Tag: national assembly

  • National Assembly okays additional N6.2tr to 2024 Budget

    National Assembly okays additional N6.2tr to 2024 Budget

    • Appropriation Act now N35.05tr

    The National Assembly yesterday approved the addition of N6.2trillion to the 2024 budget.

    Following the development, the 2024 budget which was originally N28.777 trillion is now N35.055 trillion.

    The approval to add the N6.2 trillion to the 2024 budget followed the consideration of the reports of the Senate and House of Representatives Committees on Appropriation that considered the request.

    President Bola Tinubu had urged the National Assembly to consider and approve the N6.2 trillion as addition to the 2024 budget

    Chairmen of the Senate and House Committees on Appropriation, Senator Solomon Adeola and his counterpart in the House, Hon. Abubakar Bichi, presented the reports for consideration.

    Both the House and the Senate approve the N6.2trillion as requested by Tinubu in a bill.

    The Bill was entitled: “Appropriation Act (Amendment Bill) 2024.”

    The bill as passed authorised the issuance of N35,055,536,770,218 from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federation.

    Out of this cash, N1.742 trillion was allocated for Statutory Transfers, N8.270 trillion for Debt Service, N11.268 trillion for Recurrent (Non-Debt) Expenditure, and N13.773 trillion for the Development Fund for Capital Expenditure for the year ending December 31, 2024.

    The bill was transmitted to the parliament on July 17th 2024, by President Tinubu.

    Bill sought for an Act to amend the Appropriation Act, 2024 to provide N6,222,595,926,139 only out of which N3,222,595,926,139.00 is for Capital Expenditure and N3,000,000,000,000 only for Recurrent Expenditure.

    The Bill was read the first and second time and referred to the Committee on Appropriations for further legislative action.

    Adeola in his presentation, urged the Senate to recall that the 2024 Appropriation Bill was passed into law by the National Assembly in the sum of N28,777,404,073,861 and was subsequently assented to by the President on January 1, 2024.

    According to him, the 2024 Appropriation Act (Amendment) Bill seeks to among others, make available additional funds for Renewed Hope Infrastructure Development Projects, to be undertaken across the country and to meet other recurrent expenditure requirements, such as the minimum wage increase necessary for effective governance of the Federation.

    He said the Committee processed the Bill together with its House counterpart, in line with relevant rules of legislative practice and procedures.

    Read Also: Forum urges unity among Plateau members in National Assembly

     “I therefore, present this harmonized report on the Amendment Bill, 2024 for consideration and passage of the Senate,” Adeola said.

    The Committee observed that there was: “The need to provide the government equity component of the Renewed Hope Infrastructure Projects and other critical projects to be undertaken across the country and other recurrent expenditure requirements, like the provision for the new minimum wage, among others, which necessitated the request for the Amendment of the 2024 Appropriation Act.”

    According to him, the additional expenditure contained in the Amendment Bill will be financed by the one-time windfall tax on banks’ foreign exchange profits for the year 2023 as approved by the National Assembly on Tuesday.

    The Senate and the House passed the amendment, adjourned briefly and later adopted their votes and proceedings for the day to make it seamless for the Bill to be transmitted and assented to by Tinubu.

  • National Assembly raises forex windfall levy to 70%

    National Assembly raises forex windfall levy to 70%

    The National Assembly yesterday raised the levy on forex windfall to 70 per cent and passed the Finance Act 2023 amendment Bill.

    An Executive Bill seeking to impose 50% levy on banks’ forex profits in 2023 was last week sent to the Senate and the House of Representatives for consideration and passage.

    The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Olawale Edun, who was at the National Assembly yesterday, put the funds so far injected as incentive into the manufacturing sector by the Federal Government at N1tr.

    The passage of the Finance Act (amendment) Bill followed the consideration of the report of the Joint National Assembly Committees on Finance by both chambers during plenary.

    The report was presented by the Chairman, Senate Committees on Finance, Sani Musa to the red chamber and his counterpart in the House, James Abiodun Faleke.

    The Joint Committee in the report, observed “that the banks enjoyed windfall as a result of exchange rate unification policy of the Federal Government.

    The committee said: “That the windfall was as a result of FX allocation to selected commercial banks. The policy does not permit the use of windfall for dividend payments.”

    Below are the committee recommendations:

    •      That the application of the provision of Section 30 of the Principal Act shall take effect from 1st January 2023.

    •      The levy shall be (70% for federal government and 30% for banks) on the realized profits from all exchange transactions of banks.

    •      Any bank that fails to pay the windfall profit levy to the service, has not executed the deferred payment agreement as at the time of commencement of the regime, shall be liable to pay the windfall levy withheld or not remitted in addition to a fine of 10% of the levy withheld or not remitted per annum and interest at the prevailing Central Bank of Nigeria, minimum discount rate.

    Read Also: NASS passes Finance Bill, imposes 70% levy on Banks’ windfall forex profits

    The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy said the N1 trillion lifeline for the manufacturing sector was within the last one year.

    Yesterday’s public hearing of the panel was the continuation of defence on the Finance Act (Amendment) Bill 2024, deliberations which commenced on Monday.

