Tag: David Mark

  • Buhari greets David Mark at 70

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Saturday congratulated a former President of the Senate, David Mark, on his 70th birthday.

    Buhari, in a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu, felicitated with the family, friends and political associates of Mark, who served the country as military governor, minister and Senate President.

    The statement reads: “As Senator Mark turns a septuagenarian, the President commends the maturity, stability and focused legislation that he instituted in the upper chamber during the eight years he served as Senate President and the dutifulness that culminated in the passing of many bills.

    “President Buhari believes the wealth of experience that Senator Mark had gathered over the years will be most useful for the development of the country, especially in sustaining peace across the country.

    “The President prays that the almighty God will grant the former Senate President longer life, good health and wisdom to continue serving his people and the country.”

  • Mark mourns Shagaya

    Mark mourns Shagaya

    Former Senate President, Senator David Mark, has described the sudden death of Brigadier General John Shagaya (rtd) as shocking and saddening.

    Mark in a statement by his media assistant, Paul Mumeh, said that the country has lost one her finest fertile minds who believed in the unity of the country.

    He noted that the late Shagaya did not only believe in the sanctity of the rule of law, but also in a society where every body was free to pursue his of her legitimate ambition.

    Mark said, “I am shocked, I am sad, he was my friend, comrade and colleague.He was among the best fertile minds in the Armed Forces during our days in the Nigerian Army.”

    “He believed in the sanctity of our unity. He believed in the rule of law and in a society where every citizen is free to pursue his or her legitimate ambition in any part of the country without fear or molestation intimidation.

    “After our retirement from the army, we reunited again in the 6th Senate in the service of our father land.

    “His death is a huge personal loss to me. I have lost a bosom friend, a pathfinder and a patriot.

    “Nigeria has lost one of her finest and fertile minds. I am however consoled that he left positive footprint on the sand of time. I am convinced that his legacy of uncommon commitment to the ideals of nationhood will endure and will be a reference point in many years to come.

    “May God in His infinite mercies grant him eternal rest. May He grant the immediate family the fortitude to bear the irreplaceable loss.”

  • Presidency indicts Mark, Tambuwal, others over poor oversight

    Presidency indicts Mark, Tambuwal, others over poor oversight

    The Presidency on Tuesday indicted the leadership of the seventh National Assembly over alleged failure to conduct effective oversight on Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs).

    The Presidency claimed that the failure of the seventh National Assembly to carry out proper oversight on MDAs was responsible for massive corruption and stealing of public funds which it said was the hallmark of the‎ administration of President Goodluck Jonathan.

    Recall that Senator David Mark was the President of the Seventh Senate, while Hon. Aminu Waziri Tambuwal, current governor of Sokoto State, was the Speaker of the House of Representatives in the 7th National Assembly.

    Senior Special Assistant to the President on National Assembly Matters (Senate), Senator Ita Enang, told reporters that the failure of the lawmakers to properly oversee was responsible for the alleged syphoning of the security votes in the office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) and other agencies of government under President Jonathan.

    The Presidential aide also said that the former minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs Diezani Allison Madueke, allegedly ran the petroleum sector single-handedly because the National Assembly does not do its oversight functions.

    Enang who was also a member of the Seventh Senate served as chairman of Rules and Business committee.

    He “If the committees in the 7th National Assembly were doing their work, by checking what was happening in the office of the National Security Adviser (NSA), Petroleum Ministry, we will not have had Diezanigate and all the other gates.

    “We will not have had all the probes and investigation. The legislature concentrated less that is why we are having the spill that the 8th Assembly is having. I feel guilty and I want to apologise. If the legislature did its duty like it is doing now, I think we will not have this situation.

    “This year you will have are going to have a robust executive, legislature relationship, you will not have uncommon compromises. You will have an engaging relationship.

    “The Senate has in two years doubled what the 7th Senate passed. The President has said that he will do his work as the president, the legislature will do its work and the judiciary will do its work. There will be no interference.

    “What is prevailing is the best executive, legislature relationship in the last 18 years.”

    On alleged budget padding, Enany dismissed it insisting that it does not exist.

    He explained that the National Assembly has the right to add or remove anything in the budget during budget consideration just like the executive can make amends before the budget is passed.

