Category: Opinion

  • From the cell phone

    For Dare Olatunji

     

    Dare, when the rumour legislation is passed, will I be arrested and charged if I spread a rumour to the effect that His Excellency is unarguably the most handsome governor in Nigeria with a pointed nose and least inclined to steal state funds, or that Bayelsa has 48 local government councils and not eight? Anonymous

    What a waste of time! The Constitution provides for freedom of speech, and the Constitution is superior to any other law that goes contrary. A professor who was accused of being a spy and deported from Nigeria once said that, in Nigeria you do not need spies if you want to know what is going on in Aso Rock. All you need do is to go and listen to what the market women are discussing. Why is he so worried about rumour mongers? Could it be because the rumours are true? Besides, no law can kill rumour mongering; it is our national past-time and near impossible to prove. Anonymous

    Journalism in other parts of the world have been used to expand the boundary of development and civilization. But, in Nigeria, it is a tool for power struggle and ‘give me chop make I promote you’. Today, politicians masquerade as journalists to hit the media with propaganda just to get attention at all cost. Some of them deliberately promote falsehood against the government because they are out. I stand with Governor Dickson to criminalise ‘dem say, dem say journalism’. From E. H. I.

    Rumour mongering or what they termed ‘dem say, dem say’ medium is another source of information gathering which genuine and people-oriented government can tap into to gauge people’s opinions and direct its affairs. It, sometimes, contains an iota of truth. Only an elitist government would be jittery of this important source of information. From K. M. Bello, Osun

    Re: Beware, rumour monger. The last five paragraphs of your write-up depicted that, despite the objectivity in the obvious sectional development of Bayelsan towns and villages ala Aso Rock influence in favour of Otueke or Otuoke of Mr. President, Governor Dickson was trying to muzzle the public and press opinions. Courts are there to seek redress even if Bayelsan legislators sheepishly pass such draconian bill! Without working, an absentee permanent secretary would be transacting a ‘free fund’. The rumour should go on. From Lanre Oseni

    Dickson should, first of all, prepare a bill against rumour mongers in his parlour before the public. Mr. Dickson, life itself is a rumour. When they discovered oil in Niger Delta, it was a rumour in the first instance, but people peddled it and it became real. Without peddling rumour, we will remain in darkness. By peddling rumour we will understand what is going on around us. If you want to remain viable, listen to rumour mongers and make use of your sense. Dickson, listen to ‘dem say, dem say’ so that you will not fall unaware. From Hamza Ozi Momoh, Apapa Lagos

    I am not surprised at Dickson’s ‘patriotic’ zeal to curb the ‘strange’ development of rumour mongering and propaganda threatening to rubbish his good works, or even dismember his government. Who would blame him? He was considered the best for the job by Mr. President on account of which he was imposed on Bayelsans as the governor. He in turn must go to any length to prove to the presidency that he is capable, even if it means going to the ridiculous extent of constructing policy somersault to prove that. The only mistake the ‘action’ governor has made, I think, is, while he was dutifully interested in the avalanche of severe punishments that will be handed out to the rumour mongers and propagandists when found guilty, he forgot to let us also know the handsome rewards that await those whose rumours will eventually turn to be the reality about the happenings in his government. From Emmanuel Egwu, Enugu

    Dear Sir, I see you as a dogged fighter, but what about terror conspiracy on the nation! However, I wish to congratulate you in advance – Your Excellency, Governor, Kwara State. Anonymous

     

    For Segun Gbadegesin

     

    Sir, the article, ‘the clash …’ is an intellectual masterpiece, but the recommendation is deficient. From Nkan E. G.

    Please, when did Jesus tell his disciples not to call anyone on earth father but God? Can you elaborate, please? Anonymous

    Akinyemi’s clash of civilizations is a masterpiece. But can Nigeria be part of MINT with its high level of corruption? Until we implement the National Conference, Nigeria should not pretend to belong to MINT. Anonymous

    Sir, thank you very much for serving every reader of The Nation a sip from your barrel of vintage wine. Clashes of civilizations are not only supranational, regional and international crisis-engendering phenomena; they underlie civil unrest and the urge by a part to always produce the head of state within many a country. Recent happenings in Afghanistan, Cote d’Ivoire, Mali, Nigeria and Pakistan are illustrative of this fact. From Adebayo Adedayo, Akure

    Your write-up this Good Friday reveals that there is nothing good about Good Friday in Nigeria. You are absolutely right. Thanks! Anonymous

    God bless you sir. Honestly, you caught the bull by the horn and you hit the nail on the head. One thing stands: Truth is better! I have always said it; Nigerians love good but do bad things. The mammon called Money is the bait the devil is using to control our life even the Christians. Thanks! From Bro Esan Olabisi

    I read your interesting piece in The Nation ‘The clash of civilizations revisited’. Nigeria can not belong to either BRICS or the emerging MINT blocs because we do not have any direction, be it economic or political, countries in these blocs are serious in all they do. Let us look for corrupt-ridden countries and form a bloc of corrupt countries with no sense of direction. Anonymous

    Jesus was maltreated by his accusers, he was mocked, there was a palpable miscarriage of justice, yet he was calm and cool. I believe it is quite a good example for us believers to follow. Anonymous

    No one expects, but someone is preaching it. What are the elements of the perfect column, Jesus Christ, born-again, etc. Log onto www.1520istheideal.com/perfect. Anonymous

    Re: What makes this Friday good? To Humans, what makes this Friday a good one is the tender nature of Beings who want enjoyment only. They ought to know what Jesus passed through. Let us hence shun corrupt-tendency, poor leadership, and be kind to the Poor. The sermon in this write-up is for all adults above 18 years. May we imbibe the culture of commitment, sacrifice and love for Nigeria. From Lanre Oseni

    The Christians in Nigeria should use this Easter period to pray against insecurity. Let them read their Bible and teach what they read to the people. They should preach salvation not prosperity, because preaching prosperity would bring corruption and insecurity in the country. Let them emulate Christ. From Hamza Ozi Momoh, Docyard, Apapa Lagos

    May the Lord bless you on this auspicious season of Easter, and may it be a new beginning of greater prosperity, joy, success and happiness. Wish you and your family happy Easter. From your son, Peter Ogbewo

     

    For Tunji Adegboyega

     

    Re: ‘Dem say, dem say governor’, (your column of March 31). A wonderful article as usual. But Tunji, one governor you have failed to add is the Akwa Ibom State Governor, Godswill Akpabio (although a performer unlike his colleague). From Dapo Lagos.

    Governor Dickson is working hard to carry everybody along to move Bayelsa forward, despite the fact that some appointments made by the governor are unnecessary. From Gordon Chika Nnorom, Umukabia, Abia State.

    I know that no matter the punishment that the Seriake Dickson’s committee on rumour mongering may plan for the perceived offenders, the judiciary/courts will serve as redeemers for the same perceived offenders. This is a democracy. How will there not be ‘dem say, dem say’ where a First Lady was dashed the position of permanent secretary whereas she ought to have earned it! Dem say, dem say will continue where the same free-funded permanent secretary would not do the work! Dem say people want to know the practicability of permanent secretary who is eating without working! Dem say people, ride on, o jare. Also, concerning your ‘Re: ‘Mr President remember January 2012’, I think Mr President was just sensitising Nigerians to what he has for us and what suggestions we have to move Nigeria forward on the proposed fuel price hike. We are all glad that you reminded the President of January 2012 because ‘a word is enough for the wise’. We are all too sure that the era of fuel price increase is gone. Rather, we want to see the end of the fuel subsidy scam. From Lanre Oseni.

    Tunji, thank you for yet another good outing on March 17 titled “Mr President, remember January 2. It may interest you to know that NNPC is the reason why our refineries may not work even at 50 per cent capacity! Government is using it as a conduit pipe. Anonymous

    I agree with you that Nigerians are not ready for high fuel prices. I ask: which class of Nigerians? The exploited, yes! Well, the whole truth is that the existing social system is based on exploitation. What is more, the exploited have the right to build a government of their choice. Thanks. From Amos Ejimonye, Kaduna.

    They have started oiling and assembling their rigging machinery. Very soon, they will begin to visit governors, chiefs, emirs with money in the name of consultations for 2015. The money is raised through phoney contracts, oil blocs, fuel subsidy, tax and import waivers awarded to some characters in the rigging machinery. That is where real rigging starts. I urge you editors (NGE) and journalists generally to remember how you people fought Gen. Abacha, and do the same to the PDP government’s misrule. Nigerians are ready to join in the fight; all we need is leadership and direction from the professionals, civil society groups and labour. From N. Ndubuisi.

    Tunji, you wrote well, your pen will never dry in Jesus’ name (Amen). Where is the SURE-P money to cushion the oil subsidy withdrawal? Nigerians are not feeling the impact of the so-called SURE-P funds. What went wrong? Time will tell. From Chika Nnorom.

  • Understanding Bayelsa’s anti-rumour law

    We read with interest Dr. Olatunji Dare’s comments on the stand of the Bayelsa State government to curb rumour-mongering as a serious social issue in the state. In his March 26 column, he reviewed the recent establishment of a committee by the state government to manage public information in which he expressed reservations about the possibility of curtailing freedom of expression by such development. With a bill soon to be sent to the state House of Assembly for a law punishing rumour-mongers, the columnist went as far as comparing such a law with anti-press laws in draconian colonial and military eras. We disagree with his position.

