Category: Tuesday

  • Again, Buhari’s School Certificate

    President Muhammadu Buhari’s West African School Certificate – or lack thereof –has got to be the most stubborn issue in recent Nigerian politics.

    Its durability is all the more puzzling because the issue never came up during the first three times he ran for president.  Then, all of a sudden, it bobbed up as he closed in on the ACN’s presidential ticket in 2015 and, together with a lingering, life-threatening illness, dogged much of his campaign and threatened to render him hors de combat.

    Now, on the threshold of another presidential election, the matter has taken on a new, more insidious aspect.  Not because any earth-shaking revelations or new facts for that matter have surfaced.  Rather, the manufactured controversy has been raked up anew; unsupported assertions are being peddled with scarce regard for the rules of evidence, and conclusions      that cannot stand close scrutiny are being propagated with the solemnity of holy writ.

    We have been there before.

    First, a recap:

    At the time of filing his 2015 election papers, Buhari had indicated that his School Certificate, or high school diploma, was in the possession of the military authorities and could be obtained from them.  The military authorities had said at one point that they were indeed in possession of the certificate, only to recant later in a sensational press conference.

    In a disavowal heard around the world, a military spokesman virtually put the contents of General Muhammadu Buhari’s personnel file on global display.  It contained no evidence, Brigadier Oladele Laleye said for the military high command, that Buhari obtained the requisite West African School Certificate, merely a letter from his school principal recommending him for admission to the Nigeria Defence Academy and expressing confidence that he would obtain a Division II in the WASC examination.

    The way the military spokesman carried on, you would think that he was the chief prosecutor at a court-martial.

    By then the Goodluck Jonathan Campaign had worked itself and the PDP crowd into a froth.  They launched a made-for-the-Internet “Buhari, Show Your Certificate” Campaign, hashtag and all.  General Buhari, the most desperate elements in this group said, had been smuggled into the Officers’ Corps on quota, with total disregard for the rules.  In the normal run of things, he would have rated no higher than a sergeant, they said.

    All manner of experts on the Nigerian Constitution hopped from television station to television

    station, declaring that all the credentials Buhari had earned in prestigious foreign military academies could not make up for his not having the WASC.

    “You cannot build something on nothing,” one of them said sententiously, quoting that epigram in the original Latin for added effect.  The same fellow went on to declare that, by laying claim to a qualification he did not possess, or by falsely claiming that his credentials were in the possession of   the military authorities, Buhari had committed perjury.  The penalty for         that crime, he hinted darkly, was imprisonment for 14 years.

    The implication was clear:  Buhari was more likely to end up in Kirikiri Prison than in the Presidential Villa.

    It was at this point that the GMB Campaign which had refused to be drawn into the contrived controversy — some were already calling it a scandal —and chosen instead to absorb the jeers and the taunts and the innuendos and the coarse abuse in the finest rope-a-dope tradition came out swinging.

    Buhari authorised Government College, Katsina, the successor of his alma mater, the Katsina Provincial Secondary School, to release an authenticated statement of result in the WASC.

    The transcript shows, as Buhari had earlier disclosed, that he had passed the examination in Division Two, a respectable achievement back when examination leakages were almost unheard of, and the industrial-scale cheating that today marks most public examinations was inconceivable.

    You would think that its functionaries would now cease and desist, if not admit error.

    No chance.  They called the document furnished by Buhari’s school a fresh forgery.  They claimed that Buhari could not have passed Hausa at the WASC exam in 1961 because that subject was not offered then.

    They even trotted out an “expert” in “curriculum studies” from one of the universities who declared without fear and without research that no indigenous-language examinations were conducted on that platform in Nigeria until the 6-3-3-4 formula was introduced.

    God help his students.

    Back in Buhari’s schooldays, Hausa was already being offered even at the Advanced Level, and one of the set books was Shaihu Umar, a well-regarded novel in that language by Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, later Nigeria’s prime minister.

    They also claimed that Buhari had gone straight from secondary school to the NDA, without the benefit of a School Certificate.  But that was the trajectory for all candidates.

    On finishing the School Certificate examination in December, applicants for admission to the Defence Academy headed straight for the recruitment test. If they passed the tests, they commenced their training immediately.  They would have been told to bring along their equipage, since they could not go back home once the tests began.

    When the School Certificate exam results were released the following March, cadets who passed continued their studies at the Defence Academy.  Those who failed the WASC had to drop out. You could not get past that obstacle.

    Now, four years later, Buhari has in his filing for the presidential election stated again that his WASC is in the possession of the military authorities.  His determined opponents have resurrected the manufactured controversy over the certificate, declaring the authenticated statement from his former school an outright forgery.

    Buhari’s school certificate, it has to be said, has had a dodgy life.  However, if it cannot be produced, does it follow that it never existed?  Why can’t it be presumed lost or missing?

    That is what the West African Examination Council has now done.  This past weekend, its registrar Dr. Iyi Uwadiae, presented Buhari with a document attesting and confirming that Buhari did earn the West African School Certificate in 1961.

    Dr Uwadiae said WAEC recognised that candidates could lose their examination certificates through fire and other kinds of attrition.  In such cases, WAEC issued attestations or duplicate copies.

    Hear it from Dr Uwadiae:  “Whoever sat for WASC exams in whatever year, we have the records in our database, and Mr. President, we have the records of the examinations you sat in 1961. We have the attestation of results which we issue to candidates who lost their certificates and confirmation of results.’’

    Whether Buhari had solicited the intervention or not is beside the point.  In a rational debate, the intervention should put the matter to rest, unless one takes the inane position that WAEC, a regional examining body of five member-states, is complicit in a forgery, and that its officials are accessories after the fact.

    Those who have made an obsession of Buhari’s school certificate have in fact made that charge.  According to a PDP spokesperson, “A check on the attestation clearly shows that it does not have the “Original Certificate Number,” the key authentication feature in all genuine attestations by WAEC.”

    “Instead,” it added, “a ‘non-applicable’ is entered, indicating that the beneficiary does not have a certificate to be attested to, thus rendering the said attestation unauthenticated, fake and of no effect.”

    But what the PDP said it found “most appalling” was that “Mr President’s handlers have succeeded in dragging a reputable institution as WAEC into public disrepute and opprobrium, as Nigerians are quick to demonstrate marks of forgery in the attestation issued by the examination body.”

    There you have it.

    By the way, I had no idea before now that the PDP was also in the forensics business.

    Others are disputing the attestation on grounds less recondite.  They say that, unlike the statement of results issued by the Katsina Provincial Secondary School – which they had all along disputed – it does not list Woodwork and Mathematics which Buhari had failed in the examination.

    Again, there is a simple explanation.  According to WAEC, subjects a candidate failed have long ceased to be entered on a certificate or attestation.

    One of Buhari’s most implacable traducers maintains all the same that “the evidence suggests that what Buhari asked Government College, Katsina to present to INEC as evidence of his credentials was a forged certificate.”  Buhari should therefore resign because “he does not have a school-leaving certificate and also submitted a forged document.”

    And in case you thought the law is not on his side, the fellow cites Section 137 (10) of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution, to wit: “A person shall not be qualified for election to the office of President if he has presented a forged certificate to the Independent National Electoral Commission.”

    Is it on such drivel, such chicanery, that the 2019 presidential election will be fought?

  • Fuel subsidy through the back door

    Pity a country that never gets its sums right; where what you see is not necessarily what you get; a country where good and bad are intertwined; one in which those charged with public policy perennially play on semantics to hoodwink, confuse and confound.Yours truly refers to the latest ‘spat’on the subsidy starring the Senate, the NNPC and the Ministry of Finance over the recurring issue of oil subsidy.

