Tag: Natasha

  • Natasha condemns alleged gunmen attack on family house

    Natasha condemns alleged gunmen attack on family house

    Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan on Thursday decried an alleged attack by gunmen on her family residence in Okehi Local Government Area of Kogi State.

    The lawmaker, who was suspended from the Senate over alleged misconduct, claimed the attackers appeared to have targeted her personally but were repelled by operatives of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and local residents.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan called on the Inspector General of Police to urgently reinstate her security protection.

    In a statement titled: “Gunmen Attack Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s family house,” the Kogi Central Senator said: “We condemn the brazen attack on Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s family house in Obeiba-Ihima, Kogi State, on Tuesday, April 15.

    “Armed men, mistakenly believing the Senator was present, vandalized windows in her grandfather’s house. Fortunately, security operatives swiftly responded and repelled the attackers.

    “This calculated assault appears to be a direct response to Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s courageous stance against Senate President Godswill Akpabio, whom she accused of sexual harassment.

    “We urge the Inspector General of Police to immediately reinstate her security details.”

    Read Also: Natasha rejects Agbakoba’s call for out-of-court deal with Akpabio

    On the the incident, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan said: “Two days ago, my younger brother took some contractors to my hometown in Ihima to inspect locations for upcoming projects I attracted to my senatorial district.

    “The unknown gunmen assumed I was the one in town and attacked my family house that night.

    “Thankfully, the civil defence team and community members responded promptly and chased them off. A report was made at the police area command, and no one was hurt.

    “We call on the public to remain calm and support the pursuit of justice for Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan.

    “Her dedication to speaking truth and representing her constituents should not be met with violence and intimidation.”

  • Natasha rejects Agbakoba’s call for out-of-court deal with Akpabio

    Natasha rejects Agbakoba’s call for out-of-court deal with Akpabio

    Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan yesterday rejected an out-of-court settlement proposed by legal luminary Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), counsel for Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

    Agbakoba had suggested a resolution in the case by Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan against Akpabio.

    He also urged her to substantiate her allegations.

    But the Kogi Central Senator rejected the idea, insisting that Akpabio should subject himself to an investigation.

    Asked if she would accept to settle with Akpabio, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan told The Nation: “Out-of-court settlement? To settle how? Who? What about how I felt? I don’t know how to explain it.

    “To me, am not looking for an out-of-court settlement. I don’t think I’m looking for an out-of-court settlement for today. As of now, an out-of-court settlement is out of it.

    “I am not considering an out-of-court settlement because nobody has to suffer this amount of intimidation just because she is speaking out her truth.

    “They should have investigated it. It is not about settlement, it is about justice. It is very painful that you subject somebody to so much.

    “I am not looking forward to an out-of-court settlement. He should subject himself to an investigation.

    “Besides, Akpabio is denting the image of the President. Akpabio’s actions are sending a negative signal on President Tinubu’s government.”

    Read Also: Natasha’s allegation against Akpabio has significant contradictions, falls short proof threshold – Agbakoba

    Agbakoba urged the senator should tender more proof as she had promised to do in her media interviews.

    He reporters in Lagos that the allegations were hanging without substantial evidence.

    He said: “We request Senator Natasha to provide more evidence, particularly in furtherance to the fact that she previously stated she reserves the right to provide further particulars and evidence to support the allegations against the Senate President.

    “We feel like the allegation as it currently stands falls short of the threshold for proving sexual harassment anywhere in the world.”

    Agbakoba, who had written to Mrs. Akpoti-Uduaghan as counsel for Akpabio to supply more proof, said he accepted the brief in a conciliatory manner.

    He also “honestly wishes” that the matter is resolved without going to court, adding that he had requested a meeting with Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan’s lawyers.

    Agbakoba clarified that at this stage, the Senator is not to be believed or disbelieved, stressing that she would need to clarify the difference between her behaviour between December 8 and 9, 2023.

    The SAN described sexual harassment as a serious matter that deserves careful and fair consideration, adding that the difficulty faced by anyone making the allegation and the importance of treating all parties with dignity should be acknowledged.

    However, the senior lawyer said the review of the available public records revealed significant contradictions that must be considered for a fair evaluation of the situation.

    According to him, proper institutional processes, rather than media forums, should provide an appropriate venue for addressing serious matters.

    Agbakoba insisted that while he supports a society where individuals feel safe to speak up, the principles of justice that require evidence and fairness should be upheld.

    He stressed: “Allegations, however serious, must be scrutinised with diligence and care to avoid situations where they are being weaponised for vendetta.

