Category: Comments

  • Boko Haram kills eight farmers in Borno

    Suspected Boko Haram terrorists have killed eight famers during  raids on communities on the outskirts of Maiduguri,the Borno State capital.

    Attacked were Mallan, Kesa Kura and Manjita,according to fleeing residents.

     Two persons were killed at Mallan when the terrorists struck on Thursday night.

    That was about 24 hours after attacking the same village during which three people were shot dead.

    On the same Wednesday night,   the gunmen killed three residents of nearby Kesa Kura.

    Eye witnesses said the gunmen came in pickup trucks and on motorcycles.

    They set homes on fire and seized food and livestock.

    No one was killed at Manjita because residents managed to flee after being tipped off about the looming danger.

    Residents said the attacks appeared to be a reprisal  against young men joining the civilian militia, which helps the military with security.

    On Monday, four people were killed in a drive-by shooting on a group of farmers working on their fields in Ngawo Fato Bulabulin village outside Maiduguri.

  • IBB: Poetry, power and pepper

    In my study of life and the many uses to which authority can be put, I have come to an irresistible conclusion that there is indeed  a correlation between poetry, power and pepper.

    And this conclusion I first reached in 1985, when I encountered General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida within the 24 hours he usurped power and assumed office as Nigeria’s only military president to date.

    It was at the Flagstaff House in Ikoyi, the official residence of the Army Chief of Staff from where he launched his assault into the Presidential Villa; and from where he operated for weeks, before he took up almost permanent residence at the State House, secured inside Dodan Barracks in Obalende side of Ikoyi; before finally moving the nation’s seat of power to Aso Villa in Abuja.

    My late friend, then Navy Captain Okhai Mike Akhigbe took me there on a mission to be assessed if I could become the spokesman for the new Nigerian helmsman (which he wanted), but I had a different motive, kept close to my chest and which I did not unveil until I was face to face with Nigeria’s undisputed face of courage in uniform, in 1985.

    When I was ushered into General Babangida’s presence, I almost froze, in the certain knowledge of being before a hard-boiled soldier who now had the power of life and death in his stocky palms; and whose motive of wanting to see me was different from why I wanted to be with him – just for a short while.

    Well, I was already inside the pool, as the Yoruba adage would put it and it was therefore pointless to be afraid of cold; so I summoned up the courage to draw him in, by congratulating him on his assumption of power, which came amidst a wide and popular clamour that the regime he supplanted was not what Nigerians wanted.

    That drew his smile and exposed to me his gap-tooth, after which he started quoting, copiously from Shakespearean books. I confess, that fascinated me so much because of my naive belief prior to that day that soldiers “don’t know book but gun” – a fallacy that petered out in my mind from that meeting with IBB. I then recalled once hearing that ‘wine is bottled poetry’ and you cannot appropriately talk of the quintessential soldier without the three ‘W’s of work, wine and women. Added to that, which I also remembered, was the time-tested saying that “a vein of poetry exists in the hearts of all men”

    IBB almost dribbled me to a corner but courage, which normally comes out in crisis situation, offered me an escape window to get my point across to him before outwitting me to get into a deal that my mind was averse to.

    Yes, how, in good conscience, could I cut a deal to become a soldier’s chief press secretary when the boss that gave me the platform to become known and marketable, was languishing in military jail? Then, Jakande was being tossed around Kirikiri and Ikoyi prisons, not for committing any grievous offence other than being a hard-working and achieving but unfortunate state governor at a time the national government was bleeding the country blind, economically.

    I moaned to IBB that the treatment being given to LKJ was unfair and unjust; and that what I desired most at that point in time, was to use the instrumentality of his high office to set the man free and allow him to return home to his wife and children, in peace. A wry smile welled up his face, perhaps wondering how silly I could be to be smartly and politely turning my back against a “juicy deal” and canvassing for the freedom of a boss with whom I was sacked from office by the military in December, 1983.

    He got my point well-made anyway and asked if I did not see Wole, Chief Awolowo’s son, on my way to Flagstaff House. When I replied in the negative, and perhaps thinking he needed that to get me to change my mind, he told me Wole too had just left him, with a message to re-assure his father that he (IBB) would soon set “Papa’s Boys” free, in reference to the UPN governors, most of who were eventually said to pass the litmus test of integrity and probity. He kept his promise, if I must tell.

    But the man I refer to as the face of courage, who’s reputed to have participated in ALL successful coups in Nigeria from the 1966 one that threw up the then Lt Col Yakubu Gowon as “head of state and supreme commander of the Nigerian Armed Forces” to his own in 1985, had his courage fail him at the most crucial moment of his life when he annulled the presidential victory of his close pal, Bashorun Moshood Kashimawo Abiola of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the early 90s; on the prompting, by his undenied admission, of his boys who masterminded his coming to power as military president in the first place.

    Give it to General David Mark who IBB portrayed as showing uncommon courage by opposing him from handing over power to Abiola. Perhaps IBB knew his boys won’t just blast him off like that, but would give him “pepper” before snuffing life out of him. The mesmerising Maradona of politics must have come across the many books on power and military strategy that it requires more courage to suffer, than to die!

    An acclaimed military strategist, he must have also experienced the piquant burning taste of pepper and why Yorubas say, to drum home the point on the ultra-effectiveness of pepper, that minute as pepper is, it superintends over the big, bulging eye, any day. Bintin l’ata, to fi n’soko oju.

    It was the fear of pepper, I suspect, that made IBB buckle under, for his loyal boys at the crucial moment, the very reason his popularity rating plummeted and his political relevance diminished.

    I’m his fan, no doubt, but I guess an eternal lesson has been served: for a man who, on his assumption of office, blurted that “we are not just in office but we are also in power”, this sad ending of a glorious military and political career shows that power, with all its paraphernalia, has its limit.

    Baales as kings, yes; but high chiefs as kings, capital no!

    The obaship controversy stirred by Ajimobi’s Government in Oyo State will not go away easily; at least it cannot be wished
    away, not when ill thought-out statements like the one from the Central Council of Ibadan Indigenes (CCII) keep assailing our ears and insulting the intelligence of an average Yoruba man who is versed in our culture and tradition.

    To be sure, no one can quarrel with the upgrading of the status of Baales to Obas, especially those whose existence dated way back in ages. Akanran that shares a common border with Ijebu Igbo is a classic example. They have defined areas they superintend over, the jurisdiction of which is not in contention. These are kingdoms bigger in size and mineral and vegetable potentials more than places where kingships had long been given them in other states.

