Author: The Nation

  • Railways: 60 years of neglect haunting Nigeria – Opeifa

    Railways: 60 years of neglect haunting Nigeria – Opeifa

    • NRC boss says Tinubu’s rail policy offers new hope

    Nigeria lost a critical sixty years of rail development due to consistent government neglect, the Managing Director of the Nigerian Railway Corporation (NRC), Dr. Kayode Opeifa, has revealed.

    In an interview on The Exchange Podcast, hosted by Femi Soneye, Dr. Opeifa painted a stark picture of the nation’s rail history, comparing its stagnant 4,000 km network to South Africa’s 35,000 km.

    Dr. Opeifa traced the roots of the current infrastructure deficit to a prolonged period of inaction. “For 60 years after 1912 we built nothing, we did nothing,” he stated, highlighting that from 1962 to 2000, no significant rail development occurred. This stagnation occurred while other nations advanced from narrow gauge to standard gauge, high-speed rail, and even Maglev technology.

    The NRC MD credited the Obasanjo administration with awakening to the need for rail modernization in 2002, an idea initially proposed by Chief Obafemi Awolowo in the 1970s. However, he suggested that even this effort lost momentum after its initial phase, until a more recent renewed focus under subsequent governments.

    The single most significant policy change, according to Dr. Opeifa, was the 2023 constitutional amendment that moved rail from the Exclusive Legislative List to the Concurrent List. This move effectively allows state governments, local governments, and the private sector to invest in and develop rail infrastructure, breaking the federal monopoly.

    He cited the example of Lagos State, which was previously “frustrated by the federal government” in its efforts to develop intra-city rail lines like the Red, Blue, Green, and Purple lines. “Now nobody can frustrate anybody,” Dr. Opeifa declared, signaling a new era of sub-national rail development.

    READ ALSO: Delivering in despair: Why maternal deaths remain high in Cross River

    The NRC boss outlined a three-pillar framework for successful rail development: statutes (laws and regulations), structures (implementing agencies), and processes (operational guidelines). He emphasized that with the law now amended, the focus must shift to creating the right structures and processes at both federal and state levels.

    He confirmed that not less than six state governments, including Lagos, Kaduna, Kano, and Borno, are now actively developing their own metro rail plans, having been empowered by the new legal framework. This decentralized approach is expected to accelerate the pace of rail infrastructure rollout across the country.

    The Federal Government is also complementing this by preparing a new National Rail Master Plan, which Opeifa indicated is ready for launch. This master plan aims to connect all states of the federation with national rail lines, a project he described as critical for national integration and economic development.

    Opeifa expressed optimism, stating that with the right policies in place, many states could commence rail construction by 2026.

  • Terrorism: Nigeria must accept U.S.’ support with caution – Fani-Kayode

    Terrorism: Nigeria must accept U.S.’ support with caution – Fani-Kayode

    Former Minister of Aviation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode has sounded a note of caution in respect of the ongoing rapprochement between the United States of America and Nigeria over the ongoing security crisis in the latter.

    In a two-page article titled The Word of the King of Mar-a-Lago (see pages 9 & 10), Fani-Kayode warns that as Nigeria attempts to cozy up to America in spite of recent threats and insults by President Donald trump, “we must guard our hearts jealously or trust them at our own peril”.

    He warned that men of violence are incapable of honouring agreements or reciprocating friendship, and when they do cannot sustain it.

    The ex-minister noted an attempt by the US to demonise Nigeria the way they did Sudan and Congo DRC before unleashing on them the RSF and M23 militias respectively.

    He wondered why a man who claims he wants to deliver and protect Christians warmly welcomed into the White House the newly installed President of Syria, Ahmed Al-Sharaa, who he described as the greatest butcher of Christians on earth.

    “Apparently, he loves the Christians of Nigeria but hates the Christians of Syria. He also hates the Christians of Gaza and the Palestinian West Bank, who have suffered immensely at the hands of Benjamin Netanyahu’s Zionist State of Israel.

    “What an interesting paradox and contradiction this is. Only a village idiot will be fooled by it,” he said.

    He argued that Trump’s motivation for expressing concern about the plight of Christians at the hands of terrorists in Nigeria is gain and not love.

    READ ALSO: Ulerawa: How Oyebanji’s reforms is turning Ekiti public hospitals into centre of hope

    He said: “The script is clear: stoke, provoke and fund chaos. Discredit and weaken the sitting government, incite the people, engender regime change and spark off a civil war, which will enable you to pick up the spoils and plunder the nation dry.

    “Their evil eye is on Nigeria. They say we have done nothing to stop the killings, but they won’t tell you what they have done to stop supporting, enhancing and encouraging it for the last 15 years.

    “They won’t tell you why they do not sell the arms we need to fight the war or share the necessary intelligence with us.”

  • EFCC seizes Malami’s passport, demands account for $400m Abacha loot

    EFCC seizes Malami’s passport, demands account for $400m Abacha loot

    • Now to report daily for one month from Monday

    • Allegations against me fabricated, says ex-AGF

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday seized the international passport of a former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami, SAN.

    The seizure was part of the ongoing investigation of the whereabouts of $490 million Abacha loot secured through Mutual Legal Assistance (MLAT).

    Malami cannot travel out of the country in the next one month because the condition for his release at 1am on Saturday was for him to report daily for interaction in EFCC headquarters in Abuja.

    But Malami, who said the allegations against him were fabricated, said the truth will unfold soon.

    According to the fact-sheet on Malami, he has many issues to clarify with the EFCC in the next one month.

    “We have asked him to explain the whereabouts of $490 million Abacha loot secured through Mutual Legal Assistance (MLAT).

    “We didn’t say he stole money, but he should account for the loot. This is one of the issues he will clarify to our investigators.

    “Considering the huge volumes of documents he has to go through and the detectives he needs to interact with, we have seized his international passport.

    “One of the conditions for his release on bail at 1am on Saturday was that he should report daily to the EFCC headquarters for interaction.

    “He cannot travel out of the country except as mutually agreed with EFCC or with the permission of a High Court.

    READ ALSO: Ulerawa: How Oyebanji’s reforms is turning Ekiti public hospitals into centre of hope

    “We won’t join issues with him on his braggadocio but we will release our findings to the public after painstaking investigation.”

    Reacting on his X handle, Malami said the allegations against him were fabricated.

    Although he said the truth will soon unfold, he was silent on the seizure of his international passport.

    He said: “In line with my undertaking to keep Nigerians updated on my invitation by EFCC, I give glory to Allah for His divine intervention.

    “The engagement was successful, and I am eventually released while on an appointment for further engagement as the truth relating to the fabricated allegations against me continues to unfold.”

  • Climate Action Summit

    Climate Action Summit

    By Abdu Rafiu

    World leaders of about 197 countries, and with European Union, making 198, began holding early November what may turn out to be a most important summit in a long while, given the theme of the conference. The theme is “Climate Action and Implementation.” What brings them together yearly is the future of the earth in the light of devastation and the incalculable abuse to which it has been subjected largely in the pursuit of modern living.  The Vice-President, Kashim Shettima, was at the meeting in Belem, Brazil, standing in for President Bola Tinubu.