    “Our legal system is built on the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, and this fundamental principle must be respected, even in sensitive cases.”

    Noting that Mrs. Akpoti-Uduaghan had said she would submit material evidence and present further particulars and facts, he expressed surprise that she had withheld the evidence.

    The former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) said this is unusual.

    Agbakoba noted that Mrs. Akpoti-Uduaghan’s local and international engagements have highlighted the global attention her allegations have garnered in the past weeks.

    Emphasising the contradictions between her claims and subsequent behaviour, he said Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan who made a serious allegation turned to her Instagram to also eulogise Akpabio and spoke highly of the birthday event she attended in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State.

    He pointed out that while Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan claimed that sexual harassment occurred on December 8, which was her birthday and that of Akpabio, she praised the Senate President on December 9.

    The lawyer stressed: “The timeline and dates are so contradictory. On one hand, you complained about sexual harassment on December 8, 2023.

    “Yet, on the other, you praised Senator Akpabio who you allege sexually harassed you on December 9, 2023. 

    “The juxtaposition of these two events, an alleged traumatic harassment followed by voluntary, public expression of admiration requires careful consideration.”

    Agbakoba acknowledged that there is no defined or definite description of harassment, saying that it could be in words or behaviour.

    He doubted any absolute physical act in respect of Mrs. Akpoti-Uduaghan and Akpabio.

    Urging critics to do with unguarded emotion, Akpabio said “98 per cent of what you see on social media is not court-useable.”

  • Natasha’s allegation against Akpabio has significant contradictions, falls short proof threshold – Agbakoba

    Natasha’s allegation against Akpabio has significant contradictions, falls short proof threshold – Agbakoba

    Renowned lawyer and former President, Nigerian Bar Association, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba, SAN, has said that the sexual harassment allegation against Senate President Godswill Akpabio by the suspended Senator representing Kogi Central in the National Assembly, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has significant contradictions.

    Agbakoba, who spoke at an elaborate press conference in Lagos on Tuesday, added that the allegation, “as it currently stands, falls short of the threshold for proving sexual harassment anywhere in the world.”

    He said while individuals should feel safe to speak up in an ideal society, the principles of justice, which required evidence and fairness must be upheld.

    The renowned lawyer, who is also Akpabio’s lawyer, wrote a letter to the Kogi Senator, on the instruction of the Senate President, asking her to clarify the contradictions in her allegations, which were published widely in local and international newspapers.

    “This widespread coverage has damaged our client’s reputation locally and internationally. We are happy to allow you a reasonable time to clarify the contradictions that we have referred, while our client reserves the right to all legal options,” he said in the letter.

    Agbakoba, while speaking at the briefing, noted that the embattled Senator had claimed that she was sexually harassed by Akpabio on December 8, 2023, but she went on social media to eulogise the same Senate President a day after that.

    He specifically pointed out that the warm, celebratory tone and personal affection expressed in the public message the suspended Senator posted a day after the alleged harassment presented a significant timeline contradiction that could not be overlooked.

    “Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan claims that she was sexually harassed by the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, on December 8, 2023.

    “However, merely one day later, on December 9, 2023, she publicly posted favourable messages about the Senate President on both her Instagram and X (formerly Twitter) accounts.

    “In these posts, she eulogised the Senate President and spoke highly of the birthday event she attended in Uyo, Akwa Ibom,” Agbakoba stated.

    Read Also; Steps to creating a N500tr budget, by Agbakoba

    According to him: “the juxtaposition of these two events, an alleged traumatic harassment, followed by voluntary public expressions of admiration requires careful consideration.”

    The former NBA President also mentioned previous allegations against Reno Omokri and an unnamed minister, noting that, though each allegation must be evaluated independently, the suspended Senator’s pattern required careful consideration.

    “Sexual harassment is a serious matter that deserves careful and fair consideration. We acknowledge the difficulty faced by anyone making such allegations and the importance of treating all parties with dignity.

    “Our review of the available public records reveals significant contradictions that must be considered for a fair evaluation of the situation.

    “We believe that proper institutional processes, rather than media forums provide the appropriate venue for addressing such serious matters,” Agbakoba said.

  • Alleged assassination plot: Natasha urges IGP to dismiss Akpabio’s petition

    Alleged assassination plot: Natasha urges IGP to dismiss Akpabio’s petition

    Suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, (PDP- Kogi Central) has called on the Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, to dismiss the petition by the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, accusing her of criminal defamation and incitement.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan, who was recently suspended by the Senate for alleged misconduct, however urged the IGP to investigate Akpabio over allegations of threats to her life.

