Category: Columnists

  • June 12 and IBB’s say nothing book

    June 12 and IBB’s say nothing book

    The real account of the June 12 saga has yet to be given. All that former military leader Gen Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB) did in his book in which he wrote extensively on the subject was to make himself look good and patriotic. IBB did not come clean with Nigerians about what really happened to June 12 beyond rehashing the tales they actually know about the annulment.

    Writing on the subject in Chapter 12, under the title: Transition to civil rule and the June 12 saga, the ‘evil genius’ lived up to his appellation as he danced around the subject, looking for ways to justify the actions he took on the issue. He blamed every other person connected with the election, except himself, for what happened. But as ‘’president and commander-in-chief’’ he told readers that he took responsibility for everything. Who else does he want to take such responsibility?

    His second in command, the late Admiral Augustus Aikhomu, who he tacitly accused of initiating the annulment with a ‘’terse, but poorly written statement on a scrap of paper’’ by the late former number two citizen’s press secretary, Nduka Irabor? Or the then National Electoral Commission (NEC) chairman, the late Prophet Humphrey Nwosu, who he alleged ‘’suspended the June 12 election results ‘until further notice’ without my knowledge or prior approval”.

    The IBB autobiography: A journey in service is replete with such accusations and blame game. Every bad thing was done by a third party, while he was involved in only good deeds. Is this not the same IBB who once boasted that he “is not only in government, but also in power”? Did he not also tell the world that as a soldier, he was”trained to dominate his environment”? How then did he become a weakling in a situation where he was expected to show strength and damn the consequences?

    As shown in his memoir, his authority was challenged time and again by some of his subordinates, especially his friend and ally, the late Gen Sani Abacha, and he never had the nerve to call them to order. According to him, it was not because he was afraid of Abacha, but for the safety of himself and his loved ones. If IBB so loved the country as he claimed in every portion of his book, no sacrifice would have been too much for him to make for his nation. But as he may say, he is not Jesus that laid down His life for the world.

    Where then is the so-called patriotic streak that propelled all he did while in office? He was only patriotic to the point that it benefited him materially. He said he had no pact with Abacha to leave the latter in office when he “stepped aside” on August 27, 1993. Was that a wise decision since he knew how dangerous and power-hungry Abacha was? For a man who had “wanted to violently overthrow” him, IBB did not play the statesman by, so to say, bequeathing Nigeria to Abacha.

    Read Also: How U.S. based Nigerian nurse is changing lives through food pantry

    For all he cared, Nigeria can burn as long as he and his family had their peace of mind. It is a cardinal sin for him to have done that and no amount of whitewashing can cleanse him of it. June 12 was a momentous event and it provided a chance for IBB to leave a lasting legacy after his exit from office. IBB missed the opportunity and posterity will never forget that when the time came for a soldier of his calibre who confronted a coup plotter, Buka Suka Dimka, with barehands and also executed a “loyal and childhood friend”, Mamman Vatsa, for alleged coup, to take Abacha down, his legendary courage failed him.

    There is nothing IBB writes or says about June 12 today that will interest Nigerians until he is ready to come out with the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. He was a central figure, nay the main character in the saga. Everything about the June 12 election revolved around him. He held, as they say, the knife and the yam and he could cut it the way he liked without anyone challenging his authority. He was not ready to stand up for the country because it seemed he, just as Abacha, had animosity against Abiola which he did not write about.

    As Abiola said of him in the heat of the June 12 imbroglio, with “a friend like IBB, who needs an enemy?” Abiola knew his enemy before he took on the over four-year battle for his mandate that eventually claimed his life in 1998. Today, IBB is shedding crocodile tears for that ‘friend’, and according him the honour he knowingly denied the business magnate while alive. Readers cannot be fooled about the sweet nothings he wrote about Abiola in his book because he was economical with the truth about the events surrounding the June 12 annulment.

    It was obvious even before the election that the poll was going to meet with a bad end. The June 11, 1993 meeting of the National Defence and Security Council (NDSC), to which he unilaterally changed the name of the Armed Forces Ruling Council (AFRC) after he dissolved the nation’s then highest ruling organ, was full of foreboding for the election billed for the next day.

    In a rare press conference, held somewhere in Lagos after the AFRC dissolution, former defence chief, the late Lt Gen Domkat Bali, accused IBB of running “a one-man show”. Prior to the NDSC meeting, the late Justice Bassey Ikpeme had on June 10 stopped NEC from conducting the June 12 election, setting off a chain of reactions, which prompted, among other things, the acrimonious NDSC meeting on the way out, which he recollected in his book.

    The booby traps set for the June 12 election were many. There is no way that IBB can say with his hand on his heart that he was not part of those opposed to the conduct of the election from the outset. The speed at which he sent a United States (US) diplomat, Michael O’Brien, packing for issuing a statement that postponement of the poll would be unacceptable to America was alarming. It portrayed IBB as having his own agenda for the election and in the fullness of time, the nation saw the result. If Babangida is serious about laying to rest the ghost of the June 12 saga, he should be bold enough to do full disclosure.

    At 83 going to 84, there is nothing for IBB to fear again. He has, as they say, seen it all. What the people want from him is a fair and accurate account of the June 12 poll annulment, and not this tale of how he was boxed into a corner to accept what others wanted in order to allow peace to reign in the military, and by extension the country. It is good as a leader for him to take responsibility for the action of his then subordinate, Abacha, who he claimed annulled the election.

    But taking responsibility is not the same as being the one who annulled the poll. Or did he? His honest response is the only way to bring closure to the June 12 saga. If he needs to write another book to do that, why not? So far, the truth comes out.

  • El-Rufai’s long goodbye

    El-Rufai’s long goodbye

    Last week in this column, I tried to examine former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai’s, theory on the North’s king making role in Nigerian politics. I was keen to move on to some other subject this week, but the man of the moment clearly had too much on his chest and had to unburden. Cue Monday’s soundbite-laden interview on Arise TV. So, permit me dear reader, to drop my twopence on this matter.

    Almost six years to the day, the former governor visited Lagos as guest speaker at the Bridge Club where he gave an exposition on how to retire political godfathers. Given the time and location, it was no mystery who his comments were aimed at.

    The dust had barely settled on the 2019 polls where former President Muhammadu Buhari secured a further term – albeit with diminished voter enthusiasm. The country had not even put the ritual of a second inauguration behind it, but El-Rufai was already talking about the race for the 2023 All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential ticket.

    He admonished the then incumbent to deal with ‘desperate’ and ‘over-ambitious’ elements within APC whose activities, he said, could make the president’s second term difficult from day one.

    That same pattern has been noticeable in the past couple of months. His party’s federal government led by Bola Tinubu has been in power for less than two years, but he started his scheming much earlier; defiantly holding meetings with elements of the opposition Social Democratic Party (SDP) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    The sole purpose of these explorations certainly isn’t strengthening the ruling party, but how to take it down from its perch. Why else would you profess membership of one party and be brazenly consorting with others – not caring who took notice?

    El-Rufai loves to brag about his fearlessness. He thrives on supposedly ‘speaking truth to power’ – which in itself is something more politicians should be encouraged to do. Unfortunately, his volubility may just be his greatest weakness.

    In my 2019 piece titled “El-Rufai the godfather slayer”, I wrote that the man was “something of an enigma. To some he is a straight talker given to shooting from the lips. Others would say he shoots first and reflects later – thus pushing him into the category of loose cannons.”

    Watching and listening to him in his latest interview you came away with the picture of an angry, embittered individual who was determined to burn as many bridges as he could find. He blithely declared that he no longer considered longstanding associates like his successor Uba Sani and National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, as friends.

