Category: Sunday

  • Tax matters

    Tax matters

    Americans are frequently heard to equate death with taxes because as far as their expectations as Americans go, you must pay your taxes as surely as die at the appointed time. You even have to pay your taxes within a specified time frame. The consequences of not doing so are supposed to be so unpleasant as not to make the payment of tax very attractive. That holds true for most Americans but not for all Americans. This piece of knowledge we have been able to extract from the life and times of one Donald J. Trump who has managed to withhold his taxes for long periods and in the end paid derisory sums as tax. He has been able to do this with the connivance of his lawyers and accountants who by all accounts are as clever as a cartload of monkeys. That method will not work for the vast majority of Americans which is why it will not be discussed any further.

    I remember clearly my first encounter with the subject of tax. Not as you may have guessed from a lesson in Economics but as a topic in Religious Knowledge. Or, to quote the correct title, Christian Religious knowledge. As can be expected in a joint Anglican and Methodist owned secondary school which I attended, everyone who passed through the school in my time had to face the WAEC examiners in that subject and so, I did.

    In our study of the New Testament, we were informed that in the year when Quirinius was governor of Judea, the word went out from Caesar Augustus that each person be counted, each one in his own village. This is why a humble carpenter named Joseph loaded his pregnant  fiancée on a donkey which bore this heavy burden all the way from Nazareth where he lived and practiced his trade to Bethlehem on account of having descended from the house and lineage of David. How that story ended is known to everyone and is therefore not worth telling here. It is at this point that we have to veer off into the jungle of taxation.

    The census of Quirinius has been placed around the year 6BC, which means that it took place some two thousand and thirty years ago at a time when the nascent Roman empire was undergoing rapid expansion under Caesar Augustus. This demanded a great deal of money which was squeezed out of the conquered peoples who had just been brought under the umbrella of Pax Romana, which guarantee was provided by the sharp spears and sturdy shields of superbly trained Roman soldiers.

    Taxes are paid by living people and the rulers of the Roman empire were determined to collect the taxes from everyone living within their far flung empire hence the decree that everyone reported in their ancestral homes. There to be counted, meticulously no doubt, and be added to the tax roll. These taxes collected was the money used in providing equipment for the army and the building of those excellent roads along which the army moved swiftly whenever and wherever their intervention was required. It has to be pointed out that the army at that point was not only needed for the upkeep of empire, it was also to be made available for the expansion of empire so that even more taxes could be collected from newly conquered territories. Apart from the expenditure on the army, there were other items of other public works including, for example, the provision of potable water which were of course taken care of by the taxes which were extorted from the subjects of the Emperor on his throne in far away Rome.

    The people of Judea, like most red blooded people everywhere loathed the payment of taxes. This is not just because it deprived them of their hard earned money but in their special case, because it also forced them to work to acquire Roman coins on which the head of the emperor was stamped. This went violently against the tenets of Judaism which forbade the handling of graven images. The combination of these and other circumstances within the principality precipitated extremely brutal revolts which were no less ferociously confronted by the Romans who were not averse to the large scale crucifixion of all those who were found guilty of tax evasion in the course of these revolts. The need for Joseph to be captured in that famous census was all about the payment of tax and it was as compulsive as death itself. I must confess that the connection between the circumstances surrounding the birth of Jesus was not emphasised in the lessons that we were exposed to in those days. I made that connection in later years by which time, I had become exposed to books other than the Bible for further instruction.

    Later, much later, many thousand miles from Judea across the Atlantic, there was another iconic response to the issue of taxation. Then, the altercation was between the settlers in the original thirteen colonies which made up the nascent United States of America and the English king, George III who by the way, was German. This time, nobody was being counted and the conflict was upon a point of principle. The thirteen colonies which acquired statehood existed under the shadows of Great Britain to which as it befitted a budding empire, taxes had to be paid and they were duly collected. The colonies were directly controlled by governors who were responsible to the king and this being the case, those from whom taxes were being collected were excluded from the process by which tax assessments were carried out. In time this became a sore point with the people who had to pay those obnoxious taxes. They voiced their dissatisfaction with this arrangement but rather than try to find ways of reducing tax burdens, they were increased. The situation quickly spiralled out of control and the colonised people decided that since they were not represented in the councils of power, then they should not be taxed. They took up the cry, no tax without representation and went into rebellion which after years of bitter fighting led to the birth of the USA. This, the foundation of the Republic was built on the issue of tax and since they had no king or a hereditary aristocracy, nobody could be exempted from paying taxes and the principle of joining life taxes to life itself became firmly established. An example will suffice.

    Read Also: Nigerians will appreciate Tinubu for Tax Reforms – Reps deputy spokesman

    One of the most powerful but certainly the most colourful gangster in the USA in the turbulent Prohibition era was Al Capone, a ruthless but bloodily successful killer with the blood of many men on his hands. It is thought but never proved to be responsible for the Valentine day massacre, so called because it took place on February fourteen 1929. On that day seven mobsters were shot to death in a Chicago garage by gunmen, two of who were dressed as policemen. The men in the garage who were members  of a rival gang, the head of which was the prime target were lined up against a wall and cut down in a hail of submachine gun bullets. The operation lasted only a few minutes after which the gunmen coolly emerged from the garage with their hands up followed by the fake policemen with drawn guns. Although the target of this mayhem fortuitously escaped the massacre, this was a brazen show of force which showed the perpetrator’s contempt for all the rules of civilised behaviour, a monster who had put himself above all laws, human and divine. Al Capone was conveniently hundreds of miles away from the scene of the crime but a great deal of objective evidence pointed to his instigation of the crime. Almost a hundred years later, this involvement, as his involvement in many other murders has not been proved and could not be proved. Al Capone lived above the law in every way except one; he could not live and at the same time not pay his taxes.

    Al Capone had led a life of crime virtually all his life. He was steeped in prostitution, robbery, gambling, bootlegging, protection racketeering, drug trafficking, not to talk of countless murders. Still, he could not be touched by the law because nothing could be proved against him. There was no doubt however that he had a stream of income as proved by the lavishness of his lifestyle. His belief was that since all his income was illegitimate, he did not have to pay any tax. The ground was cut from under him however when a judge ruled in a separate case that illegitimate income was also subject to tax. The most casual investigation showed that Al Capone had no tax returns for many years. He was promptly charged with tax evasion and sentenced to a long term imprisonment equivalent to the crucifixion he would have been subjected to under the harsh laws of the Roman empire. He paid the penalty for living and not paying tax and found out the hard way that the only two things you could not escape in life were death and taxes.

    The issue of taxes continue to loom large in the consciousness of Americans which is why it featured prominently in the manifestoes of both Harris and Trump leading up to the lately concluded elections. It might have done but it does not seem to have mattered to the electorate in the end. This is because the net takeaways from the two candidates are that under Harris tax paid by all income groups except those in the highest 1% earning group was to be reduced. For Trump on the other hand, tax was going to be increased on all earning groups except for those in the highest 5% group. In other words, taxes were to go up across board except for the richest people and corporations who could look forward to increased income and higher profits. The poor on the other hand had little to gain but higher taxes. And this in a country where the only things that you cannot dodge are death and taxes. Times have indeed changed from the days of Augustus when some people were ready to put their lives into the real danger of excruciating torture and death by refusing to pay their tax. At least now, people do not have to go on any journey to be registered because it is the business of the government to make sure that you are tracked every step of the way from cradle, wherever that cradle may be, until death when you are released from the burden of paying tax even though there is still the small matter of death duties.

  • The North wakes up

    The North wakes up

    There is this common saying among the Yoruba to the effect that as long as there are lies on the head, so long shall blood be present there.  Therefore, as long as the North remains Nigeria’s ‘enfant à problèmes’, its problem child, so long will writers and analysts continue to highlight issues there in the hope that relevant stakeholders will wake up to their responsibilities as Nasarawa State governor Abdullahi Sule, and a few other critical stakeholders demonstrated in the piece below.

    Speaking this past week at the inaugural regional conference on population dynamics, security, climate change, out-of-school children, and vulnerable children, held in Lafia, Nasarawa State, the governor and Chairman of the North Central Governors’ Forum, called for decisive action to address the longstanding challenges, especially, of the almajiri system in Northern Nigeria.

    Said the governor: “We must wake up and solve these problems ourselves without waiting for others to do it for us. We must take the bull by the horns and stop complaining”. That was after he attributed the persistence of this, and other problems in the region to systemic failures  and the neglect of parental responsibilities, emphasising the need to educate citizens on Islamic teachings, especially the fact that it is a sin to have more children, or  wives, than one can care for. Concluding, he asked: “Why should the North continue to hold the entire nation down when these   problems are theirs to solve?”

