Tag: national assembly

  • The answer to LGA third-tier fraud

    The answer to LGA third-tier fraud

    Again we are back to square one. While the celebration over July 11 Supreme Court judgment that granted financial autonomy to the 774 Local Government Areas across the country lasted, not a few had wondered if the Supreme Court was not putting the cart before the horse by embarking on a judicial misadventure over what was unarguably a political issue. And now, the National Assembly, which but for its hypocrisy has the power to confront the nation’s demon, is bellyaching about sections 13, 14 and 16 of Anambra LGA new bill which seek to compel the local governments to pay their federal allocation into an account to be established by the state government, a bill it claims runs afoul of the Supreme Court judgment.

    Perhaps our National Assembly that that often treat Nigerian with less dignity than even the colonial masters, think Nigerians are suffering from collective amnesia since neither the said Supreme Court judgment nor the National Assembly has removed the constitutional power of the state Houses of Assembly to make laws for local government.

     One was however not surprised  that this was coming from Governor Chukwuma Soludo who, as CBN governor, called attention to the chicanery of our leaders with his “Nigeria is the only known federation in the world where the centre allocates funds to third tier of government it does not supervise”.

    The truth is that military arbitrarily created local government as third tier of government like the 36 states also created without logic or rhyme are a fraud by those driven by command and control military mind-set. If the fervour was about rural development, we did not see that play out during Babangida’s regime when most of the badly executed or abandoned DFFRI projects were cornered by retired military officers.

    And If it was to deepen democracy as Obasanjo wanted us to believe, very few will be persuaded that deepening democracy at grassroots level was by providing money, cars and logistics to feuding intra-party members to destroy their party or destabilise their state as he was reported to have done in Ekiti by ferrying a few members of state House of Assembly out of their states to Abuja to impeach their governors for opposing his third term bid has a familiar ring of fascism.

    It was not a surprise most of the professors Obasanjo dragged to his LGA’s ‘third tier crusade’, parted way with him when they discovered they had been used. Both Professor Ben Nwabueze and Chief Rotimi Williams who helped Obasanjo to destroy whatever was left of our federalism in 1979 by ceding almost 70% of the items in the constitution to the exclusive list with nothing in residual list publicly regretted betraying the country before their passage to the great beyond.

    The tragedy of our nation is that unlike the unambitious set of leaders we have had since 1999, Nigeria once had selfless and visionary leaders for whom the nation came first. Ex-president Jonathan acknowledged this during his 51st independence anniversary by “thanking our founding fathers  who brought  joy and hope to the hearts of our people  after six decades of colonial rule  by working together to  restore dignity and honour  to a multicultural and multilingual nation of diverse people with more than 250 distinct languages and ethnic groups”.

    Read Also: African Diasporans seek Nigerian citizenship

    This they achieved in spite of the initial lack of consensus on the national question with Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe and his group canvassing for unitary system, Obafemi Awolowo and his Yoruba group insisting on federalism while Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa who believed “Nigerian unity is a British invention” and Ahmadu Bello who expressed grief over “the mistake of 1914” settled for confederacy.  But at the end, realizing their responsibility to those that look up to them for direction, these illustrious Nigerian pathfinders settled for a federal arrangement that allowed groups to develop at their own pace.

    Unfortunately, nearly all northern governors have since 1999 been opposed to returning the country to a federal arrangement, a social system that promises ‘unity in diversity’, justice and fairness. The reasoning behind the northern governors short-sightedness is that the north because of its numerical advantage in the number of states and LGAs, not only collect more free monies from the federation account, but gives it a veto power over any form of constitutional amendment.

    But for refusing to confront our demon, everyone is a loser. Nuhu Ribadu some two years back had challenged these northern leaders to show how billions of naira collected from the federation account since 1999 have impacted on the lives of the poor in the north. It is in this regard, one can also ask the Niger Delta’s self-serving leaders who many believe are behind oil bunkering, if lives of ordinary people of the Niger Delta are better today than in 1999 when they first embarked on economic sabotage of the country. And what has been the fate of ordinary people in the Southwest and Southeast where governors surreptitiously worked against restructuring of the country for fear of losing easy money coming from Abuja which they often deploy towards ‘building bridges over land?

