Category: Monday

  • Hero of our time

    Hero of our time

    During the Iraq war, I collided with some of my American students over its raison d’etre. Nationalist fervour trumped common sense among them when I contended that President George W. Bush and his cabinet had not shown Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. Some loathed me; I toasted the facts. They joined the mass fury of the public and lapped like cat the tendentious milk of White House’s propaganda.

    One of my students vacated the class to Baghdad’s smoky streets. A year later, quite a few of them accosted me to tender their apologies for tarring me as a hater of their country. The fog may have cleared, but the dead could not knock their way out of their caskets. Day after day, the tv screen treated a sad country to picture after picture of boys who had petered out over the apocrypha of their leaders.  The surreal apparition tanked Bush’s rating, but the man remained defiant and impregnable. Few remember the boys today. I don’t know if my student, a ruddy and eager youth, survived the inferno. In the words of the poet, W.H. Auden, “Even the dreadful martyrdom must run its course.”

    I contemplate that as I view footages of Ukraine streets. Whole buildings tarred black by mortar, whole families in peril, whole families perished, whole day treks in snow and fear, mothers and daughters on the run, the aged lumber along like a minute old calf, a nuclear plant bonfire, a scenic street tranquilised by an armoured tank, a baby asleep as rockets whistle past.

    The story comes home. Nigerians run against death, and also against prejudice. Some have arrived home, leaving a wreck behind, their surviving self being the remnant wreck. They have their pieces to repair. All of this because of a geo-political game gone awry. Vladimir Putin, the villain of the century so far pitted against Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the hero of the century so far.

    Even if Putin is wronged, he has no excuse to wrong the nationals, humans who hold no guns or grudges.

    Some Nigerians project lies. One, that NATO had an agreement not to expand. Two, so he had a right to invade. I would like anyone to tender that agreement signed by NATO. When the Soviet Union was about to crumble, Russian Mikhail Gorbachev, signed no deal to forbid NATO to expand. In 2014, here was Gorbachev’s words: “Not a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn’t bring it up, either.”

    At the Visegrad Declaration, Poland, Hungary and then Czechoslovakia, sought guarantee to join the European security system. In 1993, President Boris Yeltsin wrote President Bill Clinton that, “Any possible integration of east European countries into NATO will not automatically lead to the alliance turning against Russia.”

    A certain entente knitted US and Russia. The US inspected their nuclear weapons and signed a deal with Russia that Ukraine got rid of its nuclear weapons so long as Russia guaranteed its independence and sovereignty. If Ukraine had those weapons, Putin would not be flexing its muscles.

    Just as U.S. was an imperial bully in Iraq, so is Putin. He is revising history as a pretext to pulverise Ukraine. America will not satisfy Putin’s sanguinary thirst. They are sacrificing Ukraine to make it the graveyard of Russia’s economy.

    NATO can be blamed for expanding. But blame Russia first who cannot endear itself to its old subjects. All NATO members are by choice. Putin is trying to force another nation to love him. Love does not come by fiat. If not, he would not want need all that weapons and get all that resistance. Not Crimea, or Estonia, nor Moldovia, or Georgia want Russia. Putin sees them as pigmy nations. He may conquer the land, but not the soul. American learned that in Iraq. As novelist George Elliot noted, “Power finds it place in lack of power.” The former Soviet bloc countries sought embrace with NATO. Russia is the jilted bully.

    If America has gone so far with NATO, Russia cannot roll back the clock. It is called Realpolitik, a term enunciated by German writer Ludwig von Rochau and popularised by such men as Bismarck, Kissinger, Kennan and Lee Kwan Yew.

    Rather than think of clever ways to undo the NATO swagger, he is hectoring the innocent. Putin sulks in his saturnine throne. He distorts power like his forbears: Stalin, Brezhnev. Charles de Gaulle, himself a lover of coercive powers, says this of Stalin: “This is not the domination of a party, nor of a class, but that of a single man. It is not a regime of the people. It is against the nature of man. We will have them on our hands for a hundred years.” How prophetic of the stiff-necked general.

    But the man of the hour is Zelenskyy. There have been fewer men like him in history. Not de Gaulle, who had to plant himself in London to growl over the airwaves, or Churchill who had America over his shoulders. Not Mandela ensconced in a jail. He is not seeking shelter. He is fighting for the soul of his country. Not a warmonger, he forbids “a legend of 300 Spartans. I want peace.” He tells America, “I want ammunition; not a ride.” Like the great French play, Le Cid by Pierre Corneille, that decries the shame of dying without having fought.

    He is that sort of leader we want in Nigeria. Not one who has not seen struggle, who has not faced the loom and danger of a tyrant’s whip. Not one who has not abandoned family and friends to lay down his life for freedom and democracy. We want a man with sacrifice and spirit of Zelenskyy in 2023. Not those who have only known air-conditioners and fried rice and private jets.

    Zelenskyy also united his people. More than economic revival, the first task of Nigeria’s leader in 2023 is to unite us. To play down tribal fealty or fanatical faith, and clasp everyone to one bosom. That is why Zelenskyy is the hero of our times, a direct opposite of Russian writer Mikhail Lermontov’s novel of an anti-hero.

     

    It’s the Lord’s doing

    •Felix E. Adedokun,
    President, GKS

    As the Bible shows, patience is a long virtue. The God’s Kingdom Society hit the news on a Salem note in the investiture of Brother Felix Ekundayo Adedokun as its president, the first since the fraught era of Emmanuel Aighalua and, before then, the Trojan of the word E.T. Otomewo.

    Adedokun is an exponent of the word, sober, self-possessed with flair and intellectual aura, a dynamo behind the microphone. He comes in to cement a time of peace in the church that once tumbled through high tides of ego and clique. He crested his own stormy waters when some thought he was sandwiched between two factions because his wife was daughter of the suave Benjamin Tietie who led a breakaway. He maintained a sangfroid, staying in the church with his wife and children. His focus was on God, not man. He might have followed Christ’s words, “By your patience possess you your soul.” Today, he is president. I can only say, it is the Lord’s doing. The vice president, Tariola Ekisowei, another stalwart, was my senior by three classes in Government College, Ughelli. But I never knew him in that light until we were out of school. I knew him as the quiet senior unstirred by others who bullied their juniors. He only bullied on the football field as a sleek defender whose two loping legs cautioned any feisty dribbler. Benedict Hart, the secretary general, I knew as a reporter in The Guardian and I never knew, too, that he could view the vineyard from the newsroom window. The treasurer, Olufemi Akinwale, we grew up in our late teens together in Lagos. A calm, well-adjusted person who loved IICC Shooting Stars, but I also never envisioned him in the ministry. What a delight to watch him preach with knowledge and presence as he expounds a Bible text after another. Theophilus Iwoh, of course, was on course, following his father’s footstep. Iwoh is a controlled preacher with a depth of articulation. The choirmaster general, Timothy Esimagbele, continues to amaze me with his fluid fingers on the piano.

    The investiture was conducted by Brother Joel Solupeju, a spry old man who is now the chairman of the Assembly of the Lord’s Ministry Elders – a mouthful. Known before as Olusola, he was my spiritual father for all of my youth in Ibadan, up till my undergraduate years in Ife. He broke down texts and clarified queries for me, especially when I had private storms and existential anxieties about the authenticity of the faith. So grateful he still kicks as a soldier of Christ, a term I first heard from him. I should note that Adedokun, Iwoh, Akinwale and Esimagbele are chips off the old block. They follow their father’s haloes. E.A. Adedokun, an executive minister, cast an avuncular shadow on the church with his humour and institutional memory. M. O. Iwoh headed the executive board. Michael Akinwale joined over a decade after he thought his application had been forgotten. He and his son are a type of Joseph and Jesus, the carpenter birthing a preacher. Jonathan Esimagbele, the publicity secretary and one-time choirmaster general, was my father’s best friend.

