Tag: June 12

  • June 12: Peaceful transitions sign of Nigeria’s democratic maturity – Gov. Yahaya

    June 12: Peaceful transitions sign of Nigeria’s democratic maturity – Gov. Yahaya

    Gov. Inuwa Yahaya of Gombe State has described the peaceful transitions in Nigeria’s 26 years of uninterrupted democracy as sign of maturity.

    He stated this in his goodwill message issued by his media aide, Mr Ismaila Uba-Misilli in Gombe on Thursday to commemorate June 12 Democracy Day in the state.

    He stated that though the journey had been challenging, the country had recorded remarkable milestones in entrenching democratic principles.

    He added that Nigeria’s democratic journey had shown signs of maturity and political stability when compared with many countries in Africa.

    Yahaya said “Nigeria’s 26 years of uninterrupted civilian rule is a remarkable milestone.

    “As the largest democracy in Africa, Nigeria has continued to hold firm to democratic principles despite complex socio-political and economic challenges.

    “Our ability to transit peacefully between administrations and navigate national difficulties is a sign of democratic maturity.”

    The governor described the June 12 Democracy Day as a moment to celebrate the efforts of those who championed democratic course across the country, upholding the values of freedom, justice and national unity.

    He said that the day is also to acknowledge the steadfast commitments, sacrifices and contributions of such champions to the sustenance and advancement of democratic governance in Nigeria.

    On Gombe State’s democratic journey, he said that the visible transformation and sustained development was a compelling evidence of the enduring benefits of democratic governance in the state.

    He stated that “from a modest beginning, Gombe has emerged as one of the fastest growing states in Nigeria.

    Read Also: Kogi: Appreciating Gov. Yahaya Bello’s farewell gift

    “Our success story is rooted in democratic governance, visionary planning and the resilience of our people.”

    Yahaya, who is also the Chairman of the Northern State Governors’ Forum, extended his heartfelt congratulations to President Bola Tinubu “and all heroes of democracy, including the judiciary, legislature and civil society.”

    He also commended the media for deepening democratic culture, while urging caution against the spread of fake news and divisive rhetoric.

    The governor urged residents of the state to remain united, law-abiding and prayerful, noting that the collective efforts of all Nigerians is key to securing a stronger, stable and democratic nation.(NAN)

  • June 12: Judiciary urged to checkmate politicians

    June 12: Judiciary urged to checkmate politicians

    The Judiciary has been urged to live up to expectation checkmate the excesses of desperate politicians from truncating democracy.

    An elder statesman, Chief Adesunbo Onitiri, said this in a statement in Lagos yesterday, on the June 12 anniversary and 26 years of  unbroken democratic government.

    He said there was the need to strengthen the legislature, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), press and local governments to boost the dividends of democracy and good governance.

    He said the situation where the governments and politicians would continue to disobey court judgments, interpret them to suit their whims and caprice should not be tolerated.

    Read Also: June 12: Bode George urges Tinubu to reinstate Fubara

    As the last hope of the common man, the Judiciary must dispense to the admiration of parties in any dispute, Onitiri, a prominent Lagosian advised.

    Onitiri stressed the need for the national and states’ legislature to work in tandem with the Constitution by enacting laws and motions that would improve lives, as well as taking their oversight functions with seriousness.

    To bring government to the grassroots, the governors must allow the local governments to function fully and their monthly allocations go to them, the elder statesman emphasised.

    Onitiri called for a vibrant, fearless, impartial and incorruptible press that would mirror the society, hold governments and politicians accountable.

  • President marks June 12 with maiden State of Nation address

    President marks June 12 with maiden State of Nation address

    The anniversary of the historic June 12 1993 presidential election will be marked today in a special way.

    This day, now Democracy Day, will witness the maiden state of the nation address to Nigerians through their federal lawmakers.

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu will stand before a joint session of the Senate and the House of Representatives to speak on how the polity is faring.

    Business mogul Chief Moshood Abiola won the election and widely acknowledged to be free and fair. But it was annulled by the military  government of Gen. Ibrahim Babangida.

    The year after, having struggled to get his mandate Chief Abiola declared himself president at Epetedo in Lagos.

    He was arrested, detained, put on trial for treason. He died in custody on July 7, 1998.

    President Muhammadu Buhari declared Abiola President posthumously on account of his victory which was denied, and awarded him, again  posthumously, the highest national award of Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR).

    He also declared June 12 as Democracy Day to replace May 29.

    So as not to reduce the value attached to the state of the nation address, the Federal Government said there will be no military parade today.

    In a statement, Abdulhakeem Adeoye, on behalf of the Director of Information and Public Relations, said there will be no ceremonial parade this year, however, the celebration will include two key public engagements by the President.

    The statement reads: “At 12 noon, President Tinubu is scheduled to attend a Joint Session of the National Assembly at the National Assembly Complex.

    “This special sitting will serve as a symbolic affirmation of the synergy between the Executive and Legislature in nurturing Nigeria’s democratic system.

    “There will also be a Public Lecture on Democracy, to be held at 4pm at the State House Conference Centre, Abuja, with the theme: “Consolidating on the gains of Nigeria’s democracy: Necessity of enduring reforms.”

    Clerk to the House of Representatives, Yahaya Danzaria, told representatives in a memo on June 8, that the President is expected to arrive at the National Assembly at about noon.

    House spokesman Akintunde Rotimi gave a breakdown of the President’s engagement during his visit.

    Rotimi said: “The leadership and honourable members of the House of Representatives will participate in a special joint sitting of the National Assembly on Thursday (today), June 12, 2025, to commemorate this year’s Democracy Day.

    Read Also: State of nation: Tinubu in hurry to fix Nigeria, says Arewa Think Tank

    “This development was formally conveyed to members via an internal memorandum issued by the Clerk of the House of Representatives.

    “The special joint sitting is scheduled to hold at the House of Representatives Chamber, National Assembly Complex, commencing at 11am, with preliminary proceedings ahead of the arrival of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu at 12 noon.

    “The theme for this year’s celebration is: ‘26 years of democracy: Renewing our commitment to national development.”

    “President Tinubu is expected to attend the occasion as special guest of honour and will deliver a Presidential Address to the joint sitting.

    “The programme will also feature goodwill messages from former presiding officers of the National Assembly and the conferment of national honours on select legislators by Mr. President.

    “This joint sitting represents a significant moment in Nigeria’s democratic journey. It underscores the pivotal role of the National Assembly in safeguarding democratic values, fostering accountability, and advancing national development over the past 26 years of uninterrupted civil rule.

    “The House of Representatives urges all Nigerians to embrace the spirit of Democracy Day as a time for reflection, renewed patriotism, and commitment to building a more inclusive, prosperous, and united nation.”

  • June 12 and its abiding spirit

    June 12 and its abiding spirit

    • By: Opeyemi Bamidele

    June 12, 1993 was truly a watershed in our post-independence history as a federation of diverse people. It was a day that no fewer than 14.29 million voters trooped to their polling units nationwide to elect a new civilian president and put paid to the regime of tyranny that eclipsed our fatherland. Before us were two presidential candidates – Chief MKO Abiola of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and Alhaji Bashir Tofa of the National Republican Convention (NRC).

