Category: Sunday

  • SNAPSONG 151

    SNAPSONG 151

    Our absent government

    “There is too much government in my life”,

    Laments my American friend,

    His front yard alive with plaintive posters

    Hanging from his roof, a billowing flag

     

     

    In its red-white-blue, the same colour

    As the socks peeping out of his shoes.

    “The Taxman comes without a break

    The police get me booked

     

    For neglecting my safety belt; it’s they who

    Must forever decide what part

    Of the road I have to drive, and the volume

    Of the boom from my woofer boxes

     

    And the vaccine mandate,

    Oh, that dreariest of all decrees,

    What business of government is it

    If I choose to dare the bug and die?

     

    *

    Over here, buddy, a starkly different story

    Simply no government in our wretched lives

    Our nights are dark, our taps are dry

    Our skull-lined roads pave a crowded path to hell

     

    We live like orphans and die like paupers

    Our Eating Chiefs have swallowed the budget

    The Law is lame; a King called Chaos

    Is high on the throne

     

    In my part of the world

    Government is permanently AWOL*

    Coming only when the taxes are due

    And another election is ripe for rigging

     

    *Absent Without Leave

  • The Limits of propaganda

    The Limits of propaganda

    BUT for his background of being a lawyer and public relations practitioner, I would not have been bothered about some of his utterances which makes one wonder if being an information minister gives the right to make unfounded accusations just to defend the government.

    Being an information minister in an administration that has a lot of explanation to give for too many things that are not as they should be, maybe putting Alhaji Lai Mohammed under much pressure to be seen to be up to the task of his office, but that should not be an excuse to throw caution to the wind.

    He should at least be faithful to the ethics of the two noble professions he has practised and know the limits of propaganda even if that was what earned him the present position as many claims.

    His recent claim that many Non-Governmental Organisations in the country are working against Nigeria’s interest is yet another of his trademark name-calling of perceived critics of the federal government.

    The minister who urged Nigerians to be circumspect about the activities of some NGOs claimed that the government was in receipt of reports that some were on the payroll of foreign agents, traducers with ulterior motives to destabilise Nigeria.

    Despite not being under a military regime, Alhaji Mohammed who is a lawyer found it difficult to understand why the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), like any individual or organisation that has the freedom to exercise rights guaranteed in the Constitution,  should sue the Federal Government when the operations of Twitter was suspended.

    As far as he was concerned, every patriotic Nigerian should regard Twitter as an enemy of the state working to destabilise the country because he says so as if we don’t know the truth about what informed the government’s action.

    Accusing SERAP of ulterior motives for suing the government over the unjustified suspension, the minister shockingly claimed like an unlearned person that “in every case being filed by some of these NGOs, they receive subventions from their donors and sponsors and this should worry Nigerians”

    “If you notice, one of the fastest-growing businesses today is the NGO and the country is full of all sorts of NGOs which are being funded for ulterior motives,” he added to give civil society organisations like SERAP doing their best to uphold democracy and hold the government accountable a bad name to hang them.

    It’s unfortunate that the minister in his desperate bid to fend off criticisms of unjustifiable decisions like the suspension of Twitter resort undermining the crucial role of NGOs in especially a country like ours where the government has largely failed to live up to its responsibility or violate the rights of the citizens which is the case with the suspension of the microblogging platform.

    SERAP’s suing of government over any action it views as unjustified or requesting for any document predates the Buhari administration. The organisation has sued the federal government over other actions it took before the Twitter suspension, so there should be justification for imputing any special ulterior motive in this case.

    But for the kind of close-monitoring and demand for accountability that organisations like SERAP subjected the Goodluck Jonathan administration to, which people like Mohammed hailed then, it would not have been easy for the present administration to defeat the incumbent.

    Instead of just claiming to know the NGOs on the payroll of foreign agents with ulterior motives to destabilise Nigeria, the minister should have named them if he was sure of his fact and wanted to be taken seriously for once as a truthful spokesperson of the government.

    Having been challenged to release the list of the NGOs he claims the government has and proceed to prosecute them, it is up to the Minister to prove that he is not a purveyor of fake news as he has always accused some media organisations of doing.

  • The new normal

    The new normal

    IN the course of discussion with a colleague on the seemingly unending fuel scarcity in the country on Wednesday, I asked what, apparently, was a rhetorical question: is this how we would continue to live with fuel scarcity until the end of the President Muhammadu Buhari’s seemingly unending and tortuous second term, next year? He replied casually that that would appear to be the new normal. I almost accused him of plagiarism because that was the title I had in mind for this piece: the new normal. Both of us then wondered if our leaders are not ashamed about the way they have been running the country these past decades and the despondency in the land despite being blessed by the Almighty.

    But anyone who has been following President Buhari’s leadership style would have known that the situation would get this bad someday. And it can only get worse unless the government changes its style. The government has been too laid back to make any serious impact on governance. It is simply unimaginable. You have crude oil, yet you cannot refine it despite wasting billions on moribund refineries that have become more or less like a ‘male dog’, what my people call ‘ako aja’ (a dog that is incapable of reproducing).

    And, as if not being able to refine what you have is not enough embarrassment, we cannot even import the right specification. So, we have what the late Fela Anikulapo-Kuti called “double wahala for dead body”. Oyinbo people call it double jeopardy. But what we suffer in Nigeria is more than double jeopardy; we suffer multiple jeopardy. We can’t refine. We can’t even import aright. So, what can we do right? At this juncture, my colleague and I laughed heartily. But it is not a laughing matter.

    In fact, the new normal is that in some places, Nigerians are not just queueing for petrol, some of them are compelled to remove the fuel tanks of their motorcycles and vehicles to the filling stations because the petrol attendants would not sell in jerrycans anymore, ostensibly because people are either engaging in panic buying or because touts are taking advantage of the scarcity to buy in jerrycans and resell at cut-throat prices to motorists who cannot afford to wait endlessly on queues to buy what ordinarily you just drive in and out of filling stations to buy. And with all the attendant risks? They won’t even sell directly to vehicle owners. It is already that bad.

    The new normal. The new normal! So, what does it mean?

    Wikipedia refers to ‘new normal’ as “a state to which an economy, society, etc. settles, following a crisis, when this differs from the situation that prevailed prior to the start of the crisis. The term has been employed in relation to World War 1, September 11 attacks, financial crisis of 2007-2008, the aftermath of the 2008-2012 global recession, the COVID-19 pandemic and other events.” For many of us, especially in this part of the world, the concept gained currency during the coronavirus pandemic.

    Just as the Global System for Mobile (GSM) communication has revolutionised the way we live, so has COVID-19. Until the advent of GSM in Nigeria in 2001, telephone remained an exclusive preserve of the rich, with about 450,000 telephone lines to the country’s then over 160 million population. But all that has changed. We have had a new normal from the post-GSM era to date, as one can, right from the comfort of his home send and receive money electronically, among other new developments that came with GSM. Meaning that new normal can be functional or dysfunctional. It is not necessarily a bad thing. But the one induced by fuel scarcity is bad through and through.

