Category: Politics

  • ‘Ekiti has bright future’

    ‘Ekiti has bright future’

    Ekiti State Labour Party (LP) governorship candidate Hon. Opeyemi Bamidele has unfolded his manifesto, urging the people to be hopeful for a brighter future.

    He said, if elected as the governor, the LP would build a new democratic culture in the Fountain of Knowledge, foster development and promote a charter of prosperity.

    Bamidele, who released a 68-paged blue-print titled: “My vision, my dreams, my aspirations for Ekiti’ in Ado-Ekiti, the state capital, promised to develop agriculture, commerce and industry, mining and tourism.

    The flag bearer also said that his administration would accord priority to education, healthcare delivery, infrastructural development, housing, urban development, environmental sustainability and security.

    Describing himself as a change agent, the House of Representatives member said that his emotional attachment to the 130 towns and villages underscored the Labour Party’s and the Bibiire Coalition’s quest to invest governance in Ekiti State.

    Noting that he was motivated by the deep sense of patriotism to introduce the social welfare intervention programmes in Ekiti since February 2004, Bamidele assured that he would provide a credible and transparent leadership.

    He said: “I have chosen to put these ideas in the public domain with this ‘Blueprint on Ekiti Growth and Development Agenda’. It is a manifesto of change and charter of prosperity through which Ekiti will be catapulted to the next level”.

    Bamidele added: “My vision is driven by the conviction that government primarily has responsibilities to perform and must be held to account on improved conditions that meet basic standards of living; employment generation and livelihoods sustainability, rural transformation and infrastructural development, access to quality and affordable education and security of lives and property.

    “I strongly envision a responsible, responsive, constructive, inclusive, all-engaging and resourceful leadership to steer the ship of the State. With the support of the good people of Ekiti State, we will passionately commit ourselves to deploying governance to make life better for our people. I am committed to translating the limitless potentials in Ekiti State into socio-economic advancement and sustainability.”

    The LP flag bearer said that, within the his first year in office, he will embark on programmes aimed at revatalising education, agriculture, vocational training and entrepreneur development and health care services.

    Bamidele described poverty as a challenge, assuring that his government will reduce it through its intervention programmes. He said politicians cannot afford to treat it kid gloves.

    He added: “We must, most aggressively, pursue an ambitious programme to wage war against poverty, if the future must be secured in the interest of all and sundry, both rich and poor, in the society. We reckon that corruption, to a large extent, fuels poverty. Our focus therefore, is to be unequivocally committed to openness, transparency and accountability in governance. We would ensure fiscal discipline and due process in carrying out government policies. That way, we would be assured the commitment of the people to work hand-in-hand with government to create the much needed environment for wealth creation through socio-economic opportunities at household, community and societal levels.”

    Bamidele proposed an-all inclusive government, stressing that governance is a collective enterprise involving the elder statesmen who agitated for the creation of the state, the political class, the academia, the civil society, organised and informal private sector, traditional institutions, the media, and faith-based organizations.

    He said that his administration will give a sense of belonging to the stakeholders, including civil servants, so that they can meaningfully contribute to the decision making process. He also said that, apart from the emphasis on democratisation and stability, his government will develop the Ekiti economy and guarantee prosperity.

    Bamidele stressed: “In collaboration with the relevant federal agencies, organised private sector (OPS), multilateral agencies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs), our government will address the varying needs of different categories of people, including the women, aged, widow, youths, students, special people, unemployed citizens, etc.

    “The physically challenged will equally have access to free education and other forms of sponsorships to facilitate access to equal opportunities, and the infrastructural development initiatives in the state will be handicap-friendly and inclusive, ensuring that public buildings and walkways cater for the sensitive needs like the building of ramps and provision of Braille signs, where possible; thus setting the pace for other States in the federation.

    “Mass empowerment initiatives will be deployed into harnessing the potentials of our youths and to encourage the development of specialized skills in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and other technical vocations such as welding, barbing, electrical/electronic installation and repairs, hairdressing, and fashion design.”

    On participatory governance, the federal legislator said: “Our government would embark on community roundtables that will draw participation from representatives of community”.

    Bamidele promised to set up a skill acquisition institute to coordinate learning and skill transfer in business. He said the institute will be equipped with standard training facilities and designated sites for farmland and mining activities. He added: “The institute will facilitate training in mining, piggery, horticulture and other forms of agricultural practice, handiworks, craft-works, creative designs, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) as well as other technical vocations.

    “The institute will develop and review, from time to time, curriculum for socio-economic empowerment and development to sustain skill transfer. The institute will designate and coordinate business incubation clusters with appropriate and sufficient facilities within Ekiti State”.

  • ‘There are many pretenders in the race’

    ‘There are many pretenders in the race’

    Abia State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship aspirant Mr. Friday Nwosu, a lawyer, spoke on his ambition, zoning and other partisan issues. MUSA ODOSHIMOKHE met him. 

    Are you still running for the governorship in Abia State?

    There is a rumour being spread by those who are not comfortable with my growing popularity across the state that I will not run. Nobody anointed me; I seek the support of God and people of Abia State to be the next governor. I’m not somebody who can abandon a battle halfway. I don’t engage in things I don’t mean. I mean what I do and do what I mean. So, my interest in the governorship race is never going to be an exception. I’m still very much in the governorship race. Go to Ohafia, Bende, Arochukwu, Umunneochi, Umuahia, Ukwa and other parts of the state. The name on everybody’s lips for the governorship race is Barrister Friday Nwosu.

    The leaders of Ukwa/Ngwa Zone are pushing for a consensus candidate. What is your view?

    We can only recognise an aspirant when that person has bought the party forms for the election. As at now, beside myself, I don’t know of any other aspirant, who will contest for the position. Are you sure that these other people will participate at the primaries? So, we cannot begin to talk of consensus when you don’t even know who is contesting. Some of these people you call aspirants are pretenders who were sent to cause confusion among those genuinely interested in the race. When you procure a form from your political party, with a view to running for the primaries, we will know that you are an aspirant. I’m the only aspirant who has been going to all corners of the state telling people that I want to be the next governor of Abia State and everybody knows I’m not pretending about it.

    It was said that you promised to withdraw for a better candidate…

    This is the handwork of my detractors, who have chosen to quote me out of context. I did not make such a statement. Who is the better candidate that I will withdraw for? As a legal practitioner, I deal with facts. I cannot begin to talk about stepping down for anybody when I know that no aspirant is better qualified than me. I can assure you that many of these aspirants will not even purchase the expression of interest forms. They are standing on one foot, pretending to be aspirants. But,  time will reveal these pretenders and their game.

    What are your chances in the race?

    From the result of my consultations, I tell you that I will win the party primaries and the general elections. Even, if there is going to be a consensus candidate, I believe I have the wherewithal to emerge. I’m the candidate to beat in the race.

    What value do you think you can add to governance, if elected?

    I have developed programmes and policies capable of taking Abia to the next level, from where Governor Theodore Orji would stop. My plans are carefully tailored to sustain his worthy legacies. I will build on the achievements of the governor because he has laid a solid foundation on which anybody coming after him can build on. I’m particularly interested in the Liberation Farms projects undertaken by the governor. My administration shall accord every sector of the  economy the attention it deserves, if elected as the next governor of Abia State. We must look towards agriculture as the solution to the unemployment problem in Nigeria. If Nigeria must regain her lost glory, there should a well articulated work plan towards reviving our agriculture, which is capable of offering employment more than the oil industry. We must also invest in education and skill acquisition and grant scholarship to indigent students. I will work with relevant development agencies to bring more democracy dividends to the people.

    Some people perceive you as a green horn in politics. Is this your first outing politically?

    I have been in politics in this country since 1983. I was in politics in 1983 before I joined the Nigerian Police that year. I resigned from the police at the end of 1994. On October 1, 1996, when we were expecting Gen. Sani Abacha to lift the partial ban on politics, I was a leading politician in my locality. I was a founding member of the defunct Democratic Party of Nigeria (DPN). When Abacha died and we all started afresh, I was in the PDP. At a time, I left the PDP for theAPGA. In 2002/2003, I had emerged as the state chairman of the APGA. In the APGA, I was also the Secretary of Forum of Political Parties Chairmen and candidates in Abia State.

