Category: Columnists

  • As good as gone…or?

    Professor Iyayi died in the hands of Nigeria

    I have always believed that what makes an individual poor is not so much his/her lack of material resources as his/her lack of the requisite imagination to deal with that lack of resources in an integrative way. At any point in time, poverty cannot lead to the destruction of any man or woman. What destroys is this frightening vacuity of mind. When a man reaches that stage of flailing his arms around the air wildly hitting out at anyone rationally or irrationally, you know he is as good as gone. I know this because I see it a lot in my dog. Whenever I see him uselessly flailing his paws and looking wistfully at passing birds flying high up, I know he has lost it, at least for that day. For, I never can tell whether he is thinking of dinner or of flying.

    By the same token, a country is not poor because it lacks enough resources to cater for its citizens or even develop itself. A country is not poor because it cannot pass muster in international or cross-border competitions. No matter how rich or ennobled at starting point, a country is soon rendered poor and stricken when it has leaders who are not leading it or enriching it. When the major preoccupations of a country’s leaders are the deadly combination of self-gratification and self-justification, then you have a problem. Indeed, that country is poor because of the vacuity of mind of its leading statesmen. This vacuity will sooner or later destroy the country and its citizens. Any interested researcher or even disinterested observer can come quickly to the conclusion that Nigeria as a country is already destroyed, thanks to, yep, its vacuous leaders. Now, that leadership has started to destroy its own citizens.

    There is no sane individual who plies Nigerian roads that is not shoved aside DAILY by one governmental convoy (ferrying frolickers!) or police convoy or bank convoy! This column, along with many others, has repeatedly stressed that no sane society should allow any group of people tear furiously through traffic the way Nigerian governmental functionaries, police and bank vans do. Now, look what this country has gone and done to Prof. Festus Iyayi, one of the most distinguished and respected academics in this country through the convoy of Gov. Wada of Kogi State.

    When I heard the news that the Kogi governor’s convoy had killed the professor, I was sad for many reasons. First, that death represented for me a sealing of the fate of Nigeria. Prof. Iyayi was one of those who believed in the Nigeria project because his faith in the ability of ASUU to make Nigerians and its leaders understand the reason for applying reason in national affairs was unshaken. I never met him yet I met his commitment to being unwavering in his belief. He believed where many of us had lost faith. If he did not, he would not, at his age, have committed himself to travelling the length and breadth of this country to attend meetings. The tendency is there to believe that ASUU fights battles for its own ends and thus Iyayi died in an ASUU struggle. That view was expressed by someone who reacted to the online version of the news but it was heartening to note that practically every other respondent dressed the fellow down for failing to see beyond his nose. Clearly, anyone can see that when ASUU goes on strike to press for something, the nation is often the better for it as universities are raised to higher platforms of performance, and the staff and students are the ultimate beneficiaries. Iyayi did not die in an ASUU struggle; Professor Iyayi died in the hands of Nigeria.

    That is my second reason for being sad. Nigerian leaders created and are maintaining the present social disorder for personal aggrandisements. Listen as I tell you. Now, every single government official uses not just sirens but convoys – the executive, legislative, army, state functionaries; police, local government, palm-wine tapper functionaries… And where are they all tearing through the traffic to get to? Just name them: in Nigeria, we use convoys to convey oga-on-top to the offices or hospitals or girlfriends’ apartments, the wives to the markets, the girlfriends to their friends’ apartments, etc. Now, traffic in any Nigerian city is chaos on the throne as people need to become wild behind the wheels in order to get home. There is no law, there is no order. Everyone flails uselessly and wildly at the others’ throats, along with the commensurate verbal insults and deprecating abuses, just to get that advantageous edge to get home first as if trying to breast a tape.

    Sadder still is that the drivers of these vehicles are all drawn from the society. They do not come from Mars. They are therefore, our neighbours, friends, husbands, relatives, sons; we who walk or drive along these roads. When governmental vehicles drive in a tearing hurry against every sense of traffic reason and safety, they therefore have to shove us their own neighbours, friends, wives, relatives, sons, daughters out of the way, sometimes damaging their neighbour’s, friend’s, wife’s, relative’s, mother’s or father’s vehicle or legs in the process. Yes, the very many people who have died in these unruly road behaviours simply increased by one last week. They have been relatives of these drivers and commuters. Imagine a driver getting home and being told that the accident he caused had claimed his nearest and dearest. Just imagine that deep, deep irony. That is what literature, and the courts, feed on.

    Wait, there’s more to be sad about. We all know what power is like: it assiduously takes over an individual. S/He finds that s/he can do anything and get away with it until s/he begins to act like a monkey. Power in the hands of an educated man or woman is safer because the voice of his/her education would tell him/her again and again that with great privilege comes great responsibility. Not so the not so educated. Power in such hands is at best a very risky business and at worst a destructive gale. To them, ‘Just drive’ means ‘you own the entire road’; ‘let no one come near the vehicle’ means ‘gun down all ants, cockroaches and rats pretending to be people that cross this vehicle’; and ‘escort this money’ means ‘suspect and kill everyone you meet along the road whether or not they come near the vehicle’. Thus it was that once, while travelling along a Nigerian highway, the vehicle I was in was unfortunate enough to accost the convoy of then Vice-president Atiku. Only the savvy driving of my companion saved us that day as the convoy took the entire two-lane road and it had everyone else jumping into the bush over culverts. The alternative was to wait and be hit head-on by these semi-illiterate relatives of ours holding in their hands the illusion of power and understanding very little or nothing of it.

    For goodness’ sakes, no life in this country is less or more important than any other. It cannot be said indeed that any government functionary becomes indispensable once he/she gets there and has to be protected at all costs. That’s a capital NO for that, unless of course you want to count their parasitic existences. So, why should they be so interested in protecting themselves at the expense of the people they are supposed to watch over?

    Worse yet, and this is the last, every government official caught out has always found ways of displaying inhumaneness by blaming the victims. This is exactly what Kogi State press officials did by peddling falsehood over the Iyayi matter. That is just classless. Such utterances show more than anything else that the country is as good as gone. Only serious social engineering can bring us back from the brink now.

  • ‘Mourning the dead’? Ha!

    THIS edition starts with THE NATION ON SUNDAY of November 10: “A key factor in resolving the political conundrum in Taraba State…unexpectedly died last week, upsetting calculations about the conflict.” Apart from, perhaps, the condemned criminal who has a date with the hangman, nobody knows when their death will come. So, that aspect of ‘unexpectedly’ smacks of loose thinking. The speaker simply died last week. As the Bible states, no man knows the day or time of his exit—except, possibly, supernatural cases like money rituals!

    The next set of grammatical fatalities is from THE NATION ON SUNDAY COMMENT (EDITORIAL): “Last Saturday, November 2, was no different as a large crowd converged at (on) the venue to….”

     

    Dateline: THE NATION ON SUNDAY COMMENT, November 10: “…with the much anticipated and keenly contested governorship election slated for next Saturday.” No lexical stampede as we embark on a chronological exercise: November 9 (last Saturday), November 16 (this Saturday) and November 23 (next Saturday)—counting from Sunday, November 10, the day the editorial in question was published. Therefore, the right entry should have been ‘this Saturday’—not ‘next Saturday’! Otherwise, it hallmarks cloudy and confused thinking.

    Lastly from the weekly comment under review: “While we join the government and people of Anambra in mourning the dead….” Do we mourn the living? Just mourning!

    “…Obiano’s critics said however he is (was) little unknown….”

    “…have been holding consultations in his sprawling country home mansion and soliciting for his blessings.” Yank off ‘for’ to avoid syntactic ripples.

