Tag: BUHARI

  • Buhari approves INDC to tackle climate change

    Buhari approves INDC to tackle climate change

    President Muhammadu Buhari has approved the submission of the country’s Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) to address climate change to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

    Nigeria’s INDC was approved by the President on November 26 and submitted to the UNFCCC on November 28, ahead of Monday’s opening in Paris of the United Nations Climate Change conference, widely known as COP 21.

    The Federal Government’s policy in the INDC to address climate change, according to a statement by the Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina, commits to 20 per cent unconditional and 45 per cent conditional Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) emission reduction post 2020.

    The statement said: “The action plan announced by the Federal Government represents a fair and meaningful contribution to address climate change and equally reaffirms President Buhari’s commitment to an economic transformation which places inclusive, green growth as key priority for this administration.

    “President Buhari was fully aware of the acute threat that climate change poses to Nigeria’s development through flooding, desertification and insecurity, and many of these accrue from weather-related natural disasters.

    “In Paris, the issue of Lake Chad’s current depletion, which has become a cause of international concern, will be major focus of a meeting of the Lake Chad Basin Summit of Heads of State and Government, which President Buhari will attend with Nigeria’s delegation on Tuesday, December 1.

    “The Lake Chad is currently less than 10 per cent of its original size and little of the remaining waters is in Nigeria. Of an estimated 20 million people that lived on the Lake Chad Basin as at 2013, about 11.7 million were in the North Eastern region of Nigeria.

    “Also during the conference in Paris, President Buhari is scheduled to participate in the launching of International Solar Alliance by the Indian Prime Minister and the French President, where he will seek international partnerships to deliver Nigeria’s climate change response.”

  • Buhari’s Teheran sermon

    President Buhari’s recent visit to Iran, in more ways than one, marked a substantial departure from his previous foreign outings. Not only were the issues he raised during the trip very clearly contextualized, they were largely devoid of the usual controversy that dogged his earlier foreign trips.

    Those visits saw his media team sweating profusely to clarify ambiguities or possible sources of misinterpretation of what their principal actually said. His visit to the United States of America shortly after he was sworn in stands out very distinctly in this regard.

    During that visit, Buhari’s response to reporters’ question on how he intended to treat those who did not vote for him, in which he said those who gave him 95 per cent votes cannot in all honesty be treated on the same issues with those that gave him five per cent had generated intense misgivings. So also was his prepared speech at the United States Institute of Peace in which he said “Unwittingly and I dare say, unintentionally the application of the Leahy law amendment by the US government has aided and abetted the Boko Haram terrorist group…”

    He was severely criticized on the first for inappropriateness in admitting at such a gathering he would discriminate against the areas he got little votes. And on the second, he found himself mired in unmitigated conceptual error for stating that the Leahy law was aiding and abetting the Boko Haram insurgency.

    The fact is that the Leahy Law does not in any way aid and abet the Boko Haram insurgency. The effect of the Leahy law in the fight against Boko Haram is only in the form of the constraints it imposes through its stipulations on strict adherence to the rules of engagement. This applies to the fight against terrorism the world over, Nigeria not an exception.

    Things appear to have changed during his visit to Iran. His responses in two key areas gave him out as a leader who not only appreciates extant realities now but one prepared to place credit where it rightly belongs. The way he addressed some of the issues, cuts the image of a leader who appreciates the milieu he now operates and the larger dictates of what Charles Lindblom called incremental change in governance.

    These were evident in his speech to the Nigerian community on the fight against corruption and improvement in power supply in the country. He had said in respect of the fight against corruption that unlike in his first coming as a military head of state when he could arrest and detain alleged corrupt officials to prove their innocence, the dictates of the rule of law and due process cannot permit of such now. He said those accused of corruption would have been prosecuted before now, but for the need to investigate them and gather enough evidence to facilitate prosecution.

    Keen observers of President Buhari’s posturing in the war against corruption since he assumed office, would be quick to admit that this marks a substantial departure from his previous handle and posturing on the matter. About three months back, he had told the nation that those who looted our national treasury will be arraigned in court in a matter of weeks. There have also been further statements raising hope that those who milked the nation dry have been sufficiently identified and will soon pay dearly for it.

