Tag: Goodluck Jonathan

  • Does the president need help?

    Does the president need help?

    I’m afraid, he is the only one that can help himself

    It is not in my character to react to people’s comments. But I found the comment by Jide Ajani of Vanguard titled “Goodluck Jonathan: A president in need of help” quite interesting. The beautiful piece was published in the May 11, 2014 edition of Vanguard. The piece was a recap of the Presidential Chat of May 4 and the dinner that followed.

    It is not that Ajani said anything that we did not know. But the beauty in his write-up is that what he said was not based on conjecture or wild imaginations, but an account of what took place at the president’s residence. When, for instance, we say Nigeria’s rulers are surrounded by sycophants, we tend to see the sycophants as some ghosts that mill around the seat of power, ever ready to sing the praise of whoever is in charge. This ‘dance-on-we-are-solidly-behind-you orchestra’ is as old as the country’s seat of power; perhaps older. I cannot recollect any government where they did not feature; interestingly, they almost always have the ears of those in power. This means that our rulers love being deceived or flattered. The sycophants last so long in government while those who say it as it is don’t.

    Those who have worked closely with some of our political rulers, including presidents, governors and even local government chairmen know that this is  one of their worst challenges. A former governor in the south-west had an information and strategy team when he became governor. For the better part of his first term, this team functioned well and was able to help the government, which also made the job easy for the team by its initial impressive performance. But decline set in when political considerations and petty ego took over, with sycophants making the governor to see only what he wanted to see.

    There is no doubt that it takes the grace of God for one to be able to maintain a cool head while occupying certain influential positions. One will indeed pity these rulers when you see the caliber of people deceiving them (the rulers) usually for what to eat and sometimes for inexplicable reasons when one realises that some of the sycophants are men and women of means and not those of straw. Even many of us who only have the privilege of managing a few hundreds of people sometimes become something else with the little powers in our hands.

    Most of us saw the last presidential chat and we rated it poorly as usual; vintage President Jonathan. But, according to Ajani, the president’s handlers hailed the performance. Hear him: “At the end of the two-hour session, the coterie of staff and a few friends were all smiles. ‘Mr. President, well done’; ‘Mr. President, that was a good one’; ‘Mr. President, that was great”. Those were the comments from virtually everyone around. So, you needed to do a reality check: Were these guys referring to the same media chat that had just ended; a chat that saw Mr. President avoiding some questions and instead launching into a series of expeditions? But then, you were quickly reminded that by Mr. President’s own standards, this was one of the best performances”.

    Now, to specifics, quoting Ajani again: “On the question of corruption and the NNPC, President Jonathan missed some points. He did not need to attempt to define corruption and its relationship with stealing. He did not also need to drag the legislature into it – by saying he smelt legislative dictatorship in the conduct of the activities of the House of Representatives; he also did not need to attempt to draw a parallel between corruption, inflated pump-head price of petrol and the popular rally of January 2012.

    “On the need to curtail the excesses of petroleum products’ marketers who are selling beyond the official rate, President Jonathan sounded very distant.   There is the Department of Petroleum Resources, DPR, statutorily mandated to monitor activities in the sector.   But Mr. President first embarked on a voyage of disbelief; that he finds it difficult to believe that the claim was true; and that Nigerians were responsible for the serial inhumanity against fellow Nigerians.   Then suddenly, Mr. President remembered that there was DPR which, he admitted, should begin to do its job”.

    This is what Mr. President’s aides were commending. Curiously, Ajani singled out presidential spokesman Reuben Abati and Labaran Maku, the Minister of Information, as being different from the pack. Well, I do not know whether he merely said this to humour them because, I may not know Maku well but the Abati I knew would have written volumes and volumes of negative things about the Jonathan presidency if he is not involved. I said I do not know if he is humouring the duo because Ajani spoke of Maku in the same piece thus: “Watching our Information Minister on CNN, shouting and attempting to use decibel to break down their microphone smacks of panic response. Yet, I can bet you, as indecorous as that action may be, there would be some people in the Villa who would say, ‘Well done, Mr. Minister,’ ‘You did well, Mr. Minister’.

    Of course, we do not need Ajani to tell us that people who commended this kind of terrible media chat were jesters.  I have no problem with the president surrounding himself with jesters, but they must be quality ones and not   those who “cracked jokes that were at once dry and unproductive”, as Ajani puts it.. With this kind of jesters in the Villa,   the president’s sense of judgment in recruiting his aides or even choosing those around him becomes questionable.

    Even if they are deceiving someone and those deceiving the person pretend not to know they are deceiving him, the person being deceived ought to know when he is being flattered. If your handlers say you had a great performance today and the next day, the media and other opinion moulders condemn the very thing they said was a scintillating performance, then you should know something is wrong somewhere. The worst disservice many Nigerian rulers do to themselves is to see every criticism as being politically motivated. If, for instance, any news medium said the president did well during that chat, that medium would be shooting itself in the foot. If it persists along that line in its treatment of matters from or concerning the Jonathan presidency, it is only a matter of time for that medium to begin to rely on crutches from the seat of power instead of its own integrity and professionalism for survival, and consequently consign itself to history. President Jonathan would be naive to think that the media can do well by reporting that he is doing well when even the blind can see that  he is not. The media mirror the society even as they set the agenda.

    Matters are not helped by President Jonathan’s kith and kin in the Niger Delta who believe that their ‘son’ is being vilified because of where he comes from. I find this sickening because the president has not just ‘naturalised’ as a south-south indigene; we knew he was from there when he was massively voted in in 2011. If today the music has changed or is fast changing, it has nothing to do with where the president comes from; it is more of a function of a people who are disappointed that the man they invested a lot of hope in three years back does not have an idea of how to solve any of the country’s multifarious problems.

