Category: Opinion

  • Raising the bar of Polio campaign

    Has the fight against polio in Nigeria defied brilliant strategies? I don’t agree. Has the situation gone so wild beyond redemption that we have to accept to live with wild polio virus for the continual destruction of the limbs and lives of our young ones? Never!

    Are there strategies and measures that can make us overcome this monster and free our children from the wrath and fierce indignation of this virus? Yeah; sure. There are methods that we can adopt that those who are not convinced will buy into and have a rethink. This method will arouse our interest and douse the energy of resentments against us. This is what we need to wake our anger and make us defeat polio in Nigeria. Can we eradicate polio by the year 2015? Absolutely possible if we adopt the recommended strategy and take the suitable armour.

    We have spent so much to gain so little. So much energy, so many resources (money included) and regrettably lives have been lost in this struggle and yet little has been achieved. Now, the poser is; why are we here? Why can’t we break this evil chord tying us to this triangular mess and loose our dear country from the comity of Afghanistan and Pakistan? The answer is simple! It is because we don’t want to change strategy. We are addicted to one particular method of campaign; leaders championing the course. This method has proved ineffective in our context as it also failed in many other countries in the past.

    I am not saying that political leaders leading this crusade will always fail. I will be quick to mention former American president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, FDR. Crippled by polio at age 39, FDR became a staunch anti-polio campaigner. His physical status spoke more than mere words can utter. Little wonder he defeated the multifaceted monster when its rage was fiercest. He stopped the death and crippling of children in their thousands in the United State of America.

    What made him so effective and efficient? He had what the people wanted to see and could as a result spoke convincingly about the evils. He had the requisite credentials for the fight because he wore the shoe and knew where it pinched. Do we now have to pray for another exceptional case of polio attack on a political leader for us to eradicate it in Nigeria? God forbid! There is a way out.

    Recently, Bill Gates, the co-founder of Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation came to Lagos in company of Alhaji Aliko Dangote, the multi-billionaire businessman. They came to pay a courtesy visit to Babatunde R. Fashola SAN, the governor of Lagos State at the State House Ikeja in recognition of his anti-polio activities. These two financial and economic giants have come to join forces to eradicate polio in Nigeria. And they need see another man with political power and national interest, Governor Fashola, for the success of their mission.

    My recent article, Polio Eradication, Matter of Leadership, I did compare Fashola and FDR. What I failed to mention is that no matter how powerful Fashola may be politically, no matter how passionate he may be about eradicating polio because of his love for the children and their future, he can only mobilise men with requisite credentials for the fight. Even the seemingly formidable team of Dangote Foundation and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation will fall before wild polio virus in Nigeria if requisite human resources are not deployed.

    I had written before and mentioned the benefit of polio survivors leading the fight against polio in my past articles published in national dailies and widely circulated on the internet. When I did, I was not actually emphasising that I must be included. I am only convinced that when they do with all passion, the result will be visible to all. I can testify to this. I had won co-passengers inside bus when I saw them with babies. I have been able to convince many of my neighbours not only to accept our vaccine but also made them advocates of this crusade. India also had Gautam Lewis at the vanguard of this in India, and you know the result today, India is free. Beyond “seeing is believing”, a polio survivor has a story to tell and can tell his or her story with all passion and conviction. And if you love your child, you want to buy his/her story and possibly support the crusade.

    In August 2009, Nigeria witnessed an unprecedented match against polio in the country. That was when we had the National Stakeholders’ Forum on Polio Eradication in Nigeria. This forum, at the instance of Governor Fashola was observed nationally at various dates in that month. In Lagos and many other states, it was on August 8, 2009. This marked significant reduction in the number of cases we have been having annually. But polio is still with us. To make a total riddance of this problem, he has suggested that we raise the bar of polio campaign. Fashola said, “…that is one thing that I wish to work with you (referring to Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) and the Dangote Foundation to look at how many polio survivors that are here and let them lead the campaign as a physical demonstration of what can and what could have been, in addition, of course, to doing all of the things that we really need to do”.

    This is raising the bar of Polio campaign in Nigeria. Let political differences and ideologies, ethnic sentiments and religious extremism be subdued, if only briefly, for the health of Nigerian children and unanimously take this counsel and appoint polio survivors to lead this crusade while our political leaders and global partners provide the needed support. If we do this, I am very sure; this will be the last stage of the fight. And it will not be long, we will gather, as a people, to celebrate one year in mind of the last polio virus.

    • Olugbenga, a polio survivor and Lagos Polio Ambassador writes from Lagos.

  • Which way Nigeria?

    To say that the polity is presently heated-up is an understatement. There is confusion everywhere and the situation is gradually getting out of hand. Selfish and unpatriotic interests have taken the place of national interest in the minds of the people steering the affairs of the country. The well-being of the people and the future of the country are now meaningless to those who should vehemently and unequivocally protect and uphold same.

    The crises rocking the nation are so numerous that it would be a needless to catalogue them here. Be that as it may, it is only an unpatriotic and inconsiderate fellow that will say all is well in the country. The situation is not entirely the fault of the people at the helm of affairs. As citizens, we share in the blame for some of our actions or inactions that have pushed the country deep into the present state. The question that readily come to mind at this point is – What should we do to right the wrongs?

