Category: Comments

  • Lagos, street begging and public security

    Armed with a Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH) prescription paper, 56 year old Kehinde Olatubosun, a drug addict and an indigene of Oyo State, recently confessed to making about N300, 000 monthly from unsuspecting Lagos residents through begging. Begging is an age long activity prominent in urban centers where it is common to see the physically challenged, visually impaired, deaf and even supposedly stranded visitors (famously referred to as corporate beggars) throng walkways, street corners, religious centers etc begging for alms.

    Due to the influx of people from different parts of the country in search of the proverbial Golden Fleece, Lagos, like cities such as Kaduna, Kano, Johannesburg, South Africa, Shanghai and others, has to contend with various socio-economic challenges peculiar to cities with exponential growth and metropolitan composition.   Lagos, no doubt, has a high number of assorted street beggars. While some of them are genuinely in need, others, like the aforementioned Mr. Olatubosun, have turned begging into a business enterprise. In the years gone by, there was a case of a Lagos beggar who made a fortune by deceitfully collecting  money from unsuspecting Lagosians and used the proceeds to build a house on which he boldly inscribed: ‘Eko go’ (Lagosians are gullible).

    Studies have revealed that people resort to begging for reasons ranging from poverty, to health challenges. Today, people take to begging for sundry reasons which include substituting begging for hard work, allegiance to tradition as in the case of parents of twins who still hide under the cloak of tradition to beg for alms.  To drug addicts such as Mr. Olatubosun, it is a means of gratifying appetite for hard drugs. In other cases, some people are exploited and forced to beg while someone else collects the proceeds. This, indeed, is the multifaceted face of modern day begging. Aside constituting environmental nuisance and health hazards to the public as some beggars have one infectious disease or the other, beggars sometimes complicate traffic situation in Lagos.

    Lately, street begging has been identified as a means of defrauding as well as a source of insecurity in the State.  Compared to highbrow areas like Ikoyi and Victoria Island where residents would rather prefer to alert the police rather than give alms to beggars, people living in densely populated suburbs of the metropolis are typically friendlier to beggars. In fact, there is a particular Street on the mainland mostly inhabited by visually impaired beggars. It is also not uncommon to notice groups of people in branded T-shirts, soliciting for alms in major bus stops and markets, to treat patients with various health challenges by displaying the latter’s pictures. It has been revealed that oftentimes, the monies collected are not usually utilized for the purpose for which they were collected.

    Opinions about the suitability or otherwise of begging differ. While others view it as part of religious obligations of reaching out to the less privileged, others are of the views that such alms should be taken to appropriate institutions such as the destitute homes and motherless babies homes. In fact, a critical observation of religious concept of alms giving reveals that no religion encourages street begging. Although the two most popular religions, Christianity and Islam, promote giving to the less privileged in the society, but resorting to begging as a way of life is sharply frowned at by the tenets of the two religions.

     However, while it is not inappropriate to give alms to beggars, their activities have, however, suggested otherwise as people now hide under the pretext of begging to dispossess members of the public of their valuables, either on the road or in their residences. A report had it that a beggar that was given alms during the day led his group of armed robbers to attack his benefactor at night. Also, some beggars are accomplices to various forms of crimes.

    Perhaps, taking a cue from the Kaduna State Government which recently banned street begging in the State, the Lagos State Government has concluded plan to enforce section 166 sub-section 1(b) of the criminal code which prohibits street begging with adequate penalty for defaulters. This, according to the State Governor, Mr. Akinwunmi Ambode, becomes necessary in the interest of public security. He said: “We’ve had security reports on the activities of persons who pose as beggars, especially in traffic, but their sole aim is to perpetrate evil. We are putting a search light on this trend and one way to do that is to ensure that we take preemptive measures to forestall this development.” To this end, he said efforts will be made to rid the state of street beggars and the homeless. Towards achieving this, the State Taskforce on Environmental and Traffic Offences has been mandated to arrest any beggar found on the highways, bus stops and street corners while transferring same to the State Rehabilitation Centers.

     In the same vein, the State Ministry of Youth and Social Development recently issued a statement to Lagos residents, imploring them to cooperate with the government in its mission to rid the streets of Lagos of the menace of beggars and destitute by desisting from giving them alms but take such gifts, monetary or materially to religious organisations or orphanages.

    On a final note, while it is true that these are, indeed, tough times for most of our compatriots, emphasis must, nevertheless, still be placed on the dignity of labour. In a financial and commercial hub like Lagos, there will always be something for everyone to do in order to earn a decent living. Street begging is not good for our image as a people. It must be condemned and discouraged by all and sundry.

    • Bakare is of the Features Unit, Ministry of Information & Strategy, Alausa, Ikeja.
  • 2016 Budget: As contractors return to site

    The truth is good food is worth waiting for. Given the energy exerted on the original copy of the 2016 budget document submitted to the National Assembly by President Muhammadu Buhari and the period of time devoted to review, criticize, edit and rework the document, one can easily understand why Nigerians are confident that the nation’s fiscal and monetary policies this year would make a positive difference.

    Perhaps, what fuels the optimism further is the resolve of the Federal Government to rebound the economy through the injection of N350 billion into the system in the next few months.

    According to the media reports, the decision was reached at the end of the two-day retreat for governors of the 36 states of the federation and members of the National Economic Council (NEC) at the Presidential Villa in Abuja.

    Reports quoted the Minister of Finance, Kemi Adeosun, as saying that part of the money will help offset the debt owed local contractors, who had laid off their workers for lack of funds.

    While the budget is still undergoing its last stage as a document before the President signs it into law, the fact that this administration is pumping such a huge amount of money into the system to stimulate the economy is cheering news to us.

    The plan to stimulate the economy with N350billion earmarked for capital projects should be celebrated for many reasons.

    Since the Federal Government is desirous of making the huge capital spending to trickle down to ordinary Nigerians, I believe areas to benefit from this development include agriculture, transportation, construction industry and power, among others.

    As the raining season beckons, the fact is there is no better time to plan for this year’s planting season than now. I expect the Federal Government to give a special attention to efforts that would make fertilizer available to Nigerian farmers. This is because President Buhari has consistently told Nigerians that agriculture would be given a pride of place under his administration. So, when the Minister of Finance announced the resolve of the administration to pump N350billion into the economy, I heaved a sigh of relief that agriculture will benefit tremendously from this capital funding.

    Another area, which I believe will benefit from the capital stimulus, is transportation. It is obvious that payment to contractors is a precursor to the making of good roads in the country.

    There is no doubt that the timing is critical for contractors to return to sites given the fact that it takes time for the real construction work to begin.

    Good roads, will provided farmers the opportunity to take their produce to designated markets with ease and this will go a long way in preserving the quality of the farm produce.

    Nigerian farmers, especially in remote parts of the country have had their farm produce like tomatoes and pepper perish given the difficulty of conveying them to markets.

    With the current state of power generation and distribution, one doesn’t need to be told before realizing that power is another sector that will benefit tremendously from the N350bn capital spending in the first quarter of the year.

    So it is not out of place to see contractors in the power sector rolling their equipment back to sites any time from now.

    Some of us are happy with the bold step being taken by this administration to focus on contractors considering the fact that some of them had last year appealed to federal and state governments to pay debts owed the firms to enable them to return to project sites across the country.

    Acting under the auspices of Federation of Construction Industry, the contractors had put the debt owed them by various governments in the past two years at N600 billion.