    “…foreign exchange inflow through export of shrimps and other fisheries (fishery) products.”

    “2015: Nigeria won’t breakup (break up), says good governance group”

    Let us welcome DAILY INDEPENDENT back to this column after a long absence. Its November 14 edition goofed: “Moves to stop girl-child marriage intensifies (intensified)” I hope the currency dictates of headline casting did not confuse the sub-editor.

    “Lamido flags of (sic) free eye service” No Arewa English: Lamido inaugurates/launches…

    “How do I recognize NUC approved universities?” A voice of your own: NUC-approved varsities

    NATIONAL MIRROR of November 14 contained a basketful of school-boy howlers starting from its politics page: “We are building evidences against those who are using….” ‘Evidence’ is an uncountable noun and has no plural form. Use a singular verb after it and note that it is wrong to say ‘true evidence’ instead of ‘reliable evidence’. Furthermore, you can say a piece/scrap/shred of evidence. Phrases are sweet if correctly used.

    From the politics page we move to the views page which circulated a-dozen-and-half Basic One infelicities that question the writer’s professorship: “The poor infrastructural facilities in the sector is (why?) compounded by….”

    “…as unmitigated abuses in this all important (all-important) department of our national life.”

    “…they stock sub-standard equipments in addition to….” ‘Equipment’ is non-count.

    “…the agency carried out massive inspection (a massive inspection) of private health facilities in the state.”

    “…some were located in distressed building (a distressed building) and some others (while others) were located (cited) in filthy environments.”

    “Some of the hospitals he disclosed operated….” A rewrite: Some of the hospitals, he disclosed, operated….

    “Quite a number of the clinics (a comma) he stated (another comma) have (had) male nurses functioning as medical doctors.”

    “It is an open secret there is sizeable (a sizeable) number of quack doctors practicing (practising—British English verb) in Lagos….”

    “It is sad that we have degenerated to (into) a level….”

    “But what is not known is what happen (happens) to such impostors at the end of the day.”

    “Asides (sic) from the dearth of medical doctors in the health sector has put immense pressure on those on ground.” Existential humanism: just begin the sentence from (or overhaul the entire wrong-headed entry): The dearth….

    “…listen to their patients (patients’) complaints.”

    “…thousands of Nigerians that seek for health care abroad.” Delete ‘for’ to avoid raucousness!

    “Amidst this (Amid these) most Nigerians have opted to patronize private clinics despite its (their) obvious shortcomings.”

    Finally from NATIONAL MIRROR Views Page of November 14 under review: “This revelation will not surprise any Nigeria (Nigerian) who patronize (patronizes) even the public hospitals.” Remove ‘the’! I believe Barrister Jimoh Ibrahim, OFR, a Great Ife, reads his newspaper as we continue with the Editorial entitled ‘Anambra Adoration Ground tragedy’ in the subsequent paragraphs!

    “…considering the capacity crowd the adoration ground attracts on weekly (a weekly) basis….”

    “…some fellows raised alarm (the alarm) on (about) ‘fire’, which made the worshippers trooping (troop) out to scamper for safety and, in the process, fell over themselves (one another).”

    Lastly from the back page before we vacate Dr. Ibrahim’s publication: “The NFF…must get its acts (act) together by looking….”

    The only intervention this week is by Mr. Bayo Oguntunase (08029442508): ‘Please note that remuneration, like infrastructure, is both a countable and uncountable noun in stateside English. Machinery has the plural machineries.’

    Avoid ‘gather together’, ‘join together’ and other such biblical expressions—use just ‘gather’ or ‘join’. Apart from elegance, they convey the message intended devoid of clumsiness.

    Next is the Views Page of National Mirror, November 7: “Crisis of unemployment in Nigeria” ‘Unemployment’ is a challenge/crisis/problem anywhere. So, unemployment in Nigeria….

    “…under the auspices of the OECD, alerted the nation of (to) the danger ahead unless something was done about youth unemployment.”

    “It is both a big risk and economic waste to be investing heavily on (in) human capital development without….”

  • Erelu Bisi Fayemi: Senior Advocate of the women fold

    Erelu Bisi Fayemi: Senior Advocate of the women fold

    Mrs Fayemi has done a lot to change the life of women and children in Ekiti State

    In my article: BUY ONE, GET ONE FREE,  of 19 June 2011, I wrote:  ‘I make bold to say that with respect to passion for Ekiti’s socio-economic development, the only difference between Dr Kayode Fayemi and his wife, the Ekiti First Lady, Erelu Bisi Fayemi, is that the latter was not elected by the  popular votes of the good people of Ekiti.’ Her most recent initiative resulted in the passing into law by the Ekiti State House of Assembly of the Equal Opportunities Bill to protect the economic and social rights of the physically-challenged, as well as those with learning disabilities in the state concerning which,  V.A Adewusi, a Diasporan member of Ekiti Panupo not only  gave her kudos, but  added that  the bill cold also technically  be regarded as a bill sponsored by the executive branch,  because, in his words,  omi eko, eko ni (they ‘re both the same) giving the example  of  when  in 1996,  U.S President,  William Jefferson Clinton,  had Hillary Rodham Clinton lead  his attempted Healthcare Reform.

    Today, I yield the column to Ado-Ekiti-based Akeem Bello, who has observed Erelu’s multi-faceted peregrinations on behalf of  the needy in  Ekiti for  quite some time. Happy reading.

    Wife: “Help me ooo! Help me ooo!!”

    Husband: “I will kill you today, you this useless woman.”

    Wife: “Please Baba Kehinde, don’t kill me.”

    Husband: “I will kill you, ‘sebi’ you said you will not hear.”

    Wife: “My eyes! My head!!”

    That was the violent interaction between Baba and Mama Kehinde in the early 80s in Bauchi. Mr and Mrs Afolabi Akinwumi, (aka) Baba and Mama Kehinde were members of a happy family. I was about twelve years old then. Our families came in contact  in 1982 when  we both rented apartments in the same compound along  the Kofar Gombe, Unguwar Dawaki area of the town. Theirs was a family of six. Kehinde was the first child and there were Taiye, Tunrayo, followed by Tunde and Sunkanmi who was the last child.  Kehinde and I were in the same class. Suddenly, the happiness in this family turned sour as a result of regular beatings of the wife by Mr Akinwumi. Initially, neighbours intervened to stop these incessant beatings but, after some time, it became so constant that no one cared again.

    That was the story till my own family moved  to  somewhere on Wunti Road  in 1983 though Kehinde and I remained in the same school. Kehinde  would tell me a year later that his father had sent his mother packing for no obvious  reasons, forcing her to leave  the  young children behind

    In 1985,  my family left Bauchi for Ado-Ekiti in Ekiti State and  I did not go back to Bauchi until in 2008 when, Sani, a mutual friend of Kehinde and I was my host.  And, quite naturally,  I asked Sani about our friend and his siblings.  His response was heartbreaking. Sani told me Kehinde was shot dead by the police while robbing a bank; Tunrayo, his sister, he said,  died of  some mysterious  ailment, Tunde became a drug addict and  he knew practically nothing of their youngest sibling. Baba and Mama Kehinde’s whereabouts, too,  were   unknown.

    This is the sad story of  a promising Akinwumi family and the extent to which domestic violence  could destroy a family and ruin the lives of innocent children. Today, I am a  graduate  teacher; my younger brother, who was very close to the late Tunrayo, is a Correction Officer in the USA state of  Texas. My other siblings are graduates from reputable universities. We were all friends to the Akinwumi’s except my youngest brother who was not part of our Bauchi history. The most painful thing, for me personally, is remembering that Kehinde was such a brilliant student.  Without a doubt, had there been an Erelu Fayemi type  there in Bauchi  at that point in time, not only  would the Akinwumi family be intact today, the children would have fulfilled their God -ordained destinies.

