Category: Saturday

  • Dame Abimbola Emmanuella Fashola @ 60

    Dame Abimbola Emmanuella Fashola @ 60

    My dear Abimbola, I celebrate you as you commemorate the sixtieth anniversary of your birth for a life that has been well-lived, especially in the service of God and humanity. On this diamond anniversary, it is fitting to acknowledge how, like a diamond, you have sparkled and lit up many lives, including mine and our children’s. Beyond us, the spark of your existence has ignited many other lives from far and near. Like the diamond, you are valued, treasured, and much sought after. Most especially, you wear value and humility with ease. Above all, like the diamond, you possess an inner strength that has been a rock for all of us. I pray for many more years of a very healthy and fulfilling life for you”.

    That was the former governor of Lagos State and Minister of Works and Housing, Mr. Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN), a man with a coldly logical and clinical legal mind waxing passionately poetic and lyrical in celebrating the 60th birthday, last Sunday, April 6, of his beloved wife, Dame Abimbola Emmanuella Fashola. Stepping into the large shoes of her predecessor as First Lady of Lagos State (1999-2007), Senator (Mrs) Oluremi Tinubu, CON, now First Lady of Nigeria, Mrs Fashola played the role with uncommon grace, disarming modesty and simplicity as well as quiet dignity. Her NGO, the Leadership Empowerment and Resource Network (L.E.A.R.N) has contributed immensely to enriching, transforming and adding value to lives in pursuit of the common good.

    Read Also: Tinubu hails Dame Fashola at 60, praises her legacy of service, unity

    Her wisdom, deep spirituality and emotional support were no doubt a critical factor in the outstanding success of Mr Fashola both as governor and Minister. In his felicitation with Mrs Fashola on the landmark occasion, President Bola Tinubu described her as “a steadfast pillar of support for her husband, offering tremendous help during his tenure as Lagos Governor and Minister of Works and Housing “. The President lauded her contributions as an experienced administrator in education management and as a passionate advocate for health and Socio-economic issues while acknowledging her impact on public awareness and sensitization campaigns on children’s and women’s health. This column joins Dame Fashola’s numerous well-wishers in praying for many more years of good health, continued success, divine wisdom and God’s abundant grace for a woman of immense virtue and value.

  • Let’s tell the truth

    Let’s tell the truth

    History never forgets. It pays a lot to tell the truth no matter whose ox is gored. I’ve read with pain how facts have been twisted on the issue of Algeria getting the three points back from Nigeria during the 2018 World Cup qualifiers. Super Eagles fielded Shehu Abdullahi in the last game in Algeria when he was ineligible due to two yellow cards he received before that game in Constantine, which ended 1-1, not forgetting John Ogu’s pile drive for the first goal.

    Indeed, the Algerians played the game under protest.  Jealously made them keep the facts to themselves, having seen Abdullahi dressed to play the match. He, interestingly played for 82 minutes before he was substituted. So, there was no need to present the protest letter out of time like Lesotho did before they eventually withdrew it, depending on the veracity of this withdrawal claim.

    In the ensuing wahala, it was discovered that FIFA sent our football federation a notice about Abdullahi’s ineligibility for the Algeria game. But in our usual style of dismissing issues, it slipped our memory to implement the FIFA notice. Perhaps, if we needed those points as we do now, we would have pulled our ears to do the right thing – drop Abdullahi from the game entirely. Besides, nobody got punished for the administrative slip simply because it didn’t cause Nigeria’s ouster from the 2018 World Cup held in Russia. Time was when the balls FIFA sent to affiliate soccer federations with Nigeria’s consignments stuck in the Nigerian port. Guess what, Nigeria had to use those balls owned by South Africa in a World Cup qualifier against Bafana Bafana. No prize for guessing correctly that the South Africans beat the Super Eagles in Uyo with their FFA-donated balls. Heads didn’t roll for this slip. It is what it is with the game’s administration in Nigeria.

    The critical aspect of the reminder notices is that it isn’t only common to FIFA. Last Friday, UEFA confirmed the eligibility of four key Real Madrid players for the Tuesday night Champions League game against Arsenal at the Emirates Stadium, which the Gunners won resoundingly 3-0. Arsenal served Real Madrid players enough plates of rice on Tuesday night to shock the world. Is this going to be Arsenal’s year to lift the UEFA Champions League diadem? We pray O Lord, Amen.

    A team that hasn’t been able to win a game from four home fixtures, has no business whatsoever participating during the 2026 World Cup to be co-hosted by the USA, Canada, and Mexico. No chance. Our players come here to prosecute our matches unable to reproduce their European clubs’ form. Yet, they return to Europe three or four days later to rule their world during matches scoring goals with aplomb. Did you say why? Of course, poor coaching at our national team level.

    Yet, when we are in the process of recruiting a competent coach for the Super Eagles, critics bring out their calculators to find out the naira equivalent of what these coaches are asking for. Ironically, 90 per cent of these critics have their kids in some of the best schools in the world and here in Nigeria. My problem with those insisting on us having a Nigerian coaching bench is that they forget the huge financial returns on this kind of investment if the team does well in such a major soccer competition as the senior World Cup. Critics of the issue of employing a truly top-notch European manager are suffering from fermented hypocrisy.

    I’m not a prophet of doom. I enjoy speaking the truth to our sports administrators who think that the world must wait for Nigeria to wake up from her slumber. No way. Sports is dynamic with defining moments meant for discerning minds to evaluate and make the right decisions. Sports are no longer essentially for recreation. It is now business by people who think outside the box not snoring folks like ours. The pain of this contemptuous scenario resulting from our refusal to plan for the future is that it keeps repeating itself in embarrassing proportions. Yet, we expect different results.

    Read Also: Truth or Dare: The dangerous s3x game in Nollywood

    We appear not to know that we are nearer the exit door than to qualify to participate in the 2026 World Cup. One would have thought that our football federation’s chieftains would have asked Eric Chelle to remain in Nigeria to start mini camps for home-based he has spotted and those he would spot later to see if he can find young, talented defenders instead of insulting our sensibilities by flaunting names of kids in Europe with Nigerian parents to woo them to play for Nigeria. Sad.

    We have allowed Chelle to return home with the usual instructions to return to Nigeria with two weeks left to the friendly games in June. Are we paying him to stay at home doing nothing? What happened to the accommodation in Abuja? Is it meant for termites, reptiles e.t.c, and not human beings? Is it that Chelle doesn’t have an office or work schedule to effectively keep him busy? Is it that the NFF chiefs aren’t abreast with the new technology that makes it easy for Chelle to do things he has been allowed to go home for? Nigeria, we hail thee.

    ”The budget for 2026 will reach new commercial heights in connection with the FIFA World Cup and will assist FIFA in its mission to provide Member Associations with unprecedented financial support,” according to the world soccer governing body’s Mundial document.

    What this message presupposes is that all the participating countries at the 2026 World Cup are in for a bountiful harvest. It is also obvious that more money would be paid to the qualifiers as qualification bonuses. At the Qatar 2022 World Cup, the qualification bonus was $12 million each, an increment on previous qualification bonuses of $8 million. The 2026 edition would be mouth-boggling, considering the fact the competition would be co-hosted by three nations: the United States, Mexico, and Canada. One wonders why these novel innovations don’t motivate our football federation bosses to prosecute this next edition flawlessly.

    With six World Cup appearances in 1994, 1998, 2002, 2010, 2014, and 2018, Nigeria may just be the only nation with no record of how much it cost her to prosecute each of the six outings. It is the reason the federation can’t plan for anything. Sadly so.

    Qualifying for the Mundial since Nigeria recorded her debut appearance in 1994 in the United States has been a battle with Clemens Westerhoff’s relationship with the departed Vice President Augustus Aikhomu being the saving grace. Westerhof had unlimited access to the President and was given whatever he needed to sustain his rebuilding processes. Super Eagles, until Westerhof came, had become super chickens with jesters having a small comedy where a little child preferred staying with the Super Eagles than his mother for the simple fact that they don’t beat anyone.

    Nigeria is in very big trouble. The country must wake up to the reality that our national flag won’t be hoisted among the comity of nations at the 2026 World Cup to be co-hosted by the USA, Canada, and Mexico.

    I wish the Super Eagles everything that they wish themselves in this World Cup campaign. Good luck Nigeria! 

  • Nigerian legislators: Power for its own sake?

    Nigerian legislators: Power for its own sake?

    The past six weeks have had the Nigerian Senate being the center of public discourse. It started with the Senator Akpabio Vs Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uguaghan drama during a plenary session. Like wild fire during the hamattan, the altercation seems to have spiraled out of control. There have been accusations and counter accusations. The senate directed the Ethics and Privileges Committee to investigate the case of gross misconduct by Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan.