    Again, for the sake of our uninformed youths, we must go through history our leaders want to supplant with revisionism which celebrates criminals as heroes.

    Between 1962 and 1963, the constitution bequeathed onto us by our founding fathers was breached by NPC/NCNC coalition partners of Prime Minister Balewa, President Nnamdi Azikiwe and Premiers Ahmadu Bello and Okpara, who jointly refused to recognise Dauda Soroye Adegbenro, the duly elected and Privy Council recognized Premier of Western Region. That paved the way for the incarceration of Obafemi Awolowo, the setting back of the giant strides made by the West and the installation of Ladoke Akintola as premier by the coalition partners without election. Anarchy was let loose on the west when those denied the right to determine their own fate decided to make sure those who sowed the wind reaped the whirlwind through ‘operation wet e’.

    While the west was burning, the north buried its fangs on the neck of the east after the disputed 1962/63 census exercises and the massively rigged 1964 election. Zik as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces had approached the military for support but was reminded that operationally, the military reports to the prime minister. Zik while pretending to be going for medical check-up but in reality embarked on ship cruise to South America, after  handing power over to Dr Nwafor Orizu, the Senate President.

    In January 1966, Igbo young military adventurers sympathetic to Zik, in breach of the military espirit de corps, selectively murdered  their friends, about eight northern senior military officers and their political leaders, two western senior military leaders and their premier while conveniently sparing their over 30 Igbo military officers and Igbo political leaders.

    Aguiyi Ironsi after quashing the insurrection took over power with the help of the Senate President who according to Richard Akinjide, refused to swear in the next available minister in the absence of the prime minister as stipulated by the constitution.

    Ironsi’s greatest undoing was the promulgation of Decree 34 which turned the country from a federal into a unitary state. That was quickly interpreted as an Igbo agenda having canvassed for a unitary system during the various constitutional debate from 1954 up to the 1957 London Constitutional Conference where NCNC leaders insisted Nigeria should be divided into a federation of 17 provinces which Awolowo claimed would amount to bringing unitary system through the back door.

    In July 1966, another set of adventurers led by Murtala Mohammed, Danjuma, Babangida,  and others initiated their vengeance coup called Araba (secession) during which all Ibo military officers on sight were brutally murdered.

    At the end the civil war that followed, successive northern military leaders created more states and LGAs for the north thus making northern leaders the 1950 Nigeria they could control a fait accompli.

    The way forward is not through a third tier fraud or unviable states created without rhyme. The cheapest and tested option before us is to confront our demons by embracing a federation of six geo-political zones as canvassed by Nigerian stakeholders including leaders of ethnic nationalities, the true owners of Nigeria.

    This is the answer to distributive injustice in the South-south, tribal war over control of political power and resources on the in the Northwest, Boko Haram insurgency in the Northeast and  the apparent ethnic cleansing in the North-central where majority of our compatriots live in IDP camps in their own country.

    And as for our embattled President Tinubu who voluntarily offered himself a sacrificial lamb after 58 years of crisis of nation-building, he has a choice as to whether he wants to be remembered as a Nigerian statesman or like his predecessors including Buhari, the best statesman we never had.

  • National Assembly to consider 25% tax on high earners

    National Assembly to consider 25% tax on high earners

    The chairman of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, Taiwo Oyedele, has disclosed that wealthy Nigerians earning N100 million and above monthly will face a 25 percent personal income tax rate if a new tax bill is passed by the National Assembly.

    This revelation was made during a breakout session at the ongoing 30th Nigeria Economic Summit in Abuja on Monday, October 14.

    Oyedele emphasised the need to strike a balance between easing the tax burden for lower-income earners and ensuring the wealthy contribute more to government revenue.

    “If you earn N100 million a month, we’re taking up to 25 percent from the rich people. That’s because we need to balance the books,” Oyedele stated.

