Category: Opinion

  • Kogi: ‘How can supreme court do this to Nigeria & democracy?’

    The judgment of the Supreme Court determining the governorship tussle involving Captain Idris Wada, Hon. James Faleke and Alhaji Yahaya Bello was surprising to say the least.

    In the judgment given on September 20, 2016, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Wada and Faleke and affirmed Bello as Governor of Kogi State.

    To my mind, this judgment – along with the judgments of the Court of Appeal and the Election Petition Tribunal – is bizarre and not in keeping with the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended).

    One is hard pressed to avoid the conclusion that in reaching its decision the Supreme Court relied on manufactured technicalities that did damage to the letter and the spirit of our laws.

    The judgment contradicts the previous judgment of apex court in CPC v Ombugadu (2013) 18 NWLR (1385) 16; Gbileve v Addingi (2014) 16 NWLR (1433) 56; Eligwe v Okpokiri (2015) 2 NWLR (1443) 348; Jev v Iyortom (2015) 15 NWLR (1483) 484 where the provisions of Section 141 of the Electoral Act was applied to the effect that a candidate cannot be declared the winner of an election in which he did not participate in all stages of the election.

    In deciding in favour of Bello, the Supreme Court basically nullified the provisions of Section 141 of the Electoral Act and reversed itself per the judgments given in the above cited cases. The Supreme Court has basically returned to its holding in Amaechi v Omehia, which is what Section 141 was enacted to prevent.

    In deciding in favour of Bello, the Supreme Court has basically violated the principle of Separation of Powers and usurped the role of the legislature.

    It is public knowledge that Faleke wrote letters to his party withdrawing as a deputy governor candidate to Yahaya Bello. Upon the refusal of his party to write to INEC informing them of Faleke’s withdrawal, he did so directly by writing to INEC informing them of his decision to withdraw as a deputy governorship candidate to Bello.

    In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court (and indeed the lower courts) completely ignored these facts. Instead, it surprisingly held that Faleke’s withdrawal was unknown to law.

    This assertion basically allows the APC to enjoy the benefits of its wrong doing. How is this legal? How is this equitable?

    Again, one is hard pressed to avoid the conclusion that the Supreme Court deliberately disregarded the fact of Bello’s withdrawal to enable it reach a pre-determined conclusion. It does not seem legal or equitable, that a Court can acknowledge the wrong-doing of a party yet allow the party to benefit from such wrong-doing.

    While we wait for the Supreme Court to give reasons for its decision, we can only accept the reality of 3 more years on tepid, uninspiring leadership from Yahaya Bello in Kogi State.

    Under Yahaya Bello’s leadership, Kogi State is racking up debts in billions of Naira with no commensurate infrastructural or developmental gains to show for it. Despite collecting billions of Naira worth of bailout funds, the state still owes several months’ salaries. As it stands, Yahaya Bello is currently leading Nigeria down a path of indebtedness and financial ruin as similar to Osun.

    God bless Kogi State.

    Deji Adeyanju

  • Who stands with Asiwaju

    Who stands with Asiwaju

    “He wanted to become the President and never wanted to relinquish regional power, was the world created for him alone?”;”He was a thief too because he was making One kobo on every bottle of Coke?”; “If he was a selfless and prudent leader, why did he build one house at Oke Bola in Ibadan, another one in Apapa-Lagos yet another one in his home town in Ikene?”

    “He was in the cult; he led us astray, he was too rigid, he was an alien, his wife was a witch, he was originally from Dahomey, he was a wizard and too power conscious”.

    The legendary ‘Yoruba Ronu’ exponent late Hubert Ogunnde warned of imminent backwardness in the face of pull-down syndrome and unbridled envy amongst the Yoruba political class. The late ace comedian Gbenga Adeboye and fuji maestro Sikiru Ayinde Barrister also separately described the Yoruba race as one that is wise, intelligent but riddled with disposition of vain expectations from human what even an angel cannot meet.

    During the travail of late Chief M.K.O. Abiola, while the nation burns in agitation for actualisation of the ‘June 12’ mandate, some eminent Yoruba leaders were spotted in and around Aso Rock romancing the late dark-google General to foist any attempt to let Bashorun Abiola off the hook of the ‘khaki boys’. When the business mogul and philanthropist finally died in detention, Yorubas were fast to say “afterall he was an International Thief Thief man according to late Fela Anikulapo”. Abiola was described as a man that sponsored several coups and therefore deserved to die in a coup circumstance. They claimed he had too many wives and children. While Abiola was being honoured globally for laying down his life for Nigeria to entrench a democracy, his kinsmen were busy scoring him low on the pages of history.

    However, nature has way of raising banners before God and men for those who truly distinguished themselves. While Awolowo and Abiola became known and remembered for their roles in our nation, those who envied their historical records had settled in the dust of history. Awolowo and Abiola paid their dues and will forever be remembered among those who have made significant impacts in the political sphere of our country.

    What does Tinubu owe us?

    Indisputably, this era has provided yet another hero for the Yoruba race in the political sphere. The nation unanimously agreed that Tinubu’s expertise dislodged incumbent federal government to install a progressive opposition. Before then, he had held political space consistently as leader of liberation movement with astonishing records evidently.

    Tinubu’s legendary has now surpassed Nigeria’s political space having been recognised as one of the most influential personality in the world and among most powerful political leader on the continent.

    The truism that “no leader is successful until he produces equally competent and successful leader(s)” has been proven to test in Asiwaju’s case. Not only has he produced second successive outstanding Governors in Lagos State, he has equally raised high profile lieutenants that are presently occupying significant political offices across board; all of them equally competent and powerful. What does Tinubu owe us?

    Popular with our brand of politics is the pull-down syndrome rather than rally round a successful one to score a point for our growing democracy. Topmost amongst Tinubu’s political enemies today are his kinsmen and those who have once been favoured by his political dynasty. His political influence is so enormous that he made those who never dreamt of attaining a political feat reach power, this after he must have discovered their leadership potentials which in itself is a great leadership quality.