    Their verdict was a six-month suspension of Senator Akpoti Uduaghan, barring her from the National assembly, suspending her salaries and that of her aides and removing her security. According to the senate leadership,  “Let it be unequivocally stated that Senator Uduaghan was suspended solely for her persistent act of misconduct and disregard for the Senate Standing Order.

    Senator Akpoti Uduaghan had made several allegations bordering on sexual harassment against the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio to the media both locally and internationally. She took her case to the Inter Parliamentary Union (IPU) some weeks back. The Chairperson of the House Committee on Women Affairs and Social Development, Kafilat Ogbara, was equally at IPU and pushed that the claims made by Akpoti-Uduaghan at the United Nations event that she was suspended for raising allegations of sexual harassment against Senate President Godswill Akpabio was untrue.

    Kafilat Ogbara as the House Committee  Chairperson on Women and Social Development was representing the  National Assembly to present a response to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s speech  at the 69th session of the United Nations Commission on the status of women was in her words, “In response to the call by the President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union, Right Honorable Tulia Ackson to hear both sides of the matter, I have received a letter from the Nigerian Senate in my capacity as Chairman of the House Committee on Women Affairs and Social Development of our parliament in Nigeria and the parliamentarian representing Nigeria at this conference,” she stated.

    Nigerians and the world eagerly await the intervention of the IPU on this issue. Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan had gone to some foreign cable news media to tell her story before coming back to the country. In the meantime, the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions hearing on a fresh petition submitted by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan against Senate President Godswill Akpabio ended in chaos as Senator Nwebonyi and Oby Ezekwesili exchanged words.

    The Senator Nwebonyi had since the Senators Akpabio Vs Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan seems like a spokesperson of the Senate President given his media rounds making some allegations against Senator Natasha. It was therefore not surprising that the Committee sitting ended in chaos given the verbal exchanges between him and Oby Ezekwesili. The trigger seems to have  been his being shouted at, to ‘shut up’ after he seemingly interrupted  the process. They then went on with invectives at each other to the utter outrage of the whole country. The Senator ‘assured’ a highly accomplished Oby Ezekwesili that, “you can never be a senator”.

    Read Also; FULL STEPS: How to escape high electricity bills, switch​ to gas-powered generators

    The Senator Natasha Vs Senator Akpabio issue has so engulfed the political space that it is the most written about national issue in the last six weeks. It has even been linked to the chaotic ‘recall attempts’ of a senator Natasha that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has declared the processes flawed and therefore not valid. An Abuja Federal High Court  presided over by Justice Binta Nyako  had on Friday barred parties in the suit filed by suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan against the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio and three others from granting press interviews on issues relating to the case.

    No matter the merits of the cases by both parties, the Roundtable conversation feels that the Nigerian 10th senate has not lived up to expectations. The Nigerian people would be better served that the senate shines through as the representatives of the people, as the second tripod of the democracy we practice that must have the people and service to them as the focal point of their tenure in the national assembly. Make no mistakes about it, politics especially with legislators is not a walk in the park, there must be arguments, debates, lobbying, points of disagreement etc., but the grass which symbolically is the people must not be allowed to suffer whle the ‘elephants’ in the parliament ‘fight’.

    Nigeria has been going through socio-economic problems over the years. More than 134million Nigerians live in multi-dimensional poverty, more than 20millions Nigerian children are out of school in what is seen as a global highest in a seemingly ‘peaceful’ country. There is high unemployment, high maternal and child mortality, high insecurity, low productivity and other high indices of poverty and underdevelopment.

    On the other hand, Nigerian legislators are some of the most highly paid parliamentarians in the entire globe. They reek of luxury, power and influence. However, their influence is not always about the people they represent. It is always almost about themselves, their ego and their comfort. There is often zero allegiance to the voters who are the mandate givers in cases of real elections.

    The question is, given the below average performances of most government parastatals, ministries and agencies that are supposed to deliver service to the people, where is the legislative oversight functions? We understand some of the perfunctory committee ‘sittings over public petitions’ , but what has changed? How effectively functional is the legislative oversight functions? Why do we often hear of ‘juicy committees’? What are the implications of tagging some committees ‘juicy’?

    Most legislators are so self –centered that they only remember their constituencies during elections only. Once they access power, they run to cities and forget the constituents.  Ironically, most of them feed fat on so-called ‘constituency projects’ that really defy any valid explanations. This often turns out to be political smokescreens.  When Nigerian politicians fully understand the meaning of their legislative duties, development would be accelerated in the country. They would understand their core duties, be more committed to the people who voted them in, be more accountable and take joy in serving the people rather than the present grandstanding and ego-trips that create chaos and are very distractive.

    The issue remains that most politicians who vie for seats in Nigeria do so not as a result of any sense of service but to acquire power for its own sake and for personal reasons. Most have no vision, no agenda or commitment to the general good. The fact that a Senator Elisha Abbo notorious for assaulting a woman in a sex toy shop suddenly jumps out to narrate his experience with a senator Akpabio few weeks after the Senator Akpabio Vs Senator Natasha issue gained national attention is almost laughable.

    While it is his right to speak what he wants us to believe is his own truth, it is apposite to remind him that as a Senator representing Adamawa North in the Senate, his scandalous behaviour then adds to the litany of toxic masculinity and official abuse of power by politicians in Nigeria. His appearance at the Ethics and privileges Committee then regarding his case was scandalous too as it ended in chaos too.

    A senator Elisha Abbo might or might not be speaking the truth of his encounter with the Senate President before he was sacked by the courts but the Roundtable sees his sudden media engagements as merely playing politics. How has he atoned for the scandal that brought him notoriety?  What legacies did he live for his senatorial district? What was the equity and fairness bills he pushed as a senator? What will a senator Elisha Abbo be remembered for?

    Taking advantage of political situations to leverage public approval or sympathy cannot earn anyone garlands. It amounts to speaking  from both sides of the mouth for one who has a history of gender injustice to suddenly want to leverage on the present issue at the senate to launder an image immersed in a scandal he has not shown serious remorse for rather than mere politicking.

    Again on the senate floor, as the senate seemingly debated on the need for late Prof. Humphrey Nwosu to be honoured post-humously, it was interesting to watch  a senator like Adams Oshiomole, who rode on the back of Nigerian workers to national prominence and political gains and visibility argue that a Prof. Nwosu, who as a worker, gave the country the freest, fairest and most credible election ever did not deserve to be honoured, because, in his words, “Don’t accept a job you cannot do and someone must have the courage to do something” all in reference to the late NEC chairman.

    For an Oshiomole, a Prof. Nwosu was a coward. Being a senator, the Roundtable conversation wants an Oshiomole to understand what an award means. It is not a canonization of any human. It is rather recognition of a certain level of diligence, excellence, commitment, sometimes patriotism and a level of integrity. Politics must not dilute the meaning of diligence, integrity and a sense of patriotism lest our children begin to seek heroes from other lands. Going round media houses trying to justify his dishonouring a man who though fallible and imperfect gave the country the best election ever, told his story before he died and acknowledged globally as a man of integrity is just a tad too disappointing.

    Being a national legislator is not just about your constituency, it is a national service that seeks to work for the progress and unity of the country. Legislators must like Ceasar’s wife be, ‘above reproach’ especially in their discharge of their legislative duties in or out of the chambers. Discipline and decorum and a sense of history, equity and justice must be keys. There must be no descent to comic distractions. It is a serious business of national importance.

    • The dialogue continues…

  • Olunloyo: Exit of Ibadan’s son of the soil

    Olunloyo: Exit of Ibadan’s son of the soil

    ‘It is time for the son of the soil to rule. Let our son do it. Let Bola Ige return to his town. An Ibadan man should be governor of Oyo.’

    That was how Alhaji Busari Oloyede Adelakun, the Ejioku-born strongman of Ibadan politics in the Second Republic and Chairman of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) in Ibadan/Ibarapa District, canvassed for a power shift to the ancient city in 1983.

    He merely voiced the collective opinion of the city’s political elite, who nursed grudges against their in-law, fork-tongued Cicero of Esa-Oke in the old Oyo State and currently in Osun State.

    Key Ibadan politicians, including the National Chairman of the party and Seriki of Ibadan, Chief Adisa Akinloye; the Attorney-General and Justice Minister, Chief Richard Akinjide; a future kingmaker in the ancient city’s politics, Chief Lamidi Adedibu, and the then Iyalode of Ibadan, Chief Wuraola Esan, nodded affirmatively.

    The setting was the Oyo Town Hall. ‘E je k’omo ti’a naa o se e’ (Let our son too become governor). Consequently, this became a popular slogan among Ibadan folks, the justification being the sheer numerical strength and bloc vote of the ancient city that could not be rivaled by any other zone.

