Category: Politics

  • Ohakim to contest again

    Ohakim to contest again

    Former governor of Imo State, Ikedi Ohakim, may still have his eyes on the plum seat which he lost last year to Owella Rochas Okorocha, if the latest report reaching Ripples is anything to go by. One incident that fuelled this assumption is the visit last week of the former governor to the camp of the victims recently affected by flood in some parts of Imo State.

    Ohakim, accompanied by his running mate in the 2011 elections, Professor Violet Onwuliri (now the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs), sympathised with the people, while assuring them of his support and assistance.

    Not a few politicians in Imo State are reading meanings to Ohakim’s gesture, which they contend, is a calculated move towards the 2015 governorship race.

  • This is not the type of politics Zik craved for –Son

    This is not the type of politics Zik craved for –Son

    Chukwuma Azikiwe (Owelle of Onitsha) is the eldest son of Nigeria’s first President, Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, the Great Zik of Africa. At the peak of preparations for this year’s annual Zik’s Lecture, he revealed to members of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), Anambra State council, some aspects of his late father not known to many. Odogwu Emeka Odogwu was there. Excerpts

    As the head of Zik’s family, how has life been without him?

    Of course, we miss our father very much. We wish he was around. Certain things happen and you wish you could discuss it with him or discuss it with people who will discuss it with him. But you know, life is finite. We will all accept the will of God. And we thank God for his life – the life He gave him and the opportunity for us to be his family.

    Why have you kept your distance from active politics over the years and why have you not accepted any political appointment like others whose fathers dominated the First and Second Republics?

    There are different angles to answer your question. One, there was a general feeling among us in the family that our father had contributed quite a lot.

    Also, he was somebody who believed in building up others to join the national struggle for independence and so on. And we thought may be, we should let others contribute their own quota. There’s always time for us to come in. And also, as some people observed, in this part, some people would say, after their father now they want to come.

    And personally, I also believe that being a good follower is also very important. I am somebody who is used to working in the background and going on errands. Like when my father was campaigning and things like that, we will do the work from behind and go to make contacts too while the show goes on.

    Also, we were looking at a situation where we saw, sometimes, very unhealthy, the developments in Nigerian politics. This is very important. May be I should have started with it. Nigerian politics, as we saw in our father and his other colleagues and compatriots who worked for the independence of our country; it was for service. They really believed in rendering service to the country and also improving the lives of the people. But we started seeing a situation where politics was for self aggrandisement or for power.

    A lot of people were going into politics in the unhealthy way. Mind you, there are still a lot of good people too who are going in with the right spirits to render service and help. But, perhaps, you will agree with me that it was becoming like a do-or-die thing and like a business. You know, very unhealthy. So, you really have to pause and study the situation before you get involved in that type of quagmire. I might say that some people have quietly talked with me about political appointments, but what was discussed, that looked very good on the surface, was actually, in the final analysis, booby traps.

    It is not in a way that I can render service purely. It looked like a juicy thing. And that’s not what our family tradition should be. But by and large, some of the political actors are really building themselves up. If they come to me they are really trying to use you and not to make you contribute. So, you look at these things and you are careful and studying the situation. And that may guide you on what to do.

    So you decided to keep away from active politics.

    Well, for the time being. We have our feelings, we know what to support. But time will tell. This is not the type of politics our fathers and their colleagues craved for Nigeria. Theirs was about service, sacrifice and so on. And they cared for the poor people.

    There were so many myths about your father and some even said he was into mysticism, or occultism, etc. How would you describe your late father?

    I will say he was a God-fearing man, a Christian in a practical way. I don’t know about magic. I will tell you a story about magic and Zik. It is a good thing that our brother from Nsukka is here.

    I believe it was in 1945 or 46. There was an assassination attempt; there was an alleged plot by the colonial authorities to have Zik assassinated. So Zik disappeared; he ran away. In this particular occasion, using an indirect way and going away from where he was headed, he ultimately landed in Onitsha. He was hidden in a basement of a friend’s house, at old Market Road. Sir Louis Mbanefo was staying there. Sir Louis’ nephews, the twins – Odigwe whom we buried three weeks ago and his twin brother, Nwakibie, who we thank God is still alive, they were taking food secretly to him.

    Sir Louis’ elder brother, Chief Isaac, who was a UAC produce buyer along the Anambra Basin, using his contacts reached Chief Ukwuta of Igah in Nsukka, who was also in the same produce business. In those days, there were really no great roads, river was very important. So, between these two people, they smuggled Zik into a thick bush at Nsukka and the place at that time was outside Nsukka town where Tailor Eze was before he died. And it was Ukwuta’s wife and some people who were preparing food and taking to Zik. The colonial authorities were looking for Zik all over the place.

    And because when he was coming to Onitsha, he had moved West and North, it was logical to look for him through the East. But the thing was that these people risked their lives and shielded him effectively. Zik was looked for all over the place, he could not be found. That was how the story came about that time that the colonial people came to look for Zik to kill him but he changed into a fly, disappeared! (Laughs). That’s one story about the magic. To the best of my knowledge, he was a good Christian and a decent person, very courageous; he wanted “treat others as you would like yourself to be treated.” He disliked oppression or injustice. And he would always fight and defend the right of others.

