Once hailed as Africa’s largest political party and the engine of Nigeria’s democratic rebirth, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) now finds itself trapped in a dizzying dance of defections, rivalries, and power tussles that threaten its survival ahead of its national convention.
Once the platform of Presidents and power brokers, the party has become a stage where alliances shift like sand and loyalty changes with the rhythm of ambition. As old wounds reopen and new factions emerge, the PDP’s struggle to reclaim its identity has turned into a chaotic ballet of self-preservation, a political dance of musical chairs in which no seat seems safe, and no leader certain to stay when the music stops. What was once Nigeria’s symbol of political stability has become a lesson in disarray, and the question haunting both members and observers is simple: can the PDP survive its own dance of musical chairs? TONY AKOWE reports
For 16 years when the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) held sway in the country, it was the beautiful bride for all Nigerian politicians. State governors and legislators, both at the federal and state levels, sought to be members of the party. The party appeared to have a mechanism for conflict resolution. Even after losing power to the All Progressives Congress (APC), that conflict resolution mechanism remained intact, putting the government of the day on its toes and holding on to its members as much as possible. Even when Adamu Muazu exited as National Chairman of the party, the party remained largely in control of its affairs. When former Borno State governor, Senator Ali Modu Sheriff and former Kaduna state Governor, Ahmed Mohammed Makarfi, emerged as factional Chairmen of the party, the party remained, while the Board of Trustees stood firm to bring all warring factions together, and the party was better for it. That battle, which nearly tore the party apart, ended only after a Supreme Court judgment restored Makarfi as caretaker chairman. A few years later, a similar scenario played out when the Uche Secondus leadership faced rebellion from governors and national officers, leading to his eventual ouster by court, paving the way for the 2021 convention, which saw the emergence of Senator Iyorchia Ayu as national chairman—a choice that was supposed to heal divisions but instead deepened them. Interestingly, since losing power in 2015 after sixteen uninterrupted years at the centre, the PDP has never fully recovered its rhythm. Each attempt at revival seems to generate a new conflict.
But the race for the 2023 presidential election put a clog on the wheel of the party. When the party went for its national convention, reports had it that there was an agreement that the presidential ticket be zoned to the south and that in the event that a northerner emerged as the party’s candidate, Senator Iyorchia Ayu, who emerged as National Chairman, would resign. But that was not to be, as Ayu stuck to his gun and ran the 2023 general election after the emergence of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar as the Presidential candidate. That action has continued to hunt the party, with former Rivers State governor, Ezenwa Nyelsom Wike, leading the main opposition to events and programmes of the party. Wike’s opposition saw the removal of Ayu and the elevation of Ambassador Umar Iliya Damagum in acting capacity. This created yet another bitter phase that has stretched longer than expected.
The tenure of the current National Working Committee of the party is scheduled to expire on the 8th of December, 2025. By implication, Damagun and his team, including those opposed to the holding of the National Convention, will be out of work with effect from that day. Considering this and in line with the constitution of the party and the Electoral Act, the party, at its 102 National Executive Committee meeting, fixed the National Convention for 15 and 16 November in Ibadan, the Oyo state capital. The meeting also set up a 44-member zoning Committee with Bayelsa State governor, Douye Diri, as Chairman, Zamfara State Governor Dauda Lawal as vice chairman, and Plateau State Governor Caleb Mutfwang as secretary. At the end of their meeting, the zoning committee recommended that the presidency be zoned to the south and the national chairman to the north. They also concluded that all positions remain in the respective regions where they currently are situated. The party therefore directed that the positions be micro-zoned for easy nomination to avoid a crisis.
However, the buildup to the national convention has not been a smooth journey. The politics of the convention has been built around powerful camps built around individuals. First, it was the battle of who is the National Secretary, which was resolved in favour of Senator Samuel Anyanwu. Followers of development within the party are of the view that the current struggle, which pits several blocs against each other, with each seeking control of the party’s National Working Committee (NWC), has the capacity to affect the ticketing power of the PDP ahead of the 2027 general elections. Interestingly, there are two broad camps in the struggle for the soul of the party currently. These are the ‘Wike Camp,’ made up of those loyal to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, and the ‘Mainstream’ Camp, made up of several key members of the party. Before now, this mainstream camp included former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and other northern heavyweights who have since chickened out of the party and pitched a tent with the Africa Democratic Congress (ADC), where they are still struggling to put things in order ahead of the 2027 elections. Even though both parties in the current dance in the PDP have continued to argue that all they want is to have a party that can win elections and promote the culture of peace, their manoeuvres appear to tell a different story. For example, Wike’s group, though nominally within the PDP, has been accused of working at cross-purposes with the party’s national leadership, with many referring to his open support for the APC’s Bola Ahmed Tinubu during the 2023 presidential election. But the mainstream members of the party led by the PDP governors see the coming national convention as an opportunity to reclaim the party structure ahead of 2027. “This convention is about the soul of the PDP,” said a senior member of the National Executive Committee (NEC). “Whoever controls the structure now will determine who gets the ticket later.”