    These, incidentally, are questions Northerners are only now asking themselves. Indeed, they believed that whoever asked them were taunting them. For instance, for warning them of the consequences of considering education a haram for the children of the poor, many Northerners never forgave Chief Obafemi Awolowo.  

    But ere we are today with uneducated youths becoming a supermarket for the recruitment of bandits and Boko Haram elements.

    To show that this event was not all talk, the governor announced plans to establish three special schools in Lafia, Akwanga, and Keffi, specifically for the rehabilitation of almajiris.

    What a paradigm shift? Only a few years back, all these governors could do for them was, first repatriate them to their assumed states of origin before they were freighted, yes freighted in trucks, to Southern forests.

    God be praised for small mercies.

    Further confirming the seriousness of the occasion, the Executive Secretary of the National Commission of Almajiri and Out-of-School Children, Dr. Mohammed Sani Idris, after saying that Nigeria has over 18.3 million out-of-school children, the second highest in the world, after Pakistan, with over 30 million almajiris roaming Northern streets, informed the August gathering that

     the commission has launched a program, in Kaduna state, to integrate 350 almajiris into formal education and skill acquisition programs, with plans to send some beneficiaries to some Islamic Universities abroad”.

    Read Also: UNILORIN wins NOA North-Central campus debate, advances to national final

    Heartwarming too, is the fact that, unlike the usual jamborees we see in the North, masquerading as seminars on all manner of things, the conference was attended by some hardheaded critical stakeholders besides politicians; people one believes, will take these decisions to fruition.

    REACTIONS TO THREE ISSUES TO PONDER (The Nation, 10 November, 2024)

    Of the many reactions to the above, space constraint will not permit more than one which I consider quite quintessential.

    It came from a U.K based Attorney, Caleb Arogundade who. wrote the following.

    “I read through this article and two things engaged my attention. First is the issue of parental neglect of children’s education in some parts of Nigeria. I have never been a vociferous advocate of ‘balkanisation’ of Nigeria, but each time that I take a cursory look at our configuration in relation to our  religious and other beliefs, I become confused.

    A section believes in children’s education, while another believes in uncontrolled procreation but without regard to the educational, and general well-being of the children so produced.

    The ‘Rankadede’ culture in some areas is at variance with the ‘Aguda ò j¹ lab¹ G¹¹si’ culture of some other areas. I look at the attitudes of most of the leaders in the Northern parts of the country and I consider same to be wicked. You won’t find the children of the elite among  ‘Almajiris’.

    This is a culture they not only promote,  but defend aggressively.  The Yorubas would say: ‘ÌwÍ tó dil¹ ni Ècù ñ yá lò’. In other words, devil finds work for an idle hand. These hapless and mostly ‘parents-less’ children can be likened to a group of expendables!

    These children should, at least, be told that disruptive activities attract appropriate consequences, but the manner the recent matter involving some Northern children was treated, showed that justice was not served; that its handling left much to be desired. The worst part was that  some people chose to portray the government in bad light.

    Closely connected

    to this is the extent of banditry and how it is ravaging the North with these products of Almajiri being ready recruits.

    There are unconfirmed reports  that the security forces sometimes find it difficult to decimate the miscreants because some of the leaders in the North easily read religious undertone to the activities of bandits and terrorists, thus offering them protection.  They wrongly view their decimation as an attempt to reduce the number of their religious adherents; the reason one hears of ‘400 bandits killed, or 500 arrested’ with the supposedly arrested ones soon finding their ways back into the bush. .

    The second issue to address is our educational curriculum. I attended a certificate course in teaching at level 5 here some years ago. The training opened my eyes to a lot of defects in our educational curriculum development. I haven’t finished the course before I realised that our own curriculum cannot be said to be fit for purpose. There’s proliferation of Universities all over the country without any thought about what  result oriented activities would follow. We politicise everything in Nigeria. Our leaders send their children out to receive qualitative education while they provide quantitative education for Nigerian youths. Governments build hospitals that are nothing more than ‘mere consulting clinics’ but jet out to treat the smallest of ailments.

    One can go on and on, but I rest my case”.

  • The NNPCL’s feather on Tinubu’s cap

    The NNPCL’s feather on Tinubu’s cap

    The last few days have been especially very hectic for the Nigerian President, working at almost break-spine speed to meet targets, get Nigeria sorted in all the ways necessary. You will recall he was out of the country the week before the last one, attending the G20 Leaders Summit in Brazil. He returned very late on Saturday of the upper week to Nigeria and continued with the mission of getting the country sorted right from Sunday, the first day of the week.

    You might not have heard much from him directly during the week because he was not seen or heard from in the media, in person, however, he did not fail to achieve what he set out to achieve. As is normal practice, echoes of his actions and directives were heard through his spokesmen and other lieutenants, indicating that even when he was not speaking to the camera for us to see, he was doing things that must be conveyed by those who have the duties of carrying out tasks.

    However, in the course of the week, a significant event occurred, which conveyed to Nigerians the import of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s view to leadership; that he is not one for just the accolades, but primarily for results and how the results impact on the people he leads. The old Port Harcourt Refinery, which has been dormant for years (I heard the last time it produced anything was 2018), came back alive on Tuesday, November 26, after a number of failed targeted resumption dates. It was actually becoming a sore point on Nigeria’s governance, especially with the coming on stream of a couple of privately-owned refineries, including Dangote Refinery.

    Long story short, one of the four nationally owned refineries, the old Port Harcourt Refinery, one of the two situated in Eleme, Rivers State, came alive, ready to serve the country. The project, which I learned was fitted with cutting-edge technology and, to use the words of the Group Chief Executive Officer (GCEO) of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), Mele Kyari, installed with entirely new parts, will now load two hundred trucks of assorted products daily.

    Now it became interesting and concerning Tinubu because of the role he played. Of course he is President and the buck stops at his table, that could have just been and nothing would still happen; the facility would still be there, decaying further from lack of use activity, past leaders have come and left without anything changing about the refinery. However, the difference with Tinubu was his single-mindedness on seeing that products start getting trucked out of the place. Mind you, all these years that the place has been prostrate, it was servicing only salaries to redundant employees. That was not the President’s vision for any public facility, every man and machine must give back the value for its maintenance.

    He was focused on bringing results from this particular facility and the entire sector. When public scrutiny was becoming a distraction, scrutiny about when the refineries on which government, right from former President Muhammadu Buhari, had been spending money, signing agreements, would start production. The NNPCL gave dates a couple of times, which for some reasons never materialised. This was becoming both embarrassing and distracting and there was where the President had to step in to save the day.

    “Mr President told me to stop projecting dates, but just focus on ensuring we deliver the project because people are only interested in results”, Kyari revealed to some journalists before the event commenced on Tuesday, rather privately though. With this background in mind, you will understand why he was so profusely thanking and appreciating the President when he was speaking on camera at the ceremony that marked the commencement of production and loading of products last Tuesday.

    “We are convinced beyond all doubt that without the support, perseverance, and patience of Mr. President, we would not have achieved this fate and all of us must congratulate him because it is his massive pressure that made us to come to this level”, he said. Tinubu’s intervention and commitment to the success that was celebrated last Tuesday was show of leadership, which he did not fail to relish. He was also not selfish about the sparkles of the glory, he would not take the spotlight alone, he ensured to give credit to his predecessor for his part, not forgetting “the pivotal role of former President Muhammadu Buhari in initiating the comprehensive rehabilitation of all our refineries”.

    The week saw the President honouring an invitation by President Emmanuel Macron of France to a state visit, along with his wife, First Lady Oluremi Tinubu. Most of his visible activities of the week were the ones he undertook in France. Right from Thursday, President Tinubu had been engaged in series of engagements, including signing of agreements on behalf of Nigeria and participating in an economic forum, which had Nigerian and French businesses.

    Read Also: JUST IN: NNPCL reduces petrol price to N1030/l for marketers

    The state visit was the first by a Nigerian leader after over two decades and it provided an opportunity for Nigeria to extend its foreign connections, especially for the Tinubu-led administration, which has identified foreign affairs as an avenue to achieve some of its economic goals for the country. However, beyond whatever might be in the visit for Nigeria, France seemed to have a more strategic reason than Nigeria to seek the visit of the largest African democracy, which is a turf it is rather less familiar with. From all indications, France aimed to explore a new connect with the English-speaking spheres of the black continent and where better to start from?   

    On a lighter note, I think it makes sense to highlight the fact that President Tinubu is contagiously transmitting Nigerianness to those we will all agree are the real Super Powers of the contemporary milieu. Yes, he has made it a very key and deliberate part of his administration’s focus and recovery strategy to ensure we are not isolated, as such kept strengthening diplomatic outreaches and shopping for foreign direct investments.

