Category: Politics

  • Why lawmakers are weak in oversight functions – Ibrahim

    Why lawmakers are weak in oversight functions – Ibrahim

    Senator Abu Ibrahim is the senator representing Katsina South Senatorial District on the platform of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC). A close associate of former head of state and presidential candidate of CPC in the April 2011 presidential election, Major General Mohammadu Buhari, he was the links man in the aborted merger plan between the CPC and Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) ahead of the 2011 elections. He spoke with Tony Akowe on a number of issues. Excerpts

    2015 is around the corner and there is the clamour for a northern presidency. What is your take on this?

    I think 2015 is not around the corner because we have only spent one and half years in four year tenure; with two and half years to go. What is in front of me now is to have the opposition parties merge into one; ACN, CPC and probably ANPP, to form a formidable opposition party. One thing Nigerians do not know is that the moment we succeed in the merger plan, even the PDP must step up because they know there is somebody who can take over from them. But because most parties are not united and have strength in certain areas, that is why they do things with arrogance because they know there is no single party that can take over from them. But the moment we come together, even though we are taking over power, they too will stand up and make sure they do the right thing. Of course, every region has the right to clamour for the presidency. But I always think the right moment will bring the right president which will be acceptable by the people, maybe a northern person or anybody from any part of the country. But when you look at the way we are passing power from zone to zone, it should be the right time for the north to have the president. But it is not a constitutional issue. It was a suitable arrangement by the political parties. But like I said, my main concern now is the merger of the political parties.

    Before the last general elections, there was a move by opposition parties to form an alliance but it collapsed. How sure are we that there won’t be a repeat of that scenario?

    You are wrong. I can claim, without contradiction, that I was the principal link between ACN and CPC. I can claim that I was the principal connector between Senator Ahmed Bola Tinubu and General Muhammadu Buhari and I know what transpired. It is the correct story I am telling you. There was no problem then except for lack of time. The issue became very serious six months to election. So as far as I am concerned, what was against us then was time. A name was agreed upon at that time for the two parties. The name agreed upon was Action Congress for Progressive Change (ACPC). It was also agreed that General Buhari will be the presidential candidate while ACN was to produce the Vice- President. But due to lack of time, we couldn’t do that. Every party then has done its conventions and had their candidates. There was no way we could go and start another convention. At least, we have basic understandings and CPC have a basic understanding on the parameter of merger. Then Buhari was agreed to be the presidential candidate and so, I don’t think there was a problem on that. But the timing was just too short because of the election. But we all knew that there were external forces that wanted to bring a setback.

    What do we expect from the National Assembly with regards to the Petroleum Industry Bill?

    What we agreed regarding the PIB was that we need technical briefing on it before considering the bill. But till now, the minister has not come to give us the briefing. Before we make a law, we need to ask a lot of questions. There are issues that need to be discussed technically and if we don’t understand the technicalities, we may pass something we don’t know anything about. After the minister and experts have briefed us, then we will understand the reasons behind the 10 percent to be given to the oil communities. It sounds nice, but how did you arrive at the 10 percent? How much is the investor making before you start talking about the 10 percent profit. So, we are still waiting for the Minister’s briefing.

    Many Nigerians believe that legislators are not performing their oversight functions well and that their laxity in doing so is responsible for the decay in most sectors of the economy. What is your reaction to this?

    I agree with you and that is the truth. But Nigerians should understand that the legislature is the weakest part of government and this is occasioned by the fact that during military interventions, when army take over, the presidency and the judiciary still exist while the National Assembly is closed down. In some countries, you will find out that some Senators have been there for over 30 years and such a senator knows virtually everything and have everything at his fingertips. Only 25 percent of members of the current Nigerian Senate are third termers and what this means is that a lot of members have a lot to learn. That makes the National Assembly the weakest in terms of capacity building, infrastructures, training and lots more. So, I agree that we are weak in that area. But we have been discussing these issues on how we can enhance our oversight functions and Nigerians must know that all these things cost money. People should not shout or cry that large sums of money are going to National Assembly. There is a complete budget office where budget is being prepared by the executive. They will study it item by item and can cost it for you and say look this project cost is high. So our oversight functions may be weak, but we are conscious of that because I am a member of the leadership. Honestly, every time we meet, we lament over our weaknesses. Like the issue of the state of our police colleges, I am a member of the Police Affairs Committee. Since I found myself in the Assembly, I have not gone to any police college. It is only now that we are preparing to visit the police colleges to see things for ourselves. We are even thinking of visiting zonal commands and places like that.

    Some people believe that lawmakers don’t actually carry out oversight function when they go out, but they go there to collect money from the agencies?