    Would you say the Federal Government is fair to your late father with regards to the construction of the mausoleum?

    Well, that’s a many sided question. The government has surely taken a decision to honour him by building the mausoleum. They are the one who decided for it. But the problem is the implementation. You can see that from the time of Yar’Adua (the late president) for example, every amount the presidency had asked for the project in the budget, the National Assembly had always approved intact. So, there’s a great support for it in the legislative arm, and, presumably in the Executive arm which sends the bills.

    But as one delay led to the other, you can see the storm of protests cutting across Nigeria which means that it is a project that people believe in and want to see completed. The main problem is the execution; this could be the fault of those asked to do it; it could also be the officials that are supposed to supervise the work. After all, you don’t expect the senators and members of the House of Representatives who passed that Appropriation Bill to troop down to Zik’s compound to come and build the mausoleum and supervise it, neither do you expect President Jonathan or late President Yar’Adua to do that.

    We believe that may be, a task force of the federal government and the ministry might help to isolate this thing from certain bureaucratic problems. Some of you were here when the previous minister, Chief Ntuesen Esien, came here. He was very sincere and he went ahead to try to implement it but, it’s unbelievable. A defective contract was awarded without the knowledge of the minister by some officials.

    Some of the workmen you see here are trying to rectify the bad job that was done. It was a bad job. We have a new minister, Ama Pepple. I hear she is very committed to this project. She sent down her top officials. We are hopeful but also take cognisance that majority of Nigerians have lost patience. From what we know, I think there is unanimity of mind to go forward.

    It appears you are enjoying the life of solitude you are living since the death of your father?

    Thank you. It is the way I regulate my life and my time. Actually, I learnt that from my father. My father always spoke about Agro who died very early. He said Africans kill their leaders by pestering them all the time. So, my father used to regulate his time. In fact, there’s a time you won’t see the Great Zik unless at a properly planned schedule.

    That way, my father was able to calm his life. He saw people that he needed to see but didn’t allow himself to be harassed. I have imbibed that. Also, I like solitude.

    What has the governors of Eastern Nigeria done for the memory of your father?

    I agree with one of you who said earlier that Zik was a national figure and Zik of Africa. It is not clear to me that it is right that the Eastern states should be saddled with the responsibility of the mausoleum project. Their proper role will be to find out from us where there is problem and join in urging the federal government to do things that are necessary in order to realise the project.

    But significantly, something was done around 2001, 2002. Governors in the South-East showed a certain commitment on some matter which, unfortunately, we have not seen any result in spite of the effort. I don’t know if you people heard of the attempt to make a Zik Centre at Enugu. It was promoted at that time by Anyim Pius Anyim, the then Senate President. Many people had their reservations; many people were skeptical because they were saying, look, why don’t we finish the mausoleum and go on to Zungeru project which is also abandoned for now in spite of the enthusiasm and resources made available by the Babangida administration.

    Well, that time, we were persuaded. We all went to Enugu for the launching of this Zik’s Centre. People like Pius Anyim Pius, he also had Anya O. Anya as one of the organisers. And virtually all the governors of the South East were there and they came in for N25million which was initial. I think they said they were trying to raise N2billion. People gave.

    The present governor of Imo State, Rochas, also donated half a million (naira) in Ojukwu’s name. Ojukwu was there. He said he would put down cash. So people were quite enthusiastically pursuing that project. The South Eastern governors really rallied round in 2001. And they had their local governments and different contacts and so on. Well, at the end of the day, nothing. It was one day, C.C. Onoh came here, forget the politics of ’78, ’79, C.C Onoh was very close to my father.

  • Jostle for Akpabio’s seat begins

    Jostle for Akpabio’s seat begins

    With three years away to the expiration of the tenure of Akwa Ibom State governor, Godswill Akpabio, intense jostling over his successor have begun in earnest. In this report, Remi Adelowo presents the issues at play, the major players to watch and the shape of things to come

    In recent months, the recurring topic of discussion among major political stakeholders in Akwa Ibom State, particularly top government officials, is the individual likely to succeed Governor Godswill Akpabio in 2015.

    Notwithstanding reports that the incumbent governor has allegedly settled for one of his key aides as his preferred successor, others interested in the exalted seat are, however, not willing to be caught napping once the whistle signaling the commencement of the race is blown sometime next year.

    Issues at play

    Will the Eket Senatorial Zone produce Akpabio’s successor in 2015? This million-naira question has become very pertinent taking into consideration the zoning formula that has been used to elect the helmsmen of the state from 1999 till date.

    The oil-rich state is split into three major zones: Ikot Ekpene, where the current governor hails from; Uyo, where the immediate past governor, Obong Victor Attah comes from, and Eket, which is yet to produce the governor since the advent of the present political dispensation in 1999.