    The climate summit is a product of a 1987 report by a 22-member UN’s World Commission on Environment and Development. The Brundtland report, captioned “Our Common Future,” worries about the state of the planet earth and what will be left of it for the future generation, what The Times of London at the time called “this fragile earth.” The report stresses that never should an economic decision be taken without regard to its consequences on the environment.

    The devastation to the environment borne out largely of economic activities, has come in various guises—pollution, deep and extensive damage to the earth-crust, emission of hardly quantifiable amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and destruction of vegetation and rivers. Already, scientists have discovered that the carbon dioxide emission has altered the stratospheric balance, perforating the ozone layer such that there is unshielded release of harmful ultraviolet radiation, which apart from inflicting skin cancer on man, escalates atmospheric warming. Deformities in fish and animals linked to radiation increases were reported. The scientists also discovered the largest ever hole in the ozone layer over the Antarctic. The ultraviolet rays deplete the community of planktons which absorb carbon dioxide. When added to that the devastation of vegetation, plant life in general that absorbs carbon and through photosynthesis in the activities of Nature Beings  also called Elemental Beings, turn it into oxygen which man and animals need, it leads not only to warming, it engenders shortfall in the quantity and quality of oxygen available. Indeed, it is a tragedy in no small measure. The harm is unspeakable. With the gradual extermination of planktons, increased heat and pollution are released into the environment resulting in climatic changes.

    The warming is laden with the danger of melting Ice-lands which is calculated will swell water level by as much as 20 centimeters (8 inches) come the year 2030 which as of today is only five years away and 65cm in 2100. By that time as scientists predict, many coastal lands will be washed off or completely submerged, places such as Bangladesh and parts of Britain and West African coastline. Pray that the prediction of Professor Ijeoma formerly of Ambrose Ali University that Victoria Island may be hit does not come to pass. At the time he made the prediction he was dismissed as exhibiting deficient knowledge of oceanography and land reclamation. The severity of the climate change even now cannot go unnoticed.

    READ ALSO: Delivering in despair: Why maternal deaths remain high in Cross River

    Each year, the climate summit is seen as raising hope of a giant leap for mankind even if at the end of the huge gathering not more than rhetorics and huge piles of presented papers, over which not much action is taken, come out of it. It arouses world consciousness to the apocalyptic future facing mankind. The awareness is imperative for nations, corporate organizations as well as individual attitude to the casual manner the earth and, by extension, the environment has been treated. This newspaper, The Guardian, on 01 August, this year, painted the troubling picture of the seriousness of the climate crisis even here in our land, Nigeria. In what the paper referred to as “…the dangerous circle of climate crisis and insecurity” and how to break it, the paper stated in an editorial: “As climate extremes tighten their grip across the globe, Nigeria finds itself at a pivotal crossroads. In 2024, the hottest year ever recorded, Nigerians from Maiduguri to Bayelsa experienced a convergence of environmental catastrophes: extreme heat, crippling floods, desertification, deforestation, and oil pollution. These are not isolated events but glaring symptoms of climate crisis spiraling out of control, and Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation, is dangerously underprepared.

    “Nowhere is this more evident than in the Lake Chad region, where rising temperatures and decades of water mismanagement have reduced one of Africa’s largest lakes by over 90 per cent. This ecological collapse has not only ruined livelihoods but fuelled migration, armed insurgency, and deepened poverty. Across the North, desertification is encroaching on farmlands, threatening food security and inflaming farmer-herder conflicts. In the South-East, gully erosion swallows homes and infrastructure. In the Niger Delta, oil spills continue to poison soil, water, and people.”

    Some years back, an Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change consisting of 300 leading scientists drew together the results of new studies which indicated that global warming was real. The studies showed that snow cover sharply decreased in the second-half of the 80s as the climate warmed up, that glaciers have shrunk and sea ice had melted. Between 1972 and 2023, according to Climate Change Indicators, the average portion of North America covered by snow decreased at a rate of about 2,083 square miles per year. Land gripped by permafrost was thawing and that was supposed to speed up global warming by releasing vast amounts of defrozen carbon dioxide and methane, another green-house gas. The studies predicted that harvests in the United States and Russia would be decimated as green-house effect takes hold. Food exports from the US that usually helped to feed no fewer than 100 nations could fall catastrophically. The forecast further said that the African savannah would dry out to resemble the Sahel. Sheep would become scarcer in New Zealand. Rice, soya beans and maize harvests would be devastated in Indonesia and Malaysia and nearly a third of the country may no longer be able to grow rubber.

    Yet, in spite of the grim situation staring mankind in the face, there is bickering and buck-passing between the developed and the developing nations. There is the belief that the position the developing nations at the summit are to push is grant-in-aid to preserve the environment considering the fact that the amount of pollution by the industrialized nations is 10 times what is emitted by the Third World countries. Businessmen in the developed countries are frowning at what they see as the attempt to curtail the amount of carbon dioxide being spewed out as it would tantamount to reduction in their economic activities and, therefore, economic well-being.

    The famous Paris Agreement comes to mind. It was a promising potent tool that world leaders agreed upon to tackle climate change and its negative impacts. According to online publications, the leaders reached what was regarded as a breakthrough at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP 21) in Paris on 12 December, 2015. The Agreement sets long-term goal to guide all nations to:

    *substantially reduce global greenhouse gas emissions to hold global temperature to below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial age levels and strive hard to limit it to 1.5 degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels, believing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change.

    *Periodically assess the collective progress towards achieving the purpose of this agreement and its long-term goals.

    *Provide financing to developing countries to mitigate climate change, strengthen resilience and enhance abilities to adapt to climate impacts.

    The agreement is a legally binding international treaty. It came into force on 04 November, 2016.

    The Nigerian brief that VP Shettima has in his briefcase is to take part in the inauguration of Tropical Forest Forever Fund. According to his aide, Nwocha the Vice-President will also participate in two roundtables chaired by the President of Brazil on energy transition as well as “in the review of the Paris Agreement with focus on Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and Financing.”

    All of the conferences are necessitated in the time of great perplexities and they point to no other thing than the consequences of what man has brought upon himself. And he is unable to see the way forward because he focuses on only one of two-sided coin of life. What has generally been understood as a danger to the environment has been confined to the devastation to land, rivers and vegetation, as well as industrial pollution through burning of fossil fuel. This, in itself, arises from limited definition of environment. What is understood by environment? Where does it start and where does it end? If in the definition of man, it is not considered complete if due cognizance is not taken of his external as well as his internal features, the description of the environment cannot, similarly, be considered complete without reference to the internal features which may not necessarily be physical. Can he be regarded as a man without his soul and the animating core inside him, the spirit encased in the soul, both of which cannot be seen? Our environment constitutes that part into which thoughts and speeches and their forms are deposited. The pollution and the devastation of this finer part of the environment are greater than those with which the world seems familiar. And it is activities in these finer parts that constitute the driving force of devastation and despoliation that eventually manifest physically.

