Category: Femi Macaulay

  • Enabling terrorism

    Enabling terrorism

    Apart from fighting terrorists, fighting terrorism financiers is also a critical aspect of the war on terror. The Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), was reported saying the Federal Government had “made progress in tackling the financing of terrorism,” and had “identified and designated a number of individuals and entities linked to terrorist activity and seized funds linked to them.”  

    But the claimed credits raised more questions than answers. The minister’s claims were not new. The previous administration under ex-president Muhammadu Buhari made similar claims. At the end of the day, the situation did not change, and terrorism financiers continued to empower terrorists.   

    Identifying terrorism sponsors is inadequate. The question is: What happens after such suspects have been identified? It amounts to nothing if such actors are identified but the authorities fail to arrest and prosecute them. Such announcements will never be enough.  Failure to arrest, prosecute and punish terrorism enablers cannot encourage public confidence in the fight against terrorism. Ironically, it even suggests that the authorities are enabling terrorism.

    Fagbemi supplied the attention-grabbing information last week, in his opening address at the 40th Technical Commission/Plenary Meeting of the Inter-Governmental Action Group Against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA), in Abuja. GIABA is an organ of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), responsible for facilitating the adoption and implementation of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter Financing of Terrorism (CFT) strategies in West Africa.

    He also said: “Efforts are on to resume the trial of those categories of people. And I think, in the next two weeks, it will be a different story. We are conscious of that issue.

    “Facilities are being put in place. Apart from the regular physical mode of trial, we are working on ways to ensure that virtual trials can also be conducted.

    “The adoption of virtual trials is aimed at preventing delay. The government is not shying away from its responsibility of providing funds for this purpose.”

    Understandably, the Federal Government wants to give the impression that it is seriously tackling terrorism. So, the authorities keep supplying information to support such a promotional picture. Last year, the then Minister of Interior, Rauf Aregbesola, promoted the government’s anti-terrorism effort at the 3rd Ministerial Conference on Counter-Terrorism Financing, with the theme ‘No Money for Terror.’  The event took place in India.  

    A statement by his aide quoted Aregbesola as saying the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU) had, in 2019, “commenced an in-depth analysis of the financing of the Boko Haram group.”

     ”This analysis, which took almost 18 months to complete, resulted in the identification of almost 100 high-risk financiers and identified links to 10 different countries.

    “Ultimately, the results of the analysis resulted in the arrest of 48 of the financiers and the ongoing prosecution of a number of them.”

    Read Also: Terrorism: Air Force reviews policies to reduce casualties during operations

    At the time, it was unclear whether terrorism financiers were actually being prosecuted in the country. The Buhari administration had been criticised for delaying the prosecution of terrorism-related suspects it claimed to have arrested.    

    In April 2021, for instance, the Buhari administration announced that it had arrested 400 alleged Boko Haram sponsors. The claimed arrests suggested a new level of seriousness in the fight against terrorism. 

    The arrested alleged financiers of the Islamic terrorist group were said to be businessmen, including bureau de change operators. They were said to have been arrested in Kano, Borno, Lagos, Sokoto, Adamawa, Kaduna and Zamfara states, and Abuja. 

    The arrests were said to have been carried out following investigations involving the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Department of State Services (DSS), Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

    The unnamed suspects were expected to be prosecuted without delay. More than two years after the announced arrests, there is no evidence that they have been prosecuted. Is that how to fight terrorism?  

    Also, last year, army authorities in charge of the Northeast Joint Operation announced that “A total of 886 detainees are awaiting transfer to Giwa Project in Kainji for prosecution.” The Giwa Project is in Kainji, Niger State. They said there were 1,893 suspects in custody at the Giwa Centre. There is no evidence of prosecution. Without prosecution, how can it be proved that arrested terrorism suspects are guilty and deserve to be punished?  Can deterrent effect be achieved without punishing the guilty?

    The Terrorism (Prohibition and Prevention) bill, 2022 signed into law by ex-president Buhari, stipulates a range of sanctions, including life imprisonment and death sentence, for anyone convicted of terrorism-related activity.

    The legislation, which came after previous ones in 2011 and 2013, sought to “provide for an effective, unified and comprehensive legal, regulatory and institutional framework for the detection, prevention, prohibition, prosecution and punishment of acts of terrorism, terrorism financing, proliferation and financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in Nigeria; and for related matters.”

    Fighting terrorism and its sponsors demands prosecution of arrested suspects based on existing law, without which stipulated sanctions cannot be applied. There are available lessons on how to fight terrorism effectively. The question is whether the country’s authorities are teachable.

     For instance, in 2021, the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added the names of six Nigerians to “the List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons… for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, Boko Haram.”

    It accused the Nigeria-based terrorist group of “numerous attacks in the northern and northeastern regions of the country as well as in the Lake Chad Basin in Cameroon, Chad, and Niger that have killed thousands of people since 2009.”

    The six Nigerians were: Abdurrahman Ado Musa, Salihu Yusuf Adamu, Bashir Ali Yusuf, Muhammed Ibrahim Isa, Ibrahim Ali Alhassan, and Surajo Abubakar Muhammad.  

    The United Arab Emirates (UAE) Federal Court of Appeals in Abu Dhabi had convicted them of transferring $782,000 from Dubai to Boko Haram in Nigeria.  Adamu and Muhammad were sentenced to life imprisonment for violations of UAE anti-terrorism laws; Musa, Yusuf, Isa and Alhassan were sentenced to 10 years in prison, followed by deportation. 

    The US sanction against them, the agency said in a statement, “will prevent these individuals’ funds from being used further to support terrorism.”

    Obviously, terrorism sponsors fuel the activities of terrorists, and disabling them is as important as crippling terrorists. Terrorism financiers and terrorists should not only be identified but arrested and prosecuted without delay. Failure to do so amounts to enabling terrorism. 

  • More words than action

    More words than action

    It’s clear that the President Bola Tinubu administration inherited a troubling security crisis from the Muhammadu Buhari administration, which demands urgent remedial action. But it’s unclear how the Federal Government under Tinubu will fight insecurity in the country, or even how it is fighting insecurity. 

    There are verbal indications that the new administration will pursue different approaches to win the fight against insecurity, but it requires more than words to achieve the desired objective.     

    For instance, when the Minister of State for Defence, Bello Matawalle, last week appeared before the Senate Committee on Defence, he faulted the fight against insecurity under the previous administration. He said: “The issue of Boko Haram is not new in the North-East and our system, but because of what has transpired in the previous government, the issue was not tackled seriously.” A former governor of Zamfara State, he also noted that insecurity, particularly banditry, “is new to us in the North-West.”

    According to him, “Today, actions are being made and operations taken on such criminals. The issue of security needs collective cooperation from state, local governments and the federal government.” The “actions” and “operations” he referred to must be visible and effective. The suggested three-pronged approach, involving the local, state and federal governments must go beyond words.