    With Edun at the meeting was the Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Mr. Zacch Adedeji, who declared that accelerated stabilisation fund focused among others, series of legacy projects, geared towards putting in place infrastructure to make the sector more viable.

    Responding to a request by members of the committee that manufacturing sector should be considered as beneficiary from the proposed levy, Edun said the sector had already been taken care of.

    The minister said: “There is expenditure of one trillion naira (N1 trillion) in terms of incentives to the manufacturing sector to help them with the high cost of production.

    “In addition, under the Accelerated Stabilisation and Advancement Plan, which is a six-month plan for emergency economic, fiscal, and corporate sectoral actions in order to help in particular, the manufacturing sector, there is low interest funding coming for the manufacturing sector.”

    Adedeji said the proposed one–off windfall levy is geared towards redistribution of wealth, which according to him would be beneficial to the various sectors.

    He explained to members of the joint committee that the strategic programmes of the President Bola Ahmed Tinibu Administration were targeted at reinvigorating the manufacturing sector.

    The FIRS boss said: “Accelerated stabilization fund focusing on helping the manufacturing sector are already being doled out aside legacy projects strategically targeted at making the sector more vibrant and viable.

    “Some of these strategic projects that would in terms of infrastructure reinvigorate the sector are the Badagry – Sokoto Highway which would make journey from Badagry to Sokoto in 11 hours.

    “Also, the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway is another strategic road infrastructural project that will bring about the required connectivity for reinvigoration of the manufacturing sector.

    “The plan of President Bola Tinubu on the economy, manufacturing sector and development generally is very robust.”

    Sharing percentage from the windfall levy between the federal government and the banks, was however not agreed upon before the minister, the FIRS boss and representative of the Governor of Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), were excused from the meeting.

    Some members of the joint committee suggested an upward review of the 50 -50 sharing formula proposed by the President in his executive bill.

    The National Assembly raise the levy from 50 per cent to 70 per cent in favour of the Federal Government.

  • Forum urges unity among Plateau members in National Assembly

    Forum urges unity among Plateau members in National Assembly

    The President, Plateau Indigenes Forum in the National Assembly (PIFNASS), Caleb Danfulani, has urged National Assembly members from Plateau State to work in unity for the good of the people.

    He made the call at the grand reception in honour of the Plateau Legislators of the 10th Assembly in the National Assembly Complex on Wednesday.

    He said the Association is aimed at promoting the unity and enhancing the well-being of its members and all of them from Plateau regardless of party affiliation, tribe and religion.

    “Distinguished Senators and members, of course you will agree with me that your primary function is to represent your constituents, make laws and perform such other functions that will ensure the security and well-being of the citizens not only Plateau State but Nigeria at large.

    “Your Excellency, Distinguished Senators and Honorable members, this Association is aimed at promoting unity and enhancing the well-being of its members and all of us from Plateau regardless of party affiliation, tribe and religion. 

    “Our aim is also to see that we promote the ideal of oneness thereby creating that bond of brotherhood and pursue common goals that will lead to the growth and development of Plateau. 

    Read Also: BBNaija organisers reduces prize for Season 9

    “We should all work as a team to see that we attract developmental projects to Plateau. This, we cannot achieve alone but with proper collaboration and lobbying of other legislators from other States where we share Boundaries, for instance, Kaduna, Nasarawa and Bauchi.

    “Your contributions will be most recognized and appreciated when you present Bills, Motions, contribute positively to debates on issues of national importance and pass meaningful resolutions that have direct bearing on the lives of the people and also quick response to matters arising from your various constituencies.

    “The PIFNASS has been leveraging on the performance of the legislators to reach out to the Constituents through its foundation (PIFNASS FOUNDATION) which is aimed at promoting advocacy and awareness to the constituents on the activities of the legislators. 

    “This has in turn projected a better reflection of your roles to the constituents as against the wrong perception of the National Assembly by members of the public.”

    He announced that the Senators and members from the state have been given automatic membership of the Association as Grand Patrons as contained in the Constitution of PIFNASS.

    “To our great senior citizens who have successfully retired from the service of the National Assembly, we celebrate you and we also assure you that your names are written in gold in PIFNASS. Greater shall be your future. Let us (members) also remember that one day we shall all retire,” he added.

    He said the Association, apart from ensuring the welfare of its members, has also been reaching out to the State especially during the periods of crisis. 

    “We have in the past donated several relief materials to victims of crisis in Bassa, Mangu and some parts of Jos in which we pray that such will not occur again.

    “The Association as part of its programs is preparing to organize another Advocacy and Awareness campaign to the three Senatorial Zones in the State in the Year 2025 between the Months of August and September during the annual recess. 

    “This will be done in collaboration with the legislators and their constituents to further enlighten them on the activities of legislators in the National Assembly.

    “In its quest to further strengthen the members, the Association has established its own Cooperative Society to give us the opportunity to invest and save. All members are encouraged to join by investing and saving in the Cooperative where dividends will always be shared as the times are hard and retirement needs proper planning and learning new trade, ideas and having streams of income.