    The president of the group, Solomon Ogunbusola, had explained that delay in payment of the debt had grounded operations of most of the companies.

    According to him, many of the companies have closed shops while thousands of workers have been retrenched.

    Mr. Ogunbusola said that no fewer than 8, 000 workers in the industry were laid off in a period of six months.

    According to a media report last year, contractors handling over 184 federal road projects have abandoned the various sites due to lack of funding from the Federal Government and the huge debt owed them by the Federal Ministry of Works. The report said that following the decisions of the contractors to abandon the sites, N1.76trn federal road projects across the country had suffered setback.

    As far as I’m concerned, the spread of the abandoned projects underscores the need for the Federal Government to offset its liabilities in order to encourage the firms to return to sites.

    In the report, the Federal Government classified 184 projects as ongoing as at September 2014.

    The North-Central zone had 29 projects, with a total length of 1,20.81km and a cost of N294bn; North-East had 26 projects, 1,219.65km long and cost N314bn; North-West had 20 projects, 1,040.22km long and cost n188BN; WHILE the South-West was put at 31, stretching 1,072.63km.

    We all know that if the contractors borrowed money from banks to ensure progress of work on the projects, the consequences of non-payment by the government become hydra-headed, especially as the contractors would be unable to repay the borrowings from banks.

    This is why I think the current administration deserves support for taking the bull by the horn by the resolve to release money to contractors.

    We should also not lose sight of the provision given to these contractors. Newspaper reports quoted the minister as saying that the federal Government will extract commitment from these contractors in order to ensure that the disbursement to them will be used largely to facilitate recruitment of staff and not to be used for the payment of management fees.

    Equally commendable is the declaration of the Minister of Finance that adequate mechanism has been put in place to ensure discipline in fiscal policies. This, to my mind, will give credibility to government’s programme since we are made to understand that the era of “money for the boys`’ is gone.

    I strongly believe that by the time this money hits the accounts of contractors, a process which is expected to motivate them to move their equipment back to sites, Nigerian economy will be better for it. This is because apart from big contractors who are owed directly by the Federal Government, the small-scale contractors needed for menial jobs are bound to begin to enjoy patronage.

    Apart from the direct gains from the resumption of construction works, which include the prospect of better roads and the attendant accessibility to farms and other economic sites, the anticipated capital injection will definitely boost economic activities in all the nooks and crannies of the country.

    Besides, the debt burden, which the current administration seeks to lighten with the planned payment of contractors is a very substantial debt burden that mirrors the poor priority government over the years have attached to road infrastructure development or maintenance. This level of indebtedness, of course, can lead to abandonment of the projects, cost inflation, poor execution of the projects, disengagement of workers thereby exacerbating the unemployment situation and even litigations.

     When that happens, the amount of interest charges may not only over-run the entire contract amount but may necessitate the lending banks making substantial provisions for non-performing loans or outright bad debts. The capacity of the banks to extend credit facilities to other needy economic agents will therefore be curtailed. Most assuredly, the stability of the banking system may become impaired with grave adverse consequences such as bank distress and/or failure, disengagement of employees, loss of investments by investors and hard-earned deposits by customers.

    This is one of the reasons why I’m joining other well-meaning Nigerians to salute the efforts of the current administration to empower contractors to go back to sites.

    • Odoko is an Abuja-based policy analyst
  • PTAD and the brutality of politics

    All over the world, countries that strive to develop oftentimes look inward in terms of the best of its human and material resources. Where these are in abundance, it becomes a huge plus for that country, and when these materials are harnessed and put to optimum use, rapid growth becomes the result. However, where human resources abound, for instance, but are not put to proper use, and the policy of use-and-dump is encouraged, government suffers, development goes into recess and the people are ultimately robbed of the benefits of the services of these resourceful individuals.

    Thus it is public knowledge that our beloved country is unarguably one of the richest countries in the world as it boasts of some of the best in terms of human resources. It is quite gratifying that since 1999 when democracy was restored in Nigeria, successive administrations have deemed it expedient to tap into the intellectual, administrative and managerial wealth of highly valued Diaspora Nigerians by inviting them to contribute their quotas to the development of motherland.

    It is with this benefit of hindsight that Ms Nellie Mayshak the suspended Executive Secretary of the Pension Transitional Arrangement Department (PTAD), was appointed in 2013 following the establishment of the agency in August of that year under the Pension Reform Act 2004, to consolidate and manage pensioners under the Defined Benefit Scheme (DBS) aimed at integrating pensioners who did not transit into the new Contributory Pension Scheme that was introduced in 2004.

    The need for the engagement of a Coordinator with the qualification, requisite skills, competence and cognate experience, that would have the primary and sole responsibility of ensuring full and expedited implementation of the project became very necessary. The Jonathan administration with the advice of the then head of Service, Alhaji Boni Yaji and the Minister of Finance, Ngozi Okonjo Iweala found Nellie Mayshak very apt for the job. What with her impressive resume as an international development expert with nearly three decades in public sector management with stints in UK, Eastern Europe, Canada and several African countries including Angola, Cameroun, Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, South Africa, and Sudan. Also, as a one-time Adviser in the office of the Prime Minister of Kenya and Cabinet Office of Uganda, the Nigerian government had no doubt that she was going to bring her wealth of experience to bear in the running of PTAD and this she did with the impressive gale of successes that the agency recorded under her supervision.

    Prior to her appointment, the Defined Benefit Scheme was riddled with monumental cases of misappropriation and allegations of fraud for several years which elicited public outcry over what was seen as an open and mindless pillaging of the sweat of our hapless pensioners. The cumulative effect of all these  was an unfortunate situation of bloated payroll and accumulated liabilities, unremitted and unaccounted trapped funds with pension underwriters, thereby increasing backlog of pension liabilities that were mounting on a daily basis.

    This was the sorry state of the Nigerian pension scheme before the appointment of Ms Mayshak, who swiftly and deftly applied her experience to turn the Scheme around using modern technology and automated processes to drive payment efficiency, a development that has significantly ameliorated the plight of thousands of the hitherto vulnerable Nigerian pensioners, who depend on their monthly pensions for the sustenance of their livelihood.

    This has not only introduced transparency and accountability in pension payments, but has to a very large extent, ensured that the management of the DBS is fraud free, and has changed the paradigm of pensioners from gross neglect and disaffection to relief and hope.

    Sadly, those who perpetrated pension fraud in the system over the years watched with heightened consternation while the system was being cleaned up. The axiom that when you fight corruption, corruption will fight you back became rife in no time.  Before we knew it, oppositions from some notable government agencies with stakes in pension business mounted, as series of petitions started flying right, left and centre accusing PTAD of moving too fast with consolidation. Insurance companies that defaulted in the payment of pension funds as well as fraudsters delisted from pension payroll also joined in the growing number of oppositions against PTAD.

    It is also on record that there was no love lost between the agency and a one-time accountant general of the federation over a job schedule with financial underpinning which was ultimately decided on the side of the former.

    No sooner was this matter resolved than the seat of power was regaled with  series of anonymous petitions accusing her of misappropriation of funds, nepotism, inflation of contracts and using companies allegedly linked to her to corner juicy contracts at PTAD.

    It did not therefore come as a surprise to watchers of events when Ms Nellie Mayshaks name made a huge appearance in the public and social media domain when she was handed a suspension letter by the supervisory minister, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun.