    In the process of achieving these foreign-focused targets, Mr President has also been quietly pushing the ‘Identity Nigeria’ in the way we used to see it only with our culture merchants and young showbiz exports. For example, ‘Afrojams’, which is primarily denominated with songs by Nigerian artistes, has pushed Nigeria out to the world, taking some cultural codes and expressions along as it permeates the wider-world.

    It should no longer be strange to us hearing either Ed Sheeran, a British singer/songwriter, sing “Omoge nor be so” in ‘Peru’ with Fireboy DML, or hearing Chris Brown, an American star, sing “the boy nor dey take nonsense” in ‘Hmmm’, a track he did with Burna Boy and featured Davido. Something like Nigeria seizing the world by storm, imprinting its very vivid and colourful cultural identity on the world’s conscience. This has been going on for a while.

    In that same trajectory, President Tinubu has in the last few days affected two major world leaders to deviate from their own to adopt our own. It was first the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, during his one-day state visit, just before the G20 Summit. Prime Minister Modi, while making his speech at the tete-a-tete, adopted the Yoruba word of affection; ‘oree mi’, meaning ‘my friend’, to refer to his brother-leader, President Tinubu. That, to many Nigerians, especially those who understand or speak Yoruba, was a really profound moment, when a man with a very strong cultural background honoured us as a nation by choosing to speak our tongue.

    Then this week, on Thursday evening, to express his value for President Tinubu’s visist, the French President, Emmanuel Macron, switched from his traditional and very widely spoken French tongue to our own pigin on his verified X handle, @EmmanuelMacron, to describe his excitement. Mr Macron said “Na big honor for France, dear President Bola Tinubu @officialABAT, to welcome you for dis State visit as one big partner and friend of today and tomorrow. E still dey sweet me well well as I remember say I be young intern for French Embassy for Nigeria that time”.

    Without meaning it, Mr President is fast becoming another cultural export, drawing those who matter to pay attention and learn about our lives as Nigerians. I will not be surprised if President-elect Donald Trump soon starts hustling to be invited to Aso Villa to come try our amala and gbegiri or ofe nssala with pounded yam out, that is because we are cool like that and the world cannot wait to feel us.

    In this new week he continues with being busy because he is expected to be heading out for another foreign engagement in South Africa. Let us keep praying for our President to success. His success is our collective ease.

  • We are the trees of the world

    We are the trees of the world

    (For the recent casualties of  University of Ibadan’s  Heritage Park)

    We bleed when cut

    We are the Trees of the World

    We are the Trees of the Life

    We laugh, we cry, we whisper, we shout

    We breed, we brood, we breathe 

    We carry the Planet in our careful hands

    A tender burden, historic task

    The loom and latch of a naked world

    We robe the Earth in our green embrace

    Hour by hour we lose our kin

    To waste, to war, and the senseless blaze

    Read Also: CBN reforms support strong, resilient African financial architecture – Cardoso

    The careless axe, the haughty chain saw

    And the cannibal greed of the rich and strong 

    Behold the Spider Monkey and the Spectacled Bear

    The Butterflies, the Forest Crabs

    The Eloquent Parrot, the Sagacious Owl

    The Cool Canopy and the Travelling Roots 

    A Tree never falls alone in the forest

    It takes our Future with the crashing leaves

    The blind gold-digger, the reckless farmer

    Subject your greed to the Need of All

    We are the Trees of the world

    We are the Trees of the Life

    Pearls from the Past, flowers of the Future

    We burn when ignited, we bleed when cut

    We are the vital lobes  of the lungs of the Planet

    From Green: Sighs of  Our  Ailing Planet , Black Widow Press, 2021  

  • Nigeria’s democracy worth defending

    Nigeria’s democracy worth defending

    Nigeria’s democracy was never more threatened than immediately after the February 2023 presidential election. The threats were multilayered. Those who lost the poll headed for the courts, tried to browbeat the judges through orchestrated campaigns to shame them, suborned foreign courts and organisations to sanction the delegitimisation of the poll, incite public and civil society insurrection, attempted to arrest the conclusion of the electoral process, campaigned for and instigated coup d’états, and sponsored street protests of all kinds using the unions. That democracy has lasted for some 24 to 25 years, though it sometimes wobbled badly along the way, is of no significance to the plotters. Their main goal was to destroy democracy than celebrate the longevity of a process that seemed to have disinherited them, nor were they keen on getting bogged down in debates about whether what would replace the democracy they resent met civilised standards. Their last gasp plot was the deployment of hunger and hardship concerns to instigate violent street actions – not protests as Amnesty International persistently conflates – capable of overthrowing democracy.

    After about 18 months of feverish plots to undermine democracy, the plotters appear to be ready to give up and instead focus on organising themselves for the next polls. They may not have relented in sabotaging public facilities, such as electricity transmission lines and towers as well as national facilities in order to discredit the administration, but they are quietly turning their attention to the internal affairs of their opposition political parties. The jostle for positions of influence is gently beginning, but there will be no commensurate fight to reform or sanitise party platforms and fine-tune party ideologies. Neither of the two opposition parties, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Labour Party (LP), has cleaned up its act, but they hope that by some magic, their parties would suddenly become better organised and more appealing to the electorate. They hope they can palliate the unhappiness of internal dissenters and smother the fires within. Hope may be irrelevant in delivering needed solutions to the parties, but they will keep hope alive for want of a more scientific approach to the crises that have baffled them for two agonising years.

    It is too early to tell how sanguine the anti-democratic forces would be about their chances of surviving the next two years intact, let alone flourishing, until the next polls. They are limited in every area of politics, and are stymied by their almost total lack of imaginativeness. Indeed, two factors will in summary determine how well they can respond to the changing dynamics of Nigerian politics. Firstly, the PDP and LP presidential candidates in the last poll, former vice president Atiku Abubakar and former Anambra governor Peter Obi respectively, probably feel a sense of emptiness gnawing at the back of their minds, particularly their political ideas and platforms. Alhaji Atiku will be 80 years old at the next poll, and neither he nor his family can tell what kind of deterioration will come upon him or unnerve him. Already, despite retaining his age-old truculence and intransigence, he has become lethargic. Mr Obi deployed ethnic and religious politics in the last poll with devastating aplomb. But the Bola Tinubu administration has taken away the religion leg of that infamous pair of weapons, leaving only the ethnic card for the former governor. Mr Obi will be unable to exploit the remaining isolated card as ferociously as he did in 2023. The Southeast may be clannish, but they are not stupid. They read the trends diligently and will be painfully aware that the ethnic card alone will not fetch their champion the presidency, assuming he contests.

    But a video shared on X (Twitter) last Saturday may perhaps hold some promise for Alhaji Atiku’s and Mr Obi’s supporters. In the video, the former vice president hosted Mr Obi to a breakfast in Yola, Adamawa State, prompting, despite the incongruity of the event, discussions about an impending coalition between the former candidates. They had aligned in 2019 on the PDP platform to fight the presidential election of that year against ex-president Muhammadu Buhari, but were trounced. The joint ticket failed mainly because it could not find a platform that resonated with voters. In the 2023 poll, however, Mr Obi’s platform was as passionate as it was evocative; but delinking from Alhaji Atiku made both candidates vulnerable to the APC’s divide and rule tactics, and a great thrashing. Speculations about the purpose of the Yola breakfast may not be far off the mark. They indicate that some form of alliance may be in the offing, for the two gentlemen have recognised that going into any presidential electoral war individually was a recipe for disaster. That disaster is certain to reoccur if the two politicians do not join forces. Even then, they may yet discover that forming a coalition takes hugely away from their individual appeal. It is not clear why Alhaji Atiku uploaded the video, instead of Mr Obi. What is, however, clear is that the former vice president still entertains the chimerical hope that he could still run for the presidency at 80. He obviously hopes that President Tinubu will make more enemies than friends in the months ahead, and the economy would go into a tailspin, in order to facilitate the chance of beating the All Progressives Congress (APC) in 2027.

    Read Also: Tinubu and Macron: Leveraging friendship for development, by Tunde Rahman

    Secondly, the anti-democratic forces, aided by saboteurs of power grids and other facilities and policies, will hope that the economy will not respond to all the medications administered by the Tinubu administration. Should hunger, exchange rate, inflation and insecurity remain on the front burner months to the election, they would hope the formation of a political coalition could finally unhorse the administration and doom its chances in the next poll. But that is hard to bank on even for politicians as indurate as Alhaji Atiku and Mr Obi. Current economic indicators, not to talk of the immense potential of other far-reaching and radical measures like the hated tax reform bills, seem to show that the economy is both on the mend and remains responsive to medications. It may sound propagandistic, but official statements by the administration’s economic managers suggesting that the economy has turned the corner and is on the mend may be right. Exchange rate has not worsened as many analysts projected, and inflation has appeared to reduce its furious pace. Balance of trade and economic growth have remained positive, and other drivers of negative economic indices appear to have been tamed. Insecurity has also declined significantly. Hardship and hunger remain, but in the next 12 to 18 months, they are unlikely to be as ferocious as they have been in the past months.