    At President Tinubu’s inauguration in May, he declared that security would be “the top priority” of his administration, saying the Federal Government would “reform our security doctrine and its architecture,” and invest more in security personnel by providing “better training, equipment, pay and firepower.” He needs to translate his words into effective action.

    According to SBM Intelligence, about 629 Nigerians were killed by non-state actors, including Boko Haram insurgents, ethnic militias, bandits and armed robbers, within the first 45 days under President Tinubu.  

    The International Centre for Investigative Reporting, the Council on Foreign Relations’ Nigeria Security Tracker (NST) and media reports indicated that non-state actors killed 587 people within the same period.

    Unsurprisingly, Nigeria’s security crisis was further highlighted at the opening ceremony of the Countering Violent Extremism Course 3/2023 recently organised by the Martin Luther Agwai International Leadership and Peacekeeping Centre (MLAILPCK) at the Nigerian Army Resource Centre (NARC), Abuja. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Government of Japan supported the course, which had participants from Nigeria and other West African countries.

    The Deputy Resident Representative (Programme), UNDP, Mr. Lealem B. Dinku, drew attention to the scale of insecurity in the country, and the huge number of lives lost to the crisis. He observed that “violent extremism (VE) has continued to be ingrained in scope and impact since creeping into Nigeria geographical space in 2009 but has been more pronounced since 2013.”

    According to him, “It was estimated that between 2009 and 2023, Nigeria has suffered no less than 35,000 casualties while billions of dollars have been lost due to destruction of property, public infrastructures, disruption of socio-economic activities including livelihoods and displacement of mass population.”

    The authorities should be troubled by this picture of devastation within 14 years. Even more troubling is the reality that the crisis is ongoing. The UN official noted that the country “is still grappling with the menace of VE and its attendant socio-economic implications till the moment.”  

    Read Also: UK-based pastor remanded in Ibadan prison over alleged N305m fraud

    Japan Defence attaché to Nigeria, Lt.-Col. Morita Tatsuya, spoke in a similar vein at the event, saying, “Nigeria has been subjected to the adverse effects and attacks of Boko Haram and ISWAP in the North-East for quite a long time.” He also noted: “More recently, terrorists have expanded their sphere of influence to the North-West and other parts of the country.” Additionally, violent separatists in the South-East continue to add fuel to the fire. Banditry and kidnapping for ransom are part of the insecurity mix in many areas of the country.

     He identified solutions, including sharpening the capacity of security authorities regarding counterterrorism and the protection of civilians, and implementing measures to counter violent extremism, which is at the root of terrorism.

    Tackling insecurity in the country certainly demands more than words. It requires urgent action. The event gave an insight not only into the problem but also the solution. It was a grim reminder of the disturbing reality that the country is far from winning the fight against insecurity.

    It is noteworthy that when long-term Niger Delta activist Mujahid Asari-Dokubo visited President Tinubu in Abuja, in June, he was reported saying he had discussed security issues with him.  In an interview with journalists after the visit, Asari-Dokubo, described as the leader of the Niger Delta Peoples Salvation Force (NDPSF), took credit for bringing security and peace to parts of the country.  His words: “Today you are traveling to Kaduna on this road, it is not the army that made it possible for you to travel to Abuja or travel to Kaduna vice versa, it is my men employed by the government of Nigeria stationed in Niger. Today go to Baga, you go to Shiroro and go to Wase. We have lost so many men; we don’t even have one per cent of the armament deployed by the Nigerian military and we have had resounding success.”

    It was puzzling that he presented a narrative of collaboration with the country’s armed forces. It was equally puzzling that the Nigerian Army issued a statement denying knowledge of the activities of his so-called private military company in the places he mentioned.

    These conflicting narratives from both sides suggested that the country’s struggle with insecurity is unstructured. The country’s armed forces and security agencies are expected to be the actors in the fight, not non-state actors like Asari-Dokubo and his force.   

    The Federal Government has not clarified the status of Asari-Dokubo’s so-called private military company and its alleged role in the fight to bring security to the country, about five months after he made the claims.  Also, the authorities must decisively address the question of illegal arms in unlicensed hands. For instance, he has been seen in several viral videos playing the role of militia commander in the midst of gun-wielding robots. Are his martial activities lawful? Lawlessness must not be encouraged. It sends the wrong signals.  

    Notably, Matawalle told the Senate Committee on Defence that the country needed “key legislation on insecurity.” It remains to be seen how the legislative and executive arms of the Federal Government will collaborate towards tackling insecurity in the country. He also said, without proof, that the security crisis “is gradually going down,” adding, “we just received two attack helicopters to strengthen the battle against insecurity.”

    So far, words outstrip action in the fight against insecurity in the country. That is not the solution to the security crisis.  

  • Abacha loot and Tinubu’s agenda

    Abacha loot and Tinubu’s agenda

    It is striking that the so-called Abacha loot is still changing hands, 25 years after the death of the infamous Gen. Sani Abacha who ruled the country dictatorially from 1993 to 1998.

    The Minister of Europe and Foreign Affairs of France, Catherine Colonna, during a recent visit to Nigeria, said she had “informed President Tinubu that in response to the request submitted by the Nigerian Federal Ministry of Justice, and in agreement with the US Administration, France will return to Nigeria the assets stolen from the Nigerian people by General Sani Abacha and his family, that have been frozen in France since 2021.”

    She added: “We will start discussions with the Nigerian administration in order to allocate these 150 million US dollars to development projects benefiting the population, according to the priorities of the Nigerian government.”

    President Tinubu described it as “good news,” saying the money would be “judiciously applied in attaining our development objectives,” according to his spokesperson, Ajuri Ngelale, in a statement.  When the money is returned, it will be the first Abacha loot to be returned to the Tinubu administration.

    In August 2022, the Federal Government under President Muhammadu Buhari signed an agreement with the American government for the repatriation of $23.4m to the country.  At the time, the then Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, who tagged the money “Abacha 5,” said the agreement resulted from negotiations and meetings between Nigeria, the US Department of Justice and the UK National Crime Agency.

    Read Also: Tinubu welcomes repatriation of $150m Abacha loot by France

    He was also reported saying, based on the terms of the agreement, Buhari had approved the funds to be utilised for the Presidential Infrastructure Development Fund (PIDF)projects, including Abuja-Kano Road, Lagos-Ibadan Express Way and the Second Niger Bridge under the supervision of Nigerian Sovereign Investment Authority (NSIA).

    The return of the outrageously humongous Abacha loot to Nigeria has been marred by transparency and accountability issues. For instance, at a forum on asset recovery organised by the Swiss Embassy and the African Network for Environment and Economic Justice, in Abuja, in June 2018, the then Switzerland Ambassador to Nigeria, Eric Mayoraz, said: “All funds hidden in Swiss banks by Abacha were fully repatriated and so we don’t have any of such funds in Switzerland again. $752m was returned in 2005 and we discovered more and more in other banks and that involved the $322.5m that was repatriated earlier this year.” In other words, over $1bn Abacha loot had been returned.