    Recall that Abiodun Olujimi, Senate Minority Leader had at plenary on Oct. 16 and in a point of order, alleged the existence of a $3.5 billion dollar “Subsidy Recovery Fund” being managed only by the GMD and Executive Director, Finance, of the NNPC”. The Senate in apparent consternation had immediately set up a committee, chaired by the Majority Leader, Sen. Ahmed Lawan to investigate.

    Recall also that Ben Akabueze, Director General of the Budget Office, had alerted Nigerians to the existence of a N53 subsidy on every litre of petrol consumed by Nigerians which at the current petrol consumption level of 45 million litres comes to a princely N2.38 billion in daily under-recovery.

    But then, simply because we are dealing with a notoriously opaque entity that has long lost its rationale both as a business concern and as a national oil corporation, an ordinarily simple and straight-forward matter has not onlybeen made complicated but has been, quite characteristically, shrouded in the corporation’s dubious semantics.

    After initially denying that a $3.5 billion dollar subsidy fund exists in a statement on Oct. 17, last Thursday, NNPCthrough its GMD, Maikanti Baruhas now admitted to a”revolving fund of $1.05 billion dollars to defray the cost of under-recovery in the importation of fuel”.

    Pressed by the lawmakers to differentiate between subsidy and the “cost of under-recovery”, heclaimed that whereas subsidy was usually captured in the national budget, the latter was not! Ostensibly sensing an implied affront to the nation’s organic law, he would later claim justification in section 7 (4) (b) of the NNPC Act, which mandated it to defray its operational costs from its revenue!

    “This $1.05 billion is being administered under a steering committee that was set up, and a working committee that handles daily operations of this fund.

    “These committees comprise representatives of the Minister of Finance, Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Accountant General of the Federation, CBN, Petroleum Pricing Regulatory Agency, Petroleum Equalisation Fund Management Board, Directorate of Petroleum Resources and the NNPC. “The fund is being transparently administered according to laid down processes and governance.

    “The actions of NNPC” he said “were in compliance with the National Assembly directive that NNPC, as the supplier of last resort should, and has, maintained robust petrol supply and distribution to the nation. Currently, no other oil company imports petrol due to the high landing cost above the N145 per litre price ceiling on sale of the product, and also due to the lack of provision for subsidy in the Appropriation Acts since 2016”.

    Although well said, it is no less self-indicting. In the first place, good intentions cannot be a substitute to law. The law is clear enough on how public funds can be spent, which is through the appropriation instrument. The management of the corporation ought to know, and the point is elementary, that NNPC Act cannot be superior to this simple requirement. As for the steering committee set up to administer the so-called under-recovery, surely, Nigerians would be interested in knowing the legal instrument that set it up and the relevant law applicable.

    Read also: NNPC denies alleged existence of $3.5bn fuel subsidy fund

    These are strange times indeed.

    The issue really is that the fuel subsidy issue, once emotive, is no longer what it used to be. Indeed, while majority of Nigerians would seem to have long incorporated the concept into the nation’s fiscal lexicography, only those in government, for reasons best known to them, continue to, in the manner of ostrich, play the hide and seek over a matter borne of simple arithmetic and common sense.

    So, where is the difference in the claim by Olujinmi of a “Subsidy Recovery Fund” (which she alleged was created surreptitiously by NNPC) and so-called revolving fund for under-recovery which NNPC admits is actually in operation – a pool neither known to law nor within the contemplation of the Nigerian constitution?

    For a government ever so eager to brandish the implementation of the Treasury Single Account as achievement, it comes as curious novelty that NNPC could claim the leeway to operate an account neither known to law nor subject to the dictates of parliamentary appropriation. So where is the difference between the reforming Buhari-led administration and the ancien regime which it so trenchantly vilifiesat every turn?

    More fundamentally, what does one make of the bizarre economics under which the country gets to burn off billions of naira under the disgraceful subsidy regime, cloaked as it were, with the veil of secrecy which ensures that business of under-recovery is guaranteed to thrive?

    Think of the double whammy: the country spends some $8 billion annually to bring those auto-contraptions we so much love to advertise on our pockmarked highways; citizen-entrepreneurs forage the scrap-yards in Europe and America for used auto-parts in what some estimates put at $4 billion business; our self-serving elite, ever so ready to conflate their rentier interests with the public good thinks nothing of government shelling out some $3.5 billion in petrol import alone of which approximately $1.5 billion is borne by the government in under-recovery and associated rent on behalf of the owners of the 12 million vehicles on Nigerian roads.

    And now with energy prices on gallop, we are suddenly finding that we need more and more of scarce funds to underwrite the subsidy.

    Hardly common sense or economics; it is more appropriately, profligacy.

    I understand why the subsidy issue is an emotive subject. I have heard the argument, and it is a familiar one, that a country which exists only in name and where the limited available resources are cornered by rapacious elite and basic social services are non-existent have no business denying the ordinary citizen his enjoyment of one of nature’s most beautiful gifts! Nothing disagreeable in the sentiments – if you ask me; the debate about what to do with the wasting asset is unlikely to be resolved either now or anytime soon. But then, what is not going to help is the denial of its econometrics and the recourse to outlawry by an administration supposedly sworn to change.

  • Exit The Fixer

    Tony Akhakon Anenih’s passage (4 August 1933 – 28 October 2018) at 85, like the death of any elder, is sweet and sour, especially for his kith and kin.

    Sweet, because he was an old man.  Sour, because no matter how old your old folks get, you hate to see them go.

    So, you can’t but bond with the Anenih family, in their grim gaiety — empathy with them while mourning their dead; but gaiety too, because their patriarch died at ripe old age.

    But outside that intimate family circle, in the broad public sphere where he played for almost 40 years (1981-2018), Anenih was one of those unsavory figures of Nigerian politics and governance.

    But the redeeming grace was his ideological fealty, extremely rare, in the quicksand of Political Nigeria.

    Anenih rose or sunk with his conservative class; and would do whatever it took to put his talents at their disposal — no matter how ugly or dire. In Soyinka-esque quip, the end justifies the meanness!

    So, he didn’t earn that moniker, Mr. Fix It, for nothing — the ultimate muscler-in-chief, in the Olusegun Obasanjo (dis)order, which pitiably collapsed in 2015, on fall guy-in-chief, Goodluck Jonathan.

    Neither, for nothing, did he, at the zenith of conservative power, earn President Obasanjo’s fond praise: “My Leader” — perhaps, comparable only to Obasanjo’s rogue praise of the late Lamidi Adedibu, the Obasanjo-era South West “garrison commander”.

    Anenih made his political debut as Bendel State (now Edo and Delta states) chairman of the 2nd Republic National Party of Nigeria (NPN).

    He not only ousted another Tony, the great Chief Anthony Enahoro, iconic 1st Republic (1960-1966) progressive voice turned 2nd Republic Bendel conservative guttural. Via another controversial election, Anenih led the local NPN to electorally sack Governor Ambrose Alli, the Bendel Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) governor (1979-1983).

    Their triumphant candidate was the iconic Sam Ogbemudia, who nevertheless was governor from 1 October till the putsch of 31 December 1983, that terminated the 2nd Republic.

    Read also: Anenih’s unsung wonder

    Incidentally, Ogbemudia (also now dead) would later distance himself from the Anenih-powered Edo politics of underdevelopment; which came crashing with the Adams Oshiomhole governorship, birthing in 2018, with the reclaim of a stolen mandate.

    The great Enahoro too would later sever his interregnum with the political conservatives, to launch his Movement for National Reformation (MNR), which with other allies, staged the Pro-National Conference Organizations (PRONACO) national conference, proposing a new constitution to re-federalize Nigeria, in Lagos, 2005.

    But not Anenih!  He lived and died a conservative, warts and all, though even he fell into some eerie (dis?)quiet, very close to his grave, when he declared himself “retired” from politics.

