Tag: Atiku Abubakar

  • Anenih: The bitter-sweet memories

    Our first encounter in 2000 was simply apocalyptic. The old cop was at his bewitching best – marshalling provincial tactics of intimidation and seduction.

    An editor with THISDAY then, I was in Benin City for the weekend and happened to have been with then Governor Lucky Igbinedion at the White House that evening before the then acclaimed “strongman of Edo politics” appeared like an apparition.

    Nothing, in my wildest imagination, had prepared me for the coming volcanic eruption while chatting with the Edo governor over wine. As the day wore on, folks – a few familiar faces and the others unknown – began to trickle in, until the main lounge was packed full with the “powers and principalities” of Edo PDP then, ahead of a pre-scheduled state caucus meeting.

    Easily recognizable among them was the durable Chief Sam Ogbemudia, debonair Mike Oghiadome (deputy governor), gangling Samson Ekhabafe (now late) and feisty Aguele (state chairman).

    Then, the air would freeze as Chief Anenih sauntered in a white kaftan with everyone standing up in courtesy to “The Leader”.

    It didn’t take long for his sharp police eyes to notice the oddity of my presence.

    “Youngman, who are you?”, he muttered, before taking his seat on the two-seater sofa by the national flag.

    “I’m Louis Odion.”

    “Louis Odion, the journalist?,” he asked, eyes dimmed quizzically behind his trademark thick bi-focals, while others watched with growing curiosity.

    “You guessed right, sir.”

    What remains difficult to tell till date is whether it was that casual retort or the self-assuredness it was expressed that stoked Chief Anenih’s anger the more. With a voice now almost breathless in anger, he chose to direct his bazooka instead at the chief host (Igbinedion) and let out a fiery shot: “Lucky, what’s this enemy doing here?”

    “My Leader, Louis is my friend o. He’s in town and came for a drink.”

    “What friend?!” he exploded further in a paroxysm of expletives and imprecations, too harsh – if not mean – to restate here. He continued: “He cannot be a friend. This boy abuses everybody every day with his pen. I used to think he was even an old person. I didn’t know he’s such a young boy like this.”

    In the brief, testy silence that followed, the building would seem to be quaking in the tremor of his venomous rage.

    Then, the earth parted again and the volcanic eruption resumed in its blazing severity, with Chief Anenih finally thundering: “Young man, will you get out of this place!!!”

    Of course, by now, such dark hint was enough to activate my survival instinct.

    As I made for the door, the stentorian voice boomed again, “Young man, come back here!”, with the same Chief Anenih beckoning me to come and sit next to him on the sofa!

    Never in my life had I been this publicly embarrassed before.

    After hesitating at the door, I turned back, more out of respect for someone old enough to be my grandpa.

    Only then did the gathering of party grandees return to a cacophony of banters, but their voices muffled, in deep reverence of the monumental presence of “The Leader”, while awaiting the meeting to be called to order.

    In our corner, a completely new drama began to unfold. After you chastise a child with the right hand, they say, you’re obliged to cuddle him with the left. From the earlier bullying, “The Leader” suddenly and astonishingly resorted to patriarchal charms. The way he went about it was most disarming. He wasn’t looking at me as he began to speak in soft voice, having pulled closer on the sofa.

    Cupping his mouth with the right hand so that not even anyone standing by could eavesdrop while facing the crowd, he whispered conciliatorily to me: “I can see you’re really angry at the way I spoke to you now. Louis, that’s me. Go and ask my children, when I’m angry I tell them off. After that, we’re family again.”

    To break my last wall of defence, he doubled the flattery, “Louis, I never knew you were even this handsome,” his face now lit with a broad smile. “But if I may you, why do you always like attacking me in your writings?”

    “Sir, I’m only a journalist doing my work,” I finally found my voice “As a reporter, I report facts. As a columnist, I only express my personal opinion. I may be wrong, but don’t mean to be disrespectful, sir.”

    Then, he sent for his aide, Odion Ugbesia, and asked him: “Do you know this man?”

    “No sir.”

    “That’s the famous Louis Odion, the journalist. He’s your namesake and also from Edo. Take his number and give him all my direct numbers in Abuja and Benin and make sure you’re in touch with him.”

    Indeed, that night marked the next phase of the complicated relationship I would have with Chief Anenih in the next decade. Which journalist – especially one whose forte is political reporting – will not swoon at securing unlimited access to arguably one of the biggest players in Nigerian politics at the time. A rich news source, undoubtedly.

    But such access also comes its own perils.

    Unfailingly paternalistic, he would henceforth often ask THISDAY publisher (Mr. Nduka Obaigbena) whenever they met, “How’s my son?”, referring to me. And whenever Mr. Obaigbena wanted to pull my legs in the office, he would tease, “I wonder what you’re looking for in the circle of those old men.”

    The morning after a “political solution” was contrived to the Onshore-Offshore dichotomy palaver in 2002, I was the first journalist to get the exclusive, courtesy Anenih who presided over the presidential panel that sat all night to resolve the issue. That singular recommendation helped defuse mounting tension in the Niger Delta and brought immediate succor in particular to Akwa Ibom which had had to endure zero oil receipt for months.

