Category: Opinion

  • Bayelsa at 16:  A paradigm shift in governance

    Bayelsa at 16: A paradigm shift in governance

    Some Monday October 1, the country will be marking its 52nd independence anniversary. Bayelsa State will equally be rolling out the drums to mark the 16th anniversary of its creation on October 1, 1996.

    Naturally, the state should command and evince the respect and admiration of all, owing to the discovery of oil in commercial quantity in Oloibiri in 1956. The discovery launched Nigeria into global reckoning as a major oil-producing nation. It is sad to note that 56 years after the discovery of oil and now 16 years since the creation of the state, not much has happened to alter the largely rural status of a state that is today nicknamed the Glory of all Lands.

    Oloibiri, the small, creek community where oil was first found in Nigeria, has today become some sort of metaphor. Several authors have written about Oloibiri. One author likened the abandoned creek community to a once beautiful village bride, who suffered countless rape by the same man who professed undying love for her and with several unfulfilled promises of marriage. Now she lies desolate and there is nothing left in her that is desirable for any man to treasure.

    Yet, another anonymous author once wrote in a piece titled ‘Mission Oloibiri: “The goose that lays the golden eggs nourish the same persons who famish her so as to exploit her more effectively”.

    Many other narratives of the political economy of Bayelsa State by such discerning intellectuals like Claude Ake and local natives alike noted the prevailing unsavory ecological circumstances which had actually contributed largely to its under-development.

    Some people have alluded to the emergence of Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan as President was God’s own way of compensating the deprived people out of whose land oil was first discovered. Good as it sounds, the line of reasoning smacks of conventional wisdom.

    President Jonathan, no doubt, is first and foremost, a Bayelsan, one in whom we take enormous pride. Indeed, President Jonathan has exhibited a rare trait of a leader who truly symbolizes our collective resolve and aspiration as a people earnestly desirous of turning a new page in our country’s history.

    I have heard people make comments like “It will be disastrous if President Jonathan fails to turn around the fortunes of his people after the expiration of his term in office.”

    President Jonathan as the President of the whole country has a responsibility to govern all parts of the country, not just Bayelsa or Niger Delta. Besides, how does having a son of the soil as President, as many would like us to believe, amount to an appropriate compensation sufficient enough to atone for the long years of cruel, unjust deprivation and unfair exploitation and depletion of our natural resources? How does it adequately compensate for the terrible devastation of the natural environment and eco-system in the last 50 or more years since the discovery of oil?

    What is important now is for us to press on in our collective pursuit to build a better country, where everyone will have a true sense of belonging and be made to feel the impact of government. The ethnic card and politics associated with it must stop as basis for national renewal. And this is why the emerging face of Governor Henry Seriake Dickson as a bridge builder in a multicultural nation like ours is most commendable. We are seeing a new era of politics of substance, politics of meaning and conviction.

    For good reasons, Bayelsans who hitherto were cynical about politics and politicians due to their penchant for failed promises have had cause to beat a retreat. They are now seeing fundamental things happening in government unlike in the past. Consistently for the past six months, the Dickson-led administration has lived up to the commitment to announce and publish all revenues accruing to the state. This singular move, which was designed to entrench a regime of transparency and accountability in the conduct of government business, has indeed done a lot to rebuild the lacerated ligament of confidence of the people in governance. It has further endeared the state to investors as evident in the influx of investments in key sectors of the economy such as in the agricultural sector where a Memorandum of Understanding was recently signed with a Dutch firm seeking to set up a cassava processing plant in Bayelsa for the purpose of export.

    Tourism is also looking up as a strategic means of development with the basic infrastructure and policy framework being put in place.

    The last 16 years have been quite challenging as a state but our people are beginning to understand and appreciate that under the Dickson-led administration, politics is no longer business but a mission. Indeed, through his actions and pronouncements in office, Governor Dickson has re-enacted Dante Alighieri’s lux fiat – ‘show the light, to bring to the fore that he that finds himself at the head must lead the way for others to follow’.

    Bayelsans are truly persuaded that the restoration agenda is well on track. The ban on commercial motorcycle has given way to brand new Restoration taxi-cabs and buses now visibly plying the streets of Yenagoa and its environs. There is also the massive restoration of decrepit infrastructure, reformation of the institutions of good governance, strict enforcement of law in line with the avowed commitment to ensure zero tolerance for crime and criminality. The Dickson-led administration has no doubt made the necessary investment in security in order to create and sustain a secure society governed by the rule of law.

    Even more evident is Governor Dickson’s resolve to deliver on education given his principled stand on the development of the human capital. Little wonder, his declaration of state of emergency for the sector immediately resulted in the pronouncement of the policy on free and compulsory education for children in primary and secondary schools with emphasis on computer literacy, science and technology. This policy has since taken effect, so also is the rebuilding of educational infrastructure.

    Bayelsa State is fast becoming the epicentre of educational excellence. Never in the history of Nigeria with exception to the regime of the Western regional government under the able leadership of Chief Obafemi Awolowo, has any state governent taken such keen interest in the education of its citizens like Governor Dickson has done. For the first time in the history of the state, tution-free education is backed up by provision of free school uniforms, writing materials, exercise books, school sandals, including the supply of state-of the-art school furniture to enhance the quality of learning for every Bayelsan child. Quality education has become a necessity, taking cognizance of the challenges of the modern knowledge economy.

    To further underscore his attachment and passion to education, Governor Dickson’s giant strides in this sector are evident in the award of scholarships. First, was the award of N1billion post- graduate scholarships to 300 persons to study in the best universities in Nigeria and abroad. Then, there is also the award of schorships to 250 secondary school indigent pulpils under the Bayelsa State Restoration Secondary Schools Scholarship Scheme, started by Chief DSP Alamieyeseigha and President Goodluck Jonathan as governors of the state. The scheme is being sustained by Governor Dickson in its effort to build on the solid foundation already laid by the duo. What is interesting to note here is that, of the 250 beneficiaries of the scholarship scheme, 50 of the slots were allocated to students of Ijaw speaking parts of Edo, Delta, Akwa-Ibom and Ondo States.

    As Bayelsa gets set to mark its 16th anniversary, one thing that can be taken for granted under this present administration is the fact that there is a new ‘sherriff’ in town whose word is his bond. Governor has really redefined governance as a tool for development, accentuating stout leadership and integrity. It is widely shared that the paradigm shift in governance offers the prospect of faster economic progress than ever witnessed. In the evolving scenario, we can see a bold identity of creative leadership and enterprise with the sole objective of casting off poverty in Bayelsa State. No doubt, making this vision an enduring one would require collective effort, cooperation and some sacrifice on the part of the good people of Bayelsa State, serving a higher, more worthy goal than individual or group interest. On the part of the leadership, we have seen a lot of courage in this regard, raising hope of greater possibilities. So at 16, it is plausible to contend that Bayelsa State is still relatively young and the journey of statehood arguably tough and mixed, but there is great hope that the future is very bright. This is the good news.

    • Markson-Iworiso, Chief Press Secretary to Bayelsa Governor, sent this piece from Yenagoa.

  • Why Fayemi deserves Governor of the year

    It is no longer news that the Governor of Ekiti State, Dr. Kayode Fayemi was recently named the Leadership newspapers Governor of the year 2011 at an elaborate ceremony in Abuja. Other awardees were General T.Y Danjuma who bagged Man of the year, businessman Aliko Dangote as Business person of the year, Condoleeza Rice, the former US Secretary of State as author of the year; Ann Marie Imafidon, the young academic wizard who bagged an Oxford University Masters Degree the age of 12 as the young person of the year.