    Chief Anenih would burst on the Nigerian consciousness, as second chairman of the Ibrahim Babangida-created Social Democratic Party (SDP), after his more conservative People’s Front (PF) faction, of the late Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, had trumped, in party posts, the more progressive People’s Solidarity Party (PSP) faction, peopled by the older Awoists.

    Anenih’s SDP faction conspired with anti-democratic military elements and other reactionary forces to negotiate away Basorun MKO Abiola’s June 12, 1993 presidential mandate.

    The result was the Ernest Shonekan-chaired Interim National Government (ING), which the grim Sani Abacha would later shove aside, to inflict his own iron rule.

    That brazen rape of the sanctity of the vote established Anenih’s political notoriety, once and for all.  That violent assault, and its impassioned challenge by MKO, and other pro-democracy forces, threw Nigeria into a dire crisis.

    But it also exhausted the historical possibilities of an uppity but hypocritical military; quick to grab power, but a sheer epitome of galloping graft, wanton sleaze and crippling decadence.

    For all its needless trouble, however, the June 12 crisis shut up — forever — the noxious Nigerian breed of military politicians, bringing their once respected institution into disrepute, with their uncommon greed. That was one unintended good for the polity.

    Still, the leading figures, of that ING conspiracy, only had own self-tragedies to show — for causing the majority much anguish and pain?

    Yar’Adua died in Abacha’s gulag; Obasanjo barely escaped that doom, before powering back as first 4th Republic elected president, no thanks  to the eternal plotting of the generals; Abacha himself died in office, but blights his loved ones with an abiding, rotten memory of irredeemable sleaze; IBB endures long, long post-office blues, after all the power and all the glory, of not only being in office but also being in power; Shonekan, never garrulous at the best of times, keeps a sensitive quiet at the worst, the placid face of a roaring, vicious conspiracy; and Anenih had his reputation, and political essence, permanently blighted, long before he breathed his last.

    Just as well, perhaps?  Brutal question but hardly an unfair query.

    Anenih, led by his party leader and then sitting president, Obasanjo, were unfazed anti-democratic elements.  Yet, they ended up as prime beneficiaries of MKO’s martyrdom, after four years in Abacha’s gulag, for claiming a rightful mandate.

    Still, they were cavalier, in their politics and policies, that reward for anti-democracy is prime and juicy democratic office.

    Obasanjo went on a tangent of unfazed presidential imperialism, ready to crush any opposition to its power — no matter how outrageous that exercise of crude power; or how reasoned or towering, the moral authority of the challenge.  If your doubt, ask Lagos State and its seized local government funds.

    Anenih, meanwhile, was festooned up there, to fix everything fixable or execrable, just to maintain power, no matter what.  That hubris led to the attempt to “fix” the Oshiomhole election result, which failure eventually led to, in Oshiomhole’s own biting own words, “retiring” the Edo political godfathers.

    That is the long and short of the Obasanjo-led PDP order, that collapsed on Jonathan in 2015.

    Though Anenih sunk into some loud quiet, after that order had crashed in 2015, Obasanjo appears fated to rattle until he breathes his last, given his latest activism to promote Atiku Abubakar’s PDP presidential candidacy, even after publishing unprintable stuff about that same Atiku; beside, without much ado, abandoning his own so-called “Third Force”, that he had announced, with much pomp, less than nine months ago.

    But Obasanjo labours in vain, for the order he promotes is too rotten to receive a new life.  Anenih’s death may well be an earlier spiritual warning, about the eventual but dismal death of that misadventure.

    Anenih was a prime study in the fatality of turning reactionary, even as a conservative.  But make no mistake: reaction is no sole monopoly of conservatives.

    As the 2019 elections approach, this polity teems with virulent progressive reactionaries, selling pure falsehood, just to stay alive and relevant.  But again, all that would end in vain — and pain.

    Anenih never ranked among the salutary politicians of his time.  Still, may God forgive his sins and grant him eternal rest.

  • Paramole!

    Paramole!

    That about captures the essence of Asiwaju Olorunfunmi Basorun, who turned 80 on October 15; and marked that epoch with a biography: Paramole O Koro Iwosi: Asiwaju Reuben Olorunfunmi Basorun, authored by The Nation’s Soji Omotunde.

    “Paramole” is the Yoruba for rattlesnake, which though is famously tranquil, strikes with fatal devastation when rattled.

    That was exactly Basorun’s public service essence. Teasers:

    It was the low blues of military overthrow of the 2nd Republic (31 December 1983); and the popular fib that everyone, in the overthrown old order, was a thief.

    This reconstructed dialogue ensued between a cleared Basorun and the Police at CID Panti, Ebute-Meta, Lagos. Basorun had gone to re-claim his international passport.

    Basorun: “Where is my US$ 1, 900 armed policemen took from my official GRA, Ikeja, quarters?”
    Police: “We have spent it on a number of things, including imprest. But we have small change left — in Naira”!
    Basorun (taking the Naira wad and putting it in his jacket pocket), roaring: “Now, you say we politicians are rogues! Why should you spend my money?”
    Police (mumbling): “It was not our fault …”
    Basorun (bawling): “Whose fault — the Army’s? Shame on you, all!” — and he stormed out of Panti.

    Indeed, Paramole ko ‘ro ‘wosi — the rattlesnake brooks no insult! How Basorun earned that cognomen was no less dramatic.

    Dada Adepari Paramole, his grandfather had, in his native Igbogbo, announced, with grim gaiety, that newborn Olorunfunmi would hasten his departure. Pronto, a few weeks later, Grandpa Paramole died! Enter, Olorunfunmi, the Paramole incarnate!

    No less gripping, was Albert Adewamiwa Ogumuyiwa, his biological father’s early death; and his mother, Abigail Bosede Ogunmuyiwa’s betrothal to Pa Yesufu Adeniji Basorun, a World War II veteran, then domiciled at 47, Oluwole Street, Lagos.

    The denizens of Oluwole would later be resettled at Ogba, Ikeja, segment of “new Lagos”; after Ebute Meta, Yaba and Surulere.

    Ogunmuyiwa died when Olorufunmi was five. The boy knew his father as much as a close five-year old would; since he always accompanied the parent to his farm. But the Ogunmuyiwas’ loss would appear the Basoruns’ gain, since the boy had to formally take his stepfather’s name.

    But at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Reuben Olorunfunmi Basorun would tangle with another Basorun, Alhaji Shittu A. Basorun (no blood relation). The older Basorun threatened to scuttle his subordinate’s promising career, for inadvertently sighting the senior’s pay advice — a fulsome £100!

    CBN headhunted the younger Basorun on 5 January 1959, following his dazzling prowess in Mathematics, during his secondary school years, at Eko Boys’ High School (EBHS).

    Still, the youngster survived that initial threat — thanks to fasting and prayers, from a white garment church. He would, much later, rise to become the spiritual head of one of such churches, The Gospel Church of C & S.

    Nevertheless, that initial battle would trigger his Paramole spirit, to fight for his right, and those of his colleagues’ at CBN, no matter the odds — and triumph, most of the times.

    Basorun would lead a strike — drafted when the initial leader was pressured out by the Gowon military government — for better welfare for CBN staff, until the Gowon government passed a decree outlawing such.

    He also wrote an unsigned, though hand-written letter, to protest CBN staff injustices, causing the Thomas Aguiyi-Ironsi first military government to formally warn the CBN management against such conduct.

    Later, he would lead a group of four to write daily letters to protest being looked over for promotion, when lesser qualified staff were promoted, during the Clement Isong CBN governorship. Though the others soon chickened out, he continued the daily protest letter, for which he was threatened with a sack by Governor Isong.

