States of the Gulf region spellbound. The revolution was the climax of the struggle, in Iran, which began in 1963 between the oppressed people who were seeking emancipation from the shackles of imperialism and the implacable internal oppressors who wanted to keep that country’s innocent peasants in perpetual subservience to enable them maintain the ugly status quo of the time.

    It was the miraculous success of that revolution that altered the grand design of the Western powers for the Muslim world.

     

    The Grand Design

    The West’s grand design for the Muslim world through the Middle East was first expressed in 1902 by a British Prime Minister, Sir H. Campbell-Bannerman when he observed as follows:

    “There are people who control spacious territories teeming with manifest and hidden resources.  They dominate the intersections of world routes. Their lands were the cradles of human civilizations and religions. These people have one faith, one language and the same aspiration. No natural barriers can isolate them from one another….If, per chance, these people were to be unified into one state it would then take the fate of the world into its hands and separate Europe from the rest of the world. Taking these considerations seriously, a foreign body should be planted in the heart of this nation to prevent the convergence of its wings in such a way that it could exhaust its powers in never- ending wars. It could also serve as a spring board for the West to gain its coveted objects”.

     

    Follow Up

    Sir Bannerman’s observation was in further pursuit of an earlier demand by an Austrian Jewish lawyer and Journalist, Theodor Herzl, the initiator and leader of the Zionist movement founded in 1879. In the euphoria of a chauvinist’s ambition, shortly after the establishment of the Zionist movement,  Theodor Herzl, made a demand thus:

    “Let sovereignty be granted us (Jews) over a portion of the globe large enough to satisfy the rightful requirements of a nation. The rest, we shall manage by ourselves…”

     

    The Balfour Declaration

    In response to the West’s clandestine agenda many decades after Herzl’s demand, another British Prime Minister, James Arthur Balfour, issued an insensitive, devastating declaration that now bears his name in history. That seemingly conspiratorial declaration, which forcefully conceded a major chunk of Palestinian land to the Zionists as a home, became a thorny point in the serenity of the world.

    Since then, the infamous Balfour declaration has put the Middle East in an incessant turmoil to the discomfort of the world’s peace and harmony. The declaration read partly as follows:

    “His majesty’s Government views with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and will use its best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this objective…. The rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country shall not be prejudiced by the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”

     

    Implementation

    To facilitate the implementation of that agenda effectively, some other Middle East countries had to be decapacitated economically and politically by excision from them, some juicy chunks of their lands. Thus, Lebanon was excised from Syria and Kuwait from Iraq. The strategy was to cause a dissention among the citizens of those countries with the intention of breaking the yoke of the Muslim unity which Bannerman had targeted in his infamous observation quoted above.

     

    Iran connection

    Now, how does Iran come into this picture when she is not an Arab country?

    That is the logical question that anybody who is not quite familiar with the Middle East and the intricacies of its political and economic set up may ask. Naturally, Iran is affected by three major factors: Culture, economy and politics. By culture here, we mean ISLAM. Iran is a foremost Muslim country even if her official language is not Arabic. And, as a Muslim Country, whatever affects other Muslim countries must affect her. Thus, as a major neighbour to the Arabs in the Gulf, she cannot but play a role in the politics of the region. Also, as an economically strong nation in the primordial and contemporary times, Iran occupies a very strategic position in the Middle East especially with her proximity to the Persian Gulf.

     

    Turkey for instance

    Like Iran’s, the case of Turkey in the Muslim world is a good example. Turkey is, though, not an Arab country, she was nevertheless once the seat of the Islamic Caliphate until 1924 when a diabolical agent of the West came on stage as Head of State. His name was Mustafa Kemal Ataturk; a man who wanted to prove to the West that it was possible for a non-Catholic to be “Holier than the Pope” especially when it came to adopting the so-called Western Civilization. On March 3, 1924, just one year after assuming office as the ruler of Turkey, Ataturk introduced a Bill to the Turkish Parliament seeking to secularize his country by abolishing the caliphate without any consideration for the feelings and sensitivity of the people he ruled as well as the prominent position of Turkey in the Islamic world.

    Presenting that Bill, Ataturk stated as follows: “Ottoman Empire was built and it existed on the principle of Islam. Islam is Arabic in character and in concept. It shapes from birth to death, the lives of its adherents; it stifles hope and initiative. The Republic (of Turkey) is threatened by the continued existence of Islam in its midst….”

     

    The Effect

    With the passage of that Bill, Turkey was recognized as a secular state. Politics was separated from religion and Islam was relegated to a personal matter rather than the state religion that it was before then. The caliphate was abolished and Islamic law was abrogated. Ataturk borrowed the new Turkish civil law from Switzerland, its new criminal law from Italy and its international law of trade from Germany. The Muslim personal law was harmonized with the European civil law. Religious instruction in public schools was prohibited. Purdah system was abolished and declared illegal. Co-education was introduced to schools. The use of Arabic alphabets was prohibited and replaced with the Latin Script. Adhan (the call to prayer) was no longer to be made in Arabic but in Turkish language while the national costume was changed to that of the West even as the wearing of hat was made compulsory. What Ataturk did not do was to abrogate the tenets of Islam completely.

     

    Ataturk’s Whim

    Thus, by one man’s whim, Turkey lost her values and heritage of centuries in a bid to adopt the so called ‘modernity’ brought by the so-called ‘Western civilization’. One can imagine what Islam would have become today if countries like Iran, Indonesia and Pakistan had adopted the same misfortune.

     

    The emergence of Ayatullah Khomeni

    It was the possibility of the same situation under Muhammad Pahalavi that prompted the late Iranian spiritual leader, Ayatullah Ruhullah Mousavi Khomeini to embark on the liberation struggle in 1963 that culminated in a successful revolution of February 1979. Contrary to Ataturk’s thinking, however, Imam Khomeini knew that the greatest virtue that could be lost in the life of man was culture. He knew that without a clear-cut culture man couldn’t be better than a beast. He knew that such values as law, education and religion, which guide man in his peregrinations on earth, are the attributes of culture. He knew that a nation, which surrenders its culture and adopts that of another nation, has enslaved herself permanently to the caprice of the latter nation. Thus, Khomeini saw Islam, (the culture of over one billion Muslims in the world at that time), as the target of the Western imperialists, which needed defence and protection.

