Category: Online Special

  • Five critical ways of making money you should know

    What I heard from nearly every expert was that making money comes down to a few simple ideas like creating high-value products and making your money work for you.

    – Don’t rely on just one source of income. Diversify so you have money coming in from multiple sources.

    – Focus on creating passive sources of income when you can. This will keep your income growing even when you take a break.

    – Automate your marketing system through a sales funnel including emails, videos and advertising.

    – Develop a brand, something people know you by and respect you for as an expert in the topic.

    – Balance selling other peoples products with products of your own like books, video courses and consulting.
    According to research the richest persons in the whole world are know to be business persons who try every other way to make sure there earnings doesn’t come from one area.

    I have found a better way you can double your earnings by just joining this platform and start making money UPTO 300k plus in less than 1month. Start now by reading more here=>>Click here to read more

  • Google pulls out 3.2 billion bad ads from sites

    Google pulled out 3.2 billion bad ads from sites in 2017, an official, Ms Jessica Stansfield, said in Lagos on Wednesday. 

    Stansfield, the Head of Global Product Policy, Monetised Products, Google Trust and Safety Europe, the Middle East and Africa, gave the figure during a video conference.

    She said that Google pulled out the bad ads with the aid of policies, technology and people.

    According to Stansfield, the figure shows more than 100 per cent increase from the 2016 figure which stood at 1.7 billion.

    “In 2017, we took down more than 3.2 billion ads that violated our advertising policies, which is more than 100 bad ads per second.

    “This means we are able to block the majority of bad ad experiences, such as malvertising and phishing scams before the scams impacted on people.

    “We blocked 79 million ads in our network for attempting to send people to malware-laden sites.

    “We equally removed 66 million “trick-to-click” ads as well as 48 million ads that were attempting to get users to install unwanted software,” she said.

    The official said that digital advertising played an important role in making the web what it was.

    “In order for this ads-supported free web work for everyone, it needs to be safe.

    “It should also be an effective place to learn, create and advertise, but unfortunately, this is not always the case.

    “To make things work and move smoothly, Google has introduced many measures to checkmate online ad violators.

    “For the last 15 years, Google, in a bid to keep the ecosystem safe, has invested in people, technology and policies to help fight issues such as ad fraud, malware and content scammers,’’ she said.

    Stansfield listed some of the actions that constituted the violation as scraping which had to do with copying others’ contents, tabloid cloaking – deception of someone to click on a site,  malicious activity and malware.

    She said that, to remove sites that created and spread deceptive content online, Google introduced a technology called Page-level enforcement that allowed removal of over 28 million URLs monthly.

    According to the official, Page-level enforcement technology allows better protection of advertisers by removing more bad ads from more sites while minimising the impact on legitimate publishers.

    “This new technology has been critical in helping to scale enforcement for policies that prohibit monetisation of inappropriate and controversial content,” she said.

    Stansfield said that Google was constantly updating policies as new threats emerged, adding that in 2017, 28 new advertiser policies and 20 new publisher policies were added to combat new threats and improve ad experience online.

    She said that in 2018, Google would be adding several new policies to address ads in unregulated or speculative financial products such as binary options, crypto currency and foreign exchange markets.

    She said that Google had already updated gambling policies to address new methods of gambling with items that had real-world value.

    “Google will introduce a new certification process for rehabilitation facilities, allowing legitimate facilities in this space to connect with users in need,” she added.

    NAN

  • It is time to mount the horse to prove your mettle

    First, please permit me to begin by acknowledging your demonstrated prowess in the proactive, timely and appropriate responses to the 2015 multiple electioneering campaigns issues of national and international dimensions, when you served as the APC National Publicity Secretary.

    Sir, your  clarity of thoughts in handling the emergent issues adequately elucidated Nigerians greatly. And it sufficiently psyched them to opt for the clear and rewarding choice of leadership change in favour of the incumbent APC national government led by   President Muhammedu Buhari.

    I believe,  like most Nigerians that your inclusion into the  cabinet of the Buhari Presidency and handing over  to you the portfolio of Minister of Information and National Orientation was indisputable.

    Apparently, it was a decision propelled by your past antecedents in competencies on information dissemination and publicity management. Many of us hailed your choice, because we felt you had the knack and the bite to assist immensely in disseminating or projecting the laudable policies, programmes and projects of the Buhari Presidency.

    But regrettably, the fire in you which swelled your camp of admirers, by deflating malicious and sentimental propaganda against the establishment you represent has waned, if not outrightly extinguished in the last two years.

    The next general elections are drawing nearer. And overt or clandestine malicious campaigns have been mounted against the government you serve, implicating your principal and attempting to rubbish the performance records of President Buhari.  The campaigners freely downplay his enormous achievements in various sectors of the economy, with deliberately concocted falsehoods and misrepresentations.

    But your office seeming to delight more in silently consenting to the free reign of these disgruntled opposition elements is spiting and spatting on the face of the APC led Federal Government of Nigeria. They brand it all sorts of derogatory names before your watchful eyes.

    Nigerians are shocked at the sudden cold feet you have developed in effectively performing your official responsibilities of articulating the programmes and projects of the Buhari Presidency.  This proclivity has been entrenched to the extent that even ‘Lilliputians’ in information management appeared to have inexplicably and speechlessly suppressed the enormous strength and prowess, we believed,  you possessed in this professed specialty.

    President Buhari and the government he leads has become a free punching bag for liars, detractors, saboteurs and enemies of the state, who hurl every falsehood to the public domain unchallenged.