    Hamstrung by their own identity crises and internal wrangling and limitations, and disappointed by an economy cautiously churning back to life, both the PDP and LP, in coalition or singly, will struggle to find vulnerable parts in the ruling party. They will point at the ruling party’s sometimes chaotic approach to national challenges, and they will be right; but they will also be unable to deflect attention from their own self-generated chaos and mediocre politics. Their misery will be worsened by the extraordinary performance of some governors eager to transform their states and prove more than a point, not only on account of the politics of reelection, but also on account of genuine appreciation that fame can be easily procured with showpiece works in the age of social media. Niger State’s Governor Mohammed Umar Bago, Kaduna’s Uba Sani, Enugu’s Peter Mbah, Imo’s Hope Uzodinma, Anambra’s Chukwuma Soludo, Katsina’s Dikko Umar Radda, and Benue’s Hyacinth Alia, among a few others, have shown exemplary aptitude for deft politics as well as brilliant developmental strides. They were among the reasons the frenetic desire to torpedo Nigeria’s democracy did not resonate beyond a few angry and pampered cities and elites.

    Rivers State may return to the medieval era, and the Southwest to strange mental and physical inertia, but the boldness and inventiveness of the Tinubu administration, assuming it can restrategise its flailing palliative policies, not to say the inspiring stories from some of the states, will help democracy retain its potency and lustre. Critics will still have a field day as long as hunger and hardship continue to defy solutions, and the political opposition, hungry for power, will be unsparing and ill-tempered. Even then, Nigeria is unlikely to return to a time when a few people will procure military insurrection or instigate anarchy, no matter how precarious the country’s condition. If the system could withstand such aggravated hardship as the Tinubu administration’s retooling policies have unleashed, without becoming vulnerable to a coup d’etat or embracing unconstitutional and repressive measures to curb criticism and disaffection, then democracy may have a bright future in these parts and be worth defending and refining.

  • Tinubu, France and Francophone West Africa

    Tinubu, France and Francophone West Africa

    Last week’s state visit to France by President Bola Tinubu was an unusual diplomatic engagement, the first after more than 20 years since a Nigerian leader, Olusegun Obasanjo, undertook that kind of visit. Its impact will be felt not only in Nigeria as business deals are hammered out by both countries, it will also reverberate across West Africa partly because of the strained diplomatic relations between France and the three Francophone West African countries of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger Republic. The visit is a logical progression from recent trade and diplomatic statistics between the two countries. Apart from being France’s leading trading partner in sub-Saharan Africa, Nigeria is now in pole position to exploit the vacuum created by the exit of the Francophone West African countries estranged from the French orbit.

    Nigeria is hungry for capital and investments in high-tech. France has lost not only three Francophone West African countries, it has also lost its influence in Chad, where that country has ended decades-old defence cooperation, and lost Senegal which has also served notice to France to remove its base and troops. To complete the humiliation, Chad did not even bother to inform France ahead of its decision, and has signaled its preparedness to join Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger in the Russian orbit. Since last year, Russia has been replacing the departing French forces in the region, and is helping the West African countries, which severed relationship with ECOWAS last year, to fight hardened jihadist insurgents in the Sahel. President Tinubu’s state visit to France is coming hard on the heels of that major shift in West Africa’s diplomatic tectonic plates.

    But President Tinubu will have to manage his country’s proposed deepened relations with France with more finesse than he managed the coups d’etat in the three Francophone countries. France’s reputation for financial exploitation, if not expropriation, of its former West African colonies has inspired the hostility of many Africans. Already, on social media, there were unfounded rumours of France seeking to establish a military base in Nigeria after being kicked out of its three former colonies. With the number now rising to five where France has lost its foothold, some had feared that France would desperately seek a replacement. Since the abrogation of the Anglo-Nigerian Defence Agreement of 1958-1962, Nigeria has not countenanced any foreign military base on its soil in any form. Inviting France to site a base in Nigeria is obviously not in consideration.

    There are no indications at all that France has any stated or unwritten intention to site a military base in Nigeria. On the contrary, given the buffeting the Nigerian economy has received from domestic mismanagement, what is uppermost in the minds of Nigerian leaders is deepened and mutually beneficial economic relationships in diverse fields including agriculture, mining, trade, technology, cultural exchange, and other kinds of investments. Indications coming from the Franco-Nigerian Business Council are that many profitable business deals are being finalised.

    Read Also: CBN reforms support strong, resilient African financial architecture – Cardoso

    President Tinubu is right not to toe the line of the five countries estranged from France. Nigeria does not have the unpleasant experience referenced by the Francophone West African countries which soured their relations with France. Instead, it is embracing a different paradigm pursued by other countries including China since 1978, Singapore, Malaysia, Japan, South Korea, Turkey, and even long before them, Russia under Catherine the Great. Nigeria, like these other countries, needs Western technology and business practices to develop its domestic technical capacity and drive output and growth. If other countries could absorb what they need from foreign investors without compromising their cultures and political systems, Nigeria should find out how they balanced their sometimes competing and conflicting needs.

    The state visit to France may also have been influenced by the personal relationship between Presidents Tinubu and Macron, a relationship that dates back to 2002 when the French leader worked as an intern in the French Embassy in Lagos and President Tinubu was Lagos State governor. Such a relationship generally conduces to trust and confidence in hammering out sweetheart business deals between two countries. The United States and Britain had that special relationship for decades, even though it may currently be fraying at the edges; and China and North Korea have enjoyed it for decades since Kim Il-sung took power in North Korea, among many others. If Presidents Tinubu and Macron could lay the basis for a mutually beneficial and paradigm-shifting relationship, the two countries, particularly Nigeria, could yet sing a new song in years to come. They must not allow the sour relations between France and the four Francophone West African countries and Chad dictate the tone and tenor of a newfound cultural and economically beneficial friendship. Nigeria must not inherit or be influenced by anybody’s grudges.

    More importantly, Nigeria must be clear about what it wants, what should be the objectives of the new relations with France, and why it needs to contextualise that relationship within the ECOWAS scheme of things. Since the debacle of managing the military takeovers in Mali and others, Nigeria has seemed to lack surefootedness in its diplomatic dealings in West Africa. Being paralysed or somnolent is counterproductive. From the responses of Senegal and Chad, the sub-region and parts of Central Africa, are unlikely to remain the same. Nigeria should urgently rally the remnants left, find common grounds and common purposes, and inspire a new West Africa in all areas of human, economic and diplomatic cooperation. Mali and others are tired of anyone pricking their consciences. They prefer relations with amoral states disinterested in lecturing them on democracy, human rights, systems of government, or even corruption. Good for them. But for the rest of West Africa, which should be the example for the continent as a whole, it is important to create a region that is both ethically and economically vibrant. If President Tinubu manages to walk the tightrope of the deepened relations with France, he will be inspiring the remaking of a region blighted by poverty, bad governance and instability.

  • Colonial throwback

    Colonial throwback

    I spent the first eight years of my life learning to read and by now, I have come to the realisation that those years are the most rewarding period of my life. Because I could read so early in life, I have come to appreciate the company of men and women who were infinitely older, cleverer and much more articulate than I could ever hope to be. They are the ones that I met on the pages of those newspapers which kept me company in those days. Because of the erudite ghosts with which I have surrounded myself, I have discovered the beauty of solitude and introspection. I have found that there can be a great deal of joy in solitude as long as I have an entertaining book or some such item dispensing literature of any kind for company. Perhaps this is why I have been quick to note that the value which is now placed on books is diminishing all the time. My fascination with words was sparked by a newspaper, specifically, the Daily Times in those days of my growing up. There were other daily newspapers at that time but none of them came anywhere close to what was served up by the Daily Times. Other newspapers, especially the Guardian have of course come on board since the fifties when I am sure nobody in the Daily Times would have thought that there was a little boy in Ibadan poring through every section of their journal including the classified advert section where the films that could be watched on any day of the week in all the cinema houses in Lagos were advertised. And there were several of them on the island as well as the mainland so that everyone had a choice as to which theatre deserved their custom on any day. It goes without saying that I never got to watch any of those films but got a thrill just by knowing what fare was available for those who had the privilege of sitting through those cinematic experiences.

    There is no doubt in my mind that my interaction with the hundreds of newspaper columnists with whom I have held one sided conversations over a period of more than sixty-five years has shaped my current thinking. In my turn, I have been writing opinion columns, first in the Guardian and then in other newspapers, ending on the pages of the Nation where I have been domiciled for close to three years and counting. I have found that experience as stimulating as reading what other persons have put into the pages of those newspapers that held me in their grip when I was just a reader.

