Category: Opinion

  • Need for SEC to check shareholders’ gangsterisms at AGMs

    For the purpose of providing a basic background knowledge, the annual general meeting, often abbreviated as AGM, is a mandatory yearly gathering of a publicly quoted organization’s directors, executives and shareholders. It is officially the only time the shareholders and the board of a company meet in the year to interact on well laid out businesses. However, if there is any urgent matter which a company needs to resolve in between AGMs, it may call an extra-ordinary general meeting.

    For any AGM to hold, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in Nigeria requires that a 21-day notice detailing the date, venue, time and businesses to be transacted be statutorily issued to the public, especially to the shareholders, by the company through, at least, two newspapers with good national reach.

    At such a meeting, the directors and the chief executive officer are typically expected to present the company’s annual report of the immediate past financial year detailing its performance and strategy to the shareholders. Where issues raised do not meet the expectations of the shareholders, no matter how ugly and annoying such could be, they are put to vote and here, a simple majority carries the day on any such issue(s). The provision and the power of the voting practice to resolve any contentious issue at any point of the meeting, one may want to infer, is to forestall a situation where any individual or a group of persons hiding under the guise of any association or body would want to unduly hijack and frustrate the meeting to fulfil a selfishly orchestrated and ingrained vendetta at a presumed ‘enemy’ shareholder, board or company executives that do not believe in unofficial practices.

    Whereas the above was supposed to be the case at meetings, some shareholders have taken it as self-appropriated rights to openly harass, abuse, insult and call directors and company executives all sorts of unprintable names to the point of hijacking the meeting to the utter distaste of the majority of other fellow shareholders. Where they eventually fail to achieve their selfish desires during the life of the meeting, they resort to using the media channel to blackmail the company with calls on regulators not to recognize meetings that were constitutionally and successfully held, attended and monitored by concerned regulatory authorities. Today, the fear of such shareholders is often thick in the air whenever an AGM comes up in any company’s plan in the country. It is not unlikely that some companies’ executives that choose to hold their AGMs at farther away and impossible locations which will not be cost effective for most shareholders to access do so to avoid being verbally and almost physically assorted.

    There is an argument by some concerned schools of thought that whereas there are regulatory laws which protect the shareholders against a company, its directors and executives, there are no known laws which check the actions and activities of the shareholders at meetings. Analysts in these schools of thought believe that shareholders merely capitalize on this regulatory lacuna to make themselves controlling lords at meetings with unchecked freedom to be hostile towards anyone, especially companies’ directors and chief executives, calling them unprintable names and still walk out unchecked to use the media to instigate further public blackmail.

    Now, do the shareholders have rights or interests to be protected by laws? Unarguably Yes! However, just as they deserve to be protected, the companies and their directors equally deserve to be covered by laws that protect them against the selfish activities of such few unruly shareholders.

    Going by the level this trend of impunity is attaining, it is urgently important to call on a few appropriate government agencies to put a rein on the clandestine activities of this tiny section of the shareholders’ community. First, SEC must necessarily and quickly work at providing rules which should henceforth guide shareholders’ conducts at meetings. Also, it should closely investigate and monitor activities of these few shareholders who are in the habit of putting undue pressure on company managements prior to AGMs to pursue their selfish interest which, to them, is of more importance rather than the overall interest of the company and the generality of other shareholders. Where such interests are not met, they had always ensured unruly behaviour and conduct at the general meetings.

    Furthermore, government’s appropriate agencies should carry out investigations into the existence of these few associations under which they hide to perpetuate their activities with a view to finding out whether they were duly registered. This will help check the excesses of such pockets of shareholders whose stock in trade is to lay claims to belonging to avalanche of shareholders’ associations in furtherance to the pursuit of their clandestine interests.

    Also, notable shareholders’ associations headed by honest and frontline shareholders like Sir Sunny Nwosu, Dr. O . Oniwinde, Mr. Timothy Adesiyan and Mr. Boniface Okezie, to list but this few, should take it upon themselves to check the activities of these mushroom associations being set up as machineries to extort gratifications from listed companies.

    The earlier SEC, other appropriate government agencies and the frontline  shareholders  do the above, the better it would be before these few self-seeking shareholders who carry out their trades with impunity turn AGMs to ugly scenes and threatening events to authorities of publicly quoted companies and other law-abiding shareholders. A stitch in time, it is said, saves nine.

     

    • Kayode Michael is an investment expert and analyst based in Ikeja, Lagos.
  • Tools for the needed change

    The aura of electoral victory that heralded the emergence of General Muhamadu Buhari has the president of Nigeria cannot be waved away with a stroke of the hand. No, it was a victory birthed by a groaning of a people desirous of a change in their livelihood and the leadership of their country. The change movement meant different things to different people. Yet in all the differences, they agreed on one thing – that General Buhari was the man for the job. That agreement resulted in a change of government and birthed a new Nigeria with a different political order.

    The elections and the inauguration of the new government were only the first steps in the quest for a changed nation. Having received the mandate and trust of Nigerians, the President must therefore display  and act with the acumen and wisdom needed to lift the country out of its current and existing doldrums and guide it towards a promising and rewarding future. This is a task that requires prioritization and effective delivery for two reasons. One, there is hardly no part of the Nigerian national life that is not near comatose. Two, the comatose has existed for so long that it had created a convoluted and complex web of mediocrity and paralysis.

    Consequently, President Muhammadu Buhari needs to be tactical in his approach, prioritize his tasks and focus his strengths on sectors capable of creating domino effects on the other sectors with minimum inputs. There are three major sectors capable creating the needed effects in the national life: Education, Agriculture and Power, in that order.

    A country’s educational sector is the bedrock of its national life. It is the essential foundation on which every other sector can be built and established. Like a strong defensive midfielder is a key factor for the success of any football team, a strong educational sector is the only factor for a change in our national life. Education drives invention, patriotism, loyalty, competence and excellence. The seemingly failure of Nigeria as a country is deeply rooted in the collapse and ruin of its educational sector.

    Most people rush to associate Nigeria’s problems with corruption, yet incompetence plays a greater role in the nation’s woes. Most graduates are semi-illiterate and the country has the highest rate of out of school children in the world. Our schools have failed to develop with the trend – they are still deep in teaching the 21st century students with 20th century teaching scheme. Other populous countries around the world, such as China, India, Pakistan and even the US, focus on technical and vocational education. Yet, technical and vocational education is dead in Nigeria. It has been 29 years since the 170 million populated nation produced a Nobel Laureate and our schools have failed to produce another.

