The Nation Newspaper

Tag: Natasha

  • Senate will study judgment on Natasha before acting, says spokesman

    Senate will study judgment on Natasha before acting, says spokesman

    The Senate on Sunday said it will obtain and study the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the judgment of the Federal High Court on its suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan before taking any action regarding her recall.

    The spokesman of the Senate, Senator Yemi Adaramodu, disclosed this in a statement in Abuja.

    The statement reads, “The Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria acknowledges that judgment was delivered on 4th July 2025 by the Federal High Court, Abuja, in the suit instituted by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

    “However, the Senate is yet to be served with the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the said judgment.

    “Our legal representatives, who were in attendance at the proceedings, have confirmed that the complete judgment was not read in open court.

    “Consequently, we have formally applied for the CTC to enable a thorough review and informed determination of the appropriate legal response, particularly given the uncertainty surrounding whether the court made any direct order nullifying the suspension of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan.

    “Since no party to the case has been officially served the enrolled order of the judgment, none can enforce any perceived order or relief.

    READ ALSO: Aiyedatiwa applauds Tinubu’s commitment to NDDC

    “Pending receipt and examination of the CTC, and acting on the advice of counsel, the Senate shall refrain from taking any steps that may prejudice its legal position.

    “The Senate remains committed to upholding the rule of law and will act strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria upon full clarification of the court’s pronouncements.

    “We urge the public to remain patient and assured of the Senate’s fidelity to due process.”

    In March, the Senate suspended Akpoti-Uduaghan for six months over alleged gross misconduct, following her face-off with the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, over the sitting arrangement.

    Tensions intensified when Akpoti-Uduaghan, on national television, accused Akpabio of punishing her for rejecting his alleged sexual advances.

    The Peoples Democratic Party senator submitted a petition to the Senate, alleging that she was sexually harassed by Akpabio, an allegation the Senate President had since denied.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025, challenged her suspension in court.

    Delivering her judgment on the matter, Justice Nyako faulted the provision of Chapter Eight of the Senate Standing Rules as well as Section 14 of the Legislative Houses, Powers & Privileges Act, declaring both as overreaching.

    The court stressed that the two legislations failed to specify the maximum period that a serving lawmaker could be suspended from office.

    Justice Nyako stated that while the Senate had the authority to discipline its members, such disciplinary actions must not strip citizens of representation in the National Assembly.

    She noted that since the Senate was constitutionally required to sit for only 181 days in a legislative year, Akpoti-Uduaghan’s 180-day suspension amounted to denying the people of Kogi Central effective participation in national governance.

    “The court is not saying that the Senate lacks the power to sanction a member. However, such sanctions must not negate the constitutional right of constituents to be represented in parliament,” Justice Nyako ruled.

    The court, however, found Akpoti-Uduaghan guilty of contempt over a satirical apology she posted on her Facebook page on April 27.

    Justice Nyako held that after reviewing the post and the application before her instituted by the third respondent, she was satisfied that it was linked to the suspension matter before the court and therefore found the plaintiff guilty of contempt.

    The judge ordered Akpoti-Uduaghan to publish an apology in two national dailies and on her Facebook page within seven days. She also imposed a fine of N5million.

    However, the ruling by the court has been subjected to varying interpretations, with some claiming that it has quashed Natasha’s suspension and ordered her reinstatement.

    Others claim that the judge did not make any such order but only offered an opinion.

  • Senate’ll not recall Natasha till she apologises as ordered by court – Spokesman

    Senate’ll not recall Natasha till she apologises as ordered by court – Spokesman

    The Chairman, Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Senator Adeyemi Adaramodu, has given conditions on which the red chamber would reinstate suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

    Adaramodu, who reacted to the ruling of a federal high court on the matter, made it clear that the red chamber would not reinstate senator Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central, until she apologises as directed by court.

    Adaramodu said that the court judgment did not override the Senate’s constitutional powers to discipline its members.

    In March, the Senate suspended Akpoti-Uduaghan for six months over alleged gross misconduct, following her face-off with the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, over sitting arrangement.