    In 2005, I resigned from the APGA and returned to the PDP. Since then, I have been in the party as a member in my ward, local government, state and national. In 2010, I was the Secretary of the Bayelsa State Ward Congress Committee of the PDP. In 2011, I was a member of the Kogi State Ward Congress Appeal Panel of the party. I was also a member of the Bayelsa State Governorship Screening Panel. Again, I was a member of the Disciplinary Committee/Fact Finding Panel, which investigated constitutional breaches in Rivers State. As a lawyer, I have a lot of representations for the PDP at the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. When some people got an order of injunction to stop the PDP from holding its national convention last year, I went to court and set aside that injunction. I went this far to tell you where and how I started. Is this the experience of a greenhorn?

  • ‘Poll is about Ekiti’s future’

    ‘Poll is about Ekiti’s future’

    Former Ekiti  State Governor Segun Oni, who recently defected from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC), spoke with reporters in Ifaki-Ekiti on why he has endorsed Governor Kayode Fayemi for the poll. Excerpts:  

    Why did you defect from the PDP to the APC?

    I did everything I could do to give the PDP a chance to pick a candidate that we can work with, that we can be proud of, that we can show to generations that are coming to, somebody that we can throw up as a role model for them. When the PDP decided what its own options would be, we had no alternative but to make up our mind, rigidly, to toe the path that we have now chosen.

    You said that you left  the PDP to join the APC to build a future for Ekiti. Could you shed light on this? 

    What I am doing personally, is in the interest of Ekiti and in the interest of the good name that we may lose, if we are not careful. The generations coming may have to suffer for it, if we allow it to be completely destroyed.

    As a loyalist of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, did you at any time discuss your grievances with him?

    Yes and no, because baba knows our feelings. He knows that, like him, we hold dearly the future of this society. We take that after him. He also knows that we are not looking for personal gains, he knows that we are looking for a better future for our people.I believe his reaction would that of a father whose children are disagreeing on the field and he will not kill one for the other.

    If you are reinstated to the position of the Southwest Vice Chairman of the PDP, would you return to the PDP?

    For me, I do not think that is an option. For example, will I go back and support a Fayose?

    Why are you not supporting Fayose?

    I want to make it very clear that the reason why I am not supporting Ayo Fayose is not for anything that he has done to me personally in the past.

    Fayose offended me, Fayemi offended me, but I have taken a position of forgiving everyone that offended me because I know I have probably offended them and others in the past. Anybody who finds it convenient in his own heart can also forgive me, but I am looking at the future of Ekiti State.

    What is that future?

    I have been governor and I am privileged to know that the position of the governor is an exalted position that people should be using as a point of contact to pray for their children. It means that the governor is a moral leader; he is a role model.

    If you put someone in the position of governor and not sincerely pray in your heart of hearts that your child should take after, then, it means the society has gone amiss, it means something is wrong.

    If you have somebody in the position of governor that you do not wish to be a role model for the younger ones, then, it means something is amiss. What we are saying is that this is more than legal qualifications or satisfying the letters of the constitution, we are saying the position of governor is a higher ground. And like Caesar’s wife, anybody who comes to it, should be seen to be above board because you cannot just bring anybody and say you must make him governor. That is also a slight on that position because it is supposed to be an exalted position. You just cannot make anybody governor because you are going to create problems for generations that are coming.

    If they take after a wrong role model, the society will be in trouble. Can 80 per cent of Ekiti people pray that their child or ward should take on a role model as that which we are saying?

    Secondly, I know the institution that is forming itself up for the position of governorship in Ekiti state, I think it is very dangerous. It is a very grave mistake that people are making to believe that, if evil is forming itself in a nursery, in any part of the country, if it is remote to theirs, they can afford to sleep and it won’t get to them.

    I know that, if we allow that institution to form itself, our children, our younger ones will be swearing to oaths and sleeping in coffins because we have seen the hand of the monster somewhere else in the part of the Southwest. I have seen some of their foundations, people who are wanted and are involved in questionable deals.

    They now want to be in charge of my state. I take an exception. Those sending them to Ekiti should know that, if this evil should germinate in Nigeria, it will not leave them untouched. We all have a responsibility as Nigerians. Let us join hands to ensure that this evil, in whatever form it is, is not allowed to triumph or prosper.

    We all have a responsibility to ensure that generations that are coming will not be under the influence of such foundations because it is an amalgamation of evil.

    But, Mr Fayose said he is now a changed man.

    He claims to have changed when we know his sponsors, we can also see that the primaries did not indicate that. Let me tell you that the man who coined the adage ‘a fool at 40 is a fool forever’, must have had a basic knowledge of psychology that you do not change much after you are 40.

    So, after a man of over forty says he has changed, it is a talk to hoodwink those who are vulnerable.

    Did the Presidency attempt to prevail on you not to leave the PDP?

    I do not think the President needs to call me because there are people working with the President and they can always deliver the President’s message. You see, it is not about the party now. I am sorry to say this. Some of my closest friends are in the PDP. This is about the future of Ekiti and what will happen to Ekiti State.

    This is the only state I have. If Nigeria were such that we operate a constitution that can make you an Ekiti person, today, a Borno person tomorrow or your children can be Anambra, I will not be as worried, but here you are stuck. So, why would you now allow the values that made us Ekiti, the values that made us so proud as to ask for a state a state of people, who had been known to have a history for industry, education, for integrity to now have on our laps somebody, whose educational qualifications cannot even be guaranteed. I take an exception for that and I want to be counted on the side of those who said no to such a system, no matter what it costs.

    Some might say you left the PDP for ambition or economic gains, how do you see this?

    Is there any office that I want to seek from the PDP that I would not be able to attain? If I wanted to stay in the PDP and do a bargain, do you think I would not be able to do it? If I wanted anything, including positions, contracts and everything, I would have gotten it.

    I am doing this for my conscience and that is it. Nigerians do not even believe that Nigerians can work for free for their conscience. We have so monetised it and made everything look as if it is either cash or position. That is not what all of us are. I have been out of office for nearly four years now and I want to tell you that I have not taken any largesses from any source.

    What is your opinion on the growing tension, ahead of the  election?

    I am worried because this is part of the problem. I hope that the players on every side would be careful because, if they destroy Ekiti State, what are they going to gain from it? If you destroy the younger ones, what are you going to gain from it?

    Decent people should succeed here and that is why we want decent people to be brought. They should not expect that it is only indecency that can triumph here. We are urging others to let us all work together and deliver what we believe will be in the interest of Ekiti State and that is Dr Kayode Fayemi.

    Out of all of them, my preference goes to Dr Fayemi and next to that, my sympathy will go to Opeyemi Bamidele. But,  I will not spare anything for the kind of monsters that are preparing themselves in the PDP to take over Ekiti State and probably, the Southwest. For whatever reason, we must fight them ruthlessly.

    What role will you be playing in ensuring that the elections is free, fair and credible?

    The first role I am playing now is to work with others, to support the candidate of our choice, that is, Dr Kayode Fayemi, and the APC; to sell him as much as possible to various groups and sectors to be able to see the Ekiti vision that we should all be looking at, an Ekiti that should not become a pariah in Nigeria, an Ekiti, whose name and image does not become an albatross for our children to carry.

  • ‘With internal democracy, APC ‘ll survive’

    ‘With internal democracy, APC ‘ll survive’

    Lagos State All Progressives Congress (APC) governorship aspirant Senator Ganiyu Solomon spoke with reporters in Lagos on his ambition, zoning, the agitation for a Christian governor and the fate of the party in the next general elections. EMMANUEL OLADESU was there.

    What are your expectations about the next governorship poll in Lagos State?

    Democracy translates to participatory governance, which means everybody gets involved; you participate. And that differentiates it from a dictatorial government. Dictatorial government is just about a few people, and that was what we had during the military era. There was the accusation that, ‘all these parties, you’re not allowing internal democracy.’ And they kept saying, ‘yes, we’re guaranteeing internal democracy.’