    Agriculture and power go hand-in-hand because they are the root of the collapse of country’s economy. Nigeria’s discovery of petroleum led to a reckless neglect of the country’s agricultural sectors. Before drilling and exploration, we had planting and harvesting. The nation was driven on the inflows from the sale of agricultural produce. Nigeria currently produces the top 10 most sought after crops in the world on a subsistence level. We have failed to harness our agricultural prowess and sacrificed its abundance on the altar of sweet crude. We have replaced the pyramids of groundnuts with tank farms, silos and barns with petrol stations and tanker garages. Now, the country is on a food importation binge because our production is low and it is still crude and undeveloped. Where Vietnam has built silos with capacities that can supply rice to Africa for 10 years non-stop, Nigeria’s yam and cassava are either getting spoiled or left for rodents to eat.

    And power! Electricity is a key driver for any economy. After the deregulation of the power sector and the billions of petro-dollars sank into it, there appears to be no end in sight for the country. Even though the generating companies seem to have been working to capacity, the discos seem not to have been ensuring that all the watts of power generated are distributed for use due to their own economic advantage. The decadence of Nigeria’s power sector cannot be over-emphasized – our economy is currently powered with diesel generators. Big shame.

    Good education, agriculture and power sectors will fix this country; they will combat terrorism, corruption, incompetence, greed, lawlessness, lack of patriotism and other social vices. Revamping these sectors will ensure an equal distribution of development across every region of the nation and create job for the youth. With the right policies and people, we can combat brain drain and bring Nigeria’s investments in the diaspora to the homeland.

    If PMB is going to succeed, his administration must focus on these sectors and make them his priorities. He will need to select the right persons to head these sectors and support them with the political will to drive the change. Obafemi Awolowo’s success in the old western region was driven by an inseparable combination of the premier’s strong political will and the assignment of competent men to drive his agricultural revolution and free education programmes. PMB must also find the same combination.

    PMB’s pool for the right hand is already defined – the senate just screened his ministerial nominees. Based on the resume, precedence and performance at the ministerial screening, it would not be wrong to conclude that PMB’s only requirement is to ensure that these sectors are assigned to nominees with deep experience and rich technicality and not as political compensations. Only thoroughbred academicians and administrators should be appointed minister for education, successful farmers and policy makers appointed as minister for agriculture and transparent and technical individuals as minister for power and steel.

    Per analysis of the resume and precedence of the ministerial nominees, Professor Isaac Adewole seem to be the most qualified academician and school administrator for the job of revamping the  education sector. His performance at the Senate screening was a glimpse into his cerebral power. Adewole displayed a vast understanding of the challenges facing the primary, post primary and tertiary educational system sector and proffered an outstanding way out of the quagmire. A research into his tenure as the Vice Chancellor of the University of Ibadan revealed a testimonial to his capacity in school administration. His unionist background, will naturally play a key role in negotiation with educational staffers.

    In the same vein, Audu Ogbeh is the perfect fit for the agriculture sector. He is a successful farmer with a deep understanding of the challenges faced by everyday farmers. A review of his farming history revealed a capability to transform subsistence farming into mechanized and industrialized farming. A combination of his agricultural exploits and past experience as a minister will aid him in the effective discharge of the duty the required of a minister for agriculture. Finally, Zainab Ahmed’s precedence with Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) qualifies her for the power sector. A brief look into her activities in NEITI revealed that she is a respected name in the global EITI for her transparency, zero tolerance for corruption and technical capacity – characters required for the revamping of the power sector. Also, her display on the floor of the Senate indicates that Zainab Ahmed is a strong-willed personality capable of handling such sensitive sector, the immediate past Governor of Lagos State, Babatunde Fasola will also be the right tool for the Power Ministry.

    PMB has the brightest chance to set Nigeria on the path to greatness once and for all. One can only pray that he gets his priorities right and appoints the right hands for the required job. After five months into his tenure, he cannot afford a misstep in assigning portfolios to his ministers. Nigerians will soon start asking questions about the promised change – and four years is almost over.

     

    • Dr  ( Engr)  Yusuff  teaches Electrical Engineering at Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa
  • Lagos-Ibadan expressway: The Amosun Intervention

    Just as literature mirrors the society, the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway mirrors Nigeria. Indeed, the fall of Nigeria is fully reflected in the collapse of Lagos-Ibadan Expressway. That highway is the shame of the Nigerian nation. One wonders what the successive governments did or failed to do that resulted in the ruin of the most economically strategic road in the country.

    Lagos-Ibadan motorway is the blood that runs in the veins of Nigeria. It is the life-wire of the nation. It is arguably the busiest in West Africa, conveying men and materials from the sea port of Lagos, the commercial hub of the nation, through Ogun State, the emerging industrial capital of Nigeria, to other parts of the federal republic.

    Time is life; it’s no surprising we waste lives on the highway on a daily basis. How did we descend to this level? The most important road pockmarked with craters; horrible sights of vehicles nearly submerged or simply packed up in flooded valleys and puddle-filled gullies created by neglect; pathetic scenes of market women with babies on their backs  leaving behind their merchandise at the mercy of the elements or standby merchants of death while seeking safety for their souls. What a come-down for the nation!

    This caricature of a road, which has been a source of stress, sorrow, agony, trauma and death to thousands of commuters that ply it daily belongs to the federal government. The nation has lost billions if not trillions of naira over two decades due to the prostrate state of the highway. And the  economic haemorrhage continues from government to government.

    But why should Ogun State government be  pilloried on account of the carnage and humongous man-hour loss that have become the permanent features of the highway? Why should a new government of President Muhammadu Buhari be made to carry the can; worse, for a government that inherited an empty federal till from the last spendthrift administration, which emptied the nation’s treasury to prosecute the 2015 elections?

    At exactly 10:00pm on Tuesday, Ogun State governor, Senator Ibikunle Amosun, led members of his cabinet and top echelons of the bureaucracy to some of the portions of Lagos-Ibadan highway that have brought life, directly and indirectly, to a standstill across the country.  The intensity of  the governor’s exasperation could be felt as he mobilised men and materials to these derelict sites on the highway earlier in the day. Yet, at this time of cash crunch!

    “The suffering on that road is beyond human tolerance,” he said plaintively.

    Amosun and his team inspected the progress of work by the state’s Ministry of Works, empathised with commuters who had been in the traffic for lamentable hours  and those that resorted to trekking even at that late period of the day. Some, I later gathered, reached home by 4am the next day!