    He added that the proposed changes are expected to take effect from January 2025, based on the passage of the bill by lawmakers.

    For middle-income earners making N1.5 million or less per month, Oyedele disclosed that their personal income tax obligations would decrease, while those earning higher amounts would see incremental increases in their tax rates, eventually reaching 25 percent. Lower-income earners would be fully exempt from personal income tax.

    The reforms also aim to ease the tax burden on businesses.

    Oyedele noted: “Today, whatever VAT you (businesses) pay on assets—whether you’re building a factory, buying a laptop, or vehicles—you bear it. This increases your cost, and therefore, your pricing will go up. Once our reforms are implemented, you get the credit back 100 percent on services and assets.”

    Additionally, the corporate income tax rate is set to drop from 30 percent to 25 percent which Oyedele described as “huge” for businesses. Other significant tax adjustments include a reduction or elimination of VAT on essential goods and services such as food, health, education, accommodation, and transportation.

    These essential services make up a large portion of household expenditure for the lower-income population, and the proposed reforms aim to lessen their financial burden.

    Read Also: National Assembly workers’ union leadership denies alleged N3bn fraud

    However, Oyedele acknowledged that not all sectors would benefit from reduced tax rates. For other goods and services, the VAT rate would increase to ensure the government’s revenue book balance.

    He also pointed out that inflation had already acted as a “disorderly” tax on the population, eroding the value of their money without the need for legislation.

    In addressing concerns over tax incentives and waivers, Oyedele argued that indiscriminate incentives harm the economy and that removing unnecessary incentives could relieve the business sector without costing the government revenue.

    “We cannot give all the incentives you are asking for. We think the biggest low-hanging fruit is removing these incentives, and that’s exactly what we are doing,” Oyedele concluded.

  • National Assembly workers’ union leadership denies alleged N3bn fraud

    National Assembly workers’ union leadership denies alleged N3bn fraud

    The Parliamentary Staff Association of Nigeria (PASAN), National Assembly Chapter, has denied allegation of misappropriating N3billion union funds leveled against it.

    A member of PASAN, Yusuf Abiola, had at a press conference on Monday in Abuja, accused the union executive of misappropriating the amount.

    He demanded audited financial statements and operational reports from 2019 till date from the executive.

    However in his reaction to the allegation, the chairman of PASAN, Comrade Sunday Sabiyyi, in a statement jointly signed by the Secretary of the association, Comrade David Ann Ebizimoh, described the allegation as baseless and defamatory.

    Sabiyyi called on members of the union and the general public to disregard what he described as “unfounded blackmail intended to distract the union from pursuing its mandate coherently to the letter.”

    The statement reads in part: “Our attention has been drawn to recent defamatory publication of financial mismanagement and others.

    “The Parliamentary Staff Association of Nigeria, National Assembly Chapter wishes to put the records straight and debunk the libelous allegations that the Executive of Parliamentary Staff Association of Nigeria (PASAN) NASS Chapter under the leadership of Comrade Sunday Sabiyyi regarding our Association’s financial management, leadership style, and the call for reform.

    “Firstly, to set the records straight, let me address the alleged financial mismanagement and lack of accountability raised against the Executive Council.

    Read Also: Oyetola food support scheme distributes cash gift to 1,200 Osun households

    “We want to assure the general public that the NASS Executive Council of PASAN has always been transparent and accountable in managing the Association’s finances.

    “We have followed all the constitutional procedures and protocols to ensure that funds are used appropriately and for the benefit of all members.

    “We have also maintained accurate records of all financial transactions and we
    are open to any inquiries or audits that may be required at any time.

    “Clearly the check off dues and any other purported source of funds as alleged by the detractors to the tune of three (3) billion Naira cannot be generated by the 36 State Chapters and FCT Zone of PASAN which includes NASS and National Assembly Service Commission Chapters joined together.

    “Thus, it is unreasonable, mischievous and ludicrous to imagine that NASS Chapter of the Union expended such magnitude of money; a figment of the imagination of
    our detractors.