    United by our excruciating thirst for a democratic Nigeria, at least 58.36% of the accredited voters cast their ballots in favour of Chief MKO Abiola, a business magnate and a man of the people, whose influence transversed the length and breadth of Africa. The voters, perhaps by a collective resolve, put their divergence behind them to overwhelmingly elect the presidential candidate of the SDP. It was a decision without a dot of religion, tongues and tribes. More precisely, it was a decision taken consciously in defence of people’s aspiration, freedom and future.

    At least 3,000 election observers, national and international, were accredited to monitor the 1993 presidential poll. The figure also included 135 foreign observers that keenly monitored the process nearly from all developed democracies in Asia, Europe and North America, among others, Unlike the 1979 election that was largely skewed in favour of the establishment candidate and the 1983 process that was laced with fundamental flaws that later triggered violence, observers gave the 1993 process a clean bill of health. In their report, they reached a consensus that the election “was well-conducted, free, fair and therefore credible,”

    What else did a leader or a regime require to uphold people’s most critical decisions, especially at a time of national emergency when people took off their togas of ethnicity and religion to elect a leader of their choice? But the Federal Military Government under General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida refused to toe the path of honour and respect the will of the electorate. Rather, in collusion with the military hierarchy of the time, IBB annulled the June 12,1993 presidential poll without justification; installed the Interim National Government that lacked legitimacy and appointed General Sani Abacha, now late, as the guardian of that contraption. 

    This flaw, either by commission or by omission, subsequently plunged our fatherland into a six-year vicious reign of brute despotism, the kind of which Nigeria never witnessed since the end of colonial rule on October 1, 1960. It was also a reign of brutality and incarceration, extermination and subjugation, injustice and invasion, oppression and repression that evidently set back our development trajectory and earned us pariah status among nations.

    Rather than surrender to the whims of the late tyrant and his associates, June 12 bred bravery and courage, sacrifice and unity, aggression and rebellion in the hearts of masses and marketers, students and labour unions, intellectuals and professionals, political class and leaders of ethnic nationalities across the Niger. Indeed, it was a fierce battle of all against tyranny and not the state, against the despots and not the people, against the cruelty of regressive forces that sought to bring us back into subjugation.      

    These grim realities culminated in the birth of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), an amalgam of democratic adherents that transcended the primordial considerations that dominated our politics before that time or that criss-crossed all ethnic nationalities that constitute the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The forces never left the battle for the South-west because Chief MKO Abiola hailed from the region. For any consideration, they never saw it as the battle of the South alone; neither did they approach the battlefront with the mindset of the North against the South or the South against the North.

    For all democrats alike, it was essentially a battle for the soul of Nigeria. It was a battle for the future of Nigeria and her teeming people. It was a rescue mission that united all democrats against tyrants, masses against the despots as well as civil society against the mindless jackals that prowled our fatherland. And the battle was fought fiercely and won collectively, though with sore bruises that pro-June 12 advocates had to bear and the conscionable cost that they sacrificially paid for the liberation of our fatherland.

    In the battlefront were Pa Anthony Enahoro, Pa Adekunle Ajasin, Chief Bola Ige, Chief Abraham Adesanya, Air Commodore Dan Suleiman, Alhaji Balarabe Musa, Amb. Walter Carrington, Com. Frank Kokori, Dr. Fredrick Fasehun, Rear Admiral Ndubudi Kanu, Chief Ayo Adebanjo, Chief Gani Fawehinmi, Chief Ganiyu Dawodu, Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti, Dr. Olikoye Ransome-Kuti,  Sir Olaniwun Ajayi, Sir Alex Ibru, Com. Chima Ubani, among others. All these titans of the struggle for democracy either died while the battle still raged or at some points after the battle was won. Nevertheless, they were all heroes of the June 12 struggle. And they will ever be remembered for standing firm against the rage of the military junta.

    The struggle also paraded the fearless warriors without firearms that are still living till date. The list, though inexhaustible, eminently comprises Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu, now the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Prof. Wole Soyinka, Col. Dangiwa Umar, Gen. Alani Akinrinade, Chief Ayo Opadokun, Oba Olu Falae, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, Prof. Bolaji Akinyemi, Chief Cornelius Adebayo, Hon. Olawale Oshun, Chief Olisa Agbakoba, Chief Femi Falana, Dr. Amos Akingba and many more. Till this moment, they all occupy a prime place in the heart of our collective struggle that brought about transition to civil rule on the 29th May 1999.

    Read ALso: June 12: Tinubu to confer National Honours on select legislators

    The cost of the struggle was too hard to bear. The blood of the innocent was spilled on the streets of our major cities. The leaders of the struggle were murdered. In this category was Pa Alfred Rewane, who was murdered in his Ikeja home; Alhaja Kudirat Abiola, who was hacked down on the street of Lagos and Bagauda Kaltho who was torn into pieces in the heart of Kaduna. Even the murder of Rear Admiral Babatunde Elegbede, Dr. Sola Omatsola, Toyin Onagoruwa, Alhaja Suliat Adedeji and Mrs. Bisoye Tejuosho, among others, is still a source of sordid reflection that refuses to completely pale into the pit of our memory.

    In his own case, Sir Alex Ibru survived the gunshot of the despots. But he was never the same again until God finally called him home on the 11th November 2011. Perhaps by providence, Pa Abraham Adesanya and Air Commodore Dan Suleiman were shot at a close range, but came out unhurt. Scores of the June 12 advocates ended up in underground detention. The list includes Chief Olu Falae, now the traditional ruler Ilu-Abo in Akure North Local Government, Senator Olabiyi Durojaiye and Chief Lam Adesina, who was paraded on the street of Ibadan as a prisoner of war.

    The media was not exempted from the victims of the June 12 struggle. The fearless in this industry fought convincingly with their pens. The ink of their pens still bears witness to the gore of that slain that smeared our cities, the agony of incarceration that eclipsed the hearts of the victims and the undesirability of political asylum that became an option they never hoped for. Obviously, June 12 is one historic event that Dare Babarinsa, Nosa Igiebor, Chris Anyanwu, Soji Omotunde, Kunle Ajibade, Babafemi Ojudu, Dapo Olorunyomi, Niran Malaolu, Chris Anyanwu, George Mbah, Ben Charles Obi and Bayo Onanuga, among others, will ever relish to commit their ink to scribble down their own battles against the regime of tyranny. In varying measures, they all had their own share of the bitter bile that the regime of despots served them, whether in detention or in exile, whether in brutality or in harassment, whether as fugitives or in the trench of guerilla journalism.     

    As an attorney that just kicked off my legal practice, I was a victim of the vicious military junta. I still remember most vividly how I was enlisted in the legal team that fought for the restoration of the June 12 mandate. I also remember how Chief G.O.K. Ajayi, now of blessed memory,  led the team of eminent legal luminaries to reverse the annulment of the June 12 election. I remember how I argued for the release of 11 students of the University of Abuja before a Federal High Court in the FCT. I remember how the agents of the vicious regimes invaded my law office in Abuja because of my resolve for the release of the 11 students. I remember how my chamber assistant contacted my wife to inform me about the invasion of my law office. I remember how my wife, then a registered pharmacist with Garki General Hospital, organised an ambulance to rescue me from where I was hiding. All these scenarios marked the beginning of my journey into exile. But why did the agents of the junta invade my Abuja law office? They were, according to my chamber assistant, looking for arms and weapons they presumed I stockpiled in my law office and private residence.

