Category: Opinion

  • France’s inhumanity to Africans

    France was perhaps not the worst foreign power in Africa during colonial rule but it is, without question, the cruelest post-colonial tormentor of former African colonies. I will elaborate. But first, let me explain what prompted this intentionally angry outburst: an account by Sahara Reporters titled “France Honours African Fighters in Ceremony to Commemorate WW-II”, a ceremony at which French President Emmanuel Macron reportedly paid tributes to about 260, 000 brave soldiers from Francophone Africa who fought alongside allied troops for the liberation of France from the clutches of Nazi Germany 75 years ago this August. Helpless under Nazi military oppression, France could only be rescued by the combined expeditionary forces of the Allied Powers, including hundreds of thousands of brave soldiers from several African colonies, during and immediately after the Normandy invasion in 1944.

    At the event held in Saint-Raphael in southeast France, and surprisingly witnessed by presidents of two Francophone West African countries (Alpha Conde of Guinea and Alassane Ouattara of Cote d’Ivoire), President Macron said of the African fighters that “the names, the faces, the lives of these heroes of Africa must be part of our lives as free citizens.” That would ordinarily pass for a noble and laudable sentiment, except for the uncomfortable fact that the same France not only committed and is still responsible for the most horrendous atrocities imaginable in and against African nations and their peoples. France is directly and indubitably culpable, although I do not excuse the agency and culpability of African leaders, in the severe retardation and backwardness of its former African possessions.

    What is most ironic is that the President of Guinea-Conakry, the colony whose open defiance of continued French domination of Africa in 1958 opened the floodgates for independence for the rest of Francophone Africa, and which President Charles de Gaulle deliberately subjected to the most callous punishments, would grace such an occasion. Let me quickly remind us that it was in Conakry, the capital of Guinea, during his tour of the colonies in 1958 to market his proposal for a French African community, that the arrogant President de Gaulle suffered his worst public humiliation at the hands of the radical trade unionist and political mobilizer, Ahmed Sekou Toure, who trenchantly demanded for independence for Guinea rather than to be part of any nebulous French community. Angrily, he agreed to grant independence to Guinea but subjected it to the most callous and malevolent punishment to snuff life out of the new sovereign country. Whatever the French could not cart away from the country they destroyed, including physical infrastructure, schools, buildings, agricultural equipment, vehicles, even books, thereby sending it back into a state worse than its pre-colonial existence, exactly what they did to Haiti more than 200 years ago. It had to take Ghana’s immediate injection of a grant of ten million pounds to prevent the country from going under. Much more horrible treatment awaited Algeria, the territory that the French loved to regard as an overseas extension of mainland France; it had to fight a most brutal war of independence in which millions of lives were lost and extensive physical destruction deliberately inflicted on it.

    But enough of colonial history already. A cursory look at France’s atrocious and sadistic treatment of its former colonies in the so-called ‘post-colonial’ era will not fail to convince even the most skeptical that France takes the prize for the cruelest post-colonial (read neo-colonial) power in Africa. Since the grant of independence had been made inevitable by Guinea from 1958 onwards, most French colonies became independent in 1960, and France enslaved all of them by setting the most ignoble neo-colonist traps for them, traps that validate Nkrumah’s assertion that any country in the clutches of neo-colonialism is never a master of its own destiny. No Francophone African country is a master of its own affairs. At so-called independence France corralled them into signing one-sided military and defence agreements, which included basing French troops on their soils, infusion of French military intelligence personnel into their defence and security establishments. France is the only former colonial power with its troops permanently based in several African countries (Senegal, Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, etc) to pursue and defend exclusively French national interests, including to support friendly governments, as well as to overthrow and assassinate recalcitrant leaders such as Sylvanus Olympio of Togo and Jean Bedel Bokassa of Central African Republic.

    As if that is not pernicious enough, it cleverly wove their economies into France’s economy, tied them together into a single currency whose value is dictated from Paris, compels them to save their external reserves in the French treasury in Paris, from which it gives them loans for development, collects and pockets the accrued interests! This is apart from compelling them to sell most of their primary produce to France, and import mostly French-made products and award their most important infrastructure development contracts only to French firms, and then to other countries only if there are no willing French takers. And this is besides forcing them to pay millions of dollars annually for whatever infrastructure – roads, railways, airports, dams, electricity station, and bridges – that the French had built in colonial times to facilitate resource plunder, and at rates determined by Paris. Have you ever wondered why Africa is full of failed states!

    I don’t know any neo-colonial peonage worse than this, and France is the sole author and beneficiary of it. Now you may understand my assertion that France is the cruelest foreign power in post-colonial Africa. That is why Macron’s egregious tributes to fallen African soldiers who helped to liberate France from German oppression are not sincere. What can be more sincere and honourable than ensuring that peoples who made such enormous sacrifices for France are treated with respect rather than their countries being held in perpetual servitude?

    Today, France exhibits all the outward impressions of a prosperous first world power only because of the tyranny of its ne-colonialism, its relentless pillage of the vast resources of its former African colonies, its control of their national economies and the callous extraction of colonial debts, a national wealth built on sheer inhumanity. Even Jacques Chirac, former French president, sincerely owned up to this in 2008 when he noted that “without Africa, France will slide down into the rank of a third world power.” Take for example Niger Republic’s rich uranium mines which are guarded by French forces, providing security for French firms exploiting the strategic mineral. France is nothing but a country whose prosperity is based on the proceeds of heinous crimes against the humanity of Africans and a country whose leaders are hardly better than conscienceless armed robbers. It is frankly nauseating that such people also have the guts to condemn us for being unable to develop the same states they selfishly pauperized.

    Not making excuses for the two African leaders who attended that ceremony in France, they are not unaware of how vicious and vengeful French leaders could be if humiliated, and attended to avoid any unpleasant consequences. The French should be exposed for their ignoble role in retarding Africa’s progress.

     

    • Prof Fawole writes from Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife.

     

  • Sambisa, RUGA and tourism

    The first and only time I visited Calabar, the Cross River State capital was over eight years ago to attend a conference organized by the Centre for Management Development, CMD. During the three-day programme, I soaked myself in the freshness of a city that prides itself as an old seat of the British colonists in Nigeria.

    Calabar is where in the early part of the 19th  Century, an Irish humanist, Mary Slessor put an end to an abhorrent cultural practice of murder of girl-twins because of the prevailing myth that such multiple births portend bad omen for the largely heathen society. In my morning and evening survey of Calabar during the conference, I found the city possessing an alluring beauty, with well laid out streets. Calabar is exemplified environmental purity during my visit.

    In this city, I saw the definition of dignity of labour in the passion of street sweepers. From as early as five o clock the morning, they were on the roads, with brooms in both hands and with mechanical precision and sweat streaming their faces, their two hands sweep in dizzying speed to give the city of Mary Slessor a glittering look as the sun rises daily. Its cab drivers were genial as I engaged them in discussion. As the conference wound up, I had time on hand to take a tour of Tinapa Resort.

    Tinapa is a futuristic theme park with benumbing and vast shopping facilities. The resort is the making of Donald Duke whose dream was to turn his home state into an Eldorado of sort, an African tourist destination that would rival Genting Highlands in Malaysia. A visit to Malaysia is incomplete without a sight of Genting. Tinapa should be the Marvel of Cross River, a diamond in the sun that splashes light on the garden city as it welcomes millions of visitors to lavish life savings as Calabar tourists.