    I have chosen to identify some vices for review and also draw the attention of Nigerians to their potency in undermining the sustenance of democracy.

    Prominent amongst these vices is the popular concept or practice that is presently ravaging the country’s development. That is the ‘Pull Him/Them Down Syndrome’. Politicians have adopted this weapon against perceived political opponents and the government in power. In as much as democracy allows for people to form opposition against the ruling party or government, the aim is for the electorates to have credible alternative and for the people in the opposition to act as checks on the rulers for the benefits and development of the polity.

    In view of the aforesaid, opposition to government policies and actions should be done in form of ‘constructive and objective criticism’. Political actors should learn to put the interest of the nation as paramount in all their actions and utterances. National interest should supersede religious, ethnic and political affiliations/connotations. All hands should be on deck to protect and sustain the country’s democracy. Just as political parties have their different, and in most cases conflicting manifestoes and agenda, the most important thing is the realization of the objectives which is to serve the people and move the country forward.

    If a particular policy or action of government is detrimental to the well-being of the populace or the development of the polity, it is the responsibility of the people in opposition to objectively criticize such policy or action and then proffer workable and better alternative for the government. If truly, the suggested or recommended alternative or solution is better and more meaningful, it will be open for people to see and judge. Should the government refuse to heed to better suggestions and submissions of the opposition for the fear of being termed a weak or government without clear direction, then that set of leaders would have successfully sent a message or signal to the people for revolution or imminent change in the elections to follow. This is because governance is not all about the people at the helm of affairs or party affiliations but, it is all about a common goal and objective which is the well-being of the people and betterment of the country.

    Though some actions and policies might have some negative or pressing effect on the polity in the short run, they could have lasting benefits and positives in the long run. Development is a continuous exercise and there are some developmental policies and actions which has short term pains and long term benefits. In this situation, the opposition should be objective and also take it as a challenge to explain the fundamentals and benefits to the people (by so doing, the people will be more relaxed and commit themselves to making and enduring the sacrifices) rather than feigning ignorance of the facts and blowing the short term pains beyond proportion just to give the government a bad name and make it unpopular in the eyes of the people.

    It is also pertinent to advise the government not to always perceive the opinions and criticisms of the opposition in bad light. A popular adage says ‘if we close our eyes and turn deaf ears to happenings in our surrounding with the excuse that we do not want to hear or see evil or unfriendly things or advise, by the time the good and beneficial ones will pass by, we will not also see or hear them’. In this case, our situation will be worse off. Putting it differently, government should not always perceive advice and criticisms of the opposition as misleading. The situation where aids of government functionaries see their job as countering or returning fire to well-meaning criticisms of the opposition will not bring forth positive results.

    Today, so many people have constituted themselves into political jobbers to attack perceived enemies of political office holders. They are praise singers who play to the gallery to drum up support for people in government even when it is obvious that they are derailing. To them, the leaders are always right and any opposition is seen as a crime against the state. They make inflammatory statements without being reprimanded by their principals. This development is very unfortunate and dangerous to the sustenance of our democracy. The unity of this country should not be toyed with for selfish interests. The general protests and revolutions that rocked some parts of the world lately are pointers to what unchecked utterances and outburst can cause.

    For a country to achieve greatness, the citizens should be ready to make sacrifices to sustain her unity. As it is difficult and almost impossible to break a bunch of broom, so is when the people are united in the pursuance of peace, stability and development of their country. As the saying goes, ‘United we stand and, divided we fall’.

    We should always have it at the back of our minds that a lot of sacrifices were made to achieve this democracy. Therefore, we should do everything to protect same. It will not do us any good if by our actions or inactions we allow the country to slip into a state of anarchy. A lot of people paid the ultimate price for us to get to where we are today. Generations to come will not forgive us if we misuse this opportunity and fail to consolidate as a result of our selfish and unpatriotic interest.

     

    •Oise-Oghaede, a Political Analyst, writes from Lagos

  • Facebook patriots

    Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel- Samuel Johnson, April 1775

    Nigeria as a country is full of many patriots, good ones at that matter. Yes, they are many and in legions. But unfortunately, many are mere Facebook patriots, thanks to Mark Zuckeberg and his co-travellers. What will these patriots have done without their invention? Check out the Facebook walls of many Nigerians and you will get what I mean. We are perhaps the most ardent users of this invention, using it to vent our spleens on whoever we deem fit. Or praise-sing whoever catches our fancy, whether they deserve it or not. If you read the Facebook walls of many Nigerians and set stock by what they write and post there, this country would have been an Eldorado.

    Many pontificate and talk about the ideal country and situation. However, their pontifications and ideals end right there on Facebook. They vociferously condemn what they see as poor leadership and lack of accountability, yet in their offices and attitude to work they are lazy and unproductive. They blame the leadership of the country for every wrong and yet exhibit bad traits in their own little corner of the world. They never honour their promises no matter how little, yet blame others for the same infractions. They are right, but the other person who exhibited the same trait is hounded and condemned on their Facebook walls.

    Give such a Facebook patriot N5000 to share among five people, he takes the lion share. He doesn’t see this as a trait of stealing or cheating, yet he’ll condemn a government official who awards a contract and inflates the cost. But what is the difference between the two? If a man is untruthful with sharing N5000 among five people how can such be just and truthful in the award of billions of naira contracts? Yet such a thief would come on Facebook and cast the biggest stone at a public official for the same offence he has committed over the simple act of sharing money among five people.