    The consequences of this later kind of pollution have constituted unintended weight on the earth and pushed it down. The push has brought about a shift in its orbital movement with concomitant striking climatic changes and gravitational pull. As one thing leads to the other there is imbalance in earth and atmospheric movement causing plane crashes and earthquakes in places which have fallen out of rhythm. Human beings are unable to think straight and errors are committed from shrunk horizon. The world summit on climate change, therefore, is useful only to the extent that it awakens world consciousness to the state of planet earth today. A turn-around, however, is possible only with man lifting his gaze higher and as in individuals who, having come to the awareness, resolving to keep their thoughts first and foremost, pure. All selfishness, economic woes, harm and devastation will disappear in accordance with the law. That is the time the question can be meaningfully answered: “What kind of planet will our children inherit? Will they have space and room to roam, air to breathe, and food to eat? Will they ever see an eagle flying free and enjoy the solitude of a pristine mountain lake?”

    Man is the most singular destructive agent in the whole world full of learning but bereft of knowledge, victorious knowledge. He must change and become a new person. If he conceitedly and stubbornly clings to the old way he will soon find out that his days are numbered. He will be hit like any pestilential vermin in reciprocity of the harm he had caused the earth meant to give him abode and provide him a school. Creation is both a home and a school for man. The earth provides his cloak and the materials—food and herbs—which he needs for his nourishment and strength.

    • This article was culled from www.radiatingthetruth.com

    • Abdu Rafiu is a renowned editor, newspaper manager and respected elder of journalism.

  • Jonathan briefs Tinubu on Guinea-Bissau political tension

    Jonathan briefs Tinubu on Guinea-Bissau political tension

    Former President Goodluck Jonathan yesterday briefed President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on the unfolding political crisis in Guinea-Bissau, warning that the situation remains fragile and in urgent need of regional attention.

    Jonathan, who led the West African Elders Forum (WAEF) Election Observer Mission to the country, met President Tinubu at the State House, Abuja, where he provided a detailed, first-hand account of the turmoil that followed the military takeover which halted the electoral process.

    The former president had emphasised that Guinea-Bissau’s political situation was fragile and required urgent intervention to restore constitutional order.

    Speaking with newsmen after  briefing  the President,  Jonathan alleged that Guinea-Bissau’s displaced leader, President Umaro Sissoco Embaló, personally orchestrated the coup that disrupted the country’s electoral process last week, describing the incident as a “ceremonial coup” conducted by the head of state himself.

    READ ALSO: Delivering in despair: Why maternal deaths remain high in Cross River

    He urged ECOWAS to insist on the immediate release of detained opposition candidate, Fernando Dias da Costa, and the announcement of the country’s nearly concluded election results.

    “What happened in Guinea-Bissau? It is what some people call a palace coup. It’s not a palace coup. We know real coups. In Nigeria, we know a palace coup when we see one. This was not even a palace coup. I describe it as a ceremonial coup,” Jonathan told reporters.

    He added pointedly: “It was a ceremony conducted by the head of state himself.”

    The former Nigerian leader was in Guinea-Bissau as part of a joint AU–ECOWAS–West African Elders Forum observer mission when soldiers intervened before final results of the November 23 presidential election could be declared.

    Soldiers loyal to Brigadier-General Dinis Incanha reportedly arrested Embaló on November 26, announcing that the armed forces had taken “total control” and later establishing a “High Military Command” led by General Horta Inta-A Na Man.

    However, rights groups and several diplomatic sources have since labelled the incident a “sham coup,” alleging that it was engineered to stall the publication of results and reset the political process in favour of Embaló’s allies.

    Speaking after his meeting with President Tinubu, Jonathan said it was standard practice for former leaders on continental assignments to give first-hand briefings ahead of ECOWAS deliberations.

    He urged regional leaders to act swiftly to safeguard constitutional order.

    “The key thing is that the election was concluded. Tallying of the results was almost concluded. In fact, the results are known, and the key thing is that the winner of this election must be announced,” he said.

    Jonathan stressed that ECOWAS must press the Guinea-Bissau military leadership to free Dias da Costa.

    “First, for them to release the opposition man, because the man has not committed any offence. He didn’t announce himself as the winner of the election… So there was no reason to arrest him”, he said.

    He urged ECOWAS leaders to engage the military directly, saying “they cannot kick out the military with force; otherwise, people will die. But let us know who the winner is. They should announce the result, and if the military will agree, the person who won should be inaugurated.”

  • Crusoe Osagie: Tribal warrior defending failed refugee, Obaseki

    Crusoe Osagie: Tribal warrior defending failed refugee, Obaseki

    By Fred Itua

    Crusoe Osagie, only you could vanish for more than a year, resurface from a foreign address, and still speak with the confidence of someone who left the books clean. You spent years as the loudspeaker of the last administration. You issued press statements with a weekly rhythm, wrote flowery essays about “transformational projects,” and swore on every available platform that Edo State had ownership stakes in the very businesses that are now exposing your claims as fiction. If loyalty were graded by volume alone, you would have scored an A. If it were graded by truth, the story would be different.

    The irony is almost poetic. The projects you once defended with King Kong chest beatings are the same ones now unravelling under the simplest test of accountability. The moment your principal left office, both of you disappeared into silence as the state began to open the files. The same files you told Edo people contained “transparent partnerships and clean contracts.” Suddenly, the ownership structures have no government equity. Suddenly, public lands were transferred without due process. Suddenly, basic questions about money trails have no answers. And suddenly, the authors of those grand claims are sending in commentary from outside the country instead of walking into the relevant agencies with documents in hand.

    A clear conscience doesn’t run. A clear conscience doesn’t hide behind distance. A clear conscience returns. So before writing epistles from abroad, maybe return home with your principal and explain to Edo people why the projects you swore were government-backed now appear to have been private adventures wrapped in the Edo logo. Approach the authorities. Face the audit. Bring the documents. Edo people deserve clarity, not cross-continental storytelling.

    Your new article tries to shift attention from the substance of the probes to an old, tired trick; divide the state along ethnic lines. You drag Edo South into every paragraph, painting the governor as some vengeful figure targeting Benin interests. Crusoe, that line of argument is beneath even you. Edo South is not your personal political shield. The people there are not pawns for your deflection. And you know all too well that the governor’s actions have nothing to do with tribe. They have everything to do with answering a simple question: who truly owns what?

    Two of the biggest capital projects of the current administration, Rahmat Park Flyover and Adesuwa Junction Flyover, are both in Edo South. Massive infrastructure sitting right in the heart of the region you claim is being “crippled.” There is no ambiguity about who benefits from good roads. Roads boost local trade. Roads improve movement. Roads open up communities. Governor Monday Okpebholo understands that you develop a state by fixing infrastructure, not by writing sectional speeches from a distance.

    READ ALSO: Delivering in despair: Why maternal deaths remain high in Cross River

    Your argument collapses under its own weight. If the governor were hostile to Edo South, why would he place these projects there? Why are more ongoing road rehabilitation works happening in the same Edo South you claim is under attack? Facts don’t fear accusations. They simply stand.