    “The Association has also entered partnership with Adron Homes who are into estate development to see that all its members own properties at the State Capital in Jos and I also call on all members to join in this partnership by assisting the members of this Association in reducing the burden of paying for the land. This is achievable and the Association will further advise accordingly,” he said.

    The Plateau Caucus in the National Assembly has vowed to jointly work for the interest of state irrespective of party, tribe or religion. 

    Senator Diket Plang, who represents Plateau Central in the Senate, pledged that the lawmakers were determined to bring back the glory days of Plateau and to make it a home to all Nigerias and foreigners again. 

    “When we are here, we talk about Plateau and what we can take home; no matter your party or tribe, the essence is Plateau, no matter religion or Local Governments, the emphasis is Plateau.

    “Plateau must rise again, it must be said that there is a Plateau and therefore, when they are sharing, we must collect our own and take it back home.

    “I assure you that we will leave a responsible, people-oriented and a very fair representation of the people of Plateau,” he said. 

    He charged members of PIFNASS as indigenes of the state, to guide lawmakers particularly first timers as part of their contribution to the development of the state.

    Speaking on behalf of members of the House of Representative from Plateau, Rep. John Dafaan said that all the legislators from the state operates as one family.

    Dafaan, who represents Shendam/Qua’an-Pan/Mikang Federal Constituency, said that Plateau is united 

    He said the lawmakers were already working as one for the best interest of the state. 

    The lawmaker urged PIFNASS to partner with the lawmakers and cooperate with the caucus to attract the dividends of democracy for the people. 

    Chairman of the organising committee of the reception, Dr Paul Adiwu, said that the primary duty of lawmakers was to serve the interests of constituents.

    He reminded the lawmakers that their presence in the hallowed Assembly was not only a privilege but a sacred trust. 

    Dr Adiwu said, “As we come to the close of this wonderful welcoming reception, I want to express our heartfelt gratitude on behalf of the planning committee to every one of you, for making this event a success. Your presence has made a significant impact on our collective celebration.

    “As we rejoice and honor our esteemed Members from Plateau State, let us not forget the weight of responsibility that rests on their shoulders. As lawmakers, their primary and constitutional duty is to serve the interests of their constituents – our people back home.

    “Permit us to please, remind you that your presence in this hallowed Assembly is not only a privilege but a sacred trust. We respectfully charge you to remain committed to the welfare, progress, and development of our State and Nation.

    “In the past, we have made considerable progress in improving the lives of our people through various initiatives and policies. Therefore, we must not relent now but continue to aspire for greater heights, ensuring that our actions benefit our communities. The road ahead requires our unwavering support, collaboration, and dedication.

    “As we depart this venue, let us carry with us the spirit of unity, the zeal for service, and the determination to positively impact the lives of our people. Let us remain steadfast in our resolve knowing fully well that by working together we can achieve a brighter and more prosperous future for Plateau State and our great Nation.”

  • Constitution review: Amaewhule partakes in National Assembly’s retreat as Speaker

    Constitution review: Amaewhule partakes in National Assembly’s retreat as Speaker

    Martins Amaewhule has participated in a four-day retreat of the National Assembly Joint Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution as Rivers State House of Assembly Speaker. 

    Amaewhule leads 25 pro-Nyesom Wike lawmakers of the House while Victor Oko-Jumbo heads three lawmakers loyal to Governor Siminalayi Fubara as their speaker.

    It was gathered that the retreat which was held in Abuja started on Thursday and ended yesterday. It had 35  other speakers in attendance.  

    Supporters of  Amaewhule celebrated his invitation to and participation in the retreat on their social platforms yesterday.

    One of them was Amaewhule’s Special Adviser on Media, Martins Wachukwu, who shared pictures of his principal’s participation in the retreat. 

    He wrote: “The Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Martin Chike Amaewhule just participated in the Sectoral Engagement of the Joint Committee on the Review of the Constitution with the Judiciary.

    “This includes the leadership of the National Assembly, Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures, Chief Judges, and other critical stakeholders in a technical session.”

    Amaewhule has been locked in a protracted battle with  Governor  Fubara, and the Oko-Jumbo legislators over the legitimacy of his speakership and membership of the House.

    Last week, Fubara declared that he would not recognise Amaewhule and his group 24  as speakers and members of the House. He insisted that their seats had been declared vacant following their professed defection from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    The governor  maintained that their seats had been vacant since December 30 when the declaration was made by the former lawmaker and factional Speaker, Edison Ehie. Ebie later resigned his membership of the Assembly to become the Chief of Staff, Government House.

    Eight days ago,  the Amaewhule-led lawmakers issued a one week ultimatum for Fubara to appear before them and re-present the state’s 2024 budget already signed into law after its passage by the Oko-Jumbo-led lawmakers.

    Read Also: Can the National Assembly replace constitution?

    They also sent a letter to the governor highlighting his alleged constitutional breaches in what many people saw as a fresh move to begin Fubara’s impeachment.

    With the expiration of the ultimatum yesterday, residents of the state were said to be waiting for the lawmakers’ next line of action.