    Essentially, Dare’s treatment of the inter-related issues in the scope and implication of the proposed law vis-à-vis rumour-mongering is fundamentally misplaced in conception, an outright oversimplification, and of course the fear of draconian tendency is not true.

    The intention of the state government is to have in place functional structures where information can be easily accessed by members of the public as well as quickly disseminating information on current issues of public concern to the people, detailing what is true or false, thereby nipping in the bud such dangerous information capable of causing disaffection and indeed reducing the incidence of blatant misinformation among the people. The idea is to avoid the bureaucracy in the ministries but have many centres so localized that you can easily find out the truth about anything relating to the government and the public. Here, people can contact or meet officials for quick response to whatever may be their concern or interest on the flow of information, including any rumour that may also affect the interest of an individual or organization in the state. This is important because of the pervasive nature of rumour-mongering among the people with inherent social crisis if not curtailed or addressed so frontally. What Dare failed to note is the peculiar nature of the society where such falsehood is politically motivated to create pure mischief and blackmail which could be dangerous to proper functioning of the government and socio-economic activities in the state.

    To this extent, it becomes imperative for a responsible government to find a legal means to deter such misbehavior which in all intents and purposes is inimical not only to individuals but indeed the government saddled with the responsibility of protecting lives and property. Agreed, peace and tranquility and orderly conduct of the society is threatened when there is deliberate peddling of such terrible rumours that border on criminality. Thus government must respond by spelling out what constitutes a decent citizenship and why it is not a right to engage in conscious actions to create social crisis and looking at the strategic position of Bayelsa State in the Niger Delta, then taking legal means to have stability is a legitimate action of any serious government. This is what the state government has done and will continue to impress it on the people to be law abiding as responsible stakeholders in the current mission of restoring Bayelsa State to its deserved glory in leadership and development.

    Yet, it has to be understood that we are in a democracy where the rule of law is critical. So the Bayelsa State government does not intend to make the proposed law a draconian one but a law to correct social misbehavior and enhance peace and stability in line with the freedom of Information Act and the consolidation of the law. Enforcing the proposed law will therefore have much to do with recreating our values via education as the people will have a better understanding and appreciation of the power of information and why rumour-mongering is not in the best interest of anyone, least the government. For instance, people will find it unprofitable to wake up one day and begin spreading the rumour that the state government had been sacked by a court in Port Harcourt and in the process causing panic among the people in their numbers lamenting the future of the restoration programme of the Dickson administration. This kind of insensitive jungle behavior has serious implication for the mood and temperament of the people, with consequences if not well managed.

    We further draw Dare’s attention to the composition of the State Public Information Management Committee which is largely of eminent journalists chosen for their integrity and credibility not only in their individual and professional lives but also to give credence to the good intentions of the state government. By this gesture, then rail-roading the law for ulterior motive is ruled out. Of course, its implementation will also be guided by such patriotic mind to have enlightened citizenry that are not encumbered by political manipulations but rather conscious of where we are coming from and amends we must make for a prosperous future. Instead of reverting to the locust years of the recent past, we have to move forward. These are the issues we must understand to clear our minds of any distortions. Peculiar circumstances in any political or social formation will invariably demand some clear-headed answers but to the extent that such ameliorating mechanisms conform with the basic ethics of leadership and constitutionalism. We believe we are on track for a saner society that is focused and determined to make a difference.

    We draw further corollary to the Freedom of Information Act (FoIA) which we have all appreciated as a necessary component in our democracy. Nigerians are already clamouring for greater application of this law among journalists by doing more of investigative reporting and we sincerely believe this is the way forward. But as much as the journalists will have to do their investigations, this has to be within the confines of the law by strictly doing stories based on facts as a canon of the noble journalism profession. Thus anyone who writes falsehood under the guise of FoIA is subject to punishment by the same law because truth had been sacrificed. In similar vein, we can see a variant of this law as applicable to the proposed law in Bayelsa State that will alert an individual or organization to the need to say what is true otherwise you are a problem to the state with serious concern and possible sanction.

    The last two points in the column we need to address are Dare’s query on the contents of the rumour or propaganda and his doubts about the efficacy of the proposed law. We can boldly say that not only are the contents of such rumour spurious and ill-informed, they constitute nuisance to the sanity of the society. They are inimical to peace and progress and must be checked forthwith. Importantly, the innuendos contained in the concluding paragraphs have no relationship or semblance in Bayelsa State where accountability is taken seriously and institutions of government strengthened to perform their duties for the greater good of the people of the state. Yet if Dare is contemptuous of the proposed law or its workability, he should at least acknowledge the pace of development in Bayelsa State in the last one year even as we are poised to do much more and indeed make the proposed law work to the dismay of doubting Thomases. We can always make a difference.

    • Akono, Chairman Bayelsa State NUJ sent this piece from Yenagoa.

  • Getting the best out of Lagos

    Lagos is a paradox in many respects. It is the state with the smallest land mass in the country and yet the one with the highest population. Over the years, its growth has been phenomenal, both demographically and spatially. From a population of about 25,000 in 1866, Lagos reached 665,000 by 1963, covering 69.9 (km2). It became over 10 million in 1995 thus attaining, by UN definition, the status of a mega-city. It is projected to become the third largest mega-city in the world by 2015 (UNCHS, 1996). Its population is presently about 21 million according to the State Bureau of Statistics. Lagos is currently estimated to be the fifth largest city in the world. But interestingly, almost half of the state’s limited landmass is covered by water, a situation that makes land a very scarce and highly coveted commodity.

    Its huge population and limited landmass have brought a huge pressure on the state as its sheer human population puts serious pressure on infrastructure in the state. For instance, the number of heavy duty vehicles that ply Lagos roads on a daily basis is more than those that ply roads across the country in a month. This is aside the number of pupils and students from other states that attend Lagos public schools in addition to patients that visit its hospitals on a regular basis. Consequently, the state spends more on infrastructural upgrading and provision of other basic life necessities than any state in the country.

    Despite being relatively hospitable, the state, like all other governments world-wide, has a set budget designed to aid implementation of its programmes and activities based on available resources. In the health sector, Lagos State, without discrimination provides free health care services and drugs for Nigerians in Lagos from ages 0-12 and 60 and above. Free ante-natal care is also provided for pregnant women. These services are available at healthcare centres that transverse the state with additional Eko Free Health Mission which is carried out at intervals by the Ministry of Health to take care of the people by offering test and treatments on eye care, blood pressure, diabetes , dental care, etc.

    Aside from the pressure on infrastructure, the growing population equally complicates urban development. In an attempt to live in Lagos at all cost, in view of its several fascinating offers, many people live in disorderly manner as well as in disorganized settlements that make nonsense of the state’s urban planning. Before long, most of these settlements become slums that constitute serious socio-economic threats to the state. It is in quick response to this that the government has been making conscious efforts to achieve infrastructural development and environmental renewal, initiating several programmes to reverse the ugly trend that could cause us all the Lagos that we so love dearly. Given the earlier absence of any strategic vision to manage the urban environment, government should be commended for making new efforts.

    One way through which government is trying to promote a new Lagos is to engage in a passionate drive to attract foreign investors to participate in the infrastructural and urban renewal drive in sectors such as transportation, roads, waste management, water provision, power, tourism, property development and establishment of bus assembly plants. Essentially, the project involves providing infrastructure, mass housing and tourism, as well as developing the adjoining town of Badagry and linking it to the rest of the state with a modern transportation system.

    Other notable features of government’s current effort in turning around the lot of the state include beautification and landscaping projects across the state: loops, medians along highways, setbacks and development of recreational parks in identified locations, construction of new roads and a light rail system , construction of jetties and development of more water routes to facilitate marine transportation, construction of housing units, reconstruction and expansion of the Lagos-Badagry expressway into a 10-lane conduit with a light rail, a trans-regional route to link Nigeria and neighbouring countries, the inauguration of the Eko Atlantic City among others.

    In view of the on- going efforts of the state government to make Lagos a better, safer and more prosperous place to live, it is essential that those who have chosen the city as their business as well residential hub should be more passionate, caring and friendly when it comes to protecting and preserving its environmental aesthetic values. Considering its strategic position in socio-economic prosperity of the country, we need to treat Lagos like a beautiful bride whose beauty and pride must be kept intact. It is by doing this, that we all would get the best out of our Lagos.

    Undoubtedly, a renewed commitment to the preservation of Lagos represents a major way forward for the socio-economic renewal of the country. For one, Lagos is home to about 2,000 industrial complexes, 10,000 commercial ventures and 22 industrial estates. It contributes 30% to the nation’s GDP and is the leading contributor to the non-oil sector GDP (2011 statistics). It accounts for over 60% of Nigeria’s industrial and commercial activities; 70% of national maritime cargo freight, over 80% of international aviation traffic and over 50% of Nigeria’s energy consumption.