     Yes, corruption must be fought, no doubt; yes, culprits must be brought to book and punished if found culpable, no doubt; but hauling large stones and casting same at public officials considered to be corrupt or imagined to be, would certainly belie whatever gains that are anticipated in the war against corruption. One would have expected that a public official who is working hard to align with the current government in line with its change mantra be glorified rather than being vilified.

    What benefits are there to be used and dumped by ones government based on unfounded allegations of official graft when it is clear that the proverbial hand of Esau has been busy beating the drum of infamy in a system where moral rectitude has become a scarce commodity?

    Some of her numerous detractors even went to the ridiculous extent to say  that Ms Mayshak has been paying herself the sum of N60 million on a monthly basis, when there exists a fixed consolidated salary structure for PTAD, duly approved by the National Salaries, Incomes and Wages commission in which the total salary/allowances for PTADs DG is less than N3.5million a month  which is one of the least among agencies of government in the financial genre such as CBN, FIRS, PDTF, PPRD, PENCOM and others. How is it possible for a civil servant to arbitrarily fix salary/allowances for his or herself without any recourse to the Wages and Salaries Commission that fixes the salaries and allowances of Public Servants in her cadre?

    It is saddening that government could allow itself to be swayed  by those who have benefited from pension fraud in the past and it must realize the likelihood of the incidences of  pension fraud being resuscitated if those who are after Ms Mayshaks head succeed in the long run.

     Questions and more questions! But why go on, when it is quite evident that the Nigerian Civil Service is infested with politically minded individuals with their willing collaborators in the private sector? Their venom is unmistakable. When they sink in their fangs, they leave indelible injuries!

    It is hoped that the government would carry out thorough investigation to get to the roots of this pension cankerworm in order to reengineer trust in the minds of well meaning Diaspora Nigerians who may be interested to come home to serve the government of Nigeria in future.

    • Adeniji is a Lagos based social ammentator.
  • Dogara’s call for North-east donor conference

    The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Yakubu Dogara, has been making calls for the convening of an international donors conference that would holistically tackle the economic and infrastructural needs of the north-east of Nigeria which has borne the brunt of the six-year violent uprising from adherents of the Jama’atu Ahlus-Sunnah Lidda’Awati Wal Jihad, known commonly as Boko Haram.

    Dogara first made the call in a motion he personally sponsored in August last year, on the urgent need for rehabilitation, recovery, reconstruction and resettlement of the violence ravaged region. Since then, at every fora, the Speaker has continued to champion the plights of the north-east while arguing that the region deserves global attention as a member of the international community.

    His call is inline with what has been  happening since the end of the World War II where international  conferences like that were held for Western Europe and Japan which were rebuilt following adoption of the American Marshall Plan, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Ukraine, Gaza and recently for Syria. There is therefore, no reason why it can’t be held for the north-east of Nigeria. This is the kind of patriotic zeal that comes when true leaders that are visionary-inclined are allowed to lead.

    It should be noted that, the scale of devastation, destruction and damage in the region far supersedes what happened in some of the countries and regions listed above but which the international community didn’t hesitate to come to their aid.

    The region, even before the violence erupted years ago, is one of the poorest in the world. A recent report by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) said Borno State alone has lost trillions of Naira while not fewer than 20,000 people were killed even though most of us who come from the north-east strongly believe that the number of casualty far outweighs the official figure of 20,000 with some putting it at over 100,000.

    All one need to be convinced about a call for such is to take a trip to some of the villages recently liberated in Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states. Communities were not only totally razed to the ground but one is left with no option than to conclude that the insurgents were all out to exterminate and annihilate every living and non-living beings in the affected areas.

    These insurgents succeeded in leaving to waste large swaths of territories in those states, especially Borno State, the epicentre of the violence.

    Right now, officially over 2.2 million Nigerians are living as Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in several states of the country including the Federal Capital Territory, while thousands others are refugees in Cameroon, Chad and Niger Republic. In reality, the figure would range from anything between five million to 5.5 million since majority of those displaced are not living camps but are being housed by relations both within and outside the affected areas.

    To buttress Dogara’s call for an international donor conference, UNHCR Representative to Nigeria, Ms Angele Dikongue- Atangana, during the UNHCR 2015 stakeholders’ briefing of the commission’s representation in Nigeria, urged donors and partners to take a trip to the ‘field’ to be aware of the level of destruction for a better understanding of the situation. This is because there are dozens of villages in the northeast that have been totally destroyed. The case of the attack on Dalori where reports said entire houses in the village were torched is still fresh in our minds. The enormity of the task ahead in rebuilding the area, especially the cost is something that even the federal government might not be able to totally shoulder hence the call for the donor conference.

    This much was also agreed  by the Chairman, Presidential Committee on North-east Initiative, retired Lt.-Gen. Theophilus Danjuma recently, when he said that conservatively,  over N2 trillion will be required in the short-term to rebuild areas devastated by the Boko Haram insurgency. This is just for the short term measures!

    He added that the rebuilding of the region would require the cooperation of all, considering that the magnitude of destruction is beyond the means of the federal or state governments. He further noted that rebuilding the North-east would demand maximum cooperation and resources.

    “Rebuilding the Northeast is one of the biggest and most complex challenges that Nigeria is facing today. To hold government or any one agency alone responsible for this task is to underestimate the enormity of the problem. The task would involve massive reconstruction of physical infrastructure, much of which have been totally destroyed and, of course, the more challenging one, which is the rebuilding of peace and social cohesion,’’ he had said during the opening of a two-day security seminar, organised by the Alumni Association of the National Defence College, recently.

    The rebuilding effort being done by some of the governors of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa are mere drops in a vast ocean of need that wouldn’t make much difference. For example, Borno State governor, Kashim Shettima has been building some houses in Bama and other local governments. But without help from outside to address the destruction in over 20 local governments that were initially intermittently occupied and destroyed by the insurgents, it would not go far. Moreso, with the destruction in Gwoza and Bama, two of the worst-hit local governments in Borno, their current needs will go beyond even the entire federal allocations that accrue to Borno State for now. Same for other local governments in the state and other north-east states where their need stands beyond rebuilding houses.

    The issues of topmost importance to the north-east revolve around not only the housing but health care, women and youth empowerment, education and agriculture.  Sufficiently meeting these needs would require the involvement of the international community. This is why the call by the speaker for an international donor conference is apt, timely and holds the solution to addressing the destruction because other places have held such international conferences with success. The recent one was the International Donors conference for reconstruction and development in Dafur, held in Doha, Qatar from April 7-8, 2013.

    This donor conference brought together representatives of the Government of Sudan, the international donor community, the development banking sectors, international and national Non-Governmental Organizations and international funds and foundations and provided a forum for the Darfur Regional Authority and the Government of Sudan to discuss with its development partners the needs for economic recovery, development and poverty eradication in the aftermath of the conflict in Darfur.

    Likewise the Syrian donor conference held in London where over $10 billion was pledged so much that the United Nations (UN) Secretary General Ban Ki-moon hailed the conference as a “great success,” saying, “Never has the international community raised so much money on a single day for a single crisis.”

    Just like the speaker noted, the world now is a global village in which the effect of a massive population shift within the north-east could have spiralling effect on the world. Europe is battling to halt the massive influx of refugees from Syria, Iraq and the Middle East; it is therefore in the collective interest of the international community that funds are raised to resettle the IDPs and refugees from Nigeria so as to avoid another surge to the Mediterranean sea where thousands of migrants are dying every year in their desperate effort to cross to Europe.

