Category: Law

  • Voices from the gallows: The human cost of capital punishment in Nigeria

    Voices from the gallows: The human cost of capital punishment in Nigeria

    The quiet hum of life inside Nigeria’s correctional centres masks a grim reality: hundreds of inmates live under the shadow of death, waiting for a punishment that may never come. Official figures indicate that a significant number of inmates are currently on death row across the country, a staggering population that reflects decades of stalled executions, unresolved appeals, and the weight of a justice system struggling with its own contradictions. For these men and women, each sunrise brings not hope, but an unrelenting reminder of mortality. For Nigeria, the human, financial, and institutional cost of maintaining this purgatory is one the nation can no longer ignore, NICHOLAS KALU reports.

    A system suspended between law and mercy

    Nigeria’s penal code and various state criminal laws still prescribe the death penalty for capital offences such as armed robbery, murder, and, in some states, kidnapping or terrorism-related crimes. The courts, following the law, continue to hand down death sentences. Yet actual executions have been rare since the 2000s, with governors reluctant to sign death warrants due to moral, religious, and political considerations. This has created a contradiction: a system where death sentences are routinely pronounced but seldom carried out, leaving thousands trapped in indefinite limbo.

    Justice reform advocates often refer to this as a “broken middle ground.” Inmates are condemned, but not executed; alive, but not free. Many linger on death row for decades, their cases forgotten in bureaucratic files, their names absent from public discourse except for occasional mentions in rights reports. The state, unwilling to move forward yet hesitant to roll back, continues to fund their upkeep in a situation that drains resources, clogs facilities, and undermines the credibility of the justice system.

     The toll on inmates and their families

     An inmate on death row in a Correctional Centre in the northern part of the country, told this reporter during a rare visit:“Every night, I sleep with the fear that someone will come and call my name. I don’t even know if I want the day to come quickly or never at all. You cannot understand what it means to live like this, neither alive nor dead. I wake up every day not knowing if it will be my last. Sometimes, I dream of freedom. Other times, I pray for death, just to end this waiting.”His words capture the cruel psychology of death row, a perpetual waiting game where the mind is stretched to breaking point. Depression, anxiety, and suicidal tendencies are common, worsened by overcrowding, poor health facilities, and minimal access to psychosocial support. Families of death row inmates are equally trapped, enduring stigma, financial strain, and the pain of endless uncertainty. Many sell property, take loans, or withdraw children from school to fund appeals and petitions, often with little success. For some families, the shame of having a relative on death row drives them into isolation. Mothers who once campaigned desperately for clemency withdraw after years of disappointment, while spouses and children are left to navigate life with the heavy label of being associated with a “condemned” person.

    The impact radiates outward, devastating families. Many relatives are left with stigma, unable to publicly acknowledge their kin’s situation. Others spend what little money they have on legal fees, bribes, or travel for prison visits.

    One guard whispered during the visit: “You see these men? Most of their families are broken. Wives remarry, children grow up without fathers, and mothers die waiting to hear the government’s final word. It is not only the inmate who serves the sentence; the family serves it too.”

    The inmate himself echoed this grief: “My mother used to come every month. She would bring food, tears in her eyes. Then she stopped.  That pain is worse than death.”

    Psychological trauma: Death in waiting

    Psychologists describe death row as a form of “living torture.” Mr Udo Ukpong, expert in mental health said the uncertainty of not knowing when or whether an execution will happen erodes mental health. “Depression, insomnia, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts are common. For an inmate every sound of boots in the corridor makes their heart stop. They think, ‘This is it, they are coming for me.’ Then the sound passes, and they are left shaking in their cell. I have seen strong men break down and cry like children. Some talk to themselves until they lose their minds,” he said. He said such reveal that capital punishment, even when not carried out, functions as prolonged psychological punishment that extends far beyond the courtroom.

    Families left in the shadows

    The burden of capital punishment does not end with the condemned. Families of death row inmates suffer quiet punishment of their own. Many are stigmatised in their communities, unable to bear the shame of having a relative “awaiting the rope.”

    One mother, interviewed outside a custodial facility, recounted her struggle: “My son has been inside for four years. I still travel from the village when I can to see him. People laugh at me, saying I’m wasting money visiting someone who will be killed. But he is my son. As long as he is breathing, I will keep coming.”

    For families like hers, hope and despair coexist. They mourn a loved one who is still alive yet cut off from life. The financial strain of visits and legal appeals adds to their suffering. Children of death row inmates often grow up with the stigma of having a condemned parent, carrying the generational weight of a punishment they did not commit.

    The economic drain

    Beyond personal loss, the financial cost of sustaining death row is immense. Housing one prisoner for decades without execution represents a paradox of punishment: the state spends millions to preserve a life it has officially condemned to end.

    Officials privately admit that resources strained by overcrowding, poor facilities, and inadequate staff salaries are worsened by the burden of capital cases. Nigeria’s custodial centres are bursting far beyond their capacity, and death row inmates occupy cells that could otherwise hold prisoners eligible for rehabilitation. A senior legal analyst explained: “Nigeria is caught in a contradiction. By not executing, it upholds a de facto moratorium. But by not abolishing the death penalty, it keeps spending vast resources on a punishment that serves neither deterrence nor justice.

    Read Also: Ocheme to fly Nigeria’s flag in historic PFL Africa’s semifinal bout

    “While much attention is given to the morality of the death penalty, the financial cost of sustaining thousands of inmates indefinitely on death row is rarely discussed. Feeding, housing, and providing minimal healthcare for condemned prisoners over years, and in some cases decades, drains the already overstretched Nigerian Correctional Service. Each inmate on death row represents not just a human tragedy, but a recurring cost to taxpayers.

    “Though the government has never published the exact figures, estimates by rights groups suggest a lot of money is consumed annually in keeping condemned inmates alive without closure. The funds used to sustain death row could otherwise be channeled toward rehabilitative programmes, vocational training, or infrastructure to decongest correctional centres. Instead, the system spends resources maintaining people who are legally barred from reintegration into society, yet not executed,” Musa Shuaibu, a public affairs analyst posited.