    History is now our living witness that bears abundant testimonies to what Nigeria and Nigerians went through under the reign of despots. In June 1998, however, the wrath of God descended up the vault of the tyrant. And that regime, again by providence, came to an abrupt end. At home or in exile, nearly all June 12 advocates could glaringly behold a ray of light at the end of the tunnel. Just at this point, the last death knell loudly rang from the cave of power in Abuja, announcing the demise of Chief MKO Abiola. What a conspiracy! What a tragedy!! What a disappointment!!! It was the end of an era that sealed the theft of people’s mandate. Chief MKO Abiola became the last victim of the struggle when we had already beheld the light.

    The narrative is entirely different today. Our civil space is more participatory than ever before. Our politics is open to virtually all Nigerians without discrimination. Our courts are now sacred sanctuaries where the oppressed can freely seek redress. Unlike that era, we can freely make our choices without intimidation or exercise our rights without trepidation. Whether by law or by rights, we now enjoy all these benefits because the heroes and heroines paid supreme sacrifices for the liberty our children are now exercising in the digital space, the rights they are always willing to enforce in the court of law and the privileges they most times take for granted since the return to civil rule.  

    Sadly enough, the significance of this day rarely resonates with our present generations, especially those that were born shortly before June 12, 1993 and those that came after. Our upcoming leaders too are not in sync with the essence of the struggle that brought our fatherland to this new era of political liberty. These are dangerous signposts to our collective heritage. And as a consequence, the next generation may entirely lose the essence of what June 12 represents in the history of this federation if we do not brace for the task before us. The onus, first of all, rests upon us as a government or as a federation to sustain the spirit that drove the June 12 struggle and bequeath it to the future generations.

    The struggle was driven absolutely by the unity of purpose. It was sustained by the spirit of self-sacrifice at a cost no actor could ever quantify. It was won by a sheer commitment to the cause that unites us rather than the fault line that divides us. These are the core  drivers that then enable the spirit of the June struggle. As a federation, we must sustain and uphold the values that drove the struggle in the task of building a federation that works for all. This is the only way we can build a resilient democracy together. This is the only way we achieve a viable economy together. This is the only way we can ensure a functional democracy that purely serves the overriding public interests..

    The quest for a more democratic Nigeria is not just for the government in power. The opposition also has a frontline role to play  in the task of building a functional democracy. The onus now rests upon the opposition to offer credible alternatives that can reposition our economy and stabilise the political system. This is not the era to campaign for a shadow government, an idea that does not demonstrate the spirit of the June 12 struggle or that will further endanger the unity of our fatherland. It is the era that works for the unity of our fatherland and fights all divisive tendencies that threaten our collective prosperity.    

    • Bamidele is Senate Leader 
  • Unsung heroes of June 12

    Unsung heroes of June 12

    By Idowu Ephraim Faleye

    As the nation prepares once again to mark the anniversary of June 12, the memories of Nigeria’s long and painful march to democracy rise to the surface. The stories of courage, sacrifice, and the defiance of tyranny will echo across television stations, newspaper pages, and political podiums. Names like Chief MKO Abiola, the winner of the annulled 1993 presidential election, and his brave wife, Kudirat Abiola, will be called out with deserved reverence. The country will remember General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, who died in detention, and Pa Alfred Rewane, who was murdered in his own home. These names have become familiar symbols of the democracy we enjoy today. Their faces have been etched into our national consciousness. Their sacrifices are well known.

    However, as we honour these fallen giants of our democratic history, we must ask ourselves a sobering question. What about those whose names are barely mentioned? What about the ones who also risked everything—some their careers, others their lives, and some even their future—but who are hardly ever remembered? What about the unsung heroes of the June 12 struggle?

    One such man is Colonel Abubakar Dangiwa Umar (Rtd.). A man of rare courage; a man who stood on the side of truth at a time when most people in uniform were either silent or complicit. He was not a politician. He was not a civilian activist. He was a serving military officer who dared to speak out against the injustice of the annulment of the June 12, 1993 presidential election- the election that was regarded as the freest and fairest in Nigeria’s history. It was a defining moment that could have transformed our country, but instead, it was stolen in broad daylight by the very institution that was meant to protect the people’s will.

    Colonel Umar did not keep quiet. As a military governor of Kaduna State and a respected voice in the military, he used his position to challenge the decision of the ruling Supreme Military Council. He criticized the annulment openly and called for the restoration of Abiola’s mandate. In doing so, he challenged not just Ibrahim Babangida, who orchestrated the annulment, but also Sani Abacha, who later took over and unleashed a reign of terror on pro-democracy forces. Colonel Umar knew what it meant to stand alone in the military. He knew the risks—dismissal, detention, or even death. But he chose to speak truth to power. And for that, he paid dearly. His military career was cut short. But his name should never be forgotten. He is one of the unsung heroes of June 12.

    There is another group of Nigerians whose story is even more haunting. Their names are rarely mentioned during national commemorations. Yet, their actions were perhaps among the most daring in the history of the struggle. They were not seasoned activists. They were young men. Just four of them – members of a group called the Association for the Advancement of Democracy in Nigeria (AADN). On October 25, 1993, just months after the annulment of the June 12 election, they hijacked a Nigerian Airways Airbus A310 in a desperate attempt to force the world to pay attention to the injustice that had been done to the Nigerian people.

    The leader of the group was Benson Odugbo Eluma. The others were Richard Ogunderu, Kabir Adenuga, and Kenechukwu Nwosu. Their plan was audacious. Some would say reckless. But it was driven by patriotic frustration. They boarded a domestic Lagos–Abuja flight with over 150 passengers on board, including top government officials. Mid-flight, they took control of the plane and diverted it to Niamey, Niger Republic with the ultimate destination in Frankfurt, Germany. They demanded the restoration of MKO Abiola’s stolen mandate and a return to civilian rule.

    The hijack, no doubt, was condemned by many at the time. And rightly so—no democratic society can condone violence or the threat to civilian lives. But if we look deeper, we will see that their action was a desperate cry for justice in a country that had silenced all other voices. These young men believed that if they could draw the world’s attention, perhaps the Nigerian military would be forced to do the right thing. They risked their lives, and they gave up their freedom for a cause they believed in. Whether we agree with their method or not, we cannot deny their courage. They, too, are heroes of the June 12 struggle. Unsung, but heroes all the same.

    Sadly, the silence that surrounds these names is deafening. Every year, the country rolls out ceremonies to honour the memory of democracy’s martyrs. All of them have now passed on, their contributions woven into the fabric of our history. Their pictures often appear in newspapers. Their names are mentioned in government speeches.

    If we truly value the democracy we now enjoy—if we understand the weight of what was lost and what was fought for—then we must remember all who contributed. Not just the popular names. Not just those who were part of political organizations or whose profiles were high but also those who acted alone. Those whose courage cost them everything. Those who are still alive today and walk among us quietly, without recognition or reward. Or those who, like the hijackers, returned to find that their country had forgotten them.

    This is why the time has come for Nigeria, under President Bola Tinubu—a man who himself was a target of the military and a major figure in the June 12 resistance—to set the record straight. He has the moral and historical obligation to make sure that no hero of June 12 is left behind. He must remember them all. He must tell their stories. He must honour their bravery.