    A Facebook patriot is held in a traffic snarl and he pulls out and drives furiously facing oncoming traffic. Such a traffic offender will later pounce on his keyboard and rail against leaders who blare their sirens and drive others off the highway when in traffic. If he could drive against traffic as an ordinary citizen, would he not do the same if he is in public office? Is his offence (driving against traffic) less grievous than that of the public official? No. It is the same blatant abuse.

    Who do you blame for this? Is this not one of the little breaches we perpetrate that lead to bigger abuses and make the country what it is today? Yet these Facebook patriots are major culprits and they don’t see this as part of the problems plaguing the country?

    If you are driving in your car and you finish drinking your sachet or bottled water and you throw the bottle or sachet out of your window on to the streets, do you have a moral right to blame, abuse or complain that Lagos is dirty or that Governor Fashola is not working? How is it Fashola’s fault that you couldn’t leave your trash in your car and dispose when you get home or the office? We all come on Facebook and cry over bad leadership when we are ourselves part of the problem. Why don’t we strive to show good leadership in our little corners and leave the bigger pictures to take care of themselves?

    I agree that leadership has a lot to do with it but have we ourselves shown the needed “leadership” in our little spheres? Will a man who couldn’t truthfully and justly share N5000 among five people be able to adequately share bigger resources without cornering more than half of it for himself? No. Greed has no degree; a man who shows his greed over a small portion would show the same greed over a large portion.

    To make our country great, we must be ready to walk the talk and behave and hold ourselves with the same scale we put our public officials on Facebook.

  • The Mandela gravy train

    The Mandela gravy train

    Since the death of Dr. Nelson Mandela on December 5, many tributes have been paid to his memory. Those that are of interest to me here are from three eminent Nigerians – former Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo and Ibrahim Babangida as well as Governor Babatunde Fashola of Lagos State.

    According to Obasanjo, “Nelson Mandela modestly refused to seek re-election after his first term in office as his presidency elapsed. I still recall his pragmatic words when he said to me ‘Olu, show me a place in the world where a man of 80 years is running the affairs of his country.

    “This, to me, reflects an unequalled sense of modesty for a man who spent 27 of the prime years of his life in prison for a just cause and still kept a calm and peaceful disposition to those who took away his freedom for all those years of his life.”

    He added this clincher, “As the whole world pays tribute to Madiba, I join them in celebrating the life of a man who raised the beacon of human struggle to lofty heights of nobility and whose life is an example of what we should all aspire for. His struggle and our struggles remain the same and as we all seek for answers to deal with today’s challenges. Let us bear in mind that we all have the opportunity to act nobly in whatever position we find ourselves. When we teach our children the lessons for tomorrow, let us be reminded of the lessons Mandela gave the world.”

    My question: Did Obasanjo himself imbibe any of these?

    And now Babangida, after all the usual platitudes, he said, “The other thing that Mandela displayed which is un-African was that he stayed in power for one term and decided to leave the stage, which he thought was noble as he decided to allow the younger generations like his former Vice President, Mr. Thambo Mbeki, to take over from him. It was not easy and he was a very, very rare human being. In fact, we would not have another Nelson Mandela for the next 100 years. That is as far as I am concerned. We just have to keep on learning from some of the things he believed in and some of the things he did and copying him so that we can measure up to certain standards.”

    Do these two men have any moral ground or feel no shame in saying what they said taking into cognisance the role they have played in Nigeria’s tortuous journey?

    For me, the most ennobling comment of them all came from Fashola who said, it was ironical that Nigerians faced daily harassment in South Africa, while those who supported and enthroned apartheid got more respect in South Africa.

    He said, “Tribute to Mandela, either during his life or after his death, cannot really be too much. We are privileged to share this planet with him. But then, there are more questions than answers.

    “When you look at the part of the world where ovation is now the loudest, it was the part the pain was the most vicious. In a very cruel irony, history is being revised. The people, who collaborated with the government that enthroned apartheid at that time, are the people that are paying the biggest tribute now.

    “But I ask myself: is this not the time for deep reflection? I doubt if any African country expended as much time, as much money and as much commitment as the Nigerian government.”

    I am myself a living witness to all the atrocities of Apartheid. I participated in protests on university campuses and on the streets, calling for the end of the obnoxious system. Many students lost or nearly lost their lives fighting for the end of Apartheid and many of those who were driven out of their country came to Nigeria for refuge or to study. Now that they are independent they have turned their backs against us. So much so that not even the President of Nigeria was put on the list of leaders who spoke at the memorial service.

    Have we fallen so low? On all fronts, Fashola spoke for many of us while Obasanjo and Babangida only joined the gravy train to say something.

    God bless Fashola.