    COVID-19 is another phenomenon that has taught us that several things can be done differently; that we do not necessarily have to go to the office to work. We can work online. At least that was the way it was with many workers until the pandemic subsided sometime late last year. Now, Russia-Ukraine War would seem to have almost obliterated memories of COVID-19 and its choking protocols. Even walking in groups that the Yoruba people used to see as a good thing suddenly became an aberration. Ka rin, ka po, yiye lon yeni, a thing that a serving southwest minister of the Federal Republic has recoined as ka rin, ka po, pipa lon pa ni (moving in groups kills). At least that is the lesson according to COVID-19. The new normal.

    When the current round of fuel crisis began about three weeks ago, we were told it would not last, at least officially. It is more than three weeks after, and we are still counting. Don’t forget I had said in an earlier piece when it started that we may have no one punished for the pains, the loss of man-hours and revenue and all. I am yet to be proved wrong. That is what happens when you have sacred cows manning even sensitive portfolios. They can commit blue murder and get away with it. What has followed the unwarranted scarcity is the President jetting out in this critical moment for a United Nations event in Kenya, from where he was to proceed to London, United Kingdom, for medical treatment. He however unexpectedly returned to the country on Friday, with the presidency saying he would still proceed to London for treatment. But such medical tourism should have been reduced to the barest minimum if only he had remembered that that was one of the reasons why he and his colleagues sacked the Shehu Shagari government on December 31, 1983. Then, they referred to our hospitals as ‘mere consulting clinics’. The situation in those hospitals is worse today, with the mass exodus of doctors and other medical personnel to greener pastures. A development the Minister of Labour and Employment, Chris Ngige, considered as normal. New normal, you mean? Ironically, the minister himself is a medical practitioner.

    I repeat, if this government has failed, we do not need to look far for reasons it cannot fly. With a health minister who saw nothing wrong in a situation where doctors are fleeing their country in droves due to bad governance, to a Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) governor under whose watch the country’s currency sank to its worst state in history asking, not to be allowed to ‘repeat’, but is reportedly seeking promotion!

    Unfortunately and regrettably, eyes may not have seen and ears not heard the worst if the government continues like this, to paraphrase one of our fathers in the Lord. It is not that fuel scarcity is novel in this land of plenty. Successive governments have always used it as a stamp of their incompetence. But it is one of the very few things that have been going for this government. Fuel supply has relatively been steady since it took over in 2015, after the hiccup it inherited from the Goodluck Jonathan era. Now, that too appears to be going with the winds. Or so it seems? There is no other way to explain it; that what started like a child’s play about three weeks ago has continued to haunt us three weeks after, with nary hope in sight as to when it is likely to end.

    Bad leadership has really dealt with us. It is the reason we as cloth sellers’ children are wearing rags, and butchers’ children are eating bones. We need to extricate ourselves from its claws.

    It is the reason we do not know whether to be happy or sad now that oil prices are soaring. On the one hand we are happy because that means more revenue for the government and, on the other hand, we are sad because that means government has to cough up more subsidy because it is importing petrol. Nigeria must be the only country with such a senseless template; that cash is not its problem but how to spend it.

    But we should thank God that power has somewhat changed hands in the power sector. Otherwise, we would have seen the sector’s new normal too. We have a semblance of better service in my area, at least compared with what it was like in the past because it is now work and eat in the sector. The managers now know they can be thrown into the unemployment market to swell the statistics if they fail to render the service for which they are paid. We may not be there yet, but we are making some progress, at least since it is no longer a fatherless property (government property is like an orphan in Nigeria). Nobody cares about them; people only care about the money they can make from them.

    The Buhari government rarely sanctions public officials for incompetence or indolence. Yet, his government has a surfeit of them. In fact, the country appears to be on auto-pilot. Baba is away on medical leave in the United Kingdom; Mama is celebrating birthday in far-away Dubai, with some of our First Ladies getting fuel to go celebrate with her while those of us at home cannot find fuel to move our vehicles or power our generators. Never mind all of these at a time the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) is on a month-long warning strike over poor conditions of service and the parlous state of our universities. Our First Ladies and their spouses have apparently forgotten Marie Antoinette. But, come to think of it; what do we expect them to do? Sure we don’t expect them to commit suicide for our sake because things are not working? African leaders don’t die for their people; it is the other way round. Moreover, why should they lose sleep when they know the country they are running can run on auto pilot? Since it has no fixed destination per se, wherever it lands the people can pick up the pieces of their lives and continue from there.

    So bad. Indeed terrible, we have crude oil and we are still suffering. And some people are blaming all the woes on subsidy. Would subsidy withdrawal have prevented importation of bad fuel? Please let’s call a spade a spade: the truth, again as Fela sang, is that “everything disorganise patapata”. Another truth is that nobody seems to be telling the truth about the matter.

    President Buhari, these things you are doing, there is God o!

  • Empire games

    Empire games

    As the implacable Russian military machine subjects Ukraine and its heroic defenders to a slow-motion high-tech lynching, the world is benumbed by the magnitude of the humanitarian catastrophe unfolding. The carnage has been horrific and the destruction of infrastructure heart wrenching. Never would the civilized world have imagined that this kind of urban horror was possible after the cold war.

    But it can get worse that is if Russia is forced by sheer economic strangulation or panicked by the unanticipated defiance of the Ukrainians buoyed by military support by their western allies to reach for the ultimate weapon of mass destruction. Over the years, the Russian leader has demonstrated a chilling daredevilry and coldblooded ruthlessness that nothing can be put beyond him.

    The world has never been closer to a nuclear Armageddon than this. If Putin loses his mental balance, there is every possibility he might do something desperate and unusual. The changing nature of global order has been brought forcibly to the front burner by events unfolding in Ukraine. Once again, history is reminding us that it does not progress in a straightforward manner, but in a haphazard and contradictory way.

    On the one hand, we can say for sure that the old empire is gone and buried forever.  Yet on the other hand, it can also be seen that notions of empire in different manifestations exist in the political imaginary or subliminal consciousness of the major world powers.

    While America for the past three hundred years has acted like an empire in denial even while maintaining far-flung protectorates all over the globe, Russia has retained an emotional attachment and identification with its former satellites beyond the call of ordinary duty. Yet it will be awful to condemn the Russians without first hearing them out.

    It is a case of loving your former slave to death.  With particular reference to the strategic and mineral-rich Ukraine, its old master will not even allow it to act in its own established national interests unless they tally with the larger empire interests. If they try it, they must be swiftly brought to book before they endanger empire. In the case of America, the urge to further incapacitate and even finish off the old Russian bear has never been more pressing.