    With Adedokun in the saddle, I believe the church can now pursue its purpose with greater vigour. He that believes shall not make haste.

     

  • An airline’s brush with an emir

    An airline’s brush with an emir

    The dispute between the airline, Air Peace and the Emir of Kano, Alhaji Aminu Ado Bayero could have been sorted out behind the scene but for its mishandling by his chief protocol officer, Isa Bayero.

    What are the issues? The emir had arrived at the Murtala Mohammed International Airport, Lagos from Banjul, Gambia at about 5.52am and wanted to connect the 6.15 am Air Peace flight to Kano. His cousin who doubles as his chief protocol officer, Isa placed a call to the chairman of the airline, Allen Onyema around 5.59am requesting that the flight be delayed for an hour to accommodate the emir and nine others in his entourage.

    Onyema who was woken up by the early morning call, requested for some time to get across to his officials at the airport on the situation on the ground. On learning that the plane was already fully loaded and taxing to take-off, he got back to the emir’s cousin on the difficulty in acceding to his request. He then offered to accommodate the emir in the 7am flight to Abuja.

    The suggestion was said to have been turned down outright by Isa who later wrote a petition to the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority NCAA against the airline over what he termed “disrespect to the Emir and the people of Kano”. In the petition, Isa demanded punitive measures from the NCAA against Air Peace.

    It is not clear the type of punishment Isa wanted from the NCAA against the airline for alleged disrespect to the emir and the people of Kano. Neither is the public privy to the response he got from the aviation regulating authority on his petition. But comments from Isa as the altercation progressed indicated that the NCAA viewed his position as incitement to the people of Kano against the airline. Isa admitted that much when he said: “I wrote to the DG of the NCAA to complain but if someone claimed my statement is inciting, well they are entitled to their opinion”. We shall return to this.

    In their reaction to the petition, the Chief Operating Officer of the airline, Toyin Olajide denied claims that the organization disrespected the emir. In a detailed account of what transpired between them and Isa, the company said their decision not to delay a fully loaded and taxing aircraft was rather to protect the image of the emir.

    “If we had agreed to stop and delay an aircraft already set to take-off, for another one hour only for the doors to be opened and the emir to walk in, there would have been a very serious uproar in the media against the airline and the emir”, Olajide said.  The official further claimed they pleaded with Isa to understand the situation but he refused.

    Apparently rattled by the reaction of the airline, Isa issued a 72-hour ultimatum to them to tender apology to the emir in a national daily first and then come down physically to Kano and show remorse or they will go extra miles to press home their dissatisfaction with the conduct of the airline.

    Isa’s case is that the airline delayed their flight from Banjul to Lagos for over one hour resulting in their late arrival. He is contending that since the same airline was responsible for their late arrival, they should take responsibility for their inability to connect the Kano early morning flight.

    To prove the point that they made bookings in that aircraft, he said when they wanted to re-book the next available flight to Kano billed for 7pm, the airline asked them to pay a “no show” fee.

    But the airline had claimed that the Banjul-Lagos flight terminated in Lagos and had no connection with any other destination. These claims need to be proven conclusively.

    Even as the emir’s chief protocol officer is yet to furnish evidence of bookings for that flight, there are salient issues of customer relationship that are thrown up by the dispute. If an airline delays a connection flight and makes it impossible for their passengers to meet up, the responsibility should be heaped at the shoulders of that airline and not the passengers. That point has to be made.

    But that is beside the issue. The dispute is not about the airline denying responsibility for the delayed Banjul-Lagos flight. It is the propriety in tagging the refusal to stop a fully loaded and taxing aircraft for one hour as a mark of disrespect for the emir and the people of Kano. There is obviously, no positive correlation between the two. It is mischief in its extreme form to impute such motives into the incident. Isa failed to give the matter the professional handle required of it.

    Rather, he escalated and politicized it by dragging the entire people of Kano State into a routine infraction common to our domestic airline operations. Ordinarily, the airline should have no difficulty tendering apology to the emir for the delay if that was the issue. But that was not the initial demand of the emir’s cousin. After all, a customer is always right, in business parlance. He was only bent on extracting punishment from the airline.

    The dispute got to its current entanglement because of its obvious mishandling by the emir’s cousin. First, he wrote the NCAA bandying inciting and combustible allegations to procure undeserved punishment against the airline. But he failed and was rather cautioned by the NCAA on the implications of his letter but it made no difference to him.

    Apparently dissatisfied with the position of the NCAA, he went further to issue royal ultimatum and award judgment for the publication of an apology in a national daily. The last time I read of such costs, they were issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. He has even threatened dire consequences should the airline fail to accede to his royal proclamation. Very strange indeed!

    Isa even made veiled threats to incite the people of Kano State against patronizing the airline, all in the desire to avenge the alleged disrespect of the emir. He is free to patronize any airline of his choice if he is dissatisfied with the services of the one in question. But to drag in and incite the people of Kano on this singular issue is revealing of how many of the crises in those cities are generated by the elite.

    Isa has already erected obstacles to a mutual resolution of the dispute through his brash and arrogant posturing. If Air Peace accedes to the condescending ultimatum, then, other airlines should be prepared to take orders from an Obi or Oba on similar matters.

  • Mubarak Bala’s persecution

    Mubarak Bala’s persecution

    There is no doubt that the unlawful detention of Mubarak Bala, based on alleged blasphemy, is a case of unconscionable persecution.  The 37-year-old president of the Humanist Association of Nigeria has been detained for about two years, since April 2020, without any formal charge.

    This oppression is happening under Kano State Governor Abdullahi Umar Ganduje, and implicates him in actions that violate religious freedom. The police are also complicit in this abuse of power.

    Bala was arrested at his residence in Kaduna State and taken to Kano State after allegedly posting comments critical of Islam and religion on Facebook, which had attracted accusations of blasphemy and threats.

    A group of lawyers, in a petition to the police, accused him of posting things on Facebook that were “provocative and annoying to Muslims.” A lawyer fighting for his release was quoted as saying the police had detained him on “a holding charge” usually employed to cage detainees without presenting formal charges against them.

    After he had spent about eight months in detention, in December 2020 the High Court in Abuja ruled that his detention violated his rights to personal freedom, fair hearing, freedom of thought and expression. The judge declared his detention illegal and ordered his immediate release following a “fundamental rights” petition describing how he had been detained without charge for more than seven months, and denied access to lawyers for five months. The court awarded him N250, 000 in damages. President of Humanists International Andrew Copson described the court ruling as “a victory for the human rights of all citizens in Nigeria.”

    The authorities disregarded the court ruling, demonstrating contempt for the rule of law. The campaign for Bala’s release from unlawful detention has been ignored by the authorities, which suggests undemocratic governance.

    This case of abuse of power has attracted the attention of international observers.  Notably, a group of seven United Nations (UN) human rights experts issued a statement in April 2021, after Bala had been detained for a year, condemning the “flagrant violation” of his “fundamental human rights.”  They also drew attention to their efforts to get him released.

    They said: “His arbitrary detention has continued despite our appeals to the government in May and July last year…The government must take action to ensure that the responsible authorities respect the due process and enforce the judicial ruling.”