    His sense of humour was something else. After being introduced publicly to Azu Ishiekwene, then editor of The PUNCH (against which he was vigorously pursuing a libel suit in court), Anenih quipped: “Ah, I never knew you already look lean,” referrring to Azu’s petite frame. “By the time I would have won my case again you in court and you’re forced to pay heavy penalty, I only wonder what flesh you will have left on your bones!”

    Doubtless, Anenih’s power and glory in the OBJ years were never in doubt. The Anenih-Atiku story is a riveting one indeed. Both being disciples of the mercurial Shehu Yar’Adua, it is amazing how OBJ they brought to power also separated them later.

    When OBJ’s campaign continued to limp late 1998 under Iyiorcha Ayu, it was Atiku Abubakar, as a popular acccount goes, that helped conscript Anenih, against OBJ’s initial reservations. No sooner had he taken charge than things changed dramatically. The secret? He simply reactivated the old boys’ network of Yar’Adua’s PDM by coopting members as OBJ’s field commanders in the 774 councils across the country. Only then did OBJ’s presidential campaign leap froward like tiger, a testimony to Anenih’s extraordinary talent at organizing and mobilizing.

    So, he instantly gained OBJ’s confidence and cemented his fame as the new “Mr. Fix It”. When the PDP’s presidential flagbearer later sought his counsel on the choice of running-mate after the party’s convention in Jos in 1999, “The Leader” did not hesitate before recommending Atiku as “the deputy you can trust” from the shortlist of five names.

    The story of how dire circumstances would set the two old Yar’Adua collaborators apart three years later is a story for another day.

    But a man of uncommon passions, he similarly triggered extreme emotions in others – cult worship among disciples and fierce hostility in adversaries. In what could only have spoken to a hangover from his professsional creed as policeman, he never seemed able to tolerate neutrality: you were either an ally or an enemy. To him, loyalty must include a willingness to inherit the leader’s enemies as well.

    That peculiar psychology would invariably redound on our relationship. He was never able to see reason in drawing a distinction between the professsional and the personal. Hard as I tried, I never succeeded in making him understand that I could only be held personally accountable for views expressed in my column, and not for reports published as objective representation of facts in the finest tradition of journalism.

    When the report was positive, he would call me and affectionately say, “My son”. When the story was unflattering and I called and began by saying “Daddy”, he would angrily snap back, “Will you stop ‘daddying’ me! You’ve done it again. You’re a bad son!!”

    When I wrote a column in his defence in 2004 as Sun editor based on my personal convinction in the heat of his skymish with then Governor Orji Kalu of Abia, he was deeply emotional when he called and spoke Ishan in expressing appreciation of my courage to write against the owner’s interest.

    But that “father-son” amity only endured till another negative story appeared in the Sunday Sun I edited till January 2008 or the National Life I was MD/Editor-In-Chief for the next three years.

    He would seem to finally give up on me after I accepted an offer to serve as Information Commissioner in the Adams Oshiomhole administration. “The Leader” would appear to have found it too hard to bear hearing the voice of his once beloved “son” speaking against him on national television or local radio stations or issuing statement denouncing “the  Edo godfathers” on behalf of Edo State Government. Again, he seemed unable – or unwilling – to accept the philosophical distinction between the professional and the personal.

    Then came February 17, 2012, the day Oba Eradiuauwa gave out his daughter in marriage. While exiting the marquee at the palace, Governor Emmanuel Uduaghan of neighbouring Delta State stopped to compliment me “for helping to reposition Comrade’s information management. I notice things have changed since you took over.”

    Uduaghan’s kind words only seemed to annoy “The Leader” who stood beside him. Then pointing finger at me menacingly, he growled: “Odion, you’ll soon see what’ll happen to you!” He repeated that four times.

    So, when on April 29, 2012 a band of gunmen laid siege to my private residence in Benin City and only retreated after the local vigilante boys engaged them in gun duel, it was humanly impossible for me not to draw a parallel between that descent to barbarism and the undisguised threat of February 17 and, therefore, become paranoid at “The Leader”.

    In remembering his flaws as a mortal, charity nothleseless obliges us to also acknowledge his strengths, chief of which was his generosity to unquestioning loyalty.

  • We want more than SGF, South-West PDP tells Atiku

    The South-West Zone of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) has urged the party’s presidential candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, to give more key positions to the zone if he emerges as president.

    The South-West Vice-Chairman of the party, Dr Eddy Olefeso, made the demand in Lagos on Friday night, at a meeting of key members across the six states in the zone.

    The meeting, which lasted hours, had in attendance a former Deputy National Chairman of the party, Chief Olabode George; the current Deputy National Chairman (South),Chief Yemi Akinwonmi; and a former National Vice Chairman of the party, Alhaji Tajudeen Oladipo.

    Also present were former Minister of State for Defence, Mrs Sola Obada; a former Deputy Governor of Ogun State, Alhaja Makanjuola Badru; and a member of the National Assembly, Sen. Abiodun Olujimi.

    The party’s governorship candidate in Oyo State, Mr Seyi Makinde; the governorship candidate in Ogun, Mr Ladi Adebutu; and a former governorship aspirant in Osun State, Chief Akin Ogunbiyi, was also at the meeting, among others.

    Olafeso said though the promise of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF) slot by Atiku was a good development, the zone deserved more key political and government positions.