    The silent gang up is hard to imagine. Tinubu is a politician who recognises political freedom and acknowledged that political space is meant for nothing but for contest and prove-of-strength. Hiding and ganging up strength to fight his popularity is not politics but sycophancy. Let anyone who opposes Tinubu come out from the hiding, declare opposition and allow a contest. As a Jagaban, he has never been afraid of contest. He knows the rules of the game. He contest, he does not fight. A gentleman and generous living legend he is.

    Those who think they can assemble from the back stage to launch political attack against Tinubu need to suspect a more ground breaking onslaught from the loyalists among his reigning political empire. This is not a fight for Tinubu, but a fight for the real progressives who uphold loyalty as guiding principle from day one they enrolled in Asiwaju’s political and leadership institute.

    Personally, I want to believe all rumours linking former Governors of Lagos Raji Fashola, Ekiti Kayode Fayemi, Rivers Rotimi Amechi and present Governor of Ogun State Ibikunle Amosun to the political ambush better remain rumours and rumours for ever. They are gentlemen. Rather than ambuscade, let anyone in doubt flow a political party, establish a lead and show the world how to sustain a political empire.

    Undoubtedly, even Mr President who has a proven integrity and fear of God is not expected to stand against Asiwaju at this crucial moment save for the vultures trying to hijack his political influence to submerge popular opinion such as seen in Kogi and the Senate among other references within the party.

    Every coup against Tinubu has always vindicated him and vindictive of the traitors. As it is, Nigeria sees the Senate under a Saraki and the ongoing polarisation in the national progressive camp simply because a man’s achievements are grossly envied by those who cannot half his records even if they live and do politics for a decade more.

    Tinubu’s many sacrifices are unusual. His contributions to political and national development are unequalled in this generation. His legacies for Nigeria’s democracy will take another decade to see its like. His influence across all industries and strata are not a coincidence. The growth of his political reign has witnessed ingenuity, hard work, commitment to the masses, love for the country, firm believe in team work and exceptional gifts ordained by God. He never fought clandestinely; he does not do illicit pattern. He just owned his game.

    Today, we have an icon that is already a living legend. Those who truly believe Asiwaju is a worthy leader and benefactor should wait for no other time to stand with their leader. I stand with Asiwaju. The forces at the national stage and the domesticated ones in Lagos cannot be greater than the grace of God upon this enigma called Tinubu.

    For the Yoruba race, for sure it takes another century before we see like of Asiwaju again. What do we stand for at the moment? Celebrating our own glory or settling for otherwise which is far less a decision?

    Olulade is a member of the Lagos State House of Assembly, representing Epe Constituency II

     

     

  • Understanding Osogbo’s flash flood

    Eid El Kabir holiday on Tuesday September 13 was marred by the torrential rainfall and the flash flooding recorded in parts of Osogbo that fateful day.

    Actually, it was the culmination of the downpour that had commenced few days earlier in fits and spasms of drizzles and short bursts of heavy rain interspersed with occasional deceptive sunshine lasting for few minutes, that soon gave way to clouds and then rain.

    However, after a scorching noonday sun gave the false impression of a hot day, the sun soon retreated as the cloud spread its dark blanket over the sky, and for four hours or thereabout, it rained heavily and non-stop with increasing intensity. The aftermath was the flash flooding recorded in some parts of the capital city like Rasco, Gbonmi, Oke Onitea and Testing Ground. As is the nature of flash floods, the water receded about two hours after the rain. This regrettably was not until after wreaking havoc. At Oke-Onitea, a middle-aged man, Elder Ebenezer Olabode, was swept away by the monstrous water. This, according to The Nation and other media accounts, was due to his insistence on wading through the water with his car, against all entreaties to turn back, before running into a ditch, and in the effort to escape from his vehicle, was washed away by the waters. Well, the circumstances of his death are academic now. Every life is precious. May God grant his family the fortitude to bear the loss and repose his soul.

    Many property (and thankfully no lives) were lost at other places that witnessed the flash flood, especially at Rasco and Gbonmi.

    However, the torrential rain of Tuesday September 13, as terrifying as it sounds, was only partly responsible for the flood. Before that Tuesday, Asa Dam in Kwara State had opened its valves which water flowed into Eko Ende and Eko Ajala in Ifelodun Local Government before emptying into Owala Dam in Okinni, in Egbedore Local Government, all in Osun. When Owala could not hold the water, it was then opened to Osogbo waterways. The water from Owala Dam had not receded before the heavens opened and it was the combination of the two waters that overwhelmed the drainage system in Osogbo and caused the flooding.

    Rain is one of the acts of God that humans have little or no control over beyond anticipating its consequences and evacuating humans and valuables on the path of the flood it brings. For instance, Lagos and parts of Ogun, being below sea level, is beyond question they will experience flooding every year during the raining season.

    Even advanced countries are not spared the impact of flooding. I shudder to remember the 2005 Hurricane Katrina which submerged not less than 80 per cent of New Orleans with water as high as 15 metres and which killed nearly 1,500 people. This was after more than 90 per cent of the city had been evacuated before the water came.

    In 2013, more than 100,000 people were displaced in Europe when the Elbe River overflowed its bank after heavy rainfall. The New York Times also reported on June 2 this year that following heavy downpour, flooding surged through Europe in which thousands were displaced and not less than nine persons killed between France and Germany.

    But the flash flood in Osogbo could have been worse. Before the coming of the Aregbesola administration, flooding in Osogbo and other parts of the state was an annual ritual. But the administration has since 2011 been dredging and desilting the rivers, streams, rivulets and waterways in the state.

    The continuous effort had seen the government clear a cumulative total of 270 kilometres of waterways and removed 4.3 million metric tonnes of sand and debris so far. This also includes clearing gutters and road islands of sand and particles. The project has so far cost the government N2.6 billion of its meagre resources, out of which N1.2 billion is still owed contractors.

    The years 2011 and 2013 were particularly eventful in that not a single incident of flooding was recorded in Osun even when Oyo, Ogun and Lagos States had the worst flooding in recent times. Even the heavy rains that had brought serious flooding to Ogun and Lagos states earlier this year had spared Osun and the residents of the flood prone areas in Osogbo had taken it for granted before Tuesday’s deluge.