    I remember when Chief Akande spoke on this, because he was the first person to give something close to a manifesto, of sorts, before the official launch of the party. And part of what he said, apart from fighting corruption, is that in this our party, we are going to make sure we imbibe the culture of internal democracy. So, anything that will make the party look at another direction, instead of a particular direction, will make it short on internal democracy. So, to me, it’s about perception. Some people may say the body language of the leadership is tilting towards this person; at the end of the day, it’s about perception. I say this because I relate with the leadership; none of the leaders have said, ‘I don’t think you can go,’ or ‘you’re not going,’ or has sent somebody to me to say ‘you’re going back to the senate.’ As far as  I am concerned, any way, the issue of the Senate is closed; I am not going back to the Senate. Maybe, we should start with that:  I am not going back to the Senate; that is settled.

    What is your reaction to the endorsement of Mr. Akin Ambode for the governorship election by the Olowo-Eko, Oba Rilwan Akiolu?

    Let me say that, in making the pronouncement, Kabiyesi was expressing his preference. He has also expressed his personal opinion. We’re talking of a party now; I don’t know which part or provision of the constitution of the party says a traditional ruler endorses or can endorse. Whatever he says is his personal wish, which is not the same thing as the wish of the generality of the people.

    At the end of the day, we have a party structure. Let me also tell you that he made the pronouncement at a time when we had not even concluded putting party structures in place. So, it couldn’t have been in consultation, with who? Is it with the political leadership? Is it with the traditional leadership? We’ve had different opinions since then. We deliberately did not come out to say anything about it because we felt it was a political statement. And what do you do with political statements?

    You either respond or you leave it. In this case, we decided to leave it. It has happened a number of times when a traditional ruler in one state would say, ‘this is the person we want.’  At the end of the day, the man would not go anywhere. It has happened several times. I don’t want to cite instances. Even in Lagos, it has happened. In our own case, such statements would not deter us. It will not deter the party man.  What is the weight of a vote? Every vote carries the same weight, regardless of the status of the individual. So, what anybody can do is to go behind his chosen, preferred, aspirant, mobilise people behind him, and provide a level playing field. It is not even for them to do that, that is the provision of the constitution; that is the tenet of democracy – provide a level playing field. And there must be transparency. Whoever wins becomes the party’s candidate, every other person queues behind him. It is not by pronouncement it is not by proclamation;, yes, they were using proclamation years ago to annex, to cede, land , to cede society, to cede country, but not now. That is now out of vogue; this is democracy, you can’t do that. So, we’ll just leave it at that – it is political and we, politicians, take as political, and consign to its proper place.

    Consensus or primaries, which would you recommend to your party?

    Now, we have a much more bigger party; that means it has also increased our stakeholders. And let me also remind you recently, we had a very aggressive membership mobilisation drive which brought a lot of people into this political party. These people now are interested; how do you do consensus? Do you do consultation down to the grassroots level? Do you do consultation up to various sectors of the political parties? Because you need to do that. Then, how do you now aggregate their opinions? If you meet a particular group, they would have somebody. If you meet another group, they would have a different person. So, you have to meet various groups at different levels, up to the lowest rung of the ladder, from the top to the bottom. How do you now aggregate their preferences? You have to do it; it has to be very scientific. Whatever you do, you must make sure it can stand the test of time. What is that test of time? The election.  What I will recommend is to have primaries. It will put everybody’s mind at rest.

    We believe you’ve been consulting with political leaders in the state. Have you consulted with Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, and what did he tell you?

    Yes, I’ve consulted with him. There’s no way you’d want to run for governorship, or any serious political office and you don’t meet your leaders. I met him and he said, ‘well, you can go ahead with your ambition; at the right time we’ll roll out the party programmes and so on, but right now we are busy putting up the party structures.’ We agreed that putting up party structures will not stop me from meeting people, going ahead with my plans. That is it.

    There are some issues that may shape the primaries-zoning and religion. We want your opinion on these issues, zoning and religion.

    I always try not to go into discussing religion, because people can be very emotional about religion and, given what is also going on round the country, it is a very sensitive issue. In this particular part of the country, we don’t discuss religion when it comes to governance. This is the very first time some people are bringing it up. And I can tell you that they are bringing it up because of their own selfish interests. I don’t want to go further, but look at the average family here, you have them muslims, you have them Christians. I have a cousin who is a reverend; my sister is a deaconess; go to Methodist Church, Palm Avenue, that is the church our grandparents attended. That is where they had their burial. So, how will I do anything against a Christian community, for instance? It has never been an issue. Some people have come out to say governance is not about religion. Religion will not put food on your table. You’d have to look at people you believe have integrity, who have what it takes to govern. And I will not also want to go into comparison, as some people would want to do. The moment they succeed in bringing this, and somebody comes on board, and the only credential he’s waving is ‘I am a Christian,’ or ‘I am a muslim,’ his royalty, whether we like it or not, will go to that group, first and foremost. And it will now exert a big influence on his policies, on his roles, on anything he does, because he would now think he’s obliged to that community. That is about religion – like I said, it is very very sensitive, people can be very emotional about it. Now, about zoning. Again, in the history of Lagos – I challenge anybody to prove me wrong – this would be the first time that anybody would sit down and say ‘we’re zoning to this particular person’, and they made a mistake of it. Those people that were doing it made a mistake of saying they were zoning to a particular town. You can only zone to a senatorial district, because that particular town does not constitute the whole district. And when eventually they said, ‘Ok, Epe.’ Its part of the East. We have some other towns, some other divisions, as part of the East. The other divisions rose up and said, ‘no, it’s our turn, because Epe has done it before.’ These are things that are avoidable, if we ourselves had not inadvertently brought it up.

    However, in my own case, if they think that would be a deterrent, no. I also have a roof in the East. And also because they’ve made it possible to move from one senatorial district to another, or ven move across – move from a senatorial district, jump over to another senatorial district. So, it’s all well and good. Whatever I am saying is not new to Lagos politics; there are precedents. It is accepted, it has become a norm, so we do it.

    You said you’re also from the East, where?

    How?

    My dad was from Ipakodo. You go to the palace, they will tell you. They will tell you also his role in upgrading the Obaship. My mum is from Ituwolo, and my maternal grand mum is from Ibeshe. So, whatever way you want to push it, I am there. They can’t talk of zoning as a way of stopping anybody. It is also not a provision of the party, which means anybody, even from the Central, can run. It is the party members that would say, ‘no, we prefer this person.’

    It depends on who the individual is. You go ahead, just leave party members to their thing, that again would promote democracy. It would make the candidates to talk to people, to talk to people across the other senatorial districts. You just don’t fold your arms and say because somebody has zoned it to your area, that is the end. You also need the other districts. At the end of the day, you’re not going to be governor of Lagos East only; you’re supposed to be the governor of Lagos State.

    What are your chances of getting the party ticket, given the possibility that you’re believed to be independent-minded, which is probably one of your undoing?

    I’d gone through this root before, and I know what it requires, I know what it takes. And I have also said that it would be foolhardy of anybody to join a political race without doing self-assessment. In Lagos State, anybody from our party throwing his heart in the ring in 2011 would have been foolish, because there was no way he would have defeated the incumbent. In the same way, I think I have done my own assessment, and, with respect to members of my own party, I know their thinking, I know where they are leaning towards. And I know that they are agitating very strongly that this time around, they should be allowed to indicate their preference. With that in place, I stand more than a good chance of clinching the ticket, and finally by the grace of God.

    Have you also talked to Governor Fashola?

    I said any serious contender will do a far and wide consultation with the leadership of the party, and when you’re talking of the leadership of this political party – I don’t know how you read – by the time you mention a few names, and you’ve not mentioned the governor, you still don’t know where you’re going, you’re joking. He’s a leader of the party, both at the national and state levels. Definitely, he’s one of those I’ve consulted.

    What would you do if there is a free and fair primary election and you did not win?

    A free and fair primary election? Oh, I’ll queue behind whoever wins. If there was none – we ‘ll leave that to that time. We will act accordingly.

    What happens, if you lose in a flawed primary election? There are speculations that you would move out of the APC.

    We still need to sell our party; we still need to sell our party to the general populace, which is much more important, and that is why I will not engage in a bitter fight, because at the end of the day we still need to come together to fighter a greater ‘devil’. The second option, where there’s a close margin, where there is free, fair transparent primary election, the people would have spoken and there is nothing you can do; it becomes our party issue. You rally round whoever emerges, and try to work out things together. As for the last scenario, where some people think they can outsmart the others, we’ll act accordingly.