    READ ALSO: Why I abandoned law to pursue acting – Femi Adebayo

    Tension rose when Akpoti-Uduaghan, on national television, accused Akpabio of punishing her for rejecting his alleged sexual advances.

    The Peoples Democratic Party senator submitted a petition to the Senate, alleging that she was sexually harassed by Akpabio, an allegation the Senate President has since denied.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025, challenged her suspension in court.

    Delivering her judgment on the matter, Justice Nyako faulted the provision of chapter eight of the Senate Standing Rules as well as Section 14 of the Legislative Houses, Powers & Privileges Act, declaring both as overreaching.

    The court stressed that the two legislations failed to specify the maximum period that a serving lawmaker could be suspended from office.

    Justice Nyako stated that while the Senate had the authority to discipline its members, such disciplinary actions must not strip citizens of representation in the National Assembly.

    She noted that since the Senate was constitutionally required to sit for only 181 days in a legislative year, Akpoti-Uduaghan’s 180-day suspension amounted to denying the people of Kogi Central effective participation in national governance.

    “The court is not saying that the Senate lacks the power to sanction a member.

    “However, such sanctions must not negate the constitutional right of constituents to be represented in parliament,” Justice Nyako ruled.

    The court, however, found Akpoti-Uduaghan guilty of contempt over a satirical apology she posted on her Facebook page on April 27.

    Justice Nyako held that after reviewing the post and the application before her instituted by the third respondent, she was satisfied that it was linked to the suspension matter before the court and therefore found the plaintiff guilty of contempt.

    The judge ordered Akpoti-Uduaghan to publish an apology in two national dailies and on her Facebook page within seven days. She also imposed a fine of N5 million.

    Responding to a question, Adaramodu said: “Which judgment are we appealing when they (court) said the Senate has the right to discipline its erring members?

    “The court has not ousted the Senate’s statutory right to punish any erring senator.

    “It was established that the senator in question erred. The court has already told her to go and do some things, like restitution.

    “So, after the restitution, the Senate will now sit again and consider the content of that restitution, and that will inform our next line of action.”

    According to Senator Adaramodu, the Senate would only reconvene to deliberate on the matter after Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan had complied with the court’s directives.

    “The onus is no more on us now; it is already on her doorstep to go and apologise.

    “Once she does that, then the Senate will sit and determine how to deal with her matter.

    “The first reaction now will not be from us. The court has ruled, so once she takes the step to redress and does what the court has directed her to do, the Senate will sit and look at the content of her reaction as prescribed by the court.”

    Addressing journalists after the judgment, counsel to the Senate, Paul Dauda, SAN, described the judgment as a partial victory for the Senate, particularly on the issue of civil contempt arising from social media posts made during the case.

    Dauda said: “The first application filed by the Senate, that no social media posts should have been made, was decided in our favour.

    “The court directed that the satirical apology be taken down and that a proper apology should be published in two national dailies.

    “Additionally, damages of N5 million were awarded to be paid to the court.”

    On the substantive ruling regarding the suspension, Dauda noted that the Senate’s authority to discipline its members was not in dispute.

    “It appears the court affirmed that the Senate, as an institution, has the right to discipline its members.

    “While members are elected to represent constituencies, they are expected to conduct themselves in accordance with the Senate’s standing rules,” he said.

    He explained that the court did not order Akpoti-Uduaghan’s reinstatement but merely suggested that the Senate could consider recalling her.

    “There was no relief asking for the suspension to be lifted. The judge only made what we call an obiter dictum, a non-binding remark, that the suspension may have been excessive.

    “We will consult with our colleagues, read the full judgment, and respond accordingly,” he added.

  • Senate’ll not recall Natasha until court-ordered apology, says spokesman

    Senate’ll not recall Natasha until court-ordered apology, says spokesman

    The Chairman, Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Senator Adeyemi Adaramodu, has given conditions based on which the Red Chamber would reinstate suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

    Adaramodu who reacted to the ruling of a Federal High Court on the matter, made it clear that the Red Chamber would not immediately reinstate senator Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central, until she apologises as directed by court.