    Akpabio had written to Egbetokun, alleging that the senator falsely accused him of plotting her assassination.

    He accused the Kogi Central Senator of “heinous lies” aimed at damaging his reputation and inciting unrest.

    However, Akpoti-Uduaghan in a statement by her counsel, Victor Giwa, on Saturday, accused the Senate President of attempting to preempt investigations into his alleged role in a plot to harm her by raising counter-allegations of public incitement.

    She said that Akpabio’s petition was a deliberate attempt to distract the police from more pressing allegations against him.

    “We remain counsel for Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan, hereafter known as our client. Our attention has been drawn to the news-making round that Senate President Godswill Akpabio has filed a petition against our client, Distinguished Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, alleging incitement of the public against his person.

    Read Also: Alleged sexual harassment: FUOYE workers disown planned industrial action

    “It is our client’s position that the Senate President should submit himself for a full investigation to security agents before any allegation of incitement against him.

    “The Senate President is a ‘principal suspect’ in the case of a threat to the life of the distinguished Senator Natasha, whose securities have been withdrawn illegally at the instruction of the Senate president.”

    She said that not until the investigation into the allegations against the Senate President had been completed and proven to be false, could the Akpabio’s petition be entertained.

    “We, therefore, call on the Senate President to submit himself to full investigation rather than divert the attention of the security agents through a bubble petition.

    “It is only when the investigation has been concluded, and the allegation has been shown to be false, that the issue of incitement and false allegation against Senator Natasha can be entertained.

    “We therefore call on the Inspector General of Police to discontinue the Senate president’s Petition as being diversionary and prejudicing of investigation,” the lawyer said.

  • Akpabio petitions Police over ‘assassination plot’ against Natasha

    Akpabio petitions Police over ‘assassination plot’ against Natasha

    Senate President Godswill Akpabio has written a  petition to the Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, urging him to investigate the assassination allegation made against him (Akpabio) by suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

    Akpabio, in the petition dated April 3, denied the allegation made by the Kogi Central Senator on April 1.

    The petition, which was also forwarded to the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi,  sought the prosecution of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan for criminal defamation.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan had while addressing a mammoth crowd in her country home at Obeiba-Ijioma, in Okehi Local Governnment of Kogi State, during Sallah, accused Akpabio of allegedly instructing former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello and his successor, Ahmed Usman Ododo to assassinate her in Kogi, with the intention of framing up her constituents for the crime.

    Akpabio categorically denied the allegation and called them “heinous lies” and a “reckless and deliberate attempt” to damage his reputation.

    The Senate President  described the accusations as politically motivated and intended to incite unrest and harm his public image.

    Read Also: Omololu Olunloyo (1935 – 2025)

    Akpabio said: “I write to formally bring to your attention and seek immediate investigation and prosecution of a criminally defamatory and malicious statement made against me by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, a suspended member of the  Senate on the 1st of April, 2025 and which was widely publicised on radio stations, televisions and newspapers, including the social media.

    “In the public outburst at Kogi State while addressing her audience, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan falsely alleged that I instructed the former Governor of Kogi State, Alhaji Yahaya Bello, to ‘assassinate her in Kogi State instead of Abuja’ with the intent of making it appear that her constituents were responsible for her death.”

    “This statement is not only a heinous lie but a reckless and deliberate attempt to damage my reputation, endanger my life and security, and incite political unrest.”

    The Senate President noted  that the allegation was made without any supporting evidence, adding that the widespread media coverage it received, further exacerbated the impact of the false claim.

    He said: “The severity of this false allegation, and the fact that it has gained public traction, makes it necessary that law enforcement agencies treat it with the urgency it deserves.”

    He called for a thorough investigation and prosecution of Akpoti-Uduaghan under the relevant provisions of the law.

  • How recall petition against Natasha failed – Sources

    How recall petition against Natasha failed – Sources

    The recall petition against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan failed because the petitioners could not get 50 per cent of registered voters in three out of the five local government areas that make up her senatorial district to endorse their bid.

    The local government areas are Adavi, Ajaokuta and Okehi.

    The petitioners, however, succeeded in other local government areas, which are Okene, and Ogori/Magongo.

    The five local government areas make up Kogi Central Senatorial District, also the district of Governor Ododo and his predecessor Yahaya Bello.

    There are 474, 554 voters in the district but INEC could only verify 208,132 voters by signatures/ thumbprints.

