Category: Commentaries

  • Kudos to Fayemi

    SIR: Dr. Kayode Fayemi, the Governor of Ekiti state deserves commendation for his laudable developmental giant strides in the state. He is a man who works quietly while positively impacting on the lives of his people.

    Before he came on board, many people in the state had looked on with gloom concerning the state of affairs in that land. Indeed, people were not happy at all with the administrations of his predecessors in office.

    However, all that have changed now. The people of the state are once more proud to associate themselves with the affairs of the state. Every weekend, people troupe into Ado Ekiti from different parts of the country to spend the weekend.

    Fayemi has made it possible for the capital to wear a beautiful look, such that people feel at home to unwind and discuss matters amicably. Until now, it was not like that. So, let the governor and his able team continue to push on; continue to provide for the people. Let Ekiti people continue to feel the impact of a gifted leader ready to serve without recourse to rancour or undue attention to himself.

    Ado is now a wonderful place to be. The roads are motorable and the people themselves wear cheerful looks on their faces now. Things have begun to look up once more for all of us in the state. This is more kudos to Fayemi and his people.

    • Serifat Oye,

    Ikare, Ekiti State.

  • Why reform is failing in Nigeria

    SIR: The nation’s budget for year 2012 is largely dependent on oil to the tune of about N5 trillion despite the fact that India is expecting, for the same period, $70 billion (N10.5 trillion) from software exports alone.

    Perhaps we need to remind ourselves of where both India and Nigeria are coming from. In the 1980s, when the Delta Steel Company (DSC) was being built by a consortium of foreign companies, Mecon of India was

    serving as consultants to DSC. Mecon seconded many of its experienced engineers to DSC, helping to groom their Nigerian counterparts.

    While these highly experienced expatriate Indians were chauffeur-driven in brand new, air-conditioned, official Peugeot cars, people in DSC were usually surprised to hear of how some of them were receiving letters from their home office, informing them of the approval of their motorcycle loans!

    This was at a time fresh Nigerian graduates looked forward to buying new cars after just a few years of working. This was before our present addiction to“tokunbo” products. But India has since transformed into one of the sensational economies including Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) while Nigeria is retrogressing deeper into poverty, which according to figures from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), has worsened from 54.7 in 2004 to 61.9 in 2011.

    Our state governors are busy bickering over statutory allocations, while their counterparts across the world are aggressively harvesting the infinite

    opportunities created by globalization. While we remain on revenue allocation, the world is moving in the direction of technological creativity.

    The real tragedy is that even with the pitiable state of our nation, our

    entrenched interests are still fighting viciously to ensure that nothing changed. More tragic is the fact that they are using the rest of us, to bring down anybody that tries to change things! We are helping our entrenched interests to ensure that nothing changes, and to deal with each officeholder that refuses to toe their line.

    The Goldman Sachs’ research report for 2007 listed Nigeria among its ‘Next 11’ group of countries expected to catch up to the fastest developing BRIC economies.

    That reform might even have been most providential, considering what could have become of the Nigerian economy if the global meltdown that soon followed had met us with a financial sector driven by fragile, under-capitalised banks!

    Similarly, the all-important Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB), which had clearly forgotten the destination of the 12-year journey it started since 2000 with President Olusegun Obasanjo’s “Oil & Gas Reform Implementation Committee” (OGIC), is now suddenly contemplating reality!

    This means that all those years of regulatory uncertainty, blocking billions of dollars of oil-sector investments, are coming to an end. Again, for the first time in our petroleum history, we now have a “Nigerian Content Development Act”, which has transformed the capacity for local participation in the sector.

    •Gabriel Zowam,

    Reform & Process Improvement expert, Abuja.

  • Obama’s re-election implication for Nigeria

    Obama’s re-election implication for Nigeria

    President Barack Obama won against his hard fighting Republican opponent, former Governor Mitt Romney in the November 6th 2012 presidential election. Obama, the first ever black President of the most powerful nation in the World in history, was born to a white American mother and a black Kenyan father.