  • There is zoning in Enugu, says group

    There is zoning in Enugu, says group

    The people of Uzo-Uwani Local Government Area, Enugu State have called on  the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP and Governor Sullivan Chime to respect the zoning agreement in Enugu State in the interest of fairness and justice.

    A community leader,  Ignatius Onodugo, said the neglect of the pact would lead to the political marginaliation of the area.

    He  said the agreement on the rotation of the House of Representatives slot between Uzo-Uwani and Igbo-Etiti councils in the Nsukka Constituency  is sacrosant, adding that it is the turn of the former to enjoy the slot in the next year’s election.

    The community leader said the  federal legislator from the constituency is trying to tamper with the agreement by mooting a second term agenda.

    Onodugbo said: “In recognition of the historical and brotherly affinity and the need to foster peace and unity between Igbo-Etiti and Uzo-Uwani Local Government Areas,  some wise men from both areas met in February, 1998 and entered into an agreement that the House of Representatives seat would  rotate among the two brotherly local governments.

    “They further agreed that Igbo-Etiti would produce the first candidate for the seat and this led to the emergence of Hon. Mathias Ozor in 1998 under the platform of the UNCP. However, his tenure was short lived because of the truncation of the Abacha transition programme due to his demise,” he said.

    He added: “Again, in January, 1999, by a broader representation, another agreement was entered into by political leaders from the areas reiterating the need to foster a harmonious co-existence between the two areas by rotating the seat.

    “It was further agreed that Uzo-Uwani LGA shall take the first shot this time around having conceded the position to Igbo-Etiti the previous year but for the truncation of the transition programme.

    “This agreement led to the emergence of Dr. Romanus Ezike from Uzo-Uwani whose election was upturned by the electoral tribunal . He spent only three months in the office and was replaced by Hon. Chris Nnadi from Igbo-Etiti, who now stayed from September 1999 to 2007.”

    “It is instructive to note that, since the inception of the Fourth Republic in 1999 till date, Uzo-Uwani has served only four years out of the 16 years by 2015 when the incumbent might have completed her tenure making Igbo-Etiti to occupy the position for 12 years leaving Uzo-Uwani with only four years.

    “It is in the interest of the foregoing that we call on all men of goodwill to see the need for an Uzo-Uwani to take the next turn’’.

  • APC, PDP, LP battle for Ekiti

    APC, PDP, LP battle for Ekiti

    Political parties are warming up for the June 21 governorship election in Ekiti State. Their candidates are campaigning vigorously across the 16 local governments. Sulaiman Salawudeen highlights the issues that will shape the poll in the Fountain of Knowledge.

    The die is cast in Ekiti State. On  June 21, the governorship election will hold in 16 local government areas. The candidates are boasting that they are going to win with a wide margin. But, it is only when the results are  announced that the boys would be separated from the men.

    Three weeks to the election, the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, and his  Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Labour Party (LP) counterparts; Mr. Ayo Fayose and Hon. Opeyemi Bamidele; are campaigning vigorously to gain an upperhand. Out of 18 parties, only the APC, the PDP and the LP  passed the certification test by  the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).  The assessment was based on  many factors including, financial muscle,  the spread and popularity of the parties and their campaign strategies.

    The open air campaigns, which started about two months ago, may not necessarily determine who emerges as the governor at the end of the day. According to observers,  more fundamental  is the strength of the parties. This observers say, would be complemented by the campaigns.

    The parties appear to be leveraging on the partisan campaigns  to beat the INEC directive, which stipulates that open air campaigns must end by 6p.m. This is because there is no limit to the period that any of the candidates or their accredited representatives could call at the residence of anyone for consultations and  ralllies.

    In spite of the violence that has characterised the campaigns, the major contenders are banking on the promise that votes would count. Therefore, the campaigns have gradually into the door-to-door and person-on-person mode to woo voters.

    Many rallies and campains have been held in the past weeks. There have been numerous ‘cross-carpeting’, as splinter groups  across the parties switch loyalty.

    It was the LP that set the pace by admitting members of the APC into its fold. The PDP, on the other hand, has been reconciling members, following its rancorous primaries. As the campaign progressed, the focus shifted to the ruling APC. Everyone was eager to see the party’s joker. Four weeks ago,  former Governor Segun Oni disclosed that he would team up with the APC candidate to sustain the development pace in Ekiti State. Alhough the three contenders had promised to restrict their campaigns to issues, the fear that violence may mar the poll has continued to disturb  major stakeholders. This has compelled the police and traditional rulers to broker peace among the parties. Now, the situation may  have been brought under control as the candidates have vowed to deal with overzealous supporters  crying more than the bereaved.

    There is a sensational adulation  of Fayose by some spectators at campaigns  more circumspect segment  queue behind Fayemi, based on a number of factors. Pundits rank Bamidele third, behind Fayemi and Fayose. Though the PDP and the LP candidates have  assured their supporters that they would win the election, many are of the view that it was a show of bravado.  The critical success factors include the public rating of the incumbent, party structures, membership drive and established voting patterns.

     

    Incumbency factor

     

    So far, the public assessment of Fayemi has been favourable. Today, Ekiti people cutting across the academia and other professions have rated the governor high on performance. They are openly supporting him based, on excellent performance.

    To them, Fayemi’s Eight Point Agenda has revealed the  test of  leadership. The governor has performed in critical sectors, including  infrastructure, education, health, agriculture, empowerment/employment, tourism.

    Professor Ladipo Adamolekun,  explained that “Fayemi’s performance in governance has ranked him well in the class of achievers  in the mould of the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo.”

    Afenifere leaders, after visting the project sites, described Fayemi’s performance in superlative terms. They were among the 50 different groups  and individuals, who have  endorsed the governor for another  term and  volunteered to campaign for him. On the contrary, it is believed that, if Fayemi had done poorly in governance, the assessment would also have reflected such and have affected his public rating.

    According to observers, no town or community in the 17-year-old state is shortchanged in the distribution physical projects and political appointments. Monarchs are carried along through their involvement in the state-sponsored Community Self Help Project.

     

    Party organisation

     

    According to observers, the APC is the  best organised party in Ekiti State. The party has also promoted internal democracy. This is evident in the selection of its candidate for the June 21 poll and its membership drive. To such observers, this attribute has contributed to the  coherence and unity of purpose in the fold.

    The APC has updated its membership records  and mobilised it members to obtain permanent voter cards. According to one of the observers: “What the APC has done  is  more than enough, but they are not taking any chances. It is the only party, which has no faction in whatever guise and therefore, no ‘disgruntled elements’. It is also the only party that promoted an open drive for members, at the end of which it netted 326,000 members.

    “It took the lead in the commencement of open air campaigns. It has gone round the state two times and  still not relenting. The party has also conducted two successful mega rallies, bringing together members across the 16 councils.

    “But, the PDP can be regarded only to the contrary, having shown far less seriousness and brothely love among themselves. No observable membership drive and no intra-party coherence. Although it claims its membership base is over 300,000, it was just one haphazard fixture backed neither by moves nor evidence.” While the APC held its primaries without any rancour and chose its  candidate’s running mate in an atmosphere of peace,  the PDP,  is perceived as moving from one confusion to another.

    The PDP primaries was a failure.

    It was marred by irregularities, which further exacerbated the already strained intra-party relations. Fayose is seen essentially as an unfaithful interloper in the PDP brought to satisfy the party leadership, a leadership which does not connect with certain realities in the organisation of the party. Owing to the way Fayose emerged, many  PDP members have dumped the party for other parties, especially the APC while some “have decided to remain and work against Fayose”.

    Also, instead of using  the opportunity of choosing the running mate to assuage feelings and launder the party’s image, Fayose’s choice of Dr. Olubunmi Olusola from Ikere Ekiti, instead of  Dr. Dare Bejide, one of those aggrieved by the outcome of the primaries, has not helped matters. The aggrieved aspirants are now spoiling for war, not only with Fayose, but the national leadsership of the party for breaching the agreement with them. They have consequently threatened to call it quits with the party. The collapse of a podium in Ifaki-Ekiti while Fayose and whole legion others were campaigning has been described as a bad omen.

    According to observers, the creation by Fayemi of a separate campaign outfit to take care of strategies and operations is further affirmation that the APC operates on ‘hard reason and logic’, rather than on “emotions”. This, according to analysts, is unlike the PDP and the LP, where campaign organisations exist only in name, while all arrangements and strategies, including the branding of vests and other outfits and printing of posters and pamphlets, revolve around the candidates.