    Erelu Bisi Fayemi, like Betty Ford, 1918- 2011, wife of the 38th President of the United States of America, Gerald R. Ford, had a passion for  womens’ rights and that  became her calling. She never hid her feelings about this even if it was against the spirit of the Republican Party, her party.

    Erelu Bisi Fayemi is not by any means a sterile women’s rights advocate. She pursues her exertions to the very end, seeing them become law. For instance, the bill she inspired on prohibition of violence against women was passed into law by the Ekiti State House of Assembly on 25 November, 2011 just as the one on Equal Opportunities, that is, against discrimination of any kind, was passed this November.

    Hers too, is not a one -sided advocacy. Therefore, as an educated woman versed in our culture, Erelu, where ever she goes, advises women to respect their husbands. She tells them that the laws are made to protect them, but that they too, must not abuse the laws.

    Erelu Bisi Fayemi has given philanthropy a new perspective in Ekiti State.  At the launch of  her  Ekiti Development Foundation, all the Dangotes, the Elemelu’s, well known names in philanthropy in the country, were present to lend their support to a worthy cause. Since then, there had been no looking back for her. She has in place, a provision of N200,000 for any family that gives birth to twins or other multiple births just as she recently facilitated the construction of Adunni Olayinka Wellness and Cancer Diagnostic Centre at the Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti, to facilitate early detection of  breast cancer. There is also her Feeding Project  for the elderly and the hungry who are given both cooked meals or raw ration. A few weeks ago, she visited all the markets in the state to assist market women in their various trades. The programme was called ‘Erelu be oja wo- Erelu Visiting the Markets -’ during which women traders were given buses and millions of naira to upgrade their trade;a  completely unprecedented happening in the history of the state.

    Erelu’s efforts are not borne out of gender sentiment or political exhibitionism. Rather, they are deeply held passions borne out of the words of God. For instance,  in the Quran chapter 65 V 6, Allah says;

    “Lodge them where you dwell, according to your means, and do not treat them in such a harmful way that they be obliged to leave. And if they are pregnant, then spend on them till they deliver. Then if they suck to the children for you, give them their due payment, and let each of you accept the advice of the other in a just way…..”

    This is similar in the Bible to Ephesians 5 vs 28 which says:

    “So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loveth his wife loveth himself”

    Some ‘Ifa’ verses in Yoruba cosmogony also attest to this. These verses are why Erelu will insist on respect for women dignity by their husbands. Women are the navel  of any home.

    Erelu, just like Hillary Rodham Clinton, is a formidable pillar behind her husband. She is giving Dr. Kayode Fayemi the necessary support he needs to  continue to move Ekiti forward. Her school of politics is with a difference; carrying out her activities, as she does,  with civility and an unrivalled panache.

    Mrs Fayemi has done a lot to change the life of women and children in Ekiti that all we can do is commend, and thank her, for the many ways in which  she has, and continues to  touch  lives, especially of our women, children, the hungry, the sick and the needy, in general.

    I therefore urge the entire Ekiti citizenry to support her husband, our dear governor, Dr John Kayode Fayemi,  who has, in three years, taken Ekiti to  socio-economic heights never seen in the entire history of the state.

    Akeem Bello writes from Ado Ekiti.

  • Bad news from Ghana

    Bad news from Ghana

    President Mahama’s hammer on  Minister Hammah for merely contemplating corruption is bad judgement.

    It would appear the Ghanaian president, John Mahama, took anti-corruption war to a ridiculous level when he hammered the country’s deputy minister of communications, Victoria Hammah, not for committing any crime, but for merely contemplating one. I am sure our own President Goodluck Jonathan and many other African leaders must be wondering what is going on in Ghana because that is something novel in this part of the world. A public official being dismissed for allegedly making a statement suggesting she could be corrupt? And what is the source of the information? A taped conversation that the minister had with someone which quoted her as saying she would not quit politics until she had made $1million, that leaked on November 7, and the next day, the minister got the boot. Just like that! Even baby lawyers know that intention is not a crime. Shouldn’t President Mahama have waited for his minister to commit the crime before moving against her?

    The most disgusting thing is that some people have been commending him for this inhuman action. This runs against the grain of what obtains in this part of the world; which is that even when it is crystal clear that crimes have been committed and the public till tampered with, we still need to set up committees to look into the issue. In Nigeria, for instance, our president is so fastidious he would not want someone punished for sins they haven’t committed. Look at the recent case of the aviation minister, Ms Stella Oduah, the matter is still being looked into by several committees. The House of Representatives had looked into it and said the poor woman had a case to answer. But thank God for our President who understands that such a beautiful woman doesn’t come easy; so he is not one to be goaded to act by such conclusion from a House that seems to have a phobia for beautiful women. We shouldn’t forget this same House passed a similar ‘vote of no confidence’ on Ms Arunma Oteh, the Securities and Exchange Commission boss, and asked President Jonathan to starve her of oxygen (money). If the President had answered their prayer, the woman, a paragon of beauty that God created her, would have been ‘recreated’in the image of the House of Representatives.

    We should wonder what kind of unsustainable template the Ghanaian president is trying to set for Africa? How can you render a minister jobless for merely dreaming of setting a goal for herself while in public service? Don’t ministers have performance bonds or targets? If the government demands that of them, why would a minister not set his or her personal target of how fat his or her bank account should be by the time he or she is quitting the public service? What is the big deal in that?

    Obviously President Mahama’s action has given him away as a nincompoop in matters of corruption. When the issue is corruption, we are champions; and this is acknowledged worldwide. How many awards has Ghana won on corruption? If thus we have such comparative advantage over Ghana in the matter, it follows that Ghana must turn to us for solutions to corruption-related matters. As far as Ghana is concerned, the cankerworm fled their shores when Jerry Rawlings killed three former heads of state, among others, as sacrificial lambs. Corruption, it seemed, then relocated its castle to Nigeria.

    Imagine also the ridiculous amount for which a honourable minister was fired! A mere $1million that she had not even made! Imagine, this is one other thing that annoyed me in this matter. If the minister had wanted to eat a toad, shouldn’t she have gone for a fat and juicy one? That a minister was contemplating quitting government after hitting the $1million mark shows that Ghana’s public officials don’t have taste. What would a Nigerian public official do with such peanuts that could only buy one bullet-proof car? That apart, didn’t the honourable minister grease some palms to get the job? President Mahama should have asked his Nigerian counterpart who would have lectured him that the poor woman needed to recoup money she spent greasing those palms before being approved minister. In Nigeria, such things have become a part and parcel of us. A lawmaker once told us why people must steal after winning elections. He said they must recoup their investments. Yes, here politics is investment, and, like all investments, the investors must make profit. We might not have clapped for him then, but we hailed him for saying the truth. Was Minister Hammah not entitled to such return on investment?

    Honestly, it is the Ghanaians that I blame for giving their president this kind of sweeping powers. Are there no traditional rulers from the minister’s place who can protest on her behalf? Has she not got some ardent youth supporters? Where are they? By now, they should have protested that the minister’s sack was the handiwork of her political detractors who are unhappy with the good works she is doing? Or, don’t they have political detractors in Ghana? And the senior advocates? Where are they? Should they not educate their ‘unlearned’ president that you don’t punish people for merely contemplating to empty government treasury into private pockets?