    The implications stretch far beyond human suffering. The Nigerian Correctional Service spends enormous sums maintaining death row inmates. Feeding, clothing, guarding, and providing minimal healthcare to thousands individuals under heightened security measures drain already strained correctional budgets. A senior correctional officer who requested anonymity explained: “Every death row inmate costs the government more than a regular inmate. Their cells require more personnel, more surveillance, and the state must ensure they are kept alive despite the sentence hanging over them. Multiply that by the thousands we have, and you see how the money adds up.”

    Legal gridlock and delayed justice

    A major factor behind the swelling population on death row is Nigeria’s slow judicial process. Appeals can drag on for years, with inadequate legal aid for indigent prisoners. Some inmates exhaust all legal avenues yet remain on death row because governors decline to sign execution warrants. Others have their cases forgotten altogether in the labyrinth of judicial files, with missing transcripts or delayed reviews preventing closure. In effect, the punishment becomes indefinite incarceration under the harshest psychological conditions, a situation some argue is even more cruel than execution. For lawyers and rights advocates, this limbo undermines the constitutional guarantee of fair trial and timely justice.

    A punishment that no longer deters

    Supporters of the death penalty often argue that it serves as a deterrent against violent crimes. Yet available evidence in Nigeria does not support this claim. Armed robbery, kidnapping, and terrorism continue to surge despite death sentences being routinely handed down. Criminologists argue that crime is better addressed through effective policing, speedy trials, and socio-economic reforms, rather than the remote threat of execution that is rarely carried out.

    The way forward: reform, not revenge

    Nigeria now faces a choice. It can continue with the current limbo, sentencing people to death without carrying out executions, or it can take bold steps toward reform. Many legal experts and rights groups advocate for replacing capital punishment with life imprisonment without parole. This alternative provides certainty, reduces the psychological torture of waiting, and allows the justice system to focus on rehabilitation and correction rather than indefinite punishment.

    Reform would also ease the financial burden. By reducing death row populations, resources could be redirected toward prison decongestion, vocational training, and re-entry programmes for non-capital offenders. It would also align Nigeria with the global movement toward abolition, improving its human rights record and strengthening its moral authority in international forums.

    Conclusion: a costly contradiction

    The death penalty in Nigeria has become less a tool of justice and more a symbol of contradiction. It condemns people without closure, drains the treasury without purpose, and erodes the humanity of both inmates and the system that holds them. Families are broken, custodial officers are burdened, and the justice system loses credibility under the weight of stalled executions and endless appeals.

    As one rights activist observed, “We are running a system where we neither kill nor forgive. In the end, everyone suffers — the inmates, their families, and the nation.”

    Nigeria must confront this reality. The true cost of capital punishment is not just measured in lives condemned, but in the dignity lost, the resources wasted, and the justice delayed. To remain on this path is to perpetuate a cycle of cruelty without resolution. To choose reform is to acknowledge that justice can be firm without being fatal.

    • This report was produced with the support of Hope Behind Bars Africa (HBBA).
  • Taming the corruption monster

    Taming the corruption monster

    • Northeast Attorneys General unite against the cankerworm

    The fight against corruption is a national struggle to promote transparency, accountability and justice. It is also to ensure that available resources serve the people, strengthen institutions, and foster sustainable development for future generations. The matter was the focal point of discussion at a roundtable organised by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), the Attorneys General and political leaders from the states in the Northeast Nigeria, DUKU JOEL writes

    Corruption remains one of the biggest albatross in the nation’s social and political development. While successive regimes have made deliberate efforts through legislations and the establishment of institutions like the Independent and Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), the challenges still linger in the implementation and the efficacy of the laws and the institutions.

    At a recent roundtable hosted by the ICPC, political leaders and anti-corruption czars pledged to make a  push to combat corruption in Nigeria’s Northeast, a region scarred by years of insurgency and humanitarian crises.

    The event held penultimate week at the Amada International Hotel in Maiduguri. The theme was “Institutional Integrity and Regional Cooperation: The Role of Attorneys-General in Advancing a Corruption-Free Northeast”. It brought together egg heads in the ICPC, the Attorneys-General from Borno, Yobe, Adamawa, Gombe, Bauchi and Taraba states in a renewed effort to tackle corruption and strengthen institutional integrity in the region.

     The top–level legal officers and stakeholders were expected to chart strategies to curb graft and promote good governance and foster a united force against corruption in the region and the country in general.                                                       

    Recover stolen assets, strengthen anti-corruption institutions 

     ICPC Chairman, Dr. Musa Adamu Aliyu, emphasized that punishment alone cannot defeat corruption.

    According to him, there is the need for a multi-faceted approach that includes strengthening systems, recovering stolen assets, and supporting victims.

    “We know from global experience, and from our laws, that punishment alone is not enough. We must combine approaches: recover stolen assets, restore justice to victims, strengthen our systems, and above all, work together across institutions and across regions,” Aliyu said.

    The ICPC boss cited the Supreme Court decision in AG Ondo State v. AG Federation, which emphasised the need for joint efforts from both tiers of government in tackling corruption.                                                                                   In the opinion of Dr. Aliyu, corruption remains one of the most stubborn challenges that has significantly contributed to the country’s weak economy, insecurity, and the lack of public trust in government institutions.

    “Corruption remains one of the most stubborn challenges of our time. It weakens economies, fuels insecurity, and undermines public trust. The world today speaks with one voice against corruption, and Nigeria must not be left behind”, Dr. A;iyu said.

    While giving a brief background of the engagement, the ICPC boss said, “we began this journey on 3rd September, 2024, when we held the inaugural roundtable in Abuja with 34 out of 36 Attorneys-General present. Since then, we have moved across the six geopolitical zones, Kano for the Northwest,Asaba for the Southsouth, Ilorin for the Northcentral and Enugu for the Southeast. Today, we gather in Maiduguri for the Northeast,” he said. Dr. Aliyu also took his time to commend the Borno State Government for prioritising judicial reforms while noting that such efforts would significantly iimpact the anti-corruption fight.

    “Here in the Northeast, we know how deeply corruption and weak institutions can worsen insecurity and poverty. Yet, we also know the power of reform. The Borno State Judiciary, under the leadership of the Chief Judge, Justice Zanna Kashim, has set an example for the nation in judicial reforms.

    “That spirit of reform is what we must carry into today’s discussions,” he added. Agreeing with the initiative of the engagement were the remarks of the Chief Judge of Borno State Justice Kashim Zannah who was represented by Aisha Kumalia.