     

    Membership drive

     

    The APC and the PDP have roots in all the 177 wards and 2,195 polling units in the state and recent campaign efforts have further complemented the fortunes of the parties.

    The PDP, which was been  disorderly initially, has had a better showing lately, especially after the emergence of Fayose who, in a way, has been able to oil the party machinery. Even, the LP candidate, using his position as a member of the National Assembly, has reached out to most wards, especially those in Ekiti Central.

    But, the APC  seems to be ahead, in terms of the communities networking effort, using the projects Fayemi has executed across the 132 towns. The success of the social security scheme in which 25,000 elderly citizens get N5,000 monthly, has bolstered the governor’s campaign efforts in many ways. Further, the fact that all three senators representing Ekiti, five out of six House of Representatives members and 25 out of 26 state assembly members belong to the APC is equally a boost for Governor Fayemi’s re-election campaign effort.

    Also in the party’s favour is the established voting patterns across zones. The swing communities of Ado-Ekiti, Ikere-Ekiti and Ido/Osi seem to be tilted towards the incumbent governor.

     

    Ekiti South

     

    Ekiti South has been the stronghold of the APC,  since Fayemi came on board. In the last presidential election, Southwest states voted for President Goodluck Jonathan.

    President Jonathan in 2011 won only in Ekiti North and Central, but not in the South, suggesting that the then Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) now APC has a massive support in that zone. Senator Lawrence Agunbiade, and former Ondo State governor, Evangelist Bamidele Olumilua, the federal lawmaker, Ife Arowosoge, Bamidele Faparusi, are few of the formidable political players from the zone.

    But, the highest vote from the zone is always from Ikere, being the second most populated town in Ekiti. However, the town has always been voting for opposition. For instance, in the 2003 governorship election, Ikere voted for former Governor Fayose against Adebayo. In 2007, when Fayemi contested againt Segun Oni, Fayemi won in the town. However, given the fact that the town has enjoyed a lot of developmental projects and political appointments from the current administration, Fayemi has a big following in the town.

     

    Ekiti North

     

    Ekiti North, the base of the governor, also parades high-ranking politicians and government officials that can swing the votes in favcour of Fayemi. Among them are Segun Oni from Ido-Osi; Babatunde Odetola, another strong party member from Ido-Osi; the Head of Servive (HOS), Mr. Olubunmi Famosaya,  from Oye; Secretary to Government, Alhaji Ganiyu Owolabi, from Oye; Kayode Fayemi Campaign Organisation’s Director General, Bimbo Daramola from Oye; and a PDP stalwart, Mr. Ben Ogun-tunase, from Ikole.

    Chief Paul Alabi, another PDP chieftain and former deputy governor are believed to be supporting Fayemi. The PDP is particularly disadvantaged in this regard, as no high-ranking government official at the federal level is from the zone.

    The  Ido/Osi local government has been the enclave of the PDP since 1999. former Governor Oni, former ambassador and education minister, Prof. Tunde Adeniran and former Aviation Minister, Prof. Babalola Abori-shade are from the area.

    After Fayemi had assumed office, the PDP still  proved its dominance by winning a seat in the House of Assembly. Hon. Bunmi Oriniowo, who recently decamped into the APC alongside his political father, Oni, emerged despite the incumbency power of the defunct ACN.

    Now,  Oni is a chieftain of the APC. His foot soldiers; Taiwo Olatunbosun, Kayode Babade and Ben Oguntunase, have not been playing any critical role in the PDP. It was even gathered that they were among the lot who opposed the emergence of Fayose as the party’s flag bearer.

    When former Vice President Atiku Abubaka was about to defect to the APC, Borishade  played very significant role in the deal, which means that he would work for Fayemi. Analysts have predicted a resounding victory for the APC in Ido-Osi and the Northern axis.

     

    Ekiti Central

     

    Ekiti Central is the most difficult zone. It is the home of Bamidele, Fayose and Fayemi’s running mate, Prof. Modupe Adelabu. In 2003 and 2007, Ado, like Ikere, voted for the opposition party. But, this had resulted from the irreconcilable  differences between the incumbent and the people of the town. In 2003, they accused Adebayo of not developing the town to a befitting status 2007, they accused Fayose of opposing the town’s monarch.

    The Ewi of Ado,  has openly supported Fayemi for a second term in office. He is  pushing for his success. Ewi’s support not unconnected with Fayemi’s urban renewal programmes which is believed to have elevated the capital  into a modern city.

    The swing communities of Ado-Ekiti, Ikere-Ekiti and Ido/Osi, the APC maintains a clear lead. Ido Osi, from the analysis, is a clear axis of strategy and possible tragedy. Fayemi’s is backed by Oni who is popular in this area. Although the PDP has dismissed Oni as “a mere paper tiger,” towns people hold him in high esteem.

     

    Rigging

     

    There are challenges for the APC.

    While the party’s performance has been responsible for its popularity and acceptability among the enlightened segments, including teachers, lecturers, lawyers, civil/public servants, doctors, nurses, the market men and women, it has also been strangely responsible for its alienation from other segments, including commercial motorcycle riders and others whose understanding of responsible governance is nill.

    The PDP, has launched attacks from the rear, bolstered by opportunistic recourse to the initial strained relationship the administration and  teachers, following upon the insistence on the Teachers’ Development Needs Assessment (TDNA) test, the promotion examination and staff audit, which led to the sack of some senior workers across the 16 councils.

    But,  Fayemi may have doused the tension through recent meetings with both groups which, according to sources, “have started yielding results. Some officials of the teachers’ and council workers’ unions even clarified in a meeting: “They often say a known devil is better than an unknown saint. But given this ‘fight’ (the June 21 election) between Fayemi and Fayose, it is just a case of a difficult saint against a well known devil. We have made decisions, based on what we know about the two candidates and our members will act wisely.”

    To further nullify the effects of the  strained relationships with teachers, Fayemi recently announced the cancellation of the TDNA and approved the payment of 27.5 per cent Teachers’ Pecuniary Allowance,  for teachers since his administration came on board.

     

    Fear of rigging

     

    Although, the APC leadership  has continued to allay fears about so-called federal might for the PDP candidate, analysts maintain that the possibility of rigging ‘is high.  The Anambra State poll was bungled.

    While  the INEC has allayed fears about rigging  the decision of President Goodluck Jonathan to foist a candidate believed to be unpopular  on the Ekiti PDP has not doused the anxiety.  There are two issues, will the police protect the votes.Will INEC prevent rigging? June 21 will tell.

  • ‘Fayemi deserves second term’

    ‘Fayemi deserves second term’

    In this piece, social critic Dare Babalola contends that Governor Kayode Fayemi will have an edge over other candidates because of his impressive performance in the last three and half years.

    As the countdown to the June 21 governorship election in Ekiti State begins, the candidates have been delving into their respective individual histories to convince the electorate to vote for them. For former Governor Ayo Fayose, his singsong has been that he is no longer the Fayose that was governor 10 years ago. From one rally to the other, especially in locations where many of his actions had alienated the people from him, Fayose repeatedly claimed that he is now ‘born again’ and would be a different governor if given another chance.

    It has been another ballgame with the incumbent governor, Dr Kayode Fayemi, who is leveraging on the execution of his eight-point agenda to convince the electorate that he deserves a second term on the crest of his performance.

    The flagship of the Fayemi government is the infrastructure development of the state. Fayemi has used his campaign rallies to point at many roads he has constructed or rehabilitated in all parts of the state, bringing the attention of every community to how they have benefitted under the scheme. He had promised in 2010 that the scheme is to establish optimum communities that will improve citizen’s lives and attract investments so much that by 2014, all parts of the state is accessible by major roads, making water dams in the state functional to increase water supply by 80per cent and engage in private-public partnership for independent power projects. To actualise the vision, he embarked on the construction of five kilometre road in each of the 16 local governments bringing the total to 81.5 kilometres in the first phase. The second phase covered another 91 kilometres across the 16 local councils. A total of 958 kilometres of federal, state and local government roads have been rehabilitated, reconstructed and/or constructed in the last three and half years. The highpoint is the dualization of major highways in the state capital complete with road furniture that has transformed the face of Ado Ekiti into a modern state capital.   The government is also currently laying 400 kilometres long water pipelines to provide pipe-borne water for every community in the state as envisioned in the eight-point agenda.