    There are other awardees in other categories but the award of the Governor of the year conferred on Fayemi was the most discussed and the cynosure of all eyes.. Fayemi is always wary of awards because of the indecent and spurious nature of most awards that are equally conferred on unworthy fellows in the country. In fact, he has rejected many but for him to accept the Leadership award; there must have been a cogent reason. This was revealed in his acceptance speech when he said he accepted the award because the process of selection was transparent, predictable and independently verifiable. The award is credible because nobody was asked to pay any money. Predictably, the winner of the award last year was Governor Adams Oshiomhole who proved that he deserved the award going by how he has transformed Edo State and later secured a landslide victory for second term in office.

    Despite the meagre resources of Ekiti State (Ekiti earns 2.5 billion from the federation accounts out of which it pays 1.5 billion as salary), and the debt of N40 billion inherited from the Oni’s administration, Fayemi is currently embarking on a massive transformation of the state capital through road construction where about 15 completed roads would be commissioned in October while construction of five kilometres each is presently going on in all the 16 local government areas of the state. There is urban renewal, and provision of pipe-borne water, streetlights, traffic lights and the general beautification of the city.

    The Fayemi administration provides free and compulsory education at the primary and secondary levels while it reduced fees payable in higher institutions. It consolidated the amorphous higher institutions it inherited for purposes of better funding and overall management. They are now well poised to partner with the state government in its development efforts. The administration has also done a lot to improve the study environment by renovating all schools in Ekiti State in two phases with the first phase concluded in just eight weeks under Operation Renovate All Schools (ORASE). The renovation works include reconstruction of dilapidated classroom blocks, school halls, laboratories, chapels, painting of classroom blocks and school fence, PVC ceilings, new windows and new furniture.

    33,000 laptops have been distributed to students, teachers and the physically challenged in Ekiti State schools. This is an unprecedented achievement. The governor recently signed an agreement with Samsung in South Korea to establish an engineering academy in Ekiti State which is going to be first of its kind in West Africa. The academy will impact on the faculty of engineering in the state university and will provide after sales services of computers and training of electronic engineers. Samsung will also assemble its products in Ekiti. The deal is payback for Ekiti by Samsung which got the contract to supply the 100,000 laptops for each student in Ekiti.

    Health care delivery in Ekiti is one of the best in the country as more than 1.5 million Ekiti people have benefitted from the free health mission and programme of the government. Little wonder that the latest MDG Report (2012) circulated by the Federal Ministry of Health scored Ekiti high in healthcare delivery. According to the report, Ekiti has the second lowest infant mortality rate in the country. The Minister of Health recently commended Ekiti State for doing what no other state is doing on health care in the country. Ekiti is the only state that is doing free health 100 per cent to its pregnant women and covering 45 per cent of the state’s population under her free health programme.

    Many industries are being revived while the tourism potentials of Ekiti State are being presented to the world with the complete transformation of the Ikogosi Warm Spring Resort and the development of the tourism corridor of that area. The Warm Spring has been completely re-engineered with a new swimming pool and a befitting landscaping, while modern chalets have been built for the use of tourists. An amphitheater is currently under construction at the resort and has reached 85 per cent completion. Ire burnt bricks which has been abandoned in the last 21 years is about to begin operation as installation of N400 million naira worth of equipment is ongoing. The ROMACO quarry company in Igbemo Ekiti and the Ikun Diary farm in Ikun Ekiti would soon begin operation.

    Fayemi has paid more than lip service to making agriculture the bedrock of industrialisation and a large employer of labour. Under the Youth Commercial Agriculture Development Programme (YCAD), 7,500 pilot commercial farmers have been shortlisted, while 1,000 hectares of land have been cleared for the purpose in Phase 1 of the project. The project is designed to result in a minimum of 20,000 youth commercial farmers by 2014. Farmers have been empowered via the provision by government, of agricultural soft loans, farm implements and herbicides, while millions of naira was expended on equipment to assist rice farmers to increase their yield. The empowerment of farmers is also being replicated at the local government level where farmers have been greatly assisted. The Federal Government recently approved two ultra-modern state of the art rice processing mills, one of which will be sited in Igbemo-Ekiti. The 600 million naira joint constituency irrigation project of the three senators representing Ekiti State at the Senate to be sited in Itapaji Ekiti, has attracted additional 600 million naira from the UNDP which will execute the project for which the state government has made about 5,000 hectares of land available. The project will allow for all season farming of tomatoes and pepper which shall be processed at the site. Residential buildings shall also be built on the farm and factory that will employ over 1,000 Ekiti youths. A cassava processing plant has begun operation in Orin –Ekiti while Chinese investors wooed by the governor have agreed to invest in large scale cassava farming in Ekiti. Cassava bread was launched by the Governor on August 7, making Ekiti the first state in the country to take the cassava campaign initiative seriously.

    The administration has employed a total of 4,643 graduates under the Youth Volunteer Scheme, 7,500 facility managers and street sweepers. 200 youths are undergoing skills acquisition while some 240 youths have resumed training under the auspices of the National Directorate of Employment which has established an active synergy with the state government not to mention the hundreds in the employ of the Traffic Management Agency. As a result of all these, the state was recently described as follows in the current Human Development Report: ‘Ekiti State is the most conducive environment to live, for long and healthy living with a life expectancy average of 55 years more than the national life expectancy average of 50 years’.

    Without a doubt, Governor Fayemi has impacted positively on large areas of the state and by the time on-going projects are concluded, the governor would have more than firmly planted his feet on the sands of time. The words of the elder statesman Alhaji Maitama Sule who presented the award to him capture the personality of the governor: “At a time like this, we need leaders not looters, leaders, not rulers. We need leaders with the fear of God; those who will not lie; leaders who will accept in public what they can accept in private; leaders who are not corrupt; leaders who will not steal; leaders who look in the eyes of the common man with compassion and not eyes of the privileged few. May I congratulate you on behalf of the nation because the nation needs leaders like you; let other leaders emulate this governor”.

    • Jamiu writes from Ado-Ekiti

  • From The Cell Phone

    For Gbenga Omotoso

     

    Building 11 new airports in Nigeria will certainly create more jobs in the aviation industry or won’t it ? From Uwem Ekanem, Uyo

    Gbenga, the man of the year. Goodluck Jonathan has nothing to showcase neither has he anything to tell Nigerians by October 1. He can only tell Nigerians the number of bombs that have exploded since he assumed office. Corruption is the order of the day; kidnappers, hired assassins are everywhere still our President said he is the most criticised leader in the world. He has not done anything that deserves commendation. As long as he sticks to his policies that are not favouring Nigerians, we will continue to critisise him. He brought harship to Nigerians by removing fuel subsidy. He said he is fighting corruption yet the subsidy fraudster are moving about freely. The President said unpatriotic Nigerians sponsored the protesters why didn’t he sponsor the counter protest? Mr Goody, wake up now. From Hamza Ozi Momoh. Dockyard, Apapa, Lagos.