    Read Also: N30trn Ways and Means: Senate panel accuses CBN of frustrating probe

    He would then allege a grand conspiracy between the twosome in cahoots with the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) to destroy his reputation via the agency of an ongoing House of Assembly probe of Kaduna State finances under his watch.

    Ribadu is supposedly driving this because he is interested in becoming president in 2031 and wants to eliminate all potential Northern rivals. This is a weighty allegation to be made against even an estranged friend. Unfortunately, El-Rufai who is alleging doesn’t provide any proof beyond suppositions and suspicions.

    He, also, finally got round to blaming Tinubu for his failed ministerial nomination. Although, he admitted the president was well within his rights to change his mind. It is understandable that he would feel a sense of deep disappointment having appeared like a shoo-in for the cabinet. But let’s not forget that he was nominated and screened by the Senate. Whatever stumbling block prevented the president from making a call to clear the way must have been a veritable immovable mountain.

    Some of the information in the interview was unnecessary and only served to raise questions as to what his true motivations for past political moves were. For instance, to what purpose was his going on about how he and the president were never friends?

    One thing is clear: his political journey in the APC is clearly at an end. His recent actions are not indicative of someone intent on promoting healing in home but rather those of a man who would rather wreak as much havoc as possible on his way out. He’s doing so by accumulating foes instead of multiplying friends – not a wise move by any politician

    Criticising the party’s leadership since Tinubu assumed office., he said: “I’m a founding member of APC, but I have concern about how the party is being run… how many people sacrificed a lot to ensure that it was an internally democratic party with progressive ideals, two years after the election of President of Tinubu, none of the party organs is functioning. The progressive ideals are not being pursued with any vigour,” he said.

    “APC is my party. But the APC has left me; I didn’t leave the APC. We founded this party based on certain values, but today, the party has moved away from them. I feel stranded.”

    “If I can’t find those progressive values in APC, sooner or later, I may have to find another platform to pursue them. But I still hope the party will correct its course,”

    Fair criticism, if indeed the party hasn’t been meeting in line with its constitution. But it’s funny how history repeats itself. These same rumblings are reminiscent of what transpired at different times under Buhari when influential members of the party complained about party organs not functioning.

    Well known El-Rufai associate, Salihu Lukman, then a member of the National Working Committee (NWC) wrote long public letters bemoaning dysfunction within the APC structure. But not many who were so dissatisfied have taken things to the scorched earth level of threatening defection.

    Early in April 2023 under the chairmanship of Senator Abdullahi Adamu, Lukman claimed that the National Executive Committee (NEC) and Board of Trustees (BoT) were ineffective, stressing that they have not been holding meetings in accordance with the party’s constitution.

    In a statement titled: “APC and Questions of Progressive Credentials”, he complained that the NWC had rendered other party organs prostrate since 2022.

    He alleged that no statutory organ of the party had functioned in line with the constitution of the party, adding that the National Advisory Council (NAC) was yet to be constituted.

    The former Director-General of the Progressive Governors’ Forum (PGF) lamented that the Adamu-led NWC had committed fundamental infractions like the ones that led to the dissolution of the Adams Oshiomhole-led NWC in 2020.

    These infractions, he said, included the refusal to convene the NEC and National Caucus meetings, and refusal to give quarterly financial reports.

    Clearly, the ruling party has had a challenge in this area, so it is a bit dubious making it look like a Tinubu invention.

    The way it is being flogged by El-Rufai looks like someone is preparing an alibi or justification for an imminent action.

    Of course, it is to be expected that whoever takes over would effect changes that make the party more democratic internally. So, hopefully the NEC and Caucus meetings scheduled for this week could be part of that course correction. Dissent is part of democracy and no party member should be crucified for being critical. However, questions have to be asked when disgruntlement crosses the line and becomes open fraternisation with political opponents whose stated agenda is ousting your own party’s government.

    Questions have to be asked when a notable member of APC takes to social media every other day to launch attacks against the president, fanning embers of anger against him in the North, excoriating his Southwest kinsmen and denigrating his appointees as incompetent ‘Lagos boys.’

    This is more so when the likes of the ex-Kaduna governor never raised a voice in anger when Buhari was accused of lopsided appointments in favour of the North. That galling hypocrisy is what blunts some of their criticism of Tinubu’s appointments.

    It remains to be seen how much more of El-Rufai’s slash and burn criticism the APC hierarchy can take before moving against him in some fashion. He may not even wait around much longer to be served such humiliating punishment. As he has said, the party has left him and he’s clearly on his way out to the perfect platform. Talk of a divorce made in heaven.

  • Dear Governor Aiyedatiwa

    Dear Governor Aiyedatiwa

    I write to congratulate you on your inauguration as the seventh Governor of Ondo State, my home state. I would have sent this letter to you privately or even come to your office to congratulate you, but I could not  do so now for two reasons. First, I am currently out of the country. But, secondly, and more importantly, I wanted the public to know that I have accepted you as my Governor, despite my public opposition to your election. It may interest you to know that, in the same vein, I did not support your predecessor, late Governor Rotimi Akeredolu (may his soul rest in peace) during his first election in 2016 but rallied around him once he was inaugurated as Governor. I even successfully mediated between him and then Osun Governor Rauf Aregbesola over the scuffle between his SSG, Ifedayo Abegunde, and Osun’s Commissioner for Regional Integration, Bola Ilori. I also went on to support Akeredolu’s re-election in 2020.

    I look forward to discussing matters affecting our state and, particularly, Idanre Local Government, my beloved cradle. Ondo State, even as part of the Old Western Region, was the bastion of democracy and home of progressivism. It was the home base of numerous associates of Chief Obafemi Awolowo, including Chief Adekunle Ajasin, Chief Gabriel Akin-Deko, Chief Reuben Fasoranti, Chief Adebayo Adefarati, and Chief Wumi Adegbonmire.

    Each of them left a significant mark on the development of the state. Chief Ajasin, for example, built the Secretariat, which continues to be the seat of the Ondo State government till today. In the current democratic dispensation, Chief Adefarati took off where Chief Ajasin stopped and saw to the establishment of the Ondo State University in its present location, after splitting with Ekiti State University.  His successor, Dr. Olusegun Agagu, notably established the Ondo State University of Science and Technology, named after him by your boss, Rotimi Akeredolu, SAN. Agagu’s successor, Dr. Olusegun Mimiko, built the iconic Dome, initiated the concept of Mega Schools and built many of them across the state. Above all, he established the first University of Medical Sciences in the country.

    Akeredolu, who succeeded Mimiko, developed the expansive structures opposite the Dome, housing the Ondo State Internal Revenue Service, the IT Hub, and other facilities. He also expanded teaching hospitals and facilities for UNIMED, and constructed a network of roads throughout the state, including two iconic flyovers at two major intersections in Ore and Akure.

    Every Governor since 1999 invested heavily in infrastructure in major sectors, notably in education, healthcare, transport, agriculture, and trade. It is hoped that you, too, will put your own stamp on the development of the state. Indeed, the task before you is enormous, given the current financial and security situations in the state. The good news for your administration is that state allocations have increased, and I trust you are making effort to also increase the state’s Internally Generated Revenue. State residents are anxiously looking forward to the dividends of democracy from increased revenue inflow.

    Read Also: Tax Reform Bills will drive Nigeria toward $1trillion economy – Senate

    But it is to Idanre I now turn for the rest of this letter, because of an urgent task before your administration.

    Your Excellency will recall that our beloved monarch, Oba Frederick Aroloye, Arubiefin IV, the Owa of Idanre Kingdom, joined his ancestors nearly seven months ago, precisely on July 30, 2024 (see my tribute, Kabiyesi, Oba Frederick Adegunle Aroloye, Arubiefin IV, 1926-2024, The Nation, August 7, 2024). As indicated in my tribute, Idanre people are anxious for government action in order to avoid the seven-year delay and confusion that attended the installation of his immediate predecessor. Already, Idanre people are suffering from the disruption of traffic, following the relocation of major markets in the town as a result of the traditional mandatory change until a new monarch is installed.