     

    The Iranian Revolution

    No one believed in 1979 that a mass protest which started like a small political billow, engendered by the country’s unarmed Mullahs could eventually grow into such a great magnitude of political ‘earthquake’. By the time the foggy dust finally settled, a new Iran had emerged from the debris of the old. Against the wish and expectation of the capitalist West, the secular, monarchical Iran became a democratic, Islamic republic. The drama was quite electric.

    Characteristic of the West, all hands were put on deck, at that time, to ensure that an Islamic republic did not succeed the tyrannical monarchy headed by the Shah Pahlavi and heavily backed up by the oppressive West. America was most active in that ambitious but vain effort. She would not easily allow the massive benefit she had been enjoying for decades in that oil-rich country, under the Shah regime, to slip out of her hands just like that. Thus, under the pretext that she wanted to rescue her citizens from the siege laid by Iranian students on that country’s embassy, in Tehran, the US attempted an invasion of the country.  The espionage activities by the American diplomats, inside that embassy, against the new Islamic government in Iran had warranted the siege.

    The Strategy

    While a number of US F15 bomber jets were approaching Iran, President Jimmy Carter engaged his country’s press in a chat without giving any hint of the impending military operation in Iran. The tactics was to divert the attention of the press and that of the country from the illegal Pentagon’s military expedition. But no sane person can ever fault the contents of the Qur’an. More than 1400 years before that incident, a verse of the Qur’an had been revealed to Prophet Muhammad (SAW) thus: “They (the unbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed. Allah is the supreme schemer”. Q. 3:54.

    Jimmy Carter’s thought was that by the time he would be finishing his press address, the news would have reached him that America had successfully invaded Iran. He had therefore intended to announce the news of his ‘great’ successful scheme to the press as the epilogue of his address. And that would have served as his impetus for wining that year’s election for a second term in office. But, as Allah would have it, instead of the expected news, what he got was a shocker of his life.

     

    The failure of the Strategy

    Two of the F15 fighters deployed for the operation miraculously collided in the air just at the point of entering Iran crashing with their contents, and consuming the lives of 16 top air force officers while the other jet fighters had to turn back having run into confusion. When this devastating news reached Carter, it was too much to hide and it quickly became a public knowledge.

    Thus, the mighty America failed woefully, with her technology, in circumstances she has never been able to analyze and explain convincingly. With that scheme, it became obvious that Jimmy Carter of the Democrat Party had dug his own political grave. Of course, he lost the election to the cowboy turned Politician, (Ronald Reagan) of the Republican Party. For about 444 days (well over a year), the 52 American hostages remained under the siege of the Iranian students. It took high-level diplomacy, through third party countries, to get them released.

    Yet, America was not done. She went ahead to freeze Iran’s foreign reserve of $80 billion in addition to imposition of economic sanctions with the intention of running that country’s economy aground. The only Iran’s offence in this case was to chart an independent political course that could liberate her citizens from the manacles of the Western imperialism. Ever since, the relationship between America and Iran has remained icy.

    That relationship however, further deteriorated recently when Iran started a nuclear project with which to prop up her economy. America responded with a threat saying the United States would not tolerate any nuclear project in Iran because the latter could not be trusted with such a project.

     

    The World’s Greyhound

    Only a fool will not know that the UN, as presently constituted, is the greyhound of the US through which the latter barks randomly at the rest of the world.

    But for the recent Iraqi episode that became regrettable for the self-appointed policeman of the world, and of course, the North Korean case, which has become a cancerous sore on the head of the US, another Gulf war would have either ensued or become advanced in plan by now. The secret of America’s military successes in various parts of the world is neither in technological advancement, nor military superiority per se. The failed rescue mission in Iran shortly after that country’s revolution has confirmed that.

    Rather, the secret of America’s military successes in various wars around the world are rather in her ability to cause schism among some other nations and races.

    Iran has never been a prey to America’s direct military aggression, even when the Shah Pahlavi was in power, because that Gulf country has never played a fool dancing to the sour music of the predatory country called America in a seeming military market.

     

    Sanction as a Weapon

    Now, with the threat of invasion of Iran by Israel on the one hand and economic and political sanctions against her by the US on the other, will history repeat itself? One fact has become clear about the US political trend ever since her withdrawal from her self-isolationism in 1945. The success of her internal politics has been regularly dictated by her foreign policy. Thus, many American Presidents have won or lost elections at home due to the foreign policy of the concerned President. Will this also repeat itself? The days ahead will answer this fundamental question as events continue to unfold. But with the objection by China and Russia to using suffocating economic sanctions against the people of Iran, the US may need to watch steps carefully especially with respect with the aloofness of most European countries to her unilaterally planned invasion of Iran. Iran is neither Iraq nor Afghanistan. The world cannot afford another World War now. No one should attempt to plunge it into one by taking a country’s military capability for granted. A word is enough for the wise.

  • Group seeks proper child upbringing

    Parents have been urged to pay attention to the upbringing of their children and teach them the Islamic way of life.

    Amir of Mujahidun Club of Nigeria, Ustaz AbdulRasak Idris stated this at a Quran competition organsied by the club in Lagos.

    Idris said parents need to take seriously the training of their children in the Islamic way especially making them to learn the Quran at tender age.

    “The primary responsibility of the parent is that they give their children quality education, not only western education, Islamic education also should be included, as  it is necessary because if you don’t give your children Islamic education, you are going to regret it in future because the children won’t give you rest of mind as a parent. The Quran would teach a child everything in life including the moral and the spiritual aspects; they won’t go astray and you, parents would have rest of mind,” he said.

    He said that kids who have knowledge of the Quran from tender age would not constitute social menace in the society.

    Idris said: “There is no moral upbringing in the children again even the adults, whereas the Quran teaches us how we should live our lives. That is why we come back to the Quran, to train the young ones, if initially our children know the Quran and its concept and behave in the way it teaches us, definitely this country would be better and that is our mission.”