    Let us go through the projects you cried about with a little more honesty than you offered in your essay.

    The Museum of West African Art (MOWAA) is not demolished. The problem is the century-old public hospital that was brought down to make way for it. You told the world glowing tales about the project. At a time in your tenure, you practically became the spokesman for the project. You defended the demolition of the Central Hospital with venom, pulling down all critics. Today, the ownership structures show no government equity. So tell us, Crusoe: was it love for Edo South that made your principal promise the Oba of Benin a Royal Museum, only for it to morph from the Benin Royal Museum to EMOWAA and finally to MOWAA without a single clear benefit to the people? So the real question is simple: how did Edo people get schemed out of MOWAA? That question must be answered, not drowned in sentimental writing about “cultural renaissance.”

    Ossiomo Power, which you praised like it was the eighth wonder of the world, is now facing well-documented questions about land acquisition, and exclusivity clauses. Edo State cannot inherit liabilities because someone once wrote long essays describing it as a miracle project. If land was grabbed without due process, should the host communities remain silent?

    Presco is another emotional bullet in your narrative. You try to whip up fear by claiming 13,000 hectares were revoked. Yet you leave out the fact that the Certificate of Occupancy was never revoked. What happened was the reckless action of an individual who acted without the governor’s authority. That individual has been dismissed. That is what accountability looks like. This is what you never saw fit to do in your years in office.

    Your attempt to shield these murky dealings behind ethnic sentiment is petty and disappointing, even for someone who has mastered political spin. There is nothing about these probes that targets any region. They target opacity. They target irregularities. They target contracts signed without Cabinet consent or legislative oversight. They target the absence of public equity in projects the previous government swore it owned.

    Add the Radisson Blu Hotel in Benin City to the questionable project list. The hotel is also at the center of an ownership controversy involving allegations of fraud and mismanagement of state funds under your principal. An assets verification committee and the state assembly are investigating, with findings indicating that the state’s initial 70% stake was reduced to 20% shortly before Obaseki left office. This occurred after the administration allegedly used taxpayer money to fund the project and then transferred ownership to private entities, leading to calls for a forensic investigation and public accountability.

    And yes, they target the habit of signing away public land to private companies using quiet back-channel arrangements. If Edo State land was transferred to private hands under questionable circumstances, what exactly is wrong with asking questions? Only those who fear the truth fear a probe.

    Crusoe, governance is not storytelling. And your new life as a visiting correspondent for Edo politics should not include rewriting history. If you and your principal have nothing to hide, return home and face the facts. Stop issuing long-distance accusations. Stop pitching Edo South against the rest of the state. Stop acting like accountability is an attack. And stop pretending that asking basic questions about public assets is a crime.

    The truth is simple: this administration will not be blackmailed by an on-the-run former governor and his restless spokesman. If you have documents, evidence, records, or anything more meaningful than adjectives, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Edo State House of Assembly are open. Walk in. Show your receipts.

    Until then, spare Edo people the melodrama. They have lived through eight years of it already. This is a new chapter. This is a government cleaning up the blurry pages you left behind.

    You may rest your case, Crusoe. But the facts are just beginning to speak.

    • Itua is Chief Press Secretary to Governor Monday Okpebholo of Edo State.

  • Ex-INEC chair Yakubu, Fani-Kayode, Omokri, Ibrahim named ambassadors

    Ex-INEC chair Yakubu, Fani-Kayode, Omokri, Ibrahim named ambassadors

    • Ugwuanyi, Ikpeazu, Pedro, Bent also make 32-man envoy list

    • Tinubu sends 32 ambassadorial nominees to Senate for confirmation

    • Four women among career nominees, six are non-career picks

    President Bola Tinubu yesterday forwarded a fresh list of 32 ambassadorial nominees to the Senate for confirmation, 72 hours after the submission to the Red Chambers of three names as ambassadors designate.

    President Tinubu in two separate letters to Senate President Godswill Akpabio, sought “expeditious consideration and confirmation” of 15 career ambassadors and 17 non-career ambassadors.

    The nominees are a mix of technocrats, former public officials, career diplomats and political appointees, according to a statement issued by Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga.

    Ten women are on the lists with four of them being career diplomats.

    Among the non-career nominees are former presidential aide Reno Omokri (Delta); former INEC Chairman, Mahmood Yakubu; former Ekiti First Lady, Erelu Angela Adebayo; former Enugu State Governor Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi and Barrister Ogbonnaya Kalu from Abia.

    Others include former Katsina House of Assembly Speaker Tasiu Musa Maigari; former Plateau Commissioner and former UBEC deputy executive secretary, Yakubu N. Gambo; former Senator Nora Ladi Daduut (Plateau); former Lagos Deputy Governor, Otunba Femi Pedro; former Aviation Minister, Femi Fani-Kayode (Osun); and Barrister Nkechi Linda Ufochukwu (Anambra).

    Also nominated are former Oyo First Lady, Fatima Florence Ajimobi; ex-Lagos Commissioner Lola Akande; former Adamawa Senator Grace Bent; former Abia State Governor Okezie Ikpeazu; Ondo Senator Jimoh Ibrahim; and former Nigerian Ambassador to the Holy See, Paul Oga Adikwu (Benue).

    The 15 career ambassador and high commissioner-designates include Enebechi Monica Okwuchukwu (Abia); Yakubu Nyaku Danladi (Taraba); Miamuna Ibrahim Besto (Adamawa); Musa Musa Abubakar (Kebbi); Syndoph Paebi Endoni (Bayelsa); Chima Geoffrey Lioma David (Ebonyi); and Mopelola Adeola-Ibrahim (Ogun).

    Others are Abimbola Samuel Reuben (Ondo); Yvonne Ehinosen Odumah (Edo); Hamza Mohammed Salau (Niger); Ambassador Shehu Barde (Katsina); Ambassador Ahmed Mohammed Monguno (Borno); Ambassador Muhammad Saidu Dahiru (Kaduna); Ambassador Olatunji Ahmed Sulu Gambari (Kwara); and Ambassador Wahab Adekola Akande (Osun).

    The statement said the nominees will be posted to countries with which Nigeria maintains “excellent and strategic bilateral relations,” including China, India, South Korea, Canada, Mexico, the UAE, Qatar, South Africa and Kenya, as well as permanent missions to the United Nations, UNESCO and the African Union.

    Specific postings will be announced after Senate confirmation.

    The president had on Wednesday forwarded the names of Ambassador Ayodele Oke (Oyo), Ambassador Amin Mohammed Dalhatu (Jigawa) and retired Col. Lateef Kayode Are (Ogun) to the Senate for confirmation as ambassadors to the United Kingdom, the United States or France upon confirmation.

    Mahmood Yakubu, 63, is a Professor of Political History and International Studies and an expert in Guerrilla Warfare, Terrorism and Counter terrorism.

    He was INEC Chairman between 2015 and 2025.

    He attended Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto and University of Oxford, and  Wolfson College both in the UK.

    Author, columnist, adventure traveller, and social media influencer, Reno Bemigho Omokri, was born on January 22, 1974. He was a Vice President of Joe Trippi and Associates, a U.S. political consulting firm. He also served as an aide to former President Goodluck Jonathan.