    Many Oyo and Ibarapa leaders aligned with the view because Ibadan had taproots in the districts. The history of Ibadan shows that many of its leaders and holders of Baale, Balogun, Basorun, and Aare Ona Kankanfo titles came from traditional Oyo and Osun towns: Oyo, Iseyin, Iwo, Ogbomoso, among others.

    Read Also; FULL STEPS: How to escape high electricity bills, switch​ to gas-powered generators

    The beneficiary of the novel recruitment strategy, which had a semblance of racial prejudice in the days of hot politics, was Dr. Victor Omololu Olunloyo of the NPN. He succeeded Chief Bola Ige of the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) in the 1983 polls. Both men had served as commissioners in the state before politics put them in different camps.

    Between then and now, seven governors – Olunloyo, Kolapo Ishola, Lam Adesina, Rashidi Ladoja, Adebayo Alao-Akala, Abiola Ajimobi, and Seyi Makinde – have occupied the Oyo State Government House at Agodi in Ibadan. Six are from Ibadan, but only one came from outside of the city. The trend may continue in the future.

    But the son-of-the–soil euphoria did not last. Three months after assuming office, Governor Olunloyo was toppled by the military after the coup that brought General Muhammadu Buhari to power. Olunloyo never bounced back to political relevance. 

    At the twilight of his life, he was full of reminiscences, advising the younger ones to see power as ephemeral, even though alluring and sweet.

    Olunloyo is remembered as a governor, but it should be noted that he had been a household name since his youth. What catapulted him to stardom was his high intellectual status. Olunloyo was in the mould of a genius: intelligent, resourceful, competent, and effective. He made genuine contributions to the educational, socio-economic and political development of his state as a teacher, administrator and public servant before he became governor.

    He was among the most brilliant students in all the schools he attended. At 27, he capped his intellectual pursuit with a doctorate in Mathematics at St. Andrews University in the United Kingdom (UK) in 1961. He returned home to teach, first at the University of Ibadan (UI) and later at the then University of Ife (UnIfe), now Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), where he became the Head of Department at 28.

    In the First Republic, the intellectual society was polarised by antagonistic political leanings. While the likes of Professors Hezekiah Oluwasanmi, Samuel Aluko, C. O. Taiwo, Saburi Biobaku, and Akin Mabogunje gravitated towards the progressive camp, the scholars of conservative ideology supported other political ideals. Nearly all the bright minds of that era took sides in the divisive political struggles.

    As the two camps in the Western Region ran into turbulence and emergency rule was imposed, the dons offered intellectual support to the warring camps.

    The list of emergency commissioners was carefully selected. The interim cabinet comprised dons, politicians, public servants, and traditional rulers who wanted Premier Ladoke Akintola back in office after six months. That was the plan of the Tafawa Balewa Government. Olunloyo made the list.

    It was his first direct involvement in governance. As he reminisced later, the leaders of the Western Region who went their separate ways meant well for the region. However, the bone of contention was their approaches, which did not align with each other. He also discovered that Prime Minister Abubakar Tafawa Balewa was financially incorruptible and non-flamboyant. When he visited his office at Ribadu Road in Ikoyi, Olunloyo likened it to the office of a school headmaster – an austere room – reminiscent of when Balewa was in the teaching profession.

    The regional crisis was mismanaged. Its climax was the rigging of the 1965 regional assembly elections. Olunloyo watched from his post at the University of Ife when the “Wild, Wild West” was in flames. In the melee, the coup plotters killed the principal actors and drove their followers away. Afterwards, a counter-coup followed.

    Already a promising lecturer and public intellectual, Olunloyo became a commissioner under Military Governor Adeyinka Adebayo. In the Ministry of Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, the lot fell on him to resolve the Alaafin of Oyo succession crisis, which his predecessor, Chief B. A. Ajayi, could not resolve. There was an opposition to the candidature of Prince Lamidi Adeyemi by Action Group (AG) sympathisers who orchestrated the removal of his father, Oba Adeniran Adeyemi, from office. They preferred Sanda Ladepo.But Olunloyo stood his ground, based on the facts available to him, and offered the correct advice to the governor on Adeyemi’s eligibility and suitability. The prince was thus crowned the king. It was not surprising that the Iku Baba Yeye later installed Olunloyo the Balogun of Oyo.

    Olunloyo also shone brilliantly as Commissioner for Education. He fortified the school inspection system, visiting many public schools unannounced to assess the quality of teaching and teachers, examining school infrastructure and the entire teaching and learning environment.

    Olunloyo had the privilege of building two polytechnics – Ibadan and Kwara – from their foundations as rector. The two institutions have played significant roles in the educational, economic, and technological development of the country.

    It must be noted that throughout his public service career, Olunloyo shunned corruption, avarice and inordinate pursuit of materialism. He was a man of contentment. He was also blunt. When Awolowo, who appreciated his sheer brilliance and intellectual exploits, beckoned on him to join his party, Olunloyo declined. He said Awo was too honest and that major actors, particularly in the North, would not support him because he was highly inflexible.

    The crowning of his involvement in public service was his election as governor. In 1979, Ibadan played a prominent role in Ige’s victory, although Akinjide, an indigene, was his rival at the poll. The election marked a significant shift in political calculation because from 1951 to 1962, the city tilted towards Zik’s National Council of Nigerian Citizens (NCNC), and between 1962 and 1966, gravitated towards Akintola’s Nigeria National Democratic Party (NNDP), which forcefully gained control.

    As major political actors, particularly Adelakun, who served as Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, and later, Health, deserted the UPN, Ibadan turned its back on Awolowo once again. The shift in political allegiance also fitted into the plan by NPN’s National Chairman Akinloye to win Oyo for the party as a stepping stone for bidding for the 1983 presidential ticket. But this never happened.

    Although a nominal party member, Olunloyo was catapulted to the front burner of the struggle for Agodi Government House. He got the governorship ticket, not by the grace of deep pocket, but because the NPN hawks wanted a credible person on the ballot.

    NPN wanted Oyo badly. Akinloye also wanted to prove that he was in control of Ibadan politics, through Adelakun, in the post-Adegoke Adelabu era.  The campaign was hot. It was marked by propaganda and thuggery. It was not easy to convince the masses of Ibadan. Therefore, Adelakun branded Awolowo an enemy of the city. He accused the UPN leader of recommending Ajayi from Ekiti, Bola Ige from Ijesa, Dauda Adegbenro from Egba, and Bisi Onabanjo from Ijebu as commissioners in the military government but neglected Ibadan, even though Emmanuel Alayande was around.

    At the close of the poll, the Federal Electoral Commission (FEDECO) declared Olunloyo winner. Hell was let loose. In some towns, houses and other properties of NPN stalwarts were destroyed. But the poll was affirmed by the Supreme Court, though with a dissenting judgment.

    In the saddle, Olunloyo wanted to run a clean government, despite the flawed election that brought him to power. He appointed competent party chieftains and sympathisers as commissioners. But he rejected Adelakun’s request to make him a commissioner, saying he did not measure up in terms of education. Olunloyo directed Adelakun to seek an appointment with President Shehu Shagari. A crisis was brewing in Oyo NPN.

     Olunloyo announced that the past administration would be probed. He also turned his attention to the Ibadan Municipal Council, firing salvos at the chairman, Oye Olunloyo, and reiterating his plan to probe its finances.

    Reports and cartoons of those days also depicted a vibrant and excited governor who momentarily behaved in unusual ways while conducting state affairs. He was serious-minded but humorous. He was goal-oriented, but he faced distractions from party elements. Since he loathed the embezzlement of public funds, many civil servants would have run into problems over time.

    Olunloyo would have been a good governor, nevertheless, if the military had not sacked the civilian authorities.

    After the coup, he was arrested, like other notable politicians. The former men of power from UPN and NPN were dumped at Iyaganku Police Station in Ibadan preparatory to their movement to Kirikiri and Ikoyi prisons in Lagos. Olunloyo sighted Ige and greeted him. When the Black Maria that was to convey them came and soldiers asked them to enter one by one, he respectfully requested Ige to enter the vehicle before him, saying: “Egbon (my elder brother), you are to enter first because you are my senior in this thing. After all, I spent only three months while you spent four years.”

    Nothing incriminating was found against Olunloyo, unlike Senator Barkin Zuwo, governor of Kano State for three months, who protested his harassment by the military, saying the N4 million for which he was arrested was government money found in Government House.

    There is a need to immortalise Olunloyo, not because he was governor but because in the previous positions he held, he displayed patriotism, probity, integrity, and rectitude.

  • In defence of Humphrey Nwosu: Correcting Oshiomhole’s misconception

    In defence of Humphrey Nwosu: Correcting Oshiomhole’s misconception

    Within the pantheon of Nigeria’s experiment with democracy and it’s ideals, few names stand as tall as Professor Humphrey Nwosu’s. Yet, recent comments by former Edo State Governor Adams Oshiomole now a Senator  diminishing Nwosu’s contributions to Nigeria’s democratic evolution represent not just historical revisionism but a dangerous attempt to rewrite and perhaps reduce the sacrifices made during one of Nigeria’s most turbulent political periods.