    The breakdown of the verification, obtained last night, was as follows:

    ● ADAVI: (114,663 registered voters) 32,671 verified – 28.49%

    ● AJAOKUTA: (96,504 registered voters) 45,808 verified – 47.47%

    ● OGORI/ MAGONGO: (17,688 registered voters) 9,369 verified – 52.97%

    ● ОКЕНІ: (94,456 registered voters) 37,064 verified – 39.24%

    ● OKENE: (151,243 registered voters) 83,220 verified – 55.02%

    TOTAL: (474,554 registered voters) 208,132 verified – 43.86%

    Read Also: Nigeria can still qualify for 2026 World Cup – Chelle

    A source privy to the intrigues behind the failed recall process said: “INEC was under pressure and blackmail by those for and those against.

    “Some forces, including a few Senators and political bigwigs, wanted the verification signatures/ thumbprints done within 48 hours.

    “INEC stood its ground and opted to apply the guidelines and regulations strictly. Although it has a 90-day window to complete the recall process, INEC worked within a compressed timeliness or tight schedule to authenticate the signatures/ thumbprints.

    “There was evidence of rushed application, failure to indicate the addresses or phone numbers of petitioners, but the electoral umpire insisted on due process.

    “Despite the scheming, INEC subjected every part of the recall move to a transparent process.

    “The petitioners were too much in hurry, they left many things undone.

    “They also did not reach out to many constituents due to limited time.

    “The truth is that nothing warranted the urgency attached to the petition because all actors have been in and out the court on the matter.”

    Asked about the reaction of some of the lawmakers, the source added: “When they were lamenting, we said you made the law which we implemented. It was impossible for INEC to change the law.”

    Section 69 of the 1999 Constitution (As Amended) says: “A member of the Senate or of the House of Representatives may be recalled as such a member if –(a) there is presented to the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission a petition in that behalf signed by more than one-half of the persons registered to vote in that member’s constituency alleging their loss of confidence in that member; and

    (b) the petition is thereafter, in a referendum conducted by the Independent National Electoral Commission within ninety(90) days of the date of receipt of the petition, approved by a simple majority of the votes of the persons registered to vote in that member’s constituency.

    Another source said the outcome of the verification showed that Natasha has to work harder because “she was not too strong in three out of five local governments in the district.

    “She won the battle on technical ground, not by popularity.

    “For any election, it is a matter of simple majority of the lawful votes.

    “From the field report, she needs more homework.”

  • A noose called Natasha

    A noose called Natasha

    A noose is dangling over the head of the Nigeria’s legislature and the Kogi State Government. It is known as the Natasha noose. It gave enough warning before creeping up the thick cranial base of her tormentors. We warned too. And we darkly conjectured, even remotely comparing her to the dreaded Empress Catherine, a lady of German extraction who went ahead to rule Tsarist Russia for thirty three years after doing away with her husband, the hapless Tsar, with the help of her lovers. She accounted for the scalp of many feckless Russian noblemen, but can also be wildly generous to them in parting package. Now that Nathasha is precariously perched like the infamous mosquito on the most delicate part of the male anatomy, it will take more considerable diplomatic skills and political acumen than her interlocutors have shown to prise her away.

     But Natasha’s adversaries appear unrelenting, obviously in haste to dragoon and quarter her for good. Having lost the battle to recall her, they have gone ahead to reopen the case with immediate effect, as if adding a few more questionable signatures will redeem the validity, credibility and legitimacy of the whole exercise. Little have they realized the massive pressure they are piling on the weak links of struggling democracy and the net effect of all this on an INEC already hobbled by institutional vulnerabilities and the erosion of public confidence. Despite its fondness for hiding behind one finger, INEC frailties are on ample display in the battle to recall the stormy petrel, even though it is to its credit that it came off very well.

     When they first brought the sack of aramanda voters’ list, INEC threw it back at them claiming that it was an unsigned document. But twenty four hours later, having been briefed or having debriefed itself, INEC countermanded its earlier instance by affirming that things were in order and the recall was on song. Meanwhile, background groaning and grumbling began emanating from the selfsame INEC about how arduous and expensive a recall process can be. Then suddenly last Tuesday evening, the electoral commission dismissed the whole exercise as flawed and lacking in requisite numbers. There are rumours that the commission has been guided by the irate voice vote at Natasha’s Okene rally and its convulsive possibilities. The Okene damsel has become a piece of bone stuck in the throat of gendered hegemony.