    Presently, not a few politicians from the Eket zone, where the current Deputy Governor, Obong Nsima Ekere, hails from are agitating that, in the spirit of equity, fairness and justice, the zone should produce Akpabio’s successor come 2015.

    Not all politicians in the state are buying into this argument. This school of thought, according to findings by The Nation, posit that from the days of Obong Akpan Isemin, who ruled the state from 1991 to 1993, to Architect Victor Attah (1999-2007), to the current governor, the field had always been thrown open for interested aspirants from all the three senatorial zones, and that the same principle should apply in the countdown to the 2015 race.

    In their counter-argument, proponents of the zoning policy, though agreed that aspirants from the three senatorial zones participated in the governorship primaries of the PDP, the contest was deliberately skewed to conform to the zoning policy of the party.

    Candidates in contention

    The three major political parties expected to field strong candidates in the 2015 elections are the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). But the real battle will play out in the PDP, which has produced the governors of the state since 1999.

    Leading the pack of contenders in the PDP is Obong Umana Okon Umana, the Secretary to the State Government. A tested technocrat, described as fiercely loyal to Akpabio, Umana was the Commissioner for Finance during the Attah administration and has been the SSG since the incumbent governor came on board in 2007.

    A first and second degree holder in Economics from the University of Calabar and Port Harcourt respectively, Umana is also an alumnus of the prestigious Columbia University Graduate School of Business, New York and London Business School. He is believed to boast a wide network of political structure and large followership across the three senatorial districts.

    An unconfirmed speculation has it that the incumbent governor, barring any last minute change of plan, has allegedly penciled Umana as his successor.

    Next in line is the Deputy Governor, Nsima Ekere, from Ikot Abasi in Eket Senatorial District. A graduate of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Ekere has been in politics since 1997 and was the Chairman of AKIPOC, the state investment agency during the first term of Akpabio, who picked him as his running mate in 2011.

    If the unwritten zoning policy is adhered to, Ekere is strongly favoured to clinch the governorship ticket of the PDP, even as his boss’ disposition to his candidacy cannot be ascertained at least for now.

    Other names being bandied within the political circles of the state include the current Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Mr. Effiong Abia, and a former Senator who represented Eket Senatorial Zone at the National Assembly from 1999 to 2003, Udoma Udo Udoma.

    If he eventually throws his hat into the ring as it is being speculated, Udoma’s pedigree and stature will serve as his unique selling points. Highly principled, Udoma, a graduate of the London School of Economics, was a big player in the private sector before he dabbled into politics in 1999.

    A partner in the law firm of Udo Udoma & Osagie, he is currently the chairman of the governing board of the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). Described as highly principled, Udoma had turned down an offer of a junior ministerial appointment from the then President Olusegun Obasanjo, which he termed as ‘demeaning’.

    In the ACN, which has emerged as the major opposition party in the state, the race on who picks the party’s governorship ticket still appears hazy.

    For now, the party’s governorship candidate in the 2011 general elections, Akpan Udoedehe, has not given any hint of his political plans in 2015. But sources revealed that the former senator from Uyo Senatorial Zone still nurses ambition to rule the state.

    Who will Attah support?

    Though out of power since 2007, Obog Victor Attah, remains a respected political figure in the state. His reported fallout with Governor Akpabio, and the attendant acrimony it generated in the politics of the state, according to sources, is yet unresolved.

    The former governor, it would be recalled, threw his weight behind Udoedehe in the 2011 elections, and even though his anointed candidate lost, there are strong indications that he is still determined to take his pound of flesh from Akpabio over what his associates call a ‘betrayal of trust’.

    Will Attah back Udoedehe again in 2015? That remains a matter of conjecture, but The Nation gathered that a new young, popular and uncontroversial candidate may get Attah and ACN’s nod for the next governorship elections.

    The ANPP in Akwa Ibom State, according to sources, is presently in near comatose. Activities in the party have been virtually non-existent despite the fact that it posted a relatively good showing in the 1999 and 2003 elections.

    The countdown has indeed begun.

  • ‘We need true federalism to live together’

    ‘We need true federalism to live together’

    In this group interview, Bishop of the Anglican Diocese of Calabar, Rt. Rev. Tunde Adeleye, spoke on many national issues. Nicholas Kalu reports.

    In corruption in the country

    There is hardly anything more to say about corruption in Nigeria. We live in it and live with it. No one learns how to be corrupt in our country. We are so corrupt that our children grow up to think that it is part of normal life. It may look as if these expressions are too gloomy but all of us here know that corruption in Nigeria has affected all parts of the socio-political and economic life of the country. It has eaten deep into every part of our country.

    So, what can we do now? We have to pray more while we continue to preach against it; punish offenders of corruption at all levels under the relevant laws; reward people who refuse, like Daniel in the Bible, to be corrupted; and adhere strictly to all laws about corruption. The issue of declaration of assets by public officers should be taken seriously. Those who get rich and suddenly have large scale property beyond their incomes should be investigated.

