Category: Opinion

  • Democracy, governance and credible elections (2)

    Democracy, governance and credible elections (2)

    Let’s come to the issues of recruitment and selection. All over the world, leadership is what changes history. Think of the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, led by leftist revolutionary Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, aka, Vladimir Lenin, and come to terms with the fact that followership are just extras in a movie! Or, was it ‘the people’ or a determined leadership comprising few people like Awolowo, who made the deserved changes during the Action Group days? Was it ‘the people’ who built Ghana’s Volta Dam as a testimony of tenacity and human courage for which Kwame Nkrumah was ultimately sacrificed?

    In Nigeria, what’s the position of training a cadre? Mhairi Black was 20 years and 237 days old when she was elected into the British House of Commons but she has been involved in politics since the age of 12. Gordon Brown who eventually became the British Prime Minister was already distributing leaflets for the Labour Party at the age of 13! In our clime, politicians are not there because they are interested in politics but because it’s a survival kit. Most of the taxi drivers in Ghana have converted their cars from Petrol to GAS (LPG). With good leaders in the saddle, shouldn’t Nigeria have attained this feat some five years back? Since cassava is grown in large quantities, shouldn’t there have been ethanol plants that could turn cassava into ethanol?

    Yes, we can have all the Bimodal Voter Accreditation Systems (BVAS) in the world but an election starts from the ease of registration, ease of changing the registration and allied stuff. With these in mind, why has it been cumbersome for people to be registered in Nigeria? Of course, this wasn’t so in the past! More importantly, to change one’s registration at that time when there was no technology wouldn’t take more than two days! Tragically, Nigeria is now a different story entirely! Consider the amount of disenfranchisement going on in our universities and you’ll pity dear fatherland! The optics of the situation are so bad that even with technology in place, a student who registered at Osun State University in Osogbo but who is now on the post-study compulsory year-long national service in Calabar cannot vote. With technology, it should be easy for such a soul to change his or her registration! But that’s not so here! At every step, a man who registered in Katsina State but has now secured a job opportunity in Ogun State shouldn’t find it difficult to change his registration within two minutes. After all, aren’t we now sending money from Oyo State to Abia State via the telephone in seconds?

    Read Also: ASUU to FG: adhere to TETfund Act to save public varsities

    Keiichiro Hirano, in ‘At the End of the Matinee’, remarked: “People think that only the future can be changed, but in fact, the future is continually changing the past. The past can and does change. It’s exquisitely sensitive and delicately balanced.” Beyond any doubt, change is in the possibility of time and the total resolve of the critical mass of the population of a given society is what makes a change to come. For change to happen in any society, the governance aspect must be headed by a man or woman of understanding who can see the vision through. What’s more? The flow of change must be smooth and seamless; otherwise, social hiccups are capable of disorganizing any society. Well, were this dispensation to be headed by one nincompoop somewhere, one would have been sensing danger in the foreseeable future. But President Bola Tinubu is one king of the street who has an advantage of street wisdom. He is also an enigma who has mastered the business of governance. As fate would have it, these have mushed together to project the leadership structure for this administration.

    Much is expected from Tinubu because he already has a track record of being a progressive. He commendably fought the Olusegun Obasanjo regime on the basis of a sensible federalist position. And now that the starting gun has been fired, it only remains for him to take control of the ladder. Now that history is right therefore before him, Nigerians expect the president to demonstrate his commitment which is laudable to a federalist state. The president must first and foremost see himself as a patriotic, original Nigerian who is above tribal, religious and clannish sentiments.

    Tinubu’s government is expected to dust the Uwais Report which so far has attacked all forms of elections and democratic deficits in Nigeria. Since governance and credible elections are interwoven, that the Report has continued to gather dust has only shown that successive governments were not interested; and that’s too bad for democracy.

    Unlike countries like Brazil, Australia, Argentina and Seychelles where voting is mandatory, it is because Nigerians have switched off that voter turnout in Nigeria has successively become pathetically low. In the aforementioned countries, a defaulter could be fined the equivalent of the minimum wage but do our leaders even pray for mandatory voting in Nigeria? Unlike what obtains in sane climes where elections are permanent campaigns of sorts, elections in Nigeria are just four-yearly rituals.

    In the normal manner, Nigeria should by now be thinking about Diaspora voting, for Nigerians abroad cannot be contributing more than $20b to the country’s economy annually without having the right to vote. Remove $20b from Nigeria’s Balance of Payments and current accounts and one doesn’t need to be an econometrician before understanding that NGN would by now have been standing at N1,800.00 to the dollar. Again, if Diaspora voting could happen in Kenya, why has Nigeria remained an effort flying in the air?

    Tinubu’s government also needs to fight for a living wage to act as a reflationary stimulus to attract investments. In doing that, it should go to the Awolowo school of thought which saw the living wage as an investment thing. Besides, it’s time Nigeria went back to the past in terms of a constitutional rearrangement that’s based on production, not consumption, to prevent the roads of governance and elections from being tarred with sharing, for he who controls the government controls the cutting of the cake. Nigerians are suffering and are finding it difficult to breathe. But, since the poor on this part of the globe are not organized, they can only cry but their voices won’t be loud enough to attract reasonable attention.

    Have we forgotten that majority of the adherents of ‘dìbò kóo sebè’ (vote and collect money for a pot of soup) political arrangements are the uneducated and the unlettered? Of course, when this class is obliterated, it means that the country is growing. After all, we all know what that means in a country like Nigeria where the poor must be kept perpetually poor! The notorious truth is that there will be no peace until the masses get back their society for, when the people are not gainfully employed, they will be engaged, of course at a cost that governments across board don’t seem to understand. Obviously, that’s what’s giving the government some leverage; and that’s what has paved the way for all sorts of mix. That’s what the fracas in Rivers State is all about! That it is about good governance is just a rumour in the Tea Room!

    Lastly, let it be noted that a country that allows a people who formed themselves together for the reason of the security of the stomach has already opened the door to terror and associated consequences. Therefore, unless Nigeria goes back to the spirit of the 1963 Constitution, the country will continue to be a familiar figure in labour loss!

    May the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, grant us peace in Nigeria!

  • Abiodun: Double portions from a tripartite covenant

    Abiodun: Double portions from a tripartite covenant

    By Kunle Somorin

    Sometimes, destiny has a way of playing a fast one of mortals or giving them a reason to tie their journeys to certain events, past or future. Whether many subscribe to it or not, there are things we identify with or are identified by that tell some stories about our personality. For instance, some people believe that when it rains during a funeral, the deceased is most likely heading to paradise. Others attach coincidental accomplishments to the “good legs” of a newborn or a newlywed. 

    I hadn’t given many of those interpretations much thought until recently when I stopped taking the birth date of one great Nigerian for granted. On May 29, 2019, Prince Dapo Abiodun was first sworn in as the chief executive officer of the Gateway State. Coincidentally, May 29 happens to be the governor’s birthday. These days, I can’t help but tell myself that this illustrious man was born on political transition day for a reason!

    Though not many will agree that he’s the best governor the 48-year old state has had, but most are in agreement that he’s one governor that has fought more battles than his predecessors in the hands of one of them. Many more will say he did his very best, brought panache, élan, commitment, focus and through fortuitous circumstances achieved inclusive governance in the face of daunting challenges and intimidation. So far, he has provided answers to opposition from within his political party and outside opposition outside his party have been tamed with a carrot and stick mentality and genteel assemblage of forward-looking politicians and inveterate technocrats in his cabinet in a manner that has changed the face of governance in the state, permanently.

    Read Also: ASUU to FG: adhere to TETfund Act to save public varsities

    The Dapo Abiodun administration’s systematic approach to governance, which saw him lay a solid foundation for the implementation of deliberate policies, programmes and projects within the first six months in office, has led to predictable yet unprecedented success in the socio-economic transformation of the state. Within five years, his clear template and deliberate action plan on how to transform the state by implementing the “Building Our Future Together” agenda, has yielded unprecedented results.  His five developmental columns of I-S-E-Y-A: Infrastructure; Social Development and Well-being; Education; Youth Development, and; Agriculture and Food Security are unmatched by any state governor in Nigeria.

