Category: Opinion

  • Amaechi’s God-given victory

    Amaechi’s God-given victory

    RIVERS State Governor Rotimi Amaechi must celebrate his re-election victory as Chairman of Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) with humility and gratitude to God. This is because he who God has blessed, no President can curse. No force can change what God has decreed. In the midst of tension, the one God has ordained as most appropriate in the prevailing circumstance has won.

    Amaechi’s victory is in actuality against all odds. The presidency working through Akwa Ibom State Governor Godswill Akpabio strained 19 governors to sign an open endorsement before the elections; but as God will have it, the governors voted with their conscience and returned Amaechi to office. Akpabio is now showing the world the pre-signed document where Governor Jonah Jang’s name was written as winner ahead of the election.

    Amaechi’s political triumph has been a wonder of light, freedom and democracy above forces of darkness, despotism and dictatorship. Right from the episode of his aspiration to become state governor, he had been confronted with serial injustices, humiliations and embarrassments – just as it was in his desire for a second term as NGF Chairman. But in all, it has become perceptible that God has been favouring him. The irresolvable contention between Governors Ibrahim Shema and Isa Yuguda was not an error but occurred in order to pave way for him. On the other side, Plateau State Governor Jang who emerged at the dying moment when the two were forced to step down rightly lost to gain the position which he was not prepared for.

    Yet, even as Amaechi has won the polls, the war is not over. The battle line for 2015 is being drawn and the hand writing is becoming clearer for people that have been blinded by sentiment and power. This is a test case on how 2015 will look like when forces of darkness will no longer comprehend the light of day. The governors, including those who voted against the winner might as well begin to see the non-viability of their contentious forum.

    In reality, the NGF brouhaha is not profiting Nigeria anything. It is sad that PDP government has continuously wasted much of the nation’s time and resources in politicking than in growth and development. The forum, with Akpabio’s haughty carriage and other governors playing the devil’s advocate for the president has polluted political atmosphere across the land with detraction to securing power and position becoming the priority.

    For Amaechi and the opposition, as 2015 approaches, more battles might be brewing which is bound to be dirtier. If Niger-Delta (ex-) militants and their leaders could be mobilized to protest publicly against Amaechi, requesting that he should step down as governor, the future of the nation, even if Boko Haram is extracted, is becoming unguaranteed.

    Just like the opposition is trailing, Amaechi might need to use this opportunity to accomplish the vision for his mission. If not, the desperate presidency with its massive manhunt tools will incessantly work to pull him down the same way the nation is being dragged down. The target would be to deprive him and his people of enjoying the rest of his political life just like the masses today are hardly benefitting from the reward of democracy under the ruling party.

    The merry-go-round Akpabio and his pro-Jonathan colleagues should realize that Nigerians are becoming wiser politically. Not many would because of ethnicity or regionalism still want to align with failure in 2015, even with the desperation to hold on to power. Just like some PDP governors denied the pro-Jonathan NGF candidate of their voting rights, many Nigerians in the South would not just vote for a failing southerner if there is a trustworthy achieving northerner in the competition. More and more, Nigerians are yearning benefiting from the good of the land above wasting their voting values on the basis of ethnicity.

    This was why the progressive governors might have read the minds of the people by securing victory for Amaechi. The outcome is an indication that there is still light at the end of the nation’s dark tunnel.

    The likes of Akpabio displayed how he has been governing the people of his state by false pretences. A leader who would always prefer to satisfy an individual in transitory power instead of commitment to selfless service to the people might not receive anticipated personal recompense at the end of the pursuit.

    So thrilled that he was empowered as Chairman of a desperately-created PDP Governors Forum to tackle Amaechi, Akpabio has manifested himself as a typical wolf in sheep’s clothing. He hardly knew how not to throw stone as a resident in a glass house. After his group failed to satisfy the master’s personal political desire, he attempted to turn issues upside down by declaring the election which he engineered as invalid. He said Amaechi ought to have stepped down before the conduct of the election, adding that there was no way an incumbent could be in office while an election was being conducted. It was as if he has forgotten that in Nigeria, like he experienced when seeking for his second term as governor, incumbents do not leave office before elections.

    If also he is still standing on his contention of rigging, emanating from the voting and verification of only 35 governors in attendance, then democracy still has a long way to go in Nigeria. The list he had prepared ahead of the election can never stand as authentic voting pattern. He might have counted the vote before it was casted. Whereas, he ought to know that some of those who signed on the list never did it on their minds but just to please him and his boss. Election is a game of numbers. All manners of manipulations used to be done during general elections, and might be thought as the way out in 2015 might not work again.

    If Amaechi who was eventually voted for by most of the governors had had been declared the loser, Nigerians would have been greatly thwarted. Akpabio needs to be taught that God will always do what He wants to do, no matter what, because power belongs to Him and He gives it to whom He wants. Evidently, Akpabio needs some education to know why he could not even deliver despite all the threats and arm- twisting. Let him understand why he and his team gambled and failed.

    Indeed, the reality of the NGF election is that it is a technical knockout for anti-Amaechi politicians. After several months of intrigues and politicking, the president failed to convince his initial candidate to step down for a newly-chosen one, and could not also convince his party governors to vote for his even tually chosen candidate. This inconsistency means that he has been weakened politically by the result of the election. He picked the wrong battle and was not ultimately honoured.

    It is distasteful that Mr. President, the number one citizen could not gather enough support within his own political party to defeat his perceived opponent. He should now be much more bothered how votes from South East and South-South will return him to Aso Villa in 2015. The fact is that nothing seems to be working in this regime. South-South is only supporting him because he is their son; not much practical benefit with impact on the life of the people.

    We must imbibe the lesson that the political future of Nigeria is greater than that of any individual. Nobody can become the authentic president of Nigeria without the support of majority of Nigerians. Most Nigerians has been crying in all corners that President Goodluck Jonathan is not performing pleasingly. It does not matter his address to the nation this week granting self acclamation for achievbements, what will impress the people is the level of positive impact of his practical performance on their lives.

    The wisdom might be for him to put sentiments and desperation aside so that he can move Nigeria forward. The nation that once had the potentiality of greatness has been stagnant for too long.

  • Orji: Vindication of change maker

    Orji: Vindication of change maker

    Two years after the liberation of Abia State, after the revolution that conquered the ancien regime, it is time to put Governor Theodore Orji on the scale. It is time to march the light-bearer of the people’s mandate to the dock for cross examination. It is time to assess the grand march to freedom, to review the journey so far. How has Abia fared? What is the experiential feel of the people in the new life of freedom?

    Indeed, the month of May is a month of reckoning when our nascent democracy is put on trial for self-defence. The May 29 Democracy Day anniversary is now crucial for our political history. It is not only a day of celebration but more importantly a day of stock-taking. Just as every individual’s story is different and particular so also is the story of states and nations. For Abia State, it is a long walk to freedom, a struggle of emancipation. Like Plato’s allegory of the cave-dweller where the cave inhabitant marches through darkness in search of light, the story of Abia democracy under Orji is a complex trajectory through bondage and then liberation.

    Monuments are great legacies and great footprints in the sands of time. They are marks of noble leadership. Governor Orji has concentrated energy in building a galaxy of legacies in Abia. But, in my personal evaluation, his greatest legacy for which posterity must sing eulogies is his deed of gift of freedom to the people of God’s Own State. For, as Voltaire, the French Philosophy of the Enlightenment noted, freedom is the parent of all the needs of the human spirit.

    Today and 24 months in the second saddle, Orji is confidently stepping out to the market square to show himself approved a workman who does not need to be ashamed. For a people who have seen the two sides of tyranny and then freedom, they are better witnesses in this open trail of the Ibeku man. They are better judges and jurists in this open court of public conscience. Under Orji, there are no more tin-gods and tin-mother-gods in Abia. Nobody goes to Igbere or Nweke Street or anywhere to prostrate before human deities of power. The word “Okija” is totally obliterated out of the Abia social and political lexicon.

