Tag: Nigerian Newspapers

  • NURTW factions trade words over bloody clash in Ibadan community

    Two factions of Oyo State chapter of the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW) on Sunday traded words following violent clash at the weekend at Egbeda area of Ibadan, the Oyo State capital.

    Deafening sound of gunshots boomed in the area at the weekend, causing panic as residents ran for cover to avoid bodily harm and injury.

    Many residents around the trouble area were said to have remained indoors as shop owners hurriedly closed their business and ran for safety.

    It was learnt that trouble started when a former NURTW chairman, Mukaila Lamidi (aka Auxiliary), in company of some of his men and two officers of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), invaded the house of an estranged aide, Musiliudeen Muideen, with dangerous weapons.

    It was gathered that apart from beating and shooting Muideen, members of his household, including his brothers, were allegedly dealt with.

    However, Auxiliary, when contacted, denied the allegations, saying that the claim was false.

    The NURTW chief alleged that some members of the union were out to paint him black for the governor, Seyi Makinde, to stop his impending announcement as the new NURTW chairman.

    Auxiliary, who spoke through one of his aides, Alhaji Ahmed Raheem, said the allegation was an attempt to destroy his reputation, stating that as a peace-loving person, he would never engage in acts that would bring disrepute to the state.

    Read Also: Kidnapped NURTW driver freed

    Raheem said Auxiliary had intelligent report that some hoodlums were planning to attack people to tarnish his name and he went there with the NSCDC officers to arrest them and subsequently handed  them over to men of the state joint security task force.

    But, the victim, Muideen, confirmed the attack on him, while speaking with reporters yesterday, saying that his house was invaded with six vehicles loaded with NURTW members and two NSCDC men brandishing dangerous weapons.

    He stated that if it were to be in the night, he would have been killed.

    Muideen added that after he was beaten to the point of death and his family members traumatised, he was driven to the headquarters of the state joint security task force, Operation Burst, and handed over to the state commander.

    Another member of NURTW, Kabiru Adekunle, said he bolted away from his house immediately he was informed by a source that the members of the union were heading towards his house.

    The two men called on Makinde to save the state from being turned into a battlefield with those they described as miscreants lording themselves over others.

    Commander of the Operation Burst Captain Peter Osolo, who confirmed that some NURTW men were brought to the outfit, said he released them when he discovered that nothing incriminating was found on them.

     

     

  • FAAN pensioners issue two weeks deadline on benefits

    PENSIONERS of the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) have given its management two weeks to address the withdrawal of some of their benefits or face an industrial action.

    They said before the management withdrew the benefits, they had enjoyed them for 14 years.

    Their threat followed a stalemated meeting of July 24 between an ad hoc committee set up by the managing director to dialogue with the pensioners.

    The pensioners, under the aegis of Nigeria Union of Pensioners (NUP), told reporters that FAAN’s new management had stopped their emoluments, which they had been getting since 2008, based on an agreement between them and the agency’s management.

    Their National Chairman Rasaki Ope and National Secretary Emeka Njoku at FAAN said some people at the agency were out to mislead the new management under Capt. Hamisu Yadudu to review only the salary and proficiency while leaving out utilities, meal subsidy and housing, among others.

    The union leaders wondered why such decision should be taken without reasons, after 14 year.

    Read Also: Controversy rocks FAAN’s recruitment

    They threatened that should the FAAN management insist on its position, the pensioners will canvass the implementation of the 33 per cent increase on current pension, based on of the Federal Government circular.

    According to them, the Nigerian Airspace Management Agency (NAMA) and the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) were paying their pensioners, based on the circular.

    The pensioners regretted that the FAAN management, for over 10 years, refused to review their pension, as against the five-year requirement for such review.

    They said the FAAN management had defaulted with existing regulations stipulated in the agreement that pension rates would be increased only when there is corresponding increase in FAAN workers’ salary and relevant allowances.