    It is noteworthy that Nobelist Wole Soyinka, a globally respected defender of fundamental freedoms, lent his voice to the campaign for Bala’s release. In a letter of solidarity marking his 100th day in detention, published by Humanists International, Soyinka said: “You are not alone; there is a whole community across the globe that stands beside you and will fight for you. We will not rest until you are free and safe.”

    The literature laureate added:  “You have lived. You have stood against the tide of religious imperialism. You have fought for all Humanity, to ensure a better, fairer, world for all. You have not sought to appease those that treasure scrolls. You have not bowed to pressure to revere their unseen deities.”

    The crux of the matter is Bala’s self-declared atheism. According to the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU), which is also campaigning for his release, “The real reason for this outrageous and inhumane action is because Mubarak has renounced Islam and has openly declared himself to be an atheist.”

    A Kano State indigene from a Muslim family, he is not on the same page with his family members on religion.   His relations put him in a psychiatric hospital in 2014 after he renounced Islam and embraced atheism.

    He is a vocal atheist, and his rejection of religion is offensive to many people in the country’s Muslim-dominated northern region. The Facebook post that led to his arrest and detention reportedly read, “Fact is, you have no life after this one. You have been dead before, long before you were born, billions of years of death.”  This view opposes religious belief in an afterlife.

    Campaigners for Bala’s freedom regard him as a Freedom of Religion or Belief (FoRB) Victim. According to the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), “Advocates believe he may be charged with blasphemy under Section 210 of the Penal Code of Kano State, and/or with violating Section 26(1) (c) of the Cyber-crimes Act, which criminalizes insult of any persons due to their belonging to a group distinguished by their religion, among other characteristics. A blasphemy conviction under Kano’s Shari’a court could lead to a death sentence, and if found guilty of violating the Cybercrimes Act he could face a fine and up to five years in prison.”

    The allegation of blasphemy against the humanist illustrates the clash between Islamic law, also known as Sharia, and secular law; and shows why the supremacy of the country’s secular constitution should be emphasised.

    There are fundamental issues about the operation of Sharia in a multi-religious but secular country such as Nigeria where the Islamic system of justice operates in 12 Muslim-majority states in the northern part of the country alongside a secular justice system. Sharia has been controversial in the country since its introduction in 1999.

    There is no question that Bala’s arrest and detention violate some of his fundamental rights under the country’s constitution.  The fundamental human rights listed in the Nigerian constitution are: the Right to Life, the Right to Dignity of Human Person, the Right to Personal Liberty, the Right to Fair Hearing, the Right to Private and Family Life, the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion, the Right to Freedom of Expression and the Press, the Rights to Peaceful Assembly and Association, the Right to Freedom of Movement, the Right to Freedom from Discrimination, and the Right to Acquire and Own Immovable Property anywhere in Nigeria.

    Importantly, the constitution allows the restriction, suspension or limitation of the fundamental human rights of persons in Nigeria only where there is an order of court or a state of emergency or a democratic law that allows such suspension or restriction of fundamental human rights. Bala’s case is excluded.

    As he remains in unlawful detention, his wife, Amina, has described her “psychological and emotional trauma” as “unbearable.”  They have a toddler.

    He is suffering because he is an unbeliever and his position on religion conflicts with the religious beliefs of those in the majority and those in power. He is a victim of abuse of power based on religious intolerance. This is condemnable.

  • Mefi’s orchestra

    Mefi’s orchestra

    Rarely does this essayist patronise any rejoinder with his precious prose. But sometimes when a rabbit plays braggart around a big cat, like a white lion, it has itself to blame for being a quick and easy snack.

    So, when I wrote a piece, Here we go, last week, it was just to let the CBN governor understand that eyes are on him. He should quickly rebuke the interlopers of our public space with his posters. Or, if he supports them, he should withdraw his tail, resign his office and leave the nation’s Naira and kobo enterprise to those who are not paying visits to printing presses. we don’t want to see his faces on walls and electric poles. He is a CBN governor, not a model. He is not even a model of a CBN governor. To that later.

    But rather than follow the path of honour, the CBN’s shadow men were sent on another errand.

    They came in the name of the Coalition of Civil Society Groups. In their first outing, they named no names. They hid under Emefiele’s friends. I might have thought they would say, Mefi’s friends, because that is what his coterie of wasps who call themselves his friends call him in intimate moments, especially when they are in the “contractual” mood and gusto. Well, I called them amorphous, so they took the bait and announced themselves under a series of names. These so-called groups are also names without recognition. I would want to see pictures behind those names and a track record of the so-called groups and whether they can boast any profile of benefits to even their neighbours. I teased them out last week. They took the bait. They are exposed, if not completely.

    There are of course names behind those names. They should be bold enough to lift their veils. Or else we can as well call them the Game Boys of the media, the media equivalent of the Yahoo Plus. They are the ones pushing him around newspaper and television, and evangelising his glories as the Nigerian genius of money.

    All of this we will put to rest if Mefi can allow his dumb profile to expire, and talk. Mefi is too shy. Mefi is afraid. Mefi allows others to talk for him.  Mefi is waiting for God. Mefi is communing with the Holy Spirit. Or Mefi is pining for Buhari after his Jumaat prayers. Mefi must be messy.

    In their rejoinder, the so-called coalition wrote that Mefi ‘knows nothing about the posters.” Mefi must be in a different country. It’s at the airport and his work routes in Lagos and Abuja. Are they implying that the good old boss who oversees our money suddenly turned blind? He does not read? Now that he read my column, has he still remained blind? They contradict that by saying he is too busy to “throw stones at every dog that barks at him.” Or maybe they are saying he is blind, but he hears those who bark. Thank God for ears! Even at that, he knows, if not from his eyes but his ears.

    They accuse me of “malevolent intention,” of being “preposterous,” of malice, of lacking good faith and good conscience. To borrow the words of the French novelist Flaubert, they lack sentimental education. They need a few lessons in emotional intelligence. There is a book of that name. It is called Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman. From the way they write, they don’t seem to read much. But I can afford them a copy if they seek enlightenment. I will ignore their canine metaphor or what literary critics call intentional fallacy. They are also guilty of affective fallacy. Not today for such theories.

    The real malevolence issues from them because all I ask for decency. The lack of decency of a CBN governor simultaneously running for president and enjoying the epaulettes of office is the same lack of decency in the expletives in  their advertorial diatribes. They are entitled to their own adjectives and nouns. So am I.

    But who is this Godwin Emefiele? Who is this man who has rented a bandwagon, and whose orchestra ministers no grace to the ears nor is it a beauty to behold?

    He is the CBN governor who they are hoodwinking into a messiah. A man who became CBN chief under Ebele Jonathan. He was in charge of the CBN after the colourful Sanusi left to become a Kano monarch in a major career fiasco. Mefi is the one whose central bank enabled Jonathan and his men to compromise our vaults, where hauls and hauls of Naira were moved around, especially in the Otuoke chieftain’s attempt to come back to power. It was on his watch that all the loot for which Buhari’s EFFC got angry fell, and it pursued the femme fatale and oil minister Diezani Allison- Madueke, when Sambo Dasuki went berserk with billions distributed not only among party mavens but also to game boys.

    Was it not the same Emefiele, who bowed to the kabiyesis of power with file in hand like a school boy of JSS one? But before then, after the Jonathan misadventure, was he not lobbying not to be fired? He became a good boy after they retained him in his cosy apex office rather than to nest and rest in his Agbor redoubt in retirement. With such relief, can you blame him for bowing obsequiously to any oligarch in sight?

