Category: Opinion

  • Public assets and wealth – good leadership – public good

    Public assets and wealth – good leadership – public good

    By Andrew A. Erakhrumen

    Scarcity has its basic definition(s) particularly in economics. It can be experienced, for clear and unclear reasons, in series of circumstances. We were told, in economics, that during scarcity, demand for a good or service is greater than availability of the good or service. Scarcity also means that resources are limited while human wants are unlimited. Of course, there is/are difference(s) between wants and needs; even so, basic needs for most Nigerians suffer the same fate as wants! While we believe that human beings are insatiable, for good or bad, it is a moral (and in some climes, legal) issue for sustainable systems to be erected and supported in order to make their (human beings’) basic needs realisable. This is still a difficult challenge in this part of the world.

    Unfortunately, Nigerian governments always leverage on the definition(s) of scarcity to explain away sheer wickedness and thievery of public wealth. For instance, why are those in government always telling ridiculous ‘stories’ that resources for funding education, health, security and other public good are scarce when humongous amounts of money are reported stolen, regularly, from public coffers? There are versions of these ‘stories’ that people have been hearing over the years! How these lies were sustained for this long in Nigeria is baffling; perhaps, it has to do with the possibility that “…..there are more people outside government waiting [in the queue for their chance] to steal in government than those currently stealing there…..”

    The moral decadence in Nigerian society, today, obviously supports this view. Morality has been made unimportant in the quests for (basic) needs.

     Immorality – no matter how subjective its various definitional trajectories may take – can be a type of poverty. Sadly, poverty, in its different (concealed or revealed) expressions, is a serious disease. Unbelievably, many have been unknowingly seriously afflicted with this ailment for generations. This is why certain perpetually-restricting inanities and primordiality are the criteria governing the thinking of many concerning putting people in public offices, today. After enabling and empowering mediocrities in government using only these criteria, they thereafter continue to make the same mistake of believing that “strongmen/women” rather than strong organically-backed institutions are the solutions to the country’s socio-politico-economic challenges.

    Read Also; Japa: We Issued 2.1m passports In 2023 – Immigration

    Certainly, strong institutions are not built overnight, anywhere. They are built through a people’s tenacious sincerity of purpose and consistent demystification of pretenders such as past/current Nigerian political leaders interested only in looting the country! Yes, the politicians are not the only problem; there are many horrible top civil servants in governments’ bureaucracies. Politics is local but a people can learn from others. History will teach those who want to learn from it.

    Strongmen/women may have helped in other climes concerning visible national development; however, they have worsened the situation of underdevelopment in Nigeria. This country’s political system neither encourages excellence nor discourages dismal performance. The real concept of consequence(s) of action(s) is/are no more applicable in Nigeria’s public service except media trial/political victimisation.

    What kind of a political system gives well-known brigands unrestricted, unrestrictable and unaccounted for access to public assets/wealth? Why are Nigerians expecting much from those (supposedly) serving them when laws are violated with reckless abandon by their leaders, and others, whose job is to uphold laws? Why these expectations when they (followers), in their corners, are guilty of the same (or worse) offences their political leaders are consistently accused of?

    Who are the sycophants hailing politicians in criminal enterprise? Leaders are to give leadership but what type of leadership? This is mainly determined by individual/societal values and priorities. Collectively, what is Nigeria’s value system? Are Nigerians interrogating morals? What kind of leaders will be unexplainably opulent at public’s expense while pushing the narrative “…..there is no money…..”?

    Leaders are from the society not the outer space. Thus, they mostly give the leadership type that resonates with their followers. The implication of the foregoing is that if followers dislike, or are not satisfied with, the deliverables from “leaders”, they (followers) are supposed to know what to do. Positive examples abound, worldwide. If there is no fear of consequences of offences, they will be repeated by offenders, again and again! So, there must be (a) problem(s) with a followership that always complain about its political leaders but still allows same scoundrels to lead it!

    Whose fault is it if followers allow themselves to be divided based on meaninglessness and pettiness that often benefit their oppressors? Whose fault is it if they refuse to team up in flushing lawbreakers out of office replacing them with the “good” leaders they yearn for?

    We have been convinced that Nigeria does not presently have the type of leadership pool from which “quality leaders” can emanate. We mean the type of leaders that encourage (in the country) such positive developmental strides being experienced in some former developing countries. Here, we are referring to those countries that were on the same (growth/developmental) level as Nigeria less than a half-century ago; nonetheless, it was hoped that the followers would wake up to find sustainable solution(s) to this challenge. High quality political leadership is basically for service. It is not about mercantile mind-set powered by stolen public wealth! It is not the acquiring of, and putting on, well-sewn clean foreign suits, traditional attires and colognes/perfumes; any simpleton can do these!

    Where you have serious people, leadership is not about emptiness, noisiness and bullying saturating Nigeria’s political space. Alas, the supposed sanctuaries – Nigeria’s higher educational institutions – where robust intellectualism is thought to reign supreme have been invaded by this derangement! The “Town” and “Gown” are now seamlessly on the same page with the former giving direction to latter! Mediocrities are now the champions with mediocre deliveries all over! Tomorrow’s “leaders” (dealers/ruiners) are watching and learning! This reality is unbelievable, considering the preponderance of high quality humans in and out of Nigeria! This is lamentable! It is shameful to those who know what ignominiousness is about! We feel for the existing but diminishing sanities that are uninvolved in this madness! Irrespective of the darkening gloominess, positive advocacies should continue even if they may momentarily seem to connote hoping against hope!

     • Erakhrumen teaches at the University of Benin.

  • Mr President, it’s time to banish the darkness

    Mr President, it’s time to banish the darkness

    By Oguntoye Opeyemi

    The country is in dire need of an immediate solution to its power supply issues. Many young citizens possess the drive and passion to contribute to the nation’s development, yet they are hindered by the lack of adequate power supply. Without reliable electricity, aspiring entrepreneurs find it exceedingly difficult to establish and sustain their businesses. The current state of total darkness or erratic power supply significantly hampers the growth of small and medium-scale enterprises. It’s crucial to recognize that no nation can achieve sustainable growth and development without ensuring reliable access to power.

    The Egypt Megaproject stands as a testament to Siemens’ historic achievement, delivering 14.4 GW of power capacity to Egypt’s grid in a record-setting 27.5 months from financial closure. This monumental endeavour not only alleviated persistent power shortages but also propelled Egypt toward long-term power security, crucial for industrial growth. Additionally, the swift completion of two simple cycle power plants in Assiut and West Damietta, totalling 1,500 MW, within just eight months in 2015, further exemplifies the efficacy of visionary leadership and practical implementation. While comparing ourselves to China’s Belt and Road Initiative may seem ambitious, studying such initiatives could offer valuable insights into addressing our own challenges of consistent power shortages.

    It is evident that effective leadership is paramount in driving the reform agenda for our country, and the support of the people is crucial in this journey towards a greater Nigeria. The Ministry of Communication, Innovation, and Digital Economy deserves commendation for its proactive measures, including the introduction of the 3 Million Technical Talent (3MTT) Program. This initiative has been well-received by Nigerians as it offers a promising platform for success in the IT sector. However, to truly maximize the impact of such programs, reliable electricity is indispensable. Access to power is essential for powering up gadgets and enabling active participation in training programs. Therefore, it is imperative that efforts to improve electricity supply align with the goals of the ministry to ensure the success of initiatives aimed at empowering Nigerians in the digital age.

    When the current minister was appointed, his first initiative was to start a weekly political socio-event, capturing all his former political associates from his former political party. This went on for months, neglecting the core mandate given to him by the presidency. It raises questions about the minister’s understanding of the urgency and uniqueness of the ministry’s challenges. Given the critical nature of this ministry, it was a mistake to treat it as a trial-and-error endeavour. It is evident that the current minister is more bewildered than even a bus conductor. This calls for a reassessment of our approach.