    Obama incidentally emerged as the youngest person to emerge President of the United States of America in 2008 at the age of 48 and as the 44th President of that country. Obama’s phenomenal spell in politics began when he was elected to the Illinois state Senate. Little wonder then that Obama is seen as the friend of the poor especially when during the campaigns, his rich rival Governor Romney was caught on tape castigating poor Americans for dodging payment of tax and even stated that almost 47 percent of Americans don’t pay income taxes.

    Obama’s re-election could be considered a tough victory considered to be one of America’s most expensive electoral contests in history with over six billion United States Dollars going down in the estimation of a commentator on the Cable News Network (CNN).

    America’s campaign funding mechanisms are however water tight and transparent. Substantially, the just concluded election was focused on the thematic issue of the declining economy of the United States even as the eventual winner and the incumbent President came under considerable pressure for failing to keep to virtually all of his noble electoral promises which he rode on to defeat senator John McCain of the Republican party in the 2008 presidential poll which became a landmark/watershed event for producing the first ever African- American president for the united States of America.

    Few months before the November 6th 2012 poll, the influential The Economist magazine of theUnited States ruled out the possibility of President Obama’s re-election on merit considering what the editorial team saw as Obama’s colossal failure to deliver on any of his lofty electoral pledges since four years of becoming President.

    For instance, theSeptember 1st-7th 2012 edition of The Economist magazine reduced the reasons why Obama may lose his re-election bid into one major issue- for importantly failing to create new Jobs and save the United States economy from a free fall.

    According to The Economist; “Three million more Americans are out of work than four years ago, and the national debt is $5trillion bigger. Partisan gridlock is worse than ever: healthcare reform, a genuinely impressive achievement, has become a prime source of rancour. Business folk are split over whether he dislikes capitalism or is merely indifferent to it. His global-warming efforts have evaporated. America’s standing in the Muslim world is no higher than it was under George W. Bush, Iran remains dangerous, Russia and China are still prickly despite the promised resets, and the prison in Guatanamo remains open.”

    The Economist wrote further; “The defense of Mr. Obama’s record comes down to one phrase: it could all have been a lot worse. He inherited an economy in free fall thanks to the banking crash and the fiscal profligacy that occurred under his predecessor; his stimulus measures and his saving of Detroit carmakers helped avert a second Depression; overall, he deserves decent if patchy grades on the economy. Confronted by obstructionist Republicans in Congress, he did well to get anything through at all. Abroad he has sensibly recalibrated American foreign policy. And there have been individual triumphs, such as the killing of Osama bin Laden.”

    For us in Africa, Obama’s emergence as the first ever black American President was interpreted to mean that our continent and our largely impoverished citizens may witness advancement and development given that the United States apart from being the world’s richest economy also ranks as the largest trade partner of much of Africa.

    Obama’s last four years has however been anything but good for Africa just as most analysts say Africa under Obama suffered the worst neglect in the framing and implementation of the United States foreign policy.

    Andrew Beatty, an analyst who contributed a well researched work to the Africans review online was of the considered opinion that Africans never benefited much from the last four years of the Obama administration.

    Mr. Beatty recollected that when President Obama paid his first post election visit to Africa beginning with a stop in the West African country of Ghana, the United States President told Africans in very lucid terms that as a man with African blood running in his veins, his administration would work to better the situation of the citizenry of Africa who are facing widespread poverty; corruption; terrorism; lack of proper democracy and totalitarianism. But did he fulfil these solemn pledges? This writer replied in the negative.

    Andrew Beatty however offered possible raison‘d’être for why Obama’s Africa’s dream are largely still unrealistic.

    He wrote thus;”But as America’s Great Recession deepened, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan trundled on and the Arab Spring exploded, sub-Sahara Africa found itself in a familiar spot; on the back-burner.”

    With his re-election, President Obama in his victory speech also indicated in very subtle way that Africa may indeed not benefit from his second term just as crude oil rich nations like Nigeria, Angola that currently rank as trading partners of the United States may lose out given that Obama has showed clear determination to free America from excessive dependency on foreign crude oil resources.