    But then, came the Murtala Muhammad coup, the sack of Isong and the appointment of Mallam Adamu Ciroma as new CBN governor. Ciroma finally addressed the problem and Basorun (with other cheated but qualified staff) got his promotion as Assistant Director, thus attaining the CBN executive rank.

    That vaulted him into some instant CBN staff champion — “For any problem,” his fellow staff would crow, “call Basorun”!

    When he exited CBN in 1979, to join the elected Lateef Jakande government, as secretary to the Lagos State Government (SLG), he had attained the post of Deputy Director.

    Even with punitive postings to Maiduguri and volunteering to go run the Jos branch of CBN during the Araba crisis of 1966, at the apex of the Igbo pogrom in Northern Nigeria, he had rendered stellar service to the apex bank.

    That was aside from, as part-time student, earning professional epaulets as chartered banker, chartered secretary, and a BSc in Business Administration from the University of Lagos. He would, post-Second Republic, study Law at the same Unilag; later proceeding to the Law School, Lagos, to earn a BL.

    Indeed, Basorun’s punitive posting to Maiduguri nearly scuttled his Unilag BSc programme, but for the understanding of his Dean, Unilag’s Faculty of Business Administration, Accounting Professor, Michael Adeyemo.

    Yet, Basorun responded with nothing but excellent service to his bank. It was no wonder then, that his latter days at CBN, under Olabiyi Durojaiye (later Senator) and Ola Vincent as Governor, was much more enjoyable.

    Paramole got to know Alhaji Jakande, in his bid to checkmate a perceived marginalization, by Ikorodu indigenes, of other natives of Ikorodu Division.

    Jakande referred him to Femi Alokolaro, a Lagos lawyer, who was coordinating Jakande’s — and Chief Awolowo’s — Committee of Friends in Lagos, the precursor to 2nd Republic Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN), that won power in Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Bendel and Ondo (LOOBO) states.

    But no sooner than he joined the Committee of Friends than he became one of the brain boxes of that spectacular 2nd Republic Jakande government. He was that government’s first SSG. This biography also opened an intimate window into that government’s policy thrust.

    Indeed, that Basorun inevitably was made “secretary” to almost all organizations he belonged to — Lagos-wide; and in his native Igbogbo, where he has amassed tremendous community value — underscores his unstinting and meritorious service: Jakande’s SLG, secretary to the Ikorodu Division arm of Committee of Friends; and to umpteenth Igbogbo development unions: cooperatives, community banks, etc.

    But despite the Jakande link, Basorun joined the PRIMROSE — People Resolved Irrevocably to Maximizing Resources of State for Excellence — anti-“Baba sope” [the patriarch has decreed] rebellion, against the Jakande order, in 1991.

    Paramole is as much about the personal, political, community and spiritual history of His Eminence, Olorunfumi Basorun, spiritual head of The Gospel Church of C & S, Orile-Iganmu, Lagos; as it is about the formative history of CBN and a whistle-stop history of Political Lagos, from the 2nd Republic (1979-1983) till date; and the dynamics of Igbobo’s development — at least from the subject’s agile eyes.

    It’s a treasure everyone curious about Nigerian political history must have.

    Quote: “Paramole is as much about Olorunfumi Basorun, as it is about the formative history of CBN and a whistle-stop history of political Lagos from the 2nd Republic”

  • Paramole!

    Paramole!  That about captures the essence of Asiwaju Olorunfunmi Basorun, who turned 80 on October 15; and marked that epoch with a biography: Paramole O Koro Iwosi: Asiwaju Reuben Olorunfunmi Basorun, authored by The Nation’s Soji Omotunde.

    Paramole” is the Yoruba for rattlesnake, which though is famously tranquil, strikes with fatal devastation when rattled.

    That was exactly Basorun’s public service essence.  Teasers:

    It was the low blues of military overthrow of the 2nd Republic (31 December 1983); and the popular fib that everyone, in the overthrown old order, was a thief.

    This reconstructed dialogue ensued between a cleared Basorun and the Police at CID Panti, Ebute-Meta, Lagos.  Basorun had gone to re-claim his international passport.

    Basorun: “Where is my US$ 1, 900 armed policemen took from my official GRA, Ikeja, quarters?”

    Police: “We have spent it on a number of things, including imprest.  But we have small change left — in Naira”!

    Basorun (taking the Naira wad and putting it in his jacket pocket), roaring: “Now, you say we politicians are rogues!  Why should you spend my money?”

    Police (mumbling): “It was not our fault …”

    Basorun (bawling): “Whose fault — the Army’s?  Shame on you, all!” — and he stormed out of Panti.

    Indeed, Paramole ko ‘ro ‘wosi — the rattlesnake brooks no insult!  How Basorun earned that cognomen was no less dramatic.

    Dada Adepari Paramole, his grandfather had, in his native Igbogbo, announced, with grim gaiety, that newborn Olorunfunmi would hasten his departure.  Pronto, a few weeks later, Grandpa Paramole died!  Enter, Olorunfunmi, the Paramole incarnate!

    No less gripping, was Albert Adewamiwa Ogumuyiwa, his biological father’s early death; and his mother, Abigail Bosede Ogunmuyiwa’s betrothal to Pa Yesufu Adeniji Basorun, a World War II veteran, then domiciled at 47, Oluwole Street, Lagos.

    The denizens of Oluwole would later be resettled at Ogba, Ikeja, segment of “new Lagos”; after Ebute Meta, Yaba and Surulere.

    Ogunmuyiwa died when Olorufunmi was five.  The boy knew his father as much as a close five-year old would; since he always accompanied the parent to his farm.  But the Ogunmuyiwas’ loss would appear the Basoruns’ gain, since the boy had to formally take his stepfather’s name.

    But at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Reuben Olorunfunmi Basorun would tangle with another Basorun, Alhaji Shittu A. Basorun (no blood relation).  The older

    Basorun threatened to scuttle his subordinate’s promising career, for inadvertently sighting the senior’s pay advice — a fulsome £100!

    CBN headhunted the younger Basorun on 5 January 1959, following his dazzling prowess in Mathematics, during his secondary school years, at Eko Boys’ High School (EBHS).

    Still, the youngster survived that initial threat — thanks to fasting and prayers, from a white garment church.  He would, much later, rise to become the spiritual head of one of such churches, The Gospel Church of C & S.

    Nevertheless, that initial battle would trigger his Paramole spirit, to fight for his right, and those of his colleagues’ at CBN, no matter the odds — and triumph, most of the times.

    Basorun would lead a strike — drafted when the initial leader was pressured out by the Gowon military government — for better welfare for CBN staff, until the Gowon government passed a decree outlawing such.

    He also wrote an unsigned, though hand-written letter, to protest CBN staff injustices, causing the Thomas Aguiyi-Ironsi first military government to formally warn the CBN management against such conduct.

    Later, he would lead a group of four to write daily letters to protest being looked over for promotion, when lesser qualified staff were promoted, during the Clement Isong CBN governorship.  Though the others soon chickened out, he continued the daily protest letter, for which he was threatened with a sack by Governor Isong.

    But then, came the Murtala Muhammad coup, the sack of Isong and the appointment of Mallam Adamu Ciroma as new CBN governor.  Ciroma finally addressed the problem and Basorun (with other cheated but qualified staff) got his promotion as Assistant Director, thus attaining the CBN executive rank.

    That vaulted him into some instant CBN staff champion — “For any problem,” his fellow staff would crow, “call Basorun”!

    When he exited CBN in 1979, to join the elected Lateef Jakande government, as secretary to the Lagos State Government (SLG), he had attained the post of Deputy Director.

    Even with punitive postings to Maiduguri and volunteering to go run the Jos branch of CBN during the Araba crisis of 1966, at the apex of the Igbo pogrom in Northern Nigeria, he had rendered stellar service to the apex bank.