    Bogus figures representing monies said to have been stolen have been bandied from sundry sources. Public appetite has since been sufficiently wetted for the eventual onslaught on those who have mismanaged this economy. But not much progress has been made in that direction before Buhari’s admission of the difficulties in fighting corruption in a democratic dispensation.

    Before now also, the envisaged battle against corruption has been canvassed in such a manner that raised eyebrows on the propriety of the adopted strategy. The twin issues of due process and rule of law were seriously canvassed by those who picked holes in the media trial and seeming conviction of people in the court of public opinion even when sufficient evidence of their alleged misdeeds was yet to be gathered.

    Ironically, these reservations were the major concerns of Buhari as he spoke to his Teheran audience. It was the same reasons that were often adduced by the Jonathan regime to defend allegations of tepid approach to the war against corruption. It would appear Buhari is gradually coming to terms with the reality of the war against corruption in a democratic setting and that mob justice or media hysteria will prove inherently deficient in dealing with official thievery. How much constraints the new reality will impose on the campaign against corruption will depend on the amount of credible evidence available to the authorities and the disposition of the judiciary to the fight.

    Only last week Buhari had lamented the level of corruption that has permeated the Nigerian judiciary. He had urged that arm of government to fight against the perception and reality of growing judiciary corruption that imposes serious constraints on efforts to hold public officers accountable to their constituents.

    When we pair both statements, the reality of the current war against corruption begins to dawn on us all. It is increasingly getting clearer that the trial of alleged corrupt public officials and recovering of whatever they might have stolen can only be achieved through the gathering of sufficient evidence that will aid prosecution and conviction in the courts. That is the reality Buhari has just admitted and it holds the prospects for whatever progress that will be recorded in the war. If our experience with such high profile trials is anything to go by, the war should be viewed with subdued optimism.

    Buhari should focus more efforts in building strong institutions so as to make the brazen looting of our collective patrimony by sundry buccaneers nigh impossible. There is a limit beyond which we cannot go when these monies have already been stolen and the tracks of the thieves cleverly covered.

    The other aspect of his speech that deserves mention for its larger heuristic value was that on improvements in power supply. Buhari was honest to admit that he was yet to give any directive on the power sector before the improvements in power supply lately. Hear him, “We have not said anything to them yet. I think they only find it sensible or appropriate for them to try and improve on power supply”

    It is obvious Buhari did not want to appropriate the credit for the improvement in power supply contrary to what some of his supporters would have desired. That is the way to go.  Before now, we have seen overzealous supporters of the regime seeking to downplay some of the achievements of the previous government. The impression often created when a new government takes over is that the previous one achieved little or nothing.

    Ostensibly, this posturing is propelled by the vaulting desire to seek legitimacy. But, it has been the bane of governments on these shores. That has also accounted for the plethora of policy discontinuities that have brought in their wake little or no progress and monumental wastage of public funds. But a government does not operate from a zero point. It operates incrementally in the sense that each policy is only an addition to an existing one.

    Incremental change recognizes that meaningful progress is better made when successive regimes improve on extant policies. That is the issue that was brought to public focus by Buhari and he should seize that momentum to ensure that epileptic power supply is consigned to the dust bin of history during his regime. But then, if he has not given any directive on the power sector and some progress is being recorded, somehow, he shares in the success. That is the lesson from Teheran which all leaders should internalize.

  • Ex- minister: Jonathan handed over power to avoid bloodshed

    Ex- minister: Jonathan handed over power to avoid bloodshed

    A former Minister of National Planning, Dr. Abubakar Sulaiman, on Sunday said ex-President Goodluck Jonathan handed over to President Muhammadu Buhari to save the lives of many Nigerians.

    He also said Jonathan had sufficient evidence to remove the former Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Attahiru Jega, but he exercised restraint.

    Delivering a paper on the 2015 power transition in Nigeria at the annual Zik dinner  lecture  /award in Abuja,  Sulaiman said it was not external pressure that forced Jonathan to hand over to President Buhari.

    Sulaiman said contrary to general belief, there were cases of compromise by INEC

    He said:  “Few months to the general elections, there were calls from some quarters for the sack of the INEC Chairman, Prof. Attairu Jega.