    The government’s response to flooding has not been restricted to just clearing waterways. As part of the general environmental and urban renewal policy of the state, some buildings on waterways have been taken out. Others were earmarked for same. The lining of the waterways is also in the works. This is estimated to cost N44 billion. It is my sincere hope that the Federal Government will come to the aid of the state on this.

    Beyond remedial measures, we need also to look at the man-made aspect of the tragedy. Dumping refuse on waterways, stacking building materials, especially sand, and erecting buildings on waterways and floodplains are clear invitation to flooding. Flood will naturally occur when there is obstruction to free flow of water.

    From the pictures – motion and still – projected in the media, it is evident that all the buildings flooded, especially at Rasco and Gbonmi in Osogbo were either built on flood plain or too close to the bank of moving waters. This is the fruit of the physical planning failure of the past. We won’t be talking of flooding of houses and destruction of property if the regulation on planning had been followed. The government is deemed to be wiser than the people and should save them from their self-destructive acts. Therefore, it must summon the political will to do the needful once and for all and prevent future occurrence.

    While we are still grappling with the aftermath of the flash flood, it is most disheartening that the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) went to town to celebrate the disaster in a ‘we-now-have-something-against-Aregbesola’ false triumphalism. What kind of people make political capital out of a natural disaster that befell the people? In civilised societies, politics are put aside and everyone begins to lend a helping hand.

    Then they falsely allege, as is their usual practice, that the state government collected ecological funds from the Federal Government and misappropriated it. But the truth is that the Aregbesola’s administration never got a dime of ecological funds from the PDP Federal Government in its nearly six years. As things stand, the N12 billion outstanding ecological funds owed Osun has received approval for payment from the Buhari administration, but this is yet to be cash backed.

    I will like to appeal again to the Federal Government to release this sum to the state, for it to be able to pay its contractors and continue the good works it has done so far. As we speak, earth moving machines have been deployed to the waterways and clearing the sand and other materials impeding free flow of water.

    The flood notwithstanding, environmental sanitation and flood control has been one of the success stories of the Aregbesola administration.

     

    • Fasure lives in Osogbo
  • One year of Akwa Ibom’s Dakkada

    Precisely on September 23, 2015 at the Godswill Akpabio International Stadium Complex, Governor Udom Emmanuel of Akwa Ibom State launched the famous Dakkada Philosophy. The initiative was meant to chart a new course of greatness for the state believed to be named after the Qua Iboe River.

    The governor must have been convinced, and rightly so, that there is hardly any progress anyone could make in life without a strong belief in the self-concept. There is a consensus of opinion among experts that human beings are powerful and are likely to accomplish whatever they set their minds at achieving. Even among the religious, the Tower of Babel in the Bible is one of the examples often cited to prove that unity and determination are strong factors in helping humans to achieve their goals, even if it meant building a tower to reach heaven.

    So, the whole essence of the Dakkada creed is a call to unity and determination, a clarion call to encourage indigenes of Akwa Ibom State to believe in themselves and take their destinies in their hands in order to realize their full potentials.

    There couldn’t have been a better time to instil a sense of patriotism and self inputs in a people whose main economic activities are fishing, farming, trading, artisanship and white-collar services – although a large population of the people are also in other parts of the world either blazing the trails, or in search of the proverbial greener pastures.

    Yes, the Dakkada creed is a creed of greatness, of motivation.  It is a creed to jettison mediocrity for excellence in every sense of the word.  It is a clarion call on all Akwa Ibom sons and daughters to ignite their love for their state and the nation. Going by the creed, the people should always believe that they could accomplish anything good as individuals. The creed believes in the potential of every Akwa Ibomite to unleash their potentials.

    It may be difficult for anyone to fault the importance of focus as an essential ingredient in the desire for greatness either as an individual, state or a corporate entity.  So, it is not unusual that the governor’s initiative is being commended.

    No doubt, it is good for governments to have policies that will be their driving forces. And it is commendable that a creed like the Dakkada is not being seen as a mere government policy but a philosophy that people could buy into, something that could be well formed in their sub-consciousness. Attitudinal change is pivotal to experiencing growth and development especially in an underdeveloped economy as Nigeria’s. Everyone should be involved in lifting the nation’s economy from the doldrums.

    The government should constantly carry the people along for the Dakkada philosophy to work effectively. Thankfully, the governor is seizing the period of the celebration of the 29th anniversary of the state created on September 23, 1987, to mark the one year celebration of the Dakkaba creed. It should not end there. Government should use this anniversary to appraise its effectiveness in galvanizing the people of Akwa Ibom towards greatness.

    The creed itself is seen by many as a stimulus for the actualisation of the governor’s five-point agenda of job creation, poverty alleviation, wealth creation, economic and political inclusion as well as infrastructural consolidation and expansion. It will be recalled that the first thing the governor did when he got to power in 2015 was to assemble a technical team of experts to drive his administration’s development plans.

    Also, at his inaugural speech on May 29, 2015, the governor had asked every person from the state to “come with their hoes and shovels to bury the twin evils of ethnicity and tribalism,” which according to him, are capable of slowing the state down in the race of development. He had also advised the people to sow the seeds of brotherhood, love and unity to energise the people of the state to   maintain their current momentum and leadership position.  He had told the people to “remember that with the spirit of brotherhood, love and unity, no foe can defeat us, and no rival can overtake us.’’

    But, the spirit of patriotism is not enough to build a state. It is laudable that the governor has put in place a think-tank of tested and qualified professionals with sound administrative acumen to assist in moving the state forward. The administration’s free and compulsory education policy; free health care services for pregnant women; children between age zero and five and the aged; in addition to other welfare packages for the people, are also commendable.

    No doubt the administration has recorded some accomplishments across all sectors of the economy. With a budgetary allocation of N65.42bn in 2015 state appropriation and N91.8bn in 2016, infrastructural development and road construction, bridges and drainages have remained some of the priorities of the administration.

