Category: Commentaries

  • That empty apology

    That empty apology

    After slamming a 200 percent tariff hike on its data bundles, mobile network operator MTN has tendered an apology and begged forgiveness from its subscribers.

    Early last week, the network reputed as Nigeria’s largest telecom provider raised the cost of its 15GB data bundle by 200 percent against the backdrop of recent approval by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) for telecom operators to review their tariffs by 50 percent. Under the new template, MTN’s 1.8GB monthly plan now goes for N1,500, replacing the 1.5GB plan that was previously priced at N1,000. The 20GB plan soared to N7,500 from N5,500.

    Following persistent pressure by telecom operators for permisson to raise tariff in line with prevailing market conditions, NCC in January gave the nod for 50 percent hike. The regulator body, in a statement, said the approval was pursuant to its power under Section 108 of the Nigerian Communications Act (NCA) 2003 to regulate and approve tariff rates and charges by telecommunications operators. Network operators had pushed for some 100 percent increase, but NCC said it approved 50 percent taking into account industry reforms that should positively influence sustainability.  Subscriber groups, notably organised labour, protested the approval of tariff increase, but government considered it in the best interest of the sector and stood its ground.

    Read Also: AU endorses Nigeria as AfCFTA Digital Trade Champion

    MTN rammed in a 200 percent hike, though, and later last week apologised to subscribers. In a statement worded in informal conversational tone, the operator acknowledged the frustration of its customers over the ambush tariff increase, and sought to appease their outrage, asking that they “forgive and forget.”

    The statement in pidgin English said: “To our 15G digital bundle lovers, you dey vex. We know. We know how upsetting it must have been to suddenly wake up to a 200 percent increase on your favourite digital bundle. We could share several reasons, and provide explanations, but omo, all that one na story. We don cast. We get it and admit it. Let’s just say na mistake.” It added: “In this love season, don’t stay angry with us. Please forgive and forget. You matter, die, and we will never stop showing you how much. Let’s continue our relationship. Thank you for your understanding.”

    Hardball has been checking since the statement was issued to see whether the apology was meant to translate to a reversal of the tariff hike. Evidence shows the contrary. And so, you could ask what equation represents “forgive and forget” in conventional economics and what value it adds to subscribers when the tariff increase remains in place. By the way, what has happened to regulation, whereby the NCC gave approval for 50 percent hike but MTN imposed an overreaching 200 percent? By its statement, the network appears to have only mocked the helplessness of subscribers and the curious inaction of regulatory authorities.

  • Darkness unacceptable

    Darkness unacceptable

    Less than two months into the new year, Nigeria experienced another national power grid disturbance on February 12, after a similar incident that affected parts of the country on January 11. The Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) had attributed the January occurrence to line tripping.   

    Reports said the grid lost power generation before noon in the latest incident. Most power plants on the grid were reported to have lost generation when the incident occurred, including the Egbin power plant, Azura Edo, Geregu, Olorunsogo, Jebba, Omotosho, and Paras Energy, among others.

    For instance, Abuja Electricity Distribution Company said “a system disturbance occurred on the national grid… causing a power outage across our franchise areas.” Similarly, Ikeja Electricity Distribution Company said “we experienced a system outage…affecting all our feeders.”

    Later that day, TCN spokesperson Ndidi Mbah explained that the Omotosho-Ikeja West 330kV transmission line had tripped at the Omotosho end at the same time that the Benin-Egbin 330kV line was on a scheduled outage for mechanical line tracing. She added: “The tripping resulted in a cascaded outage affecting the Lagos, Abuja, and Osogbo axis. However, all other parts of the grid remained unaffected.” She also announced that normal power supply had been fully restored to the affected areas.

    The grid collapsed 12 times in 2024, according to reports. Predictably, the frequent collapse of the grid has been frustrating to Nigerian electricity consumers, including homes and businesses. If grid disturbance has occurred twice already in the first two months of the year, it is a disturbing sign that Nigerians should brace for worse. 

    Read Also: Imo community’s electrification project ends decades of darkness

    The President of the Nigeria Consumer Protection Network, Kola Olubiyo, who is also a member of the Technical Investigative Panel on Power System Collapses, implied that frequent grid collapses were inevitable because “the grid is stagnated, is limited, and is full of inefficiencies.”

    Even the Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, last year blamed grid collapses on the deplorable state of the country’s power infrastructure.  He argued that there was a need to have power grids in different regions or states to end frequent grid collapses.

    Interestingly, three days after the incident, TCN still felt it needed to clarify what happened. The company said in a statement on its X handle on February 15: “TCN management would like to reiterate that there has been no system collapse this year.” Also, it claimed to have the “exclusive right to provide information to the public about events and status of the grid.”

    It missed the point. Whether what happened was a “system disturbance,” a “system outage,” or a “system collapse,” darkness is unacceptable.

  • Tunji-ojo and quiet revolution in the ministry of interior

    Tunji-ojo and quiet revolution in the ministry of interior

    • By Hakeem Jamiu

    DR. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo stands as a beacon of transformative leadership within Nigeria’s Ministry of Interiors. His tenure has been marked by a quiet revolution, characterized by innovative initiatives and a steadfast commitment to enhancing the lives of citizens through effective governance. Under his guidance, the ministry has not only modernized its operations but has also set a new standard for accountability, transparency, and social justice.

    Dr. Tunji-Ojo has implemented a series of groundbreaking programs that have addressed pressing issues in immigration, correctional services, and fire safety. His initiatives reflect a profound understanding of the complexities of governance and a dedication to creating a safer, more efficient Nigeria. Some of these innovative and revolutionary initiatives and programs are discussed here under:

    “Safe Haven” has emerged as a key program aimed at enhancing national security and community safety. By fostering partnerships with local law enforcement and community leaders, Dr. Tunji-Ojo has ensured that citizens feel secure in their environments, laying the groundwork for a more harmonious society.

    The “Smart Border” initiative exemplifies his commitment to modernizing Nigeria’s border management. By incorporating advanced technologies, this program has streamlined border operations, making them more efficient and secure. This initiative not only enhances national security but also facilitates legitimate trade and travel, fostering economic growth.

    In response to the increasing need for effective disaster management, Dr. Tunji-Ojo established the “Disaster Response Unit.” This unit is dedicated to coordinating emergency responses and ensuring that Nigeria is prepared for any eventuality, demonstrating his proactive approach to governance and commitment to protecting lives and property.

    The introduction of the “E-Visa” system has revolutionized how Nigeria manages immigration. By simplifying the visa application process, this initiative has made it easier for foreign nationals to visit Nigeria, promoting tourism and international collaboration.