    “There were sufficient grounds for such calls but President Goodluck maintained a position that taking such decision would altercate the process and create an impression which only an insider would understand. There were indeed cases of compromise on the part of the commission, but as the president so wished, let the sleeping dog lies.

    “Invariably, the decision to maintain the status quo in the commission by the administration was one decision that further led credence to the peaceful outcome of the electoral process. We must not forget that the president in his exercise of his constitutional power has the authority to fire the chairman and replace him with any of the National Commissioners to preside over the commission.

    “Nobody should be on the illusion that the president lacked the gut to exercise such power. After all, Gen. Babangida annulled the June 12 election, thereby depriving Chief M.K.O Abiola of his awaiting victory.

    “It is within context of this remarkable gesture and unparallel leadership style of the president that I found it disturbing when the APC led government sometimes grudgingly acknowledged this fact or believed that it was the external pressure that accounted for such political accomplishment.”

    The ex- minister said if Jonathan had wanted to scuttle Buhari’s election, he would have used the incumbency factor.

    He said: “The extent to which a political transition is peaceful and credible depends largely on variance of factors. We have however demonstrated the import of leadership factor has been consequential to the outcome of any electoral process. Is it the leadership that was out to tame the process or the one that respect the sanctity of the electoral body and other agencies?

    “This paper has successfully argued that more than any government in the past, the Jonathan administration has demonstrated penchant for rule of law, freedom and untainted electoral process.

    “The power of a president is such that if he had wanted to truncate the process or manipulate it, he could have done it. Contrary to the opinion of many that perhaps he could not have done it or had no option not to do otherwise.”

  • Terrorism will thrive with complacency – Buhari

    Terrorism will thrive with complacency – Buhari

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Sunday in Malta said that violent extremism and terrorism could only thrive and endure if good people remained idle and complacent.

    A statement issued in Abuja on Sunday by the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Malam Garba Shehu, said that President Buhari stated this at the Commonwealth summit in Malta.

    It said that the president was speaking on behalf of other participating African Heads of State and Government at the closing Executive Session of the 2015 Commonwealth Summit.

    President Buhari said that he was confident that terrorism would be ultimately defeated with greater international cooperation and collaboration.

    “We have had the opportunity to discuss, in a serene atmosphere, wide ranging issues that are of great significance, not only to the members of the Commonwealth, but to the entire global community.

    “Of particular note is the Action Statement on Climate Change, which is expected to herald our commitment to saving the planet for present and future generations.

    “Of equal significance are our deliberations on Radicalisation and Violent Extremism. We are witnesses to the growing phenomenon of terrorism that is affecting us all, whether big or small.

    “The reign of terror will only succeed if peace-loving people choose to remain idle. But I am confident that through our collective efforts, we will defeat this scourge and restore peace,’’ he said.

    He also reaffirmed the unwavering commitment of Nigeria and other African member-countries to the promotion and protection of the core values of the Commonwealth.

    “I came into power via democratic principles and values espoused by this same body.

    “Nigeria as a country will continue to protect and promote these democratic ideals,’’ he further assured heads of delegations at the session.

    The President thanked the outgoing Secretary-General, Kamalesh Sharma, for his exemplary service to the Commonwealth.

    “We in Nigeria will not forget his five memorable visits to our country during his tenure.

    “As this is his last CHOGM in his present capacity, I know I speak for my colleagues from Africa in expressing our immense gratitude and best wishes to him,’’ President Buhari said.

    Buhari also congratulated the Commonwealth’s Secretary-General-elect, Rt. Hon. Patricia Janet Scotland, and assured her of the full support of Nigeria and other African members of the Commonwealth.

  • Buhari joins 150 world leaders for climate change conference

    Buhari joins 150 world leaders for climate change conference

    President Muhammadu Buhari is scheduled to arrive Paris, France, Sunday evening to join about 150 other world leaders for the Conference of Parties 21 (COP21).

    The meeting is aimed getting nations to agree on how to deal with the issue of climate change.

    There has been no agreement on practical actions even though governments have already committed themselves to limiting green house gas emissions that interfere with the climate,

    This Paris meeting is therefore seen as the last chance to arrive at concrete binding resolutions over issues which have been discussed every year since 1992 under the auspices of the United Nations.