    I cannot accept that because I have been to many places and nothing of such happened. I think the issue is beyond giving or receiving brown envelopes; it is the issue of capability. If you look at the number of staff an American Senator has and you look at what we have here, you will laugh. A Senator in America has over 70 staff, while I have just five staff. Every committee should have operational vehicles, but our committee has only one. So, if we want to visit for example Police College and our members are ten in the committee with only one vehicle, the car will not be able to take us all and we will end up looking for assistance from the ministry for a bus which could compromise the process. So, all I am trying to say is that we need to do our oversight functions well, but the National Assembly is not founded properly to have the capacity to do the job well.

    Every year, a lot is said about constituency projects for members of the National Assembly and people have always come up with this idea that money budgeted are diverted to personal use by members. How much was actually budgeted for constituency projects last year?

    There was negotiation between the federal government and the National Assembly on that and at the end of the day, I think about a hundred billion will be provided for constituency projects. However, let us not misunderstand constituency projects as if the money is given to members of the National Assembly. Each Senator is allocated some of the money and you decide which of the projects is more important to your area. You will go then and put it under the ministry concerned. The ministry will receive the money and execute the projects.

    This was how this issue of constituency projects came in and nobody is given a Kobo out of the money. What is important is to make it clear that money is not taken from federal treasury and given to me for example to go and implement projects in the name of constituency projects.

    Don’t you think that getting involved in project execution and monitoring is taking you away from your legislative duties?

    Approval of the budget is one of our primary functions and the budget covers project. If we approve, why can’t we have the right to say my constituency should have this and that? I am more of a representative than a minister because I am elected. I am supposed to have a constituency office. I am supposed to be with my people always to know their needs and report back and make sure their needs are attended to.

    It is easier for people of my constituency to come and see me than to see the Minister even though the budget is prepared by the Ministers. So, approval, which is the Appropriation Bill, is the function of the National Assembly. The President prepares it and brings it to the National Assembly who appropriates. That is why this issue of project is not taking our time. An oversight function again is to make sure that the projects that are contained in the budget are carried out. When you look at the constitution, you will see that it is part of our primary function. In fact, it’s our biggest function to make sure that the budgets are implemented. That is why we have committees for each sector. For instance education is attached to education ministry. They can go to the minister at any time to say look, we appropriated a hundred million to build a schools in so and so places; we want to go and see the place. Appropriation and monitoring of oversight function is the most powerful tool in the National Assembly and they can indict the government if they so wish. They can go and see project and with that we can expose corruption.

    What do you think should be done to tackle insecurity in Nigeria, particularly in the north?

    I was watching Al jazeera recently and I saw the president of Somalia saying there was this link between Alshabab and Boko Haram, which means that these things are now having a global network. So, I think the Federal government has to act fast in terms of diplomatic relations with those countries that they think Al’shabab and Alqa’ida have roots. This fight in Mali is so important to Nigeria because definitely the alqa’ida Almagrib have link here. It may have started as a local issue, but international terrorist groups are looking for local groups so as to start coming in. The federal government has to step up and cooperate with other nations for a lasting solution for this insecurity issue.

    Coming back to your state, Katsina, what is your take on the activities of the PDP-controlled government in the state? How will you rate the performance?

    I am disappointed with the attitude of the Katsina State Government. There were two issues of concern to me. There are power projects, transmission lines which were awarded by late Yar’adua and funded for two years. One of the projects was in Katsina South and three are in Katsina North. Suddenly,

    in last year’s budget, they were removed and these were projects that were signed and construction was going on; but they were removed from the budget. Along with my colleagues, we were fighting to ensure that they were restored in the budget. I tried to get Katsina State government involved but somehow they were not forthcoming.

    Another issue is that of water. We have Jibiya dam and the Safka dam which will involve foreign loan and because of our involvement in the approval process, we said Katsina has been omitted. But we have no right to sign loan on behalf of Katsina and so it requires the governor to come but he didn’t come. Honestly, Katsina state government have failed completely in addressing the suffering of Katsina people, especially in the area of water and electricity when they can come and use their position as PDP government to do so.

    We members of the opposition got some listening ear and all that was required was for them to come and participate in the fight; but they didn’t come. I cannot say right now whether the issue of Power has been restored in the budget. So, I cannot give the Katsina State government pass mark. They claimed to have built 600 tube wells in the 34 local government areas of Katsina State while we have built 1100 of such wells in Funtua zone with eleven local government areas. Some of the roads we are doing belong to Katsina state government. I don’t know what they are doing, but I can see buildings with no relevance being built. Class rooms without teachers; you can see buildings but no teachers.

    I am bringing ICT schools, but we need security. We are going to put computers in the class rooms but we need security. If the schools are not capable of securing them, we will try to involve the state government. I will take the project there and let them secure them. I may be in this position maybe for four years but if a state government or local government is involved, there will be a permanent security so that it will last longer. I am sorry to say that Katsina State government is not doing what it is expected to do.

