Category: Commentaries

  • Attention PHCN, Ogbomoso

    SIR: Generally speaking, electricity supply to Ogbomoso city has improved greatly in relation to some years ago when socio-economic activities of the city were comatose due to epileptic power supply. Therefore, management of the Power Holding Company of Nigeria, Ogbomoso deserves commendation for this improvement. However, I will like to draw the attention of the company to low current experiencing in some parts of the city.

    Current being supplied areas like Agbala Daniel, Iwagba, Oke Anu, Papa Adeyemo, Stadium area, Odokoto, Caretaker, part of Randa among others, is too low and could not be useful for any socio-economic activities. Aside, the PHCN is short changed because pre-paid meters do not read under that condition. Equally, those with old meters or direct lines are being short-changed because they are paying for darkness.

    I implore the management of PHCN to find solution to this problem for the sake of the users and of course, income of PHCN. Enough transformers were provided for the city by the immediate past government in Oyo State. The two local governments in Ogbomoso metropolis that is, Ogbomoso North Local Government and Ogbomoso South should be made to account for distribution of the transformers. Equally, there are some idle transformers in some areas of the town like Oke Afin, Aislaff area, Apake and so on. There are also some transformers in the city that are as old as the city itself. PHCN should please replace these moribund transformers for the sake of the socio-economic activities of Ogbomoso city.

    Adewuyi Adegbite

    Apake, Ogbomoso.

  • Mo Ibrahim Index: Africa’s famished leadership landscape

    Mo Ibrahim Index: Africa’s famished leadership landscape

    It must be embarrassing to the Mo Ibrahim Foundation and humiliating to the African continent that no one was found eligible this year to be awarded the Mo Ibrahim Prize for good governance, which is given annually to a democratically elected leader who voluntarily quits office after registering great impact on his country. The award was instituted in 2006 by the communications entrepreneur and billionaire businessman of Sudanese origin, Mo Ibrahim. So far, only three former leaders have won the $5 million prize: Joaquim Chissano of Mozambique (2007), Festus Mogae of Botswana (2008), and Pedro Pires of Cape Verde (2011). In the past four years, there has been only one winner, with the foundation declaring that it failed to give it in 2009, 2010, and now 2012 because it would not compromise leadership excellence, which the prize rewards.

    Along with the inability of the foundation to give the award this year, it also issued its report on good governance, which it said reflected only a marginal improvement over previous years. Entitled the Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG), it uses 88 indicators supplied by 23 independent data providers from inside and outside Africa. The foundation reports, among other things: “While governance continues to improve in many countries, some of Africa’s regional powerhouses – Egypt, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa – have shown unfavourable governance performance since 2006. Over the past six years, all four countries have declined in two of the four main IIAG categories – Safety & Rule of Law and Participation & Human Rights. Each of these four countries deteriorated the most in the Participation sub-category, which assesses the extent to which citizens have the freedom to participate in the political process. South Africa and Kenya have also registered declines in Sustainable Economic Opportunity. And Nigeria, West Africa’s powerhouse, has for the first time this year fallen into the bottom ten governance performers on the continent.”

    While the four powerhouses have proved a major disappointment to many analysts, Nigeria is understandably the main focus for Nigerians. It would have been a surprise to rate Nigeria highly given how brutish life has become in the country. It is hoped that rather than join issues with the foundation, Nigerian leaders, particularly their abrasive and unrestrained spokesmen, would see the report as a true reflection of the situation in the country and an encouragement to spare no effort at reversing the negative image insecurity, destabilisation of the judiciary, extra-judicial killings, and political exclusion have brought upon her.

    South Africa’s poor rating is also not surprising, as readers of this column must have expected. This column in 2008, it will be recalled, regretted the leadership change in South Africa’s ruling African National Congress (ANC) that brought in Mr Jacob Zuma, whom it described as distracted and sometimes frivolous, in place of the aloof intellectual, Mr Thabo Mbeki. Almost immediately Zuma became President of South Africa in 2009, his country’s image began to fare very badly in the face of his superficiality, social indiscretions and political blunders.