    The vision of the Fayemi Government is to establish a knowledge economy that will ensure that skilled manpower, for which the state is renowned, becomes an economic advantage. In three years, the government renovated 836 primary schools and 183 secondary schools. The government also established 24 new primary schools in 2011 and another 18 in 2012 bringing the number of primary schools from 776 in 2010 to 836 by 2012.These initiatives has led to remarkable increase in primary school enrolment which jumped from 155,296 in 2010 to 170,768. This trend has been repeated in secondary school enrolment making Ekiti State the highest per capita in terms of public school enrolment in the country.

    In its effort at promoting e-learning and making the students competitive in the global economy, it distributed 33,000 laptops free of charge to students and 18,000 laptops to teachers at a subsidised price. The government also introduced the payment of Rural Allowance to teachers in the rural areas. It introduced the payment of Core Subject Allowance to teachers of subjects like Mathematics, Physics, and Biology to promote the teaching of science and ensure that Ekiti students are competitive in this age of technology. In tertiary education, the government restored peace and industrial harmony to Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti; reduced fees paid in higher institutions and introduced various scholarship schemes to help many indigent and brilliant students of the state. Between 2011 and 2013, a total sum of N315.7Million was disbursed as scholarship to 2,329 students while bursary awards of N148.2Million were paid to a total of 9,919 beneficiaries.

    These initiatives have not taken time to yield fruits. Although Ekiti State has always being renowned for high literacy level, the level of literacy in the state has further gone up from 67 percent in 2011 to 72.2percent by 2012. In the formal sector, the state has recorded many recognitions of the advancement in education. The state has won the Best Overall Performance State in the Annual National Mathematics and Science Competitions by Science Teachers (STAN); first position in Mathematics for Senior Secondary School Category in the National Quiz competition organised by MAN in 2013; first position in ANCOPPS National Stage Quiz/Essay Competition in 2013; Best Male Student in 2013 WAEC Result and for two years running; has produced the best student in the Nigerian Law School.

    It is in recognition of these remarkable strides that the World Bank recently announced a $10 million support for the state under the State Education Programme Investment Project (SEPIP).

    Fayemi has also recorded significant strides in the provision of healthcare services. He introduced free health care for pregnant women, children under the age of five, elderly citizens, the physically challenged persons and people living with HIV/AIDS. He renovated all general hospitals in the state and constructed a new one, Oba Adejugbe General Hospital, in the state capital, to bring healthcare service to the doorsteps of the people. He constructed a Cancer Diagnostic and Wellness Centre, named after his late deputy, Aduni Olayinka, in Ado Ekiti. In general, Fayemi has increased the number of health care facilities in the state from the 350 he inherited 2010 to 495.

    Beyond the walls of the hospitals and the health facility centres, Fayemi introduced a regime of health missions through which specialized teams of medical personnel travel across the communities to provide healthcare services to the people. At the last count, 363,050 persons have benefitted from the programme. Another 7,850 persons have benefitted from the Ilera Lafin programme through which health care services are taken to the palaces of the traditional rulers for the benefits of the communities, bringing number of beneficiaries of the health outreach programmes to 370,900.

    The benefits of these initiatives are beginning to manifest. The state now has the lowest infant mortality in the country. It has the lowest maternal mortality in the country as well. It presently has the highest life expectancy in the country at 55 years; against the national life expectancy of 47 years. These records are not surprising given the response of the people to the healthcare initiatives of Fayemi. For instance, in-patient attendance of public health care facilities jumped from 9,448 in 2010 to 11,867 by 2012. Delivery of birth in the secondary health facilities increased from 2,190 in 2010 to 2,823 by 2012, while out-patient attendance at secondary health facilities rose from 62,374 in 2010 to 85,730 by 2012.

    A major initiative of the Fayemi administration is the enactment of the Ekiti State Senior Citizen Welfare Law under which citizens above the age of 65 are entitled to a monthly stipend of N5,000. The government has enrolled 25,000 senior citizens of the state under the scheme. The senior citizens also enjoy free medical service.

     

    In the area of industrial development, Fayemi resuscitated the Ire Burnt Bricks Industry which had been moribund for 23 years, established enterprise development centre sat Iloro, Aisegba and Ilupeju to train the people in entrepreneur skills, increased the number of small scale industries from 1,066 in 2011 to 2,257 by 2012 through the provision of a conducive environment and several economic empowerment schemes. He also remodelled the Ikogosi Warm Springs and embarked on a scheme to develop the tourism corridor of the state.

    For gender equality and development, Fayemi led the way in the country when he enacted the Gender-based Violence (Prohibition) Bill and the reservation of at least one third of all appointments and promotions for women. Skill acquisition programmes has been provided for girls out of school, the number of women based cooperative societies has been increased from 100 to 386 between 2010 and 2011 and micro credit facility has been extended to over 5,000 women and special empowerment schemes were designed for market women.

     

     

     

     

     

  • ‘With internal democracy, APC ‘ll survive’

    ‘With internal democracy, APC ‘ll survive’

    Lagos State All Progressives Congress (APC) governorship aspirant Senator Ganiyu Solomon spoke with reporters in Lagos on his ambition, zoning, the agitation for a Christian governor and the fate of the party in the next general elections. Group Political Editor EMMANUEL OLADESU was there.

    What are your expectations about the next governorship poll in Lagos State?

    Democracy translates to participatory governance, which means everybody gets involved; you participate. And that differentiates it from a dictatorial government. Dictatorial government is just about a few people, and that was what we had during the military era. There was the accusation that, ‘all these parties, you’re not allowing internal democracy.’ And they kept saying, ‘yes, we’re guaranteeing internal democracy.’

    I remember when Chief Akande spoke on this, because he was the first person to give something close to a manifesto, of sorts, before the official launch of the party. And part of what he said, apart from fighting corruption, is that in this our party, we are going to make sure we imbibe the culture of internal democracy. So, anything that will make the party look at another direction, instead of a particular direction, will make it short on internal democracy. So, to me, it’s about perception. Some people may say the body language of the leadership is tilting towards this person; at the end of the day, it’s about perception. I say this because I relate with the leadership; none of the leaders have said, ‘I don’t think you can go,’ or ‘you’re not going,’ or has sent somebody to me to say ‘you’re going back to the senate.’ As far as  I am concerned, any way, the issue of the Senate is closed; I am not going back to the Senate. Maybe, we should start with that:  I am not going back to the Senate; that is settled.

    What is your reaction to the endorsement of Mr. Akin Ambode for the governorship election by the Olowo-Eko, Oba Rilwan Akiolu?

    Let me say that, in making the pronouncement, Kabiyesi was expressing his preference. He has also expressed his personal opinion. We’re talking of a party now; I don’t know which part or provision of the constitution of the party says a traditional ruler endorses or can endorse. Whatever he says is his personal wish, which is not the same thing as the wish of the generality of the people.

    At the end of the day, we have a party structure. Let me also tell you that he made the pronouncement at a time when we had not even concluded putting party structures in place. So, it couldn’t have been in consultation, with who? Is it with the political leadership? Is it with the traditional leadership? We’ve had different opinions since then. We deliberately did not come out to say anything about it because we felt it was a political statement. And what do you do with political statements?

    You either respond or you leave it. In this case, we decided to leave it. It has happened a number of times when a traditional ruler in one state would say, ‘this is the person we want.’  At the end of the day, the man would not go anywhere. It has happened several times. I don’t want to cite instances. Even in Lagos, it has happened. In our own case, such statements would not deter us. It will not deter the party man.  What is the weight of a vote? Every vote carries the same weight, regardless of the status of the individual. So, what anybody can do is to go behind his chosen, preferred, aspirant, mobilise people behind him, and provide a level playing field. It is not even for them to do that, that is the provision of the constitution; that is the tenet of democracy – provide a level playing field. And there must be transparency. Whoever wins becomes the party’s candidate, every other person queues behind him. It is not by pronouncement it is not by proclamation;, yes, they were using proclamation years ago to annex, to cede, land , to cede society, to cede country, but not now. That is now out of vogue; this is democracy, you can’t do that. So, we’ll just leave it at that – it is political and we, politicians, take as political, and consign to its proper place.