    In America’s subconscious, Russia, even in its economically degraded state, represents the most potent global threat to America’s military domination and unipolar designs. The Americans nurse a secret fear of the Russian military machine. This is probably because the Russian army is a match for them when it comes to gung-ho daring and sheer fecklessness in battle.

    Unlike the Chinese who fight with uncanny mental subtlety combined with uncommon natural toughness and who believe with their greatest general that the best victory is the one won without a a single shot, the war-like ancient nobility of America and Russia share a bloodlust and a glorification of martial derring-do which probably hark back to a mutual Viking ancestry.

    This Russian high caste are to be distinguished from what the Germans dismiss and mercilessly caricature as the untermensch, or semi-barbarians, wild unreconstructed sub-humans from the Siberian steppes. This paradoxical consanguinity leads to a love-hate relationship.

    Vladimir Putin shares with the Russian nobility a deep distrust and abiding phobia for the west and its hypocrisies and corrupting values. Starting from the frenzied modernization—or westernization—program of Peter the Great which led to the creation of Petersburg from scratch, the Russian high class believe that whenever Russia apes the west unconscionably, it always leads to national disasters.

    Rapid and untrammelled industrialization in an essentially backward country led to factories where conditions were so  fetid and appalling that they spawned radicalized workers that became foot soldiers of two revolutions. Marxist rhetoric downloaded from Anglo-German Europe flourished powered by intellectual emigres like Lenin who himself was eventually spirited back into the country from Western Europe.

    It was only the brave and charismatic Empress Catherine who saw through the western ruse. A woman of unsurpassed mental acuity and formidable intellect, the gamey matriarch who overthrew her own husband in a savage putsch, had invited Diderot, the celebrated French philosopher and famous social disrupter, to impress on her the virtues of radical reforms, particularly the emancipation of slaves and serfs. But the great lady saw through the trap and quickly bundled the slightly unhinged philosopher back to Paris. This at least helped to stave off revolution for almost two centuries.

    Thus with a split identity, Russia struggled and managed. Ironically it was Soviet munitions and the rugged fighting spirit of Socialist Russia which helped the west to overpower Hitler’s Fascist machine. Then came what they consider the biggest catastrophe of their modern history. Ensnared by western cajolery and flattery, Mikhail Gorbachev let his guard down.

    The Soviet Union crumbled and splintered into its component parts. It led to an apocalyptic fiscal meltdown and the rise of corrupt oligarchs who fed on the misery of their own people. The lot fell on Putin to clear the mess and to restore Russia to some measure of stability and international respectability.

    But there is a sting at the end of the tail. Just as it is said that Stalin drove barbarism out of Russia through sheer barbarity, it will be said that Putin drove oligarchy out of Russian by creating his own oligarchs. Yet a sizeable portion of the Russian populace is willing to put up with Putin’s authoritarian rule and draconian cruelty as long as it restores Russian pride and glory.

    The equation may be changing. But this is where Putin is coming from. A coldblooded Slavic supremacist, the Russian leader has forgotten nothing and forgiven nothing. When Ukraine, a former prized satellite of the old Russian Empire, began to assert its independent cultural and political values, when it began to turn an affectionate gaze in the direction of the west and NATO in particular, it was like raising a red flag in the face of a distempered Russian bull.  Here they come again!!!

    Putin is having none of that. With NATO in his backyard, Putin feels totally disrobed and encircled by the hostile western powers. As far as he is concerned, this is a last-ditch battle to save his country and its civilization from being overwhelmed by the much-hated west. If all else fail, and if care is not taken, the Russian monomaniac despot may go under pulling the nuclear trigger.

    The civilized world is aghast and appalled. But when they bemoan the horrific carnage in Kyiv, the wanton brutality on the streets of Kharkov and the unremitting cruelty with which the Russians have put this beautiful country to sword, Putin taunts: Where were you when the Slavic Serbs were bombed into submission, or when Iraq was destroyed on flimsy grounds, when Libya was openly disembowelled and when Afghanistan was overwhelmed by sheer firepower?

    As many Ukrainian cities are reduced to rubble by Russian heavy-duty artillery and fierce aerial bombardment, it is becoming a dialogue of the deaf. Putin dreams of a return of the old Russian Empire. But this is not going to happen. You cannot step into the same river twice. The old Russian Empire is gone forever. The earlier Putin is made or persuaded to realize this, the better for everybody.

    The irony of it all is that history will record Putin as the person who signed the death warrant of the warm, friendly and affectionate relationship between these two Slavic nations through frustrated and miscalculated aggression. Once again, the Russians have been pushed into an “unforced error” by their western tormentors and it is the Americans and the EU nations looking like unlikely liberating heroes on the streets of Ukraine.

    After centuries of intermarriages and blood ties, the Ukrainians had come to regard the Russians as their own. But after the invasion, the public mood in Ukraine has shifted against Asiatic despotism and all that Russia represents. It will be militarily impossible from now to keep a bubbly and fiercely independent nation under the thraldom of a neighbouring Tsar.

    China, North Korea and Vietnam should be approached to nudge Russia back to the negotiating table. A war against a hostile people does not end with effective military occupation. It is merely the end of the beginning.

    Russia should take a cue from its signal and disorderly retreat from Afghanistan which unleashed a chain of events culminating in the dissolution of the Soviet Union itself. Putin should learn from the Chinese effective pacification of Hong Kong how to pursue national interest with strategic cunning and superior patience.

    In exchange for the immediate cessation of hostilities in Ukraine and the unilateral declaration of unconditional ceasefire, the strangulating economic blockade of Russia should be lifted forthwith. It is an economic crunch that will hurt Russian in the short run and everybody in the long run. Ukraine must be persuaded not to join NATO in the nearest future until the strategic and geopolitical implications are thrashed out.

    If this feels like the Cold War all over again, we must perish the thought. This one is much more than the Cold War and of greater global import. We appear to be on the cusp of great events; a possible reconfiguration of existing power relations. In a dramatic re-enactment of what is known as the cunning of history, the nation-state paradigm has come under its most potent threat from newer variants of its old empire-state progenitor.

    The Russia/ Ukraine conflict has put into sharp perspective the dire circumstances of indentured nations. They proliferate on the African continent. An indentured nation is one that is yet to achieve economic and political manumission despite flag independence. They are very vulnerable to the antics and reprisals of their former masters. More than sixty years after the onrush of decolonization only few African countries can boast of genuine sovereignty or organic nationhood.

    Unfortunately for them and without having consolidated the nation-state paradigm, they are being frogmarched to a new global order in all its immense geopolitical complexities. Either by direct involvement or through mercenary proxies, Russia is already deeply embedded in Sahelian Africa. And so is China in other regions. The old colonial powers never really left.