    What I am saying is that the Ghanaian president should have caused his government to set up a committee to find out whether the voice in the alleged tape was that of the minister. Even as that is busy doing its work, he should pretend to be angry with the minister by setting up his own committee tagged presidential fact-finding task-force on the matter. At the end of the day, committee reports will jam committee reports such that he will have no option than to set up another committee to harmonise the reports of all the committees. Then, another committee of eminent bureaucrats would be set up to prepare what we know as Government White Paper (that is if the matter is so serious as to ever get to that stage). Before the White Paper is ready, the people would have become weary and put the matter behind them, until another scandal breaks. That is what Fela called ‘government magic’. Why then would President Mahama want to demystify government the way he has done?

    The Ghanaian President should not infest us with his kind of anti-corruption war. We don’t fight corruption that way. I wonder what African presidents review at their so-called peer review sessions, when Ghana’s president would take decisions on a matter that he is least competent to act on when he simply should have referred the matter to his Nigerian counterpart. He is lucky Chief Olusegun Obasanjo is no longer our president; otherwise, he would have taken offence at such insult. Nigeria is not only big, we are also rich. Our ruling party, the Peoples Democratic Party is the ‘largest in Africa’; so, what the hell is wrong with President Mahama?

    Not to forget that the woman in question reportedly contributed significantly to President Mahama’s electoral success. How can such a neighbour in need become a bloody nuisance for merely dreaming to make $1million off the government? Obviously, President Mahama has not heard of such things as Neighbour to Neighbour. We need to tell him, in fact, educate him on how to handle such sensitive matters. Obviously too, the Ghanaian leader has not heard of ‘soft landing’. These Ghanaians actually need to be tutored about a lot of things. Apparently what they do not know is by far more than what they know, or think that they know. If a president can single-handedly dismiss a minister, then, who says our own president is about the most powerful in the world? Haven’t we a lot to teach the Ghanaians about zero tolerance for corruption?

    Ghanaian ministers who might want to resign in protest and solidarity with their sacked colleague should hop into the next plane to Nigeria. They have my assurance: none of them will in no wise be cast out. But they must be prepared to up the ante. In Nigeria, one million dollars will only get them a bullet-proof car or spent on official furniture!

  • Technology, the Military  and Disasters

    The  typhoon that hit  the Philippines so  cruelly this week has shown in stark terms that  the war between man and nature is far from over. It  has also  shown that  even though  technology can identify disasters  like typhoons as well  as their deadly speed-  which was 310 km per hour in the Philipines typhoon – no technology can as yet predict the level and volume of human and physical disasters to follow. That  was what made the Philippino disaster so gruesome  and awesome to beholdand  its fury brought to a global audience suck in by the unique majesty and brilliance of information technology and  the unique  ubiquity  of the internet. Global  empathy was instant and profuse and whilst one wept at  the sight of nature  making nonsense of humanity with impunity,  right before our eyes,  the US military

    shown like a million stars  in the gallant way its cargo planes brought desperately needed relief materials and succor to  the far flung areas of the Phillippines devastated  by this highly destructive   typhoon.  From  the bottom of my heart I say ‘ God bless America’ for that and I  really mean that,  no matter what I may have written about the US  of recent especially with regard  to  its policy on Syria.

    Let  us  put  emotions  aside  now  and look  today at the good, the bad and the ugly side of the Phillipines disaster  and the reaction of its government , and  the international community. We shall also  appreciaite  the satellite TV stations whose reporters brought the carnage wrought by nature to us  all in our living rooms and places of work. The  role  of the military  in Egypt where the imprisoned former President Mohammed Morsi has issued a letter through his lawyer telling Egyptians that Egypt will never regain stability unless the  rule  of  the military that removed him from office is terminated by the Egyptian people. Which is like a call to arms. This call will be examined along side the news that  the Russians are talking with the Egyptian military on many issues including the sale of arms. Which  means that in diplomacy  as in life itself,  nature abhors a vacuum given the fact that the US recently stopped arms sale of F16  fighter jets to Egypt in protest  at the military coup  in Egypt. We  finally examine the implications for Nigeria of the US designationg Boko Haram and Ansaru  militant groups  as foreign terrorist  organisations and thereby blocking all US  financial transactions with them.

    Again,  I doff  my hat to the US  military’s  humanitarian intervention  in the Phillipines  to save lives, although  given the US  military’s pedigree in logistics and movement  of men and material, one should not be that surprised. I  once read  a case study from Havard University detailing how the US navy moved men and materiel  to Saudi  Arabia during the first Gulf War  involving coalition of 15  nations mustered for the war by  the UN  and  US President George  Bush Snr  and it was the greatest movement of personnel  and equipment in history at that time. This time speed and size were also in dire need and the US military responded in kind. A war  ship was moved towards  the Phillipines to enable navy helicopters deliver relief materials faster  and in greater quantities . The US  military has shown its human face in saving lives and human dignity  by  its reaction to the typhoon in the Phillipines and it is   a  face of mercy and kindness  which is scarcely associated with the same military  that the Pakistanis and Afgans will  forever associate with drone strikes and missile attacks. More importantly the US has shown the Philippino  people that it is a friend in need while  China which promised half a million dollars but increased that to $1.6m has shown  that the typhoon disaster  has not built  bridges over territorial disputes it has with  the Phillipines .And that  really shows the Chinese in poor light in terms of humanity and that is really a pity.

    In  addition some Philippines  news media have criticised their President  Aquino and government for not reacting fast enough and I think  that was unfair given the fury and speed of the Typhoon which was said  to be the fastest and largest on land unlike Katrina that landed on water. This  is  because there is no way any human capacity can spontaineously meet  such a massive challenge of nature and the Philippines leadership is no exception . In addition when CNN’s seasoned  reporter Amanpour was interviewing a  Phillipino Minister immediately the disaster struck she was asking questions about corruption in the Phillipines which I thought  was uncalled for at that stage and I am happy that  that  trend of coverage was abruptly ended  by the  well respected network  . It was replaced by the stories of professional CNN reporters  who betrayed no emotions as they narrated and showed  moving episodes  and faces of those grieving for their loved ones . I salute  the devotion to duty of these reporters but I do not think some bit of emotion to show at least that they are not drained of it or,  are, at least not enjoying the tragic  spectacle,  would have been out of place .

    In  Egypt however the face of the military  which has seized power and is preparing its Commander in Chief to contest in the next presidential elections is  anything but inviting or humanitarian given the challenge posed by Egypt’s deposed but democratically elected President  Mohammed  Morsi. There  was no natural disater in Egypt this week but the  politics, events  and  demonstrations  of the last few months have claimed almost as many lives as the typhoon in the Phillipines.  Now  the military  have  lifted  emergency rule but  the elected president is on trial and has called for a jihad  to remove the military  which deposed  him  from  power  and is trying him in court.

    The  problem in Egypt is a ding dong battle between democracy and the miltary and the miltary are winning . The Americans were  supposed to check mate them but they looked elsewhere  instead and even refused to recognise  a coup in plain sight. Instead they  scuttled  an arms deal involving high tech F 16  war  planes . But  the  Egyptian military dont need war planes to disperse demonstrators. They  need batons and tear gas,  tanks  and masks  and they have them in abundance in Cairo. In  addition I am sure  that the Russians  will provide  any way the equivalent of F16 jets to the Egyptian military. The deal  will surely be consummated before the US  comes back from the diversion created by China and Russia over Iran’s nuclear sanctions talks  and change of attitudeby its new leader at the last UN General Assembly. However  by the time the Iran sanctions talks collapse ,as it will soon do,  it  will be clear that the Americans have been sold another dummy  as in Syria . By that time however  the Russians would have put their  feet in the door  firmly  at least to sell high tech jets to the Egypptian  military  and dig in as they have done with Assad  in Syria.