    The Vice-Chairman said that the zone had been schemed out in the power arrangement of the party for the past few years.

    Olafeso said for Atiku to give the zone a sense of belonging and compensate “for the years of abandonment”, he should zone key positions of the Chief of Staff to the President and Àttorney-General of the Federation to the South-West in addition to the SGF.

    He said the South-West had the second highest voting population in the country and would demand its fair share of political positions if PDP wins in 2019.

    “We have been denied for too long. In 2011, the country under the control of our party zoned the position of the Speaker of the House of Representatives to the zone and it was taken away.

    Read Also: I earned N60.2m in three years, Atiku tells INEC

    “And from 2011 to 2015, we were left just like that and the reverberating effect of that abandonment is the reason why we are still having the hangover of neglect till today.

    “Now we are here again, the party is working with a zone with 14 million votes, the second largest in the country.  We refuse and we will not accept where we finish the job in the next election and for one reason or the other, we will not be considered.

    “We don’t have to wait till after the election before we say what we want. We want to let the party and our candidate know that certain positions are strategic to governance and we want them.

    “Yes, the SGF is great, but there is nothing wrong with having the Chief of Staff and Attorney-General on top of it to compensate us for the denials of the past, so that all of us can work as a united front.

    “We will continue to fight for it, we will speak with a loud voice. We give so much, so the zone deserves a lot,” he said.

    While congratulating Abubakar on his emergence as presidential candidate, Olafeso said the zone was pleased with the choice of Obi, a former governor of Anambra State, as his running mate.

    He said the country was faced with serious economic challenges, and Obi had the pedigree that could realize the party’s economic vision for Nigeria.

    Olafeso said the zone was concerned about the travails of former governor of Ekiti State, Mr Ayodele Fayose with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), over a case.

    He urged members of the party to stand with Fayose at his trying moment, saying the former governor was paying for being truthful and standing against injustice.

    “I was in the court the last time and I am glad to tell you that he has been granted bail.

    “We will do our best to ensure that he perfects his bail conditions and he is released soon,” he said.

    Olafeso also said he was confident that the verdicts of the Osun and Ekiti governorship elections, where the All Progressives Congress was declared winner in both polls, would be upturned at the tribunal.

    Olafeso urged members to be leave behind post-primaries disagreements and work together to ensure the party’s victory in 2019.

    He said the party had come out of its recent factional crisis to emerge strong, expressing the confidence that it would dislodge APC in 2019.

    Akinwonmi, on his part, said the party was working assiduously hard to wrestle power from the APC in 2019.

    He, however, said the party executive could not do it alone, calling on all members to do their bit to help achieve the electoral goal.

    NAN

     

     

  • PDP to Buhari: Present your certificate to INEC

    The People’s Democratic Party (PDP) has charged President Muhammadu Buhari to show proof of his vaunted integrity by presenting his academic documents to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and put to an end his certificate saga.

    The main opposition party also urged President Buhari to fulfill his obligation like other presidential candidates, by presenting his certificate, if he has any, instead of bugging the commission with affidavits.

    A statement Friday by the spokesman for the PDP, Kola Ologbondiyan, accused the President of seeking ways to short-circuit the system, instead of complying with set rules.

    The party said while its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, has submitted his educational and other relevant documents to INEC, President Buhari has continued to insist that his secondary school certificate was with the military authorities.

    The statement said, “Indeed, a situation where President Buhari has been dodging the certificate issue raises huge questions of integrity, which demands that he makes available his credentials, or apologise to Nigerians, if he has none, so that the nation can move ahead.

    “President Buhari knows by now that Nigerians are no longer interested in his claims in an affidavit wherein he stated; “I am the above-named person and the deponent of this affidavit herein. All my academic qualification documents as filled in my Presidential form, APC/001/2015 are currently with the Secretary of the Military Board as of the time of this affidavit”.

    The PDP maintained that integrity strictly demands that President Buhari, particularly as the Commander-In-Chief write to the military authorities directing them to forward his claimed credentials to INEC, as requisite evidence of compliance with a key requirement for election into the Office of the President, under Section 131 (d) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    “That President Buhari and the previous INEC succeeded in circumventing the law in 2015 does not make such acceptable in our current electoral process.

    “Moreover, President Buhari and the All Progressives Congress (APC) must realise that even their followers that were beguiled in 2015, are currently not prepared to accept ‘NEPA bill’ as WAEC certificate in the 2019 elections.

    “This is particularly as the certificate scandal contributes to the erosion of Mr. President’s rectitude to check the humongous corruption, ineptitude and recklessness among his officials which has brought the nation to its knees under his administration.

    “Furthermore, President Buhari’s failure to tidy up such grey areas also contributes to his inability to cultivate and earn the productive followership of the youth and the respect of the international community, resulting in retardation in national productivity and dearth of international development partnership in the last three and half years.

    “This situation has even been worsened by the revelations that President Buhari’s ministers and aides parade forged certificates.

    No country makes meaningful progress with persons with these educational pedigrees in its leadership.

    “The PDP, therefore, urges President Buhari to do the needful so as not to cause any frictions that will put INEC under further pressure ahead of the 2019 general elections”.

     

     

  • The shape of the coming Senate

    Even before the 8th Senate calls it a day, many have begun to imagine the shape of its successor. Isn’t this too early?