    But has Donald Duke’s dream to make Calabar a daring tourist destination materialized? This can be confirmed or refuted by what has become of Tinapa since he left office after eight years in the saddle. Since, my last and only visit of Calabar, Tinapa has hardly made any cheering news as a tourist destination to put the city or Nigeria on the world tourism map in the mould of Disneyland. Yet for a state like Cross River, if it were in South East Asia which I’m a bit familiar with, Tinapa would have been a high revenue earner as it pulls millions of tourists into the embrace of the garden city.

    Not just Cross River; every state in Nigeria has the potential to earn megabucks from tourism, far more than what some whole countries in Asia, the Pacific and the Caribbean islands earn from visitors. If in New Delhi, one could pay to visit the home of the Ghandis, I ask why can’t our tourism ministry make millions from Tafawa Balewa tourist site in Bauchi? Indonesia’s Taman Mini Indonesia Indah Independence Park receives streams of tourist daily in Jakarta, a site promoted by the wife of one the country’s president just as the iconic Petronas Twin Towers and the adjoining KLCC Convention Centre in Kuala Lumpur is a daily crowd puller. The entirety of Singapore at the Southern tip West Malaysia is a tourist delight.  When Nigerians travel to Dubai or Doha, they tell tales of even just the airports as tourists’ delights.

    When we travel to Saudi Arabia or Israel, we talk of those countries beyond the spiritual import of the hajj, umrah or the pilgrimage they hold for Muslims and Christians. We talk about beauty and order in the countries. We talk about efficiency of their infrastructure. When we travel to India, we envy the health services on offer. When we attend conferences in Europe, we are fascinated by the quality of service of the hospitality industry there. The sporting infrastructure in some countries is the main attraction that yields for them billions in dollars. Some islands in the pacific region are just good enough for their silence and, perfect for rehabilitation or recuperation. Brunei Travelling by road to Abuja occasionally, I always luxuriate in the sights, scenes and sceneries of the lush foliage of green vegetation as it unfolds in the near twelve our drive, rolling hills and hillocks, towering mountains, heavy boulders and intimidating rock formations that define the Nigerian landscape in that segment of the country from Osun through Ondo, a strip of Edo and the swathe of Kogi before entering the sprawling Federal Capital Territory to be surprised by its wide boulevards. It is a sheer beauty, indeed alluring, mentally rejuvenating and spiritually soothing or calming, like the feeling one gets in the rain forest of the Borneo Island, shared between Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam.  On such long trips I am most mentally fertile, manufacturing many of my masterpieces on motion.

    Abuja has a fair share of iconic buildings to be proud of in the country, including the breath-taking National Mosque and the opulent National Christian Ecumenical Centre that qualify as tourist attractions in many countries of the world. Traveling from Abuja to Kaduna sometimes last year, the Idu Train Station was my transit point from where I had a ride like in a flight to the Northern Nigerian political capital. What do these tell us about tourism in Nigeria? Simple. The country has vast tourism potentials which unfortunately have not been sufficiently tapped into. I think we first need to have a wider perspective of tourism.

    Tourism is not just about travelling to have fun or for holidaying. Tourism covers every aspect of life that necessitates one to leave his home for another. From pilgrimage to establishing business link, seeking university admission, health rehabilitation, conference participation, arts and specialized exhibitions, trade fairs, cultural shows, sports fiestas and cultural festivals come under the gamut of tourism.  Each state government must therefore seek opportunities in the comparative advantages of its territories, leveraging on them to develop into tourism assets or potentials for earning huge revenue. This requires investment in supporting infrastructure and providing the enabling environment to attract tourists of shades and intents to their states

    For instance, the Centre of Excellence and State of Aquatic Splendour is blessed with beautiful beaches waiting for further exploration. All the littoral states can form a front to develop water sports just as the states in the savanna belt can offer the land for dizzying safaris and motor races. Our rainforest region indeed are crying for conversion into wild life parks for exploration of our flora and fauna and interesting forest expeditions. Money can be made in showcasing our cuisines and our artistic dexterities in exhibition of our prodigies wasting away in many corners of the country or finding solace in crime as one million boys, badoo, internet fraud and traders in flesh.

    Now the Borno State government according to news has decided to hand over part of the dreaded Sambisa Forest to the federal government for the experimentation of Rural Grazing Area, RUGA. This is where the notorious Boko Haram once used as cover for their onslaught against the Nigerian state in their mad ambition to overrun the country and force on the nation their queer ideology that attacks rationality and knowledge, the very foundation of the faith they claim to profess.

    Borno State Governor Babagana Zulum announced the donation recently when the Shehu of Borno, Alhaji Garbai El-Kanemi, visited him at Government House, Maiduguri during Sallah and hinted that the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps, agro rangers and hunters had been mobilised to secure the area and revealed: “We have identified six different locations we consider safe for the pilot scheme in the state. The Ruga scheme is as old as history; it is not a new thing. I don’t know why some people are politicising it.

    Extricating it from politics or escapism, a business tourist zone in Sambisa to be be developed into an ideal RUGA becomes a pull for the world to see a zone of death rise as a settlement that spells a NEW DAWN in employment and productivity; a place where business in dairy or milk products, meat processing and associated industries come alive with passion perfection.

     

    • Abdulwarees is of the Voice of Nigeria.
  • Offence of treason

    The #RevolutionNow movement, championed by the presidential candidate of the Africa Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore, appears to have melted like an ice cube flung into a flame. Could it be that Sowore overrated himself? Perhaps, he trusted his famed competences and followership in the cyber world, and thought that such can be translated into street followership.

    Running scared, the federal government post-haste accused him of committing the highest offence against public order. If Sowore had consulted a psycho-analyst before the #RevolutionNow, he would have been warned that President Muhammadu Buhari would not take chances with any potential threat to his government, when history blames his indifference for the palace coup, which the wily former President Ibrahim Babaginda masterminded against his leadership in 1985.

    Some historians claim that General Buhari was warned that a coup was brewing, but he ignored it, apparently waiting to see tangible signs – like mutiny or the movement of troops. But this time, the General may have panicked too early, and he has the freedoms enshrined in the 1999 constitution to contend with. In a democracy, protests and adverse opinions are seen as inherent in the fundamental rights, guaranteed by law.

    But seriously speaking, the charge of treason and treasonable felony are serious offences against the state, which is why they attract death penalty and life imprisonment respectively. In most democracies, the charge of treason is usually linked to a military invasion, either from within or from outside the country. In our political history, it was only under the military that treason and treasonable felony were routine, except of course the Obafemi Awolowo saga, which because of its political undertone crippled the first republic.

    So what are treason and treasonable felony? Section 37(1) of the Criminal Code, provides: “any person who levies war against the Sovereign, in order to intimidate or overawe the Governor-General or Governor of a Region, is guilty of treason, and is liable to the punishment of death.” Sub-section 2, further provides: “any person conspiring with any person, either within or without Nigeria, to levy war against the Sovereign with intent to cause such levying of war as would be treason if committed by one of Her Majesty’s subjects, is guilty of treason, and is liable to punishment of death…”

    Tightening the noose further, that relic of colonial legislation in Nigeria, provides in section 38 that: “any person who instigates any foreigner to invade Nigeria with an armed force is guilty of treason, and is liable to the punishment of death.” With Sowore merely ‘whining his mouth’, as they would say in Nigerian street lingo, many are wandering how such theatrics could mutate to treason? But the government is not taking any chances in the media war, knowing the reach of Sowore’s internet warriors.