    READ ALSO: Ulerawa: How Oyebanji’s reforms is turning Ekiti public hospitals into centre of hope

    Erelu Angela Adebayo is a former first lady of Ekiti State.

    She obtained a B.Sc (Hons) Social Science from the University of Ibadan, an MBA from the University of Lagos, and an MPhil (Cantab) in Land Economy from Cambridge University.

    She was also the first female chairman of the Board of WEMABOD Estates and had served on the boards of the Aliko Dangote Foundation, Meyer Paints Plc and Women at Risk International Foundation.

    She is the Founder of Erelu Adebayo Foundation and Erelu Adebayo Children’s Home.

    Lawrence Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi, 61, served as governor of Enugu State from 2015 to 2023.

    Before then, he was a member of the House of Representatives from  Igboeze North/Udenu federal constituency between 2003 and  2015.

    He is a graduate of the Enugu State University of Science and Technology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN)

    Alhaji Tasi’u Musa Maigari from Fuyuni in Zango Local Government Area of Katsina State was born on April 25, 1966.

    He attended Sardauna Memorial College (SMC) Kaduna from 1978-1983 and later Kaduna Polytechnic 1985-1988 where he bagged a National Diploma.

    Nora Ladi Daduut, a professor of French, represented Plateau South in the Senate from 2020 to 2023.

    Otunba Olufemi Pedro, 70, is an economist banker and politician who served as deputy governor of Lagos State from 2003 to 2007.

    Pedro was chairman of the Small and Medium Enterprise Development Agency of Nigeria (SMEDAN) from 2018 to 2022, and was the founding chairman of the Lagos State Sports Trust Fund.

    Chief Oluwafemi Fani-Kayode, 65, is a politician, author and lawyer.

    He was Special Assistant on Public Affairs to President Olusegun Obasanjo from July 2003 to June 2006. He was Minister of Culture and Tourism from 22 June to 7 November 2006, and later the Minister of Aviation from 7 November 2006 to 29 May 2007.

    Okezie Ikpeazu, the immediate past governor of Abia State, is 61 years old.

    He was governor for two terms from 2015 to 2023 on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    He is a product of the Universities of Maiduguri and Calabar.

    Dr. Jimoh Ibrahim, who currently represents Ondo South in the Senate, is a business mogul with interest in oil & gas distribution, hotels, resorts, airlines, banking, real estate, insurance, and publishing.

    He is 58 years old.

    He studied law at Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, and obtained Master of Public Administration (MPA) from the same institution.

    He also attended Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, graduating with a combined Master of Laws (LLM) and Master’s In International Taxation degree.

  • Trump, Tinubu and insecurity: Matters of particular concern

    Trump, Tinubu and insecurity: Matters of particular concern

    By Allison Abanum

    In October 2025, the United States President Donald Trump sparked a major diplomatic uproar when he issued a veiled military threat aimed at Nigeria, warning of “possible action” unless the Nigerian government curbed violence against Christians. He even instructed the Pentagon to prepare plans for intervention and threatened to cut U.S. aid if things didn’t change.

    Trump framed his warning in stark, militaristic terms: “fast, vicious, and sweet … just like the terrorist thugs attack our cherished Christians,” he said.

    To many Nigerians, this was more than bombast. It was an overt attempt to shape Nigeria’s internal security narrative — pressuring a sovereign nation on its homegrown conflict with an international gun to its head.

    As a Nigerian and a proud Christian, I can testify that the insecurity is real, but it’s deeper than religion.  Nigeria’s security challenges are severe. From banditry in the northwest to insurgency in the northeast and herder-farmer violence in the Middle Belt, violence has spiked and shows no signs of letting up.

    But the blunt truth is that Trump’s religious framing mischaracterized the complexity of the crisis. While some attacks do target Christians, the violence is not exclusively religious: many incidents stem from economic desperation, resource competition, weak governance from the previous administration, and porous borders.

    The issue is not neatly sectarian — it’s deeply political and socioeconomic. Groups like Boko Haram and the Islamic State in West Africa Province (ISWAP) do have ideological underpinnings, but banditry and kidnappings often have more in common with criminal networks exploiting state weakness than with religious war.

     There’s a clear political undertone on all fronts to what is happening in Nigeria.

    Diplomatic coercion under guise of human rights

    Critics argue that Trump’s threat is less about protecting persecuted Christians than about exerting political leverage. By casting Nigeria as a ‘Country of Particular Concern’ on religious freedom, he amplifies pressure on the Tinubu government.

    READ ALSO: Ulerawa: How Oyebanji’s reforms is turning Ekiti public hospitals into centre of hope

    It’s observed that this might be a negotiating tactic — a way to force Nigeria into concessions while projecting moral high ground.

     Beyond past experiences with foreign intervention on the continent, there is fear that such threats could unravel the country’s fragile stability.

    There is also concern that military action — even threatened — could lead to escalated conflict, incentivising armed groups to act more aggressively or provocatively.

      Insecurity has long roots in local governance failures: corruption, inadequate policing, an underfunded security apparatus, and political neglect of violence-prone regions.

    By framing the issue as “terrorism against Christians,” Trump may be simplifying a far messier problem — one that the Nigerian government can solve, and the Tinubu-led Government is solving.

    Beyond security, Nigeria is a major oil-producing nation. Some critics speculate about ulterior motives: is this moral outrage, or an opportunity for increased leverage in geopolitical and resource-based negotiations? Only time shall tell.

    Tinubu inherited a nation weighed down by decades of neglect —  A federation battling imbalance across regions. And crucially, he inherited a security landscape fractured by years of terror attacks, banditry, mass kidnappings, and the gruesome killing of Christians and other innocent citizens — the very crisis Trump referenced in his warning. Instead of pretending the problems were small or temporary, Tinubu did something unfamiliar in Nigerian politics: he confronted them head-on. That is what makes him the man of particular concern — not because he triggered the crisis, but because he is the first leader in a long time courageous enough to dismantle it.

    One of Tinubu’s earliest and boldest moves was to overhaul the nation’s security architecture. He dissolved the old security hierarchy, appointed new service chiefs with proven field experience, restructured the Defence Headquarters, and insisted on accountability and measurable results. Under his directives, joint task forces were revived, air-ground synergy improved, and intelligence collaboration tightened. In just months, thousands of terrorists, kidnappers, and insurgents were neutralised or captured.

    From the moment he assumed office, Tinubu made it clear that he was not interested in cosmetic leadership. Subsidy removal was not a political decision; it was a patriotic one. A country cannot move forward while financing a multi-billion-dollar black hole that empowers cartels and impoverished citizens. Tinubu took the risk. He chose truth over comfort. He knew the backlash would come, but he also knew Nigeria could no longer afford to live on economic lies. Today, the fiscal space created by that bold step is what states are using to pay salaries, fund projects, and revive governance.