    The delay and disruption so far are understandable in view of the three-month window provided in the Declaration and the reorganisation of the Local Government, including an election. It is now hoped that there will be no further delay since the election had already taken place, followed by your inauguration.

    Fortunately, the procedure for the selection of the Owa of Idanre had previously been approved by the Ondo State Government, following its review of the Morgan Commission’s recommendations. For example, the Ondo State Government approved, as a general rule, that “the concept of ‘Omo Orite’, ‘Aremo’, and ‘Abidagba’ should be abolished wherever it was being practiced”.

    With particular reference to the Owa of Idanre Chieftaincy Declaration, it is important to emphasise that the Ondo State Government recognises in the Declaration (a) that Idanre has only one ruling house, that of Agbogun; (b) that Idanre has only 12 Kingmakers (titles provided); and (c) that “all male ‘direct’ descendants of the past Owa of Idanre” are qualified to be proposed as candidates (see page 65 for details).

    Another major task for which the people of Idanre would be very grateful is the dualisation of the Akure-Idanre Road. This was discussed with Governor Akeredolu but he put his preference on a new link road between Akure and Idanre through Ijoka, for which the community remains grateful. However, the major artery to Idanre from Akure remains the one between Oke-Aro through Alade and Atosin. Your immediate attention to this road will be highly appreciated, especially given the tonnage of cocoa, timber, and foodstuff hauled through the road.

    Here’s wishing you a successful tenure.

    Professor Niyi Akinnaso, MFR.

  • Annul N17-20B Presidential Library!

    Annul N17-20B Presidential Library!

    Give N1m each to 20,000 secondary school libraries. 

    Humphrey Nwosu, who died in October 2024 at 83, chairman of National Electoral Commission [1989-1993] was a chief victim in the greed driven horror and tragedy which still surrounds the ‘freest and fairest’ election. Humphrey Nwosu is finally vindicated. Then, a generation of hope-driven Nigerians were force-fed a new military government term ‘annulment’ of the 1993 election. That devilish act created an aftermath stained with the blood of falsely accused and convicted innocent patriotic Nigerians and which witnessed wrongful imprisonment in terrible conditions, fear, ‘Japa Babangida’ and the terror causing  ‘Japa Abacha’. The murder spree under Babangida accelerated under Abacha.

    In order to survive, many fled facing mental and monetary problems, destabilised families and businesses and communities with destroyed historical roots. Entire families for years never saw any relations, losing the essential ingredient of African society- the extended family. The consequent changes in life were catastrophic and created unhealable wounds to date. Yes, some wounds heal as evidenced by many who suffered greatly now becoming rather strange comical laughing bedfellows at this autobiography launch.

    However, if you died in 1993 or later, as thousands did, from the now known to be a criminal and illegal annulment, you are dead and your family has been in chronic mourning. You were not invited to the autobiography presentation. We cannot open the graves, marked and unmarked, of you and thousands of other tortured victims of the democracy struggle to apologise on behalf of the unapologetic perpetrators even as an unbelievable N17 billion was raised for a Presidential Library Complex for the man who failed to deliver his self-appointed, coup-generated, responsibility to release the peaceful election results and install his legitimately elected successor, Chief MKO Abiola -THE WINNER OF THE 1993 ELECTION.

    At last, we can shout that without arrest or editors warning us to say ‘PRESUMED WINNER’ fearing of litigation or military backlash. Yes, Buhari reinstated his legacy. Thanks! We remember the collapse of Abiola’s huge business empire and can only imagine the real suffering of his family. The human and economic cost went beyond the Abiola dynasty. The human and economic losses are incalculable particularly in the Southwest during five months of self-inflicted ‘solidarity’ strikes. Like many, I took to daily walking 43 minutes to a strike-driven reduced workload. 

    In Ibadan, we got together, meeting secretly, not parking in front of my house, the meeting point, and for six weeks discussed what could be recommended to others to be done across particularly agriculture and education to alleviate the sledgehammer that was the sectional despotic retrogressive military government as the military plummeted from democracy deliverer ‘hero’ to ‘zero’ countrywide.

    Read Also: N30trn Ways and Means: Senate panel accuses CBN of frustrating probe

    Following that dialogue, we made some impact and I started Educare Trust in 1994 which with the help of many members and partners created the Educare Trust Exhibition Centre in 1998 in Ibadan. The ETEC has been a springboard impacting millions of youths with social skills, moral and civic volunteer values, health empowerment, school and reading books [mini-libraries], footballs and sports equipment, computer literacy and co-curricular activities etc. All these to fill the gap left by a military and even political leadership which neglected the complete education of Nigeria’s youth. That criminal neglect while the rich got richer, in spite of the efforts of Educare Trust and others, has led directly to most schools falling into decay without even a grant to buy books for the empty or non-existent library, footballs, sports equipment etc.

    Note that the one seeking a Presidential Library in his ‘honour’ or ‘dishonour’ was not elected president in a country which, because of his generation of failed leadership, has a huge educational elephant in the autobiography launch room.  That elephant is the 18,000,000 out-of-school-children, Nigerian’s unable to go to mostly inadequate schools.

    School is compulsory, by the way.  It is very likely that seeing the almost N17b raised on the day, latecomer sycophants or previous beneficiaries will still climb on the bandwagon with in their ‘settlement might’ raising the figure to N20,000,000. Applied to the school library system, that is N1,111 for every ‘Out-Of-School-Child’. It is N322,000 for each of the 62,000 government primary schools  in Nigeria or N849,256 for each of the 23,550 secondary schools.

    Many years ago, as the education system lay in ruins, there was an announcement to set up a Heritage University  following a Heritage Secondary School by the recipient of this N17b-?N20b Presidential Library Project Fund. Then I wrote without success that it would have been better restitution for him to award every secondary and primary school in Nigeria just $1,000. This was presumptive on the ‘discovery’ of the location of the ‘disappeared’ $12,500,000,000 First Gulf War windfall referred to by the then expelled Financial Times correspondent.

    Once again, the former leader in the midst of lame autobiographical explanations for ‘failure to act’, and even facing accusations from descendants of Abacha, is at a huge moral financial crossroads- to serve ‘MYSELF OR THE MANY’- the Nigerian children with library upgrades in 23,550 secondary schools or 62,000 primary schools or N500,000  to 40,000 schools or N1,000,000 to 20,000 schools.

    He risks being the only visitor/reader in his GIANT PROPOSED PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY.

    We, the people, will annul this project to help pay Nigeria’s moral national debt to the dead, the deprived and the 18,000,000 out-of-school-children.

    Mr Ex-President: Annul this presidential library.

  • Beyond Babangida’s Abuja crowd

    Beyond Babangida’s Abuja crowd

    The make-up of Babangida’s Abuja crowd during the public presentation of his autobiography- ‘A Journey in Service ‘last week was in character with a leader who like ‘Maradona’ takes delight in devious scheming. On hand to give him solidarity were five of his fellow former military Heads of State who see manipulation of the governed as great asset. They all believe that government doesn’t need to ask what the governed want. Why are they leaders if they cannot dream for their people?

     The second group is made up of former products of Babangida’s school of democracy; he personally christened them ‘new breed’ politicians. They were from the onset forbidden from making contact with neither the past nor their corrupt leaders. Today, some are in the private sector while others have become part of our current governing class. The military is their role model and for them, government is about sharing spoils of war. They didn’t have problem raising N17billion towards the building a presidential library for their godfather, ex-President Babangida, accused by detractors of institutionalising corruption in Nigeria.