    Alluding to series of agreements reached between the agency’s management between 2002 and 2008, the pensioners argued that it was baseless to agitate for increases based on government circulars, as it was already resolved in 2002 that anything contrary to the agreement would attract legal action.

    The pensioners warned that they would no longer allow their rights to be taken from them due to the inability of the human resources and administrative directorate to restorer their benefits.

  • NNPC warns violators of pipelines’ right-of-way

    The Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has raised the red flag on what it called “flagrant and dangerous” violation of its pipelines’ right-of-way by some individuals and communities along the corridor of the system 2E pipeline network stretching from Port Harcourt (Rivers State) through Aba (Abia), Enugu (Enugu) up to Makurdi (Benue).

    In a statement by its Group General Manager, Group Public Affairs Division, Ndu Ughamadu, the NNPC said the infringement on the statutorily guaranteed 25-metre setback for the infrastructure was not only detrimental to the free flow of petroleum products but was far more harmful to dwellers of illegal structures and shanties due to the combustible nature of hydrocarbon.

    The corporation noted the inseparable link between the cases of oil pipeline right-of-way-encroachment and incessant pipeline vandalism cum oil theft with attendant negative effect on the economy.

    According to the NNPC, the creation of the minimum 25-metre buffer for the pipeline is designed to allow for maintenance, repairs and replacements of pipelines as need may arise while ensuring the security and safety of the facility.

    Read Also: NNPC secures $3.15b financing for OML 13

    The buffer also ensures that those living contiguous to the lines are shielded in cases of leakage, rupture or explosion, the corporation said.

    It added that as a first step towards eventual removal of such structures by the team of Army Engineering Corps, its downstream subsidiary, the Nigerian Pipeline and Storage Company (NPSC), embarked on extensive consultation and enlightenment targeted at violators in affected communities.

    The corporation noted that the safety and wellbeing of the people remained paramount to its management.

    The NNPC explained that based on penetrating reconnaissance executed by the Army engineers – stretching from Ogale-Eleme community in Port Harcourt-Aba axis to Otade community in Enugu-Makurdi leg – structures in violation of the pipeline safety corridor have been identified and clearly marked with notice of imminent removal served on affected occupants.

    The corporation noted that the essence of the red flag was to bring urgency to the situation along the PHC-Aba-Enugu-Makurdi line whose level of violation is about 75 per cent stating that the position is intolerable with clear cases of individuals channelling products into private homes.

    “Such incidents are not only crystal clear cases of economic sabotage but pose unimaginable danger to the entire neighbourhood,” the statement said.

     

  • Folarin: no painful screening for ex-governors, senators

    Forner Senate Leader Teslim Folarin and currently representing Oyo Central at the Senate has said it was unnecessary to subject former governors and those who have served in the Senate to what he called painful screening.

    He said this is because they deserve respect and honour, having been entrusted with huge responsibilities in the past.

    The screening of ministerial nominees, including some former governors and senators by the Ninth Senate has generated mixed reactions.

    Some Nigerians have criticized the current Senate for allegedly being an “executive rubber stamp” on 17 ministerial nominees.

    The 17 ministerial nominees were said to have been treated with special favour when they were asked to take a bow and go, without passing through thorough screening, as others.

    Folarin said unknown to many, the Senate has its internal workings, rules and traditions.

    Addressing reporters at the weekend in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital, at a “thank you party” he organised for his constituents on his electoral victory, the former Senate Leader said the Upper Chamber under Lawan has “distinguished Nigerians who know what they are doing”.

    Read Also: Senators decry rising suicide cases

    He said: “We have our traditions. If you are a former member of the National Assembly, it is our tradition to allow you to bow and go.

    “Nigerians may not like it but that is the way it is. If you have been a governor and you come to the National Assembly for clearance, we must respect you because you have been entrusted with a huge responsibility before.

    “What do we ask a governor? Again, in some cases, once they talk for about five minutes, you will know what they have in stock. You don’t have to keep people for about one hour before you know you have screened them. If you screen somebody for five minutes, you will know if the person is sound or not.”