    The diplomat employed diplomatic language when he justified the concern of the Swiss government that the $322.5m should be well managed and spent to enrich the poor. Mayoraz said: “Unfortunately, some of the assets that were returned, there was not so much transparency in it. So, we have to introduce the World Bank to get involved in this so that this particular one can be used by the Nigerian government with the monitoring of the World Bank.”

    This arrangement mocked Nigeria. It suggested that Nigeria’s leaders couldn’t be trusted with the returned Nigerian loot. More tragically, the arrangement was a response to a bad record regarding the management of the initial $752m.

    The involvement of another monitor, the United Kingdom government, clearly compounded the insult.  At the forum, the then head of the Department for International Development in Nigeria, Debbie Palmer, said the UK government would spend £600,000 to monitor the use of recovered assets. Palmer cited reports that said Africa was losing $50bn to political corruption every year.

    From January to April 2020, about N23.7bn of the N125bn ($322.5m) recovered Abacha loot was disbursed to about 703, 506 vulnerable Nigerians under the Federal Government’s Conditional Cash Transfer scheme, according to the Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice (ANEEJ). The non-governmental group led the Monitoring Transparency and Accountability in the Management of Returned Assets (MANTRA) project.

    Under the Buhari administration, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) had observed that “The return of the Abacha loot is a chance for President Buhari to commit to the enforcement of the 2016 judgement by Justice Mohammed Idris, which ordered his government to publish, disclose the spending of recovered loot since 1999 by past and present governments till date, as well as details of projects on which the funds were spent.”

    There is no doubt that the unavailability of such a comprehensive record of how recovered looted funds were utilised, or not utilised, for development purposes over the years discredited the Buhari administration’s anti-corruption campaign. 

    Gen. Abacha’s military dictatorship was responsible for the deaths of many pro-democracy fighters. Many prominent and not-so-prominent Nigerians fled the country to escape his hit squad. During his time in power, he intimidated the existing political parties into endorsing him as the sole presidential candidate in a desperate self-succession effort.

    Notably, Abacha prevented the inauguration of Chief M.K.O. Abiola who won the country’s historic 1993 presidential election annulled by his predecessor, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida. Abiola was detained for four years by the Abacha regime, and eventually died in detention in July 1998, a month after the dictator’s death.

    Abacha’s evil was compounded by his kleptomania. He is believed to have stolen money to the tune of over $3 billion from the treasury. The story of his mammoth loot stashed away in banks across the globe continues 25 years after his death. He was described by a US Justice Department official as “one of the most notorious kleptocrats in memory, who embezzled billions from the people of Nigeria while millions lived in poverty.” 

    In 2014, the US Department of Justice had highlighted Abacha’s looting methods, and was reported to have frozen $458m in corruption funds linked to him in secret bank accounts across the world. The action was described as “the largest kleptocracy forfeiture ever in the US.”

    The US Department of Justice had identified Abacha’s looting style which, interestingly, has not gone out of fashion in the country, even under democracy. Abacha’s “fraudulent schemes” included “the ‘security votes’ fraud, through which more than $2 billion was embezzled from the Central Bank of Nigeria.”  Sadly, the “security votes” fraud is still in vogue among those in power in the country today as an easy path to wealth acquired fraudulently.   

    Now that $150m Abacha loot is coming home, the Tinubu administration must use the money in ways that demonstrate the believability of its Renewed Hope Agenda.

  • Where are they?

    Sadly, two abducted high-profile professors of medicine were in the news last week when the President of the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA), Dr Uche Rowland Ojinmah, lamented that the country’s medical professionals were endangered.  At an event on October 24, during the association’s 2023 Physicians Week in Umuahia, Abia State, Ojinmah, perhaps hyperbolically, observed: “The menace of the kidnapping of doctors, dentists, and their relatives has become a daily event to the point of desensitisation.”

    He highlighted two disturbing cases, saying, “Let me also remind the government of Cross River State that we are still awaiting the return of Prof. Ekanem Philip-Ephraim. To the Abia State government, we are still waiting for information on the whereabouts of Prof. U.U. Iweha. We will not stop asking. Kidnapping and insecurity, I must tell you, are now major causes of medical brain drain, and we call for action, not rhetoric”.

    It’s been more than a year since Prof. Iweha, a professor of Surgery, was abducted. He was the provost of College of Medicine, Amachara, Gregory University, Abia State, before his abduction on June 5, 2022. He had served as the chief medical director (CMD) of Abia State University Teaching Hospital (ABSUTH), Aba, and CMD Abia State Specialist Hospital, Amachara.

    According to his son, Chukwudi, he had rushed back home from church on the day, to prepare for an event where he was scheduled to represent the Chancellor of Gregory University, Prof. Gregory Ibe. The kidnappers were waiting for him at the gate of his house in Umuajameze Umuopara, Umuahia South Local Government Area (LGA) of Abia State.

    He said the kidnappers initially demanded a ransom, which the kidnappee’s family paid. They were then told that they would find him at the Army checkpoint at Isiala Ngwa by the express road.  They went to the place, but he wasn’t there. The kidnappers stopped picking up their calls.

    “As a family, we cannot discern the motive behind this evil act or even point an accusing finger at anybody,” he was reported saying, in June, on the first anniversary of his father’s abduction. He criticised the police investigation of the incident, and appealed to the Abia State governor, Alex Otti, and the lawmakers representing his community at the state and federal levels to help “bring this matter to a positive conclusion.”

    “We are still looking for our father,” he stated, adding, “We appeal to the media to create further awareness of our painful and traumatising situation, with the hope that anyone with information will come forward, and it will lead to the rescue or release of our father.”

    Women of the Umuopara clan had dramatically staged two demonstrations in August 2022, demanding government intervention and effective action from the security agencies. Also, the Abia State chapter of the NMA went on strike for three days in June 2022 to force the government to take action on the abduction issue.

    Nothing has changed. Prof. Iweha’s whereabouts are unknown. Who kidnapped him? Is he dead or alive? These questions demand answers.

    It’s been more than three months since Prof. Ekanem Philip-Ephraim was kidnapped “at about 9:00 pm” on July 13, 2023. The incident happened “around Mountain of Fire and Miracles Ministries Church, off Atimbo in Calabar Municipality LGA.” A report said “four robust individuals arrived at the professor’s facility in a Toyota vehicle pretending to be patients and then whisked her away.” A professor of Neurology, she was a consultant at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (UCTH), Cross River State, before her abduction.