    Babangida, the self-styled evil genius, often obsessed with self-preservation, loves none but self. He is as selfish as he is self-centred. He is a leader with no abiding faith. Babangida was the leader who carried out a palace coup against his principal he accused of not carrying people along in decision making only for him to take IMF loan roundly rejected by Nigerians as shown by the result of a national survey he commissioned. Despite experts’ advice and general rejection of the Structural Adjustment Programme, it was embraced by Babangida even as the result was the turning of our country into a dumping ground for foreign manufactured goods from all over the world. And finally, the evil genius, thinking he knew what we want, took a multi-cultural and multi-religion nation like Nigeria into OIC without consulting Nigerians.

    This is why I think his last week act of contrition over his role in the June 12 1993 fiasco during the public presentation of his autobiography- ‘A Journey in Service’ was an assault on sensibilities of thousands of Nigerians beaten by and detained by the police or killed by soldiers while demonstrating in Lagos and across Nigeria against Babangida’s coup against the nation.

     For anyone who is familiar with the style of the ‘Maradona’ who dribbled the academia, the media that made him, and the traditional institutions that bestowed on him honours without end across Nigeria including the (Opu Omu Alabo), the chief war leader of Rivers, the Oka ome Eme (a man of his words of Enugu) and the Comforter of the Igbos), it is not difficult to dismiss his last week act of contrition over his June 12 1993 coup against Nigeria an assault on sensibilities of Nigerians

    And if one may ask, what is the Maradona apologizing for after blaming everyone else for the coup except self? As if the evil genius thinks he is still the Commander-in-Chief 32 years after Nigerians angrily chased him out office, he is identifying those Nigerians should hold responsible for the 1993 coup many believe he masterminded but executed by his friends. He has identified, Arthur Nzeribe, the Association to Better Nigeria (ABN), he admitted was his friend as the one who secured an illegal midnight judgment that threatened the conduct of the election; he named his Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Clement Akpamgbo who in clear violation of Decree 13, which barred any court from interfering with INEC’s conduct or scheduling of the elections, he said misadvised government and  Akpamgbo’s godson, Justice Ikpeme, whose Abuja High Court granted the ABN an injunction stopping NEC from conducting the June 12 elections.in the dead of night. Babangida also wants Nduka Irabor sanctioned. According to him the June 12 elections “was annulled on June 23, 1993 through “a terse, poorly worded statement from a scrap of paper, which bore neither the presidential seal nor the official letterhead of the government, read out by Nduka Irabor”.

    Unfortunately, Babangida forgot that in spite his current denials and buck passing, he validated, all the above decisions he now says were not approved through a public broadcast and press conference where he also laid out plan for his Interim National Government contraption.

     Sadly, Babangida, a common trickster thinks no one sees though his subterfuge. The other five perfidious generals who were out with him last week suffer from the same affliction

    But how did we get here?

    We are an endowed nation. At independence, Nigeria was seen as the hope of the black race. The East was rated as having the highest growing economy in the world, The West had television ahead of Belgium and Germany and was through welfarist policies including free education and free health services, was on the verge of creating an egalitarian society. Our dreams and hopes came into an abrupt end when ethnic irredentists turned the Nigerian Army into an army of balance of terror in 1966.

    It is precisely because Babangida style is not different from those of other Nigerian former generals that ruled us like conquered people that I want us to look beyond his Abuja crowd and interrogate how total disrespect for Nigerians by our successive military leaders from Aguiyi Ironsi to Abdulsalami Abubakar has brought the nation to her knees.

    Read Alao: Why Nigeria intervened in Liberia’s civil war, by Babangida

    First let us take a journey through memory to see how we got here.

    There was a military insurrection in January 1966. Ironsi who emerged as the new leader of the country in a moment of madness promulgated Decree 34 of 1966 that overnight turned a multi-cultural Federal Republic of Nigeria into a unitary state. Unitarism was a social system long canvassed by the Igbo ethnic group.

    The response of the north to unification was the July 1966 vengeance coup that led to the killing of many Igbo military officers, massacre of Igbo people in the north and eventual civil war.

    Gowon played the ethnic card by allowing himself to be railroaded into power in breach of espirit de corps of the military which favoured Brigadier Babafemi Ogundipe, then the most senior surviving military officer as Head of State. Of course, there wouldn’t have been any civil war but for Gowon’s refusal to abide by the terms of the Aburi Accord.

    Obasanjo also betrayed the country when he, as an umpire in the 1979 election, chose to support Shehu Shagari. The rest of the country viewed Obasanjo’s action as a form of payback to the northern hegemonic power that allowed him to succeed assassinated Murtala Mohammed in 1976.

    Buhari actually believed he could rule Nigeria without Nigerians’ consent.  In 1984, he treated northern politicians with kid gloves while he sent their southern counterparts who, as government, officially cornered contract commissions to build universities and health facilities for the mass of their people in Edo, Ondo, Ogun and Lagos to prison years ranging from 100 to 200.

    Besides stealing the country blind, Abacha, the maximum dictator ruled the country on his own terms. He waged war against Abiola and his Yoruba people while preparing himself for self-perpetuation

    Abdulsalami, besides imposing the 1999 Constitution regarded by many as Decree 24 as it was never discussed by Nigerians, believed he and other northern military officers that brought Obasanjo  out of prison, and imposed him as Yoruba preferred candidate and went on to work for his victory, have neither patience or respect for the sensibilities of the Yoruba people.

    The net effect of this on the nation was that at the birth of the fourth republic in 1999, there were no politicians with experience in parliamentary democracy or even or even the party system. What we had were military-baked new breed politicians that saw only the outgoing soldiers as role models.

    This was why Ayo Opadokun, a former NADECO chieftain, speaking on the legacies of Ayo Adebanjo and Pa Edwin Clark who died after lifelong struggle on Channels Television last week said he holds exception to being told our current political class are politicians. To him as well as to many other Nigerians, they are military apologists who since 1999 could not even guarantee the status of citizenship Nigerians enjoyed under colonialism especially in terms of constitutional engineering.

    As a way forward, Opadokun says President Tinubu who understands and has been part of the struggle for nation-building should engage the leaders of ethnic nationalities, the owners of Nigeria.

    I think it is time to stop playing the ostrich and let those who claim they don’t know the meaning of restructuring that it is a quest to return our country to a federal arrangement which most multi-cultural societies in the world believe guarantees unity in diversity.

  • IBB’s gobbled vomit

    IBB’s gobbled vomit

    On Thursday, February 20, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida (IBB) buried Gen. Sani Abacha.  He was the arch-villain that annulled the June 12, 1993 election!  The dead stay dumb!

    Abacha is long dead and buried. But from his grave, a thick stench oozes: of unbridled cruelty, dark cunning, a vicious power brute and a gargantuan appetite for executive-sleaze-at-gun-point, such that “Abacha loot” fairly defines his living essence. 

    Sadiq and sis, Gumsu — brave souls! — stoutly defend the honour(?) of their father. But even they, beyond filial bluff and bluster, know that carrying the Abacha name is a terrible burden. 

    Abacha, as stark maximum ruler and iron thief, epitomizes near-bestiality.

    But beyond burying the dead Abacha, IBB also spectacularly buried himself — alive — with co-bearers of false tales over the June 12 question. 

    In that Transcorp Hilton Hotel, Abuja “Open Grave” — ironically the title of the second of Hon. Wale Osun’s trilogy on the June 12 saga: the direst political crime in Nigerian history — all the conspirators were there, if not in body, then in spirit.