    Adaramodu said that the court judgment did not override the Senate’s constitutional powers to discipline its members.

    In March, the Senate suspended Akpoti-Uduaghan  for six months over alleged gross misconduct, following her face-off with the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, over the sitting arrangement.

    Tensions intensified when Akpoti-Uduaghan, on national television, accused Akpabio of punishing her for rejecting his alleged sexual advances.

    The Peoples Democratic Party senator submitted a petition to the Senate, alleging that she was sexually harassed by Akpabio, an allegation the Senate President had since denied.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025, challenged her suspension in court.

    Delivering her judgment on the matter, Justice Nyako faulted the provision of chapter eight of the Senate Standing Rules as well as Section 14 of the Legislative Houses, Powers & Privileges Act, declaring both as overreaching.

    The court stressed that the two legislations failed to specify the maximum period that a serving lawmaker could be suspended from office.

    Justice Nyako stated that while the Senate had the authority to discipline its members, such disciplinary actions must not strip citizens of representation in the National Assembly.

    She noted that since the Senate was constitutionally required to sit for only 181 days in a legislative year, Akpoti-Uduaghan’s 180-day suspension amounted to denying the people of Kogi Central effective participation in national governance.

    “The court is not saying that the Senate lacks the power to sanction a member. However, such sanctions must not negate the constitutional right of constituents to be represented in parliament,” Justice Nyako ruled.

    The court, however, found Akpoti-Uduaghan guilty of contempt over a satirical apology she posted on her Facebook page on April 27.

    Justice Nyako held that after reviewing the post and the application before her instituted by the third respondent, she was satisfied that it was linked to the suspension matter before the court and therefore found the plaintiff guilty of contempt.

    The judge ordered Akpoti-Uduaghan to publish an apology in two national dailies and on her Facebook page within seven days. She also imposed a fine of N5million.

    Responding to a question, Adaramodu said: “Which judgment are we appealing when they (court) said the Senate has the right to discipline its erring members?

    “The court has not ousted the Senate’s statutory right to punish any erring senator.

    “It was established that the senator in question erred. The court has already told her to go and do some things, like restitution, so after the restitution, the Senate will now sit again and consider the content of that restitution, and that will inform our next line of action.”

    According to Senator Adaramodu, the Senate would only reconvene to deliberate on the matter after Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan had complied with the court’s directives.

    “The onus is no more on us now; it is already on her doorstep to go and apologise. Once she does that, then the Senate will sit and determine how to deal with her matter.

    “The first reaction now will not be from us. The court has ruled, so once she takes the step to redress and does what the court has directed her to do, then the Senate will sit and look at the content of her reaction as prescribed by the court,” he said. 

    Addressing journalists after the judgment, the Counsel to the Senate, Paul Dauda, SAN, described the ruling as a partial victory for the Senate, particularly on the issue of civil contempt arising from social media posts made during the case.

    Dauda said: “The first application filed by the Senate, that no social media posts should have been made, was decided in our favour. The court directed that the satirical apology be taken down and that a proper apology be published in two national dailies. Additionally, damages of N5million were awarded to be paid to the court.”

    On the substantive ruling regarding the suspension, Dauda noted that the Senate’s authority to discipline its members was not in dispute.

    “It appears the court affirmed that the Senate, as an institution, has the right to discipline its members. While members are elected to represent constituencies, they are expected to conduct themselves in accordance with the Senate’s standing rules,” he said.

    He explained that the court did not order Akpoti-Uduaghan’s reinstatement but merely suggested that the Senate could consider recalling her.

    “There was no relief asking for the suspension to be lifted. The judge only made what we call an obiter dictum, a non-binding remark, that the suspension may have been excessive. We will consult with our colleagues, read the full judgment, and respond accordingly,” he added.

