Category: Politics

  • ‘2013 budget must be people-centred’

    ‘2013 budget must be people-centred’

    To Dr. Ifeoluwa Abiose Arowosoge who represents Ekiti South West/Ikere/Ise-Orun Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, any budget proposal without the people as its focus is useless.

    Though he commended the early presentation of the 2013 budget, Arowosoge said the House would ensure accountability, transparency and full implementation of budget, adding: “The House is currently reviewing the performance of the 2012 budget before passing the 2013 Appropriation Bill. Without good performance of the 2012 budget by the executive, it would not be wise for us to pass the 2013 budget. As we speak, budget is just at about 35 per cent implementation level which is a very poor performance.”

    He therefore maintained that President Goodluck Jonathan deserves both praises and knocks over his 2013 Appropriation Bill, which he said, was being considered by the legislature.

    He expressed delight that the “Budget of Fiscal Consolidation with Inclusive Growth” gives lion share to the security sectors for the second year running, saying: “It is a good idea to give priority to the security sector in view of the high level of insecurity in the country. The remote cause of insecurity in the country is unemployment of the teeming youths which should be addressed equally.”

    The second highest allocation of N426.53 billion to education, to him, is fair as according to him, education is the bedrock of the future development of the nation. However, he lamented that the amount fell short of UN/UNESCO recommendation for education.

    He described as inadequate, the N1.54 trillion (33.3 per cent of total budget of N4.92trillion) allocated for capital expenditure, owing to the urgent need for infrastructural development in all sectors of the economy. “Though it is an improvement over the previous years, it is not enough to guarantee positive socio-economic transformation that will improve people’s welfare in the present-day Nigeria.”

    “The removal of import duty and Value Added Tax on all imported commercial aircrafts/spare parts; agricultural/solid minerals machinery/spare parts and completely knocked down components for mass transit buses, of at least 40-seater capacity, are good incentives for economic growth of these sectors. It is commendable and Nigerians should seize the opportunity to invest in these areas,” the lawmaker further said.

    The agricultural sector, he said, deserved more than N81.4billion (a mere 5.23 per cent of total capital budget) allocated to it because it is the sector that can guarantee food security and an employment opportunity for the nation’s teeming youths. He maintained that “the sector should be on the priority list of the government, if we are to promote agriculture.” “We are all aware of the unprecedented floods which ravaged many parts of our country, causing massive destruction of farmlands that may result in food shortage in 2013. Therefore, more funds should be provided for the agricultural sector to meet the flood recovery, food production plan and the creation of 3.5 million jobs proposal of the federal government. Without jobs opportunities/food security, no meaningful development can take place at the grassroots. United Nations recommends at least 10 per cent annual budget for agriculture and many African countries are meeting this target,” Arowosoge explained.

    Appreciating the seeming improvement in the power sector with the ongoing reform, he expressed the hope that the ongoing privatization of the generation and distribution companies would spur improved performance in the sector, noting that if the feat was improved upon, it might be the beginning of the nation’s economic revival.

    He also expressed the readiness of the House to pay urgent attention to the passage of the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) currently awaiting consideration. “We will ensure that the bill brings major reforms and ensure accountability, transparency and efficiency in the sector. We will also encourage and support the government in cleaning up corruption from the management of the petroleum industry,” he said.

  • Ekiti: The journey to better times

    Ekiti: The journey to better times

    Just two years in the saddle as governor of Ekiti State, Dr Kayode Fayemi has taken steps to translate his administration’s eight-point agenda into evident development in many areas of people’s needs, writes SULAIMAN SALAWUDEEN.

    For about seven months after assuming office as Ekiti State Governor, Dr Kayode Fayemi carried ‘the slow governor’
    tag. Obviously, out of desperation, many had expected him to wield the magic wand to change their story overnight, especially as regards the decrepit infrastructure across the state.
    The roads, easily the closest to the people and which are among the indices of people’s assessment of government’s performance or non-performance, either rightly or wrongly, had worsened from being bad to the impassable.
    The situation had topped the list of other reasons on ground for critics and cynics to hurl expletives at a governor popularly acclaimed at inauguration as “the messiah”.
    Unfortunately, according to the deputy governor, Mrs. Funmi Olayinka, “the roads didn’t go bad suddenly; dilapidation has always been a process; a process that had survived at least seven years before Fayemi assumed the leadership of the state.”
    The Commissioner for Information and Civic Orientation in the state, Hon. Funminiyi Afuye equally noted: “The governor never lost sight of the evident degeneration of the social infrastructure or his election avowal of more abundant life for citizens. His focus on and interest in planning would not make him engage in any haphazard project execution however urgent or politically attractive it might seem.”
    The redoubtable literary critic and poet, Odia Ofeimum, supported the view. He said: “The reason for Fayemi’s initial slowness could be understood, given the scale of work to be done (on roads and other areas) and how to reach for more fundamental course to engender reversals without raising unnecessary dust among the establishment, even while massing up needed quantum of resources to launch changes decisively and without disruptions”.
    The governor himself summed it up, saying: “The imperatives of transparent and purposeful governance require a creative overhaul of the subsisting system which has to advance traditional expectations of the public beyond bland demands for food, clothing and shelter.”
    This probably explains why, early in the campaign period, he came up with an Eight-Point Agenda meant to provide answers for the myriad malaise which “commonly bedevils existence mostly where governance runs foul of legitimate and popular yearnings.”
    But two years after, how far has Fayemi gone in delivering what Afuye described as “the ideal type governance” as summed up in the Agenda?
    In fact, the eight points, including governance and infrastructural development; modernising agriculture; education and human capital development; healthcare services; industrial development; tourism; gender equality and empowerment, have become popular lately, not just as refrain in speeches and comments of ranking officials of the state but “for representing/summing government actions on evident programmes and projects.”
    True to the avowal of the governor himself as complemented by the Information Commissioner’s statement that the “the year (2012) would be one of consolidation”, it’s easy to take general stock of several achievements now rather than a trickle flow it essentially was in the first year. To the administration, the Agenda is the plinth upon which every other item on the agenda is based; the spirit that drives the administration.
    Quite often considered “a stickler to perfection and a fearsome humanist who has transcended the pettiness of partisan conducts in spreading enduring/useful effects of governance among the citizenry”, he has shown it in all project executions ranging from road among other infrastructure; agriculture, free health missions, social security scheme for the elderly, tourism development to educational advancement drives.

    Transforming the capital city

    Beginning with tasteful completion of all the structures hitherto at various level of decay across all parts of the state, which were ‘abandoned’ by past administrations, the government has since moved on to revamp Ado, the state capital with all-encompassing road constructions alongside street/traffic lamps. It is through what is now known as the state’s revolutionary urban renewal initiative.
    Most inter-township roads embarked upon by the administration across the 16 local government areas of the state have been significantly completed, aside the five-kilometre roads he has been constructing in council areas. Simultaneously, he has been busy attending to some decrepit federal roads across the state.
    No fewer than 17 roads totaling approximately 157 kilometres have been completed in the state while 30 others, about 1,900 kilometres in length are ongoing. Government has since commissioned 12 of the completed roads.
    Besides, the administration has begun laying cyber-optic cables in the ICT sector, which, at completion, would ease tasks and reduce costs of transacting all manner of internet-aided businesses. Samsung has located an engineering academy in the state while an airport is said to be underway with the recent submission of a comprehensive report on same by the Chief Afe Babalola-led panel.
    Well over 20 communities have been connected to the national grid and over 200 electricity transformers distributed among communities, including Irele, Oke Ako, Iyemero, Itapaji, Ilemeso and others that had remained married to darkness for ages.
    The completed renovation of Oluyemi Kayode Stadium in Ado, perhaps lends credence to Fayemi’s avowed commitment to enhancing sports development in the interest of youths in the state.