    From the dismal public infrastructure he inherited roads: rural and urban, water, electricity and housing, the song changed the deleterious landscape on Ijebu-Ode-Mojoda expressway to Epe in Lagos State, the Sagamu Interchange to Abeokuta will make most governors in other states green with envy. Even the intra-city roads from Ilaro to Ilara, Ajebo to Ajenbadele, Odeda to Odogbolu, Iwopin to Iwoye, Iperu to Ipokia, Sango- Ota to Sagamu, Ijebu-Ode to Ijoko, Igbesa to Igbogila, the story has been that of transformation.

    By prioritizing the construction and rehabilitation of roads. From the day he was sworn in – his birthday – the governor made a solemn vow to the people of Ogun that infrastructure, especially good road network, was crucial to his administration’s investment drive. That is why roads across the state are being aggressively constructed and rehabilitated. This also led him to establish the Ogun State Public Works Agency (OGPWA). Within the past five years, the governor has either completed or is working on roads in all of its 20 local government areas, spanning almost a thousand kilometres and mainly Federal Government (Trunk A) roads.

    An accomplished businessman, Prince Abiodun was always keen on exploring the opportunities presented by Ogun’s geo-location. To him, the state’s proximity to Lagos and its gateway status to the West African market through Benin Republic should propel the state into economic prosperity. He established investment agencies, such as the Ogun State Enterprise Development Agency (OGSEDA), to provide entrepreneurial literacy services, capacity development and access to start-up capital to support Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs).

    These, most times, in in line with his late dad’s directive before he came into office and in consonance with the “tripartite covenant between me and God, on one part, to serve Him and reciprocate His faithfulness through the journey so far by being a tool to bring the greatest good to the greatest number of Ogun State people, regardless of creed, gender and political affiliation. On the other part, it is also a covenant with the good people of Ogun State.”

    Five years may not amount to much, yet DA’s Midas touches are everywhere. The governor that has triple internally generated fund from N50bn to N150bn is making good on his promises, distributing social infrastructures evenly in all parts of the state, whether assessed via senatorial districts, or the well-known ethno-geographical classifications, namely Remo, Ijebu, Yewa and Egba, which we know as “RIYE”.  In housing, for instance, close to 4000 units of flats have constructed in Kemta-Idi Aba, Kobape in Abeokuta, Ilaro, and Sagamu, beside the avant-garde, urban regeneration buildings across our Government Reserved Areas and the Muhammadu Buhari Estate in the State capital. Also, the administration is changing the landscape with urban renewal and blazing the trail in public transportation with compressed natural gas (CNG) buses. Of course, the agro-cargo airport is an icing on the cake.

    Recently, when many states were experiencing protests as a result of the high cost of living crisis, Prince Abiodun was unfazed by any risk of a spillover into his state. While there were protests elsewhere, the people of Ogun State were receiving a very unique kind of Valentine’s Day present, as the governor rolled out palliatives worth over ₦5 billion to reduce hardship during the current cost of living crisis and to better the lives of people. Prince Abiodun his government was not oblivious nor insensitive to the challenges being faced by the citizens and would leave no stone unturned to ensure that succour came to the people. He also appreciated the perseverance, patience and understanding of all residents in the state, assuring them that the present economic situation is just a transient phase that will soon pass.

    Having traversed the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory, I know the long way social interventions go in the lives of people. When I served as his official spokesperson, I was surprised by the foresight, diligence and effectiveness with which the governor goes about impacting the lives of Ogun people. The provision of a minimum of five exercise books for all 850,000 students in public primary and secondary schools, as well as a one-off N10,000 education support grant for at least 100,000 pupils and students in public primary and secondary schools in the state, is already extraordinary. Then he announced the provision of N50,000 each to all 27,600 of its indigent students in tertiary institutions nationwide as an education grant! He didn’t stop there, food palliatives, such as rice, vegetable oil and other items are being provided for 300,000 households across the state. Part of the initiatives is the commitment of N500 million towards the offsetting of the backlog of deductions from civil servants’ entitlements and additional N1bn quarterly gratuities to retirees inherited from the previous administration. There is a reason why Ogun State is peaceful!

    Prince Abiodun has hacked the cheat code of good governance at the sub-national level and has demystified quality leadership in such a way that makes his shoes already heavy for his predecessor. What’s more, he has been able to do so just five years out of the eight years of two terms the constitution permits him to spend as a governor. Only God knows how unmatched his legacy will be by the time he bows out on May 29, 2027… Again, on his birthday!

    Born on 29 May 1960 to the late Dr. Emmanuel Abiodun and Mrs. Victoria Abiodun in Iperu Remo, Ogun State, Prince Abiodun comes from the royal family of Iperu. He attended the prestigious Christ’s School Ado Ekiti and later St. Joseph’s College, Ondo before earning a 1986 BBA in Accounting from Kennesaw State University in Atlanta, Georgia. He has also been a serial entrepreneur and Chairman of the board of the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) before winning against all odds the governorship election of Ogun State in March, 2019.

  • The Biden Administration’s Chicken Kiev Complex

    The Biden Administration’s Chicken Kiev Complex

    By Stash Luczkiw

    For those who don’t remember: Chicken Kiev (as it was spelled at the time), in the context of geopolitics, refers to an Aug. 1, 1991 speech by then-US President George H.W. Bush in the capital of what was still the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.

    The Berlin Wall had fallen nearly two years earlier; East and West Germany had only been reunified for eight months. Independence movements were stirring within the Soviet Union, particularly in the Baltic states and Ukraine.

    Bush had come to the USSR essentially to support Mikhail Gorbachev’s programs of glasnost and perestroika. So he made a side trip to Kyiv to warn Ukrainians about “suicidal nationalism,” suggesting that the best, most pragmatic course for Ukrainians would be to hew to Gorbachev’s center and tread lightly with their aspirations for freedom.

    In short, Bush was worried about the Soviet Union falling apart and getting drawn into a chaotic conflict. As such, he backed Gorbachev’s “policies of glasnost, perestroika, and democratization” which “point toward the goals of freedom, democracy, and economic liberty.”

    Read Also; I’m amused seeing those who said Asiwaju had no chance now gallivanting around him – Gbenga Daniel

    Seventeen days after Bush’s speech, Communist hardliners mounted a coup d’état and sequestered Gorbachev, who was vacationing at his Crimean dacha.

    The coup failed almost immediately. Gorbachev was disgraced. Boris Yeltsin took the reins of power. Exactly 23 days after the Chicken Kiev speech, Ukraine declared independence. By New Year’s Day of 1992, the USSR had officially ceased to exist.

    Fast-forward 32-plus years and Ukraine is now witnessing a poignant reiteration of that Chicken Kiev episode.

    Against the background of an existential threat posed by a revanchist Moscow which has proven in no uncertain terms that it wants to eliminate any semblance of a free and sovereign Ukraine, America is again reluctant to help Kyiv for fear of Russia descending into chaos.

    US Secretary of State Antony Blinken came to Kyiv for a brief visit this past week. He gave a speech with much praise for Ukrainian courage and resilience. He reiterated the rhetoric of President Joe Biden’s wanting Ukraine to “win” (of course, without defining what “winning” might mean; and since Biden and his acolytes have already said that Ukraine “has already won” it leaves us semantic watchdogs rather dissatisfied). But in the same speech, after a litany of niceties, Blinken basically scolded Ukraine about its endemic corruption. (Voices in Kyiv say he read Zelensky the riot act in private and told him that the White House wants this war over by the election in November – but, then again, Kyiv is full of voices these days.)

    Later in the evening, Blinken – that staunchest of Ukraine supporters among Biden’s ambivalent-with-regard-to-Kyiv inner circle – played guitar at a night club, jamming with a local band. He sang “Rockin’ in the Free World,” by the great Canadian singer-songwriter Neil Young: “We got a kinder, gentler machine-gun hand…”

    Then came the very cringe-worthy May 15 press conference, with Blinken squirming and jotting down notes to help him avoid saying anything unpleasant. He was asked twice about Washington’s insistence that Ukraine not use any US-provided weapons to strike Russian territory. For a little background: Russia’s current Kharkiv offensive could have been summarily blunted had Ukraine been able to use US-made ATACMS with cluster munitions on Russian troop concentrations just over the border.

    Unfortunately, Blinken’s maladroit circumlocution testified to the Biden administration’s own Chicken Kiev complex.