    All the banks in the country are not only located in Lagos, but actually have their headquarters in the state, while over 40 per cent of telephone subscribers’ base networks are also in Lagos. Aside from this, Lagos consumes about 45 percent of the petroleum products in the country. Similarly, the state accounts for 20.2 percent of Nigeria’s nominal Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 50.7 percent of non-oil GDP.

    Also, the two seaports in Lagos account for 70 percent of the sea trade in the country while the two electricity distribution companies Eko and Ikeja Districts account for 50 percent of PHCN’s transmission power. Similarly, about 80 percent of international air travels arrive in and depart from Lagos. Equally, Lagos is a private sector-driven economy. Therefore, growth in Lagos would have spiral effect on Nigeria as a whole.

    Equally worthy of note is that, there is hardly any part of the country that is not represented in Lagos. Progress in Lagos reflects in parts of the country, because people who live in Lagos make their money here and go to their states to invest same. All these point to Lagos as the economic nerve centre of the country. So, if Nigeria is to be rated as one of the major players in the emerging markets, Lagos truly holds the key.

    It is, therefore, imperative that we embrace positive attitudinal change with regards to our handling of the environment which offers us unlimited possibilities for economic development and advancement. It is, for instance, unacceptable that spare parts traders at the popular Ladipo market, Mushin, should always wait for the state government to use the full weight of the law before they comply with simple environmental regulations. Same goes for our driving culture. The saner we make the roads to be, the better for us all. Despite its many geographical constraints, we could all live happily in Lagos if only we respect and abide by the rules and laws of the land.

    • Ibirogba is Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Lagos State

  • The Cross in a season of violence

    Nigeria is in a season of violence – bombing, kidnapping, armed robbery, ritual sacrifice, economic and political insecurity, corruption, and spiritual enterprise. A couple of weeks ago, within 24 hours in different parts of the country, 164 were feared dead in Niger Delta boat mishap, 55 in Kogi boat mishap, 38 in boat mishap in Rivers state and over 60 others in bomb explosion in Kano.

    The history and litany of violence in Nigeria especially after the colonial slavery, inter-tribal wars, the 1914 amalgamation, 1966 civil war and many others is littered with too much blood. Beginning from October 19, 1986, a harvest of bomb blast continues to spread. In 1994, the sporadic violence around the villages in Jos under a climate of ethnic, social, and religious tensions left over 2000 dead. Nigeria’s violent history continued into the 21st century with the February 2000 and September 2001 slaughter of thousands in Kaduna over the introduction of Shari’ah law, and a spree of church and mosque destructions and burnings in Jos respectively. It is on record that in November 2008, disputed local elections triggered clashes between Muslim and Christian youth in Jos. Hundreds died. In April 2011, riots following the controversial election of Christian President Goodluck Jonathan killed an estimated 800 people. Thousands more have died in 2012 since Boko Haram militants urged Christians to leave the north. The bomb explosion near a church in Kaduna on Easter Sunday, April 8, 2012 is among the Boko Haram’s violent jihad against Christians that pushed the country into seventh place in annual rankings of the countries implicated by terrorism by the Global Terrorism Index.

    The Anglican Archbishop of Jos, Most Rev Dr Benjamin Kwashi provides a first hand experience and information about some causes of violence in Nigeria. According to Archbishop Kwashi ‘what seems to be a recurring decimal is that over time, those who have in past used violence to settle political issues, economic issues, social matters, inter-tribal disagreement, or any issue for that matter, now continue to use that same path of violence and cover it up with religion.’ Professor Toyin Falola explained this leadership manipulative behaviour as the chief causes behind the major cases of violence in 1980s, and 90s, including the Maitatsine, Kano, Bauchi, Kaduna, and Katsina riots. The problem is that Nigeria is at the risk of professionalism and careerism that dominates its politics and leadership and this continues to poison the prospect of real representation in leadership, thereby threatening the promises of godliness and democratic government. The honourable elites are behaving dishonourably, milking the system especially the oil money to the tune of 48 trillion naira in the past 12 years, and promoting corruption for their personal gain while public anger grows. Without any sign of repentance and accountability, plans on how to remove the fuel subsidy and how to spend over 100 million dollars on the Centenary city plan are going on regardless of mass youth unemployment and lack of social amenities. Indeed, oppression can make a saint mad in Nigeria. In developed countries, government functions as the agent of the people, in Nigeria the people are treated as the agent of the government, hence millions of our youth becomes idle hands ready to be hired and used to settle political and economic issues, and religious disagreements.

    Nigeria is gradually becoming a spiritual and political lost Eden, but the Good News is that there is a Cross that can break the ‘it’s never been this bad before’ syndrome over the affairs of the nation. In church history, the cross has functioned in violent ways. Constantine’s vision of the cross at the eve of the battle at the Milvian Bridge in the fourth century was for military power and control. The Crusaders in the Middle Ages, the Conquistadors in the 15th and 16th centuries have used the Cross as an excuse also for military power and forms of violence. However, the Cross is primarily a symbol that brings hope for the forgiveness of sins and possibility of a new life to those whose hearts have been moved to encounter Jesus Christ. The theology behind the Cross is about grace, giving, self-sacrifice rather than killing or taking others as captives. The cross is an assurance that in the midst of violence and destruction, God is in control over the affairs of Nigeria. While love moved Jesus Christ to be lifted up and to die on the Cross, then raising him up in resurrection, hatred through corruption, bad and greedy leadership, and violence is moving thousands to die in Nigeria. Sin leaves a stain. If Nigeria is to overcome its season of violence and move on after shedding the blood of innocent souls, we need to participate in an act of cleansing. The crucifixion of Jesus Christ on the Cross is the act of reconciliation between man and God. The major reason behind the violence and corruption in Nigeria is that many are blind and unable to recognize God’s holy place in creation, fall, and redemption. Nigeria’s soil is polluted with too much blood and the nation can only be restored through contact with something holy and clean. This is the message behind the Cross upon which Jesus Christ died and the starting point for the unity and healing of the land (Heb. 2:17).

    The Cross in a season of violence points to the power of forgiveness that ‘takes control away from the oppressor and give power back to the victim who can then release the oppressor.’ Rev Tom Stuckey, a former, President of British Methodism explained that the cross shows that justice comes before power. According to him, the message of the Cross ‘reveals humankind’s obsession with power … oppressive dictatorships, unaccountable hierarchical institutions and faceless bureaucracies.’ The Cross in a season of violence is telling Nigerians that, just as Judas destroyed himself, every dragon and powers behind the violence – Boko Haram, corruption, and kidnappings in Nigeria ‘will ultimately destroy themselves through their own self-aggrandizement.’ The Cross is devoid of arrogance, but a startling display of love and hope that, in the midst of dark corruption, frames our existence with new meaning. Nigeria is a nation where people do irreparable damage to themselves, and to others, in the struggle to get rich or climb to the top, even in the church. Nigeria is like Judas, where people, especially the leadership embrace the darkness of nothingness and self/national destruct. Judas’ whole life was based on illusion, love of money, a loss of sense of self-worth and points towards the path of hell. The message of the Cross points to the new tree of life – not a tree of violence or death, a precious fountain, free for all, a healing stream that flows from Calvary’s mountain for the healing of a corrupt nation overwhelmed with violence. To the church, the Cross in a season of violence represents the pattern of the Christian life, discipleship, crucifixion of self will, and the willingness for moral and spiritual reorientation as the evidence of God’s touch of grace rather than the present celebrity and personality culture. The church must stop exchanging the shame, weakness, and foolishness of the Cross for material and human glory. The Cross which points to a sense of hope in a season of violence calls for watching and waiting in prayer, hoping and trusting until Nigeria reaches the golden strand. The gate of hell will not prevail over Nigeria. Happy Easter.

    • Very Rev Dr Okegbile lectures at Methodist Theological Institute, Sagamu.

  • Ondos and Bayo Akinnola

    MS Grammar School, Bariga, Lagos is the first secondary school to be established in Nigeria. It was established in 1859.

    Methodist Boys’ High School Lagos was established in 1878, Methodist Girls’ High School Yaba in 1879, Baptist Academy Lagos in 1885, Hope Waddel Training Institute in Calabar in 1895, Saint Annes School, Molete, Ibadan in 1896, Etinan Institute, Etinan in Akwa-Ibom state in 1902, Methodist School, Oron in 1903, Kings College, Lagos (FLOREAT) in 1909, Saint John’s School Bida in 1904, Abeokuta Grammar School in 1908, Alhuda College Zaria in 1910, Eko Boys High School Lagos in 1913, Ibadan Grammar School (Deo Et Patriae) in 1913, Ijebu-Ode Grammar School (Non nobis Domine) in 1913, Government Secondary School, Ilorin in 1914, Government College Katsina-Ala was established in 1914, Murtala Muhammed College in Yola in 1920, Barewa College in Zaria in 1922, Methodist College Uzuakoli in 1923, Government College, Ibadan in 1927, Government College Umuahia in 1927, Queens College Lagos in 1927, Aggrey Memorial College, Arochukwu in 1931, Saint Gregory’s College, Obalende (Pro Fide Et Scientia)in Lagos in 1928, Igbobi College, Yaba, Lagos, in 1932, Saint Theresa’s College in Ibadan in 1932 and Christ the King College, Onitsha in 1933.