    Folarin said those the Senate felt needed to be quizzed were quizzed, adding: “Take, as an instance, the nominee from Oyo State, Sunday Dare, was screened. We grilled him. This is because at the level he had operated, he had been screened by the committee of the Senate for his position as Executive Commissioner of the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC). I wanted to showcase what we have in Oyo State to the whole world. That was why I invited my colleagues to ask him questions.

    “Also, a lot of them are returning and they had been screened four years ago. What do you want to ask them again? In the case of the Attorney General, we screened him very well; didn’t we?”

     

     

     

  • Sultan, others should guarantee El-Zakzaky’s release, says Shehu Sani

    To rights activist and former Senator Shehu Sani, proscribing the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) as a terror organisation will not end the face-off between the group and the Federal Government.

    He urged the Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Sa’ad Abubakar III and other prominent Islamic leaders to stand as guarantors for the groups’ detained leader, Sheikh Ibrahhem El-Zakzaky and his wife.

    In chat with reporters on Sunday in Kano on the recurring clashes between IMN and security agencies, the senator said the ban will worsen the crisis.

    He said: “The solutions to IMN problem, in my personal opinion, are four. The first is that the Sultan of Sokoto and other religious leaders should provide guarantee to the Federal Government on which the leader of the IMN would be released to them. Secondly, the IMN should stop all forms of protest, whether peaceful or violent.

    “The third aspect of it: the government should move towards addressing the problems of their members who were killed and their homes that were destroyed, in compliance with the previous court orders.

    “The fourth aspect of it is that the movement should stop its alleged relationship with nations outside of Nigeria that pose security threats on our country. If they are a movement, they should be a movement; as the name implies, a Nigerian movement to pursue their ideas, their beliefs and whatever they preach.”

    The senator said everything must be done to avoid a situation where the movement will suddenly disappear from the radar to spring surprises.

    Sani said: “The court of law cannot address a problem of either insurgency or agitation or crushing this kind of idea. We have heard several laws on terrorism. It is 10 years today, but we are still battling Boko Haram. That is one.

    “Secondly, which one do we prefer: the Islamic Movement that has a leader we can arrest, that has members we can see, that has an identity that we can prosecute or a group that can be forced to go underground and pose a serious security danger to the country? I think the option is ours.”

    A human rights’ group, Access to Justice, also said that the proscription through an ex-parte order negated fair hearing.

    Read Also: Ohaneze Youths to FG: free El-Zakzaky

    In a statement by its Convener Joseph Otteh and Programme Officer Daniel Igiekhumhe, Access to Justice said it was dismayed by the orders, which it called “deeply unfortunate”.

    It said: “With respect, the court clearly sacrifices the constitutional and due process rights of the IMN group in the very flawed process it followed to arrive at its decision.”

  • Presidency: freedom of worship not affected by IMN ban

    The proscription of Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN) has nothing to do with peaceful and law-abiding Shi’ites in the country, the Federal Government explained on Sunday.

    Lawful members of the group have not been banned from practicing their religion, the government in a statement by the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu.

    The statement said rather, it was to discourage wanton violence, murder and willful destruction of public and private property.

    But the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) has said it would not be distracted by the court order, declaring the sect as a terrorist organisation.

    A Federal High Court in Abuja had on Friday declared the group a terrorist organisation, following an ex parte application filed by the Federal Government.

    The Presidency’s statement said that contrary to the claim by the IMN that it had been banned from practising its religion, President Buhari’s administration has not banned Shi’ites from observing their five daily prayers and going to Mecca to perform the Holy pilgrimage.

    The statement reads: “Their position is blatantly false and deceptive. The IMN is deliberately changing the narrative in order to gain sympathy and divert the attention of the world from its terrorist activities, including attacking soldiers, killing policemen and a youth corps member, destroying government ambulances and public property, consistently defying authority of the state.