    Restoring pride to Agriculture

    Efforts to modernise agriculture have seen the state engage the youth in commercial farming with the successful launch of the Youths in Commercial Agricultural Development (YCAD) in which 150 youths were launched into various specialties of agricultural production with a grant of N500million, each getting N1.4 million for rice, cassava, oil-palm and cocoa production. The initiative, according to sources, is intended to generate 1,500 direct and about 10,000 indirect jobs between now and the end of next year.
    Government has equally been up-to-date in paying counterpart fund to other formidable participants in the sector including FADAMA and African Development Programme (ADP), while focused support through training and provision of requisite input, including fertilizers, has been sustained in aid of the Association of Farmers of Nigeria (AFAN).
    After the merger of three state-owned universities, namely University of Ado Ekiti (UNAD), University of Science and Technology, Ifaki Ekiti (USTI) and The University of Education, Ikere Ekiti (TUNEDIK), government has furthered targets on ‘education and human capital development’ with the renovation, including re-roofing and quite often wholesale reconstruction of some buildings. About 120 secondary schools out of the existing 180 have benefitted from the programme.
    It has also launched a series of unprecedented training and retraining of teachers, at both primary and secondary schools, seen as “core to the intended changes critical to educational advancement in the state.” Also, the state College of Education, Ikere-Ekiti has received a generous dose of attention as evident in improved infrastructural development in the school of late.
    The government has also distributed 36,000 units of solar-powered net-book laptop computers free to students out of a target of 100,000 – 11,000 to teachers at minimum cost and another 100,000 units of school bags to public school pupils.
    Basic texts in English and Mathematics alongside those of the sciences, Fayemi has said, would soon reach every student as a necessary and complementary icing on the cake of unprecedented reversals in learning and education in state schools.
    Clearly a core focus of the administration, ranking fifth on its agenda, ‘healthcare services’ has seen the renovation of structures and upgrading of facilities in the state Teaching Hospital (EKSUTH), and the general hospitals/primary health centres across the local governments.
    While one state-wide free health mission held January and three-zones follow-up missions which followed last year in Ekiti North, Central and South, yet another round of mission took off again in December last year in Ekiti North.
    A combined minimum of 300,000 individuals in all parts of the state have been attended to in an exercise which, according to the Commissioner for Health, Professor Sola Fasubaa, has gulped over N400 million.
    Also ongoing are free health services for pregnant women, children under five years, the physically challenged and elderly citizens, aged 65 and above.
    Primary health facilities across the 16 local governments have been substantially upgraded with improved staffing combined with encouraging missions. The primary health centres have yielded unprecedented patronage from local peasants unlike before.
    The result has come for the state in having not only the highest life expectancy at birth in the country today, but even the lowest in HIV infection besides a zero-rate prevalence of polio cases. To the governor, “we must have been doing something right to achieve these feats.”

    Industrialisation and tourism

    Industrial development has gained commendable focus from the administration through the resuscitation of the moribund Odua Textile Limited and Ire Burnt Brick Industry to complement achievements at the Ikogosi Bottling Company.
    While several other private initiatives are equally springing up across the state, the administration has set up in the three senatorial zones, enterprise development centres currently being built in Ilupeju (Ekiti North), Aisegba (Ekiti Central) and Ijero (Ekiti South). It has also completed the renovation/beautification of the Oodua Enterprisse Development and Skills Acquisition Centre, Ado.
    The state has also set up the solid minerals development company while production of cut stones has started in Efon Alaaye under the supervision of Fountain Holdings Limited. It is equally a state government initiative which is undertaking and super-intending several other joint partnerships.
    Tourism development which ranks seventh under Fayemi administration’s EPA has since assumed a prominence perhaps more than as envisaged possible within two years.
    The successful celebration of the maiden Ekiti festival of Arts and Culture in which about seven states participated represents enduring height of several other turn-around measures aimed at lifting the sector.
    These initiatives include but are not limited to the effort to repackage many age-long artifacts buried in the recesses of the traditional palaces and grooves from Ado, Ikere, Efon Alaaye to, Okemesi, Ijero and other towns. It is an effort being spearheaded by the governor’s amiable wife, Erelu Bisi Fayemi.
    A major success, however, is the wholesale rejuvenation of the Ikogosi Warm Spring in partnership with the Mantis Group of South Africa alongside efforts to harness well over 200 potential tourism sites spread in almost every major town and villages in the state. The Ikogosi may soon assume a prominence that will confound many pleasantly across the country.
    Although, ‘gender equality and empowerment’ ranks last in the administrations EPA goal, its essence resonates in almost all others as manifest in the massive employment generation through initiatives in tourism, agriculture and industrial regeneration.
    Specifically, with the launch last year of the Ekiti Youth Volunteer Aids Corps in which 5,000 able youths across endeavours and academic qualifications were employed, several others have been engaged and trained by the State Job Creation and Employment Agency and Ekiti Enterprise Development Agency (EEDA), which has combined both to employ and empower a minimum of additional 3000 youths.
    Some of the employees take home not less than N10,000 monthly and have been engaged in the civil/public services or through state supports and attached to other private concerns while, according to Mr. Oskar Ayeleso, Director-General, EEDA, those who have benefitted from skills/trades’ acquisition drives spearheaded by the agency are now profitably self-engaged; some with a retinue of mentored support staff.
    According to Director General of the Ekiti State Job Creation and Employment Agency, Mr Folorunso Aluko, while the state has sustained the payment of the monthly stipend which has gulped over N600 million since inception, the target of 20,000 jobs in four years appears achievable.
    The initiatives in areas of agriculture, industry and tourism, along with efforts of the EEDA have lately spurned avenues for useful engagement of nearly 10,000 individuals, with potentials to quadruple that figure within four years.

    Social welfare for
    the aged

    Perhaps mention has to be made particularly of the direct economic intervention in the lives of about 20,000 elderly individuals in the state who have clocked a minimum of 65 years through the now popular social security scheme in which beneficiaries are paid N5,000 monthly stipend.
    A move popularly acclaimed as first of its kind not only in Nigeria but in whole of Africa, South of the Sahara, the scheme now costs the state not less than N100 million monthly.
    The governor explained: “It is a social democratic agenda, acclaimed for being non-discriminatory, consistent and credible. No one asks for your party card. About 20,000 are enjoying it now and we keep improving on the figure as we do update every six months.”
    However, aside the developmental programmes coming under the clearly delineable compartments of the EPA are several other efforts which consolidate the agenda as found across Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs).
    These other efforts are inclusive but not limited to the successful turnaround in tax administration in the state through the electronic (e) receipt system. They include the recent overhaul of the state fire/medical emergency services which has witnessed recruitment and training of 153 staff, purchase of five fire-fighting engines, six sophisticated ambulances, three water tankers along with the renovation of the three existing Fire Stations at Ikere, Ikole and Ijero.
    The greatest achievement of the administration as affirmed by the governor and supported by Mr. Femi Falana, SAN, is perhaps the entrenchment of the culture of law and order. Falana had said: “That people can move freely and transact their businesses without fear/hindrance as typical of some past administrations in the state is an accomplishment which ranks prime among others.”

    Teachers, LG staff up
    in arms

    The administration has nonetheless been facing unrests from labour, specifically the local government staff and the teachers who clamour not for wage increase as the state is always the first to pay its workers, but for the “sustenance of a tradition graft and complacency.”
    While the local government staff are up in arms against official moves subjecting them to “staff audit” meant to ascertain actual figures of genuine staff, the teachers are opposing the Teachers Development Needs Assessment which they claim is meant to ultimately lead to retrenchment.
    Although the staff audit is about being completed, getting the teachers to write the TDNA has not been successful, as just about 100 teachers three weeks ago, wrote a test in which over 16,000 were the target, creating a stalemate in which government’s well justified stance appears to be matched by teachers’ unbelieving stubbornness.
    What is the direction of governance in the New Year? According to Afuye, attention would be better directed at the provision of water and electricity, while ensuring that none of the ongoing projects suffers negligence.

