Category: Commentaries

  • The cankerworm called malaria

    SIR: Last week, the Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant General Azubuike Ihejirika, disclosed that the Boko Haram sect has killed 3,000 people in the last few years. That is a high figure by all means and the menace needs a prompt solution. But by the end of this year, it is estimated that 300,000 Nigerians will have been killed, not by Boko Haram, nor through community clashes, road accidents, plane crashes, or war, but by a vicious killer called malaria. That figure is the combined population of five countries: Seychelles, Andorra, Dominica, Liechtenstein and San Marino.

    Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa; it is also the most hard-hit by malaria in the entire globe. Often referred to as ‘the disease of poverty,’approximately 50 percent of all malaria cases occur in only five of the world’s countries. Nigeria has the unenviable distinction of placing first among inflicted countries by raking up 23 per cent of all reported cases. Inflicting much pain and suffering, malaria not only destroys lives, but tears apart families and cripples the ability of countries to move forward.

    According to Nigeria’s National Malaria Control Programme, some 90 million of the country’s total population of 169 million are affected by malaria annually. Over 300,000 Nigerians perish as a result of the disease each year, a figure which represents ten per cent of the yearly death total in the African continent. Malaria is a cruel disease which strikes people of all ages, and 30 per cent of infant deaths in the country can be attributed to complications stemming from malarial infection. The disease also contributes to Nigeria’s ongoing economic issues, costing the developing country an average 160 billion naira (one billion dollars) a year in medical expenses and lost hours of productivity.

    As yet, no efficacious vaccine has been developed to combat malaria. In affected regions of the world, the only defence people have is the near-impossible task of avoiding mosquito bites. For this specific reason, malaria relief efforts to date have centred on mosquito net donation programmes. Sleeping under insecticide-treated nets has proven to be somewhat effective, preventing five to six out of every 1,000 children they protect from being infected, according to independent non-profit organization, the Cochrane Collaboration. Aerosols and coils are also known to be effective in combating the malaria scourge. Locally developed repellants have also been ascertained to be effective in the fight against these noxious insects in most rural settlements. As good as these measures are, they have harmful and side effects to human health.

    With our limited means of defence against the disease, malaria is once again on the rise. Recent research by Dr. Vincent Corbel and a team of French scientists, published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, shows that malaria-carrying mosquitoes are developing a tolerance to the various insecticides employed against them. Corbel’s research also notes a shift in the insects’ feeding habits, circumventing the use of mosquito nets by concentrating their attacks outdoors.

    The challenge is to eradicate mosquitoes completely. But since that is a long shot, the onus is on all stakeholders to find a more effective way of preventing mosquitoes from biting people, especially young children and pregnant women. Organizations as well as government agencies should take this as a challenge. In recent times, the Global Fund has saved more than 7.7 million lives by funding treatment and preventative care programmes across the planet. Leading humanitarian agencies such as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Roll-Back Malaria (RBM) and DFID have over the years been committedto fighting malaria.

    In the light of the present realities, it is expected that iconic innovative companies will invest more in research and development in order to come up with safe and affordable products that will ensure that the mosquitoes are entirely stamped out.

    • Azuka Onwuka

    Lagos, Nigeria.

    azonwuka@yahoo.com

  • Time to tackle rot in police

    Time to tackle rot in police

    SIR: Your esteemed newspaper would have done an evergreen service to this nation if this view of ours is published therein on the ongoing trial of former Inspector General of Police, Mr Sunday Ehindero and a former Commissioner of Police in charge of Budget, Mr John Obaniyi before an Abuja High Court over his alleged complicity in the misappropriation of about N557million belonging to the Nigerian Police Force (NPF).

    Though Ehindero has pleaded not guilty, to the six-count criminal charge preferred against him by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), it behoves the anti-graft agencies in the country not to look back in this effort to sanitise the system.

    Interestingly, the anti-graft agency has maintained that by its investigations, the accused persons allegedly diverted a whopping N300million out of N557million donated to the NPF by the Bayelsa State Government when President Goodluck Jonathan was its Governor. The money, the ICPC revealed, was traced to a fixed deposit account at a bank where it had yielded an interest of N9.8 million.

    Observing that the money was donated for the procurement of arms, ammunition and riot control equipment, ICPC, equally alleged that the accused persons placed another N200 million in a fixed deposit account with another bank where it once yielded N6.5 million interest.