    It much surprises me, that a “Stand Well Well” comrade like Senator Oshiomole, one who had a series of standoffs against civilian dictators seems not to understand the magnitude of Professor Nwosu’s actions during the June 12, 1993 elections. To do so,  one must first understand the context. The Ibrahim Babangida military regime was not merely authoritarian; it was sophisticated in its brutality. This was an administration that had perfected the art of silencing opposition through the most extreme measures. Critics were dispatched mysteriously, vocal journalists were imprisoned or worse, and the state security apparatus had been transformed into a terrifying instrument of repression.

    It was in this climate of fear that Professor Nwosu, as Chairman of the National Electoral Commission (NEC), took a stand that could easily have cost him his life. When it became clear that Chief M.K.O. Abiola was winning the presidential election by a landslide, Nwosu attempted to release the results despite immense pressure from the military junta. This was not a small act of defiance; it was an extraordinary display of courage that put him directly in the crosshairs of a regime known for its ruthlessness.

    As Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, Nigeria’s first president, once famously remarked, “Only a madman would challenge a man with a gun.” By this measure, Professor Nwosu’s defiance was either an act of madness or exceptional bravery. History has vindicated him, confirming it was the latter.

    The consequences of Nwosu’s stand were swift and severe. He was removed from office and placed under surveillance by that administration and the other two that succeeded it. His family faced harassment, and his safety was constantly under threat. Yet, even under these circumstances, he refused to recant or disown the election results. Decades later, the trauma of those days remains evident in his recounting of events – the fear, the isolation, and the very real understanding that his life hung in the balance.

    The military regime knew that silencing Nwosu was not enough; they needed to erase any evidence of their unfairness. But Nwosu had anticipated this. Prior to his removal, he had ensured that results from polling stations across the country were documented and preserved. This foresight meant that even before the infamous annulment speech by President Ibrahim Badamosi Babaginda, Nigerians already knew that Abiola was the eventual winner.

    Read Also: RCCG Governing Council will hold meetings on the Moon – Adeboye

    Beyond. June 12 as an event, that is if we are forced to accept Senator Oshiomole’s flawed premise which is that Nwosu’s stand during the June 12 crisis was not extraordinary – a premise that is historically inaccurate – there remains the undeniable fact that under Nwosu’s leadership, Nigeria conducted what is widely acknowledged as the freest and fairest election in its entire history as an independent nation.

    The Option A4 voting system introduced by Nwosu revolutionized Nigeria’s electoral process. The system introduced a transparency that significantly reduced the possibility of electoral manipulation. This innovation alone represents a monumental contribution to Nigeria’s democratic development.

    Furthermore, Nwosu’s insistence on announcing results at polling stations before they were collated at higher levels created multiple verification points that made wholesale rigging much more difficult. Many of these reforms continue to influence Nigeria’s electoral system today, a testament to their effectiveness and Nwosu’s foresight.

    Senator Oshiomole again forgets that an event as historic as June 12, may not have occurred had Nwosu not insisted on that faithful day of June 11th before stern looking generals and an Attorney General (Clement Akpambo) who was stoutly against Abiola’s emergence, that the June 12 elections be allowed to go on. Historical records note that it was Nwosu’s strong arguments before the National Defence and Security Council NDSC that forced the hand of the junta to allow for the conduct of the elections.

    Nigerians must recall that at this point in the life of the Babaginda administration, IBB was at his “maradonic” best, having shifted the handover dates and the return to democracy on four occasions 90,91,92 and then 93, now while the nation was already fatigued with his democratic game of chairs, how can we know that a shift in the election date would not have affected an Abiola win, or a constitutional impasse of sorts or even another cancellation, ban and unbanning witnessed in the last exercise before the process that produced Abiola and Tofa, his rival.

    Given these contributions, the Nigerian Senate’s treatment of Professor Nwosu during a recent hearing was not just disrespectful but a disservice to Nigeria’s democratic history. For a man who risked everything to protect the sanctity of the ballot, the dismissive attitude displayed by some senators, including Oshiomole, was unbecoming of the institution.

    The Senate, which owes its very existence to the democratic transition that Nwosu’s actions helped facilitate, should have accorded him the respect befitting a national hero. Instead, he was subjected to questioning that seemed designed to minimize his contributions and cast doubt on his integrity.

    What makes Nwosu’s story particularly remarkable is that he was not a politician seeking popularity or power. He was a civil servant, an academic thrust into a position where his commitment to institutional integrity was tested in the most extreme circumstances. When faced with a choice between personal safety and upholding the democratic will of Nigerians, he chose the latter.

    In a country where institutional weakness remains a significant challenge, Nwosu’s example is particularly relevant. He demonstrated that institutions are ultimately only as strong as the individuals who lead them. His refusal to compromise on electoral integrity, even when faced with threats to his life, serves as a powerful reminder of what true institutional leadership looks like.

    If Oshiomole and others fail to see the extraordinary nature of Nwosu’s actions during the June 12 crisis, they should at least acknowledge his contributions to electoral reform in Nigeria. The improvements he introduced to Nigeria’s electoral system, many of which remain relevant today, deserve recognition and appreciation.

    Moreover, in an era where Nigeria continues to struggle with conducting credible elections, Nwosu’s expertise and experience should be valued rather than dismissed. His insights into electoral management, gained through practical experience in one of Nigeria’s most challenging periods, could prove invaluable to current efforts to strengthen the country’s democratic processes.

    Adams Oshiomole’s attempt to diminish Professor Humphrey Nwosu’s contributions to Nigeria’s democratic journey is not just factually incorrect but morally misguided. Nwosu’s courage in the face of a brutal military regime, his innovations in electoral management, and his unwavering commitment to institutional integrity make him a towering figure in Nigeria’s democratic history.

    The true measure of Nwosu’s contribution is not just in what he did but in what he risked. In standing up for democracy, he put everything on the line – his career, his freedom, and potentially his life. Such sacrifices deserve not just acknowledgment but profound gratitude from all who benefit from Nigeria’s democratic system today.

    As Nigeria continues its democratic journey, it would do well to remember and honor heroes like Professor Humphrey Nwosu – individuals whose courage and integrity helped pave the way for the democracy the country enjoys today. Anything less would be a disservice not just to Nwosu but to Nigeria’s collective memory and democratic aspirations.

  • Before Chelle goes

    Before Chelle goes

    No stories. The World Cup is neither executed through prayers, nor is it a lottery or a centre where anyone can walk in to operate the gaming machines. No. It is a platform to showcase excellence built over time and not a stage to exhibit mediocrity as we have always done in the past.

    If Nigeria must avoid missing the next World Cup, the players must know the implications of not attending the Mundial. Not attending the World Cup for eight years would destroy the progress we have achieved in the past. Nigeria’s other cadres have missed out on participating in their World Cups. We glossed over it. Soon, the hurricane would sweep off Nigeria from the senior World Cup, leaving in its wake sorrow, blood, tears, and all shades of buck-passing. What a pity. I weep for Victor Osimhen.

    What does patriotism to your fatherland mean in football? Let’s take a trip back to the Euro 2020 Final and watch how Cristiano Ronaldo, in spite of his injury, sat on the bench and joined the coaching crew on the touchline to shout, instruct, and motivate his colleagues to victory. CR7 could have walked down into the dressing room to do other things, but the patriotism in him didn’t make him do that. He joined in that instance to ensure victory for his country. Luke Shaw was shown a red card against Italy but stayed with the England squad for the next game against Ukraine despite being suspended for the match instead of returning to Manchester United. Patriotism, passion and loyalty are the identities of a warrior, and the players mentioned above understand this wholeheartedly.

     Would we also want another shameful situation where we wake up one morning to find the international media awash with stories that Eric Chelle has quit the Super Eagles as Head Coach, like most of his predecessors have done in the past?

    Can any follower of the game categorically say that the contractual deal between Chelle and his employer, NFF,  is cast in stone? Can we beat our chests to say that Chelle has been paid his wages, bonuses and allowances to date? Again, what would Chelle be doing between April and early September when  the next two World Cup games would be played? Who has seen Chelle’s contract to say that all the terms can be met, beginning with getting an official car and driver, not forgetting a befitting five-star accommodation space fitted with an Olympic-sized swimming pool to say the least?

    Would anyone be surprised to read here that there are whispers in the camp about unpaid entitlements for the coaches and backroom staff?  I hope the NFF knows that the European clubs would be neck deep in their preparations for the 2025/26 season. They wouldn’t be favourably disposed towards releasing their players for national team matches. The players too, would want to participate in their clubs’ pre-season training sessions to quicken the processes of blending the old and recruits meant to fortify their European clubs.

