Tag: Orji Uzor Kalu

  • Alleged N3.2b laundering:  Ex-governor gets new trial date

    Alleged N3.2b laundering: Ex-governor gets new trial date

    THE trial of a former Abia State Governor Orji Uzor Kalu was stalled yesterday due to the absence of Justice Mohammed Idris of the Federal High Court in Lagos.

    Justice Idris was said to be attended the ongoing judges’ conference in Abuja, which is held at the beginning of every new legal year.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) re-arraigned Kalu, Udeh Udeogu and Slok Nigeria Limited on 34 counts of laundering N3.2 billion.

    They pleaded not guilty.

    The alleged diversions were done between August 13,2003 and January 12, 2005, the prosecution said.

    The EFCC accused Slok of conniving with one Emeka Abone, said to be at large, to help Kalu retain the alleged stolen funds in its accounts.

    The offence is contrary to Section 17 (c) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act 2003 and punishable under Section 16 of the same Act.

    The trial has been fixed for October 3 to 6.

  • EFCC: Court upholds competence of witness on Kalu’s trial

    EFCC: Court upholds competence of witness on Kalu’s trial

    A Federal High Court on Monday in Lagos upheld the competence of a witness, Christiana Ohiri, in the ongoing trial of a former Governor of Abia, Orji Uzor kalu, charged with money laundering.

    On Oct. 31, 2016, the EFCC preferred a 34-count charge bordering on N3.2 billion fraud against Kalu and a former Commissioner for Finance during Kalu’s administration, Ude Udeogo.

    Also charged is a company, Slok Nig. Ltd.

    The accused had pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    At the hearing last month, the defence team had raised objection to the competence of Ohiri, a manager of a branch of the UBA at Umuahia.

    Ohiri is described as second prosecution witness.

    Ruling on the objection, Justice Mohammed Idris held that the witness was competent to testify in the trial.

    Idris held that the witness could give evidence in the case, since the provisions of the Evidence Act had been complied with by the EFCC.

    The court declared that the signatory to the proof of evidence was not in doubt, adding that there was substantial compliance with the provision of the rules.
    The judge held that “the proof of evidence before this honourable court is competent”.

    In continuation of her evidence before the court, the witness said that no payment was made to the former governor from the government house account.

    Under cross-examination by Kalu’s lawyer, Chief Gordy Uche (SAN), over a document containing information about 36 bank drafts, the witness said that no draft was either paid by Kalu or issued in his name.

    Responding to a question from the silk, the witness said: “the first defendant (Kalu) did not personally come to me to purchase any draft and his name was not included on any of the drafts.

    “His name or photograph also does not feature in the mandate cards of the signatories to the Government House Account.’’

    The witness had earlier informed court that between September and October, 2006, the UBA head office had contacted her branch, requesting for some documents about some transactions that were done earlier in the year.

    She said that some of the transactions were listed while others were retrieved from the bank’s archives and sent to Lagos.

    Ohiri said that she did not know what the head office wanted to do with the documents.

    She said that by 2007, she was invited by the EFCC, which asked her some questions about the documents her bank sent to the commission.

    “I was invited to the EFCC four times in 2007 and I made three statements at the commission’s office,” she stated.

    When Uche suggested to the witness that her statements were contradictory and inconsistent, she replied, “I disagree’’.

    Further proceedings has been adjourned until April 11.

    In the charge, the accused were alleged to have committed the offences between August, 2001 and October, 2005.

    Kalu was alleged to have used his company to retain N200 million in an account in First Inland Bank, now FCMB.

    The money is alleged to be part of funds illegally derived from the coffers of the Abia State Government.

    In one of the counts, Kalu’s company, Slok Nig. Ltd. and one Emeka Abone, said to be at large, were also alleged to have retained in the company’s account the sum of N200 million on behalf of the first accused.

    They were alleged to have used Manny Bank (now Fidelity Bank Plc), Spring Bank Plc, the defunct Standard Trust Bank and Fin Land Bank, now FCMB.

    In counts one to 10, the accused were alleged to have retained about N2.5 billion in different accounts, whose funds were said to belong to the Abia government.

    Cumulatively, the accused were alleged to have diverted over N3.2 billion from the Abia government’s treasury during Kalu’s tenure as governor.

    The offence is said to have contravened the provisions of Sections 15(6), 16 and 21 of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2005.

    It is also said to have contravened the provisions of the Money Laundering Act of 1995 as amended by the amendment Act No.9 of 2002 and Section 477 of the Criminal Code Act, Laws of the Federation, 1990.