    These retrogressive elements are succeeding is misleading vulnerable Nigerians, with these smart schemes.   But it is glaring that you have abdicated your responsibilities of enunciating a concrete agenda of information dissemination and stimulation of robust public debate among Nigerians on the performances of the Buhari Presidency.

    In its stead, you have consciously marooned Nigerians on the Island and donated the citizenry to the rumour mill  and or, denial of information, which the opposition is exploiting maximally in plotting their evil agenda against Nigeria. You have lost the gripping touch and the engaging golden voice once accustomed with you.

    Sir, where is thy golden voice?  I must confess and with all sense of responsibility, humility and all fairness to you and Almighty God, that you have proven us wrong by not doing enough in the present circumstance. It is now more convenient to assert that you appear to have lost track of your responsibilities and roles, as Nigeria’s mouthpiece,   as you are conspicuously not doing enough. Should we now suggest that you are better at the party secretariat and should therefore, be redeployed to the base?

    I am amazed that you have not realized the whole gamut of a strategic communication of this magnitude, at a time the image of your country is severely battered and deprecated. Please,  you need to adopt  both conventional and non-conventional approaches, like the revival of public enlightenment campaigns, as even defined by the nomenclature of the ministry you superintend.

    Again, occasional visits to states, where federal projects have been undertaken or are ongoing to interact with the people and raise platforms of awareness of the existence of such projects is imperative now.

    Sir, with due respect, it is time to mount the proverbial horse and ride to prove your mettle or else  I am tempted to believe that it’s either Nigerians overrated  your competence  or  simply, you pass casually, just like  one  of the many  indolent state governors who merely rode on  the wings and benevolence  of President Buhari to be shadowy  super stars in  the corridors of power.

    We all know in reality that everything that aligns with President Buhari markets itself. But time has come to do the needful, by arresting the prevalent inactions your office has slipped into,   to keep Nigerians constantly informed

    I appreciate your audience. May God give you the necessary wisdom, guidance and strength to match the demands of the moment.

    Regards,

    Chief Philip  Agbese

  • The ONE Campaign must apologize to Africans and African women

    In the face of the #metoo crisis in the Aid sector, the ONE Campaign, a leading global organization purporting to fight poverty and preventable disease in Africa, has yet to come forward and apologize for the hypocrisy of campaigning for women’s empowerment yet systematically creating a day to day work environment that is hostile to women and persistently harassing and humiliating Africans and women. African women have borne the worst of the brunt of this hypocrisy.

    My experience at ONE saw inappropriate conduct by top management and widespread ill treatment of professional women across the organization, particularly senior women in the executive management team. ONE is an organization in which every woman reaches a breaking point or in my case the point where you #icantbreath and so a number of these brilliant women leaders at ONE left the organization in part because they couldn’t take the subtle and open hostility they faced from from speaking truth to power or believing that African perspectives should be central to the organization as Africa was where the organization’s work is focused. They were labelled “disasters”, “bad people” and “worse leaders” especially once they’d left. I had my own special derogatory labels… The queen of Africa, snob, arrogant, and no doubt the b word.

    ONE does not handle rejection well and like a scorned lover, trashes people through the mud for choosing to move on “without their permission”. The talented Molly Kinder, Lisa Gibby and Eloise Todd are cases in point. ONE of them had the temerity to tell the ONE board the truth about ONE management. And in typical ONE fashion the victims are turned into villains by the magical powers of misdirection that ONE has so perfectly honed. A quick look at Glassdoor.com reviews and feedback by ONE European and American employees, exposes ONE as an organization that is run by white men in London and DC claiming to be working for Africa and with no respect for women.
    Being an African at ONE is to be inferior. Nothing therefore offends the sensibilities of the white saviour complex of ONE leadership in DC and London than an African attempting to have a point of view about development or poverty. I can speak more openly about Dambisa Moyo because their attacks on her were more public, with all the resources and voices they could mobilize to discredit her following the publishing of her NYT best seller Dead Aid in 2009. They were offended to their messianic core that an African woman (more educated than the average northern citizen) could dare to add her voice to the debate on Africa’s development and the direction it should be taking. And so ONE launched an aggressive and sys tematic smear campaign, at times unfortunately using unsuspecting “credible” African voices to discredit Dambisa.

    I fell out of favor with the powers that be quite early in my employment there for the audacity of refusing to publish any criticism of Dambisa or Dead Aid by way of media articles. That I could even talk back as they were trying to shove down my throat the argument that Dambisa’s work was analytically weak, shallow on evidence and altogether factually wrong; and challenging them with a response which became my refrain could only be equated to blasphemy. My line was “with all due respect to Jeffrey Sachs and the good work he is doing in the name of Africa, you would need to convince me that a white man cares more or is even capable of caring more for and about Africa and its people than an African woman!” This refrain never failed to turn faces red but I felt strongly that it was my duty to defend Dambisa’s professional, intellectual and moral integrity when it comes to Africa’s development if for no other reason than the fact that she was an African woman speaking truth to power. Besides, I never heard a compelling argument from her opponents other than the usual patronizing equivalent of africans will be extinct without aid.