    But high chiefs, without kingdoms, as obas? If it is not sacrilegious, and it is not intended to ridicule the office of the Olubadan or targeted at a particular person, as it is already being insinuated, I wonder where the sense is, in the odd arrangement. Obas without kingdoms are like kings without oloris (wives); where is the pride or dignity in those kingdoms?

    Abiola Ajimobi I met at close quarters once, since he mounted the gubernatorial chair; and the humility and respect he accorded me on that occasion linger in my mind till now but that impression contradicts what some others think of him; they ascribe pride and arrogance to him but who can satisfy the world, anyway?

    Governor Ajimobi did well to upgrade Baales to Obas but to mix it up with the controversial elevation of Olubadan high chiefs to obaship where they will be wearing beaded crowns is not on. The natural question that arises from this is: will these high chiefs remove their crowns when they enter Olubadan’s Palace for meetings since we are being told they will remain under Olubadan’s authority or Ajimobi wants it recorded against his name that he’s the one who made nonsense of the long-held belief that while you can have myriads of chiefs in the palace, only one king reigns and presides at any given time!

  • Court adjourns hearing on forfeiture of Diezani’s alleged 58 houses

    The Federal High Court in Lagos yesterday adjourned till September 22 the hearing of an application for the final forfeiture of 58 houses allegedly belonging to a former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs Diezani Alison-Madueke.

    She allegedly bought the houses between 2011 and 2013 for $21,982,224 (about N3,320,000,000).

    Listed as first to sixth respondents in the suit are Mrs Alison-Madueke, Donald Chidi Amamgbo and four firms—Chapel Properties Limited, Blue Nile Estate Limited, Azinga Meadows Limited and Vistapoint Property Development Limited.

    Justice Chuka Obiozor adjourned to enable the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) respond to an objection filed by one of the respondents.

    The commission’s lawyer, A. Ozioko, said: “We have obtained an interim order in respect of this suit and the case was adjourned until today (yesterday) for report and to also allow the respondents to show why the properties should not be finally forfeited.

    “But this morning, we were served with a motion on notice by one Mr Nnamdi Eze Anochie. We ask for time to respond and to take the application for final forfeiture.”

    Justice Obiozor granted the prayer for an adjournment.

    Justice Abdulaziz Anka, who sat as a vacation judge before Justice Obiozor took over, ordered the interim forfeiture of the properties on August 22 following an ex parte application filed on August 16 by the EFCC.

    He authorised the EFCC to appoint a firm to manage the properties and gave the respondents 14 days to show why the properties should not be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.

    The judge directed the agency to publish the order in any national newspaper and adjourned till yesterday.

    Ozioko told Justice Anka that Mrs Alison-Madueke paid $16,441,906 (N2.6 billion) cash in several tranches and another $5,540318 (N840,000,000) cash for the properties through four ‘front’ firms which held the titles in trust for her.

    He listed the firms as Chapel Properties, Blue Nile Estate, Azinga Meadows and Vistapoint Property Development.

    Ozioko said the commission had discovered 14 other firms incorporated for the ex-minister for the purpose of holding the titles to those properties.

    The former minister, he added, purchased the properties from the proceeds of suspected unlawful activity during her tenure.

    The agency described the properties as including 29 terraced houses comprising eight four-bedroom penthouse apartments, six three-bedroom apartments, two three-bedroom maisonettes, two twin bedroom apartments and one four-bedroom apartment.

    The houses, located at No. 7, Thurnbull Street and 5, Raymond Street, Yaba, were allegedly bought by Diezani for the US dollar equivalent of N937,000,000 through Chapel Properties Ltd.

    Others are 16 four-bedroom terraced houses in Heritage Court Estate, Plot 2C, Omerelu Street, Diobu, Government Residential Area (GRA) Phase 1 extension, Port-Harcourt, Rivers State, purchased for N928,000,000 through Blue Nile Estate Ltd.

    She allegedly purchased 13 three-bedroom terraced houses with one-room maid’s quarters en suite for N650,000,000 through Azinga Meadows Ltd.

    The commission also stated that Diezani paid N805,000,000 through Vistapoint property Development Ltd for six flats of three bedrooms and one boys’ quarters each, a lawn tennis court, gym and ‘matured garden’

    According to an affidavit in support of the application by an EFCC investigative officer, Mr Sombori Mayana, the commission got wind of the properties in 2016, following its execution of a search warrant on the office and premises of Diezani’s acquaintance, Mr Donald Chidi Amamgbo.

    Mayana said: “Among the documents recovered from the office of Mr Donald Chidi Amamgbo was an undated report titled ‘HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY EOTK PRODUCT – AUGUST REPORT’

    “The report contained a list of 18 companies and several properties located in the United Kingdom, Nigeria and the United States of America.

    “During the course of his interview, Mr Donald Amamgbo told us that he registered the 18 companies to assist Mrs Diezani Alison Madueke in holding titles of the properties.”

    Mayana averred that a principal manager and Head, Business Development of FBN Mortgages Ltd, Mrs Bolanle Onotu, confirmed that the properties were sold by her organisation to Diezani’s alleged four proxy firms for N937million, N928 million and N650 million and received payment through First Bank account numbers 2004483850 and 2008133531 between September 23, 2011 and June 16, 2015.

    “First Bank of Nigeria Plc. stated that the source of the money was from Mrs Diezani Alison Madueke and that the bank picked up United States dollars from her house at 10, Frederick Chiluba Close, Off Jose Marti Street, Asokoro, Abuja,” Mayana added.

    He said a total of $16,041,906 was picked up by the bank at Diezani’s house between September 29, 2011 and April 4, 2013 and converted to naira.

    According to Mayana, another firm, Adebern Parks Nigeria Ltd received N802,500,000 in its Zenith Bank account from an Ecobank account for the purchase of some of the properties.

    One Mr Adeyemi Edun “received the sum of N840,000,000 from Skye Bank Plc, which on his instruction transferred the sum of N805,000,000 to his Eco Bank account from where he paid Adebern Parks for the property.”