    Throughout the campaigns in 2011 and at the inauguration, Orji spoke about his covenant with the people. He expressed determination to break off from the past, to lead Abia out of the doldrums. True to his words, he has led a successful revolution of the mind. The mental orientation towards politics and power in Abia has changed. Power is no more a matter of a cult of brotherhood headed by one family. Nobody carries a cow to any godfather to pay obeisance. Unlike in the past where people make pilgrimages to Igbere, Orji enthroned true representative democracy where all Abians of every hue and colour could have a chance to serve.

    In Abia today, it is the communities and the constituencies that make nominations for commissioners and other political offices. The advisers and assistants are appointed based on merit, track record and competence. Today, meritocracy has been restored as against mediocrity. In the past, it was a case of class distortion and class destruction wherein the elite became endangered species while goons and lay-about became the ruling class.

    Another great legacy of value is the stability and harmony that Orji has brought into the Abia polity. Starting from his administration, he has served with only one team in the last two years. In the days of bondage, there would have been more than ten dissolutions or reshuffling of cabinet by now. Destiny thrust into his hands a society that was visibly at war, a state that was highly polarized where the parties were at daggers drawn. Precisely, he inherited war. But, he did not go the way of the Mosaic – an eye for an eye. He did not amass arsenals for a return fire. He chose the path of Mahatma Gandhi – truth, peace and reconciliation.

    He embarked on a mission of reconciling the state. He threw out an olive branch and threw the door of government house open. In the new air of freedom, the exiles returned home, the old fugitives returned home to embrace their erstwhile foes. The political warriors laid down their arms and all, in one collective spirit, enlisted into the new vision of Abia. This was how the governor came to be the first National Peace Ambassador.

    Indeed, as Orji stands at the market square this month to give account of his stewardship, one issue will be very pertinent. And that is that the first primary duty of government is the maintenance of law and order. This should be the mother of all assessments, the most paramount indices for measuring successful leadership. How has Abia fared under Orji in terms of law and order? Abia, undeniably, has been an oasis of sanity. Orji’s Abia is standing tall in the federation as a model state in terms of law and order and social harmony. And this was not legislated into existence but a product of committed and pragmatic action.

    In the midst of a country gripped by violence, where bloodshed either by accident or by deliberate organized crime make the headlines everyday in the papers, Abia State has remained an isolated case of a sort of heaven on earth where peace reigns and where residents sleep with their doors wide open. And, I emphasize again, this did not come by fiat neither by providence but a product of judicious and strategic governance. Governor Orji toiled day and night, tasked his brain and mind to attain this state for his people. Thus, Orji is the builder of a new Abia of law and order.

    Orji has also run a legacy regime. This regime is about catering for the welfare of the people in terms of infrastructural renewal and provision of social amenities. Today, with a paltry N3.5 billion monthly federal allocation, from where he pays a monthly salary bill of N2.5billion, he has been able to build legacy projects, like the world-class Conference Centre in Umuahia, the new four-storey Secretariat Complex, the new Government House, the Abia Diagnostic Centre in Umahia and Aba, the new High Court building, new modern offices for the Broadcasting Corporation of Abia and a host of other monumental projects. The roads in Aba and Umuahia have been transformed.

    In the power sector, there has been a revolution in Umuahia and its environs where Orji deployed about N1.5 billion to execute a power evacuation work from the Federal Government installed 132/133 kVA power facility at Ohiya. The power is evacuated to other distribution points at Oboro, Afara, Ikwuegwu, Obowo and the Umuahia environs. Today, in Umuahia, electricity supply has been improved by nearly 100 percent and this has engendered a new life in Abia.

    It is farming season in the east and Orji has launched an agricultural revolution. There are Liberation Farms spread across the 17 local councils of the state. They are expected to employ about 10,000 workers when fully operational. Already, 50 Abians are working at the Okeikpe farms, the plot project of the liberation farms where plantain is being bred. For the first time in Abia, a leader emerged that made youth empowerment a top priority in the government policy schedule. This came to a climax recently in an open ceremony where the Governor distributed over 200 vehicles to youths to enable them embark on small-scale businesses.

    In the area of the minimum wage regime. Abia State under Governor Orji is one of the first five states that started paying the Consolidated Medical Salary Structure early in 2011, ditto for the Consolidated Health Salary Structure for health assistants, health officers, vet officers, agric health officers nurses and doctors. In the same vein, Abia is also one of the few states that immediately paid the ASUU agreed salary structure for universities. He also went beyond the Federal Government prescribed N18,000 minimum wage for civil servants and followed the NLC standardized salary regime and has been paying N21,100 since December 2011.

    This is but a brief testimonial for the Abia liberation, the vindication of the liberator. At the market square, Like Paul of Tarsus, Orji would stand on the podium, his hands spread out to the heavens, and say: I have fought the good fight. “I have finished the race. I have kept the faith.”

    • Adindu is the President-general of the Abia Renaissance Movement (ARM)

  • From the cell phone

    For Gbenga Omotoso

    May Almighty God add to your brain, that is the prayer Goodluck Jonathan but he is not type of good luck we need in Nigeria. Anonymous

    For our President to vist a state in Nigeria where Nigerian flag would not be waved to welcome him; may the Almighty God protect him. Anonymous

    I am pleased with the self confidence which Dr. Goodluck Jonathan uses to aproach issues like this. The Federal Government should remember to include bullet proof, anti suicide bomb and most importantly, anti Judas Iscariot as security messures. Anonymous

    “Who will stop the gunman?” is a very pathetic story of the helpless state of security in the country. Service with intergrity, commitment to service, appropriate use of technology will save us from the gunman. From ADEYCorsim, Oshodi, Lagos

    Sir, whatever the president’s visit to Borno, Yobe means nothing to the perishing Nigerians. What matters is for the press to stop their show of academic prowess. Let them start and advertise (non stop) free and fair election method. That is official legalisation of the God’s given June 12,1993 open-air (option A4) electoral system; unalloyed. God wants to control National Assembly, the States Assemblies and the local government councils for the benefit of all Nigerians. Period! From the watchman over God’s Heritage in Nigeria and Africa

    The piece is thought-provoking. Who will save us from the gunman? The oppressed can. What they need is state power which is in the hand of the oppressors who will never build a humane society because they have found comfort in the social order. Thanks. From Amos Ejimonye, Kaduna

    If you are loved by your people you do not need that kind of security. Anonymous

     

     

    For Olatunji Dare

    Good day Sir, I was not surprised to read the article “Our unfortunate police officers”. Sir, the agony is that, the politicians enjoyed the services of police officers to rig and manipulate election results, send people to their early graves, use the police to protect their property, family, and even girl friends, escort bullion vans. Nobody cares. But, I do not want any of my sons to be a police officer. From Abdullahi Ahmad

    “Our unfortunate police officers” is a fantastic write-up. I symphatise with the bereaved family. But for the Nigerian police, until a functional and a purposeful Government is in place, we cannot have a sigh of relief. More ink to your pen sir. From Preye, PortHarcourt

    What an excellent analysis of the whole problem. Thanks for your courage, God will bless you for telling the truth. From Abdul, Kaduna State

    Sir, I do not know how to thank you for your comments on the public issues, than to say God will give you more wisdom to carry out your duty. Anonymous

    Any job-seeking Nigerian, who wants to commit suicide by being hacked down like felled tree and chopped as logs, should join The Nigeria Police. It is only in this job that its top brass looks and holds its men with disdain and disgust. The whipping security outfit – Police – in Nigeria is a metaphor of our inept leadership and a sign of a failed nation. Even in death the unfortunate police officers are each worth a sum of N2m. From Ter Akaa, Abuja

    Sir, I like what you wrote, it is the whole truth. God bless you! I am not a police man but I know this is exactly what is happening. From Kingsley Yohanna Madaki, Kaduna State

    It seems the President and his co-travellers did not understand the meaning of governance. Is there no more protocol in directing the affairs of the country again? How can our police men who are well trained to combat terrorism, ordered to go and flush out militants ended up being flushed? Were they not told about their mission or were they under spell? May be they were rushing to the place hoping that they will be bribed in order to leave the village untouched. Let the government try to be a government of value not government of success. In a society where value is not embraced such society is in danger. Our police men have not learned from history, 12 of them were shot dead in Balyesa yet the police authority did not learn anything from it. The only grammar they know is, ‘we are on top of the situation’. Let us not deceive one another, the situation is on top of the government. From Ozi M.

