Category: Comments

  • Fashola’s bag of excuses

    Fashola’s bag of excuses

    he Honourable Minister of Power, Works and Housing, Babatunde Raji Fashola, SAN, is no stranger to Nigerians. He came into the political limelight when he succeeded Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu as Lagos State governor. He had earlier served as Tinubu’s Chief of Staff, succeeding Alhaji Lai Mohammed, now Minister of Information and Culture.
    Few would disagree that Fashola made some mark as governor. And, thanks to the confidence reposed in him at the federal level by President Muhammadu Buhari, he now oversees three key ministries merged into one.
    Fashola was expected to reverse the trend that translates to not less than 80 per cent of the nation’s highways in a bad shape. Power is another kettle of fish altogether, because much of the country is practically in darkness. And given the housing deficit in the country, one cannot downplay the seriousness of the task at hand.
    Some sounded a note of caution when three ministries were handed over to Fashola seemingly on a platter of gold. His tepid performance has given credence to the concerns, because, since taking charge of the so-called super ministry, Fashola has only become adept at giving excuses. Not long ago, he granted Channels Television an interview which turned out to be just another litany of excuses. He traced the challenges in the power sector to 1950 when the first electricity ordinance was passed. He also said he needed to visit all the power plants in the country in order to understand what he was expected to manage. Frankly, the honourable minister is beginning to sound like a broken record. Nigerians need stable electricity, not excuses. Fashola should proffer and implement solutions. We all know the problems. It’s not so long ago he was busy lambasting the former administration of Dr. Goodluck Jonathan. Now he is in charge, he should act.
    This is the same Fashola who in 2014 said it would take just six months to fix Nigeria’s electricity problem. He has been in the position more than a year now, and instead of improvement, what we have is a worsening situation. There is no light at the end of this tunnel. I subscribe to the view of Senator Shehu Sani that Buhari should consider appointing a minister who is an electrical engineer with the requisite knowledge of the industry.
    During the last presidential campaign, Fashola urged Nigerians not to accept the excuse of vandalism for inability of the then government to provide regular electricity. Yet now, Fashola is singing the same song. He has been quoted as saying as long as miscreants continue to vandalise oil installations, Nigerians cannot enjoy steady power supply.
    To add insult to injury, Fashola wants Nigerians to pay more for light they do not have. He seems unaware that about 70 per cent of Nigerians are poor and cannot afford expensive utilities. Each time he is reminded about this fact, he seems to give the impression that electricity is not for the poor. There is no gainsaying the fact that the task Fashola has been given is too cumbersome for him. His endless stream of excuses betrays the fact that he needs help. He has bitten off more than he can chew.
    Allowing him to continue to oversee the power sector will only subject Nigerians to more hardship. We are suffering enough as it is, and everything possible should be done to soothe our pains.
    What of housing? We have a deficit of about 17 million in the housing sector, which can only be tackled if we build one million new homes every year. I don’t see Fashola achieving this with his bag of excuses. It is on record that throughout his tenure as Lagos governor, he did not build houses for the low income bracket or the middle class. His excuse was that there were no low-cost building materials, so he could not build low-cost houses. Let’s face it, how many Nigerians can afford to pay between N40 million and N100 million for 2/3 bedroom flats under Fashola’s LagosHoms scheme? Even if the flats were mortgaged, how many Nigerians earn N40 million in 10 years? Take for example someone who earns N200,000 monthly. If he saved his full salary for one year (which is unrealistic), he would only have N2,400,000. In 10 years, he would have saved N24,000,000. How then would he be able to afford the houses built by ex-Governor Fashola in Lagos? How many Nigerians even earn N200,000 per month in the first place?
    Back to federal roads. The Lagos-Sagamu Road, the Enugu-Onitsha Highway, and Aba-Ikot Ekpene Highway linking Abia and Akwa Ibom states – are all death-traps. The Uyo-Calabar Road, Ogbulafor-Makurdi Road and the Abuja-Lokoja Expressway – send wrong signals about us as a nation. The Benin-Auchi Road has become a haven for kidnappers.
    Most of the federal roads and flyovers in Lagos, where Fashola reigned supreme for eight years, are in a terrible state. The Apapa-Oshodi Expressway and the Ijora Bridge tell better the stories of these roads, as well as that of an administrator who is either confused or overwhelmed. Nigeria makes billions in revenue from the ports in Apapa, yet the roads are bad.
    Speaking at a pension conference last year, Fashola said: “It was difficult to get private capital into critical sectors of our economy like infrastructure. Private capital and fund managers were not going to invest funds entrusted to them in infrastructure if we wanted to use them for free.
    “As a people, we were willing to pay for these services outside our country but demanded that they be provided for free in our country.”
    Fashola forgot to add that in those societies where Nigerians willingly pay for public infrastructure, people are confident that no one is taking them for a ride.
    The minister further stated that: “If we compare the quality of service on the Lekki-Epe Expressway, where toll is paid, to the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, where toll has been removed, the choice is ours to make. Is it cheaper to drive on a road free of toll and spend five hours for a one hour journey? If you calculate the fuel burnt in five hours of standstill traffic and the stress, you will see that the toll free is not free.”
    Fashola is just playing on our intelligence. The resistance is not because people do not appreciate good service. It is that our leaders are often insincere. In most deals dressed up ‘for the public good’, the citizens are being milked dry.
    My advice to Fashola: he needs to speak less. Acting and delivering results will endear him more to the people. He should stop giving excuses because he comes across as incapable of doing the job at hand.
    All we need are results and not some bogus excuses that Fashola finds rather easy to give. He has been made the ‘prime minister’ of this administration and he should deliver, simple.
    •Odubena, a public affairs analyst writes from Lagos.

  • Economic autonomy and the lessons from Lagos

    Lee Kuan Yew, the architect of the modern day Singapore, visited Nigeria a few days before the military struck on January 15, 1966. His visit was in connection with the Commonwealth Conference held in Lagos on Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe. His conclusion about Nigeria in 1966 is contained in a book he wrote in 2000 titled, ‘From Third World to First’. In the book, he concluded: “I think their tribal loyalties were stronger than their sense of common nationhood”.

    The tragic preference for tribal loyalties at the expense of good governance has made Nigeria arguably the worst run of the world’s seven most populated countries. For too long, our country is used as a symbol for anything that is wrong in terms of countries that are endowed with resources. In spite of hundreds of billions of dollars that we have made from oil, Nigeria still has the second-most destitute people in the world, after India.

    Unarguably, the country has structural problems. But any talk about restructuring without good governance from the constituent states amounts to beating about the bush. Today, State and Local Governments give the impression that their entire operations depend on the statutory Federal allocation. Apart from the Federation Account, each tier of Government is required by the Constitution to raise its own local revenues upon which they should run the services allocated to them under the constitution. It was evident before oil became an important source of income that this country possessed abundant natural resources and a vigorous and dynamic human resource to develop into a prosperous and progressive nation. One still believes that it is still so if we turn our attention away from oil as our main source of wealth.