  • Real estate and recession

    Real estate business might not be very buoyant at the moment. The reasons are not far-fetched; the ongoing economic challenges in the country, resulting in paucity of funds and fluctuations in the value of the naira against the dollar and pounds, has made some people to put on hold investment in real estate, while a number of would- be investors have to contend with the task of locating investment opportunities in markets that offer the greatest long term growth and stability, and or investment in other endeavours.

    That Nigeria is going through a recession is no longer news. That there is a rapid drop in the prices of properties at the moment; or that prices of properties have fallen in some areas to the point where the problem of affordability has almost become a challenge of the past, or even that there are scattered and uncompleted developments in various parts of the country, with new construction projects either abandoned and, where completed, left unoccupied, and many tenants defaulting in rents payment while many houses remained vacant for very long periods especially in high rental areas of Maitama, Asokoro in Abuja, Ikoyi, Victoria Island, and Lekki in Lagos to mention a few, and that rents could not be increased while some tenants actually asked for rent reduction, all due to the current economic recession are also no longer news.

    One of my major clients invited me for a meeting recently, and in the course of our discussion, sought my opinion on whether to sell some of his properties and use the proceeds to invest in other endeavours, his reasons being low return on property investment at the moment. My explanation to him and to those who might be at a crossroad as regards investment in the real estate is that despite the economic downturn, real estate is one sector of the Nigerian economy that has a very bright future. Not quite long ago, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) revealed that strong developments in the construction, real estate, and technology sectors in developing countries such as Nigeria has supported the world economy through tough financial periods in recent years, and would continue to do for a long time to come. While mentioning Nigeria as one of the developing countries with the greatest potentials in real estate and one of the competitive players in the global real estate market that is fast becoming increasingly attractive to investors, it says that these developing nations will account for about 70 percent of world growth over the next decade, touting Nigeria as one of the developing countries with the greatest potentials in real estate.

    One distinguishing advantage for the sector is the fact that the need for real estate across strata remains extremely strong. Though it is challenging at the moment, due to the present economic difficulties, yet the difficulties present opportunities for innovations, and these will ultimately benefit the sector. Opportunities will continue to exist.

    The current low investment in the real estate sector which has seen property prices dropping at near historical lows notwithstanding, one can convincingly conclude that this is the right time to invest in real estate. I will advise investors to increase their real estate portfolio by taking advantage of the cheaper property prices, the abundant array of great deals from motivated sellers, distressed sales, foreclosed properties and several other incentives at the moment. The prevailing situation offers an opportunity for potential investors to step in, pick them up for a fraction of their real value, leverage on the sellers willingness to grant significant discounts and consider offers or terms that under normal circumstances they would not consider, including reasonable deposits and payment in instalments. On the other hand, property owners may consider taking advantage of the market by either refinancing their own properties for lower rates and better terms until the market rebounds, instead of leaving same vacant and generating no income at all. Nigerians in Diaspora should seize the opportunity presented by the current economic situation and the prevailing exchange rate of the Naira and Dollar/Pounds to invest in the real estate sector by acquiring more properties back home.

    One other notable advantage of real estate investment is the fact that real estate investment is relatively stable and possesses the ability to absorb inflation. This is a very secure investment, in the sense that you can never lose your money. It is about the only investment that rarely loses its value, and even where it does, real estate investment always has the potential to bounce back within a relatively short time. Whilst it is noted that the scarcity of funds may pose a challenge at the moment, there are several financial strategies that potential investors may consider. For instance, investors could go into partnerships or incorporate companies wherein they can pool resources which can be utilized to acquire developed properties or even large expanse of land that can thereafter be divided into plots and allocated to the partners. It is worthy of note however that the recession will not last forever, as the market will soon restore its lost value.

    Essentially however, housing and accommodation could be the major driver if Nigeria’s real estate sector is to deliver at the rate and scale needed to contribute significantly to the nation’s economy. The housing shortage in low, middle income residential and office spaces is put at 17 million in a country of about 180 million people. And as the population increases, we will encounter further strains on an already challenged industry.

     

    • Mustapha, ANIVS, RSV, MNIM is the Principal Partner in the firm of Mustapha Ewenla & Partners.
  • Anambra election and charter of equity

    The November 18 governorship election in Anambra is fast approaching and the major political parties have produced their candidates. The candidates of major political parties contesting the election are, Osita Chidoka (UPP), Godwin Ezemo (PPA), Oseloka Henry Obaze  (PDP),Tony Nwoye (APC), and Governor Willie Obiano (APGA). It is a good omen that the party primaries have been concluded and ndi-Anambra are now faced with the opportunity of choosing their next governor. If they make a good choice, it will be for the betterment of our beloved state and if they make a bad choice, it will end in regret.

    Already some selfish politicians have started telling anybody that cares to listen that there is nothing like zoning and that they don’t mind the consequence of working against zoning. They don’t give a damn about public interest; rather they are devilishly scheming to subvert public interest for their own selfish interest. But one thing that is certain is that public interest will always over-ride personal interest. Our people are now politically aware and cannot be misled by selfish politicians. I remember vividly that in 2013 when Mr Peter Obi was leading the campaign for power shift to Anambra North, it was being aired on radio stations across Anambra State that anybody that was not in support of power shift to Anambra North is indirectly supporting Igbo marginalisation in Nigeria. I concur with the referred opinion. We Igbo cannot be crying of marginalisation in Nigeria and back home in our various states, we are supporting marginalisation. Some people are attempting to shift the goal post in Anambra State and they must be stopped for the betterment of the state.

    Dr. Chris Ngige governed Anambra State for three years. Peter Obi governed Anambra State for eight years and Governor Obiano will complete his first term on March 17, 2018.

    Osita Chidoka hails from the same Anambra Central Senatorial zone with Ngige and Peter Obi. Tony Nwoye is from the same local government and senatorial district with Governor Obiano. Oseloka Obaze hails from Ogbaru and the same Anambra North senatorial zone with Obiano. Godwin Ezemo hails from Aguata in Anambra South senatorial zone. Among all these governorship candidates, Governor Obiano is the only person that is constitutionally bound to go for only one term in completion of his mandate for the people of Anambra north. The rest are constitutionally eligible to go for two terms.

    As at 2013, when ndi-Anambra voted for zoning, it was done with the understanding that power can only stay in Anambra North for eight years and return to Anambra South by 2022. It is said whatever that is worth doing is worth doing well hence the reason behind my advocacy for the entrenchment of sense of belonging in Anambra State political system. Anybody trying to wave Anambra charter of equity aside in the forthcoming November 18 governorship election is an enemy of progress because anybody that wants the progress and betterment of his state will support the implementation of good initiatives in his state.