    As the Mo Ibrahim Prize indicates, Africa is indeed a famished continent with few leaders of enviable reputation. Increasingly, the Foundation will find it harder to give the prize, and harder still not to lower its standards or compromise excellence as it vowed. Take Nigeria, for instance. In its more than five decades of independence, it has had only one leader out of 13 who vacated office in line with constitutional provisions – Chief Olusegun Obasanjo. But if Obasanjo fooled himself that he left office willingly, or that, as his praise singers chorused, he impacted positively on the country in line with the Mo Ibrahim Index, he fooled no one else. He left office groaning so loudly that the whole world noticed his pains. Even if the African leadership award were to suffer some little compromise and he was favourably considered, Hardball would himself lead the protest.

     

  • Jonathan’s Yoruba friends

    Jonathan’s Yoruba friends

    SIR: Nothing can be more unfortunate than hearing that the so-called Yoruba leaders were pursuing President Goodluck Jonathan for juicy and sensitive positions. There can be no better way of eradicating the policy of principled opposition established by the Yoruba sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo.

    An Awoist can be justified if the government of the day were ideologically sound and progressive, but not a government flown by those milking the nation dry, perpetrating abject poverty and criminal activities, such as armed robbery and kidnapping.

    The Nigerian security forces and the general populace are under severe attacks from Boko Haram, kidnappers, armed robbers, and marauding Fulani herdsmen all over the country. The Police are misused in Abuja, Port Harcourt, and elsewhere in the country. How unimaginable to hear that the concern of the so-called Yoruba leaders is how to solicit juicy positions for Yorubaland, rather than how to overthrow mediocrity and corruption?

    Yes, it is selfish, self-centered and myopic at the same time. It is a subtle way of seeking legitimacy for a discredited government that has imported Boko Haram terrorism, petroleum scam and scarcity, together with the attendant mass penury.

    I am again appealing to well-meaning Nigerians to rally round opposition unity. What is happening in Yorubaland now, under the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) is an indication that the opposition will not perpetrate business as usual. However you view it, things have changed for better in Edo State and Yorubaland under the ACN. Yes, I criticize the ACN governors because no condition is perfect, but I know the difference compared with when the states were under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    Indubitably, Pa Awo must be lamenting in heaven that unexpected persons are betraying his policy of principled opposition to ask an anti-people government for juicy and sensitive positions. As the Yoruba would say, Omo eni iba joni iba dun (How pleasant it will be to see your own child resemble you in character and behaviour!).

    Let the selfish ethnic leaders continue to romance with Jonathan while Nigeria is wrecked by miss-governance.

    • Pius Oyeniran Abioje, Ph. D,

    University of Ilorin

     

  • Anambra and a governor’s passion

    Anambra and a governor’s passion

    SIR: Nigeria has been traumatised by the menace of malignant water which besiege and sack neighbourhoods with no threat spared on lives and properties. Lives have been lost and princely properties either swept off or laid waste by rampaging flood. The situation elicits sadness as those affected lay abandoned and helpless while the devastation seeks new victims. Many travelers have had tastes of the bitter pill, being either cut off by failed roads and bridges or caught up in surging water. It has been pains, ruins and emptiness in the hearts of victims while the physical environment bows too in submission.

    Signs are that Anambra State, east of the Niger, seems to be experiencing an overflow of the sadness dotting the route of the uncontrolled spread of the mighty River Niger and many other large bodies of water in the state. The gory scene has not been witnessed before in the communities as not even the oldest of men in the affected communities have any faint memory of such mishap among them. Majority of the communities in Ogbaru, Anambra West, Anambra East and Ayamelu Local Government Councils are submerged in water. Some parts of Awka North Local Government Council and parts of Onitsha also suffer heavy flooding. And the hope of an immediate recess hangs loose, as the water would not stop surging into new grounds.

    While these calamities on man and materials are bemoaned, the capacity of leaders to rise to the daunting challenges of leadership is here scaled. Given the impromptu nature of the hazards, none (victims and leaders alike) had the luxury of a programmed window-dressing for political posturing. The nature of it all caught everyone in their true elements. It is in the light of this that one makes a critique of Governor Peter Obi’s response towards alleviating the pains of his people in the flood-ravaged parts of Anambra State.

    Governor Obi has proved himself an exponent of politics for the development and well-being of his people. Watching him wade through deep flood in search of his people submerged in water in many of the affected communities tells the story of commitment in leadership. Where most leaders would at best send their aides, Obi would rather confront the crises himself preferring his aides attend to less challenging tasks.

    The situation in Anambra where residential houses, including upstairs, industrial estates, vast areas of cultivated farmlands, markets, schools, churches, hospitals, roads and bridges are submerged in water terrifies still as there seem to be no ready clue as to how much longer both the government and the people of the state would contend with the challenges attendant to the disaster that flooding has visited on the State and its people.