    Already the impact of the effect of the insurgents is felt in our neighbouring countries and the need for such conference now can’t be over-emphasised. Consequently, leaders of this country should start persuading world leaders and work toward having something like that, even if it’s in Africa.

    Speaker Dogara deserves not only to be supported but also commended by all for his consistency in pushing for the convocation of the confab. The responsibility of doing that now rests with the federal government or the executive as the parliament or legislature cannot delve into that since it is not within its powers to do so.

     

    • Hassan is Special Adviser (Media & Public Affairs) to Rt. Hon. Speaker, House of Representatives.
  • The matter of grazing reserves

    The Federal Government is contemplating the establishment of grazing reserves and stock routes across the country to check the incessant bloody clashes between nomadic Fulani herdsmen and farmers. It is also argued that grazing reserves will boost livestock production, ease herding challenges and reduce seasonal migrations of herdsmen. The idea of grazing reserves is not new in the country. The colonial government toyed with it and a few years into independence, the Northern Regional Government took up the idea and proposed extensive grazing reserves in parts of Northern Nigeria including the Sokoto, Katsina, Zaria and Bauchi provinces. In 1965, the regional government enacted the Grazing Reserve Law whose high point included the ‘Fulani Amenities Proposal’ aimed at providing special amenities to support the pastoral Fulani. During the military era, both the World Bank and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) supported efforts at further development of grazing reserves in the country.

    Though this international support did not yield any sustainable results as most of the planned reserves failed to take off, the concept was not entirely abandoned. High level Fulani lobby led by MACBAN (formed in 1972) and Pastoral Resolve have continued to throw up the idea as a possible solution to the incessant clashes between farmers and herdsmen.

    In 1998, the Petroleum Trust Fund (PTF) under its Chairman, General Muhammadu Buhari perfected a blueprint to rehabilitate grazing reserves and stock routes across the country. The blueprint became stillborn after General Sani Abacha’s demise. In 2012, The Pastoral Resolve, (PARE) a non-Governmental Organization founded to champion the interest and well-being of pastoralists in Nigeria  was reportedly seeking ¦ 5 billion to establish pilot grazing reserves in Adamawa, Bauchi, Benue, Kogi and Nasarawa states.  Grazing reserves and stock routes are known to dominate Fulani demands on the country and all leading presidential candidates in previous elections in the country since 1999 have committed themselves in writing to the Fulani on the issue of grazing reserves.

    In truth, the improvements needed in livestock production in the country cannot be initiated and successfully carried out if majority of Nigerians involved in livestock production insist on a nomadic lifestyle. There is no merit in this lifestyle today; moreover, the conditions that supported nomadism in the colonial and immediate post-colonial period have also drastically changed.

    Population has increased even in areas, like the North-central zone, which were hitherto assumed to be sparsely populated. Desert encroachment has also continued to be a major challenge in the country. In 1961, Nigeria had 0.51 hectares of arable land per citizen. In 1990, the figure shrank to 0.29.  By 2010, it was 0.21 hectares per person. At current population growth rate, it will shrink to 0.17 hectares per person by 2020 and, further to 0.13 by 2030 and 0.10 by 2040. It is estimated that by 2050, it will be 0.08 hectares per person. We must take urgent steps to transparently regulate and reform livestock production in the country as a way of avoiding further bloodshed. Grazing reserves are not a transparent or efficient way of regulation and reforming livestock production in the country. Even in parts of the country with high livestock population, the idea of grazing reserves has been virtually rejected. Grazing reserves in Katsina, Sokoto, Zamfara, Bauchi, Kano and Borno have all been effectively abandoned.

    It is becoming clear to the discerning mind that the bloody push for grazing reserves outside the cattle producing states of the country is not more than a devious attempt to secure usufructuary rights to land and exploit the political opportunities that such rights may confer on the Fulani.  The Kachia Grazing Reserve as a template illustrates this point clearly.  Established in 1963, it became a strategic enclave for the Kachichera Fulani who had settled in Southern Kaduna since the Fulani Jihad of 1804. As agro-pastoralists, the Kachichera were still considered as ‘visitors’ in Southern Kaduna by the indigenous nationalities of the area. The Kachia reserve was established as a political masterstroke to give them a window of opportunity in the area.  They moved into the reserve from places like Kurmi Biri, Abet, Zagon Kataf, Zonkwa, Ungwan Rimi and Kagoro to secure usufructuary rights to the land and today, they have stepped up demands for a Ladduga chiefdom. It is noteworthy that up to this day, the indigenous people whose lands were appropriated for the Kachia reserve are yet to be compensated.

    We must redefine the Nigerian livestock challenge and disambiguate it from the Fulani challenge to be able to provide useful answers to the challenges. The Nigerian livestock challenge is about improved livestock production practices that would enhance the quantity and quality of animal protein and dairy related products to meet national needs. In tackling this challenge, the focus must be on how we can efficiently acquire and manage improved livestock breed, give the breed access to improved pasture and use herd management practices that can give us value for money. The challenge requires the permanent settlement of those involved in the livestock industry and informed economic decisions by individuals, governments and stakeholders who want to be involved in the livestock industry. In tackling this challenge, we must also appreciate the fact that not every area of the country has good potential for the livestock industry. There are also lessons to learn from history.

    In 1980, Governor Aper Aku of Benue State commissioned a study on the feasibility of grazing reserves in the state.  Findings from the study indicated that the provision of water (a basic infrastructural requirement in grazing reserves) would result in increased degradation of land around proposed water sources and in some instances boost tse–tse breeding. The study also found out that the characteristic cropping systems in the state around yam and cassava left little or no residue as supplementary feed for cattle in the dry season. More importantly, the study found out that no farmer nor community in the state was willing to allow their ancestral lands (which are their means of livelihood) to be appropriated for grazing reserves. The conclusions of the study showed that grazing reserves were not viable in Benue State.  This is one reason Governor Aper Aku  established a model cattle ranch at Ikyogen  where improved cattle breed were kept and grasses grown for them to ensure all year round  pasture. Grazing reserves in Nigeria have not reduced clashes between herdsmen and farmers. They certainly have given Fulani herdsmen usufractuary rights over land and other opportunities that come with those rights, yet they have not improved livestock production in any way. This is the sad fact.

    The Fulani challenge on the other hand is about unwavering attempts at clinging to an obsolete lifestyle in which livestock is kept for other reasons out of the economy. It involves a desperate and bloody push for ‘grazing rights’ for the Fulani of the ‘whole world’ to enable them continue a lifestyle of dire consequences. This is the explanation for the horrific massacres of farmers (including women and children) on their homesteads by well-armed Fulani gangs ready to take the law into their hands with impunity. Nigeria must face the Fulani challenge squarely and stamp out the indiscriminate migration of Fulani and their herds across the country. The Kadawa with their herds who also continue to crisscross our borders must be stopped. Allowing these cross border migrations has grave implications for national security, planning, health and the stability. The ECOWAS protocol on free movement of persons within the sub-region should not blind government from doing the needful. The protocol does not provide for free movement of livestock nor people with criminal intentions. ECOWAS countries like Ghana are increasingly turning away murderous herdsmen from their borders while other countries in the sub-region like Burkina Faso and Mali have opted to ranches.

    The grazing reserve concept is a simplistic answer to the challenge of livestock development in the country. It is an answer that is politically suspicious. It is not useful and has been overtaken by events. Grazing reserves will only continue to threaten other people and their livelihoods just as they will continue to complicate the education of the nomadic child and his future. They will open up the country to Fulani of the ‘whole world’. Nigeria has no land to contain them and no responsible modern nation state will accept such high nonsense especially when it is capable of threatening the peace.