    An audit of the voting pattern among African countries at the recent UN resolution on Ukraine shows a continent bitterly divided with individual countries voting according to the body language of their new postcolonial masters. Almost a century and a half after the Berlin Conference, a more fearsome scramble for Africa may well be under way.

  • A flying Emir is subject

    A flying Emir is subject

    Oscar Wilde, the great Anglo-Irish dramatic genius and hell raiser, once had a bet with a group of friends that he could make an instant sentence out of any subject matter under the sun. Seeing a fatal trap wide open, one of his friends quickly proposed the king of England as a subject matter. But the brainy wit quickly retorted that the king is not a subject, thus fulfilling his contractual obligation while sidestepping the trap of royal blasphemy. The king is a sovereign and not a subject.

    Oh dear, oh dear!!! While pursuing the subject matter of empire games and the fate of indentured nations, the miscommunication between the court of the Emir of Kano and the management of Air Peace Inc. had degenerated into an unseemly spat with royal threats issued and hints of ominous reprisals to follow. We urge restraint on all sides and a constructive engagement which ought to lead to an amicable settlement.

    All over the world where the institution survives, traditional rulers are regarded as sacred personages; objects of popular veneration and adulation.  They are beneficiaries of royal privileges which go with their position as secular fathers of their people next only to the Gods they worship. In Africa where the institution not only survives but flourishes, traditional monarchs serve as an important bridgehead and holding device in the arduous transition from tradition to full modernity. Only acephalous anarchists dismiss this.

    Ever since he acceded to the throne of his illustrious forefathers in turbulent circumstances, his Royal Eminence, the Emir of Kano, has exhibited a calm forbearance and remarkable sangfroid, ever courteous and unfailingly polite with a royal mien that speaks volumes for superior breeding. This much was admitted by the spokesperson of Air Peace who described the emir as a perfect gentleman not known for troublemaking.

    But reverence for the traditional institution is one thing. Regard for modern aviation protocols is another thing entirely. To the best of our knowledge, the Kano monarch does not own an airline. Even if he does, he will still be bound by the strict regimen of flying. The emir is an educated and widely travelled person and he must not be seen to be interfering with modern aviation protocols.

    The spat was entirely avoidable. It all began when the plane carrying the emir and his royal entourage touched down in Lagos from Banjul a full hour behind schedule. The Air Peace connecting flight had already completed all protocols and was readying to go. Having failed to convince the Air Peace ground staff to delay the flight for the emir, a member of the entourage put a call through to the Chairman of Air Peace asking him to persuade his staff to delay the flight.

    According to Allen Onyeama, he managed to pick the call a second time at 5.58 am having been roused from sleep. But at that point, the aircraft was already in what is known as Irreversible Departure Mode. There was nothing even the owner could do, short of asking the take-off to be aborted with grave consequences and a PR disaster for the emir. It is curious and profoundly ironic that the person making the demand is said to be a professional pilot who ought to know better.

    Thereafter, all hell was let loose with the Kano palace demanding an apology from the Air Peace management for what it considers an unwarranted contumely and disregard for a much revered traditional stool. When the apology was tardy in coming, the equivalent of a royal fatwa followed with automatic alacrity, as they say.

    This is nothing but royal privileges and a sense of feudal entitlement gone gaga. It has no place in a modern nation-state. It is this sense of entitlement of the Nigerian elite that spelt terminal doom for the Nigerian Airways, the Shipping Line and the old Railways. It will be terribly counterproductive and a fatal embrace of the forces of retrogression if the otherwise revered emir allows himself to be cast in that light, particularly with regards to a private airline.

  • Tinkering with the constitution

    Tinkering with the constitution

    That the 1999 Nigerian Constitution is incurably defective is no longer news. There have, therefore, been many attempts to remedy it through amendments. The latest effort is being superintended by the 9th National Assembly. How successful they will be will depend on just how exquisitely they can put new wine in old wineskin. Meanwhile the lawmakers in both the Senate and House of Representatives have continued to tantalise the public with amendments that appear welcome, feasible and even significant. But the process is just starting; it still has a long way to go after harmonisation. How the amendments will fare at the states is also anybody’s guess.

    The National Assembly has done well to drive the Electoral Act amendment to its final destination. It is doubtless imperfect, but it is a good beginning. In that same can-do spirit, the lawmakers are giving the constitutional amendment process their best push. Should they succeed, and there is no reason for them not to, they will be lauded far above their self-abnegating decision to please the presidency at any cost. They deny the accusation of being subordinate to the executive arm, and are doing their best to prove their independence by pushing through fairly radical amendments. It is unknown how persuasive they are in convincing everyone of their legislative independence. Yet, even if they succeed in their latest constitutional effort, that success would be qualified, obviously circumscribed by the nature and limitations of the constitution they are seeking to amend.

    Nigerians would do well to moderate their expectations. At the end of the process, no one is sure that the initial euphoria that has greeted the amendments so far would be sustained. There is no doubt a little something for nearly everyone, like separating the office of the Attorney General from that of the Minister of Justice, and granting autonomy to state legislature and judiciary. It is not clear how local government autonomy, which they are recommending, will work. But the fundamental challenge thrown by the constitution has not been touched. Women, for instance, are up in arms about affirmative action to demand for special seats at national and state levels, including in the legislature and executive cabinets, but they have not justified to the legislature why in an open system in which there are only largely self-imposed limitations, including cultural and religious strictures, they must need to hold certain groups down in order for women to be better positioned or represented. Overall, there are some 68 or so amendments expected to be worked and voted upon. Not all will pass, and not everyone will be pleased. Perhaps, as time goes on, more amendments will be proposed and passed.

    However, there is nothing to be done now or in the near future regarding amending the constitution that will transform the controversial document into a lasting, stabilising and cohesive grundnorm. It has foundational problem. Until that foundation is comprehensively rebuilt, whatever is built upon the existing document will only last for a while. But once the foundation is right, the competition for the presidency would be modulated, gender equity would become less controversial, and the basis for ethnic and religious interrelationship would be addressed and agreed upon. Despite all the hue and cry, and regardless of the purported federal nature of the constitution, the country has clearly not agreed the basis for unity.

    What is even worse is that in tinkering with the constitution, with the frightful prospect of a worse tear occurring as the country mends its torn constitutional garment with unshrunk cloth, nothing significant has been said about one of the major issues undermining both the constitution and the country as a whole. That issue is the cost of governance. The problem is that without restructuring the country, preferring instead to only mend the existing one, it is nigh impossible to reduce the cost of governance and free funds for development. The present cost is prohibitive. It cannot be sustained. It must be admitted that women need to agitate for better environment for their gender to thrive politically and even economically, and had they joined hands with others to press for a significant reduction in the cost of governance in favour of, say, education and health sectors, the society would be better served, while the affirmative action issue would be regarded as foresighted and altruistic.