    And  to mark the one year of the Dakkada creed, the governor has said he would be flagging off the construction of 19.3 kilometres Anua-Mbak-Ishiet Road; construction of Ikpe Ikot Nkon-Obotme-Arochukwu Road;  and construction of 17.4 km Odoro Ikpe Mbiabet Ikpe-Mbiabet Ikot Udo Road [Rice Mill Road] with 30m span bridge. All these, according to the governor are targeted at making the state self-sufficient.

    Indeed, the step being taken towards the industrialization of the state via construction of major roads, infrastructural developments and agricultural schemes including the Cocoa production scheme are all steps that can accelerate the state’s journey towards its desired destination of greatness. If these steps are sustained, the journey to greatness of Akwa Ibom state may be nearer than what is being imagined.

    It is very important for political office holders to know that mobilising people for greatness must go hand in hand with development schemes to achieve government’s goals and objectives.

    The people should constantly be at the centre of every government policy. It is not enough to ask people to think great thoughts. The leadership must do its own part. The easiest way to get the cooperation of the citizens is by doing things that will make them happy.

    Leaders should learn to fulfil their part of the bargain in order to commit the citizenry to do their part.  It is a two-way thing. A government that strives to meet the needs of its people will not struggle to earn their confidence and cooperation.

     

    • George wrote via georgemomah@gmail.com
  • Zuckerberg, Nigerian economy and power of ideas

    Few weeks back, famous co- founder of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, visited Nigeria. The visit was completely devoid of the traditional fanfare often associated with such high profile visits. For most part of his stay, Zuckerberg was in the company of ordinary Nigerian folks. Seeing him completely at home in the company of regular Nigerian youths kept one wondering if this is, indeed, the genius who created the globally acclaimed billion dollar-brand  that has effectively integrated the world into a truly global village. It is instructive that despite being a leading global entrepreneur, Zuckerberg’s lifestyle doesn’t in any way reflect his stupendously wealthy pedigree.

    Let me, however state that the essence of this piece is not to celebrate Zuckerberg’s simplicity. Rather, it is to call attention to what, in my opinion, has turned Zuckerberg into a captivating global phenomenon. And this is the power of ideas. Famous Nigerian success coach and motivational speaker, Sam Adeyemi, once affirmed, and rightly so, that ideas rule the world. The quality of ideas available in a given society determines the quality of life and opportunities available in such society.

    Many people seem not to understand that the quality of our lives as human beings is substantially a reflection of the quality of ideas we generate. Many still seem not to comprehend that the ideas which we conceive, like kola in Igbo culture, is life in itself. It is the kind of ideas that we give to our space that it gives back to us. No more, no less. Zuckerberg invented Facebook in his twenties and as a university undergraduate. Thanks to the strength and depth of his idea, today, he ranks among the world top billionaires. The source of his kind of wealth is quite instructive for the average Nigerian youth. His wealth was founded and driven on the power of ideas.

    Presently, our nation is passing through a painful economic route. Oil, which has been our major source of revenue for decades, no longer commands huge financial status in the international market. Even if it still does, Niger-Delta militants’ activities remain a major worry.  So, we are stuck; wallowing in self-pity and indulging in destructive blame game that leads to nowhere. But the Zuckerberg model has shown us clearly that having fertile and bright minds is better than possession of billions of oil wells. The utility of the latter is tied to the earlier. Without the required human resource, whatever prosperity that any nation possesses will eventually amount to nothing. This, sadly, is the story of Nigeria.

    Without bright ideas, there cannot be innovations. And it is innovations that bring development. Innovation is the natural by-product of idea. Innovation is the prime basis for socio-economic progression in any society. We must be under no illusion. Societies that fail to harness the power of innovation will eventually become the customers of those that do.  There is no magic about it. Our economy is presently at comatose because we have relegated innovation to the background for a long time. Rather, we celebrate overnight billionaires with no visible entrepreneurial and cerebral pedigree while we sentence our younger folks with bright ideas to a life of misery and frustration.

    A failure to frame and harness innovation might consign future generations of Nigerians to material dependency on those nations that had seized the mantle when they had the opportunity. We must be able to create an environment in which young entrepreneurs can come up with the most innovative products and services. Innovation is a journey. But it is an endless one. For us to be relevant in the emerging world order, we must ensure that our youth keep thinking, developing and working.

    To integrate innovation into our daily living, we must take on a leading role in promoting science, technology and modernism as core policy areas that not only hold the key to the future, but could also make our nation one of the continent’s innovation leaders.

    It is only in successfully doing this that we could effectively harness the untapped potentials of our youth, thereby unearthing our numerous but hidden Mark Zuckerbergs.  In Zuckerberg’s own words: “This trip has really blown me away by the talents of young entrepreneurs and developers in this country, and making a difference and making a change. It reminds me of when I wanted to start Facebook. I wasn’t starting a company at the time but wanted to build something to see if it would work. And that is what I see people here do, pushing through challenges, building things that you want to see in the world. You are not just going to change Nigeria and the whole of Africa but the whole world.”

    The future belongs to ideas and ideas naturally feel right with the youth. It is in realization of this that Zuckerberg, perhaps, shunned older key players in the nation’s telecommunication and media industry and chose to rather associate with the youth as he understands that the future can only be driven by young talents.

    If we are to ensure that the next generation of our compatriots is not a wasted one, we need to change our values system as a people. This is the time to raise and nurture young folks with innovative mind-sets.  As previously asserted, idea is the engine that transforms the way we live and think. The advanced economies of the world were founded and being sustained on great socio-political and economic ideas.

    Fifty years ago, controversial American physicist, historian and philosopher, Thomas Samuel Kuhn, coined the term ‘paradigm shift’. What he was referring to then is the moment when our worldview essentially alters as a result of a new idea. For our nation to truly experience a feasible ‘paradigm shift’ from adversity to prosperity, this is time to invest in new ideas that could positively shape our future.

     

    • Ogunbiyi is of the Ministry of Information & Strategy, Alausa, Ikeja.
  • What does the President carry in his pocket?

    There is this apocryphal tale that the President of the United States of America, said to be our planet’s most powerful country, travels carrying a bag that holds the key to war and peace in the world. It is claimed that the briefcase contains the code the US leader may unravel to release the huge atomic arsenal of God’s Own Country in the event of an attack.

