Category: Commentaries

  • A day of gory tales at the US consulate

    A day of gory tales at the US consulate

    Every upsetting creation has its own odd value, though. This blustery morning, it was a huge rat hurdling in the bathroom that thankfully stirred me from the bottom of deep sleep. Time was 4am, the hour Lagos would be in slumber, but applicants seeking the US visa that day had to be on their feet: Some came with little children, some with breast-sucking infants; some on wheel chairs, some in the last days of their pregnancy, some moribund, with fatal illnesses but able to trudge. Some were punks, seeking cheap escape from the awful economy.

    Some with frivolous claims, but not to outcast those with genuine judgment. For many Nigerians, undying impressions about US and her civil image would not come through sumptuous dinners with the Ambassador, which they are unlikely to have, but rather through the mandatory come across with the temper or idiosyncrasies of an interviewing officer usually caged behind a steel glass, leaving visual and audio pin-holes as the only means of contact with locals. The five torment hours of this reporter revealed the raw nightmares of Nigerians, rich or poor, armed or defenseless, royals and peasants.

    In the past, I had appeared courtesy of the United Nations’ invitation to speak on indigenous issues and also subsequently as a guest speaker on self-determination at international Yoruba conferences, and therefore, ‘robbed’ of the piercing grief.

    This Friday, some came from remote towns and villages, from crisis-torn Yobe State to far off Calabar to meet the largely irreversible visa appointments, traveling several of kilometers. Even in this odd hour, at the office located in down town Lagos, overlooking a long stretch of splashing and clapping sea, sometimes mixed with the faint, harmonious chorus of crickets and frogs, hundreds of applicants already milled in the shadow of the dwindling darkness. Many had slept on the bare floor, and had their bath or defecate in the adjoining bait of the roaring sea. I thought: history is never static.

    The old is pregnant with the new and the new contains elements of the old. Barely 300 years ago, our forebears who were taken into slavery against their wish, would not have imagined their great grand children would battle, out of their own volition to seek passage to the land that degraded them and which they had detested.

    However, encounters of many visitors at the US consulate make them believe that though laws of slavery have been expunged, but the mindset, that tiny invisible box, of some consuls, remains as it was four centuries ago. “What has changed is the form, not the content of slavery”, one dying applicant who sought medical attention in the US but whose visa was rejected told me that Friday. For one thing, the 5-hour experience of this reporter left vestigial traces of repugnant memories of Nigerians as underdogs. It appears like a daily routine of trauma.

    One applicant who had three kids lined them up on the bait of a drainage near the embassy, all night long, for a 6.30 am appointment. For Ebong, he came in from Calabar, it was his third trip having missed the appointments in spite of an all night agonizing bus travel, spanning 20 hours. Two of his cousins with their three kids perished few years ago on their way to a visa appointment. As we snaked through the line, one dead beat ebony black pregnant woman was seen moaning through the horrific line of largely hopeless applicants, including some women, some of who had to be frisked by male security guards.

    Outside the embassy, there were no toilets; women and children are at the mercy of a dungeon-like pit, managed by thugs. A young man told how a pregnant woman was raped near the on-looking, gibbering and furious beach. After the start whistle for the screening was blown, after 5am, a dutiful chocolate coloured lady announced the rules for applicants.

    A comic police guard rolls out the “dos” and “don’ts”, which included not bringing your “anointing oil” into the embassy. But nothing could be so perplexing as the sometimes humiliating questions thrown at applicants, especially terrifying questions that infringe on the privacy of the individual and the dignity of the human person. For hundreds of thousands of Nigerians seeking the US visa for scientific research, ill health, human rights conferences, medicare, knowledge-driven events, securing the US visa has become as difficult as an elephant passing through the needle’s eye.

    An Ekiti medical doctor at the point of death who needed medical attention abroad was denied last month, because he had “no tie” with his country. Ties are sometimes defined in economic terms, placed far above the family. Leader of the Coalition of Nigerian Right Groups, (CONRIG) said his appearance was like passing through a “torture chamber.”

    At the end, the consular told him with ignominy to ‘go and apply for Visa lottery.” He vowed never to apply for the US visa in his lifetime. Rasaq Olokooba of the Coalition of O’odua Self Determination Groups, (COSEG) had a running battle reminding his questionnaire that he was going for a conference that promotes global security and his denial would amount to a classic case of betrayal against the cherished image of the US.