    Dr. Tunji-Ojo also championed the “Migration Information Data Analysis System” (MIDAS), which enhances the management of migration data. This system provides critical insights that inform policy decisions, ensuring that Nigeria can effectively address migration challenges.

    Recognizing the need for reform, he established the “Immigration Service Reform Committee”, which focuses on modernizing the operations of the Nigerian Immigration Service. This initiative aims to enhance efficiency, reduce corruption, and improve service delivery, ensuring that citizens receive the support they deserve.

    Read Also: Reforms impacting Immigration, Correctional Service, others, says Tunji-Ojo

    In the realm of correctional services, Dr. Tunji-Ojo has made significant strides with the “Rehabilitation and Reintegration Initiative”. This program emphasizes the importance of rehabilitating inmates and preparing them for reintegration into society, fostering a more humane and effective correctional system.

    The “Digital Case Management System” is another key achievement that streamlines the handling of cases within the justice system. By digitizing records and processes, this system enhances transparency and reduces delays, ensuring that justice is served promptly and fairly.

    Furthermore, the modernization of custodial centres, particularly the “Kuje Medium Custodial Centre”, reflects his unwavering commitment to improving the conditions of incarceration. By upgrading facilities and implementing best practices, Dr. Tunji-Ojo is working to create a correctional environment that encourages rehabilitation rather than punishment.

    Beyond his official duties, Dr. Tunji-Ojo is renowned for his philanthropy and dedication to social justice. His initiatives extend into communities, where he actively supports educational programs, healthcare initiatives, and empowerment projects. He understands that true leadership goes beyond policy; it involves uplifting the lives of those who are most vulnerable.

    His commitment to accountability and transparency is evident in every initiative he undertakes. Dr. Tunji-Ojo believes that good governance is rooted in the principles of integrity and openness, and he has made it his mission to instil these values within the Ministry of Interiors and beyond.

    It is an incontrovertible fact that Hon. Dr. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo’s tenure in the Ministry of Interiors serves as an inspiring model of effective leadership and innovation. His achievements in immigration, correctional services, and disaster management are a testament to what can be accomplished when vision is coupled with action. As he continues to champion the cause of accountability, transparency, and social justice, he not only transforms institutions but also uplifts the very fabric of Nigerian society.

    I must not end this piece without singling out our President, His Excellency Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, for special commendation for his remarkable foresight in appointing Hon. Dr. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo as the Minister of Interiors. His support in providing him with the enabling environment to excel is equally commendable and reflects the President’s dedication to fostering effective governance.

    Thank you, Mr. President, for your vision and leadership in empowering capable individuals like Dr. Tunji-Ojo to drive meaningful change in our nation.

    • Okelekwe writes from Abuja
  • 2027: Ogun West on my mind

    2027: Ogun West on my mind

    • By Kayode Oladele

    In all human affairs, there is always a time for realistic stock-taking whether as individual, collective groups, or corporate governance. Whichever way, self-evaluation is a good way to track progress, celebrate achievements, and adjust strategies. It also helps to identify strengths and weaknesses to evolve a means of overcoming them.

    Looking back at history, though we may have reasons to disagree on politics or style of governance, all successive administrations that had governed Ogun State have made significant impacts in turning the state into a land of opportunities. The state is lucky to have been ruled by great minds. And great minds, they say, think alike. Beginning from the first civilian governor, Bisi Onabanjo, to Aremo Olusegun Osoba, down to Otunba Gbenga Daniel (OGD), his successor, Senator Ibikunle Amosun, and the incumbent Governor, Prince Dapo Abiodun, there has been an abiding fate in the collective vision to make the state a trailblazer in education, industry, economy, administration and good governance. The same spirit has sustained the state’s peculiar advantage as the home of foremost leaders, great icons and pioneers, distinguished scholars, boardroom gurus and top-notch professionals Nigeria has had to parade. To date, Ogun State ranks high in the human development index, the most vital resource for greatness.

    It is not by accident that Ogun State has played the most significant role in moulding the stature and status of the Nigerian state since independence. From politics to administration, business to music, activism to education, Ogun State has an array of successful individuals who became national figures.

    Who will forget Chief Obafemi Awolowo whose contributions to political and human capital development loom large in Nigeria’s political firmament? What about the late Moshood Kashimawo Abiola (MKO), who bestrode the nation’s business and political landscape like a colossus, or Ernest Shonekan, the renowned head of interim government? In activism, the kutis-Afro music maestro, Fela Anikulapo, his brother Beko, and Dr Tai Solarin will forever be remembered for their tireless social crusade. Together, they formed the pantheon of heroes of our current democracy. The living legends among them like Olusegun Obasanjo, Prof. Wole Soyinka, Mike Adenuga, the Sofelas, etcetera, are like the knight in shining armour.

    Since it was carved out of the old western region on February on February 3, 1976, all successive administrations have played one unique role or the other in turning Ogun State into a land of opportunities. Thus, coming as the first civilian governor during the Second Republic (1979-1983), Bisi Onabanjo already had his job made easy with a clear roadmap to work with. And he gave his best to the state leveraging the oceanic plentitude of human resources available to implement his policies. His most enduring legacy is the establishment of Ogun State University (now, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye). With this vision, the university pioneered tertiary education development, turning the state into the nation’s education capital, having the highest number of universities and higher institutions of learning in the country. The university has produced several icons, administrators, business moguls, legal luminaries, educationists, literary giants, prominent entertainers as well as social and civil actors. It has also continued to attract, develop and nurture people from diverse backgrounds who are now playing pivotal roles in the phenomenal growth the state has recorded.

    Read Also: Ogun Customs harnesses Art to boost cross-border trade, economic integration

    Aremo Olusegun Osoba, who came into the saddle after nine years of the military interregnum, served twice as governor between 1992 and 1993 in the first instance and 1999 to 2003 at the advent of the present civilian dispensation. In both instances, he consolidated the achievements of his predecessors across all sectors, especially his rural electrification and rural roads  scheme which he vigorously pursued during his four-year second tenure. He resolved the age long portable water problems across the State particularly  in Ijebu-Ode and its environs  and brought good governance to the doorsteps of many rural dwellers in the State in accordance with the objectives of the millennium development goals (MDG). Civil servants were also accorded priority through the prompt payment of their salaries and allowances including regular promotions. 