    Read Also: Fed Govt set to convert over one million vehicles to CNG by 2027

    The NMA, Cross River State chapter, in a statement in August, lamented that after “28 days in captivity and 21 days when we last heard from her, the situation has remained unchanged,” despite “the withdrawal of services and continuous peaceful protest.”  The group noted that within the past five years, 14 doctors had been kidnapped in the state, adding, “we cannot continue to save lives while ours and that of other law-abiding citizens is under constant threat by armed bandits and kidnappers.”

    Nothing has changed in this case too. Prof. Philip-Ephraim’s whereabouts are unknown. Who kidnapped her? Is she dead or alive? These questions also demand answers.

    It is disturbing that the NMA president numbered “kidnapping and insecurity” among “major causes of medical brain drain.” The country’s medical sector-related human capital flight, which has escalated alarmingly, was formerly mainly blamed on bad governance and  poor working conditions.

    Indeed, the exit figures concerning healthcare professionals in the country are troubling. More than 9,000 medical doctors were reported to have left the country to work in the UK, Canada and America, from 2016 to 2018. Also, more than 700 medical doctors trained in Nigeria were said to have relocated to the UK from December 2021 to May 2022, a period of six months. The number of Nigeria-trained nurses registered in the UK was said to have grown from 2,790 in March 2017 to 7,256 in March 2022.  Notably, Ojinmah said at an event last October: “Nigeria-trained doctors are leaving in droves for Saudi Arabia, Oman, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. No official figures yet, but it can’t be less than 2,000 as of today.”

     The country’s doctor-patient ratio is dangerously low, and is nowhere near the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) standard doctor-patient ratio of one doctor per 600 people. With only about four doctors available per 10,000 people in Nigeria, it is unsurprising that there are issues regarding availability of, and access to quality primary healthcare services in the country. There is no doubt that the problem is compounded by the flight of healthcare professionals.

    The unresolved abductions of the two professors of medicine further underline the scale of insecurity in the country. It is sad that they were kidnapped, and their whereabouts are unknown. This is a familiar picture in the context of the country’s security crisis. That is fearful. 

    There are several other unresolved kidnap cases across the country. When such cases are unsolved, it adds fuel to the fire. The evil agents of insecurity should not be allowed to thrive. The authorities should urgently deal with the monster.  

  • Renewing war on corruption

    Renewing war on corruption

    Will the exit of the old authority figures from two major Nigerian anti-corruption agencies, and the entrance of new ones, positively change the story of the country’s unimpressive and ineffective fight against corruption?

    This is an inevitable question following the recent appointments of Ola Olukoyede as executive chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), and Musa Adamu Aliyu as chairman and chief executive officer of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).

    President Bola Tinubu’s spokesperson, Ajuri Ngelale, in a statement, notably described Olukoyede’s new role as an “important national assignment,” adding, “a newly invigorated war on corruption undertaken through a reformed institutional architecture in the anti-corruption sector remains a central pillar of the President’s Renewed Hope agenda.” 

    He also said Aliyu’s appointment was “in furtherance of the Renewed Hope mandate to reform key institutions and invigorate Nigeria’s war on corruption.”  The emphasis on reform was an acknowledgement of past failure.

    According to the presidential aide, Olukoyede “is a lawyer with over twenty-two (22) years of experience as a regulatory compliance consultant and specialist in fraud management and corporate intelligence. He has extensive experience in the operations of the EFCC, having previously served as Chief of Staff to the Executive Chairman (2016-2018) and Secretary to the Commission (2018-2023).”

     He said Aliyu “has embarked upon many far-reaching reforms as the Attorney General of Jigawa State since September 2019,” has a doctorate in law, and was “named as a Senior Advocate of Nigeria-designate in October 2023.”

    Olukoyede’s appointment, for a renewable term of four years in the first instance, has been confirmed by the Senate, which is expected to also confirm the appointment of Aliyu, who will have a five-year tenure.  

    It remains to be seen how both men will approach the fight against corruption. There is no question that Nigeria needs to fight corruption with greater seriousness. Two events in July, about two months after Tinubu’s inauguration, highlighted public disenchantment with the anti-corruption war that the administration inherited from the Muhammadu Buhari presidency. Buhari made a lot of noise about fighting corruption, but positive results were hardly visible.

    At an event in Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, on July 10, to mark the 60th anniversary of the Call to Bar of Aare Afe Babalola (SAN), activist lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) observed that “The level of corruption in Nigeria has assumed a very dangerous dimension.”  He said: “We have a situation whereby highly placed public officers steal money meant for building hospitals, people are dying on our roads, money for ecology meant to fight erosion are also being stolen.”

    Read Also: Kano to tackle corruption despite intimidation, says Yusuf

    Falana added: “President Bola Tinubu must show leadership and lead an anti- corruption crusade. Some of those who are going in and out of the villa are standing trial for looting the treasury of this country. So, wrong signals must not be sent to our people and the international community.”

    This event was followed by a two-day national anti-corruption conference in Abuja, July 11-12, organised by the Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA) and the Centre for Fiscal Transparency and Integrity Watch (CEFTIW). The theme was “Nigeria and the Fight Against Corruption – Reviewing the Buhari Regime and Setting Agenda for the Tinubu Administration.”

    HEDA chairman Olanrewaju Suraju, in his assessment of the Tinubu administration’s first steps towards fighting corruption, said: “If we want to go by what has been happening so far in terms of the fight against corruption, we can’t for now, say that we have any good reason to believe that there is going to be any serious fight against corruption.”

    Olukoyede inherited “no fewer than 25 high-profile corruption cases involving former governors, ministers and senators,” according to an investigative report published on October 22. The cases involve “not less than N772.2bn and another $2.2bn, alleged to have gone missing through money laundering, fund diversion and misappropriation,” the report said. Some of the cases seem interminable.

    Anti-corruption activists had criticised the EFCC under the previous chairman, saying most of the convictions claimed by the agency involved online fraudsters, and that high-profile political players were treated as sacred cows. They also alleged that “Some of the commission’s officials simply negotiate with suspects, get assets and cash retrieved and do plea bargains. This opens limitless opportunities for corrupt bargaining and self-enrichment by the operatives of EFCC.”

     The immediate past chairman of the agency, Abdulrasheed Bawa, had eventually resigned after the Tinubu administration suspended him “to allow for proper investigation into his conduct while in office.” The federal government said there were “weighty allegations of abuse of office levelled against him.” His detention since June, without charge, does not help the anti-corruption war.

    The new EFCC boss gave an insight into his thoughts on how to fight corruption during his screening by the Senate. He was reported saying, “I will do more in the areas of blocking the leakages. We spend more money fighting corruption when we could have spent less to prevent it.”

    He gave concrete facts and figures concerning a survey he did, which covered three years, 2018 to 2020. The picture was food for thought. “I picked just one scheme, one species of fraud, which is called contract and procurement fraud. I discovered that within the three years, Nigeria lost N2.9tn,” he narrated.

    “When I put my figures together, I discovered that if the country had prevented the money from being stolen, it would have given us 1,000 kilometres of road, it would have built close to 200 standard tertiary institutions; it would have also educated about 6,000 children from primary to tertiary levels at N16m per child.