    Re: Our unfortunate Police officers. Thank you for being one of the few that empathise with the Nigerian police on their plight. Be warned, it is a serious offence to bear nonsense in mind against senior sorry superior police officers whose will is the rule. But what about the government that appoints these officers, are they not the same?. Dare, wait for your time, police is your friend o! From Uhuo, Abakaliki

    The state government said it will give the widows one million naira each, compared to what the present government is wasting every day. Wha a nonsense government! What can one million naira solve in the lives of these poor women and their children? When the snake was arround they did not hit it; they were looking for stick after it had left. Will that work? The present goverment is handling things with levity which is very dangerous to the survival of our democracy. From Hamza Ozi Momoh, Docyard Apapa Lagos

    Sir, correction, they did not kill the snake when it was arround. Anonymous

    Dare, your piece entitled “Our unfortunate police officers” is a welcome revelation and educative insight into a truth that has eluded many a Nigerian Citizen. We all need to appreciate the position of the Nigeria Police. I take opposition though to your statements credited to former IG of Police, Mike Okiro. In my opinion, he was the best IG the Nigerian police could ever boast of having at the time. And I have facts should you be interested. Anonymous

    I will like to present CrimeFight solution to the nation’s top officers urgently. I assure you that this will engage all citizens in Nigeria to solve terrorism and crime incidents. Policemen are dying in numbers and this is unacceptable. CrimeFight is endorsed by FBI in tracking Boston bombers and is being recommended as anti-kidnapping solution. I am right here right now: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=4.82845,7.00400 Enough is Enough. From ADOKI

    A beautiful and courageous piece sir. I am encouraged. Anonymous

    Re: Our unfortunate police officers. Unfortunate for our nation’s Police Force as their past and present travails are such that underdevelop the country. Their unfortunacy is being caused generally and specifically by corruption, nationally and within the past and present Police echelon! I am also amazed why past police heads are being recognised by President Jonathan to head and member transformation of the Police vis-a-vis tackle the rampant insecurity situation in Nigeria. With nauseating composition, will the rotten headship and most corrupt members improve the Police in totality? No! From Lanre Oseni

    Re: Our unfortunate police officers. The Nigerian Police Force is a victim of long years of neglect and lack of strategic development amongst its administrators. These and coupled with the unrestrained resort of its rank and file to extortion and killings of innocent citizens in time past and even in recent times have led to a complete lack of trust and contempt for the force by Nigerians. It is such scenarios and perceptions that could make them targets for the expression of bottled up anger by militants/sect members as we have in Nassarawa, the north eastern part of Nigeria and the Niger Delta. The beautiful ones of the Nigeria Police Force have not yet been born. From Olumide Soyemi, Bariga Lagos

    The failed attempted arrest of the Ombatse leader leaves more questions than answers. Why were transfers made just before the operation was to commence? Why were majority if not all of those sent on the suicide mission from one religion? How did the police intend to prove alleged forceful conversion in court? Why is there no documentary evidence by the police or Almakura to justify the operation so that the family members and indeed Nigerians will know that lives were not just wasted for some other reasons? How could anyone attempt to give these brave men a mass burial like some common criminals? Almakura and the IG Plateau Government have questions to answer. Anonymous

    The birth of anarchy, law abiding citizens will now acquire firearms “to protect themselves” then an idiot will wipe out a whole village, vendettas will compound the present situation, pessimistic? Truly a hell hole. From Pete, Eket

    The recent attack on the police in some parts of this country is a fall out of the ill-preparedness of the Nigerian state. There is nothing to show for the billions of naira budgeted each year for the police. They are ill equipped and very poorly motivated. I believe that with these recent attacks things should take a new shape for the better. An average policeman in Nigeria should no longer be a sitting duck. The families of those killed should be adequately compensated. From Ojo A. Ayodele, Emure Ekiti

     

    For Segun Gbadegesin

    I am ashamed that in a country of over 160million people, persons like Asari Dokubo who do not have any pedigre are points of reference. His stock in trade is crime and arms running. It goes to show the stuff our president is made of. Asari and his cohorts are bankcrupt upstairs. The mega party ( APC) is the recipe Nigerians need to come out of coma. No amount of threat from the creek where Asari resides will deter or cow Nigerians from voting out Jonathan and his party in 2015. Asari ought to be tried criminalising the whole of Niger Delta which has spilled over and is ravaging the whole Eastern States. It is only in Nigeria that membership of the ruling party immunises you against corruption. Okupe is yet to start work in both Imo and Benue states where he has been mobilised. I weep for Nigeria. Thanks. From Henry Njoku.

    Re: Scaremongers and APC. Your essay appears charitable to PDP. All that PDP needs is to drum its success score card for ruling at the centre over a decade vis a vis resources at its disposal. It is clear naiveness for any one to feign ignorance that government at the centre is not a function of then regions or current states coming together. PDP can only get nervous out of underperformance. What a beauty! No region or ethnic group can achieve it alone in Nigeria. We had better develop courtship across the country for solid democracy than deceitful ethic or regional fanaticism being promoted. From James, Jos

    Please be informed that late Pini Jason Onyegbadue hailed from Obizi in Ezinihitte Mbaise LGA but not Aboh Mbaise LGA as written by your editor on the 10th May edition. Please accept my correction. From Njoku Henry.

    Re: Scapemonger and APC. Rather than unite and make comments that will unite us, Okupe and Asari Dokubo’s assertions are more disuniting than causing oneness. They should remember however, that power is transcient and history will later judge individual’s role on the health or/and growth or otherwise of a society. May Almighty God remove the wool, covering the sight of War-drum and the scare-monger, ameen. From Lanre Oseni.

    I fervently pray that PDP will produce goodluck in general election comes 2015, which will turn to badluck for them. Anonymous

     

    For Tunji Adegboyega

    Re: Jonathan’s emergency. I agree with you fully that most northern elites failed to hit the nail on the head. I have neither heard nor read of total, outright and real condemnation of the dastardly acts, volatile and destructive activities of Boko Haramists, in the last three years. I have only heard and read of amnesty suggestion. Emergency rule, to me, had been delayed till now because many big-wigs had confused President Jonathan with suggestions of patience and dialogue that they would not take while in power! Have dialogue and amnesty worked? Hard pills for a tough sore! From Lanre Oseni.

    The state of emergency came late; in spite of that, we welcome the president’s action in the national interest. The activities of Boko Haram have made Nigeria to become a laughing stock in the comity of nations. It is always difficult to build in crisis situations. But where are the sponsors of Boko Haram? Time will tell. From Gordon Chika Nnorom, Umukabia, Abia State.

    Tunji, honestly, I like the way you translate these Yoruba proverbs into English. From Awe Olusola, Osogbo.

    PDP’s zoning formula was never meant to be a tidy arrangement clearly stating the respective turns of the different zones. It was ‘wuru wuru’ and ‘wayo’ politics ab initio. The ever wily elite of the north who had authored it only wanted an unsustainable arrangement that would return power to the north as soon as possible, following the loss occasioned by the circumstances of MKO’s death. Those who thought they had a divine right to lord it over others desired no more than the swiftest return to status quo. Their frustration largely accounts for that which is aptly tagged political Boko Haram. From Kuteyi, R.R. Ondo.