    First, Blinken repeated that America was “committed to helping ensure Ukraine winning this war” – which means nothing since the Biden administration has already defined the current situation as a win. When Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky last visited Washington, Biden stood next to him and said: “For you to be here today, again, today, nearly two years later [after Feb. 24, 2024] and for Ukraine to be staying strong and free, is an enormous victory already.”

    Then Blinken spouted the formulaic: “We have not encouraged or enabled strikes outside of Ukraine, but ultimately Ukraine has to make decisions for itself.”

    When pressed again about the possibility of letting Ukrainians hit Russian territory with US-made arms, in sync with Britain’s policy, Blinken deflected the question: “Again, we are determined that Ukraine win this war and succeed for its people and for its future. We’ve been clear about our own policy, but again, these are decisions that Ukraine has to make, Ukraine will make for itself. And we’re committed to making sure that Ukraine has the equipment it needs to succeed on the battlefield.”

    Translated from diplomat-speak, “win” and “succeed” mean the situation on the ground today, with Ukraine de facto renouncing its lost territory. And “battlefield” – a crucial word in this context – means not Russia proper. In other words, the handcuffs are still on.

    If there was any doubt about what Blinken meant – since many news outlets jumped the gun and interpreted Blinken’s comments as a green light – then that was clarified the following day at the Pentagon.

    The question, verbatim, to Pentagon Deputy Press Secretary Sabrina Singh was: “So, we’ve heard a number of times from the US officials that [the] US does not want Ukraine to strike targets inside Russia with American weapons. In the wake of [the] Russian offensive and attacks on Kharkiv, does [the] US consider changing that approach? Because that’s what Ukrainians are asking for. It’s very difficult for them to respond to these attacks that come literally from across the border when Russians know that they can basically be safe there.”

    The somewhat oxymoronic response was: “Yeah, we haven’t changed our position. We believe that the equipment, the capabilities that we are giving Ukraine, that other countries are giving to Ukraine should be used to take back Ukrainian sovereign territory.”

    When asked to clarify whether the handcuffs were a “request” or a “binding condition,” the Pentagon press secretary said: “Again, I would reiterate that, in every single Ukraine defense contact group that the [US] Secretary [of Defense] convenes, the weapons that are provided, again, it’s for use on the battlefield. And the Secretary, in his conversations with [Ukrainian Defense] Minister Umerov, talks through how best those capabilities can be used, and we believe that is within Ukrainian territory.”

    Translation: Don’t hit Russian territory with US weapons. “Battlefield” here means “Ukrainian sovereign territory.”

    This approach to limiting Ukraine’s ability to inflict damage on the army trying to annihilate it is entirely consistent with what the “Russia experts” in the Biden administration are lobbying for: cut a deal with Moscow; keep Russia from falling apart; pressure Kyiv to cut its losses.

    The approach is also entirely consistent with Bush Sr.’s Chicken Kiev speech.

    It only took 17 days for the personality of Boris Yeltsin to put the kibosh on Bush’s principled liberal-democratic pabulum.

    America’s idealist pragmatists

    In all fairness to George H.W. Bush, if one reads the Chicken Kiev speech in its entirety, one has to admit that it is a remarkable work of rhetoric exalting the pragmatic American tradition of enabling liberal democratic ideals to flourish.

    For example, the quote about “suicidal nationalism” is skillfully qualified in the full text: “Americans will not support those who seek independence in order to replace a far-off tyranny with a local despotism. They will not aid those who promote a suicidal nationalism based upon ethnic hatred.”

    What liberal democrat in his or her right mind would support any nationalism “based upon ethnic hatred”?

    The rest of the speech is an eloquent testimony to that levelheaded, rational approach to geopolitics that characterized Bush Sr. and a host of American political figures from George Washington to the Roosevelts to Biden. And Biden has surrounded himself with eminently competent professional diplomats and political technicians like CIA Director William Burns and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, who either know Russia well or rely on the wits of Russia specialists like Samuel Charap and others in the ivory tower shelters of Thinktankdom.

    But Bush Sr. was laughably wrong in his assessment. In his speech he said: “We will determine our support [for the stable Soviet center as opposed to the reckless independent republics] not on the basis of personalities but on the basis of principles.” It only took 17 days for the personality of Boris Yeltsin to put the kibosh on Bush’s principled liberal-democratic pabulum.

    And now the current Biden administration is laughably wrong in its scarcely veiled drive to contain Vladimir Putin without letting Russia fall apart.

    Geopolitics has one hard and fast law: All empires come to an end.

    The dissolution of the USSR was the death rattle of the Russian Empire. The US thought it had won the Cold War definitively, that the “end of history” had arrived, or at least was nigh. Whereas Putin thought otherwise; he saw it as a “catastrophe” that necessitated a tactical retreat. Now he’s on the offensive again. And the US must face the implacable reality of the Russian Empire’s death throes courageously, without the mealy-mouthed hedging found in Chicken Kiev’s rhetoric.

    Negotiations with Putin on Putin’s terms – i.e., “what’s mine is mine and what’s yours is negotiable” – may seem pragmatic. But it’s only as pragmatic as trying to placate a rabid game-bred pit bull with a doggie biscuit.

    And for those who think Donald Trump might somehow cut a better deal than the Biden administration, that his personality will supersede the principles he is bereft of, let’s remember that Trump is the most principled of human beings, and his highest principle is himself. He will sacrifice Ukraine and America in a heartbeat if it serves his greater glory.

    Like the Soviet Union, the Russian Empire will disintegrate, and the United States will need to fully commit to its rhetoric rather than play safe behind the guise of some speechwriter’s pretty rhetoric or a representative’s cringe-worthy dissembling.

    The alternative is nothing less than the end of the liberal-democratic order.

    ·               This article was first published in www.kyivpost.com

  • Dende’s N5b defamation suit and need for responsible journalism

    Dende’s N5b defamation suit and need for responsible journalism

    By Hezekiah Oyero

    A renowned businessman, philanthropist, and licensed Customs agent, Ibrahim Egungbohun, (fondly called IBD Dende by his associates), is in the news lately for the wrong reason. In recent viral social media posts, some reckless reporters under the guise of investigative journalism accused him of the crime of smuggling, gun running, and terrorism, among others.

    Following the ensuing outburst of comments, reactions, and innuendoes that trailed the wrongful allegation, he is now before the Federal High Court, Abuja, to seek appropriate redress for the emotional and psychological assault he has had to grapple with since the offensive publication became a public issue. 

    One of the downsides of social media platforms is the increasing probability of crimes such as defamation (in this case, digital defamation), infringement of users’ privacy, and cyberbullying. Cyberbullying occurs mostly online to intentionally harass or cause harm to the targeted individuals through the sharing of a video that includes untrue comments about the victims. This is with the intent of defaming them and causing harm to their reputation.

    Regrettably, some conventional media houses have gone beyond the call of duty, acting as a willing tool in the hands of faceless bloggers for the propagation of fake news even at the risk of their reputation. To be sure, the Nigerian constitution assigns the obligation of holding the government accountable to the media. Section 22 of the 1999 constitution states: “The press, radio, television and other agencies of the mass media shall at all times be free to uphold the fundamental objectives contained in this Chapter and uphold the responsibility and accountability of the Government to the people.”

    However, it must be stated that the Constitution is not blind to the legal consequences of wrongful discharge of this onerous responsibility especially where the principles of fairness, accuracy, and objectivity have been sacrificed for the narrow self-interest of an individual.   

    Read Also; Governance began only three months ago due to Rivers crisis – Fubara

    And rightly so because the framers of the constitution did not envisage a situation where any media house would focus its time and resources on frivolity rather than issues that matter most to the people. The Media is primarily meant to serve the overall interest of the nation. And in so far as this responsibility is concerned, there is no denying that media have contributed in many significant ways to nation-building. The role the media played in the struggle for the enthronement of the present democracy and in sustaining the development of our society cannot be overemphasized. However, media houses must be seen to continue to live up to the expectations of the people. 

    Media houses must focus on policy and always see the relevance of their stories to policy-making and implementations to improve journalism and minimize the circulation of fake news.

    Without a doubt, writing a perfect story is not an easy task. It takes discipline, foresight, research, and strategy to conjure a balanced story. But when it is done right, it ends in total victory.