    Lastly the  immediate effect  of the categorisation of Boko Haram and Ansaru  as foreign terror groups to the US  is  to freeze the accounts of these groups and those associated with them. It  also means that it is not only the Nigerian army that is fighting them. More importantly it may mean that the US  may send drones to Nigeria. That then takes the war on terrorism to a new dimension in Nigerian terms. Which  to me shows that the Boko  Haram threat  has been  handled with kid gloves by Nigeria  and the US has taken the fight out of our hands. What  then are we having the  big ,  well trained military at our disposal for ? Even though some time ago the Nigerian president asked the US  not to  do what it has just done, I  have no doubt in my mind that it pays some vested interests  in our security  apparatus to internationalise the Boko Haram menace and they have surely succeeded. How  the army or the military will react to this Americanisation of the Boko Haram threat will define the success or failure of the Nigerian state in the months to come.

  • The Chimes’ marital tragedies

    The Chimes’ marital tragedies

    Of all the horrible consequences of the Chime and wife saga, its impact on marriage and traditions is the most devastating. For over one week, the world has been treated to unsavoury accounts of Mrs Clara Chime’s marital battles with her husband, Enugu State Governor Sullivan Chime. At a time we were left to imagine what happened inside and also outside the Enugu Government House apartment to which the governor’s wife was restricted for medical reasons, according to the governor, or where she was detained, according to her. We have heard from the governor that his wife has mental challenges requiring medical seclusion, but the lady in question has countered that she is only suffering from depression, and not madness as the world was led to believe.

    The battle has attracted all sorts of attention, from the local to the international stage. The home media has been feasting on it. A notable lawyer has been briefed. Local artistes and civil society groups have picked it up, seeking justice for Mrs Chime. International organs may also have been informed of the ordeal of a certain state governor’s wife at the hands of her husband. Security personnel are deeply involved, if only to do the bidding of their master.  The folks, especially the traditional ruler, of Ozulobu community, Amuda, Umunneoche Local Council of Abia State, Mrs Chime’s hometown, have also heard it.

    We have equally heard that the governor and his security team have, at least once, tried to ship Clara back to her mother in an Enugu estate but failing to see the woman to whom to hand her over, they thought it was better to return her to the restricted apartment in Government House until the time was right. Then, we heard that the right time came a few days ago when Mrs Chime was successfully handed back to her mother, but there soon came another report that Clara has moved to Port Harcourt amid comments that she has finally been freed.

    That was quite an ordeal, not just for the woman but also for her husband. Nothing in the saga lifted her profile, nor could anything in it lend Mr Chime to any hearts. It did grave harm to Mrs Chime, who four years ago ascended the celebrity ladder when she married the love of her life and moved into Government House. When her image graced the pages of the newspaper, it was that of a beautiful woman, graceful in that cocky gele headgear with which our female celebrities make a statement or two. When she was shipped out a few days ago, she may have shaken off the shackles of the Government House, but indeed she was leaving a shrunken woman, toppled from the heights of power to the ordinariness of daily living.

    As for her husband, few things can lower a man before humanity. It may still be common for a man to see off his wife and take another woman to replace her but something dies in such a man, even if sycophants may whisper in his ear saying all is well. Such good-for-nothing companions may tell their misguided friend that there is nothing to be ashamed of and that indeed people can marry today and divorce tomorrow. Celebrities of all stripes have turned marriage and divorce into a queer art. Some sound a bit boastful when they say they have married seven times and divorced as many times. Today I say I do, tomorrow I say I don’t. At Chime’s privileged heights, women can be a dime a dozen, but when a man begins to inflate his lungs with such airs, doom is around the corner.

    As damaging as the ordeal is to Mr and Mrs Chime, the marriage institution and our traditions are the worst hit. What is happening in Enugu is the most devastating assault on marriage. It more than mocks matrimony. It ridicules love and questions marital union because as Clara departs, it is not apparent that anything has irredeemably broken the codes of their matrimony. I do not suggest that there are no difficulties in marriage. There are, and some may take the grace of God to resolve. But in the Chimes’ case, all that we heard is Clara’s mental challenge for which her parents should find a cure, as the governor reportedly said. Mrs Chime herself has said her problem is depression. Now, whether the problem is mental or merely prolonged sadness, lingering low self-esteem or loss of interest in what once made Clara happy, restraining her or sending her away is not the answer. What caused her problems in the first place? The unwritten code of matrimony demands that the couple sort out what has crept in to rob them of their joy. If it required the best doctors, psychologists, therapists or counsellors in the world, it was within the Chimes’ means to find an answer to whatever troubled Clara. When the love-struck Sullivan held his bride’s hand as they faced the priest, they heard something similar. They were told that neither sickness of the mind nor of body should warrant a separation. They were also told that poverty should not drive them apart. Nor should wealth of which they have plenty. The officiating elders at their traditional marriage would also expect that much from the couple. More so because they were not just another couple; they were the first family of the state. Everyone looked up to them to lead the way. To a large extent, they were the moral compass of Enugu by virtue of their position.

    Traditions expect that couples quietly work hard at their challenges, and should not launder their messy linen in public. Part of the burdens of public office is that the officers should labour to be above board. They fail sometimes, and that can be understood, but such brazen assault of matrimony as illustrated by the Chime’s marital tragedy is way outside the permissible.

    Divorce grounds are rare in Christianity; even then there were none in the Chimes’ case. The traditional setting may be more permissible but what steps did Chime take to meet the requirements, if indeed he and Clara have gone their separate ways?

    Their four-year-old marriage, stormy as it apparently was, produced a son, who, according to reports, is staying with the father, rather than the mother, as the former wished. As the boy grows up, he sure will ask questions. The father had better prepare to answer them.

  • Shades of violence

    Shades of violence

    It is now over three decades since I first read the gripping novel simply titled ‘Violence’, written by Professor Festus Iyayi, the renowned academic, literary giant, humanist and labour activist whose life was cut short on Tuesday in the most painful and tragic circumstances. The distinguished thinker, writer and combatant for the oppressed died in active service while participating in another phase of the struggle against those debilitating and dehumanising existential realities so graphically depicted in his various literary offerings.

    Although it was his second novel, ‘Heroes’ that won him international recognition and acclaim, ‘Violence’ has made a more enduring impression on my mind. Close to three decades after its publication, it still vividly reflects the appalling human condition in post-colonial Nigeria. Indeed, in many ways the country’s material and moral climate have worsened significantly since Iyayi was inspired to put pen to paper.

    The unscrupulous contractors, thieving government functionaries, powerful women of valueless virtue and other oppressive and exploitative elements portrayed in the book have become even more venal and reckless today in the plundering of the country’s resources than was the case in the 1970s and 1980s. By the same token, the plight of the downtrodden represented in the book by the struggling labourer, Idemudia, and his wife, Adisa, has degenerated abysmally. Poverty, hunger, joblessness, disease, illiteracy and other indices of underdevelopment have worsened. The criminal inequality between an obscenely wealthy elite and the impoverished majority has widened alarmingly.

    Iyayi teaches us in that book that the phenomenon of violence has much wider ramifications than is often associated with it in casual discourse. All too often, we restrict our definition of violence to the despicable activities of armed robbers, kidnappers, rapists, assassins, demented terrorists and other criminals. Yet, he contends that there is a far more insidious and destructive form of violence. This kind of latent or ‘structural’ violence provides the fertile ground in which the earlier, more perceptible types of violence fester to our collective detriment.