    His second term may be used to developed alternative sources of energy such as the green energy and if this scientific aspiration is achieved, Africa’s and Nigeria’s prized asset-crude oil will inevitably witness a decline in international price. Already, political elite of Nigeria have reportedly stolen over $400 billion from crude oil revenue since the last three decades.

    Addressing his supporters after his re-election, President Obama said;

    “Tonight you voted for action, not politics as usual. You elected us to focus on your jobs, not ours. And in the coming weeks and months, I am looking forward to reaching out and working with leaders of both parties to meet the challenges we can only solve together – reducing our deficit, reforming our tax code, fixing our immigration system, freeing ourselves from foreign oil. We’ve got more work to do.”

    Writing under the catchy title of “The rich and the rest of us” The Economist edition of October 13th-19th 2012 also indicated that Obama’s second term would be devoted to solving the rising inequality in America and this disclosure is another indication that Africa may not witness much assistance from the Barack Obama’s second term because he has shown remarkable readiness to practice the wise saying that “Charity begins at home”.

    The Economist magazine had written thus; “Over the past 30 years incomes have soared both among the wealthy and the ultra-wealthy. The higher up the income ladder, the bigger the rise has been. The result has been a huge, and widening, gap-financially, socially and geographically-between America’s elite and the rest of the country”.

    What Barack Obama’s re-election should truly mean for Africa is that Africans must work hard to bring the needed changes in our collective fortunes by fighting corruption, mounting pressure on the political elite to abide by the tenets of accountability and transparency before looking up to the United States of America for the big brother assistance.

    • Emmanuel Onwubiko, Head, Human Rights Writers’ Association of Nigeria

  • Oil politics and oil wars

    Oil politics and oil wars

    No matter how passionately President Goodluck Jonathan pleads with the governments and people of Rivers and Bayelsa States to end the ongoing media war between them and curb rising communal tensions and animosities, there may be no one to heed his appeal. It is not because they intentionally want to defy the president or simply because they love to fight, or even because they do not appreciate the implications for the Nembe and Kalabari Ijaw from Bayelsa and Rivers States respectively. The reason is oil wealth and the power and possibilities it affords.

    The dispute between the two states assumed national dimension when Rivers alleged that the federal government appeared to have taken sides with Bayelsa over the boundary dispute pertaining to oil wells between the two states. The Soku oil wells, Rivers claim, are in the Akuku Toru Local Government Area of Rivers State, not in Bayelsa. The state also alleged that the federal government took sides by “recently” releasing to Bayelsa monies previously fixed in escrow account consequent upon the ongoing case before the Supreme Court. Pursuant to the dispute, eminent Kalabari sons and chiefs organised protests in Abuja drawing national and international attention to what they said was unfair handling of the dispute by federal government agencies, including the National Boundary Commission (NBC), security agencies, and Surveyor General’s office.

    Bayelsa not only insists the oil wells justifiably belong within its borders, it also condemns Rivers for blackmailing the president, a Bayelsan by birth, and unnecessarily stoking tensions and passions between the two states. The Bayelsa government also insisted a few days ago that the state had received no monies from any escrow account. It recommended that Rivers should go and get its facts right. Perhaps, soon, Rivers will give the public proof of how and when the escrow monies were released. It is also hoped that the Boundary commission will publish the 12th edition of the Administrative map of Nigeria to set the facts straight. Hopefully, someone will tell Nigerians why the 11th edition adjusted the map in 1999 to put the oil wells in Bayelsa, and why for more than 12 years the 12th edition has remained in the works.

    Neither this column nor any state, nor yet any group should take sides in the controversy just yet, no matter their private suspicions. But everyone is disturbed that from all indications both the Kalabari people in particular and Rivers State in general are wary of the camp the federal government seems to support. It is recalled that when the dispute began in 2000 with the publication of the 11th edition of the disputed map, the president was then deputy governor of his state, Bayelsa, and so was quite acquainted with the facts of the case. There are already insinuations the president could find it hard to detach himself from the dispute. But he has moved very quickly to douse such insinuations by twice calling the disputants to a meeting in Abuja and requesting (not order, as some newspapers reported) the quarrelling states to cease media war on the dispute. The states have of course gingerly ignored the admonition and interpreted the Supreme Court ruling on the matter very creatively.