    It is hoped that public spirited persons, organisations and indeed the Federal Government would heed the entreaties of Anambra State government and make haste to bring relief to the displaced persons whose hope of survival hinges on such interventions.

     

    • Okechukwu Anarado

    Adazi-Nnukwu,

    Anambra State.

     

  • Whither government of the people?

    Whither government of the people?

    SIR: I was stuck, recently, watching the Special Adviser to the President on Research and Strategy, Douglas Oronto itemise government’s “Sure and Steady Transformation of Nigeria” agenda on a Sunrise Program on Channels Television.

    If dreams or set goals were to be awarded on merit of their presentation, or of their change-effecting potential, then the objectives of this present government deserve a national honour for their simplicity, objectiveness and seeming enticement.

    Unfortunately however, like it has always played out, a lot more is easier said than done. From Agriculture to Aviation, Health, Education and Infrastructure… both past and present records of government efforts puts it way below the possibility of achieving these lofty aims. The keywords has always been an increasing government scope and size, underachievement and sadly, unapologetic requests for another shot at their failure.

    The Government, according to Oronto, is determined at improving agricultural productivity in Nigeria, increase access to standardised education, improve the conditions of airports, work on sustainable healthcare and improve the level of infrastructure, citing the recent positive remarks on improvement in power supply by citizens all over the social media.

    Oronto’s message to the people is simple. That the elected government is simply a gracious machinery, foisted on the people it was meant to serve and protect. Hence, the sworn duty to protect and defend the people is replaced with favours within the corridors of power, and a sympathetic consideration for the people at the mercy of the whims and discretion of whoever holds power.

    The facts proving the government’s position as a babysitter on a blank cheque is apparent and vast. Regardless of how good promising adevelopment blueprints are, or their potential for maximum results, a society without security is akin to a basket being filled with water.

    It is time to quit drawing water into baskets as there can never be any meaningful socio-economic growth and development in an atmosphere riddled in insecurity and chaos. No matter how beautiful the picture of a country is painted, and forced down the throat of gullible citizens using state propaganda machinery, you can only succeed fooling all the people some of the time, but surely as Abraham Lincoln maintains, “you cannot fool all of the people all the time.”

    The gory picture of four young Nigerians cold-bloodedly murdered in a conspired effort of an entire community requires no effort to shed tears. This barbarous act only reflects the very attitude of the government towards the security of its own people. While lives and properties were continually being assaulted into extinction in parts of the country, the government is busy boosting security in the seat of power.

    The need for a nation, poised for growth and development is not a gracious government, but a government constituted for the benefit of the people, by the people and for the people, to protect inalienable their rights to life, defend their liberties and secure their properties.

    • Fiyinfoluwa Elegbede

    Greenville, South Carolina,

    USA.

     

  • Teachers’proficiency test, not about Fayemi

    Teachers’proficiency test, not about Fayemi

    SIR: I first wrote about the Teachers’ Development Needs Assessment (TDNA) that has brought about different versions of fabled stories in Ekiti State when it was becoming an ill-used tool in the hand of political spin doctors. I stated the needs for it and urged the Ekiti State government to adequately allay the fears of retrenchment being expressed by the teachers.

    In all sense of fairness, I dare say that the government has played its part well. What I find unacceptable is the continued seemingly non-negotiable stance of the teachers in preferring to stick to their guns, irrespective of interventions from almost all stakeholders. It may then not be too far-fetched at this point to ask what the agenda of these teachers is.

    The Ekiti State Chairman of the Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT), Comrade Kayode Akosile, says they are not scared to write the test as speculated in some quarters. Well, I say they are. No doubt, there are a few shining lights that one can be proud of, but most of the teachers cannot even eat what they sell.

    Teachers in Ekiti State, and indeed Nigeria, know themselves and can readily, if they want, give you an objective assessment of one another. In fact, the competent and the objective ones will tell you we are truly on a downward slope and could soon crash. If a primary school teacher cannot read English text smoothly, what is the fate of the pupils under his/her care?

    If a teacher of English language cannot differentiate between ‘tin’ and ‘thing’ in pronunciation, where then are we headed? If a so-called secondary school English teacher does not know the ‘h’ in ‘honest’ and ‘honour’ is silent, how can his/her student pass Oral English in their SSCE?