    It is disheartening when someone of your prominence has no better tool to analyse the Boko Haram phenomenon with than the fabled story of celestial virgins. Have you ever heard of medieval scholar Ibn Taymiyyah whose magnum opus is a 37-volume work whom Boko Haram claims is their ideological father? Why is it that not a single Nigerian newspaper has been able to translate and transcribe for us just one of the tapes of the murdered Boko Haram leader, Yusus? A serious understanding of Boko Haram has been much disturbed by the subterranean contempt, fear and hatred of Islam. Anonymous.

    Keep telling the truth; heaven will not fall on you. Rather, it would fall on those who take accommodation in falsehood. God bless you. Anonymous.

     

  • NAFDAC’s drug distribution initiative

    In a move designed to sanitise and streamline the nation’s drug trade, the National Agency for Food, Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) under the dynamic administration of Dr Paul Bortwev Orhii recently moved to restructure the drug distribution system. The initiative, a complement to the anti-counterfeiting and anti-faking strategy introduced by the current management of NAFDAC, will ensure the creation and establishment of large drug markets otherwise known as Mega Drug Distribution Centres (MDDCs) in the nation’s six geo-political zones.

    Under the arrangement, private sector partners will provide the structures, while the federal government, through NAFDAC, will ramp up its regulatory activities. The governments in 36 states are expected to establish and own drug markets to be known as State Drug Distribution Centres (SDDCs) under the coordination of NAFDAC. States will be permitted to upgrade their Central Medical Stores (CMSs) to meet SDDC standard to conserve resources.

    One other feature of the proposed scheme is the compulsory channelling of locally produced and imported pharmaceutical products to both the regional and states drug markets for re-examination by NAFDAC. Upon certification of products quality, the wholesalers will then be allowed to take delivery and subsequently commence sales to the retailers, comprising community pharmacies, public/primary health care centres, private health institutions as well as the patent and proprietary medicines vendors (PPMV) – the last link in the chain to get the products to the final consumers or general public. Dispensing will be based strictly on prescriptions from appropriate medical experts in line with global medical procedures.

    At a well attended launch of the National Drug Distribution Guidelines, Nigerian National Pharmacovigilance Policy and Implementation Framework as well as the inauguration of Drug Distribution Advocates of Nigeria by the Federal Ministry of Health at the Sheraton Hotel and Towers in Abuja recently, Health Minister, Professor Onyebuchi Chukwu and other stakeholders in the nation’s health sector were full of optimism that this new framework will ensure the sanitization and standardization of pharmaceutical products distribution and marketing. The consensus was that the new scheme will achieve the desired goals and objectives of cleaning the extant rot in the drug distribution sector which will in turn impact positively on the nation’s health care delivery sector.

    Nigerians are certainly familiar with the uncoordinated status of drug marketing and distribution of the past years and how these have posed great challenges not only for the health care delivery system but also for the image of the country. There is no doubt that the previous haphazard drug distribution system accounted for the presence of the huge chunk of adulterated, substandard and fake pharmaceuticals in our nation and this in turn has obviated our collective desire for effective, efficient and internationally comparable health care system.

    The new arrangement is expected to bring about the availability of affordable, efficacious, safe and good quality drugs. Also sources of drugs at every level of healthcare provision and mode of distribution would easily be identified thereby instilling orderliness and absolute confidence in their distribution. The new distribution template will enable local pharmaceutical products win back the lost confidence of Nigerians and consumers in the West African sub-region. Locally, the system will stop the careless and nonchalant display of drugs in open markets as only governments and privately owned health facilities nationwide will be source of all drugs.

    Similarly, quacks, and other intermediaries who lack knowledge of drug composition and capabilities would be chased out of markets; importers, smugglers, producers and marketers of counterfeited or fake pharmaceuticals will be compelled to stop flooding the nation’s health centres, hospitals, pharmacies and medicine stores with life-endangering substances under the regime of trade accountability that will be in place.

    In addition to restoring integrity and confidence to the pharmacy profession, the current ubiquitous drug selling and distribution practices which adorns the nation will fizzle out to give rise to a system where all drug dealers will source products from a unified, accountable, reliable and scientifically manned point of supply. Big time pharmaceutical dealers will take delivery of drug consignments meant for Nigerian markets from which minute drug dealers/sellers will depend for product supply which would have been thoroughly examined by NAFDAC for public consumption and use in medical centres.

    The challenge of curbing the influx of fake or counterfeited pharmaceutical products through our porous land borders will be automatically resolved with the establishment of international standard drug markets which will act as a single channel through which pharmaceutical products can gain entry into all nooks and crannies of the nation. We expect to see immediate results in reduction of infants and adults death rates alike; just as patronage for home made drugs will be boosted, thereby expanding local drug manufacturers’ revenue base, boosting their employment generating abilities while also guaranteeing job security for those employed in such firms as well.

    •Ikhilae, a public affairs analyst, writes from Lagos

  • Policy inconsistency and FDI myth

    Policy inconsistency and FDI myth

    IN a speech at the closing of the 8th National Conference on Investment (NCI) recently in Abuja, Nigeria’s minister of trade and investment, Dr. Olusegun Aganga made a projection of $16 billion revenue from foreign direct investments (FDIs) in 2013 alone. According to the minister, the $16 billion revenue, if realised, will be utilized to create more jobs and wealth for the nation’s teeming population. Expectedly, some Nigerians would share Aganga’s optimism. But the stark reality of the business climate in Nigeria points to a different year-round investment intake result altogether. In fact, for most discerning analysts, the minister’s projection of FDIs into the country in 2013 was a mirage. This skepticism stems from the very obvious: an inclement business atmosphere in the country largely beclouded by a thick cloak of government inconsistency in policy formulation and implementation. It is a noticeable fact worldwide that in any nation where there are periodic policy reversals and somersaults the growth of the economy of such a nation is bound to be disrupted.Undoubtedly, competitiveness in the contemporary global business environment is enhanced by the establishment of certain basic rules and frameworks by national governments. Such rules and frameworks define the terms and conditions for smooth operations by various players, thereby creating the clement atmosphere that guarantees efficiency and success of all businesses. In this vein, the private sector is allowed to take the driver’s seat in running the economy.

    A survey conducted by the Intelligence Unit of The Economist on the challenges and opportunities faced by public sector officials and corporate executives around the world, made so many profound revelations with respect to policy implementation. For instance, the report of the survey of 211 public and private sector respondents, which was conducted in July and August, 2009, showed that “policy implementation-and its ongoing application-is important because inconsistency in both the public and private sectors can result in regulatory non-compliance, exposing organisations to legal problems”.

    Instructively, however, inconsistency in policy formulation and implementation in Nigeria is so glaring today that is has been reckoned with as a major obstacle to the growth of the nation’s economy. The report of a World Bank’s assessment of the business environment in Nigeria published late last year, revealed how the Federal Government has periodically altered the rules and frameworks for businesses, thereby impeding effective business operations and resulting in usavoury consequences for many business organisations. The report titled “Nigeria: An Assessment of the Investment Climate in 26 states”, also noted how the government’s periodic policy somersaults create critical constraints that impede the development of the non-oil sector of the nation’s economy.

    Similar revelations as in the World Bank report have been made at various times by experts and other renowned public servants who are obviously deeply disturbed by the trend. A former Chief Economic Adviser to the President, Chief Phillip Asiodu, while speaking at the 52nd annual conference of the Nigerian Economic Society, identified inconsistency in policy implementation by successive governments as the bane of the country’s growth and development. Barely three months ago, the Governor of Kwara state, Abdulfatah Ahmed handed down a similar verdict at the closing of a two-day interactive session between his government and the Organised Private Sector.