    Read Also: PDP tasks FG on current hardship in Nigeria

    Despite numerous challenges, the Transmission Company of Nigeria has failed to fulfil its mandate of efficiently transmitting power from generating stations to the people. Presently, the country boasts an installed power capacity of 12-16,000MW, yet even if we assume we’re generating 50% of this capacity, roughly 7GW, the transmission network has only managed to transmit about 4-5GW of power over the last eight years. This stagnant performance underscores the dire need for structural reforms within the agency. Given the pressing necessity for change, the co-ordinating minister should prioritize a comprehensive overhaul or restructuring of the agency.

    Egypt’s energy strategy has evolved beyond thermal stations, with a concerted effort to diversify into renewable sources. Beginning in 2016, the government prioritized solar, wind, and conventional power, incorporating gas turbines while halting the development of hydropower stations. During the period from 2010 to 2022, significant progress was made, adding 16GW of power, largely attributed to wind and solar energy. Given the immense potential and demand in this sector, it is crucial to appoint a leader who not only comprehends the role but also possesses a resolute and non-controversial demeanour.

    The advancement proposed could significantly benefit small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs), but it is essential for the president to take decisive action and assume control of the ministry. The country has been experiencing total grid collapse since time immemorial; however, between 2017 and 2023, the nation witnessed 46 grid collapses. It is accounted that in 2023 alone, the grid collapsed 12 times, accounting for 26%. The data received in performance hasn’t improved and if proper analyses of the Discos are examined also, it will equally give the same retrogressive output.

    No nation that is desirous of progress can actually achieve such with the present state of things.  In the latest data released by the Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission, NERC, most Discos have low performance in cash collection with very high billing efficiency, which has a very adverse effect on the AT &C losses of the companies. Oftentimes, there are regulations to improve the performance of the distribution companies but the major stumbling blocks are still with the government. If urgent action is not taken, we will continue to drag the same issues in 2027.

    Tunisia with a vision has recently concluded a plan to embark on a special power project called Tunisia-Italy Interconnector (ELMED). The ELMED Interconnector Project is a planned bi-directional power exchange link between Italy and Tunisia. The 600MW capacity project will be the first direct current connection between Europe and Africa. These are the kinds of initiatives that we know President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for, but unfortunately, no one appears to be able to drive it in the Ministry of Power. Solutions to each of the various value chains in the power sector must be itemized and implemented as soon as possible, to guarantee adequate and uninterrupted power supply to the country.

    The citizens of the country want to stay back and develop their nation, which will give them the chance to compete with the rest of the world, but they need adequate power supply. The only hope that they have is the belief that your capability is undoubted to deliver the renewed hope agenda. The young Nigerians who will benefit through the enormous jobs are counting on you, while the SMEs don’t want to lose hope either.

  • EU deforestation-free regulation and Africa

    EU deforestation-free regulation and Africa

    By Olasunkanmi Owoyemi

    The European Union Deforestation-Free Regulation (EUDR) entered into force on June 29, 2023 although its main prohibitions will not take effect until December 30, 2024. The EUDR was introduced to address the issue of loss of biodiversity driven by deforestation while also reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the EU. The law is a part of a broader initiative, the EU Green Deal, which seeks to make Europe the first continent to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. 

     The primary purpose of the EUDR is to ensure that any operator or trader who places certain commodities and/or products on the EU market or exports them from the EU is able to prove that they do not originate from recently deforested land.  These commodities include cocoa, Nigeria’s top non-oil export. EU countries are the major importers of Nigeria’s cocoa beans, accounting for about 70% of Nigerian cocoa beans exported yearly. This demonstrates that even though the regulation applies to the EU, its effects would extend far beyond the region.

     The EUDR prohibits, effective December 30, the placing on the EU market or exporting from the EU seven commodities—cocoa, cattle, wood, soy, palm oil, coffee, rubber and some of their derived products such as leather, chocolate, furniture or tyres. Specifically, the regulation provides that these commodities and derived products cannot be placed on the EU market or exported from the region unless:

    (a) They are deforestation-free: Deforestation as defined by the regulation means conversion of forest to agriculture use. Deforestation-free in the case of commodities such as cocoa, soy and coffee beans and products derived from the commodity means they were produced on land that has not been subject to deforestation after December 31, 2020. 

    (b) They satisfy the legality provision: This means the commodities have been produced in accordance with the laws applicable in the country of production. This requirement also relates to the legal status of the area of production on relevant issues such as land use rights, environmental protection, labour rights, human rights protected under international law, tax, anti-corruption, trade, custom regulations, etc.

    (c) They are covered by a due diligence (DD) statement: This DD statement should indicate that due diligence was carried out, and there was no risk or only a negligible risk that the products do not comply with the requirements on deforestation-free and legality.

    Read Also; Japa: We Issued 2.1m passports In 2023 – Immigration

    The DD process involves the EU company collecting detailed information that shows the product complies with EUDR, and carrying out a risk assessment to ascertain the risk of non-compliance which would reflect different factors such as the risk category of the country of production, i.e., if the country is high risk, standard risk or low risk as would be classified by the European Commission. The process will also include risk mitigation through measures such as carrying out independent surveys/audits, or supporting suppliers, especially smallholders, to comply through capacity building and investments. However, this last phase on risk mitigation would not be necessary where there is no risk or only a negligible risk that the product is non-compliant.

    Potential impacts of the EUDR on countries outside the EU

     It is the responsibility of the EU companies placing or exporting relevant commodities from the EU market to conduct due diligence and upload the due diligence statement. However, non-EU companies will invariably be required to provide the necessary information to aid this compliance. Thus, for non-EU businesses to sustain trade with their customers in the European market beyond 2024, they must proactively prepare for compliance with the regulation since EU customers will no longer be able to buy from them without facing the risks of sanctions such as potential fines of up to 4% of EU turnover.

    It is important to note that while the prohibitions of the EUDR will be enforced starting December 30, they could impact the ability of EU companies to sell products already in production if these goods remain on the EU markets after the specified date. Let’s consider a hypothetical scenario:

    In January, Emeka, a farmer from Cross River, Nigeria, sells his soy beans to Dejavu Soya Exporters in Lagos, who ultimately sells to Sines Company, an Amsterdam-based food manufacturing company, in February. Sines Company processes the soy beans into protein bars in March. These protein bars, with an expiry date of December 25, 2025, are then distributed to various grocery stores within and outside Europe.

    The potential implication of the EUDR in this scenario is that if, after December 30, these protein bars are still on the European market or any other market exported to by Sines Company, and it is discovered that the soybeans supplied by Emeka were produced on land deforested after December 31, 2020, or do not meet the legality requirements, and Sines Company is unable to upload a due diligence (DD) statement demonstrating no risk or only negligible risk, the company would be in violation of the EUDR provisions and could face sanctions.

    This possibility is supported by reported evidence of existing reduction in orders of coffee from Ethiopia based on the realization that coffee beans ordered now could potentially find their way into coffee products made available in 2025.  The unintended consequence of the EUDR is that EU companies may opt to source from production units in regions likely categorized as low-risk rather than from suppliers in high-risk regions, aiming to minimize their due diligence efforts. This could lead to the exclusion of suppliers in high-risk regions from the EU market, resulting in severe financial losses for various global businesses and smallholder farmers within the affected value chains.

     In the long run, while EU companies are mitigating their own deforestation risks, the exclusion of suppliers in high-risk regions does not necessarily eliminate global deforestation, as these suppliers may begin to trade with countries without such restrictions.