      In the end, perhaps nothing could surpass the analytical bravura and penetrating acumen of Ambassador John Galbraith’s observation of Indian society at the turn of the sixties. The great liberal economist and John Kennedy’s ambassador to India noted with caustic asperity that the more underdeveloped a country is, the more overdeveloped its women are. Galbraith might have been driven to sardonic generalization by the great disparity he noticed between the sprawling squalor and appalling misery among Indians in general around this period and the chic sophistication and alluring glamour of many of its women, particularly those from the highest caste.

    Read Also: RCCG Governing Council will hold meetings on the Moon – Adeboye

      Judging from the events of last Tuesday in particular and the preceding weeks in general, it is clear that Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan is a lot smarter and more politically savvy than all her assailants put together. One may of course object to some of her antics which smack of political desperation and brinksmanship. One may demur at her jankara tactics which do not conduce to the highest form of civility in parliamentary procedure and her lachrymose exertions which amount to sheer emotional blackmail. But there can be no doubt that she has shown extraordinary bravery, courage and fortitude in the face of unrelenting adversity and barely veiled attempts to silence her.  

    This being an authoritarian, harshly hierarchical and patriarchal society, the most progressive and egalitarian intervention can only be one that offers a lifeline and support to the female folk where and when they run afoul of the gender patrol unit of the male dominion. As the dominated stratum of a subordinated sub-class, African women are more likely to end up as victims of a double jeopardy: oppressed at home by men who are themselves oppressed abroad. To be sure, some women have proven to be equally adept, if not even more accomplished, in fiscal malfeasance than their male counterparts. But when examined closely, it will be discovered that these are lone, individual aces whose impact on society is far less devastating than the structured financial heists often associated with male-dominated financial empires and consortiums.

       In any case, pitching for women in a male-ordered world is a practical affirmation of the right of all humanity to economic and political freedom. Ultimately, it is an act of enlightened self-interest. This is a struggle for parity which has preoccupied the human society since the advent of the nation-state paradigm about six centuries ago. Some human societies do it better and faster than others, such as Iceland, Finland and the Scandinavian countries and they are happier, more humane, more productive and more prosperous for it. It is unfortunate that many in Nigeria and Africa pay lip service to the imperative of a modern, egalitarian and more democratic country without understanding how the emancipation of women plays a crucial role in the struggle to roll back the boulders of authoritarianism and traditional tyranny in post-independence and post-military Nigerian politics.

    Given the normative poverty of contemporary Nigerian politics, it is possible that neither Natasha nor many of her adversaries in the senate understand or appreciate the huge symbolic overcast against which the messy struggle to recall her from the senate is unfurling. Epic developments in history often take place under an ideological occlusion with contending protagonists often shielded from the true historic import of what they are struggling for and the possible outcome. Natasha herself cannot be said to be ideologically driven. Rich and pampered from childhood, she is a scion of the new plutocracy with its morbid acquisitiveness and anti-democratic panache. But then only few heroines of history ever emerge from the side of the people to fight for the people.

       Natasha is still very far from being a Nigerian incarnation of Nancy Astor, the American-born British politician and indefatigable campaigner for female rights. She was the first woman to be elected to the House of Commons and this was in the early twentieth century. Endowed with a caustic tongue and nettling wit, she held her own in verbal duels with male folks particularly against Winston Churchill whom she once memorably dismissed as being perpetually drunk. Once while campaigning on a rural farm, a jeering and sneering farmer thought he had the feisty lady’s back against the wall when he asked her if she even knew how many toes a sow (female pig) has. The imperious lady was having none of that nonsense. “ Remove your boots and count, man!” she shot back.

    Natasha does not need to remove her boots. What she has removed are the velvety gloves revealing her capacity to deliver bare knuckle blows to the plexus. She has shown that she needs little help. Judging from the way she has fought her corner like a ferocious kitten, it is obvious that this is going to be one helluva fight.  She has outsmarted and outwitted her fumbling and plodding enemies all the way. She has blindsided and steamrolled the Nigerian senate making the habitués of that hallowed chamber look like a bunch of political neophytes.

     When they were thinking of further hamstringing her locally, she was making a dramatic appearance abroad with her endless supply of tears on the ready. You begin to wonder whether the feisty lady keeps a generous supply of fresh onion bulbs in her swanky upmarket handbag. The reputational damage to the nation’s fledgling democracy is better imagined. And the lady is not done. Last Tuesday, Natasha upped the stakes beyond the imagination and expectation of her complacent adversaries.