    His earlier decision to go in the day was shelved in order not to compound an already horrendous situation. As you read this, palliative work is in progress on the road. This intervention is not an isolated one. Indeed, Ogun State expends about N400 million almost on monthly basis on palliative works on all the federal roads scattered across the state. From Lagos-Ibadan highway to Atan-Agbara road, from Owode-Ilaro motorway to Sagamu-Ikorodu road, Sagamu-Ore Expressway and from Lagos-Abeokuta highway to Abeokuta- Ibadan road, it is the same story of the governor spending the scarce resources of the state in rehabilitating completely failed portions of federal roads, because residents don’t differentiate between federal and state roads. And for political reasons, even those who know the difference pretend not  to know!

    Over 70 per cent of Lagos- Ibadan motorway is located within Ogun State. The state shares the longest border with the Republic of Benin. It hosts various religious organisations and their millions of followers across the country every week or month. Indeed, it is the gateway to Nigeria. Such a state deserves a special status on account of pressures that are exerted on its territory by all compatriots and foreigners.

    The redeeming feature is that we now have a new federal government that is prudent in financial matters. According to Governor Amosun, the president is very much aware of the state of the road, indeed the appalling state of all federal roads in Nigeria. As the new central government takes stock and settles down, there is no doubt that the synergy between Ogun and federal authorities will hasten the pace of the reconstruction of the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway to the eternal relief of Nigerians and Nigeria.

    Ultimately, my oft-stated position over the years remains tenable: “It is cheaper for states to own these federal roads. For instance, the ongoing repair work on the Third Mainland Bridge in Lagos has continued to consume avoidable administrative costs. The Minister of Works and other federal officials who come all the way from Abuja to supervise and inspect the road will certainly collect allowances running into millions of naira, whereas it would have amounted to a routine duty for the Lagos Commissioner for Works and other officials. And when you consider that the Abuja officials will have to do the same thing again and again in all the 36 states of the federation, the preventable wastage of tax-payers’ money stares you in the face… Contiguous states to these federal roads will naturally collaborate to reconstruct and maintain them at far cheaper costs than moving money and officials first from Abuja to the regional office, and from the regional office to the states. There is so much wastage of public funds in Nigeria.”

    And as it happens, for the Ogun State cabinet members and top government functionaries that accompanied the governor to Warewa, Arepo, etc. it was just a matter of routine.  But imagine how many millions of naira in out-of-station, hazard, etc. allowances that would have been incurred by the federal purse if they had come from Abuja to inspect the road!

    I believe we also need prayers in this country. Why is it now that we have a President Muhammadu Buhari that is committed to good governance and accountability that we are  confronted with paucity of cash? Why has the price of oil chosen this momentous time to plummet to this level? Even if the new government achieves complete diversification of the economy, will it fructify overnight, in one, two or three years? Why should it be at this time that we have a highly conscientious and honest central government that we should have this kind of financial situation as a country? So we need prayers in this country.

    Meanwhile, Senator Amosun should not be deterred by the campaign of calumny  but  remain focussed on delivering the dividends of democracy to the masses who trooped out in their thousands to reward him for a good term.

    • Soyombo writes from Abeokuta

     

  • When tribunal re-affirmed Ajimobi’s victory

    The affirmation that Governor Abiola Ajimobi of Oyo State won the 2015 gubernatorial election in the state on the platform of his popularity came from the judgment delivered by the election tribunal on Tuesday October 27, in Ibadan.  Former Oyo State Governor Rashidi Ladoja had petitioned against the election of Ajimobi whom he accused of ensuring that election did not hold conclusively in a number of local government areas in the state so that he would be able to claim victory and justify his hold on the people.

    But in his ruling, tribunal chairman Justice Mohammed Mayaki held that both Ladoja and the Accord Party could not prove their allegations of rigging, electoral malpractices, violence and non-compliance with the Electoral Act, among others.  Based on this, the tribunal dismissed Ladoja’s petition as lacking strong facts to prove his points beyond reasonable doubts.

    Even when Ladoja sought the cancellation of elections in 10 local government areas of the state along with a few other polling units, the point at issue is that the people of the state still preferred Ajimobi.  It was due to the enviable records of the transformation he had already made in the state, especially in Ibadan, the state capital, that encouraged the people to turn out en-masse to vote for him.

    The unanimous decision of the three-man tribunal is a testimony to the fact that Ajimobi’s popularity in the state is beyond human compare.  Here is a grassroots leader who appeared on the scene when the people of Oyo State were in dire need of a sincere political leader; a leader who has his eyes on total eradication of bigotry and poverty in the state.

    The people of Oyo felt it was no longer time to queue behind deceitful party leaders whose interest is usually to use their votes to achieve their own selfish ends.  Ajimobi came with the conviction to turn Oyo State around and that was why the tribunal made it clear that the people have spoken.  The vote they gave to Ajimobi was meant to consolidate his hold in the politics of the state.  It was to demonstrate the fact that the All Progressive Congress (APC) has come to stay.  This is a party the likes of Ajimobi have used to attain their political dreams because they are convinced that the party is here to serve the people.

    Therefore the tribunal judgment is not only affirmative and populist, it is a total affirmation of the widely held view that Ladoja had long lost his political grip and hold in the state.  Or how else can one describe his continuous inability to wrestle power from the status quo in the last 10 years or so?  Even when he said he would appeal the judgment, there are no facts on ground to lend credence to fresh claims and discoveries that can help his situation.

    The spontaneous jubilation throughout the state after the judgment was delivered further attested to the indomitability of the Ajimobi phenomenon.  He is on ground, firmly in place to handle the affairs of the state.  When the righteous is in power everybody is in joyous mood.  The mood in Oyo State right now is that of liberation, freedom and Eldorado.  The people have come to a point in their political journey and history when reality and clear sense of discernment should be their perception.  In so doing they have seen in Ajimobi that long awaited leader eager to liberate them from the mundane; from the era of endless political squabbles.

    This is the time to move forward; time to steer the ship of the state towards growth and development.  This was why the governor ensured that the governorship election was held in an atmosphere of fairness and orderliness to avoid reprisals.  Today, he has been proved right.  All Ladoja needs to do, just like Governor Ajimobi reassured him, is to combine forces with the party in power to attain peace in the state.  With concerted peace, Oyo State will be a better place for everyone; especially for the leaders.

    Apart from most people hailing the judgment as wise and fair, it was clear that the people of the state do not as yet wish that any new political development should come that would lead to chaos.  A student of the University of Ibadan, Oyo State, Muri Okebola praised the tribunal chairman for his thoroughness and urgent sense of responsibility.  “This is too good to be true,” Okebola declared.  Yet his greatest joy is in the fact that Oyo State has known giant strides and relative peace since Ajimobi came to the saddle.