    Then the president’s wife, Patience. We know that there is little we can do concerning what God has joined together. We also know that love is thicker than water; even if Mr President has not done full disclosure by giving us an idea of how  madam performs at the home front, her marital and conjugal duties and all, but we know her meddlesomeness in governance is unhelpful to her husband and the country.

    One thing that President Jonathan should understand is that he cannot be doing the same thing the same way and expect a different result. I do not know if it is not late in the day for him to retrace his steps because if the perception of his government must change, then he has to do away with many of those aides that have been giving him the wrong feedback about how Nigerians rate him and his government. I know political exigencies and even the fear of missing their melodious even if ultimately injurious tunes may not make that possible. But the ball is in his court. As they say, ‘heaven helps those who help themselves’.

  • ‘Jonathan, most troubled President’

    ‘Jonathan, most troubled President’

    TO the National Chairman of the Labour Party (LP), Dan Nwanyanwu, President Goodluck Jonathan is the most troubled leader the nation has ever had.

    He pleaded with Nigerians to pray for Jonathan, saying “he has lost so much weight over Nigeria lately.”

    Nwanyanwu, who spoke in Abeokuta, the Ogun State capital, said the President never “had peace” since he was elected in 2011.

    He lamented that he is shedding “much weight over security” challenges plaguing the nation.

    He noted that while past leaders with all their respective shortcomings enjoyed relative peace while in office, the experience of Jonathan has been quite different.

    Nwanyanwu said: “Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown. I really want you to pray for our President.

    “Take a look at him on the television; he has lost so much weight due to the insecurity challenge confronting the country.

    “Alhaji Shehu Shagari had peace; Chief Olusegun Obasanjo with all his troubles had peace; Umaru Yar’Adua had peace though he was ill.

    “But President Jonathan has had no peace from inception. He has lost weight thinking about Nigeria. I urge you  to pray for him.”

    Nwanyanwu spoke during the inauguration of the LP State Secretariat on Onikolobo road, Abeokuta, which was attended by former Governor Gbenga Daniel; Ondo State governor, Olusegun Mimiko; Chief Sule Onabiyi and thousands of party faithful.

    He said the Labour Party will work for the President in respect of the 2015 election and urged all party members to support Jonathan.

    Also, the National Leader of the party, Governor Olusegun Mimiko of Ondo State, pledged to rally LP to work for Jonathan.

    Mimiko, who noted that he was in Ogun State to reassure all LP loyalists that the crisis rocking the state chapter of the party has been resolved. He described the state governor, Senator Amosun’s infrastructural development projects as an elitist urban renewal project aimed at inflicting pains on the poor masses.

    Mimiko said, “Urban renewal is good because when the cities are renewed, it attracts businesses. But the whole essence of attracting businesses is to improve on the socio-economic lives of the people of the state.

    “But if the concept of urban renewal is to destroy the means of the livelihood of the people, you destroy their generational heritage, then that renewal is not worth it. Urban renewal must not be at the expense of the masses. It is very good to renew our cities.”

    Daniel, who is the state leader of LP, pledged that if the party wins the governorship election in the Gateway State, all workers sacked by Amosun would be reinstated.

  • Should FG swap Chibok girls for Boko Haram terrorists?

    Should FG swap Chibok girls for Boko Haram terrorists?

    Nigeria is ready to talk to Boko Haram for the release of more than 200 abducted school girls, a minister was quoted by the BBC as saying Minister of Special Duties Tanimu Turaki said if Boko Haram was sincere, its leader Abubakar Shekau should send people he trusts to meet the standing committee on reconciliation. Many Nigerians – politicians, lawyers, public affairs analysts and others – are for dialogue to free the girls – should the need arise. Some are, however, opposed to “talking with terrorists”.

    Sir Olaniwun Ajayi said:

    Afenifere chieftain and delegate to the National Conference Sir Ajayi rejected the sect’s proposal, saying that it is devoid of logic and no basis can be found for it in law and morality.

    He queried: “Which country is that practiced? People offended the state. Their ring leaders who sent them on an unlawful errand to invade a school and take the innocent girls are giving conditions. They are saying that their members in detention should be released before they release the girls. Where is that done in the world?

    “A thief invaded a house. Then, the thief is saying that, before what is stolen can be returned, you have to pay money to the thieves. No government can do that. Our government should not do that. In other countries, the sect members would have been apprehended by now”.

    Another Afenifere chieftain, Chief Ayo Adebanjo, said:

    “The government has done the right thing by exploring dialogue as route to the solution to the problem. But, it is legally and morally wrong to propose the release of the Boko Haram suspects in prison in exchange for the innocent girls. That is not acceptable”.

    A delegate to the National Conference, Senator Olabiyi Durojaye, said:

    “The people terrorising the country cannot give terms and their demands are irritating.”

    He stressed: ‘It is the height of ignorance. You have harmed people and you are asking that some people should be released from detention before you can release the girls. They are trying to ridicule the government and our nation. I am not happy about the whole situation. There are experts who can handle the negotiation with the sect. But, their condition is not right”.

    Former Kaduna State Governor Balarabe Musa said:

    “The Federal Government should accept  it, if it will encourage dialogue. The two sides are holding hostages,  although the Federal Government may say it is holding criminals. It may be the beginning of peaceful settlement of the problem. The Federal Government has no alternative than to dialogue. The offer should be accepted as it will give room for meaningful dialogue.”

    Former Lagos State Deputy Governor Rafiu Jafojo said:

    “It is unfortunate and uncalled for. Icannot support that. The children have nothing to do with their claims, what they want and what they are fighting for. If they want to fight the government as terrorist, they can fight the government. But, they cannot be seizing girls. Why should they go to schools to disrupt the peace of the place?