    “The Presidency notes that the banned organization was taken over by extremists who didn’t believe in peaceful protests and instead employed violence and arson, driving fear and undermining the rights of others and constituted authority.

    “The Presidency agrees that the constitution protects freedom of worship, but not to the detriment of the society, especially where such freedom harms others, and breaks law and order.

    “The Presidency insists that such criminal behavior and disregard for rights of others and human life will not be tolerated by any responsible government, explaining that everywhere in the world protesters operate within legal boundaries and conduct themselves peacefully without molesting others, or engaging in murder and killing of security personnel or destroying public and private property.

    “The Presidency regrets that despite all efforts by the government and other well-meaning Nigerians to make the IMN militants to see reason and abandon violence, such appeals fell on deaf ears as they killed, maimed and destroyed willfully, constituting daily nuisance to workers, commuters and other innocent citizens.

    Read Also: Court ‘ll decide El-Zakzaky’s fate – Presidency

    “Having defied appeals to operate peacefully, and given their seeming determination to destabilise the country, the government had to act before the situation goes out of control, after admonishing many times over that people should not use religion to perpetuate lawlessness.

    “We are fighting lawlessness and criminality and not pursuing a policy of discrimination against any group.

    “You cannot be in court while at the same time engaging in violent protests, molesting people and inflicting pains on others, which includes taking innocent lives.”

    In a statement on Sunday, IMN media forum President Ibrahim Musa, described the order as a “joke.”

    He said the order will not distract the group from continuing its demand for the release of its leader Ibrahim El-Zakzaky, who has been in detention since 2015, should be released.

    The spokesman said though the group was yet to get the copy of the order, its lawyers were already studying development.

    The statement reads: “The Islamic Movement has learnt of the fallacious court order for its proscription by a high court in Abuja, that it is a terrorist group.

    “We are in consultations with our lawyers, and we would, as a peaceful people … give an appropriate response.

    “We want to assure the general public and the international community that we will not be pushed into taking any rash decision no matter the provocation.

    “This order, we believe, was hastily obtained to sweep under the carpet the glaring human rights abuses suffered by the IMN since the Zaria genocide of December, 2015.

    “We reject any false flag terror attacks that the authorities would be plotting in our name, and by this assure the general public that we have never contemplated the use of terror tactics in our ways. This is not about to change.”

  • Third party behind Obaseki, Oshiomhole rift, says Edo APC

    The local chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Edo State has blamed the perceived feud between Governor Mr. Godwin Obaseki and the national chairman of the APC, Adams Oshiomhole on some selfish individuals.

    Rubbished the claims that Obaseki and his predecessor are loggerheads over the control of the state and leadership tussle in Edo State House of Assembly, the state wing of the party said those that “are feeling uncomfortable with the reforms introduced by the incumbent” have been trying to put a wedge in-between the two leaders.

    The Edo State APC Chairman, Anselm Ojezua, who revealed in an interactive chat with reporters in Lagos, blamed the crisis on the deceptive nature of players in the state’s political space.

    He pointed out that the state has been in the news for the wrong reasons because certain individuals who had hijacked the resources of the state in one way or the other resorted to blackmail and misrepresent facts to strain the relationship between the governor and his predecessor.

    Read Also: Kinsmen pass vote of confidence on Oshiomhole

    According Ojezua, the reformed introduced by the present administration has blocked such elements from collecting and diverting revenue meant for the development of the state.

    He said the challenges before the party in state was beyond the leadership tussle in the House of Assembly. Ojezua said: “It is just that Third party is trying to create problem between our national chairman Comrade Adams Oshiomhole and Governor Obaseki. The developments in recent times have whittled down the tension created by the crisis.

    “The national chairman of the party has discovered the ulterior motives of the political jobbers going to him in Abuja to spread all sorts of falsehood that the governor has dumped the blueprint drafted to make Edo State attractive for investments to boost economic prosperity of the state in order to rubbish Oshiomhole’s regime, or that the governor is against his people or that the party was bound to lose the next election if the governor is allowed to continue in that direction. Our national chairman now knows better and we are talking and back to where we ought to have started.’’