    What next?

    The commissioner said: “The coming year will witness water, water and water everywhere as obsolete equipment in Ureje Dam has already been completely replaced and the water distribution points in Okela and other areas have been fixed. I want to say that government has also finalised arrangements for an Independent Power Plant (IPP) project which will focus mainly Ado-Ekiti as an industrial/commercial hub of the state.”
    The commissioner added: “Let me assure our people that at the end of Fayemi’s first term no project however massive in terms of size and cost will be an abandoned project. It is to the eternal credit of the governor that so many efforts have been sustained on all fronts, at high pitch standards in every section and segment of the state.
    “It could be contended that the administration of Dr. Kayode Fayemi which gained ascendancy exactly October 16, 2010, has done its bit to justify confidence as expressed by people through popular but now quaint ‘shouts of Fayemi we want’ in the days of struggle. His performance has won him the Governor of the Year Award by Leadership Newspapers, affirming Ekiti as the best governed state in the country.”

  • Lessons from Ondo election, by rights groups

    Lessons from Ondo election, by rights groups

    The October 20 governorship election in Ondo State has raised serious concern about the future of democracy in Nigeria, Civil Society Coalition for Mandate Protection (CSC-MAP), a non-governmental body, has said.

    According to the CSC-MAP which monitored the election in the 18 local government areas, the electoral process was marred with monetary inducement of voters, late arrival of voting materials, outright lack of opportunities to vote in some areas, especially in Idanre area, and violence at some polling booths.

    The group listed the riverside communities as some of the areas where voting materials did not arrive until 2pm, at a time many of the voters had been disillusioned and had retreated back home.

    “The last election raises serious concern about the entire democratic process in Nigeria. We saw people being given money; several people voted because they felt their immediate pecks and privileges were met while the turn-out was not remarkable,” the group’s General Secretary, Sulaiman Olubunmi Sanusi and Public Relations Officer, Ajayi Inuejalawo jointly stated at a conference held in Akure, the state capital.

    Sanusi claimed that out of the 1.5 million registered voters, less than 700,000 people voted. According to him, this situation was influenced by many factors, some of which are the militarization of the state with the presence of soldiers on the streets; the possibility that fake voters were registered; the feeling by some of the voters that the election was predetermined due to perceived federal government’s influence and, possibly, the loss of confidence by the electorate in the entire democratic process.

    The group therefore urged the police and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to probe alleged instances of ballot stuffing by law enforcement agents during the election.

    “It is a sad thing that Nigerians still need to be guided to vote at gun point and the election won at gun point. Nigeria is perhaps the only democratic country in West Africa where, on Election Day, voters were watched and intimidated from the nozzles of armed soldiers’ AK-47 rifles. Nigeria must raise the electoral bar to a level where people can vote out of their own conviction but not in a situation where voters were goaded by bullets. This situation fuels voters’ amnesia and it is a far cry from the basic elements of democratic principle. It is a system that puts the incumbent at a great disadvantage and to the detriment of the people,” Sanusi added.

    The group, CSC-MAP, which has 65 affiliate members, believes that the outcome of the Ondo election does not in any way reflect true democratic practices that meet global standards.

  • ‘Welfare of Nigerians our concern’

    ‘Welfare of Nigerians our concern’

    Hon. Opeyemi Bamidele is the Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Legislative Budget and Research. In this interview with Victor Oluwasegun and Dele Anofi, he speaks on the benchmark controversy, the challenges of the committee, and other issues.

    What was your focus as the  chairman of a committee that is so important to the budgeting process?

    Part of the passion, as I assumed office as Chairman, House Committee on Legislative Budget and Research was to do everything possible at the level of the committee and work with the leadership of the House to ensure that the National Assembly Budget and Research Office did not only commence work, but in the real sense of it, becomes relevant and actually get itself grounded as a major resource centre for the members of the House as well as our Senators. Our focus is also to turn it into a centre that would assist researchers from outside the National Assembly and if possible outside the shores of this country.

    Would you say you met the office up and running when you became chairman?

    In fairness to those who pioneered this project before I got here, it was not that nothing was done to establish the NABRO as a functional office, but unfortunately, beyond getting the building ready and furnishing the office, nothing practically was done in terms of staffing the place, except getting some consultants to shortlist curriculum vitae of some members of staff of the National Assembly.

    Eventually, what we did when we came on board was to get the approval of Mr. Speaker with the concurrence of the Senate President for us to open up the office and begin to run it as a functional resource centre. When we got the approval, we were able to second an initial 13-member senior staff of the NASS led by a Director to NABRO for the office to take off. We also ensured that we gave them whatever was needed to operate. With that, the story has not been the same since then because today, we have a NABRO that is different. But then, we can still do much better in terms of staffing.

    We are currently improving capacity and we are supposed to have specialized desks like for economy, economic analysis, budget, politics, inter-governmental relations and different sectors of governance. I am sure we will get there eventually, but I want to say that with the initial category of staff seconded to the place, the office has taken off but next will be to massively recruit additional professionals and experts that would be able to help Honourable members and Senators thoroughly and comprehensively develop and strengthen their thoughts and thinking processes in different sectors and areas.

    What would you regard as the primary function of NABRO?

    NABRO is actually meant to help the House Committee on Budget and Research to do its work. And according to our rules, part of the work of our committee is to make timely and non-partisan analysis on the budget proposal and on the performance of the budget all year round after the Appropriation bill must have been passed to law. It is also meant to assist in developing the capacity of members through local and foreign trainings, and as much as possible, serve as a research centre where members of both chambers can really go and do comprehensive research into different issues.

    Having taken off, we are trying to get better because now, we don’t have to rely solely on consultants for everything as we now have a research centre that can take care of most of the things the consultants would be doing. Our target is to have a NABRO that would be able to compare and compete favorably with similar establishments in advanced democracies in terms of structure, staffing and modus operandi. I must say that the attitude of the Speaker was very positive in this regard because without that I don’t know if we could have achieved anything.

    Do you consider your job on the 2013-2015 MTEF as a watershed?

    I will rather say that there has been a lot of improvement from the past, I won’t call it a watershed because we are going to do much better in future by the grace of God. I can, however, say that our work on the 2013 budget was definitely a statement that it is not going to be business as usual and to show that we really have our hands on the plough.

    In the last four months, we have released five different publications that included the mapping of the year 2012 budget, which simplified and analyzed the budget by geo-political zones. We have seven different publications regarding the mapping, one each for a geo-political zone and the Federal Capital Territory. This was meant to assist each member of the House and the Senate in identifying what has been provided for in the 2012 budget, what was on-going and what was new from the previous and current budget were all clearly identified.

    And what are these publications meant to achieve?

    With the document, our legislators can easily monitor projects in their constituencies without confusion on timing or status. Essentially, the document would make our oversight function much more easier while it would also make those who are supposed to implement the budget accountable. I can assure you, this has introduced a new dimension to the whole process of budget monitoring. In the document, we have asked questions that even Mr. President and the ministers are now asking, which in turn, permanent secretaries and directors are now asking contractors.

    In a way, it is like we have helped the Executive develop a template for budget implementation and monitoring. So this goes beyond 2012 budget, it is about whatever we are spending, whatever is on-going and whatever is new. Apart from the budget mapping, there were other publications we produced like our own Mid-year Budget Performance report which was made available to members in September.

    Would you consider your efforts on the MTEF a waste if the House forsakes its stance on the $80 benchmark?