    “It would have also delivered more than 20,000 units of three-bedroom houses across the country. It would have given us a world-class teaching hospital in each of the 36 states of the country and the federal capital territory.”

    Now he can put his anti-corruption ideas into practice. The EFCC and the ICPC are symbolic of the country’s fight against corruption. Fighting corruption is serious business, and these anti-corruption agencies must not give the impression that they are mere anti-corruption symbols.

    The new authority figures in these agencies must demonstrate a new drive, and launch a renewed fight against corruption so that the country can truly have renewed hope of crushing corruption. 

  • Adeleke’s altruism

    Adeleke’s altruism

    As the Governor, I’ve taken a principled stance on the Security vote. Since taking office, I’ve directed that it should be allocated to benefit the state, not my office. This reflects the sacrifices I’m making as a leader, and I encourage others to follow this example.”

    Osun State Governor Ademola Adeleke posted this striking communication on social media at 2:54pm on October 5.  He elaborated on the post during his interactive session with the people of the state in the capital, Osogbo, on the same day. 

    “As a leader who is leading by example,” he was quoted as saying, “I have sacrificed the entire sum of my security vote (about N600m monthly) from the inception of my administration since November 2022. I have dedicated this monthly fund to the development and progress of Osun State.”  He added that he preferred to use the security vote for such purposes “rather than keep it to myself like others before me.”

    His words, if factual, are food for thought. His action, if real, demonstrates a rare altruism in high office by a governor in Nigeria. It is unclear how he ensures security if he spends the “entire” security vote on “development and progress.” Perhaps his claim is a bit hyperbolic. But the substance of his statement is significant, and deserves commendation.    

     Historically, so-called security votes at the governorship level in Nigeria have been linked with corruption. Indeed, a former governor of Kano State, Musa Kwankwaso, once described security votes as “another way of stealing public funds.”

    Read Also: BBC insists Tinubu’s CSU certificate not forged

    In March 2022, for instance, officials of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) arrested the immediate past governor of Anambra State, Willie Obiano, “for alleged misappropriation of public funds, including N5bn Sure-P and N37bn security vote which was withdrawn in cash.”

    Also, in a letter to then President Muhammadu Buhari, in January 2022, Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) highlighted a report by Transparency International (TI) indicating that “most of the funds appropriated as security votes are spent on political activities, mismanaged or simply stolen. It is estimated that security votes add up to over N241.2bn every year.”

    The group urged Buhari to instruct the EFCC and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) to “jointly track and monitor spending of security votes” by the 36 state governors.

    Paradoxically, security votes connected with governors in Nigeria are usually not used for security purposes. In 2020, for instance, a former governor of Abia State from 2007 to 2015, Senator Theodore Orji, who was under investigation at the time, told the EFCC how he spent N38.8bn security votes in eight years for other purposes, showing that security votes do not mean what they should mean. The former governor was reported saying he received N370m monthly as a security vote in 2007, and N410m monthly from 2008 to 2015.

    Orji said he shared much of the N38bn with members of the Abia State House of Assembly, his security informants and traditional rulers. He claimed to have also given part of the money to military units, the police, the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and security agencies as what he called statutory allocations.

    In a breakdown of who got what, the former governor said he gave state legislators N5. 760bn, at N60m per month, in the eight years, and also claimed to have paid N75m monthly to security informants in 15 of the 17 local government areas of the state within the same period.

    He was also reported saying the so-called informants pocketed about N7.200bn from 2007 to 2015, and some of the security agencies received N2m per month. But he failed to provide a comprehensive list of all the beneficiaries of the largesse.  

    Governor Adeleke’s claim on the use of his security vote prompts questions on how other governors are using their own security votes. National Publicity Secretary of the Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) Ken Robinson lamented in an interview: “What the security vote has become is money that cannot be queried, that cannot be audited and money that cannot be asked how you are spending it.” This is unacceptable because it encourages non-accountability and corruption.

    There is a need to rethink security votes at all levels of government in the country towards preventing abuse of useful security resources.  Who determines the security votes in the individual states? What are the considerations? Are the security votes meant for the personal security of governors or for the security of the states they govern? This particular question leads to an examination of Nigeria’s odd practice of federalism, under which the states are disallowed from having their own police, for example. The centralisation of security enforcement at the federal level is ultimately counter-productive.    

     Tackling Nigeria’s serious and diverse security challenges requires not only federal effort but also state-level and regional interventions. Individual states should devise arrangements to ensure security in their territories. The introduction of regional security organisations funded by state governments in the southwest and southeast regions of the country is commendable. It may well be that if security votes were spent on security at all levels of government in the country, the current terrifying level of nationwide insecurity would not exist.

    Governor Adeleke of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is a politician who has a reputation for exhibitionistic public dancing. But he has gone beyond entertainment by setting a good example on the matter of security votes. He said enough to suggest that the “security votes” fraud is still in vogue among people in power in the country today as an easy path to wealth acquired fraudulently.

    Is it possible that there are other governors following Adeleke’s path who are unknown because they have not publicly stated what they do with their security votes?  Let them remove their masks for recognition. 

    If Adeleke is a lone traveller on this path of exemplary gubernatorial altruism, others should learn from him. The lesson: Security vote should not be a fraudulent scheme. It is nobler to spend discretionary security votes in the interest of the people, and with a sense of transparency and accountability.

  • Exit of Mr flag man

    By Femi Macau

    Oddly, the designer of Nigeria’s flag, Michael Taiwo Akinkunmi, received the country’s national honour more than five decades after he designed the significant symbol. The delay was inexplicable and inexcusable.  The national honours were instituted four years after the flag was officially hoisted on Nigeria’s Independence Day, October 1, 1960, in replacement of the British Union Jack. The honours are for Nigerians who have rendered service to the benefit of the nation.

    After a campaign by Nigerians who felt he deserved a national honour, Akinkunmi was eventually honoured by his country in September 2014, under the President Goodluck Jonathan administration. He received the national honour, Officer of the Order of the Federal Republic (OFR), and was also symbolically appointed as a salaried honorary life presidential special aide. He was 78 at the time and a retired civil servant.

    He was in his early twenties when he designed the flag in 1959, after stumbling upon a newspaper advertisement calling for the submission of designs for the Nigerian flag ahead of the independence of Nigeria from British rule in October 1960. He was then studying Electrical Engineering at Norwood Technical College, now known as Lambeth College, in London.

    He said in a published interview: “I took details of what is expected to design a flag that would be used by a country that was about to witness independence. I took part in the competition and my design was selected as the best.”

    His design was a vertical white band with a radiating red sun, which was flanked by two vertical green bands.  It was selected from among about 2,000 entries as the winning entry because of its ingenuity and profundity. He got 100 pounds for his effort. The judges, however, removed the red sun, leaving only a green-white-green design for the national flag. The green colour signifies agriculture; the white colour stands for unity and peace. 