    The fitting requiem — to blast the soul of this evil ensemble — was IBB’s admission (hardly news!) that Chief MKO Abiola indeed won the June 12 election; and that he regretted annulling it!  But as everything IBB, that “regret” has fired fresh controversy.

    Read Also: Natural Gas is bridge to Nigeria’s industrial future, says Optimera Energy

    MKO’s crime was winning a fair election, which result a band of over-fed Army traitors felt was infra dig.  For that, the Nigerian rogue state killed his wife, Kudirat, wrecked his thriving business and finally killed the man — and made Kudi’s six children complete orphans — after MKO had spent his entire presidential term in the evil Abacha gulag!

    It’s an epochal crime that would continue to haunt, blight and plague the coming generations of everyone involved!

    Fittingly too, also buried in that open grave, was former President Olusegun Obasanjo, the fake rectitude that brazenly fronted for the IBB-Abacha turpitude, to bury, without trace, June 12.  But see who is buried alive now!

    The pretentious Obasanjo was there to rally the odious Interim National Government (ING) nonsense that threw up the feckless Chief Ernest Shonekan.

    He was there when, as elected President, he tried to supplant June 12 — the hallowed date MKO won; and which would turn the nemesis of the political military — with May 29: the hollow day Obasanjo took power in 1999, albeit from MKO’s supreme sacrifice.

    Obasanjo forced down that fraud, until President Muhammadu Buhari threw it out; and named June 12 as authentic Democracy Day in 2018, to take effect from 2019.

    Finally, on February 20, he was there — as chairman of proceedings — when IBB ate crow, declared that on MKO they had all lived a shrill lie, and exalted PMB for exulting the truth of June 12, over Obasanjo’s lie of May 29!

    But as the Abuja Hilton drama played out, one towering irony ruled the roost: a “June Twelver”, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, that faced down the plot, when it was hot and fatal for too many, had become President!  Indeed, the inevitability of right over wrong!

    Yes, PBAT wasn’t supposed to go there and gloat. That would have been bad breeding. 

    Yet, not a few fume that his high praise of IBB was a tad too fulsome!  Might it be that PBAT is president of everyone — the good, the bad and the ugly? 

    Or that, even with his famed sharp street antenna, that always feels out the true mass temper, even he is trapped in that notorious elite bubble, which jars with the harsh reality outside?

    In truth, the superlative praise that gathering poured on IBB was nauseating.  Yes, IBB could have made of Nigeria restless sites of policy scaffolding, all through his eight power years.

    But he, more than anyone alive or dead, gifted contemporary Nigeria with “settlement” — that subversive generosity that captured the supreme ethos of the IBB years: a gangling venality that toasted sleaze; and conked honest, hard work. That razed our moral fabric.  It explains why, today, the civil service is a nest of graft.

    Yet, there is some nobility in IBB’s recant and apology on June 12.  It’s a doughty act of courage that should stand him in good stead, whatever his final place in history.

    In that, he towers over Gen. Obasanjo, his old commander-in-chief, whose cardinal rule is doubling down on past rots: June 12, ING, May 29, and the horrible, horrible 2007 elections, among his many power blunders!

    Would IBB show Obasanjo new redemptive ways in simple but noble apology?  Time will tell.

    Still, IBB’s new memoir, A Journey in Service, conclusively proves military rule is arrant disservice, despite the many fibs IBB allowed himself. Proof? How the principal players turned out, over coups d’etat.

    Gen. Yakubu Gowon, the most angelic of them all, faced the indignity of his juniors stripping him of his high rank, over unproved coup allegations — a wrong IBB righted.  From Gowon’s age of innocence, the military progressively self-destroyed, in deep rot.

    The mercurial Murtala Muhammed practically got bumped off, even before he started ruling.  Even IBB, if ever so coyly, admitted that Murtala’s impatient reforms, marked by giddy purges “with immediate effect”, effectively killed the federal civil service.

    Gen. Buhari, the most puritanical of them all, with naked jackboot dictatorship, sucked with the endangered masses that he had tried to save from IBB-era debauchery. 

    IBB’s sweet slime, power and policy waywardness et al, peaked with the tragic annulment — which challenge, by civil society, birthed Abacha: as stark, paranoid, kleptomaniac, megalomaniac and brutal as they come! 

    Under Abacha, Shehu Musa Yar’Adua died in jail for coup.  Obasanjo himself tasted jail, and was sprung by the virtual bell of Abacha’s sudden death — a privilege Abdulsalami Abubakar never extended to MKO before his rogue state murder.

    Abacha was the worst-ever portraiture of military rule.  Just as well, he and his terrible breed destroyed the political military, for Nigeria to claw back its soul!  Still, without IBB’s “evil genius”, monster Abacha couldn’t have thrived.

    Strange, though: IBB still, in a section of the book, permitted himself the delusion to rationalize military rule — audacious? Why, he even hallucinated, with all the havoc he had caused, about a so-called “Babangida School of Political Mentorship!” Horror!

    Such IBB conceits, powered by self-eulogy, drive the book, as it had driven the fatal annulment that made him a pariah, if not in his elite bubble, then among the masses; and now hankers after a so-called presidential library!

    Pray, who elected IBB “president”, beyond booming guns, his personal whims, and the caprice of his conclave of palace coup rats that ousted Buhari? And what’s the worth of a presidential library, if only to remind folks of the havoc you left behind?  Conceit!

    But then, that’s the thing!  From fond sentiments that wafted through the book — by the way, beautiful and fetching prose that delivered a mine of contemporary history — IBB still thinks he left Nigeria better than he met it. He’s entitled to his grand delusions!

    Still, on his presidential library project, IBB again trumps Obasanjo.  He has raised some N17 billion, to make that project a reality, 32 years after he left power. 

    Obasanjo’s fundraiser, back in 2005, was a holy suborn, though he branded it “donation”.  A sitting president doesn’t pen in contractors to “donate”, yet kid anyone it’s no brazen extortion!

  • IBB: Revision for contrition?

    IBB: Revision for contrition?

    It is just as well that Nigerians have been speaking on Ibrahim Babangida’s long awaited book – “A Journey of Service” since its public presentation Thursday last week. Surely, if a week after its release, most Nigerians appear less convinced about the aptness of the subject’s so-called journey of service which the title desperately sought to project, what the snippets out there suggest goes beyond a less-than-credible account of the eight-year trauma unleashed on a long-suffering people by the individual now famously described as Maradona. It is, to put things mildly, a nauseating patchwork of astounding self-justification, and a most egregious assault on the psyche of an injured people.

    Let me start with a confession at this stage: I have not read the book. I will hopefully do as soon as I am able to grab a copy. But like every concerned Nigerian, I have followed, closely, the events from the presentation to the subsequent naira rain in the service of the vainglorious monument of a so-called presidential library project – a scandal, an obscenity, if you ask me. That is a different matter by the way.

    Just as theirs belong the prerogative of what to make of his account as laid out in the book, Nigerians ought to join me in commending the number one artful dodger for finally coming out with his story – never mind that this is coming after 32 years since the annulment of an election that the world has come to accept as the freest and fairest in the nation’s electoral history.

    To say that the man they call IBB is no ordinary leader is no overstatement. For good or bad, the point really is not to deny him his place in history. Next to Yakubu Gowon under whose leadership the nation fought a bloody civil war, he is arguably Nigeria’s most consequential leader till date. Howbeit, if a minority few detected his pretensions to high-mindedness particularly in the early days of his administration, one must give it to his uncommon ability to deploy a certain charm offensive, added to his trademark toothy smile, to get majority to accept that he meant no harm.

    With all manners of palace intellectuals in his beck and call, the administration, which he was the supremo, was apparently well prepared, to answer to any and every quest, right up to playing god! In those giddy moments of intoxicating power, some even dared to call him the Prince of the Niger!