    Not really. The parties have named their presidential candidates. The focus has naturally shifted to the other aspirants. Among those struggling for senatorial seats are governors and presidential wannabes. So many are the governors heading for the Senate that the Upper Chamber has been branded a rehabilitation centre.

    Those who hold this opinion have been asking: Is the Senate part of the governors’ huge retirement package? Are there no other worthy hands for the job? Must governors remain in government ad infinitum? Are these genuine patriots or politicians whose ambitions are driven by sheer avarice? Are they scared that the verdict of history will be harsh on them, hence the need to seek a reprieve in the Senate? Senator Shehu Sani gave the game away when he revealed that a senator carts home monthly N13.2million in allowances. The salary of a senator remains one of the best-kept secrets of our public life. So, is it the allure of lucre?

    What is clear is that the Senate still holds a seductive attraction for politicians. Incidentally, some prominent senators won’t be returning.  Senator Benedict Murray-Bruce (Bayelsa East), the passionate apostle of the comical – sorry, a slip there – “common sense revolution” will be sorely missed. His occasional controversial interventions, such as when he advised Osun State to pay salaries even as his home state Bayelsa was owing arrears of workers’ salaries and entitlements, will be missed.

    The distinguished senator has since moved on, joining the Atiku Abubakar Campaign Organisation.

    Senator Shehu Sani (Kaduna Central) has dumped the All Progressives Congress (APC) after losing the ticket in controversial circumstances. It would have been a miracle if Sani had grabbed the ticket, despite his perceived close relationship with President Buhari. Governor Nasir El-Rufai and Sani have not been the best of friends. The governor is seen to be proud, garrulous, tempestuous and ruthless in his vindictiveness. Some have even called him violent, citing the demolition of the property of those who disagree with him as a reflection of his recklessness. But his friends claim El-Rufai is a good man.

    As I was saying, Sani has quit the APC and declared for the PRP, which traces its roots to Malam Aminu Kano, champion of the talakawa.  If he runs, the same forces that ran him out of APC may run him out of the race. In other words, the senator’s political future is hanging in the balance.

    Senator Suleiman Othman Hunkuyi (Kaduna North) lost his battle for the PDP ticket after he fell out with El-Rufai – the governor takes no prisoners – and left the APC. In the heat of the collision with El-Rufai, the governor, at dawn, led a team of experts to demolish his property for lack of some documentation. Hunkuyi is not likely to return to the Upper Chamber.

    Senator Dino Melaye (PDP) and Senator Smart Adeyemi (APC) will be slugging it out. What a rich choice for the good people of Kogi West! Adeyemi, former president of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), was actually displaced by Melaye in the 2015 election. He was no bench warmer and his contributions were well delivered – with logic and facts. Theatrical Melaye will be parading a solid record of distractions at plenary, childish stunts, immodesty in conduct and foul language that all seem to come to him so naturally.

    Who will carry the day?

    Patrick “Igodomigodo” Obahiagbon  – I am sure you remember him, the former member of the House of Representatives- has secured the Edo South Senatorial District ticket of the APC. While in the House, he enlivened discussions with his hilarious presentation. His grandiloquence was unmatched as he indulged in verbosity and deployed unfamiliar words to make his point. But the entertainment value of his contributions reverberated across the land.

    Obahiagbon secured the ticket in a dramatic manner. He and two others knelt down like schoolboys before an angry headmaster, grovelling in the full glare of a crowd of delegates at the convention to pick the flag bearer. The photograph went viral on the Internet. Many were shocked that the former Chief of Staff to the Governor could stoop that low. Yes; he did. Did he not conquer?

    Since Obahiagbon got the ticket, many have been recalling his numerous comments on the polity. Among such comments is the one he made on the controversy surrounding the planned fuel subsidy removal by the Goodluck Jonathan Administration.

    He said: “I have read with acatalectic disgust government’s asinine and puerile ratiocinations attempting to justiceate the proposed removal of subsidies from petroleum products. It has asseverated that its intentions is guided by the need to checkmate the odoriferous excesses of a Machiavellian and Mephistophelean cabal and I have said to myself, what a shame. What a self-indicting admittal of failure of governance. What an hocus pocus!”

    And this on varsity teachers’ strike: “The ASUU strike is a miasma of a despicable apotheosis of an hemorrhaging plutocracy, cascadingly oozing into a malodorous excrescence of mobocracy. With all termagant ossifying proclivities of a kakistocracy, our knowledgia centura is enveloped in a paraphlegic crinkum crankum. Therefore ASUU, cest in dejavu, dejavu peret ologomabia.”

    Should Obahiagbon find his way into the Senate, it will not be out of place to say that the House’s loss is the Senate’s gain.

    After helping the PDP to conquer Ekiti State in the 2014 election, nothing much was heard of businessman Chris Uba. Now he has asked his brother Andy Uba, a senator, to drop his planned return to the Upper Chamber because he has been there for eight years.

    “It is now my turn,” Uba said, adding: “I want him to throw in the towel because the fight is going to be very serious.”

    All ye scorned godfathers, rejoice; your reward is here. The godfather of Anambra politics has elected to fight your battle. He told reporters: “I want to run because we have been sponsoring politicians in Anambra State and across Nigeria. I have been doing that and a lot of people have passed through my school.