    Fubara, who described the invitation as the ranting of delusional folks,   said they wanted to lure him into giving them legitimacy.

    The Amaewhule-led lawmakers are expected to reconvene today to make their next line of action public.

  • Can the National Assembly replace constitution?

    Can the National Assembly replace constitution?

    • By Collins Okeke

    A bill titled “A Bill for an Act to Substitute the Annexure to Decree 24 of 1999 with a new governance model for the Federal Republic of Nigeria” circulated online for some time. Drafted by Dr. Akin Fapohunda, the Bill proposes a new constitution to be cited as “The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria New Governance Model for Nigeria Act 2024.”

    It suggests that the National Assembly has the authority to replace the 1999 Constitution with a new one. This proposition has sparked a debate about whether the National Assembly truly possesses the power to replace the existing constitution. This article explores this issue, drawing on the arguments presented by the distinguished constitutional law expert, the late Professor Ben Nwabueze.

    The constitution, in Section 4, vests legislative powers in the National Assembly, which comprises the Senate and the House of Representatives. According to Nwabueze, these powers are threefold:

    1. Power to legislate on behalf of the Federal Republic of Nigeria;

    2. Power to legislate for the federation to ensure peace, order, and good government;

    3. Power to legislate for the Federal Capital Territory.

    The latter two powers are explicitly defined in the constitution, with the areas of legislation listed in Section 299 and the Exclusive and Concurrent Legislative Lists.

    However, the first power—the authority to legislate on behalf of the Federal Republic—is more ambiguous and has been subject to various interpretations.

    Read Also: Uproar in National Assembly as Reps grill minister over alleged N1.5b diversion

    A core pillar of Prof. Nwabueze’s argument rests on the distinction between the “Federal Republic of Nigeria” as a sovereign nation-state, and the “Federation” as the collection of component units that make up Nigeria (i.e., the states and the Federal Capital Territory).

    He draws attention to Section 2 of the constitution, which separately defines these two entities.

    Section 2(1) describes Nigeria as “one indivisible and indissoluble sovereign state to be known by the name of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” while Section 2(2) states that “Nigeria shall be a Federation consisting of States and a Federal Capital Territory.”

    With this distinction in mind, Prof. Nwabueze interprets Section 4(1) of the constitution, which vests the legislative powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in the National Assembly, as granting the assembly the power to legislate on matters related to Nigeria’s national sovereignty.

    Meanwhile, he sees Section 4(2), which empowers the National Assembly to make laws for the peace, order and good government of the federation, as pertaining to legislation that impacts the component units of the federation.

    If one accepts Prof. Nwabueze’s interpretation, the logical next question is: Under what circumstances can the National Assembly legitimately invoke its Section 4(1) powers to legislate for the Federal Republic as a whole, rather than just the Federation?

    Dr. Olisa Agbakoba SAN, expanding on Prof. Nwabueze’s paper, provides some insights.

    He suggests that this power could be exercised in times of grave national importance or when there is an existential threat to the corporate existence of the Federal Republic.

    He cites examples such as the invocation of the “Doctrine of Necessity” in 2010 to appoint Goodluck Jonathan as acting president following the incapacitation of then-President Umaru Yar’Adua, and the potential creation of a new constitution, given its far-reaching implications for the nation.

    This brings us to the crux of Prof. Nwabueze’s argument: the National Assembly’s power to not just alter but completely replace the constitution.

    Nigeria has been on a journey to find a suitable model that will give the constitution acceptability and legitimacy. The country has considered national conferences, which failed.

    The present model of alteration of the constitution has not worked. It has cost so much, taken far too long, and failed to win popular and legitimate acceptance. Prof. Nwabueze suggests a third model: wholesale constitutional replacement.

    In advocating for this third model, Nwabueze makes a distinction between “sovereign” constitutions, which are written by the people through a Constituent Assembly or similar body, and “statutory” constitutions, which are enacted by a sovereign parliament. He points out that all of Nigeria’s constitutions to date have been statutory in nature.

    The 1960 Independence Constitution was a schedule to an Order-in-Council of the British government, the 1963 Republican Constitution was enacted by parliament simply repealing the 1960 Order-in-Council and replacing it with a new constitution, and the 1979 and 1999 constitutions were schedules to military decrees.

    Building on this, Nwabueze argues that the National Assembly has the power to repeal the current 1999 Constitution, which was enacted via Decree 24 of 1999, and replace it in its entirety with a new constitution. He believes this power derives from Sections 4(1) and 315(1)(a) & (4) of the Constitution.

    Section 315(1)(a) provides that an existing law shall be deemed an Act of the National Assembly to the extent that it is a law with respect to any matter on which the National Assembly is empowered by this constitution to make laws.  Nwabueze contends that since the National Assembly has the power under Section 4(1) to legislate for the Federal Republic, and the 1999 Constitution (Promulgation) Decree is a law on a matter the National Assembly can legislate on, it can therefore repeal and replace the decree, and by extension, the constitution.