    In the first instance, I doubt if the House would blink an eyelid on its position on the benchmark but for that to even happen, that is, bending our position for whatever reason, it would not amount to a waste of time and efforts at NABRO.

    At NABRO, we are to make recommendations and it would be for the House and the Senate to decide, because NABRO is a creation of the National Assembly and not the other way round. What NABRO was expected to do and has done is to come up with and define the fundamentals on which whatever decision we are taking would be rested. NABRO has done it successfully by explaining that for the same reasons the Executive is proposing $75, these same reasons support $80. Part of the issue defined by NABRO is that we need to be sincere and patriotic about it. For instance, in the last 10 years, has there been a time that the price of oil sold for the so called benchmark? It has always been more and was there any time that the oil price fell below $100 in the last 10 years? No.

    But the argument of the Executive is in favour of savings?

    Yes it is, but we have moved from the Excess crude account to Sovereign Wealth Fund. The truth of the debate is what did you do with the excess, not whether we have been having these excesses. The Executive has always cited examples of countries with low benchmark but the truth they are not telling Nigerians is that what those countries do with excess crude was not the same we do with ours. We are putting this to the fore, that if we say put it at $80, we show how much the difference of $5 would amount to in a year and this is what we recommend should be done with it.

    This will also be appropriated for, we are not leaving it at their discretion but that the difference should be used to reduce our deficit. By that we would be reducing what we owed by 66 percent, and this will create space in our investment environment as our private sector would have space to borrow more. This will be against the tradition of the government mopping up all available funds for borrowing. By reducing our local deficit by 66 percent, the market would be free for private market participant as more money would be available for them to access. By implication, they will be able to turn their industriess around by engaging more people, creating jobs and stimulate the economy.

    We are not saying peg the benchmark at $80 just to make more money available to share, or for more money to save but what we are saying is that we are not against you saving, but just take away $5 and reduce our deficit with it. We even gave an alternative, that should the executive find it difficult to reduce our deficit with the $5, that it should then be used for critical intervention in the area of infrastructural development. This is because there are so many roads that have become death traps and you are going to have a budget that is 68 percent recurrent and only 32 precent capital. So, we are saying that the difference between your proposal and ours should be committed to capital expenditure. But we are more persuaded that it should be used to reduce our own local deficit and its not something we cannot defend.

    In all, NABRO has been able to clearly reason this out and we have given our recommendation, obviously the House adopted that recommendation as emphatically stated by Mr. Speaker in his vote of thanks at the budget proposal presentation. So, it is up to the Executive to at least come to the realization that they are not the only ones who love Nigeria, they are not the only ones who have the scientific understanding of the economy and how to run the economy. They also have to accept the fact that they do not have the monopoly of how to move Nigeria forward. I think it is high time we descended from our Olympian height as public officers and see through the arguments of other people, especially arguments that are supported by facts and figures and everybody can see.

    Yes, they want to save more money because that is why they want a lower benchmark but at the end of the day, they are still borrowing hugely. According to their borrowing plan, they intend borrowing over N700b which they did not include in the MTEF. We raised an eyelid and they brought it separately, so what is the wisdom behind borrowing N700b when you can leave benchmark at $80 and have more money to use, spend or reduce our deficit with.

    These are contradictions within the system that Nigerians need to ask questions about. We have listened to a lot of commentators sympathetic to the Executive and calling on the National Assembly to reason with the Executive and go with the $75 benchmark- making it look as if it is an issue between the National Assembly and the Executive. Some have even described it as a row between the National Assembly and the Executive but that is not it. This is because we are all servants of the same master, in this case, the overriding Nigerian public interest.

  • Constitution review: Reps harp on grassroots participation

    Constitution review: Reps harp on grassroots participation

    The House of Representatives on yesterday reiterated its resolve to ensure grassroots participation in the on-going review of the 1999 Constitution.

    The House explained that its planned “peoples’ public sessions” was created to ensure that no Nigerian citizen irrespective of class, place of abode and or affiliation is denied a chance to make an input.

    Chairman of the House ad-hoc Committee on the review of the Constitution and Deputy Speaker of the House, Hon. Emeka Ihedioha made the declaration during an interview with journalists at the 127th Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) holding in Quebec , Canada .

    Ihedioha said that “peoples’ public sessions” will take the 360 members of the House to their constituents to convene all-inclusive consultative meetings in their constituencies on the way forward for the country.

    The public sessions, he said, was designed to ensure that the voices of those at the grassroots are not only heard but also reflected in the amended constitution.

    “Constitution amendment is not a process that should be left in the hands of the political class or a vocal elite that exerts some control over advocacy machineries alone.

    “That is why the House of Representatives has designed this innovative, peoples’ public sessions to provide opportunities for all strata of Nigerians to make inputs into the kind of constitution they want.

    “For the first time, we are directly taking the constitution amendment to the doorsteps of the Nigerian people, going beyond the usual zonal hearings that get hijacked by elite endowed with the means to manipulate public opinion.

    “The sessions will be no-holds barred, non-partisan and broad-based as the National Assembly will not impose a ceiling on the range of amendments sought by Nigerians.”

    The deputy speaker assured all stakeholders of the willingness of the House of Representatives to approach issues thrown up for amendment with an open mind and that the sessions will be held simultaneously in all 360 federal constituencies on November 10 to make the constitution a truly peoples’ document.

    On the theme of the IPU conference tagged, “Citizenship, Identity and Linguistic and Cultural Diversity in a Globalized World,” Ihedioha said it re-echoes fundamental challenges Nigeria has faced with respect to issues like the indigene/settler controversy, state creation and structure of government.

    The challenges, he said, can be addressed and successfully resolved holistically through a constitution amendment process as is being championed by the National Assembly.

     

  • 2013 budget stirs House, Executive face-off

    2013 budget stirs House, Executive face-off

    The battle line seems drawn as Chairman, House Committee on Finance, Abdulmumin Jubrin challenges Finance Minister Okonjo-Iwaela and Central Bank of Nigerian (CBN) Governor  Sanusi Lamido Sanusi to public debate. Jubrin was the Chairman, Joint Committees of the Legislative Budget and Research of National Planning and Committee on Aids, Loans and Debt that considered the 2013-2015 Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) and Fiscal Strategy Paper (FSP). Victor Oluwasegun and Dele Anofi report.

     

    The Legislative Budget & Research Committee of the House of Representatives is the engine room for the National Assembly’s Budget and Research Office (NABRO). For the first time since the return of democracy in 1999, the office actually did an analysis of the budget (in this case, the 2013-2015 Medium Term Expenditure Framework submitted by President Goodluck Jonathan) as required in the Fiscal Responsibilities Act, 2007. The committee in conjunction with the House committees on Finance, National Planning & Economic Development and Aids, Loans & Debt Management , in its report on the MTEF, recommended that the benchmark be increased from $75 to $80 per barrel of crude oil. This has been a source of conflict between the House and the Executive.

    Indication that the battle between the House and the Executive on the 2013 budget may have just have begun, emerged when the Chairman, House Committee on Finance, Dr. Abdulmumin Jubrin challenged the Minister of Finance Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and the Governor of Central Bank, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi to a public debate on the feasibility or otherwise of the $80 benchmark for the 2013 budget.

    According to the lawmaker, there seems to be more to it than meet the eye concerning the stiff opposition from the Executive to the slight increment of $5 to the proposed $75 . He said the economic management team of President Goodluck Jonathan must, therefore, be courageous enough to prove beyond doubt why the $80 benchmark should be discarded. Jubrin noted that the only way to convince Nigerians is for both parties (House of Representatives and the Executive) to engage in a public debate for Nigerians to have the benefit of merits and demerits of the contending issue.

    Besides, he posited that the Executive must be able to disprove 2013 forecast for international oil price at between $100to $120. According to him, key international forecast agencies, like the Energy Information Agency, the Barclays, the Credit Swiss, the Dutch Bank and the City Group put their projections at between $ 120 and $100 while the average of all their forecast was pegged at between $100 and $105.