    At first, I blamed the NUT leadership for its stance on the TDNA, but I have since stopped doing that. As a union, NUT must protect its own, good or bad. It also has a duty not to allow its dirty linen to be washed in the open. It must continue to find reasons for the teachers not to write the TDNA, even if the reasons are unreasonable and pointless.

    And in trying to do that, Governor Fayemi has been demonised. But this is not about Fayemi or Eniola Ajayi. In four or eight years, Fayemi will be gone, Eniola will move on but Ekiti will be here. The children of the illiterate and the un-lettered, who cannot afford the luxury of private schools, will continue to attend these schools and trust me, ‘church’ will continue to be ‘shursh’ and ‘orange’ will always be ‘horange’.

    At this point, let us push vain politics aside and join the government in ensuring that we get it right. Even if all the teachers would not write the TDNA, we must find another way to change our present course to salvage our future. We owe it a duty to our society and our children to build for them a foundation that could make them competent doctors, lawyers, activists, journalists, broadcasters, social commentators, policy-formulators and teachers of the future.

    ‘Dimeji Daniels

    Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State

  • Budget wars

    Budget wars

    For many months before President Goodluck Jonathan finally read the 2013 budget estimates, the National Assembly had been squirming over what they described as poor implementation of the 2012 budget. The legislators became so angry that for a time it was believed they were unwilling to have the president present the budget. There were even parliamentary discussions suggesting the National Assembly would first undertake a tour of the country to assess how well the president implemented the outgoing budget, before he was given a hearing. Eventually, the budget was presented last week, but not without its dramatic moments, some of which were captured by the press. The president, it was reported, uncharacteristically and directly requested for copies of the scathing speeches made by the Senate President David Mark and Speaker of the House of Representatives Aminu Tambuwal on the federal government’s indefensible budgetary habits. A surprised and embarrassed Tambuwal was said to have demurred, but finally surrendered his copy to the president.

    In their remarks, Mark pledged to Jonathan and all Nigerians that the legislature would not “robotically pass the budget estimates as presented,” while Tambuwal groaned that the president had not impressed anyone in implementing the 2012 budget. These remarks have in turn triggered another firestorm. Heralding the storm was the veritable storm trooper himself, aka attack dog, Dr Doyin Okupe, a presidential assistant newly recruited and dying to prove himself and justify his wages. He berated both Mark and Tambuwal for nursing unrealistic expectations of the 2012 budget, and for speaking, according to him, indecorously to the president. In any case, he summed up patronisingly, the remarks were not necessary, for the president had presented a “masterly” budget.

    Had the cantankerous Okupe remembered that neither Mark nor Tambuwal suffer fools gladly, perhaps he would have been more restrained in waving a red rag to two bulls at the same time, with Tambuwal even more bullish than the average. Predictably, the two top legislators have taken up the challenge with alacrity and have thundered their own replies. Mark described Okupe as meddlesome, acerbic and dedicated to making enemies for the president rather than friends. It will be recalled that on an earlier incident, in which Okupe spoke defiantly to the Senate leadership, Mark had characterised the presidential assistant as someone who spoke before thinking. With his latest attack on the National Assembly leadership, that unflattering impression of Okupe will now naturally endure in the Senate. On his own, Tambuwal described Okupe as ignorant, uncouth, disrespectful and overzealous. That image of Okupe will not change in a million years in the House of Representatives.

    If Okupe’s manners grate on the nerves of the National Assembly leadership, it is probably music to the ears of his employers who recruited him to pep up the communication world in the presidency, a world that had threatened to mummify in airy intellectualism, somnolence and pacifism. Aah, that sanguine feeling; there is nothing like descending to the mire and becoming down-to-earth pugnacious. For the presidency, here at last was their Java man, the missing link whom archaeologists describe as Pithecanthropus erectus. If his employers are satisfied with his combativeness, who cares what anyone thinks?

    Among other issues, the real budget fight will be over the $80 oil benchmark proposed by the National Assembly, as against the $75 suggested by the Minister of Finance, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. Her arguments are simple but apocalyptic. If $80 benchmark is used, she warns, it will fuel inflation, devalue the naira, lower savings, and reduce investments. She has not offered convincing proof how these scary scenarios will come about, or why it has to be $75 benchmark and not $70 or even $60. All she knows is that the wizards who drafted the budget used realistic economic model and standard technique common to commodity-dependent countries. So far, the legislators are unimpressed. More, they have threatened that the budget dispute would not be considered as a family affair. Read that to mean war – a war Tambuwal cheekily suggested should help the president to be a better man in delivering the dividends of democracy and implementing budget proposals.