    According to Governor Dapo Abiodun in one of his numerous encomiums on Chief Osoba, “throughout  his leadership (in Ogun State) , Chief Olusegun Osoba navigated challenges with foresight and determination, laying the foundation for the socio-economic growth we enjoy today.”

    The administration of OGD focused on industrialization and the establishment of technological educational institutions. He  started the construction of Ogun state agro cargo airport in Ilishan-Remo, an international air cargo port dedicated to offering direct export of agricultural products in Ogun state and Southwest Nigeria to the international community. He also established three free trade zones in each of the senatorial districts in Ogun State, namely, the Ogun Guangdong Free Trade Zone Limited, Igbesa, Ado-Odo/Ota Local Government Area, Olokola  Free Trade Zone (OKFTZ); Olokola Deep Seaport and Kajola Free Trade Zone in Ifo respectively in addition to the development  of  Abeokuta city center.  The slogan of his administration from  2003 to 2011 was “Re-awakening the sleeping giant”.

    Ibikunle Amosun also left a remarkable legacy in the development of the state with his statement of purpose, “Mission to rebuild Ogun State (MITROS). He left an indelible imprint in the sand of time with his road infrastructures and urban renewal programs which changed the face of Abeokuta, the State capital among others. In 2013  Businessday Newspaper in Lagos gave him the “Good Governor Award “ as the governor of the fastest growing state economy in Nigeria amongst several other laurels.

    Under the incumbent Governor Abiodun, the state has recorded phenomenal growth both in domestic and direct foreign investments, emerging as the leading most economically viable state in Nigeria. The pursuit of his transformation agenda as encapsulated in the ISEYA- “Building Our Future together” mantra can be summed up under the banners of his aggressive infrastructure development projects, creation of an enabling environment for investment, enhanced Ease-of-Doing-Business Index among others.

    His landmark achievements include massive economic growth. development of the Gateway International Agro-cargo Airport, Ilishan-Remo, Inland Dry Port, reconstruction and construction of about 600km road network across the three senatorial districts, multi-modal transport system etc.

    Governor Abiodun in one of his public statements declared that Ogun State is “the fastest growing investment and commercial destination not only in Nigeria, but in the entire West African sub-region, attracting one of the highest Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) and local investments.”

    Ogun State deserves a candidate who can take it up from the incumbent Governor and continue the good work. Consolidating these great strides cannot happen by accident. There must be a smooth transition that can guarantee the emergence of a competent, focused, committed and visionary candidate who can continue the good work of the present administration.

     Part of the reasons for the lack of continuity in development efforts in Ogun State is the absence of smooth or sustainable  transition from one administration to the other.  This has made the trajectory of growth haphazard, perfunctory and contradictory. Unlike Lagos State which has developed a comprehensive development master plan and a sustainable succession pattern, in Ogun State, every cycle of election has always come with acrimony and internal power squabbles. We must break loose from this trend to achieve some reasonable level of stability in the running of the affairs of the state. Without stability, the development progress of the state will be like a ball-room dance; one step forward and two steps backward.

    As 2027 approaches,   we cannot afford to follow the same path if we must maintain the state’s leading role as the most economically viable in Nigeria and an investment destination of choice. It’s a task before the stakeholders particularly, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in the state.

    The only way to avoid a repeat of the immediate past experience is for the principal stakeholders to be open, transparent and fair in their handling of this matter. In doing so, consensus-building is very critical. Not only that a transparent and open consensus-building process will guarantee the emergence of a credible candidate but also lessens the tendency for disagreement that often results from acrimonious or bitter contests. Acrimonious political contests serve no one’s interest; it destroys the unity and internal coercion of the party and ultimately its defeat. We cannot afford to tread that path. Happily, the APC is a very strong  political party that can stand any test of time time even though, we owe a duty to build and nurture it for the future prosperity of our state and our people.

    In doing so, we must address the concerns of the people of Ogun West with fairness and open-mindedness, focusing on the ultimate goal of achieving a seamless power transition to the next successor in the coming dispensation. So far, Ogun West has articulated genuine reasons for seeking the governorship slot and consistently engaged the relevant stakeholders in constructive dialogue. For mutual agreement, we have to approach the issues with the spirit of give-and-take.

    As an open contest, there is already an array of contenders from Ogun Central seeking the ticket of the APC. No less than six prospective aspirants of Egba extraction have signified their intention to take a shot at the governorship seat. It makes the power game more interesting and more inclusive.

    Much more exciting is the fact that unlike in the past when prospective candidates from Ogun West Senatorial District are hardly favored  statewide, there is currently a strong wave of bipartisan support, enthusiasm and popular  movement across the length and breadth of Ogun State for the Ogun West Senator, Aremo Solomon Olamilekan  Adeola  (Yayi ) whose beloved mother of blessed memory fortuitously hailed from Kemta Odutolu in Abeokuta, Ogun Central Senatorial District.  He currently enjoys massive support from maternal kinsmen in Abeokuta in addition to being regarded as a homeboy by his kit and kin in Ogun West.

    This presents a unique opportunity for the good people of both senatorial districts  to leverage their influence and goodwill to advance their collective agenda and kill two birds with one stone. Fortunately, the popular support and clamor for Senator Olamilekan Adeola (Yayi) to run for Ogun State’s Chief Servant in 2027 is not just borne out of the call for affirmative action for Ogun West that has been deprived of the opportunity since the creation of the State. It is indeed, a product of Yayi’s “political utilitarianism” which in a nutshell believes that government actions and policies  should maximize happiness for the people and he has left no one in doubt about his intentions to achieve happiness for the people of Ogun State which explains the reason why he is widely regarded across the State.

    That collective resolution though, is not to undermine the aspiration of other contenders who may want to exercise their fundamental rights to contest under a level playing field as guaranteed by the Constitution.

     Regardless of who we are and where we come  from, we need each other to survive and actualize our collective dreams and aspirations as a people. The future of Ogun State is in our hands. We are all equal stakeholders. However, every section must be given its fair deal to have a true sense of belonging. In our search for a credible candidate who can lead the state to the next level of development after the expiration of the tenure of Governor Abiodun, the stakeholders in Ogun State must ensure fairness, justice and equity.  The people of Ogun West Senatorial District must be given an exclusive opportunity and be supported to produce the next governor of our dear state.