    Christ School Ado-Ekiti (Christus Victor) was established in 1933, Ilesha Grammar School (Ehuwa Omoluwabi) founded in 1934, Saint Patrick’s College in Calabar,1934, Dennis Memorial College Onitsha in 1935, Holy Rosary College in Enugu in 1935, Government Secondary School, Owerri in 1935,Olivet Baptist High School, Oyo in 1935, Edo College, Benin in 1937, Ibadan Boys High School in 1938, Offa Grammar School, 1943, Government College Ughelli in 1945, Remo Secondary School, Sagamu, 1946, Imade College Owo, 1946, Emmanuel College Owerri,1947, Hussey College Warri in 1947, Victory College Ikare in 1947, Stella Mary’s College, Port-Harcourt in 1948, Aquinas College, Akure (Integratis) in 1951, Oyemekun Grammar School, Akure in 1953, Gboluji Grammar in Ile-Oluji in 1954, Saint Finbarrs College in 1956, Igbo-Elerin Grammar School, Ibadan in 1957, Olofin Anglican Grammar School Idanre (illuminatio In-rupe) 1957, Edo Boys High School Benin in 1960, Government Comprehensive School, Port-Harcourt in 1962, Comprehensive High School, Aiyetoro in 1963, International School, Ibadan in 1963, Federal Government College Ido-Ani in 1977 and Vivian Fowler College in 1991.

    All these institutions, thousands of them which cannot be mentioned in this article for lack of space, all have history behind their establishments by communities, governments, religious bodies and individuals including Lagos City College, Yaba, Lagos established by Dr. Nnamdi Azikwe on January 3, 1963 and Titcombe College, Egbe founded by Reverend Tommy Titcombe on behalf of Sudan Interior Mission on January 26, 1951.

    I am sure that our secondary school experience must have shaped our lives either personally or collectively. And in the words of Sesan Ogunro, an ex-student of Christ School Ado-Ekiti, whom I agree with when he said, “Christ School to me was the University of life, it taught me all I need to make it in life, how to laugh in the face of hardship and lack, how to be positively competitive, how to be a friend before having a friend, how to trust and love Jesus Christ as our cornerstone and more importantly how to handle success with humility. These were the lessons that prepared me for life”.

    The subject matter is the first secondary to be established in the present Osun, Ekiti, Ondo, Delta and Edo states, that is- Ondo Boys High School in 1919.

    In 1917, the then Osemawe of Ondo, Oba Jimekun worried about the absence of secondary school in the town and the ordeal which his subjects experienced in sending their children outside Ondo for secondary school education, set up a six man planning committee in collaboration with Canon Moses Craig Akinpelu Adeyemi for the establishment of a secondary school in Ondo. Members of the planning committee were Chief Logbosere Cornelius Awosika (Secretary/Treasurer), Chief Lomafe Olatunji Awosika, Daniel Rogers, Chief Seriki Akinrosotu, Chief G.O. Fajiye and Mr. J.O. Akinwotu all late. In 1918, the committee recommended the establishment of Ondo Boys High School and Canon Adeyemi who later married Miss Elizabeth Modupeola Okuseinde, became the first principal of the school. That is why today a College of Education which I understand is now a university is named after Canon Adeyemi.

    Not only had the Christians contributed to the Education in Ondo. The Moslems also did. For Islam arrived in Ondo in 1888 through Alfa Abubakar Ajao who made his son Alhaji Habeeb Ajao, the first Chief Imam of Ondo Kingdom in 1885. In 1942, the late Seriki of Ondo, Alhaji Saheed Tugbobo Fawehinmi donated five acres of land for the establishment of the first Muslim Secondary School in Ondo in 1942. The Present Seriki of Ondo State Alhaji Khaleel Fawehinmi is the grandson of Saheed Tugbobo.

    The Establishment of Ondo Boys High School in 1918 gave the Ondos a window of opportunity to advance in commerce, agriculture and education.

    Who are the Ondos? They occupy part of the present Ondo Central Senatorial District. Most of them are farmers producing cocoa, rubber and timber.

    The Ondos, Ile-Olujis and the Idanres speak identical dialect. Traditional political authority is vested in the King (the Osemawe), who is generally considered the spiritual and political head of the Ondos. He heads the Council of senior chiefs called Eghae; these are (Lisa, Jomu, Odunwo, Sesare, Adaja, and Odofin) who with him make up what is considered a cabinet, referred to in other Yoruba towns as Iwarefa. The Obaship is hereditary, and currently, three ruling families are recognised to produce candidates, one after the other. These are: Okuta, Foyi, and Leyo. The coral beads worn on their wrists and ankles as well as the big drum “ugbaji” which they and a few Ekule Chiefs are entitled to beat during ceremonies distinguish the Eghae.

    At first the Ondos were not keen on public service; they were more interested in commerce where they excel but at the urging of the late Osemawe of Ondo, Dr. Festus Adesanoye who was Federal Permanent Secretary as far back as 1963, Professor Olu Akinkugbe and others, their interest in public service grew and so were the opportunities.

    As a result of their link to education as far back as 1919 and with two universities and over 34 secondary schools, coupled with their hard work and foresight, the Ondos have produced eminent sons and daughters who have distinguished themselves in their chosen careers.

    If I may mention at the risk offending many, they include Bishop D.O. Awosika, the first Primate of the Anglican Communion Bishop Omotayo Olufosoye (1907-1992), late General Adesujo Ademulegun (1923-1966), Gani Fawehinmi (SAN), the present Osemawe, Dr. Victor Kiladejo, Chief Alex Akinyele, Chief Gbenga Akinnawo, Captain Fola Akintotu, Professor Olu Adegoke, Sunny Ade, Ope and Jimi Bademosi, Sandoye Fadojutimi, Kole and Gbenga Ademulegun, Yele Ogundipe, Bode Betiku, Feyi Famutimi, Ronke Akinsete and her dad, Dr. E.O. Akinsete, Chief Dayo Duyile, Raheem Ayo Akinkotu, Seye Ladapo, Kunle Bolodeoku, Fusi Adefusika, Mrs. Omobolanle Johnson (nee Akinnola), Engineer Akinyinka Akinnola, Mrs. Yewande Zaccheus (nee Akinnola), Mrs. Aarinola Kola-Daisi (nee Akinnola), Jise Akinmurele, Abbas Akinwande, the Akinboboyes, the Awosikas, the Ladapos and many more too numerous to mention.

    But one name that stands out is Chief Oreoluwa Ilemobayo Akinnola, who answered the final call recently. He was the Mayegun of Ondo in 1978, Lotin of Ondo in 1984 and the Lisa in 1992. Tall, big and dark; he was a vibrant human being. His hobby was courting friendship and he courted the friendship of so many including mine, President Olusegun Obasanjo, Segun Agagu, Chief Rasheed Gbadamosi, Chief Subomi Balogun, General T.Y. Danjuma, Chief Pius Olu Akinyelure, Chief Igbinedion (the Esama of Benin), Brigadier Mobolaji Johnson, Chief M.K.O. Abiola, Chief Kunle Ojora, Chief Olu Falae, the Ooni of Ife, Kabiyesi Oba Okunnade Sijuade, the Deji of Oyemekun, Oba Biyi Adesida, General Abubakar Abdusalam, General Ibrahim Babangida and so many more.

    May his soul rest in peace.

    • Teniola, s former director at the Presidency lives in Lagos.

  • The clash of civilisations revisited

    The clash of civilisations revisited

    There was a massive intellectual uproar in 1990s when Professor Samuel P. Huntington, a Harvard University Professor, in a lecture at The American Enterprise Institute first propounded a theory that the post-Cold War conflicts were going to be characterised by a clash of civilisations where people’s cultural and religious identities will be the primary source of conflicts. The lecture was in 1992. In 1993, he expanded the lecture in an article in FOREIGN AFFAIRS titled “THE CLASH OF CIVILISATIONS?” as if he was no longer sure of the applicability of the concept. Finally in 1996, he further gave the concept a book-length treatment when he published a book titled: THE CLASH OF CIVILISATION AND THE REMAKING OF WORLD ORDER.

    Two preliminary points should be made at this point. The first is that academics don’t just wake up to start propounding theories out of idleness. Usually, it is in response to a stimulus, whether external or internal. In this particular case, Huntington was reacting to the end of the cold war, a war marked by ideological conflicts between capitalism and communism. With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the emergence of Russian nationalism and other nationalism in Eastern Europe, scholars were divided into two camps. There were those like Francis Fukuyama who saw this as the end of conflicts and others like Huntington who thought conflicts would simply find other sources.

    It was in an attempt to find an intellectual basis to explain future conflicts that Huntington came up with the concept. As mentioned earlier, there were other scholars who were also involved in seeking to provide an explanation for what to expect. Francis Fukuyama’s concept was embodied in his own book titled, THE END OF HISTORY AND THE LAST MAN. His own point of view was that with the decisive defeat of communism by Western capitalism, the whole world was bound to embrace the tenets of Western capitalism and we would all sleep facing the same direction.

    In a 20-minute lecture, I cannot do justice to an analysis of Fukuyama’s thesis. That would have to be for another day and another audience.