    If he’s away from the US and he’s briefed on his hotline, all he does to enable a lethal hit-back is to go for the bag and probably a key in his pocket. But if he wants peace, he simply allows his pocket be at peace.

    Early in 2016 however, sitting President Barack Obama spiked this story of one man playing  God, one man who upon a cryptic call thousands of kilometres from Washington, can decide the fate of billions of souls worldwide, can trigger a contest to destroy mankind. He told a YouTube interviewer that all he holds in the trousers pocket are harmless mementoes, none approximating a nuclear lock.

    The gay broadcaster Ingrid Nilsen fired the question that laid all bare: what does President Obama carry in his pocket? The US leader dug into his right trouser pocket and out came an assortment of keepsakes: a rosary given to him by Pope Francis, a tiny Buddha, a metal poker chip he said he got from ‘a bald biker with weird mustache’ in 2007, a Coptic Cross from Ethiopia and a Hindu statuette of monkey god.

    A strange collection for a head of state to carry! But he says when he feels tired or discouraged as he battles American and global headaches he reaches into the pocket for relief and mental refreshment. According to Obama, they inspire him and help him “get back to work”.

    Now after thrilling myself with Obama’s revelation and observing the travels of our own President Muhammadu Buhari, I have begun to wonder what the Nigerian leader also takes along in the trousers under his flowing agbada. Surely Buhari, the leader of the world’s most populous black nation, would have run into numerous people and well-wishers who would deposit some gifts with him after each encounter.

    It is doubtful though if this Spartan ex-general would encumber himself with the sentimental symbolism that these oddities appear to stand for.

    By the way, Buhari being a devout Muslim would not be expected to be a devotee of images. Islam forbids any appearance of idol adoration which the possession or admiration of a metal bust suggests. Not known to be a faith extremist, Buhari would nevertheless not lend himself to breach Islam’s tenets on images.

    So what does our president carry in his pocket? We can safely submit he carries with him his prayer beads. These would encourage and animate him, not weigh him down as heavy metal trinkets might. If he’s away from home in Nigeria and unpalatable news reaches him, the president can go for the supplication chain in his pocket and cry to God for help .If the Nigerian leader is at a gathering where it may look out of place to pull out the tesbiu to pray for Nigeria, I think the president, while silently praying, can simply press his fingers against the beads in the pocket for assurance that God is always there for Nigeria. There can’t be a greater source of succour.

    This reminds me of an undercover policeman who went to a newspaper house to arrest an editor and one of his deputies in the dark days of military dictator Sani Abacha. He and colleagues failed to get their quarries and in exasperation as the journalists milled about in defiance, the officer kept on touching his trouser pocket for assurance that a pistol was within reach for action if the newsmen tried to be heroic.

    But President Buhari has gone beyond the age of personal metallic security the pistol stands for. He enjoys what they now call virtual security surveillance.

    Buhari must travel light; he must guard against adding to the burden brought on him daily by worrying about his 170 million compatriots.

    Ironically, Obama says he shifts the lumbering weight and stress of office on to the metals he carries around. They are items from two groups of people: fellow Americans and those from outside keeping a partisan watch on his conduct. The mementoes therefore are not hollow tokens.

    When they tinkle in the pocket, they assume a cry urging the president not to fail to deliver. Obama sees them as citizens groaning and prompting him to remember his campaign promises.

    So what should our own Buhari carry in his pocket?

    In Nigeria the underclass like Obama’s “bald biker” would not enjoy space enough to pump a gift into the president’s palm. So let’s rule out such precious experience.

    Now there are more inspiring items Buhari needs to have with him as he travels. He must have an independent record of what the citizens say of him and his government beyond what the media report and what his aides tell him. When he’s taken up and down in his numerous trips in and out of Nigeria, let him observe closely the palpable frown and anxiety on the faces of his people. Let him breach protocol by showing up unannounced at public places at odd hours. Let him make random calls to fellow Nigerians and to interactive radio and TV shows. Let him follow it up with visits to the people in their homes and offices.

    What Buhari comes up with is what he would put in black and white and carry about to reorient and inspirit him.

    Babatunde Raji Fashola, the man Buhari has picked to oversee three utility departments, attributes his phenomenal success as Lagos governor to a pact he struck with a small document he called Black Book. He packed it with his campaign promises along with ’little things’ he observed among the people. He had the book as his companion wherever he went. Each time the heaviness of work seemed to overwhelm him, Fashola would fetch the book in his sokoto. Reinvigorated, he would say like Obama: “I better get back to work”.

    Let President Muhammadu Buhari also carry with him ‘little things’, not in his pocket, not in his briefcase, nor in his iPad. He should keep his own Black Book in his heart. No safer place to secure a sacred treasure! The ancient Latin scholars called such dear notes vade mecum (carry me wherever you go).

     

    • Ojewale is a writer and journalist in Ota, Ogun State.
  • Fayose, Ize-Iyamu and Edo guber election

    There must be some extraordinary milestones in the journey of a people at which point their leaders periodically pause for deeper reflections; it is expected that at such moments, that those invested with the responsibility of guiding the destiny of their communities will abstain, even temporarily , from the seduction of political theatres, that no responsible leader would deliberately seek to overheat the political landscape, to saturate civil discourse with mendacious tales manufactured to mislead the electorate and, consequently ignite civil disorder. Such a minimum conduct should be a binding obligation especially in circumstances where the situation could trigger a state of insecurity in the polity. After all, one of the foremost tasks of governance is the protection of lives and property of the citizenry.

    Regrettably, it seems that such a refined paradigm of humane contemplation in public affairs is far beyond the horizon of the likes of Governor Ayodele Fayose of Ekiti State. Fayose, who has become a noxious embarrassment to Ekiti and even to some members of his own political party, recently, swam across Rivers Ogbese and Osei to pollute the waters of Edo State. As events relating to security reports and, consequently, hints of possible postponement of Edo State’s 2016 Governorship Election were unfolding, Fayose immediately took on the role of a harbinger for doomsday. On the fateful Wednesday, September 7 , the news ‘breaking ‘ all over Edo State that grave security reports available to the Department of State Services (DSS) and the Police could necessitate a change in the gubernatorial election date from Saturday, September 10 to some weeks later.