    In the media space, the federal government has gone ahead to accuse Sowore of having links with the disorderly followers of embattled leader of Islamic Movement of Nigeria, Sheik El Zakzaky and also of planning to team up with the separatist group, the IPOB – both organizations the federal government had banned as terrorist groups in controversial circumstances. So, with the dragnet linking him to IMN and IPOB, the federal character principle is maintained, at least in the court of public opinion.

    On treasonable felonies, section 41 provides: “any person who forms an intention to effect any of the following, that is to say: (a) to depose the sovereign from the style, honour, and royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, or of any other of Her Majesty’s dominions, or from her style, honour, and name of Supreme Lady in and over Nigeria, or in and over any other country which has been declared to be under her protection;”

    Or (b): “to levy war against the sovereign within any part of Her Majesty’s dominions, or within any country which has been declared to be under her protection, in order by force or constraint to compel the sovereign to change her measures or counsels, or in order to put any force or constraint upon, or in order to intimidate or overawe any House of Parliament or other legislative authority or any of Her Majesty’s dominions, or of any country which has been declared dominions, or of any country which has been declared to be under her protection.”

    Or (c): “to instigate any foreigner to make an armed invasion of any of Her Majesty’s dominions, or of any country which has been declared to be under her protection – and manifest such intention by an overt act, is guilty of felony and is liable to imprisonment for life.” Interestingly, the federal government has secured an order of a federal High Court to detain Sowore for 45 days, within which it will hopefully conclude its investigation and prefer the taunted charge of treason against him.

    In the days ahead, it will be seen whether the surrounding issues raised against Sowore will provide the prima facie evidence that will be required to proffer a charge of treason or treasonable felony against the embattled political activist. In Ajidagba vs IGP (1958) 3 FSC 5, the Supreme Court held that prima facie simple means “ground for proceeding.”  On prima facie case, the apex court held: “a prima facie is not the same as proof which comes later when the court has to find whether the accused is guilty or not guilty….”

    Again, in Ikomi vs State (1986) 5 SC 741, Nnamani JSC, held: “It is sufficient, if the depositions and statements attached to the information disclose a prima facie case against the accused person. The question ought to be this: from these depositions, is it probable that the accused persons are linked with the offence….” Referring to the role of the Attorney General, Coker JSC in Ikomi’s case held: “An Attorney General is not the Judge of the case but a prosecutor of the charge. His responsibility was not to decide the merit of the case but to ensure that the charge is not preferred irresponsibly, solely to embarrass, harass or prosecute.”

    But in what looks like a departure from the settled principles of Ikomi vs State, the Supreme Court in Abacha vs State (2002) FWLR (Pt.118) by a majority judgement upturned the concurrent judgment of the two lower courts. The apex court, per Belgore JSC held: “In the matter now at hand, there is nothing linking the appellant with the crimes on the indictment than suspicion.” While many believe the federal government have acted tendentiously against Sowore, it is the courts that will determine whether his actions fit into the definition of treason as alleged by government.               

  • Gowon’s sermon

    Yakubu Dan-Yumma Gowon, 84, is Nigeria’s former Head of State. He served in the Nigerian Army between 1954 and 1975. Nine of those years were dedicated to Nigeria as her ruler. Within that period, he also led war efforts to keep Nigeria as one indivisible entity. Wikipedia describes Gowon as Nigeria’s military leader who “took power after one military coup d’etat and was overthrown in another.”

    The former military strongman has many firsts to his credit: the youngest man and the first bachelor ever – and the only one so far – to rule Nigeria. He is also the father of the ‘No victor, no vanquished’ aphorism that has now won laurels among war mongers and political gladiators. As fate would have it, the war veteran is the convener of ‘Nigeria Prays’, a Christian religious programmeestablished some 23 years ago, “out of the need to put an end to the various problems plaguing Nigeria.”

    Gowon was in Osun State with his ‘Nigeria Prays’ team recently and the message was that of peace and stability of Nigeria. He was in the state to assure the people that, our predicament notwithstanding, what has gone wrong can be remedied only if we can pray.

    Top of Form

    Well, let me join other well-meaning Nigerians in commending Gowon as a good and responsible elder-statesman who has, since his removal from office and return from exile, been canvassing attitudinal change among Nigerians. Unlike others who derive pleasure from doing stuffs that are rich in compromising the unity and oneness of Nigeria”, this remarkable and fantastic Nigerian has never wavered in urging Nigerians to depart from their old ways so as to allow God to shame their frustrations and dismember their encumbrances. Little wonder Osun State governor, Gboyega Oyetola described him as “a man of integrity, a man of honour and a man of peace.”

    From the sociological analysis of what is on ground, there is no doubt that society still looks up to people of Gowon’s age and pedigree to provide leadership because corruption seems to have made those who are supposed to take over from them lose the privilege and requisite respect. Given his age, the former leader is already old. By now, he is expected to be resting and enjoying the fruits of his labour. In saner climes, there ought to have been a generational change that would have led to the baton falling on somebody else. In this wise, one can understand the retired General’s nostalgia. Unfortunately however, the challenge facing us as a people is that there is no rallying point; there is nobody to believe in and that’s the major issue! For instance, with all that the likes of Bola Tinubu have done, some people still query their motive, space and place in the affairs of Nigeria.

    Yes, following God is good! Praying without ceasing is also rewarding! After all, He has awesomely promised to hear His “people who are called” by His name “from heaven, forgive their sin” and “heal their land”, if only they will “humble themselves and pray, and seekHis face, and turn from their old ways”. That’s God! But how many people believe in God and are we really God’s people?

    Broadly speaking, Nigeria is Africa’s biggest market; very hugely import-dependent. Beyond mere postulations and associated externalities, over-55% of her population is educated. By this, I mean, they can read and write. We also have the soil, the sunshine, even the oil and all that’s needed to make our lives worth the while. However, looking at what Nigeria does have, and should have, the current state of her security is, to say the least, uninspiring. Nigeria, as it is, is the paradox of a nation. Like a child, attempting to crawl, dear country is conspicuously weighed down by social, economic and political problems. Sad that Nigeria doesn’t look like a country with direction! Since she has been captured by the muddy and messy intrigues of politics, she is now moving dangerously towards extreme poverty and disaster. So, no cohesion! Regrettably, this uncertainty, this fear, is already wreaking havoc! For example, some of our latter-day, so-called leaders have no paid jobs and no second address. In politics and science, there is nobody to lead; and, in sports, the coaches will fight over estacode and selection processes. The crying thing is that our children are not solid on the inside!

    But, where did Nigeria get it wrong? Once upon a time, the Ahmadu Bellos of this world were seen and believed as leaders. Even, when Tafawa Balewa as the Prime Minister was stationed in Lagos, he still deferred to the Sardauna of Sokoto, whose seat as Premier of Northern Nigeria was in Kaduna. Till date, nobody has replaced Nnamdi Azikiwe as leader of the Igbo Race. And, Obafemi Awolowo’s challenges notwithstanding, he remained the leader of the Yoruba race until he passed on in 1987. We will want the world to know the truth and the unequivocal truth is that, immediately Abraham Adesanya died, Afenifere as a foremost Yoruba socio-cultural group, from whose rank successive Yoruba leaders had hitherto emerged, disintegrated into factions. As we speak, Afenifere is with no clear leader!