    It is in the interest of everyone that the president should be successful in finding a just solution which the situation demands, not an amicable solution to the dispute as he and his aides announced they wanted. The reason is that all eyes are on him to see whether he would do justice, or he would embrace expediency. Already, because of the crisis of leadership bedevilling Nigeria and the rest of Africa, most continental leaders have sunk to the abysmal level of luxuriating in primordial sentiments. This is evident in the manner Nigerian leaders site projects in their communities so that they will have a community to happily retire to. The hugest challenge before Jonathan is to get Rivers and indeed all Nigerians to trust his sense of impartiality and judgement on the Soku oil wells dispute when even he, like many of today’s governors and unlike First Republic leaders, could not resist the parochialism of siting a federal university smack in the middle of Otuoke, his beloved town.

  • Aba: A resident’s creed

    SIR: We believe in Abia, the owner of all moribund industries and deplorable roads in Aba.

    Endowed with oil wells and a formidable football team, including cheering fans. We believe in Aba, the only commercial nerve centre of Abia state, once beautified and decorated by SOM and after some years went into decay but was fairly repaired by OUK and finally suffered under TAO, crucified and dead but not yet buried but would rise again under a forthcoming God fearing leader and be restored to its former glory. There and then its residents would heave a sigh of relief.

    We believe in the law and policy makers, supporters of multiple taxes and levies in Abia State, especially in Aba. We also believe in the judiciary, the overseers of all good and bad in the state and we hope for a sensitive leader who would put smiles on the faces of Aba residents in no distant time.

    We believe in one indivisible Nigeria that would launch us into the utopian world by the year 2020.

    I know they would call for the head of this writer but I fear no evil as I want to go to heaven for I cannot reach there if I did not die.

    • Nkemakolam Gabriel

    Port Harcourt

  • Obama defies the odds again

    Obama defies the odds again

    You did not have to be a clairvoyant to predict that President Barack Obama of the United States would be re-elected in the November 6 presidential poll. But Hardball ignored metaphysics and acted breathtakingly like a seer on Monday by sticking out his neck in favour of an Obama victory. And so after taking seven of the nine swing states (or eight out of 10 if Pennsylvania is counted among the battleground states), Obama surpassed expectations by winning, at press time, 303 Electoral College votes to his challenger, Mr Mitt Romney’s 206. If he takes Florida, which was still being counted when this column went to bed, he would climb to a massive 332 Electoral College votes. In terms of popular votes, he exceeded the Republican candidate’s votes by more than a million. Obama’s Electoral College votes doubtless painted a rosier picture than the popular votes (50% to 48%), which showed that the keen contest that ended in a dead heat before balloting, was after all anything but heated or dead.

    But the remarkable thing about Obama’s victory goes beyond the election statistics that has dazed everyone, how he won, what he intends to do, and what coded messages can be gleaned from his challenger’s strong showing in the ballot. Just as it is presumptuous to think that Hardball’s prediction of an Obama win was of any significance to the electoral outcome of the 2012 US presidential poll, it would also be hubristic to counsel the winner on what to make of his victory. It is more important to consider what Nigeria can learn from the poll.

    The US of course has the infrastructure to conduct a smart election and get the results out in a jiffy. They have done that again this year with the customary aplomb the world associates with them. Even though it is the third or fourth largest country in the world by total area and the third largest by both population and land area, this country of more than 314 million people, which in 2008 saw a voter turnout of about 131m out of a voting age population of more than 225m, has conducted elections without shutting the economy down and declaring a national holiday, and has declared the result virtually a few hours after the last ballot was cast. Such feat becomes notable when compared with the dreadful botch Nigerians have made of their elections. If Americans could do it, the question is why can’t we? Is the problem just one of technology or age of country?