    Enang said: “In all my legislative years, padding is a new word in the legislative lexicon. So we have to define it as a new matter. In my opinion, padding is an illegal or unlawful insertion by a person who is not expected to do it in a legal, legislative document.

    “Therefore, unless a bill has been passed and forwarded to Mr President for assent, there can be no padding. If the bill had been forwarded to the president and something is inserted into that before it is assented to by any person and something is added different from what is in the votes and proceedings of the Senate and House of Representatives, that is what constitutes padding.”

    Enang also dismissed the insinuation that the 2017 budget was poorly implemented.

    For him, the level of implementation of the 2017 budget is “very high”, especially when about N1.3 trillion has been released in two quarters.

  • N5.4b slush funds: EFCC begins interrogation of  Mark, probes ex-Minister

    N5.4b slush funds: EFCC begins interrogation of  Mark, probes ex-Minister

    After allowing him a two-week of recuperation, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission( EFCC ) yesterday grilled a former President of the Senate, Chief David Mark in connection with alleged N5.4billion slush funds.
    Also, the commission is investigating Mark in respect of a curious payment to him by the Office of the National Security Adviser( ONSA).
    A former Minister of State for Niger Delta, Mr. Sam Ode is already  being probed over N2billion campaign funds meant for Benue State.
    According to findings by our correspondent, Mark reported to the EFCC at about 1.45pm
    He had earlier presented a medical certificate to the anti-graft agency that he was not fit enough to “be able to write a statement.”
    Based on his fidgety nature, the EFCC allowed him enough grace to attend to his health.
    Mark, who was at the EFCC office with one of his sons, was ushered into the investigation room at about 1.48pm.
    The allegations against Mark include alleged N200m -N550m arms procurement cash from ONSA; N2.9billion curious payment into the account of the National Assembly’s account and shared to Senators during Mark’s tenure;  his role in about N2billion campaign funds meant for Benue State; and illegal purchase of a N748million official residence of the Senate President.
    A top source, who spoke in confidence with our correspondent, said: “We have resumed full probe of Mark, who came to respond to issues raised for him by a panel of detectives.
    “Being in company of his son, he was calm during interrogation which involved the presentation of  some of our findings to him.
    “Altogether, he has more than three cases before the EFCC but we are gradually isolating every issue in which he was implicated.
    “By the time we release the facts to the public, Nigerians will realize that the ongoing probe of the former Senate President has nothing to do with politics. We have been on some aspects of the investigation since 2015.
    “In one of the findings, about N200million was collected in cash for Mark from ONSA through a proxy.”
    Meanwhile, a former Minister of State for Niger Delta, Sam Ode has been implicated in the disbursement of N2billion campaign funds meant for Benue State alongside Mark
    The cash was suspected to be part of the allocation wired from the Office of National Security Adviser(ONSA) meant for arms procurement.
    Another source said: “We have already quizzed the ex-Minister  who has given useful information on who got what among PDP chieftains in Benue State.
    “Our detectives have identified those who signed for the N2billion. In fact, some stalwarts diverted the cash into personal use.
    But Mark had denied allegations of conspiracy, abuse of office and mismanagement of funds.
    In a statement through his media aide, Paul Mumeh, he said: “To set the record straight, Sen. Mark was invited by the EFCC via a letter addressed to the National Assembly to answer questions on the 2015 presidential election campaign funds as it concerned Benue state.
    “As a law abiding citizen, Sen. Mark honoured the invitation.
    “Curiously, they also alleged that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) paid over N2bilion into the National Assembly’s account which he, as the then President of the Senate,  allegedly shared among the 109 Senators (including PDP, ACN, and ANPP) in 2010. Again, to the best of his knowledge, Sen. Mark is not aware of such transaction.
    ” This simply did not make sense to any right thinking member of the society.  Sen. Mark wondered why anybody would think that PDP will pay money into National Assembly account. He however clarified all the issues raised before returning home.
    “Sen. Mark believes in due process and rule of law. He has maintained a clean record of public service over the years and will continue to uphold the highest standard of conduct expected of public servants.
    “Sen. Mark’s house has since become a pilgrimage of sort to Politicians across party lines, friends and well-wishers identifying with him at this moment.
    “He however appealed to his supporters, friends and associates to remain calm and see his current travails as a price he has to pay for leadership.
    “For the avoidance of doubt, this is the first and only official statement from the office of Sen. Mark on this issue.”