    On the call for state police

    This is probably one of the most recently discussed issues in the country. The argument has been whether to have a state Police or not. Some individuals have declared that the nation is not ripe, as at now, for a state police. The President, from some public reactions, seems to be in agreement with that submission.

    To be candid, what is more disturbing to us is that one wonders why operational arrangements, which work all over the world would not work in Nigeria. Here, it will either not work or will be seen as not workable. State policing is working all over the world without problems. Over there, state and federal policing operate without clash of interest or purpose. But, here, even before we start operating it, the clash is made obvious. The main reason it will not work in Nigeria is because of corruption and abuse of power which is inherent here. One of the best ways of addressing the security problem in Nigeria would have been to involve the community through the state police; but, truly, it will be abused and it will not work here.

    We fully support the formation of state police. It will go a long way to solving our community violence, restiveness, crime and all forms of fraud. We even recommend local government police in addition to that. Our recommendation is that this should not be put in place until and unless the operational conditions are well spelt out and conditions for preventing its abuse are also properly spelt out. Their operational areas and job description should properly be outlined to avoid clashes.

    On rising spate of kidnapping

    We understand that kidnapping is gradually coming back in full force again. Recently, some newspapers reported that this is becoming frequent again in certain states in the eastern part of the country. Did I hear that there is kidnapping in Calabar now? We wish to suggest to government to involve the community vigilante in the security of their areas, to reduce this menace. This is an area where the local or community policing would have been very helpful. These kidnappers live in places and operate in locations where other people live. They do not operate in the air. They live with people and our people know them.

    On high rate of unemployment

    The happiest news anyone can receive in Nigeria now is creation of jobs for the teeming jobless people in the country. One of the reasons most Nigerians voted for the present head of state was his promise to create jobs. That was a very comforting promise for anyone, any day. Our children are jobless and millions of our graduates are roaming around the towns looking for work.

    Many of them, out of frustration, have resorted to robbery, including internet robbery, with other ills in the society. We therefore request that the federal government should make haste to create more jobs as they have promised. Also, the curricula of our tertiary institutions should include basic training in trade and craft so that the graduates can leave the school knowing some trade which they could start as they graduate. Our economy will improve if we have graduates who are equally printers, photographers, mechanics, (without being called engineers), tailors, masons, painters, farmers, drivers, carpenters, designers, cooks and so on.

    The Federal Government should provide money (loans) for such graduates to set up their own businesses, if they desire to start something. We recognize that these schemes are already available in different parts of country with different names. The latest is YOUWIN for the women directly. We thank the government for this and want it to continue.

    On the Niger Delta

    We have always held the view that some of the matters arising in the Niger Delta are also pending. We commend the federal government for steps already taken to address some of the experiences which are peculiar to Niger Delta. But we still think that since this part of the country lays the golden egg, it should not be allowed to perish while laying the eggs and they should get more than what they are getting from the federal share.

  • 2015: Fresh crisis over PDP’s zoning controversy

    2015: Fresh crisis over PDP’s zoning controversy

    National Secretary of People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Olagunsoye Oyinlola, this week declared that the party will stick to its zoning policy in picking its presidential candidate in 2015. Sam Egburonu captures the reactions of some stakeholders and reports that the declaration has only added more fuel to the raging controversy

    When the National Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, gave fresh reasons this week, why the party will stick to the zoning arrangement in picking candidates for the 2015 general election, many thought the official position would put paid to the age old debate. But reactions from political stakeholders show that it has only added fuel to the raging controversy.

    According to Oyinlola, “What has endeared the PDP to Nigerians is the zoning arrangement, which has given minority groups the hope of realising their political aspirations in the country.” This being the case, he said, the party will retain the zoning policy for the 2015 presidential election primaries.

    Genesis of the controversy:

    PDP’s zoning policy attracted public attention soon after Dr. Alex Ekwueme and other strong candidates lost out in a peculiar, rather controversial circumstance during the primaries for the 1999 presidential election. It was a development that generated bad blood within the party and set tongues wagging. So, the grand drama, which led to the emergence of former President Olusegun Obasanjo at the convention, soon became subject of public debate within the party and outside.

    The debate, however, gathered steam ahead of 2003 elections, when some other zones interested in the presidential ticket requested for a shift. It was then made public that zoning policy has been enshrined in Article 7(2)(c) of the party’s constitution. It says in part: “In pursuance of the principle of equity, justice and fairness, the party shall adhere to the policy of rotation and zoning of party and public elective offices and it shall be enforced by the appropriate executive committee at all levels.”

    Instead of facilitating cohesion, it seems this law has, in a way, created more controversies within the party as zones within the country began to demand that it was their turn to produce the party’s presidential candidate.

    The controversy peaked and became more complicated after the sudden demise of President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, barely a year before the 2011 presidential election. His deputy then, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan, from the South-South zone, had emerged the Acting President, and eventually got the PDP ticket to contest the election. This had irked some northern PDP stakeholders, who argued it was their turn to rule until 2015.