    Thus, the assorted and manifold looters of the public treasury including pension fund fraudsters, fuel subsidy scammers, scavenging bank executives, thieving ministers, unscrupulous legislators and their humongous allowances among others are perpetrators of structural violence against society. The late Afro beat king, Fela Anikulapo Kuti, made the same point in his chartbusting album, ‘Authority Stealing’. He sang memorably about the armed robber who steals one thousand Naira while the pen robber steals one million Naira.

    Yes, the fanatical terrorist destroys thousands of lives with his bombs. But the corrupt state official who steals billions of public funds consigns millions to poverty, hunger, disease, squalor, despair and joblessness. Corruption is as devastating as terrorism. One form of bombing is no less destructive than the other.

    It is a sad irony that Professor Iyayi, who dissected the phenomenon of violence with such brilliance and clarity towards the liberation of the oppressed, should himself have his life violently snuffed out on the death traps we call high ways across Nigeria. The circumstances of the distinguished professor’s untimely transition help to highlight the diverse shades of state violence that militate against life, liberty and human dignity in contemporary Nigeria. In that respect, the manner of his exit is as useful to the struggle for the liberation of Nigeria as the prodigious energy he expended to help realize this objective in his lifetime.

    The pathetic state of major highways across the country is a manifestation of the vicious violence perpetrated against citizens by the Nigerian state. This violence takes the form of massive corruption and sheer ineptness. Given the stupendous sums of money made from petroleum in the last 14 years, there is absolutely no excuse for the non-existence across Nigeria today of a vast network of modern and safe highways. Equally inexplicable is the absence of a modern, secure and reliable rail transport network that would considerably ease the pressure on road transportation.

    Describing the Lokoja-Abuja road where Professor Iyayi died as “arguably one of the busiest in the country”, the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) lamented that “The contract for its dualisation was awarded about 10 years ago. Quite sadly and unfortunately, no appreciable work has been done, thus turning the stretch into a slaughter slab…The congress holds the view that there is no justification for leaving this road and indeed other critical roads undone”.

    This tragically is the story of most critical inter-state highways in Nigeria today. On September 21, 2005, the one time students’ union leader, pro-democracy activist, human rights campaigner and anti-corruption crusader, Chima Ubani, died in a motor accident on his way from Maiduguri where he had participated in an anti- fuel price hike rally. And on December 20, 2008, the renowned actor, dramatist, teacher and poet, Femi Fatoba, lost his life along with four other colleagues in an auto accident along the Ughelli/Patani road in Delta State.

    The deceased were returning to Ibadan from the Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State where they were teachers. Of course, these are only a tiny fraction of the thousands of little known but equally precious lives that have been lost on roads criminally abandoned by a negligent Nigerian state.

    The accident in which Professor Iyayi died was as a result of a collision with a vehicle in the convoy of Kogi State Governor, Wada Idris, on the Lokoja-Abuja road. The escort vehicle in the convoy was reportedly trying to overtake others when it ran into the bus conveying Iyayi and other officials of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU). Efforts of Kogi State officials to exonerate the governor’s convoy from blame for the tragedy have been most unconvincing. For, Governor Wada himself nearly lost his life a few months ago when his reckless convoy was involved in another crash. The NLC was thus right in blaming Iyayi’sdeath partly on “executive lawlessness/impunity on the part of the Kogi state governor.”

    Excessively unwieldy, boisterous and aggressive convoys constitute another shade of psychological violence unleashed against the people by wielders of state power in Nigeria.

    Now, why was Professor Iyayi on the Lokoja-Abuja road where he was involved in the fatal accident that claimed his life? He was on his way to Kano to participate in the National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting convened by ASUU to take a decision on its protracted strike action that had paralyzed public universities for over four months. Surely, if the universities had been properly funded there would probably have been no need for a strike. Or to be more specific, if the Federal Government had honoured the agreement it freely entered into with ASUU in 2009 and further reiterated through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in 2012, the prolonged strike action would have been utterly unnecessary.

    It is so sad that it was after public universities had been grounded for over four months that President Goodluck Jonathan considered it fit to intervene personally in the dispute and hold talks with the university lecturers. Professor Iyayi died on his way to participate in ASUU’s deliberations on the President’s proposals. Of course some will contend that Iyayi would still have died anyway if it had been so destined, probably. But this does not excuse the utter lack of seriousness with which the Federal Government has handled this national crisis.

    To worsen matters, the Minister of State for Education and lately Supervising Minister of the Ministry, Chief Nyesom Wike, has been actively pursuing his undisguised 2015 governorship ambition in Rivers State rather than face the responsibilities of his office. Despite the prolonged closure of universities he has been busy launching his Grassroots Democratic Initiative (GDI) across local governments in the state and constituting a nuisance to legitimate governance in Rivers. The presidency’s indulgence of this kind of irresponsible behaviour creates the unfortunate impression of utter contempt for Nigerians. It is a direct slap on the face of the public and offers another example of the structural violence against the sensibilities and dignity of Nigerians by temporary occupants of public office

  • Ethiopians’ misadventure

    Ethiopians’ misadventure

    The Ethiopians are in town with one goal– acquiring two goals to stop Nigeria from participating in the Brazil 2014 World Cup. No problems with such an ambition, especially with the unpredictability of the beautiful game.

    The East Africans will be counting on the fact that Nigeria missed out on the qualification ticket to Germany 2006 World Cup in Kano. But the settings are different, not with the remarkable achievements of the Stephen Keshi-led technical crew.

    In the first leg played in Addis Ababa, the Eagles struggled with the weather and the undulating turf. While our players struggled to control the ball, the Ethiopians ran through us like hot knife through butter. They were faster, younger and psychologically propelled by the intimidating presence of their vociferous fans.

    In fact, the fans at the Addis Ababa Stadium gave the Walya Antelopes the zeal to push the Eagles back. They will be missing that today in Calabar, the Cross River State capital. Besides, the weather will not be a challenge to the Eagles. Our fans don’t have the do-or-die spirit exhibited by the Ethiopian fans. The level turf and the fact that the players know what is at stake that will make the game a mountain too high for the Ethiopians to climb.

    Having seen the first game in Addis Ababa, one is tempted to dismiss the Ethiopians. They ran the Eagles ragged because of extraneous factors, which will be missing today. If the Eagles whip the Ethiopians by four un-replied goals, it would be an anti-climax because many a Nigerian would be using the first leg game to assess the visitors.

    One flaw the Ethiopians showed in the first leg was that they lacked stamina. In the closing stages, they lagged behind as the Eagles showed their mastery of the game. With an unfavourable weather for the Ethiopians in Calabar, one won’t be surprised if by the 60th minute, they have conceded goals.

    My conviction about a goal feast for the Eagles rests with the belief that the visitors are minnows and are only in Calabar to fulfill FIFA’s requirement of the two-legged tie and not to pick the group’s qualification ticket.

    Given the pedigree of the two nations in soccer, an easy game is on the cards. The Eagles must strive to hit the target within the first ten minutes. The Ethiopians were seen to be very weak on the flanks. They kicked and shoved Victor Moses and got away with some crunchy tackles, apparently because they were at home.

    If Moses starts today’s game, he will pave the way for a total annihilation of the Ethiopians because the visitors won’t be able to match his pace and trickery on the ball. The few tricks Moses employed in the first leg were hindered by the sloppy pitch, which made him stumble on the turf.

    In Calabar, the Ethiopians would fall like a pack of cards with Moses’ dribbling skills and movement. I hope too that Keshi will field Ahmed Musa and Emmanuel Emenike upfront. These three men (Moses, Emenike and Musa) have what it takes to whip the Ethiopians with goals because the Ethiopian goalkeeper is not the safest, considering the way he handled the ball in the first leg. Once Emenike shot accurately, the goalkeeper fumbled. Keshi needs to drum it into his players’ ears the need to hit the ball accurately when convenient.