  • On health professionals and NAFDAC’s boss

    On health professionals and NAFDAC’s boss

    In recent time, some Nigerians have taken delight in churning out negative stories about the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) as a body or on the person of the Director-General, Dr. Paul Orhii. While the agency has its mechanisms to respond to such issues as raised, one is tempted to react to the spurious, ill-informed and jaundiced view of a hired writer, Sylvester Onubogu, which he titled Health professionals and NAFDAC’s boss, Orhii, published in The Nation on Sunday newspaper (December 8, 2013). Onubogu wasted a valuable page making the trite argument about the qualifications of the Director-General of NAFDAC, a medical doctor, lawyer and PhD holder in neuro-pharmacology, to head the agency, where in the last four years he has midwifed the agency’s growth and efficiency to the extent that today it is adjudged the foremost food and drug regulatory agency in Africa and one of the top 20 in the world by international bodies.

    Let me state from the outset that this write-up would not have been necessary because Orhii’s qualification to head NAFDAC and the groundbreaking record he has achieved in the agency was recognised by no less a body than the World Health Organisation (WHO), which just recently appointed Orhii the Chair of the Member State Mechanism (MSM), which is a body with such eminent members like the USA, Canada, EU countries, India, China and Brazil; a body consisting of about 193 countries committed to the fight against Spurious, Substandard, Fake, Falsely-labelled Counterfeit (SSFFC) medicines. Appointment to this exalted position involves a lot of high level meeting where candidates’ qualifications, records and achievements in their countries are thoroughly scrutinised by other medicine regulatory agencies in the world.

    It thus beggars belief that a man who has done so well in his assignment at home and who has gone further to prove his mettle at the world stage is the same person Onubogu and his faceless sponsors will want to cast aspersions on and as unqualified for the position he is holding. The big question here is who are these detractors undermining Orhii as a person and Nigeria as a nation even where Orhii is acknowledged as one of the leading lights of the transformation agenda of the Jonathan administration? It is no doubt that through the Orhii-led NAFDAC, Nigerian industries in the food and drug sectors have been well positioned by NAFDAC’s regulatory efforts to not only sell their products locally but to compete internationally through exports so as to bring back the glory days of the past where Nigeria was Africa’s major and best exporter. It is the same groundbreaking success that is being recorded in enforcement activities where Orhii has introduced cutting-edge technologies that has made it impossible for counterfeiters to escape detection and where also for the first time in the history of NAFDAC the most deterring convictions were secured by the agency, making sure that criminals caught in the act are made to serve long jail sentences that will serve as warning to others.

    This writer concentrated his attack on Orhii and the fact that he is not a member of the relevant pharmacy bodies in Nigeria. But the fact is if his argument is taken into consideration based on the provisions of the law he quoted to support his arguments, the person occupying the office of the Director-General can be 1) Food scientist 2) Medical doctor 3) Pharmacist or any of the science disciplines based on their experiences in food and drug matters. As a matter of fact, in the name NAFDAC, food is mentioned before drugs. Or is Onabolu saying that a pharmacist can double as a food technologist?

    There is simply no gainsaying the fact that NAFDAC as an agency is not an island unto itself and its structure, set up and activities are aligned with those of similar agencies performing similar roles in countries all over the world. The precedence set up by food and drug regulatory agencies in the world is experts who come from such varied disciplines like medicine, law, pharmacy, engineering, political science and various other fields are appointed to the headship of such agencies by their governments based on proven track record of achievements. More instructively, the United States Food and Drug Regulatory Agency (FDA), towards which NAFDAC is patterned has been headed by 21 Food and Drug Commissioners. Out of these 21 commissioners, 13 were medical doctors, including the current commissioner, Margaret Hamburg, MD. And at various times, a veterinarian, scientists, a lawyer and only one pharmacist has headed that body so far since its inception in 1906.

    Looking at other developed countries, the heads of the food and drugs regulatory agencies come from highly varied fields, which breakdown is as follows: Belgium, Dr. Xavier De Cuyper, graduate of Agric. Engineering; Brazil, Dr. Dirceu Bras Aparecido, specialist in Bio Pharmacognocy; Canada, Kathryn McDade, Political Science and Administration; European Commission, Dr. Andrzej Rys, Medical doctor and radiologist; European Medicine Agency, Prof. Guido Rasi, Medicine and Surgery specialist; Mexico, Mikel Arriola Penalosa, Lawyer; Netherlands, Dr. Aginus Kalis, Medical doctor; New Zealand, Dr. Stewart Jessamine, Medical doctor and general practitioner; Singapore, Dr. John Lim, Medical doctor; Switzerland, Jurg H. Schnetzer, Lawyer and graduate of business administration; UK, Dr. Ian Hudson, Physician and Paediatrician.

    So where is the argument of Onubogu and his faceless sponsors?

    Dr. Osifo writes from Benin-City, Edo State.

  • Osuji got it wrong on Aregbesola

    Steve Osuji’s”Expresso” column in The Nation of Friday, November 1, in which he lashed Owelle Rochas Okorocha of Imo State for destroying his state’s economy, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola of the State of Osun for his looks, faith and his education policy and Dr. Akinwunmi Adesina, the Federal Minister of Agriculture for being adept in theatrics than his official portfolio was indeed an excoriation. Osuji, no doubt, holds his own as a columnist in this well-respected Nigerian newspaper but he displayed such a crass error of judgment especially as it relates to Aregbesola and his education policy.