    He reiterated Speaker Aminu Tambuwal’s emphatic declaration that the 2013 budget would be anchored on $80 bench mark. Jubrin, however, expressed confidence that the Executive would have no better argument against the House’s position. In his words: “They will not have any superior argument, mark me and if they can, the Executive that I know, would have responded the first time we started talking. They have nothing superior to tell Nigerians than this point we have given. This is a pro-people analysis and position and they don’t have anything to say other than this. I am challenging them to a public debate, the Minister of Finance, the Governor of Central Bank, the DG of Budget Office and others involved in drawing up the document. Let us all face Nigerians a put our facts before them”.

    To buttress his argument on the defects inherent in the budget proposal of $75 benchmark by the Executive, the lawmaker regretted that those saddled with the management of the economy seemed to be incompetent and unwilling to consult widely in the process of preparing the document.

    “A very important factor that we discovered and which is quite disgraceful is that the position of MTEF is at variance with the position of most of these MDAs. Most of these agencies don’t even know the content of MTEF. We were the ones that gave them copies of the MTEF. So, it is convenient for us to draw conclusion that the MTEF is just a product of one to three people that are saddled with the management of our economy. There wasn’t wide consultation, it is not a national consultation but just a product of few people that believe that they can sit and write policies for this country and write MTEF for this country and write the budget of this country, which is why I said it without mincing my words,” he said.

    The lawmaker also urged Nigerians to be wise to the antics of the Executive that would always want to present one aspect of an issue rather than avail the people the opportunity of all aspects to the issue. Contrary to the Executive’s claims that savings, among other parameters, would be badly affected if the benchmark was jerked up to $80, Jubrin said the Executive has not been forthcoming on the true analysis of the situation. While he stressed that the lawmakers were not against savings, he regretted that the country’s economic managers have not been fair to Nigerians through unreasonable savings. He said, “You know that crude is going for about $110 as it is, if we peg the benchmark at $75, for instance, if the international price of crude as at today is $100 and we peg the benchmark at $75, it means that for every barrel of crude that you sell, $75 will go into financing of the budget and extra $25 should go into savings because this savings is the excess crude account and the Sovereign Wealth Fund. So what we are saying is that we are increasing the benchmark to $80 because we are convinced, after our analysis, that it is safe for us to increase it by $5. The implication of this is that rather than save $25, you will now have $20 to save. All we are taking away from them is just $5 out of the excess to service our budget deficit. So why are they resistant to it? Are we throwing the money in the river or are we taking it to go and share for our people in the villages? No, we are using it to help the economy; rather than taking it and dumping it in that place like European and American banks at a giveaway interest at the expense of the country, we are saying they should take part of it and invest it today which is the bone of contention”.

    Another loophole which the Jubrin picked in the budget proposal is the bloated recurrent expenditure which he said the government has not been able address. He expressed disappointment that despite all the noise over cutting the cost of running government, the Executive has not been able to reduce recurrent expenditure to an appreciable level. “These are part of the problems that we addressed during the MTEF. We had expected that in the MTEF because it is a medium term plan, so it is for 2013 – 2015, we will receive a systematic and clear-cut strategy to reduce recurrent expenditure drastically but it is not contained in the MTEF. I am so disappointed in the Minister of Finance because we made recommendation about that in the earlier MTEF.

    “I had thought that one area where she would have shown her competence is to be able to drastically reduce recurrent expenditure and if you ask them how they intend to reduce it, they will not give you figure but percentage. They are taking advantage of Nigerians because a lot of people are not enlightened about these things. Now, what they are saying is that they have reduced the recurrent expenditure by 3%. Why are they scared of converting it to monetary value? Let people understand from a real perspective of the budget provisions. The implication of this is that they want to continue to promote recklessness in spending and that shows how incompetent they are”,

    Jubrin also faulted the claims of the Executive that the $5 increment would put pressure on exchange rate and inflation. He said “I told all the agencies that came during our engagement during the MTEF deliberations to quantify the impact that a $5 will have on our exchange rate and on inflation; they have not been able to do that. We have also asked them if they have problem with this increment just for the singular reason of reducing the deficit and consequently reducing government domestic borrowing to create space for the private sector but they have not responded. The final reason they always give which is very important is that it will make more money available for the State and Local Government which they will mismanage because they believe that every Nigerian is corrupt and that they are the only people who are credible. I am not holding brief for State Governors but I think it is an insult to all State Governors that being against $5 was because it means more money for State Governors to misuse. I am calling on the State Governors to listen to this and now respond to the Ministry of Finance and the Minister. When we talk this way, they say that we want to bring down the country, shut down the economy.

    Jubrin however advised the Finance Minister, Ngozi Oknojo-Iweala to resign her appointment if she cannot manage the economy with the $80 benchmark as the House would not shift ground on its decision. He said for the Minister to undermine the Appropriation Act when it becomes operational would amount to breaking the law. “The Minister of Finance would have to resign her position If she can not comply with the provisions of the Appropriation Act because that would amount to breaking the law. By the time the budget is passed, it becomes law that everybody must comply with. We are talking from the point of law because our position on the issue of bench mark would be backed by the law and if she cannot relate with it, it would be better for her to resign rather break the law”.

     

  • ‘It’s turn of Anambra North for governor’

    ‘It’s turn of Anambra North for governor’

    Chikodi Anarah is the leader of Igboadagbe Peoples Forum, a group championing the clamour of Anambra North Senatorial Zone for the governorship seat of the state in the 2013 poll. In this interview with Correspondent NWANOSIKE ONU, he explains why the zone should produce the governor.

     

    How would you react to the view by many people say that zoning or power rotation is undemocratic and have cited the United States of American as an example that should be emulated?

    It depends on the kind of information which such people have at their disposal. Power rotation is not a setback, rather it strengthens democracy. The problem is that some people attempt to copy verbatim, programmes that are country and culture specific into places they cannot fit in. the United States is a homogenous federation with special qualities.

    Those qualities make the country different from ours and they include high literacy level; good record of fundamental human rights and rule of law; and the pursuit of planned and equitable development. In the US also, a strong sense of national unity is prevalent. In fact, unity is not a setback for the relationship among groups. Also it is not a setback for national development and progress. Even where differences seem to exist, they are just superficial because the prevailing social forces do not allow for marginalization or conscious exclusion of groups from dividends of democracy.

    What do you think is the problem here?

    What makes the difference here is the question of unity. Unity is the major challenge here and groups are mutually suspicious. There is marginalization and there is conscious effort to deny dividends of democracy to unfortunate groups. That is the problem. Our system of laws and the prevailing social forces are not such that groups are adequately protected. Our low level of literacy does not even support sufficient knowledge of our fundamental human rights. If you don’t know your rights, how do you pursue them? Whether there is planned and equitable development is as good a guess of yours as mine.

    How does that give rise to zoning?

    Of course the result of marginalization is a feeling of discontent whose eventual expression is breakdown of law and order. But if a group is sure that at a certain point its people will occupy those positions that can give it a sense of belonging, its agitations and cries against marginalization will become less if not extinct. The most constructive plan to tackle such problems we have in this respect is power rotation. You may call it zoning or anything. The most important thing is to give people a sense of belonging and achieve stability in the system. This is why the forum I am spearheading insists that the north senatorial zone should produce the next Governor of Anambra State.

    People say that the north senatorial zone is not blessed with rich and competent people who can contest and win the position of Governor. What is your take on this?