    To be sure, he was not all image and no substance. He was a doer of sorts. For roads and food security, his administration had the Directorate of Food, Roads and Rural Infrastructure (DFRRI); there was the Mass Mobilization for Self-Reliance, Social Justice, and Economic Recovery (MAMSER) to educate the citizens about the political process, their civic duties and to inculcate in them a dependence on locally made goods and Nigerian products. They, the administration that is, even had the National Agricultural Land Development Agency (NALDA) to assist willing farmers to prepare the land for cultivation! Nigerians will recall the much reviled Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP), the policy anchor to address the then looming economic catastrophe. 

    And then the spectacular bid to nurture a so-called new breed of politicians and with it, the laboratory of costly political experimentations; an era when politicians were banned, unbanned and re-banned by his administration– politicians thought to have crossed the lines of the administration’s political orthodoxy.

    If Nigerians were exasperated by the chaos falsely presented as a transition programme, the artful manoeuvres which berthed few hours into the elections and the subsequent annulment of same on June 12, 1993 certainly went beyond a mere turning point, it has since defined everything that the administration represents to Nigerians if not the global humanity.

    It is precisely why Nigerians chose to see the book – A Journey of Service – as an essential June 12 story – as against the autobiography that it is. As far as most are concerned – everything of meaning starts and ends with the story of MKO Abiola, a man who won an election fair and square but was denied the fruit of his victory for reasons that are as inexplicable as they are illogical. (Like most adults at the time, I could still play back in my mind those testy moments when a rambling Babangida, as if under the influence of substance, decreed the election annulled)!

    Now that the Supremo testament is out in the bookstands, many are actually wondering whether the so-called memoir should not have been more appropriately titled The Return of the Maradona. Yes, an exposition on the same old indulgences in semantic inexactitudes that is vintage IBB!

    Still, there is lot that Nigerians ought to be thankful for. First the dubious, but utterly self-serving attempt to conflate ‘acceptance of responsibility’ with ‘expression of remorse’ has been finally exposed for what it is – an exercise in chicanery at best. The man is apparently far too gone to understand the difference and their import. He apparently thinks that he has done the country no wrong to call for an apology to be offered. Or better still, he thinks that would detract from his macho image of the soldier’s soldier!

    Read Also: Tax Reform Bills: Less than 30% of Nigerians pay tax, says Akpabio

    That thousands died didn’t appear to matter; nothing about the grave socio-economic dislocation spawned by the crisis seems to matter; these were mere collateral damages and should be accepted as such! That, for yours truly, is a revelation, a sure profile in leadership.

    Second, the confession that he, IBB was never truly in charge of anything! Again, I am relying on newspaper reports!

    Yes, he was supposed to be the commander-in-chief, but Sani Abacha, his army chief, was actually the one running the show! Interestingly that all of the other brass-hats which he gleefully named as his nemesis, and all of whom he claimed were sworn to ensure that the transition did not run its full course, are now dead! While that remains his words against theirs, the only thing that he did not add is that the perceptibly rattled, rambling and incoherent general that appeared on TV to announce the annulment was actually a Babangida clone!

    How about that shameful admission, coming from our beloved military president, a four-star general?

    Now that the man has pretty little to offer the nation or anyone for that matter, it’s probably time Nigerians left him alone as he continues to enjoy the peace of his rarefied hill-top mansion in Minna!

  • IBB dribbles history

    IBB dribbles history

    Gen. Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida, popularly called IBB, surely has a mysterious gift of celestial mercy. Otherwise, how can his grave sins against Nigerian democracy be atoned by democratically elected leaders who ordinarily should be hounding him? The launch of his autobiography: “A Journey of Service” last week, in Abuja is reminiscent of Isaiah 1:18, which said: “come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow, though they be red like crimson, they shall be white as wool.” 

    While he reigned as military president, IBB was called Maradona, after the famous Argentine footballer, Diego Maradona, a gifted dribbler, who used his hand (he called it the hand of god) to score a goal against England in the 1986 world cup quarter finals and got away with it. Short and sturdy like IBB, the Argentinian football maestro had leaped into the air and with a feint of his hand, made up the remaining inches needed to score against England. Unlike now, then, there was no video review to crosscheck what happened.

    Until last week, pundits would easily have written off IBB as belonging to the infamy of Nigerian history. His gravest sin was the annulment of June 12, 1993 presidential election which Moshood Kashimawo Abiola (MKO), won handsomely. That action set a chain of reactions, which resulted in the death of the winner of the election, his wife, Kudirat Abiola, and several other persons killed to enforce the annulment. Many great political careers were annihilated for supporting the malicious annulment or for seemingly condoning it.

    Three decades after, the chief culprit of the annulment, seems to be the beneficiary of fulsome forgiveness in the manner Prophet Isaiah wrote thousands of years ago. While accepting responsibility for the criminal annulment of the election, the wily general also sought to exculpate himself from the criminal act, by laying the actual doing of the act (actus reus and mens rea) on late Gen. Sani Abacha, who he is sure is more loathed, by many. Of course, if you doubt IBB, you can go ask Abacha, his own side of the story.

    A case of eating your cake, and still having it in the fridge or approbating and re-approbating, as we say in legalism. By IBB’s account, if you believe him, he was as much a victim as those who were consumed by the criminal annulment. The worse, he wants history to say of him, is that he was just a coward, who could not stare down Abacha, his subordinate army chief. Perhaps, that may be a better historical indignity to live with, than the criminal indictment of annulling a democratic election.

    It is hoped that a list of those who lost their lives to that act of cowardice of IBB answering the commander-in-chief, when in actual fact, it was his chief of army staff, Sani Abacha, that was the chief commander of the nation’s army, will be published as addendum to IBB’s book of apology. It would also be necessary to acknowledge the personal and national economic losses, Nigerians and the nation suffered as a result of his allowing Abacha to annul the election, as he is now alleging.    

    Of note, many Nigerians, who were mere accessory after the criminal act of the annulment and who had died without the atonement and reasoning together of last week, have been wished the hottest part of hell by many aggrieved Nigerians. If a wish list is made of those who should be in the hottest part of the hades, many of those who were mere errand boys to IBB in the criminal annulment of the 1993 election would feature prominently.

    But, against the run of play, IBB is niftily seeking to come clean, to escape the historic condemnation for the sin which by his own admission, he accepts responsibility for. The members of the human rights community, who may have been nursing the secret wish that IBB can be hauled before a court to answer for the illegal annulment of that election are greatly disappointed. They may have imagined that since Nigerian democracy has become entrenched, and those who were on the firing line of the annulment army, like President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, are now in power, the time for IBB’s criminal indictment is drawing near. 

    But here we are, the man who had dribbled politicians with an unending transition programme; who had banned, unbanned, and re-banned politicians, in a manner reminiscent of dribbles by Diego Amando Maradona, in the soccer field, instead of taking a hit from the offended, not only received plaudits, but garlands from the president and the committee of living past presidents and leaders. And not only the political class, the mega billionaires in Nigeria, were there in their numbers, seeking to outdo each other, in praises and donations for a presidential library of a retired military head of state. 

    Read Also: Nigerian Breweries hits N1tr turnover

    Surely, IBB is a lucky man. A cursory look through the internet would reveal that presidential library is rooted in democracy. But IBB despite being a past military leader has successfully appropriated that symbol of democracy, which he spurned, as military leader. The google says that Presidential Library system formally began in 1939, when President Franklin Roosevelt donated his personal and presidential papers to the US federal government. Now, IBB has rewritten the histories of presidential library by launching one, though he was a military president.