    We must search for useful answers. These can be found in ranches, which have to be run as economic enterprises. On these, more livestock can be kept and the country can have more meat and dairy related products. Fulani leaders, politicians and businessmen must show the way in this. It is possible. While doing this, we must also recognize the rights of other people, communities and states to choose what livelihoods are appropriate to them. No group should be privileged above another here.

     

    • Gundu, PhD is of the Department of Archaeology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
  • JAMB CBT: Nigeria must move forward with technology

    Following the conduct of the 2016 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) by the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB), various allegations have been flying around. From the outright ridiculous to the downright untrue, attempts have been made to discredit the Computer-Based Test (CBT) mode of the examination, which replaced the Paper and Pencil Test (PPT), with some protesters even calling the Chief Executive/Registrar of the board, Emeritus Professor Dibu Ojerinde, unprintable names and calling for his sack.

    Is the attempt to discredit CBT and thereby force JAMB to return to the PPT mode, which many have agreed encourages malpractices and which the JAMB Registrar once noted was consuming time, human and financial resources, worthy? Are the protesters justified to ask for the sack of Professor Ojerinde? This is a man who has, in the last nine years at JAMB changed the face of the board and brought a relatively high level of credibility to its examination and, indeed, deployed technology to public examination in such a way that the country’s education sector now has hope.

    What exactly should be the way forward for the Federal Government, which has said the PPT mode would be restored? These and many more were the questions that came to mind in the midst of the orchestrated protests and name-calling that have greeted the 2016 UTME.

    For those who had the privilege of monitoring the conduct of the examination, whatever challenges the examination had, were not in its organisation. In fact, JAMB deserved commendations for the effective deployment of Information and Communication Technology for the examination, which saw to most candidates sitting for the examination in safe and relaxed atmospheres devoid of external influences and disturbances. Of particular interest was the organised manner in which the examination was conducted and the zero allowance for interference or avenues for examination malpractices, as parents and wards as well as external materials were far-removed from the venues of the examination.

    The challenges had begun when the board began the release of the results only about 24 hours after the examination. Some candidates claimed they had different versions of results within hours while mischief-makers went to town with claims of marks being added for some candidates. Some had even gone ahead to claim that JAMB was arbitrarily adding and subtracting marks after the candidates had finished the examination. But can these claims be right? Thank God that the House of Representatives’ Committee on Education has eventually clarified the House’s position and passed a vote of confidence in CBT. The statement of the committee’s chairman, last week, that Nigeria could not afford to return to PPT, more than anything, vindicated Ojerinde, whose brainchild the CBT is.

    Now, if, indeed, the spurious allegations and sponsored protests have any merit, the question those behind the protests should answer is why they want to set Nigeria backward by two decades by calling for the cancellation of CBT and why the needless calls for the sack of the JAMB Registrar. If, indeed, there were challenges with the 2016 UTME, wouldn’t it be more important to address the challenges rather than calling for the cancellation of CBT and the sack of the man who brought it to JAMB?

    A look at JAMB’s operations of the CBT, since its introduction, would reveal that the board has been adhering to the International Test Commission’s2005 version of the International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet Delivered Testing. In fact, the board introduced a mechanism to aid candidates who might have challenges with the testing by employing the managed mode of testing, which allows human supervision and control over the test-taking environment. Candidates who took the 2016 CBT would testify to having access to centre supervisors who readily helped with any difficulty relating to the systems and the testing procedure. Therefore, when the protests and the calls for Ojerinde’s sack erupted, one was forced to ask who those behind the protests are. Could it be true that they are the cabals that specialise in malpractices, whose businesses have been destroyed by the JAMB Registrar and his policies at the board?

    Interestingly, South Africa first developed Computer-Based Testing in the 1970s and it has been perfected and deployed over the years and the country adapted the guidelines drawn up by the International Test Commission. Today, that country has gone miles ahead in conducting credible public examinations through CBT. However, Nigeria, which is obviously laid back in terms of technology, only had the opportunity of CBT as late as three years ago when JAMB introduced the mode. When that decision was taken; experts had described it as a blessing to the education sector. It should be noted that many universities had begun to conduct Computer-Based Tests for intending applicants. Apart from Nigerian universities, several Nigerian candidates have had to face international examinations conduct via the internet such as SAT and TOEFL, among others, with many of them only coming in contact with the CBT mode of examination for the first time when they wrote those examinations. Therefore, when JAMB introduced CBT, not a few people had thought it adequate as a testing ground for future examinations in the Computer-Based mode.

    Now, with the position of the House Committee on Education that there would be no going back on CBT, there is hope that the gains recorded by the policy would not be reversed because it had teething problems. But in order to correct anomalies and make the system more efficient, JAMB, the Ministry of Education and others should evaluate the challenges and complaints about the CBT and subsequently improve on it to deliver more efficiently. The Federal Government and the National Assembly must also look at the endless possibilities available in CBT and create legal frameworks to support this mode of examination, so that rather than rue the challenges of the 2016 UTME, we can relish the potential of CBT for the future.

     

    • Alao writes via adealcommunications@gmail.com
  • Understanding Oshiomhole’s industrialization policy

    It may not be possible for a government to build industries across the state and turn the economy around within a short time of eight years. There are however quick-wins that a serious government can undertake to achieve stunning results to the acclaim of a famished people. In other words, there are opportunities that a government can exploit immediately they present themselves to boost the living standards of the people. These opportunities will always present themselves in the life of every administration and whatever an administration makes of such opportunities depends on that administration’s policy thrust as powered by its economic team, if any.

    Bottomline is, even a bad situation can be quickly turned around by a government that thinks on its feet. That is what Governor Adams Aliyu Oshiomhole has succeeded in doing in Edo in his little more than seven years of being in charge. Today, the result is there for all to behold.

    The governor had stated from the onset that governments have no business running industries but creating the enabling environment for investors. Indeed, he had stated that his primary focus was to ensure that businesses thrive through the creation of enabling climate. Today, the proof of that conventional wisdom is the avalanche of private sector industries dotting the entire length and breadth of Edo State – thanks to the vastly improved environment for doing business which his policies have brought about.

    As they say – the proof of the pudding is in the eating. That the industrialization policies are impacting positively on the socio-economic landscape of the state is no longer in contention. The fact that multinationals like Dangote Group of Companies, Yong Xing, Wells Farms, Bua Group, Azura power among others have registered their presence in the state goes beyond mere acknowledgement of the changing times but of the immense possibilities in the future. To be sure, some of these investments come under public-private-partnership initiative of the state government; others are wholly private sector driven. Together, the state is the richer for it.

    Never mind that dearth of statistics has remained the bane of the nation, it is projected that no less than 100,000 job opportunities have been created over the course of the last seven years under the Oshiomhole administration. These jobs cut across the public and private sector just as they straddle information and communications technology, health and social welfare and other sectors of the state’s economy. Some of the jobs directly created are in the Information and Communication Technology Agency, the Board of Internal Revenue, Edo State University, Central Hospital. These agencies among others, have employed and continue to employ thousands of youths many of whom would have remained in the labour market were these opportunities not opened up to them. That is not all. The state government is retooling Central Hospital to a Five-Star Hospital; it is building a new university all of which would further boost economic activities of the state and its people.