    Regulation without due consultation

    The EUDR by its very nature affects several other countries outside the EU that produce the commodities covered by the regulation, and there should have been due consultations with these value chain players prior to the introduction of the regulation. While the intent to address deforestation is commendable, the approach adopted raises questions about fairness and collaboration considering its highly punitive nature.

    The EU’s imposition of planting and sourcing regulations without sufficient input from origin producers reflects a form of economic colonialism. This regulation disregards the efforts of value chain countries in the global south to painstakingly balance environmental consideration with people’s livelihoods. I opine that the posture the EU has taken is one that undermines the impact of producing regions on its economy. For commodities such as cocoa, Europeans countries already benefit significantly from trade with African countries in terms of factors such as price. In addition, the disparity in labour values between Africa and Europe is stark, with African cocoa employees earning considerably less than their European counterparts. Governments in the EU therefore already benefit more from taxes paid by these employees in the cocoa value chain than their counterparts in Africa. Importantly, about 70% of cocoa produced globally also comes from West Africa and this makes Europe heavily reliant on the region. Europe has several businesses with multimillion euros factories that depend on cocoa beans from Africa. What happens if Africa decides to also start boycotting these businesses? Europe would no doubt face substantial losses.

    Seventeen countries including cocoa giants like Ghana, Cote D’Ivoire and Nigeria have signed a joint letter to the EU Commission and parliament officials to maintain a constructive and open dialogue with sourcing countries about possible mitigation measures, particularly to help small and medium-sized companies. They have reiterated that the regulation is an “inherently discriminatory and punitive unilateral benchmarking system that is potentially inconsistent with WTO obligations”.

    I believe that the time has come for Africa as a whole to address the issue of its lack of relevance in the international cocoa industry, considering that Africa provides over 70% of the raw materials used in chocolate and cocoa products. The raw materials fuel the massive factories built by these multinationals in Europe. The same raw materials from Africa pay for the salaries of millions of workers in Europe and the western world in general. I am of the opinion that the lack of relevance attached to Africa in the international cocoa industry is a result of the lack of policies to be adhered to in guiding the trade of this commodity.

    • Owoyemi, a company executive writes from Ondo State.

  • What I fear most about 2024 U.S. presidential poll

    What I fear most about 2024 U.S. presidential poll

    Trump has undermined a crucial pillar of American democracy

    By Richard L. Hasen

    Can the United States have a free and fair election this year? And if it does, will voters actually believe it was fair? Thanks in part to Donald Trump’s continued outsized and polarizing role in American politics, we can take nothing for granted. But after 30 years of studying and working to strengthen U.S. election law, I am actually more optimistic than I was in 2020 about the prospects for a mostly fair vote count in November.

    Last election, I warned of an “election meltdown” and a country that was not prepared for a litany of ills — foreign interference, spikes in misinformation, attempts at election subversion and more. This time around, however, I have a different outlook: Those threats are still there but this time we are aware and we are better prepared.

    What we should be more worried about is that losers won’t accept the results as legitimate, a sentiment that exploded only after election day in 2020, when Trump’s refusal of an orderly transition of power led to a violent assault on the Capitol. In 2024, however, election denialism is at the forefront, before most voters have even cast their ballots. This supercharged distrust could lead to further violence and instability and help cement the kind of corrosive election denialism that does lasting damage to our democracy.

    Holding credible elections in the United States has always had its challenges, but it’s gotten even harder since 2020. Most other advanced democracies in the world do not go through what the United States does each election season: legislatures and administrators changing voting rules to make voting harder or easier, sometimes in an effort to gain partisan advantage; a cycle of litigation over those rules, often reaching the highest levels of the judiciary; and incendiary rhetoric about voter fraud, vote suppression and rigged elections followed by stories of scattered election snafus that are often portrayed as sinister manipulation rather than more accurately as illustrations of incompetence. Until we amend the Constitution to provide a real right to vote, we can expect this quadrennial cycle of angst, doubt and uncertainty to continue.

    Read Also; Tinubu’s quest for living wage for Nigerian workers: 37 to the rescue

    Trump supercharged and magnified these American voting pathologies. The 2020 election took place during the Covid pandemic before the emergence of vaccines, creating serious challenges to holding a fair election without exposing people to disease. New litigation centered on how to run an election amid a health crisis. The pandemic increased the cost of running elections dramatically but the federal government did not come up with adequate funding to cover the increased costs, leading to private philanthropy underwriting election administration. Covid led many people to vote by mail to avoid viral exposure, but Republicans were less likely to shift to mail voting than Democrats after Trump incessantly and without merit claimed the ballots would be vectors of fraud. The slower count of mail-in ballots in some states like Pennsylvania led to shifts in reported election results from Trump to Biden, further feeding the false fraud narrative.

    Trump encouraged his voters to doubt the election’s integrity, which ultimately led to a deadly insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021 — but he’s yet to be held accountable. He’s beat conviction after impeachment, could well stop the clock through appeals on criminal prosecution before the election, and may beat back attempts to disqualify him at the Supreme Court. Odds are that he’ll be back on the ballot in November 2024 running against Joe Biden for president.

    The current backdrop for the 2024 election may seem bleak: Many of those who helped to ensure a fair election and a peaceful transition of power in 2020 have been silenced, replaced or intimidated. Researchers who studied and reported on disinformation have been unfairly attacked as engaging in election interference in collusion with the government. Conservative states have passed new laws barring the use of private funds to help support election administration, derisively calling such money “Zuckerbucks” after Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s foundation provided hundreds of millions in crucial 2020 funding. Lawsuits and congressional hearings by the Orwellian-named House committee on the “weaponization of government” may be deterring some government agencies from reporting election disinformation and foreign interference to social media companies and others. The social media platforms that had deplatformed Trump after he encouraged the violence at the Capitol have restored his accounts.

    Some Republican officials have been booted out of the party or out of power, including Aaron Van Langevelde, the Michigan state member of the board of canvassers who confirmed Biden’s 2020 victory in the state, and Republican members of the U.S. House, including Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, who lost primaries or chose not to run for reelection. Attrition rates among election officials, who have faced relentless threats and intimidation while earning relatively low pay, are substantial.

    And yet there is reason for hope.

    Efforts have been made to ensure the 2024 election will be mostly fair. Congress amended the set of rules used for its counting of Electoral College votes to close off some of the shenanigans with alternative slates of electors that Trump and his allies tried in 2020. The Supreme Court last year in Moore v. Harper rejected an extreme theory that would have empowered legislatures to overcome even their own state constitutions and state courts in constricting voting rights. Election deniers who ran for chief election officer in swing states lost in 2022. People are now hypervigilant about attempts to subvert election results and are on guard against new forms of manipulation. Trump, no longer in government, has fewer tools to try to manipulate results. The 2022 elections, without Trump on the ballot, went off smoothly. (Of course, there is much more that can and should be done in law, politics, media and tech to assure a fair and safe election, as a group of us explained in a recently issued report, “24 for ’24.”)

    But things look less promising when it comes to voter confidence in the fairness of election results — on both sides of the aisle.

    Trump is already laying the seeds for claiming voter fraud in the 2024 elections should he lose, positing without evidence that Democrats are allowing illegal immigration into the United States so that these new arrivals can vote for Biden in the 2024 elections. (Noncitizens are ineligible to vote in U.S. presidential elections.)

    One of the mistakes I made in the run-up to the 2020 elections was believing that if the U.S. could pull off a free and fair election, it would take the oxygen out of false and outlandish claims of voter fraud. In fact, Trump has been able to manufacture doubt out of absolutely nothing; fraud claims untethered to reality still captivate millions of people looking for an excuse as to why their adored candidate may have lost. The upshot, of course, was an insurrection on Jan. 6. We should be deeply concerned about a sequel, even if Trump is not in the Oval Office this time.