     

  • Fans chide soccer authorities over clubs ouster from CAF

    Fans chide soccer authorities over clubs ouster from CAF

    Football fans in Abakaliki have chided Nigerian soccer authorities over the ouster of its clubs in all categories of the African Football Confederation (CAF) competitions.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Enugu Rangers International beat Zamalek of Egypt 2-1 in Enugu on Sunday in the CAF Champions League round of 32 clash but lost 3-5 on aggregate after a 1-4 first leg loss.

    Rivers United also lost 0-4 on Saturday to El-Merriekh of Sudan and lost 3-4 on aggregate after winning 3-0 in the first leg in Port Harcourt.

    The fans who spoke to NAN on Monday in Abakaliki described the situation as appalling, noting that both teams’ subsequent qualification to vie in the Confederation Cup was not enough consolation.

    Dickson Ojeh, Team Manager of National Amateur League Side, Alter Nite FC of Abakaliki, said that the soccer authorities and clubs did not understand the politics involved in such competitions.

    “El Merriekh frustrated Rivers United with their fans pelting our players with stones, while Rangers were not allowed to record the proceedings of their first leg game in Cairo.

    “In a sharp contrast, Rivers United gave El-Merriekh a queens treatment in Port Harcourt, while Zamalek officials were flaunting their television relay rights in Enugu and moving freely as if they were in Cairo,’’ he said.

    Supporting this assertion, Chika Nwangele, Ebonyi United FC skipper, said that El-Merriekh and Zamalek had the full support of their nation’s soccer officials when prosecuting their matches.

    “How many Nigerian Football Federation (NFF) officials were involved in prosecuting both matches in Nigeria or accompanying the teams to Ombdurman and Cairo?

    “Zamalek and El-Merriekh players were visibly more motivated than their Nigerian counterparts who grapple with allowances and bonuses whenever they want to travel,’’ he said.

    Chief Okechukwu Nshii, former Head of Sports Department in Abakaliki Local Government Council, blamed the development on fatigue occasioned by a congested domestic schedule.

    “It is sheer madness for the Nigerian Professional League Board to organise matches during mid-week as top football nations in the world don’t practice such.

    “Clubs play as much as two matches in a congested week and this also affected Ifeanyi Ubah and Wikki Tourists FC who were eliminated in the first round of the CAF Confederation Cup,’’ he said.

    Mrs Peace Okenwa, a don and soccer buff, called on soccer authorities to consult former Abia Governor, Chief Orji Uzor-Kalu, for tips on his magic wand for Enyimba in 2003 and 2004.

    “Uzor-Kalu as a soccer strategist has the key of repeating Enyimba’s back to back winning success as Nigerian clubs have been groping in the dark since then.

    “CAF should also look-into the complaints lodged by Rangers and Rivers United against their opponents and treat them on merit because football no matter how keenly contested, should not be war,’’ she said. 

  • Court okays witness evidence against Kalu over N3.2bn fraud

    Court okays witness evidence against Kalu over N3.2bn fraud

    A Federal High Court in Lagos on Thursday ruled that a prosecution witness was competent to give evidence in the ongoing trial of a former Governor of Abia , Orji Uzor Kalu, charged with N3.2 billion fraud.

    In a short ruling on Thursday, Idris held that the witness was competent to give evidence although he was not listed in the proof of evidence.

    “I have no doubt that the witness is competent to give evidence in the trial.”

    Idris, however, pointed out that the witness was not properly brought before the court, and urged the prosecution to comply with the provisions of Section 379(1) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.

    The judge, therefore, directed the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission to supply the Defence with additional proof of evidence.

    The EFCC had on Oct. 31, 2016, preferred a 34-count charge bordering on N3.2 billion fraud against Kalu and his former Commissioner for Finance, Ude Udeogo as well as Kalu’s company — Slok Nigeria Ltd.

    The accused had pleaded not guilty to the charges and were admitted to bails.

    At the last adjournment on March 8, the prosecution had began examination of its second witness, Mrs Christiana Ohiri, the Umuahia Branch Manager of UBA .

    The witness had began her testimony and the prosecution and sought to tender some statements of account through her when a defence counsel, Mr Mike Ozekhome (SAN) objected to the admissibility of the document.

    He argued that the document could not be tendered in evidence as same was not duly certified, and urged the court to uphold his submission.

    Justice Mohammed Idris consequently adjourned the case to March 9 for ruling.

    The accused were alleged to have committed the offence between August 2001 and October 2005.

    Kalu was also alleged to have utilised his company to retain in the account of a First Inland Bank, (now FCMB), the sum of N200 million.

    The sum is alleged to have formed part of funds illegally derived from the coffers of the Abia State Government.