  • Natasha: Court affirms Senate’s power to discipline members

    Natasha: Court affirms Senate’s power to discipline members

    • Convicts Senator for contempt, orders her to pay N5m fine

    • Asks Senate to reconsider her suspension

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has affirmed the power of the Senate to discipline any member for unethical conduct.

    Justice Binta Nyako, in a judgment yesterday, held that under the Senate Rules, the Senate President is empowered to allocate seats to members, and such a member is only allowed to speak from the seat allocated to him or her.

    Justice Nyako found that since Natasha was not speaking from the sit allocated to her during the Senate’s sitting of February 20, she was not entitled to be heard.

    The judge held that although the Senate could suspend its members, it should reconsider the period of such suspension.

    She urged the Senate to consider recalling her to afford her the opportunity to represent her constituency and for her to also apologise to the Senate.

    READ ALSO: Meet Nigerian riding bicycle from Nigeria to USA

    Earlier, Justice Nyako found her guilty of contempt and fined her N5 million to be paid to the coffers of the Federal Government.

    The judge found Natasha to have violated an order of the court made on April 4 restraining parties from commenting on the subject of the pending suit.

    The judge held that by posting a satirical letter on her Facebook page on April 27 while the April 4 order subsisted, Natasha was in contempt of court

    The judge said since Natasha is found guilty of contempt in a civil case, thereby making it a civil contempt, she would not be sent to prison but made to pay a fine and offer public apology to the court.

    Justice Nyanko ordered Natasha to publish the public apology in two national dailies and her Facebook page within seven days.

  • Natasha: Court affirms Senate’s power to discipline members 

    Natasha: Court affirms Senate’s power to discipline members 

    …convicts Natasha for contempt 

    …asks Senate to reconsider her suspension 

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has affirmed the power of the Senate to discipline any member for unethical conduct.

    Justice Binta Nyako, in a judgment on Friday, held that under the Senate Rules, the Senate President is empowered to allocate seats for members and such a member is only allowed to speak from the seat allocated to him or her.

    Justice Nyako found that since Natasha was not speaking from the sit allocated to her during the Senate’s sitting of February 20, she was not entitled to be heard 

    The judge held that although the Senate could suspend its members, it should reconsider the period of such suspension.

    Read Also: BREAKING: Court finds Natasha guilty of contempt, slams N5m fine

    She urged the Senate to consider recalling her to afford her the opportunity to represent her constituency and for her to also apologise to the Senate.

    Earlier, Justice Nyako found her guilty of contempt and fined her N5million to be paid to the coffers of the Federal Government.

    The judge found Natasha to have violated an order of the court made on April 4 restraining parties from commenting on the subject of the pending suit.

    The judge held that by posting a satirical letter on her Facebook page on April 27 while the April 4 order subsisted, Natasha was in contempt of court 

    The judge said since Natasha is found guilty of contempt in a civil case, thereby making it a civil contempt she would not be sent to prison but made to pay a fine and offer public apology to the court.

    Justice Nyanko ordered Natasha to pay N5m to the coffers of the Federal Government and publish public apology in two national dailies and her Facebook page within seven days.

  • BREAKING: Court finds Natasha guilty of contempt, slams N5m fine

    BREAKING: Court finds Natasha guilty of contempt, slams N5m fine

    …Orders her to publish public apology within seven days 

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has found suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan guilty of contempt and fined her N5million to be paid to the coffers of the Federal Government.

    Justice Binta Nyanko, in a ruling on Friday, found Natasha to have violated an order of the court made on April 4 restraining parties from commenting on the subject of the pending suit.

    Read Also: Senator Natasha docked on cybercrime charges

    Justice Nyanko held that by posting a satirical letter on her Facebook page on April 27 while the April 4 order subsisted, Natasha was in contempt of court.

    The judge said since Natasha is found guilty of contempt in a civil case, thereby making it a civil contempt she would not be sent to prison but made to pay a fine and make public apology to the court.

    Justice Nyanko ordered Natasha to pay N5m to the coffers of the Federal Government and publish public apology in two national dailies and her Facebook page within seven days.