     

     

  • Rage over First Ladies’ house

    Rage over First Ladies’ house

    Joe Agbro Jr. in this report captures the rage that has trailed plans to build a N4 billion Africa First Ladies’ Peace Mission headquarters in Abuja

     

    plans to build a N4 billion Africa First Ladies’ Peace Mission headquarters in Abuja is the subject of a raging controversy allegedly rooted in an age- long political battle.

    Already, many rights groups have wondered if the scheme would not constitute profligacy on the part of President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration.

    All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), in its reaction to the proposed scheme, said in a statement signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Chief Emma Eneukwu, that the move to build the Africa First Ladies Peace Mission House with public funds is illegal.

    ‘ANPP believes that the matter is a non-issue as the budget for the complex is inherently illegal and should not waste the time of the distinguished senators in their work.

    ‘The fact on ground is that the Federal Government has already declared that the African First Ladies, Peace Mission is a non-governmental organisation and could not be funded with the taxpayers’ money.

    The N4bn proposal was contained in the FCT’s N253bn budget for the 2013 fiscal year currently before the National Assembly.

    The ANPP statement further said, “our party finds it puzzling, absurd and incongruous that another project of the AFLPM could now be smuggled into the budget of the FCT, an undeniable burden to the already burdened citizens of our great nation.”

    The party wondered why the FCTA decided to fund the AFLPM building project to the detriment of Nigerians in need of different people-oriented projects. It also charged the members of the Senate to reject the budget provision.

    On its part, the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) described it as ‘outrageous imprudence.’

    The CPC National Publicity Secretary, Mr. Rotimi Fashakin, declared that the budget in itself was a demonstration of the present administration’s profligacy.

    ‘It is appalling to see budgetary allocation as much as N4bn for the office of the First Lady that is not recognised by the nation’s constitution,’ CPC said, adding: “At a time when many Nigerians have been rendered homeless by the anti-people stance of the PDP-led FCT administration, it is ludicrous to imagine that, rather than embarking on projects in alleviating the afflictions, this clueless regime has again shown its undisguised self-centredness.”

    Also speaking on the issue, Executive Director of the Civil Society Legislative and Advocacy Centre, Mallam Awual Musa-Rafsanjani, said, ‘the allocation was an insult to Nigerian taxpayers.’

    However, the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has come out to defend the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) N4bn funding of the Africa’s First Ladies, Peace Mission building.

    A statement by the National Publicity Secretary of the PDP, Chief Olisa Metuh, condemned CPC and Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) for criticising the N4 billion for the First Ladies, Mission, explaining that the building was not for Nigeria’s First Lady, Dame Patience Jonathan.

    As Metuh argues, the complex, on completion, is to host the AFLPM which has the backing of the African Union as an instrument for championing women and youth development.

    “The Peace Mission House is a public institution, a building in the likes of the Women Development Centre (WDC), Nigerian Cultural Centre, among others, which the law empowers the FCTA to build and operate in provision of facilities for the advancement of its development efforts.

    Defending its position, a statement from the office of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) minister reiterated PDP’s arguments and absolved the office of the Nigerian First Lady from the alleged profligacy.

    ‘As part of its efficiency measure,’ the statement said, ‘the FCT Administration saw in the proposed headquarters of the African First Ladies’ Peace Mission building an opportunity to save cost by using the AFLPM building to serve multiple roles in providing office accommodation as well as housing not just African First Ladies’ Peace Mission but other international bodies as well.’

    It added, ‘the FCT administration has statutory duty to build for the good of the public edifices such as the Women Centre, National Hospital for Women and Children (now National Hospital) and the current Nigeria Cultural Centre and Millennium Tower that is being built at the cost of 62 billion naira by the FCT Administration.’

    Most Nigerians are yet to be convinced. Human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, simply said, ‘It’s just a proposal. The National Assembly has not passed it, and I am sure the senate has already handled it (the proposal) well. It’s not going to pass through. And if it passes through, it is going to be challenged because it is illegal.’

    Political watchers and insiders at the corridor of power in Abuja, who responded on the condition of anonymity however told The Nation that the controversy is further fuelled by the political power between Dame Patience Jonathan and the former First Lady, Alhaja Turai Umaru Yar’Adua over the land. Some of them alleged that Turai and her supporters have not let go and are behind criticism.

    It would be recalled also that in July 2012, the African First Ladies Summit was enmeshed in a controversy following reports that the federal government bought 200 new super cars for the summit. Then, the AFLPM had refuted government’s involvement.

    As the controversy rages, Patience Jonathan and Turai Umaru Yar’Adua are carefully keeping mute over the matter.

     

  • Chime and the Enugu groups

    Chime and the Enugu groups

    It is no longer news that the Governor of Enugu State, Mr. Sullivan Chime, returned to Nigeria on Thursday after 140 days sojourn abroad where he reportedly attended to his failing health.