    This gloomy state of affairs is further compounded by the rising tide of killings, bombings, kidnappings, as well as widespread corruption that has permeated all strata of government in the country. The ugly wave of bombings and killings by militant groups, especially across northern part of Nigeria has reportedly claimed at least 3,000 lives since 2010 when the insurgents intensified their campaign of violence in various parts of the country. The violence, coupled with the heightening of kidnappings in the South-east, and lately the South-west have serious implications for businesses, and also for foreign direct investments. For instance, the 2011 World Investment Report of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) revealed the lull in business activities cause by insecurity in Kano State alone has cost the Nigerian economy at least $6 billion (about N1.3 trillion).

    The decrepit infrastructure all across Nigeria is no less a drag on successful business operations in any part of the country. In fact, many household names in the business circles in Nigeria such as Michelin and Dunlop, Virgin Atlantic Airways, Woolworths, British Gas – BG Exploration & Production (including massive sale of assets by oil majors and threats of departure due to inconsistencies in the provisions of the Petroleum Industry Bill) had to close shops due to poor infrastructure, and other encumbrances to economic activities nationwide.

    Regrettably, the few resilient companies, especially the multinationals that make significant contributions to the growth of the nation’s economy, are also being put at great risk by the multifarious consequences of the rising tide of corruption in the country, which has recently been acknowledged in the international community. Various companies have in recent times complained openly about series of maltreatment by public office holders, especially officials of Federal Government agencies. In some cases, the companies, particularly the multinationals are crying out over blackmail and other forms of mischief, once they refuse to submit to the unceasing demands of some top government officials for bribes. In fact, there are even cases of harassment of some of the big companies that refuse to coddle the bribe-seeking government functionaries, through the instrumentality of the police and some corrupt courts officials.

    Beyond the negative consequences of corruption on businesses in Nigeria is another prohibitive demon called multiple taxation. This is also a huge impediment to successful businesses in Nigeria as all three tiers of government across the country compete to squeeze the life out of the few companies that have braved the odds to operate under the harsh investment climate.

    What all these point to is one fact: that Aganga’s prediction of a whooping $16 billion (about N4.2 trillion) of FDIs coming into Nigeria in this financial year is clearly a myth. However, for the Nigerian government to make this dream come to fruition, and possibly surpass that target in the years ahead, it must retrace it steps by showing much more commitment to creating a conducive business climate in the country. This can easily be achieved through a number of factors: avoiding zigzags in policy formulation and implementation; taking decisive steps to curb corruption, investing massively in infrastructural development, and checking multiple taxation of the business entities that have shown resilience to the odds in our business environment.

    It is perhaps significant to draw the government’s attention to the position strongly canvassed nearly three months ago by Director-General of the Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (NACCIMA), Dr. John Osemede. The NACCIMA DG said at a forum in Lagos that: “The Federal Government should work to make the private sector to run the economy, while it focuses on making and enforcing economic policies and collection of taxes. The private sector seems to operate consistently but the regular government changes makes policy inconsistency and implementation challenges prevalent”. This surely is the way to go, if the Federal Government is committed to ensuring that its Transformation Agenda delivers value to Nigerians.

    •Shekarau, former Vice President (North) of the Nigerian Guild of Editors, is a Communications Specialist and Public Affairs Analyst.

  • Hanging on moving trains

    The ugly sight of passengers hanging on moving trains, especially in Lagos, has gotten to a rather worrisome level. For those who regularly commute along the Nigeria Railway Corporation, NRC, rail tracks across the state, the spectacle of people sitting on top of a moving train and others hanging on same, has become a common sight. Despite the huge public outcry against this ugly and barbaric act, those who indulge in it have refused to see reason. Indeed, some of them have been arrested either by special task force or men of the Nigeria Police. Recently, 33 of such people, aged between 18 and 52 years, were arrested at the Ikeja and Agege Railway Stations for hanging on a moving train. In-spite of this, however, the ugly trend has not ceased.

    It is quite easy for some people to offer the usual simplistic line of argument that stranded commuters have to resort to hanging on moving trains because that is the only alternative available to them. However, I bet to disagree with this line of reasoning. It is like a man justifying his foray into armed robbery or other such criminal activities on the account of joblessness. This is unacceptable. Life is a precious gift by God. Self preservation is, therefore, the responsibility of every human being. Self-preservation is keeping you alive, either physically or psychologically. The desire to stay alive is a natural instinct in every human being.

    Animals equally share this feature with man. Every animal seek those elements of its environment that will enhance its chances for survival. These include food, water, oxygen, and periods of rest to allow the body to repair any wear and tear on the tissues. Alternately, it will avoid or evade those elements that might reduce its chances for survival. Such dangers include predators, starvation, dehydration, asphyxiation, and situations that can cause damage to the body.

    Anyone that chooses to sit on the roof of a moving train is indirectly embarking on a suicide mission. In most cases, those who indulge in this act do not necessarily do so because they lack other viable options but out of a lack of proper understanding and appreciation of the gift of life. It is more of a careless disposition to life. Even if there is no punishment against such dastardly act, the self-preservation instinct in every man is enough to discourage any rational man from embracing such act. The practice of passengers hanging on coaches of trains is totally undesirable, considering the huge impact of a train accident. Available records have shown that train accidents are usually fatal and terrible. One can only imagine the survival chance of passengers hanging on coaches of trains in the event of an accident.

    As a responsible and responsive government, the Lagos State government would not fold its arms and watch people indulging in such anti-social behaviour. For one, it doesn’t speak well of us as a people. Two, it makes us a laughing stock in the committee of nations. Third, it makes nonsense of every effort of the state government to rid the state of uncultured attitudes in recent time.

    As a government that is passionate about the people, all our policies and programmes are geared towards the preservation of the sanctity of the human life. Prior to this administration’s introduction of the BRT system for mass transit, most commuters across the metropolis move around in rickety death trap popularly called ‘Molue’. However, the introduction of BRT, modern taxi cabs and other such convenient and comfortable forms of public transportation has provided commuters in the state with better and viable alternatives means of transportation. This is what governance is all about. It is about improving the lots of the people.

    One way in which the state government has been displaying its passion for the people is through its numerous safety programmes as it especially relates to transportation. One major way through which the state government has ensured safety of lives on our roads is by improving the quality of roads in the state. There is arguably no other way to boost the efficiency of the transportation sector as well safeguard the lives of our people than construction and rehabilitation of roads. The rate at which roads are being rehabilitated and constructed in the state in the last one year has attracted commendations from far and near, even among oppositions and has convinced the masses that a lot can come out of the country when visionary leaders are chosen to govern. Recently, the ramp on Falomo was commissioned to ease traffic on Ozumba Mbadiwe. The Lagos-Badagry expressways, the Mile 12-Ikorodu road, the Moshalashi –Ipaja road among many others are presently undergoing various stages of renovation.

    Another strategy of the state government in enhancing the safety of lives on our roads through the improvement of vital road infrastructure is the provision of functional traffic lights in addition to the rehabilitation of existing ones. In addition to the streetlights provided along the newly constructed roads, about 2,445 poles spanning about 85.58km of street lighting projects were installed across the state within the period under review. The intention of government is to ensure that travel time on major roads is reduced by 35 percent as a result of the elimination of conflicts at traffic signal light intersections.

    Equally, the state government has continued the construction of the Blue Line Rail project along Okokomaiko. The first phase of the project, which is a 7km distance from National Theatre to Okokomaiko, has in the last one year recorded huge progress. The ultimate plan is to extend it to Badagry with the sole aim of providing commuters along the axis better alternatives in public transportation.

    Similarly, water transportation is also being given a boost. New jetties are springing up while old ones are being renovated. Private ferry services are operational in different parts of the state while dredging of inland waterways is on-going. Safety on the sea is given utmost priority by government as it has concluded the dredging and signalization of the 32km water route from Badore to Ijede. Likewise, the Badore and Ikorodu terminals have virtually been completed except for minor finishing works preparatory to opening.