    It is clearly the validation of the fact that he who comes to equity must come with clean hands.  This is indeed a landmark verdict that would boost people’s total confidence in democracy; it establishes the fact that the judiciary could as well rise to its occasion as the last hope of the hopeless.  It is a verdict that has brought back that glimmer of sunshine in the lives of the people whose hopes always hang in the balance as to whether the judiciary can be pungent and decisive.

    This was why Governor Ajimobi himself quickly saluted the judiciary for its promptness and call to duty.  “I am grateful to God for this victory,” he said.  “I have been able to break the second term jinx in the state.  I therefore thank the people for the confidence reposed in me by voting for me a second time, despite innuendoes, evil machinations and falsehood by our opponents.”

    In this, the Governor has affirmed irrevocably that power belongs to the people.  Yes, it was the totality of Oyo people that brought him to power.

  • Nwabueze on corruption and national question

    My attention was drawn to Prof. Ben Nwabueze’s write-up on the Buhari administration’s war on corruption by Steve Osuji in his Friday, October 23 column in The Nation  titled: Nwabueze on Buhari: Elders as critics? The write-up may have appeared as some advice for President Muhammadu Buhari, but to the discerning, it was another tirade against the president’s anti-corruption crusade from the so-called Igbo Leaders of Thought of which the esteemed constitutional scholar is its public face – if not its sole member – going by the fact that the elder statesman is the only signatory to the organization’s always negative stance either through articles or advertorials on policy issues of the Buhari administration.

    The first strand of Nwabueze’s piece was his patently odious plea to Buhari and Nigerians in general that “corruption is not Nigeria’s Number One Enemy.” The other leg was his tutorials that our inability to recognize that the socio-cultural underpinning of Nigeria’s ethnic nationalities has always been the bane of our growth and development and not corruption, which he crystallized into what he called the “National Question.”

    For starters, Nwabueze marshaled all the strengths he could muster to advance his argument that eradicating corruption should not be our over-arching priority, but finding a lasting solution to the National Question. Like the strength of an octogenarian, Nwabueze’s vigorous defence of his National Question at the expense of the most egregious, in-your-face, and heaven-may-fall corruption never witnessed in Nigeria’s history that happened under Jonathan’s watch became feeble at best. It beats one’s imagination why Nwabueze would continue to discount the mood of the Nigerian electorate who wanted corruption to be concretely tackled once and for all. More importantly, our erudite statesman may have inadvertently frittered away his moral authority with his position on corruption. Nwabueze it was who, before the presidential election, told his Igbo nation that it would be in their best economic interest to re-elect Jonathan even when it had become very glaring to Nigerians and the international community that the “shoeless boy” from Otuoke had made corruption the fundamental objectives and directive principles of state policy. Before his first trip to the United States after his inauguration, it was the same Nwabueze who told President Buhari to “let bygone be bygone” by not lifting a finger against this hydra-headed corruption monster.

    As much as it is within the rights of our eminent scholar to weigh in on issues of national importance with a view to giving the nation his perspectives that comes with age and rigorous intellectual analysis, the heart of the matter may be that Nwabueze is finding it very difficult to live down the fact of Jonathan’s electoral loss. It’s baffling that the same Nwabueze, who admitted that “the revulsion against corruption that has involved trillions of naira worth of crude oil pirated from the country’s oil wells by government officials and their agents/associates… [that] reached the highest pitch of outright thievery in the last years of the President Goodluck Jonathan administration, and has given rise to widespread yearning for decisive action against it” would call the president’s war on corruption a “make-belief” that “rests less on concrete actions and results actually accomplished and more on propagandist talk…purposely designed to charm the minds and hearts of people, already eagerly yearning for action.”

    It is not uncommon for an octogenarian such as our revered legal luminary to have forgotten so soon that it was not his personal or intellectual influence, nor the votes of his South-east region of which he’s its Leader of Thought that threw up Buhari to once again attempt to clean the Augean stable, but the Nigerian electorate that gave Buhari the clear electoral mandate strictly on account of the “three fights” he said he would engage in if elected, which included wrestling down the corruption monster in accordance with democratic tenets. For Buhari to now act otherwise which is Nwabueze’s preferred option in his latest write-up, would have been grossly irresponsible and out of character for a leader who has been lauded around the world as having the highest integrity quotient in Nigeria’s leadership history. Buhari does not need “propagandist talk…designed to charm the minds and hearts of [the] people” who handed him the incontrovertible mandate to do something about corruption.

    It’s difficult for one not to wonder that Nwabueze’s ‘injunction’ to PMB to abandon his corruption war is not some frantic and insidious attempt to protect certain geo-political interest that predominated in the Jonathan administration and had used the opportunity maximally to cash-in. Otherwise, why was Nwabueze unhappy that Jonathan and some of his key ministers are being demonized with what Nigerians now know as facts? Nwabueze may have been relieved that Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has shamed her enemies because she was not the Jonathan’s minister that allegedly carted away as much as $6 billion. But our former Minister of Finance and the Coordinating Minister of the Economy may one day have her day in court because even though $20 billion may not be missing as alleged by the erstwhile Central Bank governor, now the Emir of Kano, she admitted that what was missing was $10 billion, which was never accounted for before the termination of a government in which she held the country’s purse strings.

    Since “President Buhari does not qualify to be hailed and idolized as liberator and national hero…unless and until he effectively and successfully comes to grips with the National Question which Nwabueze went further to describe “as Nigeria’s predominating and daunting problem [that have] been left largely untackled over the years”, one must wonder why our renowned constitutional scholar did not advise Jonathan to set up a real and authentic national conference that would have addressed the National Question once and for all when he had the golden opportunity to properly reposition the country in the six years he was in the saddle.

    Nwabueze’s allusion that the president’s “inadequate educational qualification, which disables him from understanding fully…the complex ideas and issues involved in governing Nigeria” was most disingenuous. It was a deliberate disregard and wanton disrespect for a man who had not only held all the important positions in the land including its chief of state, but a man adjudged by world leaders as having the right leadership credentials of integrity, discipline and incorruptibility. It’s such an unfortunate irony that these attributes were first identified in Buhari not by our acclaimed intellectual powerhouse like Nwabueze, but by some stark and hopelessly illiterate Nigerians from the arid north who would probably first turn a book upside down before they would struggle to pronounce even a word. Sometimes we can learn a thing or two from those we call ‘dummies.’ For Nwabueze to be asking President Buhari to focus his energy on the National Question at this material time is akin to a doctor first spending his precious time asking a patient on life-support about his relationship with his neighbours. Nigeria must be stabilized first by Buhari’s surgical operations of obliterating the Boko Haram insurgency, the killing of corruption before it kills her, and recalibration of the economy that will open up job opportunities for our teeming jobless youths. It’s only then that the nation can have the strength and energy to seriously address Nwabueze’s National Question.