    By the ICPC’s claim, the agency revealed that the fraud was perpetrated between May and November, 2006 during when Ehindero piloted the affairs of the Nigerian Police – between 2005 and 2007.

    There is no doubting the fact that the blood of many a concerned Nigerian will be running cold today whenever they ruminate on the magnitude of looting that has become the norm in this endowed nation where the masses suffer in the midst of plenty.

    An average policeman in the country today is a sorry figure. They work grudgingly on empty stomach and in most cases, with pitiably tattered bathroom slippers. They are poorly remunerated and armed. This is among the reasons they fall easy preys to armed robbers who boast superior weapons. Yet, year in, year out, we hear of mind-boggling allocations for police and other security agencies in our annual budgets. Then where have these allocations been going?

    Of course, save-our-souls telephone calls would have been causing serious traffic congestion in the air now, but we dare say that the entire world is watching the developments vis-à-vis the so-called commitment of the Goodluck Jonathan-led administration to fighting corruption no matter whose ox is gored.

    In this matter, Jonathan’s administration is equally on trial as the outcome of the Ehindero Trial will go down as part of his profile by which posterity will judge him and indeed, our beleaguered Judiciary.

     

    • Edwards Olawale

    President, People’s Voice against Corruption (PVC),

    Surulere, Lagos.

  • Nigeria needs improved identity management systems

    Nigeria needs improved identity management systems

    SIR: May I use this medium to express my concern over the worrisome dearth of records and the dangers it portends for our dear country, Nigeria.

    Many IT professionals have always advocated that government should create an integrated national database which will feature information about all its citizenry. A database from where public and private organizations can pull information, with needed data to tackle issues of security such as criminality and terrorism is essential. Instead of doing this, government has either completely ignored the calls. For example, billions of the country’s resources have been wasted on printing of national identity cards, registration of voters especially during elections, conducting population census and many other resources-wasting programmes.

    It is befuddling that the various agencies of government such as the defunct Directorate of National Civic Registration (DNCR), Independent Electoral Commission (INEC), and the National Population Commission (NPC) saddled with these responsibilities create different databases to achieve their goals. This would have been unnecessary if a national database exists. Same data, such as name, date and place of birth; local government area, state of origin, occupation, etc are repeatedly being sourced from individual citizens during the course of his/her lifetime. Examples include enrolment in schools, opening of bank accounts, application for employment and others.

    In 2007, the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) was established by the federal government as the only recognized, regulatory and institutional mechanism for implementing government’s reform initiatives in the identity sector, but unfortunately not much has been heard about the agency.

    As a regulatory and institution for implementing government’s reform initiatives, the objectives of NIMC as regards the National Identity Management Systems (NIMS)are to carry out the registration of citizens and legal residents as provided for in the Act; create and operate a National Identity Database, issue unique National Identification Numbers (NIN) to qualified citizens and legal residents; issue a multipurpose (Smart) Card to every registered person who is 16 years and above and provide a secured means to access the National Identity Database so that an individual can irrefutably assert his/her identity.

    Others include harmonizing and integrating Identity Databases in Government Agencies to achieve resource optimization and shared services facilities, collaborating with private sector and/or public sector institutions to deliver on the NIMS and register births and deaths in collaboration with the National Population Commission.

    It is however a sorry case that the assets which NIMC took over from the Directorate of National Civic Registration (DNCR) “could not be re-used” according to the former. The implication of this is that NIMC have to start all over. Nothing to show at all for the existence of our nationhood since 1960 when we got independence, no data!

    It is interesting that NIMC has, however, taken the bull by the horns by initiating the NIMS programme in 2009. The NIMS comprises the National Identity Database also known as a Central Identity Repository or Register (CIDR), a chip-based, secure identity card and a network of access and means to irrefutably prove or assert the identity of an individual among other things.

    Most importantly, what NIMC needs to look at critically is the clause that NIN will only be issued to every citizen from the age of 16 years and above. Does it mean that those under 16 are not Nigerians? NIMC should ensure that there should be no age restriction in obtaining NIN. Once a child is born into a hospital, he/she should be registered and enrolled into the NIMS and issued a NIN immediately to reduce the accumulation of those that are supposed to register and would help in monitoring each citizen, right from birth.

     

    • Olatunde Tijani,

    IT Consultant, CEO, Leo6 Technologies.