    Winners of the ninth edition of the Annual Quran Competition went home with a flat screen television set, home theatre and electrical cooking pot, while each participant were rewarded with copies of the Quran and exercise books.

    Chairman Organising Committee Moshood Adeosun said the only antidote to the nation’s problems is the Quran.

    Adeosun said the nation will finds tranquillity when people return to the Quran and imbibe its teachings.

    “Nigerians should teach their children Quran when they are young, they should memorise it, read it and follow its teachings. In doing this, we can only find peace of mind and high moral standard in the society, because when they are young and you teach them in the way of Allah, they would not misbehave; if our leaders or our pass leaders have fear of Allah, Nigeria will not be where it is today because if people know the teaching of Quran, we would not have issue of Boko Haram,” he said.

  • Islam without the Arabs

    Monologue

    The article in this column today was first published in 2010 when an unpredictable pendulum started to swing dahgerously on the Arab world. Its repetition here is due to its relevance at this time following the recent diplomatic ripples leading to the ostracisation of Qatar in the Gulf Region and the criminal murder of a Saudi Journalist Jamal Kashogi in cold blood, in the Saudi Arabian Consulate in Turkey.

    Preamble

    Islam, today, is like a lily by the mossy stone. And that mossy stone is nothing other than the Arabs through whom Allah’s divine religion was revealed to mankind. The more turbulent the Arab world goes, the more fragile the Islamic lily becomes. Now, many questions are begging for answers around the world about Islam, but most of those questions are not answerable.

     

    Islam at Inception

    When, at the inception of Islam, the Qur’an described the “pre-Islamic Arabs as a people with great penchant for recalcitrance and hypocrisy” they (the Arabs) quickly retorted by saying that the reference was to rural and not urban Arabs. Their justification for that reaction at the time was that over 80% of the Arabs were rural dwellers. But today, with more than 80% of the Arabs being urban dwellers, has it not become manifest that Arabs are Arabs whether they are urban or rural dwellers?

     

    Arabs before Islam

    To those who are not familiar with the Arab history before the advent of Islam, it may look like an irony that the religion of peace called Islam originated from among such people. But those who understand the workings of Allah will know that revealing Islam to mankind through the Arabs was a deliberate divine policy. If that religion had not come into existence through a stubborn race like theirs, the Arabs would have been its bitterest enemies and even the relative peace in the world today would have been a mirage.

     

    Social movement

    Besides the above questions, Allah’s design for Islam as a religion was to make it a social movement springing from the very grassroots and rising gradually to the topmost echelon of human aristocracy. That Islam came to mankind through a people with such Qur’anic description, therefore, could not have been an accident or a mistake.

    If Islam had been revealed to mankind through the institution of monarchy or that of of aristocracy, it would have grown into a religion of masters and servants. And, in that case, the operations of Mosques would have been according to human status while the whims and caprices of the rulers and the lords would have formed the bulk of the laws guiding that religion. Thus, justice would have been according to the wishes of those monarchs and lords in a situation of cash and carry just as it is happening in Nigeria, a non-Islamic State today. In a nutshell, justice would have been a matter of nomenclature carried out in the name of Allah

     

    Stubbornness as a trait

    It is not strange that the Arabs of today are what the Qur’an had called their ancestors about 1500 years ago. A leopard cannot give birth to a lamb.

    Stubbornness as a trait is not peculiar to the Arabs. It is common to all peoples dwelling in desert areas. Even their animals like camels and donkeys share the same trait with them. The divine logic in driving Islam into the world though the desert Arabs is therefore to convince mankind that even stone-hearted people like them could be softened by this non-such religion. Despite the emergence of Islam through them, the Arabs have never been able to part with their natural obduracy which was the premise from which Prophet Muhammad (SAW) began the propagation of his divine mission.

     

    Judo-Arab Relationship

    Arabs and Jews are brothers from the same father (Prophet Ibrahim) but different mothers (Hajarah and Sarah). They share many traits of recalcitrance and obduracy in every aspect of their lives. Just as the Jews rejected Prophet Isa (Jesus) who emerged from amongst them so did the Arabs deny Muhammad even after they had convincingly  accorded him the status of a truthful and trustworthy personality, based on his excemplary character before he became a Prophet. But for the fact that his message eventually brought fame to the Arabs and elevated their status in the comity of nations they would not have rejected the divine  message called Islam theoretically and practically.

     

    The only Prophet from Arabia

    Incidentally, Prophet Muhammad (SAW) was the only Prophet from the Arab line. All other known Prophets after Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) came from among the Jews. Thus, the Jews can be said to be the world’s most luxurious race in divine prophet-hood. Yet, no Prophet was ever really accepted by them. The fact that a few of them hold on tenaciously to Torah which was revealed to Prophet Musa (Moses) and now called Old Testament, is only due to an historical prophecy which enabled them to hope for survival in the land of Judea.

     

    Jewish population

    Today, the entire population of all the Jews in the world is about 16 million people. Forget about the rhetoric hipe of six million of them being victim of massacre in Germany during the time of Adolf Hitler. It is mere poltical propaganda.

    Now, less than 7% of the Jewish population is religiously Jewish. The rest only answer the name Jews politically. In other words, despite the emergence of hundreds of Prophets from its blood, this race seems to be pathologically apathetic to religion. It can therefore be described as a race in a permanent state of war with God.

     

    Like Jews like Arabs

    In this case, the Arabs are hardly dissimilar from the Jews in their thoughts and in their actions. That the idea of the ongoing suicide bombings in the world originated from among the Jews but became the heritage of the Arabs is not strange.

    Of the four rightly guided Caliphs who succeeded Prophet Muhammad (SAW) as Heads of State and leaders of the Muslim Ummah, only one (Abubakr) was not killed in office and that was probably because he ruled for only two years. The other three, Umar Bn Khattab, Uthman Bn Affan and Ali Bn Abi Talib were all murdered gruesomely in cold blood as Heads of State by no other people than fellow Arabs. The Jews had done same long before the Arabs.