  • David Mark can’t be intimidated, says Moro

    David Mark can’t be intimidated, says Moro

    Former Minister of Interior Comrade Abba Moro has said the invitation of former Senate President David Mark by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for interrogation, last week, has proved that the commission’s anti-corruption war is targeted at perceived opponents of the ruling All Progressives Congress, (APC).

    Mark was invited by the anti-graft agency on account of his alleged involvement in some financial dealings when he held sway as the number-one lawmaker in the country.

    Reacting to the development, Moro, who is a chieftain of PDP and strong ally of the ex-Senate President, wondered why the travail of Mark in the hands of EFCC was coming at a time his supporters were making passionate call on him to contest for the presidency in 2019.

    “It is an unfortunate development and it goes to confirm my fears that the EFCC fight against corruption is tainted with vindictive essential and targeted at perceived political opponents of the APC.“

    “The so called quizzing of the immediate past senate president, Senator David Mark is generating avoidable innuendos, insinuations and conjectures. It is curious that the quizzing of the immediate past senate president is coming at the heals of the clamour by a cross section of Nigerians that Senator Mark should present himself to contest to be president in 2019. I just don’t want to believe that Senator Mark’s current travails is connected to the audacity of his supporters asking him to contest to be president in 2019. This is a sad commentary on the democratic credentials of 21st century Nigeria.

    “We just hope that Senator Mark’s invitation is handled a lot carefully that it doesn’t snowball into any ugly incidents. It is highly reprehensible that this is happening to Sen. David mark, a man who has given his all to Nigeria and has handled all his national assignments with dexterity, transparency and high ethical standards.”

    He added: “This latest bizarre action of the anti-graft agency will not deter Nigerians from expressing their genuine concern for the deteriorating state of the nation and the desire to enthrone a more humane government that will execute a more people oriented policies to ameliorate the living conditions of the average Nigerian.

    “This macabre attempt by the EFCC to blackmail Sen. David Mark and slander his hard earned integrity will not succeed in deterring him from contesting to be president of Nigeria if he so desires and if it is the wish of Nigerians.”

  • ‘Why we are probing Mark’s acquisition of Senate President’s house’

    ‘Why we are probing Mark’s acquisition of Senate President’s house’

    The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami (SAN) and the Chairman, Special Presidential Investigation Panel for Recovery of Public Property (SPIPRPP), Okoi Obono-Obla have explained why the panel was probing the purchase of the official residence of the Senate President by David Mark.

    They said the investigation was informed by information to the effect that Mark, a former Senate President, unlawfully acquired the property in 2011, without being reflected in the Federal Government’s gazette as required.

    They argued that the house said to be built on 1.6 hectares of land, located in Gudu, Apo, Abuja, is a national monument that was not meant to be acquired by an individual.

    Malami and Obono-Obla’s explanation is contained in the court papers they filed before the Federal High Court in Abuja Thursday in reaction to a suit by Mark, challenging the notice of investigation served on him by the SPIPRPP.

    The documents include a notice of preliminary objection, a counter-affidavit to Mark’s motion for interlocutory injunction and a defence to the substantive suit.

    An official in the office of the Chairman of SPIPRPP, Aribatise Olanrewaju, who deposed to the counter- affidavit for Malami and Obono-Obla stated that the panel was empowered to probe the circumstances in which Mark took over the property.

    He said although former President Goodluck approved the sale of the property to Mark; the purchase was not gazetted as required by law.

    He said: “The request of Senator Bala Muhammad (the then Minister of Federal Capital Territory) was approved by former President Jonathan, but on the condition that the sale should be gazetted.