      Yobe State Attorney-General, Barrister Saleh Samanja, who spoke on behalf of his colleagues, said the synergy wouldn’t have come at a better time than now.

    He stressed the need for state governments through the instrumentality of the law to strengthen the war against corruption.

    A university don and Special Guest of Honour at the occasion, Prof. Auwalu Hamisu Yadudu, reminded the Attorneys-General not to forget their profession as lawyers while they hold political offices as well.

    In his opinion, Nigeria as a federation requires such meeting to discuss areas of conflict and jurisdictions in our laws and strengthen national cohesion.

    “It is a welcome development because in a federation like ours in Nigeria, there is a possibility of conflicts in jurisdictions but sitting together and addressing  things together can minimize or perhaps can even eliminate areas of conflicts,” he said.

    The Professor of Law, who spoke on the likely conflict if one person should hold the positions of the office of the Attorney-General and Commissioner of Justice. He said the officer would hold to allegiance to his employer. He said it largely lay with the individual holding the office and how he is able to discharge his duties independently within the extant laws.

    “The independence of the institution is a matter for the officers or the officials heading such organisation to exercise the independent powers given to them by the constitution and by the law and to be a deterrent to the rule of law and exercising independent judgment to carry out their functions.

    “There need not be conflict of interest. Sometimes, we do not know what happens between the chief law officer of the state and his principal. They will not come and say it in the public how and where they disagree or how they resolved it. They won’t come and say so. I know it’s very painful for them to be accused of one wrong doing or another perpetrated by their principal and them looking at it and doing nothing because if they also do, they would be held liable for breach of confidentiality”.

    Read Also: EFCC chair urges youths to reject corruption, embrace integrity

    “On the separation of the office of the Attorney-General with Commissioner for Justice, I personally do not think it’s the separation that would ensure independence or autonomy. There are other climes where the office is occupied by one person but they still discharge their independent judgment and advise the Chief Executive and still do not undertake any prosecution or legal processes. So I don’t think separating the office will attain that objective”, Prof Yadudu explained.

    Absence  of  oversight functions create grounds for corruption

    Keynote speaker, Senator Kaka Shehu Lawan (SAN), a former Attorney-General of Borno State who represented the Chairman, Senate Committee on Anti-Corruption, Sen. Emmanuel Udende, said the Akpabio-led Senate was a friendly force of the ICPC in fighting corruption in Nigeria which is determined to strengthen antigraft institutions through robust legislations and effective over-sighting.

     Senator Lawan noted that the fight against corruption wasn’t just a legal matter but a critical battle for survival, security, and public trust, while urging a strategic and sustained partnership between State Attorneys-General and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).

    Senator Lawan framed the collaboration as a strategic imperative for the Region’s sustainable recovery. He argued that with billions of naira flowing into the Northeast for reconstruction and humanitarian aid, a lack of coordinated oversight could create a fertile ground for corruption. The consequences are tangible and devastating: underfunded schools, dilapidated hospitals, and weakened security infrastructure.

    “Every naira lost to corruption is a blow to survival, stability, and the dignity of our people”, Lawan stated, emphasising that corruption in the Northeast wasn’t an abstract problem, but a lived reality.

    His words; “As I have already stated, it is both an honour and a responsibility to address this distinguished gathering of State Attorneys-General, senior officials of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), and other stakeholders committed to advancing transparency and accountability in Nigeria’s governance.

    Our topic today, which is “Building Effective Partnerships between State Attorneys-General and the ICPC: A Strategic Imperative for Sustainable Corruption Prevention in Nigeria’s Northeast”, is not just an academic subject, but a call to action at a time when our region, and indeed our nation, cannot afford the heavy costs of corruption.

    Corruption is not an abstract governance problem; it is a lived reality that manifests in underfunded schools, dilapidated hospitals, uncompleted roads, delayed salaries, and weakened security infrastructure. Nowhere is this more visible than in the Northeast, a region with vast economic potential, yet one that has endured years of insurgency, humanitarian crises, displacement, and slow-paced recovery. In such an environment, every naira lost to corruption is a blow to survival, stability, and the dignity of our people.

    “The task before us is further complicated by the scale and complexity of resources flowing into the Northeast, from federal allocations and state budgets to humanitarian aid, donor funds, and reconstruction projects. These streams, if left without adequate oversight, become channels for mismanagement and diversion. The consequence is twofold: development stalls, and public trust in government institutions erodes.

    Against this backdrop, the role of the state Attorneys-General, as chief law officers of their respective states, becomes pivotal. You are the constitutional custodians of legal order at the state level, with authority to initiate and oversee prosecutions, advise on governance processes, and ensure that the actions of government comply with both the letter and spirit of the law.

    The ICPC, on its part, has a federal mandate not only to investigate and prosecute corrupt practices but also to engage in systemic reforms, preventive education, and inter-institutional collaboration”.

    “It is at the intersection of these mandates that the opportunity for effective partnership emerges. By working together, aligning legal authority with investigative reach, and harmonising preventive measures with prosecutorial strategies, state Attorneys-General and the ICPC can form a powerful coalition capable of closing systemic loopholes, deterring corrupt conduct, and building public confidence in governance.”

    Gaps hindering corruption fight

    While both the ICPC and the state Attorneys-General share a common mandate to uphold integrity, Sen Lawan pointed out several persistent gaps that hinder their effectiveness which according to him includes; Fragmented Legal Frameworks: These are inconsistencies between Federal and State laws which create loopholes that corrupt actors exploit.

     Weak Information Sharing:  which involves the lack of a formal, secure system for exchanging intelligence and case-related data that often leads to delays and missed opportunities for intervention;

    Capacity Constraints:  where many state-level agencies lack the financial resources and specialised training in areas like forensic accounting and cybercrime investigation needed to handle complex corruption cases.

    Other gaps according to Sen. Lawan have to do with Political Interference: which is significant challenge of political pressure on Attorneys-General to shield politically-connected individuals from prosecution;

    Lack of Proactive Monitoring:  which stresses that anti-corruption efforts are often reactive, focusing on prosecution after funds are diverted, rather than preventing corruption from happening in the first place.

    Pathways to a resilient  partnership

    To overcome these challenges, Senator Lawan in his paper outlined several practical pathways for building a more-effective and resilient partnership. His recommendations were not just about talk, but about tangible, structural change.