    Rather than tinkering with the constitution, it would have been far better and more sensible and visionary to advocate a new one. But neither this set of lawmakers nor the executive arm will countenance the constitutional change necessary to assure the stability and progress of Nigeria. They won’t hear of it, they won’t do it, and they will always argue that there is no legal or political basis to carry out the kind of fundamental changes sufficient to guarantee peaceful coexistence in the country. In their myopia, the law enforcement agencies are already guaranteeing that, regardless of the intolerable social and economic pressures.

    Read Also: Adamu Adamu’s bad day at the office

    Education minister Adamu versus NANS

    Last week’s impromptu meeting between the Education minister, Adamu Adamu, and representatives of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) led by their president Asefon Sunday didn’t go well at all. Bad but subtle temper suffused the discussions. Neither side behaved nobly. Many analysts have pointed out that it was time students grew up and upped their unionism tactics. They are right. Not only must students’ union leaders refine their methods, students themselves must change their mindset in electing their representatives. At the impromptu meeting, Mr Asefon exhibited commitment and passion, and there was no doubt, despite his struggle with eloquence and misrepresentation of facts, that he knew what the students desired of their government.

    The meeting, however, ended abruptly without achieving anything because the minister lacked the emotional capability to deal with the tantrums of the students’ union leader. Mr Asefon misrepresented the minister, and even spoke without the decorum and wisdom expected of him; but by peevishly responding in less dignified manner to the students’ provocations, the minister exhibited the common and condescending approach of Nigerian leaders to citizens’ queries and demands. It is not enough that the students were wrong; it is important that ministers and leaders must be right as well as conduct themselves as servants of the people. They are not the people’s masters, as they are often portrayed by government.

    Mallam Adamu was wrong to have walked out on the students, even though reports suggest that he returned later in the night to meet with the students to remedy the faux pas. The students as well as most Nigerians would interpret the minister’s reaction as rude and his manner insufferable. Did the students speak disrespectfully to the minister? Did they twist facts relating to the minister’s family or children? There are suggestions they did, perhaps unknowingly. But a better approach would have been for the minister to correct the misrepresentations and gently and maturely rebuke the students’ manners. There are a thousand and more ways to handle the students, most of whom at the meeting were not too old to be his children. Mallam Adamu forgot he was in public office, and that a far nobler spirit of leadership and service was required of him.

    If the minister had had the presence of mind to appreciate the sufferings of the students forced to endure repeated ASUU strike, if he knew the cost to parents of keeping their children in school beyond the school calendar, if he knew how disruptive the interruptions to academic calendar has become, he would be more amenable to their pains and cries. Their irreverence and mistaken conclusions would not have mattered at all. Now, everyone sees the minister as a callous man serving a government that is indifferent to educational issues.

  • Pastor Enoch Adejare Adeboye @ 80: Is there not a prophet amongst them? (Part 1)

    Pastor Enoch Adejare Adeboye @ 80: Is there not a prophet amongst them? (Part 1)

    Diya will not die; it is Abacha that will die!” – Bishop Francis Wale Oke (1998), President Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN)

    The small and unique gathering was in the city of Ibadan, Oyo State capital of Nigeria. It was in 1998 aftermath of the tribunal judgement on the phantom coup involving Lt. General Donaldson Oladipo Diya and other military officers. The military tribunal sitting in Jos, the Plateau State capital, sentenced Diya and other officers culpable to death by firing squad! Major newspapers’ headlines of that particular Saturday, the day of the gathering, were all agog laced with gory pictures pinpointing the judgement of the tribunal. The gathering was called by the President of the Sword of the Spirit Ministries International (SOTSM), Bishop Francis Wale Oke. It was aimed at building capacities of pastors in SOTSM. In opening the meeting, Bishop Wale Oke, now the President, Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN), out of the blues and without recourse to the context of the training, jolted virtually all of us when he declared: “Diya will not die; it is Abacha that will die!” It was irrational and illogical to human reasoning! Most of us present were flabbergasted and did not want the referred man of God to be in trouble knowing the ruthless antecedent of the dark – googled general, Sanni Abacha, the then Head of the military junta. All said and done, there was a mysterious divine twist and turn resulting in the sudden death of Abacha. Ultimately, Diya was let off the hook and he is still alive! This brings to mind the words of Ezekiel in the Holy Writ: “So when it comes to pass—as it most certainly will—then they will know [without any doubt] that a prophet has been among them.” Ezekiel 33:33 (Amplified Bible).

    Adeboye and Nigeria – Great Sense of Patriotism

    I have been a keen follower of the General Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG), Pastor Enoch Adejare Adeboye, the Ifewara – born, Osun State, cleric for over a decade. The uncommon love, bond, devotion and faith in his service to God and humanity cannot be gainsaid. He shared these traits together with his one and only beloved wife, Pastor Mrs. Folu Adeboye (Mummy GO). Particularly, the monthly Holy Ghost Service holding at Redemption Camp, along Lagos – Ibadan Expressway on the first Friday of every month; the October edition is usually resplendent with the thousands of singers (Mass Choir) in sartorial splendour of green – white – green replica of the Nigeria’s flag – national colours! Daddy GO, as he is affectionately called by millions of his spiritual sons and daughters globally, together with his wife, Mummy GO, as if acting in symphony and synergy, adorn the same green – white – green attire synonymous with strategic branding in organizational dynamics. What an open display of love and affection for one’s country! No, doubt, Pastor Enoch Adejare Adeboye is a true patriot who is passionate for Nigeria to emerge as one of the best globally.

    Pastor Adeboye: Passion for Nigeria

    This columnist remembers with nostalgia that it was in the early 1990s that RCCG was involved in 100 days praying and fasting solely for Nigeria. Many of us in Christendom were seemingly mocking the believers then in RCCG as if they were the only disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ. Annually, the church fasts and prays for Nigeria. Any wonder, the crème de la crème of Nigeria today belongs to the denomination, RCCG? What a man sows he reaps! This columnist was a participant in a particular Advanced Ministers’ Seminar in Ibadan where Bishop Francis Wale Oke told all participants that Adeboye’s life laced with fasting could only be akin to fish and water. Adeboye believed so much in fasting and praying that at almost 80 he is still going strong in the art, with many days without food, while many younger Christians are avoiding fasting. What a peculiar man of uncommon grace!