    Details shortly…

  • JUST IN: Natasha docked over alleged defamation of Akpabio, Yahaya Bello

    JUST IN: Natasha docked over alleged defamation of Akpabio, Yahaya Bello

    …gets N50m bail

     …trial begins Sept 23.

    The suspended Kogi Central Senator, Natasha Apoti-Uduaghan was on Thursday docked at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory for allegedly defaming the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio and former governor of Kogi state, Yahaya Adosa Bello. 

    She was put on trial by the office of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice AGF on three-count criminal charges bordering on harmful imputatiom. 

    The embattled suspended Senator was accompanied to the court for the trial by her husband and associates.

    However when the charge was read, she pleaded not guilty.

    in view of her plea, the prosecuting lawyer, David Kaswe asked Justice Chisoba Oji to remand her in prison till the determination of the charge. 

    However, Natasha’s lawyer, Professor Roland Otaru sought and got permission to move bail application for the defendant on the grounds that it was matured for hearing having been served on the prosecution and having joined issues with each other. 

    In moving the bail application, Otaru urged the judge to exercise her discretion in favour of the defendant.

    He argued that the suspended senator was not a flight risk and would not interfere with police investigation and witnesses. 

    Besides, he submitted that the Constitution of the country presumes her innocent, while the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 emphasizes bail in such an offence. 

    On his part, the prosecuting lawyer urged the judge to refuse the bail application, adding that the prosecution took great efforts and encountered difficulties before the defendant could be served with the charge. 

    Read Also: JUST IN: Natasha arrives court for arraignment over alleged defamation

    However, in her ruling, Justice Chisoba Oji noted that the alleged offence was not a capital one and that the law presumes her innocent for now. 

    She admitted her to bail in the sum of N50M and one reasonable surety in the like sum. 

    The judge held that the surety must be owner of land property within the jurisdiction of the court. 

    Meanwhile, September 23 has been fixed for the commencement of trial in the charge marked

    CR/297/25 filed on May 15, 2025.

    Natasha is, in count one of the charge, accused of making harmful imputation which she knew would harm the reputation of the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, by claiming he plotted, with former Kogi governor, Yahaya Bello, to kill her.

    In count two, Akpoti-Uduaghan is accused of making a similar harmful imputation knowing that it will harm the reputation of ex-governor Yahaya Bello.

    She is, in count three, accused of making another imputation, which she knew would harm the reputation of Akpabio by associating him with the death of one Miss Imoren Iniubong.

  • JUST IN: Natasha arrives court for arraignment over alleged defamation

    JUST IN: Natasha arrives court for arraignment over alleged defamation

    Suspended Kogi Central Senator, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has appeared at the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Maitama, Abuja, on Thursday for her arraignment over alleged defamation.

    She arrived at about 10:30 am ahead of the 11:00 am session, awaiting the presiding judge.

    Filed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, Mohammed Abubakar, the criminal charge (CR/297/25) accuses Akpoti-Uduaghan of defaming Senate President Godswill Akpabio during a live Channels TV interview on April 3, 2025.

    Read Also: Alleged murder plot: Senator Natasha’s planned arraignment stalled

    The Senate President and former Kogi Governor Yahaya Bello are listed as nominal complainants. 

    The Federal Government alleges she falsely claimed they plotted her assassination disguised as a mob attack.

    In the broadcast, she reportedly said: “Let’s ask the Senate President why he withdrew my security… He then emphasised that I should be killed, but I should be killed in Kogi… Who is going to get justice for me?”

    Details shortly…

  • Democracy must work for people not just at polls — Natasha

    Democracy must work for people not just at polls — Natasha

    On Democracy Day, suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has called on Nigerians to uphold the ideals of justice, equity, inclusion, and national unity, insisting that democracy must yield tangible benefits beyond elections.

    In a statement on Democracy Day, the Senator representing Kogi Central paid tribute to the late Chief Moshood Kashimawo Abiola and other pro-democracy heroes whose sacrifices, she said, laid the foundation for Nigeria’s current democratic system.