    The anger was not helped by former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s reported argument that there was no zoning formula in PDP. This was in sharp contrast with the reported position of the then National Chairman of PDP, Chief Vincent Ogbulafor, who was quoted as saying, “We felt that the zoning of the presidency of the party as enshrined in the party’s constitution should be maintained and, therefore, the zoning arrangement in the constitution should hold for the next four years.”

    It is instructive that Ogbulafor became the first victim of the fuss over zoning as he was soon forced to resign over an alleged fraud when he served as Minister of Special Duties in 2001.

    Explaining how deep the leadership of the party felt over the matter, the next National Chairman, Chief Okwesilieze Nwodo, told newsmen in 2010, “Yes, I said to BBC and I repeat to you again that zoning in PDP has been jettisoned. There is no zoning on ground right now. Absolutely, there is no zoning. In 1999, there was zoning and only one northerner insisted on his inalienable right in the Nigerian Constitution to contest against the zoning arrangement of the PDP. The PDP put its foot down and I wrote a letter to him and returned his cheque. That is the late Abubakar Rimi of blessed memory.

    “In 2003, after four years of Obasanjo, candidates sprang up from across the country. They paid, they canvassed. Nobody returned their money. Nobody wrote them that there was zoning. Nobody! In 2007, there were more candidates from Southern Nigeria than Northern Nigeria and I think if that election was allowed to hold without interference; may be anybody among Peter Odili, Donald Duke or Sam Egwu would have won. They all paid. Nobody returned their money. Nobody stopped them.

    “Nobody talked about zoning. They all contested. Why zoning now? Why? We have jettisoned it, but we can revisit it. I’m not afraid about revisiting it. If we think that we need to revisit zoning today, let us revisit zoning. But the one we did in 1999, no, no, no, no, it has been jettisoned by PDP itself.”

    After Jonathan won the 2011 elections, the controversy continued and had indeed served as the fuel that fired major political intrigues.

    It played out clearly in June 2011, when some radical elements in the House of Representatives in collaboration with some northern caucus of PDP plotted a political ‘coup’ that ignored PDP’s zoning formula and elected Hon. Aminu Tambuwal as the Speaker. The party had zoned the position to the South-West and reports had it that Hon. Mulikat Akande-Adeola was the anointed candidate.

    Since that incident,many had indeed concluded that zoning has finally been discarded by the younger elements and the less conservative members of PDP.

    But with Oyinlola’s declaration, the matter is again at the front burner. Already, questions are being asked: Does this mean that the South-South zone, where President Goodluck Jonathan hails from, will conclude a second term, irrespective of agitations from the North and the South-East zone? What will happen in the selection of other top public positions at the federal and state levels? How will this development affect the party’s fortunes in 2015 and beyond?

    Scepticisms:

    Initial reactions to the current declaration of the leadership of PDP have been largely sceptical.

    PDP leader and former Vice President of Nigeria, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, for exmple, told The Nation that if the leadership of the party has decided to make amends, it must begin by admitting wrong. As he puts it, “It is a fact that the issue of zoning is still enshrined in the PDP constitution as amended. However, recall that in the run up to the 2011 election, the principle of zoning as enshrined in the party was implemented in breach. If the current leadership wants to right the wrongs of the past, it has to match its intent with action. It can not be that zoning is right for some people and it is abandoned when it comes to others.”

    For Mike Okorie, a Lagos based lawyer and former PDP House of Representatives aspirant in Abia State, expressed similar sentiment. He told The Nation: “The statement credited to the Secretary of the party on the vexed issue of zoning in 2015 should ordinarily be seen as the rule than the exceptions, knowing full well the pole position of a secretary in the life of an organisation. But this is PDP! Soon, there will be asertions and denials since the statement did not emanate from the publicity secretary of the party. For more reasons than one, the statement is not conclusive of the matter. Besides, the party is noted for policy shifts, summersault and double standard. Let us not forget in a hurry the events leading up to 2011 presidential elections and even thereafter, when zoning was observed in the breach, if not jettisoned. Now, the trillion naira question is whose turn is it, at least, to produce the next Speaker, House of Representatives not to talk of the President? “

    Non PDP observers have been even more sceptical.

  • Legislator cautions agencies on death penalty

    Legislator cautions agencies on death penalty

    The Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary, Dr Ali Ahmad has cautioned international agencies from meddling into the affairs of Nigeria concerning its death penalty law.

    Ahmad therefore threw his weight behind the Edo State Governor Adams Oshiomhole’s recent approval of the execution of two condemned prisoners in the state.

    He asked the international agencies opposed to the decision to allow Nigeria implement its law “since death penalty is still part of Nigeria’s legal document.”

    The lawmaker told reporters in Ilorin, Kwara State shortly after donating a transformer and electrical poles worth about N5 million to Duma community, Oja-gboro, Ilorin and a block of three classrooms to Isale-Asa LGEA Primary School, Ilorin.

    He added that the position of the House of Representatives on the controversial issue is that, “Edo Governor was right to sign the execution of the two condemned prisoners”.

