Category: Wednesday

  • Valentine’s Day; No Indian visa on arrival; ‘Operation Record Uniform and Official Corruption’

    Valentine’s Day; No Indian visa on arrival; ‘Operation Record Uniform and Official Corruption’

    Two days to Valentine’s Day. Be nice to everybody and not just your lover. Do things right. Stop taking bribes. Stop using your uniform or position to intimidate or deprive others and then say a deceitful ‘Happy Valentine’s Day to your poor wife or girlfriend when you have fraudulently deprived so many of happiness by abusing the trust of your position, your uniform and your connections? How many Nigerians would genuinely send a Happy Valentine’s Day card to anyone you have ever encountered in uniform?

    Commiserations to Nigeria for being one of only eight countries not to be granted ‘an Indian visas on arrival’ in India, a privilege given by India to 180 other countries. Nigeria, your reputation is in tatters.

    The long overdue change of Mbu, the questionable, biased Commissioner of Police (CP) offers Jonathan the chance to extricate himself from the quagmire of Rivers State which threated to drag him into the unpresidential mud. What Rivers State needs, and what all states deserve, is an unbiased police service protecting all life and all property and not interfering in the primacy of the political organs except where they break the law. In Oyo State we also had such huge problems and various supporting CPs and party strongmen. It took a natural death and a change of police and political leadership to usher in a welcome avalanche of ‘Ajimobi peace’. We pray this will be the lot of Rivers State. Nigeria does not deserve violence. Someone should study Oyo State and Ajimobi’s methodology and spread it around the country.

    Across the country, why is that the ‘uniform in Nigeria’ continues to disgrace itself even as so many police and military lay down their lives fighting crime and terrorism and making orphans of their children, widows of their wives and paupers of their families?

    What is it in Nigeria and indeed in most of Africa and even developed countries that mutates a uniform wearer into a monster terrorising the very people the uniform is to service? But we must face our own malignant demons and not bother with the uniform demons of other countries until we have to visit them when crossing the border. Nigeria and Nigeria’s NGOS and professional bodies and indeed every Nigerian must never remain mute about this ‘uniform terrorism’. We must stand against this deeply ingrained ‘Nigerian Uniform Terrorism’ which has unfortunately received the full support of the organisations that those uniforms are acting on behalf of. Where are the police and supervisors? Tell every Nigerian you know, old and young, sitting at windows above the road, sitting in shops, sitting in public and private transport or walking down the road that they can and must record anything and everything that involves officialdom. The mobile phone can be the ‘Weapon of Mass Destruction Of Corruption’ WMDC? We must record on mobile phone every encounter with every official from secretariat to road until a change, a movement against uniform corruption, comes over Nigeria. ‘Operation Record Uniform and Official Corruption’. The sooner we start on this course the better. Be assured that it will happen as frustration at the brazenness of uniformed corrupt practices on the streets, in traffic, on the highways and in government offices where the ‘uniform’ is a title from Director General down to the filing clerk and gateman and is embarrassing the children and the nation.

    Nigeria must discuss, dissect and deal with the massive and apparently insurmountable corruption of the Nigerian uniform of any and every colour –black, grey, camouflage, yellow, white, maroon, light brown, navy blue, army green, airforce blue or whatever. Who smiles at a uniform? It is corruption to kill a citizen without cause, but the list of needless killings gets longer by the day. Road uniforms known for entrapping drivers and demanding needless items like fire-extinguishers and stupid unrealistic particulars. You may be the best and brightest professional in Nigeria dispensing life with each handshake and nod. But you are still subject to the myopia of governance, administration and the all-pervasive power of mediocrity and the Nigerian ‘Uniform’ police, FRSC, on your way home. Once a uniform is worn, even the uniform of political or government office –the agbada and babanriga and the civil servant, Tax consultant- its wearer mutates into a ‘legally illegally’ extortion monster, automatically and irreversibly.

    Continuous voters registration is the norm, as a person becomes 18 years old that person goes and registered as a right and responsibility. Such a voters card can be used for transactions and ID purposes.

    Surely ‘performance, planned and executed’, are supposedly key elements in the reason for the establishment and existence and desire of all politicians and political parties. If not they were fraudulently set up, fraudulently run and fraudulently in power. Unfortunately it seems that political parties are ‘strategizing’ to recover ‘lost’ states and ‘win’ more in the coming election perhaps ‘by any means necessary’. However some parties are strategizing even as they haemorrhage governors, senators, representatives, council chairmen and thousands of their personal faithful political cohorts.

    Unfortunately the political parties always forget that the first rule of successful politics as judged by the people, the citizens, the voting majority is ‘performance’. PDP and other parties must commit to maximum developmental performance as a ‘political strategy’. They must also be willing to subject that performance to public, not publicity, critical scrutiny. They will lose all honest elections unless they resort to rigging and cheating.

     

  • Sanusi and the missing billions

    Sanusi and the missing billions

    It is hard to find the model of the Central Bank boss which Sanusi Lamido Sanusi copied as his time in that position unfolded. From day one he was determined to be himself. Never one to shy from offering strong views, it meant hurtling into every controversy feet first.

    For many, that was okay in a newspaper columnist or activist, but unseemly for a Central Bank governor. Sanusi would not hear of it: after all he had made clear to those who appointed him that he was set in his ways.

    Usually, Central Bank bosses are taciturn. Whenever they spoke it was akin to an oracle descending from a height to commune with ordinary mortals. The entire nation would pay attention and, sometimes, the weight of the pronouncement would send shivers through markets across the world.

    Such is the weight of the utterances of the likes of the Paul Volkers, Alan Greenspans, Ben Bernankes, Mervyn Kings of this world. In Nigeria, Central Bank chiefs have never had that almost mythical standing that the aforementioned names conjure. However, when you think of names like Clement Isong, Adamu Ciroma, Abdulkadir Ahmed, Joseph Sanusi, you think conservative and low key – not flamboyant and outspoken.

    This preamble is not meant to be criticism of Lamido Sanusi’s personality and how that has affected his job as Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor. Rather it is an attempt to make sense of the tepid impact of the thunderous allegations made about the management of the Nigeria’s finances by the nation’s top banker.