    As most responsible leaders in alliance with peace and democracy-loving people of Edo State patiently waited to comprehend the rapidly evolving scenarios from INEC and the security agencies, the all-knowing ‘Fayoses’ of the world had jumped on the drama stage, beating the drum of tension.  Fayose along with some other famously discredited PDP voices engaged in jaundiced analysis of the unfolding situation and offered lugubrious conclusions. In his desperate quest for central relevance in the 2019 national PDP calculus, Fayose completely threw caution to the winds, not giving any thoughts to the consequential harm that his comments could inflict on the polity.

    He hastily told the media that the postponement of Edo election was an APC plot for the purpose of perfecting its rigging strategy. How can a state chief executive make such a potential crisis- generating statement without a shred of evidence? While it is a disappointing conduct, the theatrics is not totally surprising. The governor with apparent psychopathic penchant for verbal recklessness and shameless demagoguery further said that the APC was about to destroy the ‘’ legacy of free, fair and credible electoral process bequeathed on the country by the PDP’’. On what planet has Fayose been dwelling in the past 16 years? For anyone to so endow the PDP with the attributes of qualitative and virtuous democracy is the zenith of historical impunity. Coincidentally , the ‘Fayoses’ of our polity wallowed in the planet of impunity for decades until some wise ‘Asiwajus’ and other committed national patriots created an unprecedented African model of responsible opposition alliance called the APC.

    Governor Fayose and the likes of Edo State factional PDP governorship candidate Osagie Ize-Iyamu are engaged in hallucinatory flights and hoping to block the surging wave of progressive history. Ize –Iyamu, former Chief of Staff and later Secretary to the State Government in the remarkable fiasco called Lucky Igbinedion’s regime (1999-2007), is trying to garner political credits by imputing murky motives for the postponement of the Saturday 10 election. Ize-Iyamu ought to understand that the attempt by the PDP to manufacture conspiracy tales out of the postponement cannot displace the authentic narratives of the wreckage of the vandalized lives and economy that he (Ize-Iyamu) left behind as ‘’co-governor’’ under Lucky Igbinedion.

    Edo voters will not suddenly abandon the issues of deficit of trust for PDP; their memory will not suddenly be wiped out on how their salaries and pensions lagged in arrears and situations of whole communities cut off from neighbours during raining season due to poor state of the roads. Their reflection will remain vibrant on how their children were cramped into dilapidating structures called schools under Ize-Iyamu-Igbinedion government and how such major assets like the Bendel Brewery, Bendel Feed and Flour Mills as well as Bendel Line were either used to obtain huge loans which was rechannelled to private pockets or sold to enrich some individuals. That was the past under PDP and Ize-Iyamu is yet to honestly explain how the future will be different under his government.

    Therefore, the attempt to make the postponement of the election the central issue for the voters is an illusory political adventure that will end up in a landslide defeat of the PDP on September 28.

    It appears that Fayose has forged a blood pact with Ize-Iyamu in the effort to destabilize Edo State since both are allegedly inspiring disorderly reaction to INEC’s decision to postpone the election.

    It is understandable that both Fayose and Ize-Iyamu will see common ground in their approach to INEC’s decision; the two PDP members are beneficiaries of the odiously unforgettable culture of impunity under former National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki. Fayose is yet to give credible accounting for the billions of naira allegedly plundered from Nigeria’s security vote and, smuggled through Akure airport into the governor’s custody. Some of the loot was supposedly funnelled into Fayose’s re-election bid in 2014. And this is the same Fayose who is now alleging that the APC was destroying the legacy of democracy because INEC gave considerate weight to serious intelligence estimate by the DSS and the Police regarding Edo election.

    Is the Dasuki-Fayose four billion naira mafia-like money laundering operation the standard practice for the kind of democratic legacy that our nation should preserve? Like Fayose, Ize-Iyamu is yet to comprehensively respond to allegations of an estimated one-billion naira, also from ‘’ Dasuki’s Central Bank ATM ‘’. The people of Edo State are still left with puzzling questions about the exact role of the factional PDP candidate as the identified principal character in the approximate one billion naira scandal. It must be said that Fayose has no redeeming political value just like Ize-Iyamu, both of them are birds of identical plumage and would therefore flock on similar flight of political disaster.

    With the postponement of the election, (protesting) parents of children scheduled to write WAEC initially on the same date felt some sense of relief for their children. APC was ready for the election hence the party held it’s very successful grand finale rally at the Samuel Ogbemudia stadium on Tuesday September 6 with an unprecedented crowd of party supporters and APC leaders across the country in attendance.

    From the ward level to the senatorial apex, the organizational machinery of the party was in top gear and calibrated for overwhelming victory. APC governorship candidate Godwin Obaseki however told supporters in a message that while he was formidably confident that APC would have indisputably emerged victorious on that Saturday, he does not wish to put the” lives of voters and the general population at risk for any reason’’.

    For Ize-Iyamu and Fayose, it seems that they would rather jettison the advice of the security agencies and ‘bully’ INEC to hold a poorly-supervised election with NYSC members refusing to cooperate because of deficient security arrangements.

    September 28 is here already;  the trajectory of the Rainbow of victory steadily points in the direction of the APC, none of these hallucinatory somersaults by the Ize-Iyamus and Fayoses will change the resolute determination of Edo people to vote for a continuing energetic march on the terrain of progress. There will be no going back to the years of bondage under the PDP.

  • Whose idea is Change Begins With Me?

    Dear Editor, I have followed with great interest the allegations of plagiarism made against Alhaji Lai Mohammed, the Honourable Minister of Information and Culture and the rebuttals made by his office. I am constrained to write in respect of same with a view to setting the records straight having had privileged knowledge and information about the conception of the Change Begins With Me campaign.

    I watched the launch of the campaign by President Muhammadu Buhari and silently chuckled to myself that the honourable minister had finally been able to launch it.  It was almost with a sense of de javu as I listened to PMB launch what Alhaji Lai Mohammed had started to conceptualise even before his swearing in as minister for information.