    With an exploding population of an ethnically and religiously diverse people, estimated at 24 million, Lagos stands out as a model of how good governance can enhance peaceful co-existence and spur growth and development. The state has seen steady improvement in its governance since 1999, when Nigeria returned to democracy. In similarity to how cities such as Chennai and Hyderabad in India and Medellin in Columbia had in the past outperformed and outshone their national government in promoting growth, child education and crime and poverty reduction, Lagos has become a laboratory which  the federal government and other states of the federation can emulate for  practical lesson.

    A unique combination of visionary leaders, vibrant and pro active public service, an active and engaged civil society and progressive development plan have worked together to lead what was once the poster child for a slum-ridden and largely impoverished lawless metropolis, into a new modern era.

    The economy of Lagos State is fast outpacing economic growth in other parts of the country and, indeed, in the sub region as the state’s non-oil revenues now sustain increase investment in infrastructure and other social amenities. While other states have been left almost bankrupt, following the drying up courtesy current economic recession, Lagos raked in N287 billion in Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) in 2016, well above the total budget size of more than 20 states.

    With about N600 million in 1999, when Asiwaju BolaTinubu took over, the IGR rose to between N10 billion and N11 billion by 2007 when Tinubu left office. With continuing reforms in the internal revenue system, aggressive tax drive, capacity building and professionalism of the Lagos Internal Revenue Service (LIRS), the IGR of the state had by 2015 when Mr. Babatunde Fashola (SAN), left office, risen to about N23 billion monthly.

    A key secret of Lagos’ economic growth is infrastructure development which has been the hallmarks of succeeding administrations since 1999. This is premised on the principle that the better the infrastructure the more the likelihood of tax compliance. This is in sharp contrast with what obtains at the federal level where a large proportion of revenue projection has little to do with government’s performance, since about 75 percent of the national budget is projected in anticipation of oil receipt.

    Aside its creative revenue base, Lagos flexibility in sourcing competent and resourceful personnel, irrespective of typical Nigerian considerations, partly accounts for its socio-economic stability. In Lagos appointment or recruitment into public office is mainly anchored on competence.  Lagos is the only and truly melting point in Nigeria; a land of opportunities for all. Lagos has continued to show the way forward in its commitment to an indivisible Nigeria where no one is denied of opportunities for self actualisation on mundane considerations. The state’s primary, secondary and tertiary health facilities and, indeed, other such infrastructure remain accessible to all Nigerians without any discrimination. The State Security Trust and Employment Trust Funds are available for the good of Lagos residents.

    Now, the question is can Lagos really save Nigeria? Alone, it’s unlikely — one factor is that the country’s population is expected to hit 400 million by mid-century — but Lagos can now be the model for transferring more authority to other States. And they, in turn, could help to shift the polarized national politics. Another way forward is replication of collaboration that gave rise to LAKE Rice, a kind of recession soother champion by Lagos and Kebbi state governments which also has other benefits of renewing investors’ interest in agro-based industries, boost for agric related cooperative societies among others.

    From the LAKE Rice example, it is obvious other states need to look inward for more of such progressive and productive partnership, especially in terms of regional economic integration. It will be a fascinating idea for business to flourish and encourage industrialization. If income levels rose, improved education and a rising middle class will naturally follow. Greater affluence and aspiration, in turn, tend to act as a useful brake on population growth.

    Another lesson from Lagos is the culture of peaceful coexistence and religious tolerance among residents. An atmosphere of peace and tranquility is the bedrock for any sustainable societal growth and development in a cosmopolitan City like Lagos. This is why the state government, through the Ministry of Home Affairs, is promoting peaceful, harmonious relationship among the diverse religious groups in the State as well as ensures the sustenance of peaceful co-existence among residents irrespective of their ethnic and religious persuasion. The State has continued to operate a multi-prong approach strategy which includes a mix of public enlightenment campaign, sensitization and advocacy programmes against hate preaching and religious intolerance.

    On a final note, with the recent discovery of oil in Lagos, its journey into prosperity seems to have just begun. But then, for Lagos to remain a leading light in the country, both residents and visitors alike must abide by all rules and laws that regulate socio-economic interaction. It is only in doing this that Lagos could continue to be a haven of hope for all.

    • Musbau is of the Features Unit, Ministry of Information and Strategy, Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos.
  • As America and the world wait for Trump

    As America and the world wait for Trump

    Few days from now Donald Trump will step into the White House as the 45th American President. The Americans are in fever pitch anticipation waiting for a man whose conduct, so far, has been   contrary to the norm. Trump is a novelty in American politics, nay the world. His victory shocked the pundits and soothsayers whose predictions never gave Trump a chance. Why? They could not imagine a man with such crude dispositions and unorthodox style would garner votes to victory. Talk about his mannerisms, they are far away from being normal. Many dismiss his penchant of speaking what they dub the language of the street and directed at the proverbial common man right from the time he started campaigning for his party’s Republican ticket through to the presidential elections.

     For the first time, a presidential candidate openly took the media up and spat on their faces for their rabid opposition to his candidacy. To him, given the obvious bias of the mainstream media in favour of his opponent, Hillary Clinton, the Fourth Estate of the Realm had betrayed the cardinal principle of the profession that truth is sacred. He sees majority of the journalists and broadcasters   as liars and  jokers. He also threw a punch at illegal immigrants, vowing  that he would fish them out and get them expelled as soon as he was sworn in. He had a scathing message for the religious bigots – especially the Muslims – threatening once sworn in, he would make the   United States too hot for them to stay. To him “they are blood suckers”.

     Trump is now US President elect , rhetorics of electioneering campaigns are gone. The question begging for an answer is :  Will he be true to his campaigns promises? A BBC commentary  column of 10 November 2016 raised some poignant posers for Trump on tackling   some of the major issues he raised during his electioneering trips across America. I wish to recall few of them in this piece. Already some of his cabinet nominees are talking of the rules of law to implement some of Trump’s weird policies rather than carrying them out by fiat.

     First on his card is the removal of two million illegal immigrants . How he is going to achieve this still remains cloudy. There are only an estimated 178,000 illegal immigrants with criminal records . Even if they are two million, to begin mass deportation on that scale would be hard. However, Americans are waiting for his joker.

     Second:  The building of Trump Wall. He has slightly changed one of his campaign promises that would make Mexicans finance the building of the wall to now saying the wall will be built through appropriations process as soon as April. In one of his tweets, Trump said : “The congressional appropriations to build the wall was because of speed”.  New York Republican Representative, Chris Collins, echoing that said American tax payers would fund  the cost for the wall but that he was confident Trump would negotiate getting the money back from Mexico. “When you understand that Mexico’s economy is dependent upon US consumers, Donald Trump has all the cards he needs to play” . The wall is estimated to cost as much as $10 billion ( N480 billion).

    Third: To deny visa- free travel to countries which refuse to take back their citizens. In theory he can, under section212 ( F) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 152, making reference to President Barack  Obama who had used the act to block visas of certain groups. But for Trump to apply the rule to the entire countries of the world may be difficult to achieve.

    Fourth: appointment of a new Supreme Court Judge. It is yet to be seen. Though there is a vacancy in the higher echelon of the US court after the death of conservative Antoin Scalia.