    And more than that, he must act. Colonel Abubakar Dangiwa Umar deserves national recognition. His role in challenging the military dictatorship must be acknowledged with an award befitting his uncommon bravery. The AADN boys must be rehabilitated. Their actions must be officially recognized for what they were: Patriots, though desperate, stand against military tyranny. They must be compensated, not just financially, but with dignity. Their names must be restored to the honour roll of our democratic struggle.

    Read Also: Nigeria’s $5b oil-backed loan from Aramco delayed by oil price drop

    We cannot allow history to forget them. We cannot continue to celebrate some and ignore others. The story of June 12 is not complete without them. Their sacrifice was just as real. Their pain, just as deep. Their courage, just as inspiring. And if we let their names die unsung, we are telling future generations that only some kinds of heroism matter.

    As we mark another June 12, let us reflect not just on the well-known faces that grace our history books, but also on the forgotten ones whose bravery has been buried under the weight of time. Let us speak their names. Let us tell their stories. Let us honour them—because they, too, gave us this democracy.

    And to the families of these unsung heroes, to the men who still carry the scars of their sacrifice in silence, and to the ones whose dreams were cut short in the name of justice, we say: you are not forgotten. Your story matters. Your struggle was not in vain. One day, this nation will remember you—not with silence, but with honour. And on that day, your courage will shine as brightly as any other name in the golden book of Nigeria’s freedom.

    •Faleye writes from Ado-Ekiti.

  • June 12 and a ‘N45b debt’

    June 12 and a ‘N45b debt’

    Today is June 12, and the country remembers as it has done in the past 32 years the presidential election that took place that day in 1993. Why did the military annul the election won by the late Bashorun M.K.O Abiola? We may never know because a key figure in the saga, Gen Ibrahim Babangida, is not ready to open up on the issue. He had an opportunity to do so in his book: A journey in service. He did not; instead, he blamed those under him then, especially Gen Sani Abacha, for the annulment.

    But former Jigawa State Governor Sule Lamido, who was secretary of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) on which platform Abiola contested the election said it was annulled because of the N45 billion owed the business magnate by the military government for a contract in the 1970s when former head of state, the late Gen Murtala Muhammed, was federal commissioner for communication. The military, he said, at the release of his own memoir: Being true to myself last month, felt that Abiola would use his office to recover his money if allowed to become president. Why deprive a candidate of his mandate because of the money he legitimately earned? Contract execution and election are not related. If a man has discharged his contractual obligation, he is entitled to be paid.

    Read Also: June 12: Tinubu a beacon of Nigeria’s democracy – Onuigbo

    Abiola was doubly wronged. He was denied his money and his election was annulled for fear that he would use his position to right the first wrong done him. For how long will we continue to bury our heads in the sand like ostrich over this matter? Is Abiola owed that much? Did he work for the money? If the answers are yes, why did  the military not pay him? If there were isssues, the best the military could have done was to go to court and not to arbitrarily withhold his money, and subsequently also deny him his mandate. I agree with Lamido that it was the height of injustice. There is no nexus between the contract and the June 12 election.

    Paying his family the money now, with interest, may not really address the criminal act of annulling the June 12 poll, but it will serve as some form of compensation for them. It may not be too bad if President Bola Tinubu weighs in on the matter in his address to the joint session of the National Assembly today. The claim has dragged on for too long.

  • June 12 and anatomy of a phantom coup plotter

    June 12 and anatomy of a phantom coup plotter

    By Stanley Ojah

    The humid night air hung heavy over Kaduna as Colonel Olusegun Oloruntoba was roused from sleep by an urgent pounding on his door. Before he could fully comprehend the situation, armed soldiers burst in, their faces obscured by the shadows of their berets.

    The date was March 1995, marking the beginning of a 1,460-day nightmare for one of Nigeria’s most distinguished military engineers.

    No warrant. No explanation. Just the cold, metallic click of handcuffs snapping shut around Oloruntoba’s wrists.

    “You are under arrest for treason.”

    Treason? The word echoed in his mind. As they roughly handcuffed him, Oloruntoba’s mind raced through his 23 years of impeccable service. Hadn’t he just received a commendation weeks before for his work on indigenous weapons systems? How could a man who dedicated his life to strengthening Nigeria’s defence capabilities suddenly become an enemy of the state? What followed was a nightmare of torture, solitary confinement, and a death sentence—all for “a coup that never existed.”

    Olusegun Oloruntoba’s journey began in the modest town of Okoro-Gbedde, Kogi State, where he was born on June 15, 1951. The son of a civil servant and a teacher, young Olusegun demonstrated exceptional academic prowess at the Provincial Secondary School in Okene. His physics teacher, Mr. Adebayo, often remarked, “This boy will either become a great scientist or a great soldier.” As fate would have it, he would become both.

    The Nigeria-Biafra civil war (1967-1970) left an indelible mark on the teenage Olusegun. While he was too young to enlist, the conflict ignited his patriotic fervour and convinced him that Nigeria needed not just warriors but technically competent officers who could develop indigenous military solutions.

    Oloruntoba’s military career began in January 1972 when he was admitted into the Nigerian Defence Academy’s Regular Combatant Course 11. His exceptional performance earned him early recognition, with Commandant Major General E.O. Ekpo noting in his evaluation: “Cadet Oloruntoba combines rare analytical skills with physical endurance – a complete officer material.”

    After commissioning, the young officer pursued a degree in mechanical engineering at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, graduating with honours in 1978. His superior officers quickly recognised his technical acumen, posting him to the Army School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering.

    The British government soon took notice of this brilliant Nigerian officer, offering him a scholarship to Cranfield Institute of Technology (now Cranfield University), where he earned a Master’s in Industrial Engineering and Production Management (1981-1983). During this period, he became one of the first Nigerian officers to be registered as a chartered engineer by the British Engineering Council.

    Returning to Nigeria, Major Oloruntoba (as he was then) embarked on what would become his most significant contribution to Nigeria’s military: the indigenisation of weapons production. His crowning achievement came in 2004 when he led the team that produced Nigeria’s first locally manufactured 60mm mortar tubes, 81mm mortar tubes and rocket-propelled grenade launchers (RPG7)

    For this feat, he received the Defence Industries Corporation of Nigeria’s Merit Award. Colonel D.J. Abdullahi (retd.), who worked with him on the project, recalls, “Oloruntoba would work 20-hour days, often sleeping in the workshop. His dedication was unmatched.”

    Simultaneously, he excelled in military training, serving as Directing Staff at the prestigious Command and Staff College, Jaji. His lectures on military engineering became required reading for up-and-coming officers.

    The annulment of the June 12, 1993, elections proved to be the turning point in Oloruntoba’s military career. At a commanders’ meeting convened by his GOC, Brigadier General Ahmed Baku, Oloruntoba voiced what many junior officers feared to say: “With all due respect, sir, if the Head of State has genuine reasons for annulling this election, he owes Nigerians an explanation. If not, Professor Nwosu should be allowed to announce the results.”

    The room fell silent. Colonel Jibril (retd.), who was present, later recounted: “We all agreed with Oloruntoba, but he was the only one brave enough to say it openly. That was the day I knew his military career was in jeopardy.”

    True to form, Oloruntoba was quietly reassigned to teaching duties at the Staff College – a move considered a demotion in military circles. Unknown to him, this was merely the prelude to a more sinister plot.