    It is striking that he won the flag design contest, which can be described as an art competition of sorts. As an electrical engineering student, he made an enlightening statement that artistic talent was not necessarily exclusive.   

    Read Also: Youths get training on relationship skills

     He was reported saying, “I was well known all over the place. Everybody was calling me Mr Flag Man.” After his education in the UK, he returned to Nigeria in 1963 and rejoined the civil service in Ibadan. He had been employed by the government of the Western Region after he left Ibadan Grammar School (IGS) in 1955. He retired as a civil servant in the early 1990s.

    Interestingly, it can be said that he became anonymous after some time, until one Sunday Olawale Olaniran, then an undergraduate at the University of Ibadan, helped to put him back in the spotlight. Olaniran, who called him a “hero without honour,” was doing research on Nigeria’s history for a pamphlet when he decided to search for the designer of the country’s flag.

    “People said he was dead, that I should forget about looking for him and just write about the flag,” Olaniran was reported saying.  But he kept searching until he found the flag designer in Ibadan.  Akinkunmi was said to be living alone, and lacking proper care.  When they met, according to a report, Olaniran said he “was incoherent and kept talking to himself.”

    The researcher was moved to tears. “So, I got in touch with a journalist and we went back two days before Independence Day,” he said. “Even the journalist couldn’t believe the man was still alive.”

    Akinkunmi was a pensioner, but his pension payments were irregular, the researcher said, adding, “Some Nigerians went to him and donated foodstuff, clothes.”

    When the story of his sad situation appeared in The Sun on October 1, 2006, Olaniran said, it attracted the attention of many Nigerians who were unaware of his plight.  Two years later, in 2008, Olaniran was contacted through his blog by a representative of the organisers of the Nigerian version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?, who wanted to get in touch with Akinkunmi. 

    He later appeared in a special edition of the TV show, and got a cheque for two million naira. His son said the money “given to him by the telecommunications giant, MTN, when he was a guest on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? in 2008,” enabled him to complete the building of his house in Ibadan. The house, painted in the colours of the Nigerian flag, made a strong statement about its owner.

    His eventual inclusion in the list of national honours’ awardees in 2014 was the climax of a difficult journey to deserved recognition.  It was a long road to that juncture.

    In June 2021, Akinkunmi unveiled a Nigerian flag described as “the world’s largest national flag” at an event at the Polo Ground, Jericho, Ibadan. The organisers of the event stated that they had begun the process to get the Guinness World Records to certify the said record.  The flag covered an area of 3,275.6 square metres, a length of 75.3 metres and a width of 43.5 metres. Before the event, the Guinness world record for the largest flag was held by the United Arab Emirates, and covered an area of 2,448.6 square metres.

    He said at the event: “I have always dreamt about Nigeria being at the front of every good thing and I’m delighted to be part of this historical event.” It was a testimony to his place in history as the designer of the Nigerian flag that he was at the centre of the unveiling of the country’s flag in pursuit of a world record.

    The Chief of Defence Staff of Nigeria at the time, Gen. Lucky Irabor, who made a surprise appearance at the event, highlighted the significance of the country’s flag, saying, “Let us always remember that the flag is not a mere symbol of Nigeria, it is a symbol of a United Nigeria. Let us work together for unity and love in the country.”

    Akinkunmi’s exit on August 29, aged 87, prompts a look at Nigeria’s history since its independence in 1960 when the flag he designed became the country’s flag. The country has witnessed ups and downs, but the green-white-green flag is unfaded.

  • Shettima: Leader as reader

    Shettima: Leader as reader

    Two recent viral pictures showing Nigeria’s Vice President, Kashim Shettima, standing and sitting in a space defined by an abundance of books, grabbed my attention. The setting was a bookshop in Sandton, Johannesburg, South Africa.   

    “He wasn’t in a hurry,” according to an eyewitness who accompanied him to the bookshop, Gimba Kakanda, the lead consultant on public policy and politics at The Cambridge Collective.  In a published article titled ‘Book-hunting with Mr Vice President,’ Kakanda said he witnessed Shettima’s “unquenchable thirst for books, profound intellectual curiosity, and insightful perspectives on writers and subjects. These topics spanned domains ranging from economics and philosophy to the intricate realm of politics.”

    Their visit to the bookshop happened on the sidelines of the 2023 BRICS summit in South Africa, August 22 -24, where Shettima represented President Bola Tinubu.

    “Sometimes,” Kakanda narrated, “he would sit in between reads and then rise to proceed to other sections. Senator Kashim Shettima appeared to have an interest in almost all kinds, except for, by his admission, motivational books, which of course are mostly superficial philosophical projections.”

    Read Also: Day Kashim Shettima shocked his boss

    At some point, according to him, Shettima said: “You should read this book. It’s Mariana Mazzucato’s enlightening opus, The Value of Everything. She offers a caricature of capitalism and a penetrating take on the subject.” He wrote: “With gratitude, I accepted the book.”

     ”A personal philosophy” informs the way Shettima buys books in the cities he visits, Kakanda observed, and quoted him as saying, “You know the most accurate portrayal of a people or culture is found in the books you buy in their communities. Such books are the most credible reflections of their realities and experiences.”

    Buying books is one thing, reading them is another thing. “But even as the collection of books grew, I had no doubt he was going to read them,” the eyewitness said, relying on history. He recalled: “I had personally observed Senator Shettima‘s remarkable ability to devour substantial volumes within a day and yet retain every intricate detail. One particularly memorable instance of this occurred in 2018, following the public presentation of former President Jonathan’s memoir, My Transition Hours, which distorted certain events of his tenure as governor of Borno State.

    “Astonishingly, merely a day after the book’s release, he had not only completed reading it but had also penned a comprehensive critique outlining the inaccuracies it contained.” Kakanda added that he had been struck by “such a feat,’’ considering that Shettima was at the time governor of Borno State, and had wondered how he found the time to read the book.    

    Another fascinating narrative about the book lover, by another writer, caught my attention as I tried to find out more about this leader who reads. In an article published some days before Shettima’s inauguration as vice president in May, Olayinka Olusegun, a former journalist who is now a farmer in Shaki, Oyo State, supplied corroborative information.  ”I have known him for 22 years,” he wrote.

     He recalled how, in August 2004, Shettima had requested that he should help get two copies of a book by Sam Nda Isaiah, Selected Writings on Governance, Democracy and Statecraft, quoting him as saying, “I believe in the Nigerian project and we can make this country work someday.” He had visited him in his office at Zenith Bank, Maiduguri, Borno State.  This was seven years before he became governor of Borno State (2011 -2019), 15 years before he became senator, Borno Central (2019 – 2023), and 19 years before he became vice president in 2023.  The writer said he delivered the books “a day later.”