    Already, we are being told that the NFF will soon schedule a crisis meeting to address undisclosed subject heads. Indeed, it appears that Chelle’s contract doesn’t specify what would happen in the future. However, uncertainty over his long-term position has reportedly left him reconsidering his role.

    According to Nigerian sports journalist and lawyer, Osasu Obayiuwana, the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) has convened an emergency meeting to discuss the situation.

    Read Also: NNPC: Ojulari takes over from Kyari, seeks management, staff support to attain enormous targets

    “Eric Chelle is considering terminating his contract as Super Eagles manager. Sources within the NFF say that uncertainty over his fate beyond the FIFA World Cup qualifying series has led to a dramatic change of heart.  The NFF will hold a crisis meeting to address the matter,” Obayiuwana revealed.

    Yes, Chelle has seen that Nigeria’s chances of participating in the 2026 World Cup are far-fetched. And he needs to plot the trajectory of this movement as a professional football manager so that he isn’t marooned with Nigeria’s anticipated failure to pick the Group C’s sole qualification ticket. Ignore the cheap talk of qualifying as the group’s second-best team. This comes with another round of more difficult games.

    Rather than allow the laws take its course on the issue of South Africa fielding an unqualified player against Lesotho, our soccer federation chieftains are taking turns to shed light on it publicly, forgetting that the task of winning the remaining four matches is much easier than leading the campaign for the points deduction from their current points haul. What these NFF busybodies don’t understand is that deducting three points from Bafana Bafana’s points’ haul leaves the door ajar for Republic of Benin to finish in second position, of course, Benin have no game against South Africa making the last Group C game between Nigeria and Benin one in which the visitors a spoiler when the chips are down in October.

    I hope nobody will be talking about a South African conspiracy when the Rwandans come to Uyo in September to play us as if it is their first game in the competition. NFF people must learn how to keep their traps shut with due respect. If the Rwandans come to Uyo for the three points, it would be a legitimate ambition, having beaten us 2-1 inside the Stadium of Champions in Uyo during one of the Africa Cup of Nations qualification games.

    Now that we have a coach for the Eagles, NFF chieftains should task Chelle to establish enduring structures for the team to return to its previous winning form rather than insult fans with sloppy displays reminiscent of what we saw in Uyo last month against Zimbabwe, which ended 1-1. Nigeria has lost the fear factor, which made teams pitched against us here panic before the kick-off until they eventually get bombed with goals on match day. Rock in your casket, gangling Rashidi Yekini.

    NFF should allow the coach to pick his players since the buck stops on his table when things go awry. It won’t be a bad idea if the present members of the body’s Technical Subcommittee are removed and replaced with practising tacticians of repute. Being a former footballer doesn’t immediately qualify you to be a member of the NFF technical sub-committee.

    Whenever the Super Eagles’ team lists are released, they always look the same. Those who tottered during the competitions are swept back into the team on the altar of being experienced. The question to them is when will the budding talents in the 774 Local Government Areas of the country be eligible to play for Nigeria? In the past, we used to blame a mafia to certain players in the former Midwestern region in Nigeria. A senior colleague described those calling the shots before team lists are released as the ”committee of friends,” with the coaches kowtowing to their choices.

    Indeed, Chelle should develop a template that makes it mandatory for only regular players from the top European leagues to be invited to play for Nigeria going forward. Chelle needs to be told to stick to his plans by committing the country to play warm-up international friendlies against countries better than the Super Eagles to really assess our team. Friendly matches are trial games designed to expose new players and identify areas for improvement in the team, thereby introducing healthy competition for shirts among the players.

  • Pretentious killers of democracy

    Pretentious killers of democracy

    Those responsible for killing democracy in Nigeria are turning around to blame latter-day leaders for the monumental effects of the serious infractions they committed while in office.

    Those responsible for the fragility and weakness of institutions are shifting blame. They delude themselves into thinking that the country is enveloped in a collective amnesia.

    The master riggers, clueless actors, serial defectors, and religious bigots are mooting an inexplicable alliance and downplaying the obvious distrust. They hope to hijack power and return the country to the decay they wrought. They desperately need power to feather their nests and not to cater for the welfare of the masses. New people are not joining the gang. They are only recruiting their old, distraught followers in an unguarded noise making.

    Their aim is to garnish their lies with enticing flavours, taint the truth as a means of their prevarication, and instigate a section of the media against their target, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who has refused to fall into their trap.

    The objectives are two-fold. They plan to weaken the government of the day—although they were not better in their days in power, as their antecedents clearly show. They now peep at 2027 in trepidation, knowing that as things get better, the nation will mock them and ignore their antics. This is the reason they are desperate to work for the collapse of the government by all means.

    Also, they play the diversionary game to get by. They apply emotional manipulation in their game of deceit. They do not want the world, especially their gullible supporters, to see what the current administration has done well. They are concerned about a few inevitable foibles and human pitfalls. What the government has done right is not visible to them. As goes the Yoruba saying: the enemy’s horse is always dwarfish. They do not bother about this administration’s accomplishments. They enjoy pointing fingers over the challenges that are half-solved and those being frontally tackled to achieve the desired result, as their implementation is ongoing.

    They raise an unrealistic standard they never met when they misused authority before power slipped from them. They complain not because of their love for the masses but because they miss the privileges associated with public office.

    Read Also: Tinubu is a courageous leader, we are praying for him – Bishop Wale Oke

    They are united not by vision, ideas, and conviction but by their morbid hate for their common foe in the highest office in the land.

    Their past gave some of them away as religious bigots. Now, they are still exploiting the opium of the masses for manipulation. Some of them – Christians – are treading the populist path by going to break fast with the Muslim faithful when they never met the criterion of sacrifice by observing Lent, which their religion demands. They sat on mats with commoners, taking pictures and inundating the social media with their symbol of camouflage reticence.

    Their adversarial media backers accuse pro-Tinubu supporters of warming up for a second-term mobilisation. But they are also promoting the crusade for an alliance by the disorganised and disunited opposition gang.

    At their recent outing in Abuja, they upgraded their propaganda to absurdity. They cried out to themselves, saying democracy was declining, falling, and not living up to expectation – their expectation, that is. They also turned to the judiciary to malign the temple of justice. The sin of the judiciary is that in the last presidential election, the loser was not proclaimed as the winner.

    Instructively, two leading members of the opposition claimed in 2023 that they, and not President Tinubu, won the poll. They were fooling themselves. At least one loser was lying. Beyond that, the court ruled, based on the constitution, the law, electoral guidelines, and the evidence before it, that the two leading losers could not prove their allegations against the winner and the electoral umpire.

    Whenever the court rules in their favour, it is the triumph of democracy. Whenever the ruling is against the hypocrites, it is a travesty of justice and the rule of law.

    In 1999 and 2003, the presidential battle shifted from the ballot box to the court. They won. It was democracy at work. In 2023, when they lost, it was the decline of democracy and natural justice.

    The propaganda is ongoing that all jurists or most of them are corrupt because they allegedly wrote judgments in the bedrooms of some imaginary political barons and moneybags. Yet, those making the allegations lack the courage to reveal the identities of the culprits.

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) is responsible for the discipline of erring judges. But the venerable complainants are timid; they fail to submit petitions that would make the body launch an investigation. They commit a fallacy of easy generalisation.

    It is ironic that those whose political careers were salvaged by the judiciary in the past are turning around to mock the Bench without justification. It is worrisome because while the executive and the legislative arms can be dragged into the mucky waters at any time, it is forbidden for the honourable judges to join issues with politicians outside the court, no matter the provocation and intensity of smear campaigns.

    It is nothing short of regression to maladaptive behaviour in the post-election period by pompous candidates with an inflated ego. These characters indulge in an unending murmuring, almost two years after the poll, due to their reluctance to embrace reality and accept their fate. That lack of adjustment, which makes them to hold on to the past instead of focusing on the future realistically, is likely to affect their preparation for the next election. Psychologically speaking, the attribution of failure at tge poll to their rival who won meant that they lack an internal  locus of control.

    They are regrouping after they were scattered by antagonistic interests in the past. But a deep gulf still exists between them and the masses who they have endlessly exploited in the past through their rape of democracy.

    The proponents of the newest theory of democratic decline derived a weapon of blackmail, following the declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State by the President. They forget what their grand patron did in Ekiti and Plateau, the two states where the jungle never matured. The critics closed their eyes to reality and truth. As accomplices in the civilian dictatorship in Rivers, none of them raised an eyebrow when the House of Assembly was callously demolished by the power-drunk chief executive, who described it as his personal property. They also kept mum when lawmakers were denied access to the parliament, thereby denying 27 constituencies of representation for more than a year. They pretended as if all was well when only a three-member Assembly indulged in constitutional crimes against popular rule by erroneously giving the nod to the governor’s illegal actions. To them, all was well when the governor swore in commissioners who had not been screened by the parliament. They were pleased with running the state without a budget.