    Without doubt, Nigeria needs a philosophy to follow and people with character in geopolitical zones to defer to. But can we have peace without justice and how do we retrieve some of these values from those who are using us against us and are prospering at our expense? The more reason the actors in Nigeria will have to sit up and address the salient issues currently threatening the survival of this country. To achieve this, emphasis must be laid on education as well as character formation and nurturing. Take it or leave it: until the people come together and agree on predictable parameters and standards that can serve as guides, the country will continue to wallow in incongruous ideological and political atrocities. Until we realise that distortions in social order will not only lead to dysfunctions in values but also show how complicated we are as a people, this ‘katakata’ will not ease our anguish, no matter the amount of supplications offered onto God.

    • Komolafe writes in from Ijebu-Jesa, Osun State.
  • Wall Street Journal and nocturnal burials 

    The highly respected Wall Street Journal recently published a story where it sensationally claimed that over a thousand soldiers killed in the ongoing counterinsurgency operations in the North East have been buried unceremoniously and secretly in trenches and also in unmarked graves in the area of operation.

    Among several others, the Journal claimed that “After dark, the bodies of soldiers are covertly transported from a mortuary that at times gets so crowded the corpses are delivered by truck, according to Nigerian soldiers, diplomats and a senior government official. The bodies are laid by flashlight into trenches dug by infantrymen or local villagers paid a few dollars per shift”.

    This issue is very profound and sensitive. It hits at the core of troops morale, discipline and the will to fight. It can ruin the fabric that holds the military together. The story suggests that the Nigerian Army is unprofessional and lacks the basic commitment to the preservation of the memories of its personnel who die serving the nation.

    It is against this background that the author of the story should have made an effort to speak to the authorities of the Nigerian Army, being the lead agency in the counterinsurgency efforts or the Defence Headquarters, rather than rely on the views of the so called “Nigerian soldiers, diplomats and government officials”. In Mass Communication 101 classes across our tertiary institutions students are taught to develop the spirit of fair and balanced reporting.

    This is even better emphasized in more developed societies that lay claim to better standards and higher human ideals. So what happened in this instance? If as the author claims, he spoke to “Nigerian soldiers, diplomats, and government officials”, why didn’t he speak to military authorities also? Where is the basic ethics of news reporting?

    Read Also: The Wall Street Jobber and Nigeria’s Jaded Opposition

    I will not try to defend the burial record of the Nigerian Army in the North East per se because being an interested party, there would be the presumption that I am pushing the official position or being defensive.

    However, I will discuss Customs and Traditions of the Nigerian Army as it affects burials and how these practices have been strictly adhered to in combat, beginning from the Nigerian Civil war, the ECOMOG Operations in Liberia and Sierra Leone and Peace Support Operations which Nigeria has participated in. In the end, hopefully, important questions which are at the core of this controversy would have been answered.

    Just like weddings, burial rites of service personnel even during periods of hostility constitute an integral part of the Traditions and Customs of the Nigerian Army and indeed the military, as inherited from the British. The practice is that, upon the death of serving personnel, his Commanding Officer sends a condolence message to the Next of Kin, on behalf of the Service.

    Thereafter, such a commander continues to render such assistance as may be required by the Next of kin until after the burial, payment of benefits and relocation of the Next of Kin. Funeral ceremonies of deceased serving personnel are procedural and are followed through subject to prevailing conditions.

    Notwithstanding, at the funeral of an officer or a soldier, the following are usually provided; Escorts, Firing party, Bands and drums, Gun carriage or horses, Pall bearers, Bearers for the coffin and Insignia bearers.

    During hostilities as is currently playing out in the North East, exigencies of the operation may not allow the usual ceremonial procedures. In this instance, when a unit breaks contact with the enemy, the commander reorganizes and during the period he checks his men to determine who is wounded, missing or Killed in Action.

    Thereafter, he issues a Situation Report to higher headquarters and simultaneously commences the evacuation of medical emergencies. Casualties are moved to the rear, where preparations are made for burial after Next of Kin are informed and requested to attend. In the event where a unit is over run and there is no organized withdrawal, search and rescue patrols are usually dispatched to recover missing, wounded and killed personnel.

    This has been the doctrine which has guided operations in the military in Nigeria.

    What has been discussed above is not theory, it is the practice. As far back as 1967 when the civil war broke in Nigeria, Nigerian Army personnel were already conversant with the handling of colleagues who have paid the supreme price. In his account of the Nigerian Civil War titled “Biafra War Revisited”, Major General OE Okon (Rtd) gives insight into the management of war casualties during “Operation Tiger Claw” launched to capture Calabar and neigbouring localities from Biafran troops thus:

    The DC – 3 flights that took reinforcements from Lagos to Calabar returned

    with casualties. The ships, “Bode Thomas” and “Qua River”, delivered

    more supplies and reinforcements and also took back casualties to Lagos.

    Elsewhere in the book, General Okon also recounts how troops of 16 Commando Brigade which were surrounded by Biafran troops in Owerri from November 1968 to April 1969, maneuvered out of the encirclement, carrying along with them “equipment, refugees, Prisoners of War and even the corpse of their dead Brigade Major”.

    The essence of this was to ensure that the Brigade Major was given a befitting burial. These are just a few instances of the institutional perspective regarding the respect accorded Nigerian Army personnel who were Killed in Action during the 3 year civil war.

    During the 10 year long ECOMOG Peace Enforcement Operations in Liberia and Sierra Leone, prevailing customs, traditions and extant policies continued to guide the management of causalities. Nigerian Air Force C130 crews in particular which sustained logistics resupply of those missions regularly brought back Nigerian casualties for burial.  As a United Nations peace keeper in Sierra Leone between 2001 and 2002, I witnessed the exhumation of the remains of a Nigerian soldier who died during an engagement with the defunct Revolutionary Republican Front (RUF) and was buried in the grounds of Catholic Hospital in Lunsar, for a befitting burial in Nigeria. If soldiers who died in combat in foreign and distant missions were not buried secretly and at night, it should surprise anyone that the Wall Street Journal is making such claims in the North East campaign that is largely within the Nigerian space.

    In fact, the Code of Conduct for troops in the North East clearly states that “wounded or killed soldiers must not be left behind”. So, is it after enduring so much to bring back a dead colleague that the remains will be buried shabbily in a “trench at night, and secretly”? Is this logical?

    Disrespect of the dead is an offensive and condemnable act in all cultures of the world. The two major religions in Nigeria abhor it. In the military, it is an anathema because it kills morale which is the biggest factor in victory. So, is the Nigerian Army willingly shooting itself in the foot? Or does the Nigerian Army hate its soldiers? What could be the motivation for the alleged act? There is no evidence that Nigerian Army authorities are disdainful of its personnel living or dead.

    From the Wall Street Journal report, no motive was apparent. In the wake of the criticism, information managers in the Defence Headquarters have rebutted the claim. The social media has been inundated with images of public burials of soldiers killed in the North East, in day time and in the presence of bereaved families. Is it possible that these videos are fake or were hurriedly put together after the story broke? Do the videos which are available online confirm mass and burials at night which the Wall Street Journal report claims?

    It is often said that there is no smoke without fire. In my view, the fire in this smoke is probably because some deceased soldiers may have been buried though properly, but in the absence of their Next of kin. This situation could arise sometimes owing to the inability of the Next of kin to arrive Maiduguri in time and the burial cannot be delayed for obvious reasons.