    Unfortunately, fake news has become a big thing in the field of Social Media Journalism in Nigeria. Like Fabrizio Moreira rightly said: “Fake news can be as simple as spreading misinformation or as dangerous as smearing hateful propaganda.”

    In our present situation where there is increased reliance on social media, ethical questions in journalism have become a big issue. This is sadly so because editors who act as gatekeepers are no longer thorough in verifying materials gathered from social media before publishing. Again, because fake news is cheap to produce, there is no longer adherence to fact-checking and cross-referencing sources as vital aspects of news writing. 

    It is, therefore, imperative for media houses to adhere to the essential values of accuracy and truthfulness in ethical reporting to avoid grave legal consequences of unverified stories. Where that is not done, there could be a dangerous descent into hate-based harassment. That underscores the need for the regulation of social media to create a balance between access to and freedom of information and the rights of others and society itself to be protected from abuse. 

    The moral and legal consequences of a general lack of objective balance between the two dynamic issues of access to and freedom of information in news circulation is what the Court is about to decide in the ongoing proceedings of the suit filed by Egungbohun against Fisayo Soyombo, an investigative journalist, the Foundation for Investigative Journalism and the Arise Media Group.

    In the suit he filed through his team of lawyers led by Mr. Bola Aidi (SAN), he said he was on several occasions, through posts that were shared on a social media platform, X, described as the biggest smuggler in the South West region of the country.

    Not only that, he also told the court that he was equally wrongly accused on the micro-blogging platform of smuggling bullets and guns to the eastern part of Nigeria.

    He further averred that a series of defamatory posts that were made against him by the defendants had tarnished his hard-earned reputation and caused him a loss of goodwill.

    As the Court proceeds in its trial of the case, one thing is sure: No matter how long it takes, the long arm of the law will catch up with those who takes delight in inflicting injuries on others in the name of journalism and social media freedom. Nothing is wrong with social media freedom but everything is wrong with irresponsible use of the platform to bring down others.

    For the avoidance of doubt, the height Alhaji IBD Dende, a renowned socialite and philanthropist, has reached in his career trajectory is not by sudden flight. He already had the foundation of his success laid in a sound relevant education before he took a plunge into the business world. Born and raised in Ebute-Igbooro in the Yewa axis (Yewa North Local Government Area) of Ogun State, he holds a Master’s degree in Leadership from the Commonwealth University. He also acquired knowledge in Business Art and Technology from the London Graduate School. From the onset of his career, he has continuously expanded his expertise by completing several business courses online.

    He began his career in clearing and forwarding and gradually diversified his business interests into multiple sectors including the hospitality industry. Apart from his endeavour as a licensed Customs agent, he has also demonstrated exceptional entrepreneurial skills in quarry and mining, automobile sales, and real estate. 

    Today, his company, IBD-Impex, has become one of the fastest-growing privately-owned companies in Nigeria. Under the subsidiary, IBD Hotels, he has established a leading brand in the hospitality industry within Ogun State, making significant contributions to the local economy through employment generation and actively supporting the communities in Yewa land.

    Outside the business circle, he has also worked assiduously to earn his reputation as a philanthropist and a socialite with a network of friends and associates across all walks of life, including President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Governor Dapo Abiodun.

    As a testament to his contributions to the socio-economic development of the state, he has earned several reputable awards of honors from prestigious organizations, both locally and internationally. These include, among others, the Chartered Fellowship Award from the International Association of World Peace Advocates, the Outstanding Award from the Oduduwa Development Initiatives, and the Distinguished Merit Award from the Yewa People Development Council.

    His dedication to serving humanity and supporting noble causes has also been acknowledged by organizations such as the Lions International Abeokuta Lions Club, the National Community Ethics and Value Environmental Compliance Corps, and the Arewa Gamji Emirate Royal Council.

    As the founder of the IBD Foundation, a charitable organization that has transformed the lives of many individuals, he has done a lot in putting a smile on the faces of the underprivileged in the society.

    On account of his numerous contributions to the growth and development of his community, a traditional monarch, the Eselu of Iselu in Ogun state, Oba Akintunde Akinyemi, had to risk his hard-earned reputation by writing an open letter to the 3rd defendant on the defamatory and damaging nature of a documentary that was aired against Dende. “In the said open letter, the monarch advised the 1st and 3rd defendants to desist from further defamation of his subject and to always verify their claims before feeding it to the public.” But the plea fell on deaf ears.

    The rest is in the law court. In a case like this, the onus of proof lies on the accusers. The suit reads in part: “The claimant’s hard work, integrity, dedication and tenacity have given him business goodwill among well-meaning Nigerians and have enabled the claimant to establish business and personal relationships with top Nigerian businessmen and politicians including Nigerian President, His Excellency, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, incumbent Governor of Ogun State, His Excellency, Dapo Abiodun, amongt several others,” Dende averred in the court process.

    Citing examples of some of the posts that were shared against him,  Egungbohun further added that: “The claimant avers that in the defamatory post of 26 March 2024, the vivid description given by the 1st defendant on how the bullets and guns alleged to have been smuggled in by the claimant were pierced into their component parts, smothered with black nylons just how turkey is packaged, lumped together with turkey as though the real import is turkey, and smuggled to eastern Nigeria with the knowledge of a particular Customs officer in Zone B shows that the 1st defendant was either present at the time of smuggling/partook in the smuggling of the bullets and guns, or that he was present and saw when the guns and bullets were smuggled into Nigeria.

     “The claimant avers further to paragraph 35, that the defamatory statement of the 1st defendant that the claimant smuggled bullets and guns to eastern Nigeria is an innuendo which infers that the claimant is a sponsor of the insecurity and terrorism in eastern Nigeria.

    “The claimant states that the defendants’ tagging of the claimant as a smuggler, gun runner, terrorist, etc. is outright falsehood and defamatory of the claimant’s hard-earned reputation and character as the claimant has never engaged in the act of smuggling, gun running, terrorism or any other illegal act,” among others.

    Furthermore, “the claimant avers that the defendants’ derogatory post, publication, and remarks have soiled his hard-earned reputation before his friends, business associates, colleagues, and clients.

    “The claimant avers that the defendants in defaming and assassinating his name and character with reference to his goodwill and relationship with prominent Nigerians, deliberately seek to malign the claimant’s name and reputation before his friends, business partners, and political associates,” noting that the “claimant’s good name and reputation have been smeared for life by the libelous posts of the defendants.”

    “The claimant puts the defendants to the strictest of proof of all the defamatory and derogatory allegations made against him.”

    Consequently, the claimant, among other things, prayed the court to hold that he was defamed, as well as to issue an order to compel the defendants to retract the libelous statements and tender an apology to him through their various platforms.

    Apart from seeking a restraining order against the defendants, the claimant is also praying the court to award N5 billion to him as general damages and another N10 million to cover the cost of the litigation.

    Court action is one of the options available to the victims of defamation. Depending on the merit or demerit of a case, defamation carries some potential damages and legal consequences. Part of the reason some media practitioners in Nigeria engage in defamation is a general lack of consequence for their actions or inaction. In this matter, the burden of proof is on the defendants. Therefore, to come out of the case unscathed, they must produce evidence to prove the defamatory imputation is substantially true. With the current lack of restraint, it will be easier for the proverbial camel to pass through the eye of the need than the defendant to escape the wrought of the law.

    ● Oyero writes from London, UK

  • Sim Fubara’s political mind games

    Sim Fubara’s political mind games

    According to Oxford Languages, a mind game is “a course of manipulative behaviour intended to discomfit another person or gain advantage over them.” Julia Wilde of D News in a 2016 presentation titled “The Mind Games Politicians Use To Win Our Votes” notes: “From the way they look, the way they sound, to the words they choose, politicians and their staff carefully craft their speeches and appearance to invoke emotion in their constituents.” Roy Eidelson also deals with this tendency in his 2018 book titled Political Mind Games: How the 1% Manipulate Our Understanding of What’s Happening, What’s Right, and What’s Possible.