    President Obama has nominated a replacement but the Republican controlled house has refused to consider it. Mr Trump has an opportunity to nominate a candidate to the  Supreme Court. Through  this, he could influence decisions on everything from abortion to freedom of the Press and probably same sex marriage.

     Fifth: Repealing Obama Care. Already the Republican legislators who now dominated the two houses of Congress have   tactically endorsed Trump pledge to have Obamacare repealed as   soon as he assumes office.  Though this threat will be a tall order to achieve,Trump will need to find a way to overcome a strong Democratic  opposition in the Senate. To repeal health legislation without an immediate replacement will deny millions of Americans  now receiving affordable  health care.

    Sixth: Cancellation of all payments to the UN climate change programmes. Though he can get the scrapping of payment through the Republican dominated Congress, he will have to contend with Paris Agreement which ratified it as an international law. Withdrawal may take four years or more.

    Seventh: Trump who described China as a currency manipulator may be inclined to rattle China with an executive order to remedy what  he considered an unacceptable situation. But given the vibrancy of the Chinese economy, whatever measure President Trump might take against China is likely to be of limited effect.

     The Trump cabinet is almost in place. These are the men and women who will set the tone of implementing Trump’s “weirdest” ideas. It is, however, a mixed grill. Some of  his nominees do not share the rather extreme positions of Trump on some issues, like the National Security Adviser, Michael Flynn, who has a history of tactically supporting anti- Muslim activists , Jefferson Beauregard who  believes in equal rights for all and Steve Bannon- Trump’s Chief Strategist- whose selection was most welcome by white supremacists. In a most dramatic twist on Tuesday 9  January 2016, Trump’s nominee for US Attorney General stunned the Senate Confirmation Panel when he said : “ I abhor the KK Klan and what it represents and its hateful ideology”. Even those placard carrying protesters against his nomination: “Stop the racist pig from getting into power” were dis appointed when he further said, he did not support outright Muslim ban from the U.S.  “ We have great Muslim citizens”.

    Trump will be carrying a lot of baggage into his office next Friday judging from his last news conference last Wednesday 11 January 2017. As a business man , he maintained he would ever be, though he pledged to transfer the running of his multi- billion dollars businesses to his two sons. His link to Russia  is an albatross that is making many Americans to believe that their indomitable world influence will be  compromised. And the last which to me will be very hard for him to fight is his disdain for the Press.

     The world is waiting for Trump and how he wants to actualise his campaign mantra : “ WE WANT TO TAKE  OUR AMERICA BACK” against these odds.

    • Olamiti writes from Las Vegas.

     

  • Obama and the end of an era

    Obama and the end of an era

    In a few days time, the curtain will draw on the tenure of the first Black president in the United States of America, Barrack Obama. Against all expectations, Obama brightly talked his way into the White House as a stunned world applauded the sheer beauty of rhetoric. Not in the 21st century has any man captured the attention of the world with his sheer brilliance as Obama has done in the last eight years. Obama loves the world stage. That is his territory. That is where he holds his audience spell bound. Since, perhaps, Franklin D. Roosevelt, no American president has exhibited oratory prowess as Barack Obama.

    He brought a message of hope to his compatriots. If there was anything that was really needed prior to his election, it was hope. The eight years of George W. Bush jnr. had thrown the nation into severe economic mess. Bush penchant for war mongering had far-reaching consequences on the American economy so much so that he made mess of a buoyant economy he inherited from the preceding Clinton administration. The political connoisseur that he is, Obama rallied his compatriots and sold to them his ‘audacity of hope’.

    The message was unambiguous and quite effective. It soon became a movement that developed a life of its own. Even in nations outside the shores of America, the message was spectacularly received. Here in Nigeria, the clowns that we are, some folks threw caution to the wind by going round the country to raise funds for the Obama course. Such was the infectious nature of the Obama movement!

    Well, Obama was talking and the Americans were listening while the rest of the world watched enthusiastically.  His campaign for the presidency was built round the optimistic slogan, “Yes we can”, which was primarily about hope and change. His campaign managers promoted him as the messiah who would build a new America where poverty, unemployment and other social ills would become history. On his own, Obama was a good product. He proudly announced his audacity and bragged about his capability. He spoke about how he was obliged to run for president by what he termed “the fierce urgency of now.”

    Like Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Martin Luther King and Bill Clinton, Obama is a master of public speech. Using the power of rhetoric, he dazzled Americans with his brilliance. He spoke glowingly on how he would create jobs, improve the economy, regulate taxes, reduce deficits, and improve energy and education in addition to promoting world peace. Americans overwhelmingly elected Obama president. Thus began the making of a legend.

    Upon his inauguration, expectations were understandably high across the world, particularly in America.Obama’s first Inaugural Address elicited hope as he proclaimed: “Today, the work of remaking America has begun.” And truly, the change came swiftly. With Democrats in control of both the House and Senate, Obama shortly signed into law an “economic stimulus” package that would cost nearly $1 trillion and would keep unemployment under 8 percent and usher in a robust economic recovery. Goodbye to depression. Welcome prosperity.

    Now, after eight years of occupying, undoubtedly, the most demanding office in the world, Obama critics accuse him of engaging in more talks than actions. Obamacare, a supposedly well thought out policy has been the brunt of severe criticism by elements opposed to Obama. Indeed, the policy was one of the items that was ruthlessly torn into pieces by Donald Trump during the last fiercely fought American presidential contest. Plans are currently on-going to entirely scrap the policy by the in-coming Trump administration.

    Similarly, many of Obama critics believe his foreign policy was a disaster. They cited cases in Libya, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Israel, to mention but a few, as evidences of Obama’s foreign policy mess. They argue that while he demanded radical changes in Israeli –Palestinian relation, Obama actually did nothing tangible in the Middle East to herald the hope of the change he so much mouthed publicly. His critics equally affirm that it was his inability to act promptly that gave impetus to the rise of the Islamic State. While the Kurds and the Iraqi government raised alarm about the deteriorating state of affairs as the Islamic State continued its aggressive territorial expansion, Obama failed to produce the needed ‘Reaganic’ or Bush like response that could have sent across the right signal.

    But for Obama’s diehards Americans’ expectations of him were too extravagant from the outset as the nation’s economy was almost in shamble when he took over and he couldn’t have been any quick fix it.. However, the truth is that, Obama himself worked quite hard to stimulate the people’s expectations. Undoubtedly, when the American voters opted for him, they did so base on the strength of their conviction that he would not only talk the talk, but would actually work the talk.

    But then, love him or hate him, Obama has done his bit for his people. In an increasingly unpredictable and volatile world, he has preserved American traditional alliance while also stretching forth hands of friendship to many other nations. It is to his credit that America has opened a new chapter with the Cuban people. With American friends overseas, Obama has helped to make the world relatively peaceful. His advocacy for global warming has helped to keep the subject alive across the world. To a great extent, he has been able to reverse a great recession, reboot the American auto industry and unleash the longest stretch of job creation in American history. Significantly, he shut down Iran’s nuclear weapons program without firing a shot. This is in addition to avenging the painful 9/11 disaster by fishing out the supposed mastermind of the sad event.