  • Imagine Obasanjo, Bakare as revolutionaries

    Imagine Obasanjo, Bakare as revolutionaries

    Almost in quick succession, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, a former president, and Pastor Tunde Bakare of the Latter Rain Assembly spoke about revolution or made revolutionary remarks in the past few days. Of the two, Bakare confuses us the more. Whenever he presents himself in public we are in a quandary what to make of him: a pastor full of the character of his Lord, temperate in speech, gentle, kind and empathetic, or a typical Nigerian politician who must have things his way, opinionated, aggressive, inconsiderate and, in the literal sense, eager to bring the house down on everyone? The former president, on the other hand, is a self-canonising and irritable politician who speaks daggers, if Hardball is permitted to adapt Shakespeare, and uses it with utmost relish.

    Obasanjo drew first blood and triggered the misspeaking that has culminated in the noisily talk of revolution. Newspapers and online media described his speech as revolutionary, and reported that it was made in Dakar, Senegal where he had gone over the weekend to attend a West African regional conference on youth employment sponsored by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the African Development Bank (ADB). They paraphrased him as saying that unless something drastic was done urgently to address youth unemployment, which hovered around 71 percent, we would head inexorably towards revolution. Inexpert paraphrasing can, however, become a very problematic issue in mass communication or in the hands of a clumsy redactor.

    Though the media said he spoke of revolution, all the former president said was this: “I’m afraid, and you know I am a General. When a General says he is afraid, that means the danger ahead is real and potent.” In his refutation after he was widely reported to have spoken of revolution or warned that one was likely, the former army general said those who quoted him spoke bad English. He could never call for a revolution, he said, apparently because he had too much at stake in a system that has callously misused its citizens, a system he himself did his damnedest to promote, ossify and institutionalise.

    If Obasanjo did not call for a revolution, what then did he do? A careful reading of his sanctimonious rationalisations in Dakar seems to lead the analyst to the point where he stopped just short of calling for a revolution, but hinted that social chaos was unavoidable. Knowing him for who he is, a dyed-in-the-wool conservative, he would see opportunity for his kind of leadership in such chaos; and more, he would recommend a suppression of protesters if it came to that. In short, he would do anything but recommend a revolution.

    Not only did the media misquote and misinterpret Obasanjo, their reports also brought out the hardliner in Bakare. The Latter Rain Assembly pastor simply assumed Obasanjo was quoted correctly and then concluded that the former president would be a victim of the revolution he called for in Dakar. More fanatically and sacrilegiously, Bakare said religious leaders, especially the private jet ensemble, could not escape the repercussions of popular revolt going by the damage they had caused the nation by their greed and connivance. Speaking in Lagos on Monday, he had said: “I am not inciting the public against the church and the mosque, but the congregation must demand explanation from their leaders. They must demand to know where they are getting the money. If it is not from the church offering, then it is from Abuja. All general overseers must go to prison. If the revolution does not begin in the church, it cannot spread; if it does not begin in the mosque, it will not spread, because they control the population.”

    From his Dakar speech and follow-up explanations, it is clear no one should ever imagine Obasanjo a revolutionary; this closet radical is too conservative and too indebted to the decaying system to be one. Bakare, on the other hand, does not just seem to be unalterably irreverent and iconoclastic; his remarks show him to be more than a revolutionary. He seems in fact to be a Trotskyite or perhaps even a Stalinist, or a hybrid of the two Marxist tendencies, but certainly not a priest.

     

  • Great Piece, ‘The decent society’

    SIR: I read Sam Omatseye’s weekly In Touch column of November 12, titled The Decent Society. It is brilliant, dispassionate and incisive.

    It is advocacy for “ground rules” to underpin the reconstruction of a decent society aligns with what I called the “agreement of a New Normal” in a recent speech for the 2012 Akintola Williams Annual Lecture. May your ink never dry.

    Blessings always,

     

    • Oby Ezekwesili

    Former Minister for Education

     

  • Gullibility is harming Nigeria on all fronts

    Gullibility is harming Nigeria on all fronts

    SIR: Kindly let me use your esteemed medium to express my worries over the worsening gullibility among my fellowmen which makes them fall easy prey to the antics of fraudsters who are in various forms.

    A Harvard study said the most gullible people in the world are the Filipinos. The study said “the causes of this gullibility include the inability to question information and an over-reliance on interpersonal sources.”

    All too often, Nigerians fall easily to swindlers, especially money doublers. Usually, the customer brings a small amount of money which he hides under a scrap of cloth.