    Professor Ben Nwabueze’s analysis provides a fresh and thought-provoking perspective on the extent and limits of the National Assembly’s legislative powers, particularly as they relate to the constitution.

    His arguments around the Assembly’s unique power to legislate for the “Federal Republic” as distinct from the “Federation,” and its ability to unilaterally replace the Constitution, are novel and merit serious consideration. However, these arguments are likely to remain contentious and generate further debate on this crucial issue.

    As Nigeria continues to grapple with the challenges of governance and the search for a suitable constitutional model, the ideas put forth by Nwabueze will undoubtedly play a significant role in shaping the discourse.

    While the ultimate resolution of this debate remains to be seen, one thing is certain: the question of the National Assembly’s power to replace the constitution will continue to be a central focus of Nigeria’s constitutional development in the years to come.

    • Okeke is Associate Partner/Head of Public Sector Practice Group at Olisa Agbakoba Legal (OAL).
  • National Assembly mulls increased funding, others for FERMA

    National Assembly mulls increased funding, others for FERMA

    Chairman Senate Committee  on Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA), Sen. Babangida Hussaini has assured that the National Assembly would ensure the agency’s budget is increased sufficiently to boost its efficiency and productivity.

    He said NASS is poised to support any progressive initiative that will dovetail into the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and ensure the agency is repositioned to meet its core mandate.

     He said the committee will  ensure transparency, value for money and responsive and proactive management.

    Hussaini spoke in Lagos during the joint retreat of the National Assembly,members of the board and management team of the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA).

    Read Also: What will Tunji Bello bring to FCCPC?

    He said the retreat was a forum for charting a new course towards achieving the objectives for which the agency  was established.

     “The National Assembly would ensure FERMA’s budget is increased. We must support FERMA, and everyone must work hard to ensure its mandate is realised. The agency should evolve strategies to curb accidents on roads.  We must work seamlessly and plan as a team,” he said.

    Chairman House Committee on FERMA, Hon. Aderemi Oseni, said the committee has drawn up a 14-point agenda to reposition the agency and address its challenges, adding that a competitive national strategy will be developed to improve road infrastructure in the country.

    He said it was imperative to change the way FERMA functions fully, and in doing so, there will be an improvement in the quality of road networks.

    The lawmaker said the transformation will benefit not only the agency but also the whole nation, noting that for every Nigerian to enjoy safer travel, lesser transportation costs, growth in economy and improved quality of life roads must be well maintained.

    FERMA Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer Emeka Agbasi said the agency is poised to have 75 percent of  roads to be in fair and good condition between now and  2027. He noted that the percentage of bad roads has dropped from 50 percent to 20 percent.

  • National Assembly extends implementation of 2023 capital, supplementary budgets till December

    National Assembly extends implementation of 2023 capital, supplementary budgets till December

    The National Assembly yesterday approved President Bola Tinubu’s request to extend implementation of the capital component of the N21.83 trillion 2023 Appropriation Act, and the N2.1 trillion 2023 Supplementary Appropriation Act, till December 31, 2024.

    This means that capital allocations of the 2023 Appropriation Act, 2023 Supplementary Appropriation Act, and 2024 Appropriation Act will run concurrently till December 31.

    Few minutes after the start of plenary, and the introduction of the two bills by the Senate and House Leader, both chambers went into an executive session to deliberate on the request.

    This makes the third time both budgets will be extended. Their life span was first extended to March 31, and later June 30.

    Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abass, read Tinubu’s letters in the Senate and House respectively.

    Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele, and Leader of the House Prof. Julius Ihonvbere, moved separate motions urging both chambers to suspend their relevant rules to enable them consider the Bills expeditiously.

    Read Also: Nigeria enters export agreement with Saudi Arabia for red beef, soya beans

    Bamidele said: “Recall that on March 20, these Acts were amended to allow for exhaustive implementation of capital projects till June 30. The extension will expire on June 30, and many projects are yet to be completed. They will thus allow for continued implementation for the maximum benefit of the country.

    “Undoubtedly, this would go a long way in avoiding the compounding problems of abandoned projects. Hence, the need for the enactment of this proposed legislations to extend the implementation.

    “I therefore urge my colleagues to give their full support to these bills, to allow for full utilisation of the capital releases in order to help reflate the economy.”

    Senator Mohammed Ali Ndume noted that the main reason for the extension was to allow the Federal Government complete ongoing capital projects. Senator Orji Kalu said there are many uncompleted projects in different parts of the country. He urged his colleagues to disregard criticism on extension of the budgets.

    Akpabio explained that the upper chamber will monitor implementation of the capital component through oversight function.

    Thereafter, the Bills were read for first, second and third time and passed by the Senate.

    Leading the debate on the two bills, House Leader Ihonvbere described them as straight forward and aimed at ensuring the completion of all ongoing capital projects captured in the two documents.

    But Minority Leader of the House, Kingsley Chinda, argued that while it is legally alright to extend the capital components of the budgets, it is morally wrong to have about four budgets running at the same time.

    He argued that while the minority are not against completing capital projects in the budget, Nigerians are bound to ask questions on why the government should be extending the life-span of the 2023 budget and 2023 Supplementary budget.