    After the first Caliphate era, polarization started to becloud the Muslim Ummah so much that a seed of indelible enmity inadvertently planted in the Muslim world grew into a tree which fruits were meant for the Sunni and the Shiite’ factions of Islam to harvest to their mutual disadvantage.

     

    Arabs in Spain

    At least, it remains a fact of history that the Arab Muslims ruled Spain for about 500 years from 750 CE to 1258 CE. It was   during that period that countries like France, Italy, Germany and Britain and others had their first contact with intellectual civilisation. If Islam was genuinely the Arabs’ objective of struggling for power, what Islamic achievements did they make during their half of a millennium rule over Spain? And why were they eventually evicted with ignominy from that country?

     

    If the Arab ingenuity had not been encapsulated in greed and self-centeredness, the intellectual hierarchy of the world today would have been different. In their lifestyle, even before the advent of Islam, the Arabs were notoriously known for three obnoxious engagements. These were WAR, WINE and WOMEN and they often engaged in each with relish. But Islam came to condemn each of those primordial  engagements which can be described as the main causes of self-destruction.

     

    Islamic leadership

    It is because Islam originated from the Arab domain where the two foremost Islamic homes (the Ka’abah in Makkah and the Prophet’s Mosque in Madinah) were situated plus the fact that the revelation of the Qur’an was in their language that the leadership of Islam is globally conceded, albeit tacitly, to the Arabs. But rather than rising to the status of Islamic leadership, they placed premium on Arabism and turned Islam into a pun on the chessboard of their racial, greedy politics.

    Today, what matters to the Arabs is Arabism rather than Islamicism. That is why virtually all the Arab countries are more related to Arabic rather than Islamic names officially.

     

    Islamic bodies

    Some topmost Islamic bodies like Muslim World League and the likes which came into existence for the Unity of the Ummah some decades ago are now moribund because the Arab Muslim leadership that is supposed to pilot them is nonexistent. The only global Islamic body known to be functioning today is the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) and that is because the Arabs need the population of that body to checkmate any unpalatable Western policy against the Arabs at the United Nations level. Incidentally, to counter the Arab agenda, the Westerners have infiltrated that body through a surreptitious incursion into it. Many of them are now members of OIC even if in observer status.

     

    Arabs business mentality

    To the great delight of the West, the wealthy Arab Muslims of today are spending their enormous resources in purchasing and acquiring football clubs in Europe even as their brethren in non-Arab parts of the world are wallowing in abject penury, squalor and degradation. What profits are then expected from such inconsequential ventures?

     

    Reference point

    In an article published in this column in 2010, yours sincerely analysed the population strength of the Arabs compared to that of the Jews. In that article, the population of the Arabs was put at 333.3 million while that of the Jews was said to be 13.3 million worldwide. At that time, only 4.7 million of the latter population is resident in Israel. Yet, the achievements of the Jews in terms of intellectualism and material wellbeing were almost 27 times those of the Arabs. In other words, population strength plus strong enormous wealth does not help the Arabs to develop in concrete terms even as those Arabs are virtually indifferent to Islam which brought them into limelight in the first instance.

     

    Enemies of Islam

    The summary of all the assertions here is that the Arabs and no other group of people, are the real enemies of Islam. They are the ones using their wealth to boost the various economic activities of the West including stock exchange, Hotel businesses and tourism as well as sports and games at the expense of the lives of Islamic adherents. Considering all factors militating against Islam, it seems that the greatest puzzle about the Arabs is their mutual enmity in which no Arab country wants to tolerate another. Egypt and Algeria are sworn enemies just because of rivalry in soccer game. Saudi Arabia and Yemen are in perpetual warfare merely on some primordial issues which had pitched the one against the other before the advent of Islam. Iraq and Kuwait are two neighbours that can never sleep with their two eyes closed due to mutual suspicion. Syria and Lebanon seem to have permanently designed an indelible demarcation line between them just for the reason of material gains. Libya and Sudan have had to go into military conflicts a number of times, across their common border, for no reason other than material benefits. Morocco and Algeria will rather choose the gallows than settle a seeming permanent rancour between them over the questionable ownership of Western Sahra. How can there be unity? Yet, some Nigerian Muslims often blame the problems in the Arab world on Western conspiracy. If that is truly the case, what prevents the Arabs from conspiring together to resist Western conspiracy against their unity?

     

    Nigerian factor

    Based on sheer religious sentiment, many Nigerian Muslims think that by pitching tent with the Arabs against the Jews on the Palestinian issue they are pitching tent with Islam. This is far from the truth. The problem of the homeless Palestinians is purely humanitarian rather than religious. And that problem is more fuelled by the Arabs who ply hypocritical role in it than by the Jews who are directly benefitting from it.

    How many Nigerian Muslims know that the siege on Gaza Strip which began in January 2009 was not by Israel alone? It was a clandestine connivance of Israel and Egypt with the military support of the Western countries and financial backing of Saudi Arabia. Are Egyptians and the Saudis not Arabs? Why should they tighten the noose of death on their fellow Arab brothers? But that is the Arab nature for you. If you see them in any solidarity, it is for the purpose of hatching a treachery against a fellow Arab country or Islamic interest. The recent senseless imbroglio between a mischievous tripod in the Gulf region and Bahrain is a sufficient example of what the Arabs can do to contradict what Islam preaches.

     

    Islamic relevance

    Arabs love power and they will do anything, including suicide bombing and cold blood murder to cling to power directly or indirectly. That is why democracy in the Arab world knows no  voting in a democratic sense. It is a mere matter of nomenclature. Once installed, an Arab Head of State will remain in power till his death. He will even want to be succeeded by his son. Syria is a typical example. And, except for the sudden insurgency that led to the infamous Arab spring, Presidents Hosni Mubarak of Egypt and Muammar Gaddafi of Libya would have been succeeded by their children respectively despite their claim of democracy.