    Tinubu is cherished today not because he makes easy decisions, but because he makes necessary ones. He is a president who chooses responsibility over populism, honesty over deception, and long-term stability over short-term applause. Nigeria needed painful surgery; Tinubu did not shy away from the operating room. And that includes the security theatre — where he boldly dismantled lethargy, empowered the military with new equipment, restored morale, and demanded measurable victories against terrorists and criminals, and in the economic theatre, where he is redefining Nigeria’s investment climate. And in the national theatre, where he is stitching together a stronger, more united, more equitable republic.

    This is why Tinubu is the man of particular concern — the leader bold enough to take Nigeria from warning to awakening, from discomfort to direction, and from concern to confidence.

     Nigeria is an independent nation, and we don’t need any foreign Interference in our democracy.

    The more reason why this issue of insecurity in Nigeria is more political than religious is that Trump made this statement at a time we were recovering from regular kidnapping, insurgency and bandits’ attacks. Immediately, Trump made the statements,  and everything escalated again.

    It is clear there is a political coup against our democracy and President Bola Tinubu-led government because it is expected that after Trump spoke of bringing military support, crime and kidnapping should decrease.

    Instead of bandits being scared and running for their lives or reducing crime, it became worse; it clearly shows there is a conspiracy somewhere against the Tinubu-led Government and our democracy.

    What made it more political than religious is that after Trump emphasised Christian genocide, the recent attacks and happenings are now only on the Christian schools and churches.

    Most of the Northern politicians are not saying anything about all the recent killings and abductions because of their political pursuit. Most of them understand that Tinubu is very courageous, patriotic and very responsible. The only way is to destabilise and weaken him and want him to manage the situation as a politician and not tackle it as a leader, so it continues to be their bargaining strength politically after Tinubu leaves office.

      Insecurity is a global challenge , even in countries like America, the United Kingdom, France, etc., they still have insecurity challenges.

    I hereby charge all Nigerians not to be ignorant of the devices of the enemies of our democracy and the Tinubu-led government.

      Nigerians should stand firmly by President Bola Tinubu; we should give him every needed support so he does not go down, as the enemies of our country continue to undermine him.

    The world must acknowledge that Tinubu’s leadership is turning Nigeria into a country of particular interest- a country the world must watch, understand and finally respect, because what the enemies of Nigeria intended is becoming Tinubu’s opportunity to showcase Nigeria’s resilience under real reforms.

    And in the grand irony of both local and global politics, the label that once signalled weakness is now the stage Nigeria’s strength is emerging.

    Trump cannot call a man ‘Particular Concern,’ when the same man is the one turning concern into opportunity.

    *Allison Abanum writes from Orogun, Delta State.

  • Adeleke battles for survival in Osun as PDP implodes

    Adeleke battles for survival in Osun as PDP implodes

    With the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) trapped in factional paralysis, Osun State’s Governor Ademola Adeleke risks approaching the 2026 governorship election without a platform. He must decide whether to remain in the party, with the faint hope that the crisis may be resolved, or find a new political home before the nomination deadline closes. Deputy Political Editor RAYMOND MORDI reports.

    Governor Ademola Adeleke is facing one of the most unpredictable electoral challenges of his political life as the 2026 Osun governorship race approaches. For most incumbents, the path to a second term is straightforward: stand on the platform that brought you to office, present your record, mobilise the party machinery, and win the primary.

    But nothing is straightforward anymore. Adeleke now stands on fractured ground as the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), once a national powerhouse, collapses under the weight of its own internal warfare. A party once capable of producing sweeping victories is now incapable of offering even the basic guarantee required for survival: the recognition of its national officers by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to sign nomination forms.

    The INEC deadline for party primaries — December 15, 2025 — hangs like a tightening clock, no longer a routine administrative milestone but a political threat. With no credible path to a valid primary, and two hostile factions locked in a legitimacy war that recently spilled into street-level confrontation in Abuja, Adeleke must choose whether to wait inside the turmoil or seek a safer political platform.

    Party at war with itself

    To understand Adeleke’s dilemma, the journey begins in Abuja. The PDP is not merely divided; it is deconstructing. Prof Anthony Kila, a seasoned policy analyst, describes the situation as a national collapse of civility and institutional order.

    What began as intra-party disagreements has transformed into open warfare. On one side is the Turaki–Makinde faction, led by newly elected National Chairman Tanimu Turaki, with the backing of Governors Seyi Makinde of Oyo and Bala Mohammed of Bauchi. Their controversial convention in Ibadan last weekend saw them seize control and expel their rivals.

    Opposing them is the Wike–Anyanwu bloc, led by FCT Minister Nyesom Wike and Senator Samuel Anyanwu, who insists he remains the authentic National Secretary despite his expulsion.

    The standoff reached a troubling climax on Tuesday (November 18), when both factions attempted to take over the PDP headquarters. Tear gas drifted across Wadata Plaza as rival groups shoved and surged. Wike sat in his vehicle, watching the chaos unfold — a tableau of power and calculation.

    Inside the besieged building, Turaki made an astonishing appeal to U.S. President Donald Trump, asking for help to save Nigeria’s democracy.

    For Kila, this was not just disorder but a warning: a democracy falters when its main opposition descends into street-level confrontation. The PDP’s implosion is not a backdrop to Adeleke’s re-election effort — it is the central obstacle.

    Governor without a platform

    This national turmoil has direct consequences for Osun. Senator Anyanwu, who is recognised by the Wike faction as National Secretary, has vowed not to sign any primary-related documents for Osun.

    Kamorudeen Ajisafe, PDP National Deputy Vice Chairman (Southwest), was blunt: there is no realistic path for the PDP to nominate a candidate for the 2026 Osun governorship election. His analogy was equally blunt: if someone blocks your gate and another opens theirs, why cry over the one who shut you out?

    The precedent from Ekiti is alarming. There, the Wike–Anyanwu faction wrote to INEC requesting a postponement of the primary. INEC rejected the letter because it was not signed by both the recognised National Chairman and National Secretary. The Turaki–Makinde faction proceeded with the primary on November 8 as scheduled.

    The same script is unfolding in Osun, but with far higher stakes.

    Complicating matters further is the fact that the two principal national officers required to sign PDP nomination forms (Acting National Chairman Umar Damagun and National Secretary Senator Anyanwu) are now split between the two opposing factions. This makes any near-term recognition by INEC nearly impossible and closes the door on a quick institutional resolution.

    Adeleke cannot rely on judicial or administrative intervention to rescue the party’s nomination process within the narrow window available.

    Adeleke’s political future is thus tied to a rapidly tightening constraint: he is a sitting governor who may soon be left without a platform.

    READ ALSO: Ulerawa: How Oyebanji’s reforms is turning Ekiti public hospitals into centre of hope

     Escape routes in view

    With the PDP unable to guarantee him a ticket, Adeleke is exploring alternatives. Party insiders confirm that he has opened discussions with both the Accord Party and the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA). These smaller parties often serve as emergency platforms for politicians navigating high-stakes elections.

    Sources suggest that negotiations with the Accord Party have advanced the most, with internal conversations on how to receive the governor already underway.

    There were also rumours of talks with the African Democratic Congress (ADC), though his media aide publicly denied them.