    In Nigeria, the first civilian Governor of Osun State, Alhaji Isiaka Adetunji Adeleke, played mind games, during the governorship campaigns in 1992, through, among other means, his awesome long convoys of glittering cars. In fact, he was nicknamed “Serubawon” (‘Cast fear in their hearts’), through his intimidatingly affluent campaign roadshows. Eventually, he defeated even more established politicians in his party, the Social Democratic Party (SDP). Mind games continue to have concrete relevance in contemporary Nigerian politics, and the incumbent Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), is increasingly proving to be adept at playing them.

    Like gubernatorial candidate Isiaka Adeleke in the 1990s, Fubara has emerged as a fearsome political spectacle in today’s Rivers State. But Fubara did not establish his intimidating political credentials through the display of affluence. Rather, in the language of Roy Eidelson, Fubara demonstrated, unmistakably, “what’s possible”. And his political opponents have been justifiably apprehensive. As the saying goes, if you’ve been stung by a bee before, every insect you see thereafter becomes a stinger in your imagination. In their passionate response to Fubara’s visit to the state’s legislative quarters on 9 May, 2024, it appeared as if the anti-Fubara lawmakers did not want to take anything for granted.

    Read Also; Governance began only three months ago due to Rivers crisis – Fubara

    But, were the legislators justified? Yes, they were. A feud developed between Fubara and his political mentor and predecessor, Barrister Nyesom Wike  (also of the PDP), who was in fact the political enabler of Fubara’s ascendancy to the position of Governor. The rift was due to what appears to be the over-bearing influence of Wike on the Fubara governorship. With Wike controlling an overwhelming majority of the members of the Rivers State House of Assembly, and with increasing belligerence on both sides, Fubara feared that he could be impeached by the legislators. As a seemingly preemptive measure to prevent the lawmakers from carrying through any impeachment proceedings, Fubara ordered the demolition of the legislative chambers. This counterpoise demonstrated how far he could go in his feud with Wike, who is his erstwhile benefactor, and with Wike’s supporters.

    Meanwhile, there was widespread exchange of pugnacious language between the two sides. Wike’s grouse with Fubara was that the latter was an ingrate who was repaying good with evil, considering the former’s nomination of and immeasurable support for Fubara’s campaigns, which earned him victory at the governorship polls.  In a 24 November, 2023 press engagement, Wike declared: “I don’t like ingrates.” Fubara had ample opportunity to shoot back on 6 May, 2024 when he received a delegation of elders from Bayelsa State: “There’s nothing wrong in one helping anyone, but nobody takes the place of God in any situation, and so long as I’m concerned, God is God. God can even bring your enemy to open a door for you. … But that is not enough for me to worship a human being.” Fubara further said: “the young people … who claim that they are Assembly members, are not assembly members. They’re not existing. … Their existence [depends on] me allowing them to exist. If I derecognise them, they’re nowhere.” 

    Like a ding dong, Wike responded on 12 May, 2024:  “I have never told anybody to worship me. Nobody can worship man … but as politicians we appreciate those who have helped us.” Wike also assured one of the 27 anti-Fubara lawmakers: “Nobody will remove you as an Assembly member.” This assurance probably became necessary because on the floor of the House of Assembly on 11 December, 2024, the 27 pro-Wike legislators announced their defection from the PDP to the All Progressives Congress (APC). Legal opinions differ as to whether, by that action, they had not lost their seats as Assembly members. In response to calls from both within and outside Rivers State, the President had attempted to broker peace between the feuding parts, based not on legal niceties, but on political expediency. 

    Meanwhile, Fubara doubled down on his mind games by paying an ominous visit to the Rivers State legislative quarters on 9 May, 2024. This visit was ominous in a number of ways. First, the pre-chambers-demolition visit of 30 October, 2023 followed the belief that the legislators were planning to impeach the Governor, just as it was being rumoured before the 9 May, 2024 visit that moves were on to impeach him. Second, the Governor was reported to have said as follows about the visit to the legislative quarters: “It’s my property. I came to see it. Is the assembly not part of my property? Is there anything wrong in checking out how things are going on there? You’re aware of the development. We have a new Speaker. And I went there to see for myself how things are, because there might be a few things I might want to do for the good of our people.” It is to be recalled that the demolition of the assembly chambers was also presumed to be due to the compromised integrity of the building, seemingly for “the good” of the legislators and “our people”.

    Third, on the 9 May, 2024 visit, he was dressed in a polo shirt on a pair of trousers and topped with a flat cap complemented with a soft, self-assured swagger. This dressing reenacted cynically the sartorial pointer to the possibility of demolishing the legislative quarters. In other words, Fubara’s attire was like the executioner’s suit to the legislators. Once bitten, twice shy. So, the legislators were wondering whether history was about to repeat itself. They expressed their apprehensions very passionately, even if sometimes ridiculously.

    According to the exasperated factional Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Martins Amaewhule, “Rivers people were stunned this afternoon when they got the information that the Governor of Rivers State Sir Siminalayi Fubara stormed the Rivers State House of Assembly quarters in yet another attempt to demolish the Rivers State House of Assembly quarters just the way he demolished the Rivers State House of Assembly complex. … The Governor has shown that he’s a violent man. … We call on the President of the Federal Republic, we call on the International Community, the British High Commission, the U.S. Embassy, all known democracies in the world, to intervene … and call him to order.”   

    In continuation of his mind games, on 10 May, 2024, it was widely reported that Fubara had signed Executive Order 001 – 2023 relocating the sitting of the state’s House of Assembly to the Government House. The Punch newspaper of that day tellingly headlined the news as, “Rivers  crisis: Anxieties as Fubara’s men release 2023 executive order moving legislators’ sittings to Govt House.” The newspaper also quoted the Executive Order as follows: “Now, therefore, I, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, the Governor of Rivers State, this 30th Day of October 2023, under the powers vested in me under the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, hereby issue, order and direct that all proceedings and business of the Rivers State House of Assembly shall temporarily take place at the auditorium, Admin Block, Government House, Port Harcourt, until the repairs, renovation and reconstruction of the chambers of Rivers State House of Assembly.”

    Just as Fubara’s mind games with respect to the visit to the legislators’ quarters and his Executive Order were beginning to lose some steam, Fubara shot back to headline dominance by saying on 13 May, 2024, at the swearing-in of the new Attorney-General for Rivers State, “As it is today, in the local parlance, they say that the jungle has matured. We will be setting [up] a panel of enquiry to investigate the affair of governance.”  Moreover, at the same event, seemingly responding to the assurance which Wike had given to the lawmaker mentioned above that his position in the House of Assembly was secure, Fubara remarked on 13 May, 2024: “Maybe where they are, they are telling them that nothing will happen. It’s happening here live. We have our own legislators that are performing their duty according to the Constitution.”

    Though he did not specify the years or administrations to be covered, his statement has generated the following, among other headlines: “Fubara to probe Wike’s administration” (The Cable); “Fubara vows to probe Wike’s administration”; and “Why I will probe Wike’s administration – Governor Fubara” (TVC News). These show Fubara’s effective use of innuendo.

    Wike may be older than Fubara, and may be more versed in the act of governance. But Fubara has managed to establish verbal equality with him; that is, if he has actually not already surpassed Wike with the ominousness of Fubara’s words. To Rivers State House of Assembly members in particular, the fear of Fubara is increasingly appearing to be the beginning of wisdom. He doesn’t seem to have time for base theatrics and doesn’t contest for a singing position; rather, he is proving to be a quintessential Nigerian political mind games player.

    Fubara is also helping to consolidate a stereotype. On 7 May, 2024, Babajide Kolade-Otitoju said as follows regarding Fubara on the TVC News programme ‘Journalists’ Hangout’: “a lot of people who don’t talk, they are more dangerous than people who talk all the time. This is what we’re seeing.” This seems to be echoing Wike’s perception of Fubara. This perception is metaphorically represented in a Yoruba proverb as “Denge tutu lehin o gbona ninu” (‘Pottage is cold on the surface but hot beneath.’) Those who don’t recognise this fact easily get their tongues and throats scalded. Fubara is, in other words, the kind of person labeled as “Eniyan jeje, ab’iwa kunkun” (‘A gentle person, with a tough character.’)

    In the past one and half to two weeks, Fubara has thrown River State into emotional over-drive and has made himself a topical issue. In fact, writing about him today in this column, shows how successful his political mind games have been. Meanwhile, the resolution of the Rivers State political crisis is in the hands of the judiciary. It is hoped that the different cases in court would be given accelerated hearing in the interest of the nation.