    I was therefore shocked, surprised, bemused, most concerned and puzzled when I read online allegations and strong claims of plagiarism that the change campaign was the brainchild of other people and that the honourable minister has “stolen” their idea and concept.

    I recall very clearly that I met with Alhaji Lai Mohammed on the morning of November 10, 2015 in his hotel suite at the Hilton in Abuja.  It was a day before the swearing in of the cabinet. I had called Alhaji Lai Mohammed seeking a meeting with him primarily to congratulate him on his nomination as a minister and also because of speculation that he was going to be Minister for Information and Communication.

    Alhaji Lai Mohammed was pretty confident that morning that he was going to be assigned the information portfolio but said nothing about communication. I also recall that I had the pleasure of meeting his wife and sister who were also in the suite.

    After exchange of pleasantries and rubbing minds on the state of our nation and expectations of the new cabinet, he gave me a detailed breakdown of his strategic and tactical plans to re-orientate our people to achieve the required paradigm shift and new thinking to take Nigeria to the promised land. His discussion was centred around change and how it needed to be implemented. Alhaji was very clear about the critical role social media would play and he promised that as soon as he settled down, he would seek my assistance to meet with the mobile operators to explore how technology and social media will help propagate the change message and re-orientation of our values.

    Truth be told, I was initially sceptical as it sounded like War Against Indiscipline (WAI) all over again but as he espoused more and more, I understood very clearly what he wanted to achieve and the direction he was going. He was very emphatic and it was the first time I heard “Change begins with me”.

    I committed to helping him and also undertook to rally the mobile telecommunications industry to support in propagating the change message as I was part of the leadership of the Association of Telecommunication Operators of Nigeria  ‘ALTON’ and a senior Executive of MTN Nigeria at the time. After the swearing-in on November 11, 2015, I again met with the Honourable Minister in his office on November 17, 2015 this time in the company of my then Boss, Michael Ikpoki, the immediate former Chief Executive officer of MTN Nigeria. It was a courtesy visit late in the evening at the Ministry of Information. The minister reiterated the change initiative and again sought the cooperation of the mobile industry.

    Shortly after this meeting, I separated from the services of MTN Nigeria Communications Limited. The minister remained in touch and we continued to brainstorm on the change campaign. Sometime in January, I met with the honourable minister at his home on Isaac John Street GRA Ikeja early on a Saturday morning. His son Folajimi also joined us as we did more brainstorming on how best to achieve his objectives. The honourable minister then requested that I prepare a submission for him on how we could deploy technology and social media to drive the change campaign with focus on the youth population.

    We continued to speak and on February 22, at 11.12pm, I sent a deck of slides to aid his engagement with mobile operators for the propagation of the Change Begins With Me campaign.

    On February 23, the honourable minister requested via SMS that I forward the slides to two of his aides namely Segun Adeyemi and Adeleye Williams.

    Electronic communications leave an indelible trace. It is therefore very surprising that anyone would suggest that the Change Begins With Me campaign was not the brainchild of the honourable minister. I state without any equivocation that Alhaji Lai Mohammed had discussed the Change Begins With Me campaign extensively as early as November 10, 2015. It is therefore impossible that the idea of the campaign was first proposed to the minister at a meeting in December. Absolutely impossible.

    I have no doubt that the minister is the subject of unending unsolicited proposals as anyone in a position of authority in Nigeria can testify. Best practice is to have a policy for managing unsolicited proposals.

    I have elected to state the above for the records because I believe it’s the right thing to do.

     

    • Goodluck is a former telecommunications executive.
  • “Saving our ship: Global response to refugees and migrants”

    “Saving our ship: Global response to refugees and migrants”

    Perhaps no issue on the global agenda is more susceptible to manipulation by grandstanding demagogues than refugees and migrants. ‘Us’ versus ‘them’ is a timeless if irresponsible unifier, used throughout history to obscure our common humanity by those with dangerously self-serving interests. The difference now is that more people are on the move than ever before, and in an era when storylines spread with viral speed, we see xenophobia rising and too often erupting into violence.

    This week’s United Nations Summit for Refugees and Migrants represents a breakthrough at a breaking point. With so many shrill voices dominating the debate, governments from around the world are responding in measured tones that can yield real results if promises are kept.

    The Summit marks the first-ever gathering of top leaders to discuss refugees and migrants. It will adopt a groundbreaking consensus agreement: the New York Declaration. Fittingly, that document honours a city renowned for its vibrant diversity,–symbolized by the Statue of Liberty standing tall in New York Harbor. Most importantly, the Declaration sets a principled and pragmatic approach for addressing the challenges of people on the move while upholding our most cherished values.

    The stakes are high. There are 244 million migrants in the world. More than 65 million people are now forcibly displaced. Half of them are children. Refugees running for their lives too often face grave dangers on their journey to safety. When they arrive, many suffer discrimination and even detention. Facing difficulties in a mobile world, they often travel farther in search of safety and stability. But legal pathways are scarce, and unscrupulous smugglers take advantage, charging exorbitant sums for a risky chance to escape.

    Wars are lasting longer and refugees are finding it harder to return home – with the length of displacement in some cases stretching across generations. Contrary to prevailing impressions, the vast majority of refugees are not in rich countries; 86 percent are in the developing world. And the poorer countries hosting refugees do not receive nearly enough help. Last year, United Nations humanitarian appeals received barely more than half the funds that were sought.

    Resettlement options are also a fraction of what they should be. Nearly a million people were identified as needing resettlement in 2015, but just over 100,000 received it.

    The challenges are enormous – but we should not forget the benefits.  With the right approach, refugees and migrants can bring benefits to both their adoptive societies and their home countries. This well-documented upside should not be lost in the debate.

    The New York Declaration should be seen in the wider context of new and ambitious international efforts to improve conditions where people live so they are not forced to leave. Central to this is the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, our global plan for peace and prosperity on a healthy planet. We are also pushing to prevent and resolve conflicts – and to sustain peace once the guns fall silent.

    The Summit will feature testimony from those directly affected. I am especially looking forward to meeting again with an extraordinary young woman I first encountered last month at the Olympic Games in Rio.