    Consensus or primaries, which would you recommend to your party?

    Now, we have a much more bigger party; that means it has also increased our stakeholders. And let me also remind you recently, we had a very aggressive membership mobilisation drive which brought a lot of people into this political party. These people now are interested; how do you do consensus? Do you do consultation down to the grassroots level? Do you do consultation up to various sectors of the political parties? Because you need to do that. Then, how do you now aggregate their opinions? If you meet a particular group, they would have somebody. If you meet another group, they would have a different person. So, you have to meet various groups at different levels, up to the lowest rung of the ladder, from the top to the bottom. How do you now aggregate their preferences? You have to do it; it has to be very scientific. Whatever you do, you must make sure it can stand the test of time. What is that test of time? The election.  What I will recommend is to have primaries. It will put everybody’s mind at rest.

    We believe you’ve been consulting with political leaders in the state. Have you consulted with Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, and what did he tell you?

    Yes, I’ve consulted with him. There’s no way you’d want to run for governorship, or any serious political office and you don’t meet your leaders. I met him and he said, ‘well, you can go ahead with your ambition; at the right time we’ll roll out the party programmes and so on, but right now we are busy putting up the party structures.’ We agreed that putting up party structures will not stop me from meeting people, going ahead with my plans. That is it.

    There are some issues that may shape the primaries-zoning and religion. We want your opinion on these issues, zoning and religion.

    I always try not to go into discussing religion, because people can be very emotional about religion and, given what is also going on round the country, it is a very sensitive issue. In this particular part of the country, we don’t discuss religion when it comes to governance. This is the very first time some people are bringing it up. And I can tell you that they are bringing it up because of their own selfish interests. I don’t want to go further, but look at the average family here, you have them muslims, you have them Christians. I have a cousin who is a reverend; my sister is a deaconess; go to Methodist Church, Palm Avenue, that is the church our grandparents attended. That is where they had their burial. So, how will I do anything against a Christian community, for instance? It has never been an issue. Some people have come out to say governance is not about religion. Religion will not put food on your table. You’d have to look at people you believe have integrity, who have what it takes to govern. And I will not also want to go into comparison, as some people would want to do. The moment they succeed in bringing this, and somebody comes on board, and the only credential he’s waving is ‘I am a Christian,’ or ‘I am a muslim,’ his royalty, whether we like it or not, will go to that group, first and foremost. And it will now exert a big influence on his policies, on his roles, on anything he does, because he would now think he’s obliged to that community. That is about religion – like I said, it is very very sensitive, people can be very emotional about it. Now, about zoning. Again, in the history of Lagos – I challenge anybody to prove me wrong – this would be the first time that anybody would sit down and say ‘we’re zoning to this particular person’, and they made a mistake of it. Those people that were doing it made a mistake of saying they were zoning to a particular town. You can only zone to a senatorial district, because that particular town does not constitute the whole district. And when eventually they said, ‘Ok, Epe.’ Its part of the East. We have some other towns, some other divisions, as part of the East. The other divisions rose up and said, ‘no, it’s our turn, because Epe has done it before.’ These are things that are avoidable, if we ourselves had not inadvertently brought it up.

    However, in my own case, if they think that would be a deterrent, no. I also have a roof in the East. And also because they’ve made it possible to move from one senatorial district to another, or ven move across – move from a senatorial district, jump over to another senatorial district. So, it’s all well and good. Whatever I am saying is not new to Lagos politics; there are precedents. It is accepted, it has become a norm, so we do it.

    You said you’re also from the East, where?

    How?

    My dad was from Ipakodo. You go to the palace, they will tell you. They will tell you also his role in upgrading the Obaship. My mum is from Ituwolo, and my maternal grand mum is from Ibeshe. So, whatever way you want to push it, I am there. They can’t talk of zoning as a way of stopping anybody. It is also not a provision of the party, which means anybody, even from the Central, can run. It is the party members that would say, ‘no, we prefer this person.’

    It depends on who the individual is. You go ahead, just leave party members to their thing, that again would promote democracy. It would make the candidates to talk to people, to talk to people across the other senatorial districts. You just don’t fold your arms and say because somebody has zoned it to your area, that is the end. You also need the other districts. At the end of the day, you’re not going to be governor of Lagos East only; you’re supposed to be the governor of Lagos State.

    What are your chances of getting the party ticket, given the possibility that you’re believed to be independent-minded, which is probably one of your undoing?

    I’d gone through this root before, and I know what it requires, I know what it takes. And I have also said that it would be foolhardy of anybody to join a political race without doing self-assessment. In Lagos State, anybody from our party throwing his heart in the ring in 2011 would have been foolish, because there was no way he would have defeated the incumbent. In the same way, I think I have done my own assessment, and, with respect to members of my own party, I know their thinking, I know where they are leaning towards. And I know that they are agitating very strongly that this time around, they should be allowed to indicate their preference. With that in place, I stand more than a good chance of clinching the ticket, and finally by the grace of God.

    Have you also talked to Governor Fashola?

    I said any serious contender will do a far and wide consultation with the leadership of the party, and when you’re talking of the leadership of this political party – I don’t know how you read – by the time you mention a few names, and you’ve not mentioned the governor, you still don’t know where you’re going, you’re joking. He’s a leader of the party, both at the national and state levels. Definitely, he’s one of those I’ve consulted.

    What would you do if there is a free and fair primary election and you did not win?

    A free and fair primary election? Oh, I’ll queue behind whoever wins. If there was none – we ‘ll leave that to that time. We will act accordingly.

    What happens, if you lose in a flawed primary election? There are speculations that you would move out of the APC.

    We still need to sell our party; we still need to sell our party to the general populace, which is much more important, and that is why I will not engage in a bitter fight, because at the end of the day we still need to come together to fighter a greater ‘devil’. The second option, where there’s a close margin, where there is free, fair transparent primary election, the people would have spoken and there is nothing you can do; it becomes our party issue. You rally round whoever emerges, and try to work out things together. As for the last scenario, where some people think they can outsmart the others, we’ll act accordingly.

     

     

     

     

  • APC, PDP flex muscles in Edo

    APC, PDP flex muscles in Edo

    The recent defection of Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu and his followers from the All Progressives Congress (APC) to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is being celebrated with fanfare in Edo State. But, can he swing the pendulum of victory towards the opposition in future election? Correspondent OSAGIE OTABOR asks.

    The emergence of Adams Oshiomhole as the governor of Edo State six years  ago under the platform of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) has diminished the stature of the   Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).  He also impressed the people during his first term, with the rapid transformation of the state. This earned him the mandate for a second term.

    The governor got the second term mandate, in spite of the determination of the PDP to bounce back. This feat has convinced everyone that his victory in the 2007 governorship election, which was  stolen, was not a fluke.

    But, the Edo State  PDP is celebrating the recent defections from the ruling party to its fold, saying the party is capable of displacing the APC in 2015 and 2016. The next governorship election may be two years away, but the PDP is already beating its chest. The PDP leaders believe that the party has found its feet, with the defection  from across the 18 local government areas. The former APC members are loyalists of Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu, who had a disagreement with  Oshiomhole  over the recent party congresses.

    With this development, members of the  PDP are optimistic that the party would sing victory songs during next year’s general elections and the 2016 governorship election. The chairman of the party, Chief Dan Orbih had boasted  that it is a signal that the party is returning to power.

    Observers however, fault  Orbih’s optimism, saying it is too early to conclude that the coming of Pastor Ize-Iyamu will swing the pendulum of victory towards the PDP.

    Apart from the four APC lawmakers in the  House of Assembly who joined the defection train, other defectors were former members of the PDP that had left the party, ahead of the 2007 general elections. The key defectors are Evelyn Omokhodion, former Speaker of Edo State House of Assembly, Bright Omokhodion, Chief Amos Osunbor, Alhaji Usman Shagadi, and Abubarkar Momoh.

    The four former APC lawmakers are Abdulrasaq Momoh (Etasako West 1), Friday Ogieriakhi (Orhiomwon South) Patrick Osayimen (Oredo East) and Jude Ise-Idehen (Ikpoba-Okha).

    Abdulrasaq Momoh said that he was not really part of the APC because he was disowned by the defunct ACN, following last year’s local government elections. Momoh was arrested during  the elections following rifle allegedly found on him. Subsequently he was remanded in prison.