    Furthermore, as I was setting up ONE’s presence in Africa I thought it was a good idea to set up a policy advisory board again in an effort to ensure that we were systematically bringing authentic African voices and perspective to the global organization as well as to the Board of directors. I was grateful that DC and London agreed for me to set this up. Populating it with the best African minds was easy given my previous two decades of experience as a development expert having lived in 10 countries working for the major multilateral development agencies which meant that I had a formidable Rolodex of African intellectuals in my orbit.
    What I had not anticipated was the narrow hidden agenda by the management in agreeing to an Africa policy advisory board, which was to finish their unsettled score with Dambisa Moyo as opposed to my foolish idealism of helping to deepen ONEs engagement with Africa. This approach to them made sense since I had, much to the chagrin of my then new bosses in London and DC, categorically refused to lead their campaign to discredit Dr Moyo.

    But despite being caught in that “rock and hard place” space where they couldn’t live with me and couldn’t live without me at the same time, we soldiered on for five rock solid years smashing all ONE historical records. So in this love-hate relationships, they liked the success and association with it despite the personal resentment, hate and jealousy by the “leadership” of ONE in DC and London who made it their mission to undermine me at every turn.

    I tried not to judge them too harshly. After all, other than a few African ministers or high level African professionals they’d come across but who were not employed by them and therefore could not be patronized by ONE, how would they in their world view ever have known how to interact with an African woman who was not dying of HIV/AIDS under a tree in an African village. Complicating matters even further an African woman whose parents and grandparents were also educated, enlightened, worldly and cultured in ways they could not fathom. They couldn’t possibly know what to do with me, so pity seemed the more appropriate emotion in regarding them than annoyance as I co-existed with my bosses.

    To sum it up, Dr. Dambisa Moyo’s rising star and attendant stardom destabilized them in familiar ways that all successful confident Africans destabilize them, as she popularized widely held views on the failure of aid. Specifically, ONE’s top leadership were offended that an African woman could boldly raise her voice against AID rather than be grateful to the aid campaigners and aid givers. To them this was the ultimate taboo and what followed was their special venomous blend of aggressive racism and sexism reserved only for women who look and sound like Dr Dambisa Moyo.

    But if Dambisa in her own time ever wants to share her experience about the aggression she suffered driven by ONE attempts to mute her, she will. I can only attest to the ruthlessness of ONE against African women while engaging in their favourite pastime of poverty tourism. There are so many stories of unrelenting emotional and verbal abuse as well as outright incendiary and subliminal bullying of women that I could talk about, but does it matter?

    ONE needs to apologise to Africans because there was certainly the appearance that major decisions, campaign priorities and approaches for work in Africa were largely influenced by romantic affairs in the bosses’ office rather than on any rhyme or reason like for example real priorities on the ground in Africa. Africans have been the biggest losers as the campaign justifies its existence and funding on the back of Africa. Attempts to make campaign efforts more African were an exhausting battle for all African ONE staff, as the staff in DC and London always knew better!

    But in every treacherous situation one needs strong allies to survive and even thrive like I did. Despite my team and i contending with internal opposition against a genuine Africa focus, the stakes were high for me as an African, as a woman, as a leader and as the Founding Executive Director. ONE Africa simply could not fail on my watch. The A team fought tirelessly to develop an authentic policy advocacy agenda for the continent by bringing to the forefront and strengthening African pers pectives within ONE. To be specific ONE’s Africa membership when I arrived was estimated at about 75,000 members most of who were in Cape Town naturally because the U2 360 degree tour had come to SA and performed in Cape Town. In exactly five years under my leadership we had succeeded in smashing the odometer by growing that number to 3.5 million members – larger than the global membership in Europe and America; this notwithstanding the fact that together the European and American offices wielded over 95% of the ONE annual budget while the Africa office made do on shoe string resources and consistently outperformed targets.

    It was in the final analysis, the benevolence of my two excellent colleagues, the global policy director and the global marketing director who believed in our real potential for landscape success in Africa that made it possible for me to succeed against all the odds stacked up against me and my team. Their departments functioned like a support service we could outsource as they bought into our Bono inspired vision for effectively fighting poverty through sensible homegrown policy interventions. I remain proud to share the glory of the ONE Africa success story with those two colleagues and remain grateful for their sincerity.

    It became our mutual understanding and not-so-funny inside joke that the only way I could get things done in Africa was by having white male friends in high places to be the voice of my voiceless self where it mattered. But in fact any white male would do even at very low levels because they got more respect from London and DC than the highest ranking African woman in the organization. My white American special assistant on admin was a good case in point – through his voice and racial privilege I was able to unblock a lot of bureaucracy in DC that applied only to Africa and Africans but to no other office in Europe or the UK.

    Despite being treated as second class citizen, it was to the surprise and much begrudgery of the mothership that the Africa pilot campaigns succeeded massively. The top bosses had neither expected nor prepared for this success so there was no budgetary plans for Africa. In fact I became the center of a national scandal in ONE nation when I started to recruit a few staff to help run setting up of the office and the daily insults were that I was too important to sweep the floor, make my own tea or book my own flights. How ironic, I told them, that in an organizations where the secretaries in DC and London have secretaries, yet the Africa executive director is not even allowed to a receptionist. Africa’s share of the global budget was 3% and at the height of my success it was 5% yet 80% of the organizations success was being reaped out of Africa.

    Since my departure in 2015, without a strong pillar against anti-Africa practises, many young African men and women on staff had their confidence and competence attacked. ONE was also ferocious in seeking to bury any past successes that were 100% ascribable to Africans. While the impact of our campaigns still reverberated outside, it was almost a sacrilege act for staff to talk about any past success on agriculture, SDGs and women’s empowerment campaigns that I led on.