    He explained that the party decided to throw its weight behind the governor because of his resolve to take the state to next level of development.

    On how to resolve the impasse in the House of Assembly, the party chair said nobody has prevented the remaining 12 lawmakers from being inaugurated.

    Also speaking, the Special Adviser to the Governor on Media & Communication Strategy, Crusoe Osagie, said governor remained focus on the provision of good governance.

    He said that that the Obaseki-led administration has deployed enormous resources to ensure the transformation of the education.

     

  • Governors row over Ruga

    Controversy continued to rage on Sunday on the suspended Cattle Settlemen (Ruga) policy.

    The position of two governors in the North – Abdullahi Sule (Nasarawa) and Bello Matawalle (Zamfara)  – contradicted that of their colleagues in the Southeast.

    Sule and Matawalle said there was no going back on the implementation of the controversial policy in their states. Their Southeast counterparts foreclosed the implementation of cattle settlements in their states.  They spoke through the Chairman of the Southeast Governors’ Forum (SGF), David Umahi, who doubles as Ebonyi State governor.

    The Southeast governors reiterated their stand not to yield any land in their states for the Ruga programme.

    According to them, in response to the emerging security challenges, they have decided to set up both a committee and a centre for Southeast Integrated Monitoring/Intelligence Gathering to be centrally located in Enugu.

    The governors, whose decisions were articulated in a communiqué read by Umahi,  said they would establish forest guards in each state of the zone and roads cleared up to 50 metres into the bush to have a clear view of roads ahead.

    According to them, the security committee will also address the safety of fuel pipeline route to Enugu depot to ensure that pumping of petroleum products in Enugu depot resumes in the shortest possible time.

    The governors discussed the comparative advantages of agriculture and its attendant benefits to the region.

    They said: “The forum therefore resolved to pool funds together to fund our people who are interested in rice, cassava, cow rearing, piggery, goat rearing, poultry, fishery and some other cash crops permitted by our soil.”

    Read Also: RUGA will not happen in Edo – Obaseki

    On the status of the Akanu Ibiam International Airport Enugu, the governors commended their Enugu State counterpart, Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi, for his numerous interventions in addressing concerns raised by FAAN and in ensuring that the airport is functional.

    They, however, decried the deplorable state of the airport’s runway and pleaded with the Federal Government to consider their request for the reconstruction of the runway.

    “While calling on the Federal Government to take more meaningful action on Enugu-Onitsha Road, Enugu-Port Harcourt Road, Owerri-Onitsha Road, Okigwe-Owerri Road and Owerri-Umuahia Road, at the same time, we commend the Federal Government for the steady progress on the second Niger Bridge project”, the governors said.

    In Nasarawa, the governor insisted that the state government will continue with the implementation of the project.

    He spoke on Sunday while hosting the leadership of Fulani residents in the state to appreciate the governor’s efforts to sustain the peaceful atmosphere being experienced in the state between herders and farmers.

    Sule said: “The Ruga Settlement Project was not brought to the state by anybody. But in my quest at searching for means that could bring a lasting peace in the state, I personally went to the federal Ministry of Agriculture and understudy the pros and cons of the project where I discovered some substantial benefits derivable from it when I subsequently demanded that it should be established in Nasarawa State.

    “It was after understanding the benefits that Ruga settlement would bring to the state that I summoned traditional rulers of the state to discuss the issue which the traditional rulers in their unanimous decision assented to the programme. We in Nasarawa State are going ahead with the Ruga project as an experiment for other states of the federation to emulate.”

    Speaking, the Sarkin Fulani of Nasarawa State, Senator Walid Jibrin, said that the Fulani were in full support of Ruga Settlement Project which is; embraced by the government of Nasarawa State in order to mitigate the persistent conflicts between herdsmen and farmers.