    Today, from one operation route in 2007, government is running water transportation on 12 routes (Ikorodu-Marina/CMS; Marina – Mile 2; Ikorodu – Addax/Falomo; Ikorodu-Ebute Ero; Marina-Ijegun Egba-Ebute-Ojo; Mile 2 – Marina/CMS-Mecwen-Falomo; Badore – Ijede; Badore – Five Cowries; Marina – Oworonshonki; Ebute Ojo –Ijegun Egba; Oworonshonki – Five Cowries and Baiyeku – Langbasa) under the supervision of Lagos State Waterways Authority(LASWA) while passenger traffic has grown to over one million passengers per month and it is increasing.

    The inter modal link now has BRT buses moving passengers from its terminals in different parts of the metropolis to ferry services and is to run vice versa when fully operational. Ferry services will also link light rail terminals while BRT buses will also service light rail terminals. However, as much as government is stepping up efforts to enhance safety of lives through its numerous laudable programmes and projects, the people, as it has been stated earlier, owes it a responsibility to embrace a lifestyle of safety and self preservation.

    •Ibirogba is commissioner for information and strategy, Lagos

  • APC: Nigerians must be allowed to choose

    SIR: When the ACN Convention held in Lagos a few weeks back, I made some comments about the necessity for INEC to act above board in ensuring that this merger succeeded and to afford the parties seeking to merge every lawful opportunity and assistance to do so.

    Recent developments, largely by well-meaning and many concerned Nigerians who have asked me about the purpose and importance of this merger compels me to go back to the issue of INEC’s role.

    Although I said INEC must act above board; that alone will not be enough. INEC must also be seen to have acted above board.

    If it is true that our worried opponents have any plans or any hand in scuttling the merger, they must re-think and desist.

    If they believe that the merger offers no ideology, it is not for them to decide that.

    That is the decision the people of Nigeria, who own Nigeria’s sovereignty have to make and live with.

    More importantly, every personnel of INEC, from chairman to the most junior officer must see the consummation of this merger as a historic milestone in the political history of Nigeria.

    It is true that all previous merger attempts have been unsuccessful. That is a matter of old but relevant history.

    It is also true that a new merger is increasingly becoming possible.

    If I was in INEC today, I will seize the moment and write my name in history for many generations to come as being a part of the team that delivered Nigeria’s first successful political merger.

    Of course there is the possibility that some people see history in the making and turn their backs.

    In that case they can only be recorded amongst the list of people who did nothing.

    For our part, we will do everything to depart from a history of mergers that have failed.

    This is why I feel privileged to be present to witness the CPC convention being held to approve the merger.

    All of you here have participated in a historic event. By coming here and voting for the merger, you have done your bit.

    The most important thing that this merger will achieve, is that it gives the people of Nigeria a real choice as to who to trust with their affairs.

    This is instructive because a choice between the PDP and the PDP is not a choice.

    As you can see, we do not know in May, what the state of our country’s budget is.

    If they know that the people have a choice, they will understand the people’s intolerance for this dysfunctional arrangement that they call a government.

    They will know that you can make a change at the ballot.

    That is the essence of this merger.

    A government without a budget is like an automobile workshop without basic tools.

    It cannot fund power projects.

    It cannot fund security agencies.

    It cannot fund anything.

    When we create that choice and the people of Nigeria decide that they want to stay with the party that has brought us this far then they will have made their choice – A REAL CHOICE.

    • Babatunde Raji Fashola,

    Alausa, Ikeja.

  • Jonathan’s carrot-stick offer

    Jonathan’s carrot-stick offer

    If anything, the declaration of emergency rule in Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states has brought to the fore the inherent contradictions in our perception of and response to the war against terrorism in the country. It has also exposed the unreliability or deceit in some of the information we have hitherto been fed regarding what ought to be done to tame the scourge. More so when it is realized that terrorism, being a global phenomenon, ought to be confronted according to universally tested rules of engagement. But ours, for curious reasons, was touted to be different and therefore required some local therapy.

    Perhaps, due to pressure, outright confusion or to fulfill all righteousness, the federal government found itself incapable of taking the right decisions at the right time. This was in spite of clear evidence that some of the solutions being proffered were not only self-serving but inherently incapable of substantially redressing the threat to the nation’s sovereignty. And the cavalier handling of the matter was further portrayed as evidence that armed confrontation was incapable of taming the monster.

    So it was that President Jonathan fell for the amnesty lobby group. Not even the repudiation and rejection of the offer by the insurgents was considered enough signal that something was amiss. He pressed on, inaugurated the amnesty committee even on the eve of the bloodbath in Baga, Borno State. The subsequent sacking of Bama and other terrorist killings in parts of the north could not change the situation.

    The questions which nobody was interested in responding to were, if northern leaders who rooted for amnesty had the mandate, respect and confidence of the insurgents, why did they find themselves incapable of reining them in? Why were they unable to persuade the terrorists to sheathe their swords temporarily for the committee to conclude its work? Who really wanted the amnesty in the face of the resurging tempo in the criminal escapades of the insurgents? Or were these heightened attacks to underscore the point that the government has been brought to its knees and must therefore do the bidding of the terrorists? These were the nagging contradictions.

    President Jonathan’s declaration of a state of emergency in the three states was therefore, a direct consequence of this dialectics. It was a huge contradiction to accept that amnesty could pull the surprise when there is no change of heart by the insurgents. If the pontifications of apologists of amnesty had been relied upon, the terrorists could have mustered the needed capacity to over run the entire country. That was what drove Jonathan to order massive deployment of soldiers to among others, arrest, detain, search, cordon off any building and stamp out the impunity of the insurgents. He said that the activities of the terror group amounted to a declaration of war against the Nigerian state and an attempt to undermine its sovereignty. That is correct. Curiously, all the negative tendencies which Jonathan cited to justify emergency rule had all along been there.

    Yet, we were sold to the idea that dialogue is the most efficacious therapy to this unprovoked act of insurgency. The first issue thrown up by the impending military action in the three states is that it amounted to a loss of confidence in dialogue or the amnesty programme. And this loss is two dimensional. There is loss of confidence from the side of government that dialogue or amnesty is all it takes to redress the madness. And its resort to full scale military action illustrates it all. There will also be loss of confidence on the part of the terrorists in government’s genuine commitment to dialogue. These are not in doubt. Before now, the terrorists had complained they did not trust government’s sincerity to dialogue. That was why Dr. Ahmed Datti withdrew from the earlier panel on the matter. He cited the same reason for declining his nomination in the current one.

    But the government says military action will run simultaneously with discussions on amnesty. To underscore this point, the committee met with the president the same day emergency rule was proclaimed. How workable this will turn out is a matter of time. But it is difficult to conceive how the committee can reach out to the insurgents now their lives are in mortal danger.

    There are two axioms to contend with here. The first is that government has come to terms with the fact that it has to re-establish its authority in those states. It has also accepted that dialogue or carrot cannot do it hence the need to offer the insurgents the stick. But then, what are the likely outcomes of the combination of these two strategies in the fight against terrorism? There are some possibilities. The first could be to demonstrate government’s capacity to tame the monster. The idea is that if battle is taken to the hide-outs of the terrorists and they are smoked out, those left will be quick to accept the peace process. This draws support from the widely held view especially in the north that government is incapable of winning the war at the battle field and must therefore negotiate.

    The other could be to demonstrate very unambiguously that it has the capacity to re-establish its authority by militarily incapacitating the insurgents. The message is that the offer of dialogue should not be misconstrued as weakness on the part of the government. They are being told in very clear terms that it is either they embrace peace or be routed out by the superior fire power of the government forces. There are two possible scenarios. The first is that the insurgents may be so frightened by the new direction that they will quickly scamper for the peace option. If they embrace this option, they will save lives and bring a quick end to the hostilities. This appears attractive.