    Is it a case of the man having made his opinion so readily available on every topic – especially those polarising, political ones that have nothing to with his role as Central Banker – that today not many pay much attention when he speaks? Has he talked his way into irrelevance?

    Or is it the case that scandal and malfeasance in public office have become so common place they have lost their shock value? We have found ourselves in the gutter for so long and have now accepted the stench as part of life?

    Could it also be that President Goodluck Jonathan and his administration are so stuck in their ways they would see no evil and hear no evil? Has the president who in a moment of frustration once declared that “he didn’t give a damn” now reached the point of thumbing his nose at his critics – daring them to do their worst with every fresh charge?

    In a different country the magnitude of the claims being made by the CBN Governor would have triggered a political tsunami that could have brought down a government. Here, he makes these explosive allegations, the head of the richest government parastatal issues a dismissive rebuttal and life goes on as though the exchange was conducted in Greek and the rest of don’t understand, or the issues thrown up are not important enough to ignite serious inquiry by the legislature and law enforcement agencies.

    In December 2013, Sanusi stirred the pot when he claimed that the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) was yet to remit $12 billion to the federation account. Finance Minister, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala interjected that the amount was actually $ 10.8 billion. There was supposed to be proper reconciliation of the figures by all parties involved to ascertain when the said sum was actually missing.

    But before this could be done, the NNPC blithely announced that the exercise was unnecessary. Apparently, it had accounted for the “missing billions.” The portion that was supposedly not remitted had been spent on fuel subsidy, pipeline repairs and sundry expenses. Some official I cannot now recall actually retorted the money had been spent by all Nigerians because we all benefit from the petroleum subsidy.

    That was the explanation for a $10.8 billion hole in the country’s finances. Rather than being disturbed the government would soon launch a counter attack against Sanusi for daring to ask questions. At some point Jonathan even demanded his resignation for allegedly leaking a confidential letter to the public. The president was more irked by the politics of the situation than the morality.

    Following the truce brokered after the CBN Governor refused to go quietly, many thought he would keep his counsel to himself in the few months he has left. Not so. Speaking this last week at the resumed Senate hearing on the alleged missing crude oil funds, Sanusi dropped a new bombshell – alleging the NNPC was yet to account for $20 billion ( over N3 trillion) being part of oil sales for the period between January 2012 and July 2013.

    This time, NNPC Managing Director, Andrew Yakubu, dismissed Sanusi as ignorant because the “CBN is a banking outfit, not a petroleum outfit.” He blamed the repeated claims by Sanusi on a lack of “understanding of the technicalities of the oil industry.”

    Yakubu’s comments are not only insensitive, they are disrespectful. What technicalities I ask? We are talking here of figures and keeping proper accounts. Serious issues are being dredged up that require rigorous explanations – not some trite comment. Even if the CBN Governor and his entire team of experts are as “ignorant” as Yakubu claims, it is his responsibility to expose that “ignorance” and enlighten the public with concrete evidence.

    Whatever Sanusi’s personal shortcomings may be, it would be totally irresponsible for the legislature and law enforcement agencies not to follow up on the grave allegations being made by no less a person than the governor of Nigeria’s Central Bank.

    Even if the “missing” monies were expended on the most laudable of causes it is important to establish how we got to the point of the funds being spent.

    These are the critical posers that demand clarity. Sanusi alleges that the NNPC was actually operating an unauthorised subsidy scheme through which the Federation Account lost $100 million monthly to what he calls a “racket.” Criminal activity is being imputed here.

    He has challenged the corporation to produce authorisation allowing it to purchase kerosene at N150 per litre from federation funds only to sell same at N40 per litre, “knowing full well that this product sells in the market at N170-N220 per litre.”

    These are serious issues that demand urgent clarification. That is the only way to know if Nigeria is truly being bled dry, or whether Sanusi is just an ignorant fiction writer who only wants to be remembered only as a mischief maker.

  • CP Mbu gets his reward

    CP Mbu gets his reward

    Former Rivers State Police Commissioner, Mbu Joseph Mbu, would be remembered for a long time in Nigerian political folklore not for his crime-fighting skills, but for how he became the issue as local politicians jockeyed for ascendancy.

    His role in the dogfight between Amaechi and the First Family and their surrogates represents a new low for a police force that does not rate too highly in public opinion. Many drew parallels between Mbu’s actions and those of another infamous Police Commissioner, Bishop Eyitene, who the then ruling National Party of Nigeria (NPN) used to frustrate former Anambra State Governor, Jim Nwobodo.

    Some have been celebrating Mbu’s transfer from Port Harcourt as though his new posting were some sort of punishment. Hardly! In terms of how they are prized two of the most coveted postings in the Nigeria Police are the commissionerships of Lagos and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    It would seem that those whom he served so faithfully have rewarded Mbu with a plum posting. Many had canvassed that the man be sent Borno State where his aggressive and partisan policing methods would have helped the government achieve their April 2014 deadline for snuffing out the Boko Haram insurgency.

    But while Amaechi and his supporters may be heaving a sigh of relief, senators would be well advised to invest in a couple of rubber bullet-proof vests. A certain Senator Magnus Abe would tell them that with Mbu in town that is a wise investment!

  • On PDP’s weight loss programme

    Politicians are by nature the most sunny and optimistic set of people on earth. They would spin a calamity and make it seem like their greatest hour. Garrulous Information Minister, Labaran Maku, belongs to that breed. Each time he opens his mouth gems fall out.

    While trying to make sense of the unending defections from the ranks of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), he declared that the party was shedding weight in order to regain strength. In Maku’s universe anyone who has defected from the party was either shameless or desperate.

    The minister forgets that many of those who have abandoned the party are in the final lap of their second tenure. It is unlikely therefore that their motivation for moving to the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) was about being given tickets to run for office again.

    In any event, if that were the motivation it is something they could easily have received without the aggravation they went through as members of the G-7 governors or New-PDP. I dare say it takes even greater courage to divorce a party you have associated with for ages and plunge into the unknown with new associates in a party that is just in formation.

    In a country where government patronage is the only game in town and legitimate opposition is demonised, it takes more courage to walk out of one’s comfort to join forces with those on the outside.