    Huntington would not be the first person or scholar to use the phraseology. In 1990, Bernard Lewis had applied the phrase in his own article titled “THE ROOTS OF MOSLEM RAGE.” Even as far back as 1926, Basil Mathews had written a book titled “YOUNG ISLAM ON TREK: A STUDY IN THE CLASH OF CIVILISATIONS”. Therefore as you can see, the phrase has an ancient pedigree. But that does not mean that it was and still is an accurate rendition of world history, then and now.

    I decided to share my own views about the concept with you because I am fascinated by his classification of the world along civilisational lines and also because I believe it is a useful tool in understanding present-day conflicts in the world and in Nigeria.

    What is a civilisation? A people with their belief system. It is that simple. Even though Huntington defines a civilisation as a cultural identity, I want to avoid the narrow connotation of the use of the term, culture, by preferring the elastic meaning implied in a belief system.

    As its ancient pedigree implies, there has always been a clash or clashes of civilisations from when homo erectus transmitted into homo sapiens. As I have argued in a previous lecture, the first case of genocide resulted in homo sapiens wiping out homo erectus even though we know so little about the belief systems of both, whether they were compatible, the same or antagonistic. If you read the Bible as a historical document, you cannot but come to the conclusion that the wars between ancient Israel and the Philistines, Amorites, Assyrians etc were as a result of clashes of civilisations. The wars between the British and the Benin kingdom, between the British and the Fulani Emirates, between the Oyo and Fulani empires were all manifestations of clashes of civilisations.

    This is not to imply that all wars are civilisational wars. Civil wars by definition cannot and are not civilisational. This also does not mean that every war between two different civilisations deserves to be categorised as a clash of civilisation. The wars of Alexander the Great did not seek to impose Greek value system on conquered territories, neither did Ghenkis Khan seek to impose Mongolian value system on the territories he conquered.

    What then is a war of civilisations? It is a war driven by the desire to impose a different system of cultural and religious values on others who hold on to a different system.

    Therefore as a concept, it is sound.

    According to Huntingdon, there are five major civilisations:

    1.Western civilisation comprising the United States, Canada, Western and Central Europe, Australia and Oceania.

    2.The Orthodox civilisation of the former Soviet Union, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece and Romania.

    3The Eastern civilisation made up of Buddhist, Chinese, Hindu and Japonic civilizations.

    4.The Muslim Civilisation of the Greater Middle East extending to Northern West Africa, Albania, Bangladesh, Brunei, Comoros, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan and Maldives.

    5.The civilisation of Sub-Saharan Africa located in Southern Africa, Middle Africa (excluding Chad), East Africa (excluding Ethiopia, Comoros, Kenya, Mauritius and Tanzania), Cape Verde, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, Liberia and Sierra Leone.

    Then there are other groupings which are contentious:

    1.Latin America which includes Central America, South America, Cuba, the Dominican Republic and Mexico. They regard themselves as part of the Western civilisation although there are slight variations in social and political structures from Europe.

    2.The Anglo-Caribbean is regarded as an emerging quasi-civilisation.

    3.Ethiopia and Haiti are regarded as cellular civilisations in the sense that they are lone countries.

    4.Israel is another cellular civilisation even though embedded in western civilisation because of the attachment of the diaspora Jews.

    There is another group of countries regarded as “cleft” because large portions of the population identify with different civilisations. Examples are India (Hindu-Muslim), Ukraine (Eastern-rite Catholic-dominate western section versus Orthodox-dominated east), Benin, Chad, Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania and Togo (Islam/Sub-Saharan Africa), Guyana and Surinanme (Hindu and sub-Saharan Africa), China (cleft between Sinic, Bhuddist, and the West in the case of Hong Kong and Macau) etc.

    These are Huntingdon’s classifications which I endorse by and large because like any attempt to make order out of chaos, there are bound to be rough edges and imprecise classifications. I should add that I regard the Roman Catholic Church as a special specie of civilisation. It is only Roman Catholic countries like Ireland, like countries in Eastern Europe and in Latin America where the Church has clashed with governments, and where it is the governments who have been battered and bruised who will easily understand why I classify the Roman Catholic Church as a civilisation.

    But much more important is the fact that mutations and fluctuations are the hallmark of human history. Right now, Huntingdon has identified five major civilisations. But Arnold Toynbee, that master historian of the world who wrote history in broad strokes as master painters like Dale, Van Gogh or Gaugin paint on broad canvasses, in his A Study of History, identified 21 major civilisations at that time. A Study of History is the 12-volume magnum opus of British historian Arnold J. Toynbee, which he started in 1934 and finished in 1961.The author traces the development and decay of all of the major world civilisations in the historical record. Toynbee applies his model to each of these civilisations, detailing the stages through which they all pass: genesis, growth, time of troubles, universal state, and disintegration.

    The major civilisations, as Toynbee sees them, are: Egyptian, Andean, Sinic, Minoan, Sumerian, Mayan, Indic, Hittite, Hellenic, Western, Orthodox Christian (Russia), Far Eastern, Orthodox Christian (main body), Persian, Arabic, Hindu, Mexican, Yucatec and Babylonic. There are four ‘abortive civilisations’ (Abortive Far Western Christian, Abortive Far Eastern Christian, Abortive Scandinavian, Abortive Syriac) and five ‘arrested civilisations’ (Polynesian, Eskimo, Nomadic, Ottoman, Spartan).

    You will immediately notice that Tonybee’s work is deficient in his total ignorance of, and hence non-inclusion of African civilisations. In any case, his work shows that civilisations are not frozen in concrete but are in a state of flux. Some will die out, some will be absorbed by more vibrant ones and some will absorb others.

    On reflection, one obvious fact jumps out and that is that there is nothing actually new about the events crystallised under the rubric Clash of Civilisation. Those were precisely the clash called the Crusades at that time. That also confirms another Arnold Toynbee eternal truth that human history is marked by a cyclical pattern. What goes round, comes round.

    Does that imply that there is an inevitability of conflicts or wars because of the existence of different civilisations? The answer has to be in the negative. For different civilisations to breed conflict, at least one of the civilisations must be driven by a global mission to achieve superiority over others, to deny others the legitimacy of existence and must possess a belief system that is not subject to change or mutation.

    There are two ways to change a course of action. It is either through superior force or through superior argument. Neither works against suicide bombing.

    Boko Haram did not introduce the Clash of Civilisation into the Nigerian politics. This was done by the Dan Fodio incursion into Nigeria and the attendant Jihad. Nigerian politics since then has been coloured by this Clash of Civilisation. This clash cannot be resolved by western type elections. It can only be resolved by a GRAND CONSENSUS WORKED OUT BY THE POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, RELIGIOUS, CULTURAL, AND INTELLECTUAL ELITE ON THE PLATFORM OF A NATIONAL CONFERENCE

    It is this frightening possibility of a world crisis that cannot be subjected to the usual diplomatic processes of carrot-and-stick that underlay the intellectual criticism of Huntington’s work.

    A more problematic issue is to what extent can we ascribe to the whole the belief system of the fundamentalist fringes? Does Al-Qaeda reflect the moslem faith? Do the Christian fundamentalist sects reflect the Christian faith? Or have these fundamentalist sects occupied the available space that the mainstream has become captives of the fringes.?

    The answers have public policy implications. We should not be complacent or panic. Somehow the world manages to survive it all.

    (As an aside, in 2011, Mr. Jim O’Neili an out-going Chairman of Goldman Sachs coined the term BRIC as the new global economic power. It was later amended to read BRICS —Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

    There was a lot of wailing and gnashing of the teeth all over Nigeria as to the omission of Nigeria from the list. We were all determined to get into that group or go burst in the process.

    Now we are told that we did not need to go through that flagellation. Mr. Michael Andrew, the global chairman of KPMG International says there is a new economic kid on the block that is making waves called MINT (Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey).