    The other is that unsure of the real intentions of the government and for fear of reprisals, the insurgents will fight on. Their hit and run strategy and the fact of the successes they had made before now, may embolden them to sustain the fight beyond the expectations of the government. And since the insurgents are driven by some weird ideology, there is every thing to expect that they will not succumb to the fear of escalated military onslaught. They will fight on. This possibility is also very high.

    If this happens, the government may have to wage the war much longer than envisaged. And in a desperate attempt to subdue the terrorists militarily, both the civilian population and the insurgents will suffer irretrievably. Then, it would have given skeptics ample room to mock the new offensive. Already, skepticisms are rife that the emergency rule will fail like the earlier ones declared in some local governments. Fears have also been expressed on the safety of the civilian population as the onslaught lasts.

    Whichever way, it is clear that government has a big burden to discharge in the way it confronts the Boko Haram insurgency in the days ahead. The choice of military action is justified. Somehow, the government has no other option than to restore peace and order in those areas or abdicate and throw in the towel. But the fight is likely to be encumbered by the strategy of the insurgents that blurs differentiation between them and the civilian population. It is therefore difficult to fathom how the military can wage this war successfully without being accused of violating the rights of civilians. That is the new challenge even as the Boko Haram insurgency must be stamped out.

  • Nexim Sealink project and intra–Ecowas trade

    Nexim Sealink project and intra–Ecowas trade

    The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) was established on May 28, 1975 as a regional trade organisation comprising countries in the West African sub-region. The aim o f setting up the Community was manifested in its original treaty. According to provisions set out in the treaty of Lagos, and later, the revised treaty in 1993, the objectives were to promote co-operation in economic, social and cultural activities towards a desirable establishment of an economic and monetary union through the total integration of the national economies of member-states. Inherent in the letter and spirit of the Treaty were the ideals to raise the living standards of the ‘ECO-citizen,’ maintain and enhance economic stability, foster relations among member-states and contribute to the progress and development of the African continent in line with the principal provisions of the African Economic Community (AEC) Treaty under the African Union.

    Within four years of the operationalisation of the treaty, it became clear that as laudable as it sounded, the goal of achieving total integration of national economies of the constituent countries would require more concerted effort and commitment. Hence, the 1979 Protocol relating to free movement of persons, goods, services and right of establishment was conceived as an instrument to enable free movement of ECOWAS citizens within the sub-region. Loaded into the protocol were the goals of institutionalising a single regional socioeconomic space, providing ECO citizens with opportunities in member-states, including the utilisation of arable land by indigenous agriculturists, access to coastal areas by landlocked member states, employment of English and French language experts and, most significantly, unfettered access to natural resources by member-states. In a nutshell, the Protocol was intended to create a ‘Borderless West Africa.’

    Leveraging Nigeria’s Commitment

    No other economy within the sub-region has been weighed down more than Nigeria from a disconnected West African market. Given the huge size of its population and GDP, the various Administrations in Nigeria had demonstrated ample political will to ensure the Community thrives. Indeed, the country has been the galvaniser of the ‘ECOWAS dream’ and has doggedly deployed human and material resources to keep the trade bloc together in the face of recurring political, economic, socio-cultural upheavals since the days of ECOMOG till the current intervention of its military in the Malian crisis.

    What is lacking, according to international relations experts, is for Nigeriato lead the process towards realistically breaking down the trade walls under the Free Movement Protocol and unleashing the potential of free exchanges of goods and services as have been witnessed in similar trade regimes under Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) or the trilateral North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).Understandably, the implementation of most of these agreements is being spearheaded by the various export credit agencies of the constituentcountries.

    Hence, it behoved Nigerian Export-Import Bank, (NEXIM Bank) – the trade policy bank of the Federal Government of Nigeria – to facilitate the process for the establishment of a dedicated sea link within the ECOWAS region.This is borne out of concernsby the current executive team of NEXIM Bank led by the MD/CEO, Mr. Roberts Orya, on the partial realisation of ECOWAS’ intra-regional trade facilitation and operational objectives, high intra-regional freight costs and shipment delays, which make cargo delivery within the sub-region to take an average of 45 – 60 days.

    At the recent sensitisation and pre-investors’ forum on the Sealink Project on Wednesday, March 27th, 2013 in Lagos,for the entire council and executive of the Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture, (NACCIMA),Mr. Orya provided an update on the initiative and invited its membership to invest and partner with the Bank and other stakeholders in the SPV and Regional Maritime Company. He stated the Bank is facilitating the establishment of a dedicated Regional Sealink project as a means of overcoming the challenge of road infrastructure as well as absence of rail links within the region which has perpetually bedevilled intra-regional trade. The appeal for a sealink is further strengthened by the comparative low budgetary cost and short implementation timeline for a sea link-project vis-à-vis either a regional road or rail project.

    According to Mr. Orya, the availability of a maritime vessel will significantlyreduce the high transportation costs and excessive transit time which make intra-regional trade non-competitive, with West and Central African transport and logistics costs identified as one of the highest in the World. According to available statistics, these have resulted in low level intra-regional trade at less than 12% and 10% for African and ECOWAS trade respectively, compared to other regional blocs such as European Union (EU) andASEAN whose intra-regional trade flows are respectively at 50%, 40% and 25%.

    Why embrace the Sealink Project?

    Inviting the NACCIMA to invest in the project, Orya stated that the funding requirement for the regional sealink project is $60million out of which $36 million will be required to purchase vessels, equipment, office space and other infrastructure and $24 million for working capital to cover general and administrative costs to be raised through equity and debt financing respectively.

    Beyond making business sense, the project has some inherent accruable national benefits that further justify its implementation.

    These include unlocking opportunities in the maritime sector through effective indigenous participation, thereby stimulating maritime-related employment as well as localising some of the maritime freight payments of an average of $5 billion annually from import / export tonnages.

    It will also facilitate the realisation of the various Maritime-related laws like the Cabotage and MIMASA Acts and the implementation of the National Shipping Policy; stimulate and attract private sector funding for the development of key maritime infrastructure with the national benefit of improving the level of intra-regional formal trade, thereby enhancing contribution of trade/exports to GDP.

    Also, it will assist in palliating the disastrous effects of road/rail infrastructural deficit challenges that affect regional integration and a major cause of the muted growth witnessed over the years in intra-African and ECOWAS trade levels.

    Most importantly, it will enhance competitiveness of Nigerian exports, thereby improving the contribution of manufactured exports from the current level of under 6%, and enhancing local industrial capacity utilisation and attracting new investments.

    Additionally, the project will enhance Nigeria’s status as a maritime hub for West and Central Africa with attendant benefits of facilitating Atlantic short-sea trade and development of pool of talent / manpower for the industry.

    Furthermore, it has the immense potential to stimulate multimodal transport development to cater for non-littoral regional member countries;hence it will facilitate growth of hinterland haulage business as the market segment is not yet targeted by major shipping lines, thereby offering a huge opportunity to the proposed Sealink Project.

    The Transformation Agenda

    The Sealink project is in line with the Transformation Agenda of the government which projects investments in roads, railways, inland waterways, ports and airports developmentin collaboration with various stakeholders to evolve a multimodal, integrated and sustainable transport system, with emphasis on rail and waterways, through an effective Public-Private Partnership arrangement. This aims to create synergy and ensure an even and nation-wide distribution of gains from the Administration’s investments in the key sectors, termed ‘main growth drivers’ such as the manufacturing, agriculture, solid minerals, manufacturing, services, trade and commerce, etc. Affirmatively, the Sealink Project will take the gains of the Transformation Agenda beyond the shores of the country. It will immediately open up our shores and immensely contribute to Nigeria’s march to become the premier economy in Africa through creating a seamless export platform for movement of Nigeria’s manufactured/semi-processed goods, services, and personnel with a certainty to boost competitiveness and productivity across these sectors. Specifically, it will spur more private sector initiative and innovation, enhance the development of the key sectors’ value chain, create/sustain more Nigerian jobs as the ECOWAS markets become one and Nigeria’s products and services are brought to the world.