    “But they call us godfathers. We have made case several times for the party to make some provisions in the party’s constitution to protect godfathers, but no way, no provision… .

    “After sponsoring politicians, immediately they get to Abuja, you can’t get them on the telephone again, nobody will see them again; they buy choice cars and the next thing they will blackmail you. Little thing, they will start fighting you; they will say they know the President, they’ve known the party chairman and as a godfather, you are in trouble. So now we need to occupy offices to protect our position and the positions of our people. That is why I am running.”

    If Uba wins, he will be representing the good people of Anambra South.

    Abba Moro won the PDP ticket for Benue South. Moro is the dutiful former Interior minister under whose watch the Nigeria Immigration Service conducted a recruitment in which more than 100 young men and women died. It is not immediately clear if Moro is holding the ticket in trust for former Senate President David Mark, who joined the race for the PDP’s presidential ticket and came last in a field of eight contestants.

    All in all, the 9th Senate promises to be an exciting assemblage of very interesting politicians.

     

    As Nnamdi Kanu shows up

    The riddle of IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu’s sudden disappearance about one year ago has been resolved – somehow. A video of the separatist group leader performing some religious obligation in Jerusalem —the Israelis deny he is with them —was quickly followed by a broadcast to his followers.

    Kanu spoke of Nigeria in unpleasant terms and derided the court before which he is standing trial. He has the right to his opinion about Nigeria and his advocacy for Biafra. But then, is foul language part of the ingredients of the kind of revolution the IBOP chief is preaching?

    Those who claim without any proof whatsoever that Kanu was being held by the military – some even said he had been killed – can now see their folly. They have been deceived. Not so those who have had to face the grim reality of the fire that Kanu’s misbegotten adventure sparked.

    What happens to those who lost their loved ones in those bloody protests over a matter that dialogue could have resolved? How about businesses that lost  fortunes in the temporary anarchy loosed on some parts of the Southeast by Kanu’s misguided actions? Who will compensate them?  Will those who stood surety for Kanu produce him in court?

    No matter how strong his belief in Biafra is, Kanu and his supporters should realise that force will not give them the prize; dialogue can.

    Enough of the bloodshed that accompanies this kind of dream. Enough.

  • PDP accuses APC of ‘fabrication’ against Atiku, Obi

    The People’s Democratic Party (PDP) has accused the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) of fabricating spurious publications against its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar and his running mate, Mr. Peter Obi.

    The party insisted that its presidential flag bearers have been well-received by Nigerians across board, contrary to what it described as spurious publications.

    A statement Wednesday by the spokesman for the PDP, Kola Ologbondiyan, the party further knocked the APC and the Presidency for alleged smear campaign against the PDP candidates.

    Read Also:2019: PDP chair restates doubts over INEC’s neutrality

    The statement said, “Having failed in their attempts to smear him with unfounded allegations, they have now resorted to attacking our vice presidential candidate and trying to create the impression that he is not well received in some parts of the country.

    “The PDP is already aware of how the APC has paid millions of naira to hack writers to spin negative narratives with a view to create an impression of disagreement and bad blood among our leaders and members across the northern and southern divides, who have since aligned with the Atiku/Obi ticket.

    “The PDP and majority of Nigerians are aware that the APC and the Muhammadu Buhari Presidency have been jittery since the emergence of Atiku Abubakar as our Presidential candidate, a disposition that heightened with the choice of Peter Obi as his running mate, hence their frenzy to cause confusion within our fold.

    “The PDP restates that the combination of Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi, with their internationally acclaimed forthrightness, hard work, ingenuity and managerial competencies, guarantee a prudent and result-oriented administration that will liberate our nation from the economic shackles which the wasteful, incompetent, and deceptive APC administration has plunged our nation into.

    “Furthermore, the Buhari Presidency and APC’s unrelenting resort to fabrications and personal attacks against our candidates instead of presenting their claimed achievements and programmes to Nigerians, confirms that they have nothing to offer as they have been trending on false performance claims and propaganda.

    “On our own part, the PDP, as a Pan Nigerian and performance-oriented political party, will never descend to the shallows with the fading APC and the Buhari Presidency, but focus on how to salvage our nation from the economic hardship, acute hunger and starvation as well as the daily bloodletting that have become the order of the day under the President Buhari administration.

    “Nigerians have gone through enough pain and anguish under President Buhari and no amount of smear campaign and personal attack on our candidates will ever whittle their resolve to vote in Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi with their proven political will and commitment to the welfare of Nigerians”.

     

  • 2019: 200,000 Atiku supporters declare support for Buhari

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and presidential candidate of Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) has lost over 200,000 members of his Atiku Care Foundation as seven coordinators of the group from the North-West states defected to the All Progressive Congress (APC), declaring loyalty to President Muhammadu Buhari’s 2019 re-election bid.

    The group which officially joined one of President Muhammadu Buhari’s campaign organizations, the Arewa Network Group led by Abdulmajid Danbiliki Kwamanda said they decided to dump Atiku over their conviction that Nigeria would be better if President Buhari is given another mandate to return in 2019.

    Speaking to Reporters in Kano, spokesman of the group and former Director of Administration and Strategy for the North-West zone of the Atiku Care Foundation, Comrade Sunusi Ababai, said over 200, 000 members of the Atiku Care Foundation in the North-West have declared their loyalty to President Buhari.