    Defection is a gamble. APC chieftain Abiola Ogundokun mocked the governor’s predicament, declaring that once a sitting governor begins negotiating with smaller parties, it signals the end of the road.

    But Ogundokun may have misread the situation. Adeleke’s real challenge is not popularity at the grassroots level — where his accessibility and populist style still resonate — but the shrinking time available to secure a legitimate platform.

    Osun PDP on the brink

    While the PDP burns nationally, fissures have opened in its Osun chapter. The Ife Federal Constituency, which used to be the party’s stronghold, is now a battleground. Stakeholders recently passed a vote of no confidence in Deputy Governor Kola Adewusi and former National Secretary Wale Oladipo (both from the constituency), accusing them of collaborating with Taofeek Ajilesoro, the House of Representatives member who defected to the APC in August.

    This matters because Ife is the heartbeat of Osun politics. Whoever captures Ife typically captures the state.

    Osun State PDP Chairman Sunday Bisi has attempted to calm tensions, calling for a family meeting. However, the fractures are widening, deepening the pressure on Adeleke to consider an alternative platform.

    APC watches, waits — and smells blood

    Across the aisle, the APC watches with strategic calm. Party leaders believe the PDP is collapsing and that Adeleke is trapped inside a sinking structure. Ogundokun insists the APC remains the most disciplined and stable political machine in Osun.

    APC strategists are refining their game plan. Some argue that zoning should be discarded entirely. Their strategy is simple: break Adeleke’s grip on Ede and dominate Ile-Ife. They believe those two battlegrounds will determine the 2026 outcome.

    Despite internal tensions, the APC senses opportunity and is preparing to exploit it.

    Beyond Osun: democracy at stake

    This crisis is not just about Osun. Prof Kila argues that political parties form the backbone of democratic legitimacy. When the main opposition party disintegrates, the broader system trembles.

    He points to a troubling pattern in the country: judges openly displaying partisanship; party officers appealing to foreign leaders; politicians disregarding their party’s internal rules. These are signs of institutional erosion.

    If the PDP collapses entirely, Nigeria risks drifting toward a one-party state. And democracies rarely endure on one leg.

    Adeleke’s crisis, therefore, mirrors a national one.

    Three paths for the governor

    Adeleke faces three strategic choices: Remain in the PDP. This option preserves loyalty but carries enormous uncertainty. Without immediate resolution of the factional crisis, which is unlikely,  given the split between Damagun and Anyanwu, the governor risks being stranded.

    Secondly, he may reconsider defecting to the APC. This would solve his nomination problem and align him with federal power. But the APC rejected him publicly in the past. Joining now exposes him to accusations of desperation.

    Thirdly, he could join a smaller party, like the Accord Party or the APGA. This provides a clean nomination and insulation from PDP turmoil. But smaller parties lack statewide machinery. Adeleke would need to build one quickly, at the risk of alienating PDP loyalists.

    Each path demands sacrifice. None is safe.

     Stakeholders tell the story

    PDP leaders insist Adeleke is staying put. Osun State Chairman Sunday Bisi maintains the governor has not considered defecting. Elders reaffirm their confidence.

    But rank-and-file members whisper a different sentiment: remaining in a PDP without functional national leadership may be political suicide.

    The APC has sharpened its rhetoric, portraying Adeleke as a liability to any party he joins. They mock the PDP’s handling of his screening, calling it an attempt to mask the embarrassment of the APC’s earlier rejection.

    Independent observers note that Adeleke still enjoys a strong grassroots appeal. They also stress that the APC’s internal unity is far from perfect. As for the ADC, it remains too weak in Osun to present a direct threat.

    In short, the field is fluid. Every option remains in play.

    The scenarios ahead

    The best scenario for Adeleke would be a swift PDP reconciliation recognised by INEC; a prospect now remote due to the split between Damagun and Anyanwu.

    A middle scenario is that he stays in a fractured but functional PDP. If the APC fields a weak candidate and the ADC remains fragmented, he could still win.

    The worst-case scenario is simple: the PDP fails to present a candidate. Party leaders defect, Adeleke moves too late, and the APC — united behind a strong flag-bearer — sweeps the election.

     Test of leadership, legacy

    The decisions Adeleke makes in the coming weeks will shape not only his re-election bid but his place in Nigeria’s political history. Leadership often requires navigating contradictions: loyalty versus survival, identity versus strategy.

    If he navigates this storm with clarity, he may emerge as a stabilising figure at a moment when Nigeria’s opposition is struggling for relevance. If he falters, he risks becoming a symbol of the PDP’s wider collapse.

    The Osun 2026 governorship election is not merely a state contest. It is a test of Nigeria’s multiparty democracy.

    Time is short. The field is shifting. And Adeleke must choose his path.

  • Benson: Only good governance, not bullets, can overcome Nigeria’s insecurity

    Benson: Only good governance, not bullets, can overcome Nigeria’s insecurity

    By Bola Joseph

    It is one thing to grandstand, perhaps, for mere showmanship. It is another to want to be on the positive side of history, in spite of whatever is seemingly at stake or in one’s way. After all, the nation is already in the thick of her routine political season. The general election is some months away.

    Everything is, therefore, deemed fair and in equal spirit. However, it gives a unique cast when the inspiration derives genuinely from sheer patriotism. This, without a doubt, appears to define the intervention of Hon. Babajimi Benson, Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Defence, last Tuesday.

    Although insecurity in Nigeria is an existential challenge that her leadership has battled unsuccessfully for many years, the last few weeks have nonetheless witnessed a different elevation in what seeks to threaten the nation’s corporate existence.

    From the south to the east and north of Nigeria, concerned citizens of all classes and social statuses have aired their views on what has become a brazen menace to corporate Nigeria: insecurity.

    But when Hon. Benson, a proud Lagosian, spoke on the floor of the House to lecture everyone and also admonish the nation, the message started to sink in better with clear comprehension.

    Ordinarily not given to verbosity, his submission, on Tuesday, hit differently with finesse, urgency, facts, rare but citable examples and of course, cosmopolitan exposure.

    He drew instances from far and near, while also giving the most requisite ingredient, which is hope, at a time when even the best of optimists is already looking to opt out.

    As he stood before his colleagues, slouching over his desk, seemingly heartbroken and palpably disturbed, he called out: “Mr Speaker, indeed, we live in very interesting times. It was America who created the word VUCA. So we live in a VUCA world. VUCA means volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous.

     “Mr Speaker, today, I rise not as a Chairman of the House Committee on Defence, but I rise as the voice of millions of Nigerians, who yearn for and rightly deserve a nation that is safe, hopeful, united and prosperous.

     “If you recall the days of yore, the Nigerian military has excelled in many different fronts, including Liberia and Sierra Leone. We went into those countries with full force and with our full arsenal that was purchased under the regime of President Shagari. I repeat, we went with our full arsenal. We went, we saw, and we conquered.”

    As he proceeded with his homily, somewhat, he recalled. “But we did something that no nation would ever do. We were honest. We went there to assist our sister nations. We did not stay to milk and make money out of their predicament. Mr Speaker, what most nations do is recoup and replace the equipment that they’ve expended in those countries. Nigeria didn’t do that.