    Then he took over, and the first victim was the first child he should chaperon: the naira. Only last week, the IMF wrote that the Nigerian currency drops by 10.6 percent annually. He has also become what economists call an activist CBN governor. His hand is in every pie, agriculture, education, aviation, textiles, power, health, entertainment. He wants to be like Leonardo Dan Vinci, but he is jack of all trade and master of none.

    He is said to have overstretched the borrowing limit of the bank, but economists can always justify that for political reasons. But let’s see what he has done with all his interventions. The naira is limping like a dog. That is the dog he should pay attention to. In agriculture, we saw an exhibition of a rice pyramid. It was a mockery of Nigerian hunger. While glorifying rice, the cost of the same commodity has doubled since he became CBN chief. The pyramid is as high as the cost for anyone. Again, he claims we do not import rice. Officially yes. But he should go to the borders in the night, and witness trailers after trailers of rice streaming through. Go to the mama puts and dinner tables, and you will know that Nigerians don’t import rice but eat imported rice. What a paradox. What meretricious glory. His Anchor Borrower programme has no anchor with the people, and it is yielding nothing, so we are just borrowing from the future. He puts his hand in power, we grope in the dark; in textile, we clothe in pain, where are the textile booms of old? In farming, we famish; In education, where is the fruit in schools? In entertainment, no one is dancing.

    Some economists have cavilled at activist CBN governors. It is a new war between what they call New Keynesians and New Classicists, the former being in Mefi’s camp. But Keynesians want to lead the economy by the nose. No problem for me, but lead right. The Classicists descend from Adam Smith and Ricardo. But our Mefi has not done right by Maynard Keynes. Look at CACOVID and the mess – that word again – he made of it. Billions that I want the CBN to account for. The people turned poorer for it rather than turn that money into profitable use, it became a sort of contractor’s delight. His men are hiding under the camaraderie of cowardice because the real men goading him cannot reveal themselves. This man is a victim of a racket but does not know yet until his eyes of understanding will be open. Too late then. He should also deny reports of three private jets making the rounds.

    In spite of these failings, Mefi can run for president. But he cannot have his cake and take it. Even the new electoral law signed by Buhari forbids appointees from running while in office. He just should follow the honour path, resign and let’s tackle his messy legacy. Or he should remain and we, as Nigerians say, “will manage him like that” until his tour is over.

     

    Wrong, Isa, wrong!

    •Onyema

    Who on God’s earth does Isa Bayero think he is? In what century does he think we are living in? Maybe he thinks this is the age of Uthman Dan Fodio, a feudal epoch where a prince can ride roughshod on any mortal. He says he is a pilot and flew a few presidents. Congratulations. But the age of pilots, he should know, came after the age of the divine rights of kings. He is here but living in the age of caves. Not in the 21st century. Otherwise he won’t insist that an airline about to taxi should stop for about an hour because a person wants to fly. It is not an emirate airline with a small e. It is not Feudal Air or Royal Skies. It is Airpeace and those on board were not royalists but republicans. I don’t know what presidents he flew, but I guess they were not democrats.

    Bayero said Airpeace Chairman Allen Onyema should apologise? What royal impunity? The Kano throne has a history of better dignity than that. I am sure Onyema will not apologise or travel to Kano to bow for an offence committed against him. It is Isa, who should wrap his tail around him. We abide in a democracy and not in a kingdom.

  • Those afraid of electoral bill!

    Those afraid of electoral bill!

    What interests will suffer now that President Buhari assented to the Electoral Act amendment bill? This poser is still relevant even with the belated signing of the bill into law. Even then, the president’s reservations on section 84 (12) targeted largely at statutory delegates, cannot justify the time it took to assent to the bill.

    Not even the excuse of wider consultations would suffice since this bill had been sent to him before. But on each occasion, he found excuses to delay and decline. Perhaps, he may have capitalized on section 84 to refuse assent but for pressure from the public.

    The Saraki-led National Assembly had before the 2019 elections, transmitted to him amendments to the electoral law which were to enhance the conduct of that election. But Buhari declined assent on the excuse that it came too close to the election. That election is now history. But the electoral malfeasances which the National Assembly wanted checked by amending sections of the Electoral Act, miserably featured prominently during that election.

    Given this, expectations were that action would be on top gear after the elections to re-work that document to ensure that our electoral past characterized by rigging, alteration and falsification of election results are consigned to the dust bin of history. But that expectation was not fast in coming.

    It took agitations from the larger society before the current National Assembly woke up from slumber. Even then, they disappointed not a few when they sought to subject the Independent National Electoral Commission’s INEC decision to deploy technology during elections to the approval of government agencies with no business in electoral matters.

    Again, it took protestations from the public for the Lawan-led National Assembly to go back to the drawing board. They moved expeditiously and came up with provisions for direct party primaries and electronic transmission of election results among others.

    But the president refused assent to the bill raising objections that direct primaries did not make for plurality of options; citing cost and logistic implications as some of his reservations. The National Assembly was faced with the choice of overriding the powers of the president by invoking extant constitutional provisions.

    Apparently to avert possible confrontation or out of deference, the National Assembly was quick to re-work that document. In the new document, direct primaries did not feature as the indirect and consensus options were adopted.

    Since the main objection of the president had been addressed by the new bill despite the limitations of indirect primaries, it was expected he would assent to it without delay. But again, that failed to happen. The body language of the presidency did not accord with the serious attention and urgency that document demanded.

    Again, it took demonstrations from civil society groups and sundry allegations and accusations by the opposition for the presidency to come public with puerile excuses on the matter. That was a few days to the expiry of the mandatory period for presidential assent.

    Yet, this is a president that had copiously been giving assurances for free, fair and credible elections. The impression we get from the foot-dragging is that the Buhari regime is not very comfortable with electronic transmission of election results despite claims and pontifications to the contrary. Now that he has assented to the bill, the feeling is that he is compelled to do so by the sheer weight of public pressure. So, he cannot possibly take all the credit for assenting to the bill

    Only last December, during a virtual summit on democracy organized by President Joe Biden of the United State of America, Buhari promised to put in place and strengthen “all necessary mechanisms to ensure that Nigeria will not only record another peaceful transfer of power to an elected democratic government but will also ensure that elections are conducted in a free, fair and transparent manner”.

    That promise has been in serious conflict with his serial prevarications in assenting to the electoral bill until last Friday when he seemed to have succumbed to pressure. In modern democracies, the National Assembly represents the aggregate of the total views of the electorate.

    It is composed of elected representatives of the people and they speak on their behalf. They spoke clearly and eloquently on this matter and the president did not seem to have any choice than assenting to that bill if we are not contending with a verity of Robert Michel’s iron law of oligarchy.

    Our legislators allayed the fears of the president by expunging direct primaries from the bill.  The new bill now provides for indirect primaries and consensus as well as the visionary electronic transmission of election results. The bill is both visionary and ambitious and in it can be found effective therapeutic responses to electoral fraud and associated vices.

    It baffled that Buhari did not seem to have appreciated the urgency in giving that piece of legislation the utmost urgency required of it. Not even with warnings from INEC that delay in signing the bill would adversely affect its preparations for elections in two states in a few months’ time.

    Yet, this is one piece of legislation that could derail constitutional democracy if not given the desired handle. And what remains of a putative democratic construct that cannot guarantee the sovereignty of the electorate?

    Buhari touched on this contradiction when he lamented during the virtual summit that the democratic gains of the past decades are under threat of unconstitutional takeover of power…due to ‘unilateral amendment of constitutions by some African leaders’

    Our democracy faced similar threats while he delayed and prevaricated on the electoral bill. The new law is most welcome. Those popular with their constituents have nothing to fear.