    Jibrin, who doubles as Chairman, Board of Trustees (BoT) of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), however, begged other ethnic groups, especially Igbo and Yoruba, to give the Ruga Settlement Project a chance.

    Matawalle insisted on going ahead with the project in Zamfara.

    He told State House reporters after the Presidential Policy Retreat at the Presidential Villa, Abuja: “In Zamfara, we will adopt Ruga in our strategy to address the herders/farmers crisis; it is a developmental project on ranch and we are ready for it.”

    His Plateau counterpart, Simon Lalong, identified tackling insecurity as the most important thing he took away from the retreat.

    Lalong said: “I had mentioned here that when I was elected as the chairman of Northern Governors’ Forum, I said my priority is security. So, part of what we discussed at the retreat is how to tackle insecurity as presented by the Inspector-General (IG), Mohammed Adamu.

    “The second aspect is education. We mentioned to the President the Almajiri system. So, these were the things that all of us have taken in and, very soon, I will convene the northern summit for us to collectively discuss because at the Northern Governors Forum I have already set up a committee chaired by the governor of Katsina to look at generally insecurity in the North.”

  • IMN crunch

    The Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN), security agencies’ see-saw, over the continued detention of Ibrahim Elzakzaky, the IMN leader, just got to a crunch.  The IMN just got proscribed, as an alleged terrorist organisation.

    The reaction has been mixed, mostly influenced by where you stood on the ideological spectrum.  Crusaders of citizen liberty howl “state outlawry!”  But advocates of citizen safety scream “law and order!”  It is viewing the same continuum at two extreme ends.

    That indeed is the jam of the modern state.  How much of personal or group liberty should you allow before risking collective safety security, another key canon of the pristine state, via the social contract?

    Opposing advocates go on an emotive binge, stacking their cards, to checkmate the other, just to win the extant argument.  Still, a bit of common sense (which by the way is never common) would do here.

    Just like individuals, corporate citizens have the protection under the law — until they breach that law. That is what crime and punishment is all about.  That is why convicts are gaoled — or even executed — for a breach of the law.

    By the same token, a corporate body’s right is not absolute.  Since, by the social contract, the state is sworn to protecting the collective against the powerful, garrulous, violent or even unreasonable few, a group risks its rights and liberty being curtailed, if it became a menace to other citizens, group or individual.

    By that, is the IMN ban justified?  The answer can’t be sweeping, for it would depend on specific circumstances.

    For starters, by the provisions of the 1999 Constitution, you can’t proscribe a faith, say Islam or Christianity or African traditional beliefs.

    But you sure can ban a religious groups which has become a menace to others, so long as the courts buy the facts you have sworn to before it.  Still, that cannot be forever, except that nuisance exists forever, which is well nigh impossible.

    So, those who scream IMN’s ban is wrong, because it robs the adherents the fundamental right of practicing their faith, get it fatally wrong.

    IMN is not the only Shiite group in the country.  If it faces ban, therefore, it is not because it is Shiite (like the two other groups); but because it is violent (unlike the other two).

    So, by its often violent conduct and undisputed nuisance to others, even the most romantic IMN apologist would agree its behaviour isn’t exactly its best asset in its defence against ban.

    Its latest protest that claimed a top cop and a fledging youth on youth service, aside from arson: the razing public facilities, was a gory peak to a well established pattern of notoriety.

    But the law and order side too must not pretend the IMN had no right to protests — even if they err by their unfazed violent protests — to press for the release of their leader, after a court bail; even if the bail is disputed by both sides.

    Unfortunately, the federal government has founded the El-Zakzaky non-release on claiming he is a security risk.  That is another level of complication, again unfortunately not helped by IMN’s swashbuckling challenge to the laws of the land.

    In the final analysis, however, it is best everyone regains their rights and liberties.  But you can’t claim relief under a law you claim not to recognize.