    “I don’t support the idea of unconditional release of the innocent girls. Let them release the children to their families and embrace dialogue. Why should faceless people give conditions to government?

    Lagos state House of Assembly majority leader Dr. Jibayo Adeyeye said:

    “While nothing would be too much on the side of the government to ensure that the girls are released and reunited with their families. The government should however be weary of succumbing to demand by terrorists as it would send a wrong signal in future to others who would want to blackmail the nation when it is faced with such situation in future. I think the Federal Government should follow the lead from the release video about the girls and track them down while it buys time with the exchange proposal.

    Rights activist Mike Ozekhome said:

    It was former President of America JF Kennedy, who said you should never negotiate out of fear. There are times that we have to stoop to conquer. We are talking of lives here; we are talking of little children, fairly between the ages of 10 and 16 years, taking into the wilderness by Boko.

    The parents of these little children are traumatised, they cannot sleep, and they cannot eat. They do not know the fate of their children. Shekau has said initially that he will sell the girls into slavery; he has changed his position to exchanging them for the arrested Boko Haram people. The question now is what is the way out? The Turaki Committee’s primary purpose is to see how they can negotiate, so as to end the insurgency. I therefore, do no say that the idea of negotiation with Boko Haram is so alien to the government, that it is suddenly a taboo. The government has been accused that it was playing a game of stick and carrot. We are now talking about human lives. This is one area where I throw my weight behind the government of Nigeria, to negotiate with these people to release these little innocent girls. Some of who will become ministers, governors and top government functionaries in Nigeria.

     

    Abubakar Tsav, former commissioner of police, Lagos States has mixed feelings about the matter. He is fully in support of negotiation with the insurgents “for the sake of the girls, who are innocent and should not be made to suffer for what they did not cause.” He added: “One could also consider this from the point of view of their parents who are now in trauma and do not know what next to do. So, on humanitarian grounds, yes, I am for negotiation. In the interest of peace, anything we can do to bring back these girls would be welcomed.” He said America at one point or the other exchanged prisoners with people they considered as terrorists, to effect the release of their citizens.

    But on the other hand, Tsav insists such an idea is arrant nonsense. His words: “These people have killed a lot of Nigerians; they have destabilised this country; and they have bombed churches and mosques. Seen from that perspective, it is not proper. If we do it, we would be indirectly supporting terrorism.”

    The former police commissioner said Nigeria’s problem was that when President Goodluck Jonathan was advised to negotiate with them at the outset, he refused, saying he cannot negotiate with ghosts. “Now these ghosts are disturbing the whole country. So, I think those who are advising the President are not advising him well,” he added. Besides, he said the area where the girls were abducted is under emergency rule, and that the security agencies failed in their duty to protect the citizens. Tsav wondered whether there is any sort of connivance between some of the soldiers and Boko Haram members.

    Chief Niyi Akintola said:

    “Boko Haram demand as unjustifiable, unreasonable and should be rejected by the Federal government.

    “The Federal Government should not succumb to blackmail. It should not compromise anything. Those who had committed crimes against humanity cannot dictate terms of their release from detention.  They should account for their crimes.

    “On what basis should the government negotiate with them. Their demand is totally unacceptable. The whole world is against them, everybody is angry with them. We should condemn Boko Haram’s act.

    Afenifere chieftain, Senator Ayo Fasanmi, said:

    “Even though human lives are involved, government should not negotiate with murderers.”

    Mr. Chris Uche (SAN) advised government to leave every option open. He urged the Jonathan administration to explore all options and possibilities to get the girls back to their parents.

    Alhaji Tanko Yakassai, Second Republic politician said:

    “This does not necessarily mean that government should accede to all the demands of the terrorists.  I believe in the course of negotiation, a middle course may be found,” he said from his base in Kano on the telephone, adding: “It is important that the door of negotiation should not be shut.”

    Yakassai, who was special adviser to Second Republic President Shehu Shagari on National Assembly Affairs, said the Federal Government had not entirely ruled out negotiation, and that his understanding of government’s position is that it may resort to negotiation when the need arises.

    Dr. Jerry Chukwuokolo, an Enugu lawyer and rights activist said:

    “The whole idea is absurd.”

    He argued that Boko Haram insurgents cannot be compared with Niger Delta militants in anyway. He said: “We were able to negotiate with the militants because we saw them, but these insurgents who are they?

    “Secondly, what they have done to fellow Nigerians without justification is heinous; how can we be negotiating with such elements? In fact, I’m beginning to think that the whole thing is being orchestrated. These girls have been in the custody of the terrorists for only three weeks, but they can now recite lengthy passages in the Quran; majority of these girls are Christians, I don’t think it is possible.”

    Former Information Minister, Prince Tony Momoh said:

    “In my own personal opinion and as a Nigerian, I believe that the President is in a big dilemma. If he refuses to negotiate and any of the children dies, people will not forgive the President.

    “The President himself said he does not want to win an election, if the blood of one person would be shed. People will be looking at those areas, personally, I believe in communication.

    “Communication is the only way crisis can be resolved not through war.  At a particular time, in the affairs of men, if there is war, there must be talking. In this regard, my own policy at any time an issue arises or there is a disagreement, I would like to achieve peace through talking.

    “I don’t believe in war, so with that mind set and we have these kids being held by Boko Haram and they are saying the only way to release them is through negotiation, I will negotiate. To say you will not negotiate, people will put the blame on you if anything untoward happen to them.