    That was aside from, as part-time student, earning professional epaulets as chartered banker, chartered secretary, and a BSc in Business Administration from the University of Lagos.  He would, post-Second Republic, study Law at the same Unilag; later proceeding to the Law School, Lagos, to earn a BL.

    Indeed, Basorun’s  punitive posting to Maiduguri nearly scuttled his Unilag BSc programme, but for the understanding of his Dean, Unilag’s Faculty of Business Administration, Accounting Professor, Michael Adeyemo.

    Yet, Basorun responded with nothing but excellent service to his bank.  It was no wonder then, that his latter days at CBN, under Olabiyi Durojaiye (later Senator) and Ola Vincent as Governor, was much more enjoyable.

    Paramole got to know Alhaji Jakande, in his bid to checkmate a perceived marginalization, by Ikorodu indigenes, of other natives of Ikorodu Division.

    Jakande referred him to Femi Alokolaro, a Lagos lawyer, who was coordinating Jakande’s — and Chief Awolowo’s — Committee of Friends in Lagos, the precursor to 2nd Republic Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN), that won power in Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Bendel and Ondo (LOOBO) states.

    But no sooner than he joined the Committee of Friends than he became one of the brain boxes of that spectacular 2nd Republic Jakande government.  He was that government’s first SLG.  This biography also opened an intimate window into that government’s policy thrust.

    Indeed, that Basorun inevitably was made “secretary” to almost all organizations he belonged to — Lagos-wide; and in his native Igbogbo, where he has amassed tremendous community value — underscores his unstinting and meritorious service:  Jakande’s SLG, secretary to the Ikorodu Division arm of Committee of Friends; and to umpteenth Igbogbo development unions: cooperatives, community banks, etc.

    But despite the Jakande link, Basorun joined the PRIMROSE — People Resolved Irrevocably to Maximizing Resources of State for Excellence — anti-”Baba sope” [the patriarch has decreed] rebellion, against the Jakande order, in 1991.

    Paramole is as much about the personal, political, community and spiritual history of His Eminence, Olorunfumi Basorun, spiritual head of The Gospel Church of C & S, Orile-Iganmu, Lagos; as it is about the formative history of CBN and a whistle-stop history of Political Lagos, from the 2nd Republic (1979-1983) till date; and the dynamics of Igbobo’s development — at least from the subject’s agile eyes.

    It’s a treasure everyone curious about Nigerian political history must have.

  • Labour’s rumble

    Even without the latest threat by the unions to commence a nationwide, indefinite strike from November 6, if the government does not meet their demands for a new minimum wage, the outcome of theirtango with the governments would seem predictable. With few months to the General Elections and an economy already tottering on the brink; and with workers obviously primed to press things to their maximum advantage,and with neither the federal government nor our all-conquering governorshaving any answer to the challenge that is potentially debilitating to the national economy, it seems a straight one-sided affair. The best that the rest of Nigerians can hope is an outcome that will not further push the economy down the alley.

    These are perilous times no doubt.

    The story out there is that the federal government is pushing for a new minimum wage of N24,000from the N18,000 set in 2010 by the Goodluck Jonathan administration. Referencing a “tripartite agreement of N30,000 which it insists was a “compromise to demonstrate the willingness of Nigerian workers to make sacrifices towards nation building”, the organised labour thinks it has a deal which the government denies. For this, the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), through its president Ayuba Wabba, accuses the government of “mischief” while urging “the organised private sector “to speak up on this matter”.

    That is the latest twist in the story. While Nigerians are being primed for the inevitable showdown, for the parties and their allies in tango, the matter may well come to finding the arguments that suit the moment. Trust labour which had initially demanded N50,000 minimum wage,the climb down to N30,000 is not only reasonable, the fact that the current wage, set more than eight years ago, and in a completely different economic context and with vastly varied  parameters, would ordinarily make any thought of compromises a non-issue. As for the typically doddering federal government, it surely couldn’t make the argument enough: the offer of N24,000 (as against states’ proposal of N20,000)is merely pragmatic.As if it is any different from the states that it is wont to pillory, the federal government would further argue that many of the states are not doing enough to generate internal revenues to meet the recurrent expenditure; that too many avenues for corruption still exist in their bureaucracies. Moreover, considering that majority of states in the federation are in different degrees, in arrears of wages and pensions despite the massive federal interventions by way of bailoutsand the so-called Paris Club refunds, it should ordinarily be easy to understand why the burden of an extended burden of wages reviews will be a terrible pill to swallow particularly at this time.

    Both, surely have enough points to press. The Nigerian worker, as archetype wretched of the earth, far more than sympathy, deserves justice which the current wages deny him.  Aside the squalid conditions under which he iscalled to work, the terrible compensationswhich are such that can only guarantee a life of servitude – assuming s/he is any different from the pulverised counterpart outside of the orbit of the formal economy. On the other hand is the grim reality of a country, far from the illusion of being awash petro-dollars, is either perennially in debt or one struggling to pay its bills.

    So, why wait till now to push the minimum wage matter?

    The answer obviously lies in labour’s timing of what it sees as government’s vulnerability.  With an election around the corner, neither the federal nor state governments obviously wants to be seen on the wrong side of the organised labour on the issue as indeed any issue for that matter. Which is unfortunate really, considering that labour’s position of the matter is unassailable. Are there lessons the organised labour movement can learn from countries where express provisions are made by parliament for periodic reviews of minimum wages – if only to make such quests less disruptive to the economy? Is there anything that the current quest would achieve that a  more structured presentation of the issue would not have achieved at a more auspicious environment and time?

    So, who wins? Labour is certainly right to assume that it will have the upper hand at this time. But then, it will not always be the case.  To begin with, if the lessons of the last eight years are any instructive, one thing is to have a minimum wage on paper; the other is to have the ability to pay. Today, in many of the states where arrears of wages of workers are owed, all manners of formulae and improvisations are being deployed as the otherwise neat wage structures are turned on their heads.  Secondly, although the brouhaha is supposed to be about minimum wage, it is actually a programme of wage review across the board and with it the grim possibility of an inflationary spiral. Thirdly, that the quest applies only to those in the formal sector means that the brunt of the ensuing inflation will be borne – and this disproportionately by the segment of the population regarded as most vulnerable.

    Fourth, at a time the economy is actually shrinking – as against expanding – has anyone, including the leadership of labour considered the implication on industrial employment and capacity?

    How can anyone hope to win in the face of massive deficit in infrastructure; poor work ethic and overall poor productivity – again across the board?  Or is the quest simply about getting few additional crisp naira notes into the pocket?

    While we are at it, let me suggest something less disruptive that labour can do at this time: lead a fight for maximum wage – a peg on executive compensation. It can begin the fight at the corporate suites – starting with those meaningless Annual General Meetings where heist is lionised and legitimised. Not forgetting the heist-dom at the National Assembly. Sure will be hell of a fight but will be worth ever penny of it.   

    Has anyone truly considered the issue of unbridled executive compensations in the face of corporate failures as anything but toxic for the economy?

    I suggest that labour leads the charge.

  • The NYSC as nemesis

    Something revivifying has happened to the National Youth Service Scheme (NYSC).

    Just when it was being canvassed that the scheme no longer served any useful purpose beyond supplying cheap and largely indifferent labour and should be scrapped, it caught up with a senior member of the Federal Cabinet and threw the future of another one into uncertainty.

    All of a sudden, a beleaguered bureaucracy became the nemesis of the unwary and the wayward.

    It began when the online newspaper Premium Times reported that the Minister of Finance (as she then was), Kemi Adeosun, had not fulfilled the one-year mandatory service for graduates under 30 years old, and had secured exemption from it with a forged document.

    Repeated day after day with slight variations, the story soon took on the manner of a crusade, especially when Mrs Adeosun declined to be goaded into responding, and President Muhammadu Buhari appeared to show no interest in the matter.