    Gbenga, you actually hit the nail on the head on Jonathan’s ineptitude in your piece of 20-09-12. You aptly captured his inefficiency on major policy and political matters. To refer to the subsidy strike in Lagos nine months after shows he has learnt nothing and forgotten nothing. I only hope is not building his castle in the air thinking South west wìll vote for him by attending the book launch of one of those he teargased during the subsidy strike. Lastly your joke on what manner of dialogue? Kept reeling on the ground with laughter your pen will never run dry. Amen. From Ayo Apelogun, Ilesha.

    Jonathan creates needless problems for himself through his wrong choices, actions and utterances and turns around to blame an imaginary opposition for the consequences. He is perhaps the only Nigerian President to date who believes Nigerians are incapable of differentiating between right and wrong. Anonymous.

    Re: Of fuel and other crises. By now, one expects the Finance Minister to have paid the subsidy to the marketers who have been given clean bills and penalise the culprits. We are innocent enough to be penalised to witness fuel queue again. Enough of the inefficiencies in essential public goods — fuel, roads and power. Cassava-bread remains a child’s play because the powers at the LGs, States and Federal Government will breach the rule. Although a Muslim, I completely disagree with the plan to dialogue with the Boko Haram. Where that is done, expect militancy in other parts of Nigeria. From Lanre Oseni.

    It is very unfortunate that the President regards the masses as fools, who can not think on their own. Did we need anyone to call us out to protest when the President gave us over 125 per cent fuel price increase as a New Year gift? Not a few people beleive that the labour leaders were settled to call off the protest by the time they did. Nigerians were not ready to accept anything above N65 per litre. From Alh. Adeboye Lawal Ibadan.

    A capital of less than N500,000 is enough to set up a small satchet (pure) water factory but our President is proud to taunt us with the fact that pure water is not available in his village! in 2012? No wonder he calls himself the most criticised President in the whole world. From Adeleke Foster. Anonymous.

    The plan to build 11 more airports is a waste of money. Only one flight comes to Jos, some of the passengers are or were from Bauchi and Gombe, yet the flight is always diverted to Kano to be able to fill the airline before going to Lagos. Both Bauchi and Gombe are busy building or upgrading airports.Where are the passengers going to come from when the plane which they use still has to go to Kano to fill up since the mid 90s? On dialogue, the government is simply negotiating with the political Boko Haram. The ideological Boko Haram can never negotiate a divine command and may soon start targeting the political one for daring to negotiate God’s command. In their view, God permits them to only give ultimatums. From Buga Funj, Jos

     

    Segun Gbadegesin

     

    Re-Ideas that live. I pray to live with idea and ideals that live and also die for the idea/ideals that live. To the end unitarism and achieve true federalism, we must see that we end corruption in its entirety, irrespective of our political affiliation! Just watch the big six who are bidding for the purchase of PHCN. These are some of those who will lead the true federated states in future. Where did the fund come from, to share PHCN purchase? They can not live for such ideas/ideals of Steve Biko, Martin Luther King and others. From Lanre Oseni.

    Re:Ideas that live: What an excellent piece of writing. Actually, in the fullness of time true federalism will eventually triumph over unitarism. From Andy Ashinze. Lagos.

    I read youur piece Ideas that live and I jumped and screamed, do we have leaders who will die for ideas that live?I don’t think so, especially, our current political leaders. Anonymous.

     

    For Dare Olatunji

     

    Most of the societal ills Gani fought against are still very much with us in excess. Anything more corrupt than the men and times of today cannot be conceived. Should we not expect more illegalities where the Constitution is spurious? Gani tried his very best. Afterall, virtue is aiming at the mark, not hitting it. The man who tries hardest is thereby the most successful. From Adegoke O O, Ikhin, Edo State.

    Dare, I loved reading your article. I’m particularly impressed by the hilarity evoked therein and your artistic deployment of suspense throughout your anecdote. Well, that’s the kind of society we have, consistently inconsistent about which way to go. From Saintmatthew (PH).

    Re-remembering Gani, our Gani. Prisoner J40/4990-Late Chief Gani Fawehinmi, will see the face of Allah. Allah will forgive him his sins. His family he left behind will never meet with any trouble. His children and grandchildren will continue to excel in life. Late Chief, will be seated in al-janah fir dauz, AMEEN. He was an unequalled fighter-leader, a GEM. From Lanre Oseni.

     

  • The Onitsha River Port: Matters arising

    The Onitsha River Port: Matters arising

    At last things are beginning to look up in the maritime sector. The recent commissioning of the Onitsha River Port and President Goodluck Jonathan’s pledge that many more will soon follow suggest the determination of the present administration to restore water transportation to its pride of place. If vigorously pursued, marine transportation will become a huge foreign exchange earner for the nation.

    Water is about the greatest natural resource God in his wisdom blessed this country with but its potential for rapid transformation of a nation is not widely recognised in Nigeria. So vital is this resource to human existence that the earth and the human body are each made up of 70 per cent water. Some other nations that are similarly endowed have applied this resource to a great advantage in the areas of transportation, hydro-electric power generation, irrigation purposes, aquatic farming and recreation. But here, the reverse is the case. Since the discovery of oil in Olobiri in 1956, ‘the blue gold’ has been relegated to the background.

    The maritime sector is about the worst hit. Since the exit of the British, the sector has suffered serious neglect. A few Nigerians in the agencies entrusted with responsibility of growing the sector have been taking advantage of the prevailing situation to milk the nation dry. Dredging contracts invariably end up being abandoned with the connivance of the supervising government agencies and project consultants. Even when such contracts are completed, dredged silts are deliberately deposited near the channels knowing that with time the silt will surge back into the channel and pave the way for the award of fresh contracts. The stipulation that dredged silt be moved far away from the channel is never adhered to. All these have resulted in the unfortunate situation where some channels have been dredged severally to no avail and at huge cost to the nation. But despite its pitiable state, this sector remains the nation’s second highest revenue earner.

    The lackadaisical disposition of successive administrations towards marine development reflects in the fact that the Onitsha Port complex has been commissioned twice. The first was in the early 80s by the National Party of Nigeria (NPN)-led Federal Government, but soon after, the port became moribund as the dredging of the lower Niger River was incomplete at the time the port was opened. Ever since the Onitsha Port has remained idle. Nothing significant was done by any other administration, military or civilian, until the award of the 2009 contract which culminated in the recent commissioning of the complex after a full dredging of the channel. The Goodluck Jonathan administration must be commended for this feat and going by the optimism of National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) officials, the inland ports of Oguta in Imo State, Degema in Rivers State and Baro in Niger State will soon come on stream. However, beyond reviving inland ports is the need to sustain them through periodic maintenance dredging. Any attempt to develop marine transportation without laying the foundation for its sustenance will come to naught.

    Encouraging as the return of the Onitsha port may be, it is disturbing that we are still not getting our priorities right. Developing inland waterways and ports when nearly all the main water routes leading to the Atlantic Ocean are in various states of disrepair is like putting a cart before the horse. The international ports of Calabar, Port Harcourt, Azumiri, Koko and Ibaka that served the British so well in their quest to colonise Nigeria and for movement of slaves and agricultural produce have for so long fallen into disuse. It is imperative to pursue the development of these routes with the equal zeal so as to complement the inland routes. By so doing, the government will be taking marine development to great heights and the nation will then be in a position to reap its full benefits. The maritime industry has the capacity of stemming rural-urban migration, stimulating economic activities and creating millions of jobs that can catalyse the rapid development of this nation. This is besides its tendencies to reduce the cost of living given that water transportation is by far cheaper than air or land, and to absorb the pressure on the roads prompted by the movement of cargoes on the highway.