    President Buhari will present Nigeria’s statement at the opening session on Monday before participating in the launching of the International Solar Alliance, an initiative of Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, who has invited around 110 nations to join the alliance.

    The alliance is to be named the International Agency for Solar Policy and Application (InSPA) and is aimed at a host of African nations and others located within the Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn.

    The President will thereafter attend a summit of the Heads of State and Government of the Lake Chad Basin Commission and Benin Republic which has been scheduled to take place on Tuesday on the sidelines of the COP21.

    Deliberations at the Paris meeting of the Lake Chad Basin Commission and Benin Republic will focus mainly on the war against Boko Haram and other security issues of common interest to participating countries.

    Also on Tuesday, the President has been scheduled to participate in another COP21 sideline event titled: “the Conference on Climate Change and African Solutions” organized by the African Union (AU).

  • Buhari approves new cost-cutting measures for MDAs

    Buhari approves new cost-cutting measures for MDAs

    In the federal government quest to reduce cost of governance as well as curb the incidence of mismanagement in the ministries and departmental agencies (MDAs), President Muhammadu  Buhari has approved the establishment of an Efficiency Unit (E-UNIT) in the Federal Ministry of Finance.

    The principal objective of the Efficiency Unit, The Nation gathered, is to ensure that all government expenditure is necessary and represents the best possible value for money.

    Available records have confirmed that presently, the nation’s recurrent expenditure completely dwarfs capital expenditure by a ratio of 84/16. This includes non-wage related overhead expenditure such as travel costs, entertainment, events, printing, IT consumables, stationeries etc.

    As at September 2015, the entire capital expenditure was just N194bn while overhead expenditure was N272bn. This scenario is considered unsustainable and at variance with the current administration’s resolve to reform the economy and reduce the cost of governance.

    According to the Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun, the Efficiency Unit will undertake programmed reviews of all government overhead expenditure with a view to reducing wastage, promoting efficiency and ensuring quantifiable savings for the country.

    Specifically, the Efficiency Unit will work across all MDAs to identify and eliminate wasteful spending, duplication and other inefficiencies; identify best practices in procurement and financial management and share such knowledge to ensure its adoption.

    Findings of the Efficiency Unit will be formally communicated accordingly and will be enforced through establishment of expenditure guidelines, undertaking follow-up reviews, spot checks and other measures that will ultimately checkmate wastages across all areas of federal government expenditure.

    Meanwhile, a Committee to undertake activities of the Efficiency Unit has since been set up to be chaired by the Finance Minister, with members drawn from both public and private sector.

    The Project Leader is Ms Patience Oniha, a highly experienced Banker and Chartered Accountant, with 30 years experience in financial sector.

    Other members of the Committee include Head of Service of the Federation, Accountant-General of the Federation, Auditor-General of the Federation and Director, Budget Office of the Federation. Members drawn from the private sector include Alhaji Kabir Mohammed, former ICAN President; Mr. Kunle Elebute, (Partner KPMG) and Ms Seyi Kumapayi, Chief Financial Officer Access Bank.  Members of the Supervising Committee have agreed to donate their time without fee as their contribution to making government more efficient.

  • Buhari: 42 months to go!

    Buhari: 42 months to go!

    With six months already gone, the president should realise that time flies!

    Going by Nigeria’s constitution, the president, governors and legislators have a four-year mandate, after which they return to the electorate to seek approval to continue, or go home to rest. So, exactly 42 months from now, Nigerians would either be waiting for the return of President Muhammadu Buhari for a second term, or be preparing to swear in another president if they deem him to have performed below expectations. The choice is the president’s.

    Traditionally, many writers who remember the import of today as exactly six months since the president came on board would dwell on his activities of the last six months. For me, however, this has become predictable despite its little significance. The last six months is gone; it can never be recovered. So, we should look forward to the remaining three-and-a-half years of the Buhari presidency. And, if we even think the president has 42 months to go, we must have lost sense of the country’s political trajectory.  Unless there is a new paradigm, the race for 2019 will begin at best 24 months from now. This is much more so that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) that President Muhammadu Buhari’s All Progressives Congress (APC) trounced at the polls is not resting. It wants 2019 to come as early as yesterday, in its dream of returning to the same power it occupied for 16  wasted years.