    According to him, “For several years now, we have been working hard for the development of Atiku Care Foundation. A lot of promises were made when we started.

    “They told us that Alhaji Atiku Abubakar needed a platform to reach out to the masses at the grass root. We were committed because there were a lot of programmes from healthcare delivery, education, entrepreneurship, and youth and women empowerment.

    “We started with our own money. Nobody gave us a dime because we believed that Atiku meant well for the nation; but unfortunately, we were abandoned at a time structure of the Foundation became solid. We were waiting all these while for Atiku to finance the programmes, only for us to hear how he splashed Dollars in Rivers state just to win the PDP presidential primaries.”

    Read Also: `Atiku will give SGF slot to South West’ – Daniel

    Ababai said the group has decided to pitch its tent with President Muhammadu Buhari’s 2019 re-election bid for his foresight and commitment to redeem Nigeria from the shackles of corruption and poverty.

    “We worked for him without money, but he did not even appreciate our efforts and contributions. We believe that if such a person is given the mandate, he will disappoint Nigerians. So, our support for President Buhari is based on our personal conviction that he is the Messiah Nigeria needs now.

    “We call on Nigerians, particularly, the youths to rally round President Buhari and give him the mandate to correct what the PDP-led government has plunged this country into for over 16 years they held on to power.”

    Also speaking, the former Director of Atiku care Foundation in-charge of Kano state, Hajia Fatima Muhammad Kabir, regretted that the former Vice President betrayed their dreams of reaching out to the less privileged through the Atiku Care Foundation.

    According to her, “after listening to a series of programmes conducted by Abdulmajid Danbiliki Kwamanda, coordinator of the Arewa Media Forum, promoting President Buhari’s 2019 campaigns, I realized that President Buhari remains a better choice for Nigeria, particularly, the masses.”

  • While waiting for manifestoes

    The timetable on campaign must have slowed down the nine presidential candidates from sharing details of their intentions and plans for governance with many voters who are eager to know what they are to vote for, beyond names and profiles of presidential candidates. An electoral process that limits campaign to 90 days may need to be reviewed after 2019. It is important for citizens to have adequate time to interrogate those to whom they are releasing their own power to govern, but this is not the concern of today’s piece. Ideological conversations among citizens seem to have been more active since Atiku Abubakar won the presidential primaries of PDP. Individuals and groups have been acting as if the candidate to contest on the platform of restructuring has finally emerged. But nothing is clear yet about any of the presidential candidates, largely because none of the parties and candidates have made their manifestoes known to the public, because the Independent Electoral Commission (INEC) is yet to ‘lift the ban’ on campaign. But this is a good time for political enthusiasts to speculate.

    Contrary to popular reading of Atiku Abubakar as an apostle of restructuring, many commenters may be in too much hurry about what kind of candidate Atiku is likely to be by the time his manifesto is unearthed. In terms of his pre-primary utterances, Mr. Atiku has gained attention in the last few months as someone committed to restructuring as a means of sustaining the country’s unity and improving its development. In a recent exchange of views between Atiku and Vice President Osinbajo on restructuring, Atiku, to show his credentials as a federalist, advised Osinbajo about the imperative of restructuring: “My advice to the Vice President is that he should choose whether he is for restructuring or whether he is against it and stick to his choice. This continuous prevarication, the approbation and reprobation, helps no one, least of all true progressives who know that Nigeria needs to be restructured and restructured soon.”

    In view of this statement, it is logical for federalists to start viewing Atiku as a candidate committed to bringing federalism back to the country. But the party that he is a flag bearer for has never been known as one that believes in returning the country to federalism. For example, when former President Goodluck Jonathan convened the 2014 National Conference, the PDP, as a party, never said or did anything to support the conference and its recommendations. The same PDP did not show any interest in Obasanjo’s Conference on Political Reforms. Therefore, those who are already jubilating that restructuring as an ideology has finally gotten a presidential candidate in Atiku should not be in a hurry. A political party’s manifesto in both parliamentary and presidential system of government is not the making of the presidential candidate alone; it generally requires endorsement of the party that presents the candidate for office. For example, most of the policies of President Donald Trump since his coming to office seem to have the backing of the Republican Party. With the growing profile of Atiku as a federalist, it is understandable if enthusiastic federalists act as if the PDP has become or about to become a party for restructuring. If not, Atiku’s manifesto may not be allowed by his party to fly at the end of the day.  Political pronouncements and actions in the country in the last three years have suggested that a party can have a manifesto item that the president does not endorse or vice versa.

    For instance, four years ago, the manifesto upon which the APC presidential candidate campaigned included a clear statement on the readiness of the party to re-federalise the country: “Initiate action to amend our Constitution with a view to devolving powers, duties and responsibilities to states and local governments in order to entrench true Federalism and the Federal spirit.”  At that time, the PDP kept quiet in its manifesto on the issue of restructuring. But voters in many regions of the country jumped up for APC and its presidential candidate. None of such voters ever thought that restructuring would still be an issue for the 2019 election. Should the PDP co-author Atiku’s manifesto to include restructuring in 2019 and the APC re-presents the pledge it made in the 2015 presidential campaign, the two major parties will become federalist parties for voters to choose from.