    However, even in such instances there is a remedy. The Next of kin can demand to be shown the grave of the deceased and images of the ceremony. This could have been the way out, rather than the resort to self-help which has given license to fifth columnists. To prevent this ugly situation from repeating, the Nigerian Army should consider introducing No Next of Kin No Burial Policy. When Next of kin compulsorily attend the burial of their loved ones, this distraction will not reoccur.

    At the end of the day, the Wall Street Journal story on secret burials in Maimalari Cantonment is pathetic and below the threshold of good and responsible journalism. It was done in bad faith and in the frame of a typical biased and condescending Western media report that do not see anything good in the developing world. The report and its intent is beyond the Nigerian Army, It is about us as a people. The real message that the Wall Street Journal is passing is that we cannot even bury our dead.

     

    • Colonel Antigha is the Chief of Military Public Information at the Multinational Joint Task Force, N’Djamena – Chad 
  • Timipre Sylva and APC chances in Bayelsa governorship election

    November 16th, 2019 is a very significant date in the election calendar of Bayelsa State. The date can be likened to the Shakespearian Ides of March where the major political gladiators are set to engage in an epic battle to control the political soul of the state.

    This follows the release of the governorship election timetable by the Nigeria’s electoral umpire. The election is a straight fight between the ruling People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Since the birth of democracy in 1999, Bayelsa has been under the rule of the PDP and its followers pride themselves in declaring it a “PDP State”.

    However, at the 2015 governorship election, the APC and its governorship candidate, Chief Timipre Sylva, almost swept off the PDP governor seeking re-election, Mr. Seriake Dickson.

    Again, in 2019 general election, the foundation of the PDP was shaken when the Sylva-led leadership of the APC for the first time took the electorate by surprise when it won one senatorial election, two members for House of Representatives and four members at the State House of Assembly. While the result of the presidential election in the state had an impressive outing – much more than that of the 2015 – in securing more than the 25 percent required by the constitution.

    APC’s performance in the 2019 general election was so impressive and shocking to PDP members to the extent that it has demystified and punctured the PDP members’ ego trip of being the dominant ruling party in the state.

    Though the former governor and minister-designate Sylva is yet to officially indicate his intent to seek re-election, he remains the man to watch in the game as his body language and that of his army of foot soldiers continue to give nightmares to the rank and file of the PDP, with a rife speculation that he will run for the governorship.

    Barely over a week ago, PDP elders and critical stakeholders in the state held a closed-door meeting presided over by former President Goodluck Jonathan.

    According to media reports, Jonathan used the opportunity of the meeting to warn the party faithful to guard against division within the PDP. He noted that if the party failed to unite, it will lose the forthcoming governorship election.

    The warning according to close sources sent a chill down the spines of members of the party, which many people agree that the warning by the former president to his party was understandable to a large extent, as many political pundits interpreted that to mean fear of the Sylva-led APC is the beginning of wisdom.

    They point at the APC’s performance at the last general election which is still fresh in the minds of the PDP leadership. If it is allowed to repeat the feat, then PDP dominance will be automatically diminished and be consigned to the rubbles of history in the state.

    Those who have closely monitored the politics of Bayelsa agree that the governorship election in the state is a contest between APC’s Sylva and others. Those pushing forth the argument within the APC and that of the PDP that Sylva cannot win election in the state are economical with the truth. They are simply fifth columnists with a sinister agenda of planting landmines and their moles to drive the final nail in the coffin of APC in the state.

    His name “Timipre” which is translated in Ijaw language to mean ‘be alive for me’ and literally means where there is life, there is hope. While nurturing and investing his time and resources in the political planting season for APC to have roots in Bayelsa, others chose to tag and label him as a leader of ‘Boko Haram party.’ Interestingly, some of those who tagged him ‘Boko Haram’ have joined the APC in contesting for the governorship without any sense of shame.

    Against all odds, today APC has not only taken roots but has also developed branches with plenty of fruits ready for harvest time.

    According to a Yengagoa based Journalist, Mr Okon Ekpandem, “Those churning out that worn out argument about Chief Timipre Sylva, that he can’t win election for the APC are simply saying so out of mischief and out of the fear of Sylva factor in the forthcoming election. They are just trying to deceive the leadership of APC to get Sylva out of the race for the PDP to easily coast home to victory because they know he is the only candidate to beat”.

    Even the worst political detractors of Sylva cannot hesitate to concede the fact that he has become a strong political factor in the contemporary politics of South-South and Bayelsa in particular and indeed an issue in Nigeria politics.

    He is like a honey which attracts all and sundry to lick, with a good sense of generosity to a fault, very appealing to both the young and the old. Unlike some frontline politicians who have a record of pulling down their fellow Ijaw leaders to advance their political career, Sylva fervently believes that power is given by God and he does not need to pull-down characters in pursuit of his political cause.

    It is no over statement to say that he is the only detribalised living political legend in the landscape of Bayelsa. Apart from, having a political structure with large followership across the geo-political configuration in the state, he is the only one with a listening ear ready to give a helping hand to whoever that needs his help, not minding ones political affiliation.

    Besides his amiable disposition towards anyone that crosses his path, Sylva has a high premium on poverty reduction and youths empowerment. In his first tenure as governor, he did guard against capital flight by concentrating in awarding contracts to indigenous contractors.

    It was essentially designed to empower Bayelsans. This approach brought about multiplier effects; it engaged the services of skilled and unskilled labour, took several youths out of the temptations of crime, as well as patronised small scale business men and women. Interest free loans were given to small and medium scale business owners, thereby promoting them to be key players in the local economy.

    At the national level, the country’s economy was grounded to a halt, with oil production and sale at its lowest ebb between 2008 and 2009 due to the militancy in the Niger Delta. The then Governor Sylva single-handedly took the bold initiative to save the nation and restored the oil production to its full capacity. He traversed the creeks and high sea to talk to the militant agitators to lay down their arms and embrace peaceful negotiation to address their grievances.

    Sylva further initiated the amnesty option, which culminated in the laying down of arms by the militant agitators and consequent restoration of relative peace in the Niger Delta. In other climes, this singular heroic act by former governor would have earned him a national honour.

    It is against this background, back to his home in Bayelsa, there is a clarion call for him to seek re-election for the office of governor at the forthcoming November 16, 2019 governorship election.

    The propaganda in some circles, that APC will lose Bayelsa if Sylva is given the ticket, is a cheap fairy tale to mislead the national leadership of the party. It is the direct opposite of what they mean, that Sylva is the only threat and factor to defeat the PDP as far as Bayelsa governorship election is concerned.

    Many people are not surprised at the propaganda. The same trick played out when President Muhammadu Buhari was seeking re-election. The PDP in connivance with some APC moles mounted the propaganda that Mr President had not done well, that if he was fielded by the party for re-election, APC would lose at the general election.

    The outcome of the President’s re-election has put such fifth columnists to shame as Buhari won resoundingly. This is the machinery put in place by APC detractors to get Sylva off the contest for the PDP to have their way.

    This is what the national leadership of the party should resist and avoid by not falling prey to their antics, as this may finally bury the APC in the state. There is nothing wrong constitutionally for Sylva to resign 30 days to the election as required by the constitution. The chances of APC wining the November 16 governorship election are very bright with Sylva as its standard bearer.

    This is not an overstatement but based on the indices like his political pedigree. The APC leadership should avoid the mistakes of Zamfara, Imo, Oyo, Rivers and Bauchi States where the party lost due to its own miscalculations. In the South-South there is every need to win Bayelsa and add it to Edo State to establish the full presence of APC. The party must be wary of some candidates masquerading as APC in the day, but in the night, they are in the assembly of PDP.