    By this assertion, ‘The Message’ column is not opposed to leadership by succession if that will ventilate a peaceful atmosphere but it should not be by imposition. That will grossly contradict the position of Islam which was why the second Caliph, Umar Bn Khattab, rejected a suggestion that his son be made his successor. He even cursed the man who made the suggestion and accused him of nursing an ulterior motive aimed at causing a dissension withing the Muslim Ummah. The analysis here is just to show the extent to which the Arabs have returned to the love of power, even at the expense of Islam, after the first four Caliphs.

    Today’s Muslim world is like a mighty stream in which everybody drinks water. But those who position themselves at the upper side of that stream are the ones polluting it for the others. And if something drastic is not done to change the cause of pollution in that stream, it may eventually become a poison for all its drinkers.

  • On the ladder of democracy

    On Monday, democracy was on President Buhari’s mind. Receiving the Governor General of Canada, Her Excellency Hon. Julie Payette at Aso Rock Presidential Villa, the president observed that democracy is improving steadily in Nigeria, noting that Nigerians are having a deeper understanding of the culture and tenets of the system and the institutions of free and fair elections are being strengthened. 

    If the president is right, then Nigerians have earned a bragging right and must hold their heads up for making it to the elite club of nations. After all, democracy has gained global recognition as the best form of government. It’s true that we still lack progress in the indices of development, but we will sure get there once we have the right system of government.

    The president emphasized how we got to this point. We have been learning from advanced democracies while we also look inward to appreciate our peculiarities. And it must be the case that these peculiarities of ours do not drag us down or pull us back from the goal of greater enrichment of democracy. Otherwise the president would not have considered it worth mentioning.

    To determine if democracy is winning in Nigeria, we must measure it against the ideal, using for guidance the Lincolnian definition according to which the people rule themselves on behalf of themselves and for themselves. And it doesn’t not matter that this ideal is fully realizable only in village or city-state democracies where every adult member gathers under the tree to deliberate on and decide important issues. There are various ways in which even complex societies like ours can deepen democracy and advance on its ladder. To my mind, a meaningful movement toward the ideal requires our nation to invest in deliberate efforts toward the fulfillment of at least five conditions. 

    First, there must be a shared interest in the ideal. If we all agree that the rule of the people by the people and for the people is the best, and we are all included in the peoplehood, then, some of us cannot secretly harbor the monarchical or imperial spirit while expecting others to serve as subjects and toe the line. From the president to the council chair, from the Senate president to the councilor, and from the richest to the poorest, there must be a common interest in upholding and promoting the tenets of democracy to the fullest. 

    Practically, what this means in the simplest terms is consistency in our advocacy and implementation of democratic rules and procedures. One indispensable rule is that the people choose their elected representatives. And this choice applies to both the party nomination and general election processes.

    This appears to be so clear and simplistic requirement that some may wonder why it even needs emphasis. If we expect the people to vote for their party’s candidates in a general election, it is commonsensical to accord them the right to vote for their preferred party candidates during nomination. It is this principle that favors direct primary. It is a progressive principle, the idea being to enlarge the coast of democracy by bringing more people into its tribe. Of course, the aristocrats and wannabe monarchists could care less. For them, the fewer the merrier and so they limit party members’ access to monopolize power. 

    A second requirement is a constitutional respect for the equality of citizens through legislation that limits the influence of money and wealth in politics. Ideally, this means that some citizens are not filthy rich while others are stinking poor. But we know that this ideal is unrealizable where free enterprise is in play. But respect for constitutional equality is not an unrealistic requirement. What it requires is a strong legislation that bans vote selling/buying and voter suppression. It further requires making access to political offices devoid of artificial obstacles. If the cost of nomination or expression of interest forms is so prohibitive that only the wealthy can afford it, this defeats the ideal of constitutional equality of citizens.

    Thirdly, there must be strong institutions designed to protect and promote the democratic ideal. These include independent electoral umpires, non-partisan security agencies, an independent judiciary, and open and ideologically distinct political parties. Obviously, some of these are more important than others. Political parties are not essential for democracy to flourish as we have had examples of no-party democracies. However, in the context of modern representative democracies, political parties channel the interests of members around coherent ideologies which they champion. 

    A fourth condition is that individuals and political organizations are not allowed to game the system for private ends, and everyone is required to play by the rules which are fair and are put in place ahead of contests. As the temptation to cheat is always present, and as cheating is a threat to the interest of everyone in maintaining the system, this is perhaps one of the most important requirements. Unfortunately, it is one that many societies, including ours, have taken lightly. Ballot swapping, ballot box snatching, voter intimidation, and raw physical combat at election sites are abnormalities that are not in anyone’s interest.

    A final condition on my list is that positions of authority are not exploited for undue advantage. This is a no-brainer. If an incumbent running for reelection exploits his or her position to influence electoral umpires, security agencies or the judiciary, it is an unfair exploitation of their office, which they would lash out against if the shoe were on the other foot. It makes moral and legal sense therefore to have strict and enforceable rules against such action.

    Clearly, no existing society has been able to satisfy all these five conditions to the fullest. In some advanced democracies where vote selling/buying is not a threat to the ideal because voters have a sense of their dignity that cannot be bought, voter suppression is employed against minority populations. Every society has renegade individuals and organizations whose reason of being is to cheat. And in some societies that we would normally expect to respect an independent judiciary, ideological orientation predominates in the selection process. But when judges are chosen and confirmed based on ideological leaning, do we really expect a fair dispensation of justice?

    Rather than looking at other societies as our guide, therefore, it is best to ask ourselves what kind of society do we want to be? Moving forward, what is our interest in the progressive development of our democracy so that we leave a proud legacy for our children? As we count our steps on the ladder of democracy, do we set our minds toward an upward movement or are we tempted to go down a step because it serves our private interests more than the upward movement?

    As we look forward to another general election in four months, we should learn from the shameful experiences of our recent past when our topmost leadership considered election as a do or die battle; when political opponents were deemed as mortal enemies; when electoral umpires openly and blatantly shuffled aside the ethos of their profession for the proverbial pot of porridge.

    Leaders who see themselves as emperors whose will must be imposed on everyone must have a rethink because no condition is permanent. We have elections because we are a republic, not a kingdom under a monarch that is chosen by an oracle.