    Ndi-Anambra will make a regrettable mistake, if they fail to return Governor Obiano for second term because the governor’s candidature represents equity, fairness and justice. Outside this, Obiano has performed beyond the expectations of ndi-Anambra and keen watchers of events in the state. He assumed office when Nigeria economy went into recession and he deployed his private sector wealth of experience in navigating ndi-Anambra out of recession. Other states in Nigeria felt the effects of the national economic recession but in Anambra, Governor Obiano cushioned its effect with the rolling out of tax stimulus package for our people. He did this as a leader that knows when his followers are in pain.

    Today Anambra is being referred to as the safest state in Nigeria, courtesy of Obiano administration’s zero tolerance for criminality in Anambra State. His administration received applause for doing well in the agricultural sector.

    Tony Nwoye and Oseloka Obaze are candidates of godfathers. Our people will not forget in a hurry the horrible experience our state passed through in the hands of godfathers in between 1999 to 2006. That era of brigandage and lawlessness is gone for good and must not be allowed to return to our state. It is very painful seeing Peter Obi, the man that led the struggle for power shift to Anambra North, plotting to shift the goal post at the middle of the game. His support for Obaze’s governorship ambition is fraught with a vendetta mission against Governor Obiano because of Obiano’s refusal to be at his beck and call. He wants to be the political alpha and omega in Anambra State with the sole power to make and unmake a governor in the state.

    The Bible made me to understand that only God crowns kings and not humans. So I am of the belief that God made Obiano governor and claiming otherwise is tantamount to the arrogation of God powers to Peter Obi thereby making him to play god. No reasonable Anambra southerner should support the ambition of Obaze, Nwoye and Chidoka because their candidature violates the Anambra equity charter. The best option for the people of Anambra South is to support Obiano’s re-election for the shift of power to their zone in 2022.

    Anambra as light of the nation must lead by example, if truly we want the actualisation of Igbo Presidency in Nigeria. We cannot be advocating for rotational Presidency in Nigeria whereas we are doing otherwise back home. Nigerians are watching us to know if we are going to do the right thing and our failure to do the right thing will have a dire and regrettable consequence on us politically. Peter Obi enjoyed the opportunity of second term because ndi Anambra thought it wise to vote him for a second term, so that the people of Anambra Central will not feel short-changed. An adage says that “when you treat children well and equally they will be happy “. In the case of Governor Obiano, the general public and ndi-Anambra acknowledges his performance in all sectors of governance and the people of Anambra North don’t want to feel short-changed hence the reason why voting him is a necessity for the betterment of our State.

    Nwoye is contesting to retire old politicians in Anambra State. When he emerged APC candidate for the November 18 governorship election, his supporters while jubilating in social media were saying that his victory at the APC primary is tantamount to the political retirement of Andy Ubah and that when they win the main election, they will retire other prominent politicians from Anambra State.

     

    • Obigwe is National Co-ordinator APGA Media Warriors Forum.
  • Youth and national development

    Without a doubt, youth are the foundation of positive and negative picture of any society. Their energies, inventiveness, character and orientation define the pace of development and security of a nation. Through their creative talents and labour power, a nation makes giant strides in economic development and socio-political attainments.

    In all societies of the world, virile youth is the bedrock on which national integration and development is predicated. The youth are the backbone and the building blocks of any nation. It is a fact that the stronger the youth, the more developed a nation is. The role of the youth in the nation-building process cannot be overemphasized as countries that develop and utilize their youth in the right directions seem to be more developed. The energy and brightness of the minds of youth act as torch-bearer for a nation. There is a confirmed connection between the prosperity of a nation and its youth development system.

    The late British politician and writer, Benjamin Disraeli, rightly described the youth of a nation as the ‘trustees of posterity’. It is in the reality of this that many nations have made concerted efforts in galvanizing integrated approach in putting in place youth development structures that have a very high propensity to be a catalyst for their national growth. On the contrary, the countries which fail to realize the importance of the youth lag behind in every aspects of life.

    The 2017 edition of International Youth Day, themed: “Youth Building Peace”, was aimed at stressing the principal role anticipated of the youth in global peaceful coexistence among the people and the drive for positive change for development through the transformative and resourceful force of the youths which has been identified by national leaders globally including Nigeria’s President Muhammadu Buhari.

    Any nation that denies its youth the necessary enabling environment to enthusiastically participate in nation- building merely does so at its own perils. Nation-building is a dynamic process that calls for the participation of all segments of the society, including the often-overlooked and undermined youth population and youth resourcefulness that will provide an invaluable speed for the progress of any society as well as its development.

    As youth are brought into and connected with national issues and programmes, they can participate actively and contribute to decision making at multiple levels. As youths are engaged in more sustained positive relationships with adults, other youths, and national development programmes, apart from realising that they are valued citizens of their nations, such collaborations and participation may lead to skill enhancement, empowerments and confidence-building traits, which will help prepare them for active interest and involvement in nation-building.

    It is important to note that young people play a crucial role in the prospect for development and should therefore be included in all national development plans and programmes, but reality shows that attention to youth has not been sufficient and more needs to be done considering the practical implications of shifting perceptions of youth and the role they can play in the society.

    In Nigeria, the greatest challenge confronting the youth today is unemployment which has become a great challenge to national security. Despite alleged success of various youth   empowerment programmes across the country, over 54 % of Nigeria youth remain unemployed. The unemployment record in the country clearly portrays an increase in idle hands across the length and breadth of Nigeria. It is often said that an idle mind is the devil’s workshop, so an unemployed youth is a disaster going somewhere to happen. Activities of groups such as Boko-Haram, Niger Delta militants, Biafra agitators and recently, the Baddo group have serious implications for national security in the country. Sadly, some of these rebellious groups have youths at the forefront of their nefarious activities.

    It is a known fact that youths possess a transformative force. They are creative, resourceful and enthusiast agents of change. Therefore, the need for youth to be listened to and productively engaged cannot be over-emphasized in every context. Youths can determine whether this era moves towards a great peril and more positive change. Let us support the young people of our world so they can grow into adults and a true platform for more powerful leaders of coming generations.