    “The Union calls on every well-meaning member of the PASAN and general public to disregard such unfounded blackmail intended to distract the union from pursuing its mandate coherently to the letter.”

    The union described those peddling the allegation as sore losers who contested for executive positions but were defeated by their opponent during the elections that ushered in the present executive of the union.

    “We understand the concerns of our members, we believe that the current leadership is committed to addressing pending issues and determined to implement the necessary reforms.

    “We have always been opened to feedback and suggestions from our members and have always been willing to make changes for the betterment of the association,” the union added.

  • 39 youths for EU legislative internship

    39 youths for EU legislative internship

    The European Union, through its Support to Democratic Governance in Nigeria (EU-SDGN) Programme Phase II, has welcomed 39 young Nigerians into the Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre (PLAC) Legislative Internship Programme.

    This initiative offers a rare opportunity for young graduates to gain hands-on experience with legislative practices and processes at Nigeria’s National Assembly.

    The programme, which spans 10 weeks, is designed to provide interns with practical exposure to legislative work, fostering engagement and networking opportunities with members and staff of the 10th National Assembly.

    Beyond career development, it also aims to create networking opportunities and promote skills essential for legislative engagement.
    Head of Cooperation for the European Union Delegation to Nigeria and ECOWAS, Massimo De Luca highlighted the significance of the internship and its role in empowering young Nigerians to be active participants in democratic governance.

    De Luca said: “The EU is committed to supporting democratic governance and the empowerment of young Nigerians through this internship programme.

    “We believe that investing in youth capacity and legislative knowledge is fundamental to building a more inclusive, transparent, and effective democracy. Through this initiative, we hope to inspire a new generation of leaders who will actively contribute to shaping Nigeria’s future.”

    The Executive Director of the Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre (PLAC), Clement Nwankwo, said that the programme reflects PLAC’s dedication, with the support of the European Union, to strengthen Nigeria’s democratic governance.

    He said: “The Legislative Internship Programme is more than just an opportunity to learn the inner workings of the National Assembly; it is a platform for young Nigerians to engage meaningfully in our democracy.

    “By gaining firsthand experience in legislative processes, these interns are not only enhancing their skills but also helping to lay the foundation for stronger, more accountable governance in Nigeria. We are proud to partner with the European Union to provide this transformative experience.”

    Nwankwo also outlined the opportunities the internship offers, such as learning research methods for legislative committee assignments, participating in oversight, gaining knowledge of the legislative framework, and familiarising interns with key legislative documents like Bills, the Order Paper and Hansard.

    He said by the end of the programme, interns are expected to have a deeper understanding of how a bill is passed into law and the intricacies of the lawmaking process.

    Read Also: Yiaga Africa trains 74 legislative aides

    The EU-funded Legislative Internship Programme is a significant step in promoting the participation and involvement of young professionals in governance, aiming to build a generation of leaders with the skills and dedication needed to contribute effectively to Nigeria’s democratic development.

    The Legislative Internship Programme, organised by PLAC and funded by the EU, is a full-time initiative aimed at young Nigerians seeking insights into the legislative process.

    Participants are selected from across the states, with the EU fully funding the programme since 2018.

    Previously backed by the UK government, the EU took over funding to further its efforts in democratic empowerment and support for youth in governance.

    Despite being 100% funded by the EU, PLAC has worked closely to maintain the programme’s visibility while navigating the balance between EU support and PLAC’s programme ownership.

  • NASS: Much ado about status

    NASS: Much ado about status

    Let me start this piece with an anecdote. The setting would be in the heart of Abuja. A grand masquerade ball unfolded, hosted by National Assembly members. Each guest wore elaborate costumes symbolizing their perceived importance. The more extravagant the attire, the greater their sense of self-worth.

    As the night wore on, the dance floor became a battleground, with lawmakers clashing in a frenzy of one-upmanship. The air reverberated with boasts of “I am the greatest” and “My constituency is the most important.”

    Then, a wise sage appeared, carrying a mirror. “Gaze into this glass and behold the true reflection of your endeavours,” the sage declared. The lawmakers hesitated, but curiosity prevailed.