    It is common knowledge that inland waterways are secondary channels and are dependent on the international routes to operate. This is because inland ports and waterways have certain inherent limitations that prevent ocean-going vessels from passing or berthing at the ports. For instance, inland ports are usually bordered by roads and bridges that make it impossible for big vessels to pass or berth. And with a draft of between 2.5 and 3.0 metres, inland waterways cannot accommodate big vessels that move on minimum draft of 8.5 metres. Consequently, mother vessels entering the country must first trans-load to smaller vessels which then will convey the goods through the inland channels to the river ports. The standard procedure is that mother vessels that are designed for a draft of between 8.5 and 10.5 metres ferry goods into the country and thereafter transfer the goods to barges, which in turn trans-load to smaller boats that can move on inland waterways and berth in inland ports.

    Making the international ports and water channels commercially viable will not only increase the volume of maritime activities but also reduce freight rates. Vessels approaching from the Atlantic Ocean will have several alternatives to explore. They may for instance enter the Lagos channel for Lagos Port or veer into Benin River for Koko Port. They may also follow the Forcados River to Warri Port; the Bonny River to Port Harcourt and Onne ports or Calabar River to Calabar Port. The horrible state of most of these rivers puts so much strain on Lagos and Port Harcourt ports with attendant congestion of the seaports, delays in the evacuation of ship as well as land traffic that results from the movement of goods in and out of the ports. No doubt the international channels require much more capital outlay to fix but in the long run, these channels contribute more to the purse of the nation, create more job opportunities and feed the inland waterways.

    This question that naturally arises is how to develop the international channels given the several unsuccessful attempts at making them navigable in the past. Happily, the Federal Government is already considering the ‘channel management’ option in respect of the Calabar Port and this appears to be the way out of the quagmire. Besides checking corruption and ensuring quicker returns to the government, the ‘channel management’ approach imposes on a dredging company the responsibility to ensure that the channels are in perfect condition all year round. Under this arrangement, channel managers owe all users of the channel a duty of care. If a vessel gets stuck in a channel or suffers any form of damage or loss as result of poor dredging, the negligent dredging company will be held liable and made to pay damages. Returns to channel managers are also dependent on the usage of the channel. In fact, the ‘channel management’ system has ensured the smooth running of the Lagos and Bonny channels; and will surely do the same in all other routes whether international or inland. The idea of engaging contractors solely for capital or maintenance dredging bristles with problems and has been the bane of marine development in Nigeria.

    • Dr Nnadi lives in Lagos

  • Ondo and the politics of intolerance

    Ondo and the politics of intolerance

    In the run-up to the October gubernatorial election in Ondo State, the nation has witnessed series of violence orchestrated by the government of the incumbent and re-election seeking governor, Dr. Olusegun Mimiko, against the opposition political parties in the state. It all started on April 20, when the Ondo State chapter of the Action Congress of Nigeria organized a public lecture to commemorate the fifth anniversary of the death of the former governor of the state, Chief Adebayo Adefarati. The Oyemekun Road, Akure, venue of the lecture was reportedly stormed at noon by members of the ruling Labour Party who sang and danced provocatively to abusive songs against the opposition party.

    As the guests, mostly ACN members, began to arrive, the situation became rowdy as their supporters also stationed themselves outside the hall singing and dancing. The situation, however, turned violent when some invitees to the lecture, including former commissioners and special advisers who served under the late governor were prevented from entering the lecture hall by Labour Party members. The situation later spread into the town where pockets of violence were recorded but the quick intervention of the State Independent Electoral Commission which banned all forms of campaigns and rallies until July 21, saved the day. The Police Command in the state also took a pre-emptive action by banning all types of political gatherings in places where clashes had been recorded.

    On Saturday, July 28, however, the fragile peace in the state was again disturbed when members of the ruling party attacked a convoy of the ACN governorship candidate, Mr. Rotimi Akeredolu, (SAN), near the state secretariat on Oyemekun Road, Akure. The ACN candidate was on his way home after the party’s congress. There was a free-for-all fight in which dangerous weapons and ammunition were reportedly used and in the process several vehicles were vandalized while some passers-by were either robbed or wounded. Akeredolu, however, escaped unhurt but some members of the party were injured in the attack. Though the spokesman for the Labour Party, Femi Okunjemiruwa, alleged that members of the opposition party fired shots at the secretariat, the Special Adviser to the ACN candidate on Media, Idowu Ajanaku, said the incident happened at the Lafe Junction on Oyemekun Road when hoodlums blocked the convoy of Akeredolu who was returning home after he was elected the governorship candidate of the party.

    The hoodlums, according to Ajanaku, hauled stones and pebbles at the convoy prompting the security details of the candidate to take measures to ward off the hoodlums.

    A day before this attack, there was also a clash between members of the state chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and members of the ruling LP in Ode-Irele Town. According to the PDP Director of Publicity, Ayodele Fadake, the clash was sparked off when the state government decided to inaugurate a community-based project on the same day that the opposition PDP had obtained Police permit to hold a political rally in the town. According to Fadaka, some LP members planned to defect to the PDP but due to the calibre of the personalities involved, the ruling party quickly fixed its own event in the same town, apparently to cause confusion. These incidents are by no means the only ones since the campaigns started. Aside the series of unprovoked attacks and harassment of the opposition, the ruling party has also used other coercive means to prevent the opposition parties from making their impact and freely sell themselves among the people as the political campaigns gather momentum.

    But be that as it may, one begins to wonder why the re-election bid of Dr, Mimiko is witnessing such violence. This is a governor who has over the years sought to convince the world that he has performed in all spheres of the economy of the state. In education, in health, in agriculture and other sectors of the state’s economy, there have been claims of unprecedented achievements that had not been equaled by other governments in the country. While no attempt, whatsoever, is being made here to contest such claims, the series of state-orchestrated violence attending the on-going political campaigns cast doubts on such claims. If there is any lesson drawn from the 2011 General Elections, it is the fact that Nigerians have begun to demonstrate the freedom to make a choice of those who will lead them based on performance. Except in the few places where factors other than adequate political enlightenment played a dominant role, the elections were adjudged largely as free and fair by both local and international observers. The performance criterion was evident in the several states where governors of ruling parties failed to secure a second tenure. It was also evident in the few election petitions filed in against their defeat by the governors some of who later withdrew their petitions.

    So, why the violence in Ondo State? Why have the opposition parties suddenly become targets of state-orchestrated violence? Could it be that the much talked-about popularity of Mimiko is a fluke after all? Is the attack and harassment of the opposition an indication that the “Iroko of Ondo State” is suddenly afraid to face the opposition? Is the governor afraid to allow free flow of ideas for moving the Ondo State forward in terms of education and economic development?.

    There can only be one explanation to this action of the LP government in Ondo State. The government of Mimiko is afraid to face the reality of the present development in our democratic experience – the choice by Nigerians of the performance factor as the criterion for election. What is happening in Ondo State today may be reminiscence of what happened in Imo State in the 2011 elections where the boastful Ohakim claimed stupendous achievements only to be exposed and swept away by the gale of change in that state.