     

     

  • Why is life so cheap?

    Why is life so cheap?

    SIR: After following the events of the brutal killing of three students of the University of Port Harcourt and their friend, I came to the sickening conclusion that in Nigeria we are living a culture of bestiality. Ugonna Kelechi Obuzor, Biringa Chiadika Lordson, Mike Lloyd Toku and their friend Tekena Erikena, promising young adults were accused of stealing laptops and mobile phones.

    Even if these kids were guilty, we have our laws. And no one, no matter their position should take the laws into their hands. Considering that these boys were paraded for hours, and with the initial hush hush about it and the failure of law enforcement agents to go there quickly enough, hangs a cloud of doubt. Perhaps this may not be the first of its kind in that community, such killings may have been going on in secret without anyone knowing. This incident may just be the one that exposed them.

    To again show that all is not well with President Goodluck Jonathan’s presidency, while he addressed Nigerians on the 2013 Budget, he failed to use the opportunity to condemn the acts of those murderers, leaving it a little too late. A crime that was perpetrated in his own region for that matter. It is condemnable. Such attitudes can only embolden perpetrators.

    Perhaps in all this show of bestiality, the Nigerian press was the greatest felon, particularly the tabloids that splashed headlines after headlines, assailing readers with gory pictures, and cashing in on it at the same time. Where is the humanity? What about the ethics of the profession? The pictures on the net covered their genitals.

    We have lost our humanity, and that is why Nigerians no longer value life, even their own. We are still talking about the Mubi killings and now this. It did not start today. When a petty thief is caught, a crowd mills round him. A quick decision is made. In unison a tyre is put on his neck and he is set ablaze, while those who steal our commonwealth are embraced and honoured.

    President Goodluck Jonathan has inaugurated a one-year prayer project for the nation. But faith without good works they say is dead. If we do not show love to our fellow humans whom we see, how can we claim that we love God who we cannot see? We must cleanse this bloodthirsty land. Perhaps that is what has been holding us back.

     

    • Dr Cosmas Odoemena

    Lagos

     

  • Achebe deserves pity

    Achebe deserves pity

    SIR: Chinua Achebe’s love for the Igbo people obviously is boundless. And his commitment to ‘Biafra’ was or continues to be profound. Hence, his latest book:There was a country. But like most human beings, Achebe is a ‘bundle of contradictions’. Not once has he publicly decried the cruel treatment meted out to the peoples in present day Rivers, Cross Rivers, Akwa-Ibom and Bayelsa States of Nigeria by ‘Biafran’ authorities, which he represented as a roving ambassador.

    In The trouble with Nigeria, Achebe, in Chapters 4 and 10, accuses both Dr. Nmandi Azikiwe and Chief Obafemi Awolowo, SAN, of poverty of thought. Their offence? A documented desire to improve

    themselves financially and morally in the capitalist society they dwelt in and to help others, both in their public and private capacities, even from their private income. Achebe bases his position on a single paragraph each from the respective biographies of Zik and Awo, without attempting a cursory analysis of other published works of theirs and achievements in public service, and the factors that

    contributed to their stated position. Thus an illustrious novelist may be capable of downright shallowness.

    Major Nzeogwu did not plan a ‘sectional’ coup, but the execution in January 1966 was sectional and Easterners were spared. Azikiwe was tipped off by Major Ifeajuna and conveniently left Nigeria in advance. Both Northern and Western soldiers and politicians were shot dead. The (counter) coup of July 1966 was the ‘return match’. Hundreds of Igbo soldiers were killed. Some Yoruba, i.e. Major Adegoke, were killed, others brutalized, i.e. B.A.M. Adekunle (Black Scorpion), and others went into hiding, i.e. Olusegun Obasanjo, who took refuge in the Emir of Katsina’s palace. The immediate aftermath of the ‘return-match’ was the widespread killings of Igbo people all over the North (and hundreds of Westerners and others peoples from the present day South-South were killed too).