    His legendry skill in making friends was at display at the event, marking the public presentation of his autobiographical book and the launch of his presidential library. Apart from the presence of the former heads of state, the venue was brimming with retired military officers, political heavyweights and leading businessmen, even when many thought that he has become inconsequential in the political scheming of Nigeria. This writer doubts if any other former Nigeria leader can influence the assemblage of such influential men, when the beneficiary can no longer repay such loyalty.

    Many writers have called for forgiveness, more so with Abacha put forward as the escape goat by IBB. Considering IBB’s interest in history, he may actually crave that forgiveness more than the humongous billions raised at the book presentation and launch of presidential library last week. While many living June 12 democracy activists would never give him the benefit of doubt, the wily general is setting up a legacy project that would project his positive side, and seek to write his history in his own image.

    Loathed and feared by his adversaries; loved and adored by his admirers, the one they call the evil genius has shown his uncanny ingenuity even at his twilight. With perhaps his last official performance last week, has IBB succeeded in dribbling history, to his favourable acclaim? History will tell.

  • No regrets

    No regrets

    The terrible thing about IBB last week was that we allowed him to be Maradona again. The headlines last week said it all. They said the former military president regretted his actions in annulling the June 12 poll.

    If you read the book, A Journey In Service, An Autobiography, and if you heard his short speech at the book presentation, Ibrahim Babangida never once said or even suggested that he regretted it. He described it as regrettable, which means we ought to lament his shameless action. That does not amount to a personal regret.

    He also said: “The nation is entitled to expect my impression of regret.” A tongue-twister. That does not mean he regretted it. The expression was a trap, and editors, reporters, commentators and even the political class fell into it. He indeed conned journalism.

    For you to regret, we expect remorse. There was no remorse in the diction and tone of his delivery. It was a cold-blooded offering. You need remorse to apologise. To regret is to be unhappy about what one has done to oneself. Remorse means you are pained for hurting others. He did nothing of that. We climbed a high moral pedestal believing he asked for mercy. He asked for no such thing.

    IBB was Maradona again, and he conned many with his rhetorical rigmarole. I don’t like him but I admire the man. He came to laugh at the nation, and at the end of that dark cackle, he carted home a profit. If he said, we are “entitled to expect my impression of regret,” he merely said it is your right to ask me to say I am sorry, but it is my choice not to say it. I cannot give you the throat to gloat, to wrest judgment, to humiliate me as a groveling sinner. I will never flatter your moral superiority.

    He boasted that he conducted the best election. That was his point. He knew Abiola won. His opinion was worthless. Buhari has declared it, and M.K.O. Abiola has earned GCFR. IBB gave us a meal, a poisonous meal, but no mea culpa. His confession adds nothing to the June 12 value. It was just a saga of a man – IBB – trying to be heard, when all ears were deaf.

    Ten he said he took full responsibility. He said, he would do it differently, if he had the chance again. How differently? Many, including the reviewer Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, implied he would have allowed Abiola be president. The same Abiola he said in the book would not be a good president? The same Abiola he paraded Yoruba topmen, including the Ooni of ife, to see his contracts with government, his government? The Ooni yelled, “Ohun nikan la s’aiye fun ni?” Was the world made for him alone?

    Doing things differently surely did not include Abiola restoration. After that assertion, he said he did it in the best interest of the country. It means annulling June 12 was in the best interest of the country. Restoring it was not. It was a binary choice? He chose the path of perdition. He just told us that, in June 1993, the best action was to annul. He even gloats that his action was right because democracy has prevailed over disintegration.

    Read Also: Beta Nigeria trains journalists, influencers to advocate for education reform in Kaduna

    If you read the book, you could hear IBB’s voice. For those who were alive when he was president, and listened and studied his speeches, there is nothing different now. The writers then may be different from the editors like Dr. Yemi Ogunbiyi and Dr. Chidi Amuta, yet the voice is inescapably IBB’s. In his style, he projects the air of the learned, but that is because he knows how to pick brilliant men. Who would go wrong with Amuta, Ogunbiyi, et al? But he has a native cunning, an earthy brilliance, a street wisdom, and an ability to appear to grasp concepts like a sponge. We saw it when he was military president. We see it now. He was a dangerous man and he exploited the air of macabre augury around him.

    Some have called him a coward when he blamed Abacha.  He cannot defend himself. Maybe his people can. Even if they do, it will all be speculative. Sophocles wrote. “The dead will never testify against a burial.” Cowardice is an elementary, if naïve, charge. A dictator is, by definition, a coward. Such a claim says nothing new. History has a list of such despots. Pol Pot, Mussolini, Kurunmi, Caligula, Nero. They are impotent without arms and state power. But Babangida is a special kind of coward. It is a special kind of coward who stakes his life in coup after coup. It is a coward who was shot at during the civil war, flown to Lagos, rejected a surgery, recovered and was not afraid to return to battle. It takes a special kind of coward to go upstairs in a radio station in Lagos to meet with coup leader Buka Dimka without any arms. His boss T.Y. Danjuma ordered him to return and flush him out.

    He did not fear court martial as implied in Alabi Isama’s book, The Tragedy of Victory. Isama wrote that IBB asked Dimka to drop his weapons and run. IBB writes that he “inescapably” escaped. It takes more than a coward to dare Idiagbon with a coup attempt. It took more than a coward to sit at his office on the top floor of the  Defence Headquarters in Lagos when virtually every soldier was running for their life out of the building over a bomb scare but IBB remained ensconced and unfazed in his office. This is not his story, but Debo Bashorun’s account in his anti-IBB book, Honour for Sale.

    One thing I wanted to read was his use of decree two. He gave himself plaudits for abrogating Decree 4 but says nothing of Decree 2. Four was a subset of two. Rather he undertakes a phony intellectual rollercoaster trying to frame a human and democratic system. He says nothing about the deaths he piled up during the June 12 turmoil, the hounding of radicals, the many dead on street protests, the long disruptions of life, the destruction of the economy, the high-profile deaths like Kudirat Abiola, Bagauda Kaltho, etc.  There was no mention, not to say regrets or even a funereal tone on the deaths he unleashed.

    The health challenges that ultimately took the lives of Gani Fawehinmi and Beko Ransome-Kuti derived from jail times under his gulag. I remember as the managing editor of the Concord Newspapers’ Abuja bureau, I was sitting on my desk when our Villa correspondent Mohammed Adamu walked in with what looked like a scrap of a paper. It had no letter head, no signature, no government insignia. He told me Chief Press Secretary Nduka Irabor gave it to him and other correspondents. I read it, and its writing bore IBB’s serpentine style. It did not say directly that the election was annulled, but it implied it. I called the editor of National Concord, Nsikak Essien. He asked me to call the editor-in-chief, Dr. Doyin Abiola. She asked what it all meant, as though she did not understand it. I explained that the election had been annulled. As the wife of the winner, the hope of a life in the villa held the prospect of a fantasy. She became angry with the messenger, and said I should have scooped this earlier.

    I was in the joyous halo of my birthday, but history decided to mock. IBB says, it was Abacha’s men who did it. We need Nduka Irabor to let us know if his boss Admiral Aikhomu did not know about it. IBB said Aikhomu was taken aback by the letter.

    IBB said he knew nothing about Arthur Nzeribe’s Association for Better Nigeria (ABN) that mobilized a circus for annulment. He did not know about Justice Ikpeme’s decision about the June 12 poll. He felt helpless about stopping the group, yet he banned newspapers, hounded human rights group like CDHR and CLO, and the Campaign for Democracy and NUPENG’s Frank Kokori. He locked up Beko and Falana, and I remember seeing them in court and even following them to know where they were kept until a soldier pointed a gun and asked me to go back. IBB and his men did not even stop his SSS men from following me around Abuja, I did not know until Abiola’s  first aide Olu Akerele hinted me that two cars, a Jetta and 505, took turns following me about town. The same IBB who boasted as though inebriated that “we are not only in office but in power.” He knew when now President Bola Tinubu, Olisa Agbakoba, and editors of The News and Tell magazines, were staked out day and night. Fearless reporters like Alex Kabba were hunted out of the country. Yet, ABN puffed on the streets and IBB could do nothing?