    My departure threw the organization into complete disarray for two years as they were gripped by the fear of employing another independent thinking African women. Where the logical thing to do would have been to considering my deputy who was mission oriented and a brilliant leader to succeed me, ONE using its executive prerogative chose to bring in an African male colleague from outside to replace me. In a classic case of double jeopardy, my deputy was not only deprived of the promotion but the organization harassed and undermined her in full view of the junior staff. When she escalated the concerns to ONE HR and the Interim CEO she was told that she needed to go for coaching. She was also told by the Interim CEO that she was exaggerating (imagining) her experiences.

    Indeed, it was against the sound advice of experienced board and policy advisory board members that ONE went on to replace me with this external candidate who i have no doubt had an excellent track record in marketing instead of the requisite policy development experience needed to engage African governments and civil society effectively. They set him up for failure – like asking a fish to climb a tree! In a matter of weeks it was clear to all and sundry that this was mission impossible, and he was relieved of his duties barely past his probation. In other words, while the African colleague faced the humiliation of failure, the architect of that failure – i.e. the DC/London based boss remained hidden behind the bushes.

    Enter plan B: ONE then resorted to the very calculated act of recruiting an African woman with an impressive CV and an excellent track record to boot, but once again seemingly mismatched skills for the role hence undermining her even before she ever walked in the door. What they want and have arguably accomplished is to be able to carry out the role they’ve always coveted but could not do in my time, which is to tell African leaders directly from London and DC what their priorities should be, while the Africa director remains a figure head. ONE‘s public engagement at the last African Union heads of state summit where the Africa Executive Director was nowhere to be seen is a case in point. To put an end to this, ONE must invest in policy and marketing support for her and the Africa team to run and own genuine African campaigns.

    Maligning African leaders is always the first step in nearly all of ONEs relationships with African professionals, thought leaders, captains of industry or development influencers that they are forced to engage with out of an enlightened self interest. I’ve heard and seen them in action poisoning and undermining the good name and contributions to humanity of Africans of global excellence: people like Dambisa Moyo soon after she published Dead Aid; in the case of a former president of the AfDB right after I joined ONE from that institution, the former finance minister of Nigeria when they wanted to rotate her off the ONE Board, the richest black man on the planet (and other African HNWIs) as soon as I insisted that we needed to get African funders for ONE’s work in Africa – This list goes on…

    What I learned from all of this is how incurable prejudice is and that the more and better Africans perform or achieve, the more ONE resents them and finds all manner of ways and means to disrepute them.

    Case in point: As part of the fanfare of launching the ONE Africa office, I organized our first symposium and the very first meeting of the brand new Africa policy advisory board, riding on the wonderful wave of Bono/ U2 fever as their 360 degree tour had come to South Africa during that same week. As I worked on my speech for the symposium there were unsolicited suggestions and hostile pressure from the leadership to litter my presentation with images of miserable, poor, dying Africans which I respectfully declined while pointing out that African poverty is no worse than the homelessness that lives under the bridges of America. And yet images of homelessness are not forced upon our conscience each time we think of America.

    I kept going because i believed in what we were doing and I could see how citizen agency could help shape public policy for the benefit the poor. I also believed and was energized by the ONE’s Board’s assessment that we were doing brilliant game changing work. For example, in the words of Larry Summers comments following my board presentation in 2014: “Sipho, let’s assume that you have greatly exaggerated your achievements in Africa during the past one year and for arguments sake if I even conceded that only 20% of what you’ve told us today is what you’ve actually achieved, it is still fantastically mind blowing work that you are doing and I think you your team deserves more resources to keep up the good work”!

    In spite of such sterling reviews, expressing an opinion or more truthfully attempting to educate the saviors who were ONE global management was a punishable offense which merited heaps of insults, shouting, undermining and covert smear campaigns within the close, closed and effectively incestuous universe of the ONE world.

    We became a target for ending this “pet project” of Bono’s as they saw it and all kinds of survivor challenges were thrown at us – the key one being to find our own money if we wanted to stay alive. However, just as we were about to embark on this fundraising in earnest there were mumblings by the DC and London bosses about the risks of African money being unclean, corrupt, stolen, or maybe even blood money as far as they were concerned. In my usual unrelenting way, I pushed back because some of these African HNWIs especially the ones we were targeting happened to be friends of mine that I felt I could vouch for as the provenance of their wealth was widely and publicly known. But just on the off chance that perhaps their funds were not so clean, I countered that American wealth has its own dark side that can be recounted, ranging from crimes and conspiracies against humanity to banking fraud to violations of anti-trust laws and yet we don’t bat an eyelid or lose sleep when they write us checks.

    The evidence showed ONE’s lack of sincerity of purpose in setting up ONE Africa because when I got hired, I was shocked to find that the organization had not attempted to register itself officially with the SA authorities. Upon arrival, I gathered information on some of the governments basic requirements in order for an NGO to operate legally but it took them several years to comply because according to DC “the SA authorities were asking for too much information about the board of directors” which ONE being a typical opaque INGO was not willing to share if they could find a way around it. The personal collateral damage to me came down to emotional, mental and physiological trauma as I essentially was a person of no fixed abode since my status depended on an organization that legally didn’t exist.

    Whatever is happening now in the aid sector in the wake of the Oxfam train wreck, where an African woman is cleaning up after some white aid merchants is a good thing as it begins to force good behaviour such as transparency and accountability in the governance of INGOs particularly those that particularly those that use African professionals as window dressing to gain legitimacy or credibility on the continent.