    The trick is for a few customers to win small amounts to convince those with big money to play. Those who win the small sums are smart when they take their winning and walk away. But the greedy will stay and stake a bigger sum. The customer is given the cloth with the money and warned not to open it for a given period of time. Eventually, when the customer opens it he finds no money but scraps of paper. And when he returns to complain, the blame is laid on him.

    Even now, Nigerians will go for‘wonder banks’ that promise unreasonable returns.

    As Aristotle once observed, youths are easily deceived because they are quick to hope. In Nigeria the youth are lured easily by politicians for their own selfish purposes and eventually discard them. Looking for work to do, and finding none, the youth become a menace to the society.

    At no place than the church is the gullibility of Nigerians most manifest. Nigerians, believing that what ever the pastors tell them is divinely inspired, accept everything in ‘faith’. People have been flagellated to exorcise their purported demons. Men have allowed their pastors sleep with their wives believing that it will be the solution to the couple’s infertility.

    Nigerians, seeking for any means to get wealthy go to witchdoctors who are themselves poor. Idolaters carve images and call them their god. Nigerians have an unrivalled herd mentality.

    Suicide bombers have continued to bomb their own fellow Nigerians in the dubious belief that they are carrying out a divine injunction. And because of gullibility, there is no shortage of recruits. Without asking questions, without examining facts, Nigerians gang up to mob and burn fellow Nigerians alive.

    Tribalism is also a consequence of gullibility. Nigerian children grow up hating other tribes because their parents told them that those ones are their enemies. When the children grow up, they pass it on to their children and the cycle goes on. It is this deep-seated prejudice that has made Prof Chinua Achebe’s book “There was a country” an issue of truculence.

    Perhaps the most gullible among Nigerians is the government, particularly to organizations like the IMF and World Bank and some other so-called international lenders. As at today, Nigeria’s debt profile is $44 billion, and recently it signed a new deal to borrow $600 million from China’s Export-Import bank, supposedly to build a railway to service Abuja and its environs, a deal said to be in dispute. If our earnings from oil are judiciously used and leprous hands of corruption don’t touch them, we would not need to borrow money to finance any projects. Our creditors sold SAP (Structural Adjustment Programme) to us, and we bought it!

    Debt is a tool for manipulation by neo-liberalists led by these institutions and other institutions known as the”Washington Consensus”. They sold to a gullible Nigerian government the idea of fuel subsidy withdrawal. They preach privatization but are on hand to make sure local industries are not protected and dead, so that they will have leeway for their own exports. They are the ones who sold devaluation of currency and high interest rate to our government.

    Gullibility fosters corruption. That is why fuel subsidy thieves can manufacture any figures to get undue payments under the nose of gullible NNPC and government officials and still get away with it.

    It is in Nigeria where a juju man has more credibility than a professor of science. It is in Nigeria we vote politicians in because they had no shoes growing up.

    If we must develop as a nation government, institutions, individuals should be critical and refrain from swallowing everything hook, line and sinker.

    • Dr Cosmas Odoemena,

    Medical practitioner, Lagos.

  • Before we move into Mali

    Before we move into Mali

    The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is urgently putting together an intervention force of about 4,000 soldiers to reclaim Northern Mali from Tuareg rebels who on April 6, under the banner of the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA), unilaterally declared the independent state of Azawad. According to rebel leaders, Azawad, which constitutes about 60 percent of Malian territory, comprises the regions of Timbuktu, Kidal, Gao, as well as a part of Mopti region. If the territory endures, it will share borders with Burkina Faso to the south, Mauritania to the west and Northwest, Algeria to the north and Northeast, and Niger to the east and Southeast, with southern Mali to its Southwest. After the Battle of Gao on 27 June, the Islamist groups Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa and Ansar Dine took control of northern Mali, pushing out the MNLA.

    Until a number of issues are resolved, however, it would be unwise for Nigeria to join forces with the intervention force in Mali. Some of these issues were thrown up by the March coup d’etat led by Captain Amadou Sanogo, which saw the deposition of President Amadou Toumani Traore. Shortly after, ECOWAS imposed a short-lived regime of sanctions to pressure Sanogo to relinquish power. But even before crippling sanctions brought the usurpers to heel, ECOWAS inexplicably accepted a disingenuous compromise that foolishly forced the resignation of the president a month to the end of his tenure. It also led to the appointment of the former Speaker of the National Assembly of Mali, Dioncounda Traore, as the interim president, former Foreign minister, Cheick Modibo Diarra, as prime minister, and the installation of a new cabinet.