    Chinda said: “We cannot deny that capital projects are important to the country and to all of us. That is why we may not oppose this so that the capital projects can continue.

    “Currently, we have three budgets running and we are still expecting the 2024 supplementary budget from the President. One of the greatest undoing of the PDP was the lack of a budget circle. The process of having four budgets running is not too good.”

    He added that the House should step down the request and wait for the 2024 Supplementary budget, articulate all the capital components contained in the budgets and those not completed in the 2023 budget which will be put in one document and passed.

    Former House Leader Alhassan Ado Doguwa said while the House should approve the President’s request, it should oass a message to the Presidency on why they should put their acts together.

    Doguwa, who supported Chinda, reminded his colleagues that they will be held accountable for whatever they do as.

    He said: “People out there will have questions and we must rise to the occasion. We have two budgets running concurrently. That may be legal, but moral questions will always be raised.

    “I am in support of the amendments, but we must send a signal that not everything must fly. Fortunately for us, the Leader of government is one that we all trust. The matters raised are important to all Nigerians.”

    Tajudeen appealed to members to allow passage of the bills to allow for procurement of items contained in it which he said are more security related items.

    But despite the plea, majority of the lawmakers appeared not comfortable with the request for extension of the budgets as they kept on shouting ‘no, no’.

    Following the disagreement, Abbas asked that the House go into an executive session for members to iron out issues before resuming consideration of the bills.

    After the closed door session, majority of the lawmakers supported that the two bills be approved when they were put to voice vote by Speaker Abbas.

  • JUST IN: National Assembly reconvenes Thursday

    JUST IN: National Assembly reconvenes Thursday

    The Senate and House Representatives will on Thursday, June 27, reconvene from its Sallah and end of first session break.

    Both chambers had earlier adjourned plenary till Tuesday, July 2, but the chairman of Senate committees on media and public affairs, Senator Yemi Adaramodu (APC-Ekiti South), and the Clerk of the House of Representatives, Dr. Yahaya Danzaria confirmed that the National Assembly would cut its break.

    Adaramodu in a statement said the resumption of plenary has become necessary to enable the lawmakers to attend to urgent national and constitutional issues and to carry out further oversight on the implementation of the Appropriation Act, 2024.

    Adaramadu said: “It’s our statutory resumption from the Sallah break. Senate has the constitutional power to regulate its sessions and we believe that we could gain one more legislative day to deal with national and constitutional issues, hence the bringing forward from the initial July 2.

    “We hope to deal with issues concerning our further oversight on the Appropriations and clear further the hanging issues of constitutional and electoral concerns. And clear outstanding bills and motions, expectedly before our annual recess, later in the year.”

    Read Also: How has National Assembly fared in 25 years of democracy?

    On his part, the Clerk to the House of Representatives, Danzaria in a terse internal memo dated June 24, 2024, and titled: “Change in Resumption Date from Recess” addressed to Members said: “Please be informed that the resumption date from the ongoing recess has been rescheduled from Tuesday, July 2, 2024, to Thursday, June 27, 2024.

    “Accordingly, the plenary will hold on Thursday, June 27, 2024, by 11:00 am.

    “Kindly make necessary adjustments to your schedules and ensure your timely presence for the resumption of legislative activities.”

    The Nation had on Wednesday reported that President Bola Tinubu would today (Thursday) transmit the 2024 Supplementary Appropriation Bill to the National Assembly for consideration and passage.

  • FCTA disburses N3.62bn to area councils, others

    FCTA disburses N3.62bn to area councils, others

     The Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) has disbursed N3.62 billion to the six Area Councils, teachers and pension scheme as statutory allocation for the month May.

    Dr Mariya Mahmoud, Minister of State FCT, presided over the 190th FCT Joint Account Allocation Committee meeting in Abuja on Tuesday.

    Mahmoud said that N1.14 billion was set aside for the six area councils, while N2.49 billion was earmarked for teachers and pension schemes.

    Read Also: Nigerians and silver bullets

    She said that out of the N1.14 billion set aside of the six area councils, Abuja Municipal Area Council received N346.53 million, Gwagwalada got N160.81 million while Kuje received N191.38 million.

    The minister  equally said that Bwari Area Council received N152.8 million, Abaji N119.49 million while Kwali got N167.52 million.

    For the N2.49 billion earmarked for teachers and pension scheme, the minister said that N2.12 billion was allocated to primary school teachers, while N36.25 million was set aside as one per cent Training Fund.

    She also said that a total of N226.48 million was set aside as 15 per cent Pension Funds, while N107.85 million was earmarked as 10 per cent employer pension contribution. (NAN)

  • How has National Assembly fared in 25 years of democracy?

    How has National Assembly fared in 25 years of democracy?

    The legislature is regarded by many as the beacon of democracy. It is the only institution of governance that does not exist during the military as it is often suspended, while the military performs its role. It is also the closest level of government to the people. Twenty-five years after the return to civil rule, TONY AKOWE examines how the National Assembly has fared.