  • From the cell phone

    For Dele Belgore

     

    A ruin of law is what Nigerian leaders understand not rule of law. The law is bigger than individual, you cannot be talking development in a country where rule of law is not respected. Law is meant to be obeyed, but our leaders do not respect it when they are in power. From Hamza Ozi Momoh, Apapa Lagos

    Dear Dele, I read your piece with great delight, but with some equivocations. While you were right on point about our country which is now the object of global ridicule, you did not dwell on the one single problem of the elite class like you and I. Shamelessness is the biggest factor militating against the rule of law in Nigeria. Why do the so-called political, social, religious and business leaders undermine the law and scatter men and animals alike? Why are the public looters rewarded with chieftaincy titles, knighthood and national awards? It is presence of shame, much above the fear of the law that leads to respect for the rule of law in other climes. How many indicted public officers wait for the law before resigning from office in the rest of the world? Why do some former social critics become greater petty thieves once they arrive the corridors of power in our country? The absence of shame is the real reason. Let us develop the culture of shame by making it count in this society. Let traditional rulers, religious leaders, civil societies and the people lead the way in the ostracisation of the real enemies of our country. It is only then that our journey to civilisation would begin. For now it is not yet uhuru. God bless. From Hon. West-Idahosa

    Good write-up sir. We are never short of great write-ups like this but we lack men of honour, character and courage who will translate great write-ups and dreams to reality to free our citizens from poverty, ignorance and abuse from strong individuals. Anonymous

    Dear Belgore, your comment ‘Where lies the rule of law in Nigeria?’ was nothing but the truth about our country. As we continue to pray for a possible change to this awkward attitude from all and sundry, we will also pray for good people with foresight like you to be blessed with the leadership status of this our great country. From Abdullahi Dunama

    Revolution is what this funny nation wants, if not, justice will continue to be no-go-area for the masses. For me, it can take place now to all I care. From Joe, Kaduna

    Learned senior, your write-up makes an interesting reading but it seems you cannot appreciate the disaster we are in. We allowed sentiment and emotion to becloud our sense of analytical judgments in 2011 by voting for one of the most unintelligent presidential candidate, who shielded away from open forum but instead opted to debate with Dbanj. Rule of law? Utopia! Anonymous

    Yes, Belgore SAN is very much correct. The truth about correcting Nigeria’s inadequacies owes it to the ensured enforcement of the rule of law. That way, not only will we find peace, but the very big monster (corruption), sapping our marrows would be long dead. Deal with those corrupt at the top, and that will go far. Anonymous

    Open forum. Indeed, the rule of law in Nigeria is in total disarray, it is so unbearable and pathetic that we are still dwindling in trying to get it right. I hope and pray that someday there will be equality and fairness amongst citizenry when seeking for jobs, in traffic jams, during elections, etc. From Kabiru Ivori Jibril, Okene kogi

    You really open the problems of our shameless leaders. One hopes they will read this your comment. From Sgt. Ezekiel, Nassarawa

    Re: Where lies the rule of law in Nigeria? I believe that Nigerians are at fault for the non-existence of the rule of law in Nigeria. When people vote on tribal and ethnic sentiments rather than on the basis of merit, you reap mediocrity and disregard for the rule of law. How do you expect to reap the dividends of democracy from politicians in office who do not even know the essence of governance? Until Nigerians learn to vote on the basis of merit and not tribal and religious sentiments, we will continue to revolve in a cycle of mediocre leadership. From Olumide Soyemi, Bariga

    Dear Belgore, I took time to read your column and I was convinced that you are very much on track on what Nigerian leaders have turned the law of the country to. God bless you richly. From Richard

    Sir, in my own view, we do not have the rule of law in Nigeria. What we have in Nigeria is the law of rule because those who rule in Nigeria are the law themselves. From Alex Onukwue Aguleri, Anambra State

    Your Excellency, the caption of your write-up on the back page of The Nation Newspaper of March 22, 2013 ‘Where lies the rule of law in Nigeria?’ is a well convoluted conscience-awakening question coupled with the perfectly chosen illustrations and instances. All the words are enough to change the lawless misdemeanor of those who are in power, but would they listen? Only people like you who have the conscience of right and wrong can obey as well as maintain the rule of law in Nigeria. Ironically, Nigerians do not like straightforward leaders and that is the problem. From Kunegha Agbajule

    God bless you for that beautiful piece on “Where lies the rule of law in Nigeria?” I love the seventh paragraph that pointed out that the violation of the law by government officials and law enforcement agencies make law abiding citizens look stupid or weak. I do hope that our leaders do take time to read such articles and see the need to lead by example. From Obinna Iheukwumere

    Thanks sir for your write-up on the rule of law in Nigeria on Friday. Please keep it up and may you not be like our current crop of leaders when you get there because you surely will by God’s grace. Regards! From David

     

    For Gbenga Omotoso

     

    Your piece on “Post-mortem of a pardon” was well written, the humuor styled analysis added flavour, but beyond the jokes; Nigerians should know that leadership is a call to service which we will give account of someday. From Dave, Makurdi

    Re: Post-mortem of a pardon. I am impressed by your sense of humour. A beautiful satire indeed! From Ilom Chukwuji, Lagos

    I just read ‘Post-mortem of a pardon’, I no fit laugh jare!!! Also, I will not be a bit surprised to confirm that the satirical picture you painted is a near representation of the kind of psychopathic atmosphere that pervades ‘brainstorming’ sessions at the top echelons of our leadership…it is a pity. Thanks for the good job! Anonymous

    As I scant with every beat of interest through your piece, ‘Post-mortem of a pardon’, it dawned on me in a radical way that our leaders have never taken public opinion seriously nor have any remorse in taking wrong decisions, as far as it satisfies their megalomaniac agenda. This president is no different! Well done my brother, you put the reverse beautifully. From Tim, Ibadan

    Sir, frankly speaking, I laughed as I finished reading your ‘Post-mortem of a pardon’. In the last one week, there had been arguments for and against the pardon of Alamieyeseigha by President Jonathan. Those who feel for him say he deserves the pardon. Those who believe in the rule of law think the President acted wrongly. What is most alarming is the President’s media spokesman saying the critics of Jonathan’s act of pardon to his boss are suffering from sophisticated ignorance. I am laughing. I do not know how Baba will feel about this. From Iniobong Umana

    Sarcasm as a literary tool was part of what I learnt in school and in turn taught when I was a teacher; you have enough of it sir. God will nurture your mind more. Your piece always attests to this remark. I have enamored my mind to myriad of problems in my dear nation. Meanwhile sir, thanks for giving it a sarcastic treatment. From Adebiyi, Abeokuta

    Many of you read Bible as novel but, do not judge Goodluck as judgment is for God alone period. Anonymous

    The fact that President Goodluck Jonathan pardoned Alamieyeseigha does not come as a surprise. Given the feeble attempts made by the President to fight corruption, it also shows that the President is paying lip service to the issue of corruption and other serious and vicious crimes plaguing the nation. May God help us in this country. From Ojo A. Ayodele, Emure Ekiti

    The only option that is left for the President now is to resign because Nigerians are not ready to have a leader who encourages corruption by granting pardon to a corrupt person. This is the worse crime against Nigerians. From Hamza Ozi Momoh, Dockyard Lagos

    Your article is educative and informed. But what I have been observing is that in Nigeria, when you are not in power you politicise all critical decisions taken by the authority. May God bless Naija. From Majemu, Ondo state

    Re: Post-mortem of a pardon. Whether or not Mr. President did a mix of the clemency, pardon or amnesty of others and Diepre Alamieyeseigha, what is bad remains sour! Mr. President with Alamieyeseigha’s pardon committed social, political and transparency hara-kiri. By now, Obasanjo would be regretting why he failed to ethnicise, trivialise, fraternise with, and free ex-IG Tafa Balogun. The good image of Nigeria Obasanjo rebuilt is being battered by NCS and Co. When shall we liberate ourselves-Nigeria from corruptive-thoughts? From Lanre Oseni

    ‘Post-mortern of a pardon’ is all about the existence of a very powerful corrupt fraternity, which is hell bent on protecting members. Not until they are removed from government that we can have a corrupt-free nation. From Alhaj ADEYCorsim, Osodi Lagos

    Omotosho, on your write-up ‘Post-mortem of a pardon’, you have also been Alamieyeseigha for breaking my ribs. From Ali Muhammed, Abuja

    I would not have had a problem with this Alamieyeseigha pardon but the problem is that he definitely jumped bail in the United Kingdom, even if he did not commit the crime he was arrested for. In other words, he may even be innocent of the money laundering charges against him but he is certainly guilty of jumping bail which is a crime on its own. What message are we sending that we provide refuge for our citizens who run from the law in fellow democratic and friendly nations? Anonymous

    Jonathan’s pardon to Alamieyeseigha is a welcomed idea. Alamieyeseigha was setup in London by Obasanjo due to the fact that he rejected his third term ambition. I praised Mr. President for the courage and bravery in taking such a challenging decision. From Michael Okiriko, Abia

    Dear Sir, your ‘Post-mortem of a pardon’ is concise and point blank with a touch of humour.