     It was, perhaps, these modest attainments of his that resonated in the minds of his audience as they shouted: ‘Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!’ when he gave his farewell speech in Chicago, where it all began for him. But for Obama, there is no ‘third term agenda’, the job is done and it’s time to say goodbye.

    Ogunbiyi is of the Ministry of Information & Strategy, Alausa, Ikeja.

  • Relocation to Abuja: NOUN engine in Lagos still runs

    WHEN Professor Abdalla Uba Adamu was appointed on February 10, 2016 as the Vice-chancellor of the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN) by the federal government, he came with an uncommon zest to lift the institution to the next level of its development. He did not just come to do it “the way it has always been done”. Playing on the university’s acronym, he told anyone who cared to listen that he had come to move the premier Open and Distant Leaning (ODL) institution “from NOUN to verb”, clearly indicating that he had come for action. One of the many groundbreaking actions he took was moving the university from its temporary headquarters in Lagos to its permanent site in Abuja.

    This singular act was one of the most revolutionary moves seen ever since the university came on stream in 1983. So many things had taken place under the previous two Vice-Chancellors, but this one was unique in its ripple effects. Some may equate it with the movement of the nation’s capital from the same city to the same city, which had some drawdown but was in large part the most sensible to do at the time. To begin with, it was not even Adamu’s idea to relocate NOUN to Abuja; it was a move that had been in the pipeline for years. Under the former Vice-Chancellor, Professor Vincent Ado Tenebe, the land given by the government for the construction of the permanent headquarters in the Jabi area of the city had been fully developed, complete with Senate building which serves as the administrative block, faculty buildings, a teaching hospital and other structures.

    The construction was funded by the Buhari Administration under the TETFUND programme. In fact, Adamu was taken aback when he first visited the site and discovered that the headquarters was almost ready to be occupied. All he needed to do was to connect it to electricity grid! With government approval, the process of moving from Lagos to Abuja was begun within the month he took over. While some inconveniences were suffered, especially by staff who had to physically relocate to a “strange town”, the overall benefits to the university in the long run cannot be quantified. Those who conceived the idea of the relocation prior to Adamu’s appointment couldn’t have made a better judgment. The Abuja site was more spacious, modern, closer to the key government agencies NOUN has to relate with on a constant basis, and costeffective.

    Of course, some Nigerians who have been used to NOUN being in Lagos may have found the relocation unwelcome. It was a change matter, and some people naturally find change unsettling. They fear that change in whatever form can affect them negatively on a personal basis, not minding the overall benefits to both the institution and the nation. And they ask: what happens to the old structure? Where NOUN is concerned, however, the old structure in Lagos remains. Administratively, the vice-chancellor as the chief executive officerhas moved, as well as many of the principal officers and support staff. But the former headquarters, located in Victoria Island, continues to be an integral part of the university. In fact, the Deputy Vice-chancellor (Academic), Prof. Patrick Eya, remains in Lagos to superintend the university’s many operations in the city.

    This strategic move aims at ensuring that the relocation to Abuja is not felt adversely by the thousands of students of the university within the Lagos area and indeed the Southern states. All the academic activities of the university in Lagos are going on uninterrupted. The students there have seamlessly participated in the recent e-exams conducted by NOUN nationwide. In Lagos, NOUN has six study centres. Two of them, McCarthy and NN Apapa, have 15,000 and 15,328 active students respectively. This makes Lagos the hub of the academic life of the university. None of the six study centres has been shut down or was affected by the relocation of the headquarters because, like in other states, the study centres are institutionalised in the states.

    It would be interesting to know that many of the NOUN students in Lagos did not even know that the headquarters had moved to Abuja until several months later. That was due to the nature of the university’s distant learning system whereby the students scarcely find the need to visit the administrative centre for anything. All their needs are met at their study centres and online. For them, even if NOUN was sited on the moon it would not make much difference since all their study needs are met. No shaking. •Sheme is the Director of Media and Publicity, National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN)

  • The British were once here

    I was born in Idanre, a hilly ancient town in Ondo state but I have spent more years in Lagos than in any other city in the world. Since the early sixties when I used to spend holidays with my cousin, Professor Ayo Akinbobola(1942-2008) at 92,Ogunlana Drive(Bus Corner) in Surulere, Lagos along with another cousin of mine Chief Babu Akinbobola(66),Lagos has always been my focus.

    No matter my sojourn in the country be it in Eket, Calabar, Ogoja,Katsina,Bendi,Akure,Owerri,Maiduguri,Sokoto and many other cities in the country including of course Abuja—that artificial city—I always love to come back to Lagos—a city that never sleeps. In the past, Ikoyi was the best place to be in Lagos, hence my disappointment that the names of places we cherished in the past have been changed. A fact that cant be erased is that we were once colonized by the British and Lagos was also once the capital of Nigeria. Another fact was that some streets in Lagos especially in Ikoyi were named by the British to remind us that they were once here. Cameron road was named after Sir Donald Charles Cameron (1872- 1948). He was a British Colonial governor.

    In April 1925, Cameron became the second governor of the British mandate of Tanganyika, taking over from John Scott, who was acting governor for Sir Horace Byatt. From 1931 to 1935 he was governor and commander-in-chief of Nigeria. Glover road was named after Sir James Hawley Glover (1829-1885). He was a Captain in the British Royal Navy and later a colonial governor. On 21 April 1863 he was appointed administrator of the government of Lagos Colony, Victoria Island in Lagos was named after Queen Victoria (1819-1901) who was the Queen of the United Kingdom and Ireland from 20 June 1837 until her death.

    From 1 May 1876, she adopted the adopted the additional title of Empress of India. Milverton Road in Ikoyi was named after Baron Milverton. Baron Milverton, of Lagos and of Clifton in the City of Bristol, is a title in the Peerage of the United Kingdom. It was created in 1947 for the colonial administrator Sir Arthur Richards.

    He had previously served as Governor of Nigeria. As of 2010 the title is held by his eldest son, the second Baron, who succeeded in 1978. Moloney street in Lagos was named after Sir Cornelius Alfred Moloney KCMG(1848-13 August 1913) who was a British colonial administrator. He served as British administrator of the The Gambia from 1884 to 1886, Governor of Lagos Colony from 1886 to 1890, Governor of British Honduras from 1891 to 1897, Governor of the Federal Colony of the Windward Islands from 1897 to 1900, and Governor of Trinidad and Tobago from November 1900 to 1904.

    Clifford Street in Lagos was named after Sir Hugh Charles Cliiford(1866-1941) who was a Briitish Colonial administrator. In 1903, he left Malaysia to take the post of Colonial Scretary of Trinidad. Later he was appointed Governor of the Gold Coast, 1912-1919, Nigeria, 1919-1925, and Ceylon, 1925-1927. Eric Moore Street in Surulere, Lagos was named after Eric Olawolu Moore, a member of the colonial legislative council and the first Lagos member of the united committee of experts and adviser on Labour conventions and regulations.