    “June 12 stands as a symbol of our collective struggle for democratic governance,” Senator Uduaghan stated. “It is a tribute to the courage of Chief M.K.O. Abiola and the countless Nigerians—known and unknown—who stood firm to defend the sanctity of the people’s will.”

    She noted while Nigeria has made democratic strides, real progress must be measured by how governance improves the everyday lives of citizens.

    “Democracy must bring real development, empower the weak, uphold the rule of law, and protect the dignity of every Nigerian,” the lawmaker emphasized.

    She urged Nigerians, especially youth and women, to actively engage in the democratic process, stressing that their voices and participation are essential to shaping a nation that works for all.

    Read Also: Natasha: Appeal Court strikes out Akpabio’s motions, slams ₦100,000 fine

    “I urge all Nigerians to remain engaged. Our participation and vigilance are vital in building a Nigeria that serves every citizen, regardless of tribe, religion, gender, or class,” she said.

    Reaffirming her commitment to good governance, the Senator vowed to continue pursuing inclusive legislation and transparency in public service.

    “Let us not lose hope in our nation. Let us build bridges across divides and work toward a future where democracy becomes a lived reality for all,” she declared.

    She concluded with a message of optimism and solidarity: “Happy Democracy Day, Nigeria. God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

  • Natasha: Appeal Court strikes out Akpabio’s motions, slams ₦100,000 fine

    Natasha: Appeal Court strikes out Akpabio’s motions, slams ₦100,000 fine

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja has struck out two motions filed by Senate President Godswill Akpabio and imposed a ₦100,000 fine against him in favour of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

    The decision was delivered by a three-member panel led by Justice Hamman Barka on May 21, 2025, after Akpabio sought to withdraw his motions.

    The motions, dated March 3 and March 25, 2025, with suit numbers CV/395/M1/2025 and CV/395/M2/2025, respectively, had Akpabio listed as the appellant.

    Respondents in the matter included Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the Clerk of the National Assembly, the Senate, and Senator Neda Imasuen, who chairs the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions.

    In the appeal, Akpabio had sought multiple reliefs, including:

    “An order of this Honourable Court enlarging the time within which the Appellant/Applicant may seek leave to appeal against the decision of the Federal High Court, Abuja Judicial Division in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 between Senator Natasha AkpotiUduaghan v. Clerk of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and 3 Others (Coram: Honourable Justice Obiora Atuegwu Egwuatu) delivered on March 10, 2025 on grounds of mixed law and fact as contained in the proposed Notice of Appeal.”

    Read Also: ‘Why criminal charge was filed against Senator Natasha’

    “An order of this Honourable Court granting leave to the Appellant/Applicant to appeal against the decision of the Federal High Court, Abuja Judicial Division in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 between Senator Natasha AkpotiUduaghan v. Clerk of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and 3 Others. (Coram: Honourable Justice | Obiora Egwuatu) delivered on March 10, 2025, on Grounds of mixed law and fact as contained in the proposed Notice of Appeal attached as Exhibit B.”

    “An order of this Honourable Court enlarging the time within which the Appellant/Applicant may file their Notice of appeal against the decision of the Federal High Court, Abuja Judicial Division in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 between Senator Natasha AkpotiUduaghan v. Clerk of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and 3 Others. (Coram: Honourable Justice Obiora Egwuatu) delivered on March 10, 2025.”

    “An order of this Honourable Court staying further proceeding in Suit No: FCH/ABJ/CS/384/2025 between Senator Natasha AkpotiUduaghan v. Clerk of the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and 3 Others. (Coram: Honourable Justice Obiora Egwuatu), pending the hearing and determination of the Appellant/Applicant’s appeal before this Honourable Court.”

    Delivering the ruling, the Court held:

    “Application seeking to withdraw the two motions dated and filed on 20/3/2025 and 25/3/2025 is granted and the motions are struck out.

    Costs of ₦100,000 are awarded to the 1st Respondent. Appeal No. CA/ABJ/PRE/ROA/CV/395M/2025 to be deleted.”