    Maku’s ill-digested diatribe ignores the fact that for many months those who eventually left kept pressing the PDP to address their grievances but were treated like inconsequential school boys. Those untreated issues were what eventually toppled erstwhile chairman, Bamanga Tukur and led to the installation of Adamu Muazu.

    Everything in the emerging political picture points to the 2015 general elections being a very close battle. Any wise political party would choose to enter the contest with all the hands it can muster. If these ex-PDP types were such lightweights and losers why is Muazu pulling out all the stops to get them back?

    Those who think the likes of Kano State Governor, Rabiu Kwankwaso, Rivers State Governor, Rotimi Amaechi, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, are the weights that have to be shed so PDP can emerge stronger are only deluding themselves. These politicians have proven that they have following in their home territory. They are also known as fighters who would give as good as they get.

    But more importantly, I suspect that the desire to prove their continued relevance to the Makus of this world come the elections could be added motivation for all who have turned their backs on PDP.

  • JAMB’s monstrosity

    JAMB’s monstrosity

    It was meant to provide a seamless passage, but ironically, it has become a monster that is tormenting Nigerian students and also causing collateral nightmares to their parents and guardians. That is the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board, JAMB. JAMB is the official examination board for entrance into tertiary-level institutions in Nigeria. The body is saddled with the responsibility of administering examinations to students who apply for admission into any Nigerian public and private universities, polytechnics and colleges of education.

    In recent times, a lot of public outcry has greeted the conduct of JAMB examinations across the country. The complaints range from inability to access the body’s website, inadequate examination centres, the nearness of these centres to candidates’ places of domicile and all that. But of particular contention is the body’s Computer-Based Test, CBT, which many people have attributed to the woeful results recorded last year in the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination, UTME, by students who were consequently denied entrance into the nation’s tertiary institutions. Now that another UTME is holding in April, stakeholders are worried about the insistence of JAMB to give priority to the CBT and deny those students who still want to do the manual exams, that is, pencil and paper exams, the opportunity to do so by drastically reducing centres for such exams to an intolerable minimum.

    JAMB had told the nation last year that it was going to conduct pilot CBTs till 2015 before it finally opts for the system to conduct its entrance examinations to Nigeria’s tertiary institutions. One would have expected the body to still tarry awhile to perfect the conduct of its pilot scheme before putting a seal of finality on it. Even in the last year’s examination, which marked the first pilot scheme, the CBT ran into hitches which necessitated the body to shift the examination for some candidates who registered for it.

    For instance, the examinations suffered some hitches at a centre located at Yaba College of Technology, Lagos. As a result, no fewer than 200 students who were scheduled to write their exam at the centre had to be moved to other centres because they could not access JAMB’s site. This resulted in the CBT starting late. A similar incident occurred at OAK Comprehensive College, Ogba, another centre in Lagos, following a power outage cum technical problems. The consequence of this was the inability to connect the internet for the 180 candidates who were to sit for the examination. This development resulted in all the candidates being moved to another centre located on the premises of Chams, an IT-based company, located at the Government Reservation Area of Ikeja, Lagos, to enable take the examination.

    Even at that, it was not still plain sailing for the candidates. Prior to the incident, 350 candidates were earlier scheduled to sit for the examination at Chams on the day of the UTME, but with the relocation of other candidates to the centre, there was a population explosion which increased the number to 700. Since the capacity of the centre was 350 candidates at a time, the UTME at the centre was therefore postponed by another two days. The examination was invariably held in two sessions in order not to overstretch the infrastructure at the centre.

    Long before the commencement of the CBT UTME last year, Nigerians from all walks of life had expressed pessimism over the policy. Their argument was premised on the fact that it might not work after all. They hinged their resentment on the shameful epileptic power supply in the country, the low computer literacy level of many Nigerian students with much emphasis on those living in the poor, rural areas who may not have the least opportunity to work on the computer, as well as the sustainability of the policy which JAMB hopes to be adopted fully in 2015.

    There is no doubt that Dibu Ojerinde, a Professor and Executive Secretary of JAMB and his team mean well. The CBT may have been a good idea, especially now that the world is becoming increasingly ICT-compliant. One also appreciates the fact that the body’s target is to ensure that candidates’ papers are marked, and results released within a short frame of time after the conduct of its examination, but the body needs to make sure that it puts the proper machinery in place before the full take-off of the system. Like I said earlier, though Nigerians are not averse to Information Technology, most candidates, especially those in rural areas, do not have access to computer in their schools. Where they exist at all, they are drastically in short supply, perhaps, reducing the ratio of computers to students to like 1:100 or more.

    It is also quite understandable that all JAMB is doing is to improve the quality of examinations for Nigerian students so as to be able to compete favourably with their counterparts in any part of the world. However, introducing such noble policy without enough enlightenment, sensitisation and adequate preparation of the students through exhaustive pilot scheme, casts some dark clouds on the body’s determination to succeed in revolutionising the conduct of examinations in Nigeria. It is like Ojerinde is in a hurry to bring so many innovations at once to the body, mostly those that are not in tandem with available infrastructural facilities in the country. It was not surprising, therefore, that last year’s UTME recorded lots of irregularities and raised some uproar across the country.

    The 2013 UTME was taken by 1.7million Nigerian students with the hope of gaining entrance into the various tertiary institutions in the country. Unfortunately, the examination witnessed many lapses during the exercise and after the release of the results. This ugly development left many students wondering if they could ever gain admission into tertiary institutions through JAMB the way things were going. The situation is further compounded by the fact that there are limited or scanty spaces available for the candidates.

    Out of the 1.7 million candidates who sat for the 2013 UTME, only a miserable 500,000 places were available for them, leaving about 1.2 million candidates stranded. And to further rub salt into the wound, even the students who scaled JAMB’s hurdle were confronted by yet another problem when the universities were closed down due to the industrial action embarked upon by lecturers in public universities nationwide. They only had a rethink in January this year after keeping the classrooms under lock and key for an upward of six months.

    Now that the 2014 UTME is here again, the blunt refusal of Ojerinde and his men to see reason and allow the candidates to settle for the system of their choice for the examination is causing a lot of ripples in the land. So far, all entreaties to make JAMB to accommodate the pencil shading system, preferred by some candidates, have fallen on deaf ears. This obstinacy is creating panic and generating much furore among students and parents, who believe that the policies adopted by the body to address problems associated with the examination, is rather frustrating.