    The return to democracy in 1999 and the government’s inauguration on May 29, 1999, paved the way for the return of the National Assembly, which was suspended with the military’s intervention in governance. With the proclamation of former President Olusegun Obasanjo under the provision of the 1999 constitution, the National Assembly was inaugurated on June 3, 1999.  Before then, the last time the National Assembly held any session was in 1993 when General Sani Abacha dissolved the National Assembly and took over government following the now famous June 12 presidential elections. The parliament has remained, growing from strength to strength. In addition, it has developed institutions that will aid in the research and development of manpower for the legislature. The National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies and the National Assembly Library and Research Centre are two institutions.

    During the first eight years after the return to civil rule, both chambers of the National Assembly did not have a stable leadership. The House of Reps settled its leadership tussle earlier than the Senate. The first speaker of the House had a forged certificate. The discovery paved the way for the emergence of another speaker. Aside from that event early in the life of the parliament, which gave rise to two speakers in one year (Salisu Buhari and Ghali Umar Na’abba), the leadership crisis in the 6th Assembly when Patricia Etteh was impeached as Speaker and Dimeji Bankole enthroned, the House has had steady leadership over the years.

    In 25 years, the House has produced nine speakers and eight deputy speakers. The speakers are Salisu Buhari (Kano) whose tenure was short-lived by certificate scandal, Ghali Umar Na’abba (Kano), Aminu Bello Masari (Katsina), Patricia Etteh (Osun), Dimeji Bankole (Ogun), Aminu Waziri Tambuwal (Sokoto), Yakubu Dogara (Bauchi), Femi Gbajajabiamila (Lagos) and the current Speaker, Abbas Tajudeen (Kaduna). The deputy speakers are Chibudum Nwuche (Rivers), Austin Okpala (Rivers) Babaginda Ngoroje (Taraba), Usman Bello Nafada (Gombe), Emeka Ihedioha (Imo), Yusuf Lasun (Osun), Ahmed Idris Wase (Plateau) and the current Deputy Speaker, Benjamin Kalu (Abia). Interestingly, since 1999, the South-south, Southeast and North Central have never produced the speaker of the House of Representatives. In the Senate, the president of the Senate had continued to elude the Northwest and the Southwest; the two regions with the highest voting population in the country. Of the two, only the Southwest is yet to produce a presiding officer for the Senate, having not occupied the position of deputy Senate president also since 1999. The Senate Presidency has rotated between the Southeast (1999 to 2007), North Central (2007 to 2019), Northeast (2019 to 2023) and South-South (2023 to date). On the other hand, the position of the deputy Senate president has been occupied by the North Central, Southeast, South-South and Northwest, which currently occupies it. The deputy speaker’s position has rotated between the South-South, the Southeast, the Northeast, the Southwest and the North Central.

    The National Assembly has recorded several landmark achievements in the last 25 years. One of the achievements is killing the third-term ambition of former President Olusegun Obasanjo. While many believed that the idea of having a third term was foisted on him by Nigerians, the National Assembly declined to amend the constitution to allow for any sitting president or governor to have a third term in office. Senator Ken Nnamani who was Senate President during the third term struggle said the decision to adjourn the Senate contributed to killing the third-term dream as it afforded the senators in support of the idea to have a rethink.

    Speaking at the public presentation of his book “Standing Strong: Legislative Reforms, Third Term and Other Issues of the 5th Senate” in 2021, Nnamani said the fact that the consideration of the constitution review was broadcast live also forced some of the lawmakers to change their minds. He added: “I wanted senators to vote with their conscience on the issue of Obasanjo’s third term bid. I also wanted their votes to represent the views of their constituents.

    “To be an informed trustee, the senators need to understand the view of their constituents before casting their votes. On this basis, the Senate adjourned to allow the lawmakers to consult with constituents about the constitutional amendment. With this intervention, some senators returned with enlightened views. We decided to televise the proceedings. Publicizing the proceedings was not supported by those who wanted to smuggle the tenure extension through undefined procedures into the Constitution. They knew that if we had sidelined Nigerians from the proceedings, and reduced public pressure on the legislature, it would be possible to ram through, but I stood strong. We overcame intense pressure even from the highest level of government.”

    The doctrine of necessity adopted by the parliament in 2010 to save the country from a major crisis is another landmark achievement. Section 145 of the 1999 Constitution requires the president to transfer power to his deputy while he is away or unable to perform his duties. This section states that the president shall, whenever he is proceeding on vacation or is otherwise unable to discharge the functions of his office, transmit a written declaration to the president of the Senate and the speaker of the House of Representatives to that effect. This would empower the vice president to function as the acting president until the president transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary. This legislation came against the background of the attempts to sideline the then Vice President Goodluck Jonathan from becoming acting president when his principal, Umar Musa Yar’Adua took ill and did not transmit a written declaration to the National Assembly that he was away from the country.