    So, let the “ban” serve as a shock therapy to pull IMN back from the brink.  Let them conform to the laws of the land.  Let El-Zakzaky too be tried.  If innocent, let him go.  If guilty, let him serve his term.

    For now, let IMN lawyers contest the ban in court.  At the end of the day, it’s due process, not violence or self-help, that gets acceptable results.

     

     

  • LKJ’s other side

    The roll call of attendees at Lateef Jakande’s birthday party was an apparition of the Yoruba elite. Weak, wizened but worthy, the first civilian governor of Lagos looked fairer in the 90th. No past governor, or political bigwig who attended the event spoke without awe. He is a man of legacy.

    Perhaps the person who captured his acts with dramatic presence is his present successor, the BOS of Lagos, Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu. Microphone in hand and almost leaning over the sitting grandee like a grandson, Governor Sanwo-Olu said “I was 14 years old when you became governor of Lagos.” He presented himself as a model beneficiary of Jakande’s genius.

    Few people live to see their legacy as superfine as that of the Lagos chief executive who mounted the chair he left behind. Governor Sanwo-Olu is the democratic bloodline to the throne just as a monarch swims the natural bloodline of the biological fathers. He is gradually coming into his own as he repairs the brokenness of the past few years: roads restoration, discipline, traffic, et al. Governor Sanwo-Olu must be contemplating Jakande as one of his exemplary ancestors.

    So are many today looking at the man of modest lifestyle, infrastructural disruption, educational beacon and welfarist populism.  But Jakande was not only about his transformational doings as governor. Before he was governor, he was a journalist. No mean one at that. He was, however, an Awoist, a man who exemplified the Yoruba sage and soldiered with him in crypts and sunlight. He wrote and edited and was even custodian of his ideals as the steward of The Nigerian Tribune. When Awo was jailed, Jakande suffered with him in his temptation behind bars.

    So, today, it is that aspect of Jakande that fascinates this essayist.  It is a narrative subsumed in the avalanche of accolades on his nonagenarian birth mark. What is the quality of Jakande’s courage? We saw it as he soldiered as a young man beside and behind Awo. He recorded with flair and perspicacity the toils and agonies of Awo’s trials. We saw him as governor fight for programmes mocked by his adversaries. His cancellation of the school shift system was revolutionary in the city. Yours truly attended an afternoon school.

    He mushroomed the city with schools to bring every ward to learn in the morning. His NPN critics called them cowsheds. He soldiered on. He built the largest number of housing units ever in Nigerian history by any government, whether federal or state, within four years. He opened what we know as the Lekki Corridor today. He was a seer as an environmentalist, pioneering a day off to clean the city. We cannot forget another act of prescience: he began the Metroline Project, to plumb the city with rail transport to ease a metropolis of bourgeoning population. Buhari scuppered it but later apologised.

    His profile overspread the nation. He was called the action governor. In Yorubaland, and among the progressives, he was called Baba kekere. He was austere in manners. He abhorred the magnificence of office. He lived in his modest home, rode his Toyota Crown, was not drawn to the vanity of travels abroad, or the extravagancies of official boasts or swagger, was never a fop even for ceremonies. He loved his confectionary, Tom Tom, as if he needed something sweet that also reminded him of the bitterness of human suffering.  Baba kekere means literally the little father. It, in earnest, meant the heir to Awo, the father of Yorubaland and politics.

    How was it that Jakande never rose to take the crown as the leader of the Yoruba? One, it was a question of charisma. He was a doer, not a charmer. He was no orator, not an absorbing conversationalist, though a deep thinker and practical man. He was not an impresario in political gatherings. He was an organiser, but not a broker. Hence when he pushed the candidacy of Femi Agbalajobi, his name made Agbalajobi a top contender but he was eventually toppled. However, the big challenge came after Abiola’s June 12 mandate tested the Yoruba mettle. Jakande joined the Abacha regime, just as Olu Onagoruwa and Ebenezer Babatope. They joined not arbitrarily, but as a way of putting the June 12 men in government as a transition ploy until the dream was realised. Whether it was an act of hopeless gamble or naivety by Abiola and his men has become a question for historians and political scientists. In his autobiography of reportorial rigour and voyage in Nigerian history, Chief Olusegun Osoba recalled in his book: Battlelines, that even Abiola saw the June 12 struggle as already a financial pressure and thought it necessary as a respite that his followers joined the junta.