    Of greater worry is the difficulty in accessing centres through JAMB portal, especially for those who have opted for the paper and pencil system. The centres are not just there. And when they are available at all, they are located in far-flung destinations. For instance, the other day, one of the parents complained loudly that the only centre available for his son is in Kaduna. Yet, another complained that her child’s centre is located somewhere in Delta State.

    If I may ask, how would somebody who has lived all his lives in Lagos be asked to take his son or daughter to somewhere like Kaduna or Delta State, where they may not have been before, to write an examination? That looks more like a punitive banishment. And like James Glover Thurber (1894 – 1961), an American humourist and cartoonist, once said, “Men of all degrees should form this prudent habit: Never serve a rabbit stew before you catch the rabbit.” There is the need for JAMB to urgently address all these anomalies.

     

  • NSNC: Federalism, Revenue Allocation, Party Funds; Fed Exclusive List; NASS Restructuring

    Very special congratulations to my teacher, Professor Mrs Oyinade Odutola-Olurin who was 80 on Feb 2. She was a Head girl. She married EO Olurin, later Professor of Surgery and President of NMA. She broke through the glass ceiling, becoming the first African female Professor of Ophthalmology, UCH, Ibadan. She is a consummate role model, mentor, teacher, professional, humane and empathetic leader. She was ‘multitasking’ before the word was invented in medicine, in NGOs like being patron in Educare Trust, in business, religion, social and family life. People smile on hearing her name. Who smiles at your name? Work on your humanity. Be like her, become ‘The Miracle In Some Stranger’s Life’. ‘Happy 80th Birthday, Ma’am. E pe fun wa, Ma’am, Live long’.

    So the conference is officially the National Conference. We fought for 30+ years for a Sovereign National Conference. We will call it ‘The 2014 NSNC –the 2014 Non-Sovereign National Conference’. Is half bread better than none? Only time will tell, but we the people can make it happen. ‘They’ say there is a hidden agenda to keep Jonathan in power. So what? There is always a hidden agenda by politicians or civil servants. Remember the third term agenda of Obasanjo, the election agenda of Babangida and Abacha? The only people supposed not to have a hidden agenda are the Nigerian citizens.

    So let, ‘we the people’, have our say and our way for a change. Let us reveal the ‘Hidden Agenda’ of the masses of people that the 492 ‘chosen many’ delegates will represent. THE DELEGATES MUST NOT BE PAID SECRETLY OR PUBLICLY OR GIVEN ‘ALLOWANCES’ EXCEPT BY WHOEVER SENT THEM. THE CONFERENCE MUST HOLD IN A SCHOOL OR POLY OR UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, NOT AN EXPENSIVE HOTEL COMPLEX.

    Fellow Nigerian citizens have the ‘Hidden Agenda’ of ‘De-corrupting Political party funding’; ‘True Federalism’; ‘Good Governance’; ‘Revenue Re-allocation Formula’; ‘Reduction of Federal Exclusive List, removing Railways, Electricity, Waterways and a branch of the Police’; Reduction in National Assembly (NASS) Houses from two to one; Reduction in numbers of NASS members, salaries and perks as unsustainable; Reduction in days of sitting to 180 days/year.

    True federalism is not just enforcing federal character for appointments. Once you get a federal job, discrimination may force you to remain in one office while favoured colleagues are moved with frequent posting around departments and on secondments, making them ‘over-qualified’ for accelerated promotion. Is this a regular feature of NNPC, agencies, judiciary and Civil Service?

    The key areas needing resolution are several fiscal and moral including the revenue allocation formula which gives the federal government more than 56% of the budget plus control of Excess Crude Account with subsequent underfunding of the states and LGAs especially with corruption at all levels.

    The major source of Nigeria’s massive political and civil service corruption is ‘The Official And Unofficial Funding Of Nigeria’s Political Parties In And Out Of Political Power’. Corrupt civil servants enable political corruption based in the common ‘Corruption Multiplier Effect Principle’ that ‘If I steal for you, I steal for me’, thus multiplying the ‘taken funds’. The political parties do this by inflation of contracts, diversion of contract funds and demands of 30-75% of contracts and consultancy fees. These brazen methods purportedly execute the ‘legally illegal’ scams for corrupt enrichment of party and officials and the consequent impoverishment of the citizenry. Political parties must keep their hands out of the government purse. The need to expose party finances to public scrutiny and solid accounting future controls, must be put on the agenda for the 2014 Non-Sovereign National Conference. We must make these the real issues of the NSNC!

    So the only ‘No GO Area’ is the ‘unity’ of Nigeria? Unity requires happiness with the outcome of the NSNC. If not, then ‘unity’ will become a very ‘Go Go Area’. If true federalism reigns, the need for dissolution of Nigeria will not be discussed in homes around Nigeria and in the diaspora.

    For Nigeria there is no greater opportunity than now to sort these problems out. There must be a more equitable revenue allocation formula- maybe 30% for federal. We must make sure it gets on the agenda. Please, you can help save your country, peacefully. Contact, see or send a letter, phone, e-mail, tweet, Facebook, your nominated representative, write to your professional representative, your royal and religious leaders, your NGO representatives, write letters to the editor against this problem. Do not leave it to others. Do It Yourself. Jonathan can still write his name in gold, but Rivers is a black blot on his reputation. Good governance is the goal but it requires the NSCS and your close personal attention to the above details. The wide range of delegates is fantastic as is the curbing of politicians which will force politicians to listen to our concerns for ‘our’ nation.

    Mysteriously, President Jonathan chose the main ‘interested party’, the National Assembly, over the ‘We The People’ referendum, as the final arbiter. The National Assembly’s greed is notorious worldwide. Will it agree to destroy one of the NASS houses and go part-time when demanded by the NSNC? Let the NASS know that ‘we the people’ are Nigeria and we are greater than our employees –the NASS and politicians. Can the NASS be trusted to lead ‘belt tightening’ within itself and display that rare trait- Nationalism, or ‘In The National Interest’?