    What is happening in Ondo State is certainly a minus for a governor who claims to be an agent of change. It is a sad reminder of the events that took place during the 2011 political campaigns in states like Benue where the state government severally denied the opposition ACN the use of its facilities for political rallies, In Ebonyi where the PDP government of Elechi Amadi hounded the opposition All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), led by Dr. Ogbonnaya Onu, a son of the soil, out of the state capital, Abakaliki, with the lame excuse that the town was too small to host the party’s presidential rally and Bayelsa State where the former deputy governor, Mr. Peremibowai Ebebi, who was seeking a senatorial seat, was arrested by the police on a charge of an alleged offence committed in 2009.

    The truth of the matter is that beyond its undemocratic tag, this attitude of victimizing the opposition parties will expose Mimiko and his party, the Labour Party, as incompetent. If after four years of leadership, Dr. Mimiko is not willing and ready to face the challenges by the opposition, then, certainly his claim of performance is a fluke. Any governor who has performed will be proud to allow the opposition to come in and challenge his administration; because, aside the confidence it would build in the people, such a challenge will give him the opportunity to showcase his achievements.

    Again, Lagos State comes in here as a good example. The Peoples Democratic Party launched its presidential campaign at the Tafawa Balewa Square, in Central Lagos where it boasted that it would “capture Lagos”. Barely a week later, the ACN launched its own presidential rally on the same ground and had the opportunity to reply the PDP. The party told the opposition PDP that it would not only fail to capture Lagos but it stood the risk of losing the states which it still presided over in the South-west. That is the beauty of democracy.

    It is, indeed a sad commentary for Mimiko to resort to this method to secure a second term. The truth is that his intolerance of opposition does not allow for a free flow of ideas on how to move the state forward, Indeed, Governor Mimiko may have chosen a policy option that will , most certainly, see him out of office.

    Bakare wrote from Akure.

  • Kwara and its changing political environment

    Kwara and its changing political environment

    Change is constant. This truism best describes the political situation in Kwara, a state gradually shedding its political image as the Sarakis’ fiefdom. Until the 2011 general elections when they nearly lost the governorship seat, the Sarakis were the lone voice in the state politics, dictating the way of life. Opposition parties, their candidates most time disenchanted lackeys of the Saraki political clan, would contest election, lose and disappear. They would resurface in four years, weakened and discredited. That would leave the Sarakis holding the yam and the knife, caring little about human capital or even infrastructural development and waiting to manipulate their way back to government in future polls.

    Today, the Sarakis no longer have a field day in Kwara State; their disregard for public sentiments are now being exposed by a consistent, strong and credible opposition led by the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) whose governorship candidate in the 2011 poll, Mohammed Dele Belgore (SAN), has remained a strong (and alternative) voice in the state politics. Kwarans now have opposing views on how their state is run – the absence of which was largely responsible for the way the Sarakis had run the state like a fiefdom over the years.

    Evidences abound that Kwarans, including many in the government, are happy about this and are latching onto the bravery and outspokenness of the ACN to let out what was clearly a pent-up anger at the misrule, oppression and corruption of the past years.

    It is now commonplace to see hitherto shy Kwarans storm the street to protest the impunities of their government: fuel subsidy protest, looting and destruction of PDP secretariat in Ilorin, the motorcyclists’ protest and the IEDPU’s well-coordinated opposition to the government’s land policy and the open protest by Malete communities against the government’s ‘land grabbing’policy are a few examples. The people are no longer intimidated by the powers and influence of the Sarakis because attention is now easily turned on them –thanks to the opposition and the social media.

    This is not to say that they have been defeated. No. But the days of barefaced impunities seem gone. For instance, it is no longer easy (it was the norm before) to lay claim to some blanket achievements. On May 28 when the state government claimed to have tarred over 600 kilometres of road in one year and were even bold enough to list some of them, the opposition quickly rushed to the media in a detailed advertorial to expose the lies with incontrovertible facts. It was the same thing on twitter, where young Kwarans spent days dismantling what they call the edifice of lies by the state government.

    This ultimately leads to the question of 2015. It is interesting that even the Sarakis are now forced to acknowledge the existence of political opposition in Kwara, despite the initial denials. They now blame everything on the opposition. It is not certain who will win the crown. What is certain however is that the Sarakis would go to the 2015 election more fragmented, more discredited and therefore less powerful to orchestrate the sort of rigging that marred the 2011 general elections.

    Contrary to the claims made in commissioned newspaper articles and manipulated video clips on television screens, Kwarans still cannot feel the impact of governance. They are annoyed even the more by bogus claims in the media. It is like committing two grievous sins: the sin of poor performance and the sin of lying against the people. The poor showing of Governor Abdulfattah Ahmed and claims that former governor Bukola Saraki presides over the sharing of the state allocation have made nonsense of their appeal to zoning in the 2011 poll and hence give fillip to the opposition’s claim that the only reason Saraki Jnr picked Ahmed as successor was to cover his ills. The events of the past months especially the N9.2b loan scam involving Saraki Jnr have helped this insinuation. The opposition has also raised many instances of corruption, controversial loans (as in the case of the N10b the PDP-led government obtained to execute the same projects for which Saraki Jnr had raised and accessed N17b bond) and poor governance. Unfortunately for the Sarakis, their support base (the uneducated, old and dying, but large men and women voting public) is waning by the day and the ‘money power’, long relied upon to sway poor voters, may no longer save them because the youths, now forming the largest voting bloc, have learnt to collect money and still vote against them. The booing of Ahmed at the recent Eid-el fitri praying ground in Ilorin, the attacks on Saraki Jnr at Ilorin Airport by some PDP dissenters, and the outpouring of emotions on Unilorin FM (on August 15) against the government stopping of Belgore free holiday coaching programme are dangerous pointers for the PDP and the Sarakis.

    Ahmed and Saraki Jnr might have parted ways after all. The denials notwithstanding, two main camps have already emerged within the PDP: loyalists of Saraki Jnr and those grumbling about the godfather’s arrogance and poor leadership. The latter believes Ahmed should assert himself. Who wins is a matter of strategy. The cold war between Ahmed and Assembly Speaker Razaq Atunwa is a symptom of this rivalry. Saraki’s loyalists believe Ahmed had released incriminating documents about their leader to those seeking his head. It is also believed Ahmed was behind the recent allegations of fraud against Atunwa. The Sarakis are not known to take prisoners. They will fight Ahmed to a standstill. And another group is emerging on the sidelines of the two above: those routing for the former PDP National Chairman Kawu Baraje as the next governor in 2015, an ambition riding on ‘omo oko and omo ale Ilorin (bona fide Ilorin indigene)’ sentiment sure to truncate in its embryonic stage the Saraki Jnr’s emergence as the new godfather.

    In case Saraki Jnr used the PDP structure to sideline Ahmed in the 2015 race, and that is likely if the infighting continues, that would combine with Ahmed’s poor showing to make Kwara South a no-go area for the PDP. So far the expectations of the Kwara South elite, especially those of Igbomina stock, who ditched their traditional opposition to bad governance and alleged Saraki’s oppression, have not been met and they could use the 2015 to retrace their steps.

    The coming together of the Sarakis after the 2011 poll is not in any way an added strength for them. It is for many Kwarans, including many top former Sarakite politicians who went to ACPN, a confirmation of deceit and conspiracy to sustain the Saraki political dynasty. Many of them with integrity may seek to take their pound of flesh as seen in the recent defection to ACN of the influential Chief Ayeni faction of ACPN. The so-called Saraki/Idi Ape reconciliation is at best a fluke. It has not, will not and cannot address the core issues of the dispute.