    As they peered into the mirror, they saw not their costumes but the faces of their forlorn, forgotten constituents.

    “You sought this office to serve, not self-serve,” the sage reminded them. “Your greatness lies not in titles but in the positive impact you create.” As the night closed, lawmakers departed, masks removed, eyes opened to their true purpose.

    I simulate this allegory to represent the drama, a spectacle, indeed on the floor of the House of Representatives on Wednesday. Their quest for equal status with the Senate has become a farcical struggle, with the House ultimately being the laughingstock.

    It all began when Cyril Agbese raised concerns about the Grand Commander of the Order of the Niger (GCON) being awarded to the Senate President, while the Speaker of the House and Deputy Senate President receives the Commander of the Federal Republic (CFR), “creating an unfair hierarchy.”

    This disparity, he says,  is particularly striking, considering the Chief Justice of Nigeria, who ranks lower than the Speaker, also holds the GCON title.

    Truth is the constitution clearly establishes equal status between the Senate and House of Representatives, with distinct responsibilities to maintain a system of checks and balances. While the Senate confirms presidential appointments, like ministers, ambassadors, and other key federal appointments, the House strength lies in its greater authority over appropriations and the power of the purse.

    Indeed, proponents of a change in status quo, whatever that means, argue that notable Nigerians without elective office experience, such as Aliko Dangote and Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, have received the GCON. What an analogy! They contend that honouring the Speaker with the GCON is essential for democracy and rectifying this “longstanding injustice.”

    Again, the House of Reps’ push for equality appears to be a power grab rather than a genuine attempt to promote legislative harmony. The motion to confer GCON on the Speaker is unnecessary and potentially divisive. National honours are symbolic, and constitutional balance already exists. Lawmakers should prioritize substantive issues like economic development, security, and healthcare over symbolic titles. In seeking to elevate their status, the House of Reps has inadvertently undermined their own authority and relevance. The House of Representatives should recognize its existing co-equal status and significant powers rather than pursuing a futile quest for prestige.

    Read Also: FG recognises outstanding young achievers

    The ongoing debate in NASS is a stark reminder that the country’s lawmakers are bogged down in trivial matters. As Hon. Abdulmummin Jibrin astutely observed the issue should transcend titular distinctions. The National Honours Act of 1964, which limits GCON awards to two per annum, has only served to exacerbate the disparity. At any rate, no Speaker in Nigeria’s history has been conferred with GCON. The last speaker, Femi Gbajabiamila, tried in 2021 and failed. Ironically, he’s today’s President Tinubu’s Chief of Staff. This echoes the wisdom of “be careful what you wish for.”

    It’s astounding that some legislators are proposing to reassign the CJN’s GCON honour to the Speaker or even suggest that the Chief Justice’s GCON be withdrawn to make way for the Speaker. This is nothing short of an exercise in futility if the real issue at hand is the need for clarity on legislative roles and honours to ensure parity and dignity within our bicameral system.

    Unfortunately, the House has set up an ad hoc committee, chaired by Julius Ihonvbere, to interface with the Ministry of Special Duties and push for their demands. Ihonvbere, a respected scholar and apostle of Prof. Claude Ake should know better. The controversy surrounding the balance of power between the Senate and House of Representatives is not unique to Nigeria.

    In fact, many countries with bicameral systems have successfully navigated this challenge. The United States, for instance, has equal powers between the Senate and House of Representatives, with joint committees and bipartisan negotiations facilitating cooperation. The United Kingdom’s House of Commons holds more power, while the House of Lords reviews and revises legislation. While Canada and Australia have also found ways to balance power between their legislative bodies through parliamentary diplomacy and compromise to facilitate cooperation. Germany’s Bundestag holds more power, while the Bundesrat represents state interests. India’s Lok Sabha holds more power, with the Rajya Sabha representing state interests.

    Meanwhile, back in Nigeria, 70% of citizens struggle to find their next meal, and the debate over scrapping one house to strengthen the other and reduce governance costs rages on. It’s ironic that lawmakers bemoan the deplorable state of road infrastructure yet quibble over superiority instead of addressing the country’s dwindling standards.