    It is also public knowledge the governor who came into the country through the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, from London, was received by a mammoth crowd of well-wishers.

    The interest here is that while his supporters and associates have been having field days talking about his re-appearance, those who championed the agitation generated by his disappearance have also expressed joy at his return, blaming his associates, who they said caused the whole confusion by hiding the truth from the people and engaging in unnecessary cover up.

    Groups like Save Enugu Group (SEG), Enugu Mandate Forum (EMF) and the likes, are now part of the jubilating crowd.

    The message we can all learn is that handlers of our leaders can save us unnecessary antagonism if they are more open and truthful over the affairs of our leaders.

    Chime left the shores of the country since September 19, 2012, ostensibly on holidays but his prolonged stay abroad had attracted public angst even as many believed the governor’s health had failed.

  • ‘AD/Obasanjo pact  was a mistake’

    ‘AD/Obasanjo pact was a mistake’

     Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) chieftain Senator Olabiyi Durojaiye is 80 today. He spoke with  EMMANUEL OLADESU and JEREMIAH OKE on the journey so far, the controversial pact bewteen Alliance for Democracy (AD) and former President Olusegun Obasanjo, Afenifere crisis and constitution review.

    In the aborted Third Republic, you joined politics and vied for the Presidency. Do you regret not being President of Nigeria?

    I am not regretting it at all. There cannot be two presidents at a time. By the time I ran as presidential aspirant, there were 12 of us in the primaries in the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and 11 in the NRC. A friend told me that someone told him that, if anyone should be considered, it is Durojaye because he is the most qualified, in terms of integrity and knowledge. I contested and the thing was cancelled on October 17, 1992. I would have done well for my country, but, if they don’t want me, I’ll go back to where I am coming from. It is good to have independent means of livelihood. That is why I am one of the people advocating that parties should not nominate people who have no means of independent earning, so that when they fail in elections, they will have something to fall back to. As a qualified lawyer, I have nothing to worry about at all. I knew if I could not serve my country as a President, I could serve as a good citizen and that was what I have been doing.

    As a Senator, what value did you add to the system?

    The major landmark achievement and the value I added to the system as a senator was the nine reasons I canvassed against the impeachment of our leaders. In 2002, President Olusegun Obasanjo and Senate President Ayim Pius Ayinm were at loggerheads. At the beginning of that year, they were very good friends. When we opposition parties moved that certain corrections should be made on the electoral bill in 2001, which was tampered with before an ascent was given, he supported Obasanjo. When we resumed in January, we said no, the bill has to be abrogated and reenacted as we wanted the electoral bill to be. The President of the Senate was saying we should forget it because we are one nation, regardless of the party affiliation. Then, I said ‘I don’t trust your friendship with Mr. President; we are supposed to be watchdog, it is normal to be loyal to your man, but be careful. Let us oppose what is wrong and do what is right’. However, I don’t know what happened within their party. The President was recruiting some supporters to impeach Ayim and Ibrahim Mantu his deputy. But Ayim used the advantage of incumbency because he had the larger number in the house and none of them had the two-third that was required to impeach. Therefore, every vote counted. Meanwhile, I was a bit indisposed and went to treat myself in America. The Whip of my party, Senator Emmanuel Differ, was calling me on phone that they needed me at home. I decided to fly back home. I traveled back home overnight and the first thing I did was to interview Ayinm and I said to him that, remember I told you that that man, a solder, is a hard nut, don’t knock your head against Obasanjo because it will not pay you, because you are like a son to me. Meanwhile what we are reading in the America newspapers were uncomplimentary for the image of the country. Many awful things were published in the papers. The supporters of Chief Obasanjo were accusing Ayim and Ayim’s supporters too were hitting back and the thing was echoing abroad, so I was worried. I saw Ayim around 11pm and by the time I would see President Obasanjo, it was about 1am. Senator Peter Adeyemo representing Oyo could beer me witness because he was with Ayim. I called the Alliance for Democracy (AD) caucus leader in the Senate, Senator Mojisoluwa Akinfemwa, and requested him to summon a meeting. That morning, I drafted nine reasons why Nigeria cannot afford to impeach any of its leaders. Those of us in NADECO cannot allow the democracy we fought fought to crumble. I argued that the impeachment should not take place. So, every three hours, the Radio Nigeria, NTA and the private electronic media across the country were broadcasting my nine reasons against impeachment. That was the end of the crises.

    I also helped the retirees to make a law that would enable them to receive their gratuities on the day of their retirement. Alhaji Yayale Ahmed was the Head of Service. Each time he wanted to give out the cheques, he would call me to come and present to some of the retirees.

    Also one of my colleagues, Senator Wahab Tafida, the Nigeria High commissioner to Great Britain, always commended me for the role I played in the establishment of the National Assembly Service Commission.

    Along with the late Senator Chuba Okadigbo, I was part of the team that investigated the Odi massacre. I wrote a fine report.