    “However, the sales of the houses were never gazette. Notwithstanding the directive of former President Jonathan that the said house should be sold to the plaintiff upon enactment of a Federal Government gazette, the said property was illegally sold to the plaintiff;

    “The sales of these houses were never reflected in the Federal Government official gazette contrary to directive/ minute in the memo of Senator Bala Muhammad by former President Jonathan;

    “I know as a fact that the sale of the said house to the plaintiff was never conducted in a competitive bidding and transparent process; this is contrary to the provisions of Section 15 (1) of the Procurement Act, 2007;

    “I know as a fact that the sale was contrary to the provisions of the Federal Government of Nigeria official gazette No. 82, Vol. 92 of 15 August 2005;

    “The said house is a national monument, which should have never been sold;

    “I know as a fact that the provisions of Part 11 (b) of the Certain Political, Public and Judicial Office Holders (Salaries and Allowances, Etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2008 otherwise known as the Remuneration Act, 2008 provides that Senate President is provided with accommodation by the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    “I know as a fact that the sale to the said house was contrary to the provisions of Paragraphs 1  & 6 (1) of Part 1 of the 5th Schedule to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) since the purchaser (the Plaintiff) was a the Senate President  he purchased the house.”

    Olanrewaju referred the law that empowered the  panel to investigate Mark’s acquisition of the property.

    He said: “I know as a fact that the notice alluded to in paragraph 17 of the affidavit is therefore not a notice of eviction as claimed by the plaintiff/applicant.

    “I know as a fact that the 2nd defendant never declared the plaintiff/applicant acquisition of the said property illegal, but a notice to inform him that the acquisition of the said property was under investigation by the Special Investigation Panel.

    “I know as a fact that the Special Presidential Investigation Panel for Recovery of Public Property was set up by the Federal Government of Nigeria pursuant to the provisions of Recovery of Public Property (Special Provisions) Act, Cap. R4, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004,” he said.

    In their objection, Malami and Obono-Obla faulted the suit by Marked and described it as a ploy to stall his ongoing investigation.

    Obono-Obla, who endorsed the processes filed by the respondents in the suit – the AGF and Obono-Obla – described the suit as speculative and hypothetical.

    He contended, in the objection that the Federal High Court was without the jurisdiction to hear the suit.

    He grounds on which he hinged his argument include that the court has no jurisdiction to grant the relief sought by the plaintiffs in view of the fact that, by virtue of Section 251 (1) (p) of the Constitution, the subject matter of the case has nothing to do with the administration or the management and control of the Federal Government or any of its agencies.

    He said the suit was a disguise to scuttle criminal investigation of the plaintiff  (a public officer) using the court.

    Obono-Obla added tha: “This court has no jurisdiction to stop the Special Investigation Panel for Recovery of Public Property established pursuant to Section 1 (1) of the Recovery of Public Property (Special Provisions) Act, Cap. R4, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 from carrying out its statutory functions.

    “The 2nd defendant (Obono-Obla) is an agent of a disclosed principal and as such the plaintiff is wrong to sue the 2nd defendant in his official capacity with his personal name.

    “This suit has disclosed no reasonable cause of action; it is speculative and hypothetical,” he said.

    The SPIPRPP, in September this year, issued a 21-day notice to Mark to quit the property or “show cause” why the Federal Government should not “enforce the recovery of the property for public good”.

    Rather than “show cause” as requested by SPIPRPP, Mark head before the Federal High Court where he lodged the suit and prayed the court to among others, quash all steps taken by the panel to evict him and recover the house from him.

    The case will come up for hearing on January 22 next year before Justice Gabriel Kolawole.

  • Stop intimidating PDP leaders, Secondus tells FG

    Stop intimidating PDP leaders, Secondus tells FG

    The national chairman of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Prince Uche Secondus has alleged harassment of opposition figures by the All Progressives Congress (PDP) led Federal Government.

    Secondus was reacting to the ongoing investigation of the immediate past President of the Senate, David Mark by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The party chair, who spoke at the Abuja secretariat of the PDP on Tuesday, alleged harassment of the former Senate President by the anti-graft agency, saying such treatment, amounted to injustice.

    Mark is currently undergoing investigation over his alleged role in the disbursement of election funds in 2015 and the purchase of his official residence while he was Senate President.

    The government had indicated interest in the said building located within the Apo Legislative Quarters and had issued Mark with quit notice.

    But Secondus insisted that the investigation was part of a grand plan by the ruling APC to continue to harass and intimidate prominent opposition figures with the view to frustrating them and dampening their morale ahead of the 2019 general election.