    Contrary to what many believe, the 2012 US presidential poll was also not just about picking a president. Quite a number of issues were on the ballot for voters to indicate their preferences. And they killed many birds with one stone. Among the issues settled on Tuesday were:

    ·“Referendums in Maine, Maryland and Washington state approved same-sex marriage, while a measure in Minnesota to block gay unions failed

    Colorado and Washington state voted to legalise recreational use of marijuana

    ·California voters rejected a proposal to abolish the death penalty

    ·In a referendum, Puerto Ricans voted in favour of becoming the 51st US state, if Congress approves the move.”

    The election is also remarkable for the intervention of Hurricane Sandy, as Hardball noted a day before the election. Sandy is one more example of just how unfathomable human affairs are. Just when we think we have everything under control, it is precisely at that moment that forces greater than we are intervene to alter the course of history. How many military generals have lost a battle or a war because of intervening variables such as freak weather, supposedly small miscalculation of the thickness of soil, gradient of a hill, a break in communication between forward troops and resupply lines?

    To say Obama was lucky to win this election, when everything conspired against him, is to belittle his enormous talent as a public speaker, his charisma, his ability to connect with voters, his hard work and his incredible self-belief. But both his 2008 win and this latest one speak inexorably to the fact that there is a magisterial Supreme Being somewhere who sits over the affairs of men and who, as Albert Einstein once said, “does not play dice with the world.” Readers, especially the agnostics among them, would disagree; but we dare them to offer a more audacious explanation for why Obama has twice in less than a decade brazenly defied the odds.

  • Gbenga Omokhunu ‘Okada’ menace

    Many people living in Lagos would agree that in a manner that can largely be found as consistent, the Lagos State government has displayed that it is prepared to shoulder its responsibilities to the people, the environment, and of course the future of the city. The challenges and the threats confronting a city composed in the way that Lagos is, needs to be handled with great sense of duty and responsibility. Lagos has the potential of suddenly becoming unmanageable, and things can indeed spiral out of control. This possibility remain a constant headache and must occupy the attention of those who are in charge of managing the city.

    Functional and well-run cities across the world are managed within the ambit of visible and accountable leadership, strong laws, strong institutions, as well as a disciplined and committed citizenry. Today, the challenge of managing a thriving, livable and sustainable city has become even more arduous. Cities continue to draw and command serious attention. Countries are rated and taken more seriously on the strength of their cities. Cities are now major drivers of investment decisions. Investments that would end up driving the local economy on the path of development are contingent upon the quality and visible tracks of progressive and result-oriented city management. Cities have also become centres of national socialisations, as other city and town managers begin to benchmark, copy and emulate successful practices and models. Cities have not just local, but international attractions, and indeed define and bouy perceptions. When people come into your city, they can quite easily judge what kind of people you are.

    In Lagos, as in most parts of Nigeria, motorcycles are popularly referred to as Okada. The Okada phenomenon, also sometimes referred to as the Okada menace, has over time become one of the delicate touchpoints in Lagos. Depending on your side of the divide, arguments for and against it can be unassailable. It is within this prism that one can conclude that the hues and cries generated by the restriction of Okada to some routes in Lagos are not unexpected. And admittedly, this is not just by the practitioners, but of course users, also activists, political opponents and opportunistic critics and cynics.

    But it was not always like this! Until just a few years ago, Okada was virtually a non-existent feature in the consciousness of the average Lagosian. Though existed elsewhere, it was never considered as fit for this environment. Rather, we had the molues, the kabukabus, the danfos, and a few and far in-between taxis or cabs. And unlike what is beginning to emerge, the transportation system was badly structured, badly organised, largely informal, and could be described as a knocked-down engine. Government intervention in terms of the enabling environment and provision of physical infrastructure was minimal and not based on any sustainable strategy. However, with astronomical increase in population, unchecked urban expansion, sundry economic pressures and other city-related challenges, the okada trade jumped on Lagos and grew to become an invidious phenomenon.

    The most common argument against the okada trade from many quarters is the unacceptable rate of accident fatalities that have maimed and also claimed many lives. This argument cannot be overstressed.

    It does not matter the sentiments, we as a people need to stop succumbing lamely to dehumanising conditions in order to justify a living. What may be considered expedient, in most cases, is not necessarily dignifying. Part of the reasons we have come to this sorry pass as a people is that we have become people of very little sense of personal and collective dignity.