    • Odere is a media practitioner. He can be reached at femiodere@gmail.com
  • Limits of propaganda

    I had not been to my state after the controversial ruling of the Akwa Ibom State Governorship Election Tribunal that is sending both the petitioner and the defendant to the appeal court. A trip to the state last week afforded me the opportunity to get a sense of the reaction of the people to the ruling, with the hope of catching a glimpse of what to expect if the verdict of the tribunal should stand at the Supreme Court where it will likely end.

    As is usual with a research of this nature, in which you need to keep your ears to the ground to get the true feelings of the people, the cab driver who took me from the Ibom Airport into Uyo town was my first source of information. How did people in the state react to the ruling of the election tribunal, and what would be the outcome of another election if it boiled down to that, I asked him.

    The man, looking a 50-something, was quite honest in explaining that the answer to that question would depend on whom it was directed, meaning that whether it was condemned or applauded depended on where the sympathy of the respondent lay – between Umana Okon Umana, the petitioner and Udom Emmanuel, the governor whose victory at the April 11 election the former is challenging. But he made his own prediction.

    In the event of another election, Umana would win, he told me matter-of-factly, in only a manner a seer would. Why did he think so? I asked. His response was quite interesting. He said judging from the size of the crowd that welcomed Umana from Abuja after the ruling, in comparison with a similar event on the day the incumbent governor returned, there was no doubt that the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate was more popular, and would therefore win.

    It meant little to him that if the ruling of the tribunal as it stands today was upheld up to the apex court, Udom Emmanuel would need to win in just six more local government areas to remain in office.

     The cab driver’s reason for believing that Umana would win a re-election, or even a fresh election, can only point to one fact – the high level of propaganda that trailed elections in Akwa Ibom State in recent years.

    I have seen political parties win election on propaganda as was the case in the 2015 general elections.

    The mindset exhibited by my temporary guide is reflective of what you hear in different circles of APC supporters in the state. You hardly hear any meaningful articulation of what the party’s candidate is bringing to the contest, other than the fact that he has been in government for as long as anybody can remember, from the military era when he was a civil servant. Ironically, this fact, which his supporters consider strength, is what most people think is one of his weaknesses – he has been part of the problems of the past, which the present is trying to correct.

    The Akwa Ibom I know is not a place where election can be won with propaganda. The people may not have a long history of political sophistication, but they are certainly not so politically uninformed as not to differentiate between what they hear and what they see.

    Before the election in April, the main campaign weapon of APC was the claim that a victory for Udom, the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), would mean a continuation of the Godwsill Akpabio administration. But the party forgot that in the estimation of the people of the state, the former governor did so well, in terms of infrastructural development, that if Udom was going to continue from where he stopped, he would be the preferred candidate.  That was reflected in the result of the election.

    I heard the same propaganda during my short stay in the state last week. But I also found that the strategy, which did not work before the April election, stands even a far slimmer chance of working, this time around. This is because in just five months, the governor has been able to establish the indisputable fact that he is his own man. He has proved that he has something to offer.

    Now the people believe they can rely on what they see from the governor’s performance since he assumed office; they can judge him by what he has done so far, not what they hear the opposition say about him. It is propaganda stuff that no longer appeals to the people – something of a broken record.

    He may not have spent donkey years in government before taking up his present role, but with more than two years in the highest echelon of government, third in line only to the governor and deputy governor, he couldn’t have been better prepared for his current office. But beyond the fact that he cut his teeth in governance as secretary to the state government, Udom came into government with unarguably the richest credentials than any of the candidates in the April election.

    He spent his entire working life not just in the private sector, but in a very sensitive and strategic sector where adherence to corporate governance and international best practices is an article of faith. It is the reason he is going about the art of governance with a touch of difference – with the dexterity of an expert craftsman – having assumed office with a clear vision for the state. He has concentrated on the economy, because that is what the state needs, to be able to attract the investors that would benefit from the structures that he is putting in place.

    My candid assumption (not a prediction, certainly, nothing in line with the cab driver’s) is that another election – whether a re-run or fresh election – will change nothing, as far as the present occupant of the Government House in Uyo is concerned.

     

    • Etim is a Lagos-based lawyer
  • NAFDAC’s agro export drive

    Imagine Nigeria suffused with petro- and agro-dollars earned from export of sweet crude and agricultural products. The path to her much vaunted economic development would have been well paved and so her dream membership of the club of the world’s most developed economies would have become a reality.

    Her abundant fossil resources that could have propelled the uncommon development drive have become a curse, perhaps an unwarranted distraction. Agriculture that used to be the mainstay of the country from the immediate post independence era to early 1970s was relegated and ignored by successive governments. However, with the effects of mono-cultural economy ravaging the nation, instability of the global oil market becoming obvious and the developed countries’ drive for alternative to fossil fuel being stepped up, creative thinking by the nation’s political leadership and policy makers has recommended governance paradigm shift with emphasis on development of the agricultural potentials of the country, both for food security and as a complementary foreign exchange earner.

    The new agricultural development template established on private initiative is heavy on government support. Agricultural universities and research institutes have been established; agencies like National Agricultural and Land Development Authority (NALDA) and River Basin Development Authorities (RBDA) founded; actions on accelerated food production programmes, a national programme of Food for All and FADAMA project stepped up.

    The mobilization of peasant farmers has been underscored and recognized as the appropriate approach for realistic agrarian revolution in Nigeria. The extant food crisis emanates from the weak agricultural base despite the efforts of the aforementioned agencies and the financial provision of the Nigerian Agricultural and Co-operative Bank (NACB) for agricultural production within the country. The Federal Government has also put in place mechanisms for funding and insurance. They include the Agricultural Credit Guarantee Scheme; the Nigerian Agricultural Insurance Company (NAIC), and Commercial Agricultural Credit Scheme (CACS). The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) in conjunction with the Bankers’ Committee has had to increase lending to the agricultural sector from one to five percent.

    By these measures, who would not be excited that a solid foundation for agricultural revolution in Nigeria has been laid? And why would Nigeria not reap bountifully from her massive agricultural potentials? The answer is that the optimization of the nation’s agro potentials was dampened by the placement of a one year embargo (July 2015 –June 2016) on some of its agricultural products by the European Food Safety Authority. The affected agro products included beans, sesame seeds, melon seeds, dried fish, meat, peanut chips and palm oil. While the melon seeds were said to have been contaminated with aflatoxin, others were said to contain high levels of injurious and deadly contaminants such as mycotoxins, pesticide residues as well as abnormal level of dichlorvos pesticides (in the case of beans).The development, which sent shock waves through both government and business circles, especially coming at a time of renewed drive to diversify the nation’s economy to wean it from oil dependency, has unarguably set the nation many years backward.