    The chairman said, “Enough is enough. All over the world there is no place a former Senate President can be treated the way David Mark is being treated. They have failed and they know Nigerians know it.

    All they do now is to attack and harass the opposition. Don’t attack the opposition. That is injustice. Concentrate on fulfilling your promises to the people. Enough of this.

    We are not in a military era. God does not sleep. What you serve others, is what you will be served with. We handed over freely in 2015. APC should also be ready to handover without intimidation.

    “Nigerians will vote and kick out APC with their voter cards. Stop intimidation of our leaders. We will no longer take it.  People in power should be very careful because power will come and go”.

    Secondus called on opposition members to rise to the challenge of unseating the APC in 2019, stressing that they should not harbour any pessimism in the task of reclaiming power in the next election.

    Speaking at a two-day retreat from elected officials of the PDP at the Transcorp Hilton Hotel, Abuja, Deputy President of the Senate, Ike Ekweremadu, blamed the party’s defeat in the 2015 general elections on lack of internal democracy, which he said manifested in the forms of imposition of candidates and disregard for the party’s constitution.

    Ekweremadu said, “Another election year is by the corner. The new NWC must ensure that the party does not repeat past mistakes. We must return power to the people, as our name and slogan rightly demand of us. This will not only reassure Nigerians that we are indeed an improved and rebranded PDP, but will also encourage the massive return of former party faithful.

    “Furthermore, the public will evaluate our commitment to end corruption and promote accountability and transparency by the way we handle internal party affairs.

    “We have a history of fighting corruption and our systems must be corruption-free. This should stand us out as the only hope to eradicate corruption in Nigeria. The PDP established the Independent Corrupt Practices and Related Offences Commission, and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.

    “We saw to the enactment of the Freedom of Information Act and introduction of the Integrated Payroll and Personnel Information System (IPPIS), Treasury Single Account (TSA), and the Biometric Verification Number (BVN). The PDP also ensured that the Civil Society Organisations and the press flourished to promote an accountable and open society.

    “There was no effort by the PDP to tame the Non-Governmental Organisations or the use of the social media. Importantly, we beamed the anti-graft searchlight on our own members to demonstrate that there must be no sacred cows in the war against graft.

    “Therefore, we must conduct our affairs in a way that reassure Nigerians that under the incoming PDP administration, we will not only consolidate on all these track record, but will also firmly eradicate corruption from 2019”.

    The Deputy Senate President identified the choice of the party’s presidential candidate for 2019 as one of the biggest challenges confronting the PDP, stressing that the fate and political fortunes of the party would depend on the party’s presidential candidate.

    “The party must, therefore, identify a candidate with the credentials, reach, charisma, competence, and popularity to outmatch any candidate presented by the ruling APC and any other parties for that matter.

    “The party’s leadership should encourage every interested and qualified member to vie for the ticket in a free, fair, and credible party primary. Let the best candidate emerge”.

    The Bayelsa State Governor, Seriake Dickson who also attended the event, assured that the party was already making progress in its reconciliation efforts.

    Dickson, who chairs the reconciliation committee of the PDP, said all the aggrieved aspirants in the party’s just concluded national convention would be appeased.

    According to him, he had been able to plead with Prof Taoheed Adedoja, one of the aggrieved chairmanship candidates in the just concluded convention to seek out of court settlement with the party.

    Adedoja has dragged the party’s leadership to court, seeking the cancellation of the convention and also asking the court to sack Secondus as national chairman.

    Meanwhile, the PDP has fixed a meeting with all defeated aspirants in the just concluded convention for the scone week in January 2018.

    The party’s spokesman, Mr. Kola Ologbondiyan who made the announcement in his remarks at the retreat assured that all the complaints of the aggrieved aspirants will be addressed at the meeting.

  • Mark urges christian intending pilgrims to pray for Nigeria

    Mark urges christian intending pilgrims to pray for Nigeria

    The immediate past President of the Senate, David Mark, has urged Nigerian intending pilgrims to the Jerusalem to pray for the nation, to enable it to surmount socio- economic and political challenges.

    A statement by his Media Assistant, Mr Paul Mumeh, said Mark made the call while addressing intending pilgrims of St. Mulumba Catholic chaplaincy in Abuja on Tuesday.