    He was the father of Kofo Moore, the wife of Sir Adetokunbo Ademola, first Chief Justice of the Federation, who also established New Era Secondary School in Surulere, Lagos. Denton street in Ikoyi was named after George Chadin Denton (1851- 1928) who was the Colonial Secretary of Lagos in 1900. Freeman street was named after Sir Henry Stanhorp Freeman (1831- 1865) who was the first Governor of Lagos (1862-1865). He took over from acting Governor William Mccorskty. Alexander Avenue was named in honour of Cyril Wilson Alexander (1879-1947) who was Governor of the Southern provinces of Nigeria between 1929-1930.

    Egerton street was named in honour of Sir Walter Egerton(1858-1947) who was the first Governor of the colony of Southern Nigeria between 1906-1912. Osborne in Ikoyi was named after Jack Osborne who died on August 15, 2012 at the age of 103. He served with Chindits behind enemy lines in Barma, commanding Nigeria Troops during world war two.

    Lugard Street in Ikoyi was named after Sir Frederick John Dealtry Lugard(1858- 1945), former Governor General of Nigeria. Sir Lugard also named Port- Harcourt in honour of Sir Lewis Vernon Harcourt(1863-1922) who was the British Secretary for the Colonies between 1910-1915. Lord Harcourt’s nickname was “Loulou”. Macgregor street in Ikoyi was named after Sir William Macgregor (1846-1919) who served as Governor of Lagos Colony Niger from 1899- 1904 where he instituted a campaign against the prevalent malaria.

    Thompson street in Ikoyi was named after Sir Graeme Thomson(1875- 1933). He was appointed as Secretary for Ceylon in 1919,then Governor of British Guiana in 1922 and and of Nigeria in 1925. Adeniyi Jones street in Ikeja was named after Dr. Curtis Crispin Adeniyi-Jones (1876-1957), a Nigerian Doctor and Politician. His son Femi is at present a member of guild of Stewards at the Cathedral Church of Christ, Marina, Lagos. Macpherson street in Lagos was named after John Stewart Macpherson (1898-1971). He was a British Colonial administrator who served as Governor General of Nigeria from 1948-1955.

    He was responsible for the introduction of the 1951 constitution, Macpherson constitution which provided for ”semi-responsible government”. His ADC during his tenure was General Johnson Thomas Umanakwe Aguiyi Ironsi(1924-1966) who later became the Head of State of Nigeria from January 1966 to July 1966. Carter Bridge in Lagos was named after Sir Gilbert Thomas Carter (1848-1927). Carter was appointed Governor and Commander-in-Chief of the Colony of Lagos on 3 February 1891.Carter ordered an attack on the Ijebus in 1892.

    Carter travelled to various parts of Yorubaland, accompanied by soldiers, in an attempt to demonstrate the might of the British.Initially,Carter was not well received at Oyo, and the Egba chiefs advised him not to interfere with slavery, while the Ibadan chiefs said they were afraid that their slaves would “assert their freedom by running to the Resident” – and they refused to sign a treaty with Carter. However, in January 1893 the Egba chiefs signed a Treaty of Independence with the British Government. It was agreed that freedom of trade between the Egba Nation and Lagos was to be guaranteed by the British Government, in return for which no road would be closed without the approval of the Governor.

    They further agreed that complete protection and “every assistance and encouragement” would be afforded to all Christian ministers”.

    The British agreed that “no annexation on any portion of Egba Nation shall be made by her Majesty’s Government without the consent of the lawful authorities of the nation, no aggressive action shall be taken against the said nation and its independence shall be fully recognized.” He was promoted Knight Commander of the Order of St Michael and St George (KCMG) on 3 June 1893, “in recognition of his services in conducting a mission to the Yoruba country which resulted in the negotiation of important treaties and brought to an end a long-standing war”. Carter was given Ife works of art in 1896 by the Ooni of Ife, Oba Adelekan Sijuade, in the hopes that a decision in his favour would be made about the resettlement of Modakeke residents outside Ife city.

    These works (including three known as the Ife marbles), were sent by Carter to Europe. Governor Carter made a British expedition in Ijebu in 1892-1893. He forced the Ibadans and the Ekitis to sign a treaty. He trekked to Igbaji and Oke-Imesi where a treaty was signed between the Ibadans and Ekitis. On September 4 1894, Governor Carter signed a treaty with the Owa of Idanre, Oba Towurojoye Adegboye, Arubuefin I during which Idanre was ceded to be part of the British territory. A copy of the treaty is still with the present Owa of Idanre, Oba Frederick Gbolagunte Adegunle Aroloye, Arubuefin IV. After his tenure in Nigeria, he was transferred to Barbados as governor and he built the Governors’ residence there in 1904.

    That house which is still the official residence of the Prime Minister of Barbados was designed by Lady Gilbert Carter, wife of former Governor Carter. The house was named by Governor Carter as Ilaro court on Tweedside road, St. Michael in Barbados. He named the house in remembrance of Ilaro which today is the headquarters of Yewa South, Ogun State. He died on January 18 1927in Ilaro Court.

    The British did it their way when they were here and what they did is part of our history which we are still coping with today. In his book titled, ”CHARACTER AND OPINION”, George Santayana (1862-1952) wrote that ”things have their days and beauties in that day. It would be preposterous to expect any civilization to last forever”. •Eric Teniola, a director at the presidency, resides in Lagos.

  • Judicial recognition of Western Sahara

    Western Sahara is a territory in North-West Africa which was colonised by the Kingdom of Spain at the end of the 19th century. Based on a demand by Morocco, it was added to the list of non-self-governing territories by the United Nations in 1963 pursuant to Article 73 of the United Nations Charter. In 1965, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution calling on Spain to decolonise the territory. A year later, the UN asked Spain to conduct a referendum on self-determination in the territory. As the resolution was ignored by Spain, the Polisario Front began armed struggle for independence in 1973. Even though colonial rule ended in 1975, Spain illegally handed over the administrative control of the territory to Mauritania and Morocco despite the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice which had recognised the right of the Saharawi people to self-determination.

    However, the annexation led to a war between both countries and the Saharawi national liberation movement, the Polisario Front, which had proclaimed the Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR).  Although Mauritania withdrew from the territory in 1979, the war of independence continued between Morocco and the SADR backed by Algeria. After 15 years of the armed conflict, both Morocco and the Polisario Front reached a ceasefire agreement on the ground that Morocco would organise a referendum for self-determination in Western Sahara. Notwithstanding that the 1991 agreement was brokered by the United Nations, Morocco has refused to organise the referendum. With the connivance of leading western governments notably United States and France (the major arms suppliers to Morocco), Rabat has defied all resolutions of the United Nations for the peaceful resolution of the struggle of the Saharawi people for self-determination.

    Thus, Morocco has continued to occupy the largest part of the territory including the major towns and rich natural resources mainly phosphates, agriculture and fishery products. A smaller part of the territory is however controlled by the Polisario Front whose legitimacy has been recognised by the United Nations and the African Union. The mineral resources of the territory which are illegally exploited by Morocco are exported to the United States and the European Union member states. In 2000, Morocco and the EU entered into a trade agreement which was reviewed and consolidated by the 2012 Morocco-EU Liberalisation Agreement to facilitate the exploitation of agricultural products, processed agricultural products as well as fish and fishery products.