    Ruling out arbitrariness in the decision of the Edo State governor, Ahmad noted that the same governor had granted two condemned prisoners amnesty and commuted the sentence of one other into life jail, adding that, “two others whose execution order is causing ripples were said to have committed grievous offence which precludes them from governor’s leniency”.

    He added: “The position of the House is that death penalty is still part of our law in Nigeria and anybody that is saying that death penalty should not be carried out is saying that the law of the country should not be implemented. So, on that core, I disagree with them.

    “On a personal note as a lawyer, let me put a caveat that for now, I support death penalty in principle, because those who oppose it do so in principle. What they say is that death penalty is an inhuman punishment but we disagree with them.”

    “I think the problem is that they take hook, line and sinker whatever comes to them through the West just like the same-sex marriage; they want to push it through our throat and say that we should legislate and legalize same-sex marriage because it is there in America or whatever country,” he further said.

  • ‘Delta State ACN not in crisis’

    ‘Delta State ACN not in crisis’

    A Chieftain of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) Mr. Amechi Omagbeshi Ogbonnia at the weekend debunked the report of a crisis looming in the Delta State chapter of the party, describing the report as mere blackmail.

    Ogbonnia who was reacting to a newspaper report that the party was in disarray, said it is intact at the ward, local government and state executive levels.

    Ogbonnia said, “The Chairman of the party, Chief Adolor Okotie-Eboh, was a founding member of the PDP who contested for the senate and the party state chairman of the party but was frustrated by the former governor, Chief James lbori and having seen PDP as a conservative party, left it for the ACN where he rose to the position of the State Chairman.”

    “We have even seen that the person who wrote the report is not a member of ACN but from Democratic Peoples Party (DPP), so it is surprising that a non member could make comments about a party and l see what he has written as blackmail on the person of Chief Adolor Okotie-Eboh, a son of a former minister of Finance and Labour.”

    “The likes of Dr. Veronica Ogbuagu, Professor Eferakeya Adegor and others that the report favours are those not working in the interest of ACN in the Delta Central and the state al large and l am calling on them to repent, change their attitude towards the party so that they can join us as progressives that we have always be instead causing disunity among members”

    Ogbonnia also said that the leadership of Chief Adolor Okotie-Eboh is recognised at the national level of the ACN party, pointing out that he was one of the members that attended the party’s retreat in Ghana recently as published by Ghana’s magazine. He said there was no time the leadership of Chief Okotie-Eboh was used as stooge by the ruling party or at any time sold out to PDP, describing the report as blackmail.

    He alleged that Ogbuagu, Prof. Adego and others wanted to hijack the leadership of the party but said that when they could not succeed, decided to take measures like blackmail to tarnish the image of the existing state executive headed by Chief Adolor Okotie-Eboh

  • Kogi Assembly: In whose interest is Reps’ intervention?

    Kogi Assembly: In whose interest is Reps’ intervention?

    The decision of the House of Representatives to intervene in the Kogi State House of Assembly crisis has been variously interpreted by many people- lawyers, lawmakers and academics.

    Some think it is a timely intervention and an effort to save democracy from alleged executive gangsterism; others see it as meddlesomeness by the lawmakers. They argue that the House has no power to stop the Kogi Assembly from sitting.

    The House on October 17, constituted a panel to investigate the crisis in the Kogi State Legislature that led to the removal of Speaker Abdullahi Bello and 10 other principal officers. According to the House of Representatives, the state is currently battling ecological problems caused by the recent flood and cannot afford another crisis in the form of a political crisis.

    Relying on powers purportedly confered on the House of Representatives by Section 11(4), members were unanimous in their decision on the need to urgently address the crisis before it spiraled out of control.

    Deputy Speaker Emeka Ihedioha noted that it would be unjust to debate the issue without hearing from all the parties concerned in the impeachment saga. For him, setting up a committee that would listen to all sides of the matter through an interaction with the Kogi Assembly was the right thing to do.

    He said the committee would have to, among other things, unravel what led to the removal of the Speaker and other principal officers. This, he said, would enable the House make an informed decision.

    Those named by Ihedioha, at plenary that day as part of the Kogi intervention team were: Deputy Chief Whip Ahmed  Mukhtar Mohammed (Kaduna PDP) who was the leader of the panel. Other members of the committee are: Hassan Ibrahim El-Sudi, Sokonte Davis, Pally Iriase, Nkem Abonte, Ali Ahmad and Adams Jagaba.

    The thinking of the House was that the unfolding scenario in the state was inimical to the growth of democracy. A member of the committee, Iriase, who spoke with The Nation, defended the decision of the House.

    According to him, the era of military tendencies in politics was over. Besides, he noted that the panel was a fact finding committee and it was not meant to go to Kogi State to apportion blames but to find out the different sides to the crisis and forge a way out of it.

    He said the way the Kogi Speaker and the other principal officers were removed was sending a wrong signal to the other State Houses of Assembly and that it may, if not nipped in the bud, lead to a corruption of Nigeria’s young democracy.

    “The era of impunity is gone, we have a constitution that guides our ways and we, as legislators that have sworn to defend the constitution must be seen to do the right thing. This is a constitutional matter, we have done what we are supposed to do.