    While the coup leaders, unprincipled Malian politicians, and pusillanimous ECOWAS leaders engaged in horse-trading, the rebels in the northern parts of the country seized the opportunity to declare independence. This made the coup, which was in the first instance staged to force the deposed president to take the rebellion more seriously, quite absurd. In fact, Reuters described the coup as a “spectacular own-goal,” and Hardball in one of his many essays on Mali described the short-lived ECOWAS sanctions as snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

    It is obvious the UN Security Council is eager to approve the ECOWAS force in Mali because of the fear that Azawad was already turning into a hotbed of Islamic militants affiliated to al-Qaeda in the Maghreb (AQIM). Not only have the rebels brought Azawad under strict Afghanistan-type Sharia law, with stoning of suspects and amputation of their limbs, they have also welcomed battle-hardened militants from Libya and adventurers from Algeria looking for a fight. Neither ECOWAS nor the Security Council is prepared to have another territory in Africa where hotheads are trained and exported.

    Before Nigeria signs up for the Mali adventure, it must do its homework well, and the National Assembly must ensure it is satisfied before authorising the use of force. First is the fact that Algeria, which shares a 1,400km border with northern Mali, and which would be affected by a war next door, still thinks there is room for negotiations. Moreover, the US Secretary of State, Mrs Hillary Clinton, and the UN have been unable to persuade Algeria to agree to the use of force. Second, and more crucially, the underlying problems which predisposed groups to rebellion have not been addressed. The coup leaders foolishly played into the hands of the rebels by destroying democracy in Mali. If ECOWAS regains northern Mali, is it to hand it over to Captain Sanogo, who while not in power still wields enormous influence over the country and its weak interim leadership? In April, ECOWAS irresponsibly agreed to a 12-month transition to elected government. It is not clear how the defeat of rebels will serve as impetus to democracy, when it seems more paradoxically likely that it would serve as breathing space for Sanogo and his stooges.

    Before going into Mali, Nigeria must insist on the coup leaders surrendering effective control, their retirement from the military, and a reconstitution of the country’s security system. It is no use risking the lives of our soldiers for a cause that is doubtful and whose ends are uncertain and helpful only to coup leaders. Nigeria must also examine how far the transitional government has gone in restoring civil rule, especially when the ECOWAS mandate given to the Interim President to organise presidential and legislative polls will expire in five months.

     

     

  • Yuguda’s lordship over council chairmen must end

    Yuguda’s lordship over council chairmen must end

    SIR: Barely two weeks after being sworn in as the caretaker committee chairman of Ganjuwa local government area of Bauchi State, the state governor, Mallam Isa Yuguda, sacked the chairman, Alhaji Abdul Hassan. The sack was contained in a statement made available to journalists in Bauch and signed by the permanent Secretary (Political Affairs), Government House, Bauchi, Hashimu Yakubu, on behalf of the Secretary to the state Government, Mr. Ahmed Ibrahim Dandija.

    Though no reason was given for the sack of the chairman, the statement stated that the governor had appointed Sallau Baba Nassarawa as the new caretaker chairman of the local government, adding that the appointment took immediate effect.

    This is not the first time Gov.Yuguda of Bauchi state will be suspending or sacking council chairmen without giving reasons for their removal from office. It is either no reason was given or they have been replaced with “immediate effect”.

    It must be recalled that in 2010 the governor suspended the entire 20 elected council chairmen for eight months for an offence that indicted none of them.

    We believe that by now, 13 years into the present political dispensation, our governors would have shed off the toga despotic tendencies of military administrators. In as much as we are not holding brief for any erring council administrator, Nigerians will no longer accept a situation where council chairmen are removed for no justifiable reasons.

    • Jeff Nkwocha

    LG Study Network, Warri

     

  • We must eschew corruption, greed and waste

    We must eschew corruption, greed and waste

    SIR: It is clear to all now that the war against corruption has completely lost steam. What many of us do not understand is why governments and their functionaries still insult us by mouthing their so-called zero-tolerance for corruption. The correct position is that our governments at all levels now have zero-tolerance for anti-corruption war. The Otedola-Farouk scandal remains an open sore that will not get healed until and unless either or both the dramatis personae is or are prosecuted forthwith. That scandal makes a mockery of all claims that there is a war against corruption in Nigeria. Nigerians will not allow the matter to die down. The police have shown gross incompetence in the handling of the matter. The file should be withdrawn from whoever is at present investigating the allegation of bribery and given to officers or agencies that know what they are doing.