    Africa is effectively the last frontier for the survival if not perpetuity of the Neo colonial dead aid agenda, poverty tourism and poverty pornography that they so desperately push in exactly the same shape, form and fashion of the 1970s even in 2018. So what is happening today is a clarion call to other women and to Africans facing the same challenges in other INGOs : know that you are not alone in believing that these malpractises are not acceptable.

    As the Africa Executive Director I/my office was always under surveillance in what was an ongoing witch-hunt aimed not only at finding imagined fault and undermining my leadership but most familiar to the invisible hand who’s finger prints are all over this, it was designed to divide and rule Africans as a way of controlling us fully and ensuring a sense of “unsettledness”.

    This bad leadership in DC and London created a toxic work environment within the global organization that in particular undermined the Africa operation at all levels. Effectively the role of Executive Director at ONE remains the most dehumanizing experience of my life. But beating ONE at its own game kept the spring in my step. And while I hate to tell tales out of school it must be said for the record that my personal secret weapon was Bono’s support, sincerity and confidence in the rightness of what I was doing. I took my marching orders from his clearly articulated vision which continues to be ahead of the curve from the rest of the industry, ONE included.

    That said, the ONE Campaign owes an apology to Africa, to women and to African women in particular. There is a another way for the organization to exist and it is possible, it needs to reboot on a genuine clean slate that is driven by Africans – no longer a foreign hand that minimizes our precious culture, our leaders, our institutions, our poor, our HNWIs, and above all, our women. That is the only way ONE can hope for prosperous future for in Africa.

    By Dr. Sipho S. Moyo, former and Founding Executive Director, ONE Campaign Africa

  • Fossil Fuels and Water Cycle – What it means for Africans

    The water crisis affecting millions of people around the world is directly and inevitably linked to steadily-worsening climate change. In South Africa this means more Day Zero’s and a future of uncertainty. This is highly unlikely to be a once off event, and we would do well to learn from the experience of Brazil and other water stressed countries.

    Whether we actually face Day Zero or are saved by the rain, the Cape Town water crisis has created enough of a stir internationally to make people realise just how bad the global situation around water is. As the world’s biggest water-related event – the World Water Forum – kicks off in Brazil this month, with participants turning their thoughts to the theme of sharing water, it is imperative to acknowledge first, what’s brought us to the brink of this slowly-unfolding global disaster.

    The situation that Cape Town faced is just another extreme example of a problem that experts around the world have long warned against. NearlyMore than one billion people in the world do not have access to clean, safe drinking water and another 2.7 billion have a shortage of water for at least one month each year. Future projections are not optimistic either. According to the United Nations, the global demand for fresh water will outstrip supply by 40% by 2030, thanks to a combination of climate change, human action and population growth. As predicted by the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), two-thirds of the world’s population will face severe water shortages in only 20 years. This is already happening in countries such as Somalia and South Sudan that are affected by civil strife largely because of water shortages.

    In most parts of the world, the water situation is already compromised by the inadequate management and poor treatment of this scarce natural resource by local governments, and the negligence of industrial users, particularly those in the agribusiness, mining and fossil fuels sectors. Not only do they use up vast quantities of clean water, they often pump out highly-toxic effluents that can contaminate rivers and underground aquifers. Now, as climate change affects precipitation patterns across the planet, several previously ‘safe’ regions find themselves at risk of severe drought.

    By compromising water availability, desertification affects not only the consumption of potable water, but also reduces agricultural productivity, which in turn threatens food security. In countries like Brazil, that rely on hydroelectric power, another easily-overlooked consequence of the drought will be the cyclical impact on the power supply. With the reservoirs of the hydroelectric dams empty, the Brazilian government is forced to fire up the fossil-fueled thermal plants. These thermal plants, in turn, need a lot of water to cool the machines. Thus, in addition to paying more for the energy used in their homes, the population also sees the little water they have left being consumed by the thermoelectric plants.
    This is the case of the Pecém Industrial and Port Complex, in Ceará, Brazil. Pecém I and II are the two largest coal-fired thermoelectric plants in the country and are authorized by the state government to collect up to 800 liters of water per second (or 70 million liters per day) from the Castanhão Water Supply, which could supply a city of 600 thousand inhabitants.

    The largest public reservoir in Brazil for multiple uses, Castanhão is usually responsible for supplying the entire metropolitan region of Fortaleza, where almost half of the state’s population lives. Having reached its dead volume last November, the reservoir has stopped supplying the capital of Ceará for about 10 days, until the minimum volume of 173.34 million cubic meters of water was restored. In South Africa, a similar situation could emerge, with the banks like the Development Bank of Southern Africa wanting to fund the building of a new coal fired power station in Lephalale, Limpopo – an already water stressed region.

    These are not isolated cases limited to the more obviously arid parts of the world. A 2014 survey of the world’s 500 largest cities estimates that one in four are in a state of water stress. The financial capital of Brazil and one of the 10 most populous cities in the world, São Paulo went through a calamity situation similar to Cape Town in 2015, when the Cantareira, its main reservoir, was below 4% of its capacity. The water crisis was considered finished in 2016, but in January 2017 the main reserves were 15% lower than expected for the period, bringing up questions once again around the future of water supply in the city.
    And yet, despite these repeated reminders, governments continue to allow the exploitation of precious water reserves; worse, for the very industries that further contribute to climate change.