    There was a time when a former Head of State felt the vitality and efficacy of Baba Adeboye’s prayers even in Aso Rock! It was during the time of General Sanni Abacha mentioned earlier on in this article. He was then surreptitiously scheming a life – presidency project in which he was planning to initially transmute to a civilian president and then keep himself in power in perpetuity. Adeboye was joggled when someone tapped him on the shoulder that it was time to hide or run! Why? He was told that Abacha’s marabouts pointedly told him the only impediment on his way was a man in the person of Adeboye dwelling in Redemption Camp. The informant told Adeboye to prepare for a visitation of some men signaling seeming bad omen. What was he to do: run or hide? Pastor Adeboye borrowed the wisdom of Nehemiah, who in such dire straits declared: “Should a man like me flee [in fear and hide]? . . . I will not go” (Nehemiah 6:11 Amplified Bible). The renown elder statesman resorted to what he knows best – seeking the face of God aggressively. His Daddy, as he fondly calls God Almighty, spoke to him, that he needed not to worry as it was the man looking for Adeboye’s head that would rather lose his. He then directed him to tell his congregation at the monthly Holy Ghost Service of the month of June of that year to vociferously and vehemently yelled to one another: “Happy New Year!” Would it not seem abnormal or look strange? Yelling “happy new year” in June? Apparently unpredictable, so is the way of a prophet! It could be strange as prophets operate in the unseen word of the spiritual!! The sermon was acted as it was scripted, and within 72 hours the whole Nigeria was shocked and shaken as the dark – googled general mysteriously kicked the bucket! There is indeed a prophet among us even though Pastor Adeboye himself most often declares he is a pastor and not a prophet as he only hears God occasionally. This is just depicting and displaying the humility and meekness inherent in Adeboye that set him apart from many influential men and women of God in Africa and even globally.

    Adeboye and Dream of Glorious Nigeria

    In concluding this part of the series on Pastor Enoch Adejare Adeboye, this columnist would want to draw attention to a one-time vision of this great but humble man of God. He once shared the vision of Nigeria’s International Passport in green colour, presently and apparently being disdained at immigration counters of developed nations. In the vision, he saw many peoples of diverse nationalities that were surprisingly spotlighted struggling to behold the colour and content of Nigeria’s green passport! This smacks of a vision of a glorious country hereafter!! Could this come to pass within this generation taking cognizance of the seeming socio-economic cum political quagmire Nigeria is currently confronting? Will Nigeria survive disintegration, if it takes place at all? Will self-determination take place within Nigeria’s context?

    It would be recalled that Pastor Enoch Adejare Adeboye was one of the voices that clamoured for restructuring of Nigeria to avoid a break up. This was in October 2020. As a true elder statesman, and a patriot, with access to the seat of power, he met President Muhammadu Buhari in Aso Rock in August 2020 behind closed doors. The outcome of that meeting was not divulged to the public but analysts believed that issues such as insecurity and restructuring of the country were on the front burner in their tête-à-tête. This is one indication of passion for Nigeria that runs in Adeboye’s veins knowing that with God all things are possible. He has such unwavering faith and confidence that Nigeria will reach her promised land despite countless crisis, challenges and constraints analogous to the Biblical Israelites reaching Canaan even though their trajectory traversing through the wild wilderness was both wearisome and worrisome. They made it! Nigeria will make it too!! However, it will take passionate, patriotic and progressive leaders who know and value the true prophets amongst them to emerge so Nigerians would not wander and waste in the wilderness as the journey of forty days took the hard – hearted and rebellious people of Israel forty years. Are we not on the route to that wilderness wandering whereas there is a true prophet amongst us? This is wishing Daddy GO, Pastor Enoch Adejare Adeboye, a blessed and bountiful birthday. My prayers, and that of many Nigerians, are: as your days so shall your strength be, with many more years to serve God and humanity; your head will not lack oil; fresh oil of the Lord be upon you daily; you will be fruitful, fulfilled and flourish; and finally, may you finish strong and gloriously in Jesus’ mighty and matchless name. Amen.

    John Ekundayo, Ph.D. – Harvard-Certified Organizational Strategist, and also a Leadership Development Consultant, can be reached via 08155262360 (SMS only) and drjmoekundayo@hotmail.com

  • Dummy lawmakers of the South-South

    Dummy lawmakers of the South-South

    In the run-up to the 2023 elections, all sorts of crazy permutations and endorsements will inundate the polity. The permutations will keep the country entertained. Some permutations may be far-fetched, and endorsements hypocritical, but grumblings will not deter political groups and individuals from sticking out their necks in favour of candidates and political parties. It would not matter whether the endorsers and pundits get it right or not, or whether they fizzle out almost immediately; what will matter is that the press will always be there to give them a hearing.

    The press gave a hearing last Tuesday to a group of lawmakers who described themselves as Forum of Members of State Houses of Assembly under the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the South-South. On Monday, they claimed to have endorsed Kogi State governor Yahaya Bello for the presidency in 2023, arguing that the North Central, where the two-term governor comes from, had been marginalised since 1960. The news was contrived of course, and lest reporters be accused of missing the awful story, they dutifully filed it back to their headquarters. In the story, there was a list of the South-South states involved, to wit, Akwa-Ibom, Bayelsa, Cross River, Delta, Edo and Rivers States, but there was precious little else, not even the names of the conveners, prominent speakers at the forum, and sensible, credible arguments justifying the inane considerations about who was qualified for the presidency.

    According to a newspaper excerpt of the communiqué said to have been written by the lawmakers, the main plank of their argument is that the next president must come from the North Central. But if the presidency must rotate to the so-called marginalised region, why Mr Bello then? Well, the largely anonymous but clearly unrepresentative regional lawmakers have made their choice. They cannot be bothered by anything else. Did anybody put them up to it? No one is certain. But given the extraordinary manner their pick was announced like a bolt from the blue, it is hard to imagine that their hearts were not influenced. They can’t be so taken by pure mendacity that they would pretend not to know that Mr Bello, a braggart youthful governor, is a chronic underperformer in office.

    Here is the lawmakers’ justification: “That the APC State Assembly Legislators of the South-South, who were elected by the people of the six states that make up the geo-political zone believe that the best thing for our party as we approach the 2023 general elections is to give room for marginalised zones to produce the next President. Consequently, we appeal to the national leadership of our party, the APC, to zone the Presidency to North Central for fairness and sense of belonging to prevail. We hereby state that we agree to support our colleagues in the North Central to contest for the position of the President of Nigeria in 2023 – which is a position that the zone had hitherto been deprived of since Nigeria became independent in 1960.”

    Indigenes of the North Central have their grouse against the system, but it is unlikely they will subscribe to anyone categorising them as deprived of political power since 1960; what with Yakubu Gowon, a former general and head of state for about nine years, who hails from the region. What is significant about the South-South lawmakers’ endorsement is not even where the next president should come from, but what qualifies Mr Bello in their estimation. The Kogi governor is in his second term, and has campaigned vigorously. He has brought in influence peddlers from diverse walks of life, including the film industry, sports and the media. Those junkets were of course paid for. Every visit to Lokoja, Kogi State, to endorse Mr Bello never went beyond singing his praise. There was nothing sincere about the praises, their acknowledgement of his youth and vigour, and occasionally their references to his inexistent achievements, some as nebulous and specious as describing him as a guarantor of security.