  • APC as sick baby

    APC as sick baby

    In those days as a child, I was enamoured of The Jeffersons, an upbeat sitcom to upend the narrative of the black as a race of the poor. George Jefferson, as the family patriarch, was a superfly and boastful man in well-cut suits and exaggerated gait. He never let anyone forget he was swathed in riches. He carried his braggadocio to the extent of propagating his peccadilloes as a gift. In an episode, he played down his ulcer until a friend spoke of it as familiar pride of the rich. Then he held up his head and quipped, “I get my ulcer all the time.”

    Sometimes it is the pathology of some humans to toast their own illnesses, to boast their frailties into graces. Nations have honoured their own collective coughs and sneezes. Nazi Germans saw Jew hatred and slaughter as acts of worship. In his novel of Nazi Germany called Tin Drum, Nobel Laureate Gunter Grass paints his character Oskar with his drums of hysteria like a fanatic of worship.

    Or northern Nigeria in the 1960’s when Igbos and other minorities became mincemeat of irate bands, the chants and pursuits became like a force of Heaven. This also goes for political parties. In Europe, we have seen political parties rally like a tenet of faith behind xenophobia and against Islam. In Trump America, many whites turned against minorities, crowds exhaling with catharsis. Mass apoplexy was like a revolution. So, sickness can be bad, but it is worse when the sick does not know it. Sickness within sickness.

    That is APC’s diagnosis. I don’t think I have heard anyone call the party sick. Its kind of sickness is family dysfunction.

    The party acted without a convention. It is like holding a birthday party without a venue, date or celebrant. It did not see its rot until it hit a rut. When it was clear it could not do without a convention, it decided to adopt IBB’s Maradona style. It said it would hold a convention in late last year and reneged. Then it picked a month, this one. It picked no date and venue, but notified INEC. It was like an invitation card to an in-law to a wedding without a date or venue or even the bride and groom. When it decided to fix a date, it did not state a venue. When it decided on it, it was then it dawned on the caretaker committee, it should have procedures and processes. It is like the Harold Pinter play, The Birthday Party that critics have described as a “comedy of menace.” In the play, nothing is certain, not time, not place, not identity, not even language. That is what we are seeing with the sick party of Nigeria.

    They fixed a day for the party, which is February 26th. News have it that it tried to persuade the president to change the date. Even before that, it called for aspirants to buy nomination forms. But as a party chieftain and Ondo State Governor, Rotimi Akeredolu, explained to my TV show, it was an invitation to chaos. How do you call for nomination without zoning the offices? So, if the party chairmanship is zoned to the North central eventually what happens to those who buy forms from the Southeast or Northwest or Southwest? It is hugging anarchy.

    A new controversy is swirling with the caretaker committee, whose name reads like a Chinese company, that lawmakers should be disenfranchised in the convention. What is its reason? It would not say? It is a ploy to cancel some voters, to wage war against a section of the party. It does not believe in democracy. It believes in internecine conflicts. It wants brothers to fight against brothers. It is an extension of the battle between some governors and lawmakers. It wants to make governors the monarchs of the party politics. It is a monarchisation of the APC. To legalise anything, they first regalise it. The governors are the royals, and they must control things by first aggregating their interests. Even at that, they are one or not, and they are not sure that they have control. So, they are looking for the party chairmen to conspire to postpone the convention. As I suggested to Governor Akeredolu, it seems Governor Buni and his cohorts want to railroad the party into postponing. They want not to be ready, so they would be forced to put off the convention. Buni wants to provide the president and others with a fait accompli.

    Buni and his cohorts are not explaining to anyone why they cannot decide to hold a convention. They want to act like the Nigerian Judicial Commission. They want to be the judge in their own cause. Their first instinct is to sit tight and preside over the convention and elections. This way they would choreograph the proceedings and hand-pick their men. Their intention is to turn the presidential primaries into a fait accompli. They want a consensus. They are unhappy that the lawmakers did not play plaint. The electoral bill does not want consensus. Buhari seems reluctant to sign because Buni and his men are trying with Malami to twist the old man’s head.

    With a flourish of a smile, the president told Channels Television that his successor is not his business. That is an ostentation of indifference. Malami and company, which includes Buni, are funnelling their subversive thoughts to the president’s medulla oblongata. Buhari knows that if Buni fails, it will be largely a presidential disaster because he put Buni there and Buhari, not Buni, is the head of the APC.

    The president ought to ask the head of the China-sounding committee and his attorney-general what they are afraid of. Or is it who they are afraid of? Why can’t the party act as a democracy instead of cabal of intrigues. This is the first time that holding a party convention has become a quagmire, an act of desperation. When it is not a quagmire, it is a rigmarole, when not a rigmarole, it is in a standstill, when it is a standstill it is in danger of being like Lot’s wife: a pillar of salt. May hot rain not swoop on it.

    Buni has been AWOL from his state as governor. When he goes there, he could be called, “His Excellency, the visiting governor.” He is domiciled in Abuja. Yet, he has succeeded neither in reconciling the party nor doing his first task of setting the stage for a convention. It is what, in soccer terms, is described as losing both home and away matches. This scenario is making the family dysfunction a peculiar APC disease. As novelist Leo Tolstoy wrote, “All families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way,” in the opening of his novel, Anna Karenina.

    Buni and his cohorts may not be familiar with the words of Ernst Junger, one of the top German thinkers of the 20th century, “Health is good. The disease can sometimes be even better. Illnesses are questions, they are also tasks, even honours. It all depends on how one notes them.” In the top miracle of the Old testament, a man resurrects after his body touches Elisha’s corpse. He became a celebrity dead. What does APC want, a final death or a resurrection or illness as an epaulette, a badge of honour?

     

    Here we go

    •Emefiele

    An abuse of office is going on with Godwin Emefiele. His so-called committee of friends failed to protect the CBN governor. Rallies are around town. Posters are everywhere. He is still mum. If he wants to run for president, he should resign his office. He should not hide under pieties about God or Muhammadu Buhari.

    He wants to have his dollar and pounds in one transaction. He should either run and resign, or stop an amorphous group from trumpeting an ambition for a man whose only image outside of banking is a kneeling posture to some oligarchs.

    It is an abuse of office to enable a shadowy crowd of friends fretting in public over questions of the CBN chief who is stumbling to segue from a technocrat to a democrat. The so-called committee of friends was a shadow show.

    It was a limp exhibition, whose prose called for better editing. Emefiele has a spokesman officially. That is the only voice that counts, not a camaraderie of cowardice hiding under a coterie of friends.

  • Unmasking Abba Kyari

    Unmasking Abba Kyari

    How come a police officer on suspension for alleged criminal infractions was still found performing his official functions? Was it to the knowledge of his supervisors or he was just overreaching himself?

    These were some of the puzzles that trailed last week’s inter agency clash between the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, NDLEA, and the Nigerian Police Force. The simmering conflict blew open when the NDLEA in a surprising press conference, declared wanted, a suspended Deputy Commissioner of Police and Commander of Intelligence Response Team IRT of the Nigerian Police Force, Abba Kyari.

    Kyari who was declared wanted some months back by the Federal Bureau of Investigations, FBI, has been under probe for alleged criminal link with internet fraudster, Ramon Abbas aka Hushpuppi.

    The NDLEA said it had to go it that way following the inability of Kyari to cooperate with it in the face of strong evidence that he “is a member of a drug cartel that operates the Brazil-Ethiopia-Nigeria illicit drug pipeline”.