    The rules say you must have a fat account, suggesting that financial standing overrules the dignity and public reputation of the individual, a horrendous reminder of how the US appears to promote transient ethics at the expense of values that sustain humanity’s utilitarian grandeur. You should not have a relation in the US, meaning that you largely need to deny your own, since most Nigerians have relations in the US.

    One applicant once said an official almost hit him with her scorn when he asked him how many children he had and he said 12. Visa applications appear to be largely anti-children, as if every Nigerian would take their children abroad for auction or as if children do not have the right to free movement. A source said black officials at the consulate are hardly allowed to go on holidays abroad with their offspring. Another narrated she was questioned years back why she had another child when she was yet to wean her infant.

    One first class Oba in Yorubaland told me he heard of new regulations that reject Obas submitting passports with their heads covered. It is a taboo for an Oba or King to leave his head barren. Largely, it appears Nigerians are generally seen as dishonest, bruising the collective ego and hosting the boosting of generalisation.

    For one thing, the Nigerian authority, considering the influx of applicants for the US visa, should know it is her responsibility to protect the dignity of her citizens applying for legitimate visit. Abuja should show interest in the way her citizens are treated by some officials who encounter trauma daily at the “trial box.” The South East states should prevail on the US to have a consular in Enugu and same for Kano. This will reduce the pain and anguish of applicants and the deaths associated with long travels. The US may wish to adopt the German and British models, where applicants submit visas to be processed in weeks, leaving a fair deal for both parties. The US authority should make her consuls abide by the relevant laws of her own country which promotes the dignity of mankind.

    The US should train and retrain her officials on the ethics of the host country. It is unethical to ask a woman unknown to you if she was pregnant, more, to the listening ears of several other applicants. Yes. Some Nigerians are liars. Some are drug couriers. Some are cheats, but not all Nigerians are. In fact, only very few Nigerians are. Hasty generalization is a mark of illogic. It simply runs against critical and logical thinking. As the old saying goes, there may be moments when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time we fail to speak out.

     

    Adeoye is an activist and journalist and CNN African Journalist of the Year Award winner

  • Babatunde Aloysius Ahonsi at 50

    Attaining half-a-century is a noteworthy achievement, especially in a country like ours where average life expectancy is below this landmark for both male and female. It gets more important when such life has been lived in pursuit of excellence and helping others to achieve their full potentials.

    Babatunde Aloysius Ahonsi’s life is a lesson in humility and excellence. Turning 50 on February 27 is, however, a noteworthy event even when he refused to have any elaborate celebration, which is very typical of him, as many of us who have interacted and worked with him at different levels know. But Nigerians have a duty to examine his life closely and see the lessons we can glean from it. It is doubtful if a critical analysis of our developmental efforts as a country in the areas of maternal and child health, HIV and AIDS, and gender empowerment in the last two decades would not reveal his imprint in all. Whether as a lecturer at the Universities of Ilorin, Calabar, and Lagos, or as a senior programme officer in the West Africa office of the Ford Foundation, or currently as Country Director for Population Council in Nigeria, his life has been geared towards rescuing children from a myriad of diseases, ensuring pregnant and nursing women live life to the fullest, and lifting women from the shackles which our tradition and religion have bound them with.

    He has also made stellar contributions to scholarship as his copious papers on health, development, and gender issues are everywhere for all to read. Even when he left the university environment formally in 1997, he has remained attached to the system in churning out papers regularly and actually planning to return to academics fully later in his life. BAA, as colleagues and friends affectionately call him, graduated with a first class honours in Sociology from the University of Lagos and a doctorate in Population Studies from the London School of Economics and Political Science which he undertook as a Commonwealth Scholar between 1988 and 1992.

    BAA is a winner of over 20 awards for academic excellence and professional distinction since 1985, and he has been a Visiting Young Fellow at the Population Institute for Research and Training at Indiana University, Bloomington, USA (1993), a Laureate at the 1st Gender Institute by CODESRIA, Dakar, Senegal (1994), and a World Bank-Robert McNamara Fellow (1995-6). He has also been actively involved in technical assistance to several Nigerian NGOs working on gender equity and sexual and reproductive health, and to major not for-profit companies on CSR issues. Highlights of his professional career in the last 17 years include helping to catalyse the school-based provision of comprehensive sexuality education for young people in Nigeria, the empowerment of persons living with HIV and AIDS in national responses to the epidemic, and the inter-linking of reproductive health education for poor youth and women with economic empowerment approaches. His newspaper articles have not been as regular as when he used to write a weekly newspaper column but appearing rather sparingly possibly due to the nature of his current assignment.