    Nigeria’s bicameral legislature is designed to provide checks and balances, with the Senate’s 109 representing regional interests, while the 360-member House of Representatives represents the population directly. Each senator’s numerical strength is substantial, representing up to 10 local governments in some cases like Kano and Lagos. The Senate’s exclusive authority to confirm presidential appointments gives it relatively more sway. Besides these, all other perks and privileges are similar. So, rather than bickering, it’s time for lawmakers to focus on substantive issues of the economy, public infrastructure, education, health and security, etc., not symbolic titles.

    So, it is specious that there is a debate surrounding the ,“equality” of chambers.

    Proponents argue that it prevents legislative domination, ensuring no single chamber has absolute power, even when duplication, wastefulness, red-tapism, ego-tropism, lethargy, ineffectiveness and incompetence are obvious. These criticisms are valid, considering the high costs associated with running a bicameral legislature.

    The “first among equals” debate sparked by some representatives also highlights an inferiority complex. It’s essential to recognize that Godswill Akpabio and Tajudeen are already “first among equals” within their respective chambers. The National Order of precedence also places the Senate President before the Speaker, indicating a clear hierarchy. When the chambers hold joint sessions for budget presentation in the House of Representatives’ Green chamber in a matter of weeks, we’ll see who presides.

    Rather than demanding equality where it already exists, our NASS members should focus on effective governance, prioritizing national interests, and leveraging their unique strengths. It is only by embracing their distinct roles that lawmakers can earn the people’s confidence, enhance legislative effectiveness, and better serve Nigeria.

    To resolve conflicts already spawned, there is a need for emotional intelligence to be taught our Reps.

    There are also various strategies employed by other nations with a bicameral legislature and joint platforms for cooperation and collaboration between chambers. Conference committees facilitate negotiation and compromise to resolve disputes. Bipartisan negotiations foster collaboration rather than competition. Parliamentary diplomacy encourages constructive dialogue and mutual understanding. Constitutional provisions establish clear guidelines for resolving disputes. Neutral third-party mediation offers impartial resolution mechanisms. Clear definitions of powers and responsibilities prevent conflicts through transparent roles and expectations.

    I think the National Institutes of Legislative and Democracy Studies (NILDS), the intellectual arm of NASS, should play a crucial role in defining powers and responsibilities dynamics to prevent conflicts and promote effective governance. By adopting these strategies, Nigeria’s National Assembly can optimize its performance and better serve the nation.

    The grand masquerade ball only underscores the absurdity that often pervades Nigeria’s legislative landscape. But amidst the chaos, there should be a wise sage to appear, bear a mirror that should reveal the true reflection of their endeavors – the faces of their constituents, forgotten in their pursuit of power and prestige. It also highlights the imperative for NILDS to interrogate legislative etiquette and temper self-serving tendencies.

    True leadership transcends grand attire and titles. It should focus instead on genuine service and positively impact lives. Our leaders must shed the toga of Emilokanism and embrace their roles as public servants rather than being distracted by prestige and power struggles. Comparison, they say, is the thief of joy.

     Somorin, former Chief Press Secretary to Gov. Dapo Abiodun teaches History and Philosophy of Science at the Adekunle Ajasin University, Abeokuta Study Centre.

  • Reps considering Bill to appoint National Assembly’s security head from staff members

    Reps considering Bill to appoint National Assembly’s security head from staff members

    The House of Representatives is considering a Bill that will make it mandatory for the head of the National Assembly security, called the Sergeant-At-Arms, to be appointed from among the staff members of the Security Department.

    The Bill, sponsored by the House spokesman Akintunde Rotimi, seeks to provide for the establishment of a Legislative Security Directorate which will be headed by an officer with an equivalent rank of a Secretary in the service of the National Assembly to be appointed by the National Assembly Service Commission on the recommendation of the Clerk to the National Assembly.