    The most fascinating was his telling of his life at 14. His father died, and he was so distraught that he wanted to join the army. The now orphan boy was dissuaded by his relations. But for a boy whose mother lost child after child, including twins, and only he and his sister survived, and to lose his father and want to join the army? That was an early flirtation with suicide. That was the beginning of his cruelty.

     In his The Rebel, Albert Camus demonstrates how tyrants kill others because they won’t kill themselves. He saw deaths in spades too early and may have wondered why he did not die when his mother was losing several of his siblings. But just like he survived all of that death scare, he survived coups and even a coup against him.

    Many are angry that the donations to set up a library was obscene. Bigwigs donated the fat of the land to evil, and he once called himself the evil genius. No problem, so long as the library is set up to include all the evils of his brutal reign, the death, the air of funeral parlor, the rhetoric of augury, the state of fear that characterised his army with a state rather than a state with an army, a la Bismarck. Those who have nostalgia for military rule can learn. Just like the Nazi Museum in Berlin, with all the madcap personalities and incidents.

  • Jonathan and military’s role in elections

    Jonathan and military’s role in elections

    The role of the military and the general attitude of Nigerians during elections came under intense inquisition at the launch of two books at the Federal Capital City, Abuja last week.

    The books titled, Selected Readings in Internal Security and Selected Readings of Election Security Management were written by former Inspector-General of Police, Solomon Arase.  Former President, Goodluck Jonathan who chaired the occasion, took advantage of the subject matter of the books to interrogate the involvement of Nigerian military in elections’ security management.

    His verdict was that Nigerian military should be excluded from getting involved in election security duties and day-to-day management of elections as obtains in other parts of the world especially, the developed ones.

    “Here in Nigeria, we overstretch the army. In most other countries, the military doesn’t get involved in day-to-day management of elections. In some countries, they are used to manage strategic systems. The air force and the army are used to carry and convey materials to dangerous areas” he said.

    Jonathan said the military are neither used in manning polling booths nor do they stay around them citing the elections in Botswana and Senegal which he had the privilege of monitoring. He extolled the simplicity and orderly conduct of the electorate in those countries and the effective management of the process by their electoral umpires and the police.

    Drawing parallels with the simplicity and orderliness of those country’s elections without the participation of the military, Jonathan noted ‘but here, we fully do the wrong thing’.

    The former president lamented that even with the introduction of technology to enhance the integrity of elections in this country, there are still problems. “And we, Nigerians, celebrate the wrong thing. And I believe that one day, the country will get to the level where people will reject bad behaviour. And when we get to that level, that we reject bad behaviour, this issue will not happen again”, he believes.

    Two issues linked to our elections’ security management are under focus here. The first is the propriety of the continued deployment of the military in the day-to-day running and conduct of elections while the other relates to the negative orientation and attitude of Nigerians on matters concerning elections.

    Jonathan wants the military to be excluded from the management of election security because it overstretches their capacities and runs contrary to practices the world over. He was led to this position by his knowledge of the smoothness and simplicity of the Botswana and Senegalese elections without the involvement of the military. Yet, they produced outcomes that satisfied integrity and credibility tests.

    His government unarguably, presided over a general election that is rated one of the best in the country. That is not all. Jonathan stands out as the only civilian president of this country that presided over an election in which he was a candidate but lost. So, when he says Nigerian military should be excused from election security management, he should be taken seriously.

    Apart from aligning to global practices, excluding the military from election security duties will also isolate that institution from the blame game associated with the coterie of infractions and malpractices that often mar our elections. During the last governorship off-cycle election in Ondo State, the Defence Headquarters said it deployed troops in significant numbers to support the Nigerian Police Force ensure smooth election.

    “Troops presence is to ensure the security of citizens, enabling them to cast their votes without any form of intimidation while keeping mischief makers at bay”, the DHQ explained. But Jonathan says NO to that idea. He would rather keep the military out of such routine functions concentrating in securing strategic systems and conveying logistics to difficult terrains. He has a point.

    Keeping the military out of election security duties will also isolate that institution from undue politicisation as well as partisanship accusations that are freely traded at each round of elections. Moreover, scholars have pointed to a link between the frequent deployment of soldiers to civilian duties and the rash of military takeovers at the foundation stages of new African states. That phenomenon is yet to peter out. Not with the currency of military rule in some African countries after sacking elected civilian governments.

     J.I. Clarke’s perspective on the issue is quite instructive. For him, unless the impulse to let the armed forces handle the ever-widening array of domestic tasks is checked, European countries may end up with “a very expensive, improperly equipped and overqualified emergency response instrument instead of a functional military force”.

    If the armed forces of European countries could face such potent challenges, the situation promises to be more dire for their Nigerian counterparts rated less in sophistication and capacity. The solution does not lie in the constant recourse to the military to handle internal security matters but developing, equipping and adequately funding the Nigerian police and sister organisations to effectively manage such situations. This objective is achievable given the right political will.

    The other strand of the issues raised at the forum relates to the attitude and disposition of the leadership and the led to elections. Jonathan gave clear account of the simplicity and orderliness of the voting process and the electorate in the two countries; how they complied with the regulations guiding voting. But he noted with disappointment that if it were here, people will observe the rules in their breach.

    He believes that the country will get to a point where the people will reject bad behaviour. He did not come clear on what he meant by bad behaviour. But viewed within the context he spoke, it is obvious that he had in mind, the plethora of infractions that mar our elections.

    In effect, he views the ills of our electoral process as a passing phase only if the people reject bad conduct and insist that the right things be done. That goes without saying even as it places the burden of positive change on the shoulders of the people.

    The penchant by the Nigerians to acquiesce to illegalities or succumb to all manner of inducements gives further impetus to the series of infractions witnessed during our elections. These can only stop with a positive change in the orientation and attitude of the electorate such that aligns with pristine democratic ethos.

    Read Also: Forgive Babangida over June 12, Ozekhome begs Nigerians

     But the electorate is not solely to blame. The governments in power share a larger chunk of the culpability.

    Former governor of Anambra State, Peter Obi shared this view in his speech at the occasion when he emphasised that the integrity of elections is determined by the leadership in charge. Free and fair elections, he said, are possible when the right people oversee the process. He has said it all.

    How long it will take for the right people be in charge in a fragmented and highly polarised system characterised by rancorous and cut-throat politics, remains a moot issue. Ours is an inequitable plural society where the various segments are in constant competition for the control of the huge resources at the centre buoyed by prebendal predilections.

    It remains to be seen how that culture of decent electoral behaviour can emerge and endure in a system the central government controls disproportionate share of the national resources and disburses same at will with the sub-nationalities locked in bitter contest for dominance and control. An inequitable system cannot nurture the culture of free, fair and credible electoral conduct.

    This should instruct that we dilute the omnipresence and omnipotence of the federal order to lessen the pressure of bitter competition and the stress it imposes on the system. With devolution of powers to the constituents in keeping with the federal spirit, the acrimonious competition to control the resources at the centre would have been largely stymied.

    Then, moral re-orientation and re-engineering direly needed to grow the culture of decent electoral contest and effective governance can commence in earnest. That has been the missing link. And as long as our system continues to operate in the most inequitable and most aberrant form, so long shall acrimonious and do-or-die politics assail our progress.

    Perhaps, moral or ethical revolution in the Kuhnian fashion could also be activated to save the situation. But its prospects in the extant order appear a remote possibility.