    The reality is, however, much different. Mr Bello is regarded in the state as a do-nothing governor who, in his last-gasp years, is preoccupied with two or three legacy projects. He has spent a larger part of his tenure despoiling the state, cruelly mistreating workers, unable and incapable of conceptualising a development paradigm for the state, not to talk of executing it, and on the whole, leaving the state much worse than he met it. Since he never had any leadership quality in him, it is not surprising that he has neither offered nor spoken of one. Those who endorse such a fringe player idling most of the time in Abuja and imagining himself a leader and statesman believe that they have done no harm to anybody. They must be joking.

    South-South lawmakers, assuming the group that met last Monday in Calabar is real and representative, can of course endorse anyone and any party other than their party, but they owe their electorate the responsibility of making sensible and defensible decisions on whom to support. There is nothing to deter the public from running away with the impression that the lawmakers who settled for a Bello presidency are not a bunch of dummies. Nigerians may be generous with praise and even possess a macabre sense of political humour, but they are not so foolish as not to know when they are being goaded with outright fallacies.

    Micromanaging Nigeria to death

    The Senate is reportedly considering a bill sponsored by a Taraba State lawmaker to prescribe punishment for family members proven to have benefited from the proceeds of corruption by a public servant. The spirit behind the bill is of course sound, and undoubtedly many family members have benefited directly or indirectly from the proceeds of corruption perpetrated by someone in public service. There have been records of such family members also punished along with the perpetrator of corruption. The Abdulrasheed Maina pension scandal is an example.

    So why does the country need a special bill for a common, if not commonplace, crime? It is not clear. It is even less clear, assuming a fresh law can be justified, how effective the law would be when existing laws that appear adequate for such family crimes have managed not to deter anybody. Many laws are in the works all over the country, all designed to tackle mundane specifics. The urge to make crime-specific laws was responsible for inspiring hasty and careless legislations against ritual killing and kidnapping. Notwithstanding specific laws, these two crimes, for instance, have not abated.

    Obviously, something is amiss. That something is not the law; the problem is enforcement. Nigerian law books in most cases have existing laws to punish many of the crimes now inspiring a plethora of new laws. In short, new or old laws, the problem is enforcement. Until something changes structurally to remake Nigeria, the tendency to repose confidence in new laws to battle old crimes will continue.

  • Future Boko Haram

    Future Boko Haram

    Why this country is under the perpetual curse of being governed by the ‘worst eleven’ in years despite the substantial number of eggheads that we are blessed with remains one of the human mysteries. I want to agree, though, with the school of thought that a people get the kind of leadership they deserve. The country would remain in this state until something gives, whether willingly or otherwise because, as many of us have always warned, our present system is not sustainable. It is bound to crumble on someone’s head someday. Louis XV1 under whose reign the ancien regime collapsed in France was not the worst of French monarchs. It just happened that a series of events culminated in bringing down the regime and the old order in his time in 1789.

    Let me start by warning that Nigerians should learn to sift the wheat from the chaff. We should be able to separate the message from the messenger. Otherwise, we won’t get the import of this piece.

    For a political leadership that is not destined for perdition like the dog that wants to get lost and therefore would not heed the hunter’s whistle, the October 2020 #EndSARS riots were enough to make genuine and lasting reforms come from above in Nigeria. From what we see daily, it does not seem our political leaders have learnt any lesson from the protests. If they had, they would not be content with the largely cosmetic changes they were forced to bring about as an aftermath of the protests.

    I am giving this background in view of the warning by former President Olusegun Obasanjo that the about 15 million kids who are out of school today would constitute the new Boko Haram in the next 15 years if the ancien regime, particularly in the northern part of Nigeria does not dismantle itself. Obasanjo did not mention any region; but we know where most of such children hail from.

    The former president bared his mind on February 21 in Abuja, at the 2022 Murtala Muhammed Foundation Annual Lecture, entitled: “Beyond Boko Haram: Addressing insurgency, banditry and kidnapping across Nigeria.” Give it to him, he is too experienced to be talking on this kind of topic as an ignoramus. According to him, he had been to Maiduguri, the Borno State capital, in 2011, to understudy the activities of Boko Haram insurgents and found out that they are angry because they have been denied education and consequently are jobless and poor. He even traced the history of the weapons that are in wrong hands in the country, some of which have found their way into the hands of the bandits. The former president said that “The population of Nigeria today standing in over 215 million. And 15 million children which should be in school are not in school. It does not matter how we deal with Boko Haram, bandits, kidnapping and abduction today, either by stick or carrot, those 15 million children that should be in school that are not in school are the potential Boko Haram of 15 years from now.” He therefore advised the government to get these children educated and create jobs for them rather than waste resources on the provision of unsustained palliatives.

    This, for me, is the message in his speech at that occasion. Obasanjo spoke not only as a military general who knows that defeating an enemy militarily is pyrrhic victory if the sociological and other tendencies that gave birth to that enemy are not adequately addressed; but also as an elder who is street-wise. His advice perhaps stemmed from the latter, specifically from the Yoruba saying that ‘omo ta o ko lo ma gbe’le ta ko ta’. Literally translated, it means a child that is not trained or educated (built) will end up selling the house that one built. Pure and simple.

    It is because the northern establishment failed to train these children years back that they have constituted a nuisance to the north and other parts of the country today. Many of the northern elites have abandoned their ancestral homes for fear of being kidnapped or killed by these angry children. So, in a sense, what Chief Obasanjo is  saying is that the same way their parents cannotgo to their respective villages and towns today will their (the elites’ children) not be able to visit those places 15 years from now unless the elite change their ways and realise that children, whether from the rich or poor homes are all children deserving of some care, love, attention, affection, rights and privileges. Education is not an exclusive preserve of the children of the rich. If Quaranic education is enough, why do the cream of the northern establishment send their own children to the best of schools in the world? What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

    You may want to ask what Obasanjo did to stem the tide of out-of -school children, particularly in the north when he was in power. But, that, to me, is not relevant at this point. The fact is, Obasanjo is hardly affected by Boko Haram. But if he is suggesting a way out, it is in the interest of those of us who are likely to be victims to interrogate his prognosis. Moreover, the former president understands the north more than even some of the northerners. He knows how endemic some of their religious and cultural practices are enough, to know how far (possibly in vain) anyone attempting to put an end to the almajeri system would try to end or even reform the system. If you doubt this, did the Goodluck Jonathan administration not spend a whopping N15billion on the education of almajeris, what happened to that project after? Yet, these are some of the right things to do to reduce the number of out-of-school children.