    Our social situation as a people has of course gone through a whole lot of changes over the several decades since I became more or less addicted to newspapers. In the first place, newspapers have been supplanted by first, the electronic media; radio and television, not to talk of the aggressively amorphous internet which is now living in the consciousness of the vast majority of people. The trend setters these days are called influencers. Unlike the columnists who held me in thrall in my late infancy, these influencers have neither time nor ability for introspection. Some of them can hardly string more than two coherent sentences together and speak in slangs which make for translation before they can be understood. Thus, they are only good for instant entertainment which to be honest, is what their followers demand from them.

    At the time my newspaper adventures began, Nigeria was a British colony albeit a dying one at that point in time. This is because by that time, the battle for independence had already been won. Some ten years before, the situation still hung in the balance and the newspapers were out on the frontline doing their bit to see off the colonialists who operated the machinery that ran the country. They were quick to call the colonial government to order at any time that such an admonition was necessary and they were the mouthpiece of the fiery young men who kept the pot of independence boiling over nicely. They constantly reminded the colonial masters that their time was up and they had better start packing.

    At that time, just like now, that mythical man in the street went about his business of gathering on to himself, the wherewithal to satisfy his needs and had little time to worry his head about what government was doing or not doing. One sore point about the colonial status of the day was the lowly status of the Nigerian Vis a Vis any young British puppy who had been sent out from the mother country to maintain law and order in the colony. The word colony had a much changed meaning at that time from what it was in Roman and even earlier times when groups of people left their place of origin and settled in other places with the intention of transferring themselves permanently into their new territory. Such colonisation was actually still taking place at the time the British seized Nigeria and made her a colony. In the century before, millions of people had voluntarily transported themselves or were forcibly transferred from all parts of Britain to America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The Dutch had founded their colony in South Africa several centuries before and had been fully developed as an apartheid state by the time the British arrived in Nigeria. By that time, there could be no large scale settlement of Europeans in Nigeria and other parts of what can be called the malaria belt which turned that part of the world to what was described as the white man’s grave. Many who came were dead within months and others wisely stayed away. It is ironic that by the time the British were packing up and leaving Nigeria, the problem of malaria had been solved through the availability of quinine and other antimalarial drugs. Suddenly, the entire length of the West African coast line had been made habitable for both white men and their black brothers by the wonders of modern pharmaceutical technology.

    Read Also: Nigeria, we hail thee not a colonial anthem – Akpabio

    In Nigeria, the colonial masters were careful, very careful to keep the races separate from each other. To start with, at least in the South, they lived on the highest places they could find in their continuous attempts to get away from mosquitoes which occupied the lowest places, there to torment the natives with their viciousness. Effectively therefore, there was a system of apartheid which could not be maintained as soon as independence began to loom on the horizon. The system collapsed spectacularly in 1948 in the wake of what can be described as the Bristol Hotel incident.

    The Bristol Hotel was on Martins Street on Lagos Island and was owned by a Greek who did not allow black men to lodge in his hotel. One Mr. Ivor Cummings was booked into the hotel by the Colonial Office, no less. At that point, common sense dictated that with that name, Cummings was not only white but was a man of high official and social rank. When Mr. Cummings turned up at the hotel however, he confounded everybody by being black. On this account, he was not allowed to register in the hotel. By the next day, news of this arrived at the Island Club on the Marina where a group of young men were enjoying early evening breezes over bottles of beer. Enjoyment was instantly put aside and the enraged young men stopped on their way to Bristol Hotel only to recruit some area boys who at that time were called Boma boys. Yes, area boys were part of the Lagos landscape eighty years ago. This motley group had nothing but mayhem on their mind and this they visited on the hotel immediately on arrival. Twenty or maybe ten years before, the whole lot of them would have been arrested, speedily tried and locked up in the Broad street prison not far from the Island club. After all, they had been involved in assault, use of dangerous weapons, maybe even attempted murder. The newspapers of course spread the news over Nigeria at great speed and the country was boiling over with anger at the insult which had been visited on all red blooded black men everywhere. The situation teetered precariously on the lip of a precipice but mercifully not for long. The governor, a man of experience who had probably seen the light of reason and came to the conclusion that the artificial separation of races was utter nonsense saw the Bristol Hotel farce as an opportunity to right a wrong. Rather than coming down hard on the young hot heads, he announced the end of the fledgling apartheid policy which had kept the races apart. From then on, the European quarters became Government Reserved Areas, the European Hospital across the Five Cowry Creek Lane was transformed to Creek Hospital where African patients, elite African patients it has to be said, could be treated. This did not bring an end to petty apartheid in Nigeria but, whenever there were any episodes it, they were dutifully reported in the newspapers which were no less dutifully read and taken note of.

    Given the rise and rise of social media, newspapers are no longer what they used to be and so, a lot of news transmission is now through the agency of social media. Unlike the newspapers in the glorious days of their dominance, news from social media, colourful as they are must be taken with more than a pinch of salt. You can therefore imagine my shock when my first response to the video clip of a white man slapping a Nigerian was shock and disbelief. I had to do a double take and sure enough, a second look confirmed the veracity of the first one. What could the story behind the pictures be, I wondered. Then, I listened to the sound and heard the diligent slapper introduce himself as a member of the Nigerian senate and his accents confirmed that fact. What was before me was a member of the Nigerian ruling elite riding rough shod over one of the government owned serfs who have been summoned to his castle to perform some menial task. I was of course shocked at the level of violence being visited on the serf who, in the dead of night when only ghosts and spirits were abroad, had arrived at his castle to deliver a commissioned parcel. Stung to fury by the polite request that the lord of the manor should step outside so that he could be served, the poor man was slapped quite deliberately twice, the third slap arriving on the heels of the second to correct the record of the serf who had erroneously accused the aggressive senator who was actually not a senator but a congressman, of having slapped him three times.

    My first impression was that the lord and master was putting himself in the danger of an aneurysm or a stroke. There is only so much pressure you can put on the cardiovascular system before something gives. This man was clearly a man who had anger issues and is in urgent need of skilful counselling. But of course, there are so many other matters arising from this episode.

    My immediate reference was to the Bristol Hotel incident of 1948 when Nigerians resorted to violence when their racial sensitivity was aroused. A black man was refused service at a hotel on account of the colour of his skin. On this occasion it was a man wearing the mask of a white man beating up a black man who had not transgressed in any way. I expected all hell to break loose, not just because of the gratuitous violence inflicted but also because of the flood of invectives and expletives which accompanied the slaps. The level of impunity on display was enough to turn the stomach of people with a lower sensitivity than mine. It was a truly magnificent display of the power which no Nigerian should show in any dealing with another human not to talk of another Nigerian. We are now an independent nation and have been for sixty-four years but what we can learn from this incident is that we are still subject to the insults of a new breed of self imposed colonial masters even though any difference in their skin colour is purely accidental.

  • What exactly does Obasanjo want? Good governance? Sure not because he never gave it

    What exactly does Obasanjo want? Good governance? Sure not because he never gave it

    Getting back to my mother, I still remember your beating her up continually when we were kids. What kids can forget that kind of violence against their mother?

    Your maltreatment of women is legendary. Many of your women have come out to denounce you in public but since your madness is also part of the madness of the society, it is the women that are usually ignored and mistreated” – Professor Iyabo Obasanjo, PhD, psychoanalysing her father in an unsparing, no holdsbarred letter dated December 16, 2013.

    The above should enable Nigerians know who is advising them because Yorubas say you should first look at what somebody offering to make a Christmas dress for you is wearing.

    After describing the 2023 Presidential election in which his candidate, Peter Obi of the Labour Party, through whom he may have intended to resurrect his Third Term Project, of yore, was beaten blue and black to the third place as a travesty, former President Olusegun Obasanjo,

    went on to say much more at the Chinua Achebe Leadership Forum in Yale University, U.S.A where he recently presented a paper on  ‘Leadership failure and state capture in Nigeria’.

    He sermonised:

    “As a matter of urgency, we must ensure the INEC Chairperson and their staff are thoroughly vetted. The vetting exercise should produce dispassionate, non-partisan actors with impeccable reputations.

    “Nigeria must ensure the appointment of new credible INEC leadership at the federal, state, local government, and municipal – city, town, and village – levels, with short tenures to prevent undesirable political influence and corruption, and to re-establish trust in the electoral system by its citizens, further adding that “The INEC Chairperson must not only be absolutely above board but must also be transparently independent and incorruptible.”

    Pray! When did Chief Obasanjo know all these: after he graduated from the Open University?

    Or, good as they are, how exactly did his 2007 hatchetman, the one and only Maurice Mmaduakolam

    Iwu, of blessed memory, square up to these his prescriptions?