    Our paths crossed in 2003 even though his name has featured repeatedly in conversations with some friends before then. What struck me that time and till now is his simplicity in dressing and approach to issues with a knack for breaking down complex stuff to easily understandable parts. Until recently when I asked him his mother tongue, it was difficult placing him particularly within the prism of that usually confusing phrase, “state of origin” as most of our discussions are held in Yoruba which he speaks very fluently having grown up in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital. “Ogbeni, ki lo n happen?” he would intone in his baritone voice anytime we speak. More often than not, he plays the roles of a teacher, counsellor, sociologist, and educator whenever we speak. His cosmopolitan outlook has, however, not stopped him from supporting his homestead. BAA sits on the board of Otuo Microfinance Bank in Edo State.

    His undying love for Nigeria remains unparalleled and he would always intone, “Let’s keep hope alive, Nigeria is our country,” even when situation appears to be going contrary. Despite numerous opportunities to live outside the country, he has consistently refused to do so saying “Nigeria si ma da,” loosely translated: Nigeria will still get better. Whenever I asked him why he remained so eternally optimistic about Nigeria, he always answered that our abundant potentials in human and natural resources properly harnessed will surely do wonders and that he sees his life-long occupation as giving hope to Nigerians. He does not relate with anybody on the basis of ethnicity but solely on the fact that such person is a human being and that’s why his friends cut across the entire country and outside.

    He is also devoted to his family even when his career has forced him to live a peripatetic life recognising it as the hub for a successful and productive life. Babatunde – he loves that name greatly – is married to Francisca Ahlijah and they have two sons, Arenma and Osaemi. A devout Catholic who is not loud but whose life is an epitome of Christian virtues; he is an active participant in his community whether in the neighbourhood where he lives, the churches he worships both in Lagos and Abuja, and the schools his sons attend. He readily offers his skills and intellect in all these places. And for those of us his younger friends, he is the elder brother we don’t have offering us shade from the vicissitudes of life whenever we need it.

    I wish I could speak Otuo, a variant of the Bini language spoken in parts of Owan East LGA of Edo State, and wish him a Happy Birthday using the language. But this tribute suffices, and it comes with a prayerful wish that surely the best part of his life is still ahead.

    Fatade is a journalist in Lagos.

  • Politics of Rooney’s N82m weekly pay

    Football, which some have described as the beautiful, round leather game, has long been known as the new El Dorado, but is it the new political turf too? Just when you think wages have reached their heights, new limits are soon set. Just when you think interest in the game might wane, a new upwelling of enthusiasm is ignited. All a wretched family needs today to flee poverty is to have one lad (or lass) of great football talent and pronto, money begins to flow like ocean water. Kelechi Iheanacho and Dele Alampasu are two current examples of how football can instantly change the fortunes of families. But make no mistake there are deep political and racial dynamics and the bigger the deal, the higher the stakes.

    Consider the latest £300,000 -a-week- contract signed by Wayne Rooney in his club, Manchester United Football Club (MUFC). Converted, the 28-year-old England striker will earn about N82 million per week for the next four years. This deal immediately makes him the most expensive player in MUFC’s history. Rooney also becomes perhaps the most expensive in the world second only to Cristiano Ronaldo of Real Madrid. The question is: why would a sinking MUFC shell out so much money for one player in her time of deep trouble? The player is not playing exceptionally well right now; his club is in her worst situation of the last two decades; far adrift on the current English Premiership League (EPL) table. MUFC, which are the current EPL champions, are right now in danger of not only missing all silverwares this season, they may not make the top four which qualifies them for the prestigious pan-European Champions League.