    “For the partnership between state Attorneys-General and the ICPC to move beyond good intentions and translate into measurable outcomes, it must be built on deliberate, structured, and sustained pathways. These pathways should not only address existing gaps but also create a proactive, resilient framework for preventing, detecting, and prosecuting corruption in the North-East,” he advised.

     Way forward

    Some of the ways forward,  suggested  by Sen. Lawan, include  Legal and Policy Harmonisation: He called for a comprehensive review of state laws to align them with federal standards and the development of a formal Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) to clearly define roles and responsibilities.

    Joint Operations and Case Management: Lawan proposed the creation of a Northeast Regional Anti-Corruption Intelligence Network and Joint Case Review Panels to facilitate intelligence sharing and coordinated prosecution strategies.

    Preventive Monitoring: The address emphasised the need for a shift from reactive to proactive measures, including the establishment of Joint Integrity Monitoring Teams to audit procurement processes and an increased focus on institutionalising ethical codes and whistleblower protections.

    Capacity Building: Senator Lawan underscored the importance of sustained training, technical assistance, and staff secondments to equip both state and federal personnel with the specialised skills needed to combat modern corruption.

    Public Engagement and Social Accountability: He argued that corruption wilts under public scrutiny and called for the active involvement of citizens, civil society organizations, and the media through accessible whistleblower channels and community-based monitoring.

    Institutionalisation: Lawan stressed that the partnership must be institutionalized through formal agreements, dedicated funding, and regular joint reviews to ensure its sustainability beyond political transitions.

    A call to action

    Concluding remarks, Senator Lawan issued a powerful call to action, urging the roundtable to move beyond discussion and into a space of  formal commitments, concrete timelines, and measurable outcomes. 

    He underscored that the North-East’s unique vulnerabilities, including the large influx of humanitarian aid and reconstruction funds, make a coordinated approach even more urgent.

    He highlighted the need to prioritize the monitoring of these funds and the auditing of reconstruction projects to ensure that resources genuinely reach the people they are intended for.

    His words; “While the fight against corruption in Nigeria’s North-East is a legal or institutional challenge, it is equally a moral, developmental, and security imperative. The region’s ongoing insurgency, humanitarian crises, and massive

    reconstruction efforts have created both urgent needs and significant resource flows. In such a context, corruption is not just an economic drain; it is a direct threat to peace building, human dignity, and the prospects for long-term stability. The partnership between State Attorneys-General and the ICPC , he said offers a unique opportunity to align legal authority with investigative capacity, policy influence with operational reach, and state-level insight with federal oversight.

    But for this partnership to achieve its full potential, it must be deliberate, coordinated, and sustained. It must be anchored in trust, guided by shared priorities, and reinforced by institutional mechanisms that survive political transitions. We must commit to joint intelligence-sharing, coordinated investigations, harmonised policies, and targeted public engagement.

    We must also prioritize the specific vulnerabilities of the North-East, monitoring humanitarian funds, scrutinizing reconstruction projects, and ensuring transparent security sector expenditures.

    “The call to action is clear: let this roundtable be the starting point for an enduring alliance, one that speaks with one voice against corruption, acts with unity of purpose, and delivers justice that is both seen and felt. Together, let us build the foundations of integrity on which the North-East’s recovery and Nigeria’s future can securely rest”, he said.

    “When spiders unite, they can tie down a lion”,  Senator Lawan said, concluding with a powerful metaphor. By uniting the legal force of the State Attorneys-General with the investigative and preventive power of the ICPC, he believes they can tie down the lion of corruption and secure the region’s future. The challenge now is for these words to translate into a lasting alliance that transforms governance and inspires national reform.

  • Sanwo-Olu assures custodial centres’ inmates of pathways for reintegration

    Sanwo-Olu assures custodial centres’ inmates of pathways for reintegration

    Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu of Lagos State has said his government willcontinue to create sustainable pathways for empowerment and reintegration for inmates of custodial centres after their release.

    The governor said this would be done through deliberate interventions in education, vocational training, entrepreneurship, and psychosocial support to the inmates of the correctional centres.

    He stated this during the 2025 Correctional Inmates Exhibition and Graduation Ceremony of Zone A Command comprising Lagos and Ogun, held at the Kirikiri Maximum Custodial Centre.

    A total of 150 inmates graduated  in trades such as carpentry, shoemaking, tailoring, electrical installation, barbing, hairdressing, catering, welding works, pure water production, air freshner/insecticides production, and several others. They were issued  Trade Test Certificates by the Federal Ministry of Labour and Productivity

    The 2025 inmates exhibition themed: “Reformed for Impact” combined education and skills acquisition to promote self employment and reduce reliance on paper qualifications, among others.

    Governor Sanwo-Olu, who was represented by his Special Assistant on Development Agenda for Western Nigeria (DAWN), Hon. Sunmi Lanre Odesanya, stated: “Our ultimate goal is to replace cycles of crime and despair with those of hope, productivity, and impact. “Many of our reformed citizens are already making their families and Lagos proud”, he stated.

    The governor also assured the graduates of the centre of a better future.

    “To the graduates, I say your journey of transformation has only just begun. The skills you have gained are not just tools for survival but instruments of impact. Step into the society with confidence, knowing that Lagos State believes in you and that the world is waiting for your light to shine.”

    Governor Sanwo-Olu recounted tne words of James Schoolcraft Sherman, the 27th Vice President of the United States, who once said: “You cannot go back and make a brand new start, but you can start today and make a brand new ending.”

    Read Also: UPDATED: Sanwo-Olu renames Lagos Industrial Leather Hub after Remi Tinubu

    He said: ” I pray that each of you will write a better ending to your story, by God’s grace. Let me assure you that the Lagos State Government will continue to work with relevant agencies and stakeholders to build a safe, inclusive, and prosperous Lagos where no one is left behind.”

    The governor also reiterated “the welfare and future of all Lagosians,  including those within correctional facilities, remain at the heart of our administration. Through the Plus in our THEMES Plus Developmental Agenda, we have reaffirmed our commitment to gender equality, social inclusion, and youth empowerment.”

    The governor, through Dawn’s Special Assistant, Hon, Sunmi Odesanya, commended the leadership of the Nigeria Correctional Service (NCoS) and its partners for creating opportunities for “our brothers and sisters” in custody to rediscover themselves through skills acquisition, moral reorientation, and empowerment initiatives.