    Osuji’s assertion that Ogbeni “loves his politics dearly… [but] always so quick to act to impress his people” made it sound like Ogbeni has committed a serious crime for being passionate about his politics and articulating his values to his people willing to listen. Osuji’s other assertion that Aregbesola “always seems to rub off people the wrong way—from his oft soap-box like grandstanding, to his shaggy beard and his Islamic religion fervor” that “always seems to leave some sour curd for people to chew” is ridiculous. Pray, how could Aregbesola’s articulation of issues based on his personal political philosophy and his values have amounted to grandstanding? Why would anyone feel that he’s being rubbed the wrong way just because the governor’s hair follicles decided to cluster below his chin, and he simply let them be? Why should a chief of state who simply takes his religion serious leave some sour curd for Osuji—or anyone for that matter—to chew? For the aforesaid from Osuji without any shred of evidence that a poll or survey was taken that ascertained that people are being rubbed off the wrong way is nothing short of sheer dislike, if not hatred for the governor’s person. And it’s indeed very unfortunate.

    Ogbeni’s holistic approach to major policy decisions as exemplified in his policy on education which Osuji had singled out, can never be “an unwarranted exercise in mysticism and magic” in that there’s verifiable evidence of a huge jump in the enrolment of students into public schools because even parents who had their wards in private schools withdrew them because of the glaring improvement they saw in the public school system after Aregbesola took office. What’s more? The State of Osun came from the lowest bottom to the top bracket as one of the states in the country that recorded the highest percentage of students that passed the WAEC examination with at least five credits including English and Mathematics within a short period after he commenced work as governor. Osuji needs to be reminded, in case he had forgotten, that the transformation in the education system currently underway in the State of Osun is the outcome of an education summit which was held at the inception of Aregbesola administration whose participants included some of the country’s best educationists that included Prof. Wole Soyinka, among others. It is appalling to see a member of the fourth estate who was supposedly trained to see and analyze societal ills like those confronting Nigeria to have opined that “there is absolutely nothing to reinvent” in this country’s education system. Education—especially in the public sector—like all other indicators of growth and development in the Nigerian society, is nothing in comparison to what obtains in neighbouring Ghana and some other African countries, not to even mention developing countries like Singapore, Malaysia, and Brazil. A serious chief of state desirous of development in his domain cannot help but reinvent what had proven so pathetically disastrous over time and had impeded the growth of his people and societal advancement.

    Yes, the school calendar, structure or classification may not be the problem confronting the nation’s education sector but it’s most certainly part of the problem. Even the architects of the 6-3-3 system that Osuji thinks is perfectly in order had since discovered that it’s no longer relevant to the present reality. If “Opon Imo,” a computer device invented by the Aregbesola administration that puts all academic curriculums as well as past WAEC questions, among its other features, on the fingertips of 150,000 senior secondary school pupils in the state, aside from pulling down old school buildings and replacing them with new ones, are not enough demonstration that the government has already declared education to be “one of its core priorities,” as admonished by Osuji, I don’t know what other evidence he needs. For him to have said that the government’s provision of uniforms and meals for the students is not necessary is a reckless and dangerous display of ignorance. What makes Osuji think that the government cannot afford it?

    Perhaps, what seems to be the common thread that runs through the vituperations of Aregbesola’s detractors is not so much about the governor and his policies—as their arguments have never been able to gain traction—but the audacity of the man to step where even angels fear to tread. No sooner did he mount the governorship saddle than he invented a flag, a crest and an anthem for his state, a move that drew the ire of those whose thinking have either been heavily militarized or did not understand the place of a state in relation to the federal government in a democracy. Even the Jonathan administration found that legitimate move so outstandingly bad that it almost declared a state of emergency on the state on the warped thinking that the state was trying to secede, only for us to wake up one morning to find that Bayelsa, his home state had done exactly the same thing and not a single word of condemnation came from the President. A misguided faction of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) and its co-travellers went up in arms when the governor took Sukuk (Islamic bond), having accused him of attempting to turn Osun into an Islamic state. Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron, who presides over a predominantly Christian country, has just announced its country’s readiness to raise money with the Islamic bond in order to shore up his country’s ailing economy. Ogbeni is no doubt unusual but it takes an unusual set of leaders to turn an unusual country like Nigeria and its component parts around.

     

    • Odere is a media practitioner.

  • Ogun still a huge construction site

    I first came across the phrase a ‘Huge Construction Site’ in November 1999 during a tour of Germany sponsored by the government of that country. The expression was used in an information pamphlet describing the city of Berlin which was then undergoing massive reconstruction befitting its status as capital of the newly united Germany.

    That phrase, however, aptly captured the scenario presented on the streets of Berlin during the period. Every corner you turned to, there was construction work going on, with giant equipment dotting the landscape. Thus, when Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, national leader of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), in his speech on January 24 during the commissioning of the first flyover bridge to be built by the Ogun State government in its 37 years of existence used the same expression to describe the situation in the state today, one could not but marvel at the beauty of the expression.

    With 16 major road construction projects going on simultaneously across the state and other reconstruction works on some other smaller roads, Ogun State has really become a big construction site, where top civil engineering firms now compete to prove their competence.  The construction work on major roads in Abeokuta, Ijebu Ode, Ota, Sagamu, Isheri, Magboro, Ilara, Ijohun, Ilashe,  Ilishan, Ago Iwoye, Mowe, Ibafo, Ofada, Sango, Agbado, Akute, Alagbole, among others, is a manifestation of the urban renewal and infrastructural development which form part of the five cardinal programme of the Ibikunle Amosun administration’s Mission to Rebuild Ogun State.