    Igbo remnants fled back to the East, so also thousands of Westerners and ‘South-Southerners. Some Yoruba, i.e. Wole Soyinka, were jailed while others, i.e. Professor Sam Aluko, were harassed by security agencies, for ‘supporting’ Biafra. But the fate of the other Nigerians not of Igbo extraction that lost their lives and those that suffered has never been Achebe’s direct concern.

    If Achebe were to be believed, the Nigerian Federal Government with General Yakubu Gowon as Head of State and Awolowo as Vice Chairman, Federal Executive Council, Alhaji Shehu Shagari [Nigerian President during the second republic] and Alhaji Aminu Kano as ministers designed and executed genocidal policies against the Igbo people. Yet, Achebe singles out Awolowo for special mention in regard to allocation of opprobrium.

    Blatant revisionism cannot alter the fact that Awolowo’s reference to starvation being a legitimate instrument of war was in specific reference to not allowing food supplies to reach Biafran soldiers,

    while Biafran High Command refused the passage of humanitarian supplies, food inclusive, during day time. In any case, Emeka Ojukwu, the Biafran warlord, whom Achebe obviously prefers to Azikiwe, frankly stated in an interview granted to Tell newsmagazine well over a decade ago that there was never an agreement between him and Awolowo that the West would support or follow the East in secession.

    Achebe’s predictable, consistent and virulent denigration of Awolowo and his reference to Yoruba people profiting from alleged genocidal treatment of Igbo people and his prior references to the

    ‘fantastic burst of energy’ with which Igbo people ‘equaled’ the educational achievements of Yoruba people perhaps indicate a mind somewhat in bondage to ethnic chauvinism and a morbid and baleful

    fascination with Yoruba people, despite ‘lip service’ to Nigerian unity and progress.

    • Paul Temitope,

    Lagos

  • Still on the rampaging Osun students

    Still on the rampaging Osun students

    SIR: Tuesday October 9 will remain etched in my memory for a long time to come. That day, some so-called State of Osun students from different tertiary institutions enacted a contemptible theatrical display reminiscent of the type with which the limited minds among the Oyo State NURTW assaulted innocent people in the recent past. For more than five hours, the students seized the main entrance to the State Secretariat at Abere, rendered the Osogbo Expressway impassable to thousands of road users, and prevented Governor Rauf Aregbesola, his deputy and other state functionaries from going to their offices. It was a complete case of madness without method!

    I was on my way to the secretariat for an appointment when I happened on the sordid scene about 30 minutes after it started. With different cardboards screaming such eyesores as “Osun State Government is a BETREYER” (sic), the students were scattered in different directions of the road shouting and cussing. From what I gathered from about four of them, their major aim was to see the governor to express their displeasure at what they claimed to be the delay in the payment of their bursary, and to demand that the government refund the additional money they had paid as school fees when the government of Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola unjustly increased school fees in the state-owned higher institutions. Governor Aregbesola had shortly on assumption of office announced a drastic reduction in the school fees. But these evidently narrow-minded students are asking that the fees be reverted to the old, insufferable amount of the Oyinlola era if the government would not do their bidding. It was for this specious reason that they denied thousands the right of way on that day!

    This notwithstanding, the governor appealed to them to leave the highway and come to his office to state their grievances. But they rejected his request and insisted rather, that the meeting be held right there at the centre of the road! If indeed these students had come to see the governor, why did they barricade the road, subject law-abiding citizens to suffering and even refused to accord any respect to the person and office of the governor?

    The action of those freelance thugs masquerading as students was purely madness lacking in method. Everything the students did that day gave them away as political thugs sponsored to embarrass a government committed to the well-being of students. Did these students lay siege to the entrance of the secretariat after Governor Oyinlola increased their school fees? After these barbaric students momentarily came to their senses, they went into the secretariat to see the governor. But he could not come out to address them because hardly had they got in there when they started fighting one another. Of course they left in the same disorderly manner in which they entered the place.

    It is high time we began to check the lawlessness of students in this country. If we continue to condone vicious misbehaviour in the name of democracy, such free reign of terror as evident in the destruction of facilities carried out by Ekiti State University students in the name of protest a few weeks ago; the brutal killings of four UNIPORT students on mere allegation of theft; and the recent misdemeanour by supposed students of tertiary institutions in Osun will in no distant time turn our country into a Hobbesian enclave. We can’t breed responsible, decent future leaders with character where they are not made to account for their wrongdoings. No, we can’t make omelettes without breaking eggs.

    • Sogo Abioye,

    Ede, State of Osun.