    As the Supreme Court judgment stated, there was no legal State Executive Council (Exco) in place, and the governor took the actions – in lawlessness.

    The appropriate Assembly, deriving its strength from the court verdict, immediately issued an impeachment notice. Over 14 breaches were listed. It was evident that the governor’s camp was packaging a resistance. The tough guys have been told by the chief security officer of the state to wait for some inexplicable instructions. Chaos was looming. Pipelines were blown off. But before the escalation of violence, the Commander-in-Chief acted fast.

    If any of the opposition leaders were presiding over the national affairs in Abuja, what would be his next line of action? Would he allow the Rivers of crisis to degenerate into a fire? Would they not later turn round again to blame the President for inaction?

    If democracy, as they claim, is declining or falling, then, the etiology of the rot should be probed. In rewinding the events of the past for a replay, they have been revealed, more or less, as the culprits.

    In 2003, a political earthquake reverberated across the Southwest. The then ruling party at the centre was the beneficiary. Five of the six governors in the region were thrown out of office in a curious electoral coup. But they accepted the turn of events. The affected governors never went to the tribunal for redress. Also, they walked freely on the streets. There was no invitation from any anti-graft body. They served their people to the best of their abilities and within the limited resources available to their states.

    Four years later, the so-called apostles of democracy were on the prowl, stealing the mandate of the people in many states. The mandates were later retrieved in court. The funny aspect of it all was that a do-or-die election was conducted, and the beneficiary, in sincerity, owned up that he rode to power on the back of a flawed and fraudulent exercise. On that account alone, the leaders of the then ruling party could be described as men of doubtful democratic credentials. They are fake democratic curators brandishing a puritanical zeal.

    When the anti-graft agencies became a tool for victimisation under their leadership, when court orders were wilfully disobeyed and violated, when their government became a cesspit of corruption, when federal allocations to states were seized and governors threatened, and when tension enveloped the polity because they wanted to hijack power in some states without actually winning democratic elections, they did not see it as a killing of democracy.

    The supporters of fuel subsidy are still annoyed and fighting back. They are few. They have made money from the loophole for years to the detriment of the larger population.

    In the history of Nigeria, none of them fought for democracy. While the soldiers among them claimed to have fought to keep Nigeria together, the question now is: What really brought about the civil war? Was the war not foisted on Nigeria by the scramble for power among ambitious soldiers? They created the ugly situation. They fought hard among themselves to clean up the mess. They rose to political fame by dismantling democratic structures. When they led the country in khaki, to whom were they accountable? Where did they derive their legitimacy when they ruled by the force of arms?

    What was their position on the June 12, 1993 election annulment? Did any one of them fight for the restoration of civil rule, which they became beneficiaries of in the Fourth Republic?

    Was the massacre at Odi and Zaki Biam democratic?

    What is their view on the resolution of the National Question? Are they not the unitarists serving as clogs in the wheel of federalism?

    President Tinubu should not allow these fake apostles of democracy to distract his attention from the implementation of his ‘Renewed Hope Agenda.’ He should remain focused. The greatest challenges now, like before, are security and the economy. As things get better, Nigerians should support him in his bid to reposition the country to attain greater heights in all spheres.

  • Peter Obi and the limits of populism

    Peter Obi and the limits of populism

    A video that went viral during this year’s Muslim Ramadan fast was that of the presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) in the 2023 presidential general elections, Mr Peter Obi, breaking the fast with some urchins in a community in Northern Nigeria. There was Obi, a veritable billionaire, sitting legs outstretched on a mat with some Muslim youngsters scooping rice and choice protein into their mouths from the same plate. As Sam Omatseye observed in a commentary on the episode, the quality of the fried rice and chicken being devoured in the brazen politicization of what was supposed to be a sober religious observance was definitely not what the northern youths dining with Obi and members of their community were accustomed to. Indeed, the trademark designer French suit worn by the former presidential candidate stood in sharp contrast to the humble apparel of his Ramadan hosts even though Obi would want them to believe that he is in disposition, outlook and inclination one of the downtrodden members of the society who is wholeheartedly committed to their cause.

    Yet, the discomfiture of Obi at being forced to be a key actor in this farcical Ramadan breaking of fast theatre designed to score cheap political goals was all too obvious. Deep within him, the wealthy and hugely ambitious trader would have loved to be somewhere else but for the desperate need to correct his past electorally fatal missteps and carve a new political image for himself in preparation for another bid for the presidency even though he swears that he is not desperate to be President of Nigeria but only in contributing to actualizing the common good for her people. Before now, there had been another widely publicized visual in which Obi was seen in another northern Muslim community joining adherents of Islam in washing his feet in preparation for prayers, although it is not clear if that was during the fasting period.

    These antics of Obi illustrate vividly the superficiality of his politics of cheap populism devoid of deep convictions and firmly held principles. To Obi, image matters far more than substance. Like the chameleon, he changes to reflect the colour of his environment, and it is difficult to place who he really is in reality. During the campaigns for the 2023 presidential election, Obi had politicized religion to a degree never before witnessed in Nigerian politics. To whip up the support of Christians, which he successfully did to a considerable extent, he engaged in what was popularly called ‘church tourism’, going from church to church, particularly among the large Pentecostal congregations on some occasions, melodramatically calling on Christians to “take back your country”. Those Christian clerics and their delirious congregations who rapturously cheered his every word must be wondering now if this is the same man washing his feet to participate in prayers in mosques and breaking the Ramadan fast in Muslim communities.

    In reality, for Obi, neither Christianity nor Islam is of the essence; it is his ambition that matters, and the emotions and sentiments of religious adherents are to be cynically manipulated for partisan political ends. What, then, does Obi truly believe in? It is difficult to say. Is his much-advertised commitment to frugality and material asceticism not just a clever, hypocritical ploy to place himself in sharp contradistinction to a culture of opulence and display of affluence by a decadent political elite not necessarily out of principled conviction but to promote his political aspiration? It is not unlikely. If he can exploit religion with such hypocritical cynicism, is there anything else he cannot selfishly mine in a desperate quest for political gold?

    Read Also: Lagosians commend police on security, demand better welfare for operatives

    Quite apart from the Christian vote, the other constituency actively cultivated by Obi in the countdown to the last presidential election was that of his Igbo ethnic kinsmen. He did not have to exert himself too much in that regard. Understandably desirous of an Igbo presidency for the first time in this dispensation, the Igbo massed enthusiastically around Obi who they saw as the best and brightest opportunity to achieve this objective especially because of the cynical support he enjoyed from the likes of former President Olusegun Obasanjo and the late Chief Ayo Adebanjo despite their repeatedly demonstrated deficiency of electoral value in the Southwest. And to his credit, Obi did well in achieving his objectives in the 2023 presidential election.

    Not only did he win nearly 90 per cent of the Igbo vote, he also won massive Christian as well as the large numbers of migrant Igbo votes in the South-South, Nasarawa and Plateau States in the North-Central as well as in Lagos and Abuja. But that could not provide him a pathway to the presidency with the entire far northern part of Nigeria, more than half of the country, understandably refraining from voting for a man who enjoyed the fanatical support of Christian pastors who openly denigrated both the North and Islam.

    It is that error that Obi is now cleverly trying to correct by enthusiastically seeking to project the image of a broad-minded nationalist who transcends a parochial mindset and does not discriminate against any religion. He knows that his religious parochialism and ethno-regional sectionalism cost him the last election. Yet, he is striving to cultivate a national political base, without which it is impossible to win a presidential election in Nigeria without the intellectual honesty to admit that he lost the last election because of a flawed electoral strategy.

    Rather, he has, in recent weeks, intensified his denigration of democracy in Nigeria to the extent that he contends that democracy no longer exists in the country. Yet, he has on national television and at different fora just this week subjected the President Bola Tinubu administration to scathing criticisms claiming that the government is a failure and he would have performed better if elected. Beyond doubt, he has publicly acknowledged being part of a coalition being constructed with a view to wresting power from the ruling APC in 2027. Would such expression of democratic rights of expression and association have been possible in a democracy that is dead and non-functional as Obi alleges?

    Speaking at the recent 60th birthday anniversary of Honourable Emeka Ihedioha, former Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives and short-lived governor of Imo State, Obi launched an incendiary verbal attack on the judiciary to demonstrate his morbid thesis that democracy is in its death throes in Nigeria. According to him, he regained his truncated mandate as governor of Anambra State and went on to serve for two terms courtesy of a judiciary that once upheld the cause of truth and justice but no longer does so. His bile against the judiciary is that it did not uphold the comically deficient and flawed case presented before the various Election Petition Tribunals and the Supreme Court by his glaringly incompetent legal team claiming that Obi won an election he so clearly lost.