    The “coup” allegations emerged in March 1995. General Sani Abacha’s regime claimed to have uncovered a plot involving over 40 military officers and civilians. Oloruntoba’s name appeared on the list, with the allegation that he was to lead the assault on Aso Rock.

    “They claimed I was to capture Abacha,” said Oloruntoba. “Me? A man who had never even been to Abuja?”

    Retired Colonel P.N. Okeke, who served on the investigative panel, revealed in a 2018 interview: “There was no concrete evidence against most of the accused, especially Oloruntoba. But the atmosphere was such that anyone who had ever questioned the regime was suspect.”

    What followed was an unspeakable descent into the abyss.

    Oloruntoba said he was subjected to sensory deprivation in solitary confinement, suspension torture (hung by limbs for hours), sleep deprivation, and psychological torture, including mock executions. He was suspended like a slaughtered animal, his left hand tied to his left leg, hanging for hours. Beaten, starved, and psychologically broken, all to force a false confession.

    Femi Odekunle, who later served on the Oputa Panel, documented that Oloruntoba’s medical reports showed “severe ligament damage in wrists and ankles consistent with suspension torture.”

    Yet through it all, the colonel maintained his defiance. Captain Y. Bello (retd.), a prison guard at the time, remembers: “Even after torture sessions, Colonel Oloruntoba would walk back to his cell singing. He became a symbol of resistance for other detainees.”

    Sentenced to death alongside Obasanjo, Yar’Adua, and others. Yet, he never broke.

    “When they lowered me, I walked out singing—‘Who go suffer? Na dem go suffer!’”

    The special military tribunal was a foregone conclusion. Without access to proper legal defence, all accused were found guilty. Oloruntoba received a death sentence alongside General Olusegun Obasanjo, General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, Major General Abdulkarim Adisa and 35 others. International outcry followed, with Amnesty International declaring the trial “a gross miscarriage of justice.” The UK Engineering Council petitioned the Nigerian government, highlighting Oloruntoba’s significant contributions to the field of engineering.

    Read Also: Democracy Day: Igbo group hails Nigeria’s impressive departure from military dictatorship

    For four years, Oloruntoba languished in detention. The turning point came with Abacha’s sudden death in June 1998. General Abdulsalami Abubakar, recognising the grave injustice, ordered the immediate release of all phantom coup detainees, restoration of their military ranks, payment of all withheld entitlements and counting detention years as active service.

    The Human Rights Violations Investigation Commission (Oputa Panel) conclusively established that the 1995 coup was fabricated. Its recommendations included an official apology from the federal government, monetary compensation for victims, and institutional reforms to prevent recurrence.

    Despite these recommendations and personal assurances from President Obasanjo, no concrete action was taken. Oloruntoba reflects bitterly: “The same man who suffered with us became president and forgot us. That betrayal hurt more than the torture.”

    Post-retirement, Oloruntoba channelled his intellect into academia, serving as Lecturer I at the University of Ilorin’s Mechanical Engineering Department and as Lecturer I at the Nigerian Defence Academy, as well as a consultant to the Defence Industries Corporation.

    Today, Oloruntoba wears a different crown: HRM Oba (Col.) Olusegun Oloruntoba is the Olugbede of the Gbede Kingdom, a first-class traditional ruler. His palace is a sanctuary of wisdom, where he blends military discipline with royal diplomacy. He was crowned in 2010. As monarch, he has established vocational training centres, pioneered community policing initiatives and advocated for educational reforms. Yet, the past lingers.

    Now in his 70s, Oloruntoba continues to seek redress, including the full implementation of the Oputa Panel recommendations, official exoneration in military records, and compensation for years of wrongful detention. His legal team, led by Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), has filed multiple petitions to successive governments, all of which have been ignored. “Nigeria owes us. Not just money, but a recognition that we were wronged,” said Oloruntoba.

    Oloruntoba believes the incumbent president can excel where others excuse themselves. Is this June 12, the phantom coup plotters’ final redemption day?

    •Stanley is a writer and an analyst based in Lagos. He can be reached via beebeibee@yahoo.com

  • Fed Govt declares Thursday public holiday to mark June 12

    Fed Govt declares Thursday public holiday to mark June 12

    The Federal Government has declared Thursday, June 12, 2025, a public holiday to commemorate this year’s democracy day celebration.

    Minister of Interior, Dr. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, made the declaration on behalf of the Federal Government. He congratulated Nigerians on this occasion of 26 years of uninterrupted civil rule.

    He said I’m a statement signed by the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry, Dr Magdalene Ajani, that “June 12 represents our historic journey to building a nation where truth and justice reign and peace is sustained and our future assured.

    Read Also: Senate, Reps to hold joint session on June 12

    “The last 26 years tell the story of our resilience, strength and courage and a hope renewed than ever.”

    Noting that democracy is sustained with open doors for further improvement, the Minister reiterated the commitment of the Renewed Hope government of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to the universal value of democracy that is based on freely-expressed will of the people in determining Nigeria’s political, economic, social and cultural systems.

  • Why was the June 12 election annulled? (2)

    Why was the June 12 election annulled? (2)

    In his 422-page book ‘Diary of a Debacle’: Tracking Nigeria’s Failed Democratic Transition (1989-1990)’, eminent scholar and journalist, PROF. OLATUNJI DARE, writes on how former military President Ibrahim Babangida could not adduce a reasonable justification for cancelling the results of the historic June 12, 1993 presidential poll. This second instalment continues excerpts started yesterday in The Nation

    In the petition, Abimbola Davis, for ABN, claimed that if the elections were held so soon after religious riots that had convulsed some parts of the country, a breach of the public peace might follow. A proper foundation needed to be laid before the election, in the interest of peace and stability. The economic outlook was uncertain; therefore, better to hold off the election until the economy had improved. No fewer than 614 members of the National Assembly had signed a resolution urging Babangida to stay on for another four years, and their wishes deserved to be respected. In addition, 20 million Nigerians, a minimum of 2000 from each ward roughly one of every seven Nigerians had signed a resolution urging -Babangida to stay on. And an opinion poll conducted by a respected organization showed that 80 per cent of Nigerians wanted the transition period extended. The petition also contained scurrilous allegations against the governors of Edo, Benue, and Plateau, that the presiding judge said amounted to “the greatest shame in the history of Nigeria politics”.

    Frivolous as they must seem at first blush, these averments furnished the basis for Justice Ikpeme’s injunction. She was not concerned to hear the other side. She did not demand that the claims be substantiated. If this is not a measure of the extent to which she had been suborned, it is certainly a measure of her judicial competence that she accepted these allegations made by a body that had no judicial standing, no locus standi, for stopping an election that the law said could not be stopped by any court for any reason whatsoever, as a basis for stopping the presidential election, the high point of a transition that had been eight years in the making.

    In the presidential election, the only irregularity claimed was that the SDP candidate, Moshood Abiola, had gone to vote wearing an agbada on which was embroidered the SDP’s symbol, a stallion. Nduka Obaigbena who made the charge on national television, went on to call for the cancellation not just of the results from the precinct where Abiola had allegedly broken the electoral law, but the entire election. His call gained no traction.