    What the time demands is for APC put its act together, by rallying round the structure of Sylva to win the November 16 governorship election in Bayelsa State. That is truly the general verdict of vast majority of the electorate. Bayelsans have suffered a lot in the past eight years and the people are looking up to APC to put its house in order, to rescue the state.

  • Dormancy of HIV/AIDS anti-discrimination law in Nigeria

    The HIV/AIDS (anti-discrimination) Act was enacted in Nigeria in the year 2014, but has since remained dormant due to non-implementation. Unfortunately, besides the psychological trauma and pains persons living with HIV go through in the country, they also face various forms of discrimination and inhumane treatment by fellow citizens.

    The HIV/AIDS (anti-discrimination) Act, 2014, was enacted to discourage discrimination against persons living with HIV/AIDS, particularly at workplaces.

    Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is a chronic, potentially life-threatening condition caused by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). By damaging immune system, HIV interferes with body’s ability to fight organisms that cause diseases. On this basis, many people consider infection with HIV a death sentence. Many people have lost their jobs because of their HIV status, while many marriages have crashed on grounds of same.

    The worst part is that most persons who are HIV positive conceal their status while majority of persons are avoiding HIV test mainly because of social stigma and discrimination. Some pregnant women who are HIV positive avoid going for antenatal care so as not to be tested, thereby subjecting their lives and the lives of their unborn babies to serious danger. In fact, this discrimination poses a threat to peaceful coexistence among members of the society, making compliance with the HIV/AIDS (anti-discrimination) Act, 2014, very difficult.

    It is absurd that the law that was enacted to stop this discrimination has been dormant like it doesn’t even exist. For instance, section 21 (1) of the HIV/AIDS (anti-discrimination) Act, 2014, stipulates that an employer employing five or more persons shall in consultation with the employees or their representatives adopt a written workplace policy that is consistent with the National HIV/AIDS workplace policy for the working environment.

    Subsection 2 of the same section further states that the workplace polices shall be lodged with the Minister of Labour and Productivity, currently known as Minister of Labour and Employment. Section 24 (1) of the same Act goes on to repose the duty of ensuring compliance and enforcement of the entire provisions of the Act on the Attorney-General of the Federation.

    The HIV/AIDS anti-discrimination Act 2014, therefore specifically reposes the duty to ensure compliance with the entire HIV/AIDS (anti-discrimination) Act, 2014, including section 21 (1) of the same Act on the Attorney-General of the Federation.

    Meanwhile, by virtue of section 150 (1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), the Attorney-General of the Federation who is also the Minister for Justice, is the Chief Law Officer in Nigeria, and therefore responsible for and oversees all legal affairs of the nation. Now, one is wondering whether the office of Attorney-General of the Federation is aware of this Act and why it has not performed its duty in ensuring the implementation of the law and compliance by employers of labour in Nigeria. Why is it always compulsory that our government officials and even the ministries and agencies must be pushed to perform their statutory roles? This is just worrisome, alas!

    It is indeed worrisome that an Act which was enacted five years ago is yet to be implemented and complied with. I am aware that Lawyers Alert Nigeria, a non-profit human rights organization has approached court to compel the Attorney-General of the Federation to carry out its functions as provided in the HIV/AIDS (anti-discrimination) Act, 2014. Lawyers Alert under its free legal assistance project for vulnerable groups is prosecuting several cases where persons living with HIV were discriminated against and either denied employment even when qualified and able, or sacked on account of their HIV status. Of course, dismissal of an employee over HIV status is a gross violation of his or her human right to work.

    Recently, Lawyers Alert got judgment in its favour in a matter where an employee was dismissed by his employer on the account of his HIV status. The mattered was instituted at the National Industrial Court, Abuja division. The court on that account held that dismissing employees on the basis of or actual HIV status is discriminatory and unlawful.

    Justice Agbakoba of the Abuja Industrial Court found that the HIV/AIDS (Anti-Discrimination) Act, 2014, is equally applicable in the private sector and prohibits discrimination against existing and prospective employees.

    Following an increase in cases of discrimination against Persons Living with HIV in workplaces in Nigeria, Lawyers Alert in its determination to provide access to justice for persons living with HIV and to ensure compliance with the HIV/AIDS (Anti-Discrimination) Act, 2014, served a Freedom of Information request on the Minister for Labour and Employment, on November 2, 2018, requesting the document containing a list of workplaces/ministries  that have complied with the provisions of section 21 (1) of the HIV/AIDS anti-discrimination Act, 2014, which requires employers of labour to adopt a written workplace policy and lodge same with the minister.

    Unfortunately, despite series of follow-ups on the FOI by Lawyers Alert for over three (3) months, there was no document at all containing such information, with the Minister of Labour and Employment.

    While awaiting the outcome of Lawyers Alert’s suit against the Attorney-General of the Federation which is in Court 3 of the National Industrial Court – suit already mentioned and adjourned to 29th of October 2019 for Lawyers Alert to address the court on the issue of locus standi (on whether Lawyers Alert has any interest above that of the society for it to approach the court on the issue), let me just conclude here by noting that if the Attorney-General of the Federation  carries the duties as enshrined in the law and ensures compliance with HIV workplace policy by employers of labour, stigma and discrimination against persons living with HIV in Nigeria would cease and rights to work and access to justice would be enhanced for persons living with HIV in Nigeria.

    • Oyegbade is a writer and social commentator
  • Osinbajo drives Buhari’s social investment programme into second term

    As the Buhari administration gets set for its second term, analysts are focusing on a key question: what will the administration do with the policies and programmes which are designed to improve the welfare of Nigerians at the lower levels which it implemented in its first term? This is a significant issue because the administration, from the word go, pegged its legitimacy and relevance on improving the lives of ordinary Nigerians across the country. This was why the government introduced a portfolio of social investment programmes in 2015 under the office of Vive President Yemi Osinbajo with the goal of taking millions of Nigerian citizens out of poverty.

    In spite of skepticism about the implementation of some parts of these programmes, there are many documented positive reports from across the country of significant benefits delivered. Confident of its track record, the National Social Investment Office (NSIO), which coordinates the social investment programmes under the office of Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, has encouraged members of the public to examine the evidence themselves to see that the programmes are succeeding.

    Vice President Osinbajo is not only actively but passionately involved in the conceptualization and implementation of the social investment programmes. In fact, his dedication to the social investment drive of the administration has received high praise from the President. At an event held in May 2019, President Muhammadu Buhari commended Osinbajo’s efforts and said he was glad that the school feeding programme had improved attendance in schools.

    Buhari was particularly pleased that school children from poor homes could get at least one decent meal a day. The President’s joy is in congruence with the goals of the National Home Grown School Feeding Programme: to provide nutritious meals for primary school children, thereby encourage learning, increase enrolment in schools and create jobs for cooks.

    The NSIO’s June 2018 report recorded 8,596,340 pupils in 24 states being fed by the NHGSFP, and 90,670 cooks being empowered through the programme. Osinbajo announced in May 2019 that as many as 190,000 farmers earn a living through the programme by supplying farm products. The feeding programme continues to attract plenty of interest among Nigerians because of its connection to children and to the education sector.

    Another popular social investment vehicle of the NSIO is Trader Moni/Market Moni initiative, an offshoot of the Government Enterprise and Empowerment Programme GEEP. Again, Prof. Osinbajo has been receiving widespread commendation from various quarters for his successful hands-on leadership of the Trader Moni initiative, with the President jokingly expressing concern about the safety of his vice in crowded business areas.