Defections and desertions
The PDP’s internal disputes have not remained contained. Between mid-2024 and October 2025, at least three sitting governors, a dozen senators, and more than thirty members of the House of Representatives have dumped the party and joined the APC or became politically inactive. Among the most notable exits were the defections of high-ranking legislators from the North-West led by former Kebbi State governor, Senator Adamu Aliero and the South-South zones. The entire PDP Legislators from Delta state, except Ned Nwoko, left for the APC. But rather than address issues in the party that have led to mass exit of governors and lawmakers, the party leadership sees a more sinister hand, accusing the APC of using the weapon of inducement, intimidation and coercion to get its elected officials to dump the PDP. But not many staunch PDP loyalists believe that external pressures alone can explain the mass exodus. A member of the party told The Nation that “when members lose faith in internal justice, they will find another platform. The APC may be courting them, but we made it easy for them to leave.”
While leaders of the PDP and others have accused the APC of trying to create a one-party state, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has dismissed the claim, asking the opposition party to put its house in order. While addressing the National Assembly during the 2025 Democracy Day celebration, the President said, “Your alarm may be a result of your panic; it rings in error. At no time in the past, nor any instance in the present and at no future juncture shall I view the notion of a one-party state as good for Nigeria. I have never attempted to alter any political party registration with INEC. Equally, my friends, we cannot blame anybody seeking to bail out of a sinking ship even without a life jacket. I would be the last person to advocate such a scheme. In 2003, when the then-governing party tried to sweep the nation clean of political opposition through plot and manipulation, I was the last of the progressive governors standing in my region. The failed effort to create a one-party state placed progressive political forces on a trajectory to form the APC. It put me on the trajectory which has brought me before you today. I dare not do such a favour to any political adversary by repeating the same mistake of political overreach. That said, we would be guilty of political malpractice if we closed the door on those from other parties who now seek to join the APC”. His suggestions to the PDP and other losing members to the APC were direct. He said “political parties fearful of members leaving may be better served by examining their internal processes and affairs rather than fearfully conjuring up demons that do not exist. For me, I would say try your best to put your house in order. I will not help you do so. It is, indeed, a pleasure to witness you in such disarray.”
The process leading to the National Convention in Ibadan has, however, not been a smooth one. Some of those who are supposed to play a critical role in the process have either chickened out or are sitting on the fence. For example, Enugu State governor, Peter Mbah, who was appointed as secretary of the convention planning committee, has dumped the party and pitched a tent with the APC. Also, Bayelsa State governor, Douye Diri, who headed the zoning Committee as well as one of the subcommittees for the convention, has announced his resignation from the PDP. Even though the governor has not disclosed his destination, many believe that he was heading for the APC. On the other hand, Governor Kigbu Kefas of Taraba State has been sitting on the fence for a while. It has been rumoured that he was also on his way to the APC, a position that he has neither confirmed nor denied. But it was observed that the Governor was not present when his subcommittee on security held its inaugural meeting, like other governors did. He was also not present during the Northern stakeholders meeting where Kabiru Tanimu Turaki was adopted as the consensus candidate for the position of the National Chairman of the PDP. So, for now, the direction of the governor is yet unknown.
As part of the plan for the 2025 national convention, the party advertised a call for nominations from those who want to contest national offices. While several others may have come forward to buy the nomination forms, former Jigawa state governor, Sule Lamido, stayed back and refused to come forward, even though it was rumoured that he was interested in being the National Chairman of the party. He had sworn never to participate in activities of the party until Wike was expelled from the party.