    Unfortunately, in our clime, youth are not being given the needed platform to freely express themselves. Though they have always been touted as ‘future leaders’ since God knows when, our nation clearly needs a spiritual or physical veil remover for us to act the saying ‘the future is now’ for us to stop saying the potential leaders of tomorrow are too young to lead alongside other flimsy excuses.

    Around the world, there is a growing recognition of the need to strengthen policies and investments involving young people. We need a properly marshalled policy aimed at harnessing the innate and budding potential of the youth. In Nigeria, the youth almost do not have a voice in the scheme of things. Unemployment, lack of opportunities, faulty educational system, repressive political system, dwindling economic fortunes, among others, are mostly responsible for the suppression of the voice of the youth in our dear nation.

    However, it needs to be stressed that the Nigerian youth need to be more focused, creative and disciplined if they are to actually become real agents of change in the country. The agriculture and Information Communications Technology (ICT) sectors, especially, represent areas where the youth could truly make enormous impact in the country, if only they could become more forward-looking.

    The trend of rural/urban migration by Nigerian youth has drastically reduced the capacity of agriculture sector to sustain the economy which has capacity to provide job for over 70% of the youth. Sadly, lots of youth idle away in cities rather than getting engaged in agriculture at the country-side. Similarly, advancement in ICT presents numerous prospects for the youth to become creative, productive and prosperous.  Unfortunately, rather than exploit the positive and resourceful sides of ICT, some youths have turned it into a tool of defrauding and tricking unassuming individuals through the infamous “yahoo, yahoo “  syndrome.

    On a final note, governments, NGOs, youths based organizations and other relevant stakeholders need to regularly enlighten and properly guide the country’s youth to take imbibe the positive sides of life. Also, our education curriculum should be reviewed to reflect contemporary realities that would assist the youth to contribute meaningful to national development.

     

    • Erezi, is with the Ministry of Information and Strategy, Alausa, Lagos.
  • Unlocking the likes of Osinbajo

    Until the current coming of Yemi Osinbajo as Nigeria’s Vice-President, the man was holed in the medieval age of our history…  Professor Osinbajo is the father of modern day bureaucratic jurisprudence of Lagos State… He was discovered by Bola Tinubu… He went on to become the state’s first Commissioner for Justice and Attorney-General in the Third Republic in 1999… He undertook notable reforms in grassroots judicature and in court room procedures… Through his prudent counsel coupled with Tinubu’s own smart politics, Lagos successfully launched the historic creation of 37 local councils and floored the mighty federal resistance of Olusegun Obasanjo’s government… The councils have come to stay due to the firm substructure Osinbajo laid… Later, the annals continue, he was retrieved from political retirement again by Tinubu to play a role in the central government in the current dispensation… And on and on we have played the old history of Yemi Osinbajo.

    But let us be clear about this: this same history isn’t going to rate Osinbajo on Lagos only in the long run. The ruthless history we all know would demand more from Osinbajo. Had he stayed quietly in the background after his campaign in the old federal capital, he might have tamed the extinct records to favour him. However, having succumbed to the temptation to stage a comeback at a higher level, he must wrestle with the dialectics of politics of an upward plane. History is clad in an iron creed: to whom a higher measure of responsibility is given, less can’t be demanded.

    So we should not dwell too much on the past of the vice-president, even if that is what he and his loyalists might fondly desire. In my opinion though, he has delivered himself from the grip of these former times by attempting to present a new Osinbajo. It can’t be denied that he has emerged from the younger Osinbajo we knew in Lagos in Tinubu’s cabinet. We should help him to sustain that process of extrication and discovery of a new-look Osinbajo. In this second coming, if truth be told, he has exceeded expectations, especially in his days as acting President.

    A commentator said during a radio programme the other day that he didn’t know Osinbajo had such large streak of appetite for work and integrity to drive a country in a state of slough in the absence of her ailing President without triggering fears of an own ambitious agenda. He said Osinbajo seemed to have a dog’s chances of survival in the midst of starving lions.

    It was another way of saying he underestimated the Ogun State born law professor, despite the sterling performance of the man in Lagos years back. He appeared to be saying that Osinbajo might not be able to repeat the feat as an acting President.

    Now, until we gave Osinbajo (by default) the task of running the presidency in a restricted capacity, we little thought he had the quality to do it in spite of his history. We believed the professional politician might do better than a professional in politics. How tragically wrong this has turned out so far! And the nation has suffered fatal consequences because of this dim view of respect only for the professional politicians.

    There are a thousand and one Osinbajos similarly waiting to be unveiled for heroic national service. But we hold them down through a system that sees us concentrate on an effete cabal of choices. It is a process that has thrown up the cycle of the same set of people from a political family and lineage. We don’t look beyond that group to recruit our leaders and representatives. In the advanced countries of the West (UK and USA), this arrangement is called cronyism: the rule in perpetuity of the elite and their families and friends.

    Nigeria cannot secure the real change we so desperately need for a complete turnaround if we focus on this strange law of motion that sees us do a lot of running without leaving the spot of activity, without progressing. It is a barren law of motion. We talk much about transitions from military to civil rule, from a third to a fourth republic, a seventh to an eighth National Assembly, and from a centripetal to a centrifugal federalism. They are mere talk without substance if we don’t slough off the same set of operators we have had for the past four decades or thereabouts. Just do a check on the personalities in charge from day one of our existence as a country. We come face to face with the same small group of handlers working at solutions to problems they gave the country. It will be impossible to get transforming change if the agents of the procedure are always dredged from the past for a mission to launch you into the future. What they will offer is what we are having in Nigeria: a systemic petrification that has drained life out of a potentially vibrant nation.

    This is the reason the challenges of several decades ago remain with us. Read the Nigerian newspapers of the 1960s through the 80s, and the decades after; you won’t find yourself back in time. Fela Anikulapo-Kuti’s fans marked 20 years of the death of the legend early in August 2017, and his music was played all over the country and abroad. Most commentators said the biting lyrics composed scores of years ago to lampoon the failings of government, are still valid as a critique of today’s society and the government. They sound like they were waxed last night.