    And what about a Trump victory, which today seems like a real possibility despite Trump’s multiple impeachments, multiple indictments and everything else? People on the left will have a hard time swallowing a Trump win, and even if there is no election-related violence, there will be enough attempts in the election season at foreign interference and the spreading of disinformation that people will believe a Trump triumph to be fundamentally unfair and undemocratic. This will be especially true is Trump loses badly in the popular vote, but manages, once again, to eke out an Electoral College victory. If and when Trump is back in office, it is easy to imagine street protests turning violent, especially if a newly installed Trump tries to use the Insurrection Act and supportive military and police to quell city protests.

    In the end, democracy stands on twin pillars. The first is the ability to run a free and fair election. It’s a herculean task made even harder by our decentralized, partisan system in our polarized times. That pillar, despite unprecedented challenges, seems solid going into 2024.

    The second pillar is the public’s confidence in the fairness of the election. Without “ loser’s consent” — when those on the losing end of an election accept the results as fairly determined — democracy falters. Trump has succeeded in undermining the foundation of that second pillar for everyone, whether or not he’s victorious as a candidate in 2024.

    This article was first published in www.politico.com with the headline ‘I’m an Election Law Expert. Here’s What I Fear Most in 2024’

  • Remembering Sir Ahmadu Bello

    Remembering Sir Ahmadu Bello

    There are people you wish never died, on account of the immense value they hold for an individual, a people or a nation. One such person is Sir Ahmadu Bello, the Sardauna of Sokoto. But, who was Sir Ahmadu Bello? He was the Premier of Nigeria’s Northern Region from 1954 to 1966. On 15 January, 1966, in the first military coup in the country, he was assassinated in circumstances that continue to task our nation. As Premier of Northern Region, Sir Ahmadu Bello, Chief Obafemi Awolowo who was the Premier of Western Region and Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe who was the Premier of Eastern Region, formed the triumvirate who raced among themselves to chart the path to Nigeria’s development.

    In a 13 March, 2018 article wittily titled “The Ahmadu Bello Way”, Ainoko Israel Aye-Ebene and Dauda Garuba noted that Sir Ahmadu Bello had “a keen understanding of the fact that the building block for national development is regional development.” As such, they further observed, “his major priority was to push for the realisation of a Northern Nigeria that can politically and economically compete with Western and Eastern regions of Nigeria.”  Sir Ahmadu Bello recognised the key role of education in the fulfillment of this objective.

    According to a compilation by Professor Isa Odidi and Dr. Baba J. Adamu entitled “Alhaji Sir Ahmadu Bello (1909 – 1966) – The seasons of a man’s life”, this discernment informed his policies, and they declared: “Hence, education was a top priority, and the foundation of all other development efforts. Education and human resources were encouraged at all levels, and in all fields, and between 1954 and 1965 considerable progress was made. Importantly, Ahmadu Bello was able to diffuse the latent resentment and suspicion at the grassroots level among Muslims over the nature and purpose of western education. He was able to mobilize local leaders in the ‘war against ignorance,’ and lay the educational foundations for the future. His crash programs in professional education in Kano and Zaria and Kaduna, and his insistence on the establishment of a northern university at a time when many felt it was premature, attest to his forward-looking view of development.”

    Read Also; Tinubu’s quest for living wage for Nigerian workers: 37 to the rescue

    Professor Odidi and Dr. Adamu noted further: “He recognized that ‘catching up’ would take at least a generation, and hence tried to provide the political climate wherein northern youth could be encouraged and even initially protected in their initial opportunities for education. The decade from the mid-1950s to the mid-1960s produced the first mass-educated efforts in the north, which in turn have produced the first broadly based generation of northern professional and educated leaders.” As a testament to the rightness of his educational vision and mission for the North, the Engineering programme of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, in the mid-1970s and early 1980s, was reputed to be the best or at least one of the best in Nigerian universities. The university was also the home to some of the best humanities scholars represented by the iconic historian Dr. Yusufu Bala Usman who had an intellectual soul-mate in the well-respected Dr. Segun Osoba of Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife.

    In fact, both of these notable scholars, as members of the Committee and in manifestation of their intellectual sure-footedness, did not support the majority report of the 49-member Constitution Drafting Committee which convened for its first meeting on 18 October, 1975 and submitted its draft to the General Olusegun Obasanjo military government on 14 September, 1976 in preparation for the handover of power to civilians in 1979. Dr. Bala Usman and Dr. Segun Osoba rather jointly produced the minority report of the Committee. This indicated that the North was quite  intellectually active and competitive.

    Moreover, Professor Odidi and Dr. Adamu observed as follows: “Beyond education, the top development priorities were agriculture, industry and infrastructure. Ahmadu Bello believed that agriculture was the backbone of the north. He took an active interest in farming throughout his life, and was particularly concerned with issues of water, and the introduction of new technology into grassroots-level farming. He believed that local farmers would seize the opportunities for self-improvement if provided with resources and incentives. He also saw agriculture as providing a basis for industrialization in the north, especially in the cash-crop areas of cotton and groundnuts.” Whenever inter-ethnic contestations occur, as happened in 2021, and embargo is placed on the supply of food items to the South from the North, throwing the agricultural economy of the South into a tail-spin and resulting in food insufficiency scare, remember, with due adulation, that the ‘food power’ of the North is one of the enduring legacies of the deep foresight of one man – Sir Ahmadu Bello.

    The amazing foresight and sound developmental trajectory of Sir Ahmadu Bello have led Aye-Ebene and Garuba to remark: “Unfortunately, what we have witnessed in recent times in parts of Northern Nigeria is a reversal of the gains attained through the innovations pursued by Sir Ahmadu Bello in education and the all-out war he prosecuted against illiteracy and ignorance. We are witnessing a reinstatement of pre-colonial attitudes towards secular education in parts of Northern Nigeria, which has led in part to the emergence of the phenomenon of ‘Boko Haram.’” In addition, they declared as follows: “In our opinion, the present crop of Northern Nigerian elites who claim descent from the Sardauna’s political philosophy and claim legitimacy by his name have in fact departed from the Ahmadu Bello Way. By fixating almost exclusively on holding on to political power and office at the federal level, the present crop of Northern Nigeria elites, demonstrate a lack of passion and commitment to the people and the pragmatism depicted by the Ahmadu Bello legacy.”

    This notwithstanding, a grateful people converged on Maiduguri on 27 January, 2024 for the 10th Annual Sir Ahmadu Bello Memorial Lecture Series organised by the Sir Ahmadu Bello Memorial Foundation with the theme “Creating pathways for peace: tackling banditry and insurgency through good governance for sustainable development.” At the occasion, the Gombe State Governor and Chairman of the Northern Governors’ Forum, Alhaji Muhammadu Inuwa Yahaya, in his keynote address, spoke as follows about unsalutary disconnection: “Somehow, a serious disconnect exits … between the people and the government, between politics and politicians themselves and between the total system and the connectivity with development.”  According to the Governor, “To my dismay and I believe to the dismay of virtually everybody here the North that was monolithic, that was thinking almost in one line, that was acting one line obtained [desirable] results in those days up to 1966. But, unfortunately, we’ve allowed elements of disunity, Merchants, Merchants of poverty and hunger; because whoever thinks of only himself is a merchant of poverty to the people, is a merchant of disease and hunger to the people. We’ve allowed them to take sway and lead.”

    Governor Yahaya continued: “I must plead with all of us to accept that the reality on ground demands that we must change style. We must change style and we shouldn’t fear any amendment of the Constitution … If you say restructuring, fine and good, but restructure for the better with clear guidelines, with a mindset that you are not out to cheat anybody. Don’t fear resource control, because the North has [abundant resources].”