    The scenarios above have given the lie to some sponsored newspaper articles which attempted to place the Sarakis in firm control of the state. They are not. The happenings in the state show waning influence of the Sarakis and explain why opposition may cling the governorship seat in 2015 if they intensify the effort of rallying the people against the perceived past and current impunities of the Sarakis. As for whether they will change: you cannot teach old dogs new tricks.

    • Ishaq writes from Ilorin, Kwara State capital

  • Lessons from Indonesia

    Lessons from Indonesia

    Nigeria and Indonesia share a lot in common. Both are emerging economies bugged down by weak currency, corruption, unemployment, poverty and poor infrastructure. But placed on a scale of one to 10, Indonesia is much better off. For instance, although the Indonesian media, especially Jakarta Post newspaper, continues to report incidents of corruption among politicians in Indonesia, the incidents pale into insignificance when compared to the magnitude of the massive corruption in Nigeria.

    But Nigeria has its own areas of strength as this article would try to highlight. However, this analysis is meant to compare the two countries in terms of socio-economic parameters and thereafter draw conclusions and make recommendations for improvement in Nigeria.

    My analysis would be based on what I saw and heard during my recent visit to Indonesia, as well as facts and figures from secondary sources. To begin with, let me state that Indonesia is older than Nigeria. It got its independence in 1945 while Nigeria got hers in 1960. My visit happened a week after the country celebrated its 67th independence anniversary on August 17.

    The entire country, urban and rural, was awash with the country’s white and red colours, mounted everywhere on the roads, buildings, bill-boards, etc or used in decorating shopping malls, super-markets, corporate offices and so on. You could see a people so proud of their country, so patriotic in defending their country and its values, cultures, language and foods! This observation was a big contrast to Nigeria.

    Right from the Jakarta international airport, you would see a positive image of Indonesia. You would see orderliness in immigration formalities. You would encounter officials who are smart-looking and professional in their job.

    In contrast, as you arrive MurtalaMuhammed international airport Lagos, what you experience is confusion, tardiness, and too many officials in various uniforms, many of whom seem less interested in their official functions. The branding of Nigeria must start at Nigeria’s entry points with these first-line officers, and good systems and procedures!

    In terms of population, Indonesia is almost twice the size of Nigeria. By 2010, the country had a population of 237.6 million. Nigeria has about 167 million. Nigeria has 36 states and a federal capital territory, divided into 774 local government areas. Indonesia has 27 provinces divided into 357 districts, which I am told, runs Nigeria’s kind of local government administration.

    But the difference is that those elected at district levels are like a task force for rural development. My team visited many rural areas and saw that although their roads are quite narrow, they are tarred and maintained. You could see poverty but rural folks are happy with their agriculture and plantations. Rural folks are happy with their small made-in-Indonesia commercial buses, majorly driven by ladies. They are so proud of their foods and local black tea!

    Indonesia knows how to cut its coat according to its cloth! Despite its size and population, it has a unicameral legislature – the Indonesian House of Representatives. This helps them to reduce the cost of governance.

    At the economic front, Nigeria is many poles away from Indonesia. As at 2011, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Indonesia calculated on purchasing power parity, according to the World Economic Factbook (2012), stood at $1.121 trillion. That of Nigeria was $414.5 billion.

    Calculated on the basis of per capita, the GDP of Indonesia is $4,700 while that of Nigeria is $2,600. Unemployment rate in Indonesia is estimated at 6.7% while that of Nigeria is 21% as at 2011. Nigeria’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) has recently released new statistics that are frightening. The population of Indonesians living below poverty line is estimated at 13.33% while that of Nigeria is 70%.

    What really struck my team was the level of industrialisation in Indonesia. In Purwakarta, Cempaka and Bandung where Indorama Corporation has sprawling industrial complexes producing polyester filament yarns, polyester staple fibre, polyester chips, PET resins, all types of fabrics including laminated ones, etc, you see production plants everywhere, producing various consumer/industrial products shipped to various countries of the world!

    These companies employ millions of young and old Indonesians. You could see people working at the plants; producing goods/services of value. In Nigeria, I look back at Apapa Industrial area, Ikeja industrial area, Ilupeju industrial area, Kirikiri industrial area, Ogba industrial area – all in Lagos – almost all the companies there have closed down, and sent all their employees into the labour market.

    I look at Trans-Amadi industrial area in Port Harcourt – all the companies have closed down. I look at the many industrial areas in Kano, Kaduna, Maiduguri, Jos and Sokoto – most of the companies there have closed down. It is the same with companies in Onitsha, Aba, Enugu and Nnewi. Years ago, Nigeria threw its doors wide open for all manner of imports.

    President of the National Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (NACCIMA), Dr. Herbert Ajayi recently cried out that 800 companies closed down between 2009 and 2011 due to harsh business operating environment (The Nation, September 12, page 9).

    As usual, Nigeria copied the concept of trade liberalization and global competitiveness from the West, without any policy to protect local industries. Nigerian industries couldn’t cope, and all died of economic asphyxia. The lesson the world has leant from the so-called “Asian tigers” including China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc, is that countries grow economically by protecting their local industries and strengthening their manufacturing sector.

    Today, Indonesia can boast of multi-billion-dollar companies including Indorama Corporation, Jardine/Astra International, Salim Group, Sinar Mas Group, Wilmer International, Djarum Group, Phillip Morris International, Bakrie Group, Lippo Group, Uniliver, and many more which are making billion-dollar revenues and swelling the country’s economy. Indeed, the August edition of Globe Asia, Indonesia’s No. 1 Business magazine, listed 100 Top Indonesia-based companies whose 2011 revenues have helped to insulate Indonesia from the global economic crisis.

    Indonesians consume goods produced locally but Nigerians consume goods produced abroad (in Indonesia, China, Malaysia, etc). Nigerians like to live big, while Indonesians like to live moderately. Despite Nigeria’s trillion-Dollar oil revenue, Nigeria likes foreign loans and aids while Indonesia likes savings and investments!

    Another contrast between Nigeria and Indonesia is that Indonesia-based companies are relatively unencumbered by national politics and bureaucracy. In Indonesia, there are laws regulating industrial operations. Governments at the national, provincial and district levels create conducive environments for businesses to thrive and flourish. Fiscal policies are aimed at attracting foreign investments, protecting local industries and creating more employment. Tax incentives are part of the fiscal policy. Lending rate for strategic sectors is lowered. Our country has something to learn here. In Nigeria, state governments seem to breathe down on small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs) and make them to close down.

    In Nigeria, investors complain of multiple taxations, overbearing regulatory framework, and regular political interferences. Yet, such companies are expected to provide their own infrastructure: road network, electricity, water and security. These hinder economic development and growth.

    As a result of economic boom in Indonesia, crime rate is very low. Indonesians seem to be at peace with themselves — happy and contented with what they have! Ironically, Indonesians are not as “religious” as Nigerians. You may not see a church or mosque, but you see a people that are respectful, hard-working and honest.

    Jakarta, the Indonesian capital is a beautiful city of high-rise buildings and apartments, thousands of shopping malls, international hotels, and well-paved roads and toll-gates. It perhaps boasts of the highest number of motorbike riders in the world, all well-kited but daring. All businesses are conducted in Indonesian language, not English language as in most countries. The mantra seems to be “If you live in Indonesia, you must speak Indonesia!” Talk of national pride!