    There will be the tendency for the Ethiopians to be defensive. It will suit the Eagles with a midfield trio of john Mikel Obi, Oguenyi Onazi and, I dare say, Sunday Mba – if only Keshi will listen. The Eagles’ biggest flaw in the first leg was that they didn’t have a midfielder who could take the ball from the opponents and dribble his way through to pave the way for our strikers to shoot at the goal. We started playing well when Keshi wisely introduced Nosa Igiebor in the second half. Igiebor is injured; so, Mba should replace him. If Mba plays, I won’t be shocked if he scores the first goal. His darting runs towards the goal area will open up the space for him to shoot. God help the Ethiopian goalkeeper if Mba starts the game.

    Eagles’ defence saved the day for us in the first game. The quartet of Efe Ambrose, Godfrey Oboabona, Elderson Echiejile and Egwekukwe were brilliant in Addis Abba. And the defence will be further strengthened, with the return of Chelsea ace Kenneth Omeruo. They would not be troubled because the Ethiopians will defend to their peril. My worry in the Eagles’ defence is in Vincent Enyeama, who appears to be absent-minded or, most often, loses concentration.

    Keshi’s tactics for the first game were right. His substitutions made the difference in the second half. I hope he reads the game perfectly, like he did in the first leg. Other things being equal, Ethiopia’s game will be Eagles easiest since the series began last year.

    This is a warning to Keshi: Nigerians are not interested in what happens in next week Tuesday’s game against Italy at the Cottage Stadium in England. All we want is the qualification ticket to the Brazil 2014 World Cup.

    So, Keshi must pick our best legs to destroy the Ethiopians. We want to begin the celebration as early as the 60th minute, by which time we would have scored at least three goals. This target is achievable, given the potentials in the squad.

    Ethiopia will be a piece of cake. They are the platform for us to celebrate our qualification for the fourth World Cup ticket. Beyond this is the need for the government to fund our preparation for the competition.

    The qualifiers have been gruelling. We must sustain this momentum by ensuring that the coaches and players are involved in programmes that would strengthen them for the task ahead.

    Interestingly, the international friendly against Italy at the Cottage Stadium on Tuesday signposts how any serious country should prepare for the Mundial. We have been there thrice with nothing to show for it, except a deluge of revolts over allowances and the perceived ego of a few players who didn’t think they should sit on the bench in our matches.

    Cash has always being the inhibiting factor in Nigeria’s quest to replicate her sterling showings at the junior level at the World Cup.

    It cost the NFF N790 million to successfully prosecute the 2013 Africa Cup of Nations held in South Africa. The unfortunate thing with the NFF is that all our national teams have done well in most of the competitions, making it imperative for the body to perpetually shop for cash to foot their bills.

    Not a few Nigerians have argued that the game can be sold to the corporate world. True, but not in Nigeria where people like to grandstand when the ovation is loudest.

    By sunset on Saturday, when the ticket would have finally been clinched, half of the job for the World Cup could be said to have been executed. However, a lot still needs to be done to get the entire gamut of our representation in Brazil done and dusted.

    The euphoria that will greet our qualification will pale sooner than we know it, if by tomorrow and when we eventually land in Brazil, nothing in terms of preparing for a befitting and memorable exploits is put in place.

    It is one thing to bask in our qualification now, but it will be another ballgame completely to end up bemoaning a shambolic outing next year as a result of poor planning.

    To in the bud, all distractions that will occasion our poor showing should be avoided or, better still, permanently addressed beginning from tomorrow as we round off our qualification today. We cannot afford yet another slipshod dress rehearsal to our final landing in Brazil.

    Our qualification today should be celebrated beyond the assumption that this is another opportunity for estacodes for the FA officials, government functionaries and lawmakers.

    As we clinch the ticket today, there are still issues to be dealt with- coaches’ salaries, bonuses for players and camping sites for the team, among others. Without settling down to address these issues, we would have begun planning to fail because we failed to plan.

    Echoes of unpaid salaries for the coaches still resonated as I penned this piece. Nothing can be so demotivating than a labourer not being paid his wages. This is one niggling issue the government must urgently address to pave the way for rancour-free preparations for the Mundial. The government must begin to make preparations and take responsibility for all that will make for a hitch-free showpiece in Brazil. After all, it is the government that largely appropriates all the glories that come with our football victories. If we are to make a good omelet, the time to break the egg is now. And the government must set in motion the process for that to happen.

    I do not think we have enough time for any conceivable presidential task force for now. It has never worked and it is not likely to work now.

  • Soyinka Of Africa

    Soyinka Of Africa

    He is a pride of Africa and he wrote Of Africa, a magisterial text that has captured the imagination of young and old across the continent and the Diaspora, including my College of Arts and Sciences students at Howard University. And on penultimate Tuesday, they and the university community welcomed the Nobel Laureate to the Mecca of Africana scholarship. And it was vintage WS. Soyinka never disappoints and he didn’t disappoint his audience.

    It was not Soyinka’s first visit to Howard. But it was his first on the basis of his book being chosen as the common text of the year, and it was electric. Of course, it wasn’t difficult for anyone to identify him with his signature hair style as an identity marker. Students accosted him on the yard even before the programme, wanting photo sessions or autographs. For all the sessions, including student presentations on the book, it was standing room only. He gave his main lecture in the ballroom which seats at least 400, but it was streamed live to an auditorium that sits 1,000 more. As they say, it is in his home that the prophet has no honor.

    My college chose Of Africa as the Common Text for First Year Students this year. In recommending the text, the committee noted that “Of Africa is, at once, readily accessible to students and artistically imaginative, conceptually complex, and improvisational in ways that distinguish it from other academic texts, especially with regard to raising issues of continuity and change among populations in the African world. It is one of the most imaginative combinations of concepts from Africa and its Diaspora to appear in recent memory. Of Africa also builds on Howard’s commitment to help students assign equal status for Africa and global Africans as agents of cultural and political acts of recovery and takes this consideration one step further, calling for a consideration of what Soyinka calls the proper valuation of the “dynamic commodity” of African ways of knowing and being in the world. This conversation has the potential to trigger countless conversations on what it means to be African anywhere in the world.”

    The attraction of the book is simple. Howard University is conscious of its origin and its mission. Back in 1927,President Mordecai Wyatt Johnson pressed the point that “along with the training of the individual to render specific professional service, it is absolutely necessary that there shall go studies to fit a man (or woman) sympathetically to understand the kind of country that he (or she) is living in, the progress that the countryhas made, the direction in which it is moving, the nature of the institutions with which he (or she) has to deal, and the relations and possibilities of his own people to his (her) government and to the progress of his (her) country.The ultimate goal is to endeavor to develop a country that shall have a deep sense of community and of brotherly cooperation.”

    In the same inaugural address, while drawing attention to the subordination of Africa to European powers, Johnson raised the question whether “the United States is going to follow this European practice, or whether there is going to arise in this place a country so deeply convinced of the possibilities of humanity that it is willing to keep its self-control, while having no relations with even the weakest of peoples except such as it can justify in the light of its deepest conscience, and while committed to none but a purely open and aboveboard practice of brotherliness to all men and to all countries of the earth.”This emphasis on “the possibilities of humanity” has been the driving force of Howard as an institution of higher learning.

    In the opening paragraph of the text, Soyinka poses the question that focuses his attention throughout the book: What does the continent known as Africa possess that the rest—or a greater part—of the globe does not have already in superabundance? As a guide to an adequate answer, he suggests that we not limit ourselves to “material or inert possessions—such as mineral resources, tourist landscapes, (and) strategic locations..” For we also have “dynamic possessions—ways of perceiving, responding, adapting, or simply doing that vary from people to people, including structures of human relationships.”