    The Guarani Aquifer, located under the territories of Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay, is the main freshwater reserve in South America and one of the largest underground systems in the world. The aquifer has been constantly threatened by cross-border exploratory activities such as fracking, for the extraction of shale gas. Producing 50 quadrillion liters of water per year, it has the capacity to supply 400 million people. Recent news reports have also raised a new alarm: the government of Brazil is allegedly in negotiations with Coca Cola and Nestle for privatisation of this vital natural resource, with reports suggesting the companies might receive contractual concessions lasting over a hundred years.

    In addition to all the socio-environmental impact, and precisely because they are vulnerable and finite, the limited sources of drinking water have already caused serious geopolitical disputes. In Chad, Lake Chad – possibly one of the worst water related crises globally – has shrunk to one-twentieth of its size 40 years ago, fuelling conflict between Nigeria and Cameroon. Without a radical change of behaviour, and of policy at every level of governance, the wars for access to this valuable resource will be unavoidable.

    The need for change is as imperative as it is overdue: we must break the cycle of environmental damage being caused by the fossil fuel industry, introduce strict governance on common resources – not just water, but land, forest cover and air as well – and secure instead a more sustainable future that puts renewable energy in the hands of communities. The solution to the water crisis will come from the same source as the solution to other environmental crises – people power!

    By Glen Tyler, South Africa Team Leader, 350Africa

  • Africa seems oblivious whilst US sounds the alarm on China

    Former US Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, visited Nigeria this week after issuing a warning about the dangers of Chinese loans to African countries. It seems rich coming from the top US envoy in the era of Donald Trump’s “America First” and considering that nearly two-third of Africans take a positive view of China in Africa according to a recent Afrobarometer survey. Tillerson’s intervention should not be lightly dismissed. The pessimistic picture he and others paint of China’s expanding footprint in Africa is admittedly a skewed one. Still, they point to well-founded concerns about some unhealthy habits underpinning Sino-Africa relations.

    Well-meaning Africans should welcome Chinese investments. Nowhere is the need more apparent than in Africa’s strategic power sector where current levels of investment significantly lag fast growing needs. Nevertheless, a closer reading of this sector also exposes how China instrumentally tailors its investments to further narrow advantages whilst ignoring inconvenient truths about sustainability and the environment. Deconstructing the Chinese-Africa “partnership” on energy offers a much-needed corrective to both the distorted lens that Beijing employs to view its own Africa role and Mr Tillerson’s thinly disguised anxiety over China’s growing influence there.

    First, it is useful to distinguish between China’s commitment of capital to the energy (upstream) and power (downstream) sectors in Africa. The latter usefully focuses on the power generation and distribution opportunities that Africa needs to upscale towards unleashing its latent productive capacities whilst capturing more of the local energy resources into domestic value chains. It contrasts with the upstream energy sector investments which primarily aim to open up resources for export to China and other global markets.

    Angola’s case is illustrative here. It attracted a miniscule share of China’s $22.3bn loan to African power projects (out of a total $34.8bn investment committed to energy as a whole since 2000). China’s investment into Angola has been predominantly through the China Sonangol “Queensway” syndicate, which is heavily focused on upstream oil extraction. In what is perhaps the most iconic of these new Chinese “partnerships” in Africa, the world’s manufacturing powerhouse and Africa’s second largest energy producer have failed to translate their growing engagement into any appreciable improvement in Angola’s manufacturing capacity. Little wonder then that the country continues to import more than 70% of its consumer goods needs, with little in the way of domestic production capacity even for the most basic of consumables.

    The second point relates to the first, and is clearly reflected in the hydro-electric bias in Chinese power investments in Nigeria, Uganda and others. Hydro is admittedly a clean source of energy, but research suggests that it is decreasingly price competitive relative to other greener sources such as solar. Hydro requires huge capital outlay, with potentially serious fiscal implications for countries taking on concessional Chinese loans that need to be repaid in future. Also, China’s significant capacity and know-how is being rolled out in Africa at a rapid pace that belies the Asian giant’s pivots to greener energy technology such as solar and fuel cells in its home market. It has in some reckoning recently overtaken the US in clean energy technology. This lends credence to those who fret that China avails Africans of power sector loans to find outlet for its own overcapacity in dam building. Typically, there is an overwhelming reliance on Chinese workers and very low absorption of African labour into most such Chinese-funded hydro projects.

    Third, with the increasing water stress such as along Africa’s Nile basin, which is stoking tension between Egypt and Ethiopia for example, critics argue that China’s dam-building activities pay scant regard to environmental impact. This mirrors the criticisms of China’s own giant Three Gorges dam and the attempts to replicate it in Africa such as through the Ethiopian Grand Renaissance dam that is also Chinese-funded. Such a major water-intensive project has the potential to provoke serious environmental challenges, not to mention the stoking of geopolitical tension with neighbours also dependent on the Nile waters.

    In Nigeria, Chinese state lenders have shown serious interest in major dam-building projects such as in the Mambilla pleateau of central Nigeria where inter-communal clashes over arable and pastoral lands led to the killing of 20 persons in just one single incident in early March 2018. China is responsible for providing 85% of the $5.8bn cost of the Mambilla hydroelectric project. It is interesting that this significant investments in Nigerian hydro schemes occur against the backdrop of China’s relative lack of success in dominating Nigeria’s oil and gas production on the same scale it has managed in Angola for instance. Beijing should show more interest in gauging externalities even whilst continuing to demonstrate strong commitments to supporting development-oriented projects across Africa. Unlike the Obama-inspired US Power Africa initiative which aims to deliver an additional 30,000 megawatt of electricity to Africa through primarily green sources (now currently championed by Mr Tillerson’s State Department), China is far from committing unequivocally to back Africa’s transition to the green energy that China itself now covets.