    “So, if I was him, I will reach out behind the scene to them to have these girls brought back home. That is the main thing. If any of them dies and we look at the situation, the President will never escape an accusation of intransigence. If they are strong enough to be in possession of our 200 daughters, I will insist on negotiation. If they say release our prisoners, will they go and seek asylum outside Nigeria? If that is the condition to bring back our children, we must not be big headed to say we will not negotiate. If those children die Jonathan will never be forgiven.”

    Former President Committee for the Defence of Human Rights, Olasupo Ojo said:

    “A country like America’s standing policy is that you don’t negotiate with terrorists, no matter who the President is. Nigeria has no clear policy, so, it means it is at the discretion of who is the President, to decide what happens. This is the approach that President Jonathan will follow. He is not courageous, he is not bold, he is not a firebrand, and he does not have the gut. So, you can be assured he would prefer negotiation.”

    Yobe State House of Assembly Adamu Dala Dogo, said:

    “Negotiation with Boko Haram is another solution to the release of the abducted girls.”

    “The Federal Government should negotiate with Boko Haram and bring back our girls. But the Boko Haram should also send their delegates to come and negotiate with the Federal Government because government cannot negotiate with faceless people.

    “I think negotiation is another way of solving the problem while the government is considering other options. The use of force will put the life of those girls on the line and that is the least that the parents of these girls and any other Nigerian expect.

    “The Federal Government must act responsibly and fast too because time is running out on this matter.”

    Tanimu Turaki, Minister of Special Duties:

    “What I said is that we are willing to dialogue with them. And that’s why the Government set the Presidential Committee on a Dialogue and Peaceful Resolution of Security Challenges even before the abduction of the Chibok girls. We want to have comprehensive discussions with them through dialogue, that will lead to the peaceful resolution of all issues, including but not limited to the release of the abducted girls. I didn’t say negotiation because that is too restrictive in the present circumstances.”

    [polldaddy poll=8046002]

     

  • Jonathan seeks  extension of emergency in Borno, others

    Jonathan seeks extension of emergency in Borno, others

    President Goodluck Jonathan yesterday asked the National Assembly to approve another six months extension of the emergency rule in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe states.

    Jonathan’s letter which was read at plenary by Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, is the third in the series of such requests.

    The two previous ones were approved by the Senate.

    In a letter to Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon. Aminu Waziri Tambuwal, and dated May 5, Jonathan said that despite heavy presence of security forces in the affected areas through the imposition of emergency rule, the situation remains “daunting.”

    However, the Secretary of the Northern Senators Forum, Senator Ahmed Lawan (Yobe North), opposed the request.

    He said even though the military needs more hi-tech equipment to fight the Boko Haram insurgents, it would be wrong to extend the emergency rule.

    Jonathan, in the letter entitled: “Re: Extension of the period for the proclamation of a state of emergency in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe States” noted that the security situation in the three states remains daunting.

    The letter reads in part: “May I respectfully draw your attention to the State of Emergency Proclamation 2013, in respect of Adamawa, Borno and Yobe States, which was approved by the National Assembly.

    “By virtues of the provisions of section 305(6)(c) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended, the Proclamation aforementioned would have elapsed after six months from the date of approval of the National Assembly.

    “However, after due consideration of the representations made of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to that effect, while substantial progress had been made to contain situation that necessitated the proclamation of a state of emergency was yet to abate.

    “It would be recalled that the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria had upon consideration of the realities of the security situation in the affected States that had been placed before it graciously approved by resolution, the extension of the State of Emergency for a further term of six months from the date of expiration of the subsisting period.

    “The security situation in the three states remains daunting, albeit to varying degrees, in the face of persistent attacks by members of the Boko Haram sect on civilian and military targets with alarming casualty rates.

    “In view of the foregoing, I most respectfully request Distinguished Senators to consider and approve by resolution, the extension of the Proclamation of the State of Emergency in Adamawa, Borno, and Yobe States by a further term of six months from the date of expiration of the current term.”

    However, Chairman Senate Committee on Public Account and Secretary of the Northern Senators Forum, Senator Ahmad Lawan, kicked against a further extension of the state of the emergency in the three states.

    The Senator, representing Yobe North in the Upper Chamber, said he can only support more armament and funding for the troops already deployed to the states.

    Lawan, while responding to a question on the request for further extension of the emergency rule, said: “The state of emergency had been operated for 12 months now and will end on the 19th of this month. I think that should be the end.

    “The Senate President, David Mark, who spoke on our behalf last week, told President Goodluck Jonathan that the Senate was prepared to approve supplementary budget to further equip the military and boost the morale of the soldiers.

    “Therefore, I am completely opposed to the extension of the state of emergency in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe States, but I support further funding for the military operation in the area.”

    A member of the House of Representatives, Hon. Aliyu Sani Madaki (APC, Kano) while speaking under with Rule 47 of the House ( personal explanation), opposed the President’s request.

    But, the Speaker interjected that he should put his explanation in writing.

    Another member from Kano, Hon. Aminu Suleiman (APC, Kano) spoke with reporters on the issue after plenary.

    According to him, the state of emergency has so far achieved nothing.

    His words: “One year after, has the situation changed? What have they done with the huge sums budgeted for? These are a million Naira questions they need to answer. They need to justify the amount spent so far. They may have to explain to us why it should be extended,”

    But, a member, Hon. Kaka Kyari Gujbawu (PDP, Borno) said the President’s request is in order.

    “If not for the state of emergency, only God knows the state we would have been in now. It would have heightened and gone out of hand, so I support the extension and sustenance of emergency,” he said.

     

  • Ibinabo Fiberesima to Clarion Chukwura: stop tarnishing my image

    Ibinabo Fiberesima to Clarion Chukwura: stop tarnishing my image

    The president of the Actors’ Guild of Nigeria (AGN), Ibinabo Fiberesima, has debunked the rumour making the rounds that she visited the Presidency recently to seek a political appointment.