    The unscrupulous activities of some unpatriotic Nigerians, who involve themselves in agro trade without the relevant export certification for processed food are said to be the causative factors for this European Union’s move.

    The unsavory development has compelled the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) to initiate professionalized strategies to tackle the ugly situation. Consequently, NAFDAC, has unfolded series of agro export redemption packages in an attempt to shore up Nigeria’s reputation and competitiveness in global non-oil export markets. Reeling out the scientific based solutions recently in Abuja, the Agency’s Director General Dr Paul B. Orhii, said the orchestrated ban on Nigeria’s agro products by the EU was bad news he has been challenged to redress.

    The Agency, Dr. Orhii said, would rely on ultra-modern cutting-edge technologies to address all the issues that gave vent to the EU ban to avoid further extension beyond the June 2016 timeline. Investigations show that NAFDAC will deploy massive mobile motorized testing laboratories to all nooks and crannies of the nation including remote farms, agro products export processing centres, produce market centres, sea and airports, as well as land border stations. The agency’s personnel are said to be set for this all important national assignment.

    Intensive training/supervision of farmers, produce marketers and other stakeholders in agro export business is also on the card. One of such enlightenment opportunities is the fourth edition of Agrikexpo, a foremost event for agribusiness development in West Africa, planned for November in Lagos. Interestingly, the EU-Nigeria Business Forum is a major stakeholder of the event. Other stakeholders are the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, NAFDAC, and Nigeria Agriculture Business Group (NABG), umbrella association for all agribusiness stakeholders in the country. There is also the monthly training programme on African Growth Opportunity Act (AGOA) organised by the Bank of Industry (BOI).

    The success of export trade depends seriously on consistent production of quality goods and services, which meet established quality and safety standards, through the Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and hygienic practices. The NAFDAC has developed competencies on all of these areas. It has in place sanitary and phytosanitary measures, and possesses a very active website displaying its export guidelines. Serious minded agro exporters must comply with the rules of the game – meeting global standard specifications. They would be adequately provided with the required know-how on food storage, ideal packaging practices and other relevant quality control measures in which NAFDAC would be their ally.

    The step up action obviously requires adequate funding. A token sum of N2 billion is required by the agency. We know things are not easy now; this bailout for a serious agency like NAFDAC has high yielding dividends – our dream turnaround in the agriculture sector. The N2 billion is meant to aid the immediate importation, shipment, and deployment of these technological solutions into the country.

    Unarguably, Nigeria is sitting on untapped agro-dollars. Her full agri-business potentials have not been realized. The EU ban is a wakeup call. NAFDAC should be assisted to get the necessary technological solutions to the issues that necessitated the ban. These ultra-modern cutting-edge technological solutions, when acquired, will be deployed to all the nooks and crannies of the nation. Their effective deployment would propel the forces that would unleash Nigeria’s agro greatness. The agro-dollars so earned would be the seed money for our nation’s economic revolution.

    So, the Presidency, National Assembly, as well as the nation’s economic managers must rise to this historic call to rescue the nation from the self-inflicted doom by rallying round NAFDAC; approve the funds needed to actualize its well conceived and very patriotic initiative as it will be improper for us to go to sleep while our roofs are on fire.

    • Ikhilae, a Lagos-based public affairs analyst wrote via martinsikhilae@ymail.com
  • Learning at the feet of Gamaliel

    At my family’s maiden participation in the Sunday Worship Service of the UNILAG Staff Fellowship, the Guest Speaker was a man who delivered a highly inspiring message with an impeccable Oxford accent – one Deacon G O Onosode.  By 1972, we moved into University Quarters on Adelabu Street, Surulere and a Baptist colleague and friend invited us to New Estate Baptist Church [NEBC], nearby.

    To our delight, Uncle Gamaliel was the leader there and we were living some three houses from his home!  We participated in the Tuesday Bible Study in his home.  We became good family friends and I would eat two or more meals with his family each week. Indeed, I was one of the two guests he had for his 45th Birthday Dinner at the ‘Quo Vadis’ Restaurant atop Western House on Broad Street.

    When he became the acting pastor of the church, so serving for three years, three months and three weeks, I was elected Church Secretary thus becoming his close assistant.  He delegated to me the design and production of a church bulletin which became the pattern and standard followed by many other churches.  Under his tutelage, I was also appointed chairman of the Church’s Constitution Drafting Committee. He challenged, inspired and mentored younger people in whom he observed definite potential.  Thus it was that he delegated the preaching at the evening services to me and got me to lead the Bible Study in his home at various times.

    When the Lagos Baptist Conference was raising funds for the Baptist Theological Seminary, Ogbomoso in the mid 70’s, he as the chairman and I was secretary of the Fund Raising Committee.  He confidently delegated the arrangements to me and the programme was adjudged very successful.  He was a frequent minister on Radio Nigeria’s ‘Morning Prayers’ in the 70’s and extended the privilege of ministering to me on several occasions.

    He was not only my mentor in matters spiritual, he was same in financial and business matters.  I sought his review and advice on the Business Plans for our first Supermarket.  He was highly impressed that an engineer and IT practitioner had such a good grasp of Business and Financial Matters. he graciously agreed to preside over the dedication and opening of our first ‘Value Market’ in 1974.  He delegated to me the preparation of Business Plans for a relation and friend of his.  Following his example, I started investing in quoted securities; indeed, he got the law firm that incorporated his own personal investment company to incorporate mine as well.  When he was developing his property in Victoria Island and I was living in that area, he entrusted the oversight of the project to me with confidence.

    In the mid-70’s, he wanted me to be chief executive of a major stock broking firm and later, an engineering firm with three factories in the country and which would have made me chairman of a major Industrial Gases Company.  For various reasons, I declined the kind offers.

    Uncle Gam was a man of humour.  On first acquaintance he might give one the pronunciation of his surname as an Ijebu man would – ‘Onoosode’.  The late Deacon N O O Akinola was a mutual friend; he always added two extra O’s to his initials making them N O O O O!  There was another deacon who often prefixed his sentences with the word ‘Normally’.  Each time he opened his mouth to speak, he would say the ‘Normally’ prefix for him!

    He could not suffer mediocrity or non-performance.  He was adept at crafting one-sentence ‘stingers’ to convey displeasure to the persons or organizations concerned.  He had ‘midwived’ the ASSU-FG Agreement whose non-implementation occasioned the prolonged strike.  His comments were brief: “I cannot imagine why a duly signed agreement is not being implemented.  Anyone can read and understand the terms; they were not encrypted in Greek!”