    The government commenced this urban renewal programme with the reconstruction and expansion of the 2.4 kilometre Ibara-Sokori-Totoro road which was used as a model for what is now known as ‘Ogun Standard’ roads. The already completed road came with road furniture including walkways, drainage, median with street lights and flower beds, bus stop, flyover at the Ibara junction and pedestrian bridge. All these facilities are being enjoyed by the good people of Ogun State.

    As at today, the seven-kilometre Sagamu-Benin Express Junction/Oba Erinwole Junction road, 4.8 km Ilo Awela road in Ota, 8.7 km OGTV-Brewery junction road, 6 km Moshood Abiola Way, 34 km Lafenwa – Ayetoro road, 9 km Ojere-Asero road, 5.6 km Somorin – Ajebo road, 2.2 km Abiola Way Junction- Muda Lawal Stadium, 850 metre Moriamo Olorombo road, all in the state capital, are under construction.

    Other roads being modernized by the Ogun State government are the 100 km Ilara-Ijohun-Ilase road, 25 km Ilishan-Ago Iwoye road, 29 km Mowe-Ofada-Ibafo road, 9km Ejinrin-Oluwalogbon junction in Ijebu Ode, 12 km Magboro-Underpass road, Isheri road and the very important 32 km Sango-Agbado-Ojodu Road.

    Most of these roads are at different stages of completion to levels ranging from two to 30 percent and the last of the roads is expected to have been completed by December next year. The latest road where construction just started in October is the Sango-Ojodu Road which will solve the problem of neglect suffered over the years by the numerous residents of the border towns with Lagos.

    Apart from being a move aimed at fulfilling his promise to the people of Ogun State and implementing part of his five cardinal programme, the road construction projects have implications for other items on Governor Ibikunle Amosun’s mission. For instance, other aspects of the mission include employment generation, industrialization, affordable housing, affordable qualitative education and efficient healthcare delivery system. With the road construction, the problem of unemployment plaguing a continuously growing state like Ogun is being tackled. The construction firms are employing thousands of skilled and unskilled workers. Their work is also contributing to shoring up the local economy as many other allied businesses like supply of sands, granite and other materials used in construction work are now thriving.

    The road network is also part of the infrastructural development necessary to attract genuine investors who will like to have their companies located in a place where there is easy movement of goods and persons. In any case, the state government is expanding the roads in readiness for the future construction of light rail to complement the road transportation system. On April 9, the government signed an agreement with the CCECC, a Chinese construction company for the construction of light rail which will link up the major cities in the state like Abeokuta, Ota, Sagamu and Ijebu Ode. The plan therefore is to use the road construction to prepare the state as the next preferred investors’ destination in West Africa.

    The road construction projects are to be complemented by ambitious housing programme which will help to accommodate the people that will expectedly begin to relocate to Ogun State in search of jobs and a safe, peaceful abode. More importantly, the new roads, when completed, will open up the nooks and crannies of the state to modernization. There will be effective link between the far flung parts of the state in Ipokia and Imeko to Ogun Waterside and Ago Iwoye.

    However, as it happened in Berlin during its reconstruction period, the road expansion and modernization comes at a cost. There has been loss of property by some people to create right of way for the new roads. Vehicular and pedestrian movement is slowed down around the construction sites. Many people whose homes and businesses are beside the roads find it difficult to access their premises. The people of Ogun State deserve praise for the understanding and support they have been displaying in the face of these temporary pains. They have continued to support government’s efforts to bring development to the state. Many property owners voluntarily demolish their structures once they are marked to be affected by the road construction. They also troop out, praying and offering encouraging words to the governor whenever he goes on inspection of the construction sites.

    With over N90 billion being invested on these infrastructural development projects, there are those who wonder where the money is coming from. The sources are many. There is the Internally Generated Revenue which has risen from the paltry sum of N700 million per month that this administration inherited on assumption of office in May 2011 to about N4 billion. The leakages in the financial system have been blocked. There are internal loans from local banks which are being frugally dispensed. There are also funds from development partners.

    Yet, the state is blessed to have a captain who does not sit in the office, giving directives. The governor moves round the construction sites mingling with engineers and supervising the pace and quality of work. The frequent tour of the sites helps to ensure that the state is not short-changed at any time and in any manner. The tour of project sites is perhaps another way Governor Amosun uses to touch base with the people and also keeps fit, physically. See why Ogun State is Nigeria’s modern day ‘Huge Construction Site’?

     

    • Olaniyonu is Commissioner for Information and Strategy in Ogun State.

     

  • Human face of Delta Beyond Oil

    One unmistakable and discernible thread that has run through the programmes and policies  of Delta State Governor, Dr. Emmanuel Eweta Uduaghan, is his uncommon concern and care for the welfare  of the less endowed, referred to in popular parlance as the less privileged in the society. This innate trait in the governor came to the fore once again in Warsaw, Poland at the UN Conference on Climate Change.