    Myriads of questions beg for answers in this deal: would former coach Sir Alex Ferguson have agreed to a deal like this? Some say the hardy MUFC legend would have done away with Rooney the way he did David Beckham and used the proceeds to get at least two talented, younger players. Some posit the new coach David Moyes was overly taken in by sentiments having first discovered Rooney at Everton, his former club. Football pundits say he has allowed Rooney to take advantage of the weak and supine position of the club to extract an unviable contract. Now he is not by any chance the best player in the club; Robin van Persie and the new signing Juan Mata maybe one notch ahead. Now the wage structure of MUFC has been distorted and every player will expect a bigger contract soon. More worrisome, Rooney has been made a king and even a messiah of the club and this could boomerang if the other players leave the ball to him alone.

    There is also the issue of race: analysts have noted that no coloured player gets paid so much no matter how talented. Players like Romelo Lukaku (Everton), Wilfried Bony (Swansea), Daniel Sturridge and Raheem Sterling (Liverpool) are sharper strikers yet hardly any of them earn half this wage. Rooney even earns more than the phenomenal Lionel Messi!

    Well, for a country in dire need of heroes, England will create one for herself by all means. But with MUFC sinking deeper with every game, it is hoped that all of this will not turn out an albatross for all concerned.

  • Nigeria’s leaders must preserve her peace

    SIR: May I use this medium to express my concern over the worrisome attitude of Nigerian rulers to issues about the peace of the nation, which has been writhing in crises and under-development. In 1999, the then leaders thought about Nigeria’s peace and proposed rotational presidency, consequent upon which all the major political parties chose their presidential candidates from the Southwest. When former President General Olusegun Obasanjo ended his second tenure in 2007, the pendulum shifted to the Northwest from where all the major political parties chose their candidates. That gave the impression that orderliness and peace had come.

    When President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua died, President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan (GEJ) and OBJ denied the rotational agreement, that it was Jonathan’s turn. Some Nigerians argued that the agreement was unconstitutional or undemocratic. I argued that the constitution was made for Nigeria and not vise versa. To those who said rotational presidency was undemocratic, I replied that democracy is about political order, and it becomes democratic if we endorse it.

    Curiously, there was a rumour in 2007 that OBJ chose Yar’Adua as his successor, knowing that he might soon die from kidney ailment, thus making GEJ his automatic successor and thereby helping the South-south people to taste the presidency. I dismissed the rumour in favour of my belief that OBJ chose Yar’Adua selfishly to compensate Shehu Musa Yar’Adua. But, everything happened as rumoured. Yar’Adua died, and OBJ declared operation total support for GEJ. Then I started begging Nigerians not to truncate rotational presidency for it would ensure order, equity, peace and progress if made to rotate among the six geopolitical zones.

    GEJ used his power of incumbency to set machinery in motion; depleted Nigeria’s foreign reserves and plunged the nation into bankruptcy. The debilitating campaigns necessitated fuel price increase from N65 to N97, soon after GEJ’s election in 2011, dressed as “fuel subsidy removal”. The same scenario is now playing out as GEJ is going from traditional rulers to religious leaders.

    I don’t trust Speaker Aminu Tambuwal. Therefore, I appeal to the All Progressives Congress (APC) to make amends where necessary for past mistakes. I beg Nigerians to resist GEJ’s bribery and corruption for the new Nigeria of our dream. Visiting leading Kings, Emirs, etc with brown envelopes will not sway people who are tired of political disorder, corruption and abject poverty. GEJ will only enrich the bribed and aggravate ordinary people’s penury.

     

    • Pius Oyeniran Abioje, Ph.D,

    University of Ilorin.

  • Our so-called leaders are raping us

    SIR: In any given sovereignty of a country, the protection of lives and property of her citizens from both internal and external attacks is of paramount importance as a primary function of any government. But are Nigerians enjoying that protection of lives and property? In my own opinion, our leaders who are standing as the government have taken away the protection that we are supposed to be enjoying and replaced it with destruction.

    They have introduced agents such as Boko Haram, kidnappers, armed robbers and so on to help them execute their plans, yet they claimed to be fighting them. Our leaders also took away our money that should have given us needs such as potable water, good roads, electricity, good hospitals, and companies that would have helped the development of our great nation. They gave back to us unemployment and poverty which are responsible for the current heightening prostitution, armed robbery, kidnapping, terrorism, human trafficking and so on.