    The import of all of these is not to deny the potential or even the concrete benefits that China’s energy partnership can unleash in Africa, especially at a time that western backed lenders have drastically scaled down their own financial support to key projects. The real urgency is that African leaders must become less supine, pushing for a more equal relationship, and nudging current and future deals to deliver more for Africa. This should help to create local jobs even whilst working to reorient China’s overall lending so that Africa ultimately becomes more self-sufficient and primed to participate in emerging clean energy technologies. Here too, Africa has unparalleled potential from abundant sunshine to wind to the platinum required for fuel cell catalyst, etc.

    Beijing and its African partners urgently need to appreciate the folly of rehashing the west’s historical failure and parochialism in Africa. A new Africa-China orientation requires a coherent pushback by African governments against the lop-sidedness highlighted by the China sceptics such as Secretary Tillerson. He has been scathing in his assessment of China’s Africa engagement on his latest tour of African capitals. China for all its protestation will do well to heed such advice, regardless of the provenance. Unless fundamentally revamped, China’s investments as currently structured will fail disastrously to strengthen African partners or lay the foundation for local ownership and long-term sustainability. A relationship of intertwined futures and equal partnership – of the type that China trumpets – must meet these key tests at the very least.

    By: Dr Ola Bello, Executive Director, Good Governance Africa (GGA). He holds MPhil and doctoral degrees from the University of Cambridge

  • Open letter to minister of information

    IT IS TIME TO MOUNT THE HORSE TO PROVE YOUR METTLE

    May I send to you warm Easter greetings in advance.  I also wish all Nigerians a joyful season, as we gradually approach the 2019 general elections, another epochal era in the political history of our great and beloved country, Nigeria.

    First, please permit me to begin by acknowledging your demonstrated prowess in the proactive, timely and appropriate responses to the 2015 multiple electioneering campaigns issues of national and international dimensions, when you served as the APC National Publicity Secretary.

    Sir, your  clarity of thoughts in handling the emergent issues adequately elucidated Nigerians greatly. And it sufficiently psyched them to opt for the clear and rewarding choice of leadership change in favour of the incumbent APC national government led by   President Muhammedu Buhari.

    I believe,  like most Nigerians that your inclusion into the  cabinet of the Buhari Presidency and handing over  to you the portfolio of Minister of Information and National Orientation was indisputable.

    Apparently, it was a decision propelled by your past antecedents in competencies on information dissemination and publicity management. Many of us hailed your choice, because we felt you had the knack and the bite to assist immensely in disseminating or projecting the laudable policies, programmes and projects of the Buhari Presidency.

    But regrettably, the fire in you which swelled your camp of admirers, by deflating malicious and sentimental propaganda against the establishment you represent has waned, if not outrightly extinguished in the last two years.

    The next general elections are drawing nearer. And overt or clandestine malicious campaigns have been mounted against the government you serve, implicating your principal and attempting to rubbish the performance records of President Buhari.  The campaigners freely downplay his enormous achievements in various sectors of the economy, with deliberately concocted falsehoods and misrepresentations.

    But your office seeming to delight more in silently consenting to the free reign of these disgruntled opposition elements is spiting and spatting on the face of the APC led Federal Government of Nigeria. They brand it all sorts of derogatory names before your watchful eyes.

    Nigerians are shocked at the sudden cold feet you have developed in effectively performing your official responsibilities of articulating the programmes and projects of the Buhari Presidency.  This proclivity has been entrenched to the extent that even ‘Lilliputians’ in information management appeared to have inexplicably and speechlessly suppressed the enormous strength and prowess, we believed,  you possessed in this professed specialty.

    President Buhari and the government he leads has become a free punching bag for liars, detractors, saboteurs and enemies of the state, who hurl every falsehood to the public domain unchallenged.

    These retrogressive elements are succeeding is misleading vulnerable Nigerians, with these smart schemes.   But it is glaring that you have abdicated your responsibilities of enunciating a concrete agenda of information dissemination and stimulation of robust public debate among Nigerians on the performances of the Buhari Presidency.

    In its stead, you have consciously marooned Nigerians on the Island and donated the citizenry to the rumour mill  and or, denial of information, which the opposition is exploiting maximally in plotting their evil agenda against Nigeria. You have lost the gripping touch and the engaging golden voice once accustomed with you.

    Sir, where is thy golden voice?  I must confess and with all sense of responsibility, humility and all fairness to you and Almighty God, that you have proven us wrong by not doing enough in the present circumstance. It is now more convenient to assert that you appear to have lost track of your responsibilities and roles, as Nigeria’s mouthpiece,   as you are conspicuously not doing enough. Should we now suggest that you are better at the party secretariat and should therefore, be redeployed to the base?

    I am amazed that you have not realized the whole gamut of a strategic communication of this magnitude, at a time the image of your country is severely battered and deprecated. Please,  you need to adopt  both conventional and non-conventional approaches, like the revival of public enlightenment campaigns, as even defined by the nomenclature of the ministry you superintend.

    Again, occasional visits to states, where federal projects have been undertaken or are ongoing to interact with the people and raise platforms of awareness of the existence of such projects is imperative now.