    The way out I think is to bring in new hands from outside the political arena. In the elections to come, we should not behave like the snake that drops off its skin while retaining its venom. Let us do away with the deceptive new skin, the snake and its poison. We need to have more bureaucrats, apolitical figures, professionals and lettered artisans in the executive and legislative arms of government. Politics must no longer be left exclusively in the hands of politicians. Let’s go for an affirmative action policy that gives between 40% and 50% of lawmakers, cabinet members, and public office holders to the plebeians and the man and woman in the backwaters of the land. My thesis is that if we make governance all-inclusive to accommodate the educated hoi polloi, we shall be unlocking the potential of the entire society to serve Nigeria. Hidden in the recesses of the common people and our professionals is the key to refreshing and oxygenating the dying polity. The present political class is a hollow force. They can’t reinvent themselves for new ideas to redeem Nigeria.

    Yemi Osinbajo amply proves the thinking that we’ve been losing all along in not reaching out to the vast reserves of our human resources. We have counted on a class which has long entered its age of diminishing returns, the same way crude oil is moving into a cul-de-sac as a jaded economic lever.

     

    • Ojewale is a writer in Ota, Ogun State.
  • Obaze, the man, mission and destiny

    Oseloka Henry Obaze, fondly called OHO is an immensely interesting individual. Obaze, the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP candidate in the November 18 gubernatorial election is an embodiment of knowledge, an intellectual of very high repute, a diplomat of esteemed class and a leader of extraordinaire ability.

    Somebody once described a diplomat as one who could dive into turbulent water without making a single splash. He is such diplomat. In him you notice the first quality of any great leader – humility. And he has this unbelievable memory of remembering one’s name after just one introduction.

    OHO is one person, who would not make a decision while conducting any meeting without listening to the views of everyone. He calls you, however junior to him, to listen to you carefully then respond or ginger you with so appropriate words.  And I still don’t know how he manages to do it but he keeps tracks, communicates via sms and email so regularly, despite his work load and out-of-office engagements. Whenever he wouldn’t pick your call, he must return the call to apologise and explain why he couldn’t pick when you called earlier.

    OHO has this unbelievable care for people that he takes to other people’s problem as if he’s directly in their shoes. His attention, complete dedication to finding solutions mark him out as one specially created for the benefit of mankind. It’s not just for sight-seeing that he is one of the most traveled men in the world. While working for the United Nations, he had been sent to over 100 member nations. And he wasn’t just touring neither was he interested in showing around his handsome face. He was indeed being sent to help solve problems.

    You didn’t know anything about the word resilient until you met OHO. I wondered if he ever slept and I’m still wondering. Nothing he believes in will go unattained once he is on it. And he is a perfectionist of some sort. He will continue working on it until it’s perfectly executed. He’s ever consistent with his beliefs and will NEVER compromise any positive act, however tempting the course of cutting corners could present.

    OHO exhumes reliability. His ever amiable demeanour provides him with the exceptional charm that easily breaks barriers.  His consistently being sent to those nations as a UN diplomat is a confirmation of one with the ability to proffer appropriate solutions. He has served Anambra State as the Secretary to the State Government for three years and significantly across two different governors. In his book, Here To Serve, he uncannily branded the term SSG to stand for Senior ScapeGoat. Interesting but then are equally his dedication and accomplishment in those three years. He so redefined the office to not only stand it out as the real administrative hub of the state’s governance but also infused transparent dedication and quality of delivery from the members of staff. So much was his impact that when he decided to resign from that position one year into the tenure of the incumbent governor, the members of staff he was leaving behind were unanimous in printing a farewell banner thus – We Lost A Saint!

    But OHO is not all about administration. He’s much more of action. While in service to his state, he was directly in charge of managing very complex policy and practical issues. Top amongst the practical issues include the flood disaster of 2012, the illegal repatriation of Anambra indigenes from Lagos, the return and settling of Anambra IDPs from Central African Republic, the 2014 Ebola crisis, the spate of collapsed buildings in 2014 as well as handling the leadership crisis within the Anambra State Association in the United States. In all these, OHO exhibited a quality of leadership ability that won over keen observers.

    Taking the flood disaster issue as a reference point, one could be convinced beyond doubt that Anambra State and indeed humanity are blessed to have a man of such dedication and diligence around. OHO brought his years of experience in handling such issues in the UN to bear immediately.

    That unprecedented flood of 2012 devastated properties and farmlands worth trillions of Naira in 24 states of the nation. With 57 communities in eight local government areas adversely affected, Anambra State was not just one of the worst hit, it actually was deemed as the most acutely affected. Two of these LGAs, Ogbaru and Anambra West were extensively submerged. Property and business losses in the state alone were estimated at nearly N23 billion.

    But under OHO in his dual capacity as the chair, Anambra State Flood Disaster Relief Coordination Committee and chair, Anambra State Flood Disaster Relief Trust Fund, Anambra State became the most proactive and transparent state of the 24 states in effectively managing and efficiently responding to the complex natural disaster. Managing 125,000 internally displaced people, IDPs was quite a task but OHO did manage admirably. An estimated 15,000 houses and businesses were fully or partially submerged. In all, four people directly lost their lives via drowning, the lowest number of human fatalities from the 24 states.

    While efficiently coordinating and involving both the state and federal agencies responsible, the State Emergency Management Agency, SEMA and Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA respectively, Anambra State, under OHO’s firm control, admirably dealt with the worst natural disaster the state had faced since Nigeria came to being.

    Though the state government released N100 million immediately while the federal government came later with N500 million, many well-meaning people donated cash and food items, clothing, etc to the cause. These generous individuals could have been compelled to assist based on humanitarian basis but law of nature would largely revolve their encouragement to do so around the professionalism and transparency shown by the people in charge.

    Concerned Anambrarians took deep interest and time to study that disaster and concluded that in OHO was one individual completely capable of replacing the man he was then serving and assisting in managing the terrible disaster. But those people got the disappointment of their lives. They were never given the opportunity. The very terrible politics of vendetta denied the expecting population of ndi Anambra the opportunity to cast their votes in favour of this amiable and workaholic diplomat. OHO’s party then, All Progressives Grand Alliance, APGA disqualified him from participating in the primaries.

    And many Anambrarians shed tears, tears that such individual of class was denied the opportunity to govern a state he loved so much as to resign from his plum job and very enviable position in the UN to come home to serve. And because of the zoning formula in Anambra, they all believed the chance was lost forever.

    But the poor masses counted without considering destiny. When OHO agreed to serve this present government of Governor Willie Obiano, it was to show he accepted whatever God put in place in good faith. He decided to serve Anambra further from the number three role, despite the circumstances with which he was schemed out. His love for humanity was the deciding factor. He buried the desire to ever govern Anambra again and moved on.