    The Controller General, Nigerian Correctional Service (NCoS), Sylvester Nwakuche, in his address, charged the inmates to use the skills acquired to define their future, not their past.

    “Live out the meaning of the  theme, “Reformed for Impact”  by using what you have learned to positively touch lives and build a better future for yourself, your family and the society.”

    Nwakuche described the skills acquired by the inmates as “practical, marketable skills that open doors for legitimate livelihood, and enable successful re-entry into society as productive citizens.

    “This is in line with the spirit of NCoS Act 2019 which emphasises the shift from punitive to correctional philosophy in penal management.

    “Through skill acquisition and formal education, we are steadily reducing recidivism, fostering reconciliation between inmates and their families, and proving that rehabilitation is both a possibility and a reality”, he said.

    The Controller General of the NCoS remarked that the theme of the graduation ceremony perfectly captures the essence of the event, which he said was  to show that “custodial centres can and do produce individuals who are transformed, equipped, and ready to make a positive difference in society.

    “The purpose of this programme is to give visibility to the empowerment and educational initiatives we have sustained across our facilities. These programmes are not simply about training hands; they are about shaping minds, restoring confidence, and creating opportunities for a new beginning”, Nwakuche further stressed.

    He acknowledged President, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, whose unwavering support and vision for a modern correctional system, he said,  have provided the enabling environment for the programmes  to thrive.

    The CG, NCoS also appreciated the  Minister of Interior, Dr Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, whose steadfast leadership and policy direction, he noted have translated the vision into concrete action.

    “His dedication to correctional transformation ensures that our service receives the resources, oversight and encouragement necessary to achieve the results”, he said.

    He acknowledged that Dr Tunji-Ojo’s steadfast leadership and policy direction have translated this graduating inmates adding that they have used the period of incarceration not as a setback, but as a platform for growth and have embraced learning, discipline, and hard work.

    He also commended the efforts of the initiator /coordinator of the event, the Zonal Public Relations Officer of Alagbon Command, Superintendent of Correction (SC) Nsikan Blessing for her industry and published books, including “Activate Your potential; Principles of Giving; Reasons To Pray For Leaders; Why I am In Prison: and “Stars Behind Bars”, copies of which the author presented to him.

    Assistant Inspector General of Police (AIG), Zone II,  Fayoade Adegoke in his remark acknowledged that the inmates found themselves in the custodial centres following police investigations and subsequent orders and judgments of the courts.

    “The custodial centres are living up to their names by correcting the attitudes brought here by the inmates and making them better persons”, he noted.

    He urged the inmates to take advantage of the reformation and skills acquisition programmes being offered by the custodial centres to prepare them for integration and acceptance by the society on completion of their terms.

    Brigadier General Mathew Oyekola, who represented the Garrison Officer Commanding 81 Division, shared the views of the AIG Zone II, saying that whenever the military arrest criminals, they are handed over to the police for necessary investigation and prosecution,

    “I always have my men outside keeping watch, I have never been inside. But today, I am happy that you have given me the permission and opportunity to see the inside and wonderful things that you are doing with the inmates inside this place”, he said.

    Earlier in a welcome address, Assistant Controller General of Corrections (ACG) Ope Fatinikun remarked that the exhibition showcases the talents and skills of the inmates, highlighted their potentials for rehabilitation and reintegration into the society.

    ACG Fatinikun said that the exhibition also serves as a testament to the power of second chance and the human spirit’s capacity for growth and transformation.

    “As we celebrate the creativity and achievements of our inmates, we also acknowledge the complexities and challenges that lie ahead.

    “We recognize that rehabilitation is a journey, nit a destination, and we are committed to providing our inmates with the support and resources they need to thrive”, he said.

    He therefore urged all “to engage the inmates, learn from their experiences and explore opportunities for collaboration and support” adding, “together we can make a meaningful difference in the lives of those who need it most. So after they are corrected, you can look at them to come back into the society.”

    He expressed appreciation to the Controller General and all his able management team, saying, “what I have seen here today is actually beyond my expectation and I sincerely appreciate the opportunity to have a good time here. I appreciate the fact that wonderful things are happening here within the four walls that we see so high.”

    SC Nsikan Blessing, who is also the Initiator/Coordinator of the exhibition programme,  in a preface,  remarked that reformation is a collective responsibility in view of the fact that “inmates are from our communities and will return to the communities as neighbours, friends, business associates or even future spouses. Our collective joy lies in seeing inmates pass through the Reform System and reintegrate into the society as law abiding and contributing members.

    “As correctional officers, we take pride in changing the lives of the inmates and seeing ex-inmates contributing to the nation’s peace and growth”, she said even as she expressed pride that her pet project which is spreading to other custodial centres and cottage industries, has now been adopted as a zonal programme earning accolades.

  • Oil dispute: Court acquits Asemota, others over alleged felony

    Oil dispute: Court acquits Asemota, others over alleged felony

    The Lagos State High Court sitting at Ikeja, has discharged and acquitted Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Mettle Energy & Gas Limited, Osahon Asemota, along with six others, in a protracted oil dispute regarding the alleged 10,000 tons of contaminated petroleum products estimated at over $11,000,000.

    Recall that the Inspector General of Police, had in November 2018, arraigned Mr. Asemota, Mettle Energy & Gas Limited and others before Justice Mojisola Dada.

    They were arraigned on a three -count charge of conspiracy to commit felony, stealing and receiving stolen property, in Suit No:ID//980c/2018: FRN V. Trafigura & 6 Ors.

    The prosecution called over 16 witnesses, including industry experts and investigators, to build its case. However, as the defence presented its evidence, a pivotal shift occurred. The office of the Attorney-General of the Federation took over from police prosecutors after the defendants had opened their cases and concluded their defence.

    However, after reviewing the case, the office of the Attorney-General filed a notice of discontinuance dated May 5, 2025.

    As a result, the team of defence counsels argued that the defendants were entitled not only to a discharge but also to an acquittal because they have fielded two witnesses already.

    Read Also: PENGASSAN: Policy instability in oil sector may scare investors

    They relied on Section 108 (3) of the Administration of Justice Act, 2015 in buttressing their point.

    In her ruling, Justice Dada, agreed with the defendants, asserting that: “whereas in this case not only have the defendants been called upon to open their defence, they have already started same and called two witnesses before the filing of the Notice of Discontinuance.