    There was also a lot of truth-talking at the programme. For example, the former Governor of Niger State, Dr. Mu’azu Babangida Aliyu, Chairman, Ahmadu Bello Memorial Foundation, remarked as follows: “It is disheartening today to observe that even employments of government are for sale. People buy employment. Imagine a person buying employment let’s say level eight at three million Naira. How long will it take him to recoup his own money? Then will he be loyal to the government and to the country knowing that he bought that job?” The Governor of Borno State, Professor Babagana Umara Zulum, also drew attention to profligacy. According to the Governor, “How much have we spent in hosting this occasion? What quantum of money has been sunk in chattering aircraft to Maiduguri for this occasion? … Our overhead costs are too high. What has been spent in organizing this conference can bring about 1,000 out of poverty.”

    A 2022 National Bureau of Statistics report states as follows: “Poverty levels across States vary significantly, with the incidence of multidimensional poverty ranging from a low of 27% in Ondo to a high of 91% in Sokoto.” Sir Ahmadu Bello’s Sokoto! Incidentally, the Governor of Niger State, Mallam Muhammad Umaru Bago, has decided to re-enact the Sir Ahmadu Bello agricultural success, with the Governor declaring: “As a government we have seen that ungoverned spaces in the state are also responsible for this kind of menace [banditry and insurgency]. So, we are putting so much resources in clearing of land and preparing it for agri-production. We are deploying technology and mechanization, so that we can become an agri-giant. … By 2027 by the grace of God, nobody will earn less than 1 million naira monthly from my farm and I can assure you a lot of civil servants will desert  … their offices and come to the farm.”

    His Excellency Ambassador Professor Tijjani Muhammad-Bande, former Vice-Chancellor of Usmanu dan University, Sokoto, and Nigeria’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, who was the Guest Speaker at the programme, noted that “any problem affecting the northern part of Nigeria is a problem for Nigeria as a whole … in the same way that a problem dealing with any part of Nigeria is a problem for Northern Nigeria.” He further remarked: “The Sardauna and his colleagues developed a vision of a prosperous, self-reliant and self-assured Northern Region which was their responsibility. They created, repurposed and reinvigorated institutions to make their vision a reality.” Professor Muhammad-Bande also noted: “The danger is simply today the gap between the self-serving preoccupations of today’s elite and the existential realities of the multitude is progressively widening. We cannot continue to widen the gap between the rich and the poor … and then expect peace. You cannot sleep with your two eyes closed if there is this level of injustice. It has to be addressed.” In the opinion of former Govenor Mu’azu Babangida Aliyu, “as Borno State and the Northeast region has been the theatre of warfare for the last 10 to 15 years, we need a symbiotic relationship between government, the governors and the people, in the Northern states.”

    Considering the consensus of opinion and pledges of pragmatic action by the governors to reposition the North by connecting and reconnecting as appropriate, it is hoped that the 11th Sir Ahmadu Bello Memorial Lecture Series next year would be dominated by pragmatic reviews of how far the Northern elite have gone in the path-finding, self-confident and altruistic footsteps of the Sardauna of Sokoto.

  • Sanusi Lamido Sanusi’s audacity and the dearth of philosophical leadership

    Sanusi Lamido Sanusi’s audacity and the dearth of philosophical leadership

    By Godswill Iyoha Iyoke

    The foregoing was part of the Press statement credited to Khalifa Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, a banker, an ethno-religious-Fulani leader, Islamic cleric, former Emir and ex-Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria. The said statement was in his reaction to the controversy trailing the relocation moves of some departments of the CBN to Lagos. Therein he alluded to the oppositions by the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) and one Okey Emelamah against the move to register Jaiz Bank, which he construed as noise. The ‘noise’ under reference is with respect to the reactions by a section of the public of which, CAN understandably was a loud opposition voice, against the promotion of sectional Islamic banking system by the apex bank. The CBN under Sanusi’s leadership had made a draft regulatory framework for the establishment of Islamic banking system, which had the following provisions, amongst others;

    –              Definition of a Non-Interest Financial Institution as a ‘bank or other financial institution under the purview of the CBN which transacts banking business, engages in trading, investment and commercial activities as well as the provision of financial products and services in accordance with Shariah principles and rules of Islamic commercial jurisprudence. This invariably precludes any other banking model. 

    –              Prohibition certain activities in the proposed non-interest banking system, based strictly on religious principles. The state institution as the CBN cannot implement or enforce such discriminatory policies.

    –              Provision that a Non-Interest Financial Institution shall state in its Memorandum and Articles of association that its business operations will be conducted in accordance with Sharia’h principles and practices. Thus, the CBN usurped the powers of the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC); and amended the Companies And Allied Matters Act (CAMA) and its own establishment Act, by administrative regulatory fiat.

    –              Applications for NIFI licence to be evidenced by a technical agreement by its promoters with an established and reputable non-interest bank or financial institution; and restricting NIFI business models to 9 specified Islamic financial instruments and other Shariah compliant modes. Thus, exposing and subordinating our national financial and commercial systems and economy to the Sharia’h principles established Islamic states. 

    –              Prohibition of NIFIs from using common facilities in the sales or marketing of conventional and Shariah compliant products and services. This is a socially toxic act of segregation that is abhorrent to Nigerians’ constitutional right to free association.

    –              Mandates the establishment of internal Shariah compliance review mechanism and Shariah Advisory Council (SAC) as part of the governance structure of NIFIs. 

    –              Creation of a Shariah Council at the apex bank, to advise the CBN on the regulation and supervision of NIFIs and the subordination of the CBN to it.

    –              The subordination of certain provisions of BOFIA and to applicable accounting and audit standards to the provisions of the Shariah.

    The above so-called reforms were more about the institutionalization of the Sharia’h law by subtility and subordinating our laws and constitution to it.

    It is clear from the foregoing that the opposition was not against the registration of Jaiz Bank as a financial institution. Contrary to the Khalifa, the opposition was against the act of the apex Bank, a public institution and agency of the Nigerian state, in promoting a sectional religious banking system and establishing an Islamic legislative directorate in the CBN to supervise it. It is an act that is constitutionally prohibited and legislatively barred. It is inconsistent with the spirit and intent of section 10 of the 1999 Constitution and Section 43(1)(a) of the Banking & Other Financial Institutions Act of 1991 (BOFI), which Act provides thus;

    Read Also; Tinubu’s quest for living wage for Nigerian workers: 37 to the rescue

    “Except with the consent of the Governor, no bank shall as from the commencement of this Act, be registered or incorporated with a name which includes the words “Central”, “Federal”, “Federation”, “National”, “Nigeria”, “Reserve”, “State”, “Christian”, “Islamic”, “Moslem”, “Qur’anic” or “Biblical”.

    By section 10 of the Constitution which, prohibits the adoption of any religion by the state, a national institution as the CBN cannot justifiably promote any religious banking system as Sanusi did.

    Save for its sentimental religious appeal, Khalifa Sanusi cannot justify his acts in the subject respect. One therefore finds it hard to rationalize Sanusi’s charge of bigotry and noise against the very sensible objections to the offensive establishment of his choice sectional banking system, by a state institution which, is supposed to be neutral.

    While it is not constitutionally and legally permissible for the CBN to promote Islamic religious or other sectional banking system, it is not illegal or unconstitutional within the remit of individual rights or sectional interest. Contrary to popular notion, non-interest banking and its Islamic variant had existed prior to Sanusi’s appointment as Governor of the apex Bank. It isn’t a novelty, as the defunct Habib Nigeria Bank provided Sharia’h compliant financial services. The former Diamond Bank had ‘non-interest’ financial services. It is also erroneous and misleading to describe capitalized interest credit transactions, such as the Sharia’h-compliant financial services, as non-interest, simply because the chargeable interests are not compounded.