    This came as a rude shock. Insinuations arose as to whether it is a case of those the gods want to kill or a choreographed script to get him off the hook of possible extradition to the US? Is Kyari so incorrigible that he could so soon after get entangled in another embarrassing mess or what?

    But the NDLEA furnished detailed account of how Kyari allegedly tried to corrupt its officials to pervert the course of justice in the case involving two drug couriers arrested with 25kg of cocaine at the Akanu Ibiam International Airport Enugu by his IRT team.

    Armed with video footages, screenshots of WhatsApp messages and transcripts of conversations, the NDLEA demonstrated how Kyari proposed a drug deal with its officials. During the discussions, Kyari was said to have disclosed that his team had already taken out 15kg of the seized cocaine shared between the informant that gave the lead for the arrest and his team of the IRT.

    Kyari further offered to sell half of the remaining 10 kilograms on behalf of officials of the NDLEA and remit the money to them. Both the 15 kg already sold and the five he was proposing to sell on behalf of the NDLEA are to be replaced with dummies.

    The remaining five kilograms will be manipulated during testing in the presence of the suspects to give a false sense of genuineness to the 20 dummy packages. That was the chilling and obviously despicable turn of events for which the agency declared Kyari wanted.

    Few hours after the press conference, Kyari and four other officers were arrested and handed over to the NDLEA on the order of the Inspector General of Police for alleged involvement in criminal conspiracy, official corruption and tampering with exhibits in a case of illicit drug trafficking involving a perpetual transnational drug cartel.

    But the police also gave a chilling account of the confessions of the drug suspects and their serial collaboration with official of the NDLEA for ease of passage with their illicit goods on arrival at the airport. This entails supplying their pre-departure photographs and other details to collaborating NDLEA officials prior to their arrival at the airport.

    The police leadership requested the chief executive of the NDLEA to identify, arrest and investigate its officers found to be colluding with the international drug cartel involved in the case. These were the putrid stories from two key law enforcement agencies of this country. They speak volumes on the rot in the system.

    There are two strands of this case – one involving Abba Kyari and four other officers of the IRT unit. The other has to do with yet-to-be identified NDLEA officials at the Enugu airport that aids and abets easy passage of illicit drugs into the country. It is yet unclear how many of such colluding NDLEA officials allegedly on the payroll of the drug cartel at the Enugu airport have been arrested by the agency.

    Even then, emerging disclosures from the police and the NDLEA are as embarrassing as they are mindboggling. These are two key agencies with the statutory duties for law enforcement in their respective spheres. It is sad that those entrusted with law enforcement are neck deep in the current mess. The miserable impression these convey is that our security agencies are the greatest impediment to the campaign to rid the country of illicit drugs. Or how else do we account for the show of shame that is the outcome of the arrest of the two suspected importers of 25kg of cocaine?

    We are confronted with a shameful situation in which the Police and the NDLEA are in mutual recrimination on which of their officials are more complicit in encouraging the importation of illicit drugs. It is a vicious cycle of one agency collaborating with drug couriers to allow the drugs into the country. The other takes it up from there by seizing and selling them to the same public the government wants to protect.

    The financial gains from the illicit drug business end up in the pockets of those paid with public funds to protect the society from evil. Is it surprising that drug abuse has been at an all-time high despite claims to the contrary?

    Now the Abba Kyari phenomenon! It came as a rude shock that a police officer on suspension for alleged criminal links with Ramon Abbas, alias Hushpuppi could still be very active in his duties. He may have been emboldened by the prevarication of the police leadership which turned in a weak report on his earlier case.  The rejection of that report by the Police Service Commission is instructive.

    It is getting clearer that Kyari has serious backing from high quarters and may not be alone in the sundry infractions for which his name has become a bad image to the police force. It is unimaginable that he eats alone, the kind of monies that are bandied around. It is time to untie the Kyari puzzle.

    Kyari has become a huge contradiction. The turn of events casts serious doubts on the accolades and encomiums hitherto poured on him by his supervisors. How did the police come about his so-called superlative career profile that is now in mismatch with his recurring barefaced corrupt entanglement? Dialectics is already in quick activation and its outcome can no longer be delayed. Who knows who the next victims will be?

  • A parable of the west

    A parable of the west

    Few Nigerians, especially the Yoruba, know that there is a potent as well as parabolic dynamic between Chief Samuel Ladoke Akintola and the great Hubert Ogunde. It is not only where art hugs life, but where politics gleans nutrients from the past. It is the intersection of history and histrionics.

    The stories of the fall of the First Republic, the maelstrom of the Western Region, the nation’s collapse under the soldier’s boot and the sanguinary flow of fratricide in the civil war energise the 1960’s. But they are no more instructive than how the political biography of the premier of the Western Region weds the great bard of the west. But the bed is defiled.

    The episode connecting them is not only that life confronts art, but drama plays out within drama.

    Ignorance about what this essayist is about to relate reflects two things. One, we have left our study of history behind but it haunts us nonetheless. Two, our reading habits have taken an almost fatal beating. Other than tick tock, Instagram, Facebook and twitter, we are a largely illiterate breed. One author records this story more than others, and she is Professor Ebun Clark, in her book, Hubert Ogunde: The Making of the Nigerian Theatre, published in the 1970’s. She is a warrior of the arts, pioneer professor of theatre in Nigeria and wife of legendary poet and playwright J.P. Clark.

    Akintola was a colourful man, beginning from his face of many marks. His tongue emitted acerbic, subversive, if inventive wit. He became premier and turned his back on his mentor and leader Awolowo. He opened a wilderness of gnomes, mongrels and beasts in Yoruba body politic. He turned against Awo’s rich and verdant field of dreams of greens and ark of robust tree barks. He invoked Mr. Quisling in Northern Europe and Vichy’s Petain in France. He pissed in the common pond when he broke away from the Action Group and set up his own party, the Nigerian National Democratic Party. The party entered into a wedding with the northern NPC. As a counterpunch to the Egbe Omo Oduduwa from which the AG sprouted, he founded a mimic wraith called the Egbe Omo Olofin. To help launch it, his party invited the Ogunde Theatre Party to dramatise a folksong, Yoruba Ronu, which incidentally was the watchword of Akintola’s new party. Clark reprints the letter inviting him inspired by Chief H.O. Davies, one of the fellow defectors with Akintola.

    Ogunde obliged, and dramatised the song by relating the story of a king, Fiwajoye betrayed by his deputy Yeye-Iloba, who imprisoned him with two of his senior chiefs. The usurper tyrannised over his people who eventually killed him. Fiwajoye was released from prison and restored to the throne. The kingdom returned to its tranquil plenty.

    Ogunde’s was an invocation of the Yoruba crisis of the 19th century. Field marshal Afonja had colluded with a Fulani known as Alimi, and that Fulani exploited the division among the Yoruba to launch a jihad in the west. In Ogunde’s contemporary rendition, Fiwajoye was Awolowo, who was then in prison, and Yeye-Iloba was Akintola. It prophesied Akintola’s end. Artists can be seers, just like Achebe’s A Man of The People predicted the end of the republic.

    The play did not find humour with the premier. He rose in the middle of the performance with some of his associates and left. But the majority of the audience remained and thrilled to its nuances, innuendoes and projectiles. It reflected the perfidy of Akintola, and how out of sync he was with the Yoruba street.

    Yoruba Ronu means Yoruba think. While Akintola meant to appropriate that phrase to rally the tribe against Awo, Ogunde launched it as a theatrical missile. It landed straight in Akintola’s traitorous heart. It was a supreme paradox.  What he designed as a hook became his noose.