    He shared with me an occasion when someone remarked that he had never seen Deacon Onosode get so angry.  At a meeting of top church leaders in his home state, one leading CAN dignitary proposed that the then President should approach churches for Christians who, in positions of power, would ensure excellent governance. In response, he named many persons in the National Assembly and government who claimed to be Christians and whose services were, evidently, to the detriment of the government and people. Perhaps such persons should take his comment as a parting charge, knowing that if they fail to repent and make restitution, the Lord to whom they claim allegiance will visit them with far heftier damnation than his!

    By contrast, he traversed the corridors of power with excellence and transparent integrity.  For starters, he resigned his chairmanship/directorship of some 25 major companies upon being appointed adviser on budget matters by President Shagari.  It is interesting that when that appointment ended and he was to resume some of the positions, one Lagos socialite sat tight remarking: “What can Onosode do that I cannot do?” That company ran aground under the socialite!   As Budget Adviser he quipped that “instead of the normal two categories of national expenditure, we have three – Capital, Recurrent and Waste and Waste was by far the largest!”  Three decades later, waste, fuelled by unconscionable expropriation and outright thievery, has assumed such mammoth proportion that it dwarfs the traditional two into insignificance.

    In the 70’s, he expressed a desire to traverse three professions in his lifetime, one of them being medicine.  He did not; how could he with such a heavily loaded plate of essential, high-level responsibilities!  None of his days lasted longer than the normal 24 hours and he did not have a private jet to shuttle between Surulere, Lagos Island and the College of Medicine.  Nevertheless, he distinguished himself in at least three leadership vocations – Church, Business/Finance and Public Administration/Politics.

    In addition to serving as Pro-Chancellor of three public universities and the Baptists’ Bowen University, he was also chairman of the Board of Governors of The Baptist Seminary which was recognized as the leading Theological Institution in Africa.  I also had the privilege of serving as Chairman of the Board’s Funding Committee.

    Uncle Gam, I, nay, we beheld your glory, glory as of the beloved son with whom our heavenly Father was well pleased. Your excellent erudition in spiritual and temporal matters was always with complementary elocution. You manifested sagacity in all matters; ‘meteors’ like you are few and far between.  Of the abundance of greatness that our Lord endowed you with, we, your protégés, have received grace upon grace. Your 82 years confirm to us our Lord’s Word in Psalm 92:  ‘The righteous flourish like the palm tree, and grow like a cedar in Lebanon. They are planted in the house of the Lord, they flourish in the courts of our God.  They still bring forth fruit in old age, they are ever full of sap and green’

    Permit me to testify of you that this servant of our Lord was not endowed with just five talents but with more, like 10.  His productivity also exceeded 10 additional talents in profit.  Consequently, the heavenly choir of angels clanged their cymbals and raised sonorous applause and thanksgiving as His Master declared: ‘Well done, good and faithful servant; you have been faithful, I will set you over much; enter into the joy of your master.’

    Our Lord has graciously determined that ‘the time of your departure has come. You have fought the good fight, you have finished the race, you have kept the faith. Henceforth there is laid up for you the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will award to you on that Day! – as Paul asserted and predicted in 2 Tim 4:6-8.  

    Paul learnt at the feet of his Gamaliel; I learnt at the feet of this Gamaliel – Deacon Dr Gamaliel Oforitsenere Onosode. Adieu, my beloved mentor, my hero; adieu!

     

    • ‘Oduko FNCS ,Deacon writes from Lagos
  • Ooni: Not catching them old

    Unlike what is going on in the slow business of forming the Federal Executive Council so far characterized by a preponderance of elements of the older generation and the have-been, the kingmakers at Ile-Ife, Osun State, have opted to offer some lessons on how not to catch them old. For our own President Muhammudu Buhari who appears not to believe that the young shall grow, this must be a time to learn from both the Ooni-elect and the Ife chiefs who have said nay to palace gerontocracy.

    At 40, Adeyeye Enitan Ogunwusi comes in as a pulsating and rambunctious challenge to prevalent political notions of old age and experience as exclusive prerequisites for salutary performance in office or industry. To be sure, these “virtues” count. But they are not final or absolute. We must only reckon with them as some of the skills required in a successful team. Their impact will be meaningful only according to the energy input of the emerging generation.

    For, the issue of governing or organizing society isn’t all about the age of a sage. It is also greatly about energizing an enterprise which only the radiance and bubble of young age can do. Both are required for balance or equilibrium. Just as all the stands of the traditional cooking tripod are needed for a stable hold of the pot.

    When Ogunwusi’s predecessor Oba Okunade Sijuwade was brought in in 1980 as the 50th Ooni at 50, pundits said it was not too prudent, given the dominance of the political climate by the men and women who held sway in the 50s and 60s. They were still in charge of all spheres of the Nigerian firmament after an iron hold on the powerful institutions of state from pre-colonial days right to the two decades after. The point of the critics was that the system could only thrive if kindred spirits (denominated by cronyism and age) ran it at all levels.

    Now Sijuwade wasn’t quite a “kindred spirit”. But he had vast business links that accommodated politicians and the government machinery for patronage. He was therefore accepted as one of them, even if as a backroom operator in the industrial military complex of the Nigerian system. This explains why in his 35 year rule that witnessed the rise and fall of several civilian and military governments, Sijuwade’s industrial clusters that dug in westwards and went northwards and eastwards and southwards never shrank, never fell. They maintained a dynamic expansion, the same way the monarch sustained seamless relationships with influential traditional rulers in the far north and east of the Niger before his death at 85 in 2015.

    The incoming Ogunwusi hasn’t followed a similar trajectory.

    He is being caught young, not old and spent and bereft of spritely bounce, a leap that matches the vision of society that must feed on the wisdom of experience and on the raw vitality of youth. Unlike the old ones who would stop developing once in the palace, Ogunwusi would grow in the saddle; he would age with experience in “office”. He would ride on a horse with two lives: one moving at a slow pace observing and learning and the other jetting with speed and gathering momentum.

    Contrasting with those before him, Ogunwusi has spoken of a transcendental future, an age that he says should be the next level for the Yoruba race and for the youth of Nigeria. He is breaking out of the cocoon of palace mentality. He has taken Ile-Ife as the station to launch a global vision. Age is on his side to midwife his goals, if he does not look down on the counsel of the older culture. The two need one another, never mind the principle of only one captain steering the ship.