  • Lagos-Calabar coastal road as vista of economic opportunities

    Lagos-Calabar coastal road as vista of economic opportunities

    By Tajudeen Adigun

    To the rats in a covered gourd, the gourd is their universe. The space in the gourd put  a terrible limitation on their view of life. Those who see nothing good in the 700-kilomtre coastal road share the limitation of rats in a gourd.

    It might not be the longest road in Africa, but the Lagos-Calabar coastal road would be the longest highway in Nigeria after its completion. A silver bullet road that would run across two geo-political  zones of the country; the Southwest and South-South and capable of  boosting the economy beyond experts and technocrats’ expectation.

    The 700-kilometre long concrete road will, undoubtedly, impose an earlier unknown ruggedness of special iron underlay mats on the muddy soft-mangrove forest terrain. This would be creamed off with a thick layer of concrete that is capable of carrying vehicles of variety of weights that would drive on with. No wonder the seemingly prohibitive cost. Four billion naira per kilometre

    It is not only the length of the road that is intimidating and unprecedented, its whooping N15 trillion cost is equally awesome. Some obervers have insinuated padding of the cost.  It’s, therefore, not a surprise that the N4 billion per kilometer road has attracted flurry of criticism. Some people tagged it prohibitive, while others say it’s government’s joker to openly fleece the treasury for slush  funds to prosecute the 2027 presidential election. Those shouting themselves hoarse, calling it sheer prodigality or misplaced priority are not on the same page with the President. They could not see the magic to economic  buoyance that the project portends. The coastal road is a new forward moving instrument that could breathe oxygen to the troubled economy. It will be a relief for an economy that gasping for breath

    Read Also; I’m amused seeing those who said Asiwaju had no chance now gallivanting around him – Gbenga Daniel

    Funded on the Public-Private arrangement; the Federal Government would contribute 30 per cent, while Hi-Tech construction firm  would foot the balance of 70 per cent. This coastal project  has not only  been passed by the National Assembly  in the 2024 budget, it has also been twice  approved by the Federal Executive (FEC). It was, therefore, not a surprise that work has started on the Lagos end of the project. The road would, undoubtedly open up the virgin mangrove forest to unleash  multiple opportunities for revenue-generating activities to facilitate multiple economic benefits that will turn round the fortune of residents and other technically-trained hands. It’s a fertile ground for setting up  a vast hospitality industry. Besides, it could also provide opportunities for  setting  up of commercial fishing hub, if the government is desirable of  making the area a fish basket of the nation. The potential bounty of the sea and littoral edibles such as fishes, crabs, lobsters,  not to talk of other water  species from the ocean that are awaiting exploitation to garnish dining tables across the country.

    Trawlers combing the sea for a large-scale fishing, smaller vehicles harvesting the littoral coast for what it could offer. Refrigerated warehouses sited at strategic points to offering retail services of iced fish to take their consignments to the people.  The fish depots on the coastal road are just low-hanging fruits that would not only create markets , but also  offer job opportunities. This would reduce unemployment long queues, increasing disposable  income in the workers’ pockets as the government too would  have  more people on tax –paying list.

    The 700-kilometre is an ideal route for setting up hospitality industry to promote tourism.  Amusement parks, castles, hanging pedestrian bridges not to talk of tourist villages built to serve both home and foreign guests and vistors. Recreation centres that boast of different class of hotels and restaurants are also sign-posts that would kick-off benevolent economic activities.  Fuel stations that would inevitably spring up along the road are another source of job creation. The created value-chain  of service delivery that would absorb some unemployed  youths, men and women would not leave the economy positively unaffected. Foreign tourists would undoubtedly be attracted. What a source of hard currency (foreign currencies) path to boost supply to Nigeria’s foreign exchange market.  Individual entrepreneurs would tap into the opportunity of building tourist villages, castles, hanging -bridges in the mangrove forest to bring flurry of activities that could give tourists pleasure of cool breeze from the open ocean’s view.

    A challenged economy as that of the present day Nigeria in the doldrums could be retrieved from the  quagmire that is threatening to make life unbearable for the people. Tools such as monetary and fiscal policy could be deployed to the rescue. The coastal road is new avenue that could serve as a Midas touch that would provide opportunities to nurture the economy to buoyance.

    The present poor economic situation in the country; worsened by paucity of funds to finance development projects could be said to have made partnership the choice to finance  the coastal road project. The viability and the embedded profitability, it should be noted would have made it attractive to the Hi-Tech firm for  participation. The government  would exploit the opportunity of a private firm participation to reflate the slumped economy to a bubbling, robust and fast expanding economy that has what it takes to attract more foreign investors.

  • Democracy, governance and credible elections (1)

    Democracy, governance and credible elections (1)

    There is a problem about the institutional framework in which the Nigerian state as presently constituted is based. To have democracy, good governance and credible elections, there must be institutional reforms and great accountability in government. The three are interwoven, only that we tend to think that democracy is all about elections. In any case, the fact that those ingredients are currently missing is an indication that Nigeria still has a long way to go. After all, without democracy and governance, there can’t be credible elections.

    To put it politely, Nigeria, even as we speak, has very weak institutions, and without a functional justice system, she can’t be said to have credible elections. For any democracy to stand and be as its definition, the power of credibility cannot be underestimated. However, the achievement or otherwise of this ‘credibility’ is a huge task, because credibility means different things to different actors in democracy, more so as the definition hovers around the same center: the people. Notwithstanding, the issues of credibility in our elections requires a serious conference, taking into consideration the level of litigations that always go with elections in Nigeria. Take, for example, the United Kingdom where only one electoral dispute has ever gone to court over a long period of time. Of course, it is because she has a functional judiciary and nobody would want to waste his resources on frivolous litigations. The lawyer who handles such cases can even be disbarred. So, how come Nigeria remains a semi-democratic country 25 years into the 4th Republic?

    Read Also; Tinubu’s intervention made 2024 Hajj possible, says NAHCON Chairman

    In any serious democracy, it is the government that sets the right template for an election to hold. Unlike countries like Spain, France, South Africa, even some other African countries, Nigeria needs a constitutional court so that her political practitioners can originate and conclude constitutional issues in record time. In a constitutional court for instance, the needless imbroglio currently troubling the peace of Rivers State won’t even take more than two to three weeks to resolve, instead of this long-winded abracadabra, which is no doubt affecting the perception of Nigeria as an unserious economy.

    What we are saying is that governance and elections are intertwined and that a political economy that is lacking in internal security mechanisms, weaponizes and actually glorifies poverty is not one where credible elections can be held because it is based on state capture. In a country under the subordination of the state to powerful individuals and vested interests, the idea is to make the people very poor so that, on an election day, prospective voters can be induced. Even when there’s no election, the masses are induced with palliatives. The tragic truth is that political entrepreneurship has become the parameter for politicking and the determinant of victory. Otherwise, why should minimum wage even be a debate in Nigeria?

    Again, that’s where the late Obafemi Awolowo excelled as a leader! But how come successive leaders have not been seeing the link between the minimum wage, the purchasing power parity and investments? Call it an election gimmick but that’s why Governor Godwin Obaseki of Edo State deserves a standing ovation. Well, it’s not that N70,000 as minimum wage for workers in the state is fair enough but then, the governor has demonstrated that a worthy credit analyst would prefer Benin City where the purchasing power parity is N50,000.00 to Gusau where the purchasing power parity is N31,000.00. In a way, Obaseki has shown that, for any economy to attain its potentials, it is better to have 15 million people who are on a living wage of N105,000.00 per month than to have 200 million people who are on a minimum wage of N30,000.00 per month.

    ‘Ojú to dilè ni iroré ń so.’ (Pimples usually infect an idle face. The notorious truth is that we can’t have functional democracy, good governance and credible elections without a sound educational system. Had Nigeria also been blessed with a sensitive political class, Nigerians would have been benefiting from free and compulsory education as far back as 1974 or 1975. Of course, the difference would have been that Nigeria would not have been having all these problems because of a better educated population. Matter-of-factly, the better educated the people are, the better and the saner the choices. A better educated population is a better informed and more productive population. But when politics fails to deliver its goods to the people, waiting for much chemistry to work at the same pace for development to show up becomes the norm. Obviously, that’s what Awolowo got right and that’s why people like Joseph Stiglitz won the Nobel Prize for Economics.