He said, “During our time, the party was supreme. It held full authority, and everyone respected it, whether in the North, South, East, or West. Anyone — no matter how influential — who crossed the party line would be sanctioned. Today, people openly working against the PDP are still being tolerated. “Someone like Wike, who claims to love the PDP but is clearly undermining it, should be expelled by the NWC. Why hasn’t that happened? Look at the Board of Trustees (BOT). People like Ortom, who declared support for Peter Obi in 2023, are still members. That’s why I’ve said I will not attend any PDP meeting unless Wike is expelled and people like Ortom are removed from the BOT. I remain a PDP member, but I will not participate in party functions or answer calls to meetings while these individuals remain in leadership. How can I sit with someone like Ortom in the BOT to discuss the future of PDP? Or someone like Anyanwu, who is rejected in his own zone and is now being imposed by another zone? These are impostors. Wike is someone who was honoured by the PDP, brought into relevance by the PDP, and now turns around to fight the very party that made him. Wike is, quite frankly, a disaster.
“What he has done is un-African and un-Nigerian. I don’t understand how someone, simply because of his own ambition, can take things so personally and act so destructively. There used to be a party culture that prioritised collective good — something altruistic — but that seems lost now. He lacks the values and traditions that define our political culture. I’m glad, however, that President Tinubu intervened. The office was reopened by his order.”
After staying away from the activities of the party, including the sales of forms for contesting offices into the NWC, the former Jigawa governor resolved to contest the office of eh National Chairman, coming to the national Secretariat to purchase the nomination form several weeks after the close of nomination in accordance with the timetable of activities for the convention. In addition to the fact that he came to obtain the form after the sales had closed, Lamido chose to head to the Wadata Plaza, which houses the national secretariat, rather than the Legacy House, where the convention committee is operating from. He called the party a family and everything happening there a family affair. But the PDP is already burdened by several litigations, and yet, Lamido vowed to add to the list of litigations by heading to court to challenge his inability to obtain the nomination form. But the question is, as an elder of the party and one of the few founding fathers remaining in the party, should that be his option? Will his action not further burden the party and give advantage to those the party claims want to destroy it? Lamido’s anger is the lack of consultation among leaders of the party, especially those from the North West, on who should be their choice for the position of National Chairman.
National Organising Secretary, Umar Bature, is one of those who argued that a scheduled meeting of the North West leaders summoned by Zamfara State governor, Dauda Lawal, never took place as the governor gave excuses that he was travelling. But Lamido said the northern leaders and PDP governors preempted their meeting by holding one a day before their scheduled meeting to select Kabiru Tanimu Turaki as consensus candidate from the north for the chairmanship position. The convention committee had to hurriedly cancel the screening of aspirants, citing “logistical reasons” and the need for “further consultations.”
Unofficially, insiders said the party was struggling to manage deepening disputes over the zoning of key offices, eligibility of some aspirants, and allegations that certain leaders were plotting to impose a preferred list of candidates as national officers of the party. While it is reported that Oyo State governor, Seyi Makinde has already endorsed Taofeek Arapaja as National Secretary, the incumbent secretary, Senator Samuel Anyanwu dismissed that saying since the position was zoned to the south, he was not aware of the idea of microzoning the position to the Southwest, adding that he has the legal right to contest a second term as secretary, alleging that he was being denied the opportunity since he was not even aware of the sales of form.
Consensus option
Observers of the activities of the PDP said the party has always had the tradition of selecting its leaders through consensus because they believe that the party is more of a family affair.
Umar Sani, spokesperson of the Tanimu Turaki campaign team, said aside from Solomon Lar, who was given the mandate to lead the party as an Interim Chairman, several other leaders have always emerged either as consensus candidates chosen by the President or one governor or the other. Sani said, “The chairman of a major political party is not merely a regional representative, but that of the whole federation. He is the engine room and rallying point of the entire political organisation. His emergence cannot and has never been an exclusive regional affair.
From Solomon Lar to Barnabas Gemade, Vincent Ogbulafor, Audu Ogbe, Ahmadu Ali, Okwesilieze Nwodo, Bamanga Tukur, and Adamu Mu’azu, party chairmen have always been products of broader consultations and the influence of powerful blocs within the PDP. Indeed, most chairmen were hand-picked or endorsed by sitting Presidents or leading power brokers within the party. Solomon Lar’s one-year one-term tenure was an exception. He was chosen to set the ball rolling and put the party on a sound footing. Sen Ali Modu Sheriff, for example, was chosen to complete the North-East tenure after the resignation of Adamu Muazu, through the intervention of Wike and Fayose. The Sen Ahmed Makarfi-led caretaker committee was the brainchild of Babangida Aliyu (The Chief Servant) and former Gov Sule Lamido of Jigawa State in Port Harcourt. Prince Uche Secondus emerged through Wike’s backing, just as Sen Iyorchia Ayu was a joint product of Wike and Samuel Ortom. History, therefore, proves that party leaders and governors will always show interest in who leads them. Ironically, Capt. Umar Bature himself became National Organising Secretary through a unilateral nomination by Sen Aminu Waziri Tambuwal. For him now to lead a rebellion against the collective will of the governors is a clear act and a demonstration of insubordination and ingratitude.”