      In what must rank as the most fearsome and daring pushback against a sub-national government and its entire security apparatus in post-military Nigeria, the senator representing Kogi Central District defied all odds and stumbling blockades put in place by the state government, including a subsisting ban on all rallies and vehicular processions, to address a rally of her teeming supporters in the politically combustible and volcanic Ebira principal homestead of Okene. Instead of coming by road and battling the heavy duty dragnet inch by inch and ground by ground like an infantry general, she came in a chariot of thunder and dust, descending on the venue from a chopper. The security people must have wisely concluded that they were up against a heavenly mob and the multitude of irate voters about to be violently disenfranchised by the anti-democratic paladin.

    Since these are the same constituents who are said to have demanded her ouster and recall from the senate, you would have expected her to be met by a scant crowd of surly and rude denizens tearing into her with verbal rockets. Instead, the reception was tumultuous with the frenzied crowd chanting her name and singing her praises to high heavens as the senator herself latched on to the palpable mood of high octane hostility to launch some fiery broadsides against her adversaries.  To further cement the solidarity of her people against electoral and legislative aberration, she had invoked her Ebira identity reminding the surging crowd that as an Ebira person, fear is unknown to her and she would never succumb to blackmail or be cowed by anybody born of a woman. It was a deft way of summoning the moody, irascible phalanx from the Ebira hilly range.

      Let us use this column to appeal to all men and women of goodwill in the senate to sheath their sword and bury all ego-fueled obsessions with legislative rules of conduct. This is a battle they cannot win. Even if they do, it will be a Pyrrhic victory which would have cost the senate the last shred of its remaining credibility and legitimacy. This will gravely imperil the fortunes of democracy. From all available evidence, this woman will not go down lightly. She may have a few aces further up her sleeves. The salacious and insalubrious revelations have already cost the august gathering considerable reputational damage.

    This is not consistent with the higher seriousness Nigerians have come to expect from the upper chambers of their legislature as evidenced by the brilliance and sagacity of their forbears in the First and Second Republics and even the brief Third Republic before it was snuffed out. Let the senate drop this tomfoolery of a recall which has already been compromised at source and reach out to the few surviving elder statesmen in the nation to broker a peace deal with Natasha. At this perilous point, either side needs a soft landing.

  • Suspension: Court bars Akpabio, Natasha, others from press interviews

    Suspension: Court bars Akpabio, Natasha, others from press interviews

    • Senate President demands retraction from Akpoti-Uduaghan, Abbo over allegations

    • No limits to number of petitions on Natasha’s recall — INEC

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has barred parties in the suit filed by suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan against Senate President Godswill Akpabio and three others from granting press interviews on issues relating to the case.

    Justice Binta Nyako issued the order yesterday following complaint by lawyer to Akpabio, Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN).

    Ogunwumiju had complained that the plaintiff was moving from one television house to another, granting press interviews on issues relating to her case, currently pending before the court.

    He claimed that Natasha has been to the BBC and CNN to speak on the issue.

    Ruling, Justice Nyako said there shall be no press interviews by all parties and their lawyers as regarding the subject matter of the case.

    Justice Nyako, who noted that the case was sub-judice, also barred parties and their lawyers from engaging in streaming of proceedings in the case on social media.

    At the commencement of proceedings yesterday, plaintiff’s lawyer, Jibril Okutepa (SAN) told the court that the case was coming up for the first time having been transferred from another court presided over by Justice Obiora Egwuatu.

    Okutepa said parties have filed and exchanged all relevant documents except one, and prayed the court to grant a consolidated hearing of all pending applications along with the substantive suit.

    He noted that time was of the essence because his client’s suspicion was for a limited period.

    He added that his client was desirous of expeditious determination of the case.

    Lawyers to the Clerk of the National Assembly, Charles Iyoila and Paul Daudu (SAN), who represented the Senate, did not object to Okutepa’s application that the substantive case should be heard with the objections raised by the defendants.

    Ogunwumiju and Umeh Kalu (SAN), who represented Senator Neda Imasuem – Chairman, Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Code of Conduct – objected to Okutepa’s application.

    Read Also: Tinubu is a courageous leader, we are praying for him – Bishop Wale Oke

    Justice Nyako ruled and held in favour of Okutepa, saying the court would hear all pending applications, including preliminary objections along with the substantive suit.

    She then adjourned till May 12 for hearing.

    Listed as defendants in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 are the Clerk of the National Assembly, the Senate, the President of the Senate and Senator Neda Imasuem (Chairman, Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Code of Conduct).

    Natasha is, by the suit, challenging the decision of the Senate to suspend her for six months over alleged misconduct.

    The plaintiff is contending, among others, that she was not accorded fair hearing before the Senate took the decision to suspend her.