    Knowing full well that the ol’ man did not act on his own, how come the man whose cross the unfortunate Professor carried to his grace, could now turn round to lay strictures against INEC?

    Indeed, how on earth should that proceed from the mouth of Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, a man who was the ‘Capo di tutti’ of election manipulation in the annals of Nigerian history, a mere 17 years after? He must really think he could so soon sell Nigerian a hagiography.

    But not so soon because as Google never forgets, History doesn’t, either.

    So to his face today, we would count the former president’ss nine toes.

    In the first place, consequent upon the rigging that characterised gubernatorial elections in the 2007 election cycle which was superintended over by his government, nearly all the elections in the Southwest, including Edo state, were voided by the Supreme Court.

    The election, his last in government, was scored very  low by everybody, its Chief beneficiary, the highly regarded President Umar Yar’ Adua inclusive, just as the U. S National Democratic Institute whose leader, Madeleine Albrigh, then U. S Secretary of State, herself an observer at the  selfsame election,  described it as the  worst election ever, anywhere in the whole world, Myanmar inclusive.

    It is important that Chief Obasanjo be freshly reminded of that shameful   election just in case it has escaped his very busy mind.

    I shall do this using the instrumentality of just one of my many articles on the luckiest ever Nigerian Public Servant.

    Titled ‘A Grandstanding Former President Olusegun Obasanjo’, and dated 8 April, 2018, it reads as follows:

    The letter below (that letter would not be included in this recall) from Chief Deji Fasuan MON, is the leitmotif for this article at a  time Obasanjo’s one-upmanship has again reached a crescendo.

    The two-term Nigerian Head of state has been grandstanding  of late describing, in lurid terms, the sitting President Muhammadu Buhari,  just as he has done to everybody who ever held that position other than himself.

    Many have tried to posit that it does not lie in Obasanjo’s place to  continuously trash a sitting President since he has access and has, indeed, been justifiably described as the greatest pilgrim to Buhari’s Aso Villa until recently. 

    But that is when you hear some busy bodies asking you to mind the message and not the messenger.

    Of course, I do not subscribe to such sentiments since my position is that deeds, rather than talk, which is cheap, should be the determining factor, being far more indicative of who the preacher really is.

    In justification of my views, I present below a sample of Obasanjo’s performance in office using election rigging, which was archetypical of everything he did in office.

    A decent, late President Yar Adua self-confessed the rigging of his own election, the reason I chose it for this analysis. 

    I present below, a report of that election as captured by Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

     The Nigerian General Election, 2007.

     Reactions

    “Ikimi and Amusu,  representatives of the AC and the ANPP respectively, at the INEC Collation Centre in Abuja, denounced the results announced by the INEC Chairman. According to Ikimi, “In states like Edo, Enugu, Ebonyi, Imo, Akwa Ibom etc, we know that the elections did not start even as late as 5 pm.

    The results collated showed that over 80 percent of the votes being counted were in favour of the PDP and they are totally flawed. In most of the states, only the Resident Electoral Commissioners and PDP Agents signed results. We have been here since yesterday (Sunday) to observe this collation and we have collated only  eleven states when the INEC Chairman rushed down to declare the results  declaring Umoru Yar’Adua the winner.” Continued Ikimi: “The result sheets we viewed so far were not signed by any of our agents at the state level. They were only signed by Resident Electoral Commissioners and  PDP agents.”

    Also, Admiral Lanre Amusu who represented the ANPP concurred with what Chief Ikimi said. “Only results from13 states, and they were collated and signed by only the Resident Electoral Commissioners and the PDP Agents. Our agents did not sign these results.”

    The national Chairman of the Democratic Peoples Alliance (DPA), Chief Olu Falae, with leaders of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), the Action Congress (AC), All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), National Advance Party (NAP) and the National Democratic Party (NDP), has called for the setting up of an Interim National Government to conduct credible elections in the country. Chief Falae suggested that the country needed an ING to guard against the emergence of the military.

    The Atiku Abubakar Campaign Organisation claimed that  INEC deliberately left 70 percent of the ballot papers in a warehouse in Johannesburg, South Africa. We heard that the contractors could have freighted the entire 200-ton consignment into the country three days before the election (Thursday) but INEC instructed them to bring only 30 percent of the ballot papers”.

    Nobel laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka, said that the West should deny entry visas to INEC Chairman, Maurice Iwu for his “complicity in the fraudulent elections.” He said he has heard of the financial prudence and moral uprightness of Yar’Adua. “I wish he [Yar’Adua] would carry his decency even further by publicly renouncing this poisoned chalice to say: ‘I’m not a receiver of stolen goods”,

    Observers

    Groups monitoring the Presidential election gave it a dismal assessment. Chief European Union observer, Max van den Berg, reported that the handling of the polls had “fallen far short” of basic international standards, and that “the process cannot be considered to be credible”, citing “poor election organisation, lack of transparency, significant evidence of fraud, voter disenfranchisement, violence and bias”. They described the election as “the worst they had ever seen anywhere in the world”, with “rampant vote rigging, violence, theft of ballot boxes and intimidation”.

    One group of observers said that at one polling station in Yenagoa, in the oil-rich south, where 500 people were registered to vote, more than 2,000 votes were recorded.

    Bishop Felix Alaba Job, Head of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference, cited massive fraud and disorganisation, including result sheets being passed around to politicians who simply filled in figures as they chose, while bribed returning electoral officers looked away”.

    International Reaction

    A spokesman for the United States Department of State said it was “deeply troubled” by the election, calling them “flawed”. 

    “Nigeria has once again failed to rise to the occasion…. Size isn’t enough…. It is a failed giant,” said prominent Ghanaian economist Nii Moi Thompson who compared the elections to those of Liberia in 2005, saying, “Even Liberia, which is coming out of war, had more credible elections than Nigeria”.

    “There is the saying: ‘How goes Nigeria, so goes the rest of Africa’. To have this widespread abuse of the democratic initiative certainly doesn’t do Africa any good,” said Scott Baker, a professor at Champlain College in the US city of Burlington, Vermont. “How can Nigeria sit at the meetings of the African Union African Peer Review Mechanism or ECOWAS and talk about other peoples’ elections?” he asked.

    In conclusion, would President Obasanjo still be still be seing himself as a messiah, as he loves to do, in any decent country driven by democratic ethos?

    It’s time for an Election Malpractices Tribunal in Nigeria which, as happened in Singapore under Lee Kuan Yew, will have no respect for persons, no matter the office.

    Read Also: Obasanjo and his ‘failing state’ theory

    In Loving & Cherished Memory Of Ambassador Olufemi Ani.

    Not again!.

    Dipo this evening informed me of Bro Femi’s passing.

    It was an absolutely devastating news because I had a long, forever cherished relationship with the Ambassador, dating all the way back to 1958.

    That year he hosted me during my interview at Government College, Ibadan to which only 4 of us, Ekiti, were invited in Ondo state.

    I became very close to him in later life, and on one occasion recruited a Secretary for him.

    My wife and I used to joke that if the Ambassador bought something of N5000 from you, he would rather give you a cheque than pay cash, as he did a few times buying wine in our T.Club.

    A very handsome, ever sartorially turned out gentleman, Bro Femi was great to be with.

    He will be sorely missed but glory to God, he lived a highly impactful life which spanned not just diplomacy, his forte, but also such diverse areas as business, international relations, sports and community service.

    We thank God that he is survived by high achieving children who will keep the flag flying.

    May the Almighty God grant him eternal rest and comfort the family he left behind, our natal town, Are – Ekiti, which will be deeply impacted at the loss of another distinguished son, so soon after (that of) Professor Femi Olaofe inclusive.

    Adieu.

  • CONUA and ASUU again

    CONUA and ASUU again

    In an effort to ensure stability within the Nigerian University System, a renegotiation committee on the 2009 agreement has been constituted by the federal government. The committee is chaired by Alhaji Yayale Ahmed – a former Minister of Defence, a former Head of Civil Service, a former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the current Pro-Chancellor of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, and the current Chair of the Committee of Pro-Chancellors of Nigerian Federal Universities (CPCNFU).

    The Congress of University Academics (CONUA) was formed in 2018 in reaction to the constriction of the democratic space within the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU). According to CONUA, this tendency became unbearable when, in 2013, the duly-won victory of certain members of ASUU in a free and fair election was annulled by some autocratic forces within the union. Things came to a head in 2018 when over seven hundred members of ASUU were suspended and expelled from the union for expressing their dissatisfaction with the trajectory of the union. The suspended and expelled members came together and formed CONUA on 12 February, 2018, as a means of resistance to peer oppression, and proceeded to apply for registration. The application for registration, dated 30 April, 2018, was submitted on 2 May, 2018 at the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment, Abuja. The union was presented a certificate of registration by the then-Honourable Minister of Labour and Employment, Dr. Chris Ngige, on 17 January, 2023. On 14 December, 2023, the Trade Union Congress announced its admission of CONUA as one of its new affiliates.