    I want you to reflect on the controversial between Alliance for Democracy and Obasanjo, ahead of the 2003 elections.

    I was not a party to it, but I cannot absolve myself from the responsibility because, if I did not share the opinion of our representatives, I should have kicked against it. But I was equally at fault. We trusted the solder, contrary to the advice of our leader, the late Abraham Adesanya. He said the first lesson a solder can teach anyone is deception because, if they offered the right hand to you in hand shake, you should be careful because the other hand may have a dagger. So, he said to the governors who led the delegation to negotiate with the PDP to be careful. People were ridiculing Obasanjo as the man without constituency because Obasanjo could not deliver his constituency. The late Lam Adesina appealed to us that we should advise our people in his local government to vote for him at the local government level, but when it comes to other elections, they should vote for our party, so that he could deliver his constituency because Obasanjo is our man. Though I warned against that, despite the fact that I was not at the meeting. But I am not pointing accusing fingers to our governors. If I had thought they were wrong, I would have said no. But it was only Tinubu who had that foresight to say that, with the advice of Baba Adesanya, he will not go with this arrangement in Lagos. What the soldier later did to us was shocking.The Awujale and the people of Ijebu were strongly behind me because they knew I performed. So, they wanted me for the second time, but we were rigged out by the solder because we were too trusting. It’s all history now.

    What are the circumstances that led to your brief detention during the military regime?

    It was not a brief detention because I spent up to one and a half years in detention with one meal a day, sleeping on the bare floor and mosquitoes nearly ate up the whole of my body. In fact, at a time I suspected that the security men were unleashing mosquitoes to come and deal with me. It was too much, and the circumstances were because we stood for the truth. Abacha is dead now; may his soul rest in peace. He sent for me through Gusau. I was the President of Kuru Alumni Association. He said: “Our President, we all admire you and we like you, but each time we received a security report, your name is always among the people who are attempting to destabilise this country. Why are you doing this?” I said am not destabilising this country and he said, but the President is worried about that and he respected you. Those military people, Abacha, Gusau, Babangida used to show civility when they see an elderly person. Akinriade always calls me egbon. So, they show respect. I was released when Abacha suddenly died and Abdulsalam Abubakar, whose name “Abdulsalam” means peace, became the Head of State and released the first nine people.

    Is it not confounding to you that, up to now, the two factions of Afenifere are not ready to resolve the crisis?

    I did my best as an individual, but our people undermined my effort. When the things happened, I aligned with the governors in our group. The elders criticised me that I am older than those governors, why should I follow them? I said the governors’ argument was right. If you really want Nigeria to move forward as one country, we should have a political party that will cut across the whole country, so we should build the party across the country. That was the argument of the governors, but some of our elders in Afenifere did not feel that way. They felt any stream that forgets its source will dry. They also claimed that, under Baba Awolowo, Afenifere was AG and AG was Afenifere and that was where they missed it up. One thing is that electoral process was altered, right from the time of Baba Awolowo till our time. People are so reliable at that time; people voted their conscience and election was based on merit in those days, money was not the major factor. Awolowo knew the psychology of our people and people loved.

    Next year, the federal government will roll out the drums for the centenary celebration. What do you have to say on that?

    Any centenary is worth celebrating, if it is a centenary of freedom from bondage. Yes, we should thank God we are alive to witness it, provided people will not use the opportunity to siphon money unnecessarily. But we should celebrate in moderation. The amount they devoted for it should be scrutinised properly. Not that we should not celebrate, but we should spend judiciously because our being together till today is worth celebrating.

    What is your position on the Southwest regional integration?

    Yes it is good thing. It has happened before and that was what gives the West the edge over other regions, in terms of education. But people call a dog a bad name in order to hang it. We are not breaking away from Nigeria.

    Now that the National Assembly set to review the 1999 Constitution, what are your expectations?

    The National Assembly is too busy with many assignments. It should not be their business. The Federal Government should set up a committee, just as Babangida set up the Constituent Assembly in 1988-89, of which I was a member. there is no way they will work thoroughly if they are saddled with the responsibility of reviewing the constitution.

  • Is Jonathan/Obasanjo rift over?

    Is Jonathan/Obasanjo rift over?

    If it boils down to contradiction, perhaps, only Olusegun Obasanjo, retired General, Balogun of Owu kingdom and Ekerin of Egbaland can resolve it. To many observers, the civil war hero, former military Head of State and President of Nigeria has become a man of contrasting personality at the twilight of life. No doubt, he is a military tactician. If it is true, as the late Yoruba leader, Senator Abraham Adesanya, once put it, that the first rule in the military is deception, Obasanjo’s style as a military politician aptly marks him out as a man of inexplicable tricks.