    Sponsorships/Collaborations

    The project has been endorsed by the government of Nigeria. It has also been adopted and is being sponsored by the Federation of West African Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FEWACCI) withother endorsements/collaborations by the ECOWAS Commission,the ECOWAS Parliament, various multi/bilateral institutions including theMaritime Organisation of West and Central Africa (MOWCA), strong private sector support through various trade associations and heightened expression of interest by potential investors (locally and internationally).

    In his remarks, the National President of NACCIMA, Dr. H.A.B. Ajayi, lauded Mr. Orya for the patriotic zeal which moved NEXIM Bank to come up with the Regional Sealink Project and the vigour with which he is pursuing its realisation.

    He also concurred that the ECOWAS market is huge and has not been fully tapped as a result of logistical challenges being faced in movement of goods and persons, especially due to the absence of a direct shipping line for the West and Central African corridor. In this regard, NACCIMA, as a member of the FEWACCI, will like to join forces with NEXIM Bank and other progressive entities in actualising the project. According to him, “As the apex business association in Nigeria, NACCIMA is supporting the setting up of the shipping company as we did during the establishment of ECOBANK Transnational which has become a household name in all the West African States and beyond. We would like to also stress the need for chieftains of industry here present to take ample opportunity by participating in the raising of the $36million that would form the equity capital for the setting up of the transnational shipping company.”

     

    Moghalu is Head, Corporate Communication, Nigerian Export – Import Bank

  • Escaping a cycle of violence

    Escaping a cycle of violence

    Struggling to contain a smoldering Islamist insurgency, the president of Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, has ordered in more troops and granted the military more powers to arrest, more authority to seize “any building or structure” and more leeway in “any area of terrorist operation.”

    Having cut short a trip to South Africa and annulled a planned state visit to Namibia, President Goodluck Jonathan of Nigeria declared a “state of emergency” in three northeast states on May 14. In a speech to the nation, Jonathan acknowledged that there is an “insurrection” and that the government has lost control of certain areas to Boko Haram, a diffuse Islamist movement.

    The security services are already doing what the emergency declaration would permit them to do. Jonathan has promised more troops for the three states, but it is unclear where he will find them, as the military is already overstretched. Islamist violence and the brutal response from the security services are making the northeast of Nigeria ungovernable, as the state of emergency confirms. Though the insurgency uses much of the rhetoric of jihadist movements elsewhere and is increasingly adopting their tactics, it remains essentially a domestic revolt against the Nigerian state rather than part of an international jihadist movement.

    CFR’s Nigeria Security Tracker (NST) has tracked political violence in Nigeria since President Jonathan’s May 2011 inauguration, and some trends are clear. First, the graph of violence shows pronounced peaks and valleys; second, the security service’s joint task force of army and police has produced a high number of casualties; third, the insurgents’ tactics are evolving toward the style of internationalist jihadism.

    As the tracker illustrates, violence in Nigeria spiked higher on April 14-20 than any previous week since Jonathan’s inauguration almost two years ago. It mostly involved Boko Haram and its splinter groups, which notably battled state security services in the far northeastern fishing village of Baga, in Borno, a state included in the emergency declaration. But the NST also charts rising levels of violence associated with ethnic and religious conflict in the middle part of the country, and growing security service violence in response to criminal activity, such as kidnapping, in other areas.

    May could prove to be as violent as April. On May 8, the New York Times carried a front-page story documenting how Nigerian security services dumped corpses of alleged Boko Haram militants at already overburdened local morgues. In some instances, the overflow of deceased sent the stench of decomposing flesh across several neighborhoods in Maiduguri, the capital of Borno. According to the article, the military delivers dozens of bodies a day to the city’s medical facilities.

    The NST illustrates a pattern where Islamist violence provokes a brutal response from the security services that in turn drives popular support or acquiescence toward Boko Haram and its splinters. Northerners have described how, in the aftermath of Islamist attacks, security services round up large numbers of young men, many of whom are never formally arrested, prosecuted, or tried. They simply disappear. The Times report is evidence that the security services have likely extrajudicially murdered many of them.

    Several factors account for the brutality of the security services. In addition to being underpaid and poorly trained, soldiers and police are deployed outside of their native region as a matter of policy, in order to prevent their “favoritism” in a country with some 350 different ethnic groups and a population evenly divided between Christians and Muslims. Security service personnel often have little understanding or sympathy for the people they are supposed to protect. Many do not even speak the local language.

    Meanwhile, the Jonathan administration stonewalls accusations of brutality. Outcry led by human rights organizations over the incident in Baga forced the administration to establish a commission of inquiry. But Nigeria has a long history of such commissions and their findings are rarely—if ever—made public.

    Under pressure from northern leaders who are also directly threatened by the insurgents, President Jonathan has appointed a separate commission to explore a possible “amnesty” program for Boko Haram, but the insurgents have shown no interest in laying down their arms. Instead, they are increasingly using tactics associated with international jihadist groups, such as kidnapping and suicide bombs. In the aftermath of the French intervention in Mali, supported by the Abuja government and the Obama administration, Islamist rhetoric is becoming more anti-Western, and there are more frequent attacks on Christians. The U.S. drone base in Niger is widely viewed with suspicion in northern Nigeria, and not just among extremists.

    The incessant violence is starting to impact the Nigerian economy. While Lagos hustles along without regard to the bloodshed in other parts of the country, economic activity has dipped, as in Kano, Nigeria’s second largest city. Enterprises with exposure in northern Nigeria are seeing profits shrink. Cross-border trade between northern Nigeria and its neighbors is also down.

    Meanwhile, formal politics is almost entirely detached from reality. Goodluck Jonathan is widely regarded as feckless, especially in his response to the Islamist insurgency, but is still favored to win in the national elections scheduled for late next year. Nevertheless, there is more uncertainty about this election outcome than there has been at any time since the end of military rule in 1999. While Jonathan is trying to build support among the political class, his rivals are seeking to create a unified opposition party that could credibly challenge him at the polls. Sadly, both sides are resorting to traditional patronage-clientage politics without reference to the needs of the larger population.

    So anxiety about the future is high. In their more pessimistic moments, some Nigerians express anxiety about whether the country in its current form will survive to election day. There is some sentiment in favor of a military takeover, but there is little evidence that the upper reaches of the military have the stomach for a return to power. While the Islamist insurgents do not offer a viable political alternative and remain divided among themselves, the threat they pose to Nigeria’s political and economic future are significant, as Jonathan’s state of emergency recognizes.

    The federal government should reform the security services, including better pay and training, and end their impunity from legal prosecution. But, that would take time. Many northern leaders have urged that security service deployment be reduced, but Jonathan’s state of emergency moves in the opposite direction. In the longer term, decentralization of government authority, outlined in the country’s constitution but never really implemented, would be a step in the right direction. So, too, would be meaningful implementation of the rule of law, such as the arrest, prosecution, trial, and punishment of those convicted. Such steps would help address the North’s pervasive sense of alienation from the Abuja government and, increasingly, from the Federation.

    As for the United States and other friends of Nigeria, the first principle must be “do no harm.” The Islamist insurrection is the result of internal, specifically Nigerian, factors, especially a history of poor governance, impoverishment, and political marginalization against the backdrop of an Islamic revival. It would be unwise to view Nigeria’s situation through the prism of jihadist movements elsewhere in Africa, even if they share some of the same vocabulary. Nigeria’s friends should urge Abuja to approach the North through political means, rather than through more violence. A U.S. relationship with the Nigerian military would be particularly high risk. It is unlikely that U.S. training would be sufficient to affect military behavior. But even a token amount risks association of the U.S. military with Nigerian human rights abuses.

    Culled from http://www.cfr.org