    A few years back, it was possible to get good barbers, tailors, mechanics, panel beaters, welders, vulcanisers, masons, builders and the likes. Today, the story is different. Pay a visit to any of such workshops these days, you would find only the sole proprietor doing all the work. In many instances, he is old and therefore declining in capacity and productivity. Ask why he is the only one in his workshop, he would tell you that all the young ones in the neighbourhood have taken up Okada as a trade. Therefore, we have stopped producing artisans and workmen! It is not an unfounded or far-fetched fact that we now rely on workmen from Ghana, Guinea, Togo, Benin Republic, etc.

    Even school children are riding okada! What kind of future are we envisaging?

    Anyone who has fallen victim of the rage of the okada riders would support any move to contain this menace. In their typical unruly manners, they do not obey traffic rules. They ignore traffic lights, ride on kerbs and flowers, meander through tight angles and columns, ane end up damaging anything in sight. They damage urban infrastructure and run away. They would break your vehicle lamps, tear down your bumper and damage your side mirror, and quickly bolt from the scene.

    Many of them also rob. They follow people as soon as they step out of the bank carrying anything that looks like cash. They rob them of the cash and leave them stunned, if they’re lucky not to have been shot. There are countless stories to tell.

    To change the face of Lagos, courageous leadership is a prerequsite. A few attempts to deliver on strong reforms have always been met with very stiff resistance from diverse quarters and many times with ulterior designs. One would recall a few years ago when the Ministry of Transportation came up with the idea of MOT testing for vehicles in Lagos. The idea was so badly received, lampooned, condemned and derided until the government abandoned it, the merits of it notwithstanding. The Bus Rapid System also suffered the same elite cynicism. All manner of complaints raged against it. Now BRT is working in Lagos. Of course many people would remember the days of na flower we go chop? Similarly, the Oshodi transformation process was not without its fair share of cynicism. Fortunately, government managed to successfully push it through. Today, we all point to it as one of the wonders of government performance.

    Government must set clear terms and limits of residency and behaviour for people within its borders. That necessity must not be allowed to be impinged. The alternative is chaos and lawlessness. Many of the people complaining today will simply fold up their activities in Lagos and return to their towns and villages. In a recent Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) ranking of the world’s best cities to live in, Lagos was ranked in the bottom top ten on liveability index. Of the top 20 cities that McKinsey has identified as growth hot spots for companies targeting young, entry level consumers, the list includes urban centres such as Lagos, Dar es Salaam, Ouagadougou, Kampala, Lusaka and Ibadan. However, according to MasterCard’s Index of Global Destination Cities, Cairo, Johannesburg, Casablanca, Nairobi and Tunis have been ranked as the top five destination cities in Africa. Lagos did not feature. These are grim statistics that should worry any serious government, and it underscores the fact that, in fact, Lagos needs much stronger actions, and urgently too.

    Lagos, no doubt, requires a modern, integrated and well-managed transportation system. Okada has no role to play. It is a misnomer and must not be allowed to become a permanent feature.

  • On the Boko Haram’s offer of dialogue

    SIR: The ripple in the polity is heightening as a result of the latest parley offer by the dreaded Boko Haram Islamic group to the federal government. The group said it preferred dialogue to hold in Saudi Arabia and not in Nigeria. According to Abu Mohammed Ibn Abdulaziz, who claimed to be a leader of the group, “five of our members have been mandated buy our leader, Imam Abubakar Shekau, to handle the dialogue with some prominent people in the country including the former military leader, General Mohammadu Buhari”. It also picked Dr. Shettima Ali Monguno, Ambassador Gaji Galtimari, Mrs Aisha Alkali Wakil, and her husband, Alkali Wakil and former Yobe State Governor, Senator Abba Bukar Ibrahim as mediators.

    Despite misgivings, the Federal Government has indicated its desire to commence discussing with the sect as well as considering compensating members of the violent Islamic sect, especially, those alleged to have suffered from the violence and “were seen to have been killed unjustly”.