    Since the middle of last year, Obasanjo had become the internal opposition leader in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). He has repeatedly criticised President Goodluck Jonathan for his slow motion approach to issues of national importance. For example, the former President, who is believed to be Dr. Jonathan’s benefactor, has openly chided the federal government for its poor response to the security challenge, especially the Boko Haram threat.

    Obasanjo is also at the centre of the PDP crisis. He and the President are holding antagonistic views and positions on the lingering PDP civil war. The former President, party sources said, was injured by the judicial removal of his lackey, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, from the position of the PDP national secretary. The party chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, who is a loyalist of President Jonathan, has not enjoyed cordial relations with the ousted scribe. Recently, Obasanjo’s men have been attacking the activities of Jonathan Administration. Former Education Minister Mrs. Oby Ezekwesiliese has accused the government of reckless spending. Another former minister, Femi Fani-Kayode said the government lacked focus. The general feeling in the party is that the former President is rooting for another presidential candidate for 2015 elections.

    When Obasanjo stormed the Aso Rock Villa, the seat of power four days ago, many people were taken aback. It was a surprise visit. But what he did was more surprising. Contrary to his previous disposition, the former President, who attended the weekly church service as the Aso Rock church, prayed for the success of Jonathan Administration, which his men have accused of ineptitude and lack of direction. According to the report, he also had lunch with the President. However, many believe that the prayers offered by the ‘Ebora Owu’ may not have come from his heart. Others feel that there is limitation to the efficacy of political prayers.

    When he was in the saddle as President, Obasanjo had established himself in the habit of creating the impression that he had sheathed his words, only to turn back to hit his target. When the row between him and former Senate President Chuba Okadigbo reached the climax, the former President paid him a surprise visit, conveying the impression of a ceasefire. Okadigbo’s supporters exclaimed that the war was over. During the meeting with the late Oyi of Oyi and his wife, Obasanjo cracked a lot of jokes, exchanged banters with his host and waved the olive branch. Few days later, there was the resumption of hostilities and suddenly, Okadigbo was impeached.

    The same tragedy befell the former PDP national chairman, Chief Audu Ogbeh. Fed up with the crises ravaging the ruling party, the Second Republic minister wrote Obasanjo, alerting him to the consequences of the Anambra State PDP crisis. He also dissected the administration’s programmes, saying that saying that there was gap between expectation and reality. He also warned that mass unemployment was a time bomb. Obasanjo chided him for going public, despite being part of the administration as a special adviser. Later he closed ranks with the party chairman. When Ogbeh thought that the feud was over, police declared a curious war against him. He was harassed by the security agents. The former party chairman initially put up a feeble resistance. However, when the reality of the looming danger dawned at him, he resigned as the chairman. The former President installed Dr. Ahmadu Ali, who was a Federal Commissioner for Education when he served as the military Head of State, as the chairman.

    Obasanjo had dangled the same carrot at the leaders of the Alliance for Democracy (AD), ahead of the 2003 elections. He proposed a pact between himself and the party to enable him have a political footing at home. Former Oyo State Governor Lam Adesina and his Ogun State counterpart, Aremo Olusegun Osoba, became his campaign managers in the Southwest. They promised to deliver the votes to the PDP during the presidential election, while expecting the former President to assist the AD in maintaining its hold on the region.

    The leader of the pan-Yoruba socio-political group, Afenifere, the late Senator Abraham Adesanya, urged caution. At a meeting of the group in Lagos, Adesanya warned against collaborating with a military leader, saying that soldiers in politics can hardly be sincere. Reflecting on the controversial pact, Afenifere chieftain Senator Olabiyi Durojaiye, recalled that only the former Lagos State governor, Senator Bola Tinubu, took the warning seriously. Tinubu retraced his steps, but others met their waterloo at the polls.

    “It was a controversial pact. I was aware of it, and since I did not try to avert it, I share in the responsibility for the wrong step. It was started by Lam, who out of patriotism, drummed support for Obasanjo as a Yoruba, so that he could have a home support in his region. But our leader, Adesanya warmed us because Obasanjo is a military man. Pa Adesanya said the first rule in the military is deception. When Tinubu heard about that, he said he would back out of the pact and that was how he survived the political earthquake of 2003”.

    The national chairman of the PDP, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, has said that Obasanjo’s visit has drawn the curtains on the rift. But those who know the former President hold a contrary view.

    Was the visit another game of deception? Time will tell.

  • ‘Ohanaeze crisis ’ll rob Igbo of Presidency’

    ‘Ohanaeze crisis ’ll rob Igbo of Presidency’

    The crisis rocking the pan- Igbo socio-cultural organi-sation, Ohanaeze Ndi Igbo, could jeopardise the agitation for power shift to the Southeast in 2015.

    The national President of Ohanaeze Ndi Igbo Youth Council, Mr Francis Orji, who spoke on the lingering crisis, said that it has threatened the unity of Igbo leadership.