    • Oladele is a former members of House of Representatives
  • 2027: Thoughts on opposition machinations

    2027: Thoughts on opposition machinations

    • By Tunde Rahman

    Opposition politicians have revved up their engine again ahead of the 2027 election. They are busy meeting, engaging in visitations, regrouping, and strategising under various platforms. And recently at a two-day event in Abuja themed “Strengthening Nigeria’s Democracy: Pathway to Good Governance and Political Integrity,” some of these opposition figures huffed and puffed, upbraiding the present government and disparaging President Bola Tinubu and the governing All Progressives Congress. Some of them, like the former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, have taken advantage of various public speaking opportunities to condemn the government’s policy options and decisions but offered little or no alternative course of action.

    This is dismaying. During the Second Republic when the defunct Unity Party of Nigeria leader, the late sage Chief Obafemi Awolowo, was the Leader of Opposition, he would dissect the policies of the National Party of Nigeria government of President Shehu Shagari, cut it down into granular details and offer clear, convincing and actionable alternatives. Awolowo’s interventions provided useful solutions that would have bolstered Nigeria’s economy and enriched our democracy, but unfortunately, that era lasted only four years and three months as the military struck.

    President Tinubu has barely spent two years in office. Yet, political opponents have upped the ante in a desperate move to grab power in 2027. The latest move in this direction was the visit last week of the defeated Peoples Democratic Party candidate in the 2023 presidential election, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, to former President Olusegun Obasanjo at his Abeokuta, Ogun State hilltop residence. Atiku was in company with former Sokoto State governor Aminu Waziri Tambuwal, former Cross River State governor Liyel Imoke and Senator Abdul Ningi from Bauchi State, all of the crisis-ridden PDP. The former vice president claimed the meeting had nothing to do with 2027. Anyone who believes him on that will believe anything. There was also New Nigeria People’s Party leader, Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwanso, who travelled all the way to Lagos from Kano to confer with former Osun State governor Rauf Aregbesola to discuss issues believed to be in connection with 2027. Ogbeni Aregbesola is leading the Omoluabi Group in Osun.

    Three sets of opposition groups are discernible at the moment. One group comprises President Tinubu’s opponents in the 2023 election who have refused to see, and perhaps may never see, anything good in the present government, hard as the administration works to reverse the past mistakes and dwindling fortunes of the country. These men contested the last election with the President and were roundly defeated both at the ballot and in court. However, they have continued to carry on as if the 2023 election cycle has not ended. In this group are former VP Atiku and former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi. Their depleting rank of supporters, called the Atikulated and Obidents, are in league with them in this cantankerous behaviour.

    The second group is made up of some erstwhile APC chieftains who claim to still belong in the party but have constituted themselves into opposition elements within. Bitter and vicious, they include former Minister of Transportation Rotimi Amaechi and some others who rightly or wrongly feel entitled to political appointmens and government patronage. Amaechi had detached himself from the APC since he lost out at the APC primaries in August 2022.

    The last group is composed of former APC leaders who are completely out of the party but now vigorously working against the party’s interests. Ogbeni Aregbesola belongs in this group.

    These three groups of opposition figures are working to take over power in 2027. They are aiming at forming a coalition to unseat APC. None has been consummated as of this time.

    It is relevant to ask: why are opposition parties in our climes unduly fixated about taking over power? It may be argued that the zero-sum nature of our politics, the winner-takes-all syndrome, is a contributory factor. But then, the role of opposition parties in a democracy is much more crucial. It is critical in determining the level of accountability and acceptability of governing parties as well as the overall quality of a country’s democracy.

    In his seminal work on the “Role of Opposition Parties in Developing Democracies” published in a journal by Democracy Works Foundation, Williams Gumede posits that,

    “Opposition parties provide alternative visions, policies, and leaders to the governing party. They scrutinise government decisions, policies, and actions – and play oversight over the executive and the public administration. They defend the voters’ interests – not only their constituencies, but all the country’s voters.”

    Read Also: Alleged bribery: House remains committed to protecting democratic institutions

    Indeed, opposition parties’ capacity to show the electorate they are credible alternatives is crucial to the credibility of the democratic system. The strength of the opposition in a democracy plays a key role in the quality of that democracy and, by extension, the effectiveness of the state. Gumede adds that, “a democratic system is significantly undermined if the opposition does not offer any credible alternatives to the governing party, is invisible in the public debate or does not have a public profile beyond during elections.”

    Although many will reckon that 2027 is still a long time and according to a Yoruba adage, the sun out there can still dry the clothes, nonetheless, it is doubtful if the opposition as currently constituted in Nigeria is capable of ousting the APC in 2027.

    This is why I surmise this way: the major opposition parties, the PDP, Labour Party, and of course NNPP are neck deep in crisis. They parade fragile leadership with seemingly unending court litigations. Generally, the opposition seems too uncoordinated and lacks focus. Any alliance by such groups can only be fickle and fissiparous. These opposition politicians are being driven by personal ambition, and not the interest of the country.

    Also, the matter of power rotation between the North and South over two terms is also an important factor that may work against the opposition. This factor and the machinations over 2027 may have prompted the Secretary to the Government of the Federation Senator George George Akume and APC National Chairman Abdullahi Ganduje to ask the North to wait till 2031 for another shot at power, arguing that President Muhammadu Buhari from the North had done eight years in office and that the South should be allowed to complete its eight years as well.

    APC National Secretary Senator Ajibola Basiru spoke on this seeming emptiness of the disgruntled opposition groups. In an interview with the Nigerian Tribune published on Wednesday, February 12, 2025, he doubted if the opposition parties had what it takes to successfully cobble a merger or form a united front against the APC.

    He declared: “The question is, for the economic policies of Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, what are the alternatives that the opposition has brought out, beyond just planning for the 2027 election. If 2027 comes, what do they want to campaign with, and what alternatives are you giving the people. They don’t have any alternative. The so-called opposition groups are just power-mongers. The only job they have is that they want to access government power for personal aggrandizement without any program or policies for the Nigerian people. I’m not a soothsayer, but they will not be able to merge because all the leading opposition figures are driven by personal ambitions.”

    Do I agree with the APC National Secretary? I think so.

    -Rahman is Senior Special Assistant to President Tinubu on Media, Publicity and Special Duties.

  • 2027: Thoughts on opposition machinations 

    2027: Thoughts on opposition machinations 

    By Tunde Rahman

    Opposition politicians have revved up their engine again ahead of the 2027 election. They are busy meeting, engaging in visitations, regrouping, and strategising under various platforms.

    And recently at a two-day event in Abuja themed “Strengthening Nigeria’s Democracy: Pathway to Good Governance and Political Integrity,” some of these opposition figures huffed and puffed, upbraiding the present government and disparaging President Bola Tinubu and the governing All Progressives Congress. 