    For some weeks now, the actress has been under attack, particularly from her colleague, Clarion Chukwura, following the recent visit of some members of the guild to the Presidency.

    Clarion Chukwura had attacked the AGN president for not seeking President Goodluck Jonathan’s support on the issue of a legislation that could bring all actors in Nigeria under one body during her visit.

    She also alleged that Ibinabo had gone to discuss the possibility of building a national secretariat in Abuja, while excluding the veteran actors during the visit.

    However, Fiberesima, in an open letter, which has been generating mixed reactions, said: “I didn’t ask Mr. President for “a political appointment” as you have been mouthing. I thanked Mr. President for the few considerations he has made in appointing some practitioners into key government positions and requested for more of such appointments in line with our expressed desire to have more of our creative people in government and in politics, so we can be able to have people who will influence legislation that will be for the betterment of the industry.

    “Ordinarily, I would not have replied you openly because I personally do not join issues with my colleagues-whether junior or senior on the pages of newspapers or on social media. Besides, as president of AGN, I should be seen to be uniting members of the guild and not causing disaffection, as your unfortunate outburst set out to do.

    “It is for the purposes of correcting the falsehood and erroneous impression that your very unfortunate and jaundiced views might create in the minds of members of the guild, stakeholders and the public that I have written this letter to you.”

     

  • Yobe rejects extension of emergency rule

    Yobe rejects extension of emergency rule

    Yobe State yesterday rejected the extension of the state of emergency in the state by President Goodluck Jonathan.

    It faulted the President for “repeating a stale and sterile measure” which has failed over the last 12 months

    A statement by the Special Adviser to the Governor on Press Affairs and Information, Abdullahi Bego, said: “The Yobe State Government takes very strong exception to this move by the President.

    “We believe that extending emergency rule is not the answer to the prevailing security challenges in the three affected states in view of the apparent failure of the same measure over the last 12 months.

    “As some may recall, Governor Gaidam supported the first emergency declaration made by the President back in May 2013. He did so because he believed a more heightened effort was needed to deal with the escalating security challenges at the time.

    “Six months on, emergency rule was a mixed-bag that was marked more by failure than by success. So, when the President went back to the National Assembly in November 2013 to ask for an extension, Governor Gaidam was among many leaders across the country expressed reservations and asked for a change of strategy. “For instance, over the six months of emergency rule and later over the second, we have seen some of the worst attacks by Boko Haram in Yobe State. From GSS Damaturu to GSS Mamudo to College of Agriculture Gujba and FGC Buni Yadi, more than 120 students were killed by insurgents. There were many other attacks in Gujba and Damaturu local governments.

    “Although the security forces on the ground have done and continue to do their best under the circumstances, insurgents and criminals have always carried out attacks when they wanted to and have almost always got away with their barbarous and despicable acts.”

    The state government raised a poser for President Goodluck Jonathan and revisited its recommendations on how to tackle insurgency without emergency rule.

    Yobe State said: “As the President now asks for another extension, it is time to ask whether any lessons have been learnt over the previous 12 months and whether the very patriotic suggestions made by the Yobe state government, other affected state governments and Nigerians generally, have been taken into account in the ongoing effort to deal with Boko Haram insurgency.

    “First, Governor Gaidam has suggested, as did his Borno and Adamawa states counterparts, that the military and security forces on the ground need to be fully and properly kitted with superior weaponry and advanced communications equipment.

    “The governor has particularly stressed the need for more technology-driven intelligence gathering and surveillance procedures to be able to detect and prevent attacks.

    “Second, the Governor has stressed the need to carry the people of the affected states on board in the fight against insurgency. This suggestion was borne out of the fact that the very doctrine of counter-insurgency, as propounded by US military generals in Afghanistan and Iraq, was conceived as a means of winning the support of local, affected populations as much as scoring a military victory against insurgents.

    “We have seen over this period, however, that the federal government has neither provided the advanced weaponry and communications gear needed to defeat Boko Haram nor worked to build and sustain the confidence of the people in the affected states.”

     

     

    “From Izge to Konduga and from Buni-Yadi to Chibok, thousands of people have been affected in the most gruesome manner but the President has not even found it worthy to pay a sympathy visit.”

    It also claimed that insecurity is now a national problem and not limited to the three states.

    It said: “We also note that the problem of insecurity is now more of a national problem than an issue restricted to Yobe, Borno and Adamawa states alone. There are security challenges in Plateau, Nasarawa, Benue, Taraba and Kaduna states and even the Federal Capital Territory.

    “Yet, in all these places, the military and other security forces have continued to do their work of trying to restore order without an ‘Emergency Rule’ being declared by the President.

    “It is therefore our considered opinion that a new approach is needed by the federal government to defeat Boko Haram, restore peace and stability, and rebuild the livelihoods that have been lost.

    “This approach should look at the prevailing challenges in the three affected states as a security challenge rather than a political one and should build on the suggestions already made by the governments and people of these states.

    “It is our considered opinion that the military and other security forces can remain on the ground in the affected states and do their work until Boko Haram is defeated or made to surrender. In fact, we request that more boots should be deployed to accelerate the pace of effort against Boko Haram. We believe, however, that this can be done without the imposition of a state of emergency.

     

  • Chibok and power sans responsibility

    Chibok and power sans responsibility

    The Chibok girls kidnap crisis (unplanned negative publicity) and the World Economic Forum (WEF) for Africa held in Abuja (planned for huge public relations mileage) have combined to show the vacuity in Nigeria’s public space.

    Until global outrage took the Chibok affair from their effete hands, the Jonathan power family would not be bothered about what the hullabaloo was all about.