    While waiting for manifestoes from all the parties, it is premature for anyone to declare Atiku a candidate for a federalist Nigeria. But it is important for the nine parties with presidential candidates to indicate publicly the views and intentions of their presidential candidates on restructuring, a trope that has sharpened the conflict between “Nothing is wrong with Nigeria as it is” sect and the group of voters who say “Restructuring Nigeria is a task that must be done.” It is also important for party ideologues not to confuse voters by creating false dichotomy between many of the challenges that confront the country.

    For example, such issues as ridding the country of political and bureaucratic corruption, enriching the unity of diverse sections of the country, providing physical, psychological, and cultural security for citizens, and growing the nation’s economy are not as unrelated as they may seem to restructuring as a platform for addressing the conditions under which diverse cultures with diverse worldviews live together in one territorial unit. Many other countries had given thought to such matters in the past in their bid to strengthen, develop, and enrich themselves. Most recent examples are United Arab Emirates, Canada, Belgium, Federal Republic of Germany, and Ethiopia, to name a few.

    It may not look obvious that peace, prosperity, economic growth, and security hinge on a conducive structure for a county in which citizens seek the freedom to realize their potentials in ways best suited to their dominant values. Although it is hard to establish a causal relationship between Nigeria’s under-development and its unitary governance, it is, however, easy to see correlations between consolidation of unitary governance by past military rulers and decline in many aspects of development in the country. Between 1975 and 1999, Nigeria has grown to be one of the poorest countries in the world despite the volume of petroleum and gas flowing out of its soil; it is one of the countries with the worst literacy rate in the world; it is also at the bottom of countries with the highest maternal and infant mortality rates; it is a country in which majority of its citizens do not have access to potable water and modern toilet facilities; etc.

    It is, therefore, logical to assume that the older and more consolidated the unitary system imposed on the country becomes, the more agents of destabilisation and disruption the country produces: Boko Haram, Niger Delta militants, violent Herdsmen, etc. Furthermore, there was no demand for secession since the end of the civil war of the late 1960s until recently when groups such as MASSOB and IPOB felt that their progress was being undermined by a unitary system of government. Over concentration of resources in the central government has aggravated corruption, just as it does at the state level, where governors need not generate jobs and taxes to make citizens feel like co-owners of their state. Communities are policed by persons who do not understand the language of the people they are protecting.

    Certainly, persons who are seeking to rule the country need to understand these problems and construct a manifesto that can address them. In addition, presidential candidates ought to present manifestoes that carry the endorsement of the political party that sponsors them for election. Doing this will avoid intra-party crisis over the president’s decision to fulfil his or her pledge to the electorate or the party’s preference that all promises in a manifesto are redeemed. In general, citizens now look eager to vote, but they need to know the kind of future they are voting for.

     

    • Roposek@msn.com

     

  • ‘Atiku is on a mission to succeed with Peter Obi as running mate’

    The presidential candidate of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has been described as a man on a mission to succeed going by his choice of Peter Obi as his running mate.
    This view was expressed by Senator Theodore Orji, who insisted that there was no need for the hullabaloo currently been experienced, especially within the South East geo-political zone, saying Peter Obi is one of the best to come from the zone.
    Sen. Orji, who represents Abia Central senatorial district at the senate maintained that the erstwhile governor of Anambra state had carved a niche for himself in the Nigerian political landscape and had made himself popular across the polity.
    The senator said, “What you discover in this young man is that whether within the fold of the aged or the young even the young at heart, they all have something positive to say about him”.
    “He has endeared himself, sold himself to the populace and it would have been an aberration if the presidential candidate of our great party had overlooked him for someone else”.
    “He has seen it all at the highest level within and outside the state and is therefore eminently qualified to hold the position of Vice President, even the President of this nation”.

    Read Also: Why Atiku picked Peter Obi as running mate

    “I don’t think the brouhaha over his nomination should have generated such controversy especially because Peter Obi is one person that is vehemently interested in good governance and making the people to smile again, just like our candidate Atiku Abubakar”.
    Sen. Orji said that it was not sure the Southeast governors were against Obi’s nomination, saying that at the governors will queue behind Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi, adding that the emergence of the Presidential candidate was the handiwork of all PDP members.
    He said, “I’m confident that the Southeast caucus in the National Assembly are solidly behind Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi and together they will make all Nigerians to be proud. I think that is the most important thing for everyone”.
    The former Abia governor advice the people of the Southeast to rally round one of their own and ensure his success in the election because, “Peter Obi is one of our own and one of the many first eleven we have from Southeast”.
  • Atiku’s campaign council: Umahi denies rejecting appointment

    The Ebonyi State Government has debunked insinuations on social media alleging that the state governor, David Umahi, has rejected his recent appointment as the South-east coordinator of the Atiku Abubakar presidential campaign.

    A state official also said Mr Umahi has pledged loyalty to Mr Abubakar’s presidential campaign.

    Mr Abubakar is the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and has selected a former Anambra State governor, Peter Obi, as his running mate.

    Mr Umahi, who is also of the PDP, has in the past declared his fondness of President Muhammadu Buhari and recently criticised the mode of selection of Mr Obi; a factor that may have fuelled the rumour.