    Boko Haram has never hidden its desperation in advancing the course of its brand of Islam in the country through violence and unbridled terrorism and wanton destruction of lives and property, which Islamic scholars have said is antithetical to the tenets of the religion.

    While apologists of the group have continually attributed Boko Haram’s mindless acts of terrorism to poverty, unemployment and bad governance, the group itself has held fast to its stated mission of foisting its variant of the Islamic governance on the northern parts of the country, making it complex and difficult to truly understand its real mission.

    To worsen matters, the group already has international recognition as is reputed to be collaborating with two of the world’s most vicious and notorious terrorist groups.

    It is hoped that the much-sought dialogue is not going to be an invitation to more security troubles for the nation. Already, the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) has threatened “serious consequences” if the government accedes to demands made by the group without releasing its leader, Henry Okah. Okah is currently standing trial in South Africa for terrorism over his alleged involvement in the 2010 Independence Day anniversary bombings in Abuja.

    It is saddening that government has displayed poor political will and bad intelligence in fighting the insurgence. This appears to be encouraging criminal groups to canvass for official recognition, dialogue, compensation and amnesty.

    As a way out, the Federal Government should consult widely by taking into consideration, the security implication of its decision before going for the parley. The government needs to go the extra length by carefully examining the genuineness of the group making the demands before engaging in any dialogue.

    Again, why should the talk be held in Saudi Arabia? Is the nation at war? The federal government should avoid conveying the impression that the nation is tending towards a failed state.

    • Adewale Kupoluyi

    Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta.

  • SOS to President Jonathan

    SIR: Our dear President, I choose to write you publicly as all avenue’s to address our matter has been exhausted because those charged with such responsibilities are not sensitive to our plight.

    As a listening President with conscience, you had given approval in July this year for the release of the sum of N34 billion to pay the outstanding severance benefits of those that were laid-off in 2007 as a result of the public service reform exercise.

    It may interest you to know, sir, that up till now the Bureau for Public Service Reform (BPSR) and the office of the Accountant General of the federation (AGF) are still sitting on the money for no cause. All efforts to get them pay our benefits have yielded no result as they are buck passing while some are feeding fat on our sufferings.

    In this case, the BPSR is the major problem: These are Nigerians who have served the country in the past diligently, who still have school feed for children to pay, medical bills to pay, etc still they are held-up by same Nigerians as a result of corruption.

    Sir, only your untiring efforts can bring succor to us, the dying and suffering laid-off reformed workers nation-wide.

    • Danfulani Ahmed Shika,

    ABU, Zaria.

  • Ribadu-led petroleum task force

    Ribadu-led petroleum task force

    As it has once again turned out, the PDP administration from 2001-2011, according to Ribadu draft report, presided over the theft of N10 trillion worth of crude oil. In all, the entire nation lost about N16 trillion through all sorts of shady deals by PDP and its associates.

    Other findings include the loss of $29b from 2001- 2011, the theft of 250,000 barrels of crude oil daily within the same period and also the loss of a total of $183m in signature bonuses paid by oil companies to the federation.

    There were also reports of indebtedness of foreign oil firms to the nation such as Addax, now a unit of China’s state-owned Sinopec, which owes Nigeria $1.5 billion in unpaid royalties, part of a $3 billion black hole of unpaid bonuses and royalties owed by oil bonuses. Shell, the report also says, owes Nigeria’s government N137.57 billion ($874 million) for gas sold from its Bonga deep offshore field while oil majors owed $58 million between them for gas flaring penalties. They were also not adhering to newer higher fines.

    Among other recommendations, the Ribadu committee want the NNPC re-organised or be scrapped.

    Alison Madueke who sat on the KPMG report for months has also acknowledged receiving the draft of Ribadu’s report over a month ago without any action. She has however now disclosed that a committee had been set up by the Ministry of Petroleum Resources to look into the “differences in perspective on the Ribadu committee report” and make an “input”.