    The principal actor in this drama, former military president General Ibrahim Babangida, has never been able to give a credible explanation for the annulment. When pressed, he would sometimes hide behind the Official Secrets Act, claiming that he would be in violation if he divulged vital information relating to the annulment before the statutory limit of 30 years had expired. At other times, he would urge patience until he released his memoirs. More than 16 years later, there is no indication of when the memoirs will be published. At still other times, he would seek to turn the tables on his interviewers and the public, wondering why the annulment was not being discussed at an “intellectual” level, as if an event that convulsed the country and claimed hundreds, if not thousands of lives, were a mere intellectual exercise. Babangida’s son has blamed Sani Abacha, who was conveniently dead, for literally holding a gun to his father’s head and threatening to blow it up if the election results were upheld. On yet another occasion, Babangida said he was accepting responsibility for the annulment, but without any explanation or justification. By every reckoning, Babangida should be one of the happiest and most contented Nigerians alive. He has everything that money can buy and has money to buy anything he fancies. No questions are being asked about the source of the fabulous wealth that has made it possible for him to hire a retired army officer of the rank of general to coordinate his daily schedule, to engage a security detail more sophisticated than you will find protecting the president of all but a handful of African countries, to have at his beck and call a Brains Trust of palace intellectuals, and to maintain a lifestyle that rivals that of freewheeling potentates in the Arabian peninsular.

    Read Also: Tony Elumelu calls for increased oil production to boost Nigeria’s economy

    When Babangida turned 50 in 1991, his grateful brother-in-law Sunny Okogwu promised to build him a bungalow fitted with a bunker that can withstand a nuclear bombardment as a birthday gift, plus an executive jet that could reach the farthest limits of the world without re-fuelling. Elsewhere, this pledge would have sent the Revenue Service chasing the fellow. But who would have dared in those days to mess with the brother of Herself the First Lady?

    The man who was forever obsessing about “his place in history” seems tortured that he cannot conscript history the way he had conscripted an opportunistic political class. He realizes that he cannot annul history. So, at every opportunity, he has done what he does best – blaming everyone except himself, reprising those dark days when he blamed his failures not on poor policy conceptualization, wrong-headed assumptions and flawed execution, but on all manner of people.

    ‘The Nigerian factor’

    Cynics and sceptics. Extremists. Banned and discredited politicians. Politicians discredited but not banned. Persons chafing from being denied access to the easy money that flowed from import licences his government had abolished. Entrepreneurs distressed that the government launched a highly successful programme of wheat production, not merely to conserve but to rake in foreign exchange by the bushel instead of importing wheat flour. And, of course, there was the arch-spoiler itself, what he called, in a gross libel on the very people he was ruling by force of arms “the Nigerian Factor”.

    Oh, the election was not given sufficient publicity; consequently, farmers in the North had taken advantage of an overnight rain to plant their fields rather than go cast their votes. Ah, the election was vitiated by “tremendous negative use” of money. One of the candidates had waged a divisive campaign, and could not therefore be entrusted with national office. One candidate, probably the same one, was trapped in a conflict-of-interest maze so intricate that it would be immoral to allow him to take office as president.

    Thus did Babangida proceed, by sly innuendo and outright slander, to cast grave aspersions on Bashorun MKO Abiola, the SDP candidate, and on Nwosu, the NEC chief, and impugn the conduct of the election.

    ‘Any government formed by the winner would have been toppled’

    In one effort to justify the annulment, Babangida exceeded his own notoriety for wilful obfuscation and perverted reasoning. The 1993 presidential election, he said, had to be annulled, because any government formed by the winner would have been overthrown within months, and the democratic transition he had nurtured assiduously for eight years would have come to nought. The plotters were determined, and nothing could stop them.

    Yes, he had assured the Nigerian public that the coup that brought him to power in 1985 would be the last of its kind. But allowing the winner of the 1993 election to take office, only to be kicked out of office several months later, would have vitiated that solemn pledge and ruined the reputation for constancy that he, Babangida, had earned. So, better to annul the election, and leave it to an interim government to organize another poll, within six months. The determined coup plotters would not only allow the ING to function, they would also allow the new government formed after the new poll to take office. Babangida would fade away and Nigeria would enter an era of democratic bliss under the military protection of General Sani Abacha, General Joshua Dogonyaro, and David Mark, John Shagaya, Halilu Akilu, all brigadier-generals.

    Going by this reasoning, planning a coup ceases to be a crime if it is directed at dislodging a civilian government. The plotters are free to scheme and organize, free even to announce to their commander-in-chief that they are planning to stage a coup at such and such a time, and with such and such a goal in mind. The only way to head off such a calamity was for the commander-in-chief to stage the coup himself. So, he prevents the winner of the 1993 election from taking power, concocts a tissue of shameful lies against the president-elect and election officials to justify his own surrender to a band of mutineers, and sentences the country, in Nobelist Wole Soyinka’s memorable phrase, to “a piece-meal death”.

    This was the same commander-in-chief who spurned all entreaties for clemency and sanctioned the firing-squad execution of his boyhood friend who had been convicted of coup plotting in a trial during which, according to the best authorities, his guilt was far from established. This was the same commander-in-chief under whose regime military officers were executed, jailed or cashiered for concealing knowledge of a coup plot. Even more unconscionably, this was the same commander-in-chief who subjected 26 officers who had been discharged and acquitted of complicity in coup plotting to a fresh trial and sanctioned their execution when a complaisant tribunal found them guilty.

    Nobody wanted such serial bloodletting to continue, to be sure. Not even for the purpose of ensuring that a democratically elected government would take office. But it adds wanton insult to bitter injury when Babangida claims that he annulled the 1993 election to save the government that President-elect Moshood Abiola would have formed from being overthrown. He makes it seem as if he was doing Abiola and Nigerians a favour.

    A choice of who to betray

    In whatever case, the ramshackle contraption of a government he installed to head off the coup tottered and doddered for just 83 miserable days before it was shoved aside by Sani Abacha who, we are told, had made it clear all along that he was going to stage a coup, no matter what.

    Down the ages, many persons of conscience have had to grapple with the dilemma posed most starkly, I think, by the British novelist E. M. Forster: having to choose between betraying friend and betraying country.

    Babangida faced a choice of a lesser order. Though self-selected, he was president and, for better or for worse, symbol of the Nigerian state. As commander-in-chief when the nation he swore to defend and protect was teetering on the brink of violent dissolution – the nation in whose name he had exercised power virtually unchallenged for eight unbroken years he should have been the last officer standing. History will record that he chose to betray both his friend Abiola and his country Nigeria.

  • Revisiting the ‘June 12’ struggle

    Revisiting the ‘June 12’ struggle

    It has been thirty-two since the June 12, 1993 presidential election was annulled. The pain remains in the heart of the Nigerian political history. The dashed hope of those who faced the fire to restore democracy after years of military dilly-dallying still hurts.

    Although some of the principal actors in the annulment saga have been consigned to the dustbin of history, their misadventure deeply threw many Nigerians in the throes of a rascal decision by a few megalomaniacs.

    But, as goes the Yoruba saying, a lie may travel for a thousand years, the truth will catch up with it in a single day. Those who indulge in prevarication only defraud themselves, and not their victims. From history, it is evident that the human conscience imposes the worst punishment on the guilty, especially deceitful leaders. They suffer a psychological burden. The cunning may savour gerrymandering in the beginning, but their lies will ultimately explode in their faces. It will birth an ignominy.