    The only amendment that would make sense is for the National Assembly to make crimes of corruption strict liability offences that would require the defendant show that she is innocent and justify how she came about her stupendous wealth and not for the prosecution to prove that she is guilty. The Constitution should also make it clear that there would be no interlocutory appeal in criminal cases. Without these safeguards corruption cases will go on endlessly as we are already seeing with the oil subsidy scam.

    Reckless spending by states and the Federal Government needs to be checked urgently. One example which we have always brought up is the indefensible sponsoring of pilgrims to Jerusalem and Saudi Arabia. This is wrong and constitutes an unconstitutional frittering away of public resources. Those who want to go on pilgrimage should use their own resources. Religion is a private affair. If governments do not stop this unlawful practice, we shall consider instituting actions against all of them. The same goes for sponsoring of lawyers in the Ministries and in private practice on jamboree trips to International Bar Association Conferences where Nigerians do not make any presentation except to present their rowdiness and gaudy lifestyle. These jamborees explain why our roads are not motorable, our schools have collapsed and why there is general poverty in the land. Let the jamboree stop please!

    • Bamidele Aturu Esq,

    Legal practitioner, Surulere, Lagos.

     

  • Revenue crisis may hit Nigeria soon

    Revenue crisis may hit Nigeria soon

    SIR: Kindly permit me a space in your popular newspaper. Let us imagine a situation when crude oil prices do not exceed 40 US dollars per barrel and the demand for Nigeria’s oil drops because the US, a country that imports about 40 percent of Nigeria’s crude oil, cuts down significantly on imports of the product from Nigeria for other exporters of crude oil to that country.

    Let us contemplate a situation where the revenue of Nigeria can no longer support the constitutional allowances and remunerations that Nigeria’s rulers award themselves. Would it not be interesting to see scavengers of Abuja scamper away because the honey pot has been wiped clean? Board members of many redundant and unprofitable government corporations shall find nothing again to satisfy their lusts. State governors shall be hard pressed for their lack of ingenuity and creativity as they would not be able to cope with riots in their states caused by their inability to pay salaries of generally unproductive government workers. The centre will not hold again then, and the attraction of this union shall rapidly wither away.

    The saying “the need to diversify the economy” has become a cliché since nothing is being done in that direction by the leaders. However, lack of patriotic governance continues unabated.

    The 2013 federal budget proposal presented to the national legislature by President Jonathan reveals three present problems with Nigeria: First, the amount of revenue Nigeria should legitimately expect next year is not fully covered in the proposal. Two, the federal government is still acting as though there is no urgency for increased capital votes for expenditure on infrastructural development, education for the future challenges of new technology, welfare programs such as public housing in partnership with local governments (See the fourth schedule of the 1999 constitution which makes building and maintenance of houses for the poor and infirm mandatory for local councils), and on strategic partnership with state governments on projects and programs that will reduce unemployment. Three, there is no evidence that the federal government is eager to cut down on big government spending by implementing the recommendations of the Orosanya’s committee it had set up, which include either complete scrapping of redundant departments and agencies or merging some of them that perform duplicate functions. The budget proposal is silent on shrinking of the size of government in any form or shape.

    Why has the Jonathan government kept the revenue from gas sales from

    the Nigerian people? This lack of transparency is not acceptable, and our legislators must ask those relevant questions. They must unearth revenues that the federal government keeps away from both the state and local governments. An insidious conspiracy of forging figures is going on while Nigerians who know don’t talk and those who don’t know don’t ask.

    Does Nigeria need a revenue crisis to reveal information about our genuine revenues that is kept from our prying eyes? We are told how 400,000 barrels of crude oil are stolen daily! Don’t we have government anymore, or are those figures spouted out just to hide what is stolen by the kleptomaniacs in public office under some innocuous headings? Most probably, it would not move relevant government officials to resign, and neither would they lose their jobs should that figure rise to even 1 million barrels a day in the near future. The secrecy about our nation’s revenues, which is continually being spun by the PDP government, has come to be accepted as a difficult mathematical open problem that no polymath is presently inclined to consider.

    We must consider this problem. We need to resolve this seeming puzzle. A revenue crisis may hit Nigeria very soon except Nigerians are allowed to choose leaders who have a heart for the people. We can’t afford leaders who are never alarmed by their incompetence and

    lack of empathy for the people.

    • Leonard Shilgba,

    Associate Professor of Mathematics,u

    American University of Nigeria.