While announcing the decision of the northern leaders to settle for Turaki, Adamawa State governor, Ahmadu Fintiri said, “As northern leaders of our great party, the PDP and representatives of the states in the North, we have met this evening to deliberate and take a decision on the office of the National Chairman of our party, which was zoned to the north. We met this evening to deliberate and make a decision on the office of the chairman of our great party, the PDP, which was zoned to the north. In our meeting, we have reflected deeply and widely through consultation and going to Ibadan for our national convention, we have adopted a consensus candidate to represent the North, and by extension, Nigeria, as the chairman of the PDP. That gentleman is KT Turaki, SAN. This is our decision this evening, and he is the person we are presenting at that convention as our chairman to represent our party on the 15th and 16th of November in Ibadan. I do not want to preclude what others are speculating outside, but we are gentlemen, and you can see all of us; we are leaders. We represent each of the states in the north, the 19 states, including the FCT. And this is our decision, and we expect this to be the lineup of our delegates in Ibadan. PDP is an institution, and we have a mechanism to handle all these issues. We will reach out and talk to each other. We have been talking to ourselves, not today, not yesterday. This is a build-up of consensus in the last two weeks, and we have just had a consultation, and this is just the result. I assure you that the convention will be a rancour-free convention. We are still united and focused, and our primary responsibility at the moment is the convention. And this is what we’re discussing primarily”.
Speaking on other positions of the party, Gov. Fintiri assured that all positions of the party “will be resolved at the regional level, and they will present their candidates along with others for us to present at the convention. Altogether, we have ten positions in the north, as far as the convention is concerned. But, nevertheless, anybody who still feels he will want to contest in any position is free, and this is what our position has allowed. We are not excluding anybody. But then, we have just announced to you our consensus candidate, as far as these leaders are concerned. But if anybody still feels he wants to contest, I have said it, time will go by without the door being open. Even if you want to contest the positions that have been zoned to the north, you are free. We will sell the form to you. If you are not from the north, we will allow you to contest.”
But some leaders of the party from the North West, led by the National Organising Secretary, Bature, claimed that there was never a decision to endorse Turaki as the National Chairman. Bature said while the position was micro-zoned to the North West, leaders of the zone never met to decide on who to be the candidate, adding that it was wrong for Gov. Fintiri to announce a consensus candidate when the zone was not consulted.
Bature said, “We want to make it clear to everybody that this zone has not adopted anybody as a candidate from this zone for the People’s Democratic Party. There is a lot of resentment due to a lack of consultation among the leaders of this zone. We believe we are the strongest zone in the PDP, and the attitude of our leaders in this regard made us take this position that we disagree with the governor’s position of yesterday, and we are going to have our own candidate that we will nominate for that position. The North West is the zone to which the national chairmanship has been zoned. This position has been determined by other zones, and we feel it is unfair for other zones to determine a particular candidate when this zone has not been consulted. That’s why we are taking this position. He said they can go ahead. Those who are interested in contesting can go ahead to contest. Do you think that’s fair, and is there any need for disagreement when it’s open that you can contest? If it’s open, then why did they adopt somebody else? That would be the question you should have asked him. If it’s an open contest, they should have allowed others to come out and contest. They shouldn’t have just zoned it to one person. If he knew that the chairmanship position had been zoned to the North West, why should he adopt a candidate when he had not met others? Consensus is made by consultation. We have not been consulted.
The governor himself zoned these positions to the North West. We were supposed to meet yesterday at the instance of the Zamfara governor, who said he was travelling, and that meeting was suspended until today.”
Zamfara State governor, Dauda Lawal, said, “our great party is a family and like any family, we may have disagreements. It is inevitable, no matter what we do; it’s just a matter of time. But the overall interest of this collective family must supersede individual ambitions. We as leaders remain steadfast in our resolve to provide unbiased and selfless service to consensus and build a convention that is truly all-inclusive”.