    The truth has finally demolished the edifice of falsehood erected thirty-two years ago on the quicksand of political machination. The truth was never hidden; only the facts were distorted.

    Truth and conscience have hunted the annuller, who wrecked a monumental havoc on the anxious country by dashing their hope of returning to civil rule through an election. It is a lesson to those in power. Those who loomed large in the past have now seen the vanity of life and the fleeting of power.

    Former Military President Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, IBB for short, has surrendered, at last. During the public presentation of his book, titled: A Journey in Service, on Thursday in Abuja, he admitted that the June 12, 1993 poll was credible, free and fair. The former leader acknowledged that the exercise conducted by the National Electoral Commission (NEC), chaired by the late Prof. Humphrey Nwosu, was transparent. But he did not apologise to the nation for annulling the election. To those you suffered bruises during the demonstration, IBB presented ‘A Journey in Deservice.’

    The former military leader, who prided himself as the Evil Genius, only admitted the gross error of canceling the results of the poll won by the late business mogul, Bashorun Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola, who ran on the platform of the defunct Social Democratic Party (SDP). IBB confessed that he lied when he told Nigerians in a broadcast that the ballot box was abused by money. He also lied when he said the court misbehaved when it intervened in the political process.

    Babangida was not a neonate in 1993. He only took Nigerians for a ride as a lord of the manor.

    Nigerians had endured the over eight years of his political meandering. But the annulment was the turning point. The unwise decision destroyed the legacy of the charismatic General who forfeited a hallowed place in history through one moment of miscalculation.

    Many were taken aback when the gap-tooth General with fake smiles refused to vote on poll day. He avoided legitimising the credible process so that he could later have an excuse to abort the transition programme.

    The conspiracy was tick. It was the story of a great betrayal by soldiers of fortune who waged a war of licentiousness against the people. The toll was huge. The pain was deep. The scars have not healed. For families that bore the brunt, the agony has not eased.

    Read Also: Fed govt to boost farmer support with targeted interventions – Shettima

    The nation was enveloped in anxiety. Schools were closed for one year. Politicians were tossed around, banned, unbanned, and banned. The political class that had invested so much resources, time, and hope in the formation of 14 associations was thrown into disarray. All the political parties were proscribed. Then, two parties – the SDP and the National Republican Convention (NRC) – were imposed on them. The electoral procedures, from zero party council poll to the presidential election, were deliberately made Herculean. Then, diarchy was introduced. Those with guns and trembling civilians were lumped together in an inexplicable Transitional National Council that ran parallel to a superior Armed Forces Ruling Council (AFRC). Never have Nigerians been patient with a very challenging and elongated political experimentation. As the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, warned, when Nigerians imagined that the new dawn had arrived, they were woken up to a new transition nightmare.

    People voted for democracy, but the military served them with regrets and sorrows. The symbol of the struggle and his devoted wife, Kudirat, were murdered. The yearning for a new dawn became a mirage. In the end, 1993 became a year of wasted expectation and lost hope.

    In 1999, when civil rule was restored, the main inheritors of the gains of the struggle were the symbols of the military, ably supported by civilian collaborators who subverted the legitimate agitations.

    After five years of serious protest, the slogan of the battle changed, following the mysterious death of the election winner in detention. The people insisted that the military must just go. Nigeria ultimately entered the second phase of the struggle under IBB’s pre-determined successor, General Sani Abacha, the pretentious interim contraption headed by Chief Ernest Shonekan, notwithstanding.

    Lamentably, the labours of pro-June 12 crusaders were in vain. But references would always be made to the contributions of the leaders and arrowheads of the campaigns at home and abroad. Many of them have passed on. But they left a memorial. Their survivors are still keeping hope alive, especially in this period of ‘Renewed Hope Agenda.’

    These leaders include Chief Adekunle Ajasin, Chief Anthony Enahoro, Chief Bola Ige, Rear Admiral Ndubudi Kanu, Air Commodore Dan Suleiman, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu (incumbent President of Nigeria), Chief Ayo Adebanjo, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, Prof. Bolaji Akinyemi, Col. Dangiwa Umar, Prof. Wole Soyinka, Gen. Alani Akinrinade, Ayo Opadokun, Olu Falae, Frank Kokori, Fredrick Fasehun, Kofoworola Bucknor-Akerele, Ayoka Lawani, Gani Fawehinmi, Femi Falana, Chief Cornelius Adebayo, Chief Ganiyu Dawodu, Sir Olaniwun Ajayi, Olawale Oshun, Mohammed Arzika, Amos Akingba, Balarabe Musa, Ibrahim Tahir, Walter Carrington. Wahab Dosunmu, and the ‘Epetedo Declaration’ forces comprising Femi Lanlehin and Tokunbo Afikuyomi, Chief Segun Adegoke, Olisa Agbakoba, and Justice Dolapo Akinsanya, who declared the Interim Government illegal.

    The list is inexhaustible. The leaders of the titanic struggle suffered many bruises, particularly intimidation, oppression, repression, detention, and trials before many of them went into exile. In those days, killer squads were on a rampage. State-sponsored assassins were on the prowl. The fear of bombing was the beginning of wisdom.

    But, apart from these leaders, many demonstrators at home also paid the supreme price in the process of sustaining the campaigns. While some leaders abandoned the struggle for a morsel of porridge, many activists, students, and ordinary people faced the bullets and endured military tribulations to the end. Most of them are unknown and remain unsung in life and death.

    The interim government was another joke. It was the structure that filled the void after IBB reluctantly stepped aside. Its head, Shonekan, was initially given the title of ‘Head’ without the accompanying powers of Commander-in-Chief, a position held by Abacha, a tough nut, an impatient Minister of Defence, and Chairman of the Joint Service Chiefs. After three months, the inept Head of the interim government was shoved aside. In a panic, he hurriedly vacated the Presidential Villa – more or less as an impostor.

    The battle became hotter as the maximum ruler, Abacha, unfolded his self-succession agenda. Scores of protesters died as soldiers opened fire on them on Ikorodu Road in Lagos in 1994. IBB was deceptive, though diplomatic and approachable. Abacha brooked no opposition. No fewer than 174 demonstrators were wounded. A year later, some students of Edo State University were killed by soldiers for asking for democracy.

    The military caged the media. But it was fruitless. Many editors became guests of intelligence agencies. Press freedom was curtailed. Up came guerrilla journalism, which was nevertheless, costly. The family of Bagauda Kaltho is still in deep lamentation that the body of the murdered journalist is yet to be found.

    Reflecting on the ordeals of the forgotten heroes of June 12, Oshun, the Third Republic’s House of Representatives Chief Whip, wrote in his book: The Open Grave: NADECO and the Struggle for Democracy: “Too bad today, those who died then are now remembered in figures than in name.” Their deaths were not less poignant than those of Chief Alfred Rewane and Kudirat as they too were murdered in cold blood by blood-thirsty operators of the dictatorship.

    Little is known about the brave Nigerians who agreed to serve as couriers, ferrying messages and documents across the border for pro-democracy movements. They were silent patriots who sustained the struggle, despite the risks.

    Some of them were intercepted. A case in point was that of Mr. Laiyemo, a personal assistant to Chief Cornelius Adebayo. He was bearing a letter from the former Kwara State governor to a friend when the military arrested him. He spent 36 months in detention.