    He said Nigeria and the world at large required prayer to overcome the threat to peace and insecurity ravaging mankind.

    He said: “Nations are facing challenges of insecurity, terrorism and insurgency are ravaging human race,we should all resort to prayer for God to intervene.

    “That is my charge to you as you depart to the Holy Land today.’’

    He also urged the intending pilgrims to be good ambassadors of Nigeria in the Holy land, reminding them that the image of Nigeria was uppermost at the moment.

    The lawmaker also cautioned the intending pilgrims against the temptation to abscond from the Holy Land, saying “it is not a bed of roses over there.’’

    Mumeh said that the Chaplain of St. Mulumba’s Catholic Chaplaincy, Rev. Father Innocent Jooji, urged the pilgrims to be law abiding, in his contribution.

    He said that “the mission is purely a holy engagement and not a jamboree nor a shopping spree.”

    Jooji also urged intending pilgrims to avoid any act likely to tarnish the image of the country.

  • A university for David Mark

    A university for David Mark

    No initiative on Nigeria’s health care delivery system is judged worthwhile these days unless it is dedicated to curtailing medical tourism.

    There are no reliable figures on the volume and aggregate expenditure on the phenomenon, but the way some political officials and educational entrepreneurs talk, it is almost as if medical tourism is the bane of the nation’s health care delivery system, if not the entire economy.

    Just before he left office, former Governor Godswill “Uncommon Transformation” Akpabio commissioned a hospital declared to be among the very best on the planet, complete with modular surgical theatres and a helipad for air ambulances ferrying in patients requiring immediate attention.

    The complex would not only make it unnecessary for patients to go seek treatment in the      UK, France, Germany, Indiana or Brazil, at the risk of having their vital organs harvested surreptitiously;  it would also make the state capital, Uyo, a salubrious and more affordable destination for ECOWAS citizens, and people from all over the world seeking specialised medical treatment.

    When Akpabio sprained an ankle in a freak accident shortly after commissioning the hospital, he was ferried, not to the hospital he had built to curtail medical tourism, but to the UK. I gather that he headed to the UK not because he likes medical tourism, but because world-class specialists expected to run the hospital were not yet “on ground”, as we say here.  Apparently, it was taking forever to process their travel papers.

    The specialists are yet to hit the ground, I am told, and the complex has been boarded up. Akpabio’s successor Governor Udom Emmanuel, it would seem, is not averse to medical tourism  Or it may well be that he has been engrossed in transforming or re-transforming whatever Akpabio had left untransformed or only partially transformed.

    If Governor Emmanuel is not averse to medical tourism, he is in excellent company.  Those    who patronise the Aso Rock Medical Centre would rather promote medical tourism than put a brake on it. That explains why the Centre could not even boast a single capillary syringe–a device they had in abundance in village dispensary when I was growing up–to say nothing of a functioning x-ray machine the last time First Lady Aisha Buhari checked.

    Why equip the place when you can travel abroad every year, premier or business class, all expenses paid, plus generous spending money?

    Despite the bad examples around, the appetite for curtailing medical tourism remains robust. At the recent opening of the Teaching Hospital of the Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, no less a personality than the Vice President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo, expressed great optimism that the facility would help reduce medical tourism.

    But nowhere has that appetite been more robust than the National Assembly, which last week passed a unanimous resolution urging the Federal Government to establish, as a matter of urgency and necessity, a comprehensive University of Health Sciences in Oturkpo, in Benue State, the hometown  of His Excellency the Distinguished Senator (Dr) David Bonaventure Aleichenu Mark.

    The resolution was the high point of discussion and debate on a motion proposed by .Senator Mark.  The discussion brought in the usual “stakeholders”:  officials of the Federal Ministry of Health as well as the Federal Ministry of Education, plus professionals in the medical sciences.  Lending intellectual muscle to the effort is the League of Idoma Professors, incorporating home and foreign-based scholars.

    David Mark’s proposal has had a chequered history.  As president of the Senate, Mark had  urged the establishment of a medical university on former President Dr Goodluck Jonathan.  Clutching at everything that might enhance his re-election chance, Jonathan had approved it.  The approval may have been in principle, but Mark considered it a fait accompli.