  • Babangida’s triumph of hope over reality

    Babangida’s triumph of hope over reality

    Last Monday, the New Telegraph, the latest “new kid on the block” in Nigeria’s newspaper world, led its maiden edition with an interview with former military president and a favourite whipping boy of the Nigerian media, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida.

    The interview was quintessential Babangida, the Maradona of Nigeria’s politics; the man artfully dribbled past virtually all the sensitive questions the newspaper’s reporters tried to pin him down with, to wit, such questions on his opinion about the performance of President Goodluck Jonathan and that of the governor of his Niger State, Dr. Muazu Babangida Aliyu, or about the latest, now famous, altercation between his “boss”, – his own word – General Olusegun Obasanjo, and the president, etc.

    However, the one question the man would not quibble about was on the unity and integrity of Nigeria. Nothing, he said, can ever shake his faith in the existence of Nigeria as one country – not the terrible Boko Haram insurgency and certainly not the National Conference, which critics of President Jonathan, including this reporter, say looks like a red herring the President hatched up to, at the least, divert attention from his dismal record, and at worst, lay the ground for rebellion by the oil-rich Delta region he comes from, should his presidential bid for another term, which he has not declared but which he is widely suspected of harbouring, fail.

    In his interview, General Babangida said he was not in the least disturbed by the reports at home and from abroad that the 2015 election could break Nigeria. “I am,” he said, “not disturbed by such reports. I am confident it (the election) would make us stronger. Two thousand and fifteen will make us stronger.”

    The general’s unshakable faith and hope in Nigeria’s unity and integrity is understandable. If nothing else, the man fought a war to keep Nigeria one as a young officer and he has a bullet still lodged in his body to show for it. However, with all due respect, his faith and hope are, I believe, the triumph of emotion over reality – the reality that the preponderance of those around President Jonathan have little or no faith in the country as a legitimate and united entity.

    When the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator Anyim Pius Anyim, unfolded the programme for the National Conference last Thursday, he declared that the one subject, which is non-negotiable at the conference is the “indivisibility and indissolubility” of Nigeria. In saying this, Senator Anyim merely reiterated the President’s well known stance that he will never allow the country to disintegrate under his watch. Certainly not, he said on one occasion, after its various peoples have lived together as one family, for better and for worse, for a 100 years since their colonisation by the British.

    Perhaps the President is sincere about his commitment to the unity and integrity of the country. But when, on the one hand, several of those close to the President threaten to break up the country unless he remains President beyond 2015 and nothing happens to them, and on the other hand, when those who say there will be violence if the President rigs the election are routinely harassed by the security forces, you cannot, in fairness, blame those who ask questions about the sincerity of the President’s commitment.

    Even more worrisome, in this respect, is the incredible fiscal irresponsibility of his government as exemplified by the fuel subsidy scandal, which has largely gone unpunished and by the over trillion naira waivers and exemptions it has given well-connected importers, not to mention budgets in which recurrent expenditures have consistently been more than double the capital expenditure. Such fiscal irresponsibility cannot but make any reasonable and sensible person wonder if those in authority believe there’s tomorrow for the country.

    Then, of course, there is the predictable grand oil theft that has gone on since the government handed over the security of the country’s oil regime to a few former Niger Delta militants about two years ago for huge sums that were sufficient to arm and equip our Navy and other relevant public security institutions to do a much better job. So grand is the oil theft that the big multinational oil companies and even our Finance minister, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, have expressed grave concerns about the country’s dwindling oil revenues.

    Government’s apparent indifference, to say the least, about this scale of oil theft alone, not to talk of the other reasons I have mentioned for concern about the President’s commitment to the country’s unity and integrity, reminds me of the Economics Nobel laureate and New York Times columnist, Paul Krugman’s five “rules of reporting” in his 2005 compilation of his columns titled: The Great Unravelling: From Boom to Bust in Three Scandalous Years to which I once drew the attention of readers of this column back in 2012. The book was about what Krugman called the “world-class mendacity” of the President George Bush and his vice, Dick Cheney, in covering up their phenomenal unravelling of the American political economy in three short years after coming to power.

    One of Krugman’s rules of reporting a government like Bush/Cheney’s which was similar to President Jonathan’s in its disregard for orthodoxy, was that a reporter must do his homework to discover the real, as opposed to the declared, goals of those in authority. What they did before they had power, he said, was a sure clue to their real intentions.

    Before the federal might went to the Delta region, more specifically to the Ijaw, it was an open secret that most of the region’s leading citizens in both public and private sectors funded, equipped and supported the region’s militancy. That militant attitude has been much apparent as the guiding principle of public policy in President Jonathan’s administration.

    This attitude is at the root of suspicions that there is a hidden agenda in the National Conference, especially given its timing so late in the President’s tenure. These suspicions have now been strengthened by the fact that the President alone will nominate about one quarter of the 492 delegates, none of whom will be elected. Worse still, is the rule that any division over an issue will be settled only by two thirds majority. Clearly this is a recipe for confusion and chaos.

    Over 21 years ago, The Economist (August 21, 1993) published an interesting survey on the country, titled: “Nigeria: Anybody seen a giant?” Among other things, the survey speculated about the prospects of the country breaking up. This was long before the more recent American scenario about Nigeria becoming a failed state.

    The self-styled newspaper gave five reasons for and against why the country could break up. The memory of Biafran civil war being too fresh may, it said, be an argument against a break up. But it quickly countered this argument with the point that this might not stop a slide into ungovernability, something the country has experienced long before the Boko Haram insurgency. Second, it said the argument about the country’s huge internal migration leading to more integration of its various people has, on the contrary, only led to resentment by “indigenes.”

    Third, it said, the argument that too many rich Nigerians have invested in the country to allow it to break up is no guarantee that the country would remain stable. Fourth, the argument that the rich world, led by an America hooked on cheap oil, cannot afford to allow the country fall apart, the magazine said, could be easily countered by the argument that should the country face any rebellion, the rich world would find it relatively easy to seal off the oil rich region and keep the oil wells pumping. Finally, the argument that the military was always on hand to intervene to stop the country sliding into chaos was, it said, undermined by the fact that the military itself had long become divided, politically and otherwise.