    But the same man, who benefitted from the political shenanigans that denied OHO; the same man who destiny fortuitously played a favourable orchestra for; the same man who inherited an empire he never contributed anything in building…the same man completely veered off from toeing the path painstakingly designed for him in benefit of dear people of the state. The same man would unwittingly resurrect OHO’s own destiny back to contention.

    OHO’s new party, the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP has already elected him as their candidate. And in doing so the party has thrown up the best candidate for the November 18 election by a mile. Already ndi Anambra are rejoicing that they will make that choice on the D-Day.

    This is DESTINY threatening in its finest form. In OHO is a bestseller waiting to happen.

     

    • Obasi writes from Ozubulu, Anambra State.
  • Sucker-punch, like Mexico

    Mexico is clearly not what you would call a fair match for the United Stares in many regards – not in military armoury or economic fortunes, for instance. But that Latin American country lately showed a markedly superior edge in moral high grounding over its illustrious neighbour.

    United States President Donald Trump, even before assuming office last January, had for much of his public life made a favourite punching bag out of Mexican immigrants (Latinos) in his country, and without sparing a breath for their home land of Mexico. He flagged his prejudice most luminously when he kick-started his stumping for the American high office on June 16, 2015 with diatribes on Mexico, as he said: “When do we beat Mexico at the border? They’re laughing at us, at our stupidity. And now they are beating us economically. They are not our friend, believe me…When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best…They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems to us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

    The xenophobic bluster did not stop at mere words, because Trump made the construction of a border wall to staunch the flow of immigrants from Mexico a signature promise during his electioneering. And the icing as he vowed, both while on the hustings and ever since he won the presidency, is that Mexico will pay for the $10billion wall. That vow was naturally galling to Mexico, and the country has repeatedly insisted it would not by any stretch of diplomatic gambit pay for the wall.

    Actually, the mere suggestion riled former Mexican President Vicente Fox enough to peer-match Mr. Trump with Adolf Hitler, and to use the ‘f-word’ as he riposted to the then Republican candidate that his country was “not going to pay for that f-king wall!” Fox later apologised on national television for using the vile word, and Trump’s response was to underhandedly rub in the umbrage by saying at a pre-election rally in May, last year: “Vicente Fox was on television last night and he apologized, and I accept his apology…Honestly, I thought it was very, very nice, because I was giving him a little hard time about something, and he apologised.”

    The U.S. president has also implacably bickered over the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), by which he said his country was being shortchanged to the advantage of its southern neighbour, Mexico, as well as Canada to the north. He has insisted on renegotiating the trade deal or cut out of it as he did with the Paris Treaty on Climate Change.

    Then came Hurricane Harvey, which made landfall in Texas penultimate weekend and swamped the oil state in torrential rains and catastrophic flooding. By last weekend, the hurricane had ravaged Louisiana, and no fewer than 40 fatalities as well as large-scale destruction had resulted from the elemental barrage. You could say ‘God’s own country’ was having its defining moment under the eight-month-old Trump era holding up the heads of citizens in the affected areas, literally, from under the waters.

    Amidst all that siege, Commander-in-Tweets President Trump made time to be active on his famous bully pulpit, @realDonaldTrump. Mid-last week, he restated his campaign to make Mexico pay for his proposed border wall. “With Mexico being one of the highest crime Nations in the world, we must have THE WALL. Mexico will pay for it through reimbursement/other,” he tweeted. And a short interval after, he shared another tweet, saying: “We are in the NAFTA (worst trade deal ever made) renegotiation process with Mexico & Canada. Both being very difficult, may have to terminate? (sic)”

    In obvious response to those tweets, Mexico’s foreign affairs ministry in a statement insisted it would “not pay, under any circumstances, for a wall or physical barrier built on U.S. territory along the Mexican border.” But apparently seizing on former American First Lady Michelle Obama’s famous credo that “when you go low, we go high,” the statement went on to say: “The Mexican government takes this opportunity to express its full solidarity with the people and government of the United States as a result of the damages caused by Hurricane Harvey in Texas, and expresses that it has offered to provide help and cooperation to the U.S. government in order to deal with the impact of this natural disaster – as good neighbours should always do in trying times.”

    In plain language, Mexico was offering to help Trump’s America mitigate the ravages of Hurricane Harvey. But it was an offer completely at odds with Trump’s crusade to build a border wall that will keep out Mexican immigrants, and not minding his regular jibe against Latinos already in the U.S. Many American media outlets couldn’t help recalling last week that following the devastation by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the Mexican government had also deployed soldiers, medical personnel, engineers and aid to stricken residents of Louisiana and Mississippi.

    Mexico’s surprise gesture left the United States literally floundering last week, with neither a response from ordinarily rumbustious President Trump nor a clear policy on what to do with the offer. Texas Governor Greg Abbott was reported keen to accept the aid, but it apparently wasn’t exactly his call being a matter of relations between two countries. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson did thank Mexico for the offer while welcoming his Mexican counterpart, Luis Videgaray, to talks on bilateral trade and security. “It’s very generous of the government of Mexico to offer their help at this very, very challenging time for our citizens down in Texas and now moving towards the border of Louisiana as well,” he was reported saying, without stating clearly whether or not the aid would be accepted.

    I hold that there are useful lessons to learn from this Mexican tack by Nigerian politicians in their typically adversarial partisan gamesmanship. And let’s just boil it down: Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose needs finesse in his one-man squad opposition politics. The governor has been a vocal critic of the Muhammadu Buhari presidency, and that to some extent has helped in energizing the democratic space. But it should by no means be a closed-minded advocacy.

    When President Buhari was recently away on his 103-day medical vacation in Britain, Fayose was hot on the button in demanding full disclosure regarding his ailment. In brazen affront of Nigerian cultural morality, he made rash claims about survival chances of the president; and when Buhari eventually returned to the country, not a few openly wondered if Fayose would fall on his sword now that his claims had been shown fatally false. But all that, in my view, wasn’t even where he went overboard.

    There is an axiom in Yoruba, and I suspect in many other Nigerian cultures, which interprets to saying our disputing isn’t sufficient to wish each other dead. When state governors paid Buhari a goodwill visit in Aso Rock upon his return, Fayose was alone in staying away, appropriating the authority of a physician – which he certainly is not – in declaring that the president wasn’t medically fit to continue in office. And late last week, he gave a scorch-earth censure of the president’s curious claim earlier in the week that the economy was looking up, even though the Nigerian Bureau of Statistics (NBS) simultaneously issued a report showing food prices at an eight-year high.