    “This therefore satisfies the reason for the order discharging and acquitting the defendants forthwith and I so hold. Defendants are accordingly hereby discharged and acquitted,” the Judge ruled.

    Reacting to the judgment, Asemota, who hailed the judiciary for the ruling after a protracted legal battle, said: “I have always believed in the rule of law and that is why I have always attended court sittings because I needed to clear my name.

    “This verdict did not only clear my name and that of others but it has also ensured that we are protected from any retrial due to the painstaking effort made by the court to ensure fairness and transparency throughout the trial.”

    Also speaking, defence counsel, A. Udoh, who also hailed the judgment, said: “This judgment has put to rest the very erroneous and wicked belief being parroted by mischief makers that our client stole the same product he purchased with his hard-earned money.

    “Like they say the judiciary is the last hope of the ordinary man and today the court has done justice to this matter. It’s sad that people out of selfish interest could conspire against our client on this matter.

    However, we are happy, that after several years of legal battle, Justice was done” he stated.

  • Businessman jailed one year for exporting banned drugs

    Businessman jailed one year for exporting banned drugs

    By Racheal Isenere

    A Federal High Court, sitting at Ikoyi, Lagos has sentenced a businessman, Omoregie Uyiosa, to one year imprisonment for unlawful exportation of prohibited drugs.

    Justice Deinde Dipeolu however gave the convict an option of fine in the sum of N7million in lieu of imprisonment.

     Justice Dipeolu convicted the businessman after he pleaded guilty to a two count-charge of unlawful exportation of the prohibited drugs made against him by the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA).

    The prosecutor, Abu Ibrahim, told the court that he arrested the convict with 3.60 kilograms of Tramadol, a Narcotic Analgesic and 400 grams of Rohypnol psychotropic substance, on July 16, 2025, which he intended to smuggle to Pakistan, at the Tarmac Baggage Hall Basement of the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Ikeja Lagos.

     The prosecutor told the court that the convict was arrested by the joint operatives of Aviation Security (AVSEC) and the NDLEA.

    He told the court that the illegal act of the convict, contravened section 11(b) of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Act Cap. N30, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004, and punishable under the same Act.

    The convicted businessman admitted committing the illegal acts, and pleaded guilty to charges against him.

    Based on his plea and exhibits tendered, the prosecutor urged the court to convict and sentence him in accordance with Section 274(2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015.

    However, the convict’s lawyer, Dennis Warri, in his allocutor, pleaded with the court to be merciful with his client.

    Read Also: U. S. Visa applicants, social media disclosure: A risky overreach with dire consequences for Nigerians

    Dennis, specifically pleaded with the court to give his client a non-custodian sentence or a fine option in lieu of the imprisonment.

     Justice Dipeolu in his judgment, sentenced the convicted businessman to a year imprisonment on each count.

    The judge, while ordered that the jail-term shall run concurrently however, awarded a N7 million fine option on the convict in lieu of the jail-term.

    The charges against the convict stated: “that you Omoregie Nice Uyiosa,  on or about the 16th July 2025 during the joint examination by officers of Aviation Security (AVSEC) and the ndlea at the tarmac baggage hall basement of the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Ikeja Lagos without lawful authority exported 3.60 kilograms of tramadol, a narcotic analgesic similar to cocaine, lsd, heroin and you thereby committed an act which is an offence contrary to and punishable under section 11(b) of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Act Cap. N30, Laws Of The Federation Of Nigeria, 2004,

     “That you Omoregie Nice Uyiosa, on or about the 16th July 2025 during the joint examination by officers of aviation security (AVSEC) and the NDLEA at the tarmac baggage hall basement of the Murtala Muhammed International Airport Ikeja-Lagos without lawful authority exported 400 grams of rohypnol psychotropic substance under international control and you thereby committed act which is an offence contrary to and punishable under section 11(b) of National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Act Cap. N30, Laws Of The Federation Nigeria, 2004.”

  • NBA slams police over probe of Anambra A-G

    NBA slams police over probe of Anambra A-G

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has condemned what it described as an unconstitutional and provocative attempt by the police to investigate the Attorney-General of Anambra State for exercising his lawful powers to discontinue a criminal matter through a nolle prosequi.

    In a statement by NBA President, Mazi Afam Osigwe (SAN), the association described the actions of the police, particularly the Inspector General of Police’s Monitoring Unit, as “an overreach” and a “brazen assault” on the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    The controversy stems from the invitation and detention of the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) and several law officers in the Anambra State Ministry of Justice by the IGP’s team in Abuja.

    The officers were reportedly released on bail after questioning over their role in the Attorney-General’s decision to withdraw a criminal case from court.

    The NBA argued that such action not only undermines the constitutional powers vested in the office of the Attorney-General under Section 211 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) but also poses a serious threat to the rule of law and democratic governance.

    “It is shocking and indeed provocative that the IGP Monitoring Unit invited and released on bail law officers for exercising the power of the state attorney general to enter nolle prosequi,” the statement read.

    The legal body further warned that the police do not possess the authority to question, investigate, or interfere with the Attorney-General’s prerogative to discontinue criminal proceedings.

    “This power is not even subject to judicial review, let alone police scrutiny,” Osigwe emphasised.

    In an unprecedented move, the police have also extended an invitation to the Attorney-General himself, a step the NBA says could set a dangerous precedent.

    Read Also: Nigeria, Brazil to seal deals in  aviation, livestock, other sectors

    “If this is allowed to happen, the Police may one day purport to have the power to investigate a judicial officer for delivering judgments,” Osigwe warned.

    The NBA called on the Inspector General of Police to “cease and desist” from the investigation and to issue an unreserved public apology to the affected law officers and the Attorney-General.

    The association also expressed concern about the recurring abuse of the IGP’s Monitoring Unit in matters that should ordinarily be handled by local police divisions, noting the logistical and financial burden placed on invitees who are compelled to travel from various parts of the country to Abuja.

    “This mode of investigation, which is usually abused, must be reviewed. It imposes great cost on persons being investigated and disrupts their daily activities,” the statement added.

    The NBA further issues a firm directive to its National Litigation Committee, chaired by Ama Etuwewe, SAN, to immediately provide legal representation to the affected officers and pursue all legal remedies to protect their fundamental rights.