    Then, more than a month after the story broke, she resigned, after a full day in the office, and headed straight to the UK, where she had lived for more than 30 years before taking up an appointment in Nigeria.

    Unsure as to whether the NYSC law applied to her or not, she explained in her resignation letter, she had turned to those “on ground” for advice.  They had assured her that they would take care of the matter.  Thereafter, they had handed her a certificate of exemption from the NYSC which she had, in  her guilelessness, filed with her confirmation papers as Commissioner for Finance in Ogun State, and later as Minister of Finance.  And in both instances, the authorities had not disputed its authenticity.

    From the assertion that the document was a forgery, it was but a short step to declaring that Mrs Adeosun was at least complicit in, if she had not actually committed, a forgery.   And to leave her in      no doubt about the gravity of the situation, they hinted darkly that the penalty on conviction was imprisonment without an option of fine, or both imprisonment and fine.

    Her refusal to be drawn into a discussion on the issue was taken as proof of her guilt.  If she was not guilty as charged, it was said, why would she not affirm her innocence?  In the face of such a damning charge, why would she remain silent?

    And when she finally explained how she came about the disputed Certificate of Exemption from the NYSC, public condemnation — if one judged by the volume and intensity of reactions in the so-called social media — was so unsparing you would think she had embezzled the nation’s Gross Domestic Product for an entire year.

    “She is a hardened criminal,” many proclaimed.  “She must be brought back from the UK and jailed,” others chorused.  The woman who had only 24 hours ago been acknowledged as Minister of Finance of the Federal Republic of Nigeria suddenly became a “Yoroba (sic) thief,” a “Yoro-robber.” The more courteous among her calumniators called her “Calamity Kemi.”   And “Adeosun-gate” became the         latest entry in Nigeria’s bourgeoning vocabulary of corruption.

    Yet her explanation is entirely plausible, and not least because it is so artless.

    The average Nigerian has been conditioned to believe that he or she cannot get anything done by himself or herself; that, to accomplish anything worthwhile, one has to go through someone who knows the system and how to work it.  The result is what counts.  How it was achieved is the last thing on the mind of the person who stands to profit from the intervention.

    Why go through all trouble and the endless wait with no guaranteed outcome when you can engage someone to pursue the matter for you?  And sometimes, it is not even a matter of cash, at least, not upfront.

    And so, we turn to agents to help us obtain or renew vehicle licences, passports, driver’s licences, and many other documents that the law obliges us to have.   And we may be landed with fakes without knowing it.

    We turn to people within the system and outside to help our children and wards secure admission into secondary school, to meet or exceed the benchmark for matriculation, to secure employment in the banks and oil companies, to be recruited into the armed services, and so on and so forth.

    In the process, we have conditioned our children and wards to believe that they do not have what it takes to get anywhere without our intervention. Other parents are intervening for their children in various ways anyway, we reason.  So, why place our children at a competitive disadvantage?

    This was precisely the reasoning of the authorities in one of the states who suspended a secondary school principal for preventing his students from cheating in the West African School Certificate Examination.  By that action, they said, he was putting their future at risk.

    I am here reminded of the Owosho Certificate Racket that rocked the University of Lagos in the 1973/74 academic year.  Hundreds of students were sent packing overnight, some plucked out of halls where they were writing their final exams and served expulsion notices.  This followed the discovery of discrepancies between their A Level results issued by the West African Examinations Council and the results on which their admissions were based.

    How the discrepancies came about puzzled many of the victims of the scam.  Many of them had followed up their applications with visits to the Admissions Office, where they had entreated the Admissions Officer, one Mr Owosho, to help.

    He did help, and many of them became undergraduates, with bright and privileged futures ahead of them.  What the help consisted in they did not know.  Perhaps a bending of the rules, a manipulation the deck, but none of them had the faintest idea that the whole thing was criminal through and through.

    What happened was that Owosho had pulled out their result slips on file and replaced them with new result slips bearing inflated grades that had been supplied by a confederate at WAEC Headquarters. For candidates awaiting results, the duo just manufactured the grades.

    In many cases, it turned out that the grades the applicant subsequently earned at WAEC were superior to those Owosho and his confederate had ginned up.   But students in that category were expelled all the same, on the ground that they had manifested an intent to cheat.

    But that intent could not be read into the conduct of all who had gone seeking Owosho’s help.  They had no inkling that his intervention would take the form of a crime.

    Until then, I did not even know that one could gain admission to the university by any means other than pure merit. You wrote your exams, mailed in your application from your rural outpost, up-dated it when your exam results were released, and waited for your admission letter to arrive in the post.

    But that was long, long ago.

    I do not believe Mrs Adeosun had set out deliberately to procure an NYSC Exemption Certificate to which she was not entitled.  I believe she was a victim of her own innocence.  If she knew it was fake, I doubt whether she would have submitted it as part of her confirmation package before the Ogun State Assembly and the Senate, at the risk of being found out.  She stood to lose so much.

    In whatever case, the coarse abuse and vulgar name-calling were unwarranted.

    These days, thousands merely go through the motions during their service year.  The calumniators should reserve their ire for those corps members who pay their local supervisors to look the other way while they hold down full-time jobs in the cities and show up at month-end to collect their statutory stipends, those who serve out the year in self-employment or family business, those who do not report at all, and the thousands — corps members as well as administrators – who have by their conduct over the years emptied the NYSC of the idealism in which it was conceived.

  • Return of the party?

    The Akinwunmi Ambode saga, of a conceited governor duelling with party forces and losing all, may yet strengthen party discipline and supremacy, in Nigerian politics.

    That would appear the first time, as similar past bids had led to, first: intra-party elite feuding; then, messy party fissures, and finally, catastrophic consequences for the polity.

    The classic, of that ruinous trend, was the Obafemi Awolowo-Samuel Ladoke Akintola (SLA) Western Region bust-up, that first tore apart the Action Group (AG); and later tore to pieces the 1st Republic (1960-1966).

    But before using history to put the present in proper perspectives; and projecting, other things being equal, the probable future of party supremacy, a brief comment on Governor Ambode and Jide Sanwoolu, the new Lagos All Progressives Congress (APC) gubernatorial candidate.

    Contrary to gushing emotions, Ambode is no devil any more than Sanwoolu is a saint.

    The Lagos governor just stumbled where other governors — and even 4th Republic presidents, if not most chief executives of state since independence — had made hay: making themselves imperial lords over the organ that fetched them power.

    As president, Olusegun Obasanjo did it.  The present Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) angst issues partly from his willy-nilly re-sculpturing of PDP, in his own grim image.

    As we speak, Ibikunle Amosun, the Ogun governor, seems lost in that same imperialist fancy, vis-a-vis abject party conquest.  His Excellency thunders down his own Hobson’s choice as Ogun APC gubernatorial candidate, the party’s official candidate be damned!

    But before you roast Amosun as Judas-in-chief to the party cause, most of his fellow governors, across the party aisle, are steeped in similar imperious fancies.

    So, what Ambode had done — but got brutally clipped — would appear standard 4th Republic gubernatorial megalomania: an all-too-common chronic executive disorder.

    Sanwoolu would do well to learn from Ambode’s fall, though there is no guarantee, that  as governor, Sanwoolu himself won’t tread that route; if he feels he could get away with it.

    But the party also owes itself — and the people — a duty to always wield the big stick on the errant, executive or legislative.  Still, there must first be a party, in the real sense of the word; and a deliberate and sustained culture of discipline, among its hierarchs, and rank-and-file.

    No less vital: the Lagos APC must realize, and factor into its Sanwoolu gubernatorial sales pitch, that Ambode, on the performance lane, wasn’t a ringing failure.