    Secondly, compulsory education is the best form of population control. On the day of Nigeria’s independence in 1960, the United Kingdom as the parting colonial power had 7 million more people than Nigeria. Whereas Nigeria’s population grew from 44,928,342 in 1960 to 229,152,217 in 2024, the British population has grown by only 15.34 million since 1960. The implementation of the Education Act of 1947, which made education free and compulsory up to the age of 18 in the UK led to the halving of her population within one generation. Why and how? Educated people “marry later” and have fewer children. What’s more? Educated populace is better skilled, has higher purchasing power parity and many other advantages. That’s why countries like Italy and Japan have declining population growth. They are actually begging and bribing their citizens to have more children. For Nigeria, the story is pathetically different!

    Forget the delusion of grandeur, unless some steps are taken in the right direction, Nigeria as a country may be fast sliding into irrelevance. For example, South Africa is currently the biggest economy in Africa, of course with the soundest fundamentals. She is followed by Egypt and Algeria and only God knows the true occupier of the 4th position between Nigeria and Morocco. South Africa has strong institutions of the state. As a matter of fact, the ruling African National Congress (ANC) is already terrified of losing the forthcoming elections. Most importantly, she has basic industries like iron and steel and machine tools. So, she manufactures and exports cars to Europe. Unlike Nigeria, South Africa doesn’t assemble cars. As former President Donald Trump said: “if you don’t have steel, you don’t have a country.” In terms of fundamentals therefore, how to arrest Nigeria’s descent into irrelevance should be the key question.

    But how did we get here? When Nigeria decided to throw away the Lyttleton’s, 1960 and 1963 Constitutions, it became obvious that the country was gone. Brazil currently operates the 1988 Constitution, which is the 7th enacted since the country’s independence in 1822, and the 6th since the proclamation of the republic in 1889. Look at today’s Brazil! She’s currently the world’s 9th largest economy. Not only that, 92% of all new cars sold in Brazil are powered, not by petroleum motor spirit, pms, but by the ethanol derived from sugarcane. For greater certainty, Brazil is a huge producer of sugarcane. Impliedly, had Nigeria kept up her existence on the 1960 and 1963 Constitutions, she’d have been powering not less than 92% of her cars by ethanol derived from cassava. After all, dear country is currently the world’s largest producer of cassava with an annual output of over 34 million tonnes of tuberous roots. What this means is that, instead of buying a litre of pms for N700.00, ethanol derived from cassava would not have cost more than N130.00. Besides, that would have been a boost for agriculture and industry would have been competitive because its cost would be lower. Added to these is that the destiny of employment generation in the country would have been given a lift-up.

    ● To be concluded.  

  • Lagos means business

    Lagos means business

    By Funke Cole

    In a manner of speaking, the now famous tagline “Eko for Show” associated with Nigeria’s Centre of Excellence, Lagos State, is not a mere platitude after all, judging by the degree of monumental socio-economic development projects that dot the landscape.

    A first-time visitor to Mile 2, Oshodi, Oyingbo, Abule-Egba, Agege, Iyana-Ipaja, Ipaja Ayobo, Epe, Badagry, and other uptown districts, not forgetting the urban parts of the Lagos metropolis and its environs such as Gbagada, Ilupeju, Apapa, Maryland, Ikeja, Ikoyi, Victoria Island, and Lekki, among others, would naturally marvel at the presence of commerce and industry in those places. Such a visitor will be awestruck by the fast-paced infrastructure situated in those neighbourhoods whether in the form of rails, network of roads, to the mass housing projects, tourist attractions, recreation centres, etc.

    These important milestones achieved thus far, are all thanks to Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu, who has made it clear that he is on a mission to actualise the ideals and ideas of a Greater Lagos as envisioned by successive leadership of the state, chief among who is the real Architect of the New Lagos himself, President Bola Tinubu, whose template has made the face-paced developmental strides achievable today.

    Drawing inspiration from his predecessors, Sanwo-Olu’s commitment to see a Greater Lagos arise has propelled him to make significant strides along that line thus far and most of which are not just promising but already bearing good fruits.

    Read Also; Tinubu’s intervention made 2024 Hajj possible, says NAHCON Chairman

    Certainly one area the governor has recorded some giant strides is in capital importation through foreign direct investment (FDI); which has made the state the envy of many other states playing little in the FDI space as the case may be.

    Capital importation means foreign investments into a country’s economy and is made up of FDI, portfolio investment, and other investments.

    One way the state has been able to achieve this all-important lofty heights is by deliberate and conscientious efforts by all concerned, of course, with the governor not just rising to the occasion for the most part but providing the leadership to drive these significant strides. As the chief marketer of the state, Sanwo-Olu has never left anyone in doubt about the immense potentials of the state.

    Whether on the home-soil or in foreign lands, Sanwo-Olu has always raised his voice above the din as he preaches, cajoles, entices, woos everyone to the famous state rich in aquatic splendor, flora and fauna put together.

    Late last year the governor was in the forefront when he embarked on a number of business networking meetings and programmes outside the shores of the country, all in his quest to bring in fresh investments into the state.

    One of the events which readily come to mind is the Lord Mayor’s Show in London. The governor led other delegates to the United Kingdom to attract foreign investment into the state. During the show, Sanwo-Olu, along with other members of the Lagos International Financial Centre (LIFC) Council chaired by him, engaged in strategic one-on-one and bilateral meetings with key United Kingdom-based businesses, investors, government officials, and Nigerians in the diaspora, all with one message: “Lagos is open for business. Come and invest in Africa’s economic powerhouse.”

    He said his administration had been proactive in collaborating to catalyse infrastructural development and was the first African city that participated in the show to attract foreign investors to Lagos State.

    He said: “Lagos is not just going to London for the parade and pageantry; this visit has a more strategic purpose. This is a prime opportunity to showcase Lagos on a global platform. The newly inaugurated LIFC Council signifies not just an institutional milestone, but a commitment to a bold vision—positioning Lagos as the beacon of financial innovation in Africa.

    “The Lord Mayor, Prof. Michael Mainelli’s invitation stands as a resounding endorsement of Lagos State’s commitment to excellence, as well as recognition of its increasing economic prominence. This invitation aligns harmoniously with the council’s mission to establish Lagos as a global financial hub, attracting investments that will fuel sustainable economic development.

    “Investment isn’t merely a transaction; it’s a catalyst for job creation, driving sustainable development and fostering a symbiotic relationship between investors, the State, and the communities at large,” he said.

    Just like last year, an elated governor couldn’t hide his excitement last Thursday, while addressing the audience at the 2024 US-Africa Business Summit in Dallas, where he emphasised the state government’s readiness for investment.

    He said: “With a focus on infrastructure, we invite global investors to explore the vast opportunities in Lagos, Africa’s booming economic hub.

    “From health to education and agriculture, Lagos offers a stable platform for growth. The Lekki Deep Sea Port and a 200-hectare food hub project are set to revolutionise commerce and food security in the region.

    “With strategic investments in rail, health, and housing, we’re geared up to support global partners looking to make a home in Lagos and we showcased this at the event. The newly launched red rail line alone will serve nearly one million Lagosians daily.

    “Our commitment to fostering a tech-savvy environment is evident. Over $3 billion has flowed into Lagos in recent years, nurturing a network of start-ups and unicorns valued at $5 billion.

    “We promise a conducive business environment with predictable returns. Delegates at the summit are already aligning with us for fruitful partnerships. Be part of Lagos’s vibrant economic journey.”

    Expectedly, the concerted efforts by the state government have continued to pay off ultimately. At a time the economic headwinds have continued to negatively impact on most businesses, with foreign capital inflow into Nigeria ebbing by 26.4 per cent to $3.9 billion in 2023, thus plunging to a 17-year low since 2007 when capital importation stood at $5.3 billion, Lagos state on the other hand has stood afloat.

    The latest data released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) showed that foreign portfolio investment (FPI) in 2023 was $1.15 billion, indicating 29.5 percent of the $3.91 billion total capital importation recorded in the year.