    Yusra Mardini is Syrian – but she competed on the new refugee team established for athletes who, like millions of other people around the world, have been forced out of their homelands.

    Before she swam in races, Yusra was in a race to save lives.

    Last year, she left Syria on an overcrowded boat. When its engine died, she dove into the Aegean Sea and started pushing the vessel, along with a few other swimmers among the group. It took a gruelling three hours to reach the shore. They arrived exhausted – but they had proven the power of human solidarity to ferry us to safety.

    Humanity is together in one boat. Stoking fear, blaming the ‘other’ or scapegoating minorities will only increase the dangers for all.

    Wise leaders understand that we should instead endeavour to save everyone, optimize the contributions of each, and steer our common ship to our shared destination: a future of opportunity and dignity for all.

     

    By Ban Ki-moon

    Secretary-General of the United Nations

  • ‘Supreme court must do what is right on Kogi’

    ‘Supreme court must do what is right on Kogi’

    1.    On September 20, 2016 the Supreme Court will determine one of the most brazen attempts to violate the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria when it gives its judgment in the matter of Idris Wada & Others v Yahaya Bello & Others.

    2.    The facts of this case are clear and as such do not require repetition. However, the legal issues are somewhat murky. While our laws did not envisage the scenario caused by the unfortunate death of late Prince Abubakar Audu and do not stipulate the pathway to follow to resolve the quagmire, they are very clear on what not to do in pursuit of a resolution.

    3.    In attempting to resolve the issues thrown up by late Audu’s death, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) aided by the ruling All Progressives’ Congress (APC) took the option most prejudicial to democracy in Nigeria by permitting:

    i.    The substitution of the late APC candidate with Yahaya Bello;
    ii.    Passing off votes cast for the late APC candidate as votes cast for Yahaya Bello;
    iii.    Permitting Yahaya Bello to contest for the supplementary elections without a deputy governorship candidate, and
    iv.    Issuing him a certificate of return in furtherance of (iii) above.

    4.    Without prejudice to all the legal issues relating to this appeal, two fundamental issues can be distilled from the facts, both of which form the basis of our contention that Yahaya Bello ought to have been removed from office by the Kogi State Election Petition Tribunal and the Court of Appeal.

    i.    Were the Tribunal & Court of Appeal right to have upheld the election of Yahaya Bello in light of the provision of Section 141 of the Electoral Act?

    Section 141 provides that the Tribunal or Court shall not under any circumstance declare any person winner of an election if such a person did not fully participate in all stages of the election.

    This provision of law has already been applied and upheld by the apex court in a plethora of cases. These include: CPC v Ombugadu (2013) 18 NWLR (1385) 16; Gbileve v Addingi (2014) 16 NWLR (1433) 56; Eligwe v Okpokiri (2015) 2 NWLR (1443) 348; Jev v Iyortom (2015) 15 NWLR (1483) 484.

    The interpretation given to this section was that while Courts listening to intra-party disputes could declare a person who had not participated in all stages of an election winner, an Election Petition Tribunal or the Court of Appeal sitting as a court of first instance cannot do so.

    The facts are clear and unambiguous. Yahaya Bello did not participate in the elections of November 21st, 2015 where more than 230,000 votes which were allocated to him were cast.

    When the law and the judgments cited above are applied to the facts, it is impossible to reach a conclusion that the Tribunal and the Court of Appeal erred in finding in favour of Yahaya Bello.

    ii.    Were the Tribunal and Court of Appeal right to have held that Yahaya Bello could validly contest an election without nominating a deputy?

    Section 187(1) of the Constitution provides:

    “In any election to which the foregoing provisions of this part of this Chapter relate a candidate for the office of Governor of a State SHALL NOT be deemed to have been VALIDLY nominated for such office UNLESS he nominates another candidate as his associate for his running for the office of Governor, who is to occupy the office of Deputy Governor; and that candidate shall be deemed to have been duly elected to the office of Deputy Governor if the candidate who nominated him is duly elected as Governor in accordance with the said provisions.”

    The Supreme Court has, on several occasions interpreted that use of the word “SHALL” to connote an obligation that must be observed. In this context, the wording of Section 187(1), places an obligation on a gubernatorial candidate to nominate a running mate or face the risk of not being deemed to have been validly nominated to contest for such office.

    It is well known fact that Yahaya Bello did not nominate a running mate for the supplementary election of December 5th, 2015. It is also public knowledge that the person allegedly nominated on his behalf by his party, Hon. James Abiodun Faleke, wrote a letter to INEC & APC stating that he was not running mate to Yahaya Bello. It is public knowledge that Hon. James Abiodun Faleke went further to file a law suit challenging Yahaya Bello’s emergence as Governor.

    When the law is applied to the facts, there is no escaping the conclusion that the learned Judges at the Tribunal and the Court of Appeal erred in finding in favour of Yahaya Bello.

    To highlight the very contradictory nature of these findings, answers have to be sought for the following questions:

    a.    If Hon. James Abiodun Faleke was the deputy governorship candidate of the party on the day of the supplementary why was Simon Achuba nominated, screened and sworn in as Deputy Governor?

    b.    How could Simon Achuba be nominated, screened and sworn in as Deputy Governor without a letter of resignation from Hon. James Abiodun Faleke?

    5.    In several small gatherings across the State, Yahaya Bello claims to have bought over the learned Justices of the Supreme Court. These claims are as unbelievable as they are worrisome. These claims are also a sign that having analysed the legal issues, particularly the dissenting judgments of Justices Obande Festus Ogbuinya and Tijjani Abubakar, Yahaya Bello is willing to resort to any means, legal or illegal, to win this case.

    6.     As seen here, even without giving consideration to the issues of inheriting votes cast for one candidate by the other, it is impossible to analyze the legal issues, the applicable laws and the extant facts and reach a conclusion that the provisions of our laws have been complied with in a manner that confirms Yahaya Bello to be validly nominated, elected and duly sworn in as Governor of Kogi State.

    7.    As the Apex Court of land gives judgment tomorrow, we urge the Court to uphold the sanctity of the Constitution and to stop this brazen rape of our laws and this arrogant violation of our democracy.

    8.    God bless Nigeria.