    Read Also: 8000 illegal refineries destroyed in six months, says NNPCL

    Presently, the Head of the Sergeant-At-Arms is appointed from among retired senior security personnel.

    The Bill, titled: “An Act to provide for the establishment and functions of Legislative Security Directorate in the National Assembly; to provide for the qualification and condition of service of the Sergeant-At-Arms and other personnel of the directorate and for related Matters, 2024,” was read for the first time on Thursday.

  • Cashcraft dragged before National Assembly

    Cashcraft dragged before National Assembly

    A Group of Nigerians has taken Cashcraft Asset Management Company Limited to the National Assembly over failed investments totaling more than N8 billion.

    The group, in a petition to the House of Representatives, demanded the intervention of the parliament to help it recover the trapped funds.

    The petition was sponsored on its behalf by a member representing Awka North/South Federal Constituency of Anambra State in the House of Representatives, Hon. Professor Obiageli Lilian Orogbu.

    She told the House in plenary that the Nigerians involved in the investment were 9,326 and prayed the parliament to ensure that  Cashcraft Asset Management Company Limited was compelled to fulfill its contractual obligations to the subscribers.

    Read Also: Alleged planned attack on University of Abuja campus false – Police

    Orogbu further disclosed that  the company,  a duly licensed stock broker by the Nigerian Stock Exchange, (NSE) had marketed an investment portfolio described as Personal Earning and Annuity Scheme which they embraced and invested their hard-earned money.

    She noted that it was regrettable that the company after extorting so much money from those innocent Nigerians failed to offer them both returns on their investments and the capital they invested.

    Orogbu consequently urged the House to direct its Committee on Public Petitions to take over the matter and ensure that Cashcraft fulfill its part of the obligations to the subscribers stressing that some of the victims were already going into depression because of the failed involvement.

  • National Assembly postpones resumption

    National Assembly postpones resumption

    Both chambers of the National Assembly have shifted their resumption date from September 17 to September 24.

    The Clerk to the Senate, Chinedu Akubueze, and House of Representatives spokesman Akin Rotimi announced the postponement in separate statements yesterday in Abuja.

    In an internal memorandum addressed to all senators, titled: Change in Resumption Date from Summer Break, Akubueze said: “Please, be informed that the resumption date from the ongoing recess has been rescheduled from Tuesday, September 17, 2024, to Tuesday, September 24, 2024 at 11 a.m.

    The Spokesman of the Home of Representatives, Rotimi,

    In a statement, titled: House of Representatives to Reconvene from Recess September 24, Inaugurate PCC Board, Ad Hoc Committee on Petroleum Industry, the Green Chamber’s spokesman Akintunde Rotimi said: “The House of Representatives is set to resume from its annual recess on Tuesday, September 24, 2024, at 11 a.m.

    “This follows a rescheduling from the original date of September 17, 2024, as communicated to honourable members via an internal memorandum by the Clerk of the House, Dr. Yahaya Danzaria, on Wednesday, on the directive of the House Leadership.

    Read Also: Reworked Whistleblowing Bill for National Assembly soon, says Edun

    “During the recess, Honourable Members engaged extensively in constituency outreach across the country, addressing critical issues of concern to constituents, and deepening oversight of ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs), in accordance with the functions spelt out in the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the House Standing Orders.

    “Upon reconvening, the leadership of the House will inaugurate the new board of the Public Complaints Commission (PCC) and the Joint Senate/House Ad Hoc Committees on the Petroleum Industry Investigation on Wednesday, September 25, 2024.

    “Further details regarding these activities will be announced during plenary on the day of resumption.

    “As the 10th Assembly resumes, it will continue to drive its Legislative Agenda, focusing on impactful reforms aimed at national development and fulfilling its mandate to the Nigerian people.”

  • National Assembly postpones resumption

    National Assembly postpones resumption

    Both chambers of the National Assembly have shifted their resumption earlier fixed for September 17, to September 24.

    The Clerk to the Senate, Chinedu Akubueze, and the Spokesman of the House of Representatives, Hon. Akin Rotimi, disclosed this in separate statements in Abuja.