    Senate President demands retraction from Akpoti-Uduaghan, Abbo over allegations

    Senate President Godswill Akpabio has written letters to Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and former Adamawa North Senator, Ishaku Elisha Abbo to demand retractions, apologies and compensation for reputational harm over malicious claims against him by the duo.

    While Akpoti-Uduaghan accused Akpabio of plotting his assassination, Abbo claimed that the Senate president masterminded his removal from the Senate.

    Akpabio, according to a statement by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity Hon Eseme Eyiboh in Abuja, said that the “timing, tone and striking similarity of these coordinated attacks point clearly to a politically motivated smear campaign.”

    He described the accusations as baseless, malicious and false, urging the public to disregard them.

    The statement reads in part: “The Office of the President of the Senate strongly condemns the recent baseless, false and inflammatory accusation made by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, in which she falsely alleged that the Senate President, His Excellency, Senator Godswill Akpabio, GCON, was involved in a plot to assassinate her.

    “While speaking in Kogi State on April 1, 2025, the suspended Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan recklessly and maliciously claimed that Senator Godswill Akpabio ‘recruited’ former Governor Yahaya Bello to ‘assassinate her in Kogi State rather than in Abuja.’

    “This outrageous accusation is not only false but a complete fabrication and deeply irresponsible and dangerous attempt to provoke public unrest, attract media attention and discredit the person and office of the President of the Senate for ulterior motives.

    “It is important to remind the public that this same individual had previously made an unsubstantiated accusation of sexual harassment against Senator Akpabio—a claim she seems to have abandoned without explanation.

    “Having failed to gain traction with that narrative, she has now escalated her campaign of misinformation to a deadly and defamatory dimension.

    “This pattern of deliberate falsehoods and manipulative theatrics reveals a troubling willingness to exploit public sensitivities through recurring victimhood narratives.

    “It is a matter of public record that she has previously made assassination allegations against former Governor Yahaya Bello and others in 2019 and 2023, along with multiple unsubstantiated claims of sexual harassment against other dignitaries.

    “Her recurring persecution narrative and evident lying complex should not be weaponised to malign individuals or destroy hard-earned reputations.

    “Interestingly, this latest reckless allegation is not occurring in isolation.

    “Barely 24 hours later, on April 2, 2025, former Senator Elisha Abbo appeared on Arise Television to revive a previously withdrawn claim that Senator Akpabio ‘manipulated the judiciary’ to secure his removal from the Senate.

    “Nigerians will recall that Mr. Abbo, in 2023, publicly retracted this same accusation and tendered an apology after acknowledging that his claims were founded on incorrect assumptions.

    “His removal from office was the outcome of a constitutionally grounded judicial decision by the Court of Appeal, which independently determined that he was not duly elected to represent Adamawa North.

    “In a further twist, Mr. Abbo also alleged that he was denied his entitlements by the Senate President. This, too, is categorically false.

    “Entitlements such as salaries and allowances are processed strictly through administrative and legal procedures.

    “The Senate President does not and cannot unilaterally approve or deny such requests.

    “Any delays or rejections would have been based solely on due diligence and compliance with established protocols.

    “The timing, tone and striking similarity of these coordinated attacks point clearly to a politically motivated smear campaign.

    “These individuals—backed by undisclosed interests—appear united in a desperate effort to undermine the credibility of the Senate and its leadership and intended to distract from their own personal and political shortcomings and failings.

    “Senator Godswill Akpabio remains undeterred.

    “As a statesman devoted to national unity, institutional integrity, and the rule of law, he will not be distracted by malicious falsehoods or inflammatory rhetoric.

    “Regardless of the necessity for legal redress, formal letters of demand, seeking immediate public retractions, apologies and compensation for reputational harm, are underway to be served on both Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and Mr Elisha Abbo.

    “We call on the Nigerian public in particular and the International Community to reject these baseless and provocative narratives.

    “The Senate, under Senator Akpabio’s leadership, remains focused on its constitutional mandate: to promote legislative excellence, safeguard democratic values, and deliver meaningful progress for the Nigerian people.”

    No limits to number of petitions on Natasha’s recall — INEC

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has said there are no limits to the number of times a lawmaker can be subjected to a recall process.

    The clarification was made by the Chairman of the Commission, Rotimi Oyekanmi in relation to the recall efforts initiated by some constituents of Kogi Central Senator, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, over her face-off with the authorities of the upper legislative chamber.

    Natasha had been suspended for six months for unruly behavior after a verbal attack she launched against the Senate President Godswill Akpabio during plenary on February 20 because the latter insisted that she could only address the chamber from the seat allocated to her.