    In fairness to the president, when he assumed office, a few things changed for good in the country. Perhaps the most noticeable of these is power supply. Nigerians suddenly realised that electricity supply to their homes and businesses improved even as President Buhari was yet to form his cabinet, and even as he was yet to add a single megawatt to what he met on ground. Nigerians simply attributed these positive changes to Buhari’s ‘body language’. Only a few remembered that he was yet to appoint ministers then. But the recrudescence of fuel scarcity and a few other challenges have changed that perception. Buhari, where is your ‘body language’? They began to ask. The number of those asking the question began to increase as they watched the scarcity worsen from days to weeks. If the matter is not resolved this weekend, more people would still join those wondering what has happened to Buhari and his ‘body language’.

    One can only imagine what could have happened if the president had not named his ministers until now because, even as there were no serious challenges before the team was finally sworn in November 11, many Nigerians had started to be apprehensive of when we will know those that would work with the president. President Buhari promised to have his cabinet latest September but when the month was almost ending and he was yet to fulfill this promise, Nigerians naturally began to ask questions: if it took him this long to name his cabinet, then how far can he go, given the time so far spent without ministers? For me, however, the time the cabinet is chosen is immaterial. This has nothing to do with the performance of the ministers. We have had situations in the past where presidents had named cabinet almost as soon as they were inaugurated; yet we had nothing to show for it. Indeed, some of such ministers left us worse than they met us. But this should not be taken as assurance that we will have value for money only because Buhari’s ministers were late in coming. Far from it. What I am saying is that the time the cabinet is formed is not necessarily a guarantee of good performance. Even after naming the cabinet, some people say if the list paraded as what the president could offer, why did he waste our time before naming them? Irrespective of what Nigerians, particularly arm-chair critics might say, President Buhari believes he has named some of the best persons that can better do the job he wants for the country.

    One thing is that, as with the Jonathan administration when we had Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala as finance minister and coordinating minister for the economy, former Governor Raji Fashola would appear Okonjo-Iweala’s equivalent in the Buhari administration, with his bagging of the power, works and housing portfolios! Not a few are wondering what President Buhari intends to achieve with this appointment in particular which, to me, signposts the measure of his implicit confidence in the former governor. Suffice it to say that President Buhari found a soul-mate in Fashola. Remember his hard-line posture as governor and Buhari’s tendencies too when he was a military head of state. But, whether the president has made the right decision or not is in the wombs of time.  We have also seen solid minerals, agriculture and the economy as Buhari’s other areas of focus, given the ministers he appointed to oversee the respective ministries. If the ministers in these ministries (particularly Fashola) succeed and make reasonable dents on the challenges in their ministries, then Buhari’s presidency would have been made.

    With his cabinet now formed, both the president and his cabinet members know the country’s problems. President Buhari knows like any other Nigerian that the economy was destroyed by the rapacious Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) government that he took over from; he knows that there is insecurity in the land; he is aware that Nigerians are not happy with the state of power supply, that the roads are bad; our schools are in urgent need of revamping, our hospitals are now worse than the ‘mere consulting clinics’ that he met when he came as military ruler in 1983. With the crash in oil price and the massive corruption that pervaded the land, especially in the immediate past, it has become a daunting task to expect sudden improvement in the country.

    Expectedly therefore, some Nigerians have said the government is too slow in making things happen. I have the feeling some may even be silently asking how come the government has not built ‘a single’ refinery in the last six months if it does not want to remove fuel subsidy! As a matter of fact, some are asking: how many corrupt Nigerians has the government jailed? These were the same people who accused General Buhari of high-handedness when he clamped many Nigerians suspected of being corrupt behind bars without due trial in the 1980s. That has been the case with human beings; they are hardly patient for results; preferring instead, quick fixes which often break down as soon as they are fixed. It has been like that since the days of Moses when he led the Israelites out of captivity in Egypt.

    Whilst it may be tempting to see some of the criticisms, particularly those coming from the former PDP chieftains (some of who should be behind bars now but for rule of law) who ruined the country, as deserving of little attention, the president should be interested in constructive criticisms, irrespective of where they are coming from because it is part of what keeps government on its toes.