    Sir, with due respect, it is time to mount the proverbial horse and ride to prove your mettle or else  I am tempted to believe that it’s either Nigerians overrated  your competence  or  simply, you pass casually, just like  one  of the many  indolent state governors who merely rode on  the wings and benevolence  of President Buhari to be shadowy  super stars in  the corridors of power.

    We all know in reality that everything that aligns with President Buhari markets itself. But time has come to do the needful, by arresting the prevalent inactions your office has slipped into,   to keep Nigerians constantly informed

    I appreciate your audience. May God give you the necessary wisdom, guidance and strength to match the demands of the moment.

    Regards,

    Chief Philip  Agbese

  • Alakija reveals five secrets to success

    One of the richest African women, Folorunso Alakija, paid a courtesy visit to the Head Office of The Nation Newspaper in Lagos, on occasion of the International Women’s Day Celebrations last week.

    Folorunso Alakija, a Nigerian business woman, is a business tycoon involved in Fashion, Oil and advocating better life for the women.

    Emphasizing the secrets of success, she said we all need success in every area of our life in order to press for progress. Sacrifices must be made to accomplish progress and mark difference.

    “For success to be attained there must be an agenda in your head. Be focused, utilize your time properly, embody credibility, be reliable and responsibility will make you succeed,” Alakija stated.

    The Business tycoon clamoured for equal opportunity amongst men and women, encouraging females to think beyond the barrier of just rearing children alone.

    “Females should be encouraged that there is more to life than rearing children and they can be whoever they want to be. The girl child should be given equal opportunity just as the boy child. Gender equality should be a foundation laid by parents just has charity begins at home.”

    “You are responsible for your life, utilize your opportunities and say no to those who say you can’t achieve it.”

  • Simba group launches Queen Riders to empower women

    In celebration of the International Women’s Day, Simba Group, sole distributors of TVS KEKE has rolled out project “QUEEN RIDERS” aimed at empowering women to become key players in the tricycle “keke” rider’s community.

    The Business Head of Simba Group, Mr Manish Rohtagi explained that “Keke” Business is not gender based but meant to encourage women to tap into the growing market to earn a decent livelihood.

    To further encourage women actively in the “Keke” transportation business, Simba Group has set up a Free Checkup Camp where professional engineers attended to more than 50 Women tricycle riders on various issues.

    Read Also: Okada, keke: Loved, hated in equal measure

    The support included free diagnosis and repairs of their vehicles with spare parts at discounted rates, free oil filters and engine oil for attended vehicles and end-users’ training on safe driving and keeping their vehicle fit .

    A free pink tarpaulin was also provided for the women.

    Speaking on the contributions of Simba group in the society, the Marketing Head, El Hadj Seck said “Our market leadership position is the retribution of the training and empowerment programs held for the past 30 years in Nigeria. We intend to have more program to empower under-represented population within the transportation industry. 

    Over 5,000 mechanics Pan-Nigeria have been trained by Simba Group, and 3,000 special tool-sets distributed.

     

  • Terminate Alpha Beta Service With Lagos State, ADP Tells Ambode

    The Action Democratic Party (ADP) has called on the governor of Lagos State, Mr Akinwunmi Ambode to terminate the service of Alpha Beta Consulting from Lagos State revenue collection service.
    The party says that it is making this call due to the controversies that the company have been enmeshed in; from the allegations of fraud, to over-charge and the claims that the company is been used as conduit pipe to send public money into private pockets.
    ADP through its Lagos Spokesman, Prince Adelaja Adeoye said that Governor Ambode must prove that his loyalty lies with Lagosians and not some vested interests who are hell bent on milking the state dry, stressing that the insertion of Alpha Beta into the Land Use Act was a deliberate move to legitimize the hold of some greedy private individuals on Lagos contrary to the watery excuses given by the spokesman of Lagos State House of Assembly that the insertion was an error.
    ADP says that Lagos State must cultivate the culture of transparency, commitment and loyalty to residents. The party says that information in public domain has it that Alpha Beta receives close to 30% service charge on all collections on behalf of the Lagos State government. The ADP regards this as outrageous and an open affront to the residents of the state if the allegations are founded.
    ADP wonders why Lagosians must be subjected to such huge service charges, a service that could be perfectly rendered by commercial banks for far less. It says that unless the Lagos state government is out to empower cronies, Alpha Beta should be laid off with immediate effect.
    ADP says that the governor should look into the books of Alpha Beta to know how much that has been collected on behalf of Lagos State since they came on board and this should be published on the Lagos State website for the public to scrutinize it.
    The party states that they were aware of an insertion of one VisionScape, a private waste management company into the environmental act which was later removed in the final draft when the actors sensed that there will be public outrage. The party wonders why a Dubai company should be considered for waste management when there are effective Nigerian companies that can do same comfortably.
    ADP says that the governor should not mortgage the state to companies owned by some private individuals. Adelaja says that establishments such  as the Lekki Concession Company (LCC) who recently jacked up toll fees despite series of protests and public outcry are positioned just to milk the residents dry.
    The party also charged Governor Ambode to set up a panel of inquiry to investigate the allegations that some property belonging to Lagos State have been converted to private use by some individuals.
    The ADP has however assured Lagosians that they will do things differently if given the opportunity in 2019 and  that all the anti-people policies put in place by APC led government will be reviewed and booted out to be replaced by pro-people policies. The party tells Lagosians that unless they vote differently in the coming elections, the hegemony being experienced in Lagos will continue unabated.