    Though the refuse leprosy plagues his government, for its costly conceit of trying to fix what wasn’t bust, rural Lagos — witness Epe and rural Alimoso — would remember  Ambode with especial fondness.

    Perhaps since the Lateef Jakande governorship (1979-1983), no governor had treated rural Lagos as royalty, as Ambode.

    But urban Lagos too, sans the refuse plague, won’t forget him in a hurry, if he fully delivers on his legacy projects, especially the Lagos Airport access road and the Oshodi mart interchange, both now under construction.

    So, the Lagos APC must brace itself for some pro-Ambode sympathy votes, even if the governor himself seems to have embraced fealty to his party, despite his personal loss of a second term that, otherwise, he could have richly deserved.

    That tracks the discourse back to the Awolowo-SLA titanic feud, for the soul of the old AG.

    Put that side-by-side with the Bola Tinubu-Ambode-Lagos APC stand-off, and you could well trace some parallel. suzerainty

    Still, as West Regional Premier, SLA called his party’s bluff; and tried to impose, on it, executive suzerainty.  Since then, such executive conceit has plagued Nigerian politics.

    However, as defeated aspirant though sitting Lagos governor, Ambode’s submission — if it holds all through — could well re-birth the supremacy of the party, over its nominees, executive or legislative.

    Incidentally, legislators’ scorn for party platforms has also cruelly flared in the free-for-all treachery and anti-party contempt of Bukola’s Saraki’s 8th National Assembly.

    But back to the SLA-Awo-AG 1962 party imbroglio — the AG diktat to SLA, as captured  by Prof. Akin Osuntokun, in his 2010 work, S. Ladoke Akintola: His Life and Times, published by Mosuro Publishers:

    “…that this joint meeting of the Western region and Mid-Western Executive Committees of the Action Group requests the Deputy Leader, Chief S. L. Akintola, to resign forthwith the offices of Premier and Deputy Leader of the Party, failing which appropriate steps would be taken to relieve him of both posts, but, that if he resigns, the leader should give consideration to the continued availability of his services to the Party in another sphere.”

    Now, the Tinubu directive to party stalwarts, on the virtual eve of the Lagos APC gubernatorial primaries, was far less sweeping or total.  But the message was unambiguous: the governor should move or be moved, for he had derailed from the party gubernatorial masterplan.

    Yet, events leading to the AG-SLA crisis were far different from what triggered the Lagos APC Ambode ultimatum.

    The one was a party split, almost right through the middle, between the Awo and SLA tendencies.

    The other was an alleged Ambode nastiness, to party members whose sweat romped him into office; among these, irate powers and principalities, determined to force a rebellion, were their object of vile hate not summarily removed.

    But the reaction, from the media and the public, would appear similar to 1962: split between the two camps, though not in equal measures.

    Back then, according to findings in Osuntokun’s book, some newspapers, notably West African Pilot and Daily Service were gung-ho on the SLA cause; while Nigerian Tribune and Daily Express tilted to the Awo cause.

    Though Daily Times was adjudged neutral, many swore it tilted towards SLA, courtesy of the Great Babatunde Jose’s personal sympathies for SLA, while Daily Sketch would join the fray in 1964, as a domestic answer to Tribune, Awo’s personal paper.

    The public, then as now, are also divided between both camps, with not a few even fingering personality clashes (which indeed, could be part of the problem), instead of the more rigorous location of contrasting tendencies in a party collective.

    That is why, just as many posited the AG crisis emanated from Awo’s refusal to hand over real power to SLA, a rather shallow thinking also arose that Ambode’s troubles issued from Tinubu’s alleged over-bearing attitude towards the governor.

    But whatever the crisis’ reading or misreading, according to fixed biases, the Ambode response has been markedly different from SLA’s.

    Instead of playing Samson, as SLA did; and risking the roof to fall and bury the collective, Ambode seems to have embraced his sad fate with stoic grace.

    If that holds, and his party goes on to triumph at the polls, Ambode’s personal tragedy could well turn renewed hope for party discipline and supremacy.

    That could mean the return of the party to boss the Nigerian political process.  That surely, cannot be bad for Nigerian democracy, despite Ambode’s personal angst?

  • Ekiti: After a dark interlude

    What has a beginning must have an end.”

    This banality is probably the greatest truth, the most profound insight Ayodele Fayose uttered in his combined public career as governor of Ekiti State and certified nuisance-at-large.  And it came to him at a moment that must have concentrated his mind like no other:  the last state Executive Council meeting over which he would preside.

    No stunt, no tantrum, no alchemy whatsoever could alter the fact that the end of impunity and immunity from consequences had well and truly arrived for one of the most disreputable political figures of our time or any epoch of Nigeria’s troubled history.

    Yes indeed; whatever has a beginning must have an end.  His barbarous rule is over.

    Measured entirely on Fayose’s terms, i.e., by “the quantity and quality of achievements,” and even allowing for the usual constraints, Fayose’s political career will have to be judged a comprehensive failure.  At the end of four years during which he was the executive, legislative and judicial authority in Ekiti, he could only point with confidence to a hideous, over-priced flyover in the state capital, Ado-Ekiti and one or two very ordinary official buildings as his signature achievements.

    The airport project he touted so much never got off the bush-clearing stage.  He could not even cite the so-called “stomach infrastructure” initiative to which his 2015 electoral victory was attributed for want of any plausible explanation, and which he had promised on a whim to elevate into a cardinal programme of his Administration.

    The public has since learned that the election that brought Fayose to power was rigged on a scale beyond belief by the Jonathan Administration, with plenty of help from the army, the national security apparatus, the national treasury, and their combined assets.

    Measured by how much he inspired the people to nobler ends, the vision he applied to the formulation and execution of public policy, by his decency and civility, by how judiciously he husbanded resources he held in trust for the public, and by the integrity he brought to bear on the conduct of public policy, he would have to be adjudged a disaster.

    Fayose’s career is a study in political brutalism.  To him, noblesse oblige might well be a French delicacy. Driven by instinct, he showed no capacity for introspection.   He lied like a flute.  In word and in deed, he contradicted himself at so many points and every so often that his must be a case of extreme attention deficit disorder.

    For four years, he held Ekiti State in thrall.  His word was law. In his valedictory, Fayose declared, shades of Julius Caesar reporting his quick victory at the battle of Zela to the Roman Senate, that he came, he saw, he conquered.

    Fayose conquered all right.  He conquered the proud Ekiti people and reduced them to whimpering subjects.  He conquered their value system.  He conquered honour.  He conquered integrity.  He   conquered decency.  He conquered truthfulness. He conquered the law and the courts.  He conquered the state legislature, reducing it to a reptile assembly.  He conquered the bureaucracy.  And yes, he conquered democracy.

    Fayose holds nothing sacred, not even the most intimate details of his mother’s health. He profaned everything he touched and brought every cause he embraced into disrepute.

    He came, he saw, and he plundered right up to the eve of his departure, awarding himself a severance pay of N60 million while unpaid civil servants and teachers starved.  For good measure, he corralled the state’s anaemic exchequer into buying a luxury SUV reportedly worth some N70 million as parting gift.

    Despite these depredations, Fayose declared that history will be kind to him.  Who knows?  In the fullness of time, History may well unearth some redeeming attributes that would cast him in an entirely different light, some compelling evidence that would place him squarely in the league of the omoluabi.

    But History is not blind. Fayose and his proxies cannot hold it in thrall.  They cannot bend it to his capricious will.  They cannot frighten or coerce it into doing his bidding.

    He is already experiencing first-hand the instability of human greatness, real or perceived.   And that is just for starters.  In the twilight of his tenure, his confederates in the legislature were ousted by a faction of the assembly. Virtually all the guests, the high and mighty of Ekiti society from far and wide expected at an elaborate state banquet to mark his departure stayed away.  The ambience was funereal.