    Mindful of the state of our nation and the imperative for national cohesion, a more thoughtful or philosophical leader, would have considered socially harmonious banking reforms. Perhaps, because of religious sentiments and anxieties, most people could not think through to reason how inclusive banking reforms sought by the Khalifa could otherwise be implemented. Merchant bankers can effectively provide Sharia’h ‘non-interest’ financial services.    Considering

    By the way, there is no external posturing of Jaiz Bank that suggests that it is an Islamic Bank. It exists and operates as a full-fledged commercial bank. It is therefore uncharitable and utterly condemnable for the learned Khalifa to frame the very reasonable and patriotic objections to his action as noise. It is also disrespectful to Christians to treat the civilized dissent by the apex body of Christians as such. It is only juveniles or persons of unsound mind that engage in noise-making. The said statement by such an impressionable Islamic scholar as Sanusi, is not just misleading, but very uncharitable on account of its inherent inter-religious fuse. Worst still, when such a statement is based on misconceptions and outright misrepresentation of facts, for which Sanusi seems justified, based on the following assumptions;

    1.            That just like the CBN relocation moves, the promotion of the divisive, disintegrative and sectional banking system by the apex bank, is a noble and patriotic, as well as a legal and constitutional act;

    2.            That those who were opposed to the sectional Islamic banking initiative erroneously described as ‘Jaiz licensing’, were inspired by religious bigotry;

    3.            The oppositions in the foregoing respect were unreasonable. 

    On every material score, Khalifa Sanusi is an outstanding personality, a glowing star and leader within the dark socio-political firmament of the Nigerian state. He also enjoys the benefit of the gift of the garb. However, leadership is a sacred trust of which, those who enjoy the privileged benevolence of uncommon circumstances must utilize for common good. A personality such as, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi bears the extra burden of being circumspect and measured in his public utterances. From ethno-religious to socio-economic matters, he looms large in influence across the vast spectrum of the Nigerian society. To whom much is given, much is expected. Leaders are indebted to society and posterity, to say and engage only in acts that promote mutual understanding, social cohesion and national progress.

    For an ethno-religious plural and polarized society as Nigeria, Sanusi fell short of expectation with respect to his controversial banking reforms and the above triumphal utterance. There is nothing to be triumphal about over the introduction of a deceptive, divisive, disintegrative policy that lacks any apparent, ostensible or real altruistic value, either in its novelty, creativity, innovation or development quotient. The development of the Sharia’h-compliant non-‘interest banking’ system by Egyptian economics and the adoption by the Arab league, in the wake of the 1948 creation of the Zionist state of Israel, is understandable. It is time to work back acts that are based  on divisive sentiments.

    What Sanusi succeeded in doing, in the guise of inclusive banking reforms, is to raise Arabic or Islamic consciousness, nationally. Otherwise, his Islamic non-interest banking model can be accommodated under the existing non-interest banking regime as contemplated in the BOFI Act and practiced by some commercial banks prior to 2011. Arabic commercial concepts like Mudaraba, Sukuk are similar and adaptable to existing common law concepts like Higher Purchase, Credit Sales, Bonds etc. The Sharia laws with which he seeks to run the scheme is inconsistent with our Common law and Constitutional jurisprudence. While every society is living and dynamic and therefore subject to change, such changes must be inspired and motivated by the common good. Besides the motivational inspiration of his Islamic scholarship, it is hard to find other altruistic reason to justify the religious faith-inspired banking reforms.

    That he ignored the opposition, to proceed with the controversial banking system provides no room for the expression of triumphalism, as the Khalifa seeks to do, over the audacious insensitivity. He could do this because of the civility of the opposition and the dearth of philosophical leadership in emergent Nigerian society. What Nigeria needs at such historic season, as we are in, is the emergence of strategic thinkers as leaders. They are made up of creative, innovative and imaginative persons devoid of primordial sentiments. Such persons cannot be found amidst ethno-religious champions that seem to abound in places of power and influence.

  • The world of self-appointed pharmacists

    The world of self-appointed pharmacists

    Anywhere you go in Nigeria, there can be no getting away from people, mostly young men hawking home concocted medicines. These vendors are not shy to proclaim the powers of their wares which are supposed to have the power to banish all kinds of ailments from the body. What is more, they are able to perform their magic without leaving a dent in the lean purse of their potential customers. It is a win – win situation which is far too attractive to be ignored. You pay a little sum of money and you get your cure from a chronic ailment or one you did not even know you had. What can be simpler or more convenient? Some of these enterprising drug vendors have battered minivans equipped with a powerful loud speaker which they are not shy to employ. They cruise around the highways, byways, motor parks and markets at low speed, stopping quite often to plead with other road users to avail themselves of the opportunity of relieving themselves of the nuisance of varied illnesses ranging from the trivial to the potentially fatal; again at some low cost. I wonder what our preventive medical system would be like without the intervention of those hardy young men who move through our communities extolling everyone who is not hard of hearing about the dangers of the pests; rats, mosquitoes, cockroaches and even the innocent wall gecko. Once you have taken their message on board, you have no option but to purchase some powerful propriety preparation with which to rid your home permanently of these dangerous visitors which elect to live with you without your invitation. You may fail to buy something today but your encounter with a large rat tomorrow will remind you of your failure to do the needful on another day.

    With the availability of social media, you have only yourself to blame if you are still suffering from any form of health disability. If the numerous exhortations on social media are to be believed, there is a cure for every ailment known and some even unknown to man as long as you are ready to part with some money ranging in value from trivial to quite hefty. Some of these cures are reputed to be so efficacious that they are supposed to be a threat to the pharmaceutical industry, which because of its greed is hell bent on preventing the public from knowing about a particular product which can rout some quite serious conditions. Often you are told, or rather advised to make a purchase of that particular drug from a well advertised web site before it is deleted by some unnamed but powerful agency. These exhortations are sometimes fronted by someone of a professional persuasion, quite often with a stethoscope dangling from their neck or wearing a uniform in the manner of verified nurses or some claiming to be doctors imbued with the powers of kicking any number of ailments into touch.

    Read Also; FG pledges to stabilise Forex

    If you are a man, you are rendered vulnerable to those self declared men of science whose speciality is the banishment of any form of erectile dysfunction. They have a limitless clientele because there is hardly any man who does not at one time or the other have some doubt about the quality of his performance in bed. In addition, it is not difficult for any man to be convinced of his sexual inadequacies starting with the size of his penis which is in dire need of enlargement. Going on from there, the strength and duration of erection are ruthlessly examined and found to be far below par. Urgent remedial measures are prescribed for the banishment of the sexual dissatisfaction which the poor man may not even be aware that he has. He forgets that it is not the size of the dog in a fight that matters but the size of the fight in the dog. Many a big dog has learnt the veracity of this statement at great personal cost but no matter. Nobody is safe from this sales pitch for the simple reason that men are born with the fear that somehow, they are missing out on the joys which his neighbour is getting from frequent and prolonged sexual entanglement with a succession of beautiful ladies. It is a natural predilection which is brutally preyed upon by these self styled enemies of weak erections. It has to be said that this kind of advertisement must be laid at the door of Pfizer, the pharmaceutical company that became the largest drug company in the world when it gave the world Viagra and brought the subject of erections into polite and universal conversation. They even persuaded Pele of all people who could bring some men and a few women to orgasm with the sheer beauty of his football skills, to endorse the wisdom of buying and using Viagra to shore up flagging sexual potency. If Pele with his brood of children from several women could front for a drug with a guarantee of satisfaction, the potency of such a product must be assured. Pele did this with all the good grace he was born with and many men must have agreed with him.

    It is one thing to mess around with a quiescent or sluggish penis, nobody is likely to die from this. It is something else when potentially fatal conditions such as hypertension or diabetes are the conditions which these charlatans claim that they can cure with considerable ease. Do these people have no shame? Apparently not, is my immediate response.