    Interestingly, he also provided further information that may partly explain Shettima’s remarkable interest in books. “Not many know about his humble beginning as the son of late Ba Shettima, a man who sells religious books at Monday Market in Maiduguri,” he stated.  

     Yet another gripping eyewitness account, by a different writer, reinforced the narrative of Shettima as a leader who reads.  Isa Gusau, his spokesperson as governor of Borno State, painted an illuminating picture of their visit to a bookshop in Oslo, Norway, in February 2017. Gusau was then Special Adviser on Communications and Strategy to the governor, and they were in Oslo for “a Humanitarian Donor Conference jointly organised by Norway, Germany and Nigeria.”

    His published article is titled “Oslo: The ‘pains’ of shopping with Gov. Shettima.”  He narrated: “Governor Shettima and I arrived at Paleet shopping centre, a famous mall at Karl Johans gate, opposite the royal palace of the Norwegian monarchy in the city of Oslo. As we walked into the mall, I began to see branded items: clothes, shoes, watches, perfumes, name them. The governor kept walking. I was wondering what else he wanted. I tried to bring his attention to the items, he said he saw them. He stopped by an information desk and asked where he could find a store called Tanum. The officials pointed in the direction. We finally located the place and guess what, it was a mighty bookstore.

    “On entering, the governor wore a cheerful face as if he had landed on a diamond. An old man at the bookstore asked him his area of interest and Shettima said nonfiction, mostly books on Leadership, biographies, politics, history, economies, education and culture of different societies and nations. The attendant made some recommendations but before he finished calling book titles, the governor told him names of the authors and said he had read the books.

    “I am looking for books exclusive to Norway, something in English, written by famous Scandinavian authors,” Shettima said. After spending four hours of very patient stop-overs at different shelves, the governor picked dozens of books. I remember six of them he set aside for reading throughout our trip from Oslo to New York.  The list included Thank You for Being Late: An Optimist’s Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations; Northmen: The Viking Saga, AD 793-1241; The Sámi Peoples of the North: A Social and Cultural History; One of Us: The Story of a Massacre and Its Aftermath; The Man Who Created the Middle East: A Story of Empire, Conflict and the Sykes-Picot Agreement; Germany: Memories of a Nation.

    “To my frustration, there were many other books he bought. Don’t ask me what happened next because we returned to the hotel with only a box full of books.”

    Shettima, who will be 57 on September 2, got a first degree in Agricultural Economics from the University of Maiduguri in 1989, and a master’s degree in the same field of study from the University of Ibadan in 1991. After a teaching stint at the University of Maiduguri, he worked in the banking sector, and later served as commissioner in five ministries in Borno State before he became governor.

    These testimonies highlight his bibliophilism. As vice president, he may well be a metaphor for the grade of well-informed leaders Nigeria needs for advancement in the knowledge-driven age.

  • A disconnected king

    A disconnected king

    Ironically, Oba Abdulrasheed Adewale Akanbi, the Oluwo of Iwo, Osun State, is a Yoruba traditional ruler who has failed to grasp the fundamentals of his role as guardian of Yoruba traditional culture. He is not alone in this category. Aged 56, he became king in 2015 and has been at the centre of several controversies on the throne.   

    Oba Akanbi, last week, further exposed his cultural disconnection when he issued a statement banning “the practice of placing sacrifices on the road, most especially junctions, and blocking our rivers by dumping ritual sacrifices in them, which in turn causes floods.”

    He said: “Most sacrificial offerings are placed on the road in junctions. You will see palm oil and other dirty items as offerings on the road financed by our taxpayers’ money.  A road that should be maintained through collective efforts and patriotic dedication.”

    His so-called ban on road sacrifices by devotees of Yoruba traditional religion, also known as Orisa tradition, amounts to striking a blow against the religion. Perhaps he needs to be reminded that he is a product of Yoruba tradition, and is not expected to destroy the system that built him.    

    The Yoruba pantheon is made up of a multitude of divinities or orisas, with Ifa as the oracular mouthpiece of Olodumare, the Almighty in Yoruba religion. According to Prof. Wande Abimbola, a retired academic and Yoruba culture exponent, “Ifa is the heart and soul of the culture and philosophy of the Yoruba people.” The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) in 2005 added the Ifa Divination system to its list of the “Masterpieces of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity.”

    Abimbola explained in an earlier interview: “Sacrifice is a code of communication. We don’t think that verbalisation is enough.” He also said a sacrifice could consist of liquid, clothes, food or animals. A sacrifice, ebo, is usually prescribed by an Ifa traditional priest, known as Babalawo, towards solving a problem presented by the person consulting the priest.

    The Orisa way of life is faced with potent challenges in a global village of multiple and contending faiths, some of which have the advantage of apparent dominance. The Yoruba religion, for instance, appears to have been downgraded among Nigeria’s Yoruba population in this day and age, the majority of them reportedly either Christians or Muslims.

    This situation has produced many disconnected Yoruba traditional rulers who are either Christians or Muslims. This context explains the emergence of Oba Akanbi and his ilk, who see themselves as modernising agents, across the Southwest region of the country. He has a Muslim name, and describes himself as “a representative of God.”

    Read Also: Nigerian equities lose N330.8b amid global slump

    In 2021, for instance, Oba Akanbi, in a statement, controversially declared that “Idols must not be in a king’s palace… Our fathers who were monarchs who worshipped deities were wrong. I take a bold step to apologise for their mistakes. The damage deity worshipping by monarchs has caused us is monumental. I will lead the path to right the past mistakes in the Yoruba traditional system.”

    His latest attack not only shows his cultural disconnection but also his confusion about his powers in the country’s political context. He presented his hostility to road sacrifices as a fight to protect the environment and infrastructure.  If he truly seeks environmental and infrastructural protection, he can do so without unfairly targeting the Yoruba traditional system he represents. His self-assigned policing role is out of place as it violates the law and usurps the powers of the appropriate authorities, namely the relevant local and state governments.  

    His so-called ban on road sacrifices by adherents of Yoruba religion can be described as unlawful in the first place. Indeed, it can be said that his move against traditionalism violates the traditionalists’ right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and their right to freedom from discrimination, among others.

    Notably, the President of the Traditional Religion Worshippers Association (TRAWSO) in Osun State, Dr Oluseyi Atanda, in his response to the so-called ban, observed that “Traditionalists will enjoy their fundamental human rights under Section 48 of the Nigerian constitution,” adding, “If he is more powerful than the government, it’s left for all of us to see.”

    It’s unclear how Oba Akanbi intends to enforce his so-called ban. Also, it remains to be seen whether he can enforce the ban without being involved in further unlawful actions.

    Interestingly, the governors of four Southwest states, Lagos, Oyo, Osun and Ogun, declared August 21 a public holiday to mark Isese Day (August 20), which annually features celebrations of Yoruba tradition and culture. Isese is the Yoruba word for tradition.

     Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu, in a statement, said the holiday “is a reaffirmation of his commitment to continue to provide the necessary support to traditional institutions in the state with a view to promoting our indigenous culture and tradition while preserving our heritage.” Ogun State Governor Dapo Abiodun said: “The decision to accord Isese Day a special recognition was to continue in the tradition of respecting the tradition of our people and ensure the continuation of the unity and harmony among the three major religions in the state.”

    Oba Akanbi should learn from the Yoruba tradition-friendly actions of the four state governments, including the government of Osun State where he is based.

    My participation in the 10th Orisa World Congress, in July 2013, at Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, Osun State, was an eye-opener on the status of Yoruba religion. The variegated gathering, which included participants from the US, Brazil, Cuba, Venezuela and Mexico, demonstrated the appeal of the religion beyond its local provenance and brought instructive international perspectives. An all-male family of four from Cuba, a Chinese couple who lived in Venezuela and a densely bearded white American were among the alluring sights. Some of the foreign participants were captivated scholars, and not adherents of the religion.

    The five-day programme was the fourth in the ancient town, starting from the first one 32 years earlier, and six others had been held in Brazil, USA, Trinidad and Tobago, and Cuba.

    The event was organised by Orisaworld, “an organisation of practitioners and scholars of Orisa tradition, religion and culture,” said to have “individual and institutional members from over 50 countries,” which was founded by Prof. Abimbola in 1981 “to revitalise and rejuvenate the Orisa culture and all its traditions.”

    This is food for thought for Oba Akanbi, who is engaged in a self-defeating crusade against the Orisa tradition.

  • Asari-Dokubo’s martial men

    Asari-Dokubo’s martial men

    A curious character, 59-year-old long-term Niger Delta activist Mujahid Asari-Dokubo remains dramatically garrulous. He also retains his old militancy and unapologetic hubris, which continue to attract attention.  He exhibited these features yet again in a recent viral video in which he boasted about his alleged martial exploits. He is described as the leader of the Niger Delta Peoples Salvation Force (NDPSF).

    “I don’t have an army,” he said in an interview in the video, “but I have a private military company that was engaged by the Nigerian government and I have been doing the work for the Nigerian State.”  He explained that his so-called private military company “is engaged by the government and we are fighting side by side with the Nigerian military in many places. Like Niger, Plateau, Abia, Imo and in parts of Rivers State. We were in Anambra too. We are doing a good job and we are being commended by the host communities.”

    His claims were uncorroborated by any information in the public domain. They were indeed discredited by the Director Army Public Relations, Brig. Gen. Onyema Nwachukwu, who was reported saying “The veracity of his claim can only be ascertained by the relevant agency, statutorily mandated to license such outfits.” Which agency is that? It is unhelpful that the agency in question has not clarified the issue.

    Nwachukwu clarified that “the Nigerian Army is not in any form of partnership or collaborative pact with the ex-militant or whatever private security outfit he claims to own.” He added that “contrary to his claims, the Nigerian Army has never conducted any operation jointly or side by side with Asari or the organisation he represents, in any of those areas he mentioned or in any theatre of operations.”

    Which information is true? There is an urgent need for clarity on this issue. Who struck such a deal with Asari-Dokubo, if it is true that the claimed arrangement exists? What are the details of the deal? 

    For instance, it is no secret that the Federal Government, under ex-President Muhammadu Buhari, signed a controversial N48bn-per-year pipeline surveillance contract with a private company, Tantita Security Services, to check the massive oil theft in the Niger Delta. The company was linked to another well-known Niger Delta activist, Government Ekpemupolo, popularly called Tompolo, the former leader of the militant group, Movement for the Emancipation of Niger Delta (MEND).  Strikingly, the company discovered more than 58 oil-theft points in Delta and Bayelsa states at some point last year.

    Tompolo was reported saying his firm was “only providing intelligence for the security people to assist to do the work.”  It was inexcusable that the Buhari administration contracted a private security company to monitor the country’s oil pipelines. The action amounted to an abdication of responsibility and an admission of incapacity. The same would be true if the Federal Government had a secret security contract with Asari-Dokubo’s so-called private military company.

    Interestingly, Asari-Dokubo also bragged in a viral video that his force was capable of ending the crisis in neighbouring Niger by overpowering the military coupists who seized power from an elected government in that country last month.  He said: “If the government commissions me and my people to go to Niger Republic, we will go. We will defeat them and we will come back victorious. It is not a boast… We will go there, defeat them and restore democratic order.”

    In 2013, he was reported to have renounced his Nigerian citizenship, saying he did so “in protest against the inability of Nigeria to grant Ijaw Republic.” He said he had relocated his “corporate investments” to Benin Republic, which he described as “my adopted homeland.” It can be said that his citizenship status is unclear. 

    It is a measure of the perceived threat posed by Asari-Dokubo and his force that the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA), in a statement, last month, observed that the President Bola Tinubu administration “seems to be afraid of Asari-Dokubo despite the fact that the ex-agitator is threatening to destroy the country if arrested for unlawful possession of assault rifles and threat to the life and property of Igbo people in the country.”

    The group said he had “dared the military to arrest him, and (added) he would crumble Nigeria’s oil production,” and called on the Federal Government to “take steps to rein in Asari-Dokubo and his threats against the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

    It is noteworthy that he visited President Tinubu in Abuja, in June. According to him, the purpose of the visit was “to give words of encouragement to the president for the actions and policies so far made in his less than three weeks of governing a very difficult country like Nigeria.” He said they “discussed a wide range of issues, especially on security and oil theft in the Niger Delta,” adding that he assured the president that “there will be zero oil theft and vandalisation in the Niger Delta.”

     In an interview with journalists after the visit, he took credit for bringing security and peace to parts of the country.  His words: “Today you are traveling to Kaduna on this road, it is not the army that made it possible for you to travel to Abuja or travel to Kaduna vice versa, it is my men employed by the government of Nigeria stationed in Niger. Today go to Baga, you go to Shiroro and go to Wase. We have lost so many men; we don’t even have one per cent of the armament deployed by the Nigerian military and we have had resounding success.”

    It is puzzling that he presented a narrative of collaboration with the country’s armed forces. It is equally puzzling that the Nigerian Army issued a statement denying knowledge of the activities of his so-called private military company in the places he mentioned.

    These conflicting narratives from both sides suggest that the country’s struggle with insecurity is unstructured. The country’s armed forces and security agencies are expected to be the actors in the fight, not non-state actors like Asari-Dokubo and his force.  

    The Federal Government needs to clarify the status of Asari-Dokubo’s so-called private military company and its alleged role in the fight to bring security to the country.  Also, the authorities must decisively address the question of illegal arms in unlicensed hands. He has been seen in several viral videos playing the role of militia commander in the midst of gun-wielding robots. Are his martial activities lawful?  Lawlessness must not be encouraged. It sends the wrong signals.