    Every citizen has a right and a responsibility to have his or her vote count. And voters must not yield to the temptation of selling their votes for pittance for the simple reason that they are going to pay heavily for it throughout the next four years. If a governorship candidate spends 100 billion Naira or more on vote buying, we can be sure that he or she will take multiples of that amount from the treasury of the state in the next four years. Then we have no good reason to complain if we were recipients of his/her electoral corruption.

    We are now far below on the ladder of democracy. But we could ascend to the top if we set our collective mind to it. Let’s do it.

  • A day of citations

    Apology

    This article was meant for publication last in this column Friday, but due to a circumstance beyond yours sincerely, it did not come out. I am sorry for any inconvenience that the readers might have encountered as a result.

    Monologue

    IT has been asserted severally in this column that the similitude of column writing in a national newspaper on a weekly basis is like pregnancy in the womb of an expectant mother. When the pregnancy reaches advanced stage, its carrier can hardly have a moment of respite until she has been delivered of a bouncing baby whose cry will ginger her into consciousness.

     

    The problem of a columnist

    The problem of a quality columnist is not a dearth of ideas but a deluge of them. No columnist of worth will ever be in want of vocabulary to use in   presenting his thoughts and ideas to his readers. A strong linguistic background and many years of experience in reading and writing would have taken proper care of that. Thus, a worthy columnist faces problem only when it comes to choosing the subject of his writing. Such is the weekly intellectual agony which any newspaper or magazine columnist, anywhere in the world, is compelled to pass through from time to time.

     

    The dilemma of a columnist

    While a columnist is busy ruminating on an issue to write about, several other issues will spring up and start throwing themselves to him torrentially in such a way that he may easily falls into  a dilemma or even confusion.

    That was the case with yours sincerely this week. Today’s topic was not at all, in the cluster of subjects competing for consideration in this column. But usually, in the melee of searching the brain for a subject that will attract the attention of readers and quench their intellectual thirst, an experienced columnist should be able to push his God-given skill to the front burner to meet the momentary taste of his readers.

     

    Skill as a hobby

    Ability to speak or write intellectually is a gift from Allah which grows into a skill over   time. And it becomes much easier when such a skill becomes a hobby. Speaking, no matter how eloquently done, cannot be as important as getting audience. So is writing. A speaker can be classified as an orator only by the audience that listens to him always and benefit from the richness of his speech. Experienced radio and television broadcasters can attest to this. In the same vein, an author or a columnist can be celebrated or denigrated only by his readers. Any writer who takes his readers for granted, therefore, does so at his own risk. Such a writer may not be qualified for an author or a columnist. Today’s topic in this column was chosen extemporaneously out of the miscellany of others that were earnestly putting themselves forward for prompt attention.

    The topic is more about the modern virtue which gives the modern man a worthy life to live. That virtue is education that serves as the master key to the door of knowledge. Without knowledge, human life would have been worthless. Today, the main symbol of knowledge is the citadel called University. The master key to that citadel is not certificate as mostly misconceived, especially in Nigeria, but the use to which it is humbly put.

     

    Home of knowledge

    Abeokuta, the traditional home of knowledge and culture in Nigeria, was agog last, Saturday, October 20, 2018. That was probably another day on which a famous Yoruba adage: “every day is like a festival”,  was further ascertained with its deep-rooted meaning. And that was the destination of last Friday’s cruising yacht of writing called ‘The Message’ Column. And the anchorage was Crescent University, Abeokuta (CUAB) where morality is the permanent rule. That is the place where a miscellany of citations was read, as some great Nigerians were conferred with doctoral degrees  (Honoris Causa) in some notable areas of human endeavour. Dr. S. O. Babalola was one of those so conferred and the citations read at that occasion, in respect of this great man was of particular interest to this columnist as an alternative citation was prepared by ‘The Message’ column in adviance of the occasion. It went thus:

     

    An alternative citation

    Life is a school in which many apartments are available. If you are lucky to study in one department, do not assume that you have acquired all the needed education with which to survive the oddities of life. It is one thing to pass through a school. It is another to allow the same school to pass through you. That is the real essence of any education that will culminate in useful knowledge.

    The unassuming Octogenarian gentleman popularly known as Dr. S. O. Babalola has been on stage in Nigeria’s amphitheatre of positive actions for more than 50 years. Yet, he still surges ahead to the satisfactory comfort of those around him, home and abroad. If I were in a position to present this exemplary man’s citation at any public event, below is what I would have liked to present:

    “This is a citation and not a summary of a biography. It is the citation of one of Nigeria’s iconic leaders who is eminently qualified to be cited vertically from the pack of his horizontal peers. This citation is unconventional. Unlike many other citations, the emphasis here is neither on the date and place of birth nor on the schools attended and the certificates obtained. The emphasis here is rather on a citation from which most people, present here or absent, will learn how to keep the track of life without falling by the way side.

    If, on any occasion, every citation is about date of birth, schools attended or wives married the day will be tastelessly dotted with sheer rhetoric and heavily clouded by a boring monotony. The world is fast changing with dynamism and anybody who refuses to join the train of change before it leaves the station will be left behind to do so on another day.

     

    The Cornerstone

    “While man’s desires and aspirations stir, he cannot choose but err; yet, in his erring journey through the night, instinctively, he travels towards the light”. By Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

    The above poem is the parable of a rejected stone that has turned out to be the cornerstone of the house. Those who can still remember the history of Prophet Ismail, (the first son of Prophet Ibrahim) should be able to recall that the son was once ejected with his mother, from their family home and banished to a desert asylum at a place now called Makkah.  Today, we can all see the outcome of that episode in the everlasting uniqueness of Hajj as the fifth pillar of Islam. As it was in the primordial time, so it is in the contemporary time”.