    READ ALSO: Delivering in despair: Why maternal deaths remain high in Cross River

     “So we are suffering from the decay of trying to replace equipment to date. It’s been a very difficult and onerous task. We have not had friends, indeed, who will support us in building the arsenal we had in the days of yore.

     “Across the borders of our country, as a result of that, we also have issues from the Sahel region. We also have issues from the Sahel region. France has left the Sahel countries, and there are no boots on the ground there.

     “The armed forces of France used to prevent ISIL and other extremists from strolling into Nigeria, but they are out of that place now. And the countries there are run by military juntas. That’s a big problem.

     “We also have the problem of Libya. Ever since Gaddafi was deposed, Libya has been in a sorry state. Light weapons and heavy-duty weapons have had a free-flow influx into Nigeria, thus exacerbating the original huge problems that we’re facing.

     “Despite all these threats, which are strategic leadership, our growing strong institutions, and ongoing reforms, which include, as we speak, there’s a grand plan to improve the welfare of the police and the armed forces.

     “As we are here today, there’s a committee set up to look into the institutions, the security architecture and institutions, the police barracks, and the training institutions. That committee is led by none other than the Governor of Enugu State. It’s a work in progress.”

    To better situate his argument in context, especially the need to appreciate the complexities, he said, “Again, the economy, we’re hoping to grow our economy into a $1 trillion economy. The process is on. Our exchange rate is stable.

     “Our external reserve is growing, but we have frailties. We have frailties which have to do with security. Our security infrastructure, no doubt, needs to be stepped up for us to attain the eminence that our good qualities offer.

     “Though a bullet can overcome a terrorist, only good governance, opportunity and inclusion can overcome terrorism. No doubt, we must begin to strengthen intelligence and early warning systems.

     “We must begin with actionable intelligence. No modern security system succeeds without the ability to detect threats before they escalate. The House, with its committee, is working on this.

     “The House is working on strengthening the coordination between the DIA, the DSS, the police, the NIA and state security units. The House is working assiduously to establish regional intelligence fusion centres across the six geopolitical zones.

     “The House is in support of the deployment of modern surveillance technologies, drones, sensors and data analytics. We are proud of the meeting with the NSA and the trip to America. Tangible results have been gotten.”

    Appreciating the efforts so far made by the President Bola Tinubu administration in the midst of the current commotion, the lawmaker noted that, “ The American government, as said by our NSA, has signed an MOU with our country to assist in providing actionable intelligence towards eradicating these bandits.

     “Security is won not only when information flows seamlessly and rapidly, but when the information is used to take action. In this decade, research results from leading domestic and global security scholars have provided vital information in Nigeria towards peace.

     “Evidence from such studies concludes that 80% of terrorist attacks in Nigeria occur in three locations: schools, religious centres and farms. Categorising all schools, religious centres and farms in each local government area based on their current and projected vulnerability is now a minimum requirement.

     “A risk assessment – low, medium or high risk of this location must now be a priority. It is something that the House and Parliament should also ensure it is done.

     “Number two,  reforming and repositioning the Nigerian police. Our Nigerian military is not overstretched. The responsibilities of the Nigerian military are overstretched.

     “It is time to restore the police to their rightful place. As the first line of internal defence, the House Committee on Defence and other committees will collaborate with the Committee on Police to advance legislation for community and state policing with strong oversight.”

    Getting down to brass tacks while offering some real-time solutions, Benson spoke about the need to modernise the armed forces.

     “Our military remains courageous and resilient, but they must be armed not only with bravery, but with modern tools. We must immediately invest in modern warfare tools. We must immediately partner our non-aligned friends with America, with the EU, with China, with Pakistan.

     “Let us never forget, security is not about how we spend on defence, but about ensuring every citizen feels safe in their home, their marketplace, and in their farmlands. We also need to secure our borders. The inflow of weapons, drugs, and foreign fighters continues to fuel insecurity.

     “The House must support a strengthened border security command and an integrated border management system. The House must support the joint operations with Cameroon, Niger, Benin, and Chad. The House must support technology-driven checkpoints using biometrics and surveillance.”

    Addressing the root cause, he explained, is a big solution, the federal lawmaker said, “I was with you one day in the Nigerian Defence College, where you made a comparison of when Nigeria introduced the cashless system.

     “You said when that system was introduced, kidnapping and banditry went down because the ability to pay for ransom became nonexistent. I believe that is a policy this House should also look into.

     “Local government administration, it is only in a few states in Nigeria where you see competent people. Former parliamentarians run to be local government chairmen. There is a nexus between a local government being powerful and for that state to have prosperity.

     “Today, in most parts of Nigeria, the local government administration has collapsed. I remember the late Lieutenant General Lagbaja, the Chief of Army Staff. He said the happiest day in his life was when the Supreme Court passed the local government financial autonomy law. He said his men and troops fought every day to secure territories.

     “And after securing those territories, they did not have anybody to hand over the territories to because in most states, some states bigger than Belgium, bigger than Togo, bigger than most countries, the only sense of administration there is in the centre, the state government, the state governors. The local governments are nonexistent.

     “So what we need is to ensure that the FAAC account and the monies that are due to local governments,  really, duly get to the third tier of government.

     “If you recall, a month ago, the former governor of New York ran for election, left his seat as an executive governor, and ran to be a mayor in America. If you also recall, a former US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, including Manhattan, Rudolph Giuliani, was later the Mayor of New York. He ran to be the president of the United States of America.

     “Finally, if you recall, Rahm Emanuel, who was the Chief of Staff to Obama when he was president, ran to be the local government chairman in the state of Chicago. Mr Speaker, if we can ensure that our local government is the third tier of government, indeed, it should be a non-kinetic solution to end the recruitment process for these bandits or kidnappers.

     “Mr Speaker, distinguished colleagues, security is the foundation of development. Without peace, there can be no investment. Without investment, there can be no prosperity. Without prosperity, there can be no stability. Without stability, there can be no safety. Without safety, there can be no future.

     “As chairman of the House Committee on Defence, I commit on behalf of the committee, of this House, to work tirelessly with the executive, with the military leadership, with our allies and partners to deliver a strong, modern, and people-centred security system for Nigeria.

     “On behalf of Nigerians who yearn for peace, we thank you for your foresight and your dedication to building a safer, stronger, and more resilient Nigeria.”

    In the end, Benson didn’t just lay the template; he set the tone for a rather cracking discussion on the state of play. But something was not lost from his posturing: the very essence of education and the. patriotism, which puts the nation first.

    To say the nation is at a crossroads is a milder way to distil the crisis situation. Benson was mindful of the possible minefield in airing such views. Yet, he struck a rather impossible balance, which saw him give unto Caesar what was Caesar’s.

    Benson stood strong for his party, the APC, with gusto. He defended the government of the APC-led by Asiwaju Bola Tinubu with pride. Above all, he made a compelling case for the Nigerian people, standing stoutly for patriotism and good governance.