    At the very genesis, when the girls had just been kidnapped, President Goodluck Jonathan was busy dancing Azonto in Kano.  For all he cared, his own repeat presidential quest was all that mattered, not some allegedly missing girls.

    At mid-plot, the president was at his clueless worst, telling a hurting country that he had no idea where the girls were, in his latest presidential (mis)chat.

    With the permanent grimace on his face, even with the paddy-paddy questions thrown at him, even the president seemed embarrassed by how simplistic he sounded and how watery his grasp of issues appeared.

    Indeed to parody James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, it was, with all due respect to the man and his high office, a highly embarrassing portraiture of a president as simpleton!  No wonder: The Economist, high brow but highly chauvinistic Western voice, just declared: “Jonathan is hurting Nigeria.”  It hurts, but it is the bitter truth!

    True, at his best, President Jonathan’s forte is not analytical rigour.  But the Chibok crisis, vis-a-vis his obsession with a presidential encore, has brought to the fore his low emotional intelligence.  How can a personage lack both rigour and compassion, yet insist on retaining power — power for what?

    But apparently, all of these are a mere claptrap to the Jonathan power ensemble, even with its female wing.

    For starters, Kema Chikwe, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) national women leader, let it slip that she doubted the authenticity of the claim that the girls are missing.  Interpretation: it’s all politics to discredit Goodluck and his future power endeavour.

    First Lady, Patience Jonathan, pushed this claim to an abject nadir with her tragi-comic circus on television, making herself a butt of global jokes.  The lexical challenge of the First Lady is well rumoured.  Still, her lexical anarchy on that TV show confounded not a few, especially those who, like Ripples, had always thought Dame Jonathan’s reported lexical hiccups were satanic exaggerations.

    Even then, that was not the most damning.  It was rather Mrs Jonathan’s crass presumptuousness that having authority flows from being authoritarian.  On what law, in the Constitution or outside of it, is the office of the First Lady founded?

    And if that office is founded on the genteel convention of honouring a presidential or gubernatorial spouse, what part of that convention empowers the beneficiary to summon fellow citizens to summary TV trials?

    Or order arrests of fellow citizens because Her Royal Majesty, the First Lady disagrees with their constitution-guaranteed right to assembly and protest, as Mrs Jonathan was alleged to have done to two Chibok female protesters, on the excuse that neither was the biological mother of the missing girls?

    And Dame Jonathan’s stentorian tone on her TV show, something to the effect that the First Lady has summoned you to help you find your missing girls!  So, it’s their girls now?

    Whatever happens to the presidential duty of protecting every Nigerian, which has gifted her the privilege of First Lady?  Or is it a case of privilege without responsibility?  Indeed, Wole Soyinka’s laconic quip that you must first be a lady, before becoming first lady, is pregnant with meaning!

    If the presidential spouse believes the Chibok girls were a Borno, not her husband’s problem, what would she say of the global clamour for the girls’ release  — sympathisers howling louder than the bereaved?

    Of course, Dame Jonathan’s ill-fated show would appear designed to shield her husband from the charge of culpable lethargy, but put the Borno Governor Kashim Shettima on the spot, to make inviolate her husband’s presidential re-run.  Just as well, it blew in her face!

    President Jonathan, of course, has re-found his voice and is brimming again with Dutch courage, since more serious governments, and the global community, have mercifully decided to do his job for him.  But let the one with the child-like glee be informed that there are always serious fallouts  from surrendering your sovereignty because of sheer incompetence.

    Still, presidential incompetence did not start — and the way things are structured now, will not likely end — with Goodluck Jonathan.  For all his fierce projection of power, former President Olusegun Obasanjo is hardly made of more stellar quality than President Jonathan.

    Still, it is to Jonathan’s eternal discredit that Nigeria under his charge suffered the ignominy of surrendering its sovereignty to foreign powers because of creeping state failure.  What Nigerian students gained in the anti-Anglo-Nigerian Defence Pact protests of 1962, Jonathan has gleefully surrendered in 2014!

    That is Nigeria’s good luck of giving power to Goodluck!  In no time, Uncle Sam would hoist his flag here, with the triumphant message: “Nigeria, latest bastion of global sodomy, under curious universal human rights guaranteed by America”!  It would be a hefty price to pay for freeing the missing girls of Chibok!

    Though no price should be too severe to pay for freeing those Chibok innocents, for they have no hand in the manoeuvre that has landed Nigeria in this sorry pass, whoever is in charge must take the can.

    Still, from the WEF for Africa, which Nigeria just hosted, has come impressive vignettes of Nigerian excellence.  Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, minister of Finance and coordinating minister for the Economy, showed impressive grasps of issues.  So, did Omobola Johnson, Jonathan’s minister of Communications Technology, and former Accenture country managing director for Nigeria.

    Even before, Akinwunmi Adesina, minister of Agriculture, the one of designer suits, designer eye glasses, designer rings, designer moustache and even designer elocution, has proved his mettle, even if not a few think his suave policy showmanship does not quite equate robust policy implementation.

    On the media front, Reuben Abati had proved himself a patrician when the issue is public intellect, with his commentaries in The Guardian corralling rave reviews; and millions of readers lapping them up as the de-rigueur in progressive thinking.

    You might not agree with each and every one of these Jonathan aides; but in their individual capacities, you somewhat felt they could hold their own against the very best in the world.

    So, how does such excellence cohere with the unbridled mediocrity that is the Jonathan presidency?

    The tragic paradox of Nigeria is that leaders lag behind their followers; yet are expected to offer direction.  When a laggard is captain, how can the team compete?

    But this structured mediocrity is no accident; and Jonathan, Chibok et al, will probably not be the last power guinea pig, served as the latest new deal.