    Given what seems, at least to me, to be the greater weight of the counter arguments against the country’s break up, it seems Senator Anyim’s decree that the unity and integrity of Nigeria are off limits for the National Conference is no more than an expression of pious hope. The country may indeed not break up. But it would not be because of his, or for that matter, anybody’s mere say so.

    The conference itself was probably conceived in bad faith and is unlikely to lead to any good for the country. Delegates to the conference may disappoint sceptics like me and produce a useful report but the record of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party in dumping such documents into their trash cans makes it difficult, if not impossible, for any reasonable man to believe this time things will be any different.

    To be brutally frank about it, I do not understand the basis for General Babangida’s confidence that not only will all be well with Nigeria beyond 2015, the election that year will make it even stronger. Nigeria may be Africa’s and the Blackman’s giant in the sun but it is yet to have leaders that will turn its feet of clay into nimble ones that can stop it from tripping over itself.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    FEEDBACK

    My column of three weeks ago on the return of Chinweizu, the poet, author, essayist, literary critic, Pan Africanist and veteran newspaper columnist to the pages of Nigerian newspapers after a very long absence, received nearly sixty texts in response. Over a dozen of those responses offered to send me copies, original and photo, of his controversial book, The Anatomy of Female Power, which seemed to have gone out of circulation almost as soon as he’d published it. Perhaps the man himself did not read my piece in which I tried to take him up on his argument that our present constitution is an imposition of a Northern military cabal, but he did not respond to my request for a copy of the book.

    A friend has since delivered a copy to me in person. I wish to thank him and all those who offered to send it to me, mostly by mail.

     

     

  • Playing dangerous  politics with religion

    Playing dangerous politics with religion

    Last weekend, the Catholic Archbishop of Jos, Ignatius Kaigama, spoke out against what has since become President Goodluck Jonathan’s penchant for turning the church pulpit into a political platform for playing politics and making policy statements. Politicians should, he said, instead go to meet people in their villages where they live in abject poverty. The archbishop spoke this bitter truth to power in an interview with the online newspaper, Premium Times.

    The warning, coming from a senior cleric who is also the president of the influential Nigerian Bishops Conference, couldn’t have been deader on target and timelier as we begin preparations for the next elections starting in February next year.

    As if to underscore Archbishop Kaigama’s concern about the gravity of playing dangerous politics with religion, The Guardian published an editorial last Monday which condemned what it said was “the increasing recourse to religion by both the Presidency and the main opposition party…”

    “The conversion of churches and mosques into the new political battlefield”, the newspaper said, was “a dangerous adventure that must stop immediately.”

    The Guardian, like the archbishop, is right to be worried about the way some of our politicians have been using religion to divide and rule us. It was, however, wrong to say this phenomenon was new. It was also wrong to accuse the main opposition party of doing the same thing. For, while the president has been going about from one pulpit to another talking policy and politics, there has not been any report of the leadership of the main opposition party – The Guardian named no name but we all know it meant the All Progressives Congress – going openly from mosque to mosque or from church to church trying to harvest votes.

    In any case, even if the main opposition party is guilty of the misuse of religion for political gain, the greater blame must still go to the president; as The Guardian itself said, even if this allegation against the main opposition party is true, the buck must stop on the president’s table as he is “expected to run the country and not ruin it.”

    The way he has used religion to try and rule the country, going all the way back to even before the day in 2011 he knelt publicly before the highly influential Pastor Enoch Adeboye at the Redemption Camp, Ogun State, of the Redeemed Christian Church of God, for blessing in the run-up to the presidential election that year, the president may yet ruin this country.

    By now it should be obvious that the president and his ruling Peoples Democratic Party are determined to avoid a campaign based on the performance of his administration. This is obvious from the way his sidekicks, notably Professor Jerry Gana, who needs no introduction as, among other things, the country’s longest serving minister of information, through the militant Asari Dokubo to Senator Smart Adeyemi, have been defining the basis of support for the president in terms of ethnicity, region and religion.

    Professor Gana, for example, said recently that the Middle Belt where he comes from will vote for the President, apparently regardless of the man’s record of performance which, in spite of the statistics of economic growth government officials like to bandy around, has been dismal as is pretty obvious from the pervasive poverty in the land. For Gana the Middle Belt will vote for the president because, in his own estimation, it is mainly Christian and peopled by minority tribes.

    Similarly Dokubo has said the Southsouth region where he and the president come from will vote solidly for their man simply because he is their man, and it does not matter that nothing has changed in the dismal and brutish life of the common South-Southerner in spite of all the region’s oil wealth and for all these years that their man has been president.

    Again, Senator Adeyemi said in an interview in The Guardian of last Monday that the Yorubas in the North will support the president in spite of the alliance between the mainstream Southwest and Northwest politicians led by Asiwaju Ahmed Bola Tinubu, former Lagos State governor, and General Muhammadu Buhari, former military head of state and a perennial presidential candidate since 2003. “The gang-up,” as the senator called it, “seems more or less dominated by a section of Muslims from the Southwest who are in collaboration with some Northerners, who are also predominantly Muslims.”

    In what was clearly a gross misrepresentation of the Tinubu/Buhari “amalgam”, he said in the interview that those touting it as a possible winner should remember that what he said was a similar alliance between Chief Samuel Ladoke Akintola as Western premier and Sir Ahmadu Bello as Northern premier only led to the disastrous Western regional crisis which, in turn, eventually led to the 1966 military coup. Chief Akintola had rebelled against the leadership of Chief Obafemi Awolowo, whom he had succeeded as premier on the platform of the Action Group.

    Apparently the fact that Tinubu, unlike Akintola, represents mainstream politics in the South-West seems to have escaped the distinguished senator in his attempt to paint the opposition party in the false garb of an Islamic and Northern party.

    It is also obvious that the senator has ignored the fact that Tinubu’s wife is a staunch Christian and a pastor in her Church and that no one who knows the Asiwaju can accuse him of being a Muslim fundamentalist in the negative manner the West has portrayed such fundamentalism.

    Like Gana and Co., most of the president’s key supporters have strained themselves to create the impression that those opposed to their principal contesting next year’s election do so because he is a Christian and a minority and not because of his performance. And the president himself has hardly done anything to discourage this gross misrepresentation of the opposition.