    When these vendors run out of genuine ailments to confront and rout, they invent conditions, the reality of which they pass on to the general public. There are not many Yoruba men especially, who are not convinced that they are not victims of jedi-jedi, an ailment or collection of ailments of vague description which has been sent to the world with the specific intention of killing the male libido. My attempts to get a reliable description of jedi-jedi from the hawkers of the herbal medicines which can fight and root out this debilitating condition has failed, leaving me to conclude that it has been cleverly invented for the expressed purpose of squeezing money out of vulnerable Yoruba men. The reason for this invention is that there is a correlation between the ingestion of sweet things and the visitation of this vicious ailment. Now, sweet in Yoruba is simply the absence of bitterness. Food is sweet (delicious), sex is sweet (pleasurable), a story is sweet (interesting) etc. Going by this definition you are only safe from the visitation of jedi-jedi by fortifying yourself with an extremely bitter concoction brewed with any number of the most bitter plant parts available. There are no local eateries around where I live without a persuasive young lady who goes round the establishment from time to time with a bottle containing some desiccated barks to which water or more appropriately gin is added and the decoction sipped from time to time to keep this virulent condition at bay. The vendor of this preparation is always a young and a desirable lady at the height of her persuasive powers. There are however some men of northern extraction whose calling is to look after the status of the erections achieved by other men. However, such men are specialists whose practice is beyond the scope of this article and they will be left to their own esoteric devices.

    From the point of view of a trained pharmacist and by this, I mean a person who has undergone the prescribed training in the science of the preparation and safe use of drugs in an approved university, the drug situation in Nigeria is a nightmare.

    All the groups of people mentioned up till now in this article are people operating well outside the cover of the laws which control the manufacture, prescription and the dispensing of drugs. Consequently, at least by the strict interpretation of the law, each one of them has a case to answer before a court of competent jurisdiction. They are a menace to society in more senses than one but their shenanigans pale into piddling insignificance in the face of people who deal in pharmaceuticals produced by both registered and more frequently, unregistered pharmaceutical establishments. There is greater worry about fake and unregistered drugs but we should worry more, much more about fake and unregistered pharmacists some of whom are given greater recognition than those who perhaps foolishly, have taken the trouble to undergo a course of rigorous studies at a university. Their untutored competitors have an unbridgeable advantage over them if only because their practice is supervised by law. The number of people who have been sent to an early grave is better left to the imagination. Most Nigerians do not rely on a pharmacy as a source of drugs and those who do are not interested in consulting the pharmacist who at least supposedly, knows a great deal more about drugs than they hope to know. Even in the days before the coming of modern pharmaceutical practice to these shores, the practice of all forms of administration of drugs was left severely alone to those who were trained to diagnose disease and administer suitable remedies. People did not just wander into the nearest bush to collect whatever bark or leaves that their fancy directed them to collect and even if they did, the problem of adequate preparation was beyond them probably because it was common knowledge among the people that there was some magical aspect to every drug preparation. Without it, the drug cannot be more potent than water. It stood to reason that you needed that magic touch in order to make powerful medicine. Today, all that you need is the power of persuasion.

  • Celebrity status, privacy and younger generation

    Celebrity status, privacy and younger generation

    By Al-Janat Mohammed

    SIR: The distinction between one’s private and public life is becoming more and more hazy at a time when social media dominates. Celebrities, who were formerly admired for their abilities and accomplishments, now have to navigate a world in which the public is interested in every aspect of their lives.

    The younger generation have been influenced by this culture of perpetual exposure, as they readily divulge personal information online, undermining the idea of privacy. The story of Nigerian actor, Yul Edochie, and his second wife is a compelling illustration of this phenomenon, and offers a prism through which to consider the effects of this invasion of privacy.

    Without a doubt, the emergence of social media has completely changed how people communicate, making it possible to share information instantly with anyone on the planet. The loss of personal boundaries that results from people voluntarily disclosing their private lives to the world is the drawback, though.

    Read Also; EFCC nabs religious sect laundering money for terrorists

    Because they are in the public glare, celebrities have been hardest hit by this cultural change. For example, Yul Edochie’s second marriage turned into a social media show, with every detail of their union, family dynamics, and personal hardships exposed to everybody with just an internet connection.

    Beyond just celebrities, this tendency affects the younger generation as well, who have grown up in a time of continual communication. Many people reveal personal information about themselves online because they want to be validated and accepted by others.

    The younger generation frequently compromises privacy in the chase of likes, comments, and virtual acceptance, whether it be for relationship milestones or personal struggles. This raises questions about how such behaviour may affect people’s general well-being, self-esteem, and mental health in the long run.

    Although the loss of privacy is a complicated problem with wide-ranging effects on society, there may be ways to lessen its effects. Above all, it is critical to teach the next generation the value of establishing and upholding limits. Giving people the skills to decide what parts of their lives are best kept private helps them feel more in charge of their own story.

    Prioritising digital literacy education is important, with a focus on the lasting nature of online content and the possible repercussions of excessive sharing.

    Social media sites can also be extremely important in encouraging responsible sharing. Pop-up reminders and privacy checklists are two examples of features that can be implemented to encourage users to reconsider sharing sensitive information and prevent impulsive sharing.

    Platforms should also make investments in strong privacy settings so that users may decide who can see their content. Encouraging social media usage in a way that is balanced and respects one’s personal limits sends a strong message about how important privacy protection is.

    In the end, the degradation of privacy in the era of celebrity culture is a complex problem that calls for cooperation from people, organisations, and digital platforms. Fostering a healthier connection with the digital world requires finding a balance between the advantages of connectedness and the maintenance of personal boundaries.

    We may endeavour to create a culture that values and respects privacy in an increasingly connected world by embracing responsible sharing behaviours, encouraging digital literacy, and setting positive examples.

    • Al-Janat Mohammed, (NYSC) Abuja.   

  • Africa’s healthcare: Charting a transformative pathway

    Africa’s healthcare: Charting a transformative pathway

    By Sammy Ogunjimi

    SIR: Reflecting on the evolving landscape of Africa’s healthcare sector, it is evident that transformative changes are imperative for the continent to regain its manufacturing prowess and ensure reliable access to life-saving pharmaceuticals and healthcare products. We lost our manufacturing capability, and no country can be considered safe or secure unless it has an ecosystem that allows patients to have easy and reliable access to life-saving pharmaceuticals.

    We used to be a continent that was on the industrialization path, particularly in Nigeria during the 1960s and 1970s. Then, in the 1980s, with the implementation of the Structural Adjustment Policy, things began to change, enterprises began collapsing and departing Nigeria.

    We transitioned from a manufacturing nation to one that imports almost everything and developed a taste for imported items, including critical medicines. As a result, the event of COVID-19 was a wake-up call for us all. Everyone panicked, developed countries prioritized their country’s needs over everyone else’s.  Africa had to wait till everyone was sorted out before receiving diagnostic tools and vaccines. Its position was worsened by weak purchasing power and poor logistics infrastructure.

    In response to the challenges that Africa and other low and middle-income countries faced during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in the area of accessing vital vaccines, medications, and healthcare products, the World Health Organization (WHO) took a proactive step. They set up the World Local Production Forum with the aim of formulating effective strategies and fostering collaborative partnerships. The primary goal is to catalyze local production and facilitate technology transfer, empowering these nations to build capabilities that enhance their responsiveness to future pandemics and healthcare challenges.

    Read Also; Alia: I need prayers to survive landmines by anti-people forces

    As a novel industry where there is limited expertise in the continent, partnering with global pharmaceutical companies to facilitate technology transfer from them to local manufacturers is very vital, as these technologies can be leveraged to solve neglected disease problems peculiar to Africa.