    “The question over whether we would need concurrence with the Senate or whether we had not completed our assignment before suspending the House, it does not matter at this time. We have to do what we do first and if it is illegal, we have to be proved wrong.

    “All we are doing at this time is to arrest the situation before it degenerates, which we think is about deepening democracy. If at all we have overreacted, then it must be seen in the light of us working in the interest of the our democracy”.

    The lawmaker, who brought the issue of the impeachment of the Kogi State Speaker before the House, Honourable Osai Osai (Delta PPDP), has said members should condemn the action.

    The embattled Speaker,  Abdullahi Bello, had already declared that his removal was unconstitutional. According to him, the number of members that impeached him was not up to the number required constitutionally.

    The Minority Leader of the Kogi Assembly, Yori Afolabi, had also alleged that the executive arm was enticing members with a sum of N15 m to oust the leadership of the assembly.

    Bello, some weeks before his impeachment had raised the alarm that there was conspiracy against him by some members who were angling for his removal.

    When the House committee got to Kogi State, it immediately set to work, on meeting with the feuding parties, suspended legislative activities of the House until further notice.

    The chairman of the committee, Hon. Mukhtar Mohammed said the move became inevitable after discussions with  contending groups in the matter.

    Thirteen members from the embattled Speaker’s camp and three members from the opposing side that carried out the impeachment attended the meeting with the National Assembly adhoc committee.

    According to Mohammed, the plenary had to be suspended for now until after the submission of the committee’s report to the National Assembly, assuring that they were poised to do a thorough job. While he emphasized that the State assembly have to fully cooperate with the federal legislators, Mohammed reminded the state legislators that the constitution mandated them to take over the affairs of the House if the matter remained unresolved.

    “Our concern in the matter was purely the process of the impeachment and not what led to the removal of the speaker, the document specifying how the nation should be governed must be protected,” he added..

    Of course this would not be the first time the House of Representatives would be intervening in the crisis of a State House of Assembly. It did the same thing during the crisis that engulfed the Ogun State House of Assembly which was shutdown by the the Governor Gbenga Daniels.

    On October 14, 2010, a motion was sponsored by Chairman, House Committee on Rules and Business,  Ita Enang and 16 others, entitled: Inability of the Ogun State House of Assembly to perform its Constitutional duties.

    It resolved that if the Inspector-General defaulted in reopening the Assembly, “the National Assembly should take over, assume and exercise all the legislative powers of Ogun House of Assembly to make laws as the legislature thereof in accordance with Section 11(4) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 until the House of Assembly is able to resume its functions”.

    The prayers were adopted without amendment as Enang quoted Section 305 (1) of the Constitution, which gives the President the power to declare a state of emergency in any state.

    Section 305 (1) states “Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the President may, by instrument published in the official gazette of the Government of the Federation, issue a proclamation of a state of emergency in the Federation of any part thereof”.

    According to the lawmaker,  the Assembly formally sat last on June 29 and received this year’s Supplementary Budget proposal and requested for approval of a N100 billion bond from the governor and adjourned plenary to embark on annual recess.

    In addition, he pointed out that when the Assembly reopened on August 3, it was invaded by protesters, which forced the Assembly to adjourn sine die since  peace has been disrupted.

    He also pointed out that he Speaker sent a notice to the Clerk to send to members, urging the Assembly to be reconvened by the Speaker, Tunji Egbetokun.

  • Kogi assembly: divided, fractured

    Kogi assembly: divided, fractured

    How legal is the closure of the troubled Kogi State House of Assembly by the National Assembly Ad-hoc Committee on Kogi State House Assembly Matter? This poser has been agitating minds since legislative activities were put in abeyance by the higher legislature.

    The chairman of the committee, Hon. Mukhtar Mohammed Ahmed, said the committee had already got permission from the Inspector General of Police to beef up security to forestall break-down of law and order. He explained that the plenary had to be suspended until after the submission of the committee’s report to the National Assembly, assuring that they were poised to carry out a thorough job.

    The lawmaker further stressed the need for the members of the Assembly to fully co-operate with them, disclosing that the constitution mandates them to take over the affairs of the House if the matter remained unresolved.

    Backing the decision of the committee, Hon. Saidu Akawu Salihu of Koton Karfe State Constituency in Kogi State, maintained that Section 11 of the 1999 Constitution empowers the House to rise to such an occasion.

    According to him, it is a good thing that the National Assembly waded into the issue, as such had averted a crisis capable of consuming the assembly and the state in general.

    Salihu who described the decision as ‘a stitch in time that saves nine’ equally urged the people of the state to support the action so that illegality would not thrive to their detriment.

    The legislator, who belongs to the camp of the impeached Speaker, Hon. Abdullahi Bello, described the committee’s action as legal, adding that the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is uppermost.