    I have heard this outrageous lie before. You even bring in more confusion because I don’t know whether I should talk about the rich or the competent. About richness, Anambra State is not for sale. And let me ask you,. How rich was Mbadinuju before he became Governor? How rich was Ezeife or Ngige? Mr. Peter Obi could be said to be rich but not the richest. We should really not talk about richness. on the other hand, if we talk about competent people from the north, the entire newspaper pages cannot contain their list. They have people in the political class who are also professionals, bureaucratic, industrialist and so on. All the people that have served or are serving in government now from the zone are all competent. Don’t you know about people like Stella Oduah, Joy Emordi, John Emeka, Paul Odenigbo, the Obazes, Chinedu Emeka, Frank Oramulu, Stella Odife, Margery Okadigbo, Dr Alex Obiogbolu so on. Talk of industrialists and other professional like Willy Obiano, Chike Obidigbo, Patrick Obianwu and so on. The list can continue endlessly and they are qualified and competent. The Igboadagbe Peoples Forum has already commenced an exercise of research and opinion poll to know the stand and status of all the people they consider competent for the race and this will cut across all the major political parties.

     

  • 2015: Speculations on ambition unsettle Yakowa

    2015: Speculations on ambition unsettle Yakowa

    The political arena in Kaduna State has been busy with the rumoured presidential ambition of Governor Ibrahim Yakowa, but, to him, such is coming from his political adversaries. TONY AKOWE reports.

     

     

    The 2015 presidential election is well over two years away, but prospective contenders have started flying their kites; some aimed at creating bad blood among friends and party members and others purely for the purpose of testing the waters in order to know how to make their political calculation ahead of the elections.

    Although the northern socio-political organisation, the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) has said it oftentimes that it was too early to begin campaign for 2015, political jobbers have continued to hint on possible candidates for the elections. Names that have been mentioned especially in the north include Senate President David Mark, House of Representatives Speaker Aminu Tambuwal and Jigawa State governor, Sule Lamido. In a recent interview with The Nation, ACF spokesman Anthony Sani asked people to stop talking of the presidential election on zonal basis, pointing out that the election of President Goodluck Jonathan by the Nigerian people in 2011 killed the politics of zoning. He also believes that bringing the 2015 politics to the front burner at this point in time will be a distraction to qualitative governance.

    While the nation is yet to come to terms with the talk of a Sule Lamido/Rotimi Amaechi ticket allegedly being floated by former President Olusegun Obasanjo, political jobbers have gone to town with a Yakowa/Ladoja ticket even when Ladoja is yet to return to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). A group which called itself Northern Democratic Alliance took a paid advert in Kaduna-based weekly newspaper to announce that a group of civil society organisations, youth organisations, trade unions and religious organisations had met and decided to endorse Yakowa for the 2015 elections. The faceless group did not mention those organisations that decided to endorse an unwilling person who has not declared any intention for an office.

    Interestingly, a few weeks earlier, security agents in Kaduna were said to have uncovered a plot to flood the streets of Kaduna with posters of the governor aspiring for the Presidential seat. That was a few days before President Jonathan visited Kaduna for the passing out parade of the Nigeria Defence Academy (NDA). With that discovery, Yakowa, at a media parley, said he had no interest and had never shown interest in the presidential race. He said at the parley that there was no sense in thinking about another election when he had not even spent half of the four-year mandate given to him by the people of Kaduna State. That seems to have done the magic as the sponsors of the poster held them back, but apparently decided to come in another way to drive home their point. They took a paid advert to announce their plan. But in a swift reaction, the governor warned those responsible for such an action to desist from it. The governor said his primary attention at the moment was how to deliver on his electoral promises to the people of Kaduna State and was therefore not interested in contesting the nation’s presidential election in 2015. Thus, he warned against dragging his name into the race. Speaking through his media assistant, Reuben Buhari, Yakowa described those behind the said publication as mischief makers, pointing out that the attempt at dragging his name into the 2015 presidential race was a deliberate and calculated mischief aimed at pitching him against President Jonathan and Vice President Mohammed Namadi Sambo.

    The statement read: “The motive of the sponsors of this mischievous advertorial is to pitch His Excellency, Sir Patrick Ibrahim Yakowa against President Goodluck Jonathan and His Vice, Arc. Namadi Sambo. Dragging the name of Governor Yakowa into the 2015 presidential race, when the governor is yet to reach the half-way line in his first tenure is a deliberate and calculated mischief. The real intention of the promoters of this ‘tale by moonlight’ is to portray the governor in bad light, as a disloyal party member and to also justify their own mischievous intention. The governor has made it very clear that everybody has the constitutional right to contest for any political office he is interested in, but such ambition should not be built on the destruction of His Excellency’s hard-earned reputation as a trust-worthy and loyal party member.

    “The sponsors of such write-up should feel free to market themselves to the people with whom the final decision rest but should leave the governor out of it as he has never shown interest in the 2015 presidential race. For the avoidance of doubt, the focus of Governor Patrick Yakowa is the continued delivery of democracy dividends to the good people of Kaduna State through his three widely-acclaimed agenda of Security, Unity and Development. This explains the award last week of N28 billion contract for 31 new roads, in addition to about 684 kilometers of roads at various stages of completion,  the purchase of equipment of about N200 million for the Kaduna State Public Works Agency for the maintenance of failed roads, and the  first phase of the conversion of the Barau Dikko  Hospital to a University Teaching Hospital at the cost of  N474 million among other critical projects in the  education and agricultural sectors.”

    It explained further: “To do more than he is presently doing, the governor has embarked on an aggressive Internally Generated Revenue. As a law-abiding citizen, the governor is exploring the options of legal actions and a formal report will also be lodged with the Nigerian Press Council, in view of the professional issues involved in the matter. The governor will at all times remain a friend of the press, whose contribution to national development can never be questioned but will always frown at mischievous write-ups.” He pointed out that the phone number of the signatory to the advertorial was traced to a woman in one of the south-eastern states.

    Investigations by The Nation revealed that the sponsors of the advertorial may have been acting a script which aides of the governor believe is aimed at destroying the existing relationship between Yakowa and the Presidency with the aim of running him out of the 2015 governorship contest in the state. It is an open secret in the state that there are moves to ensure that Yakowa does not contest the 2015 elections. However, a group which called itself Kaduna Democratic Watch believes that those behind the advertorial endorsing Yakowa is like shaving a man’s head without his permission. According to them, aspiring to political offices no matter how small or how big is supposed to be a personal decision, adding: “It is the right of every individual to aspire to any office. Even though consultations are necessary in any contest, these consultations must be done with the person aspiring for any contest and not behind him by people who pretend to have his interest at heart and behind his back. The fact that they did not even do their home work to know that the former Oyo state governor, Senator Rasheed Ladoja who are they proposing as Yakowa’s running mate is not a member of the PDP. Ladoja is, in fact, a member of Accord Party that is forming an alliance with the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) in Oyo state to fight the PDP in the state.

     

  • ‘We’ll produce people’s constitution’

    ‘We’ll produce people’s constitution’

    Senator Ike Ekweremadu is the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Constitution Amendment. In this interview presented by the Managing Editor, Northern Operations Yusuf Alli and Group Political Editor Bolade Omonijo, the Deputy Senate President highlights the review and presents an interim report on the committee’s activities.

     

    If you look at the 1999 Constitution, there is no position on how it should be amended. What is the thinking of your committee?

    First, we have done a number of amendments in the past and we are now doing a more elaborate amendment that will be all-encompassing. Secondly, Nigerians have been very concerned about the way the 1999 Constitution came about through a military process. I think if we make provision in the constitution for how a new provision can come into force, it can take care of that concern so that subsequent constitution can also be subjected to, probably, a referendum; a more elaborate process of consultation and possibly, a conference. There is the example of Kenya . Beyond the countries we have visited, we may still have to go to Kenya to study their own system. Kenya had the same problem and what they did was to amend their constitution to make certain provisions on how a new constitution can come about. Having got that, they also set up a commission for the implementation of those processes. It took them a long while but they were able to achieve it. When people are talking about sovereign national conference or a referendum, you ask yourself, what is the authority for this? How can we achieve this when the law does not make provision for it? Section 1 of the constitution makes it clear that you can’t do anything outside the constitution. Otherwise, you will be subverting it. Very soon, we will begin to think about making provision in the constitution. I will share the view with my colleagues and if they feel strongly about it, I am sure that this kind of amendment can also take care of it.