    He expected the judges to join him in his fantasy, make-believe world of imagined electoral victory and thus become complicit in his intellectual fraudulence and dishonesty to win his approbation and support. Obi forgets that at the time he contested for the governorship of Anambra State and his mandate was rescued by the courts, Nigeria’s electoral process was far more crude and less developed than what we have today. The kind of brazen electoral fraud that necessitated surgical judicial intervention at the time can no longer be perpetrated today, and the judiciary cannot be expected to upturn elections conducted in substantial compliance with stipulated due process.

    In a bid to position himself as the leading opposition leader, Obi this week hurled verbal tirades against the economic policies of the Tinubu administration. But he mostly engaged in rhetorical flights of fancy devoid of hard facts and convincing substance. For instance, Obi claims that Tinubu should not have removed the fuel subsidy or eliminated the parallel exchange rate markets that gave room for humongous criminal arbitrage without first improving national economic productivity. He did not tell us how he would have performed such governmental magical witchcraft had he been elected President.

    On the country’s debt profile, Obi said, “Also, we have a country that is in huge debt…The cost of debt servicing is above the budget for critical areas like health and education. 70 per cent of our primary health centers are not functioning. I would fix our PHCs and primary schools if I were President”.  But as President Tinubu said in November last year: “For us, it was a challenge when the nation was servicing its debt with 97 per cent of its revenue, it was nothing but the edge of the cliff…But today, I can report to you that we have brought that down to 65 per cent, and we have never defaulted in meeting all obligations, both foreign and domestic. We have our heads above water. All countries around us, across the world, are also facing challenges.”

    Understandably, Obi cannot see even one good thing that the Tinubu administration has done in its nearly two years in office. He is entitled to his partisanly tainted view. But being in opposition does not mean that politicians must be in denial of the achievements of incumbent governments, even when they have the responsibility to subject the ruling party to the highest standards of scrutiny and accountability. For instance, to cite an example given by Mr Tunde Rahman, Senior Special Assistant to Tinubu on Media, Publicity and Special Duties in his piece on President Tinubu’s 73rd birthday, “On Tuesday, February 4, President Bola Tinubu approved a whopping N758 billion to settle longstanding pension liabilities under the Contributory Pension Scheme for federal workers nationwide…It was the first time the Federal Government would commit funds to the Pension Protection Fund, a statutory provision designed to augment pensions for low-income earners. Apart from clearing all pension increases since 2007, President Tinubu’s intervention also settled the shortfall in university professors’ pensions, ensuring retired university lecturers receive their full salary as a pension”. Not even the most brazen opposition partisanship can obscure such landmark achievements.

  • Anambra South Senatorial rerun: Between Azuka Okwuosa and others

    Anambra South Senatorial rerun: Between Azuka Okwuosa and others

    In our nation’s legislative politics, where representation has more often than not fallen short of expectations, with legislators earning notoriety for collecting unbelievable wages and other shenanigans than for mastery of the legislative rules, oratory and the exhibition of sheer intellect as witnessed within the First, Second and  part of the Fourth Republics, particularly when Dr. Chuba Okadigbo was Senate President.

    My home state of Anambra has had it’s fair share of such representatives and the death of Senator Ifeanyi Ubah did leave a vacuum in the Senate. His larger than life image in the Senate and the politics of Anambra somewhat towers above a number of pretenders who are presently  angling to fill such big shoes Ebubechukwuzo left behind. However,  one name within the litany of aspirants readily stands out, a name that has consistently emerged as a beacon of hope and proven leadership, that name is Azuka Okwuosa, one time Local Government Chairman Nnewi Local Government, ( When it had Nnewi North, South and Ekwusigo in one entity), one time former Commissioner in Anambra and a chieftain of the All Progressives Congress,  who has remained loyal to the party and contributed innumerably to it.

    As the race for Anambra South senatorial district intensifies, a critical examination of the candidates reveals that Okwuosa stands head and shoulders above the competition, offering a unique blend of administrative experience, party loyalty, and genuine grassroots connection that positions him as the ideal representative for the people of Anambra South.

    Azuka Okwuosa’s journey in public service began with his exemplary tenure as a Local Government Chairman. During this period, he demonstrated exceptional administrative acumen, transforming local governance from a mere bureaucratic exercise into a vehicle for community development. His administration was marked by several landmark achievements that continue to resonate with the people even to today.

    Under Okwuosa’s leadership, the local government witnessed unprecedented infrastructure development. Roads that had been neglected for decades were rehabilitated, providing essential connectivity between communities and markets. Water projects that brought clean, potable water to previously underserved areas were implemented. Schools were renovated and equipped with modern learning tools, creating conducive environments for education.

    Perhaps most significantly, Okwuosa introduced a participatory governance model that involved community members in decision-making processes. This approach ensured that development initiatives were aligned with the actual needs of the people rather than imposed from above. The result was a remarkable improvement in the quality of life for residents and a renewed faith in governance.

    Read Also: First Lady urges empathy, unity at Eid-el-Fitr

    His financial management style was equally impressive. In a system often plagued by misappropriation, Okwuosa instituted transparent financial practices that maximized the impact of available resources. Every naira was accounted for, and the benefits were evident in the quality of projects delivered. This fiscal responsibility earned him widespread respect and established him as a leader who could be trusted with public resources.

    Okwuosa’s appointment as a commissioner further expanded his administrative portfolio and provided him with invaluable experience in state-level governance. In this capacity, he demonstrated exceptional policy formulation and implementation skills that directly impacted the lives of Anambra citizens.

    As commissioner, Okwuosa championed innovative approaches to persistent challenges. As Commissioner for Works and Transport, Azuka attempted to meet the challenges of Anambra’s decrepit infrastructure but the politics then prevailed over common sense and by 2001, he resigned from office rather than remain in power for power sake. Such action was to absolve him in the future as being amongst those who contributed by either acts of commission or omission to the floundering of Anambra then.

    Even with the dismal performance of the Mbadinuju administration, Okwuosa’s performance in that administration was characterized by meticulous attention to detail, strategic thinking, and a results-oriented approach. He consistently exceeded targets and established new standards of excellence in public service. The networks and relationships he built during this period continue to serve as valuable assets in his political journey, providing him with access to key stakeholders across various sectors.

    His tenure as commissioner also gave him a comprehensive understanding of the intricacies of governance, including the legislative processes that are critical for effective senatorial representation. This experience has equipped him with the knowledge and skills necessary to navigate the complexities of national politics and deliver tangible benefits to his constituents.

    In Nigerian politics, where party-hopping has become commonplace, Azuka Okwuosa stands out for his unwavering loyalty to the All Progressives Congress (APC). This steadfastness is not merely a matter of political convenience but a reflection of his alignment with the party’s progressive ideals and vision for national development.

    Okwuosa has been a consistent advocate for the APC’s policies and programs, even during challenging periods when such advocacy was politically costly. His commitment has earned him the respect of party leadership at both state and national levels, positioning him as a trusted representative of the party’s interests and values.

    This loyalty translates to practical advantages for the people of Anambra South. As a senator representing the ruling party, Okwuosa would have direct access to federal resources and influence that could be leveraged for the benefit of his constituents. His established relationships within the party would facilitate smoother collaboration with federal agencies and ministries, ensuring that Anambra South receives its fair share of national development initiatives.

    Furthermore, his consistent party membership reflects a stability of character and conviction that is essential for effective representation. Unlike political opportunists who switch allegiances based on convenience, Okwuosa offers a predictable and principled approach to governance that voters can rely on.

    Perhaps Okwuosa’s most significant advantage in the senatorial race is his authentic connection with the grassroots. Unlike politicians who only appear in communities during election seasons, Okwuosa has maintained a consistent presence among the people, understanding their challenges, celebrating their successes, and advocating for their interests.

    This connection is evident in the extensive network of supporters he has cultivated across Anambra South. From traditional leaders to market women, youth groups to professional associations, Okwuosa enjoys widespread support that cuts across demographic and social lines. This following is not based on monetary inducements or empty promises but on a track record of genuine service and empathy.

    His approach to community engagement has always been inclusive and respectful. He listens to the concerns of constituents, values their input, and incorporates their perspectives into his vision for development. This participatory approach has created a sense of ownership among his supporters, transforming them from passive voters into active stakeholders in his political journey.

    The breadth and depth of his grassroots support give him a significant electoral advantage over potential opponents. While others might rely on financial muscle or external influence, Okwuosa’s campaign is powered by the authentic voices of the people he seeks to represent – a force that has repeatedly proven more powerful than money or connections in Nigerian politics.

    Okwuosa’s aspiration is not merely about securing political office; it represents a comprehensive vision for transforming Anambra South into a model of development and prosperity. His agenda focuses on addressing the core challenges facing the region while leveraging its unique strengths and opportunities.