    Our leaders went further and took away the free, compulsory and qualitative education they themselves enjoyed during from our founding fathers and in exchange, they gave us illiteracy, which is the one of the problems we are facing now in the country. What about free and fair elections? Our leaders have introduced do-or-die system of politics which brought election rigging, manipulation and at end, killings of innocent voters as well as destroying their property worth millions of naira if not billions.  Our leaders have also taken away our major source of income which is crude oil but failed to utilise it for our benefit. The interests of the common people are not in their hearts.

    Painfully, our leaders have succeeded in introducing politics in the places of worship. Now, people who claim to be Christians and Muslims are also politicians. However, they are the same ungodly people that are responsible for all the problems we are facing in this country today due to their corrupt ways. Our men of God who should be acting according to the scriptures are acting to please our politicians. Our leaders should stop deceiving themselves by telling us that they are fighting corruption. As far as I know, they are the corrupt people we know; so, how could they fight themselves? A snake cannot by mistake, bite itself.

     

    • Pius Awunah

    piusawunah@ymail.com

  • My discoveries in Osun

    SIR: Recently, I made a voluntary good governance tour of Osun State, with a view to truly intimating myself with the progress made by Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola’s government in the last three years. My findings were heart-warming and reflective of an administrator, who knows his onions. I found to my happiness, that hitherto, inaccessible roads in remote parts of the state now have Aregbesola’s magic wands on them.

    From my native Ede, through Iperindo, Ifetedo, Ejigbo, Orile-Owu, Ikire-Ile, Ife-Odan, Ikotun in Egbedore LGA, Ajagunlase, Ikirun up to Otan-Ayegbaju, Ife Ondaye, Ifewara, and some parts of Ijesaland, the story is the same. The 10km-stretch of road rehabilitation embarked upon by the 30 local government areas in the state have impacted positively on the lives of the people. The indigenes of these areas are united in one thing, that good roads are beneficial to all; be you the rich or poor. Good roads do not discriminate on who uses them, they opined. The ordinary folks in Osun are at peace with Aregbesola’s modest achievements.

    Of particular importance is the Oba Adesoji Aderemi road that still under construction. That particular road will go down in the history of Osun State, as a master-piece of an infrastructure. A feel of just one kilometre part of the road that has so far been stone-based and aesthetically asphalted will convince the worst of Aregbesola’s critics that this governor knows the rudiment of what it takes to put a road that will stand the test of time in place. The 21st century technology is being deployed in the construction of this particular road in memory of the first African Governor of old Western Region.

    Work is going on at a feverish pitch on the road which has now reached an advanced stage. This is not to lose sight of transformation that the Osogbo township roads are witnessing. Indeed, anything is possible if we have faith, the will and the heart. I know we all have the will to play our parts in this campaign for accelerated development in Osun State. I know we have faith in the present regime and we have the hearts to face the challenges ahead.

    Ogbeni Rauf , like the late sage, Papa Obafemi Awolowo of blessed memory, does not claim to have a monopoly of wisdom. But the trouble is that, when some other politicians are spending whole days and nights on frivolities, Aregbesola is always at his post, working hard at Osun State problems and trying hard to find solutions to them.For Osun 2014, it is Aregbesola against Aregbesola. End of discussion.

    •Olumide Lawal

    Ede, Osun State.

  • The harm in federal character, zoning and regionalism

    Section 14(3) of the 1999 Nigerian constitution says: “The composition of the Government of the Federation or any of its agencies and the conduct of its affairs shall be carried out in such a  manner as to reflect the federal character of Nigeria and the need to  promote national unity, and also to command national loyalty, thereby ensuring that there shall be no predominance of persons from a few states or from a few ethnic or other sectional groups in that government or in any of its agencies.”

    In full acknowledgement of the good intentions of the framers of the 1999 Constitution, as necessary to address the need for balancing the interests of the multiplicity of ethnicities in our country and the disparate levels of literacy and economic progression, I believe that with the increasing ethnic-based disturbances, continued balkanisation of the country by non-sustainable ethnicity-driven state creation, the acrimonious political discourse that is fuelled not by substance but ethnic or regional considerations, the citadel of incompetence and mediocrity that, for the most part, is the civil and public service today, given the related diminished standards, the time has come for re-consideration of the Federal Character requirements.