While Bature insisted no consultation was made before arriving at the choice, The Nation was informed that “at the meeting, the governors asked those interested in the Chairmanship position to indicate by raising their hands. Turaki and Senator Ibrahim Shekarau indicated their interest, while Senator Ahmed Mohammed Makarfi told the meeting that Sule Lamido was interested in contesting the position, but was absent at the meeting. The governors asked them to go out and discuss among themselves and come back with their resolution. Makarfi was asked to represent Sule Lamido. We all know that Makarfi was interested, but he did not indicate it, probably because he knew it would be difficult for him to get the position. When they returned, Shekarau said he would stand by whatever decision the governors arrived at, especially if they settled for Turaki. On his part, Turaki said if the governors choose Shakarau, he would abide by the decision.
“They told the meeting that Lamido had insisted that no matter the decision arrived at, he was going ahead to contest the chairmanship. He claimed that he was asked to contest the position by the northern elders. After that, the governors met to deliberate and settled for Turaki. But Lamido insisted that he would go ahead to contest, which is his right to do. But we all know that you need the governors to win, and they are not comfortable with Lamido. The governors don’t want a man who will not respect them and who will tell them that whatever they are today, he has been there. They don’t want a man who will not answer them anytime they call. That is why they did not settle for Lamido. When the governors settled for Turaki and announced it to the meeting, they called for dissenting voices by asking those who were not at peace with the decision to speak their mind. But nobody said anything. All those who are shouting now were at that meeting. The Chairman of the PDP in Sokoto was at the meeting. He did not object and did not say anything.”
Read Also: Ondo PDP chieftain defects to APC, begins grassroots mobilisation for Tinubu’s re-election
Lamido said, “Consensus? If there are consultations, there can be consensus. But if there are no consultations, then we are not united on board. I mean, the zone where I came from, we never met. We were supposed to meet on Wednesday, and the Governor of Zamfara State booked a hall at Transcorp Hilton for us from the Northwest to meet and come up with some kind of understanding. But to pre-empt our meeting, they fixed a meeting for Tuesday. So, we never met. The zone never met. That’s the problem. But it’s not the last one.”
Future of PDP
Lamido argued that the PDP must put its house in order if it hopes to make a headway in future elections, saying “the PDP should be able to organise its own house to run the party based on the policies of the party, doing the right thing at all times. The only way we can win is by having a disciplined party. If the party is not organised, if we don’t follow our own constitution and procedures, how do we win elections?
“How will a non-united party even win elections? So, you see, my main concern is getting the PDP properly restored into a stable, united family that will be able to stay focused on the bigger picture ahead — saving Nigeria and Nigerians from the APC. You see, PDP is a family of wonderful Nigerians who share a similar commitment to Nigeria and democracy. So, coming here is like coming home to the family. There’s nothing new about it.”
This view is shared by Gov. Lawal of Zamara State. He said, “A great thinker once said. Alone, we can do so little; together we can do so much. This word resonates deeply today. We must stand together, we must work together; we must heal together. As you come on this way to your assignment, I pray for divine intervention and wisdom, as well as guidance from each one of you.”
Inside Wadata Plaza: whispers and wagers
Inside the PDP secretariat, whispers of betrayal and backroom deals swirl through the corridors. Governors loyal to different factions hold parallel strategy sessions, while some aspirants have begun lobbying for interim compromises—like allowing Damagum to remain as acting chairman until after the 2027 elections. This could be so since the tenure of the present National Working Committee is due to expire in December, and failure to hold an elective convention may lead to the composition of an Interim leadership for the party, like the APC did when Comrade Adams Oshiomhole was removed as National Chairman.
Others see the convention as a chance to inject fresh blood into the party that can appeal to both old loyalists and disenchanted members. Some believe that Turaki fits the kind of Chairman the PDP needs at this moment because he has not been associated with any of the factions in the party. For many analysts, the November convention represents more than a routine leadership renewal, but a test of the PDP’s capacity to act as a viable opposition ahead of 2027.
There is no doubt that the stakes are high, and if the exercise produces a widely acceptable leadership, the PDP could begin to rebuild credibility. If it ends in another court battle or boycott, the party’s claim to being an alternative to the APC may evaporate. There are fears that some senior members of the party may stay away unless “agreements reached at zonal meetings are respected.” There are also fears of having parallel delegates and conventions. Some believe that the convention is shaping up as a battle of survival.