    Some of them, like the former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, have taken advantage of various public speaking opportunities to condemn the government’s policy options and decisions but offered little or no alternative course of action. 

    This is dismaying. During the Second Republic when the defunct Unity Party of Nigeria leader, the late sage Chief Obafemi Awolowo, was the Leader of Opposition, he would dissect the policies of the National Party of Nigeria government of President Shehu Shagari, cut it down into granular details and offer clear, convincing and actionable alternatives. 

    Read Also: Why we’re still in Togo, Benin varsities despite FG’s ban on their certificates — Nigerian students

    Awolowo’s interventions provided useful solutions that would have bolstered Nigeria’s economy and enriched our democracy, but unfortunately, that era lasted only four years and three months as the military struck. 

    President Tinubu has barely spent two years in office. Yet, political opponents have upped the ante in a desperate move to grab power in 2027. The latest move in this direction was the visit last week of the defeated Peoples Democratic Party candidate in the 2023 presidential election, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, to former President Olusegun Obasanjo at his Abeokuta, Ogun State hilltop residence. 

    Atiku was in company with former Sokoto State governor Aminu Waziri Tambuwal, former Cross River State governor Liyel Imoke and Senator Abdul Ningi from Bauchi State, all of the crisis-ridden PDP. The former vice president claimed the meeting had nothing to do with 2027. Anyone who believes him on that will believe anything. There was also New Nigeria People’s Party leader, Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwanso, who travelled all the way to Lagos from Kano to confer with former Osun State governor Rauf Aregbesola to discuss issues believed to be in connection with 2027. Ogbeni Aregbesola is leading the Omoluabi Group in Osun.

    Three sets of opposition groups are discernible at the moment. One group comprises President Tinubu’s opponents in the 2023 election who have refused to see, and perhaps may never see, anything good in the present government, hard as the administration works to reverse the past mistakes and dwindling fortunes of the country. 

    These men contested the last election with the President and were roundly defeated both at the ballot and in court. However, they have continued to carry on as if the 2023 election cycle has not ended. In this group are former VP Atiku and former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi. Their depleting rank of supporters, called the Atikulated and Obidents, are in league with them in this cantankerous behaviour.

    The second group is made up of some erstwhile APC chieftains who claim to still belong in the party but have constituted themselves into opposition elements within. Bitter and vicious, they include former Minister of Transportation Rotimi Amaechi and some others who rightly or wrongly feel entitled to political appointmens and government patronage. Amaechi had detached himself from the APC since he lost out at the APC primaries in August 2022.

    The last group is composed of former APC leaders who are completely out of the party but now vigorously working against the party’s interests. Ogbeni Aregbesola belongs in this group.

    These three groups of opposition figures are working to take over power in 2027. They are aiming at forming a coalition to unseat APC. None has been consummated as of this time.

    It is relevant to ask: why are opposition parties in our climes unduly fixated about taking over power? It may be argued that the zero-sum nature of our politics, the winner-takes-all syndrome, is a contributory factor. But then, the role of opposition parties in a democracy is much more crucial. It is critical in determining the level of accountability and acceptability of governing parties as well as the overall quality of a country’s democracy.

    In his seminal work on the “Role of Opposition Parties in Developing Democracies” published in a journal by Democracy Works Foundation, Williams Gumede posits that,

    “Opposition parties provide alternative visions, policies, and leaders to the governing party. They scrutinise government decisions, policies, and actions – and play oversight over the executive and the public administration. They defend the voters’ interests – not only their constituencies, but all the country’s voters.”

    Indeed, opposition parties’ capacity to show the electorate they are credible alternatives is crucial to the credibility of the democratic system. The strength of the opposition in a democracy plays a key role in the quality of that democracy and, by extension, the effectiveness of the state. 

    Gumede adds that, “a democratic system is significantly undermined if the opposition does not offer any credible alternatives to the governing party, is invisible in the public debate or does not have a public profile beyond during elections.”

    Although many will reckon that 2027 is still a long time and according to a Yoruba adage, the sun out there can still dry the clothes, nonetheless, it is doubtful if the opposition as currently constituted in Nigeria is capable of ousting the APC in 2027. 

    This is why I surmise this way: the major opposition parties, the PDP, Labour Party, and of course NNPP are neck deep in crisis. They parade fragile leadership with seemingly unending court litigations. 

    Generally, the opposition seems too uncoordinated and lacks focus. Any alliance by such groups can only be fickle and fissiparous. These opposition politicians are being driven by personal ambition, and not the interest of the country.

    Also, the matter of power rotation between the North and South over two terms is also an important factor that may work against the opposition. This factor and the machinations over 2027 may have prompted the Secretary to the Government of the Federation Senator George George Akume and APC National Chairman Abdullahi Ganduje to ask the North to wait till 2031 for another shot at power, arguing that President Muhammadu Buhari from the North had done eight years in office and that the South should be allowed to complete its eight years as well.

    APC National Secretary Senator Ajibola Basiru spoke on this seeming emptiness of the disgruntled opposition groups. In an interview with the Nigerian Tribune published on Wednesday, February 12, 2025, he doubted if the opposition parties had what it takes to successfully cobble a merger or form a united front against the APC.

    He declared: “The question is, for the economic policies of Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, what are the alternatives that the opposition has brought out, beyond just planning for the 2027 election. If 2027 comes, what do they want to campaign with, and what alternatives are you giving the people. They don’t have any alternative. The so-called opposition groups are just power-mongers. The only job they have is that they want to access government power for personal aggrandizement without any program or policies for the Nigerian people. I’m not a soothsayer, but they will not be able to merge because all the leading opposition figures are driven by personal ambitions.”

    Do I agree with the APC National Secretary? I think so.

    – Rahman is Senior Special Assistant to President Tinubu on Media, Publicity and Special Duties.

  • Who is Zacch Adedeji, the FIRS boss?

    Who is Zacch Adedeji, the FIRS boss?

    By Arabinrin Aderonke 

    I have worked in media, development, and journalism fields for almost two decades, and I can attest that genuine leadership is uncommon, particularly in a country like ours, Nigeria. 

    Titles and personal accomplishments are not important; what matters is the capacity to put in effort, motivate, and uplift others. A perfect example of this is Dr. Zacch Adedeji, Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS). 

    In terms of leadership, this man is a force to be reckoned with; his influence is felt not just by his words but also by his actions. He has distinguished himself in Nigeria’s tax sector in many ways.

    The famous Dr. Martin Luther King once said, “The time is always right to do what is right.”  

    This quote captures the Tax Boss’s approach. He has taken responsibility for the whole tax system, not just his role. 