    Speaking in the same vein, Hon Funsho Daniel, representing Mopa/Muro Constituency in the state, told The Nation that the committee’s action was right. He added that the House would have been in turmoil without the decision. According to him, “We respect the rule of law, “The law is made by man, not spirit. We made the law and therefore we must abide by it.” Hon Daniel, also a supporter of the impeached Speaker,

    Friday Sanni Makama, however, described the action of the ad-hoc committee as illegal and an affront the rule of law. While commending Senator Olorunnibe Mamora for condemning the act, Makama said there was nowhere in the World an ad-hoc committee of a National Assembly would suspend state Assembly proceedings.

    According to Makama, an ad-hoc committee, since it is not a standing committee, can only go for fact-finding mission and subsequently report back to the larger House, but not shutting down the state Assembly’s activities.

    He argued that the National Assembly is only empowered to invoke Section 11 of the Constitution in a case where a state Assembly ceases to function. He said: “The National Assembly, under the section, shall take over the function of the state Assembly in a situation where the Assembly ceases to exist. They have the power to legislate for the state, but the Sub-section 1-2 of Section 11 denies them the right to impeach the governor or his deputy.

    “But in the case of Kogi State Assembly, there is nowhere in the constitution that says an ad-hoc committee shall suspend the activities of the state Assembly.”

    He accused the committee of having concluded its investigation before coming to the state for the fact finding. “To show that the committee had already concluded its judgment, before visiting the state, they had asked the Inspector General of Police to seal up the assembly and thank God, the Chairman of the committee announced it at the floor of the House. I have never seen such a thing before. How can you conclude a case you have not even commenced investigating?” He asked.

    “The state Assembly had not been sitting for three months despite the need for an emergency sitting. The House did not call for emergency sitting during the killing of a Deeper Life Bible Church worshiper, and the flood that ravaged the state, which of course drew the attention of the entire world; yet, Section 11 was not invoked. It is only when we decided to change our leadership that Section 11 is invoked; it is laughable,” Makama added.

    Also speaking, the newly elected Speaker, Hon. Jimoh Lawal, added that Section 11 could only be invoked when a House is in crisis, saying that there was no crisis in the House, but an inevitable change of leadership.

    He said that the impeached Speaker, who is his brother from the same Okene Local Government area, should come and join hands with him to steer the affairs of the House, rather than going the other way. According to him, he supported Bello when he (Bello) held sway as speaker, wondering why such a gesture should not be reciprocated.

    However, the state Commissioner of Police, Muhammad Musa Katsina, told The Nation that his men never sealed up the state Assembly Complex, explaining that he only beefed up security to forestall any breakdown of law and order based on available intelligence report and a letter written to his office over a planned move to create havoc in the Assembly Complex.

     

  • Osun deputy governor urges women to join politics

    Osun deputy governor urges women to join politics

    The Osun State Deputy Governor, Mrs. Titi Laoye-Tomori, has charged women in the state to rise above the primitive idea of gender discrimination and assume leadership positions, saying politics is no longer the exclusive preserve of men.

    She said: “I am calling the attention of womenfolk to the need to take active interest in governance and the political processes of their immediate environment, i.e. ward levels, local governments, federal constituencies, and the State platform respectively.”

    She gave the charge at the Women Participation in Politics and International Day for Rural Women Rally held at the Leisure Spring Hotel, Osogbo, Osun State capital.

    Calling on women to partake in politics and to see it as a higher calling, she, however, warned that they should not see joining politics as a license for them to indulge in untoward behaviour, which she said could tarnish human character.

    She said: “In politics, when character is lost, everything is lost. This rally is about sensitising women to take their rightful position in the society, and not a call to rebel, or chant war songs against timeless traditions, such as family and relational values and usages. The time has come for women in the state of Osun in particular, to rise above the primitive idea of gender discrimination.

    “Politics is no longer the exclusive preserve of men. What a man can do, a woman can, and sometimes does it better.

    However, to achieve our goal of equal participation in the governance processes, we need two key ingredients. First, we must be fairly educated.”

    Otunba Laoye-Tomori said the implementation of the 35 percent Affirmative Action Policy about gender parity will remain elusive until the majority or every girl-child in the state is educated.

    “Gladly, the Aregbesola-led administration has made this effectively possible in the state of Osun. I plead with you all; let us send our wards to school.

    Economic empowerment of individual and the collectives, become easier with modest education. The focus of this rally is to join other countries of the world in the celebration of the rural women.

    “Here in the State of Osun, we know the worth of our rural women and we appreciate you all. We are aware that majority of our people are farmers. It then follows that the fight against hunger and poverty, which is one of the cardinal agenda of this administration, would not have been successful without the active participation of our rural women. As we celebrate this year’s Rural Women Day, I enjoin all to take advantage of the Aregbesola-led administration’s benevolence,” she said.

    The deputy governor declared that the six-point agenda of the Rauf Aregbesola administration is about economic empowerment of the people cum radical transformation of the socio-political landscape of the state of Osun.

    In her welcome speech, the Commissioner for Women Affairs and Social Welfare, Mrs. Mofolake Adegboyega, enjoined women to support the present government in the state to improve the qualitity of lives of the people of the state.