Grassroots discontent
While national leaders wrestle for control, the party’s grassroots are showing fatigue. In many states, local party offices remain shut or inactive. Funding has dried up, and loyalists complain of neglect. In the South-East and parts of the North-East, some chapters have merged their activities with local pressure groups, effectively operating outside the national structure. Many Lawmakers have abandoned the party, and as of the last count, the party had fewer than 10 federal lawmakers, especially in the House of Representatives from the Southeast East
The road to Ibadan
Despite uncertainties, preparations for the convention have been ongoing both in Ibadan and at the National level, where committees have been holding meetings. The Nation gathered that the choice of venue outside Abuja was meant to symbolise inclusiveness and decentralisation. Party sources say over 3,000 delegates are expected, representing all 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory.
As delegates prepare to gather in Ibadan, one thing is clear: the PDP’s survival will depend less on who wins the chairmanship than on whether the party can rediscover a shared sense of purpose. The dance of musical chairs may continue, but the music cannot play forever. When it stops, those still standing will have to decide—do they rebuild the old house, or walk away in search of a new one? For Nigeria’s oldest surviving political brand, the answer may determine not just its fate, but the quality of the country’s democracy itself.
But the decision of the Federal High Court in Abuja halting the convention has, no doubt, dragged the PDP several miles back. Political watchers are, however, stunned by the decision of the Court asking the party to transmit a genuine letter to INEC informing it of the convention in line with the provisions of the Electoral Act. Curiously, the issue of a letter to the commission was never part of the issues canvassed in Court. Even though the National Secretary of the party denied knowledge of the letter to INEC, claiming his signature was forged, the issue is currently before the security agencies for investigation, and how it became part of the judgment when it was not canvassed in Court has become a subject of discussion.
The question then is whether the Court has decided to do the work of the police by declaring the letter to INEC as invalid and fake, or whether the commission told the Court that it has not received any genuine letter from the PDP.
Unending drama
The drama in the party has continued unabated, with the Federal High Court in Abuja helping the stakeholders to expand the scope of the crisis by halting the national convention and asking the party to first send the INEC what it called a proper letter in accordance with the rules. But the question that many are asking is how the issue of a formal letter entered the case since it was not one of the grounds before the Court. As a result of the court order, the Umar Damagun-led National Working Committee has suspended the National Secretary, National Legal Adviser, his deputy and the National Organising Secretary for their role.
In turn, the National Secretary and his group suspended the National Chairman and his group, appointing the National Vice Chairman, North Central, as Acting Chairman. The development has placed the PDP national Secretariat under lock and key to prevent a breakdown of law and order, while the staff have been sent away from the place by the security agents.
Although it is not clear whether Anyanwu and his team informed the INEC about the development in the party, Damagun, on the other hand, has informed the commission and is determined to go ahead with the convention following a ruling of an Ibadan High Court, which has been applauded by state chairmen of the party and the Adolphus Wabara-led Board of Trustees. But the suspension and counter suspension in the party has extended beyond the National Working Committee to the Board of Trustees, which is supposed to be the conscience of the party. While Nigerians wait patiently for the party to resolve its internal crisis, the Wike group has seen anyone associated with the Damagun group as enemies of the party who must be done away with. Interestingly, the Board of Trustees is established by Article 18 of the PDP Constitution, while Article 31(2c) gives the National Executive Committee the express power to “take decisions on all matters affecting the party, including the removal or reconstitution of organs of the Party as it may deem necessary.” However, the party constitution only allows the National Working Committee to make recommendations, but only the NEC has the constitutional authority to approve or effect the dissolution and reconstitution of the BoT. In some cases, such ratification may require a national Convention to take effect. It is not clear where the Abdulrahaman Mohammed-led faction derived the power to dissolve and reconstitute the BoT, even without the knowledge of the NEC of the party.
The question many Nigerians have been asking is whether those beating the drums of war within the PDP are interested in seeing peace in the party. As the drama continues, several stakeholders have chosen to remain silent for fear of not being branded an enemy. The only stakeholder who has spoken up has been former Ekiti State governor, Ayodele Fayose, who appeared to be on the side of the Wike-led group, and Bode George, who wants the Supreme Court to sanction judges that has chosen to help derail the party, despite a Supreme Court judgement that restricts interference in the internal affairs of political parties. But Mohammed does not see what is going on and the preparation for the national convention of the party as an internal affair of the PDP.