    What should not be lost on him is that Nigerians not only want change; they want the change that would endure and President Buhari should know that time is not on his side. Before we know it, it would soon be one year that he took over. That would be less than a quarter of his four-year tenure because, as I said before, the race for 2019 will begin anytime in 2017 and attention would be shifting from the present government to the next, unless the president succeeds in steering affairs in a way that would make this unattractive. And one way to do that is by giving Nigerians the good governance that PDP could not give in 16 years.

    With six months already gone, those asking for President Buhari’s policy direction obviously have a point. Government, like an aero plane, needs a compass. Otherwise, ministries would be working at cross-purposes and ministers will be singing discordant tunes. Beyond that, there must be yardsticks with which to measure the government’s performance. This implies the government setting timelines to its programmes and policies. We need to see all that in the coming weeks, perhaps months, to keep hope alive that there will, indeed, be light at the end of the tunnel.

  • Biafra: South-East governors to discuss complaints with Buhari – Umahi

    Biafra: South-East governors to discuss complaints with Buhari – Umahi

    Ebonyi State Governor, David Nweze Umahi, has restated his resolve to retain his membership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) even as he confirmed decision of South-East governors to discuss the complaints of Biafran agitators with President Muhammadu Buhari.

    Umahi was reacting to speculations in a section of the media that he was set to move to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) when the leadership of the Abakpa Main Market Traders Association, visited him at the Government House in Abakaliki on Thursday.

    He said, “When I said publicly that Ebonyi people will support Mr. President, they said, we have moved to the APC.  PDP remains our party and will remain our party.

    “But we need help and the way to get it is not to start castigating the President and no governor should castigate the President.  But opposition belongs to the political parties.  For me and you, we are still bonafide members of the PDP.”

    On the increasing wave of the activities of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Umahi stated that the South-East governors had listened to the complaints of the IPOB agitators and had decided to discuss them with the President.

    “We have listened to the complaints of the boys.  There is no way anybody could say that what they are saying is completely outside the truth, but just like husband and wife, you must have a way of getting along through dialogue.

    “The governors of the South-East have taken up their matter to discuss with Mr. President and I believe that we don’t need another war in this country.  I want to plead with you to encourage whoever is involved that we have taken up the matter and we will do everything possible to make sure that their feelings are addressed.

    “We should not support secession. We should not support demonstrations; we should not support the castigation of our leaders”.

    Umahi maintained that his government was poised to redefining Abakaliki by looking inwards on how to take advantage of its location as a transit point to “realise our potential.”

    Urging the traders to key into the vision of his administration, he stated that the first batch of traders would be relocated to the International Market in April 2016.

    According to him, the second batch will   be relocated in  June  while the third and final batches will be  in September.

    He further announced that the government would be constructing additional vehicular parks and warehouses beside the Centenary City, opposite the International Market as a measure to minimize the inconveniences that traders might face when they move into the International Market.

    Earlier in an address, the Chairman of AMMTA, Comrade Emeka Nwome, commended the governor on his life touching achievements within six months in office.

    In a related development, traders under the auspices of South-East Amalgamated Market Traders Association (SEAMATA) yesterday expressed support for pro- Biafran movement but condemned the invasion of the market by the pro-Biafra agitators.

    SEAMATA, in a statement signed by its President General, Chief Okwudili Ezenwankwo and the Secretary, Mr. Temple Udeh said in as much as the traders support the movement for Biafran state it condemned the attitude of the pro-Biafra agitators/ protesters that was infiltrated by miscreants.

     

  • Buhari and the returned loot

    Buhari and the returned loot

    President should focus on bringing looters to book

    President Muhammadu Buhari’s disclosure that some of those who reportedly looted public fund under the Jonathan administration have started returning same quietly to the treasury might have been intended to assure  Nigerians of the government’s seriousness to fight corruption; but it has spurred controversies across the land.

    President Buhari, who gleefully made the announcement in obvious response to insinuations that not much change has been seen or felt since he took over the reins of government, is an indication that he is yet to fully appreciate the depth of the problem, and the demands of democracy.

    The president should realise that he is acting on behalf of the Nigerian state and people whose money was siphoned and misapplied. He therefore owes the people a duty of full disclosure. Who are those who embezzled the funds, thus depriving the people of basic necessities of life, and are now secretly making returns?