    The Indonesian people have a culture of keeping everywhere clean: roads, buildings, offices, name it. Government offices are sparkling clean, mostly painted in whitecolour. Indonesia has high maintenance culture, which is lacking in Nigeria. Indonesians are not crazy about made-in-Europe- and America fashion. I didn’t see the “sagging” and nudities of the Nigerian fashion revolution. What has happened to Nigeria’s traditional wears and attires?

    Indonesia is a tourist destination. What beats my imagination is how they turned a volcanic eruption site into a tourist centre! You cannot visit Indonesia without vising that site – about 130 miles from Jakarta, the state capital!

    Nigeria, I think, has a lot to learn from Indonesia, one of the Asian Tigers!

    · Nkwocha, a company executive writes from Port Harcourt.

  • Between NIMASA and Ihenacho

    Between NIMASA and Ihenacho

    Recent arrest of former Minister of Interior, Capt. Emmanuel Ihenacho by officials of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) and armed forces personnel attached to the Global West Vessel Specialist Limited (GWVSL) over allegation that his company received stolen petroleum products in its depot is bound to elicit considerable public interest.

    For one, Ihenacho was until recently, the minister of interior, an office that superintends over the internal security of the country. Thus, any action directly or indirectly connected to him which has the prospects of sabotaging the collective interests of the country, is bound to attract measured public indignation.

    Secondly, in the wake of the recent fuel subsidy scandal, the nation has been fully sensitized to the monumental fraud that goes on in the oil sector. More so, with the chilling revelation that several companies and personages received huge sums of money in foreign currency in the name of subsidy payments for fuel purportedly imported into the country even when no drop of the commodity was brought in. Many of such companies have since been charged to court and the nation anxiously waiting for the outcome of these cases.

    Again, oil is very central to the survival of our economy. Given our sole dependence on it for the execution of our development programmes, any loss of revenue from it is bound to have deleterious effects on our economy. For this, any clue as to why Nigerians are not taking full advantage of this gift which nature has bountifully endowed them is bound to arouse the interest of the famished, poor and deprived masses of this country. Thus, the allegation is not only serious and weighty but equally very sensitive.

    For all these, the controversy between Ihenacho’s company, Integrated Oil and Gas Limited and NIMASA, just like the fuel subsidy scandal, is bound to be in the domain of public opinion for quite sometime to come. More so, with some searing issues raised by the company that have further thrown up questions regarding the propriety in singling it out in a business relationship and transaction that involved other agencies of government including the NIMASA itself.

    The offence of the company was that it received a consignment of allegedly stolen fuel brought into its depot by a vessel. Director-General of NIMASA Mr. Patrick Akpobolokemi said the vessel which has been impounded is used by pirates to hijack oil-bearing vessels and steal their fuel. According to him, it was run by a cartel whose activities have been under the agency’s surveillance.

    But the company is not denying it received the fuel which is now said to have been stolen. It is equally not denying that the now controversial consignment was brought to its storage facilities. But its contention is that the rules guiding such transactions were not observed in their breach. Its argument is that the fuel was received in its depot on a throughput basis and that all the necessary clearance documents were obtained before that consignment was received.

    And that the rules guiding such transactions requiring that necessary inward clearance documents be issued by the Nigerian Navy, the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) and the supervising NIMASA were fully observed. They also claimed that the vessel that brought the fuel to their tank, MT Grace is owned by Messrs Akoto Ventures/Danyomile Marine Services Limited well known to both NIMASA and Integrated Oil and Gas Limited.

    They further claimed that MT Grace passed through NPA channels and facilities enroute to their jetty and was cleared for discharge by both the DPR and the Nigerian Navy even as the cargo was officially consigned to Messrs DPR/Capital Oil PlC and not their company.

    The issues raised by the company are very weighty as they have brought to the front burner a lot of posers that are very germane to the resolution of the alleged oil theft. First, NIMASA claimed that the vessel which has been under surveillance is used by pirates to steal fuel from oil-bearing vessels and that its activities have been under surveillance for sometime now. But Integrated Oil and Gas argued that the identity and ownership of the vessel is very well known to NIMASA itself.

    If that is so, the following questions beg for very urgent answers:

    *Why was the vessel allowed to pass through the facilities of the NPA enroute to the jetty without being arrested?

    * Is it true that after passing through NPA channels both the DPR and the Navy cleared it to discharge at that jetty?

    *Is it true that the alleged stolen fuel is fully served by the availability of the necessary inwards clearance documents issued by the Nigerian Navy, the DPR, the NPA and the supervising NIMASA?

    *And at what point did NIMASA discover that the said fuel was a stolen consignment especially since it claimed it has been monitoring the pirate vessel?

    * From where was the oil stolen and why was the ship not apprehended at that point?

    * What are the identities of the owners of the vessel and the oil consignment?

    *And why were they not arrested before the invasion of the final point of the vessel’s destination?

    These posers are very central to the resolution of the nagging issues that have been thrown up by the manner this matter has so far been handled. More so as Ihenacho, whose company is at the center of the controversy has imputed political motives and an attempt to destroy his business into the whole saga. They have also raised issues with the development of an armed unit within NIMASA that is under the operational control of parties who are neither trained nor constitutionally empowered to command federal forces under arms. That such a situation could lend itself to abuse goes without saying.

    Had the invasion of the tank farms and offices of the company been cleared through our regular security command, the commando operation that left officials of the company handcuffed and thoroughly humiliated may not have taken place.

    Then also, the litany of questions that have been thrown up by the issue would have been addressed before action is taken on who and who to hold culpable for the said malfeasance. It remains a big puzzle why the owners of the MT Grace vessel, Capital Oil PLC to which the alleged stolen oil belongs were not arrested. We are yet to be told what has been done to the Navy, NPA, DPR and NIMASA who cleared and documented the controversial consignment for discharge at the tank farm.

    Unless and until these claims are proven to be false, there are definitely more to the stolen fuel scandal than ordinarily meets the eyes. In the circumstance, the federal government should institute with great dispatch a high-powered probe into the matter. The issues that have been raised are damn weighty and only through a thorough inquisition shall we get at the root of the matter. For now, the way the matter has been handled has been less than tidy.

  • Nigeria: What went wrong? (3)

    Nigeria: What went wrong? (3)

    In continuation of this series, it is pertinent to poignantly ask and keep asking like Dr Jide Oluwajuyitan in the Nation newspapers of 19th July 2012: “how did we get to this sorry state of affairs?” The writer in the course of the series highlighted some issues such as impatience of followers to follow and flow along with leaders especially in the first republic; incessant military incursions; ingrained systemic institutionalization of corruption in our polity. There are other vital points that will be equally be highlighted in this third part.

    Citizens’ Value System

    “Organizationally, and personally, you are what you value”-Howard Whitten

    The aforementioned quotation is apt and accurate in depicting our parlous state in Nigeria. In simple terms, I will state that an individual is what he or she values. Like someone said one time: “if you stand for nothing, then, you can fall for anything!” As a nation, what are our core values? What do people of other nations perceive in the name Nigeria or Nigerians? I was opportune to live in Singapore for about four years during which I featured in the “Expat” column of the most popular newspaper: The Strait Times. The first question the journalist interviewing me put forward was: “What line will you use on those who referred to Nigerians as scammers?” I quipped by saying that they are naïve as a few bad apples do not make the whole basket rotten; and that in any case, every nation on earth has good as well as bad people among them. That was the end of the story. Many Nigerians residing in Singapore were happy that I responded well. Be that as it may, I knew within me where the journalist was heading to. Internationally, Nigeria and Nigerians have lost our place, pride and position! That is the home truth!! There are indeed few Nigerians who are out there engaging in scamming and drug peddling. Please, before you heap blame and probably curses on these few bad eggs, take some time to think: if they have been gainfully employed in their nation, will some of them ever got involved in this mess? However, I will state that it is because these Nigerians do not imbibe proper values.