    Read Also: What 10th National Assembly should focus on

    The passage of the bill establishing the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) to address the challenges in the region is another major landmark decision of the National Assembly. It however became the one instance when the parliament exercised its power to override a presidential veto. Even though the lawmakers have passed several bills that should impact the lives of the Nigerian people positively, past presidents have vetoed those bills, stopping them from becoming laws for one reason or the other. Former President Olusegun Obasanjo had vetoed the NDDC bill. But in line with the constitutional provision, the House of Representatives overrode the veto on June 3, 2000, with an overwhelming vote of 302, with one voting against and three abstaining. Four days later, on June 7, the Senate passed the bill overriding the president’s veto, thus giving birth to the NDDC.

    After the NDDC Act, there have been several opportunities for the National Assembly to exercise the constitutional power of overriding presidential veto but failed to do so. For example, in 2018, the parliament attempted unsuccessfully to override President Buhari’s veto of the Electoral Act Amendment Bill. This compelled the country to use the 2015 Electoral Act for the 2019 general election. Many felt that the disagreement between the legislature and the executive at the time was an opportunity to achieve that. But, they failed to use it to their advantage. This also happened in 2021 during the making of the 2022 Electoral Act. On several occasions, during the making of the law, the president had to return the Electoral Act to the parliament with one excuse or the other until it was finally signed on February 25, 2022, to allow for its use for the conduct of the 2023 general elections.

    Another opportunity to override the president’s veto came through a constitutional amendment in 2023. The 9th National Assembly, even though considered by many as a rubber stamp assembly carried out one of the most comprehensive reviews of the 1999 constitution. The president failed to assent to about 16 such alterations sent to him by the National Assembly after concurrence by state Assemblies. The constitution provides that “a bill for the alteration of the provisions of this constitution passed by the National Assembly as aforesaid shall be presented to the president for assent”. It also states that “where the president withholds assent, the bill shall be sent back to the National Assembly, which may, by a two-thirds majority vote in both the Senate and the House of Representatives, pass the bill again, and the assent of the President shall not be required.” In other words, if the president vetoes a constitutional amendment bill, the National Assembly can override the veto by passing the bill again with a two-thirds majority in both chambers. After that, the president’s assent is no longer required for the bill to become a part of the Constitution. This explained why senior lawyers wanted the National Assembly to override President Buhari’s decision to withhold assent to 16 of the Constitution Alteration Bills in 2023.

    The Police Act and the Customs and Excise Management Act passed by the 9th National Assembly are part of the landmark laws passed by the National Assembly since 1999 to bring reforms to the two agencies. Interestingly, before the passage of the CEMA Act in 2023, the Customs Act had not been amended for over 60 years, thereby making reforms in the agency cumbersome. In addition, some agencies and institutions have come into existence through Acts of Parliament. For instance, the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), which was passed by the 9th Assembly, is one such landmark legislation. As a bill, the PIA reportedly scaled through after about 20 years in parliament and provides a legal, governance, regulatory, and fiscal framework for developing and managing the Nigerian petroleum industry and developing host communities.

    However, one legislation that has the potential to liberalise the information-gathering and governance process is the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act which supports accountability, openness, and good governance. The law seeks to promote an open and democratic society by giving the people access to information, especially from government agencies. Even though it was first introduced to parliament in 1999, it was not until 2011 that it was finally signed into law by former President Jonathan finally signed it into law on May 28, 2011.

    Not Too Young to Run Bill is one of the constitutional amendments by the 8th Assembly allowing younger persons to contest elective positions. It reduced the age qualification for presidents from 40 to 30, governors from 35 to 30, senators from 35 to 30, House of Representatives membership from 30 to 25, and state legislatures from 30 to 25.

    The disability bill, which aims to curb discrimination against persons with disabilities, was passed in 2016. The bill was signed into law by then-President Muhammadu Buhari on January 23, 2019. The Disability Act prohibits all forms of discrimination on the grounds of disability and imposes a fine of N1 million for corporate bodies and N100,000 for individuals, or a term of six months imprisonment for violation. It gave a moratorium of five years before coming into full operation. It provides for public institutions to put in place additional facilities that will aid persons with disabilities in having access and moving freely.

    The National Health Bill signed into law in 2014 clearly defines the various roles and functions to be played by the three tiers of government on health-related issues. It was expected to help Nigeria achieve universal health service, guarantee improvement in the health sector, regulate healthcare practice, promote professionalism among healthcare providers set standards for healthcare services rendered across Nigeria and help eliminate medical quacks in the system.

    Unfortunately, the parliament has been weak in the area of oversight, while doing so much in the area of representation. Today, respect for the parliament by several agencies of government is lacking and nothing has been done to punish any of these agencies aside from mere threats of warrant. Section 88 of the constitution grants them the power to summon anybody to come and answer questions in the parliament, while Section 89 grants them the power to issue a warrant of arrest for anyone who fails to honour its invitation.

    Francis Waive, Chairman of the House Committee on Rules and Business believe that in 25 years of legislative democracy, the National Assembly has matured so much and has impacted the lives of the Nigerian people through representation. He said the lawmakers have passed a series of legislations that have had a direct impact on the lives of the people, in addition to the zonal intervention programmes otherwise known as constituency projects. He believes that the only federal presence in some local government areas across the country today is the constituency projects initiated by members of the National Assembly.