    The association also urged the legal community to see the development as a wake-up call to ensure lawyers are protected from undue harassment and to hold errant law enforcement officers accountable through prosecution, disciplinary action, and public disclosure.

  • Oloja-elect sues monarch, IG over alleged harassment, land dispute

    Oloja-elect sues monarch, IG over alleged harassment, land dispute

    The Oloja-elect of Lagos, Prince Abiola Olojo Kosoko, has filed a fundamental rights enforcement suit at the Federal High Court against the Oba of Lagos, Oba Rilwan Akiolu, the Inspector-General of Police and others.

    It arose from a dispute over land ownership in the Ogombo area of Eti-Osa Local Government, as well as succession to the prestigious Oloja of Lagos chieftaincy title.

    The applicant said he is the acknowledged Oloja-elect of Lagos and a direct descendant of King Kosoko, a historic warrior-king whose reign shaped the political and territorial history of Lagos.

    The respondents include the IGP, Assistant Inspector General of Police, Zone 2, Onikan; Deputy Commissioner of Police, Bello Muhammed; CSP Mariam Ogunmolasuyi, Inspector Ebere, Oba Akiolu, and Olumegbon Ajah Chieftaincy Family Property & Investments Ltd, a subsidiary of the Olumegbon royal family.

    Prince Kosoko alleged that Oba Akiolu, leveraging his connections within the police hierarchy, used law enforcement agencies to arrest workers on Kosoko family land at Ogombo, detain them in inhumane conditions, and file criminal charges over what is fundamentally a civil dispute.

    The applicant noted that a Lagos High Court had, in Suit No. LD/12881LMW/2022, delivered judgment in favour of the Kosoko family, recognising their ownership of 114.476 hectares of land at Ogombo.

    He stated that the court’s consent judgment, delivered on November 12, 2024 by Justice O.O. Ogunjobi, settled the ownership dispute in favour of the family.

    Despite this, Kosoko claimed that the Oba of Lagos continued to sponsor police interventions on the land instead of challenging the judgment through the Court of Appeal.

    “Ownership of land is a purely civil matter and not criminal in nature.

    “The sixth respondent (Oba Akiolu) has the right to appeal the judgment of the High Court, which he has failed to do.

    “Instead, he is using the Police and government agencies to intimidate me and collect my family land,” the affidavit reads in part.

    The applicant claimed his family had previously instituted another suit – FHC/L/CS/308/2025, before Justice Aluko of the Federal High Court, against the IG and others, over similar police harassment.

    Kosoko further claimed that the real aim of these actions is not only to seize the Ogombo land but also to strip his family of its traditional claim to the Oloja of Lagos title, which has historically belonged to the Kosoko lineage.

    Read Also: Nigerian fashion designer breaks World Record with 50-Metre sleeves

    Tracing his lineage, the Oloja-elect recounted that his ancestor, King Kosoko, acquired vast lands stretching from Lagos Island to Epe through warfare and conquest.

    He stated that a September 28, 1854 treaty reportedly recognised Kosoko’s territorial claims, and a subsequent 1863 treaty ceded Lekki and Porto Novo outposts to the British colony of Lagos.

    He argued that the Ogombo lands form part of this ancestral estate, and that any contrary claim, including that of the Olumegbon family through their investment company, is legally invalid, given the unchallenged 2024 High Court judgment.

    “The sixth respondent has been heard to boast that aside from being the Paramount Traditional Ruler of Lagos, he equally doubles as a senior of the second respondent and there is nothing that he wants from the first and second respondents that they would not do for him,” the applicant swore.

    Prince Kosoko, through his counsel, L.A. Alabi, B.A. Okoni, and Mrs A.O. Akinleye, is urging the court to grant “a declaration enforcing his fundamental human rights, particularly protection from harassment, intimidation, and unlawful arrest”.

    He seeks “an order restraining the police and the Oba of Lagos from further interference with his family’s land at Ogombo.”

    Oba Akiolu is expected to respond to the suit, while no date has been fixed for the hearing.

  • Arbitration experts, users plot ways to cut costs, delays

    Arbitration experts, users plot ways to cut costs, delays

    Stakeholders in the legal sector have called for greater accountability, realism, and strategic collaboration among users and practitioners in a bid to address the challenges of cost and delay in arbitration.

    These views were expressed at a Breakfast Dialogue themed “When Arbitration Disappoints: An In-House Counsel’s Reality Check on Cost, Delay & Unmet Expectations” and organized by the Corporate and In-House Counsel Committee of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb), Nigeria Branch.

    The event, held at Four Points by Sheraton, Victoria Island, Lagos, was sponsored by Stren & Blan Partners, and brought together corporate and in-house counsel, arbitrators, and dispute resolution professionals.

    In her opening remarks, Mrs. Olusola Adegbonmire, Chair of the CIArb Nigeria Branch, reaffirmed the Institute’s commitment to promoting excellence in arbitration and urged users to embrace ongoing training and professional development programmes to better manage their dispute resolution portfolios.

    Dr. Nike Esan (PhD, FCIArb), Chair of the Corporate and In-House Counsel Committee, emphasized the need for parties —particularly claimants — to adopt more realistic expectations and avoid inflated claims that unnecessarily escalate the cost of arbitration. She warned that exaggerated sense of entitlement and adversarial attitudes contribute significantly to the inefficiencies that frustrate arbitration users.

    The Guest Speaker, Mr. Olatunji Mayaki, Chairman of Sterling Bank Plc, underscored the human dynamics behind most disputes and stressed the need for empathy in dispute management. He urged in-house counsel to simplify legal issues through early case assessments and mock arbitrations to guide informed decision-making. In a Fireside Chat with Mrs. Justina Lewa, Vice Chair of the Committee, Mr. Mayaki further discussed practical strategies for managing arbitration timelines and costs, including well-drafted dispute clauses and choosing reliable, experienced arbitrators.

    Participants at the event emphasized that while arbitration is designed to be faster and more cost-effective than litigation, its success depends on the attitude of users. Some noted that the tendency to inflate claims, adopt adversarial postures, or treat arbitration as a precursor to litigation undermines its core benefits. It was also highlighted that poor drafting of arbitration clauses and selection of inexperienced or unqualified arbitrators often lead to procedural gridlocks and unenforceable awards.