    I am always angry when discussing this topic because it is one of the inequities in the Nigerian system that even the political elite do not factor in whenever they are talking about federalism. A second reason I am angry is because money that would have been spent wisely on other developmental aspects  across the country is being wasted to prosecute an avoidable war and fix infrastructure over and over again because bandits would not let them be. Nigeria’s constitution allows freedom of movement. I have no issue with that. But I have issue with a situation when a child that one has shown love to and trained with a lot of personal resources gets killed by another child who does not value life and for no justifiable reason. And, in all honesty, it is not the fault of the poor child: the system that produced him never showed him love and so he does not know the colour of love. Readers conversant with this column will always remember the reference I usually make whenever I am writing about this topic. It is about what one of my seniors in the university wrote in the acknowledgement column of his undergraduate project which I stumbled on when doing research for my first degree project. ‘Perrow’, as we fondly called him then wrote acknowledging the role of various people in making him whatever he was then and to his parents “who gladly embraced poverty” to see him through university education.

    But poverty is not pepper soup; so, it is oxymoron to say some people gladly embraced it. Even when the country was relatively prosperous and better run, some indigent Yoruba parents still did not mind selling their clothes to pay their children’s school fees. That tells you the extent some people can go just toeducate their children. That is the spirit in the western region. Unless we want to deceive ourselves as most of our politicians like to do just for political gains, we may all be Nigerians but we are not the same. Our erstwhile National Anthem recognised this difference: ‘though tribes and tongues may differ…’ It is not just tribes and tongues that differ, even our cultures and religious perceptions too.

    While the average northern elite may hide under religion or culture to limit the children of the poor to the worst form of Quaranic education, that is one without provision for their upkeep or that of their trainers, their southern counterparts cannot do that. That is why more people in the south are educated irrespective of their religion. That is why Christians marry Muslims and live in peace with themselves here in the south. Today, many of us get nervous seeing these children being brought in droves down south not because we naturally hate them but because we know the implications, which, unfortunately, is no fault of theirs, either. Societies will always live with crime and criminals. But it is a different ballgame when the crime borders on terrorism and advanced banditry caused by the denial of basic rights like education and other cares and privileges.

    It is not late in the day for the northern elite to reverse this trend which they brought upon themselves. I get angry and have this sense of, ‘oh, it does not seem to me that these people have got the message from Boko Haram that things must change’, when some of their leaders continue basking in their huge population. They must realise that huge population is no longer trendy if there is no value added. That value added is education. The mistake that the northern establishment has been making and keeps making, which is costing not just the region but the entire country dearly is to think that some people would perpetually accept to play second fiddle in any system. Like one of my friends used to say, anyone who assumes that his child loves to drink gari with sugar and groundnuts is making a big mistake. The day you feed that child with bread, fried eggs and corned beef, marks the turning point. It is then you will know he/she has really never loved gari and sugar, etc. It only appeared the child loves it because that is what you have been feeding him/her with; that is all he or she knows. ‘Baba ta ni ise wu’? (Who likes penury?)

    Now that the system has shortchanged the poor too much for them to notice and be up perpetually in arms against that system, that system must know it is time for reform.

    But, even as the north must reform for peace to reign in the country, I am afraid the south needs some rejigging too. I fear for the south as well. And my fear is exacerbated by the perceivable insensitivity and arrogance on the part of some of the southern leaders. If they do not change for better, the entire country might become one huge ungovernable entity. And it is worse when educated people decide to unleash their knowledge dysfunctionally, taking advantage of modern technology that they are very much conversant with. Yes, infrastructural facilities are being provided or rejuvenated in some southern states, there is little by way of job creation to absolve the millions that the educational system is churning out annually.

    In essence, what Chief Obasanjo is saying, and which I support wholeheartedly, is that beyond taking out the Boko Haram terrorists by military force, the northern elite has to ensure that potential ones that would trouble us in the future are not allowed to travel the same trajectory that today’s bandits travelled. That is to say, the elite must begin to pull down the foundation that produced that archaic and unsustainable system that condemned the children of the poor to waiting to pick the crumbs falling from the tables of the rich. These 15 million unfortunate kids must be educated. There must be job opportunities for them. Otherwise, the Boko Haram we are seeing today, as Chief Obasanjo rightly observed, would be a child’s play to the one that is coming.

  • National anthem: Ogunnaike in history

    National anthem: Ogunnaike in history

    The recent death of Professor Babatunde Ogunnaike, former Dean, College of Engineering, University of Delaware, USA, who is one of the five authors of our national anthem reminds me of the interview I had with him in 2013 following the death of retired Deputy Commissioner of Police, Pa Benedict Odiase who all along had been credited with being the composer of the anthem.

    Odiase is indeed the composer of the music of the anthem, but not the lyrics. Professor Ogunaike, a fellow of the Nigerian Academy of Engineering and four others were the composers of the various lines of the anthem following a competition they participated in.

    When Dr Sota Omoigui, one of the other composers drew attention to this historical error in his condolence message for Pa Odiase, I also interviewed him and Pa P.O Aderibigbe.

    They commended Odiase, who had been given a national honour for his role in the making of the national anthem, but were unhappy that their contributions had remained unacknowledged officially as it should have been beyond just being told in the letter to them that parts of their lyrics were included in the anthem.

    The condolence message by President Muhammadu Buhari on Ogunnaike’s death suggests that his role and that of others are worth acknowledging while they are alive and not when they die.

    According to President Buhari, Ogunnaike’s significant contribution to the lines of the national anthem, showed his patriotism and dedication to the well-being of the nation in the living words that daily reinforce the faith and spirit of Nigerians.

    Ogunnaike would have loved to hear what Buhari and other past leaders of the country think of his contribution, but unfortunately he had to die to get a presidential acknowledgement for whatever it is worth.

    Hopefully, those still alive among the composers would someday be honored by the government and not when they die for a presidential condolence to be issued for them like Ogunnaike.

    I asked the late Professor if the country had been fair to the authors of the anthem by not honouring them with a national award like it did to the composer of the music, the late Pa Odiase.

    “Of course no” he replied, noting that it is unfair not to honour someone for such major contributions.

    What should be done about honouring you and other co-authors?

    He said he was not sure what should be done, but noted that most other nations acknowledge the authors of their national anthem in some way or other.

    “I have lived in the US now for about 25 years and everyone knows that Francis Scott Key wrote the lyrics to the national anthem (even I, a recent immigrant, know this). At the very least, the people of Nigeria should be told who wrote their national anthem,” he said.

    Why does he usually feel a sense of pride and sadness when he hears the national anthem as he stated in a previous interview?

    “A sense of pride to have been involved in writing the words, but sadness because 50-something years after independence we still have not realised even the very basic aspects of what a modern nation should be. That is sad.”

    Sad indeed that like one of the lines of the national anthem, the labour of our heroes past have largely been in vain.

    My condolence to the Ogunnaike’s family.

    May the soul of the Professor rest in peace.