    Dr Doyin Okupe’s heartache on the report however was that the report was illegally and prematurely released. According to him “what was irregularly released prematurely to the media is a draft copy which still requires full assent of all members of the committee and clarifications and due process from the originating ministry before the official handing over to the Presidency”. Like Dr Reuben Abati, who also found it strange that the report found its way to the pages of newspapers even before it was officially presented, he has once more reassured us of the president commitment to fighting corruption. There is however a curious parallel of views between the minister, the two government spokesmen, and the duo of Oronsaye and Otti who have tried to discredit Ribadu’s report.

    While no one can begrudge the president’s men for their views on their principal’s commitment to fighting corruption, Doyin Okupe’s attempt to distant the Jonathan administration from the monumental stealing going in government is an assault on Nigerians. Was it not under this government that the number of fuel importers jumped from about two dozen to over 140 out of which 25 are currently facing legal actions for swindling the nation of about N3 trillion? Even if Okupe thinks Nigerians suffer from collective amnesia, Nigerians could not have forgotten so soon the revelations from Lawan Farouk report which the government tried to discredit, or the findings from Aig Imokhuede-led technical committee set up by the government itself.

    On the current Ribadu findings which those who have just secured plum government jobs are trying to discredit, Ledun Mitte, chairman of National Stakeholders Working Group (NSWG) of the Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) said would not have been necessary if the successive findings of the NEITI had been implemented. In fact in his opinion, the Ribadu’s committee report only reiterated the revelations that had come out of the successive NEITI reports that had shown that the nation was losing about $9.8 billion or N1.373 trillion in outstanding recoverable funds due to the federation account from oil companies.

    NEITI has so far conducted three different cycles of industry audits spanning the period 1999-2004, 2005 and 2006-2008. The statement stressed that each of the past NEITI audit reports clearly identified financial, physical and process lapses, and revealed a loss of some $2.6 billion due to underpayments, under-assessments, poor judgment in the computations of volume of crude sales and other leakages. Another round of comprehensive audit of the oil and gas sector for 2009- 20011 which began early in the year is expected to be concluded next month, December. In the light of the above, it is perhaps only government functionaries like Okupe and Alison-Madueke that have faith in government commitment to fighting corruption.

    Instead of addressing the cynicism of the governed, PDP that has proved over the years that it doesn’t just give a damn about the governed is busy attacking the opposition for performing its constitutional role of holding the ruling party accountable. What in a democracy is disrespectful in ACN’s argument that “both Orasanye and Otti should have resigned their membership of the committee the moment they were given the plum jobs to avoid the apparent conflict of interest. The fact that they stayed on, only to disparage the report of the task force so openly and ferociously at the end, is the clearest indication yet that they were meant to play that exact role of spoilers’’.

    In fact, that was the argument of Ribadu who was pained by the turn of events. According to him, most of the members saw their appointment as a call to duty when appointed in February, and therefore worked round the clock during the first three months. Steve (Orosanye), according to him, “never participated in any of the meetings for this work. And during the course of the committee work, Steve became a member of the board of the NNPC. And Mr. Otti became a director in NNPC. They chose to remain as members of the committee instead of resigning”.

    But as usual, government has an ally in Tribune that has always been too quick to help it identify its enemies. As part of effort to discredit the report, Tribune alleged that some politicians have hijacked the report. Quoting sources close to security, the paper claimed ‘A report in the custody of government indicates that a former presidential aspirant, who is still hopeful of contesting the 2015 election met on Saturday with a chieftain of one of the leading opposition parties in Abuja where the plot to hijack the Ribadu report as a launch-pad for the 2015 election was said to have been hatched.’

    PDP on its part, instead of showing remorse for the greed of its members is diverting attention from the issue at hand to pillory the opposition which is doing its job of keeping the government on its toes. As if the party forgets we are running a democracy, it is accusing the opposition of disrespect for the presidency.

    The Ribadu Draft Report is destined for the same fate as the KPMG report whose non-implementation, Olisa Agbakoba had described as a national embarrassment; like Lawan Farouk fuel subsidy scandal, about which Okonjo Iweala said “we are going to be very aggressive in recovering money owed government and block all revenue leakages”; and like Imokhuede’s technical report being half heartedly implemented.