    However, the legal validity of the both agreements was challenged by the Polisario Front in a suit filed at the European Court of Human Rights on November 19, 2012. Essentially the case alleged that the agreements violated the human right of the Saharawi people to self-determination. In a historic judgment delivered by the Court on December 10, 2015, the agreements were annulled on the grounds that the term “the territory of the Kingdom of Morocco” therein was understood to encompass Western Sahara. It was further held that the agreements had failed to take cognisance of the fact  that the exploitation of the natural resources of the territory of Western Sahara under the occupation and control of Morocco was likely to be to the detriment of its inhabitants and to infringe their fundamental rights.

    Not surprisingly, Morocco reacted to the judgment by temporarily freezing diplomatic relations with the EU. Equally dissatisfied with the judgment the European Council and Commission and five countries (France, Germany, Spain, Belgium and Portugal) challenged it on appeal by seeking for its annulment at the Court of Justice. Thus, following an expedited procedure adopted at the request of the European Council, the Court took arguments from the parties. In its ruling of December 21, 2016, the Court upheld the appeal. However, the Court categorically stated that in view of the separate and distinct status guaranteed to the territory of Western Sahara under the Charter of the United Nations and the principle of self-determination of peoples, it cannot be said that the term ‘’territory of the Kingdom of Morocco’’ which defines the territorial scope of the Association and Liberalisation Agreements, encompass Western Sahara and, therefore that those agreements are applicable to that territory.

    Furthermore and more significantly, the Court held that in view of the Advisory Opinion on Western Sahara handed down in 1975 by the International Court of Justice at the request of the United Nations General Assembly, the people of that territory must be regarded as a third party which may be affected by the implementation of the Liberalisation Agreement. In the present case, it is not apparent that that Saharawi people consented to the agreement being applied to Western Sahara. Having concluded that the Liberalisation Agreement does not apply to the territory of Western Sahara, the Court set aside the judgment of the General Court on the ground that the Polisario Front is not concerned by the decision of the European Council to conclude that agreement.

    The legal implication of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights is that all EU agreements and treaties with Morocco cannot apply to the territory of Western Sahara. This is a major legal blow to the claim of Morocco over the occupation of the territory. Indeed, it is a judicial confirmation of Western Sahara as a separate territory distinct from the Kingdom of Morocco in line with the unimpeachable Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice of 1975. In his reaction to the epochal judgment of the European Court, Mr. Mohammed Sidati, the Polisario Front’s envoy to Europe has correctly asserted that “EU complicity in the exploitation of Western Sahara’s natural resources is a violation of international law, an obstacle to the peaceful resolution to the conflict, and a stain on the EU’s reputation”.

    Morocco and the EU members are totally shocked by the decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the legal status of Western Sahara. The shock was captured by Morocco’s foreign minister, Salaheddine Mezouar and the EU’s high representative for foreign affairs, Federica Mogherini who responded  jointly by  saying that “Both sides will examine all possible implications of the court’s judgment and will work together on any  issue relating to its application”. Unlike the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice which has been disregarded by Morocco and her allies, the judgment of the European Court is binding on all the parties. Aside the parties to the dispute, the judgment has implications for other trading partners of Morocco.  Thus, by the judgment, any agreement between Morocco and other countries or companies which covers the occupied territory is liable to be challenged by the Polisario Front in municipal and international tribunals.

    In view of the financial risk of investing in Western Sahara with the approval of Morocco, the Polisario Front has invited governments and corporate bodies involved to legalise their activities by seeking the consent of the representatives of the Saharawi people. The caveat emptor issued by the Polisario Front is a warning to the Government of Nigeria which is currently negotiating a deal with Morocco for a natural gas pipeline that would pass through the territory of Western Sahara. To avoid unnecessary litigation arising from the proposed commercial agreement, the Buhari administration is advised to include representatives of the Polisario Front in the negotiations in line with the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of the Council of the European Union & Ors v Polisario Front.

    Finally, Morocco which withdrew from the Organisation of African Unity in 1984 upon the admission of the SADR to the body, has applied to join the African Union. As a precondition for joining the continental body, Morocco should be made to withdraw completely from the occupied territory of Western Sahara in line with the resolutions of the United Nations on the right of the Saharawi people to self-determination, the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice of 1975 and the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights to the effect that Western Sahara is not part of the Kingdom of Morocco. In particular, the attention of Morocco should be drawn to one of the principal objectives of the African Union to defend the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of the member states including Western Sahara.

  • Taraba: How it was in 2016

    Budgeting is a permanent feature of human economic and financial experience. At the level of the individual, it is the simple practice of trying to achieve a balance between income and expenditure. In the case of large institutions and governments, it is a much more complex and tasking venture. The budget is a very important economic blueprint which determines and guides the procedure for socio-economic development. It is also the means by which the people can hold their leaders to account. That is why those who think that budgeting and budget presentation in Nigeria is a mere annual ritual are wrong.

    It is also for this reason that every new budget presentation begins with a review of the performances of the immediate past one. This aspect of the annual budget presentation is important because it is an opportunity to render accounts. In Taraba State where Governor Darius Ishaku recently presented the 2017 Appropriation Bill to the state House of Assembly, the review of the 2016 budget performance particularly earned even far more accolades.

    One key feature of the 2016 budget and which Governor Ishaku spoke extensively about at the 2017 budget presentation was the Rescue Agenda, a people-centred initiative for the achievement of economic prosperity. The achievement and sustenance of peace and security is a critical aspect of that agenda. Year 2016 was a period of profound commitment to that objective. Governor Ishaku had promised that commitment as part of the economic objective of the 2016 budget in realisation that without peace, the Rescue Agenda – the socio-economic fulcrum of the administration’s blueprint for development – would be crippled.

    Ishaku spoke with pride of the remarkable progress that has been made in the attainment of peace and security. “You would agree with me Mr Speaker that my sincere commitment to the peaceful co-existence of all citizens of our dear state has seen to the remarkable departure from the near state of anarchy I met on assumption of office in May 2015.” He however acknowledged that occasional occurrences of security breaches are still being recorded in the state but noted that despite that, it was safe to say “that peace has finally returned to our land.”

    In the economic front, the drastic fall in revenue expectations adversely affected the general performance of the 2016 budget which stood at 43.27 percent. The percent performance for recurrent and capital expenditure as at September 2016 was 79.17 and 16.90 respectively. The low performance on the capital expenditure side was due to sharp declines in revenue but despite that unhealthy development, the administration was able to attend to key programmes with direct bearing on the welfare of the people.

    The year was one of tremendous circumspection in the management of state finances and Ishaku never compromised that culture which he is personally promoting. This greatly helped in the area of job creation and improvement of internally generated revenue through the production of high quality vegetables for local markets in Taraba and in other Nigerian towns and cities. Government was also able to sustain its funding of the Green House project in Jalingo and today, the project is about 50 percent completed.

    The health sector was a major area of attention in 2016 through the funding of major programmes. For example, the School of Nursing and Midwifery which had suspended its academic programmes for nearly 10 years resumed the training of nurses and midwifes again. More than 100 medical personnel representing the various cadres in the medical care sector were recruited and posted to health institutions across the state. Retired nurses and midwifes were also recalled back to work on contract basis as means of bridging the manpower deficit in the healthcare sector. In addition, more than N150 million was expended in the procurement of drugs for use in hospitals under the 2016 budget while the Primary Healthcare Development Agency was also established. This agency came on stream despite obvious financial constraints in the state because of the need to position the state to effectively handle health challenges that are common to children and women.