    The concept and practice of allocation of federal and state government positions, issues advocacy by zones or regions, political aspiration by zoning, undermine the principle of fair-play and unity that is, seemingly, the objectives of the requirement.  Specifically, mediocrity, continued ethnic rivalry and balkanisation, gerrymandering of political aspirations, regional factionalism, a system that seeks to put geo-political affiliation ahead of performance and qualifications, a polity that is perpetually heated up, are all products of the “fair-play” arrangements of the Federal Character, quota and zoning mechanisms.

    Federal Character requirements may superficially convey the impression that there is a balancing of geo-political representation at the federal Ievel and ethnic or tribal at the state level, but viewed unemotionally, it is a practice that is deleterious to a nation that seeks to be among the first twenty economically developed countries by the year 2020.  How does an allocation of federal government positions ensure that we have the best and the brightest in those positions?  What happens if a particular region lacks persons with the requisite skills, proficiency and expertise to fill its allocation?

    What about the subordinate personnel, from a different region, who has superior qualifications?  How does such allocation foster the competition amongst the regions and states that is necessary to boost literacy and economic levels which, ultimately, should result in the production of personnel who are able to compete with their peers on a national level, or on international level against those countries such as Belgium, that have to be pushed out of the top 20 economies by Nigeria’s economic ascendency.  Do we really want to continue to teach our children that you can study hard (or not) and then leave it to prayers, that when you seek to perform your civic duty, as a federal or state employee, that you have the luck of having geo-political zone balance in favour of your state of origin?

    If our mechanism for recruiting and promoting our current and future policy makers and implementers is already flawed, how can we expect the organs of government to function at a performance level that results in the delivery of the “benefits of democracy?”

    It is frightening when we realise that these individuals make and implement policies that impact all aspects of our daily lives. As Nigerians, we have never shied away from competition.  It is this need to be the best that we can be that is manifested by the professional, academic and entrepreneurial excellence of our citizens in more organised societies. It is also this pursuit of one-upmanship that also fuels the chaos that is our daily lives. Alas, this chaos cannot be constructively channeled, because we are depriving the brilliant performers of the opportunity to contribute to our nation’s socio-economic growth, thanks to Federal Character requirements.

    Contemporary times reflect a nation that has not learned from the horror of its 1966 civil war and is ever more divided along tribal, ethnic, regional and religious lines.  As a nation, we are seeing more events of loss of life caused by tribal or ethnic affiliation. We are subjected to daily bombardment by the news media of political events, activities and shenanigans with underpinnings of tribal, zonal and regional affiliations.  The run-up to the presidential election of 2010 was full of the strife associated with whether or not the presidential slot was zoned to the North and the reverberations of that period continues until now, with ramifications for the upcoming 2015 elections.  Similarly, the various state-level political party structures are caught up in fights as to where succession has been zoned to or the number of times a particular tribe has assumed an office. Has the relatively recent instance of the deportation of economically disadvantaged Anambra citizens from Lagos or the eviction of non-indigene civil service workers from some South Eastern states (supposedly based on the challenge of meeting the minimum wage increase) indicated that we are anywhere close to the promotion of national unity that is specified in Section 14(3) of the constitution?

    I am a firm believer that the tapestry of the Nigerian nation is stronger and prettier because of the diversity of our people. Together, we are better than we are apart.  However, we may never achieve the togetherness if we continue to institutionalize measures that divide us.

    The use of the Federal Character, zoning and quota mechanisms are artificial constructs that remove the fairness principle from how we live and work.  These are heinous mechanisms that put deserving people at a disadvantage to the detriment of our governance structure.  In our constant cry for visionary leaders, we must acknowledge that we will never find those stellar leaders if we continue to utilise a quota system that gives precedent to tribal, state or zonal affiliation, instead of personal attributes of excellence.

    It is my hope that in the forthcoming national discussions, that there is a robust and consequent review of the Federal Character or any such requirements that do not truly foster unity, fairness, meritocracy and nationalism. The iconic American civil rights leader, Dr. Martin Luther King said, in his “I have a Dream” speech (March on Washington, D.C., August 28, 1963), that he dreamt of a nation where his children “will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character.”  Our aspiration as a nation should be similarly so, with judgment not on the basis of tribe, ethnicity, zone, but on character and the ability to contribute to nation building.