    Today, the state can count its chicks in the spin-off from private investment promotion. Wells Farm alone for instance, promises to employ over 80,000. Ditto Bua and Dangote both of which are also looking at employing thousands of youths just as Okpella Cement factory has employed several youths and still counting. Yong Xing and Azura power have also employed and will continue to employ youths in their thousands. Add to this the fact that workers in the public service are earning salaries as at when due; the pensioners are of course not left out. Taken together with the newly engaged workers in the various companies all of whom are now contributing actively to the economy, the state’s rising profile under its current helmsman is better appreciated.

    This is where the effects multiplier comes in. To bring the picture of the concept clearer home, it refers to the increase in final income arising from any new injection of spending. In simple terms, if the beneficiaries of the different opportunities being created in the state, for example, opt to complete the building of their new houses with their salaries, the project injects extra demand and output into the economy of the state. Imagine that not a few businesses including architects, suppliers of blocks, sand, water, iron rods, wood etc. will benefit directly or indirectly from the beneficiaries’ expenditure. The building of a new house, in other words, generates a new flow of income which includes wages and profits. The workers in turn engage drycleaners or washer men, lesson teachers, mechanics, artisans among others. They pay rents, if they are not building their homes. As for companies that have opened up in the state, their various host communities will benefit not just in terms of tremendous exposure but also in terms of increase housing needs and other infrastructure.

    As would be expected, the net effects of the development will extend beyond the frontiers of the state to neighbouring states. After all, economists will argue that when income is spent, the spending becomes someone else’s income which in turn stimulates another wave of demand and supply spawning investment by individuals, construction firms and business entities, not least saving by households – and ultimately the national GDP. The resultant boost in the GDP is called the multiplier effect.

    Truth is – it seems fairly easy to appreciate the direct impact of the physical engagement of the workers in terms of their salaries and wages. This is a far cry from the multiple impacts spawned by the hospitable environment deliberately promoted by the Oshiomhole administration. It is in the understanding of the linkages that justice is done to the Oshiomhole legacy.

    Today, economic potentials of Edo State have grown to humongous proportions – thanks to the creative policies of the Oshiomhole administration. Aside attracting investors to the state, there is no doubt that the foundation for the future has been firmly laid. In years to come, citizens of Edo State will certainly remember the Oshiomhole years not just in glowing terms but specifically as the golden years of its industrial transformation.

     

    • Mayaki is Executive Director, Media and Public Affairs, Edo Governor’s Office.
  • Judas Iscariot and modern terrorists

    The story of Judas Iscariot, the money manager, who kept the money box for the revolutionary movement that was led by Jesus Christ, and who despite that he regularly pilfers from the box, still turned a terrorist against the movement for more monetary gains resonated across the world the past week as Christians celebrated the Paschal Mystery. Just the same past week, modern terrorists turned Europe upside down as they rampaged in Belgium as a follow-up to their earlier attacks in France. As Europe swiftly deployed her security infrastructure to track the terrorists, this column was struck by the share nakedness of our country, because white-collar terrorists, have like termites, eaten up the resources earmarked for enhancing our national security architecture.

    The Nigerian corrupt official is no different from Judas who was unable to appreciate that in gaining unwholesomely from the common patrimony, he was ultimately undermining himself and the entire movement. With the horror emanating from the cities of Europe, those who have compromised the humongous resources earmarked for the close circuit television security cameras slated for Lagos and Abuja should realise that they have exposed themselves and the rest of the citizens to enormous risks. For when Judas eventually sold his master, Jesus, to the enemies, he like the rest of his group became exposed and endangered. Of course, unprotected by Jesus and the common clout, he couldn’t last to enjoy the temporal gain he made from the deal.

    The government of President Muhammadu Buhari must immediately wake-up to the enormous challenge posed by the absence of adequate security infrastructure across the state capitals and the major cities in Nigeria. Without close circuit cameras, how could Belgium have within hours been able to identify the terrorists that bombed her airport and the underground rail tunnel? If it were in Nigeria, our security agencies would be groping in the dark for weeks like the Nyanya bombing and several others in Nigeria had shown. Perhaps, it is a matter of urgent national importance for the present government to show renewed interest in the N76 billion contract awarded to the ZTE Communications of China to provide security cameras in Lagos and Abuja.

    The 8th National Assembly may also have to renew the interrogation started by the House of Representatives sometime in October, 2015, after the 7th National Assembly failed to find their mark with respect to how the money for the security cameras may have been pilfered by our modern day money managers. The 2015 move by our representatives, was reportedly sequel to a motion by honourables Adekoya Adeseun Abdul-Majid and Abiodun Faleke, who jointly presented a motion, tagged: “For the reactivation/installation of closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras in Abuja, State Capitals and Major Cities and Investigation of the failure of ZTE Corporation to complete the contract of installing cameras in Abuja and Lagos”.

    In his submission, Abdul had remarked: “By the contractual terms, Nigeria was required to make a down payment of 15 percent amounting to about $70.5 million while the Chinese Exim Bank was to provide the remaining 85percent amounting to $399.5 million which Nigeria was required to repay on a three percent interest rate within 10 years at prevailing interest rate”. While the present House in conjunction with the Senate have not taken up the challenge to find out, the Judases in our midst and even in the Chinese firm who opted to compromise our planned security cameras for their immediate personal gain, should worry every Nigerian.

    Also intriguing is why the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), is reportedly demurring in fishing out those in custody of our money box, but who unwittingly connived with the enemy to hand us over to terrorists rampaging across the world. Like Judas, who was used to free money, the crave for personal gain and well-being may have temporarily driven those involved into a judasic insanity which beclouds them from realising that they too, like the rest of us, in the absence of surveillance cameras, are exposed to the cunning infiltration, of the enemies. Even when the EFCC has so much to contend with, as they appear to be too many Judases in our country, the need to find out what happened to the contract awarded to ZTE, is important; more so, if those involved can be compelled to return our money, or execute the contract.

    As seen in the story of the betrayal by Judas, fore-knowledge of the plan by a terrorist to strike, which modern technology could avail our country, is imperative for the ultimate triumph of the common good over evil. For Jesus to ultimately triumph over the plan of Judas and his co-conspirators, he had foreknowledge of the plan, and so, he adequately prepared in advance. As told by the gospel of John, chapter 12:1-11: “Six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany, where Lazarus was, whom Jesus had raised from the dead…. Mary took a pound of costly ointment of pure nard and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped his feet with her hair; …. But Judas Iscariot, one of his disciples (he who was to betray him), said, ‘why was this ointment not sold for three hundred denarii and given to the poor?’”.

    Continuing the story, John interjected: “This he (Judas) said, not that he cared for the poor but because he was a thief, and as he had the money box he used to take what was put into it”. To prepare for the terrorist attack ahead, Jesus asked his disciples to resort to prayer, which was to be their ultimate shield, as they suffered tribulation and persecutions, following the great turmoil that lay ahead. In the gospel of Luke Chapter 21:36, Jesus admonished his disciples: “Be on the alert and pray always that you will have the strength to go safely through all those things that will happen and to stand before the son of man”. Indeed, when Jesus knew that his honour to suffer, for the redemption of mankind had come, it was prayer galore. According to the gospel of John 17:1, Jesus said: “Father, the hour has come. Give glory to your son, so that the Son may give you glory”.