     

    Profile of an Icon

    “We have a man in our midst here today, whose rising profile has enabled us to know that the purpose of human life is not just to live comfortably and be happy. Beneath many days of happy mood are some quiet nights of sleeplessness and tears of sorrow. That is the secret of human experience which should serve as the first lesson to be learnt in a citation. The man in reference here is Dr. S. O. Babalola, OON, a man who combines humility with conscience to form an identity by which he is generally known. That is an identity that clearly distinguishes a man of honour from men of wealth. We should all know that humility based on conscience is the most active cursor of piety.

     

    His rising profile

    Perhaps, if Dr. S. O. Babalola had not exprienced rejection in certain quarters, at a stage in his life’s odyssey, he would not have emerged as the President of the Muslim Ummah of the South West Nigeria (MUSWEN) which is the umbrella body for all Muslim organizations in the region. And if he had not become the President of MUSWEN, he would probably not have risen to the post of Deputy President-General (South) of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA). With the latter post, he is the paramount leader of all the Muslims in the entire Southern Nigeria by the grace of Allah. What could have made this possible besides destiny through the guidance of Allah?

    Now, if, in the course of reading his citation, we trace the background of this unique icon to any school or madrasah he attended at the early age of his life, what lesson are we to learn from that? If we describe him as one of the foremost but quiet philanthropists currently in Nigeria, and list the chain of his philanthropic gestures, what uniqueness can we derive from that for him? If we say here that he is married with children and he gave those children qualitative education how does that make his life different from the lives of his peers? All those are a common feature of common citations often presented publicly, sometimes, to the boredom of the audience.

     

    The difference He makes

    What actually makes conspicuous difference in this man’s life, which only a few people are able to perceive and focus, is his ability to identify, early in life, the factors of equanimity in human life.

    That is the guiding principle adopted by Dr. S. O. Babalola who rose from the dungeon of obscurity to a very high pedestal of limelight in integrity despite all odds. But he added an addendum of his own to that principle. That addendum which has become a template for those who are willing to learn is as follows:

    “To be happy in life you must make others happy. And to live in peace, you must ventilate a peaceful environment for others. Happiness is based on peace and peace from man to man is reciprocal”.

    Thus, for Dr. S. O. Babalola, rising to become a towering leader was not by fortuitous. He had painstakingly studied the qualities of a good leader and he has patiently imbibed those qualities through self-discipline and divinely guided inspiration.

    Attributes of Good Leadership

    Anybody who cares to know the attributes of good leadership which form the ladder that took this great man to this stage of his life will discover those qualities to be as follows:

    Meaningful focus; interminable patience; relentless confidence; untamable courage; inspired innovations; natural humility; irrepressible endurance; insubordinate assiduity; divinely-guided self-motivation; impeccable resilience; enviable transparency; unequalled generosity; plausible accountability; unfaultable authenticity; intractable decisiveness; absolute contentment and, of course, unpolluted conscience.

     

    Question

    Now, which of these qualities cannot be found in this man? And which of them should not be emulated by young men and women who are aspiring to be leaders tomorrow? This reminds one of a stanza in the poem of an Arab poet thus:

    “He is not a man whoever relies on the achievements of his parents to exhibit pride; a man indeed is he who can stand out of the pack with his head raised, and say: here I am today, despite all odds of life”.

    Today, at the peak of his ladder of excellence, Dr. S. O. Babalola has become a school for those who want to study the ladder of life and how to mount it to the top. You can now see why a citation like this is said to be unconventional.  In modern time, this is what a citation should be to enable future leaders to learn from it in preparation for the mantle of leadership.

     

    Conclusion

    This alternative citation is hereby concluded with a prayer that was once offered poetically by an American woman (J. Walch) who dedicated her entire life to the service mankind upon which she died. That prayer has since become a daily rhyme for Dr. S. O. Babalola in words and in action. It goes thus:

    “God make my life a little staff, upon which the weak may rest, that what so health and wealth I have may serve my neighbours best”.

    We pray the Almighty Allah to preserve his life and imbue him with continued sound health, guidance and protection, that he may serve humanity for long in good spirit. Amen.

     

  • To Mr. President, with candor

    Your Excellency,

     

    I respectfully address you directly today for three reasons. First, I am aware you are a good consumer of information, who loves reading newspapers, including opinion pages. Therefore, I am encouraged that this piece will find you. Second, beside your expressed interest in a second term, I believe that you are even more concerned about leaving behind a legacy of probity, outstanding achievements, and principled democratic leadership.

    Third, in the philosophy and practice of leadership, the reality of a leader’s achievement is sometimes eclipsed by the conflicting perception of followers. A perception of disinterestedness in the day to day task of governance may fortuitously create an impression of incompetence, which is all that a desperate opposition needs to attack an incumbent. When they succeed in translating perception into reality in the minds of the voting public, a leader seeking legacy is in danger of losing the goodwill of the people. Unfortunately, this is where I think you are currently. Things may change tomorrow, depending on your reaction today. Let me explain.

    Four years ago, many political observers were terrified by the reality that confronted them. They knew that if there was no change, the country was headed for disaster. Boko Haram was in control of large swaths of land. The economy was collapsing under the weight of largescale corruption. The ruling party, PDP, was in tatters, unable to nip the crisis of greed in the bud. APC, your newly minted party, caught the attention of the people and its change slogan was made for the occasion. Your nomination as the flag bearer of the party was picture perfect. So were the APC state congresses and the nominations to various positions. With a sense of discipline perceived, the electorate believed that your party was ready to control the levers of power in the nation. You got elected.

    Four years later, no one is in doubt that the same level of goodwill doesn’t exist. For someone who wants a legacy, you must be interested in knowing what changed. Our people observe that if a dog once approaches a person with its tail dancing to an invisible music, but the next time it starts barking angrily at the same person, we must conclude that something changed for the negative.

    This is especially distressing for many of your supporters who believe that you have passionately tackled some of the most challenging issues facing the nation prior to your election. You have degraded Boko Haram, recovered the land they invaded, and rehabilitated many displaced citizens. You have worked hard to diversify the economy, and your investment in agriculture is yielding bountiful fruits literally and figuratively. You have taken the battle against corruption to new heights though it appears that the enemy is unrelenting in fighting back. Your opponents are naturally not impressed by all these. But it appears there is something more to your challenge if the mockery of your achievements is not limited to your opponents and some of your supporters are beating a retreat.