    Given that the 2015 elections are approaching, do you think you would have concluded the review before then?

    As far as we are concerned, we will finish sometime in 2013 and if we do, then we still have two years before the elections so that most of the things that we have done would have taken shape ahead of 2015. However, even if we don’t finish as early as we are prepared to, it will not really affect the conduct of the elections in 2015.

    Does it mean you don’t have a timeline to complete the assignment?

    We pasted guidelines since January this year and we have been following it religiously. We stated that we were going to have publications inviting people to a public hearing in the month of May, we did that. We said we would hold retreats in April, we did that. We said we would hold public hearing in October, it was held. We will be having another public hearing in November. In the first quarter of next year, we will hold a retreat. After that, within that first quarter, in the National Assembly, the debate will start in earnest. Hopefully, by July which is the third quarter, we are hopeful that the business of amendment would have been treated.

    Section 7, of the constitution provides for the independence of the local government system, but what obtains now seems to be contrary to what is provided for in the constitution. What should Nigerians expect from the amendment?

    It is one of the issues we intend to address. In addressing it, we have to first agree as to what would be the status of our Local Governments in Nigeria. We need to ensure that they get their money directly from the Federal Government without passing through a joint State/Local Government account. Recall that those who put the joint account in the constitution meant well. The idea was for the money to go into a specific account in which the State Government will contribute from their internally generated revenue and then share to the Local Governments in such a way that they will get more money than was actually paid to them by the Federal Government, but we have noticed that instead of putting money into this account and sharing to the council areas from it, some states actually take money away from the account before sharing. On the whole, beyond that amendment, it is important that governance at the state level should ensure that Section 7 of the constitution is complied with in terms of making sure that elections are held at the local government level as independent as possible.

    Your committee is said to be planning a foreign trip. Is this necessary?

    Some of our colleagues have gone to Canada to do a comparative study of our federal system and that of Canada . They came back with a very revealing result. People like Senator Attahiru and a number of other Senators were there. We believe that we also need further information, especially from those who are on the same level of development as we are, like India. We are also hoping that we will go to Brazil and we will study more advanced system like the United States of America . America is a very complex society like Nigeria . But as complex as it is, they are able to secure the territory of America while we cannot take care of our own. Canada is a multi-cultural and multi-ethnic country, yet the people are able to live together. It is the same with India , yet we cannot manage our own affairs. What are those things that are happening there which are not happening here? These are the things that we need to have practical experience of and share with our colleagues to enable them to make an informed opinion at the appropriate time. This is a globalised world. No country can live in isolation. That is why problems are easily handled these days because you can easily find examples from many places as regards how they have been able to solve their own problems. It is important for us to see how others are doing their things and getting better result. That is why it is important for us to study these areas and follow the best examples.

    How many memoranda has your committee received?

    At the last count, we had received about 240 memoranda outside the basic states’ demand. We have acknowledged these memos and these submissions and in July we had a retreat in Asaba, Delta State. There we looked at all these memos and tried to summarise them. Most of them deal with similar issues; so, we identified the specific issues which we are concentrating on; those which we considered to be thematic, we will bring them out during the national public hearing so that Nigerians will begin to make contributions towards them. We believe that every Nigerian will have an opportunity to say his or her own mind on the areas identified from the memos they have submitted. We have thrown it open to the public and I am happy that for two days, we had very useful discussion and input from various people of Nigeria . We intend to further take it to the zones so that people who are unable to attend the national public hearing will have an opportunity to bare their minds on these specific areas. Beyond that, we intend to engage our constituents. We intend to take our colleagues to their various districts so that they hold meetings with the people of their respective constituencies. Every Senator will be involved in this, but the members of the Senate Committee on Constitution Review will also organise a stakeholders’ meeting in their respective states to explain to them what we are doing and probably get their input. We are hopeful that every other Nigerian will be engaged through the electronic media, communication systems, probably by SMS. Every Nigerian will get the message on most of the issues in the form of questionnaires. It will be a two-way traffic. We would have paid for the SMS so that they won’t spend any money in answering those questions. We are setting up a website where Nigerians will have an opportunity of baring their minds in respect of these areas. On the whole, every Nigerian will be a part of this process.

    We have never had state creation under democratic setting. Do you think this National Assembly can break that jinx?

    From the memos submitted so far and from the contributions of Nigerians in the public hearings, I think there is the desire of Nigerians to have states created and we are representing the people and ours is to give meaning to the expressions of Nigerians. To that extent, we will vigorously pursue the issue of state creation. If it succeeds, fine. If it doesn’t succeed, we would have done our job.

    But some believe that you are too slow on the state creation matter.

    Creation of states is a work that needs every hand to be on deck. It requires the vote of senators and members of the House of Representatives; we also have to take it to the states so any person who believes that we sit at one place and decide on any issue including states creation does not seem to understand how these things work.

    Bakassi is a part of Nigeria as engrained in the constitutution. How will the issue of be handled during the amendment?

    The Bakassi thing is still a developing study. I don’t think it is concluded. We have heard just one aspect of it which is the ICJs judgment which we were unable to review because of timeframe and of course, because as the Attorney General has said, we didn’t have any ground to canvass. There are still other options available to Nigeria including but not limited to plebiscite for those people there to determine where they want to stay. Of course, we are also aware of the human rights violation that is happening in the peninsula right now to which Nigeria is entitled to petition and get Cameroun to answer for it. These are some of the things that are still outstanding. It is also likely that one day, that peninsula will still become a part of Nigeria.

    The issue of citizenship and residency is a very complex one. Have people raised that matter with your committee?

    Yes, a lot of concerns have been raised and we have received a lot of memos on that but speaking for myself, I don’t think the issue is that of legislation or constitutionalism. I think it has to do with our value system, our ability to live with one another. It has to do with the issue of accommodation and patriotism. These are the things that will address the issue of citizenship and residency. Beyond that, Section 147/3 of the constitution says for you to be minister from a state, you have to be an indigene of that state which I’m sure must be a mistake on the part of the framers of the constitution. No other part of the constitution makes that kind of provision. Section 42 of the constitution deals with the issue of non-discrimination. It provides in very elaborate terms that no Nigerian should be discriminated against on account of where he comes from, his ethnic base, religion, sex and so many other conditions. If we put that into focus, it means that the constitution has made sufficient provision and protection for every Nigerian in every part of Nigeria . The Supreme Court has gone further to establish that. For instance, you are in Sokoto or in Enugu and they have two regimes of school fees, you can go to court. I have not seen any Nigerian who has taken advantage of this. I am not aware of what needs to be amended in the constitution to protect Nigerians more that what is provided in Section 42 of the constitution. We are talking, so we will allow Nigerians to come up with views on how this could be addressed. Don’t forget that in the 60s, we had Mayors in the East who were from the North and don’t forget that Zik won elections in the South West and was heading to become the Premier of the Western Region. If we have sustained that attitude, by now, any person could have been governor of Sokoto State whether from South East or Southsouth. Maybe Kwankwaso would have been in Enugu as Governor. Don’t forget, too, the experience withthe late Chief MKO Abiola’s election, where we had a Muslim presidential candidate and a Muslim vice presidential candidate and they won, defeating a Muslim candidate in his own town in Kano . Those are the attitudes we need to build upon. No amount of legislation can help the matter except we change our attitude.