    The lawmaker would later allege that the Senate President prevented her from speaking because she had previously declined his sexual advances.

    Speaking on a Channels Television programmme, Politics Today, on Thursday after a bid by Natasha’s constituents to recall her was declined on the grounds that the conditions precedent had not been fulfilled, Oyekanmi said there is no limit to the number of times her constituents can call for her recall.

    “The law does not specify how many times a lawmaker can be recalled,” he said, adding that Section 69 of the constitution outlines the process for recall but does not restrict the number of attempts.

    He, however, said for any recall to succeed, the petition must meet the constitutional requirement of signatures from more than 50 per cent of the registered voters in the affected constituency.

    The commission had declined the previous effort made to recall Natasha because it noted that the number of verified signatures fell short of the required 50 per cent plus one of registered voters in Kogi Central.

    Led by Charity Omole, some aggrieved constituents had stormed INEC’s headquarters in Abuja on March 24 to submit the recall petition, citing Natasha’s suspension from the Senate s the reason for their action.

    “We cannot afford not to have a representative in the Senate. We are the ones who voted her in, and now we are saying we don’t want her anymore,” Omole said.

    INEC, however, declined the petition despite Omole’s claim that more than 250,000 of the 488,000 registered voters in the district had signed the petition, saying the original submission was incomplete, lacking the necessary contact details of the petitioners as required by the commission’s guidelines.

  • UPDATED: Court bars parties from granting interviews in Natasha’s case against Akpabio, others

    UPDATED: Court bars parties from granting interviews in Natasha’s case against Akpabio, others

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has barred parties in the suit filed by suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan against the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio and three others from granting press interviews on issues relating to the case.

    Justice Binta Nyako issued the order on Friday following complaint by lawyer to Akpabio, Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN).

    Ogunwumiju had complained that the plaintiff was moving from one television house to another, granting press interviews on issues relating to her case, currently pending before the court.

    He claimed that Natasha has been to the BBC and CNN to speak on the issue.

    Ruling, Justice Nyako said there shall be no press interviews by all parties and their lawyers as regard the subject matter of the case.

    Justice Nyako, who noted that the case was sub-judice, also barred parties and their lawyers from engaging in streaming of proceedings in the case on social media.

    At the commencement of proceedings on Friday, plaintiff’s lawyer, Jibril Okutepa (SAN) told the court that the case was coming up for the first, having been transferred from another court, presided over by Justice Obiora Egwuatu.

    Read Also: Court stops pro-Wike rally in Bayelsa

    Okutepa said parties have filed and exchanged all relevant documents, except one and prayed the court to grant a consolidated hearing of all pending applications along with the substantive suit.

    He noted that time was of the essence because his client’s suspicion was for a limited period. He added the his client was desirous of expeditious determination of the case.

    Lawyers to the Clerk of the National Assembly, Charles Iyoila and Paul Daudu (SAN), who represented the Senate did not object to Okutepa’s application that the substantive case should be heard with the objections raised by the defendants.

    Ogunwumiju and Umeh Kalu (SAN), who represented Senator Neda Imasuem – Chairman, Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Code of Conduct – objected to Okutepa’s application.

    Justice Nyako ruled and held in favour of Okutepa, saying the court would hear all pending applications, including preliminary objections along with the substantive suit.

    She then adjourned till May 12 for hearing.

    Listed as defendants in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025 are the Clerk of the National Assembly, the Senate, the President of the Senate and Senator Neda Imasuem (Chairman, Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Code of Conduct).

    Natasha is, by the suit, challenging the decision of the Senate to suspend her for six months over alleged misconduct.

    The plaintiff is contending, among others, that she was not accorded fair hearing before the Senate took the decision to suspend her.

  • JUST IN: Court bars parties from granting interviews in Natasha’s case against Akpabio, others

    JUST IN: Court bars parties from granting interviews in Natasha’s case against Akpabio, others

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has barred parties in the suit filed by suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan against the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio and three others from granting press interviews on issues relating to the case.

    Justice Binta Nyako issued the order on Friday following complaint by lawyer to Akpabio, Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN) that the plaintiff was moving from one television house to another, granting press interviews on issues relating to her case, currently pending before the court.

    Read Also: Natasha hails INEC as recall process fails, launches maternity center in Kogi

    Ruling, Justice Nyako said there shall be no press interviews by all parties and their lawyers as regard the subject matter of the case.

    Justice Nyako also barred parties and their lawyers from engaging in streaming of proceedings in the case on social media.

    Details shortly…