    Analysis of the NBS data showed that Lagos State topped the list of states, including the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) that attracted the most foreign investments in 2023 as the state raked in $2.50 billion, representing 64 percent of the total capital inflow into the country, while the FCT emerged as the second top investment destination with $1.17 billion or 30 percent of the total capital inflow.

    The report also showed that Lagos remained the top investment destination with 65.38 per cent of total capital importation just as she remained the top destination in Q4, 2023 with $771.68 million, accounting for 65.38 percent of total capital importation, followed by Abuja (FCT) with $370.80 million (34.07 percent) and Rivers State with $6 million (0.55 percent).

    For a governor, who doesn’t miss any chance at projecting the state, when Sanwo-Olu hosted the British royal couple, Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, a few days back at Lagos House in Marina, he didn’t disappoint.

    Prince Harry, accompanied by his wife, Meghan, both on a three-day visit to Nigeria to promote the Invictus Games, which he founded in 2014 and they had a stopover in Lagos as a wrap.

    The Invictus Games are aimed at raising funds and supporting serving members of the military as well as veterans to overcome their physical and mental illness or injuries, which would help them to develop a sense of belonging and increased self-esteem.

    Speaking to journalists after a closed door meeting with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, Sanwo-Olu praised the royal couple for the work they are doing with Nigeria’s military men, especially on issues around mental health.

    He said: “For Prince Harry, it has been a very interesting and informative trip to the country. He has seen a lot. And part of the things we are hoping he will take away is the diversity and extent of how big our country is, how we continue to ensure that we live together in peace and harmony, and what role Lagos plays in the whole conversation.”

    Still doubting the place of Lagos in the scheme of things as far as business is concerned? Quit doubting: Lagos is business and business is Lagos!

    ·         Cole, a public affairs commentator writes from Lagos

  • Electricity sector: Marketplace where entropy reigns supreme

    Electricity sector: Marketplace where entropy reigns supreme

    Entropy is a thermodynamic quantity, often interpreted as the degree of disorder or unpredictability. Note: Electricity generation hinges on Thermodynamic principles. Electricity is seen as basic and essential infrastructure necessary for the welfare of the citizens and growth of the economy; but in Nigeria it is seen as luxury for those who can afford it.

    It hurts most when people are made to pay for goods or services not consumed, such as the epileptic electricity supply. Nonetheless, you can’t give what you don’t have; so the electricity sector in Nigeria can’t give what it doesn’t have, as the electricity generation is very low— less than 5,000 megawatts for over 200milion people and the largest economy in Africa, as par GDP. I say, as par GDP, because assessing the economies of the continent on per-capita basis, South Africa remains far ahead of Nigeria. While Nigeria can claim the crown of Africa’s largest economy, there is a caveat:  South Africa is ahead in terms of infrastructure including electricity supply, as it generates about 42,000megawatts for about 60million people.

    Recently, Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, NERC announced 240% hike in electricity tariffs for band A customers, who are supposed to receive 20 hours of power supply per day. According to Musliu Oseni, the Vice Chairman of NERC, customers in this category will now be charged N225 per kilowatt-hour (KW/h), a significant rise from the previous rate of N66. My question is how many hours are left for the band B, C, D and E consumers from the paltry generation of about 5,000MW? I make bold to say that there is no guarantee of 20hours per day power supply to band A consumers. They should just pay, and know that ‘terms and conditions’ apply. Note: there are times when the country experiences a complete blackout due to a national grid collapse.  The crisis in the electricity sector is huge and we should declare state of emergency in the sector.

    Nigeria’s power generation is mostly thermal and hydro and has an installed capacity of nearly 13,000 megawatts. For many years, authorities only manage to dispatch about 4,500 megawatts of its installed capacity. While the Per Capita power generation ranges from 3kW to 6.6kW in many African countries, the corresponding figure for Nigeria is 0.05. This is literally shameful and unacceptable. The transmission system in Nigeria electricity sector does not cover every part of the country. It currently has the capacity to transmit a maximum of about 4,000 MW which is awfully below the required national needs and it is technically weak thus very sensitive to major disturbances. In most locations in Nigeria, the distribution network is poor, the voltage profile is poor and the billing is inaccurate. A September 2023 report by NERC showed that out of the total 12,825,005 registered electricity customers in Nigeria, only 5,707,838 had meters, indicating that over 7.1 million registered customers were still subjected to the estimated billing system— otherwise known as ‘CRAZY BILLS’ (emphasis mine). In fact, the electricity sector is marketplace where entropy reigns supreme.

    Read Also: I made a mistake with Fubara, Wike slams Governor’s camp

    Adequate power supply is an unavoidable prerequisite to any nation’s development, and electricity generation, transmission and distribution are capital-intensive activities requiring huge resources of both funds and capacity. In the prevailing circumstances in Nigeria where funds availability is progressively dwindling, creative and innovative solutions are necessary to address the power supply problem.

    As part of its contribution to the resolution of the problems of the electricity sector along the line of its mandate, the Energy Commission of Nigeria, ECN has been collaborating with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and therefore, applies the IAEA Model for the Analysis of Energy Demand (MAED). ECN on applying the MAED for a 13% GDP growth rate, the demand projections rose from 5,746MW in the base year of 2005 to 297,900MW in the year 2030 which translates to construction of 11,686MW every year to meet the demand. Unfortunately, 2030 is six years away and we are still at about 5,000MW, so let us focus on generating the balance 71,496MW between now and 2030. It can be estimated that the average cost for adding a Mega Watt of electricity is US$1.5million. This demonstrates the resources required in power supply to develop and particularly industrialize any country on a sustainable manner, are large. Based on this index, it therefore can be estimated that Nigeria would have to invest a whopping US$107 billion to generate 71,496MW by 2030. The financial requirement is phenomenal.

    Majority of the population rely on diesel generator leading to environmental pollution and inflation in the prices of goods and services. This poor electricity supply has been a barrier to private investment in the country.

    The needs for affordable, reliable and sustainable energy have led to transformation in the way energy is generated, transmitted and distributed. It has changed from a passive one-directional system to an active, multi-directional system. In this transformation consumers can now produce, manage and own generation assets. Many households now have solar photovoltaic on their rooftops and some are owners of off-site generators such as wind turbines.

    The ever-increasing population and growing demand for electricity in Nigeria has put great pressure on the existing conventional generations and there is urgent need for other alternative energy resources. Localised energy systems which have been prevalent in the UK and Europe remain the most viable solution to tackle the pressing challenges of lack of reliable, environmentally friendly and sustainable electricity supply in Nigeria.

    Currently, the price of renewable energy generation is gradually reducing and thus will help to achieve better energy access. It is obvious that population growth will always be greater than the existing generation and distribution capacity. Therefore, renewable generation and storage remains the most viable option.

    Localised energy system is a medium-sized electricity generation system of capacity not larger than 50MW connected to a local distribution network. Localised generations are connected close to the load which is responsible for losses reduction in the network.

    Local energy systems provide electricity for different categories of customers for domestic and commercial uses. Localised energy system will encourage different groups in the society to come together and invest in energy sectors.

  • On Professor Isaac Adewole’s 70th birth anniversary!

    On Professor Isaac Adewole’s 70th birth anniversary!

    Professor Isaac Folorunso Adewole, obstetrician, gynaecologist, academic, administrator and former Minister of Health, is 70 years old. So, congratulations to the Ilesa, Osun State-born role model for the youths who rose to become the 11th substantive Vice Chancellor of the University of Ibadan.

    Longevity is the currency of life! Biblical researchers have confirmed that Psalm 90:10, which puts seventy years as the ‘benchmark’ of human life, was a Psalm written by Prophet Moses, who was recorded to have died at 120 years. By interpretation, therefore, God’s own words remain 120 years!

    Read Also; Don’t leave host community in ruins, Tinubu warns lithium investors

    Genesis 6:3 but divided into three parts for Moses: 40 years in Egypt; 40 years in Midian; and 40 years to fulfill his mission as the messiah to the Nation of Israel. As we can therefore see, Adewole is just in the middle space of life, stepping into the last decade of the second part of life! After all, Moses began his real destiny fulfillment at 80!

    Now that the once-little bird is now an eagle soaring, may the Stone of Israel grant Professor Isaac Folorunso Adewole the uncommon grace of perfect fulfillment in the last lap of life’s purposes!

    May the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, grant us peace in Nigeria!