    His legislative priorities include attracting federal infrastructure projects to improve connectivity and stimulate economic growth, advocating for policies that support small and medium enterprises which form the backbone of the local economy, and securing investments in education and healthcare to enhance human capital development.

    He also plans to champion environmental protection initiatives, particularly addressing erosion which has devastated many communities in Anambra South, and promoting sustainable agricultural practices to ensure food security and create rural employment opportunities.

    As the electorate of Anambra South evaluates their options for senatorial representation, Azuka Okwuosa emerges as the candidate who offers the most comprehensive package of experience, integrity, connection, and vision. His trajectory from Local Government Chairman to commissioner has equipped him with the administrative knowledge essential for effective representation. His loyalty to the APC provides strategic advantages for accessing federal resources and influence. His grassroots connection ensures that he truly understands and represents the interests of his constituents.

    In a political environment often characterized by unfulfilled promises and disappointing representation, Okwuosa offers a refreshing alternative – a candidate with a proven track record of performance, a demonstrated commitment to service, and an authentic connection with the people. For Anambra South, the choice is clear: Azuka Okwuosa represents the best path to effective representation and transformative development.

  • Professor Diji Aina On Factionalism, Economic Parasitism And State Fragility (2)

    Professor Diji Aina On Factionalism, Economic Parasitism And State Fragility (2)

    For the humanistic scholar and thinker, man is the be-all and end-all of existence. Only that which is material, that which can be seen, heard, touched, tasted, smelled and felt is real. The spiritual is thus mere fantasy and thus no more than the creation of the fertility of the human imagination. This is perhaps what Marxists mean when they describe consciousness as a creation and reflection of matter and not vice-versa. Of course, not all radical academics are of the humanistic philosophical persuasion. Thus, the late Marxist political scientist, Professor Aaron Gana, for instance, started his Convocation lecture at the University of Jos with the famous declaration, “Let me start this lecture with two apologies. One is that because I am a “Jesus person” I am giving this lecture in Jesus name (Amen). My apology here is to those who might be offended by this declaration”. In giving this apology, Professor Gana obviously had in mind not only those who were not of a Christian religious persuasion but even more so those who are of a humanistic, materialistic, disposition particularly in an academic environment.

    Many humanistic thinkers reject the notion that man is essentially and fundamentally flawed as a result of sin and thus hopelessly and helplessly in need of a savior and redeemer to reconcile him to God and salvage him from an innate disposition to evil leading to eternal damnation. ‘I am the captain of my soul and the master of my destiny’ is the enduring credo of the humanistic ideologue. For him, man is a perfect creation with no spiritual flaws. If so, however, how then do we explain the evil we can see all around us transcending social classes, levels of educational attainment, socio-economic status as well as across all categorizations of nations – developing, underdeveloped or developed?

    The humanist has no answer to the problem of prevalent and persistent evil in human nature and society. Is it any wonder then that such humanist ‘saviours’ of man as Lenin, Stalin or Mao Tse Tung, for example, did not flinch from slaughtering large numbers of people in striving to salvage society and promote what they perceive as the common good of mankind in their respective societies even though the means towards the achievement of their goals were manifestly evil?

    Like Professor Gana, Professor Diji Aina comes across in his inaugural lecture under focus here as essentially a ‘Jesus person’. Thus, for him, factionalism has its roots in the inherent spiritually flawed nature of man that predisposes the individual to pervasive selfishness and self-centeredness thus fostering negative and dysfunctional factionalism across diverse sectors of society.

    Read Also: Professor Diji Aina on factionalism, economic parasitism and state fragility (1)

    As he put it, “The implication of the foregoing is that factionalism is the outward manifestation of a sinful (rebellious) heart, covetousness and of fallen humanity…In the biblical context, factions are outcomes of rebellious acts and are often created via subtle persuasion to upturn natural order and events. In Genesis 3:1-6, the serpent, portrayed as “more crafty than man” asked, “Did God really say you must not eat from any tree in the garden?” From this spiritual analytic paradigm, Professor Aina concludes that “The moral lesson here is that it is only by allowing the indwelling Holy Spirit that we can have eternal peace, one that propels cooperative rather than degenerative spirit that results in factions and its attendant consequences of conflict and violence”.

    After a detailed and exhaustive excursion into the manifestations of factionalism in Nigeria right from the colonial era through to the first, second, aborted third and now fourth Republic, Professor Aina posits that “It was not until the advent of crude oil as a major, national, income-earning source that the personal lust over state resources became so evident. Hitherto, it had been shrouded in a regional, economic interest-driven struggle for the political soul of the nation”.

    It is instructive in this regard that in the first republic, the most progressive, rapidly modernizing and prosperous part of the country, the Western Region, was the most affected by a fierce destructive factionalism within the ruling party, the Action Group, that split the party down the middle, fostered the massive rigging of regional elections, degenerated into widespread anarchic violence that ultimately resulted in the January, 1966 coup and the collapse of democratic rule only six years after independence.

    Although the military was initially welcomed by large sections of the populace as a redeeming political Messiah which intervened to save the country from the misrule and venality of the politicians, it took little time before the intervening military itself became the victims of divisive organizational factionalism that deepened ethno-regional mistrust, bred widespread instability and severely threatened the country’s cohesion and continued existence. As Professor Aina pungently and lucidly put it, “Resources accruable from crude oil are largely administered by those who are located outside the terrain of crude oil exploitation thereby creating factions and struggle for control. This resulted in separatist agitations, which eventually led to recurring military coups and transition governments in what Oyediran and others documented as “Transition Without End”.

    Professor Aina continues by depicting the linkage among militarism, crude oil, economic parasitism of the elite and state fragility. In his words, “Military insurgency and counter-insurgency took the odious dimension, not only truncating the development of civilian rule but the destruction of the socio-political and economic fabric of the nation. Corruption became ubiquitous, evil and malignant. Even the clergy that once served as distant echo of “voice of reason” got engulfed in the greasing of palms and monetary inducement to gain public endorsement…Nigeria is evidently at crossroads. As I have documented in a number of publications, and as many other scholars have confirmed, the factions have multiplied, metamorphosed and transmogrified becoming malignant and inimical to national progress. They have left in their wake multifaceted fragmentations that have resulted in over one million people killed in just 30 months of a civil war and scores of other people most recently in the Niger-Delta insurgency and an international terror-induced hydra-headed insurgency known as Boko Haram”.

    The lecturer documents the pervasive and persistent factionalization of political parties and groups in the current fourth republic since 1999, the deepening of corrupt elite enrichment through access to state power, rampant political vagrancy of the polite elite from one party to the other in desperate quest for platforms to contest for public office with scant regard for fidelity to party ideology, philosophy or principles. Just as intra-party factionalism was partly responsible for the loss of the PDP’s control of power at the centre to the emergent APC in 2015, no sooner had the new party assumed office than it became bogged down with fragmentation and factionalism leading not only to organizational immobility but also competing cabals in government resulting in state paralysis on diverse fronts.

    According to the author, “Assessing the new ruling party, (APC), as more or less a replica of the former ruling party (PDP), Schineider (2015), dubbed the APC as “an opportunistic coalition of interests.” In  the scenario that ended the seventh assembly, “cross carpeting”, which was the buzzword of of the politics of the 1960s was replaced with “defection”. All it took to decamp or defect in Nigeria’s puerile political ecology was to feel shortchanged in the sharing of the national cake at any point time”. As the countdown to next year’s elections continues, the political elite in control of state power persist in behaving like economic vampires, sucking the resources that should be the lifeblood of providing for the wellbeing of the generality of the people, and rendering the state even more fragile as manifested by corrupt management, pervasive criminality, kidnapping, banditry, rape, incompetent economic management and the contestation of the very sovereignty of the state by criminal gangs and terroristic elements.

    Even then, with the evidently increasing autonomy of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), and the intensification of the utilization of technology to enhance the credibility and transparency of the electoral process, the electorate may increasingly begin to more effectively utilize the power of the ballot to effect positive change in the efficacy and quality of governance in the country.

    Although Professor Aina proposes no less than ten recommendations to deal with and minimize the dysfunctional effects of degenerative factionalism in society, I will conclude by citing only one of this because it brings us right back to the spiritual underpinning of his lecture, with which we began the second part of this review. In his words, “The political society should be re-oriented towards cooperative and competitive rather than degenerative factionalism. This can be achieved if there is a deliberate effort/program towards minimizing crass materialism in the national psyche of the citizenry, using the East Asian “tiger” and Scandinavian countries’ experiences as benchmarks. I call for a return to primitive godliness, a lifestyle that aligns with the biblical aphorism “righteousness exalts a nation, sin is a reproach”. Factionalism is rooted in self and sin”.    

    • First published on February 4, 2023