    To avert Nigeria collapsing under its own violent contradictions, it is time to look beyond the power puppets and gun for the puppeteers.

  • ‘Appoint Edo NDDC  commissioner’

    ‘Appoint Edo NDDC commissioner’

    Edo State House of Assembly lawmakers have expressed their disappointment in President Goodluck Jonathan’s delay in the appointment of a state commissioner on the board of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC).

    The new NDDC board was inaugurated last December but the nominee from Governor Adams Oshiomhole, Henry Okhuarobo, was not approved due to political manouvering.

    Ms Elisabeth Ativie, who moved the motion under matters of urgent public importance, said several NDDC projects have been abandoned.

    She named a water project at her village that has been stalled due to non-appointment of a commissioner.

    “As we speak, eight other  states that make up NDDC have representatives but our state has been left out.

    “Most NDDC projects in this state have been abandoned.

    “We cannot fold our hands and watch this continue. The people have been subjected to undue hardship”

    Majority Leader Philip Shaibu said it was unfortunate that the state was yet to get a representative on the NDDC board.

    The lawmakers passed a resolution calling on the President to appoint Edo Commissioner into the NDDC.

     

  • JEG:  No second term

    JEG: No second term

    It is just as well that President Goodluck Jonathan has not formally announced that he will be seeking re-election next year.

    He should not. In fact, he should go one step further and declare, today, in the manner of former U.S. President William Sherman, that he will not be a candidate for the 2015 presidential election; that if nominated, he will decline, and that if elected, he will refuse to serve.

    More than any other incident in his accidental presidency, his shambolic handling of the abduction of more than 200 girls from the Government Secondary School, Chibok, in Borno State by elements of the nihilistic terrorist organisation Boko Haram, has called into serious question  his fitness for the job

    It is not that he had shown the mental alertness and sure-footedness his office demands in handling many crises that have rocked his administration. But the Chibok abduction and his manner of dealing with it has exposed his inadequacies as never before, and not just to his compatriots who always had their doubts.  Now, the whole world has a good idea of the leader of Africa’s most populous country and largest economy, home to the largest aggregation of black humanity.

    Several days after the abduction, a spokesperson for the Nigerian Army, of which Dr Jonathan is commander-in-chief, announced to the relief of a traumatised nation that the girls had been freed. Only when challenged a few days later did the spokesperson take back the claim. The army, he said without remorse and without shame, has been “misled.”

    The spokesperson is still at his post.  So, for that matter, is Abba Moro, the cabinet minister responsible for a recruitment test in which 16 job-seekers were trampled to death and scores suffered significant injury. So also is Diezani Allison-Madueke, who presides over the scandal-infested Ministry of Petroleum Resources. But that is another matter.

    From the time the military said it had been misled, it has been one miscue after egregious miscue for the Jonathan administration.

    For three weeks, Dr Jonathan could not rouse himself to make a national broadcast or even hold a news conference.  He did not meet with the distraught parents of the abducted girls to offer solace.

    Instead, administration officials went into clumsy denial. They questioned whether the girls were actually abducted.  They sought to pin responsibility on the school’s authorities and the governor of Borno State.

    When the President finally bestirred himself to address the public on the issue, it was through a staged Presidential Chat, with four handpicked journalists doing the questioning. The outing was a fresh disappointment.

    Dr Jonathan said nothing that the public did not already know; no insights, only bland assurances that the government was doing “everything” to secure the release of the girls. The assurances rang hollow, especially when he admitted that the government had no idea where the girls were being held, nor indeed how many of them were in Boko Haram’s infernal custody.

    So did subsequent claims that the government was “on top of the situation.”  How can you be on top of the situation when you are, by your own admission, utterly clueless as to what is going on?

    It was Dr Jonathan’s opportunity to speak directly to the parents and relations of the girls, to empathise with them, to play comforter-in-chief.

    He blew it big-time, before the attentive global audience.  He kept appealing to the parents to “co-operate” with the government in its effort to secure the release of their children. It was as if the parents somehow stood in the way of the effort.

    Jide Ajani’s excellent reporting on the recent Presidential Chat and the atmosphere in which it was held (Vanguard, May 11) could not have reassured anyone looking for evidence that Dr Jonathan is indeed up to the task.  It shows a president overwhelmed by the office, disengaged, and tentative, not exactly basking in the fawning adulation and saccharine glorification of his retinue of court jesters, but not averse to it either.

    It is an alarming portraiture.  It provides some understanding of the abject incoherence of  the Jonathan administration’s response to the atrocity that reverberated around the world.

    And it confirms what a senior adviser to Dr Jonathan told me shortly after Dr Jonathan took office as acting president.  Was Dr Jonathan up to the task, I had asked the adviser, a discreet man not given to rash judgment or hyperbole.

    “Without hesitation, No,” he had responded.

    Dr Jonathan, he told me, would come to meetings without having mastered his briefing papers, and would sometimes doze off.

    One of the worst-kept secrets in Abuja is that Dr Jonathan’s quarters in the Villa is a den, where he and a coterie of revelers carouse far into the night. This kind of routine leaves little time for serious reflection on issues of state, and for cultivating the mind and the intellect, and may well account for the detachment, the lethargy, that is the hallmark of his style.

    Nor has his meddlesome wife, Dame Patience Faka, helped matters.  She staged a “public inquisition,” as a retired ambassador who brought the video of the event to my attention called it, during which she harassed and bullied officials and others in her inimitable way to blame everyone except her husband’s administration.

    No matter how this crisis is resolved, Dr Jonathan is unlikely to emerge as a president who can be trusted to lead Nigeria through the challenges that lie ahead. To be fair, he never sought the position; he knew his limitations. It is not entirely his fault that he has proved unequal to the task.