    In this the president has merely been a good student of his erstwhile benefactor, former president, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo. The reader may recall how the chief, with Gana as his minister of information, foisted the live telecast of the entire Sunday Service at the Villa Chapel on NTA’s audience, something which was unprecedented in our national live. It seems since then the student has surpassed his teacher in this cynical manipulation of religion for political gain.

    I believe it is naive to think religion should be separated from politics in so far as religion is about what is right and what is wrong in society. All religions tell us and basically agree on the right way and the wrong way to play politics and, for that matter, how to do almost anything. For me, therefore, what is wrong is not the mixing of politics and religion as such but using religion to cover up bad politics. And it is definitely bad politics to use religion – and for that matter ethnicity or region or anything else – to seek to manipulate and divide people, the easier to rule and exploit them.

    What Nigerians want are leaders prepared to serve the public interest regardless of where they come from or what deity they worship, not leaders too full of religiosity as our leaders have been.

    As president and commander-in-chief of our armed forces, Mr Goodluck Jonathan owes himself and his country the duty to take religiosity, in contradiction to religious ethics, out of our politics. Otherwise he may yet prove the prophets of doom right who say he is the last president Nigeria will have.

  • Comment

    Comment

    For Olatunji Dare

     

    Unceremonial exit of Alhaji Bamanga Tukur is unfortunate despite his personality. PDP does not have respecter of elders, why must this insult happene to him. From Chika

    Dare, your text captioned “Retirement of the lexical kind” sounds very interesting but just note one thing. Babangida, a Northerner ruled the country for eight years. Obasanjo, a Yoruba man also ruled the country for eight years. Remember that there is no oil-well in Mina neither is there any at Abeokuta. Jonathan is of the hen that lay the Golden egg but you people did not know his value. These past leaders did not paint any old building not to talk of errecting any new one yet they remained honoured. Do not forget that the entire south-south and south-east look upon Jonathan as their candidate. You wish to see a united Nigeria but you seem to overlook the bane of the unity. I speak secretly to you that Jonathan’s neglect ends Nigeria coesive bond. Not a threat but of a whole truth. Anonymous

    Sir, I want more light into this amalgamation of a thing. From Ayodele Joseph Akao, Edo State

    You favoured the word ‘dismiss’ against the word ‘retire’ with respect to the disengagement of the service chiefs. There are number of valid reasons to justify the disengagement of a service chief and from newspaper reports that I read the presidency gave at least two of such reasons. There may be reasons to suspect every move our president makes but I do not think you were fair to him this time around. From Col. Peter Ulu (rtd).

    I read with worry the comment of Femi Fani-Kayode. I saw him as a religious and sectional bigot whose sense of social decency has badly deranged. Or how else can a man who was a minister and was alleged to have left office with poor records turn round to preach a poorly worded sermon – the gutless eunoch… He can only deceive the teens! His insult on our President is sad and Femi is an ingrate! If he feels he can whip up cheap sentiments, he is a joker! Anonymous

    Olatunji, so what terminology are you suggesting instead of amalgamation? Should we use cohabitation of the southern and northen protectorate as a terminology? Anonymous

    Mr. Dare, your article was a true direction of my thought how then do Nigerian council of elders think in this direction or Mr president? Another article for the young generation to claim their destiny. Thanks! From Peter, Abuja

    Re: Retirements of the lexical kind. Bamanga Tukur had bowed out after the forced exit. Who knows tomorrow regarding this occurrence. However one injustice committed against Bamanga tukur was that, he came in democratically but removed undemocratically. That however is a lesson for us all that ‘No condition is permanent’! From Lanre Oseni.

     

    For Segun Gbadegesin

     

    The ouster of the former PDP national chairman, Bamangar Tukur, may be a stepping stone to something better for the party, who knows? But Nigerians, I think, are more concerned with how the PDP and its ruling government could be reformed to give the people a sense of belonging in their much touted transfomational agenda, or give way for a viable alternative than who goes out of the party and was replaced by who. We are by no means interested in the strategy at using party politics to divert our attention from more important and urgent national problem – our economic reform. From Emmanuel Egwu

    Why is our ones objective ‘The Nation’ gradualy turning to an APC bulleting? Objectivity has been thrown into the trashcan. From Gabriel, Jos.

     

    For Gbenga Omotoso

    “The power of dream” is knowledge based and well researched. Nigerian politicians should put the interest of the nation on their priority list and avoid corruption and rancour. From Sunday Fiola esq, Sango Ota, Ogun State

    Unlike Biblical Joseph ‘The Dreamer’ which is spiritual and eventually came to pass, I agree with you 100 per cent on your analysis of day dreamers. Do not forget to include others like Buhari to balance your beautiful and bitter truth write-up. So far, I commend APC for what they have done in Lagos. However, APC and PDP should also not be in another mid summer night dream come. From J. Williams, Lagos.

    It is good to dream uncle Ggenga, as I am dreaming to be the governor of my state (Imo) so that my family members will get their own share of the cake. Anonymous

    Re: The power of dream. The power of dream you believe are oftentimes unrealistic could be 50-50. For some, dreams could be a reality. Fayose, Ladoja, Akala and Omisore may not be in your loved camp, at least one of them in the supposed dream, will prove your conclusion wrong. I hope tribunal will not bail you out as usual! Tukur had learnt that Nigerian politics is not the ‘truth’ one bares in totality afterall all those five defected PDP governors that were acclaimed ‘bad products’ while in PDP are being worshipped by ACN-CPC/APC today. When Suntai is ready to listen to the truth, he will succumb. From Lanre.

    My dear Gbenga, your piece on “The power of dreams” is not only interesting but amazingly fascinating. In each of the instances you took up, you examined with the precision of soothsayer and prophetic icing. I suggest that you do those concerned a favour by extracting a memo from your labour for their purpose. Anonymous

    Dreams power the world without it there will be no meaninful progress. Kudos to those who dream. Although ambition and vanity do not help matters. From Peter Nwakpa

     

    For Tunji Adegboyega

    The piece is interesting. The truth is that unemployment is synonymous with capitalist economy and ours is a peripheral capitalist order. Why? Because it is based on private profit. The whole thing will change when the toiling masses conquer political power and organise a humane society. From Amos Ejimonye.