    He urged the reconciliation committe chaired by Senator Ben Obi to resolve the crisis in the interest of the race. Orji noted that the Southeast Governors’ Forum is worried by the logjam.

    Orji, who spoke with reporters after the inauguration of Ohaneze Youth Council executive, Abia chapter, urged the parent body to form alliance with other ethnic nationalities to realise the dream of an Igbo Presidency.

    He said they can only form an alliance, if they put their house in order.

    Orji also said the Southsouth leaders can only work for development in an atmosphere of mutual trust and confidence. He lamented that over 36,000 youths in the region are unemployed.

    He added: “In the recent past, in the North, youths have been empowered. So, we are calling on the Federal Government to consider the Southeast youths. We don’t want to take up arms as the Niger Delta youths have been doing”.

    Also speaking, another youth leader, Mr. Peter Chinaemerm, urged the youths to show interest in politics.

    He said: “We will not shy away from politics because government policies affect us directly or indirectly. We will support publicly any political party candidate with clear vision or political agenda that will help our state grow, regardless of the political party”.

    The patron of the group, Mr. Friday Nwosu, a lawyer, urged the youth leaders to eschew the division and forge unity.

  • Why Ajimobi was endorsed  for second term, by Whip

    Why Ajimobi was endorsed for second term, by Whip

    The Chief Whip of the Oyo State House of Assembly, Mr. Abiodun Ammed-Adigun, has said that the party endorsed Governor Abiola Ajimobi for a second term because of his impressive performance.

    He commended the 33 local government chapters of the ruling Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) for reposing confidence in the governor.

    Adigun said the endorsement will prevent cracks in the party, adding that it would achieve victory in the future as a united house. The legislator assured that ACN will grow in leaps and bounds under Ajimobi’s leadership.

    Adigun spoke on the giant strides of the administration after receiving the ‘Grassroots politician award’ at the Trenchard Hall of the University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State.

    Urging the leaders and people to support the administration, he said it is in the interest of the state to vote for continuity in 2015.

    Adigun added:“I want to use this opportunity to commend the ACN members in the state for the recognition given to the governor as the leader of the party in the state. They have shown foresight by endorsing him as the leader of the political family after the demise of Alhaji Lam Adesina. The endorsement of the governor is an indication that the party speaks in one voice and that the good work of the governor has fetched him the honour.

    “The unity in the party and the good work of the governor will definitely propel the victory of the party in the 2015 general elections and beyond. I urged the leaders and people to continue to support the governor.”

  • Uduaghan is tackling insecurity, says group

    Uduaghan is tackling insecurity, says group

    A group, ‘The People’s Movement’, has said that Delta State Governor Emmanuel Uduaghan is tackling insecurity in the state, contrary to the claims by critics of the administration.

    The group urged the governor to deepen democracy by fortifying the democratic institutions.

    The group’s Director of Communications, Mrs. Ibifuro Tatua, said in a statement that the allegations of aiding and abetting the kidnapping of judges in the state was false.

    She said: “In a country where some governors recklessly abandon their responsibilities to the people, abuse their offices through ostentatious lifestyles, amid mass poverty, Uduaghan has made a difference by redeeming his campaign promises to the electorate”.

    The group warned those peddling rumours against the governor to desist from their nefarious activities.

    Tatua added: “Leaders at whatever level must demonstrate a certain degree of decency and exemplary conduct. Desperate politicians; those without ideas and goodwill, are running away from the real issues and resorting to character assassination and personal abuse.

    “These people, mainly elders and politicians, are not united by the common desire to move Delta State forward, but to bring down Governor Uduaghan”.

    The group extolled the virtues of the governor, describing him as an excemplary leader.

    Tatua stressed: “We know that posterity will be on the governor’s side. On assumption of office, Uduaghan promised to leave indelible and enduring legacies.This promise has translated into a lot of viable projects. He has moved in to wipe the tears of the people.

    “Apart from the renovation of primary and secondary schools, the government has awarded scholarships to undergraduate and graduate students in local and foreign universities.

    “Delta State Oil Producing Area Development Commission has so far completed 790 projects. The projects completed include school buildings, water schemes, hospitals and health centres.

  • Suswam, Gemade battle for Senate

    Suswam, Gemade battle for Senate

    The die is cast between Benue State Governor Gabriel Suswam and the former Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) national chairman, Senator Barnabas Gemade. The duo are the leading senatorial aspirants in the Benue Northeast District. Correspondent UJA EMMANUEL writes on the preparations for the contest.

     

    The stage is set for the senatorial election in Benue Northeast Senatorial District. Heavyweight politicians are on the track. However, it is believed that the contest is between Governor Gabriel Suswan and Chief Barnabas Gemade.

