By Adejare Rewane Adegbenro
There is no denying that Nigeria continues to grapple with serious security challenges. Across different regions, the threat has taken multiple forms—banditry, kidnapping, terrorism, and communal clashes. These challenges are often discussed along ethnic and religious lines. While such clashes exist, this narrow framing obscures deeper and more complex drivers of insecurity.
One critical but under-reported factor fueling violence in parts of Nigeria is illegal mining. Globally, history has shown that wherever mineral resources—especially gold—are exploited illegally, violence often follows. From parts of the Sahel to Central Africa, unregulated mining sites have become magnets for criminal networks, arms trafficking, and insurgent financing. Nigeria is no exception. In several flashpoints of insecurity, illegal mining has created economic incentives for armed groups, who destabilise communities, displace residents, and exploit chaos to continue their activities.
It is also important to state clearly that Nigeria’s current security challenges did not begin with the present administration. Insecurity has evolved over decades, shaped by governance gaps, porous borders, climate pressure, and underdevelopment in remote areas. What is different today, however, is the scale of institutional rethinking and strategic recalibration underway within Nigeria’s security architecture.
Under President Bola Tinubu, deliberate efforts have been made to strengthen coordination at the highest levels. The reshuffling of the service chiefs, alongside the appointment of a former Chief of Defence Staff as substantive Minister of Defence, reflects a move toward institutional memory, operational coherence, and strategic continuity. For the first time in a long while, all arms of the security services are reportedly working in tandem—an alignment that has improved inter-agency cooperation and reduced duplication of effort.
At the centre of this evolving framework is the National Security Adviser, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, whose role has gone beyond domestic coordination to include active engagement in international security collaboration. Nigeria is increasingly plugged into global counter-terrorism networks, particularly with the United States and other strategic partners. These engagements involve intelligence sharing, capacity building, and technical support—many aspects of which, by necessity, cannot be disclosed publicly.
READ ALSO: Kwara massacre belies end of Mamuda/JNIM terrorists
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s foreign engagements further underscore this approach. His recent diplomatic and security-focused visits, including engagements in Türkiye, were not ceremonial but targeted at deepening defence cooperation with countries that have confronted prolonged insurgent threats. Such partnerships offer Nigeria access to advanced intelligence systems, military training, and counter-insurgency expertise that strengthen long-term security capacity.
On the domestic front, plans to reinforce community-based security mechanisms, including forest and ranger units, highlight the recognition that local knowledge is indispensable. Communities understand the terrain—forests, informal routes, and hidden enclaves—better than anyone else. When properly regulated, vetted, and supervised, these local structures can significantly enhance intelligence gathering and early warning systems.
That said, no security initiative is without risks. Community-based systems, like all human institutions, can be compromised by coercion or infiltration. This reality reinforces the need for strict oversight, accountability, and intelligence vetting. It does not, however, negate the value of the broader strategy when implemented responsibly.
Operational challenges persist. Vast, underdeveloped terrains, poor infrastructure, and the threat of improvised explosive devices continue to test the military’s response capacity. Senior security officials have acknowledged that response times in remote areas can be delayed, not from indifference, but from logistical constraints. Even so, security forces have recorded measurable successes in dislodging bandit and terrorist enclaves—progress that often receives less attention than isolated attacks.
This moment, therefore, is not one for cynical disengagement or relentless delegitimisation of state efforts. It is a period that calls for vigilance, constructive criticism, and national support. Citizens play a crucial role by cooperating with security agencies, particularly through the provision of timely local intelligence. Counter-terrorism thrives on information, and communities are often the first to notice unusual movements or threats.
While democratic scrutiny remains essential, persistent sensationalism and the rush to undermine ongoing security operations can weaken morale and distort public understanding. Nigerians must recognise that many critical actions in national security are necessarily confidential and cannot be litigated in newspaper headlines.
Nigeria’s security challenges are real, but so are the efforts to confront them. The repositioning of the country’s security architecture has begun, and continuity is vital for these reforms to yield maximum gains. A stable and secure Nigeria is fundamental to the administration’s broader economic vision, including the pursuit of a one-trillion-dollar economy. Security is the foundation upon which investment, growth, and national prosperity rest—and it is clear that this reality is not lost on the current leadership.
The fight to stem security challenges is not merely a military campaign; it is a societal one. It demands unity, patience, responsible discourse, and a shared commitment to safeguarding Nigeria’s future.
Security is not a private concern; it is a collective national responsibility. It demands that Nigerians—regardless of faith, ethnicity, or political leaning—stand united in support of policies aimed at restoring peace and stability. At the same time, the Tinubu administration must decisively improve the welfare, equipment, and morale of our security forces, while according traditional institutions clearly defined constitutional roles that place them at the forefront of grassroots intelligence, mediation, and decision-making. Only through unity, shared responsibility, and institutional strengthening can Nigeria secure the peace it urgently needs and deserves.