    As Jesus and his disciples successfully prayed through the tribulations, to his resurrection, Nigeria must begin to put in place the needed security infrastructure, if she is to survive the tribulations of modern day terrorism. Preparing in advance, like Jesus and his disciples did, would make the effort of the enemy less devastating. Imagine what would have been the fate of the disciples if Jesus was seized suddenly without his preparing them in advance and telling them how to go about the ministry after his departure. Again, how could the followers have survived the tribulations if Jesus had not efficiently sold to them the hope of his resurrection and the coming of the Holy Spirit, their comforter?

    Having the capacity to know in advance and the wisdom to follow swiftly the trail of the insidious and incendiary complexities of modern terrorism is fundamental to the survival of any modern society. The modern terrorist is no different from an old terrorist like Judas Iscariot. The solution lies in eternal vigilance and preparedness.

  • Tinubu and verdict of history

    Tinubu and verdict of history

    Nothing great will ever be achieved without great men, and men are great only if they are determined to be so’ – Charles de Gaulle

    There is a thought-provoking puzzle that many politicians currently in and out of power across the country have found a hard row to hoe. That conundrum is Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu – the Jagaban of Borgu land, Asiwaju of Lagos and former governor of Lagos State. Today, the enigma clocks 64; yet, he is still waxing stronger within the nation’s political firmament as an astute political strategist and unfaltering torchbearer of progressive politics. Without any deliberate attempt, this man with large appetite for politics is impulsively etching his name indelibly on the sands of time.

    Without sounding conceited, it would not be out-of-place to state today that he remains the most-sought-after politician and perhaps, one of the few most significant of the progressive hue in modern-day Nigeria. The reality, even amongst that hate to love Tinubu, against the dictate of their conscience, is that he has become a veritable political brand that can be ignored at one’s peril in the political landscape of the nation. At a point in the history of this country, the late sage, Pa Obafemi Awolowo, was the issue. Even after the great man’s death 29 years ago, most politicians in the south-western part of the country still use his name to deceive the electorate during electioneering periods. Momentarily, Bashorun MKO Abiola appeared on the political horizon, but was cut short by the feudal military oligarchy that denied him his electoral mandate by sending him into an early grave. Most politicians in our present day deploy the Tinubu political brand name to win grassroots support during elections.

    Since the passage of Awo and, perhaps Abiola, one doubts if there is any Nigerian that has taken the political emancipation of his people from the yoke of democratic tyranny seriously as much as Tinubu has been doing. The political ignoramuses might deride him; the grovelers of centrist conservative elements are used to impugning his character, but that is the man still standing like the rock of Gibraltar. Asiwaju has the power of political liberation; he is imbued with a rare economic skill, being a shrewd accountant with vast international experience. This man of unquantifiable knack for philanthropy has this uncanny nerve for discovering a talent, which was reflected in the membership quality of his mostly well-endowed cabinet team that he assembled during his eight-year rein as governor of Lagos State.

    The man turns 64 today, but many people prefer to criticise him, out of sheer envy of his result oriented political track record; others do simply because they could not rival his steadfast commitment to finding solutions to political and other challenges facing the country. Tinubu thinks Nigeria, dreams Nigeria; he lives Nigeria and sleeps Nigeria. From the north, east, west and south, people call him at random to seek his help or input on intractable political quagmire. These men and women are not necessarily members of the political elite class; this is because the former governor is also at home with the downtrodden whose interests form the thrust of his concern for a better country.

    Some, out of steep spite of his large-heart and enormous goodwill, will query his source of wealth: And simply because the man is doing what they cannot ever do or are not privileged to do since they are not in a position to do it, they harbour the ache in their bellies. Some see him as being immoderate. But Benjamin Disraeli had an answer for the Tinubu-phobia when he said: ‘Moderation has been called a virtue to limit the ambition of great men, and to console undistinguished people for their want of fortune and their lack of merit.’ There are empirical examples of Nigerians, irrespective of tribes and especially among the Yoruba, the man’s cradle, that have benefited immensely from his political and monetary largesse. But sadly, these same people still hypocritically relish speaking ill of him. Surprisingly, Tinubu relishes welcoming such backstabbers back to his fold. Most of us see this as a weakness but he sees that to be one sacrifice of greatness that he must pay. One can only hope that this inclination of taking back backstabbers would not turn to be his undoing later in life.

    Whoever doubts Asiwaju’s progressive credentials needs to embark on historical excursion. At a time that the Yoruba states of Oyo, Ogun, Osun, Osun and Ekiti were falling to the gangsterism of dethroned People’s Democratic Party (PDP) in 2003 and 2007, it was only Asiwaju’s Lagos that stood to absorb the heat of conservatism before eventually launching, single-handedly, the worthwhile battle that liberated the former western region but Ondo, from the grips of rampaging agents of feudal politics. The giant progressive strides that the nation is witnessing today are a consequence of Asiwaju’s political acuity. This gives credence to Walt Whitman’s statement: ‘Produce great men, the rest follows.’ Progressivism is indeed taking firm root in the country today because of the great political mind possessed by Asiwaju. Indeed, Charles de Gaulle was right by saying: ‘Nothing great will ever be achieved without great men and men are great only if they are determined to be so.’

    Tinubu is indeed and always politically determined to succeed. And it is this uncommon determination to be great and to politically liberate the masses from the yoke of reactionary politics that compelled him to take with zeal, progressive politics, since year 2014’s merger of Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) with other opposition parties – far beyond the west and to all parts of the country. This gave birth to All Progressives Congress (APC) that today controls the seat of power in Abuja. The move at that time generated spite, covetousness as much as cynicism from those who always see impossibility rather than possibility in Tinubu’s laudable political initiatives. The difference between Tinubu and the rest in the political arena is that he sees possibility where others predict doom. His often-talked-about political superiority complex does not mean haughtiness, although it might appear to be so in the eyes of the mischievous among politicians who want to see it so. Tinubu feels a higher esteem over the obstacles he desires to surmount and he is blessed with the rare courage of overcoming them, with enough energy reserved for any eventuality.

    The positive roles of Tinubu in the successful political merger of the opposition parties; the outcome of the 2015 general elections in favour of then opposition and the fact that a precedent has been set that makes it impossible for a ruling party, especially at the centre, to take others for granted in the political space have become a burden of envy in the minds of most politicians that see Tinubu as a threat. Rejection of Tinubu’s political ingenuity is nothing but a deliberate creation of avoidable amphitheatre of perfidious hypocrisy.

    Despite the sleaze of political mudslinging by mostly beneficiaries of his political large-heartedness, Tinubu’s democratic scorecard remains very glittering and unassailable. The current firm control of the centre by erstwhile opposition, hitherto considered as impossible, and the invaluable role played by the Jagaban of Borgu land in bringing it to fruition merely confirmed him as the definitive contemporary political leader of the progressives in the country.

    Like Awolowo during his lifetime, Tinubu has, in contemporary Nigerian politics, become a thorn in the flesh of conservative/progressive politicians with lesser candour. This unjustifiable kvetching syndrome by some of the current political elite class against Tinubu has become a catalyst that gives him more inspiration to surpass his present enviable feat. But for a politician like Tinubu, it would most likely have been impossible for Nigerians to have the golden opportunity of looking back and saying today: We are free at long last from the shackles of democratic feudal that see power at the centre as their birth right!  This writer wholeheartedly wishes Asiwaju, the husband of adorable Senator Oluremi Tinubu, plenteous happy returns of today in sound health and continuing political relevance. Happy birthday to you sir. And as the Yoruba would pray: Igba Odun, Odun kan!