    Trader Moni involves disbursement of collateral free loans to business people including traders, women cooperatives, market women, and farmers. The recipients of the loans must be members of approved cooperatives in order to ensure that the loans are paid back.

    The NSIO has reported that over 4,084 cooperatives have benefitted with about 308,737 certified loan disbursements. Trader Moni is not the only NSIO programme that supports small businesses. There is also NPOWER, an initiative that seeks to improve the entrepreneurship culture, as well as develop skills among youths to make them more employable. The target demographic is youths between the ages of 18 and 35.

    Each enrollee is given a monthly stipend of N30,000 and they are trained in their chosen vocation by NPOWER Volunteers. The NSIO has recorded impressive statistics for NPOWER, with enrollment as at June 2018 standing at 300,000.

    Each programme targets a specific demography, and the NSIO goes to great lengths to identify eligible beneficiaries. This is evident in the implementation of the NSIO’s National Social Safety Programme which was designed to get accurate data on poor and vulnerable households who qualify for assistance by the NSIO.

    The data gathering is done through various scientific means including poverty mapping, community-based targeting and proxy means. With the information captured through this process the NSIO identifies beneficiaries for its National Cash Transfer programme.

    Each beneficiary then receives monthly cash transfers of N5000. In addition to the payment, beneficiaries are mentored and coached to form savings groups by Community Facilitators who visit them weekly. As of June 2018, the NSIO announced that it had 297,973 beneficiary households who were being trained by 2,495 Community Facilitators in 20 states. In all, the social investment programmes have produced a total of 9.76m beneficiaries.

    In Buhari’s second term, the Federal Government will be looking to consolidate on these results as the NSIO continues with its portfolio of social investment programmes with the VP overseeing them with his usual rigorous passion. There’s no doubt that the Osinbajo’s leadership is a key reason for the overall success of the social investment programmes. His oversight and the high-level implementation strongly indicate that these programmes are close to the heart of the Buhari administration.

    The progress made notwithstanding, Special Adviser to the President on Social Investment Maryam Uwais believes that the NSIO can achieve more in the next four years with improved funding. She says that the Federal Government will in its second term scale up the programmes to reach more Nigerians: “We have gone far in 21 states but we hope to build on it”, she said.

    In response to skepticism which some Nigerians have concerning the programmes she has urged the press to visit the poor communities and rural areas to investigate the activities of the NSIO. “If our media go to these rural areas, many will understand how far we have gone in the 21 states”. She also acknowledged the attention the programmes got during the last elections. “This intervention is to alleviate poverty; we are seeing results. For instance, the Trader Moni scheme has been on since 2016 but it got more attention during the elections”.

    Improved publicity of the NSIO’s operations will help to douse skepticism and improve awareness among potential beneficiaries who come mainly from communities that suffer challenges with internet connectivity and communication in general. These challenges affect both the smooth implementation of the programme and the communication of its benefits. Another challenge the NSIO must improve upon is the short-changing of field officers and beneficiaries by supervising officials who often exploit their positions in many ways.

    The good news is that the NSIO and its partner organizations such as the World Bank, UNICEF, Accenture and Action Aid, have a chance to review the results so far and change strategies where necessary. Osinbajo has said that a key part of the administration’s Next Level plan involves scaling up the programmes.

    “At the Next Level, which is what we are talking about now, what we are saying is that we must make this programme bigger,” he said.

    • Udo-Akpan is a policy analyst based in Lagos.
  • Gully erosion, corruption and development

    Mankind and physical environment are inseparable in a neat way.  That is to say, that the robust survival and economic cum spiritual progress of man depend to a large degree, on how carefully he manages the numerous environmental resources at his disposal.  However, the focus here is on gully erosion within the context of sustainable development in Nigeria. Gully erosion is one of the menaces of environmental degradation in Nigeria.  This is with a special emphasis on the southeastern region.  Gullies are a valley-like landform arising from soil removal and transportation through the lens of such agents as wind, water, and gravity. This is in addition to unsystematic/repeated farming including over-grazing as well as major earth-moving activities.

    In sum, both geological and human factors are responsible for the creation of gullies.  Not unexpectedly, gullies are more common in areas characterised by sedimentary rocks which are generally loosely consolidated.  This type of environmental menace is a global phenomenon.  In other words, gullies are a serious threat to humanity in diverse ways.

    However, they can be prevented or treated/managed to some extent, by the generation and application of robust environmental laws as well as principles.  For instance, mining activities and other related earth-moving operations including road/rail construction works can be thoroughly monitored.  This is one of the reasons why Environmental Impact Assessment policies must be pragmatically crafted and implemented.  Regular public enlightenment programmes have to also occupy centre stage in the scheme of things.

    Improper termination of drainages vis-à-vis the design and construction of roads is one of the factors leading to the formation of gullies in most parts of Nigeria.  Despite the fact that there can be no permanent solutions to gullies due to their geological origins, humans can take steps to ameliorate the situation.  Taming gullies in Nigeria, is a matter of the utmost importance understandably because it is inextricably interwoven with the concept of development anchored to socio-cultural/political stability and economic advancement.

    Many Nigerians are trying to engage in agricultural/agro-based businesses as white-collar jobs are almost practically non-existent today.  Arable land especially in the south-eastern region is being lost daily to gully erosion.  This scenario adversely affects agricultural productions and human settlements generally.  Such a situation leads to an aggravation of the current extreme material poverty among the citizenry as the affected people migrate from one location to another for survival.

    More stresses and strains are put on the neighbouring communities.  One concomitant effect of this is a greater degree of insecurity especially as Nigeria’s population continues to grow exponentially.  It has been estimated that the population would be 410 million by 2050.  Pro-activeness is of the essence in order to avert monumental human agonies in Nigeria in the future.

    It is very worrying that both the federal and state governments over the years have not shown sufficient commitment to this all-important issue of gully erosion.  Allocating huge   sums of money through the lens of Ecological Fund to the affected state governments without close monitoring of how each of them spends its share, amounts to a waste of time and a subtle promotion of corrupt practices. This attitude makes the federal government, represented by the relevant agencies come under suspicion of minor infractions of financial and economic regulations.  Nobody is ultimately accountable to the system as endemic corruption walks on all fours in Nigeria.

    The Anambra State Commissioner for Environment recently told the world that there were 1000 active erosion sites in the state, despite the huge financial support from the Nigeria Erosion and Watershed Management Project (NEWMAP).  As a result of gully erosion, Anambra has the smallest landmass in the country today.  Lagos State was formerly holding this “title” before Anambra snatched it from the latter by reclaiming land from the Atlantic Ocean.

    However, there is need for caution so that the on-going reclamation project in Lagos State does not become a recipe for colossal disaster in the foreseeable future.  NEWMAP has also been doing intervention activities in such places as Udi, Nkanu West and Enugu Ngwo in an attempt to save the situation in Enugu State.  This body has been intervening in Abia, Anambra, Cross River, Ebonyi, Enugu, Imo and Edo as far back in time as 2013.

    Currently, NEWMAP has been assisting up to 21 states to fight gully erosion with very little success.  Thus, for example, the gullies in Oko community in Anambra State have been threatening to swallow up about 826 families.  This is in addition to the fact, that many lives have already been lost in all the seriously affected areas.  The World Bank has already declared Nanka in the Orumba South Local Government Area of Anambra State as the location housing the deepest and deadliest gullies on our planet.   Consequently, the World Bank has estimated that the taming/controlling of these gullies would cost N20 billion.  The southwestern and northern regions also are not completely gully-free.  For instance, in Bida – one of the biggest settlements in Niger State, 15 serious gully sites have been identified.