    Fayose certainly needs schooling in the art of opposition politics. But the catch is: so does the Buhari presidency in politically engaging irritants like him.

    Please join me on kayodeidowu.blogspot.be for conversation.

  • ASUU strike and “change begins with me”

    For the past two few weeks, the already suffering Public Tertiary Education in Nigeria has been grounded to a halt courtesy of the insensitivity of our leadership to the future of Nigeria which lies in proper investment in education. The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) had at an emergency National Executive Council (NEC) meeting of August 12, discussed among others the abysmal level of implementation of the 2009 ASUU/FGN agreement, 2013 MoU and the shortfall in salaries leading to fractional payment of staff salaries. After exhaustive deliberations, the NEC of ASUU declared a total comprehensive and indefinite strike action beginning from Sunday August 13. This means that while the strike lasts, there shall be no teaching, no examination, no supervision, no attendance of statutory meetings of any kind and other matters. This withdrawal of service will bring suffering to the lives of the lecturers and their families (promotion delays, truncated examinations), the students (elongated stay and frustration) and their parents (more spending, more troubles and delayed rest), those whose livelihoods directly depends on a functional university (printers, typists, photocopiers, barbers, campus cab drivers) and the entire nation (national and international embarrassment, loss of man hour, and other costs etc).

    If these consequences are known, why do we keep allowing strikes to happen? Why will a government breach trust most of the time? Why do we have to ‘struggle’ and sweat to get legitimate things in Nigeria?

    Aside from the one-week warning strike in 2016 to make government do the needful, the major strike which lasted about six months started on July 1, 2013 and did not get suspended until December of that same year. I should not talk about the lives of students lost to accident and that of ASUU former President, Festus Iyayi who died in a fatal accident while going to attend ASUU meeting where a decision to end the strike was to be taken. The strike was to force government to fully implement the 2009 FGN/ASUU agreement. This agreement has provision for the payment of Earned Academic Allowances (EAA) for postgraduate supervision with Lecturer I (N15,000), Senior Lecturer (N20,000) and Professor (N25,000) per student respectively. Unfortunately since these years, students are being supervised on humanitarian grounds without pay. Till date, majority of lecturers are owed up to seven years by federal government to the tune of about N128billion while the agreement made provisions for the payment of N80, 000 for examining a Master thesis and N105,000 for PhD (external) and for internal examiners (Master thesis/N45,000 and N65,000 for PhD) respectively. But here in South-west, top universities, for instance pay N10,000 and N45,000 and yet owe for upward of five academic sessions. In the same Africa, a professor at University of Ibadan assessed a PhD thesis from South Africa and was paid close to $1,000!

    Another major grouse is the underfunding of the tertiary education as evident is downward review of education budget. President Buhari has not done well in this regard. In a Vanguard report of May 28, 2015 entitled ‘What Buhari Promised Nigerians’, the paper quoted him as promising to “Fully review provisions of the Universal Basic Education Act with emphasis on gender equity in primary, secondary school enrolment whilst improving the quality and substance of our schools, through outcome based education, that address the individual, family, and societal roles in education; and the associative skills and competencies that go with these responsibilities; targeting up to 20% of our annual budget for this critical sector whilst making substantial investments in training quality teachers at all levels of the educational system”. This has not been the case. In 2011, education got N306.3bn, it moved to N400.15bn in 2012, to N426.53bn in 2013, to N493bn in 2014, to N492bn in 2015, and nosedived to N369bn in 2016. ASUU had thought the National Assembly would input their demands in the 2017 budget but they got a shock as only six percent was allocated to education. It was therefore obvious that they were deceived into thinking their interests will be incorporated into the budget. While the agreement reached provided for federal government to inject N1.1trillion in six years to be paid in phases starting with N220billion in 2013, government is yet to make any other injection to make university education worth pursuing.

    The registration of the National University Pension Management Company (NUPENCO) is another reason for the strike. The union claims that rather than the usual N150million, it was asked to pay N1billion for a license but two years down the line, the federal government has failed to release the license while holding on to the money. They believe it was a strategy to make retirement life difficult for their members. To them, the money would have yielded interest wherever it has been fixed by the federal government.

    While successive governments continue to say there is no money, recovered looted funds run into trillions of naira while exotic cars go to the National Assembly. It is hypocrisy for public office holders not to honour agreements freely entered into by unions particularly those claiming to be better than the PDP government. But why should they care about the plight of children of the masses mostly attending public institutions? The leadership of the country from the presidency to the National Assembly have proudly published pictures of their graduating children who studied abroad on the social media. These children are to benefit soon with the enactment of the ‘not-to-young-to-run’. Yet they cannot provide same for their countrymen. Why will the federal government take ASUU to court on the issue of University Staff School yet found it difficult to obey court ruling on same issue?

    Why should a lecturer be supervising students on credit as being presently done? How else can the federal government encourage corruption other than denying people their entitlements? What more can we say about a government who prefers to recover looted funds while creating loopholes to further corruption? ASUU fights for the future and not for today but those in government are interested in what they will see today while securing only the future of their family. Those the leadership failed to cater for in the past are the ones kidnapping and terrorizing the country.

    In the days ahead, we should therefore expect increasing social deviance and crime and other cadres of social problems should the federal government not re-write history by commencing the implementation of outstanding issues with ASUU. If those at the National Assembly are graduates, they should show further commitments to education. Whether ‘too young to run’ or ‘not too young to run’, the political class must carry along the masses if they hope to have peace in the future. As ASUU says, a time will come when the children of the poor will have nothing left to eat but the rich. It is shameful not to honor agreement. As stated by ASUU president, Professor Biodun Ogunyemi in his press conference of July 18, 2016 “total implementation of the 2009 ASUU/FGN agreement especially the funding for revitalization and other service-related conditions, registration of NUPEMCO will not only increase access but also ensure industrial harmony and sustainable scheduling in the system”. Now that the federal government through the Minister of Education, Adamu Adamu has taken responsibility for the ongoing strike, let the change begin with the Muhammadu Buhari government for a positive turn-around in public education.

    • Dr Tade, a criminologist sent this piece from Ibadan.