    In one of the counts, his company (Slok Nigeria Ltd) and one Emeka Abone, who is said to be at large, were also alleged to have retained in the company’s account the sum of N200 million on behalf of the first accused.

    They accused allegedly used Spring Bank Plc, the defunct Standard Trust Bank and Finland Bank for the fraud.

    On counts one to 10, the accused were alleged to have retained about N2.5 billion in different accounts which belongs to the Abia State Government.

    Cumulatively, in all the counts, the accused were alleged to have diverted over N3.2 billion from the state government’s treasury during Kalu’s tenure as governor.

    The offences contravened the provisions of Sections 15 (6), 16, and 21 of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2005 and Money Laundering Act of 1995 as amended by the amendment Act No.9 of 2002.

    The offences also violated Section 477 of the Criminal Code, Laws of the Federation, 1990.

    Justice Idris has adjourned continuation of trial to April 10.

     

  • Kalu objects to tendering of documents in trial

    Kalu objects to tendering of documents in trial

    Former Abia State Governor, Orji Uzor Kalu, objected to the tendering of some documents by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in his trial for alleged money laundering.

    The prosecution had sought to tender the documents through the second prosecution witness, Christiana Ohiri, who is a Branch Manager at the United Bank for Africa (UBA), Umuahia Branch.

    She said the branch was contacted by the bank’s head office towards the end of October 2006 requesting for some documents for transactions done earlier in the year.

    “Some of the transactions were listed and we retrieved others from our achieves and sent to Lagos. I did not know what the head office wanted to do with the documents.

    “By 2007, I was invited by EFCC and certain questions were asked about the documents the bank sent to the commission.

    “There were a couple of accounts we were maintaining for Abia State. These included: Abia State Board of Internal Revenue account, Abia State Judiciary account and Government House, Umuahia account,” the witness said.

    EFCC‘s lawyer, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), sought to tender the bank’s response to EFCC’s request and the Government House statement of account as exhibits.

    But, the defence objected to the admissibility of the statement of account on the ground that it did not comply with Section 84(b) of the Evidence Act regarding certification.

    Kalu’s lawyer, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), said: “The documents were not certified. Certification is a legal requirement under the Evidence Act. The pages that have the bank logo have no certification.

    “They have also not told us the hardware from where the document emanated. Everything about it is wrong. There is only an EFCC stamp on the document but EFCC is not UBA. The proper custodian of the document is UBA.”

  • Money laundering: Court dismisses Kalu’s objection

    Money laundering: Court dismisses Kalu’s objection

    The Federal High Court in Lagos on Tuesday dismissed an objection filed by former Abia State Governor, Orji Ozor Kalu, challenging the competence of the first prosecution witness to testify in the money laundering charge filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The commission re-arraigned Kalu, Udeh Udeogu and Slok Nigeria Limited at the Federal High Court in Lagos on 34 count- charge of laundering N3.2billion, to which they pleaded not guilty.

    Defence counsel, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) and Chief Solo Akuma (SAN), on Monday argued that the statement of the first witness, a banker, Mr. Onovoe Oghenovo, was not frontloaded.

    Justice Mohammed Idris overruled the objection on Tuesday.

    He agreed with the prosecution that the witness having been subpoenaed should be allowed to testify whether his statement was frontloaded or not.

    The judge, however, directed the prosecution to serve the defence with the statements of other witnesses.

    When trial began and prosecution counsel sought to tender a document, defence counsel also objected.

    EFCC’s lawyer, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), during examination-in-chief of the first prosecution witness, Onovah Ogonevoh, sought to tender a document from the defunct Manny Bank Plc in response to an enquiry from the commission over the 27 bank drafts issued by the bank’s Umuahia branch.

    The bank, in its response dated October 13, 2006, had attached the customer’s name, the account number and copies of the bank drafts to a cover letter.

    The defence raised objections to the admissibility of the documents attached to the cover letter.

    Ozhekome said the letter’s certification by the EFCC was erroneous.

    “It is legally untenable for the commission to certify a document which originally was in possession of the bank. The bank is in a better position to certify the document,” he said.

    Ozhekome said since the witness was not the documents’ maker, it would be difficult for the defence to cross-examine him on it.

     

  • Alleged fraud: Court to rule on kalu’s case Tuesday

    Alleged fraud: Court to rule on kalu’s case Tuesday

    A Federal High Court sitting in Lagos on Monday fixed Tuesday for ruling on the provision of a witness statement, in the trial of a former governor of Abia State, Orji Uzor kalu, who is standing trial for money laundering.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had on Oct. 31, 2016, preferred a 34-count charge bordering on N3.2 billion fraud against Kalu and his former Commissioner for Finance, Jones Udogu.

    Also charged is a company, Slok Nigeria Limited.