    The same fate would have befallen Rev. Tunji Adebiyi, who was bearing a letter from Lagos NADECO leaders to Ajasin in Owo, Ondo State. He was caught in Maryland during a stop-and-search operation. It was Kudirat who made a passionate appeal for his release.

    Who remembers the man called Uncle Johnson, who was drawn from his retirement by Akinrinade to manage Radio Kudirat in exile, or the information technology expert, Gbolahan Olalemi, who installed and ran Radio Freedom in Nigeria, with all its attendant risks? Olalemi had the misfortune of being caught and detained. He was kept in an underground cell, flogged by soldiers, and even used as a bait to access Dapo Olorunyomi’s home in Mushin.

    During the dark period, Tinubu’s aides – Benson Akintola and Akeem Apatira – were picked up by security agents in 1994 and detained at the Federal Interrogation and Investigation Bureau (FIIB) at Alagbon in Lagos for three months. They were looking for information about Senator Tinubu, who had gone underground and later into exile.

    When soldiers stormed the Ikeja residence of Akingba, the former university don was nowhere to be found. They pounced on his nephew, Peter Ogunyamoju, who was detained at Alagbon. The military planted a bomb in the house; it exploded, killing Nelson Kassim and Dr. Omatsola.

    A NADECO chieftain, who had escaped abroad, Chief Ralph Onioha, was helpless as news got to him that one of his boys, Abayomi Kehinde, was arrested as a pro-democracy agent. Also, for having anti-military leaflets and posters, Abdulsalam Danladi was detained in Lagos between May and June 1998. Another June 12 traveller, Samuel Asogwa, was detained for three weeks for circulating pro-democracy posters and literature. He was charged with sedition.

    The same fate befell Ebun Adegboruwa, a lawyer in Gani Fawehinmi Chambers. He was detained between November 1997 and June 1998 “for being in possession of subversive documents”. His 75-year-old father was previously held in lieu of him for failing to honour a summons by the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI).

    A similar scenario played out in Ijebu-Ode where Ayomide Lijadu was arrested in place of her father, who had organised a rally to protest Kudirat’s assassination.

    Adegboruwa’s colleague at the Bar, Bamidele Aturu, was detained for a month because his client, Isaac Osuoka, had posters denouncing Abacha’s self-succession plan.

    For 18 months, Prince Ademola Adeniji-Adele languished in detention for his NADECO activism. Captured as a prisoner of war at Ibadan, Lam Adesina lost his freedom between May and June 1998.

    Between May 1995 and July 1998, Kunle Ajibade had the worst experience of his life. He was jailed 15 years for being “an accessary after the fact of treason” over a story by The News, where he was the editor.

    It was not the best of times for journalists. Chris Anyanwu lost her freedom between June 16, 1995, and June 15, 1998. She was charged before a military tribunal for accessory after the fact of treason. Her Sunday Magazine’s coverage of the phantom coup trials was infuriating to Abacha. She was initially jailed for life. Later, the sentence was commuted to 15 years.

    Another journalist, Moshood Fayemiwo, was detained for a year and seven months. His paper published materials that revealed the looting of the treasury by the military while also campaigning for the revalidation of the June 12 election.

    For Nosa Igiebor, it was a hell of a time. For seven months, he was detained. His offence was that his Tell magazine published a story exposing Abacha’s plan to ‘punish’ neighbouring countries that showed sympathy for pro-democracy movements.

    Labour activist Joseph Akinlaja was detained for days for partaking in “an illegal meeting” where bombing of oil refineries and depots were discussed and for being in a crowd of pro-June 12 crusaders.

    A soldier, Major Akinloye Akinyemi, was detained for four years for alleged coup plotting. But it was believed that he was picked up for being the younger brother of Prof. Bolaji Akinyemi, a NADECO chieftain. The elder Akinyemi stayed in exile for four years.

    Eminent banker and politician Olabiyi Durojaye’s case was pathetic. He was detained for seven months. The reason was unknown. “They told me they were just directed to keep me here (detention),” he said.

    For declaring the Abacha regime illegal, Senator Polycarp Nwite was detained for one year. The NADECO member was accused of planting bombs. In 1995, Rev. Peter Obadan was also held for seeking the revalidation of the annulled poll.

    Others detainees include Prof. Omo Omoruyi, who was shot and wounded for calling for the revalidation of June 12; Babafemi Ojudu, for his anti-Agacha stance; Soji Omotunde for decrying dictatorship; Mrs. Iluyomade, wife of Gen. Iluyomade, and daughter, who lost a pregnancy in detention; Arthur Nwankwo, for harbouring anti-Abacha pamphlets; Olorunyomi’s wife, Ladi, held in lieu of her husband; 80-year-old Chief Solanke Onasanya, who was asked to explain what he did not do; Abdul Oroh, of Civil Liberty Organisation (CLO) for his links with Soyinka and pro-June 12 campaigns; Onome Osifo-Whiskey, for criticising Abacha; Bayo Osinowo, for his association with Abiola; Niyi Owolade, for anti-government May Day riot at Ibadan; Chima Ubani, for allegedly inciting Nigerians against the military government, and Lam Adesina, who became a prisoner of war.

    Others are: Nike Ransome-Kuti, Solomon Sobande, Emeka Ugwuoke – for circulating pro-democracy posters; Olusegun Mayegun, Popoola Ajayi, and Jerry Yusuf – for hijacking a plane in protest against the Interim National Government and calling for the restoration of Abiola’s mandate.

    Human rights leaders – Beko Ransom-Kuti, his brother, Prof. Olikoye Ransom-Kuti, Femi Aborisade, Chima Ubani, Joe Igbokwe, Olisa Agbakoba, Ayo Obe, Bishop Mathew Hassan Kukah, Osagie Obayuwana, Felix Tuodolo, Debo Adeniran, Ima Niboro, Babafemi Ojudu, Bayo Onanuga, Akinola Orisagbemi (Personal Assistant to Mrs. Kudirat Abiola), Innocent Chukwuma, Bunmi Aborisade, and numerous activists under the banners of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Nigeria Medical Association (NMA), the divided Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN), Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG), Kayode Fayemi of Radio Kudirat, Lagos Justice Forum, June 12 Collective, the media, and he National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) made invaluable contributions to the struggle. The list is endless.

    Evidently, the restoration of civil rule was not achieved on a platter of gold. It was a collective enterprise involving the mighty, the low, and the suppressed masses: professionals, youths, students, artisans, peasants and the ordinary man in the street.

    Nigeria has witnessed a successful transition from civil to civil rule. The accompanied crisis and stress were also managed. But the fruits are inadequate.

    Asiwaju Tinubu was a great financier of pro-democracy activities at home and abroad. The onus is on him to reposition the country by building strong institutions, ensuring politico-electoral reforms, security, restructuring and restoration of federal principles and abolition of poverty, which was Abiola’s cardinal objective.

    If these goals are accomplished, then, the unsung heroes will heave a sigh of relief that the struggle was, after all, not totally in vain.

    Those who masterminded the reckless annulment for selfish reasons should be made to regret their action for life by giving the country good governance. But an effective government that works for all Nigerians is the best legacy to immortalise those who paid the supreme sacrifice in the June 12 struggle. This generation and the future ones deserve to have a better country the soldiers of fortune failed to bequeath to them. This is what the June 12 struggle stood for.