    But Abacha did not flinch. Abiola eventually mobilised and the sweep of Yorubaland and other progressive redoubts in the country decided on a battle-to-the-death against Abacha. When Jakande and others in government were asked to leave the junta, they refused. Here lies the question? How could a man called the heir stand on the other side instead of in the vanguard? Was it an act of discretion or a sellout?

    Read Also: Buhari greets Lateef Jakande at 90

    The issue then was that Jakande, Babatope and Onagoruwa thought they were under watch, and if they tried to show any sign of disloyalty, they would be razed to death. The story of Ibru, who almost died from the Junta’s attack, was a case in point. But the counter story was that quite a few others who were not in government were being chased all over the country, including Enahoro, Soyinka, Tinubu, Osoba, et al. Some appointees escaped out of the country.

    So, was it because they thought they were under special watch, more acute than the others? The late Gani Fawehinmi fumed often that his bosom friend Onagoruwa was cohabiting with the goggled despot.  Together they had asun (special delicacy) and pounded yam and travelled out of town on many weekends.

    Some said suicide was the option. But not so for others who risked all and slipped through the famous NADECO route? Was it because they lacked cunning? Courage without cunning is futile. Maybe they had too much cunning and so couldn’t dare. Jakande has paid since for his choice or dilemma. He has never been embraced in the inner sanctum of the Yoruba. His echo may have been heard. His name was hardly invoked, and when he was invoked, he was never beckoned. He never once was a steersman of the southwest breezes. He has remained in the quiescent fringes of the rumble of Yoruba politics since 1999.

    In Yorubaland, politicians always pray not to commit what the Bible designates as sin unto death. In other parts of Nigeria, Jakande would have risen into a myth-like status. In the Southwest, however, his clay feet loom large. It is because the Yoruba are an ideological race. Onagoruwa in death was not washed of the sin. Neither is Babatope, whose voice once had the virility of a town crier. Jakande seems to enjoy some grace. Maybe a part of the Yoruba heart heard Mahatma Ghandi’s words: “The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.” Part of this is his work in Lagos. But it is a genius of development, not of character. Today people see him the way historian Thucydides writes of the great Pericles: “We have not left our power without witness, but have shown it with mighty proofs.”

    But it is because his genius did not translate to courage in the tough hour of his people that he did not soar from Baba kekere to baba. That is the flipside of the great LKJ.

     

    Sylva for oil man

    As the President contemplates his cabinet, a few sensitive positions call for scrutiny. One of them is minister of petroleum. Since Kachukwu is not in the reckoning, a name that pops into mind is that of the former governor of Bayelsa State, the spry and lanky fellow, Chief Timipre Sylva.

    His politics as a Buhari partisan and his resume with oil and politics qualify him aplenty. He has been in the epicentre of the oil producing region. He is also the most senior Buharist from the Ijaw nation. He was a Buharist before the word was coined when the former general was in the doldrums of presidential ambition, and few looked his way. Sylva gambled with him then.

    His appointment will show Buhari as one who rewards loyalty, a point some critics are apt to point out. As special assistant to former oil minister Daukoru, he was a go-to man in planning and conducting the most transparent oil bid-round adjudged to be the best ever in Nigeria, generating over a billion dollars in revenue for the government.

    During his time, they ended the chaos in the supply and imports of products by establishing the PPPRA. As governor, he conceptualised the Amnesty Programme, the signature achievement of the Yar’adua administration. He is the oil man of the cabinet. So let the man who has successfully patrolled the terrain be made petrol man.