    Where are proper values of speaking and sticking with the truth; selflessness; humility; endurance; goodness; kindness; self reliant; diligence; tolerance; forgiveness, etc? Comrade Adams Oshiomole was returned as Governor recently in Edo State, still basking in the euphoria of his victory, he stated in the Guardian newspapers of Tuesday 17th July 2012:

    “The reason Nigeria is not making progress is that we are afraid to tell the truth. It is not a big deal to be a governor. But it is a big deal to tell the truth and to harass anyone who is responsible for dragging Nigeria backward.”

    In the course of my PhD research, I was opportune to interview Governor Babatunde Raji Fashola of Lagos State. I pointedly put it across to him: “What is your greatest value?” He responded by saying: “It is the ability to tell the truth”. Any wonder these two leaders are making waves in their states and getting reelected by winning up to 74% (Oshiomole) and 80% (Fashola) (sic) of total votes cast? This actually corroborates two scholars in the field of leadership research: Kouzes and Posner, the author of “The Leadership Challenge” (a book written as a result of over 25 years of research study spanning all the continents of the world). In the said book, many qualities were used to describe good leaders all over the world. In careful analysis, it was discovered that one trait mostly admired by followers in leaders was TRUTH.

    Religion:

    “Too much religion without God leading to moral laxity and materialism…This has resulted in the society worshipping and wining with wealthy individuals. We, as Christians…use the Scriptures as justification for our actions.”

    There is too much profession with little practice of real religion in Nigeria whether in Christianity, Islam or any other religion. Many Nigerians are too religious but practice lies, deceit, killing, stealing, kidnapping, etc. Which of the religions depict any of these traits of callousness and wickedness? In essence, there is much religion with much evil in our land as the motive of many Nigerians is crass materialism. Reading the lips of Richard Branson, the Chairman of Virgin Atlantics to decipher the tip of the iceberg in our value system:

    “Nigeria people are generally nice but the politicians are very insane… …The joint venture should have been the biggest African carrier by now if the partnership was allowed to grow, but the politicians KILLED it…Nigeria is a country we SHALL NEVER consider to doing business again..’’. “

    There was an instance, while studying in Malaysia for my PhD and things were tough for the first two years, I and my wife took a job in a call centre to augment our income. The first day at work, our Malaysian boss, after some few hours seeing our frustration as no one was virtually responding positively to our calls knowing we are Nigerians, called me aside. He told me: “Do not say you are a Nigerian, when the people asked about your nationality, just tell them, you are a South African”, I retorted by saying NO without a second thought. That was my last and only day there while my wife continued but also with a firm resolve NEVER to deny her nationality.

    Materialism or Mammon

    One point worth mentioning is that in the churches, mosques and universities, most of the leaders are no more interested in where the money comes from anymore. Once you have money, you can have the post or title; you can take the forefront seat; that honorary degree is for you, etc. It is like the Nigerian society worships money and material acquisition. It is so bad that parents no longer blush (apology to Professor Niyi Osundare), so far as their children or wards buy SUV, possess fat bank accounts, and build big mansions in cities and villages. These are the evidence of being “arrived”. No one is asking like the late father of Prof Niyi Osundare used to ask: “ibi sa ti re o re?” (Ekiti dialect interpreted to mean: where did he get his money from?) In essence, many want to now get money through any means and methods knowing virtually no one will query them as to the source of their wealth so far as it can be shared among friends, fans and family members.

    Conclusion:

    “If everyone will sweep their own doorstep, the whole world would be clean.”- Mother Theresa

    My appeal: let us all take time to reflect and honestly question our role in what went wrong with Nigeria in our own little way. In that wise, before you throw a stone at someone, examine yourself. It is imperative to point out that followers cannot “siddon look” (apology to late Chief Bola Ige) any longer. In essence, if followers will get the positive change envisaged, they need to rise up as a courageous bunch of followers with a strong voice to blow the whistle against bad leaders and stand up for good leaders. There is hope for Nigeria.

    · Dr Ekundayo, an organizational management and leadership researcher/consultant can be reached via: drjmoekundayo@hotmail.com.

  • Re: Of deathways, highways and Onolememen’s N652 billion

    Re: Of deathways, highways and Onolememen’s N652 billion

    Ordinarily, one would not have bothered replying Steve Osuji over his article published in last Friday’s (14th September, 2012) edition of The Nation Newspaper titled “Of Deathways, highways and Onolememen’s N652 billion’ but for the malicious falsehood contained therein.

    Osuji, apparently trying to create an unsupported parallelism between a recent accident along the Benin-Ore-Sagamu Expressway in which four lecturers of the Igbinedion University plunged into Ovia River and the awarded contract for its rehabilitation, claimed that the Federal Executive Council has just approved the award of the repairs of the road to the tune of N652 billion. This is not only false, but a deliberate misrepresentation of facts.

    As a senior editorial officer, trusted with a weekly column in the highly respected newspaper, Osuji ought to be abreast with accurate information, at best, cross check facts before disseminating same to the reading public.

    For the purposes of records, the rehabilitation of the third phase of the Benin-Ore-Sagamu Expressway was only approved by the Federal Executive Council on the 5th of September, 2012 for award to RCC Limited at the cost of N65.223 billion and not N652 billion as claimed by Osuji. The contract covers the rehabilitation of the outstanding sections of the Benin-Ofosu-Ore-Sagamu Expressway (Phase 111). The entire budgets for the Federal Ministry of Works in the past four years is not anywhere close to N652 billion, the figure quoted by Osuji as amount approved for the repairs of the third phase of Benin-Ore-Sagamu Expressway by the Federal Executive Council.

    Our friend Osuji would have made a balanced and beautiful article if he attempted to delve into the recent past condition of the Benin-Ore-Shagamu Expressway before the intervention of the present administration. If he did, he would have also told the reading public that barely six months after taking over as Minister of Works, Arc. Mike Onolememen substantively changed the condition of the road and commuters no longer have to spend over nine hours to shuttle between Lagos and Benin City. Not only that, the on-going works in the first two sections of the road have reached 89% and 91% respectively, making it possible for travellers from Benin to Lagos to make the journey in about four hours. Expectedly, no road has attracted commendations from the public like the Benin-Ore-Sagamu Expressway since Arc. Onolememen restored the perennial failed section at Ore.

    One would have thought that Osuji would highlight the series of abuses by motorists and other road users that are the remote causes of the recent accidents on the road. It is common knowledge that the expressway between Benin and Ore has been largely reconstructed and rehabilitated; yet motorists drive on both sides of the expressway facing each other, resulting in frequent accidents. Osuji ought to have asked why motorists cannot comply with the one-way directional movement inherent in a dual carriage way which is designed to avoid head-on collision that is still the bane of this expressway.

    It is our joy that all contractors working at various locations of the nation’s roads including the Onitsha-Enugu dual carriageway which he also mentioned, have just been paid by the Federal Ministry of Works and massive works will soon resume in a matter of days as the rainy season ends.

    Ikpasaja is

    S.A (Media) to

    the Minister of Works