     

    • Azu Obiaya writes from Abuja

    onweazuka@gmail.com

  • Before the national confab begins

    Since President Goodluck Jonathan announced the plan to convene a national dialogue in his last Independence Anniversary address, many Nigerians have been apprehensive about the likely outcome of the exercise that has been greeted with so much controversy due to leadership crisis and distrust.

    While receiving the 4,000-page report of the Senator Femi Okurounmu-led Presidential Advisory Committee (PAC), President Jonathan had promised that the conference would actually hold early this year. Most people were, however, taken aback when the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Anyim Pius Anyim announced modalities for the 492-delegate conference, which fuelled the people’s fears that its outcome might not really reflect the yearnings of Nigerians because of the disparity between the committee’s recommendations and the approved guidelines.

    The committee’s 38-item agenda had recommended that the conference should have no ‘no-go’ area; it is to be managed by 13-member secretariat under an Executive Secretary with two members from each geo-political zone; majority of delegates to be elected directly on the principles of universal adult suffrage; each senatorial zone is to send four elected delegates; each state government to nominate one delegate; the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to nominate one delegate; the President to nominate delegates for key interest groups; the nominated delegates not to exceed one-thirds of total number of delegates, and the conference to hold for at least three months and not more than six months. The committee also proposed that the conference should hold between February and July, 2014, while President should send a bill to the National Assembly for an enabling law, or alternatively, convene the conference via provisions of Section 5 of 1999 Constitution, while the emergence of delegates is to be based on any of four options.

    In the final template released, the Federal Government will now nominate 20 delegates of at least six women, while state governors and the FCT administration will nominate 109 delegates – three from each state and one from FCT. Bodies like the Nigeria Guild of Editors, Nigeria Union of Journalists, Broadcasting Organisation of Nigeria, Nigerian Bar Association, the Judiciary, the Nigerian Society of Engineers, Nigerian Environmental Society, National Youth Council of Nigeria and National Association of Nigerian Students will nominate members.

    Also to have representatives are: National Council of Women Societies, Market Women Associations, the International Federation of Women Lawyers, the National Association of Women Journalists, the Academies of Science, Engineering, Education, Letters and Social Sciences, Civil Society Organisations, religious leaders, Nigerians in the Diaspora, political parties that have representation in the National Assembly and the People Living with Disabilities. The Newspaper Proprietors Association of Nigeria, political/cultural and ethnic groups, among others, will also have representatives at the confab.

    Other nominations include 37 elder statesmen – one per state and the FCT – by the president. These nominees will also include retired military officers, the police and the state security service from each of the nation’s six geopolitical zones. Other delegates will be traditional rulers (two per zone and one from the FCT), retired civil servants (one from each of the zones and the FCT), and the representatives of the Nigeria Labour Congress, the Trade Union Congress and Organised Private Sector.

    Certainly, the primary purpose of a National Conference is to address and find lasting solutions to the problems that have been plaguing Nigeria since 1914. These problems border on the quest for the attainment of economic, social, cultural, religious and political justice and equity. Nigerians have tended to live with so much suspicion that having a national collective aspiration seems more Herculean than ethnic and tribal affinity of the over 300 ethnic groups. The nation’s albatross has worsened with the failure of the constitutions, which had never been people-oriented, to redress the fundamental defects. No wonder, Sir Hugh Clifford, Governor-General of Nigeria between 1920 and 1931, once described the nation as a mere ”collection of independent native states separated from one another by great distances, by differences of history and traditions and by ethnological, racial, tribal, political, social and religious barriers.”

    This fragmentation has continued till date. Even on the conference, a lot of agitations from many quarters continue to trail representations on primordial lines and if these are not addressed, the expectations of the conference may be compromised. The way out is for the various interest groups that feel marginalised to team up to present a common cause. It should be realised that there is no way that the all the delegates can be representative enough to reflect all shades of opinions in a heterogeneous state like Nigeria. What should top the agenda at the conference are burning issues like the devolution of powers, fiscal federalism, local government autonomy, state police, and ensuring appropriate status for the FCT, institutional corruption and so on. To ensure transparency and participation, the government should ensure that proceedings of the conference are transmitted live at every stage!

    On the outcome of the conference, Anyim had said that it would be by consensus but in the case where a consensus is not achieved, it would be by a 75 per cent majority after which, the conference is to advise the government on the legal framework, procedures and options for integrating its decisions and outcomes into the 1999 Constitution and other laws of the country.