    The accused had pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    When the case was mentioned on Monday, counsel for the prosecution, called its first witness, Mr. Onovah Ovenevoh, into the witness box.

    Ovenevoh was about to begin his testimony when an objection was raised by Udoogu’s counsel, Chief Solo Akuma (SAN).

    Akuma drew the court’s attention to the fact that the Ovenevoh’s statement was not part of the proof of evidence given to him by the prosecution.

    According to him, service of witness statement on the defence is a constitutional right and a facility that should be provided for an accused person as enshrined in Section 36(6) (b) of the Constitution.

    Kalu’s Counsel, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), also noted that it was important for the prosecution to make the statement of the witness available not only to the defence but also to the court.

    “We ought to know what the witness is going to tell the court and not to be caught by surprise.

    “Section 36(1)of the Constitution emphasised the need for an accused person to be given fair hearing and for us to have fair hearing, there must be fair trial,” he said.

    NAN

  • Money laundering: Court fixes March 6 for Uzor Kalu’s trial

    Money laundering: Court fixes March 6 for Uzor Kalu’s trial

    A Federal High Court in Lagos on Tuesday fixed March 6-10 for the trial of former Abia governor Orji Uzor Kalu charged with money laundering.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had on Oct. 31, preferred a 34-count charge of money laundering against Kalu and his former commissioner for finance, Ude Udeogo.However, both accused had pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    At the resumed hearing of the case on Tuesday, the Presiding Judge, Justice Mohammed Idris, stood down the suit till 1 p.m for trial to allow a decongestion of the courtroom.

    Meanwhile, when the case was called the prosecution was unavailable, and after waiting for a length of time, the court was compelled to adjourn the case to a further date.

    After adjournment, the Prosecutor, Mr Adeniyi Adebisi, walked in and craved the court’s indulgence for his delay as he was attending to other matters. After series of submissions, the court ruled that further trial is fixed for March 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.

    Kalu was alleged to have utilised his company to retain in the account of a First Inland Bank, now FCMB, the sum of N200 million.The sum is alleged to have formed part of funds illegally derived from the coffers of the Abia State Government.

     

    Cumulatively, in all the counts, the accused were alleged to have diverted over N3.2 billion from the Abia state government’s treasury during Kalu’s tenure as governor.

    The offence is said to have contravened the provisions of sections 15(6), 16, and 21 of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2005. It is also said to have contravened the provisions of the Money Laundering Act of 1995 as amended by the amendment Act No. 9 of 2002, and Section 477 of the Criminal Code Act, Laws of the Federation, 1990.

  • Alleged fraud: EFCC re-arraigns Kalu, two others

    Alleged fraud: EFCC re-arraigns Kalu, two others

    About eight years after the case was stalled, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Tuesday recommenced the trial of former Abia State Governor, Orji Uzor Kalu and two others.

    Kalu, his ex-aide, Jones Udeogo, and the ex-governor’s company, Slok Nigeria Limited, were re-arraigned on a 34-count charge before a Federal High Court in Abuja.

    Before the arraignment, Kalu and others had argued against the proceedings and urged the court to await the pending appeal by Slok before the Supreme Court.

    Trial judge, Justice Anwuri Chikere, rejected the defendants’ objection to their arraignment and ordered that the charge be read out to them.

    In the amended charge, Kalu and others were accused of diverting about N3.2billion from the Abia State Government’s treasury during his (Kalu) tenure as Abia State governor.

    They pleaded not guilty when the charges were read out to them, following which the court granted them bail on the terms attached to the one granted them in April 2008 by Justice Adamu Bello (now retired).

    The court adjourned to December 6 for the commencement of trial.

  • Orji Uzor Kalu moves into fashion business

    For Orji Uzor Kalu, there is no limit to success because there are no limits to his imaginations and dreams. This has helped him to become a successful businessman with a desire to have his imprint on every aspect of the Nigerian economy. When it comes to making money, Kalu always believes there are endless paths to explore. For this reason, he has his hands in almost every money-making venture.

    Orji Uzor Kalu has already made huge success of SLOK Holdings, a conglomerate consisting a number of successful companies, including the Ojialex Furniture Company, SLOK Nigeria Limited, SLOK Airlines and The Sun and New Telegraph newspapers.

    The former governor of Abia State has his eyes on another line of business. He has plunged into the fashion business and has decided to leave his imprint on the sector. He recently launched a collection of packaged shirts which he named OUK collections, saying that his desire to invest in the textile industry was borne out of the need to reduce excessive importation of goods that can be produced in Nigeria. With the determination and hard work he put into his other ventures, one can be sure his new baby will grow into a giant any time soon.