    But it would be selfish and unpatriotic of him to seek to continue to preside over the destiny of Nigeria when his term ends next year.  If the ruling PDP loves and cares about Nigeria, it should urge Dr Jonathan not to seek another term.  If he refuses, it should reject him decisively.

    Nigeria deserves better.

  • Now that the world  is watching

    Now that the world is watching

    Watching Aisha Sesay the other day interviewing President Goodluck Jonathan’s propagandist, Dr Doyin Okupe and Information Minister Labaran Maku on CNN over Federal government’s lackluster response to the Chibok school girls abducted by Boko Haram left one wondering whether these agents of the government know that the world is a global village and no country is an island.

    Spewing blatant lies and falsehood, Maku and Okupe tried unsuccessfully to hoodwink the CNN correspondent into believing that Jonathan and indeed the Nigerian government was on top of the situation and would soon bring the perpetrators of the dastardly acts to book, as they often tell us here after every terror strike by Boko Haram.

    Pointedly they were asked why it took our president three weeks to appear on camera to talk about the abducted school girls. And like a thief caught in the act, they were incoherent, particularly Maku, in their defence of the Commander-In-Chief. Sesay asked such probing questions that the authorities here would have berated the reporter over if the questions were being asked by a Nigerian journalist.

    The CNN woman was a reporters’ delight, forget about whatever prejudice the American network or any other western media might harbor against Nigeria, our government gave them the opportunity to lampoon us, and that they did, justifiably so, to their satisfaction.

    I wonder what the hired defenders of the Jonathan administration here at home would say now. The truth has no duplicate; the federal government messed up as always in situations like this, on this Chibok school girls abduction and every attempt to put up a defence or explain why it did not act on time would only infuriate Nigerians the more. May be the president should apologise to the rest of us, I mean the parents of the girls and other Nigerians, draw a line under the matter and we move ahead with the search and rescue operation.

    Prior to the global outrage that followed the abduction and the less than impressive handling of the matter by the Federal Government, intelligence sources had indicated that Nigeria was not willing to accept offer of foreign assistance, especially military assistance in order to protect the nation’s sovereignty. Which sovereignty you might want to ask? Is it the sovereignty that is being gradually taken away by Boko Haram under the president’s watch? The sovereignty that our government appears so incapable of defending?

    Well, thank God that doesn’t seem to be the position any longer following President Jonathan’s acceptance of military/intelligence assistance from the United States and a host of other friendly countries. And I think our president has done well here.

    And now that the world has offered to assist and we have accepted, no effort should be spared to bring the girls home. Thanks to Madam Oby Ezekweseli, the #BRING BACK OUR GIRLS, campaign has gained such support around the globe and prompted the avalanche offer of assistance that even Boko Haram has been forced into a rethink. Now the terrorists are showing a softening of position, offering some sort of unilateral ceasefire albeit with conditions.

    And just yesterday they released a group photograph of the girls against the backdrop of series of reports that they might have been sold into sex slavery somewhere in the Central African Republic. The photograph, with a couple of armed hooded terrorists on guard, I believe was Boko Haram’s way of saying the girls are ‘safe’  but don’t attempt to come and rescue them militarily; let’s talk if you want them back. Uhmmmmm, what a dicey situation. Meanwhile there are reports that our soldiers are combing the Sambisa Forest where the girls are presumably being kept. So what do we do?

    In rescuing the girls efforts should be made, by our military to utilize whatever superior technology, weapons and intelligence our friends are offering. Casualties, especially on the part of the girls should be minimized as much as possible if they cannot be avoided totally. There is no point in going it alone if we cannot do it safely. The example of the botched rescue of kidnapped foreigners in Sokoto sometime ago is still fresh in our memory.

    In whatever operation to rescue the girls, the Nigerian military would be on trial and the focus of attention by all the militaries of the world. If we do it well, then we would be making a statement that we are up to it in terms of protecting our people and rescuing them wherever and whenever they are in danger. But can we really do it?

    With the attention of the world firmly on Nigeria and Boko Haram, the international community should use this opportunity to help rid our country and by extension the West African sub region of terrorism; and France in particular has a big role to play here. The bulk of the ECOWAS is dominated by French speaking countries and the lack of cooperation between these countries and the few Anglophone West African nations is very glaring, especially in terms of security.

    Though not a West African country, Cameroon for instance borders Nigeria to the east and south east and is known to be a haven for Boko Haram. The reluctance of the authorities in Yaounde to help Nigeria fight this terror is well known in spite of appeals from Abuja. It does appear that nobody except France can push or cajole Cameroon into taking action against Boko Haram, even if only in its territory. France could lead a joint military operation involving Nigeria and Cameroon to get these terrorists out of our sub region. Recall that with France leading and an African military contingent comprising mainly of Nigerian troops, went into Mali not too long ago to rid that country of elements linked with al Qaeda. Same can be done here and Boko Haram would become history.

    Our people have suffered enough in the hands of these sons of the devil and if the international community truly wishes Nigeria well and desirous of the good health and wellbeing of West Africa, then they would crush Boko Haram and all such terrorist groups threatening the peace of our continent. Don’t forget the al Shabab in Somalia threatening to throw the whole of the east African region into disarray.

    It is not enough to help us BRING OUR GIRLS HOME, but the international community must help us make our region safe and create a conducive atmosphere for economic prosperity. By doing this they would also be helping themselves by not only destroying the sources of supply of terrorists in their countries, but also stemming the tide of economic migrants from Africa to Europe. As the Yoruba would say, Irorun igi, ni irorun eye; the comfort of the tree, is the comfort of the bird.