    But, of course, we have not been silent over these positive attributes of motherland, and certainly our diaspora brethren have been in the forefront of proclaiming the ancient glory of Africa as well as its future potentials even in these dreadful times. If only we can get rid of the human vampires that continue to suck its blood and the political raccoons that vandalise and drain it of resources that it drastically needs for development and redemption. So, yes, we cannot ignore the negatives: the unpredictable and irrational violence that engulfs the continent every now and then, and feeds the insatiable appetite of the world media outlets for sorry stories from and of Africa.

    “Ultimately, however,” Soyinka urges, “it is its humanity, the quality and valuation of its own existence, and modes of managing its environment—both physical and intangible (which includes spiritual)—that remain the primary, incontestable assets to which any society can lay claim or offer as unique contributions to the attainments of the world.”This is the theme of the book; it is what Soyinka interrogates with copious references to African spiritual heritage.

    Africa’s original humanity has never been in doubt. It is the subject of treatises and sometimes an overblown embellishment bordering on unjustifiable romanticism. Yet it cannot be denied that there was/is a certain sense of community that serves traditional societies well with individual members having a sense of purpose and sharing a common meaning of what it was/is to be a human being in the community.

    The harmonious coexistence in such traditional and (contemporary rural) communities still strikes us as alien in our present circumstance of ego-driven and material-obsessed existence. It is therefore no surprise, but nonetheless ironic, that having identified Africa’s humanity as its asset, the symbols of the inhumanity that has plagued Africa in the last few decades, including Rwanda, Darfur, and of course, Boko Haram, feature prominently in Soyinka’s text.Indeed, Rwanda, as paradigm for a continent was the topic of his lecture. There is truly “a chameleonic” identity to Africa, to paraphrase Soyinka’s apt description.

    The transition from an original humanity to the current inhumanity must have an enabler, if not a causal agent. One of my student presenters posed the question to Soyinka: where did the rain start beating us? In other words, where did we veer off the road of humanity? How can we explain the irrational violence in the name of religion when our folks have always coexisted in multiple religion households, exchanging gifts and partaking in communal feats during different religious festivals? And how does difference about political ideas and ideals concerning the welfare of the people and development of the community end up in violence when communities have always had their process of identifying and appointing their rulers and settling issues by consensus?

    Of course, the answer is simple and Soyinka zeroed in on it: we veered off path of humanity the moment we accepted the superiority of other people’s ways of life over and above our own and we went on to become their champions. Gbee ru mii wa deleru (“We were requested to help lift a luggage off the ground; but we took over the burden of carrying it.) In the process, we abandon our values. That explains Boko Haram. It explains Darfur. And that was Rwanda, to where WS flew after his lecture.

  • ANAMBRA ELECTION: It’s a two-horse race

    It is too close to call. It may even go to the wire. That is how difficult it is to predict who wins the governorship election in Anambra State come Saturday, November 16, 2013. Ask any two Anambrarians and they are likely to mention one of two names: Willie Obiano or Chris Ngige. As many samples as you take and as many times as you pop the question, these two names come up alternately. Obiano is the candidate of the ruling party, All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) and Ngige is of the All Peoples Congress (APC).

    There is of course Ifeanyi Ubah of Labour Party, a noisome upstart who has managed to stand out in a crowded field and Tony Nwoye, the inconsequential candidate of the beleaguered Peoples Democratic Party, (PDP). There are a handful of other pretenders but there exertions will not count for anything at the end of the day.

    THE NGIGE CHALLENGE

    A true Igbo character: First on Ngige for the only reason that the letter ‘N’ comes before ‘O’ and not for any particular bias for any of the two candidates under review. The greatest thing going for Dr. Chris Nwabueze Ngige ironically is his true Igbo character which is also the chief campaign point against him. His platform APC is being touted by his opponents as a south west party, while his comments during the Igbo ‘deportation’ from Lagos snafu is being tied around his neck like lead. But Ngige, discerning Igbo people will tell you, is the truest Igbo leader alive today. He understands perfectly, the Igbo situation in the Nigerian equation and he knows exactly what is to be done.

    It was in his quest to liberate Anambra and by extension, Ndigbo that he entered into an unholy alliance with Chris Uba and the PDP cabal during his first coming as governor. The result of that adventure is still being enjoyed in the state. He is today referred to as The Liberator of Anambra State. Anyone who has encountered Ngige knows that he has the wiles, the wisdom, the courage and hardihood that define a true Igbo man. Though brief of stature, when it comes to Igbo cause, Ngige would stand taller than any in the political arena today.

    A populist and a man of action: When Ngige was Government House Awka between 2003 to 2006, he showed what a thinking and smart governor can do in a short space of time and win the heart of his people. Where his predecessors built up excuses why they failed, he built roads and public utilities in the way Anambra people had not experienced since the First Republic. He instantly won their confidence and admiration.

    Other little matters: The 61-year-old medical doctor is well educated, tested, experienced and will need no further tutoring. He will hit the ground running and is more likely to come with no godfather encumbrances. On little snag though may be that he is given to over excitement, that disease of most men of power in Nigeria. Can he muster that level of sobriety and reflection required to deliver optimal benefits to a land still much disheveled and unstable.

    WILLIE ‘WHO’ AND THE INCUMBENT

    A tough team to beat: The best thing going for Chief Willie Obiano is the incumbency factor of Governor Peter Obi. Among his contemporaries, Obi has shown the most comportment in high office; he has also delivered some modest performance adopting an integrated development strategy that has impacted every corner of the state. His commonsensical approach to governance has also ensured some stability in a virile and difficult to manage entity. He has shown over the years that he is not the typical Nigerian do-or-die politician. On the other hand, his civil, unexcitable and austere ways have confounded his opponents and won him many followers in a land where swashbuckling in a winning virtue.

    Having created a candidate in his own likeness, all these pluses will work for Obiano who looks cast in the mold of Obi. Like obi, he has a business background; he is an accountant and a thoroughbred professional who rose through the ranks to the position of an executive director in a bank. Some solid track record of work counts for something no doubt. The continuity of the steady development of the state as initiated by Governor Obi is also a big plus.

    The APGA, Ojukwu and zoning factors: Apart from coming under the halo of incumbency, not to be ignored is the APGA- as- Igbo- party factor. As this election approached, APGA, perhaps the most fractious party in the land made up most magically, mustered a candidate and rallied behind him. Chief Victor Umeh, the hitherto embattled party chairman has never looked so happy. He has been the chief of campaign for Obiano and knows the terrains a bit. They sell APGA as Ndigbo’s and Ndigbo to APGA. At every stop, they throw in the well loved name of late APGA leader, Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu as some kind of talisman.

    There is also the zoning factor. Governor Obi had determined that Anambra north which had never produced a governor ought to be given a chance. It makes sense but many questioned and even faulted his motive with some insinuating that he was merely working to his own answer. But the gain in it is that an entire Anambra north senatorial zone may already be in the bag for APGA.

    Other little matters: Like Ngige, Obiano is well educated but unlike him, he has no political experience whatsoever. He also seems like a man who may be hamstrung by godfathers; one who may not possess a mind of his own.

    Finally, it promises to be an interesting election and another huge test for the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, the federal government and security agencies. Can they manage to render a free, fair election?

    This column will neither call nor endorse for that is the prerogative of Anambra people; both Ngige and Obiano are in my view passable candidates and either of them will expectedly, do well for Anambra people. Let the people step out tomorrow and make their choice.