    Meanwhile, on 26 October, 2022, ASUU had prematurely filed a suit at the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) challenging the registration of CONUA (and the Nigeria Association of Medical Academics – NAMDA). In the suit, it prayed the court to declare the registration illegal, and pleaded for the court to order the withdrawal of the certificates of registration of the two unions. It is important to note here that as at the time ASUU was making this plea, the certificates had actually not yet been issued. On 25 July, 2023, ASUU lost the case and the NICN declared the registration of CONUA and NAMDA legal.

    The NICN judgement was based principally on the provision of Article 2 of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Convention No. 87 which stipulates as follows: “Workers and employers, without distinction whatsoever, shall have the right to establish and, subject only to the rules of the organisation concerned, to join organisations of their own choosing without previous authorisation.” Also noteworthy here is Section 12 (4) of the 2004 Trade Union Act which expressly states: “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Act, membership of a trade union by employees shall be voluntary and no employee shall be forced to join any trade union or be victimised for refusing to join or remain a member.”On its website, CONUA also referred to Sections 20 and 21 of the 1990 Kampala Declaration on Intellectual Freedom and Social Responsibility which state: “Members of the intellectual community have a responsibility to promote the spirit of tolerance towards different views and positions and enhance democratic debate and discussion. No one group of the intellectual community shall indulge in the harassment, domination or oppressive behaviour towards another group. All differences among the intellectual community shall be approached and resolved in the spirit of equality, non-discrimination and democracy.”

    Regarding the renegotiation committee, CONUA wrote to the then-Minister of Education, Professor Mamman Tahir, and noted that there was an oversight, because the bona fide and duly registered union was not invited to be part of the renegotiation. The union argued that as at the time the 2009 agreement was reached, most of those who constitute CONUA were members of ASUU and were therefore major stakeholders in relation to the agreement. CONUA further noted that since the outcome of the ongoing renegotiation would affect CONUA members, the right thing to do is to include representatives of the union. CONUA also remarked that it was only representatives of the union that could best project and protect its interests.

    In reaction to the CONUA call for inclusivity, the Coordinator of the Lagos Zone of ASUU, Professor Adelaja Odukoya, who has been described as “the Dean of Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Lagos, Akoka,” was reported in a story, titled “You’re not relevant, ASUU knocks CONUA”, by the Nigerian Tribune of 14 November, 2024, to have said: “If they [CONUA] were once part of ASUU as they argued in the media report, they should answer for themselves if they are part of ASUU now? So, they cannot leverage on what they were in the past but what they are now is the in-thing. So, they should wake up from their self-delusion as they have been used and dumped by Ngige.”

    Professor Odukoya was also reported to have said: “And the earlier they realize that unionism etched on opportunism and charlatanism will always end in disgrace and heartbreak. They should realise that they have miscalculated. And if they have any iota of shame and any honour, they would not [broach] the idea of being included in the FGN-ASUU negotiation in whatever form. I particularly for one think that honour is not a commodity they have. And they should stop asking for undue relevance.”

    If indeed Professor Adelaja Odukoya is the Dean of a Faculty at the University of Lagos, this kind of intemperate language, where rational arguments would have sufficed, doesn’t represent the University of Lagos well, and neither does it represent ASUU well. In Yoruba culture, to which he belongs, such conduct would be categorised as that of a white fowl which doesn’t recognise itself as an elder, and so acts out of tune with the honour ascribed to the position. (“Adìe funfun ò mo’ra rè lágbà.”) As things have now turned out, CONUA has begun to match Professor Odukoya and ASUU expletive for expletive.

    Dr. Nasiru Yunusa, the North-West Coordinator and Chairperson of the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, chapter of CONUA, was reported in a story, titled “You have to face new realities, CONUA replies ASUU,” to have said that since the letter pointing out the Ministry of Education’s oversight was not addressed to ASUU, ASUU’s outbursts indicated a refusal to hoe one’s own row. Secondly, CONUA argued that, if it was ab initio eminently qualified for registration in 2018, but the registration was withheld for five long years, and justice finally prevailed in 2023 with its eventual registration, “nothing could … be more asinine than ASUU’s labelling of CONUA’s epochal success as being ‘used and dumped!’” CONUA further castigated Professor Odukoya as follows: “It is indeed a betrayal of deep-thinking scholarship that a university Professor would be ignorantly bleating about ‘unionism etched on opportunism and charlatanism will always end in disgrace and heartbreak.’”

    Moreover, CONUA said it was hypocritical for ASUU to be talking of honour. It asked where ASUU’s honour lay when, in declaring the 2022 strike, the union said the strike would be “total, indefinite, comprehensive and suffocating”; but once the Federal Government invoked the “no work, no pay” rule, ASUU capitulated and claimed that it was only the “teaching” component of its duties that it abandoned during the strike. CONUA was, thus, of the view that ASUU lacked the courage of its convictions. CONUA also noted: “This is a dawn of a new era where our universities are free from the shackles of incessant closures, and ASUU should smell the coffee and get used to the new realities.”

    Meanwhile, some side-players have also joined the fray. For example, in the 18 October, 2024 edition of TVC’s “Journalists’ Hangout”, Babajide Kolade-Otitoju remarked: “CONUA … had complained that their members were oppressed, needlessly punished, under ASUU regime and that this was what caused ASUU to be divided. But when you look at CONUA, if you have to choose between CONUA and ASUU in terms of the number of people that ASUU represents, CONUA literally does not exist beside ASUU. In fact, there are very few … universities where CONUA is present.” First, this is the typical logic of autocrats and oppressors. But, as George Orwell aptly asserts, “Sanity is not statistical.” Second, the argument is akin to rationalising a hypothetical decision, by INEC, not to invite the All Progressives Grand Alliance, Labour Party and New Nigeria People’s Party to meetings to discuss critical political matters that would affect them, just because each of these parties controls only one state, whilst APC controls 21states and PDP controls 12.

    Read Also: Parents, students seek ways out of ASUU’s perpetual strike threats

    In the same edition of “Journalists’ Hangout”, dropping all pretence to objectivity, Kolade-Otitoju said about CONUA, in relation to ASUU’s 2022 8-month-long strike and CONUA’s exclusion from the negotiating committee in 2024: “You rebelled against your own colleagues. You were silent as your colleagues fought aggressively against the oppressor. You behaved like you were not seeing what was going on. Now, the same oppressor has decided to sideline you.” Whilst Kolade-Otitoju saw resistance to ASUU’s autocratic and oppressive streak as rebellion, CONUA saw it as acting in line with the exhortation that “Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.” It is unclear why Babajide Kolade-Otitoju persistently gets so easily worked up and lapses into hubris over the fact that CONUA members have been or are exercising their constitutionally-guaranteed, ILO-sanctioned and court-upheld freedom of association.

    The combination of old positions with new perspectives can only benefit the Nigerian university system. It is in this sense that “Two heads are better than one.” It was therefore wrong for the former Minister of Education, Professor Tahir Mamman, to have excluded CONUA from the renegotiation committee. It is hoped that the current Minister, Dr. Tunji Alausa, would rectify this anomaly, in the interest of equity and the overall interest of university education in the country. The Minister also needs to direct the heads of MDAs under the ministry, such as the National Universities Commission, TETfund and Vice-Chancellors, to accord all registered unions in the university system due recognition and include them in meetings or programmes in which they ought to be major stakeholders.

    The democratic spirit and the intellectual temperament dictate the recognition, acceptance and respect for diversity of choice. It is thus hoped that ASUU would reconcile itself to the reality of the existence of CONUA and sheathe its sword. It is also hoped that CONUA would note that any hostility against it from ASUU and its associates is a passing phase. CONUA should therefore resist being drawn into unnecessary acrimony. Going forward, ASUU and CONUA should begin, consciously, to cultivate mutual respect, while noting that, as a Yoruba proverb says, “There’s enough room in the sky for birds to fly without colliding (Ojú òrun tó eye fò láì fara kan ra.)  

  • The worth of GCON conferment and his quest for Nigeria’s greatness

    The worth of GCON conferment and his quest for Nigeria’s greatness

    The week in review started on Sunday with the President’s efforts to position Nigeria as a global player taking another leap forward with the state visit of the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi. The visit, which underscored decades of robust friendship between the two nations, resulted in agreements that promise to elevate their partnership across multiple sectors, from defense and trade to healthcare and agriculture.

    Prime Minister Modi arrived to a warm reception at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, complete with a 21-gun salute—a ceremonial gesture befitting the leader of one of the world’s largest democracies. This was followed by an intimate tête-à-tête between the two leaders and an expanded round of bilateral and political discussions. The outcomes of these engagements were ambitious and forward-looking.