    Dr. Zacch has been spearheading some of the most innovative tax reforms in Nigeria’s history. These reforms were not just about improving tax collection; they were about ensuring a fair and transparent process for every Nigerian.

    Dr. Zacch is not only concerned with his success but also invests in the growth of his team. Many people express gratitude for his role as a mentor. The workforce he leads doesn’t just work for him; they grow because of him.

    The Tax Boss’s work ethic is something to emulate. If there’s one thing you can say about him, it’s that he is practical. He understands the weight of responsibility on his shoulders and approaches it with discipline. 

    FIRS has met and exceeded expectations, improving revenue generation in ways that many thought impossible. He has restored Nigeria’s faith in tax administration.

    He listens, engages, and makes sure everyone understands their position at FIRS. This has enabled him to easily implement necessary changes in the agency. 

    There is no confusion or chaos. Everything runs like clockwork because the Tax Boss is constantly thinking ahead, anticipating needs, and addressing problems before they become issues.

    Whether engaging with world-class economists or everyday Nigerians, he speaks with a clarity that makes complex issues understandable and solutions attainable. 

    It’s no surprise that he is widely respected and admired. Even Aliko Dangote, Africa’s richest man, once described him as a “smart guy.”

    The Tax Boss is more than simply a leader; he is a mentor, a visionary, and someone who is transforming the way leadership is seen. He leads with heart, dedication, and, most importantly, a concern for others, which is becoming all too rare these days.

    If you see a man who is ready to work, you will know. Dr Zacch’s actions speak louder than words. Congratulations to us all for having a leader who is all about making real change happen!

    Arabinrin Aderonke Atoyebi is the Technical Assistant, Broadcast Media, to the Executive Chairman, Federal Inland Revenue Service

  • Climate Governance in Nigeria: Challenges, opportunities, and the way forward

    Climate Governance in Nigeria: Challenges, opportunities, and the way forward

    • By Adebayo Adeleye

    Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. Rising temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, and increased frequency of extreme weather events are threatening the country’s economy, infrastructure, and human well-being. Effective climate governance is critical to addressing these challenges and ensuring a sustainable future for Nigeria. In this article, we will examine the current state of climate governance in Nigeria, highlight the challenges and opportunities, and propose a way forward.

    Current State of Climate Governance in Nigeria: Nigeria has made significant progress in establishing a framework for climate governance. The country has, among other things done the following:

    Ratified the Paris Agreement: Nigeria ratified the Paris Agreement in 2017, committing to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 20% by 2030.

    Established the National Council on Climate Change: The National Council on Climate Change was established in 2012 to coordinate climate change activities in Nigeria.

    Developed the National Climate Change Policy: The National Climate Change Policy was developed in 2012 to provide a framework for addressing climate change in Nigeria.

    Despite these efforts, climate governance in Nigeria faces significant challenges, which include;

    Inadequate Funding: Climate change activities in Nigeria are underfunded, hindering the effective implementation of climate policies and programs.

    Limited Institutional Capacity: The institutions responsible for climate governance in Nigeria lack the necessary capacity, expertise, and resources to effectively address climate change.

    Poor Coordination: Climate change activities in Nigeria are often fragmented and uncoordinated, leading to duplication of efforts and inefficiencies.

    Limited Public Awareness: There is a lack of public awareness and understanding of climate change in Nigeria, hindering the development of a national response to the challenge.

    However, opportunities abound which include;

    Renewable Energy: Nigeria has significant renewable energy potential, particularly in solar and wind energy, which can help reduce the country’s dependence on fossil fuels.

    Sustainable Agriculture: Climate-resilient agriculture practices can help Nigerian farmers adapt to the impacts of climate change and improve their productivity.

    Eco-Tourism: Nigeria’s rich biodiversity and natural resources can be harnessed to develop eco-tourism, which can help reduce poverty and promote sustainable development.

    International Cooperation: Nigeria can leverage international cooperation and funding to support its climate change efforts and access new technologies and expertise.

    Read Also: Why Tinubu’ll be re-elected in 2027, by Kwankwaso

    The Way Forward: To address the challenges and harness the opportunities, Nigeria needs to:

    Strengthen Institutional Capacity: Build the capacity of institutions responsible for climate governance in Nigeria, including the National Council on Climate Change.

    Increase Funding: Mobilize funding from domestic and international sources to support climate change activities in Nigeria.

    Improve Coordination: Enhance coordination among government agencies, civil society organizations, and the private sector to ensure a cohesive national response to climate change.

    Raise Public Awareness: Launch public awareness campaigns to educate Nigerians about the impacts of climate change and the importance of taking action.

    Develop Climate-Resilient Infrastructure: Invest in climate-resilient infrastructure, including sea walls, levees, and green roofs, to protect Nigerian communities from the impacts of climate change.

    In conclusion, climate governance in Nigeria requires a multi-faceted approach that addresses the challenges and harnesses the opportunities. By strengthening institutional capacity, increasing funding, improving coordination, raising public awareness, and developing climate-resilient infrastructure, Nigeria can build a more resilient and sustainable future for its citizens.engthening Leadership and Institutions: Establishing a robust institutional framework is crucial. This can be achieved by ensuring the National Council on Climate Change meets regularly to support effective coordination within the government.

    Improving Policy and Planning: Nigeria needs to reconcile differences in ambition between its net zero target and overall sectoral targets. This will ensure short- and medium-term planning aligns with long-term goals. Mainstreaming climate objectives into sectoral policies is also vital.

    Enhancing Transparency and Accountability: Developing a fully operational Greenhouse Gas Inventory System and improving tracking of climate finance and mitigation actions are essential.

    Promoting Public Engagement and Education: Raising climate literacy among the general public is critical. Integrating climate change into educational curricula, as provided for in the Climate Change Act, is a positive step.

    Supporting a Just Transition: Nigeria must address concerns over fossil fuel subsidy reform and ensure compensatory programs are in place to support those affected by the transition to a low-carbon economy.

    By addressing these areas, Nigeria can significantly improve its climate governance and move towards achieving its net zero ambitions.

    Dr. Adebayo Matthew, Adeleye (Ph.D., Ibadan)

    Researcher on Environmental Pollution and Control badeleye@gmail.com  +234 803 525 6450

  • Trump should be a wake-up call!

    Trump should be a wake-up call!

    President Donald Trump of the United States of America is a creation of time. The key point is not in changing America. Instead, Trump is revealing America as it is! The America that we knew – represented by F.D. Roosevelt, J.F. Kennedy and Jimmy Carter – was perhaps just a fleeting moment or a facade. Trump’s presidency has exposed the underlying realities of the country, making it clear that the perceived America was not entirely genuine.

    Trump epitomizes the body and the spirit of the White conquest of Native Americans, which is reflected in his immigration policy. On the surface, his policy aims to eliminate illegal immigrants, criminal gangs and narcotics dealers. However, in reality, Trump, as POTUS, and his supporters are pursuing a Whites-only immigration agenda, similar to the one once employed by Australia, which has now been discarded. The response to South Africa’s land reforms is clearly in this direction.

    Trump’s offer to allow White South Africans to immigrate to the US as refugees is disquieting, especially since this opportunity wasn’t extended to Palestinians or other groups. But then, this move isn’t surprising, given the long-standing discussions in the US about repopulating sparsely populated states like Wyoming, Montana and Idaho. The president seems to view this as a chance to appeal to those who fear losing their demographic majority.

    Not everything is wrong with Trump! For instance, his administration’s cost-effective unit aimed at reducing waste and inefficiency in government aligns with the recommendations of Nigeria’s Oronsaye Report, which was submitted in 2012. It’s ironic that Trump is implementing reforms that Nigeria should have undertaken years ago. This highlights Nigeria’s slow pace in addressing its own inefficiencies. Importantly, while Trump’s policies, such as dismantling USAID and the Department of Education, are not entirely commendable, his focus on cost-efficient units could serve as a catalyst for Nigeria to revisit and implement the Oronsaye Report’s recommendations.

    Similarly, Nigeria seems to expect the US, under Trump’s leadership, to take responsibility for recovering its stolen wealth. However, if the US Department of Justice is no longer pursuing cases against individuals who have looted Nigeria’s treasury and stashed the funds in the US, it raises questions about Nigeria’s own role in addressing corruption. Ultimately, the issue reveals the shape and size of a deeper problem: why does Nigeria have such weak institutions that billions of dollars can be easily embezzled and laundered abroad?

    So, Trump’s actions should be a wake-up call for us to “padlock the stable doors” to prevent the horse from bolting. It’ll be in our interest not to allow other countries to capture the horse which has fled because we refused to padlock the stable doors. Padlocking the stable doors should have involved setting up a congressional budget office to monitor and police a budget process since 1999. That this was not done and it’s not about to be done shows a complete and utter lack of seriousness in our curbing waste and corruption.

    Read Also: First Lady calls for sustainable health financing in Africa

    In addition, the refusal to use a performance planning budgeting system, first proposed by the late Omowale Kuye as the Director General of Budget in 1983, reveals a lackadaisical attitude towards budget and project management and implementation. So, no one can, or should, hold Trump responsible for Nigeria’s ineptitude.

    Trump and his supporters had a clear agenda, Project 2025, which became public knowledge before his presidential nomination. Since his tariff policies would likely have far-reaching effects on Nigeria, Nigeria should have prepared countermeasures in case he won, but did we? Were we fully prepared for the impact of his presidency? Canada was well-prepared, and swiftly responded to Trump’s policies. In contrast, Nigeria’s history shows it was once adept at preparing for economic challenges, such as the 1967 devaluation of the British pound sterling. But not anymore!

    Again, the question remains, where did we lose the plot and what’s next for Nigeria? Now, Nigeria faces brain drain, with doctors leaving the country daily. Was that also caused by Trump? Ours isn’t just a matter of sensible or senseless governance; it’s a result of successive governments failing to effectively communicate with the people. They’ve either used the wrong channels or struggled to convey their message, leaving a gaping hole in their connection with the electorate. Consequently, governments are often caught off guard, scrambling to respond to issues that could have been addressed through proper communication.

    The prosperity of the developed world was built on the exploitation and suffering of Black slaves. Unfortunately, the legacy of colonialism and slavery continues to haunt us, with the scars of pillage, human trafficking and forced labour still evident. Iconic symbols of power, such as the White House, were constructed on the backs of enslaved Africans. Similarly, the Arab world’s economy flourished thanks to Mansa Musa’s wealth and the trans-Saharan trade. Yet, despite these historical contributions, the Black world remains economically and socially shackled. 

    The Bible and Koran, scriptures that advocate for compassion, justice and humility, now serve as a stark contrast to the hypocrisy of their proponents. Colonial powers, who claimed to represent Christianity, exploited our resources, enslaved our people, and treated them as commodities rather than human beings.

    As we reflect on Nigeria’s economic challenges, it is essential to consider the importance of informed leadership. The story of the Pharaoh “which knew not Joseph” serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of ignorance and the importance of informed leadership. As if two wrongs have equaled a right, the actions of Pharaoh and Trump share a common thread – both leaders sought to maintain power and control over perceived threats. Pharaoh viewed the Israelites as a danger to his authority, while Trump has portrayed undocumented immigrants as a threat to national security and American jobs.

    Ancient civilizations also offer valuable lessons in leadership. In Greece, for instance, Oedipus Rex serves as a moral lesson about the dangers of hubris and ignorance. Likewise, India’s Mahabharata tells the story of the blind king, Dhritarashtra, who ignored wise counsel and led his kingdom to ruin. China’s concept of ‘Mandate of Heaven’ emphasizes the importance of morally just leadership. Conversely, Africa’s ‘Ubuntu’ philosophy prioritizes community and interconnectedness. It highlights the need for leaders to consider the well-being of all people, not just their own constituents. This concept is often cited as a counterpoint to Trump’s ‘America First’ ideology.

    Now that Trump has declared war on everybody, it might be a unique opportunity for Nigeria to take control of our economic destiny and build an economy based on self-reliance and the search for export-oriented, value-added policies in order to balance its books, end the perennial current accounts deficits and smash the mould of boom-to-bust cycles. Even as he continues to defy conventions and push the boundaries of executive power, dear country should learn from its history and leverage the population dynamics of countries like the United States and India to create a more sustainable and resilient economy.

    The Chinese ideograph for CRISIS is, on one side, Danger, and, on the other side, Opportunity. Essentially therefore, Trump’s second coming presents a fantastic opportunity for Nigerians. We should seize it with both hands. We shouldn’t ask other countries to do for us what we are expected to do for ourselves. In a word, failure to have a coherent response to Trump’s ‘wahala’ only means that Nigeria will continue to move, irresistibly, in the direction of boom-to-bust, underperformance and underachievement, with more Nigerians sliding into poverty. And that will be sad!

    May the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, grant us peace in Nigeria!

  • Advertising: A vote for structured regulation

    Advertising: A vote for structured regulation

    • By Soji Akinremi

    I was intrigued by some of the perspectives shared by accomplished journalist and former presidential spokesman, Mr. Segun Adeniyi, in The Verdict, his weekly column in the 6 February edition of ThisDay.

    Of particular interest to me was the section of the article portraying the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON) as a barrier to entrepreneurship, stopping just short of likening ARCON to the Third Reich due to the extent of its regulatory powers over Advertising messages.

    Many would likely come to a similarly unflattering conclusion after reading the story presented in the article, and they would have a reason for their judgment. A friend of the writer’s received a letter from ARCON demanding a payment of N1 million as a fine imposed for promoting her restaurant without obtaining the required vetting approval certificate from the Advertising Standards Panel. The letter also stated that any promotional attempts must be communicated to ARCON before publication.

    There was, commendably, no hint, however subtle, that ARCON used powers it does not have. Article 148 (b) of the ARCON Act 2022 stipulates pre-vetting and it was in the exercise of that power that it sought to penalize “call this place (the restaurant) for food,” which was the message it deemed as advertising.

    The conclusion reached was that the matter should not fall under the jurisdiction of the law, a situation that was further escalated by another demand notice from ARCON, requesting N1 million from an individual unconnected to the restauranteur. This demand was made for posting about the restaurant on TikTok, which, along with Instagram, is the preferred platform for food vendors.

    Also of interest is the article’s dim view of the expansion of ARCON’s jurisdiction to promotional messages by influencers, bloggers, comedians, skit makers and brand owners. If I ran a business in areas under ARCON’s oversight or preferred an ethics-free trade zone, which Nigerians love to bits, I would feel uneasy like the restauranteur and I would feel justified.

    The article’s view of the advertising regulatory framework, which it described as “ridiculous and dangerous”, and as one of the useless laws made by the National Assembly appears to be a vote for a return to the ethics-free trade zone.

    I want to believe that it was a nod innocently given, not agenda-driven.

    Innocence, however, offers no shield against exploitation by the unscrupulous or even those genuinely persuaded that they offer solutions. What can help is regulation, the type the advertising regulatory framework was developed to do.

    Social media platforms, for example, are crawling with medically unqualified influencers – many with millions of followers- exploiting the absence of easy medical solutions by posing as experts and selling fake cures for cancer, stroke, fibroids, hypertension and diabetes, hair fall and sexual wellness among others. The messages, which make extravagant claims of complete reversal of terminal conditions, have duped people of their money and well-being.

    Often, this is done through the creation of fake social media pages and profiles devoted to the circulation of unscientific treatment solutions, magical remedies and panacea for terminal illnesses. Video testimonies, often manipulated ads, in the form of real incidents are a major tool used to canvas customers searching for alternative treatment options.

    What this convinces me of is that the field cannot be left to every Tom, Dick or Harry whether he is a restauranteur, mixologist, financial service provider, health and wellness-focused entity or property company. A responsible society protects consumers from false information and, misleading claims, financial scams, and messages capable of compromising public health. The existence of regulatory frameworks worldwide ensures that advertising messages are accurate, transparent, and developed with consumer safety in mind. The notion that regulation hinders entrepreneurship and job creation is not only misguided but also perilous, reminiscent of the discussions surrounding commercial motorcyclists AKA Okada Riders. In their defense against threats of an outright ban or restriction, sympathizers argue that their right to earn a living must not be curtailed.

    Read Also: Why Tinubu’ll be re-elected in 2027, by Kwankwaso

     Supporters argue that, given the harsh economic situation, riders should not be banned or restricted to prevent them from resorting to crime. While the arguments are not invalid, we cannot take the right to earn a living as one that includes the right to endanger passengers, causing injury or worse. That the economy is harsh and people need to be encouraged to do honest work cannot be a licence to daredevilry that often yields grotesque outcomes.

    Globally, ethical advertising frameworks are considered essential for consumer trust, market stability, and economic growth. Nigeria, with its dizzying socio-cultural diversity, is at higher risk of advertising without structured regulation. Nearly three years ago, the Sterling Bank Easter advertising campaign drew a controversial comparison between Jesus rising from the grave and the in-oven rising of “Agege Bread”. This comparison nearly sparked an explosion of sectarian outrage across the country. Fortunately, the situation was defused thanks to the intervention of ARCON, which insisted on the removal of the offensive imagery.

    Last year, similar emotions were stirred, also around Easter, by a Federal Inland Revenue Service ad campaign (“Christ Paid for Sins, Not Taxes”). This also had to be withdrawn to forestall an eruption of public outrage.

    The real estate sector has been a happy hunting ground for many a scam artist, abetted, perhaps innocently, by big-time influencers, who endorse the false investment prospectus of shady real estate companies. 

    Without regulation, scam artists will be happily skipping around town, while those whose money they would have taken will be next door to poverty.

    We love to tout “saner climes” as places of limitless freedom. That does not apply to advertising. The United States’ Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is strict in its enforcement of fidelity in advertising. Three years ago, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) slammed a fine of $1.26 million on Kim Kardashian for promoting a cryptocurrency token on Instagram without due process and a disclosure that she had been paid the sum of $250,000 for the gig. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) insists on pre-clearance for medical advertisements to protect consumers from medications without scientific validation, a system credited with preventing the exposure of 45 misleading drug advertisements to the public. Lives and organs have been saved, without a doubt.

      I believe, that the suggestion that ARCON imposes a blanket ₦1 million fine for a breach of its framework, thereby putting small businesses under enormous strain, is an honest misunderstanding of what obtains. The vetting fee is ₦15,000, which covers the administrative costs of reviewing advertising content. The ₦1 million fine is only imposed on those who deliberately violate regulations. This is intended to serve as a deterrent, not a standard charge. Also, it is not something you do not find in other climes Those in breach of advertising regulations in the UK expose themselves to fines that could be as high as £500,000. In the U.S., a breach could invite a multimillion-dollar fine. In both countries, the message is the same: compliance attracts a minimal cost, while a breach can cause a nosebleed in terms of a fine.

    The article’s assertion that industry players have been ambushed seems to arise from a lack of understanding regarding engagement efforts with stakeholders—such as influencers, SMEs, agencies, and the public—on compliance requirements.

    The regulations are not perfect. Not many, if any, are. A stronger campaign, in my view, should be that ARCON, whose tribunal is immune from litigation, should not be the complainant, prosecutor and judge in a matter in which it is heavily invested.

    •Akinremi writes from Lagos.