    The project, an example of the insidious patronage system that undergirded the Jonathan administration, never got off the ground.  A new sheriff had come to town.

    But give Mark high praise for following up and following through.

    He took up the matter with the APC -led 8th National Assembly in November 2016, steamrolled it through three readings, culminating in the enthusiastic endorsement of the Senate. All that is required now to make   it a law of the land is President Buhari’s assent.  Some influential senators are already saying that the whole thing is a done deal.

    If they had their way, the institution would be named David Mark University of Health Science and sited in his hometown, Oturkpo, in the Idoma heartland of Benue State.  Mark had failed to deliver on his promise of Apa State, but the medical university would be some redemption.

    Speaking to the bill, Mark said the university would be equipped to engage in specialized training of doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other medical health practitioners “to cushion the current admission deficit” underscored by the fact that the traditional institutions could only take 3, 000 out of nearly 160, 000 who apply every year.

    The need to curb medical tourism was, however, the theme that ran through the hearings on the proposal.

    Senator Jibrin Barau (APC, Kano North) noted that if the bill won presidential assent, it would surely reduce the rate of medical tourism among the country’s elite.

    “No one will have to fly to India or any country on medical ground if we have all the needed state-of-the-art facility on ground in our country,” he said.  “Once this university takes off, we could even export our medical practitioners, which would boost our economy. As we all know, health they say is wealth.”

    Senate President, Bukola Saraki, represented by Senator Olusola Adeyeye (APC, Osun Central) said the bill was timely, and that the establishment of the university would help mitigate the crisis in the health sector.

    When established, the university would address the issues of medical tourism and its associated capital flights amounting to some N3 billion expended by Nigerians seeking medical attention  abroad.

    Throughout the proceedings, nobody asked why setting up a new medical university, rather  than strengthening and equipping existing teaching hospitals and medical centres to world class, was the best answer to the nation’s health care crisis.

    Nobody asked how this particular institution would be the answer to medical tourism when, even if established and equipped today, it would produce no doctors for the next five years at least.  Just how many students can it accommodate anyway?

    This whole idea of curbing medical tourism through setting up a specialised medical university:  is this not a solution in search of a problem?  Just how pervasive is medical tourism?

    David Mark is to be commended on this initiative.

    Nigeria has given him a great deal – “abandoned property” czar, military governor, Minister of Communications over presiding and the nation’s octopus telecommunications network NITEL, senator of the Federal Republic since 1999 and president of that body for two consecutive four-year terms, etc, etc, and all the rights and privileges and compensation appertaining thereunto.

    In the process, he has acquired a huge portfolio of assets, reported to include two golf courses abroad, liquid wealth salted away in European and Caribbean tax shelters (remember the Panama Papers), and goodness knows what else in Nigeria.   By some accounts, he is an authentic billionaire.

    And yet, he and his cohorts want the Nigerian taxpayer to build, equip and run a medical university named for him and situated in his hometown.

    What does David Mark want to give back to a nation that has given him so much?  What material contribution does he intend to make to an institution, the establishment of which he has pursued with singular vigour?  What bequest does he want to make for having the proposed university named after him?

    Eleswhere, those seeking this kind of honour–for great honour it is, not a right -pay handsomely for it.

    Think on these things, Distinguished Senator.

  • Nigeria’s breakup not an option – Mark

    Nigeria’s breakup not an option – Mark

    Nigerians must move on together as a breakup is not an option, former Senate President, David Mark, said on Friday.

    “Those who are agitating for otherwise are missing the point. Nigeria has crossed many crucibles. We cannot reverse ourselves,” Mark told Kaduna State Acting governor,  Alhaji Aminu Shagali, in Kaduna.

    He was at the head of a delegation of the Nigeria Defence Academy (NDA) 3rd Regular Course Alumni Association on a courtesy visit to the acting governor.

    “The only option is to move on in a manner that is progressive, peaceful and united,” he was further quoted as saying by his media aide, Paul Mumeh.

    “We may have our disagreements. But a break up is not an option. We can resolve our differences through meaningful dialogue and genuine conversation.

    “There is no use heating up the polity,” the ex-Senate president added.

    He noted that no matter the imperfections, the nation is greater and better as an indivisible country.