    The Senate appears to be driving the process alone. Since the amendment process involves concurrent action by the two chambers, what are you doing to get the House as actively involved as the Senate?

    I am happy that we don’t have bickering with the House of Representatives presently on the issue of constitution amendment. We have a peaceful system where we are working with the House, even though independently. Shortly, we will have a joint meeting with them to streamline our operations and our timeline so that nothing will drag us back. As soon as we finish our zonal public hearing, we will be able to conclude on the basic areas we are focusing on and also send copies to the House of Representatives so that members can align it with what they are doing. I am also aware that very shortly, they will be doing their own public hearing. That means we will meet at some point in the very near future.

     

  • I still look back longingly at politics of AD —Odanye

    I still look back longingly at politics of AD —Odanye

    Akinrogun Tunde Odanye, PDP chieftain, who contested for the governorship seat of the state of Osun in 2007 under Alliance for Democracy, tells Sam Egburonu in this interview that he is still longing for the progressive politics of AD. Excerpts

    Nigeria is 52 this year and most citizens feel the country is still like a baby? Why do we have to face this fate?

    I will say yes, we are a toddler nation at 52. But I will like to point out that for a change, we are gradually getting our acts together. We all seem to agree today that a lot has to be done. I mean that both the ruler and the people seem to be on the same page today as to what needs to be done. I think the only problem is the sincerity of those who are ruling and of course some of the people who are being ruled, who are beneficiaries of the corrupt system and so want it to continue. But I think we will get there. You see, unlike in the military days, when the rulers either had cotton wool in their ears and were totally deaf to what the ruled were saying or just could not be bothered, in this democratic setting, everybody knows you have to deliver because it is your performance for a second term, and assuming that is not the greatest motivation for you, assuming your second term is guaranteed, whether you delivered or you did not; there is also the fact that when you leave that office, there are a number of people who will ask you questions on why you failed to deliver.

    Are you implying that the leaders we have today are listening to the governed?

    None of them can pretend not to hear what the people are saying. Is just that some care, some do not care very much and some may not care at all. But you can hear them defending themselves, trying to justify their actions and promising to do more. We are all witnesses to what is happening today. We have a situation that when you criticize the president, you get a reply. I will give you an example which I find very ‘emulatory’ of Mr. president. Somebody in the social media carried the rumour that it was the president’s wife that was responsible for the Dana plane crash; that she was visiting and air space was closed, etc. Of course, that allegation was baseless. In times not too long ago, that fellow would have been locked up and the keys thrown away. But what do we have now? We have a president and his wife, who replied, saying this was where I was oo! In otherwise, we have a president and his wife who had to provide an alibi, which was totally unassailable and simply responding that the allegation has no truth, no foundation. You criticised the president on the removal of petrol subsidy. Some of us believe it is necessary. We know that those subsidies were entering into private pockets. We are not the beneficiaries of the subsidy. But the president harkened to the cries of the people. The most recent was the issue of the N5,000 note. He listened to your criticisms.

    So, I think he is listening. Change could be slow a times. Its like an Elephant’s turning. When damage has been done for quite a long period of time, rectifying it may not be very easy. It is the same thing they are harassing Barack Obama in America. They have forgotten he has been there for only four years. Damage has been done about eight years before he got there. You know it’s easier to destroy than to build.

    I think what has led to the greatest reverse we had was the time the late President Yar’Adua was ill and it was like nobody was really in charge. It was his ministers and some caucus of his close friends, who were directing affairs not necessarily to the best benefit of the citizens but to their benefits. That was when we heard that there were millions of dollars flying around in hard currency amongst ministers because they had no boss, more or less.

    The impression that the president is slow, which led to allegations that he was rudderless and such like, has not been helped by government’s handling of Boko Haram and other security challenges. Do you agree that he is confused?

    I am not saying this as a politician, I am responding now as a lawyer and as a regular citizen, based on my discussions with people across different political strata; I know that every enlightened person understands that many of this problems cannot go away over night. America and Israel, which are supposed to be the most security conscious countries in the world still have same experience every now and then. They don’t blame it on their president. 9/11 was never blamed on the President of America. In the UK, they are still arresting fundamentalists, both Islamists, the skin heads, etc. I ask, are we intentionally mischievous or what? Don’t we read newspapers everyday: bomb blast in Spain, bomb blast in Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Uganda, Kenya, everywhere. Are all their presidents rudderless? Its like saying anywhere there is crime, it’s Mr. president’s fault.

    One of the reasons already adduced for this state of insecurity is poverty of the common citizen, and this is not occasioned only by the president. The state governments and local authorities have contributed in this unfortunate reality and so, when these people begin to react, it is not directed at the president alone but also at their state and local leaders.

    But because we are used to the military mentality of ‘with immediate effect,’ we want everything to be done with immediate effect. When Obasanjo came, it was by immediate effect but we see that most of the decisions he took that way had to be reversed.

    Now, we have a president who takes his time to come to a decision because he doesn’t want to reverse it; a president who discusses the actions he want to take. As a result, most of the actions President Jonathan has taken have passed the test of time. That is, a good number of his actions did not need to be reversed.

    Many also have this bad impression of President Jonathan because he is a meek person with a humble mien. You know that in Nigeria, we tend to respect people that throw their weight around. We don’t easily respect humble people but the truth is that any enlightened mind knows that arrogance is usually informed by ignorance. The most arrogant people in this world are usually the most ignorant. To some of them, it is a defence mechanism. The more informed you are, the more you will realise that you are just a lucky person, that but for the grace of God, you could have been the next mendicant on the street. We have a president who has a PhD, who is sufficiently informed and exposed.

    Not long ago, you were quoted as saying that by the time some judges are tried and jailed, Nigeria’s anti-corruption crusade will become more successful. As a lawyer, are you saying the judiciary is to blame for the state of corruption in the country?

    We like pretending or deceiving ourselves. We say we are fighting corruption, how many high profile people have been convicted and sent to jail.

    But how do they tackle corruption abroad, they make sure they go after the biggest crooks, so that the small ones will be too scared to even think of it. You know when Abacha locked up those leaders Nigerians thought were untouchables, like Olusegun Obasanjo, MKO Abiola, Shehu Yar’Adua, etc; you have to be very very bold to talk after that.

    What I am saying is that corrupt judges should also be sent to jail.

    As at 1999, honest, decent people could win elections in this country. I remember Chief Bisi Akande, who was governor of Osun state then, he used to say proudly that he did not think he spent more than N50,000 in his governorship campaigns. That election cost a total of about N3million. Now, you will need a couple of billions of naira to prosecute governorship elections in almost any state in Nigeria.

    This high cost of prosecuting electoral campaigns, is it a confirmation that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is also corrupt?

    This current INEC is not corrupt. What I am saying is that this Professor Attahiru Jega-led INEC is good, is delivering and even if it is somehow corrupt, it is at a level you can describe in Nigerian context as moderate. The results we have been getting since the 2011 elections have been results we all believe are authentic. In fact, this INEC is the shining light in this dark and corrupt era.

    Originally, we know you as an active AD chieftain. Now, you are in PDP. Do you sometimes feel uncomfortable in your current political family?

    The truth of the matter is, I still look back longingly at the politics of AD. In those days, when we had AD, PDP, APP, politics was still practiced the way it should. That is no longer the case. But in PDP, one is still free to ventilate his ideas.

    But you once admitted that PDP is not perfect. Are you denying that fact now?

    The major difference between PDP and the other parties is that PDP realises it is not perfect. Others seem to say they are perfect.

    Twice or thrice, you contested for the governorship seat in your state, Osun, are you preparing for another attempt in 2015?

    I don’t know yet. One is that things seem to be getting worse. Before, the South-West was largely insulated from money politics. Now, things have gone haywire.