    It is very unfortunate that good governance is not in Nigerian leaders’ dictionary. We are the laughing stock of the international community due to bad governance. Corruption and social vices have become ‘untouchable’ issues. How can we move forward? Let us pray now. From Gordon Chika Nnorom, Umukabia, Abia State.

    Thanks for publishing my ‘musing’ in your column last Sunday. This is the abridged biography of the average Nigerian. From pregnancy, his or her mother works at least 10-12 hours a day to support the father whose income is not sufficient to take care of the family (that is if he has any income). From birth he/she begins to live with hunger and every other form of deprivation. Have you noticed that one of the very first thing an average Nigerian child knows is “Up NEPA”!. Then, after wangling through school, he/she is forced into the labour market where all kinds of jackals are waiting to exploit him/her. Tell you what, there are many graduates out there who will sacrifice almost anything to secure a 15-hour a day job to earn N30,000 monthly. Believe me, there are graduates in this country today who work 8-10 hours a day and earn less than N15,000 naira monthly. Yet, our legislators are the highest paid in the world; they are even earning more than Obama and Angela merkel of Germany and our ‘coordinating minister’ keeps telling us that the economy is improving. My brother, anyone who says he/she is ready to die for this county should be told upfront: only those politicians deserve to pay whatever price Nigeria requires to experience peace and have a shot at progress. God bless you for your insightful write-ups.

    National Assembly has indirectly become the National Directorate of Employment. To get a good job in any government establishment in Abuja these days, you must have a link to a federal lawmaker. That is why 2015 is going to be hot. All of us must become lawmakers and political office holders in order to survive! From Okwudiri, Abuja.

    I am embarrassed that your piece in the January 26 edition of The Nation on Sunday almost suggests it’s wrong to bat an eyelid if a man or boy is underpaid or treated poorly on the job … Yes, you did mention the London educated guy but there is no parity in your presentation as far as male/female disenfranchisement is concerned. I guess speaking out for males equally would have made you lose what’s left of your manhood. From Mike, Port Harcourt.

  • How not to save the Railways; Wanted:  A Housing President

    How not to save the Railways; Wanted: A Housing President

    So Bamanga Tukur of Chairman PDP and NPA ‘infamy’ or fame in the 1970s is back in transport, as chairman of the Nigeria Railway Corporation. Is this a blessing for Tukur and Nigeria or a blessing for him and a curse for Nigeria? Did his record in NPA including an investigation into his involvement in a $5m private purchase of a ship, recommend him for the job? Did he open the state branch of the CBN for a party spraying event?

    Chairmanship of the railway corporation is a national moral assignment requiring integrity. To fully recover from the 40+ years deliberate destruction of Nigeria’s railway system in favour of road trailer and tanker transport, Nigeria needs a strong modern, vibrant nationwide, all inclusive, non-politically or ethnically biased railway and railway policy. It is difficult to see how and what Bamanga Tukur brings to the railway table that will justify his appointment. Yes, the railway corporation is suddenly juicy with many new contracts, but is it Bamanga Tukur’s task to bleed the railways and contractors in order to raise funds of the party in power towards the 2015 ‘s-elections’? I think not.  Is he there to rest, after the hypertension of the PDP chairmanship? I hope not. He should better rest at home.

    Is he in the railways because of his tremendous knowledge and expertise in transport, modern engineering and 400km/h fast trains? Definitely no! Is his job for personal compensation and financial gain as chairman after a job well done in his party? Who knows? Whatever the truth, Bamanga Tukur may have a conscience especially at his age of 80+ now that God is close at hand. His party is fond of floating 80+ year olds as if the 40-60-year olds are incompetent, though they are presidents in other countries. After all President Jonathan saw other leaders in banks, business and politics in Davos. How many were 80+? Nigeria must once again endure Tukur as chairman of railways and the consequences of Tukur, if the railways staff do not strike in protest, and if Civil Society does not protest adequately. Tukur has probably supported the destruction of the railways in the past or support the benign neglect of the railways under all governments till this one. Why would Jonathan send Tukur, not known for success, to head one of his more successful projects? After all, who objected to the railway evacuation of goods from the NPA harbours throughout Nigeria during these last 40 years? Has he had a change of heart? Can a camel lose its hump? If not Nigerians should demand his redeployment to be chairman of prison commission or ask him to retire.

    I was invited to a television programme on the housing shortage last week. My contribution was brief as I did not say what was expected. So I will say my piece here. The reason Nigeria has a housing problem is totally political. There is no great ‘Housing President’. We have a lot of lip service from presidents but little practical action. What little is done often benefits a fraction of the civil service class with special housing and land allocations. Though Dangote is the 25th richest man in the world, not including silent shy Nigerians and retired generals, the poor housing situation is compounded by the high price of cement under his cement ownership, the land policy in Nigeria with the politics of the Certificate of Occupancy, the high cost of land and building materials and the almost absence of genuine mortgage loans and decent outright or long-term purchase terms.

    The great nations of the world built mass housing through politics- government programmes and policy decisions of the leadership- some mired in corruption with corrupt construction companies frequently in court. In spite of this corruption, the housing gets built and the loans are given. The post-war building programme that gave most Americans a home was a presidential directive to give work to the returning soldiers and the people a lift out of post-war depression.

    In the UK, it was the building policies of the Labour Party which provided council housing for the masses. In Lagos and most of Nigeria, most of the official housing was for government workers, taken over from the colonialists GRAs and police barracks. Awolowo’s AG and successors did build estates, some of which fell into private hands. It was during the time of Jakande of Lagos State that massive attention was paid to housing. He can rightly be called ‘Jakande the Builder’ as his policies and actions gave many Lagosians a chance to own a home even though 40 years later most of them are crumbling. The federal government has attempted to build token estates in every state but political squabbles made some of them to be located in insalubrious areas and being federal government contracts, the quality was often less than standard. The private sector has also tried to intervene but the resultant efforts are usually high end multimillion housing scams, I mean schemes. The result of these efforts is a massive under-supply of common man and middle class housing, estimated to be between 14 and 17million homes or apartments. Nigeria knows it cannot build high-rises, as our poor maintenance culture will make the upper floors uninhabitable with security risks of gangs running estates as happens worldwide. Nigerian needs a ‘Housing President’.