    The fiasco calls to mind the biblical parable of the rich man who invited all the wealthy men in the town to a banquet.  When none of the guests showed up, the wealthy man sent his servants into the town to bring just about anyone they could find, regardless of their condition, to the feast.

    But “Peter the Rock” and Bible puncher made no recourse to the okada bikers who had been his administration’s enforcers.  He no longer needed their riotous support.

    History will certainly ask and ask insistently:  How did a people so well educated, so principled, a people who set so much store by fair play and justice and honour and uprightness — how were such a people landed with a character like Fayose, a repudiation of everything they are reputed to stand for, as governor?  Why did they put up with him for so long, to the point that they almost voted into office a proxy through whom he would have continued his barbarous rule?

    But enough.

    This day belongs to Dr John Olukayode Fayemi, who takes office today, for the second time, as Governor of Ekiti State.  I do not envy him.

    Arresting the drift and depredations of the Fayose years will be hard enough.  Restoring the momentum  Ekiti lost when Jonathan and the PDP foisted Fayose on Ekiti is going to be harder.

    The economy can be rebuilt.  In the end, it always recovers.  The infrastructure can be patched now and rebuilt as time goes on. But rebuilding the value system that Fayose destroyed is going to take a longer time and much more effort.

    This is where Dr Fayemi must lead by personal example.  And the example must be complemented by his entire leadership team.  Together, they must strive to rebuild the value system of the Ekiti people.

    During his previous coming, they said Fayemi was aloof, donnish.  Then they got an impetuous populist         and demagogue who kept things perpetually on the boil. Perhaps they will now appreciate the value of deliberation and introspection.  Fayemi must now seek to be more engaging, without getting caught up in populist posturing.

    As the last gubernatorial election shows, Fayose still commands a core of passionate followers in Ekiti.  Fayemi must try to win them over, or at least enlist their support, with superior argument and superior programmes.  They are part and parcel of his constituency, which is the entire Ekiti State. They should be accorded equal treatment.

    Fayemi is on a rescue mission all right.  But a rescue mission is not a revenge mission.  Eschewing revenge in any guise or disguise is one of the building blocks of the new value system that should now inform politics and public affairs in Ekiti.

    Throughout history, periods of regression and steep decline, the type Ekiti experienced under Fayose, have usually been followed by a rebirth – a revival of the arts and culture, of learning and values:  in short, a renaissance.

    That is what the post-Fayose Ekiti calls for, and there is none more qualified to lead it than Dr John Olukayode Fayemi.  Getting our much-acclaimed Poet Laureate and literary scholar of global stature, Niyi Osundare, to present an Inaugural Lecture to usher in the Administration was an inspired move and a signal that a new order has arrived.

    Welcome back, Your Excellency, and good luck.

  • 2019: Finally, the race begins

    I have in the past week seen not a few partisans frame the 2019 presidential elections in strictly binary times: good versus the bad; saint versus sinners etc. Not a few, I must confess, have somewhat framed it as one battlebetween anti-corruption crusaders and that formless, internet tribe that calleditself the Bring Back our Corruptionmovement –drum majors for the freeloading ancien regime that Nigerians sent packing in 2015.

    Today, withAtiku Abubakaron the ballot for the Peoples Democratic Party, a man who supposedly wears corruption on his shoulder like an epaulet, it seems to me that that issues underlying the contest would certainly not be framed so narrowly. Of course, in a race, which only few months ago, seemed one-sided if not entirely closed, the nation should consider itself indebted to the TurakinAdamawafor finally injecting the long expected verve.

    And so here we are: Atiku Abubakar versus Muhammadu Buhari. As The Nation’s highly esteemed columnist Idowu Akinlotan argued with his usual candour in his column on Sunday, had the APC a choice in the matter, Atiku, the Turakin Adamawa would certainly be one opponent they would rather not have on the ballot. That Atiku is a formidable opponent is certainly undeniable. In fact, had the ruling APC ever nursed the illusion the 2019 presidential contest would be something of a cakewalk, the choice ofAtiku has since changed that; today, the challenge that he representsis certainly one that the APC can afford to ignore to its peril.

    Yet, there is something intriguing about the latest quest by Atiku. This was an individual who flunked the APC primaries in 2014. Never mind that he has been a perennial sojourner in virtually all the leading parties in the quest to realise his presidential dream.  Add to that the baggage – corruption – that most Nigerians revile, the question of his electability immediately pops up.

    Well, that is the individual that PDP has thrust forward for the highest office. My colleague Segun Ayobolu had raised the poser in his back page column in this newspaper on Saturday: Is this the Atiku moment?  That Atiku’s quest has since moved from a wild proposition to a distinct possibility seems to me not just a measure of how easily the tides can change in the affairs of a complex country like Nigeria, but how easily too success can be mismanaged, this time by the APC.

    Proof of course is the near alarm in the camp of the ruling APC since his emergence as the PDP flag bearer! Just imagine the number of tanks already rolled out even when the real battle is not even joined – yet!

    We must of course understand what makes the Atiku challenge a viable proposition . If I may make the preliminary point: nothing makes the Atiku candidacy any less sellable than of Mai Gaskiya, the ramrod, Daura-born infantry General who in 2014 was painted by the PDP as unelectable: put it simply to the issue of messaging!

    I have heard many dismiss the Atiku surge as merely underlying the craving by corrupt elements for the return of the ancien regime under which slush funds are freely shared among the elites. They are right to the extent that there are no free funds anymore for anyone to share – thanks to the Treasury Single Account (TSA), which ensures that entities which hitherto operated outside the strictures of the appropriation process are now brought into the orbit.

    However, it would certainly be the height of conceit for the administration to frame issues so narrowly. To be sure, the economy is certainly not in great shape despite the vast improvements in oil earnings. In any event, there is a sense in which the economic environment, despite the ambitious reforms being undertaken, is still light years of what is needed. A part of the administration’s unflattering scorecard is the ‘emergence’ as global capital of poverty; it certainly says a lot about the efficaciousness of current therapies that the population of out-of-school children has since jumped from 10 to 13 million. Despite oil prices being above $80 a barrels, the economy continues to wobble. For a country whose economy in the last three years has been in reverse gear, the kind of appetite for development  that one would expect is to put it mildly – missing. Where new thinking is indicated in our public finances and project implementation, what is more apparent are old wines being put in old wineskins and then labelled as new!

    The result, which is the ‘stasis’ across the board would ordinarily suffice to feed the current angst.

    Agreed, the seeds of the rot were sown by previous governments including the PDP. But then, the Buhari administration has had the whole of three years to fix some of them. Had the administration shown greater verve and dexterity, there is some chance that the current regression could have been mitigated. Again, the charge has always been – and this is not entirely without some merit – that the Buhari administration has tended to operate like the famous Red Sea – neither open nor welcoming to ideas different from its own. For a country so gifted with diversity, it is unfortunate that the administration has neither tapped into this nor reflected this in its policies and programmes.

    Indeed, had the administration been less insular, it would probably have availed itself of different perspectives other than its own – in dealing with some of the challenges facing the country.

    Is Atiku therefore the answer?

    Here, my simple answer would be that there is simply no evidence to support this. So much for the hype about being  business savvy, Atiku is neither in the mould of a Dangote nor in the class of Mike Adenuga or Oba Otudeko – individuals that have either built or are building world-class institutions. In any case, while a fair knowledge of the economy will be a clear advantage, these are hardly requirements to run a country like Nigeria where talents could easily be assembled and pressed to work.

    Although it has been said – and this would be a strong point if true – that Atiku has a way with talents, at this time, that is merely conjectural – yet to be proven.

    In any case nothing says that the Buhari administration cannot spring surprises. And this, it must!