    Uduaghan, a founding member of R20, an international organisation of sub-national governments, NGOs, corporations and educational institutions across the world committed to combating climate change, speaking at a panel discussion on “Enhancing adaptation and resilience at the local level” at the UN conference lamented the challenges of adaptation to climate change on the rural people, who are most vulnerable to the devastating impact of flooding.

    His words: “What I see here is a lot of attention being given to issues in the cities and urbanization, which is important but I will like to see some attention paid to the lives of the people in the rural communities. During extreme weather event like flooding, these are people whose economic and social means are destroyed and they have a lot of difficult time getting on their feet. So the text that will emerge from this conference must reflect the necessity of providing means to improve the adaptation and resilience of the rural communities.”

    The governor no doubt was speaking from experience. He saw firsthand, the havoc, sorrow and the devastation people at the bank of the River Niger suffered in the wake of the 2012 horrifying flood that submerged about two-third of Delta State. The victims, mostly rural dwellers lost houses, farmlands and in some cases loved ones to the flood.

    Uduaghan informed the audience that his administration has been doing a lot within the constraint of resources to implement robust adaptation and mitigation measures as the state is prone to flooding.

    “Over the past five years, my administration has worked hard in developing an integrated approach in addressing the menace of climate change. Our approach is to promote sustainable development and the diversification of the energy economy of the state. We have been

    collaborating with international institutions and corporate organizations to achieve this,” he said.

    He listed the collaboration with UNDP on Territorial Approach to Climate (TACC) study, which is now completed with the production of the Integrated Territorial Climate Plan (ITCP), a report that captures adaptation and mitigation strategies across all, including the rural communities. He also explained that based on the ITCP report, the state would encourage the use of energy saving stoves, to reduce the felling of trees for energy use at the rural communities. He also listed the use of energy efficient fish dryers and biogas digester that will turn kitchen waste to cooking gas as other initiatives his government is encouraging.

    Governor Uduaghan stated that his administration will pursue tree planting initiatives to act as green belt in coastal communities to forestall erosion and flooding. He also talked about the recently launched Carbon Exchange Desk, explaining that it will serve as a clearinghouse for carbon credit-related transactions. Delta state is the first State in Nigeria to do this.

    Close watchers of programmes and policies of the Uduaghan’s administration see foot prints of his milk of kindness and concern for the ordinary folk in all his endeavours since assuming office as Governor of Delta State since May 29, 2007. This uncommon burden for the underprivileged dots his award winning micro-credit programme that has provided economic support to over 100,000 economically weak persons, majority of whom are women, in the state. The micro credit programme which won three-consecutive Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) awards has three attributes: empowerment of the grassroots population, creating new wealth at the level and reducing unemployment in the productive age bracket. It targets the rural and urban poor, unemployed, particularly school leavers, economically disadvantaged persons, the physically challenged among others. Reports from the Commissioner of Poverty Alleviation, Dr. Antonia Ashiedu, indicates that most beneficiaries of the scheme who started as small scale businesses have grown to medium enterprises and are now exporting some of their products.

    The administration’s free rural, maternal and child Medicare programmes, where urban poor and rural folks are treated free of charge are no less welfarist. Under the free rural health scheme, which has moved to about 400 rural communities in the state, over 100,000 patients have received medical treatment, including surgeries.

    Data from the State Ministry of Health indicate that over 600,000 clinical attendance have been recorded under the free maternal care scheme since its inception in 2008. The scheme provides free medical care for pregnant women from conception to child birth. These include free drugs and surgeries. The result is drastic reduction in maternal morbidity and mortality. Prior to the scheme, the maternal mortality rate in the state was about 450 deaths in every 100,000 pregnant women but the figure has dropped to about 211 deaths, the lowest in the country. Similarly, the under five free medical programme of the state government that provides free Medicare for children under five years has reduced infant mortality in the state. Independent health data indicate that 110 deaths out of 1,000 for children under the age of five used to be recorded in the South-south states, prior to this scheme but that the figure from Delta State has dropped to about 23 on the average.

    The state government’s urban, rural and riverine transportation schemes that provide comfortable means of transportation for the citizens at drastically subsidized prices also have imprints of a man with the wellbeing of the less privileged at heart. The Mass Transit Scheme at the moment has about 800 buses on its fleet, including 50 Marcopolo Buses, 40 school shuttle buses and nine civilian buses for tertiary institutions. The target is to increase the fleet to 1,000 buses. The state Ministry of Transport has also distributed over 4,000 tricycles at highly subsidized prices and recently 130 executive boats were given out to ease riverine transportation.

    Rural folks used to rickety vehicles now board fully air-conditioned buses at little cost. Urban dwellers who were at the mercy of Shylock taxi and bus drivers now take pleasure in boarding comfortable buses, popularly called ‘Uduaghan Buses’ at very cheap rates.  Riverside dwellers too now move about in comfortable boats.

    It is common knowledge that public primary and secondary schools in Nigeria today are attended by children of the less privileged. Uduaghan, aware of this and in keeping with his character, embarked on an aggressive and massive infrastructure revolution of public primary and secondary schools. Under the programme, most of the dilapidated structures have given way to modern state-of-the-art buildings conducive for learning and instruction. Governor Uduaghan on assumption of office ensured that students in public schools are enrolled for the West African Examination Council (WAEC) and National Council on Education (NECO) examinations free, with the state government bearing the cost.