    I am an optimist but sometimes I also wonder if Nigeria will ever come out of its bowels of corruption and ineptitude. From Joseph Odey, University of Maiduguri

     

    For Dare Olatunji

     

    If Jonathan regime is a season of pardoning hard criminals, then I beg him to pardon AlMustapha from the north to complete his agenda. Anonymous

    The President does things with impunity believing that nobody will ask him. In my last week comment, I said any action the President takes now will either speaks in his favour or against him. Why is the President heating up the polity when the ovation is already louder? He said he is fighting corruption but it is the corruption that is fighting him. Pardoning Alams has shown that the President lacks political will to tackle this disease called corruption. Now, those who have it at the back of their mind to steal will steal because they know nothing will happen to them. Nigeria is in a fix. We have been fixed by our leaders, they have ridiculed us before the whole world. Corruption has become the husband of the President; it controls him morning and night. Mr. President, please reverse your decision on Alams for you to regain confidence in the minds of Nigerians. From Hamza Ozi Momoh, Lagos

    Your piece ‘Season of absolution’ makes an interesting reading. It is a pity that the council of state has become a rubber stamp body for President Jonathan. These former leaders are busy in their pursuit of contracts for themselves and their cronies despite the fact that they also collect sitting allowances. My only hope is in God as these leaders have once again failed us. Let us pray to God to save Nigeria. From Ojo A. Ayodele, Emure Ekiti

    Our leaders have ridiculed us before the world. From Hamza Ozi Momoh, Apapa Docyard Lagos

    Sir, remember that presidential pardons are given to criminals which DSP represents now and not for innocent people thanks. Anonymous

    Though I hold no brief for Alams, if somebody like the former military president is walking free in Nigeria, why not Alams? Prof, there are many serving governors now who have stolen more money than Alamieyeseigha. From Nkereuwem

    Sir, do you know that Alamieyeseigha did not loot the Federal Government money but Bayelsa State money? As the leader of Ijaw people, where do you expect Alamieyeseigha to get the money to fight the cause of marginalisation meted to the Ijaws by the three ethnic groups, if not from the State pause? You people should leave Jonathan and Alamieyeseigha pardon alone. From Chief Ogori Neingi, Port Harcourt

    Re: The state as family writ large. Your allusion to a phantom coup is laughable as Diya’s CSO during Oputa panel acknowledged that indeed a coup took place. You are as guilty as Jonathan in your support of your kinsmen. And there lies the problems of Nigerians-ethnicity. Anonymous

    ‘In this season of absolution’ is an excellent tale of the government of thieves, by fraud, for the corrupt. Nigeria is a country where members of the corrupt fraternity make the ruling class, they will surely protect any member from shame. From Alhaj ADEYCorsim, Osodi Lagos

    I think the President did a very wrong shot on Alamieyeseigha, the Federal Executive messengers also failed in knocking some good sense in the head of Mr. President. However, to save his face, his pardon should extend to other Nigerians who have defaulted and are sorry. Come 2015, I believe if this correction is not put in place, Jonathan will stand no chance of re-election, knowing full well that the like of Atiku are preparing to take over the Aso Villa, which I feel is better for our nation. From Henry Erusiafe, Delta State

    ‘In this season of absolution’, it is indeed a great write-up, keep it up, our judiciary and all anti-graft agencies should wake up from their slumber. From Rotnen, Jos

    RE: ‘In this season of absolution’. The Presidential Pardon granted to the recipients has political meanings. We will all understand better by their roles, partisan activities and alliances in the up-coming elections and the new government that will be sworn in 2015. From Ochogwu Abdullahi A., Maiduguri

     

  • Nigeria’s telecom glory in Barcelona

    Last month, from February 25-28, the whole of the global mobile telecommunications community, to wit, operators, techies, equipment manufacturers, enthusiasts, regulators and investors emptied into the historical city of Catalonia in Barcelona, Spain. The event was the 2013 edition of the Mobile World Congress (also known as GSMA 2013). It is the Holy Grail of telecommunications as it pertains to mobile market. About 1,700 companies, over 72,000 people from 200 countries attended the event, the highest attendance ever, according to the organisers.

    The yearly event is itself a demonstration of the global acceptance of the mobile genre of telecom service. Besides, the congress offered opportunity to both emerging markets and the developed markets to share ideas, compare notes and build synergies towards the enhancement of the global mobile value chain. Nigeria was at the event. The nation’s telecom regulator, the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) made a strong showing at the global summit. This is to be expected. In matters of mobile telecom, Nigeria ranks among the global top ten in growth and market size. For five years in a row, Nigeria was the fastest growing mobile market in the world, a record it still shares with no one.

    It follows, therefore, that in a global meeting of who is who in mobile telecom, Africa’s largest market should not be a passive participant. Dr. Eugene Juwah, the spunky engineer and head of the nation’s regulatory commission who has manifested a tendency to restore sanity in the sector seized the moment. At a session tagged: The Broader Way 2013 Forum – Make it Possible, organized by China’s communications equipment manufacturer, Huawei, Juwah unveiled the limitless milieu of possibilities in the nation’s telecom sector.

    He took the cosmopolitan audience made up of equipment manufacturers, service providers, investors and an amalgam of enthusiasts through the contours and crucible of Nigeria’s telecom industry. If there was ever anyone in the crowd who was doubtful about the safety of his investment in Nigeria, that doubt quickly dissolved when Juwah gave a granular detail of the efforts of the Nigerian government to guarantee the safety and sustainability of investments in the country. He also graphically illustrated the growth pathway of the early investors in the nation’s telecom market as well as the outlay of incentives available to those who would be willing to board the next flight to invest in Nigeria. Juwah seized the opportunity to pitch Nigeria’s Broadband potentials. The ovation that greeted his submission spoke volume of the connection he made with the audience. It was also manifest that some key players in the global telecom market had a wrong perception of Nigeria as an investment destination. It was, in a sense, a moment of glory for the country as Juwah won many global converts for the nation’s telecom sector.

    No doubt, Nigeria has since the mobile explosion attended many international summits but this year’s mobile world congress was a clincher. Juwah made the most of it by holding strategic meetings with several global brands and organisations, namely the Commonwealth Telecommunication Organisation (CTO) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), on how to strengthen existing synergies with Nigeria. He did not pass off the opportunity to meet with Kamar Abass, managing director, Ericsson and other top management of Global Ericsson. One of the positive outcomes of the meetings was the announcement by the Secretary General of the ITU, Dr. Hamadoun Toure, of the consensus of the global community to make Nigeria a Cyber-security regional hub. The implication of this is that Nigeria would have a cyber-security testing centre. Making Nigeria a regional hub has a direct bearing on the massive investment in submarine fibre cable within the country and offshore. It is also a fitting endorsement of the continent-wide leadership of the country in telecom. Toure, a man who has never hidden his admiration of the progress made by the NCC as a flagship regulator within the ITU family, accentuated Juwah’s submission that now is the best time to invest in Africa, especially in Nigeria.

    For Nigerians at the congress, it was no surprise that the country ranks so high on the market-performance index of the ITU. At home, there is a growing tendency to vilify the NCC and dismiss the sector as under-achieving but the world sees Nigeria differently. The nation’s telecom regulator is ranked among the best in the world and it has in recent years become the most realistic tool to benchmark the regulatory authorities in other emerging markets. Juwah sees these attributes translating to good times for the nation in the coming years. He projects that by 2015 the contribution of the ICT sector to the GDP would have shot up from the present 5.6 percent to between 13 and 15 percent. This is not an overstatement. It is a realistic forecast given the strategic interventions of the NCC and the bouquet of incentives which the Nigerian government has outlined for investors.

    This year’s mobile congress in Barcelona simply served notice to the world that Africa is rising and can no longer be ignored. More gratifying is the global perception that Nigeria ideally defines the African market. Selling Africa, nay Nigeria, to the world is usually a tough job especially in the face of the stereotype that Africa is nothing but a spot on the global map where the most ludicrous and the downright ridiculous coexist; where famine, hunger, crime and corruption stomp the streets and marketplace. Such sordid profiling is worse for Nigeria but telecom has come to add a veneer of gloss to the nation’s grubby image.

    Back home, Juwah has promised to move service delivery in the sector to the next level with the expansion of broadband service and the introduction of mobile number portability. He has rallied the private sector to invest more in infrastructure and network expansion even as he has sharpened the regulatory instincts of the NCC. A mix of this and the enthusiasm he stirred among the global players in Barcelona would precipitate yet another telecom revolution in the country; this time, in data penetration and access. The auguries point to a bright and beautiful telecom future.

  • Fashola’s thoughts on LG autonomy

    Governor Babatunde Fashola of Lagos State will go down in history as one of the very few public officers in contemporary Nigeria who excels in not just building mortars and bricks but also in farsightedness. Fashola thinks profoundly and has the courage of his convictions. He could have chosen the path of populism by continuing the tradition of making tuition at Lagos State University practically free—without minding if the graduates would ever be employable because of the poor quality of instruction and the awful lack of critical facilities arising out of scarce financial resources —but he opted for the trajectory of sustainable development through a review of tuition fees. When a large army of political actors in the South-west were playing to the gallery by denouncing Chinua Achebe’s There Was A Country, a personal account of the Nigerian civil war, Fashola attended an Achebe event in the United States where he positively reviewed the novelist’s oeuvre, declaring that his (Fashola’s) generation of Nigerians is not held hostage by the error of the past. The governor once again displayed the courage of his convictions when at the 80th birthday anniversary of former Works Minister Femi Okunnu held on February 4, he eloquently argued that the concept of constitutionally guaranteed autonomy for local governments in the country is fundamentally flawed.

    It has become fashionable since 1989 when Sam Orji was removed by the Federal Military Government as chairman of the Enugu Local Government for the media, activist groups and even academics to demand a constitutional provision for LG autonomy. After all, argue the protagonists, there are three tiers of government in Nigeria and the constitution has ensured that states are independent of the central government and vice versa. Indeed, it amounts to extravagant use of language to declare LGs the third tier of government. A federal system everywhere is composed of only two government tiers, namely, the federal government and state governments (which are called provincial governments in Canada and regional governments in Nigeria until 1967). The United Kingdom has a local government system all right, but the country runs a unitary system of government. LGs are more of administrative units than political entities. This is why LGs do not have the judiciary, a vital arm of government. Fashola appropriately calls them development centres.