    Still out of humour, Akintola’s government banned Ogunde’s theatre from performing in all of the Western Region. In fact, he was about to perform in Ilesa when the police stanched the effort, igniting a riot in the city. The government described Ogunde as “dangerous to the good government of Western Nigeria.” The order was signed by G.O. Ejiwunmi, secretary to the Premier and Executive Council. It urged the federal government to do same. Zik, the president, ignored him. Zik, for good measure, had collaborated immensely with Ogunde to cauterise colonial laws and thraldom. Few count Ogunde as a major nationalist, but it is another lapse of our historiography.

    The media rallied to Ogunde’s cause. The Daily Times condemned it. And Zik’s West African Pilot unleashed a fiery editorial that took apart Akintola government as a byword for authoritarian impulses – my phrasing. This diatribe at Akintola’s act against his tribesman gained traction in the country. The Pilot mocked him by imagining the British government banning the rollicking rock icon of the 1960’s, The Beatles. The paper predicted: “The road to ruin is often smooth. Those who travel it pay the fare. The people at Ibadan may feel on top of the world. Let us allow ourselves the role of soothsayers. We tell them to beware and fear tomorrow! They should fear the people’s ire.”

    Like Pharaoh, it hardened Akintola’s heart. He extended the ban to his music, dance, records, and he forbade them to be heard in public places as well as on radio and television. Only in Lagos could he perform. His collaborators in the centre did not stop the song. Akintola was afflicted by what I call the Okonkwo syndrome based on Achebe’s Things Fall Apart. The literary critique Killam described it as insistent fatality, just like King Oedipus, who saw death and strode defiantly on the path of perdition. Hitler gave speeches about the past of wars as meaningless savagery but he ignited a world war that lighted him up in flames.

    Ogunde’s fellow artistes backed him, including Kola Ogunmola and Duro Ladipo. It disembowelled his pocket and tested his integrity as an artist. But he did not falter. Rather, he dug in. He swiped back with the play, Otiti koro, which means truth is bitter. He began the play with the lines: We do not kill a dog because it barks/ And we do not kill a ram because it butts…

    For about two years, Ogunde cooed in the cooler. In 1966, however, the army kicked and Akintola fell. The new governor, Lt. Col. Adekunle Fajuyi, within nine days of receiving Ogunde’s plea, lifted the ban. In July 1966, he performed Yoruba Ronu at the British Council Hall in Ibadan to all and personages, one of them Chief Obafemi Awolowo. It was art as revenge. Another irony. Ogunde was in prison professionally, Awo was physically and politically gaoled. That day, in songs and dances and rhetoric and acts for the theatre, both had their victory lap. They put to the grave a chapter of infamy. A new curtain had opened in the West.

     

    Holy whore

     

    •Fashola

    It was a parable in finance when the Trojan of works, Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN) unveiled a cheque of N210 billion from the Sukuk funds. This is the third of the tranches. It is naira, not Islam. It might have come from a Muslim ideology about money.  But we are spending islam. We are enjoying it. Sometimes we forget that the idea of Sukuk forbids exorbitant exploitation. Modern funding is shylocky. We also forget that the Bible chides those who give their money away in usury. In this light, the protestant ethic has overshadowed the tenets of both holy books. Can I hear Max Weber squirming in his German grave?

    If you go across the country, you will see roads Sukuk funded. I don’t see any order banning non-Muslims from plying. In some parts of the country, Christians apply their tyres predominantly on such sukuk-funded asphalt. This is the country the Naira proselytises for us. It recognises nor faith nor tribe nor place. It abhors none. It is a sublime harlot, a holy whore. In an age when some would enact a holy war, victory belongs to this holy whore of filthy lucre. You are all welcome whether you say amen or amin, or you foreswear Allah or Jehovah, and pride man over divinity, or spirits over flesh and blood.

    I wonder how much we can get out of Sukuk and do away with the vampiric loans from China. They come with headaches and fear and a false sense of luxury. But I am not learned enough in international finance to make judgement yet as to whether we can thrive if we can forgo China shylocks for Sukuk. I am going to research. But, meanwhile, over to the Trojan and the work that N210 billion will do. A lot is being done, and a lot of roads left to do. Optimists see the cup half full, pessimists half empty. As the poet Lord Tennyson writes, “Though much is taken, much abides.” Nigeria is a vast swath, we can take it one kilometre at a time. That is what the Trojan is doing…

     

  • So Igbo can dominate!

    So Igbo can dominate!

    It initially struck as one of those fake stories that inundate the social media space. Those conversant with proceedings in the Catholic Church would have found difficult to believe that one of its priests could ban songs in any language (foreign or local) during mass services. But that was the news that made the rounds penultimate Sunday.

    In the social media platform I saw the initial story; commentators including a Catholic Priest Rev. Fr. Ben Amuchie had expressed doubt on the authenticity of the story when he wrote – “Is this really true? Please if that’s true, report him to his bishop. No bishop in Nigeria will tolerate such unclerical behaviour from any priest”.

    This writer had also commented: “Even in my kindred Catholic Church, Hausa and Efik songs are freely sung and happily too. This sounds strange but not impossible”.

    Our consternation could be imagined when the Archbishop of Lagos Archdiocese, Alfred Adewale Martins confirmed the story. In a prompt statement, the bishop suspended Rev, Fr. James Anelu of the Holy Trinity Catholic Church Ewu-owa Ikorodu for “unsavoury remarks that do not represent the Catholic Church’s position on common brotherhood of peoples of all tribes and religions”.

    Timely intervention by the bishop cleared doubts that the priest had verily banned Igbo songs and choruses in the church he superintends. He was reported to have angrily stopped a soul-lifting chorus during the second collection with remarks that the Igbo cannot continue to dominate other people even in his ‘own’ church.

    Citing his home diocese, Benin, which he claimed the Igbo dominate to the point of becoming the Bishop, Fr. Anelu claimed the spirit of God in any place recognizes only languages indigenous to that geographical location.

    This drew the anger of worshippers who rose in uproar that brought the mass to an abrupt end. That was the incident at Holy Trinity Catholic Church Ewu-owa to which Archbishop Martins appropriately responded.

    With the prompt action of the archbishop, there is the temptation to allow the matter rest. But that will be dangerous given the weight and sensitivity of the issues involved. A trending video captured by one of the worshippers obviously from afar, showed the embattled priest striving to defend his decision by citing instances that further exposed the irredeemable tribal bigot he is.

    There are issues thrown up by the development that cannot possibly escape public interrogation. The priest; apart from claiming that the Igbo dominate other people in his ‘own’ church cited the case of Benin diocese where an Igbo bishop holds sway to buttress the danger of Igbo domination.

    So he was not just reacting to the singing of Igbo song during the church service. An animosity nursed over time just found ventilation during the church service. Igbo domination! This is the first time I am hearing of Igbo domination in this country.  What I hear all the time is the marginalization and alienation of the Igbo. So there is a sphere of life in this country-the Catholic Church where the Igbo dominate others? That is pleasant to hear.

    But what kind of domination is that when the Igbo are making individual sacrifice, deploying their resources to develop churches outside their ancestral homes? What do they stand to gain from such huge human capital and financial sacrifice except perhaps, reward from heaven?

    The high number of Igbo found in churches, bears positive correlation with their material being. The lure to escape from scorching injustice, domination and alienation may have compelled them to seek divine supplication. Let nobody add to this frustration.

    Even then, can the mere singing of Igbo songs in the church be construed as sufficient evidence of Igbo domination?  If the reference is to the predominance of Igbo population in Catholic churches, why is the priest also not worried by their huge financial contributions that sustain his work? Why receive their money with cheers only to scorn their songs during offerings?