    The discussions placed significant emphasis on security. Both leaders pledged to enhance cooperation in counterterrorism, maritime security, and intelligence sharing. In response to growing threats in the Gulf of Guinea and the Indian Ocean, they agreed to coordinated actions to protect maritime trade routes and combat piracy. Joint naval exercises and anti-piracy operations will soon become a regular feature of this defense collaboration.

    “Terrorism in all its forms must be condemned,” the leaders declared in a joint statement, which was made available, in parts, to journalists at the State House by Special Adviser to President Tinubu on Information and Strategy, Mr. Bayo Onanuga, emphasizing a zero-tolerance approach to terror financing and the cross-border movement of extremists. Prime Minister Modi also offered India’s expertise to support Nigeria’s defense modernization efforts, highlighting his country’s emergence as a trusted manufacturer in the global defense industry.

    Trade and investment also took center stage during the discussions. India remains Nigeria’s largest trading partner, with bilateral trade heavily dominated by Nigeria’s crude oil exports to India. President Tinubu applauded the contributions of over 200 Indian companies operating in Nigeria, which have created thousands of jobs and significant investments. Both leaders directed their officials to finalize pending agreements, including the Economic Cooperation Agreement (ECA) and the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT), to further boost trade and investment flows.

    President Tinubu reflected on this partnership, noting, “India has stood side by side with Nigeria for decades, demonstrating an unwavering commitment to our mutual development. Our renewed agreements today only strengthen these ties further.” He also pointed to the $14 billion in pledges from Indian investors during the Nigeria-India Presidential Roundtable in September 2023 as evidence of the burgeoning economic collaboration between the two nations.

    Healthcare, agriculture, and energy featured prominently in the discussions. The Indian government extended an offer to provide affordable generic medicines to Nigeria under its Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Janaushadhi Pariyojana (PMBJP) initiative. This effort will ensure vulnerable populations in Nigeria have access to quality medicines. Modi also proposed sharing India’s CoWIN platform, a revolutionary digital health management tool, to support Nigeria’s vaccination programs and other health initiatives.

    Food security emerged as a critical area of cooperation, with both leaders acknowledging the urgent need to bolster agricultural productivity. India’s timely rice supply to Nigeria during periods of scarcity was praised by President Tinubu, who expressed optimism about future collaboration in high-yield seeds, advanced farming technology, and agricultural equipment. “Nigeria and India share common challenges, but with India’s support, I am confident we can turn these challenges into opportunities,” Tinubu said.

    Prime Minister Modi, in his remarks, emphasized the enduring friendship between the two countries. “The relations between India and Nigeria are built on mutual respect, understanding, and shared aspirations,” he said. He dedicated the Grand Commander of the Order of the Niger (GCON) honour, conferred on him by Tinubu, to the people of India and reaffirmed his commitment to strengthening ties. “This honour will continue to inspire us to take the India-Nigeria strategic partnership to new heights,” Modi added.

    One significant feature of Modi state visit was the GCON honour conferment on the Indian Prime Minister. The GCON is the second highest honour awarded in Nigeria, only after the Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR), which is reserved for the President only. GCON is therefore the highest honour conferred on any other human who is not Nigeria’s President and for those who know its significance, you cannot get any better recognition from Nigeria than this most honourable award.

    What Tinubu managed to do with that honour was further strengthening the relationship, first between himself and the leader of the largest democracy in the world, as friends from who he would want to gain favours and grace for Nigerians. Then it was meant to be a mark of friendship between Nigeria and India and nations with similar backgrounds. It was aimed at procuring more goods from India, one of the fastest growing economies, for Nigeria as well as strengthening peerage between both nations. 

    Cultural exchanges and people-to-people connections also received a boost during the visit. Both leaders agreed on the importance of promoting tourism and expanding academic and cultural programs. With over 60,000 Indians residing in Nigeria, Modi expressed his gratitude for the warm hospitality his compatriots have enjoyed over the years. “Nigeria’s diversity mirrors India’s, and this diversity is our strength. Together, we can harness it to create a more prosperous future for our people,” Modi remarked.

    The visit also highlighted Nigeria’s growing influence on the global stage. Prime Minister Modi applauded Nigeria’s leadership in Africa and its contributions to multilateral organizations. The two leaders reaffirmed their shared commitment to reforming the United Nations Security Council and increasing representation for developing countries. Tinubu noted, “Our partnership with India extends beyond bilateral benefits; it is about shaping global narratives and ensuring the voices of the Global South are heard.”

    As the visit concluded, both leaders expressed optimism about the outcomes. Memoranda of Understanding were signed on customs cooperation, cultural exchange programs, and infrastructure development, signaling a new phase of collaboration. Modi also announced 20 tonnes of humanitarian aid to support flood relief efforts in Nigeria, demonstrating solidarity during challenging times.

    “This is a partnership rooted in history and driven by a shared vision for the future”, Tinubu said, reflecting on the significance of Modi’s visit. “India and Nigeria are united by common values and aspirations, and I am confident that together, we will achieve extraordinary things.”

    At the end of the reception for Modi on Sunday, President Tinubu headed to Rio de Janeiro, the capital of Brazil to attend the 19th G20 Leaders’ Summit. Incidentally, Modi was heading for the same destination same Sunday.

    The Summit was a platform for its incumbent Chairman, being the host leader, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil, to float an initiative, which is focused on achieving a better and more human world; Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty. President Tinubu lauded the creation of the Alliance. In his words, this initiative is “a bold and visionary step” toward addressing some of the world’s most pressing issues, describing it as a “significant milestone” in global efforts to eradicate inequality and deprivation.

    “This bold and visionary step underscores Brazil’s leadership in addressing one of the most urgent and persistent challenges facing our world today. By fostering collaboration between governments, international organisations, and civil society, this initiative offers a comprehensive approach not only to addressing immediate needs but also tackling the structural causes of hunger and poverty,” Tinubu said passionately.

    Read Also: Reps seek GCON national honour for ex-Speakers

    His endorsement of the alliance aligns perfectly with its domestic priorities. Tinubu was quick to draw parallels between this global initiative and the eight priority areas outlined during his inauguration 18 months ago. “These goals are at the core of Nigeria’s development agenda, and the alliance offers a platform to accelerate progress towards them” he emphasized.

    Nigeria’s commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly eradicating poverty (SDG 1) and achieving zero hunger (SDG 2), received a notable boost. Tinubu assured world leaders that Nigeria would leverage the best practices, innovative solutions, and financial support the alliance provides.

    Beyond hunger and poverty, Tinubu championed the need for reform in the United Nations Security Council. He called on the G20 to push for Africa’s representation in this elite group, stating, “the Security Council should expand its permanent and non-permanent member categories to reflect the world’s diversity and plurality better. Africa deserves priority in this process, and two permanent seats should be allocated to it with equal rights and responsibilities. Nigeria stands ready and willing to serve as a representative of Africa in this capacity.”

    On the sidelines of the G20 Summit, Tinubu met with IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva, where the discussion pivoted to Nigeria’s ongoing economic reforms. Tinubu acknowledged the toll of these changes, particularly on the poor and vulnerable, but reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to cushioning the impact through targeted interventions.

    “We have started seeing positive results from our reforms, and the Nigerian people now understand the need for them, but we have to reduce the hardship that has resulted from the implementation,” Tinubu told Georgieva.

    Education, a critical component of Tinubu’s development agenda, also featured prominently in the discussions. “We have too many children out of school, and we know that education is a way out of hunger and poverty. That is why we are designing ways and incentives to keep these children in school, and we need your support for these kids who want to stay in school,” the president stressed.

    Tinubu’s push for investment in infrastructure and his administration’s ongoing tax reforms aimed at expanding the economic base were also discussed. “We are engaging stakeholders and sensitizing Nigerians to expand the economy’s tax base for inclusive developmental growth. We are doing this without necessarily increasing the taxes on our people who have already given a lot. We will require your support on this,” he told the IMF boss.

    With an eye on the bigger picture, Tinubu’s engagement with the IMF also highlighted Nigeria’s pivotal role in global economic dialogues. Georgieva’s acknowledgment of Nigeria’s leadership during the IMF African Caucus meeting in August was a testament to this.

    Beyond Modi’s call and the G20 Summit outing, it was the week Mr. President sacked Nnamdi Azikiwe University’s Governing Council and Vice Chancellor in just one pronouncement, swapped leaderships at two other federal universities, infused order in his media team and lead his Livestock Development team to shop for Brazilian investment. It was a very eventful week, mostly dominated by his quest to place Nigeria properly in the heart of global order. We can only wait to see what this week will offer as he returns from Rio de Janeiro and prepares for another important engagement in France, all things being equal.