    It is also the duty of the president to get the appropriate agencies of government to probe the circumstances and determine how much was actually stolen. It cannot be left for the looters to determine how much to return and when.

    Besides, corrupt enrichment is a crime against the state. It is therefore punishable. It is out of tune with the laws of the land that thieves be shielded. It amounts to encouraging such acts.

    But, in doing this, the president ought to appreciate the limitation to his powers. He is the Chief Executive of the Federation, not the judiciary. All alleged looters should be arraigned before the courts, tried and if found guilty, the penalties spelt out in the statutes should be fully applied. Only then could it be said that corruption is being fought by the Buhari administration.

    It is apposite to ask the government the account into which the recovered money is being remitted. This has become important in view of allegations that some money recovered in similar circumstances in the past could not be traced. In recent times, too, anti-corruption czars have been charged with mismanaging such funds. It behoves the president to apprise Nigerians of everything concerning this. We call on him to put a stop to this surreptitious return of looted funds, and give a full account of what has been so returned. The Federal Ministry of Finance should speak out on the matter.

    We advise that the president to desist from encouraging mere refund of whatever is negotiated behind the doors and refrain from making such comments.

    Nigerians have lost so much. The education system is in a shambles and this has affected the quality of learning, thus impairing development. The real sector of the economy is shrinking daily. As such, the manufacturing sector has, in the past three quarters, recorded negative growth. This has translated to unemployment for the teeming youth and is a threat to the health of the nation. It is certainly a frightening prospect for national security.

    At a time new ministers and other officials of state have just been appointed, and others being considered, the president should not be seen to be condoning corruption in any way. He should remain focused and consistent in presenting himself as having zero tolerance for corrupt practices. Leakages in the system account for more than half the published expenditure yearly. This much was once disclosed by a former chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mallam Nuhu Ribadu.

    Moreover, it is unfortunate that the president continues to make important policy statements and breaks news to the foreign media and Nigerians in the Diaspora. While acknowledging that Nigerians abroad retain their rights, it should be realised that his primary duty is to interact with the people at home who elected him and to whom he is primarily responsible. No other world leader succeeds or expects to succeed by holding his people and critical institutions in contempt.

    The Nigerian media was fully involved in the battle for change that produced him as president. The news that the president would not appoint ministers before September was first broken while on a similar foreign visit, he said ministers are mere noise makers and the civil service should be credited with sustaining governance in the country.

    The battle for cleansing the society should not be left for the president and his team. It is a battle for all patriots. If the anti-corruption war is to be won, we all owe it a duty to the fatherland to scrutinise processes and mechanisms adopted in enthroning new values in the society. In this case, we call on the civil society community, especially the network of organisations involved in the campaign against corruption and those promoting good governance practices to step up advocacy, reminding the president at all times of his pledge to Nigerians during the election campaign.

  • Don’t compromise, Cleric tells Buhari

    The founder of Gospel Forwarders to All Nation Mission Lagos, Reverend Samuel Okediran, has encouraged President Muhammadu Buhari not to relent on his determination to rid the nation of corruption.

    He challenged the President to remain focused on cleansing the nation to take Nigeria to the Promised Land.

    The cleric spoke at the 22nd anniversary of the church last Sunday.

    Buhari, according to him, was chosen by God, warning him not to allow politicians shift his focus from redemption to survival.

    He predicted that 2016 will be a year of progress and success for the nation if the President remains on course.

    Okediran said: “The country is blessed with a god- fearing President. What happened in the last election was a clear indication that God has intervened in this country by choosing Buhari for us.

    “God has chosen Buhari to fix this country economically and what we need is to give him support through our prayers and advice.

    “During the Buhari administration, the country will witness tremendous change in all sectors but the President should be careful about some decisions he will take in the nearest future.

    “He should not listen to selfish politicians instead he should seek the knowledge of God to direct him so that Nigeria will be a better place to live.

    “What God told me about President Buhari was that he should not compromise his stance and always stand by truth.”

    He advised the newly appointed ministers to shun corruption and other vices that can bring the government into disrepute.

    He said the era of spending the government fund ravishingly is over and counseled them to be prudent for execution of all approved projects.