    However, despite all these measures being put in place to help with the localization of healthcare in Africa, and to ensure the preparedness and capability of the continent to tackle any future emergency healthcare challenges, there are still some significant hurdles that African healthcare entrepreneurs will have to face. One of them is funding.

    Firstly, being a continent where capital is expensive, funding to invest in healthcare projects to drive such initiatives is extremely tough to obtain due to exorbitant interest rates on credit facilities. This puts African healthcare entrepreneurs at a disadvantage when compared to peers in the Western world, where lending facilities have lower interest rates. While conversations with multilateral financial institutions to access cost-effective and flexible funding are ongoing, the success of such discussions is not guaranteed as the overall loan amount requested does not align with the lending parameters of the bank.

    Another obstacle is assuring product quality, stemming from the dearth of skilled and experienced human capital. This necessitates investment in human capacity and skillset to ensure continuity and drive sustainability of such initiatives through training of scientists and researchers to meet industry needs.

    The third and most critical challenge to resolve in achieving African healthcare self-reliance is ensuring that local production facilities adhere to the standards required by prospective buyers. This is critical because the complexity of manufacturing in Africa necessitates large-scale production to overcome these challenges. Donors are typically the greatest buyers of healthcare products from such manufacturers, but for procurement to occur, these manufacturing facilities must be WHO-prequalified, ensuring the quality of the healthcare products.

    In recognition of the difficulty of obtaining prequalification approval, a journey that typically takes several years before being granted, and specifically for drug production, the WHO has established its WHO LA, i.e. listing authorities, ensuring that upon a facility being approved by an LA, donors will be assured of the products from these facilities.

    These are all the measures being put in place to help with the localization of healthcare in Africa and to ensure the preparedness and capability of the continent to tackle any future emergency healthcare challenges. The scheme aimed at enhancing African manufacturing capacity for the production of healthcare products and reducing dependence on global supply chains provides the opportunity for the production of customized solutions for African healthcare needs.

    However, despite these daunting challenges, I believe that dedicated African healthcare entrepreneurs will capitalize on this to chart a transformative pathway in the African healthcare ecosystem.

    These are exciting times, and I am hopeful for the future of the African healthcare system.

    • Sammy Ogunjimi, Codix Pharma Ltd, Lagos.

  • Time to temper the headlines on Nigeria’s security challenges

    Time to temper the headlines on Nigeria’s security challenges

    By Bayo Onanuga

    I woke up Tuesday to read some hair-raising headlines about kidnapping and killings in our country. “Over 17,000 Nigerians abducted under Buhari and Tinubu”, screamed one newspaper that described the incidents an epidemic.

    Another newspaper wrote – “2,423 people killed, 1,872 kidnapped in eight months of Tinubu”. There was yet another scary headline that will truly scare any outsider away from my state of Ogun. It says “From Rising industrial hub to den of cultists, criminals.” The impressionistic outsider will, at first blush, think every inch of Ogun is under the siege of cultists and criminals.

    Of course, this sweeping generalisation conveyed by the newspaper does not match the reality lived by the people in the state.

    As a newspaper man myself for over 40 years, I understand the game the media play. To sell our newspapers or clickbait, we tend to exaggerate and embellish, sometimes forgetting the social responsibility of the media, not to give the impression that our country is under siege by criminals or that every nook and cranny of our country is under their stranglehold.

    One of our newspapers took this responsibility to heart in its report on the same Tuesday, making its major headline, the efforts by security agents to rein in the minority vagabonds in our midst. “Security men raise bar in battle against kidnappers”, the paper reported, as it listed the bombing of terrorists den, the rescue of captives by the army and police, simultaneously as it also reported the unfortunate killing of two monarchs in Ekiti, a policeman in Imo and mother and daughter in the FCT.

    Read Also; EFCC nabs religious sect laundering money for terrorists

    The frightening headlines on Tuesday were  based on the report by the Civil Society Joint Action Group that calls for an emergency on the security situation, surprisingly oblivious that our security agencies have been working in that spirit for a long time, since 2009.

    Our security agencies deserve society’s appreciation for their efforts so far, in trying to nip in the bud the evils of kidnapping, banditry, communal killings and terrorism in our country. Their efforts, most often understated, have made our country safer at least than South Africa or the United States, where 44,310 people were killed last year in gun violence.

    South Africa faces a worsening insecurity than Nigeria. In 2023, 15,343 people were kidnapped, with Gauteng Province, where the City of Johannesburg, the commercial capital, is located recording 7,818 cases of kidnapping for ransom. Ten years ago in 2013, there were only 3,822 cases of kidnapping. They jumped to 11,000 in 2021 and have been on the upward curve since then.

    Gun related killings or murders are also high in South Africa. They increased by 35 percent between 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. In the fourth quarter of 2023, 6,289 people were killed in South Africa. An average of 70 killings occurred per day between January and March 2023. Within a more extended period, April 2022 and March 2023, the killings were 75 per day. According to official statistics, 27,272 people were killed during this period, with 11,347 shot dead.

    South Africa also leads the world in carjacking, with 18,000 cases reported in 2020 and 22,742 cases reported last year, an increase of eight percent over 2022 figure.

    Nigerians will appreciate our security agencies better with the comparative figures about our country. Between July 2022 and June 2023, Nigeria recorded 3,620 people kidnapped for ransom, in 582 kidnapping incidents. In 2022, 4,616 people were kidnapped. The same year, 4,545 people were killed by criminals in our midst.

    In a report by the World Population Review, Nigeria is not among the top 10 countries in the world, with kidnapping “epidemic“. Turkey leads with 42 people kidnapped out of 100,000 people. Lebanon is second with 15 people out of 100,000 and Kuwait third with 12 out of 100,000 held in captivity. Canada, Belgium, South Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan, Eswatini and United Kingdom make up the remaining top 10. Kidnapping in Nigeria is 0.334 per 100,000.

    Surely, every life matters. Surely, any of our compatriots kidnapped by the criminals must be a matter of concern to the government as it has always been a matter of concern to our security agencies and the leadership, whose job is to keep all of us safe.

    In my view, they have all been playing a salutary role. Contrary to the uncharitable comment that President Tinubu has been fiddling while incidents of kidnapping or killings occur, as commander-in-chief, he has been providing material support to security agencies to discharge their duties. In recent weeks, we have seen the police setting up a Special Intervention Squad, equipped with drones. The DSS has stepped up its anti-kidnapping act, rescuing 154 abducted people in the last few days.

    Last week President Tinubu approved N50billion as Special Fund to address some of the lingering security challenges in Northeast. He also approved special funds to the FCT, for the acquisition of equipment to track criminals.

    Media reporting about cases of kidnapping, communal killings and isolated terrorism acts must show some moderation by not giving the impression that all Nigerians no longer sleep with two eyes closed or are not safe in going about their day-to-day business.

    The relative peace we used to enjoy in our country was broken in the 90s by cases of kidnapping in Niger-Delta. Then followed insurgency in the Northeast in 2009, which morphed into banditry and kidnapping in Northwest and some parts of North-central. Kidnapping, which appears to be developing into an industry, has also spread to Southwest and Southeast. It will definitely take some time to put the broken pieces back into the whole.

    While we do not have a crime-free country yet, there is no denying that some efforts are being made countrywide to fight the emerging scourge. Last December Lagos State celebrated four years of near zero robbery in the state, with only one incident recorded in Epe in 2023. The Southwest states have set up Amotekun, a local police of sort, that is working alongside the police. Such efforts must be encouraged all over the country, to give our people security cover at all times. Amotekun and other local police set up by the states must be strengthened to work with our existing security structure for intelligence gathering and covert operation. Citizens and the media must also, as a matter of duty, compliment the efforts of government to completely stamp out violent crimes.

    • Onanuga is Special Adviser to the President on Information & Strategy.