    In his remarks, Dr. Adeyemi Agbelusi, Honorary Secretary of CIArb Nigeria Branch, advocated for the inclusion of negotiation and mediation clauses within arbitration agreements to narrow issues in dispute and promote early resolution. He also delivered a brief presentation and live demonstration of the CIArb Nigeria “Cost Calculator,” a user-friendly tool designed to help parties estimate arbitration costs in advance and make more informed budgeting decisions.

    Read Also: Nigeria, others to unlock $100b in growing Africa’s refining capacity

    Mr. Amala Umeike, Founding Partner of Stren & Blan Partners, called for a shift in focus from cost to value, emphasizing that arbitration should be evaluated on the quality of outcomes it delivers rather than its price tag. He decried the inconsistency of parties who promote arbitration but resort to litigation when faced with unfavourable outcomes, a trend that has led some companies to begin to exclude arbitration clauses from their contracts.

    Interactive sessions led by Mr. Victor Igwe, the committee secretary, and Ms. Ozioma Agu, a Partner at Stren & Blan Partners, further explored practical ways to manage user expectations and realign arbitration with its core values of efficiency and finality.

    The event was compered by Ms. Efosa Ewere, and concluded with a renewed call for stronger collaboration between arbitrators and users —especially corporate counsel — toward restoring confidence in arbitration and ensuring that it remains a viable, credible, and cost-effective mechanism for dispute resolution in Nigeria.

    The event was attended by past and current Ciarb Nigeria executives including former chairmen, Mrs. Funke Adekoya SAN and Chief Gbola Akinola SAN, as well as Mr. Seyilayo Ojo SAN and former Nigerian Bar Association Lagos Branch Chairman, Mr. Yemi Akangbe SAN.

    The committee was recently established by CIArb Nigeria to deepen engagement between arbitrators and corporate counsel, strengthen trust in arbitration, and promote user-focused strategies for procedural efficiency, cost management, and effective dispute avoidance.

  • Ruling House debunks Awujale lineage allegations

    Ruling House debunks Awujale lineage allegations

    The Oba Anikinaiya Ruling House of Ijebuland has debunked a claim that the “Adeyemi family” was excluded from the ruling lineage of the Awujale of Ijebuland.

    In a statement by the Family Head (Olori Ebi), Prince Toheeb Alaga, the House described the claims as false, misleading, and historically unfounded. The house stressed that there is no Adeyemi Ruling House in Ijebuland.

    It reaffirmed that the legitimate royal family is the Anikinaiya Ruling House, from which past monarchs, including the Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona, descended.

    Read Also: How a Nigerian Entrepreneur Built a $200K Warehouse in the U.S, Then Made It Free for African Exporters

    The statement clarified that the Anikinaiya Ruling House is firmly rooted in Ijebu royal traditions, with recognised lineages such as Mabadeje, Adekoya Ofirigidi, and Ade-ewu Adeire, all of whom have produced notable princes and leaders who contributed significantly to the history of Ijebuland.

    Oba Anikinaiya Ruling House announced its authorised representatives as Prince Toheeb Alaga – Adeleke Ogbagba (Olori Ebi/Family Head); Prince Hamzat Tommy – Mabadeje (General Secretary); Prince Olawunmi Samuel – Adekoya Ofirigidi (Assistant General Secretary); Prince Fatai Osinaike – Ade-ewu Adeire (Treasurer), and  Prince Rasaki Oladunjoye – Ademolu Fesogbade (Financial Secretary).

    “The public is, therefore, advised to disregard any statements, claims, or representations regarding the Awujale lineage made by unauthorised individuals or groups.

    “Our heritage is over a century old, steeped in Ijebu royal tradition.

    “We will continue to defend the integrity of our history and call for respect for the authority of the Anikinaiya Ruling House in all matters concerning the Awujale lineage,” the statement concluded.

  • Oil dispute: Court acquit Asemota, others over alleged felony

    Oil dispute: Court acquit Asemota, others over alleged felony

    The Lagos State High Court sitting at Ikeja, has discharged and acquitted Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Mettle Energy & Gas Limited, Osahon Asemota, along with six others, in a protracted oil dispute regarding the alleged 10,000 tons of contaminated petroleum products estimated at over $11,000,000.

    Recall that the Inspector General of Police, had in November 2018, arraigned Mr Asemota, Mettle Energy & Gas Limited and others before Justice Mojisola Dada.

    They were arraigned on a three count charge of conspiracy to commit felony, stealing and receiving stolen property, in Suit No:ID//980c/2018: FRN V. Trafigura & 6 Ors.

    The prosecution called over 16 witnesses, including industry experts and investigators, to build its case. However, as the defense presented its evidence, a pivotal shift occurred. The office of the Attorney General of the Federation took over from police prosecutors after the defendants had opened their cases and concluded their defence.

    However, after reviewing the case, the office of the Attorney General filed a notice of discontinuance dated May 5, 2025.

    As a result, the team of defence counsels argued that the defendants were entitled not only to a discharge but also to an acquittal because they have fielded two witnesses already.

    Read Also: From rage to reform: Nigeria’s path to true reconciliation

    They relied on section 108 (3) of the Administration of Justice Act, 2015 in buttressing their point.

    In her ruling, Justice Dada, agreed with the defendants asserting that: “whereas in this case not only have the defendants been called upon to open their defence, they have already started same and called two witnesses before the filing of the Notice of Discontinuance.

    “This therefore satisfies the reason for the order discharging and acquitting the defendants forthwith and I so hold. Defendants are accordingly hereby discharged and acquitted,” the Judge ruled.

    Reacting to the judgment, Asemota who hailed the judiciary for the ruling after a protracted legal battle said: “I have always believed in the rule of law and that is why i have always attended court sittings because i needed to clear my name.

    “This verdict did not only clear my name and that of others but it has also ensured that we are protected from any retrial due to the painstaking effort made by the court to ensure fairness and transparency throughout the trial.”

    Also speaking, defence counsel, A. Udoh, who also hailed the judgment said: “This judgment has put to rest the very erroneous and wicked belief being parroted by mischief makers that our client stole the same product he purchased with his hard earned money.

    “Like they say the judiciary is the last hope of the ordinary man and today the court has done justice to this matter. It’s sad that people out of selfish interest could conspire against our client on this matter.

    However, we are happy, that after several years of legal battle, Justice was done” he stated.