    The Ebonyi governor’s stance was explained after Friday’s State Security Council meeting.

    The government also denied speculations that the governor had concluded plans to distribute bags of Abakaliki rice branded with campaign pictures of Mr Buhari, the presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), ahead of the Christmas and New Year celebrations.

    Mr Umahi’s stance was declared by the Ebonyi State information commissioner, Emmanuel Onwe.

    He said the reports that the governor was working for any other presidential candidate other than Mr Abubakar and his running mate was false, wicked and malicious.

    Mr Onwe said his principal considers his appointment as the South-east coordinator of Atiku/Obi campaign organisation as a great honour and would discharge the duties thereof with immense commitment and dedication.

    Read Also: Peter Obi visits Ugwuanyi, Nwodo

    He urged the general public to disregard any other reports to the contrary, describing them as the handiwork of mischief makers.

    The social media has been awash with reports alleging that the governor had rejected his appointment.

    The governor was said to have disclosed his rejection of the appointment during the State Executive Council meeting on Wednesday.

    But Mr Onwe said there was no time the issue of Atiku/Obi election or campaign was discussed during the meeting.

    “The governor never rejected his appointment as the Coordinator of Atiku/Obi Campaign Organization for South-East”, he said.

    “The social media report to that effect is false and should be disregarded. I was at the exco meeting of yesterday, at no time was such thing discussed. The governor considers the appointment as a great honour and would discharge his duties in that regard with great commitment and dedication.

    “They also said that the governor has concluded plans to distribute bags of rice with the pictures of the presidential candidate of the APC; that is also not true.

    “The governor does not know any other Presidential Candidate except that of his party (PDP), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar and his running mate, Mr. Peter Obi,” Mr Onwe said.

  • S’East govs never against Peter Obi’s candidacy – Ikpeazu

    The governor of Abia State, Dr. Okezie Ikpeazu on Wednesday denied reports making round that South East governors and Igbo leaders of the People Democratic Party (PDP) extraction were against the nomination of former Governor of Anambra State, Mr. Peter Obi as the running mate to Alhaji Atiku Abubakar for 2019 presidential election.

    Ikpeazu who was answering questions from journalists at the Governor’s lodge located in Aba, the commercial hub of the state when Obi paid a condolence visit to him and the people of Abia State over the pipeline explosion in Osisioma Ngwa which has reportedly claimed over hundred lives, said it was wrong for anyone to claim that the governors of the South East were against Obi’s nomination.

    He described Obi as a worthy son of Igbo land and a gift from Ndi-Igbo to Nigeria whom every Igbo man both at home and in the diaspora will queue behind considering his pedigree.

    He said: “You were told a lie. Let me use this opportunity to congratulate our brother and a worthy son of Igbo Land for his nomination. He’s a gift from Ndi-Igbo to this country. His works and pedigree bears eloquent testimony of the Igbo DNA.

    “It will be foolhardy for anybody not to queue behind a man like this to continue to serve this country to the best of his ability. What the South East governors said was that we expect our candidate to come back from his trip and have a tete-a-tete with us. And he said he will come to speak with us.

    “There were no time leaders of Ndi-Igbo and South East Governors said we are not happy. His choice was apt and you can see the wide spread reception it is getting. If we are banking on the eleven million Igbos in the diaspora to vote it is only Mr. Peter Obi that can get them to do so.”

    Read Also: Ikpeazu: Nnamdi Kanu’s father’ll return soon

    Also speaking, the chairman of the South East caucus of the National Assembly and senator representing Abia South Senatorial District in the senate, Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe said that Peter Obi’s selection is one that has lifted the spirit of every Igbo person and has no opposition from any angle.

    “As the chairman of South East Senate caucus of the National Assembly that the whole National Assembly is behind Peter Obi  and at no time was there any problem about his nomination as running mate to our presidential candidate.

    “We know that ourselves, the governors forum and everybody in the South East are all in support of him. Because today, Nigeria needs men and women who their yes is their yes and no is no.

    “We need people who will not see subsidy and call it under recovery. We need people who will not say that they’ve defeated Boko Haram and they turn around and keep executing Red Cross Workers. Today, what we have is somebody we can all queue behind to rescue Nigeria. Let me say it without equivocation that all Igbo leaders are queuing behind Peter Obi.”

    Meanwhile, Mr. Peter Obi while speaking during his condolence visit urged Abia people to take heart. He consoled the locals and made personal donations to the affected people.

    Speaking on his nomination and the perceived opposition from South East Obi said, “We in the South East has never been divided and we have never acted against each other.

    “We have always acted as a team. The governors and the leaders are my own leaders. Since this wrong insinuation started, I’ve consulted governor Umahi, Ugwuanyi and of course today I’m here with my brother Ikpeazu, all the three PDP governors I’ve spoken with them.

    “I have spoken to Senator Ike Ekweremmadu, one of our leaders.  Of course Senator Abaribe  is here with me. I’ve spoken with all of them including T. A Orji and Sam Egwu. For us,  we are going to work like a team. For us what is important is to rebuild Nigeria and rebuild the South East.

    “What we need is to create jobs and make Nigeria better. We have always acted as a team. It is an opportunity for us to come out and vote massively for the PDP. we must put all hands on deck to get this mission accomplished.”