    So, what changed with your party and with you that the dog that once danced now barks? I concede that this may all be a matter of perception. But when a 2015 die-hard Buharist now tells me that he would vote APC ticket in his state, but he would not vote for the party’s presidential candidate, that is more than perception. What gave?

    Mr. President, it all started on your first day on the job. Perhaps, with a genuine intention to flaunt your new democratic credentials, you inadvertently sent the wrong message to your party and the National Assembly by claiming that you belonged to everyone and to no one. The old foxes took their cue and the consequence was the anarchy that descended on the party and the institutions it had just taken over. Thus, Senator Saraki aligned with PDP to capture Senate leadership and ensure that he belongs to both parties, hedging his bet on the future. With the failure of devolution legislation in the National Assembly, we have seen the strategy play out the way it was designed to.

    I am not sure if any lessons were learnt. But those leaders who struggled with you through the merger talks and who had good ideas of what a progressive party must be and do for the people cannot but marvel in disappointment. What is their incentive now to go all in with you again?

    The crisis that now threatens your victory and the party next year could have been managed well if you have been in charge from the beginning. You may have wanted to avoid the accusation of high-handedness and micromanaging that bedeviled former President Obasanjo. But on this issue, he knew better that the political crab must not sleep with its eyes closed if it would effectively protect its head. It was almost too late before you realized the danger of staying aloof. Your democratic credential surely overwhelmingly surpasses Obasanjo’s. Still, an Aristotelian mean would have served you best.

    For your detractors, the most unforgivable infraction was your response to the herdsmen killings across the Middle Belt and some southern states. Admittedly, the atrocities predated your inauguration and there may be some political intrigue going on. But it shouldn’t take days without a word from the father of the nation when the victims needed assurance that their government was with them in their distress; and not visiting Benue for days after the tragedy was a mistake. And apparently suggesting a moral equivalence between resident farmers and herdsmen on a mission to appropriate land and kill for their cattle was quite unfortunate. In a universe of values, where integrity and dignity count for something, you and Atiku don’t occupy the same plain. It is therefore a sad turn of events that even some of your 2015 supporters are now lining up behind him.

    What can you now do? Charity begins at home as the old proverb suggests. APC’s home is presently in disarray notwithstanding Comrade Chairman’s upbeat assessment. You are the leader of the party and you must act as such. The primaries have damaged the cord of unity and you alone can fix it. Delegating that responsibility to the chairman will not bring desired results. Sadly, it is beyond him now.

    With a united front restored to the party, you need to hold up your achievements for the world to see. You cannot afford to outsource this responsibility to surrogates. They can complement your efforts; but if you canvass for the vote of the electorates, they deserve to hear from the horse’s mouth. And it is certainly not inappropriate to express apology for misperceptions which may have been caused by your action or lack thereof.

    Finally, there is the perception of sectionalism which has followed you even before your tenure. Fairly or unfairly, many Nigerians think that you are committed to an Islamization agenda. There is probably nothing to it and your VP has done a great job defending you. But again, you need to address the accusation of lopsided appointment, favoritism and sectarianism.

    There is no better illustration of how people came by this perception as the ongoing drama at the NHIS. Twice the Executive Secretary was suspended by the Minister of Health and the Board respectively. And twice, he was green-lighted to return by the presidency. You probably know better the challenge at NHIS and why you overruled the Minister in 2017 and the Board in 2018. I have seen Twitter threads alleging the excesses of the Board and HMOs. But you cannot expect the public to know what you know unless they are informed. If it is beneath your office as president, can the SGF or other highly placed official debrief the public?

    Mr. President, I do not know if you can buy back the confidence and goodwill of many of your 2015 supporters across the zones. But there is a first step you need to take: level up with them; explain why their negative perceptions are wrong; and promise a more robust engagement with them to avoid future misunderstanding.

     

    God bless Nigeria.

  • 75 get N5.3m for empowerment

    No fewer than 75 people received N5.3 million cash and materials for empowerment, The Companion, an association of Muslim men in business and professions, President Alhaji Wale Sonaike has said.

    The disbursement was meant to redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor.

    At the Lagos House of Assembly Mosque Hall, Ikeja, where the seventh edition of The Companion Zakat and Sadaqah Fund Distribution was held, Sonaike expressed happiness that the number of contributors this year is higher than the previous years.

    He said: “We have also been able to increase the number of beneficiaries as well even though it is less than 50 per cent of the applications we received. This clearly shows that we still have a very long way to go.  The amount of money we were able to collect this year is about N5.3 million and this is a far cry from the Zakat and Sadaqah Fund available in the Lagos economy. We observe with satisfaction that a number of Muslim organisations are also involved in Zakat collection and distribution, but all put together is still below the capacity of the economy.”

    He thanked those “entrusting us with their contribution to the fund. I wish to call on numerous qualified Muslims to hasten to the call of Allah and fulfil this important obligation. It is common knowledge that payment of zakat is the least observed among the five pillars of Islam because a vast majority of Muslims, who are supposed to deduct and pay Zakat from their wealth have not paid sufficient attention to this obligation. Zakat is a compulsory act of worship meant not only to purify and increase their wealth but also to earn them a great reward from Allah both in this world and the hereafter. If left unpaid it will also be a source of punishment from Allah both in this world and the hereafter.”

    The beneficiaries, he said, are in different categories including education support, medical treatment and accommodation.

    “Others will receive cash and business equipment to start, support or expand their businesses in the micro and small scale level,” he said.

    Sonaike urged the beneficiaries to ensure a prudent management of the fund/equipment they receive and pray Allah to banish poverty.

    The Secretary of The Companion Zakat Fund Committee, Alhaji Abdul Kabir Olayiwola Baruwa said equipment distributed include sewing, industrial and grinding machines and freezers.

    Baruwa said the beneficiaries were selected using the criteria stipulated in the Quran.

    “The selection process is transparent and lot of due diligence was put in place to ensure the Zakat proceed goes to the indigents,” he said.