     

    • Sanusi is MD/CEO of Lagos State Advertisement and Signage Agency.
  • Employment crisis and humanities graduates in Nigeria

    Youth,’ says William Pitt the Elder,‘is the season of credulity.’ This sums up the tragedy of the Nigerian youths who grew up believing that they are the leaders of tomorrow. Credulity is not a vice. Every human being has the right to dream. And so a child growing up, and along the way picks up a dream—of becoming a doctor, a lawyer, an engineer, a manager, a professor, a top business executive, a civil servant, and so many other lofty status that makes one a success in life. On the strength of that singular dream, a child labours through schools, burns the midnight oil and eventually makes it to the university. Out of those who eventually graduate from Nigeria’s many universities, only very few, say, 30% ever get close to realizing their dreams. Graduation draws them right into the reality of the Nigerian condition.

    If you doubt my assessment of dream truncation, consider some critical but grim data. First, Nigeria is demographically a youthful country. That translates into some optimistic prognosis about how that youth bulge could become the opportunity for development planning that would be premised on youth empowerment and employability. Unfortunately, we have to contend with the global phenomenon of unemployment, and its specific Nigerian horror. As at 2015, Nigeria’s youth unemployment rate is over 50%. This figure might even be larger as the CBN hinted in 2014 that over 80% of Nigerian youths are jobless. Factor Nigeria’s lack of an impressive data culture in policy intelligence and analysis into the unemployment and education equation, and you get an understanding of how depressing the reality is.

    No doubt, Nigeria has a serious development deficit. There is no developed nation in the world that does not recognize the significance of the youths to national progress. The youth constitutes a critical mass of national capital which is then converted into a workforce that could move the machinery of development. When this fails to happen, unemployment is transformed into a debilitating malaise that wastes the vitality of the nation. This is the stage at which Nigeria stands in terms of the employability of its youth. And we only need scrutinize the root cause of the Arab Spring, and the sacrifice of Bouazzizi, the Tunisian youth who was forced by the shame of acute unemployment to set himself ablaze, to realize what chronic unemployment portents for a nation of over 190 million people with a significant youth component.

    While this is the dire consequence of unemployment, what is the cause? Here we examine two corollary variables whose combine effects are undermining Nigeria’s development capacity. I have in mind the Federal Government of Nigeria and the Nigerian tertiary education system. The Nigerian Policy on Education (NPE) is a document fabricated within the context of a paradox. On the one hand, the government recognizes that human capital development plays a huge role in driving development planning. Hence, the essence of having a policy on education is meant to push that recognition to the point of policy implementation. On the other hand, however, the very policy document that is founded on the critical role of human capital development undermines its own rationale by cutting its potential output by a radical half! In other words, by its avowed pursuit of 60:40 ratio in favour of the sciences over the humanities and the social sciences (HSS), the government undermines the potentials of the HSS contribution to national development. Suffice it to add that the critical issue really is not the 60:40 ratio which in some sense is self-justifying, it is the import of that policy as a totality of attitude of policy makers borne out of some intellectual laziness or partial blindness.

    The ratio, I suspect, is borne out of the government’s belief that the HSS are not development-useful. And that seems perfectly logical. I mean, what possible role could history or religious studies or modern European studies or philosophy play in the nation’s attempt to create a science and technology framework that could launch Nigeria’s development initiatives? It therefore seems to make equally perfect sense that the sciences ought to be promoted and funded over the HSS. This development reasoning is not purely Nigerian. The HSS all over the world are under siege, especially in the wake of the rise of the STEM disciplines—science, technology, engineering and mathematics. These four forms the hard core of development education that any nation urgently requires. And so, several departments of the non-development disciplines have been forced to rationalise their staff, brutally merged to save cost or forced to close shop. Beheading therefore became the cure for a severe headache!

    And the Nigerian tertiary education system only makes the matter worse. Because this system is essentially tertiary, its foundation is built on what we can call a ‘certificate illusion.’ In other words, the thousands of youths entering the universities every year hold the false hope that it is their certificates that would earn them a lifelong meal ticket. They are cured of this illusion after four or so years in the ivory towers. And so over the years, the Nigerian universities, the intellectual sites for the generation of national intelligence and competences, have become grim industries that churn out graduates who will eventually be unemployed or unemployable. And the graduates of the HSS are the worst hit in this unemployment equation. It would make for a rather enlightening statistics to know the proportion of HSS graduates that make up the unemployment data.

    Most Nigerian universities are complicit in this depressing predicament. At one end, there seems not to be any publicized and sustained series of concerted efforts, intellectual and political, to outline the critical role of the HSS in national development. Except maybe the universities themselves are indifference to the possible roles the HSS can play in the development equation of Nigeria. If universities are centres of competences, then there is a lot that needs to be done to ensure that there is really a genuine attempt to deliver on that mandate to boost Nigeria’s chance of ever achieving a wholesome development profile. When compared with other disciplines, the HSS constitute a set of disciplines whose value significance to the society and the nation ought to be critically revisited, or precisely updated. The slogan of the humanist scholars is that the humanities humanize. True. In the inculcation of a sense of beauty and values, an awareness of the divine, the internalization of the elements of critical thinking, etc., a human individual is weaned off terrible subhuman attitudes and beastly tendencies that compromise the essence of harmonious human relationships in what we call the human society.

    Yet, the HSS graduates must compete with other well-endowed and competently prepared graduates in the age of global competitiveness. The critical questions therefore are: In what sense can the HSS humanize in the age of capitalism? How can the humanizing advantage of the HSS inflect the Nigerian development challenge, and transform it radically? What more do the HSS graduates require to become functionally adequate? These questions are critical and the right answers to them not only becomes the leeway the HSS require to be saved the looming threat of rationalization, these answers are equally significant in integrating the HSS graduates into the development equation in Nigeria. It does not serve any purpose to recraft the National Policy on Education to achieve a 50:50 ratio balance. On the contrary, what is needed is a concerted rethinking process that can impact policy intelligence and implementation. Put in other words, the policy hand of the Nigerian government must be forced to see why rationalizing the HSS or starving it of funds would not be in the national interest, in the final analysis.

    There is a tendency that the global trend in the diminution of the relevance of the HSS would eventually trickle down to Nigeria. As it is, the first manifestation of that trend is the NPE and its lopsided ratio, fuelled by the strange belief that it takes only science and technology to develop Nigeria. Unfortunately, government and its policy makers are not looking at the issues from the other side—that science and technology themselves pose significant threat to Nigeria’s development objectives in several critical senses. For instance, the emerging technologies have become the convenient avenues by which fundamentalism and terrorism have run out of control in the human society.

    It therefore seems that the establishment of the Ibadan School of Government and Public Policy (ISGPP) becomes a timely catalyst that can independently jumpstart the conversations around the urgent need to rethink and rehabilitate the HSS not only to be in tune with its own mandate, but also to facilitate a genuine and necessary dialogue with the Nigerian development needs and objectives. The ISGPP is initiating these intellectual and policy conversations in the recognition that the HSS constitute a critical mass of disciplines whose development values have been lost in the jaundiced perception of what development is, and who and what they can contribute to it. But as a first condition for that possibility, the Nigerian universities owe the Nigerian youth a radical intervention that would be conducive to employability. It seems to me that that is one fundamental development dividend that any nation owe its youths. And the employability of the HSS graduate is a function of how entrepreneurial skill can complement the humanizing mandate of the HSS. In that, I see the marching order for the Nigerian universities: the immediate and urgent implementation of a thriving entrepreneurial education compulsory for students, and shorn off all overly theoretical ambition.