    It is a supreme irony that socio-political activists who spearhead the campaign for constitutionally provided autonomy for LGs are the very elements campaigning against the inclusion of LGs in the constitution on the ground that it should be the prerogative of states to decide whether to have LGs in their territories and the number as well as the structure, based on peculiarities of the states and their development needs. The present national uniform LG structure, a concomitant of the 1976 LG Reforms carried out by the General Obasanjo military government, is counterproductive. The current structure does not recognize differences between LGs in cities and those in rural communities. Hence, it provides, for instance, for a supervisor of agriculture in Lagos Island Local Government Area which does not have one single farm!

    Much as LGs are in theory development centres, the development quotient in their creation has been abysmal; rather, the overriding consideration has been politics. Lagos has the highest population of all states in Nigeria. Yet, it has a mere 20 constitutionally recognized LGAs, in sharp contrast to Kano, which has 44 LGAs. The reason is not difficult to understand: the last LGs were created by the central government during the Sani Abacha military regime. Abacha, a Kano indigene, made sure that the number of LGs in Kano and Jigawa (which was carved out of Kano in 1996) is about all LGAs in the South-east geopolitical zone combined!

    When it is considered that LGs are allocated huge revenues monthly from the federation account, the political economy of Abacha’s LG creation exercise becomes clearer. To address some of the far-reaching implications of the imbalance in local governments across the country, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, as Lagos governor, created additional 37 LGs in one fell swoop which he called local development centres, bringing the total number of LGAs in the state to 57. In a swift reaction, the Kano State government increased the number of its LGAs astronomically to overwhelm the new number in Lagos. In other words, the nation is in a rat race with itself because of the inclusion of LGAs in the present constitution and the consequent allocation of resources from the federation account. The removal of LGAs from the constitution will end this debilitating brand of politics.

    The 774 constitutionally recognized LGAs are too unwieldy for the nation. They are, at best, cost centres and, at worst, cesspools of graft and duty dereliction. I have been to a number of local government offices in recent years, and for some reason never met the legislators who are called councillors. The councillors go to the office only at month end to collect salary and share whatever remains of public resources with other senior officials. Most Nigerians do not know that every LG has, among other key officers, a secretary to the government, a head of service called head of personnel management and supervisors who are like commissioners or ministers. Each appointee is on a heavy pay and has a retinue of aides. Worse, some states have gone ahead to create local development centres (which are LGs in disguise), and they share the monthly resources from the federation account on an equal basis with constitutionally recognized LGs. Instead of having one chairman in a given LGA, there are now about four. This has great implications for the public treasury. Far from these centres being catalysts or vehicles for development, they are avenues for partisan mobilization and provision of jobs for politicians and hangers on. How long can we continue to toy with the destiny of an otherwise great nation?

    Gov Fashola has provided us all with food for thought as regards the place of local governments in our constitution and our federal nexus. He presents his arguments with so much thoughtfulness and admirable courage. He is a thoroughbred developmentalist, in the mould of South-east Asian modernizers like Mahathir Mohammed of Malaysia and Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore. Developmentalists are, according to new social science theorists, political leaders who genuinely regard the well-being and future of their people as inviolable and place the radical enhancement of the living standards of the citizens above politics and all personal and primordial considerations. With people like Fashola and immediate past Central Bank of Nigeria governor Chukwuma Soludo in Nigerian politics, there is still a ray of hope for our people.

    • Adinuba is head of Discovery Public Affairs Consulting.

  • NEXIM Bank and solid mineral development

    NEXIM Bank and solid mineral development

    Solid minerals are found in every nook and cranny of Nigeria’s territories. The potentialities of these solid minerals, if harnessed properly, can propel Nigeria’s economy faster than crude oil which has become the nation’s economic mainstay.

    The failure of successive governments and indeed the citizenry to tap into other sectors of the economy, apart from oil, has been blamed for Nigeria’s economic woes. President Goodluck Jonathan-run government is not resting on its oars to diversify Nigeria’s economy through harnessing the country’s abundant solid mineral resources. Against this backdrop, the Nigerian Export Import Bank, NEXIM, has articulated and sustained a blueprint to enhance the development of Nigeria’s solid minerals through financial interventions. As at 2011, NEXIM has identified the subsectors in the solid minerals to include ferrous and non-ferrous metals, stones and gems and energy minerals. These subsectors have been identified as being highly capital intensive, characterised by heavy government presence as well as policy inconsistency. This sector is also largely untapped. Its projected growth was estimated at 8.96% as at 2009.

    NEXIM Bank’s framework from 2010 to 2015 targets making this sector to significantly contribute towards creating an internationally competitive and attractive destination for capital for the profitability of the nation’s mineral resources, provide 16.1% (about N9bn) of the solid mineral sector’s financing requirement, account for 0.82% of the sector’s GDP, and create and sustain 2, 885 jobs within the solid minerals sector through project finance activities.

    With the visionary and proactive leadership of Mr. Roberts Orya in NEXIM Bank, there appears to be a light at the end of the tunnel. Orya’s giant strides have repositioned NEXIM on its fundamental mandates.

    NEXIM Bank’s blueprint is aimed at propelling the non-oil sectors of Nigeria’s economy to a grand-level. The bank’s key areas of concentration are manufacturing, agriculture, solid minerals and services. The goal is to become the leading export development bank in Africa.

    The objectives of developing these non-oil sectors are to have a clear market focus and become a major contributor to non-oil exports, build a world-class institution which imbibes best-in class corporate governance and risk management practices; be a relevant player in the export market and significantly influence government trade policies; build a profitable institution with a robust balance sheet size with a highly skilled and motivated workforce.

    Findings indicate that NEXIM Bank has so far committed about nine per cent of its total investment development portfolio, about N2.5 billion, to the development of the country’s solid mineral sector since August 2009. Its MD/CEO, Roberts Orya, revealed this when he played host to the Patrons of the Miners’ Association of Nigeria. He disclosed to the joy of his visitors that the bank was ready to support the solid minerals as a cardinal sector under its MASS (manufacturing, agro-processing, solid minerals and services) agenda.

    Echoing him, “This commitment does not scratch the surface of the sector’s requirement if Nigeria is to take advantage and benefit from the huge mineral deposits which God has blessed the country. Solid minerals mining is a highly capital intensive area, and requires strong government intervention to unlock its huge revenue and job creation benefits for the country.”

    He made a clarion call on the association to produce its strategic framework to better structure and attract sustainable investments to the sector. He said the agenda focused on issues of mutual cooperation with NEXIM and the Federal Ministry of Mines and Steel Development towards the development of the sector.

    He also revealed that Nigeria is endowed with more than 33 commercially viable solid minerals that could be exploited for the country’s economic benefit. These include gold, lead-zinc ore (Galena), iron ore, columbite, ilmenite, cassiterite, uranium, copper, molybdenite, manganese, wolframite, rutile and diorite, bauxite, gypsum, talc, bentonite and barite, rock salt, gem stones, and kaolin.

    Using the statistics from the Mining Cadastre Office and the Nigerian Geological Survey Agency factsheet, Mr. Orya said the picture of the benefits would be appreciated more when it is considered that some of these minerals are in very dense deposits. According to him, minerals like talc has been identified as having deposits in excess of 40 million tonnes in locations such as Niger, Osun, Kogi, Ogun and Kaduna states; iron ore, with over 3 billion metric tonnes of deposits in Kogi, Enugu and Niger states as well as the Federal Capital Territory; and lead/zinc veins, about 10 million tonnes of deposits spread over eight states.

    Others include bitumen about 42 billion tonnes deposits, which almost twice the existing crude oil reserves, making Nigeria one of the world’s most bituminous destinations owing to its low sulphur and ash content and the most environment-friendly; and coal, nearly three billion tonnes of reserves in 17 identified fields and over 600 million tonnes of proven reserves.

    Sources at the National Bureau of Statistics, NBS, indicate that the solid minerals sector contributes less than one per cent to the country Gross Domestic Product, GDP, as against nine per cent of South Africa’s GDP in 2011.

    “For NEXIM, the critical issues range from how to get the government and other stakeholders to properly structure the mining sector, increase funding, and attract much needed investment capital; infrastructural development for the industry, especially the establishment of internationally certified laboratories and setting up of internationally recognized and endorsed mining calendar for Nigeria as prevalent in other regimes with dedicated attention to solid mineral exploitation,” Mr. Orya said.

    The president, Miners’ Association of Nigeria, Sani Shehu, had at the event thanked the NEXIM Bank management for its commitment and support to its members in the quest to open up the solid mineral sector. He said the group is overwhelmed by the passion of the bank to support the players towards the growth of the mining industry in Nigeria.

    As a capital-intensive industry, which requires long-term investments before its potential could be fully realised, Mr. Shehu cited the experience in India, which is less endowed with solid minerals than Nigeria, but is currently earning about $75 billion (about N11.3 trillion) annually from solid minerals.

    “It took South Africa more than 15 years of steady investment to get there and the country now earns over $30 billion (about N4.5 trillion) annually from the sub-sector,” he said.

    With the commitment of NEXIM Bank towards revitalising Nigeria’s solid mineral sector, it is hoped that it will bring a new dawn on the country’s economy which has been branded all sorts of name because of its oil-based nature and lack of innovations. All hands must be on deck to attain this goal.