    In 2016, water projects enjoyed a big boost. Government ensured that the Jalingo primary water supply project was not derailed even in the face of the poor financial disposition of government. Assorted water treatment chemicals and high premium laboratory equipment were procured to ensure regular and quality water supple to the people. During the period, government also completed the drilling of 100 boreholes across rural areas in the state. Phase Two of that programme which will result in the drilling of 150 boreholes is also being planned.

    Electricity in rural areas was also a priority on the agenda of the government during the period. Transformers and other electrical and mechanical equipment required to boost and sustain power supply were procured and installed in Takum and Bali and several other rural communities in the state. The electricity power development programme is a back-up for government’s youth empowerment programme which has produced about 400 beneficiaries in tailoring, shoe making, soap making, wood works and carpentry. Improved power in rural areas is intended to help these young men and women to set up their own business outfits in their rural communities. The power projects pursued and completed in Bali, Kunini, Yakoko, Monkin, Kakulu and Bakin Duatse were all a product of this strategic thinking on the part of the Ishaku administration.

    Government’s commitment to roads construction was not in any way adversely affected even in the face of the obvious financial constraints. The determination to construct and rehabilitate roads in the state saw the government deploying scarce resources in that direction. This resulted in the huge progress made on the Phase One of Jalingo – Kona – Lau road which is now more than 65 percent completed. The road to Gembu, a major gateway to the Mambilla Plateau, was saved from total failure during the period. The failed portion at Lekitaba was promptly rehabilitated by contractors deployed to that site by Governor Ishaku.

    What was achieved in making travelling to and within the state easy and comfortable through roads development was also replicated in air transportation. The Jalingo Airport earlier rehabilitated by the government received more facilities to make it a lot more comfortable for its users. The current three flights a week arrangement facilitated by the Ishaku administration was sustained. There are also plans for the flights into Jalingo to become daily, beginning from January 2017.

    In 2016, dwindling revenue sources was a major constraint to government activities. This situation is not likely to change for the better in 2017. That means lack of funds may still affect government’s programmes for development. What, certainly, is not lacking is the political will and the sincerity of purpose on the part of the Ishaku administration. With that, the people of Taraba are assured of better days ahead as the implementation of the 2017 budget kicks off.

  • Ambode: Facing 2017 with increased vigour

    When Governor Akinwunmi Ambode of Lagos State delivered his epochal address at the Yoruba Tennis Club, Onikan in Lagos late last year, he reminded most history-minded observers about the vision of United States of America’s President, John F Kennedy when he was hosted by a joint session of the Congress on May 25, 1961. The US leader told the lawmakers of his ambitious dream to send an American to land on the moon before the end of that decade.

    It was a tall order because the world had only known of the unmanned Sputnik shock of the Soviet Union in 1957 and the feat of the cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin who became the first man in space on April 12, 1961. He orbited Planet Earth to the consternation of the whole world. But now Kennedy was daring to overthrow that record with the goal of making man walk on the moon before 1970.

    His dream became a reality on July 20, 1969 when US astronaut Neil Armstrong stepped off the Apollo spacecraft onto the moon’s surface, scoffing those who mocked Kennedy as a daydreamer, turning the joke on those who said his plan was doomed to fail.

    Now, watchful Nigerian commentators are beginning to draw a comparison between Ambode’s yearning projection to make Lagos the third largest economy in Africa and Kennedy’s wild aspiration to take man to the moon. Both are transcendent ambitions that bring forth the ability of great leaders to overcome challenges that come with far-fetched dreams and visions.

    But then, what is a leader if he does not raise the bar of governance and administration if they don’t forsake old benchmark to create new ones.

    A purposeful leader must be marked by his knack to dream dreams with both eyes opened while others are snoring in sleep and allowing the world to go by in its settled state. A good leader would harness available resources, even if negligible, and bring into being new resources needed to create a fresh order thought to be unrealizable by those given to pedestrian thinking.

    That was what Ambode did when he presented his vision of the Lagos of the near future to members of the Yoruba Tennis Club 2016 Christmas Eve Dance. This is how he summed it: “We are committed to making our state globally competitive because by virtue of our indices. Lagos State has become a major city-state in the world. We are Africa’s fastest growing market and still the 5th largest economy in Africa with a GDP of $91billion. The drop in our GDP value from $131billion is as a result of the fluctuation in foreign exchange but our ultimate goal is grow our GDP to move from 5th to 3rd largest in Africa.”

    There is no magic to how it can be achieved just as there was no magic related to man’s conquest of the moon after the idea was broached to a disbelieving world.

    With a GDP of $91billion, Lagos is at the moment the 5th largest economy in Africa. It surpasses that of Ghana whose GDP is $38.6billion dollars. It is also bigger than those of a couple of Sub-Saharan nations put together. Lagos also has a population estimated at 24million, which again exceeds the total figure for a number of African and European countries. It is instructive to state that some 15.2million of these residents are in the bracket of the productive force, which puts Lagos as the state with the largest share of the working population down the Sahara. The state is also home to 65% of Nigeria’s business, hosting over 2,000 manufacturing companies, 200 financial institutions and the largest collection of small and medium enterprises in Africa.

    These are formidable statistics a visionary leader can wield to take the society to the acme of social and economic transformation. In the hands of an ordinary leader, they do not conjure a potential for radical greatness. But it is different with Governor Ambode. He is exploiting these facts and figures to call into being a Lagos that would leap into the league of the world’s major city-states like California and New York, both in the United States of America.

    The point I am making is that it takes a man with an Olympian mind with objectives that go beyond the ordinary to harness latent advantages into progressive reality even with all its corresponding challenges. For instance, planning revolutionary changes for Lagos brings with it numerous concerns such as infrastructure renewal, human capacity building and insecurity that come with a burgeoning population of immigrants seeking economic opportunities. These are by-products of urban development and the landing of a 24 hour economy Ambode is working out.

    The governor isn’t scared by the change to come. Indeed he is backing his vision with generous but pragmatic budgetary provision. He has improved on the capital-recurrent ratio in the 2017 Appropriation Bill just passed into law by the State House of Assembly. For the empowerment of the citizens, he is focusing on employment generation, youth emancipation and vocational training. The budget also plans to build what he has described as “world class infrastructure” to position Lagos as the 3rd largest economy in Africa.

    He is also reforming the solid waste collection and disposal profile to achieve the vision of a cleaner Lagos. Transportation has been schemed for upgrade with the government leveraging on water transportation in combination with rail and road networks for an integrated system that will reduce travel time and earn Lagos the tag of a 24 hour economy.

    Of course tourism has been identified as a key component of the agenda to diversify the Lagos economy, using Badagry, Lagos Island and Epe as hubs. In 2017Ambode has set aside N20billion for these tourism projections.

    Ambode told members of the Tennis Club that these strides of development would be heavily secured by a growing investment in power generation and distribution and more spending on security.

    And going by the success of the eight days, five centres, Lagos fiesta that dramatically changed the social landscape of the state during the end festive season, it is clear from the governor’s presentation that truly he has an achievable vision required to move Lagos from its present stage to a higher level befitting its name, first as the former capital of the giant of Africa and secondly as the economic power house of the Sub-Saharan region.

    Now that the 2017 budget has been signed into law, with the ambitious and plans embedded in it, there is no doubt that the governor and his team are ready to hit the ground running to make this year a better one than 2016.

    • Anibaba, an economist, wrote from Gbagada, Lagos.
  • Ugwuanyi’s development strides in 2016

    A review of the activities of Governor Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi of Enugu State in 2016 towards the advancement of good governance and provision of critical infrastructure in the state couldn’t have come in any other better time than now. The year under review, was no doubt a tough one, considering the adverse effects of the economic recession in the country on the people. It was indeed, a year many Nigerians, both the rich and the poor, will not forget in a hurry.

    In Enugu State, even though 2016 was rendered tough by the severe economic hardship in the country, the pragmatic, people-oriented and visionary leadership of Governor Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi made a mark and impacted positively on the lives of the people through the provision of critical infrastructure and good governance.

    The governor’s development trajectory despite the meagre resources occasioned by the economic meltdown in the country has endeared him to the people of the state.

    His administration has remained focused and steadfast in its efforts to deliver on its campaign promises, “to deploy government services to create fair and equal opportunity for every willing citizen to make a living and create wealth, educate our children, and enjoy life in a peaceful and secure environment.”

    Ugwuanyi during his one year anniversary in office on May 29, 2016, pledged that “rather than allow the severe economic recession occasioned by the negative developments in the oil sector, deter us from achieving our goals, we will instead, turn the situation into an opportunity to look inwards and harness those potentials which free oil money has blinded and prevented us from exploiting all the while.”

    According to him, “it is indeed a very well-known fact that, as a consequence of the nation’s current economic woes, the monthly allocation to states from the Federation Account has fallen to less than 38 per cent of what it used to be.

    “Before we came into office, governors used to enjoy access to excess crude fallouts but now, the language has changed to bailout funds. The situation has become so bad that many states are unable to pay salaries and meet other obligations; and when a governor pays salaries, he is applauded and it makes news. The Federal Government essentially summed up the situation with its recent and solemn declaration that the country is broke.

    “However, notwithstanding these bleak economic realities, we were able to embark on the massive development of urban and rural roads across the state in fulfilment of our promise to create more urban centres, enhance rural access and boost economic activities in every corner of Enugu State.”

    From the foregoing, a critical review of the achievements of Ugwuanyi’s administration in 2016, in the midst of the daunting economic challenges speak volume and  showcase his leadership qualities in navigating the state to greater heights.

    It was in 2016 that Ugwuanyi’s administration commenced massive construction of over eight major roads spread across the three senatorial districts of the state, which were flagged off in late 2015.

    The roads include the Nike Lake road; the Abakpa Nike road; the Opi-Nsukka dual carriage road; the Amaeke-Ngwo-Nsude- 9TH Mile bypass; the Amankwo-Amaeke-Amah Brewery Junction-9th Mile by-pass; the  Ohom Orba Junction-Imilike Ani- Ezimo Uno- Ezimo Agu-Imilike –Ogbodu Aba-Obollo Etiti-Amalla-Obollo Afor ring road; the Enugu Road Junction-Umuezebi-Nru Junction-University Gate road; the Post Office Roundabout- Odenigbo Roundabout- Ogurugu Road-Ikenga road; and the Obechara Road Junction-Umuakashi-Mechanic Village-Ikenga Hotels Junction road. It is worthy of note that five of these roads have been completed and inaugurated while others are nearing completion.

    It was also during the year under review that a data-simplifying civic organization, BudgIT, listed Enugu, Lagos and Rivers as the only three states out of the 36 states of the federation that can fulfill obligations to their workers. Enugu State in spite of the economic recession has been regular in the payment of workers’ salaries and still executes capital projects. In fact, the state government paid last December salaries on the 19th to enable its workers celebrate Christmas with their loved ones. The wise decision was based on the fact that Enugu is predominately a civil service state and it is only when workers’ salaries are paid that the economic activities of the state are reactivated for the overall interest of the people.

    In 2016, Ugwuanyi’s administration grabbed the bull by the horns and embarked on the rehabilitation of the failed sections of the federal government roads along Oji River-Ugwuoba-Anambra State boarder road by old road and 9th mile-Egede-Nsukka-Obollo Afor- Benue State boarder road to alleviate the pains road users experience on the roads and guarantee smooth and safe transportation during this Yuletide.

    It was also last year that the governor, in a move to extend the frontiers of development to the rural areas with the aim of creating more urban centres to boost economic growth and improve the lives of the people,  simultaneously flagged off 35 infrastructural projects across the 17 Local Government Areas of the state. The projects, which comprise 25 roads, water schemes, electricity, hospitals, schools, buildings, among others, are ongoing.

    The state government last year approved the release of funds for the execution of N3 billion worth of projects for the renovation of over 276 primary and secondary schools in the state with the Federal Government providing 50 percent of the sum. It also embarked on the recruitment of 2000 primary school teachers to improve the standard of education in the state.

    Recently, 750 unemployed youths selected from across the 17 Local Government Areas of the state were enrolled into the SDGs Skill Acquisition programme to create opportunity for them to realize their potentials with the aim of creating employment and eradicate poverty in line with the administration’s four-point agenda.  The state government pays each trainee N5,000 per month for transportation and N100,000 at the end of the training to assist the person start his or her own business.

    The governor’s passion for sporting activities and support to the Enugu Rangers International Football Club saw to the club’s winning of the 2016 Nigerian Professional Football League – a remarkable feat that broke the club’s jinx of not winning a trophy since 32 years.

    It was also in 2016 that Enugu State through the instrumentality of its Economic Advisory Council organized the first ever Enugu State Investment Summit christened “Oganiru” to showcase the economic potentials of the state in line with the promise to vigorously promote investment and pursue the diversification of the State’s economy.

    These landmarks recorded by the governor during the year under review, were made possible through accountability, transparency, financial discipline and prudent management of the state’s lean resources.

    It was also possible through the application of the best economic practices, reform programmes in the public service, finance and economic development sector which had resulted in a significant increase in the state’s internally generated revenue. For instance, the state government after a staff audit in the 17 Local Government councils discovered a total of 3,916 ghost workers who receive salaries on monthly basis.

    With the recent presentation of the 2017 Budget estimates tagged, “Budget of Economic Recovery and Inclusive Development” before the Enugu State House of Assembly, which articulated the plans and vision of the present administration to create an environment that will further encourage full development of its human and natural resources, Ugwuanyi has rekindled his commitment to the provision of social services and rebuilding of vital infrastructure in all sectors and across the State.

    As the present administration has always promised not to allow the prevailing harsh economic climate in the country, prevent it from attaining the lofty objectives that was set out for the benefit of the people, the onus, therefore, is for the people of the state to continue to support and pray for its success for Enugu State is truly in the hands of God.

     

    • Amoke, writes from Enugu State.