    However, corruption remains a devil to grapple with.  The Senate Joint Committee on Ecology and Environments of the 8th National Assembly reported many months ago that most state governments were misappropriating their shares of ecological funds.  In 2009, about N93.7 billion was illegally transferred from the Ecological Fund to the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

    Similarly, the National Economic Council in 2009 reported that about N200 billion belonging to the Ecological Fund was mismanaged.  Ecological disasters can be controlled to a great degree, in the face of financial discipline.  But unfortunately, Nigerian leaders across the board have no space for selflessness and/or patriotism as they continue to serially rape mother Nigeria.

    This ugliness has permeated all levels of our contemporary society.  Painfully enough, the academia that is supposed to be a storehouse for the finest ideals and by the same token, robust humanity is now a near-complete sham.  Most university managers and council members are basically for amassing a fortune from the system, to the detriment of a healthy future.

    Education has not sufficiently shaped their materialistic world view as if there is no tomorrow. The federal government needs to thoroughly monitor state governors and university leaders with respect to how they manage our collective resources. There must be punishments for misappropriation of funds. The seniors at every level are infecting the youth with their virus of financial and economic recklessness. This scenario would make it difficult for Nigeria to get out of the woods.  All leaders (political and/or academic) must be ultimately accountable to the followers in order to begin to experience socio-political stability and economic progress on a sustainable scale. In this connection, peaceful protests against bad governance remain inevitable.  There is no easy solution to bad governance all over the world.

    • Professor Ogundele is of the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Ibadan.    
  • Sowore’s #RevolutionNow

    Omoyele Sowore, presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC) in the February 2019 election, openly called for a revolution in Nigeria to unseat the government of President Muhammadu Buhari. The Department of State Services (DSS), the country’s secret police, responded that his call amounted to treason or treasonable felony, arrested and bundled him into detention.

    His call for revolution, his subsequent arrest and incarceration by the DSS, have since generated more heat than light in the media, produced more obfuscation than sane and sober analysis. This piece is not to arrive at any particular conclusion, but merely to provide some perspective to the whole controversy. It is not an endorsement or condemnation of #RevolutionNow, or of the DSS response.

    As a starting point, I quote Sowore’s own statement concerning his proposed revolution: “I’m not talking of protest. I’m embarking on revolution. 85% of Nigerians are in support. Don’t tell me about legal implications or what a judge will say. I don’t care. We must bundle Buhari out of that place.” He made it clear he wasn’t calling for a protest, contrary to what some of his defenders and apologists want us to believe, but instead for a real revolution.

    Nobody, except a drunken fool, would make such incendiary political remarks and not expect to immediately attract the attention of the nation’s security services! And it is not because we are a Third World country, but even in the United States of America, touted as the most developed and freest country in the world, security services cannot but take such statements seriously, especially coming from a high-profile political personality like Sowore, also a publisher of an influential investigative online news medium. Security and intelligence services the world over react reflexively to whatever appears to them like a threat to the nation. They act on their perception of threat.

    Sowore is not an unknown quantity: a known student activist in his undergraduate days at the University of Lagos; he is the publisher of a critical online news medium, and most recently the founder and presidential candidate of a political party that contested, and woefully lost, in the 2019 general elections. He is not an ordinary street folk; he has multitudes of followers both as a journalist and politician. His words therefore carry weight, whether they are made casually or seriously, and only a fool would not know that he would appear on the radar screens of the nation’s intelligence and security services.

    He ought to be wiser than to imagine that his public statements and writings would go unnoticed. Even those of us who write occasional commentaries on national issues in newspapers, not to talk of the regular columnists, cannot claim that our submissions are not being carefully studied by the ever watchful intelligence and security services. It is always the risks we have to take in order to mould public opinion on national issues. So, how can Sowore’s threat to “bundle Buhari out of that place” not be subjected to more critical scrutiny?

    Let us return to Sowore’s outburst: it is undoubtedly inflammatory, provocative, irresponsible and capable of inciting national unrest and chaos. Since it is true that he made that statement then he is truly calling for a revolution in the proper sense of the meaning and understanding of that word.

    I wonder if all his defenders, apologists in the media and civil society, political opportunists and sundry do-gooders weeping more than the bereaved, actually digested the actual meanings and implications of the key phrases in the statement… “embarking on revolution”; “I don’t care”; “bundle Buhari out.” These are neither harmless statements nor mere ranting of a drunk; they are clear, precise, well thought out and reflect his state of mind concerning how to address the country’s problems. He truly means that he wants to embark on a revolution. There is no other meaning to be read to it.

    A look at what “revolution” actually means both in ordinary English language and in its Political Science usage will help. The Cambridge English Dictionary (online version) defines revolution as “a change in the way a country is governed, usually to a different political system and often using violence or war.” Dictionary.com (also online) reiterates this same meaning, defining revolution as “an overthrow or repudiation of and thorough replacement of an established government or political system by the people governed.”

    Also in the same vein, the authoritative Encyclopaedia Britannica explains that revolution, as understood in Social and Political Science, is “a major, sudden, and hence typically violent alteration in government and in related associations and structures.” It goes on to assert that a “revolution constitutes a challenge to the established political order and the eventual establishment of a new order radically different from the preceding one.” It is generally associated with such related terms as coup or coup d’état, insurrection, mutiny, rebellion, revolt, uprising, upheaval, all of them involving violent change of government.

    This undoubtedly must have been the way the intelligence and security agencies understood and interpreted Sowore’s #RevolutionNow, i.e., immediate and violent overthrow of existing political order. Isn’t this precisely what Boko Haram and other insurgent groups have been attempting for about a decade now? Only a naïve or outright stupid person would not expect a swift response from the state. World history in the 20th and 21st centuries is replete with such revolutions or revolts that destabilized and violently altered political order – the Cuban and Iranian revolutions, and most recently the Arab Spring.

    Since that is the case, then Sowore should have known he was seeking confrontation with the lion in its den, and must have prepared for the consequences. Or did he? I think it is all bluff and bluster, a grandstanding to shore up his sagging activist and political credentials, but the DSS doesn’t see it that way. Who can blame them! Personally I don’t believe that Sowore is capable of a revolution, for revolutions are made of much sterner stuff, but his inflammatory rhetoric can become the pretext for the disgruntled and the disaffected to unleash mayhem and instability on a nation that is already on tenterhooks from myriad internal security challenges. Such reckless utterances can create a political situation that is easily capable of spinning out of control, even though that may not be his intention.

    What is to be done? This country needs peace and stability for national political and socio-economic development, and it is important for all hands, including those of Sowore and his fellow “revolutionaries”, to be on the deck. He should contribute his intellect the efforts to find solutions to the problems plaguing our country rather to cause chaos. That is why I think charging him with treason or treasonable felony on account of his inflammatory rhetoric, reckless and irresponsible though they are, is like trying to kill a fly with an elephant gun, unless the DSS has real evidence of planned insurrection that is not yet in the public domain. It therefore shouldn’t be hard for both the DSS and the court to arrive at an amicable resolution in the overall interest of the nation, a nation he loves and aspires to lead.

    • Prof Fawole is of the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife.