Category: Commentaries

  • Time to rise against Boko Haram

    This time it is in a boarding school in Yobe, one of the northern states.  Children have been slaughtered in their sleep.  The report was on one of the African TV channels on the Sky platform. The crime scene is a unity school. Boko Haram has desecrated the altar again. After all we have been through as a nation, must our children be butchered so?  Remember, the price we paid, and our resolve – “To Keep Nigeria One is a Task that Must be Done!”

    The news report included a clip of an interview with President Goodluck Jonathan – a file tape – evidence that we had encountered this challenge before.  It required a voice-over to make our President’s speech discernible; that is just a mild irritation regarding the insinuation that the Nigerian president didn’t speak clearly.  It would not matter if it were merely an insult or perceived dent to our collective ego.  What matters more is the symbolism of the president’s physical and aural posturing.   These were very symbolic, suggestive of the kid gloves with which this matter of Boko Haram is being handled. The President appeared to be wringing his hands, while pledging to do his best.  The image spoke of a man, indeed a nation perplexed by a band of hoodlums.  That file tape had been recorded after a previous atrocious incident committed by the group and there has been several.

    According to their profile on the BBC News website, the Boko Haram was established in 2002.  Their mission and grievances are unclear; though they have declared a war against western education, it is not clear what they seek to achieve by their wanton destruction of life, and they have been getting bolder in their senseless aggression towards the rest of us.  According to BBC’s timeline of their activities, their earliest attacks was in 2009, that is five years ago.  Records from Nigerian media which have more intimate knowledge of the localised incidents will no doubt be more comprehensive; they are like to have accounts of earlier albeit ‘smaller’ incidents which world media had missed.  Not so those in states like Borno, Bauchi and Yobe who felt the blows dealt.  These are states in the extreme north-east, but the people (victims) are our compatriots.  In terms of social infrastructure, their needs are far greater than what is required in most other states.  Yobe is far behind on various indices of development and Boko Haram merely compounds the situation, laying siege on the locals, redefining concepts of nationality and citizenship by the selection of their targets, instilling fear, deepening isolation and stifling meaningful economic or development activity as well-meaning development agents stay away.  I mean who wants to die?  In its 12th year of existence, Boko Haram continues to wax strong.

    By 2011, the group gained national and global notoriety, first by attempting to disrupt the inauguration of the President in May.  Some of our international guests gave that ceremony a miss.  On that occasion there was no big bang in Eagle Square Abuja, but some Nigerians in the northern states paid the price for Boko Haram’s publicity. There was another media spectacle which they created in June.  It was a forerunner for more despicable acts to follow, a blatant act of defiance to the authorities.  The move shouted loudly, “Catch me if you can!”   They took on the Police Headquarters in Abuja with such impunity.  In this they had desecrated the altar, but not much progress was made in apprehending them and securing the nation.  By August, global media attention was secured by bombing the UN building in Abuja.  World community had been defied; Boko Haram gained recognition as a terrorist group with two fingers in the air.  The response from our leaders? Pledges and promises, some hollering, some arrests, some criminals paraded, some vagabonds roam free, and the carnage continued till the mother of all atrocities.  We thought we had seen the worst with that attack on the churches in Abuja on Christmas day 2011.  Three years later, many senseless violent acts in between, and here we are again lamenting the killing of defenceless children in the dead of night. Haba!  This is no act of terror, it is an act of cowardice that must be stopped.

    Why have we been so helpless in tackling this issue?  Is there a growing numbness in citizens and leaders alike, to the situation?

    As citizens we have been ‘quiet’ for too long.  Our silence makes us complicit, so no more of that.  We must cash in the dividends of democracy and call on our president to stop ‘wringing his hands’ and ‘pledging his best’. He is an elected President, he must give an account of his stewardship now.  As the commander-in-chief of the nation, what has he done?  Who or what are the obstacles in his way?  We have seen in other shores, what leaders do when children are massacred.  These are not even the consistent purging that the Boko Haram campaign is turning out to be. We have seen the response of the leaders in those places; their sorrow, sense of indignation and resolute commitment to root out evil. Not so in this case. Our president dare not visit the crime scene, make solemn declaration to obtain justice for the slain.  Or can he?  What would he do if any of the deceased were his children? Come to think of it, they are!   These were students in a Federal Government College, while in school, they are wards of the federal government, just like the youth corpers who are in the service of the nation.  Many of these have also been slain by the same Boko Haram in the course of their service, with what reprisals?  Boko Haram is getting more audacious – launching their attack in government premises on hapless children as they sleep.  It really is time for a concerted effort.

    Frankly the President is not the only one to be indicted.  Everyone who has ever ruled or led in this country, every person of political (religious or economic) influence (and that includes the traditional structures – emirs, obas, obis, all the titled persons in the land, lords spiritual and temporal, captains of industry with extensive distribution networks), if you have a sphere of influence and can reach people in your constituency you have a duty and a role to play.  The closer you are to the grassroots, the more effective you can be.  But to those whom we have elected to govern must the burden fall.  Don’t you just wonder what happens at the governors’ forum?  What about our legislators, councillors and local government chairpersons?  Are they simply jostling for power – deliberating on who should lead, who is in or out of favour.  This is the time for action, not for sharing spoils of war.  It is time to form lobby groups and networks that can appeal to the good sense of those propping up Boko Haram.  It is time to reap the benefit of the extensive and expensive political machinery that we run.

    I say on this occasion, let the women take the lead.  Let’s take a cue from the Leymah Gbowee (2011 Nobel Peace Prize winner) and the Liberian Women’s Mass movement for Peace. They “prayed the devil out of hell”, on their knees and with their heads. Surely, Nigerian women can do so too! Already there are calls for rallies, for prayer and fasting.  That is a start. Let us rally women’s groups nationwide – market women’s associations could be the focus for our grassroots movement.  Let us say “No more of these violent acts!”  We are more in number than them, we should not be intimidated.  They have machetes, bombs and guns, but we have our cooking pots and feminine wiles.  We can constitute a superior intelligence force as our sisters in Liberia did.  But we must be resolute and refuse to compromise.  The task is daunting, but it may not even be so onerous, once there is the political will to act, and efforts are not compromised.

    If our mothers – Funmilayo Ransome Kuti, Madam Tinubu, Margaret Ekpo, the Aba women, Hajiya Gambo Sawaba and all their collaborators could put a stop to oppression in their time, so can we.  Really enough is enough. Our Liberian sisters eschewed the temporary comforts to get lasting gain for their children.  Women of Nigeria, arise against violence from Boko Haram and those who one way or another aid their dastardly acts.

    • Dr Esan writes from School of Media & Film, University of Winchester, UK

     

  • Ahmed and the northern economy

    Walking through the streets of Kaduna, you see several relics of the city’s once fabulous and thriving textile industry. Kaduna was once the centre for textile industry while neighbouring states of the north also shared in the prosperity of the region that was linked to its then thriving agricultural sector.

    But that was then. Today the textile industry in Kaduna is a shadow of itself. So are other industries that once made the north proud. The region has lost its once firm grip on the productive sector of the economy and is currently subject to the dictates of allocations from oil revenues from the South-south.

    Recently, leaders of the north under the auspices of the Arewa Consultative Forum, ACF, gathered to rub minds on how to extricate the region from this ugly situation, reverse the trend and restore the glory of the north as they met it when many of them were toddlers.

    And in looking for a man to draw a map to point the way forward, they found one in Abdulfatah Ahmed; the eloquent and resourceful governor of Kwara State, without doubt a man with testimony on the topic that became the focus of the gathering: “Northern Nigerian Economy Free of Oil Revenue”. In Kwara, Ahmed, first as Commissioner for Finance and later Economic Planning before assuming the mantle of leadership of the state, has been part of an award winning strategy to reposition the state, and indeed the nation’s understanding and involvement in agriculture. He is a man with deep experience in the mix of politics and economics, who is passionate not only about diversification of our economy, but potentials of an agribusiness.

    Those who chose him were sure they made the right decision after listening to his lecture. It was an admixture of bitter truth about the realities facing the region and what it can do to save the situation. He left the leaders to ponder on two critical questions: For how long will the north allow others to threaten her with economic strangulation unless she moved in a particular political direction? When will oil revenues that are outside the control of the region cease to determine the future of the people of Northern Nigeria?

    According to Ahmed, the extent to which Northern Nigeria controls its economic resources will ultimately determine the degree of its political power and by extension, its freedom. In other words, if the north cherishes real political freedom and power, it should strengthen its agricultural base where it has comparative advantage over other regions.

    His words: “ I hold that only effectively planned and managed agribusiness can sustain a Northern Nigeria economy free of oil revenues. Additionally, l assert that in order to achieve the agro-based prosperity that this region so deserves, we must also engender good governance, grow the right institutions to implement appropriate policies while entrenching equity and respect for rule of law as the foundations of agro-led prosperity”.

    “However, we must not mistake agribusiness for the ad hoc and centralized approaches to commercial agriculture that we have implemented over the years. Neither do I advocate the isolated agriculture programs implemented with limited success by states in the region. Rather, I propose an approach that fully explores specified value chains by providing inputs to farmers and connecting them to consumers through the financing, handling, processing, storage, transportation, marketing and distribution of agro products. Each point of this value chain promises significant opportunities for economic activities, jobs and markets that will also grow the revenues of other components of the chain especially the small holder and large commercial farming concerns.

    He went on: “An obvious benefit of this approach is the emphasis on value addition as opposed to the sale and export of primary produce that has dominated our agriculture over the years. Furthermore, this approach also makes it possible to forecast demand and therefore the expected financial returns due to its demand driven approach. The demand driven approach ensures that farmers and others along the value chain know from the beginning who will buy their produce or require their services. Indeed, Northern Nigeria’s antecedents in agriculture and its current share of the food supply market in Nigeria clearly demonstrate that its agribusiness opportunities are limitless. There remain largely untapped opportunities for agribusiness in the region, especially in view of high prices for food locally, regionally, and globally. Definitely, the economic future of this region lies squarely in appropriately planned agribusiness.

    “However, to achieve this vision of agribusiness-driven prosperity in Northern Nigeria, we must move beyond rhetoric and return to the basics.”

    What were his proposed solutions to the challenges facing the region?

    He listed them as follows: “One, we must put in place the necessary ingredients for building a prosperous agro-based economy.  Two, we must focus on human capital development through the provision of functional education and access to affordable health care. Three, there is need for greater collaboration among the 19 northern states so that each can leverage on the others’ strengths in agribusiness for optimal resource utilization and to eliminate wastage.

    “Four, I call for a Northern Nigeria Agribusiness Summit to fashion a roadmap for the restoration of our regions prosperity.  Five, at the core of successes and failures in our polity highlighted earlier is the quality of governance. Political parties must entrench a democratic tradition that ensures adherence to rule of law, equity, and good governance by those elected on their platform.  Six, as part of efforts to free the Northern Nigeria Economy, the 19 component states must increase their Internally Generated Revenue.”

    But above all, there was still a clincher the leaders were asked to literarily put in their left palm to avoid eating with it. He said:  “let me make something very clear. For as long as the greater proportion of those without western education live in Northern Nigeria, for as long as majority of our people live below the poverty line, as long as we harbour the largest number of people afflicted by disease, as long as our region remains a theatre of war, as long as our youths remain afflicted by unemployment, the vision of agribusiness-based prosperity that I have outlined above will remain a mirage.”

    Thus he said it has become  a matter of urgency for northern leaders to take firm action to end despair and deprivation in Northern Nigeria. And the way to do it according to the banker-turned politician is to prioritize people-focused governance that urgently transforms the lives of the average northerner.

    Speaking, the no nonsense General Buhari charged northern governors not to allow Governor Ahmed’s submission go the way of similar recommendations submitted to the Northern States Governors’ Forum 10 years ago.  Earlier in his submission, Chairman, ACF Board of Patrons, General Yakubu Gowon, said Ahmed’s submission was timely, though warned that oil revenue should not be regarded as a curse simply because such revenue has been misapplied in the past at the expense of the well -being of most Nigerians.

    At the end, participants agreed that Ahmed had provided a workable solution to the restoration of the glory of the north. What is left now is the action to implement the policy directions he provided.

    •Oba writes from Ilorin.

  • Toxic marriages

    Believe it or not, this was a public notice advertisement in this newspaper: “This is to notify the general public that Mr. Hakeem Adelabu-Soule and Miss Atinuke Monsurat Odushina are no longer married since July 19, 2010. Lagos State Government and the general public should please note.”

    Skeeter Davis (real name, Mary Frances Penick, 1931-2004), the famous American country music crooner, sang in one of her numbers: “Don’t say you love me, if you can’t change my name …”

    If the purest of love inevitably ends in marriage: a man, taking in a woman and, in the words of Skeeter Davis, changing her name to his, what leads to divorces — or worse: the purest of hate?

    Take a look again at the public notice advert quoted above. What would the once lovey-dovey couple want to achieve by such vile publicity? Probably one of the couple works for Lagos State; and despite being separated — or even divorced — from her spouse, she still bears his name? Would that qualify for impersonation?

    Or is the partner just riled that she had not re-changed her name fast enough? And the general public — what is their business in taking note that a once-upon-a-time happy couple are now bitterly apart? Ah, is the time coming when divorce bashes would be thrown with equal gaiety as wedding parties?

    What love gone sour! What bitterness! Folks, it would appear the age of toxic marriages!

    Yet, weddings are never so merry and so elaborate. But what is the point of elaborate weddings — a weekend economy in itself — if the marriage would crash with the former couples hating each other for life?

    Still, it could be worse. The story is told of a tragic woman in Ibadan, whose marriage left her, but whose parents insisted she should not leave the marriage. After yet another quarrel between husband and wife, the poor woman fled to her parents’ home. Better alone, she told herself, than endure a loveless marriage. But her dad would have none of such nonsense. So, post-haste, he despatched the woman back to her matrimonial home.

    Then the grim drama began. Neighbours claimed they heard sad moaning, like a gagged animal being slaughtered. An hour later, they saw the man speed out in his car. Triggering an alarm, they rushed into the tragic couple’s flat, only to meet the grotesque sight of a slaughtered woman! Meanwhile, the fleeing husband had a set mission: to crash himself and end it all at one of the numerous roundabouts at the nearby Ring Road, Ibadan. He did. But he survived the crash. He later went through trial for murdering his wife and got hanged himself!

    Must love-turned-awry end this way?

    If the Ibadan story is so far away, what about the lately condemned Akolade Arowolo in Lagos, who will hang for killing his banker-wife, Titilayo? And he didn’t realise what would happen to their daughter, Olamide, until it was glaring he would face the gallows?

    Must purest of love, morph into purest of hate and end in gravest of tragedies?

    Social welfare folks, declare an emergency on the marriage front.

     

     

  • Ifeajuna deserves centenary recognition

    SIR: One of the highlights of the centenary celebrations was the choice of 100 distinguished honourees. However, it offends logic that the pioneering achievement of the nation’s first commonwealth champion, Major Emmanuel Arinze Ifeajuna, who brought the country’s first major honour in an international sporting competition in the 1954 Vancouver Commonwealth Games has always been conveniently ignored by those in position of authority. It is baffling that this record setting sporting hero in spite of his illustrious 2.03m golden leap that pushed Ugandan’s Patrick Etolu and Nigerian compatriot Osagie Nafsio to the second and third spot with a 1.99m jump has been consistently denied national honours befitting his sporting prowess by successive administrations even when lesser mortals have been adequately rewarded.

    If the sole reason for the unfair treatment for ignoring this conqueror of the British Empire (at least in High Jump) is his prime role in the January 1966 coup d’ etat, the proposition is not only laughable but smacks of double standards. It is an open secret that seasoned coupists and allied conspirators have been duly or unduly honoured with state and national awards and have national and state monuments dotting the entire landscape named and renamed after them and also well represented in the list of 100 distinguished Nigerians!

    Mohammed Ali’s refusal to honour a national call in the Vietnamese war has never diminished his legendary status, in fact he was specially honoured to light the Atlanta ’96 Centennial Olympic touch and also had his 1960 Rome Olympic Gold medal thrown away symbolically restored by the IOC. This centennial ought to have provided a perfect opportunity to correct the wrongs of the past. It will be ideal to name the nation’s noblest monument of sporting prowess – the Abuja National Stadium after this sporting icon, and that to me will be a perfect way to honour this departed champion at the diamond jubilee of that epochal Vancouver feat. It is better late than never!.

    The best way to stop the spread of injustice is to challenge it when it is done on someone else. Please name Abuja National Stadium after Emmanuel Arinze Ifeajuna!

     

    •Opeyemi Ajala (ACA)

    Lagos

     

  • APC: Opportunity beckons

    SIR: The Nation of February 20, page 55 titled “APC, Buhari and 2015” is a very commendable and timely effort by the 4th FORCE. It is a brilliant exposition of the stark choices before APC as it approaches the next general elections. The author has so fluently and convincingly expressed the opinion of so many Nigerians, even from the South-south, aghast at the deteriorating turn of events for a once vibrant and promising nation. His analysis of Buhari’s profile is clear, faultless. We are therefore sad and worried about the unhealthy scheming and subterfuge going on within his party.

    We have now experienced President Jonathan for four years. We do appreciate that he has been trying his best for this country, but apparently against insurmountable odds. And it seems he is overwhelmed by the enemies of his transformation agenda, entrenched and operating perhaps more from within as fifth columnists, than from anywhere else. So I think that Buhari’s time has come.

    But what about Tinubu? Should he remain a kingmaker operating only from behind the scene? The fact is that both Buhari and Tinubu constitute the central core, the genesis of the APC. Indeed, were it not for the gradual polarization of Nigeria along religious divides, it would be ideal, even mandatory, for the party to field its two most prominent candidates side by side. A Buhari/Tinubu combination would present an excellent drive for the government and nation on the path their vision will create. A drive, I believe, into a brand new order, genuine development and prosperity for all.

    Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu also boasts an intimidating profile. His diverse activities during his tenure as Lagos governor project him as a stable and unwavering democrat. He is further distinguished by his phenomenal capacity for identifying, nurturing and then projecting out extraordinary talents as unrivalled architects of new centres of development. Due to his foresight and planning, he is especially credited with the consolidation of Lagos as the nation’s richest, most modern and vibrant economy.

    Therefore, for the APC, a unique opportunity beckons. A political party is primarily defined by the character of its president, or candidate, and the key officials he appoints to assist him run his government. It is an expensive waste of time and energy playing around with neophytes in preference to a fully tested and proven veteran.

    • John Ingwu

    Calabar

     

  • Celebration that shouldn’t have been

    SIR: It is appalling that despite the human lives and properties that were wasted last week in Adamawa and Yobe by the animalistic sect group, the federal government still went ahead with the so-called celebration of 100 years of the country’s existence. Most disgusting was that beyond a one minute silence, Aso Rock did not show much concern for the demise. It did not even deem it fit to fly the nation’s flag at half mast in recognition of those young chaps and adults who were sent to their early graves. But because human lives don’t mean anything to this administration, the Presidency carried on with the celebration with careless abandon. So, while the big men were clinking away glasses of wine in the nation’s capital territory, families in the remote Buni (Yobe) and Adamawa languished in trauma, anguish and sorrow.

    The Centenary celebration in the midst of the Adamawa and Yobe carnage was a sad reminder of the Goodluck Jonathan-led administration’s insensitivity to the plights of the masses of this country. Those precious lives couldn’t have meant anything to a president who recently threatened to pull out the soldiers in the embattled states in reaction to a honest and frank statement expressed by Governor Ibrahim Shettima of Borno, over the sect’s senseless killings in the state. For a government that has lost touch with the realities of the insecurity and deplorable economic conditions in the land, the Centenary celebration was more important and significant to her than finding ways of addressing these challenges.

    In the first place, there was absolutely nothing to celebrate. The false and fraudulent union which the 1914 amalgamation imposed on us does not warrant the waste of resources and time as witnessed in that fruitless venture. The Presidency did not need to waste such huge public fund to reopen the old wound called amalgamation. The recent mindless killingsby the Boko Haram sect group represent some of those violence and crises that have characterised the so-called marriage since 100 years ago. The innocent blood of ordinary Nigerians has been used by successive regimes to sustain the propaganda on the elusive unity of the country.

    No sensitive government would roll out drum of celebration (however important such event is) in the midst of the disaster as witnessed in the two northern states. This is why world leaders often cut short their foreign trips and official functions to visit disaster areas in their countries to commiserate with the victims. Such action usually go a long way in reassuring the citizens that their leaders care about them, and the consequence is that patriotism and hope are renewed in the people. This was exactly what most Nigerians expected from the Presidency. There was certainly nothing too urgent about the celebration (assuming it had to take place at all) that could have prevented the Presidency from shelving it to a later date at least to show the families and victims of that dastardly act that the government share in their pains and anguish.

    It is high time the Presidency woke up to her responsibility and stop dwelling so much on irrelevance. The fight against the many challenges bedevilling our dear country, especially insecurity, requires cooperation from Nigerians. But such cooperation can only be obtained when the government demonstrates some level of responsibility and concern for the total welfare of the citizens, and this was what the Centenary celebration failed to achieve. It is sad, indeed!

    • Barrister Okoro Gabriel,

    Lagos

  • Re: To praise or bury Obahiagbon

    Re: To praise or bury Obahiagbon

    SIR: I am compelled by simple reason to strongly express my disapprobation with the piece titled: “To praise or to bury Obahiagbon.” It was authored by one Gilbert Alasa on page 43 of The Nation of February 20. The writer clearly anchored his caption on ‘ignoranti facti’ and miss-information because empirical fact supports my claim that the caption should have been: ‘To praise Obahiagbon’. I strongly defer to the forgoing caption in view of Obahiagbon’s dexterous and acrobatic use of the human language with effortless precision. It is on record that Obahiagbon’s popularity rest on the oasis his unbeatable idiolect and mellifluous dialectal delivery.

    Such admirable feat can only be attained by self intellectual effort as opined by Saint Austine in one of his mantra that: “The heights that great men reached and kept were not attained by sudden flight, but they, while their companions slept, were toiling in the night.’’ Therefore, I think we  should not blame Obahiagbon for the inability of his audience to grasp his thoughts at times because while he makes all available etymological dictionaries his ‘vade mecum’ in the dead of the night, others retire into deep slumber and ‘doclce farnient’(pleasant idleness).

    The writer must concur with me that Obahiagbon deserves not only a ‘million’ praises but infinite praises for having that sagacious capacity in expanding the scope of world vocabulary. The writer also misfired when he wrote: “My concern is the recurring infusion of Latin and Greek terminologies in his discuss as well as verbosity…’’ To be candid, this writer, from my own estimation, does not know the beauty and dynamic nature of language coated in neologism, poetic licence and ‘register’.

    To him, the infusion of Latin in a speech made by a lawyer negates the principles of communication; then, why were we taught ‘register’ in school? But I will excuse my friend. Perhaps the school he attended never taught him ‘register’ as a basic form of communication. I also wish to remind him that verbosities are not necessarily bad in oral communication because they are necessary lexical ‘lubricants’ that oil the wheels of oratory. He can run a check on speeches made by great orators if he doubts the veracity of my submission. The writer went on to announce to the world that he was conferred with the sobriquet ‘Obahiagbon’. If true, I think the raison d’être for that sobriquet was to praise him for his grammatical wizardry. Since his peers did not burry him, then it will be an unforgivable sin for him to contemplate burring the political cum legislative lexicologist (Obahiagbon) of our time.

    The writer relied on Reuben Abati’s cliché which states that “we seem like in a generation in a hurry; we hurry to live, to love…” to straighten his point. Yet he fell prey to the force of ‘hurriness’ as shown in his spelling of the word ‘Crinkum – Crakum’ as ‘Krikum – Krakum’ in his piece. He also erred in his peroration when he wrote: “But what we have failed to understand is that oratory seems to have been lost especially in today’s Nigerian political sector”. I wish to admonish him to always listen to the like of Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, Governor Babangida Aliyu, Pat Utomi, Peter Esele and the great Obahaigbon again and again. God bless Nigeria.

    • Ehi Godfrey O.

    Benin City

  • Sanusi: A case of executive recklessness

    Sanusi: A case of executive recklessness

    SIR: There is no better way to describe suspension of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, by President Goodluck Jonathan than to say that it is a crude display of power and an attack on free speech, especially when it is evident that this is coming on the heels of accusations of corruption against the NNPC by the CBN governor. The oil sector is believed to be under the ampits of those highly connected to the president. This shameful action also lends credence to the fact that President Jonathan has continued to live in denial as he has demonstrated in recent time that the powers conferred on him by our extant laws are not enough for him. It is even more sad that these violations keep happening before the very eyes of the nation’s number one legal officer, Attorney General of Federation, Mohammed Bello Adoke (SAN). Ordinarily, Nigerians expect that the AGF should advise and properly guide the president on a right legal approach to take.

    The Presidency’s action is a paradox. The reason is that its action is completely at variance with what he would want Nigerians to believe informed the suspension of the CBN boss from office. For instance, the purported suspension was anchored on “financial recklessness” levelled against the governor by a so called report of the Financial Reporting Council. The CBN governor was accused of taking actions and financial decisions that ran foul of the law. It is worthy to note that the president has not demonstrated a better respect for existing laws in this regard. If President Goodluck so much cherishes rule of law, one wonders why he had to circumvent the provisons of Section 11 of CBN Act 2007 (as amended) in suspending the governor. The implication of this action is abundantely clear: the Presidency has come to equity with soiled hands! He has no such power to suspend the CBN governor. He only has power to remove the governor subject to 2/3 approval of the Senate.

    Unfortunately, the supporters of this authocratic action have not been able to justify their supports beyond the fact that the CBN boss deserved to be shown the way out for “running aground” the institution. I know as a fact that Nigerians would not be opposed to the removal of the governor if he was found wanting. Our contention is that such removal must and should conform with laid down norms. It should not be done at the whims and caprices of the presidency. The argument that he who hires has the right to fire does not hold any water under the circumstance. Unlike in the normal contract of service, the appointment and removal of the CBN governor is strictly regulated by the Act and until such provisions are altered, the action of the president remains ultra-vires

    In a sanner society, where parliamentarians perform their duty without fear or favour, the action of the president is enough to start an impeachment proceeding against him. The simple reason is that nothing could be more gross in conduct than this flagrant violation of our law. Nigerians must demand from their lawmakers to do the needful on this matter. It would be most miserable of us to allow the president get away with this inpunity.

    •Barrister Okoro Gabriel,

    Lagos

  • YOUWIN: Ekiti youths are exempted

    YOUWIN: Ekiti youths are exempted

    SIR: I wonder why some citizens and some states of Nigeria are not benefitting from the federal government empowerment scheme: (YOUWIN) www.youwin.org.ng. This programme was established to finance and assist the youth in creating job opportunities for themselves and others in the country. This is a good idea from the federal government; the young folks were so happy for this innovation. Most youths from every states of the country registered on the site in other to enjoy this benefit from the federal government

    My greatest surprise is that many were notified that they won and the winners were given some certain sums of money to empower them, but some states were exempted, including Ekiti. Is Ekiti State not part of Nigeria? Some of the youths there were notified that they won in the programme; the YOUWIN representative came to Ekiti State to meet the winners there. The winners were given a shirt, a jotter and a pen and with the promise by the representatives that they would be back in a short time to empower them financially.

    After a year, they came (October 2013), with the expectation of empowering the young folks there. They were given a certificate that they had participated in the YOUWIN programme instead of empowering them. They even took their photographs as if they had given them money.

    Mr President, no youth in Ekiti State has benefitted from your administration’s YOUWIN programme. Please note sir.

    • JoySunday

    ggodisgoodd@yahoo.com