    He said: “Before now, I had decided to give the party a chance, to know whether the new leadership would reconsider their action. But, recent events have convinced me that they are hypocrites. Similarly, the people of my constituency appear to have also seen through the party and its leadership, especially as it relates to the provision of basic amenities. We are from the same local government with the governor, but he has totally neglected us.

    “The governor has done creditably well in his homestead, Uzairue, but he abandoned my constituency for reasons best known to him. He also neglected Auchi, the headquarters of the local government. My people said they can no longer bear it and I have no other option, but to move with them. It was not a personal thing, but as a result of the neglect of my constituency. I expected when money was voted to contain the erosion problem in Auchi that it would be used for that purpose. But, it was diverted. If they used N30 billion for Benin City erosion, they should have spent N2 billion on the erosion problems in Auchi. What I’m saying is that Auchi has not been given the necessary attention. At the rural areas, there are no roads. The governor could not go to those areas by road during the campaign for his second term. He went there with helipcopter.

    “The PDP’s chances in the coming elections are better because the people are not satisfied with the performance of the ruling party. The women are complaining, bike riders who are now without jobs are complaining, school proprietors, saw-millers, workers, teachers are complaining of over taxation. All these are indicators of the people’s rejection of APC as a party.”

    But, others are leaving for personal reasons. Ise-Idehen, for instance, is warming up for the House of Representatives race, after his eight-years stint at the House of Assembly. His ambition is however, considered unrealistic by leaders of the APC.

    The lawmaker said he left due to lack of internal democracy in the party. He said the governor failed to take decisive actions on certain pertinent issues.

    His words: “It was difficult for me to leave the APC. It is only a mad man that continues to do the same thing and expect a different result. It was like I was hitting my head against the wall. People refused to change. They say one thing and do something different. It was a difficult situation.

    “The governor is fair and a good man, who has the interest of the people at heart, but the people around him are the problem. They are the problem we have in the APC. We are not fighting the governor; we are fighting the group surrounding him. The governor is a friend. He has not offended me in any way. I have nothing against him. What I am against is the system and the people around the governor. I have not heard of any plan to impeach the governor and I will not be involved in any plan to impeach Oshiomhole. As for the  speaker, it is an internal issue within the house. It is only the members of the house that can remove the speaker. It is not about me wanting to remove the speaker.

    “Those people saying we left because of our stomach are the ones lying to the governor. They tell the governor lies so that they can get something from him. But, the governor has not been able to see through the lies and when his attention was drawn to the issues, he did not act.

    “We are not in the system to fight anybody. I believe the PDP has improved in the last few years. Much to our surprise, the PDP has made a major turn-around. I decided to leave the house, which I helped to build because the environment was no longer conducive. What they are saying does not make sense.  It is really not about the stomach. I have never been hungry in my life and I will never in this life time be hungry again. I can walk away from politics and not be hungry.

    Osayimen, who is also eyeing the House of Representative, said his problem with the APC started 18 months ago when the House leadership started treating him like a minority member because he voiced the feelings of his people concerning the Land Use Charge.

    He said that he left to prove a point, adading that,  based on personal principle, he could not be in a party where he would not be allowed to express his opinion.

    Osayimen said: “The congress was just the last straw. My spirit left the party about 18 months ago. They crucified me because I stood to speak the voice of my people. What a Bini man hates most is to ask him who are you?  The party may be doing well, but without internal democracy, it still has a long way to go.”

    Ize-Iyamu is insisting that he would deliver the state to the PDP, by winning in all the 18 local government areas. He said no amount of money and blackmail could change the situation adding that more lawmakers would soon defect to the PDP.

    He said: “I gave my best to ensure the success of the party, but Oshiomhole tried to belittle some of us. Majority of the party members had a lot of confidence in me. Many of them accepted the last ACN executive list because of me. Some of us did certain things to support him. We were interested in him delivering the dividends of democracy. We wanted him to be more involved in governance. Issues pertaining to the party that would have distracted him, we took it off him.

    APC chieftain Chief Dan Owegie, who described the defection as a one-man movement, said the exit of Ize-Iyamu would not affect the fortune of the party. His words: “Those people, who allegedly defected with, him were hired. Only few people there were party men. The party tried its best. The governor tried his best. He called several meetings, but Ize-Iyamu was resolute on leaving the party.

    “The APC is going to score 18 over 18 in the next election. Pastor Ize-Iyamu can no longer deliver Edo for the PDP. We will win because of the APC, development strides. The governor will redouble his effort to develop the state. Our future is very bright in Edo. The trouble shooters have left. It is greed that is pushing them out of the party. It is too early for somebody to start putting structures on ground, two years before the expiration of the Comrade Governor’s tenure.”

    APC Secretary, Chief Osaro Idah expressed confidence that Pastor Ize-Iyamu would return to the party after he gets tired of the PDP.  Idah said it was laughable for Ize-Iyamu to talk of winning the state for the PDP when the people are aware of what is going on.

    Comrade Godwin Erhahon, who challenged  Ize-Iyamu to a public debate, said it was Oshiomhole’s goodwill and antecedents that gave the party victory in 2007. He said those being wooed by the PDP were “the rejected ones of APC, who have fallen out of grace.”

    He said: “I have challenged Pastor Ize-Iyamu to a public debate and he is not bold enough to accept it. One of the PDP spokesmen challenged me, asking why it is only the governor that is inspecting projects and not the commissioners. That shows they are scared of the achievements of the governor. The Benin Water Storm is an unprecedented achievement. Have they not always acclaimed the goodness of the governor? Is it now that they have lost out they are saying different things?

    “Oshiomhole has so deflated the PDP that, even if a swarm of flies that fell out of grace  join the PDP, is will celebrate them. The PDP are receiving those we rejected and the bad ones in the APC. Ize-Iyamu should have hijacked other parties, if he had the structure. But, they are going to where the food is ready.

    “It was when they saw what we put in place for Oshiomhole in 2005 that they begged Oshiomhole to join them. Oshiomhole won because of his personal appeal and not what those leprous hands did. Nobody wants to shake hands with them.”

     

  • There is zoning in Enugu, says group

    There is zoning in Enugu, says group

    The people of Uzo-Uwani Local Government Area, Enugu State have called on  the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP and Governor Sullivan Chime to respect the zoning agreement in Enugu State in the interest of fairness and justice.

    A community leader,  Ignatius Onodugo, said the neglect of the pact would lead to the political marginaliation of the area.

    He  said the agreement on the rotation of the House of Representatives slot between Uzo-Uwani and Igbo-Etiti councils in the Nsukka Constituency  is sacrosant, adding that it is the turn of the former to enjoy the slot in the next year’s election.

    The community leader said the  federal legislator from the constituency is trying to tamper with the agreement by mooting a second term agenda.

    Onodugbo said: “In recognition of the historical and brotherly affinity and the need to foster peace and unity between Igbo-Etiti and Uzo-Uwani Local Government Areas,  some wise men from both areas met in February, 1998 and entered into an agreement that the House of Representatives seat would  rotate among the two brotherly local governments.

    “They further agreed that Igbo-Etiti would produce the first candidate for the seat and this led to the emergence of Hon. Mathias Ozor in 1998 under the platform of the UNCP. However, his tenure was short lived because of the truncation of the Abacha transition programme due to his demise,” he said.

    He added: “Again, in January, 1999, by a broader representation, another agreement was entered into by political leaders from the areas reiterating the need to foster a harmonious co-existence between the two areas by rotating the seat.

    “It was further agreed that Uzo-Uwani LGA shall take the first shot this time around having conceded the position to Igbo-Etiti the previous year but for the truncation of the transition programme.

    “This agreement led to the emergence of Dr. Romanus Ezike from Uzo-Uwani whose election was upturned by the electoral tribunal . He spent only three months in the office and was replaced by Hon. Chris Nnadi from Igbo-Etiti, who now stayed from September 1999 to 2007.”

    “It is instructive to note that, since the inception of the Fourth Republic in 1999 till date, Uzo-Uwani has served only four years out of the 16 years by 2015 when the incumbent might have completed her tenure making Igbo-Etiti to occupy the position for 12 years leaving Uzo-Uwani with only four years.

    “It is in the interest of the foregoing that we call on all men of goodwill to see the need for an Uzo-Uwani to take the next turn’’.