    If the truth must be told, most Catholic churches in the country are what they are today because of the huge population and huge financial contributions of the Igbo. As a predominantly Catholic population, most of the Catholic churches across the country will be ghost of themselves without Igbo support and patronage. This is just the truth and they owe nobody any apology.

    The second plank of the priest’s decision is the curious that the spirit of God in any place only recognizes languages indigenous to that geographical location. That is totally false. Even as it is unclear the part of the scriptures he is referencing upon, the Catholic Church has over the years been very eclectic in the languages church services are conducted.

    For a very long time in this country, Latin was the predominant language for church services followed by English. It was after local translations were made that our local dialects came into use. Even then, Latin, English and local dialects have continued to be used interchangeably during such services

    It is even a policy of the Catholic Church to have songs and choruses rendered in a variety of languages and dialects to make for inclusiveness. In my kindred Catholic Church that is populated by three large families, songs are rendered by the choir in a variety of Nigerian languages even when you can hardly find a single person from other ethnic groups in attendance.

    It remains to be imagined where the erring priest got the warped notion that God only hears the language of the local population? And the same God ‘receives’ offerings from people of other languages in the same church? That is heresy!

    The catholic leadership must rise to the challenge of priests bent on politicizing its activities. That the faithful are cultured not to question whatever their priests say should not be exploited to assail their sensibilities. Things are changing. Stereotypes and bigoted indoctrination are giving way to new ideas, new practices.

  • Can EFCC stop Okorocha?

    Can EFCC stop Okorocha?

    Declaration by Senator Rochas Okorocha for the office of the president in 2023 could have passed quietly but for the court charges filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC hours after the outing. Though Okorocha had dramatized the event when he wrote the senate indicating his intention to vie for that position, the controversy that eventually ensued may not have arisen but for the court action by the EFCC. In his letter to the senate, Okorocha had said he was contesting for the position because Nigeria requires a detribalized leader who can unite the country; one with a compassionate heart for the poor and the downtrodden, a leader who can create wealth and address poverty, insecurity and youth restiveness.

    Presumably, he sees himself as an embodiment of these qualities for which he now seeks to rule the country. He is entitled to his opinion.

    Unlike some other aspirants who quietly made known their intention to run for that office, Okorocha opted for what he called a world press conference that drew considerable public attention to the event. He spoke with much eloquence and confidence as he made some other contentious statements to market himself as a detribalized Nigerian; one propelled by altruistic zeal. He also strove to impress sections of his audience on his religious ‘liberalism’ as he appropriately quoted copiously from the Quran to support his presentation.

    He would have gone home beating his chest for a job well done but for the ‘poison’ injected into that ambition by EFCC’s court action. In the 17-count charge, the EFCC is pressing for the trial of Okorocha for allegedly stealing N2.9 billion from public coffers.

    The timing of the court charges shortly after Okorocha declared his fitness for the presidency raised considerable curiosity and suspicion. It threw up speculations as to what the EFCC has up its sleeves.

    Was it an attempt to de-market his claims of a detribalized leader with a compassionate heart for the poor and down trodden; one that can create wealth and address poverty, insecurity and youth restiveness? And can someone charged with stealing a humongous sum of N2.9 billion public funds be trusted to keep faith with the sterling qualities Okorocha ascribes to himself for which he seeks to rule the country? These were the searing posers thrown up by the turn of events.

    As should be expected, Okorocha was quick to react to the fresh charges of fraud terming them politically-motivated and ‘false’. He claims he has court judgments barring the EFCC from harassing and intimidating him. And he has run to President Buhari to compel the EFCC to obey those court orders. It is unclear the quarters the political dimension of the EFCC court action is emanating from since Okorocha is a senator elected on the platform of the ruling party.

    As a leading member of the ruling party, it is difficult to fathom where the political conspiracy is coming from unless he wants us to believe that he does not belong to the right tendency in his party. He could not have run to the president if he nursed suspicion that he was privy to his travails. So the source of his conspiracy theory remains curious.

    What did he expect the president to do for him? He said it was to avail him of the existence of the court orders that barred the anti-graft agency from intimidating and harassing him. Could the filing of corruption charges against him be likened to an act of intimidation and harassment? It is difficult to fathom how such a meaning could be read into the EFCC action.

    More fundamentally, could a court of competent jurisdiction permanently prevent the agency from investigating a former public office holder on suspicion of corrupt enrichment? That would indeed sound very absurd. It is therefore difficult to fathom what remedies to the case Okorocha seeks from the president.

    Read Also: N2.9b fraud allegation: Okorocha seeks Buhari’s intervention with EFCC

    If every accused person has to run to the president to call the EFCC to order, then the EFCC would have become a willing tool of the ruling party. Perhaps, Okorocha had easy access to the president because he is of the ruling party. That in itself speaks volumes on the impartiality and credibility of the anti-graft agency.

    The impression the development miserably conveys is that the EFCC could be primed to erect obstacles to the political ambitions of aspirants not in the good books of the government. This fear has been there. That will re-enact a similitude of events during the Obasanjo regime when the EFCC was used to impeach some governors. The image and credibility of the agency in the fight against corruption would be worse for it.

    Okorocha went off tangent when he said he was richer before he became governor and that being a governor made him poorer. Hear him “How much is Imo State government money? Imo State even owes me because I never collected my security votes. I am supposed to collect from Imo State now N8 billion if I have to make claims for security votes I did not collect”.

    Statements like these assail public sensibilities as they have no bearing with the issue at stake. This is more so for a man in a running battle with the authorities including the Imo State government over sundry allegations of financial impropriety while he was in the saddle. This unbridled boastfulness assaults our collective psyche especially for a man recorded on video saying he is richer than Imo State.

    If Okorocha says Imo State owes him N8 billion as security votes not collected, that calls for investigation. From what account did he fund the security of the state in his eight years in office? It is also very childish to ask how much is a state governments’ money worth? I think there is something unsavory and aching in the way Okorocha goes about proving his innocence in the sundry allegations of corruption heaped against him. And that could complicate matters for him.

    He is at liberty to deny the allegations or plead his innocence. The law deems him innocent until found guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction. But he does not help matters either by asking how much a state government is worth or boasting that he is richer than his state government.

    In saner climes, such claims would be immediately matched with serious inquisition into the source of his touted wealth and the tax paid on the alleged stupendous wealth. But not here! That is why he can make such claims severally and go to bed.

    Beyond this however, is the propriety of the EFCC action. What does the anti-graft agency seek to achieve by filing the court charges hours after Okorocha presented his leadership credentials to the Nigerian public? Was it to inject a virus into his ambition, alert Nigerians that a credibility baggage allegedly hangs over his neck for which his ambition cannot sell or both? Given that Okorocha left office over two and half years ago, why did it take the day of his declaration for court action to be filed against him?

    It is clear the timing of the court action was intended to encumber the claims Okorocha bandied for which he seeks to rule the country. Okorocha’s allegation of political motive cannot be completely ruled out even as the EFCC is within its rights to institute the case at its convenience. A lesson has obviously been served to political office seekers.

    But can the EFCC really stop him from realizing his political ambition through the current court action? If it took the agency more than two years to put the facts of the case together, there is everything to expect that the court process will take a longer time.

    Even then, mere institution of the case cannot debar the accused from carrying on with his political ambition. The case will have to run its full course before it takes legal effect. He may even be sworn in only for the immunity clause to constrain the EFCC from further action. It happened in Abia State. The EFCC should get more serious with its statutory mandate for it to earn public confidence.