    Akubueze in an internal memorandum addressed to all Senators, titled: “Change in Resumption Date from Summer Break” said: “Please be informed that the resumption date from the ongoing recess has been rescheduled from Tuesday, September 17, 2024, to Tuesday, September 24,  2024, at 11:00 am.

    On his part, the Spokesman of the Home of Representatives, Hon Rotimi, in a statement titled: “House of Representatives to reconvene from recess September 24, Inaugurate PCC Board, Ad-Hoc Committee on Petroleum Industry” on Wednesday, said: “The House of Representatives is set to resume from its annual recess on Tuesday, September 24, 2024, at 11:00 am.

    “This follows a rescheduling from the original date of September 17, 2024, as communicated to Honourable Members via an internal memo by the Clerk of the House, Dr. Yahaya Danzaria, Esq., on Wednesday, on the directive of the House Leadership.

    Read Also: Reps postpone resumption from annual vacation

    “During the recess, Honourable Members engaged extensively in constituency outreach across the country, addressing critical issues of concern to constituents, and deepening oversight of ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs), in accordance with functions spelt out in the 1999 Constitution (As Amended) and the House Standing Orders.

    “Upon reconvening, the leadership of the House will inaugurate the new board of the Public Complaints Commission (PCC) and the Joint Senate/House Ad Hoc Committees on the Petroleum Industry Investigation on Wednesday, September 25, 2024.

    “Further details regarding these activities will be announced during plenary on the day of resumption.

    “As the 10th Assembly resumes, it will continue to drive its Legislative Agenda, focusing on impactful reforms aimed at national development and fulfilling its mandate to the Nigerian people.”

  • ‘Why National Assembly should be a part-time job’

    ‘Why National Assembly should be a part-time job’

    The Chairman, International Law Association (ILA) Arbitration Committee, Dr. Tolu Aderemi has advocated part-time sittings for legislators in the National Assembly.

    He gave the suggestion in his address at the 6th Justice Aderemi Annual Lecture (JAALS) held at the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Afe Babalola Centre, Iyaganku, Ibadan.

    Dr Aderemi who is the Director of the JAALS Foundation, questioned the concerning gaps in qualifications and effectiveness of Nigerian lawmakers.

    “The quality of debate and overall effectiveness of our legislative arm is simply extraordinary and not in a good way. When you look at the qualifications, parliamentary procedures, and policy outcomes in other countries, it’s clear Nigeria’s National Assembly is lagging.”

    Aderemi dissected the differences in the legislature of various countries one of which is the educational requirements.

    While Ghana, the U.S., and Singapore all have minimum age and citizenship criteria for their legislators, he noted that Nigeria stands alone in mandating a secondary school certificate or equivalent.

    Dr Aderemi argued that academic qualification could help ensure a higher calibre of lawmakers, but it may also exclude many qualified citizens from serving.

    Read Also: Gov Sani inaugurates Kaduna Skills Development Council

    He also highlighted the stark contrasts between parliamentary debates and overall legislative effectiveness.

    According to him, “the U.S. Congress is praised for its policy focus and bipartisanship, while Singapore’s parliament is known for its efficiency and consensus-building approach.

    “In contrast, Nigeria’s National Assembly is often characterized by “heated exchanges and lack of focus on policy changes,” with limited time dedicated to substantive debates.

    “This dynamic is reflected in the legislature’s handling of critical issues like the budget approval process and security legislation.”

    Dr. Aderemi drew a favourable comparison to the Scottish parliament, where lawmakers are provided dedicated spaces to “think” when debates become heated – a luxury seemingly absent in Nigeria’s legislative chambers.

    “We want the Nigerian legislative system to be improved, but that will require fundamental changes from the qualification requirements to the rules of procedure and overall expectations placed on our lawmakers,” he said.

    He posited that the structure of the system is clearly problematic, but the calibre and dedication of our legislators are also very much in question.

    He insisted that holistic reforms are needed to strengthen the National Assembly and ensure it can truly serve the needs of the Nigerian people.