    I believe that Buhari’s approach of catching members of his change team, old as it looks to most Nigerians, is not a strategy that respects the future. If you rest only on age or so-called experience, you shut out the essential spice of vibrant youth, some substantial percentage of which forms the soul of this country. It is the same bottom of the bag he has put himself in with the mean number of women he has in his cabinet. These days one of the indices you apply to assess a society’s development is how far you accommodate women in government and public office, which in turn offers a window into the extent of education you allow them to have.

    It is a twist in the tale that tutorials on change based on the infusion of fresh blood in governance and politics are coming from a symbol of what some of us have called a dying institution. Others even say it is dead; it is just that the monarchical system has not been buried.

    Whichever way it goes, this extinct order is interrogating us. A relic is reinventing itself. It is rejuvenating itself. It is throwing off ancient features and habits that stunted its growth and gave it death.

    Nigeria can also come alive again by connecting the power and potential of its youth and women to the experience of the older generation to spring a surprise on the world. Let us stop the present from aborting our future prosperity. An English philosopher Francis Bacon (1561-1626) put this role of the youth in society this way: “Young men (and women) are fitter to invent than to judge, fitter for execution than for counsel and fitter for new projects than for settled business.”

    Decades ago, the United States of America worked on this principle and brought out youthful John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Several years later, the aging Soviet Republic followed that tradition by calling upon Mikhail Gorbachev. Their societies never regretted those decisions.

    • Ojewale is a writer and journalist at Ota, Ogun State

     

  •  Lagos’ security, state police and special status

    Public security is the function of governments which ensures the protection of citizens, organizations and institutions against threats to their well-being and to the prosperity of their communities. Of late, there has been pervasive concern over the state of security in Lagos. Pockets of incidents of traffic and robbery cases across the state have heightened fears over security in the state. Unfortunately, it will be an arduous task to extricate the insecurity in the land from the socio-economic challenges that we currently face as a nation. Nigeria’s growing unemployment rate is of major concern. Official figures from the Bureau of Statistics put this figure at about 20% (about 30million). But this does not actually include about 40million other Nigerian youths captured in World Bank statistics in 2009.By implication, it means that 50% of Nigerians are unemployed.

    It is, therefore, imperative that concerted efforts be made by the federal government to fix the economy. A cursory look at apprehended criminals, of late, will reveal that most of them are unemployed people, especially artisans whose businesses have been crippled by the energy crises in the country. The most systematic approach to reducing crime in any society is through the provision of an enabling environment for entrepreneurship to thrive and catalyze employment generation.

    The current security situation in Lagos has connection with present economic downturn in the country. By 2016, unless a miracle occurs, a greater percentage of the states in the country might not be able to pay workers wages, not to talk of embarking on development projects. Few self-sustaining states like Lagos might have to really brace up as more pressure would be exerted on their socio-economic potentials. This is exactly what Lagos is currently experiencing. A recent data reveals that over 25,000 people move into Lagos on a daily basis from several parts of the country for various reasons. This is aside hundreds of others that daily troop into the state from neighbouring West African countries. Sadly, when their aspiration for economic salvation becomes a mirage, most of them readily take to crime.

    Despite the fact that security remains the exclusive preserve of the federal government, as it controls all security agencies, the Lagos State government has continued to invest heavily in security. In the last 15 years, for example, the state has invested billions of naira on the state police command as well as other security organs in the state. One of the earliest tasks of Governor Akinwunmi Ambode was to meet with individuals and corporate organisations that made commitments of over N1billion in cash and kind towards advancing the course of a safer Lagos. Consequently, 10 brand new Hilux vehicles and 15 motorbikes were handed over to the Lagos State Police Command as part of the state government’s commitment to ensure a secured and investors’ friendly state. Likewise, 100 new power bikes, 10 armoured tanks and a helicopter have been acquired by the state government to reinforce the security of the state. This is in addition to the purchase of 100 new squad cars for a new initiative tagged Special Operation Service (SOS), which will harmonize community policing in partnership with the Rapid Response Squad (RRS).

    To properly address the security question in the state, we need to   tackle the contentious issue of state police. No matter how much a state government spends on security, the reality is that it has no direct control over any of the national security organs. The current centralized police structure in the country will continue to limit the capacity of states to effectively address security issues. Nigeria is too large and complex to be policed centrally. In an ideal federal system, the issue of state police should not be a contentious matter. In order to enhance security in the country, the issue of state police must be urgently addressed.

    Equally related to this is the issue of according Lagos a special status. The special position of Lagos as the commercial nerve centre of Nigeria, and indeed West Africa, has its peculiar infrastructure and security challenges. Its sheer human density driven by an increasing population due to endless survival and economic driven immigration, its ports and waterways, its border with Benin Republic, its high concentration of banks, industries, companies, and other commercial enterprises makes it a very complex state to govern.

    When the federal capital was moved from Lagos to Abuja, there was a subsisting agreement that Lagos would not be abandoned. However, successive federal administrations have refused to take a cue from countries which relocated their national capitals without abandoning infrastructure development of the former capitals. It is now time for Nigeria to imitate Germany, Brazil, Malaysia, Australia and Tanzania, which, after relocating their capitals, did not hold back developmental programmes in the former capitals. From 1954 to 1994, the capital of Germany was Bonn. It was moved to Berlin, following the endorsement of the ‘agreement of movement’ which spelt out the responsibilities of German government for the maintenance of the old capital and which it has been meeting conscientiously.

    Also, Brazil moved its capital from Rio-de Janeiro to Brasilia. To date, all federal roads, buildings and other infrastructure in both cities are maintained simultaneously by the central government. Malaysia has also maintained two capitals. Its old capital, Kuala-Lumpur, has been retained as the legislative capital, where the National Assembly operates. Its new capital, Putrajaya, which is the most computerized city in the world, is the administrative capital. In Australia, the old capital, Sydney, still enjoys special recognition. Although Canberra is the new capital, most activities of government, international conferences, party conventions and meetings still hold in the former capital city. The former capital of Tanzania is Dar-es-Salam. When Dodoma became the new capital, the old capital did not suffer neglect.

    The federal government should take a cue from these examples by according Lagos a deserving special status. There is hardly any Nigerian that doesn’t have a stake in Lagos. According Lagos a special status remains a necessary blueprint for addressing the state’s security and infrastructure concerns. It should, however, be noted that an effective public security cannot be obtained without the active involvement, participation and support of every segment of the society because public security is the responsibility of all individuals, groups, communities, organizations and other units  that constitute the state. In as much as everyone in a state pursues varied interests, the pursuit of public security should, nevertheless, be the common goal of all. The involvement and participation of individuals and non-governmental actors in the issues of public security is, therefore, a necessity for the actualization of a secured society.

     

    • Ogunbiyi is of the Features Unit, Lagos State Ministry of Information & Strategy, Alausa, Ikeja.