    The onus lies on the government to ensure that the delegates discuss under an atmosphere that allows for genuine brainstorming and undue influence. And more importantly, the outcome should be subjected to a referendum, otherwise the whole exercise would amount to a jamboree, a waste of time and resources, as many pessimists believe, based on past experiences. Nigerians cannot forget so easily, President Jonathan’s pre-emptive stance that the report of the proposed conference would be submitted to the National Assembly for ratification. This ought not to be. We should never fail to recognise that the 1999 Constitution confers sovereignty on the people and, therefore, the best that could happen is for Nigerians to merely cede part of their sovereignty to the members of the National Assembly and not for the legislature to subsume the peoples’ authority.

    The duty of the Sovereign National Conference is to address and find solutions to the key problems afflicting the country. It is for this single reason of legitimacy that the people have unrepentantly called for a Sovereign National Conference. The late human rights activist and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Chief Gani Fawehinmi once said: “The primary concern of Nigeria since 1914 to date is to remove all obstacles which have prevented the country from establishing political justice, economic justice, social justice, cultural justice, religious justice and to construct a new constitutional frame-work in terms of the system of government-structurally, politically economically, socially, culturally and religiously”. This should be the thrust of the confab lest it becomes a missed opportunity. Anything short of this may be useless as many skeptics have been telling us. And who knows whether they will be vindicated at the end of the day or not?

     

    • Kupoluyi writes from the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta,

  • The making of a royal rumpus

    It was the much fecund French critic, journalist and novelist Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr who long ago gave us the famous aphorism, “The more things change, the more they remain the same,” and it comes quite handy now in describing governments in Nigeria and their modus operandi. Those who have been around in the last three decades must watch most frustratingly as things remain almost exactly the same even as governments change all the time. In today’s parlance, it is said that only an unstable mind would do the same thing the same way all the time and expect a different result. But it seems our governments have perfected the art of doing the same thing the same way all the time and even doing it badly. Sometimes we wonder whether it is a deliberated ploy to wear us down.

    Let us consider the new-found penchant by President Goodluck Jonathan to go on a shuttle of visits to Nigeria’s traditional rulers. Recently, he stormed the South West of Nigeria, visiting three monarchs in a blitzkrieg tour that took him to the historic towns of Oyo, Ile-Ife and Badagry. Last Monday, he was in Owerri, Imo State, for a brisk political business but on his way out, he made a stop at the palace of the Obi of Onitsha, Igwe Nnaemeka Acbebe, obviously as part of the current royalty rub-down.

    But about two decades ago, in those heady days of the military when this business of royal validation started, the hefty royals were ‘invited’ to Aso-rock by the dozen when things got a bit too heated up. After a closed-door ‘meeting’ between the junta and the monarchs, they often would come out singing a different song to their subjects. One well-known traditional ruler is still remembered today for his dramatic summersaults after visiting Aso-Rock and driving away with a heavily stuffed booth; especially in those days of June 12, 1993 agitations.

    Today, the president shuttles the royal palaces and that has its peculiar lacuna. It is bound to open up age-old supremacy tussle that had been latent since the beginning of history. No king cherishes being subordinated to another no matter how wretched his kingdom might be. In Yorubaland, for instance, the president would not pay homage to the Alafin, the Iku Baba Yeye without also calling on the Igbakeji Orisa the Ooni of Ife, regardless of the logistical calamity it might portend. And that he did recently, but where does that leave the metropolitan monarch of the ancient city of Ibadan whose door-mouth was traversed to visit those ‘bigger’ kings? What have we done to the sensibilities of the old man and his subjects? What about the ‘big crown’ in Osogbo who has already raised a red flag stating that there are three monarchs of equal standing in Oyo State?

    And the Ijebu, the Egba, the Ijesha and so on, would the presidency send a ‘message’ to them through adjoining kingdoms? Same for Igboland, the President passed right in front of the palace of Ozuruigbo IV, Eze Emmanuel Njemanze, to pay homage to Agbogidi, the Obi of Onitsha as if the former was an opposition party stalwart. Before we come to the grief that is bound to be the outcome of this presidential peregrinations Hardball asks: to what purpose is all this?