    Besides, the state’s bursary and scholarship programme has afforded students of the state’s origin and indigent students opportunity to realise their dream of tertiary education. Every student from the state benefits from an annual bursary scheme but students with a higher grade point average are in addition paid annual scholarship of about N100,000 with Masters and PhD candidates receiving N200,000 and N300,000 respectively, annually. The administration also runs a PhD scholarship scheme where students of the state’s origin who make first class are granted automatic scholarship to study up to their doctorate degree and are paid N5 million every year. There are also the overseers, children of deceased civil servants, physically challenged, aviation and law scholarship schemes that the administration is running.

    Statistics from the state’s  Bursary and Scholarship Board indicate that over 80 thousand students have benefited from the student’s bursary scheme between 2009 and 2012, while 1, 236 students in law school have also benefited under the period. Over 90 students have also benefited from the overseers scholarship scheme while no less than 300 have been granted scholarship under the first class scheme.

    • Idama is a public affairs commentator.

  • Like Nelson Mandela

    Like Nelson Mandela

    If I am ever asked, “Dele Aina, do you have any regrets in life?” I would answer, “YES! Chiefly, because I never met Nelson Mandela.”

    Africa, indeed, the world has lost the greatest black man that ever lived. I was tempted to call him, ‘the second greatest black man that ever lived, following closely behind my dad’. But then I thought, when daddy reads this, he’d call me and say, “Didn’t I teach you to be truthful and objective always?”

    So, let’s give it to Mandela. Greatest dad? That’s my dad! But, the greatest black man? That’s Nelson Mandela! He shall remain, for ages to come, the most celebrated, the most respected, the most honoured black man, ever!

    I have studied the life of Mandela extensively. He was not born with a silver spoon. He had it rough & tough all through his lifetime. In spite of all his challenges, he loved and sacrificed. He loved his enemies, and sacrificed for his people. All African leaders should take a leadership course centered on the life of Nelson Mandela.

    Indeed, anybody in any form of leadership should take out time to adequately study, adopt and apply the lifestyle and leadership qualities of Mandela.

    Mandela never owned a house in Dubai, UK, or USA. He never owned a private jet, never was extravagant or ostentatious as many African leaders (secular and spiritual) are today.

    Mandela admitted to have voraciously read the Bible while in incarceration. While I can’t say assuredly if he ever confessed JESUS CHRIST as his Lord and savior, I make bold to state that I saw more JESUS in him than I’ve seen in most spiritual leaders globally.

    Mandela was focused, forgiving, forthright, and fearless. He fought a cause he believed for 27 years in prison, refusing to accept personal freedom if his people were still being oppressed.

    He came out of prison to become the first black president of South Africa, and exited after his first term. As president, he pursued truth, forgiveness and reconciliation; not vengeance, looting, and grandstanding.

    In all his health challenges, he was never flow outside of South Africa for treatments abroad. What was good enough for his people was good enough for him. Mandela was a LEADER! Let the looters, bleeders, and blunders pretending to be leaders all over Africa, and worldwide, learn from this great man.

    His was a Long Walk to Freedom, not a short cut to stardom, success and stupendous wealth, being bandied about in many places nowadays. LORD, have mercy!

    Nelson Mandela was my mentor, my leader, my good example. He was everything a good leader should be. He was all I hope and plan to be. I love this man. I love everything he epitomized.

    Every man, high and low, should aspire and strive to be like Mandela.

    From today, when you meet anybody in leadership (spiritual and secular), ask them, “Are you like Mandela?” Whether they answer yes or no, add quickly, “Please, be like MANDELA!” Let the children of presidents, governors, senators, honourables / dishonourables, LGA chairmen, and clergy, ask their fathers regularly, “Daddy, are you like Mandela? Please, be like MANDELA!”

    Apart from his double divorces, Mandela was almost a perfect man. But then, who has never made mistakes in life? I believe Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela is in heaven with GOD.

    If you disagree with me, go there now and find out! There are two men the world will never forget: JESUS THE CHRIST, and Nelson Mandela.

    In case you’re not interested, I’m gunning for the third!
    Be like MANDELA!

    Aina is founder of  Just Jesus Foundation, writes from Lagos.

     

  • * Thumbs up for our GEJ

    Remembering especially his dismal performance in an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour and other unflattering outings, many Nigerians must have fretted when the BBC announced that President Goodluck Jonathan was going to favour its global audience with his reflections on Nelson Mandela’s legacy.

    They need not have worried.

    It was a lexical triumph for Dr Jonathan. He delivered himself with semantic and syntactic aplomb, even taking a dig at those leaders who, instead of voluntarily relinquishing office like Mandela, sit tight and plunge their countries into chaos – no need for him to name them, said Dr Jonathan; you know them — and those leaders who leave office but continually lurk in the corridors of power.

    Is this perchance an indication that he intends to “play Mandela” by seeking neither a second term nor an elongation of his current term?

    In whatever case, I hope he is not scheduled to be in the same room anytime soon with Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe. I can assure him that Mugabe, one of the most gifted polemicists in Africa and indeed anywhere, will respond in kind at the earliest opportunity, and most likely with compound interest.

    When it came to naming an example of those who, according to Jonathan, vacated office but carry on as if they are still in power, I was stuck. Can you help?