    Since 1999, the zone has been a hot battleground. The voters are politically conscious. The leaders also know their onions. The districh has produced five senators. They are Professor David Iornem Professor Iyorwuse Hagher, Professor Daniel Saaor, Col. Joseph Akaagerger (rtd), and Chief Gemade.

    What makes the forthcoming primaries interesting is that the governor and former Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) national chairman are locking horns.

    Recently, Gemade has declared that his second term ambition is non-negotiable. However, Suswan’s foot soldiers are working hard to turn the tide against Gemade. Some PDP chieftains led by a former member of the House of Assembly ,Hon Atoza Hidam,have endorsed the governor for the slot. They said he is the right person to succeed Gemade, who they said, should be prepared to play fatherly roles in the zone in post-2015.

    Since Hidan, who is from Sankera political bloc, started the pro-Suswan campaign, other leaders have joined him. The rank of campaigners is swelling by the day. Hon. Ugba Uye and Dr. Shande have also b een mobilising support for the governor in the zone. They are convinced that Suswan should not be idle, following the expiration of his tenure.

    According to the PDP elders, age is still on the side of the governor, who had represented Sankara Constituency in the House of Representatives between 1999 and 2007. They said that the push for generational shift favours Suswan to assume leadership role in the district.

    The elders said they were impressed by the performance of the former federal legislator and governor, adding that that weight of experience would better be put to used in the Senate in 2015.

    Shortly Suswam was endorsed, Gemade,addressed a press conference in Abuja, describing leader of the PDP elders ,Hon. Hidan,who is his in-law, as a mischievous element .

    He objected to the endorsement on two grounds. Gemade said 2015 is still two years away, stressing that the governor’s attention was being diverted. He also said that, by 2015, the senatorial seat will not be vacant.

    However, Gemade’s remarks have led to the intensification of the pro-Suswan campaigns. A group of former local government chairmen led by Hon Ayom Mar decided to inaugurate a campaign team team for the governor. They also unfolded plans to set up a campaign office. The group has coordinators and patrons in each of the seven local government areas that make up the zone.

    Governor Suswam is said to be excited by the activities of the group, although he has not declared his senatorial ambition. It is also not clear whether he is indirectly funding the campaigns. However, he has not disowned the campaign groups.

    Observers contend that the governor may not have an easy ride. Senator Gemade has openly declared that he will seek re-election. The former national chairman has his supporters, who are fiercely loyal to him. Speaking with newsmen, the former Secretary of Works in the Interim National Government said the people of the zone will renew his mandate in 2015, in recognition of his achievements in the Senate.

    Since Suswam joined politics in 1999, he has not lost any election. This has earn him the nickname “ Civilian General”.

    Addressing the people of Tarka local government area at a political rally last year, Suswam said, if he set his eyes on any thing, he would work hard to get it. The question is: will Suswam dislodge Gemade?

    Ironically, the governor was instrumental to the victory of Gemade at the primaries and general elections. Eyes were on his opponent, Dr. Mathias Byuan, before the shadow poll. But Suswam contacted the Presidency and the the tide changed in his favour. In 2007, it was a different ball game. The former PDP chairman was defeated by Akaagerger. But in 2011, he triuphed over the retired soldier because of the support given to him by the governor.

    Gemade is the Nom Iyange-Tiv(Rising Star of Tiv). The title was given to him by the paramount ruler, the Tor Tiv.

    In 2015, the battle will be between the “ Civilian General” and ‘The Rising Star’.

     

  • Ojudu: we must unite against retrogressive forces

    Ojudu: we must unite against retrogressive forces

    Senator Babafemi Ojudu (Ekiti Central) has called on the people of Ekiti State to unite against the retrogressive forces trying to undermine the progress of the state.

    The Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) chieftain, who was at the meeting of ‘Ekiti Parapo’, Lagos, said the state must rise above parochial interest to attain a greater hieght.

    Ojudu decried the mainstream politics, saying that it has retarded the progress of the state.

    He said: “Those who represent us at the federal level do so at their own interests. Going through some of the federal projects listed in the name of Ekiti State, I discovered there were serious breaches perpetrated by these people. This I had to challenge in order to ensure Ekiti got what it deserved”.

    Ojudu said politics and governance should not be left in the hands of neophytes, adding that only men of experience and ideas are fit to rule.

    The senator also enjoined the youths to initiate and communicate the right political values.

    He said: “The youths should embrace farming. Of course, I will not buy Okada for anybody because, apart from the risk involved, it is counterproductive.”

    “There is no job anywhere to give to any young man; they should embrace farming, like it is done in advanced countries where young men make a fortune. Why should we walk the streets in search of jobs that are non-existent?”

    Ojudu spoke on the plans to transform Ekiti by the senators from the state. This, according to him, is hinged on their agreement with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), which agreed to give counterpart funding.

    He said: “We, the senators, agreed to do something that would take the youth off the streets and in view of our programme, we approached the UNDP which bought into the ideas and gave us support.”